The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad - January 09, 2025


The Suicidal Empathy of the West, British Insanity, and Justin Trudeau (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_781)


Episode Stats

Length

37 minutes

Words per Minute

174.26782

Word Count

6,464

Sentence Count

439

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Dr. Gad Saad is a visiting professor and global ambassador at Northwood University. He is the author of The Parasitic Mind and his new book, Suicidal Empathy, which explores the evolutionary imperative to be kind, compassionate, and tolerant to those who wish to destroy us.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Dr. Gad Saad is joining us now here on The Will Cain Show.
00:00:04.640 He's a friend.
00:00:05.280 He's been on the show a lot.
00:00:06.120 He's also a visiting professor and global ambassador at Northwood University.
00:00:10.700 He's the author of The Parasitic Mind and a new book coming up called Suicidal Empathy,
00:00:16.120 which we're going to be talking about today, Dr. Saad.
00:00:19.360 But if I might, Gad, you've been listening to both Donald Trump and The Will Cain Show today.
00:00:26.860 I think there is a thematic, you know, I mean, I always think one of the most interesting
00:00:31.640 things ever said about Donald Trump is that the left takes him literally, but not seriously.
00:00:35.300 The right takes him seriously, but not literally.
00:00:37.840 Today, he is saying things that should, at least five years ago, make the left totally
00:00:42.300 lose their minds and probably censor him.
00:00:44.280 But there's also a serious thematic tie of restructuring, reprioritizing the world order
00:00:52.280 where America thinks of itself and what serves its censors first and sort of holds everyone
00:00:56.760 accountable to common sense.
00:00:58.040 What are your thoughts on what's being said right now by Donald Trump?
00:01:00.940 I mean, I didn't follow all that he said, but to your general point about America, you
00:01:07.440 know, might is right.
00:01:08.940 That's evolutionary history, right?
00:01:11.020 I mean, history is shaped by the following dynamics.
00:01:14.660 There are two tribes on each side of the river, and each of the two tribes looks at the resources
00:01:20.760 of the other one with envy.
00:01:22.720 And the only thing that stops them from attacking the other tribe is that there are other men
00:01:27.080 in the other tribe that are formidable and would not take kindly to them attacking them.
00:01:32.240 And it is that dynamic that keeps things in check.
00:01:35.620 Now, imagine if a civilization says, no, no, no, no more of that evolutionary imperative of
00:01:41.040 protecting what's ours, of exhibiting kindness, but always with a big stick behind our backs.
00:01:47.500 But rather, we're always going to be infinitely kind, infinitely compassionate, infinitely tolerant
00:01:53.620 to even to those who wish to destroy us.
00:01:57.060 That's not a good cocktail.
00:01:58.600 And that's why we end up with the kind of quagmire that we see today in the West.
00:02:04.040 You know what's fascinating about this analogy, this metaphor you've given us of two tribes
00:02:08.280 across a river.
00:02:08.900 However, if we were to take that analogy and adjust it for modern times, which you began
00:02:14.420 to there in your answer is say, okay, but the scenario in modern, at least when it comes
00:02:19.980 to the West and certainly when it comes to America is that one tribe is incredibly more
00:02:23.080 powerful than the other tribe.
00:02:25.660 And to your point, might historically might has been right, but that doesn't seem in a
00:02:31.220 lot of ways the way the might views itself today.
00:02:34.000 So the powerful tribe on one side of the river attempts to placate the other tribe, to your
00:02:39.680 point, with kindness.
00:02:41.140 And oftentimes now the other tribe is the one resorting to violence or threats of coercion
00:02:46.500 and force.
00:02:47.700 That can manifest in many different ways.
00:02:49.660 It can even manifest in cancel culture, which was driven by a radical minority.
00:02:53.860 In other words, not the might side of the equation.
00:02:56.900 But they got their way through force and coercion.
00:03:00.140 Sometimes they could threaten your job.
00:03:01.520 Sometimes they threaten your reputation, call you a racist.
00:03:04.220 Sometimes they threaten whatever it may be.
00:03:06.640 And it's like, to me, you're a hundred percent.
00:03:09.160 I love your analogy because we can rationalize.
00:03:12.100 We can say, well, but you should deal logically like this, or you should be empathetic and think
00:03:15.700 of it this.
00:03:16.360 But in the end, it's like, hey, if you keep responding to me in this coercive manner, guess
00:03:21.820 what?
00:03:22.720 I own more coercion.
00:03:24.420 Like, at what point am I forced into the role of force, meaning I being the world power,
00:03:30.160 the side of might?
00:03:31.180 The might has handcuffed itself in many ways and said, I guess I'll let myself be forced
00:03:36.620 and coerced or even be forced into immoral or wrong situations because I should feel guilty
00:03:42.240 about being mightiful, you know?
00:03:44.500 And at some point, the might is just going to go, time to flex.
00:03:48.980 Right.
00:03:49.460 So a couple of things I'll say here, Robert Axelrod, a famous political scientist in the
00:03:54.280 80s, ran simulations of what is the optimal strategy.
00:03:59.440 And he, when two parties are interacting with each other.
00:04:04.100 And so the reciprocal tit for tat strategy turned out to win, which is begin with the
00:04:10.140 first move as, you know, kind and altruistic, and then watch what the other one does, and
00:04:17.660 then simply reciprocate whatever they do.
00:04:20.920 So if they act kindly, you act kindly.
00:04:23.300 If they act nastily, then you replicate.
00:04:26.300 And of all the possible modeling strategies, that's the one that wins.
00:04:31.820 Now, it didn't need a fancy political scientist.
00:04:34.760 I think he was at University of Michigan to understand that there is a relationship,
00:04:39.020 a causal relationship between things.
00:04:41.300 If you do A, I'll do B.
00:04:43.420 Now, imagine if we break that thing whereby it's completely parasitic.
00:04:48.840 It's only one way.
00:04:49.960 I grant you endless empathy, but I never expect anything of you in return.
00:04:55.220 And let me add one more fancy professorial content.
00:05:01.740 I wrote an article about a year ago on something that I coined cultural theory of mind.
00:05:06.860 Theory of mind is something that is innate to human sociality.
00:05:11.140 It's when I put myself in your brain, Will, in order to be able to think, well, what is he thinking
00:05:17.680 right now?
00:05:18.180 And then we can engage in a fruitful dialogue, right?
00:05:21.920 Autistic children, by the way, lack theory of mind.
00:05:24.860 That's one of the ways that you're able to diagnose them early as being autistic, because
00:05:30.020 you can give them a theory of mind test, which they fail.
00:05:32.700 Well, imagine now if I argue that there is a cultural theory of mind blindness, whereby
00:05:38.700 the West thinks that kindness, compassion, empathy, magnanimity will be reciprocated.
00:05:46.920 But the other group thinks of each of those things as manifestations of weakness.
00:05:53.620 So they don't look at it as beautiful things to be reciprocated.
00:05:57.340 They see it as weakness, weakness, weakness, and weakness.
00:06:00.820 That's why I explained on, I can't remember which show it was, that when I speak to people
00:06:04.800 in Arabic, they historically have told me, we can't believe how the West acts.
00:06:10.660 For us, the West is a woman to be mounted.
00:06:15.040 Arabic is a very powerful and flowery language, but that's exactly what it is.
00:06:19.860 Weakness, I mean, magnanimity is viewed as weakness.
00:06:23.920 The quicker that we can get our politicians to understand theory of mind, the better off we'll
00:06:29.600 be.
00:06:31.660 I want to get into suicidal empathy, but since you brought up Arabic and it's a current event,
00:06:37.300 and you have contributed to this conversation unfolding on one platform, on X, we talked
00:06:45.320 about it yesterday.
00:06:46.380 So these grooming gangs of Pakistani Muslim men in the UK who are raping young women and
00:06:55.100 has been happening, I believe, for, I don't know, Dr. Saad, like, is it a 15-year time
00:07:00.360 frame?
00:07:00.840 Is that a fair, like, at least that's when it's been...
00:07:02.680 That would be a conservative one.
00:07:04.180 That's when it's been revealed.
00:07:04.880 We can go back 20 to 30.
00:07:05.800 Sorry?
00:07:07.680 I think that's when it's been revealed.
00:07:09.160 But you're pointing out it was going on before it was even discussed at all, right?
00:07:13.080 Yes.
00:07:13.840 20 to 30 years.
00:07:15.240 Yeah.
00:07:16.800 It's...
00:07:17.560 Talk to me about this because, okay, there's several levels of interest to this story.
00:07:21.840 One is the cultural diagnosis of what's going on in South Asia, Pakistan, wherever this
00:07:27.920 is taking place.
00:07:28.960 We know about what's happening in Afghanistan.
00:07:30.920 We've talked...
00:07:31.560 We've heard from American soldiers have come back and seen what's taking place in Afghanistan.
00:07:35.620 But then the second level, perhaps even more interesting, is the way that it was handled
00:07:39.240 in the UK, which is back to how the West views itself, kind of what we're talking about
00:07:43.120 here, and the way it was covered up.
00:07:46.120 It was like...
00:07:47.200 And the best way I've seen this written, Dr. Saad, is the UK was more...
00:07:51.820 In love with the image, the perfect image of multiculturalism than the truth of multiculturalism.
00:07:59.840 Exactly right.
00:08:01.020 Look, I mean, and hence, that's exactly why the British grooming gangs is front and center
00:08:06.480 in my forthcoming book, Suicidal Empathy.
00:08:08.620 Because you are rejecting, you are destroying the integrity, the bodily integrity of arguably
00:08:17.740 hundreds of thousands of children at the altar of appearing infinitely tolerant, right?
00:08:24.180 So it's a consequentialist ethic.
00:08:26.680 Yes, it would be nice for us to speak out on these issues.
00:08:30.840 But if we do that, then we will marginalize the hundreds of thousands of Pakistani men who
00:08:36.660 are perfectly kind and lovely.
00:08:39.040 I mean, what kind of insane logic is that?
00:08:41.040 That would be arguing, don't go after male serial killers.
00:08:47.560 Because by going after male serial killers, you will marginalize my dad and my brother,
00:08:53.360 who are also male, but who are not serial killers.
00:08:56.420 It's insane, right?
00:08:57.400 By the way, there's a whole range of retorts that you typically get from people.
00:09:03.320 Either they are Muslim themselves or they're Western protectors to try to justify why it
00:09:10.000 was perfectly reasonable to do the cover-up, right?
00:09:13.960 Here is one.
00:09:14.980 They put up pictures of endless white pedophiles.
00:09:18.440 As if that is a valid argument for why you shouldn't go after Pakistani Muslim pedophiles,
00:09:25.920 right?
00:09:26.340 Nobody questions the fact that there are nasty Jewish pedophiles, there are atheist pedophiles,
00:09:32.140 there are Christian pedophiles as per the Catholic Church.
00:09:35.320 So there isn't a monopoly of degeneracy.
00:09:38.700 But that doesn't mean that because that holds true, we don't say that when it comes to the
00:09:43.360 epidemiological realities of what's been happening for the past 20 or 30 years in Britain,
00:09:47.980 there tends to be one group that is grossly over-represented per capita.
00:09:53.460 And the inability to simply say what I just said is absolutely insane.
00:09:58.780 It is suicidal.
00:10:01.100 And I was going to say this phrase, if you did not, this pair of wording, per capita.
00:10:06.500 Whenever they do this, they lose the entire ability to understand per capita.
00:10:11.020 I saw a stat this morning that I think it was three and a half times.
00:10:14.640 So that a British Pakistani Muslim rate of whatever pedophilia, statutory rape, all these, whatever,
00:10:23.860 however this crime is categorized, was three and a half times more likely per capita than
00:10:27.760 if it happened, whatever, a white male Brit.
00:10:32.120 It's per capita an issue.
00:10:34.360 And then you have to get to the why.
00:10:37.680 And the why is the most important part.
00:10:39.300 Like, is there a cultural tolerance of it, a cultural acceptance of it?
00:10:43.780 And we know the answer to these things because we can also see the rates of prevalence of it
00:10:46.960 back in home culture, right?
00:10:48.900 We can go back and say, what's happening in Afghanistan?
00:10:51.340 What's happening in Pakistan?
00:10:52.960 And therefore, then you have to deal with cultural relevancy.
00:10:56.360 If you can say, okay, happening more per capita, therefore tied to culture.
00:11:00.740 And by the way, that doesn't mean everybody within the culture practices this degeneracy.
00:11:05.820 But if it happens at a greater rate in this culture, then you start comparing cultures and
00:11:10.660 going, you know what?
00:11:11.880 This is not a better culture, at least in this respect.
00:11:14.560 And therefore, the majority culture, the might culture in this scenario, doesn't have to
00:11:20.620 self-flagellate and go, oh, we're terrible.
00:11:23.380 We're terrible.
00:11:23.980 We can't condemn.
00:11:25.120 This is kind of back to where we started.
00:11:26.580 Like the might is right thing in Donald Trump, this speech he's giving today, he's reorganizing
00:11:31.600 what you said.
00:11:32.460 If you do A, I do B.
00:11:34.320 You know, that's what his whole speech is saying, basically.
00:11:37.020 But we can't have these honest conversations because I don't know.
00:11:40.980 I don't know what it is.
00:11:42.320 I guess is it we're supposed to pretend that all cultures are of equal value.
00:11:47.780 In the end, there is no bad culture.
00:11:49.800 They are all equal, except that the West is less equal, right?
00:11:53.900 So and this is why, yes, this is why I refer to cultural relativism as one of the key parasitic
00:12:02.080 ideas in my 2020 book, The Parasitic Mind.
00:12:04.980 Cultural relativism was an idea that was developed by cultural anthropologists who were were that
00:12:10.980 were they were worried that the misuse of biology, for example, arguing that there is a unite,
00:12:17.980 universal human nature might result in all sorts of nefarious political agents misusing biology.
00:12:25.940 Say, for example, Hitler, right?
00:12:28.800 There is a race, but there's a struggle between the races.
00:12:31.600 We are the Aryans.
00:12:32.680 You are the Jews.
00:12:33.800 Sorry, Jews, you lost and the Aryans won, right?
00:12:36.240 So because of that, cultural anthropologists developed a whole new edifice of knowledge where
00:12:42.800 you completely abdicated the role of biology in explaining human affairs, one of which is
00:12:48.600 who are we to judge the mores of another society?
00:12:52.400 If another society views it within their religious texts that it is perfectly permissible to cut
00:12:57.620 off the clitorises of five-year-old girls, shut up, cultural imperialists.
00:13:02.240 Don't offer any moral judgment to that.
00:13:05.140 So imagine how much that makes you impotent to weigh in on issues if I suddenly lose the
00:13:12.020 reflex to be disgusted at the idea that little girls are going to face female genital mutilation.
00:13:18.800 No, no, no.
00:13:19.460 I do judge.
00:13:20.780 I have the capacity as a free human being to say you don't have the right to cut off the
00:13:26.080 clitorises of little girls.
00:13:27.420 And if you think I'm a cultural imperialist, F you.
00:13:30.240 So, okay, now let's tie this into a debate that you're having, Dr. Saad, with a guy that
00:13:39.340 I know, a co-worker, Piers Morgan.
00:13:41.900 This took place on X, and we can put up some of the exchange that you had with Piers.
00:13:47.740 Piers had talked about having Tommy Robinson, who's a guy in the UK who's been highlighting,
00:13:54.320 putting a megaphone behind these problems going on in the UK for quite some time.
00:13:57.620 And I guess he was on Piers Morgan's program, and Piers accused him of being Islamophobic,
00:14:03.640 okay?
00:14:04.300 And that's what Piers said.
00:14:06.500 I said he was Islamophobic, which he is.
00:14:09.380 You responded to Piers.
00:14:10.400 You said, Piers, and you were very respectful, by the way.
00:14:12.920 You said, please forgive me for questioning you publicly, but what do you mean by Islamophobic
00:14:18.200 specifically?
00:14:19.360 Could you provide a framework under which scrutiny of Islam and its values and constitute fair
00:14:25.080 criticism versus what falls under the rubric of Islamophobia?
00:14:28.780 Perhaps I could ask you the following question.
00:14:30.660 Do you think that the incursion of Islam in Britain has been a net benefit to your country?
00:14:34.960 If so, how?
00:14:35.900 And if not, would this be Islamophobic?
00:14:38.520 He responded to you, by the way, Dr. Saad, and he said he said, yes, it is a net benefit.
00:14:43.420 He said Islamophobic means having or showing a dislike of or prejudiced against Islam or Muslims.
00:14:49.220 Tommy Robinson is on the record saying these things, and it meets the criteria.
00:14:53.380 Regarding the UK, I think the vast majority of Muslims here are a benefit to our society.
00:14:59.240 I hope you're going to read my response to that.
00:15:01.060 Basically, so you ask basically, define your terms.
00:15:08.060 What is Islamophobia?
00:15:09.000 Well, so basically what I said is, to sort of summarize my retort, which people can go
00:15:15.920 and check it on my feed, I said, look, number one, I can criticize communism without harboring
00:15:23.780 any hate to individual Soviets.
00:15:25.720 Let's go back to before the Soviet Union collapsed, right?
00:15:29.120 So the sociopolitical economic ideology called communism has a set of tenets, which I may either
00:15:37.800 wholeheartedly support or think that they are abhorrent and contrary to human nature,
00:15:42.260 and I could criticize those without holding zero hate towards Igor, the Soviet, yes?
00:15:49.360 By the exact same logic, it doesn't take a fancy evolutionary behavioral scientist.
00:15:53.680 By the exact same logic, I can harbor zero hate towards Muslims as individuals.
00:16:00.720 I know more Muslims who are friends of mine than most people will ever meet by virtue of the
00:16:05.120 fact that I'm from Lebanon, but I could make statements about Islam that in no way could
00:16:11.940 constitute what Pierce is referring to as Islamophobia.
00:16:15.640 Does Islam promote sexual liberation of women?
00:16:20.200 If yes, okay.
00:16:21.660 If no, then let's talk about it.
00:16:23.800 Does Islam have orgiastic love or hate towards the Jews?
00:16:29.080 What's the position of Islam?
00:16:30.480 But Pierce can't do that because for Pierce, he's been inculcated with the Western reflex
00:16:36.460 that to criticize anyone's religion is gauche, right?
00:16:41.160 You don't talk about politics at the dinner table and you never talk about religion, except
00:16:46.980 if you are criticizing Christianity, in which case you could put a crucifix in urine and call
00:16:53.260 it art and we all applaud.
00:16:55.340 That's okay.
00:16:56.100 That's progressive.
00:16:56.900 But don't you dare ever criticize Islam.
00:17:00.620 It's Islamophobic.
00:17:01.700 Now he replied to me, but I just wrote to him before I came on the show saying, I'm going
00:17:06.540 on a show on Fox.
00:17:07.900 I'll, I'll respond shortly.
00:17:09.680 So stay tuned.
00:17:10.800 There's more to come with Pierce.
00:17:13.840 Okay.
00:17:14.420 Well, you should have said the Will Cain show because that really would have chapped his
00:17:16.980 hide.
00:17:17.220 You're doing it not on Pierce Morgan tonight, but you're doing it on the Will Cain show.
00:17:20.620 Oh, okay.
00:17:21.860 I'm so glad you corrected me earlier on something.
00:17:24.280 I said, am I required to believe in cultural relativism?
00:17:29.180 And you corrected that.
00:17:30.820 It's not that we have to believe that all cultures are equal because what we're really
00:17:36.460 required to believe, as you just pointed out in like, you can put a crucifix in urine
00:17:40.240 is that the West culturally is actually inferior to these other cultures.
00:17:46.880 And your new book, which I haven't read yet is suicidal empathy.
00:17:51.060 Now I want to run this by you because I came across this thread and I, top of my head, I
00:17:55.340 cannot remember who wrote it, but I found it very thoughtful.
00:17:58.860 You're familiar, Dr.
00:17:59.980 Sad with the heat map of concentric circles of left and right and where they extend empathy
00:18:06.860 or where they extend their priorities or where, how much they care.
00:18:11.240 Have you seen this?
00:18:11.800 I don't know the, I don't know the circle that you're speaking of, but I makes a similar
00:18:15.400 argument in suicidal empathy.
00:18:16.760 So I, I can get where you're going with it.
00:18:18.800 So the right, the right gives its priority and its care to things closest to home, you
00:18:23.080 know, God, family, friends, neighborhood, you know, local state on and on until you get
00:18:28.660 to the furthest outreach circles is, you know, just as an example, Ukraine.
00:18:32.840 The left heat map looks like more care, more empathy on further outer rings of the concentric
00:18:40.740 circles, more for Ukraine than the neighbor or the family.
00:18:45.160 So the argument made by this person on X was we make the mistake of often thinking that the
00:18:51.700 left is driven by empathy, you know, a care for others.
00:18:56.260 And it, and in your case, you argue for its suicidal nature.
00:18:59.220 In many cases, he says, and I'm real, I'm real careful of this, Dr.
00:19:03.200 Sack, cause I don't want to project the worst motivations on my opponents at all occasions,
00:19:06.640 but I found this thoughtful, not partisan.
00:19:08.560 He said, it's actually driven by hate.
00:19:10.560 He said, it is a hatred of what is similar to you.
00:19:15.040 And ultimately what is you it's ultimately driven by a self hatred.
00:19:19.900 So what that means is I hate people in my socioeconomic class.
00:19:23.340 I hate people that look like me in my race.
00:19:25.720 I hate people that live like me in my neighborhood.
00:19:28.860 I hate my family.
00:19:30.920 Ultimately, I hate me.
00:19:32.600 It's all driven from some things, some something psychologically internally.
00:19:36.960 And this is, this is how the left is actually being driven instead of by empathy.
00:19:40.860 It's at its core being driven by a self hatred, something they recognize in themselves that
00:19:45.820 they hate something they see in their family that they hate something they see in people
00:19:50.100 the same race as them that they hate and on and on and on.
00:19:52.880 And that's why their empathy is so far away and theoretical.
00:19:57.140 So I do discuss these kinds of issues.
00:20:00.140 The question, if I'm, if I'm questioning the framework of the person that, that you were
00:20:05.620 reading the thread from, why does that hate exist?
00:20:09.180 And so I offer some explanations.
00:20:11.640 Actually, I was working on that section yesterday in the book.
00:20:13.840 Uh, so take, for example, the mechanism of survivor guilt, right?
00:20:18.840 So this is the idea in, in, in, in, as a psychiatric condition where the plane crashes and within
00:20:25.280 your role, the four people next to you all died, but you survived.
00:20:29.100 And then as you walk away, at first you're happy and elated.
00:20:32.520 Hey, I survived.
00:20:33.280 But then you are completely shackled by this ruminative thought of, but why did I survive?
00:20:39.920 And existentially, I feel guilty now that these four lovely people that I was having a chat
00:20:44.940 with died.
00:20:45.840 Why should I survive?
00:20:47.000 And then that can become very debilitating.
00:20:49.520 Now let's take this mechanism and apply it to the West.
00:20:53.320 If I am a progressive, I think that there is something inherently icky about the fact that
00:21:00.260 I have these riches, but whereas poor Hondurans don't, whereas people in Namibia don't have
00:21:06.560 the same opportunities as I do.
00:21:08.840 And that's why I am self-hating.
00:21:12.680 And hence the way that I remedy that self-hate, that existential survivor guilt is that I become
00:21:19.940 orgiastically empathetic to the other.
00:21:22.920 Screw my children.
00:21:24.520 It's Honduran children that are really important.
00:21:27.500 Screw American vets.
00:21:29.040 It's Honduran or El Salvador MS-13 gang members that I should be really funding with free phones
00:21:36.700 and free health care.
00:21:38.040 And so I think both the explanation that you gave and the framework that I'm creating can
00:21:43.260 be fitted together to explain the phenomenon.
00:21:46.140 I think that's right.
00:21:47.800 I think empathy is a generous motivation to extend to people who only have empathy far from
00:21:55.420 home.
00:21:55.860 And I, but I don't think it is mutually exclusive, but rather tied to the idea it's hatred for
00:22:01.800 what is similar and ultimately hatred within that is driving a lot of this.
00:22:06.260 Now, I also always want to say, I don't think it's healthy to ascribe the worst of human
00:22:12.140 motivations to people that disagree with you or who might be your opponent.
00:22:14.900 And you always need to look yourself in the mirror and say, you know, what is driving my
00:22:18.140 motivations?
00:22:18.640 It's not, you know, but I did find this very thoughtful, as I know you will be in suicidal
00:22:24.520 empathy.
00:22:25.980 Donald Trump is just finished speaking at Mar-a-Lago.
00:22:29.540 He talked about Joe Biden doing away with offshore drilling, the focus on electricity, moving
00:22:35.900 everything to an electrical grid.
00:22:37.380 He said he's in love with electricity and it's itchy.
00:22:41.340 It's a bad way to heat a home.
00:22:43.260 He talked about NATO paying its its dues.
00:22:46.000 He talked about not taking even military or economic coercion off the table when it comes
00:22:49.980 to Panama Canal or Greenland.
00:22:52.240 I say this as anyone now joining us here from Donald Trump's live stream as we react to that
00:22:56.760 as well with Dr.
00:22:57.540 Gad Saad today is all tied together by this idea of reengineering how you view the world,
00:23:04.360 your role in the world.
00:23:05.220 And, and, and by the way, this ties to what I'm talking about with Dr.
00:23:08.380 Saad, not being driven by some fake suicidal empathy, but if you do a, I will do B because
00:23:14.440 I am more powerful and I trust in my own righteousness.
00:23:17.480 Not that I'm unfallible, not that I'm infallible, but I'm also not as Western civilization supposed
00:23:22.920 to be apologetic for other cultures that we see, for example, in the UK, they've done horrible
00:23:27.700 things.
00:23:28.000 That's a recap as Donald Trump, by the way, has just finished speaking at Mar-a-Lago.
00:23:31.680 Hey, speaking of cultures, Dr.
00:23:33.400 Saad, who have some seeming sense of self-hatred, yours, Canadian culture.
00:23:39.320 You know, you guys just did away with Justin Trudeau.
00:23:42.560 He just resigned.
00:23:44.480 One of the most anti-free speech authoritarians in Western civilization, not the most because
00:23:48.780 I think New Zealand takes the gold medal, but you're on the podium.
00:23:52.760 He was on the podium for most anti-free speech Western leader.
00:23:57.700 And here he is now stepping down.
00:23:59.640 And the question I had yesterday, though, is does Canadian culture allow for a man like
00:24:06.060 Justin Trudeau or does it allow for an alternative?
00:24:09.920 Well, I'd like to think that there's an auto-correction that's taking place.
00:24:14.160 And so I do think that anyone, I mean, Ebola would have been a better prime minister than
00:24:20.060 Justin Trudeau.
00:24:20.660 He really, truly exemplifies all of the worst frailties that a human being can possess and
00:24:28.140 none of the redeeming qualities, right?
00:24:30.240 So even Jacinda Ardern, you mentioned New Zealand.
00:24:34.040 I mean, she was grotesque, but she wasn't as personally corrupt as Justin Trudeau.
00:24:40.240 He's a malignant narcissist.
00:24:41.940 He's empty-headed.
00:24:43.600 He's arrogant.
00:24:44.800 He's vacuous.
00:24:47.060 I mean, he's everything you can hope for in your biggest possible villain that you can,
00:24:53.220 you know, come up with, engineer.
00:24:55.640 So I do think that there is an auto-correction taking place.
00:24:58.980 I think, of course, Pierre Poilievre will certainly be better.
00:25:02.320 But I hold out my full optimism because the number one thing, in my view, that is affecting
00:25:09.020 the future trajectory of Canada is the demographic changes that have taken place in Canada.
00:25:15.580 And so there needs to be a stop of orgiastic immigration coming from countries that abhor
00:25:22.660 our ways.
00:25:23.560 And there needs to be a deportation of many people who don't share our ideals.
00:25:29.340 And whether Pierre Poilievre is able to do it or not, I'm not sure.
00:25:33.360 But at least I'm being optimistic that it'll be a better run.
00:25:37.200 You say it so well.
00:25:38.640 That's what I talked about yesterday here in my first episode back from the Christmas break.
00:25:41.900 It's like, it's what you and I are talking about.
00:25:44.620 I don't believe in cultural relativism.
00:25:46.440 I certainly believe in, I believe in the supremacy of Western civilization.
00:25:50.720 And I don't think we should be walking around with self-hatred and importing people
00:25:55.320 who, as you point out, hate our way of life.
00:25:57.600 We've seen the cost of that.
00:25:59.000 We're watching right now the cost of that in the UK.
00:26:02.780 You're doing something similar in Canada, and we are doing that here in the United States
00:26:06.520 of America.
00:26:07.080 You wake up one day and you are not you.
00:26:10.120 And who you are, America, it's pretty special on the entirety of the world stage and throughout
00:26:16.060 human history.
00:26:17.060 Pretty special.
00:26:18.760 You brought up Pierre, and I'm not gonna be able to say it because I don't speak French
00:26:21.840 and I never will be.
00:26:22.640 If you ranked languages that I am capable of just jumping in, feet first to the deep
00:26:29.160 end, treading water, and pronouncing it right, for some reason, French is like really low for
00:26:32.720 me.
00:26:33.740 Pierre Paulevert?
00:26:35.140 Paule Vier?
00:26:35.680 I mean, if you said it's French.
00:26:36.800 How am I doing?
00:26:37.560 Pauleyev.
00:26:40.380 Pauleyev.
00:26:40.980 Pauleyev.
00:26:41.500 He is the potential next prime minister of Canada.
00:26:45.940 He's a conservative leader, and he's really good.
00:26:48.760 And that was really illustrated in an exchange he had with, I believe it is, a Canadian journalist.
00:26:55.180 Let's watch together.
00:26:55.720 Is this the apple story?
00:26:57.540 Yes.
00:26:57.780 Okay.
00:26:59.500 He's eating an apple.
00:27:00.440 On the topic, I mean, in terms of your sort of strategy currently, you're obviously taking
00:27:05.540 the populist pathway.
00:27:08.340 What does that mean?
00:27:09.000 Well, appealing to people's more emotional levels, I would guess.
00:27:16.460 I mean, certainly you tap very strong ideological language quite frequently.
00:27:22.800 Like what?
00:27:25.200 Left wing, you know, this and that, right wing, you know, I mean, it's that type of ideological
00:27:30.300 thing.
00:27:30.860 I never really talk about left or right.
00:27:32.180 But anyways, a lot of people...
00:27:32.980 I don't really believe in that.
00:27:33.840 Okay.
00:27:34.080 You know, he goes on and on and he just, he's actually not mean.
00:27:40.680 You and I both like rhetoric.
00:27:42.100 We all, we like ideas.
00:27:43.400 And then rhetoric is the, you know, putting ideas into words.
00:27:46.500 And he just destroys this reporter who bakes assumption after assumption with, what do you
00:27:51.740 mean by that?
00:27:52.700 Give me an example.
00:27:53.760 Like what?
00:27:54.760 What people say this?
00:27:56.080 Who are you referencing?
00:27:56.780 Because he also bakes in, like people are saying, you're saying this, he goes, what
00:27:59.460 people?
00:28:00.080 Who?
00:28:00.840 And it's, it's a, Elon Musk did this.
00:28:02.640 I believe it was with, um, I don't remember which journalist he did it with.
00:28:05.700 Oh, I think it was with a BBC guy.
00:28:08.380 BBC maybe?
00:28:09.200 Okay.
00:28:09.400 BBC.
00:28:10.220 Maybe.
00:28:10.660 Yeah.
00:28:11.000 Just refuse to accept the assumptions baked into the question, which again, I don't know
00:28:15.860 much about Pierre Polovelet, uh, in his politics, but I sure do like his ability
00:28:20.420 of, of logic and rhetoric right here on display.
00:28:23.260 Can I add something?
00:28:24.120 The, the, the, the, the prop of the, uh, apple is actually incredibly powerful because
00:28:31.480 it reminds me, and this might be the first time that someone draws an analogy between
00:28:35.820 that prop and spaghetti Westerns of the 1960s.
00:28:39.480 If you remember Clint Eastwood in the sixties, I didn't even speak English then.
00:28:43.140 I was a young boy in Lebanon.
00:28:44.720 I, Arabic was my mother tongue, but then Clint Eastwood comes into a town.
00:28:49.220 He's always got that little small cigar, right?
00:28:52.220 Well, that small cigar said a lot, right?
00:28:55.600 Clint Eastwood didn't have to say much.
00:28:57.680 He just had to kind of show up and do the little cigar thing.
00:29:01.340 And I would say, I want to be that guy when I grow up.
00:29:03.840 So that's what Pierre Polovelet invoked, right?
00:29:07.040 Just very calm, very cool and biting the apple.
00:29:10.200 And that's how you get people.
00:29:11.960 As you said, there is all sorts of ways of having powerful rhetoric.
00:29:15.500 And in this case, the apple spoke a lot.
00:29:19.600 Oh, I think you're exactly right.
00:29:21.440 I don't even, casual, um, cool.
00:29:24.700 He's got his sunglasses in the same hand as the apple effortless, um, as he thinks through
00:29:30.180 this.
00:29:30.480 And, uh, and, and then by the way, posit the apple and the casualness of eating that
00:29:35.020 apple as you intellectually destroy another human being with simple Socratic questions
00:29:38.720 with the nervous laughter of the reporter, constant nervous laughter that he tries to guys in
00:29:45.240 some like arrogance or condescension, but it's really, it's really paper thin.
00:29:49.360 You know, it's not, he doesn't, you can see he doesn't even believe it.
00:29:52.500 Why do you see it?
00:29:53.560 And I see it, but all of the progressives don't, what is it in our module in our brain
00:29:59.460 that allows us to interpret these cues accurately, but they can't.
00:30:03.320 Can you help me with that, that, with that fancy lawyer?
00:30:06.420 Well, let's first start with this.
00:30:09.420 Are we accurate?
00:30:10.280 You always have to start there.
00:30:11.580 So if the other side sees that interaction and maybe they see condescension and arrogance
00:30:15.520 in, in Pierre, I really can't do it, but if, um, if Paulie F in, they, they don't see
00:30:23.340 the condescension in insecurity in the reporter, we first have to start with, are we accurate?
00:30:28.040 Of course we believe we are, or we wouldn't hold the opinion.
00:30:30.280 Um, I think I, I don't, I don't know.
00:30:37.140 I truly do believe that self-awareness is the key to wisdom.
00:30:40.280 And that's why you hear me do this.
00:30:41.920 I don't check my premises or look in the mirror because I'm a navel gazer or I'm insecure.
00:30:48.600 I do it because I believe self-awareness is the grounding or the first step to wisdom.
00:30:53.560 Like you have to start with knowing yourself.
00:30:56.980 And so I know how I would react.
00:30:59.980 The Delphic maxim, know thyself has survived thousands of years, right?
00:31:05.260 It's just two words, know thyself.
00:31:07.780 That's why I always tell people, if you've got a self-help guru, who's giving you all
00:31:12.580 sorts of very, very broad, you know, uh, prescriptions to life with all sorts of specificity.
00:31:19.700 He, he's, he's a peddler of BS, right?
00:31:22.020 Because just know thyself has stood the test of time to your point.
00:31:27.040 And you're exactly right.
00:31:28.440 That's the start of wisdom spot on.
00:31:31.140 So what do you do when you're insecure?
00:31:32.780 You do a fake laughter.
00:31:34.440 That's what Kamala Harris did.
00:31:35.780 And so I don't know why they don't see it.
00:31:37.460 I don't know.
00:31:38.080 I don't, it's, uh, the opposite of confirmation bias, right?
00:31:42.640 Confirmation bias is, oh, he said something that I already believed.
00:31:46.040 Therefore it's right.
00:31:47.000 And so the left looks at that scenario and says, um, Pierre Poliev, he is, um, he is the
00:32:01.740 totalitarian.
00:32:02.660 He is the arrogant one.
00:32:03.780 And so the, here's the humble reporter, simply speaking truth to power.
00:32:07.220 And of course, all of his assumptions are correct.
00:32:09.380 Of course, there's people saying you're an ideologue.
00:32:11.520 Of course, there's people saying you're a populist.
00:32:13.180 I don't know.
00:32:13.940 I don't think they know themselves.
00:32:14.980 No, I think, but just to add to your point, I think that, so if I'm a progressive and
00:32:19.640 I see that interaction, my mind and my senses completely shut out that nervous laugh of
00:32:26.680 the reporter.
00:32:27.580 All I see screaming at me is the next Hitler, right?
00:32:31.880 Because he is conservative.
00:32:33.780 Therefore, if he's conservative, he's probably going to round up all the indigenous people
00:32:38.780 and the trans people.
00:32:39.960 And so that's screaming at me.
00:32:41.760 So I can't, my senses can't even pick up the condescension that you're speaking of
00:32:46.280 or the arrogance or the insecurity, because there's a much louder scream coming at me.
00:32:51.620 It's called the label of conservative.
00:32:54.080 So maybe that's why they don't see what we see.
00:32:57.800 I think that's right.
00:32:59.200 I think this, this last topic I want to ask you about ties it together.
00:33:02.240 So if there is a theme to you and I listening to Donald Trump today, the cultural re-pivot
00:33:08.900 of even Facebook, um, and then bringing in what we're talking about with the UK grooming
00:33:14.260 gangs and so forth, it's, it's dealing with cultures and, you know, knowing yourself, hating
00:33:19.440 yourself versus, you know, knowing yourself and understanding your role in human history
00:33:24.180 and not, not taking on these other cultures because you believe there's something wrong
00:33:28.680 with yourself, Joe Biden gave away, I don't know what it ended up being.
00:33:33.060 Was it two dozen or so presidential medal of freedoms?
00:33:36.000 And, you know, it was Denzel Washington was included.
00:33:39.120 Lionel Messi, your guy, your guy, Lionel Messi got one.
00:33:42.680 Um, yeah.
00:33:44.420 But he didn't show up to it.
00:33:45.900 But George Soros, he didn't show up.
00:33:48.320 Yeah, I know.
00:33:49.000 I don't know why.
00:33:49.700 Uh, but, uh, George Soros got one.
00:33:53.160 And I don't think there's ever been a better historical figure that illustrates the hatred
00:33:56.880 of Western civilization and the funding of its dismantling than George Soros.
00:34:00.840 And for that, by the current modern day American left embodied by Joe Biden, he gets the presidential
00:34:06.800 medal of freedom.
00:34:08.540 It's unbelievable.
00:34:09.500 And as did Hillary Clinton.
00:34:11.480 So, I mean, imagine a world where Hillary Clinton and George Soros are lauded as bastions
00:34:19.200 of freedom, but Elon Musk is completely ignored because, you know, he's a billionaire guy who
00:34:25.780 meddles in other people's affairs.
00:34:27.720 So when Bill Gates medals, good.
00:34:30.260 When George Soros medals, good.
00:34:32.380 When Mark Zuckerberg medals, good.
00:34:34.740 When Elon does, he must be some sort of pro-apartheid monster from South Africa.
00:34:40.360 It's absolutely insane.
00:34:41.780 It's so hypocritical.
00:34:42.920 It's so dishonest.
00:34:44.000 But hopefully we're going to turn that ship around, Will.
00:34:48.120 I think there is a potential.
00:34:49.640 Let me ask that as we, as we end, because it'll, it'll tie to Facebook.
00:34:53.040 It does feel like a golden age in a bit, Dr. Sad.
00:34:56.140 It does.
00:34:56.920 Um, or at least on the doorstep of a potential golden age, because it feels like there is
00:35:01.240 a cultural shift in America.
00:35:02.420 Forget the leadership change for a moment.
00:35:04.220 The leadership change is a reflection of a cultural change in America.
00:35:07.460 And the question is, have we, and can we shift to moving away from self-hatred of Western
00:35:13.540 civilization and the exalted place of the United States of America?
00:35:16.420 Can we do that?
00:35:17.880 Is Facebook really recognizing this cultural shift?
00:35:21.060 Are all these corporate CEOs or are they just going, oh, you know what?
00:35:25.260 The mogul on the ski hill currently reads as follows.
00:35:28.160 And we need to jump down a few notches on the Donald Trump moguls.
00:35:32.000 Yeah, so, uh, to your point, I've, I've often been asked, do you think that now that Donald
00:35:38.300 Trump has gotten his second term, we're done with woke stuff?
00:35:41.600 And my answer is an emphatic no.
00:35:44.620 Is there, is there reason to celebrate orgiastically?
00:35:48.140 Absolutely.
00:35:48.900 Because the, the, the alternative would have been disastrous, but it took 50 to a hundred
00:35:53.600 years for all of these parasitic ideas and suicidal empathy and these reflex of self-hatred
00:36:00.860 to pro, to be promulgated into every nook and cranny of our society.
00:36:05.500 So it's, it's going to take a lot more than just Donald Trump for the next four years to
00:36:10.880 completely eradicate this.
00:36:12.480 So don't be complacent.
00:36:13.840 Yes.
00:36:14.340 Celebrate for a moment or two on, on January 20th, but there's a lot more work to be done
00:36:19.820 to completely eradicate this nonsense.
00:36:22.360 Hopefully it won't be 50 to a hundred years, but it will be a lot more than just one term
00:36:27.060 of Donald Trump.
00:36:29.160 All right.
00:36:29.660 I know your fingers are itching to get back to X and go after Piers Morgan.
00:36:34.040 So I'm going to let him go, but you listening at home, watching on YouTube and Facebook
00:36:38.440 need to know that he's already written the parasitic mind, this new book, which is, it's
00:36:42.060 not just the centerpiece of the conversation we've had here today, but I think the centerpiece
00:36:45.020 of a lot of what's happening.
00:36:46.600 And we just hit five new stories, including the press conference day by Donald Trump that I
00:36:51.320 do think at a deep level is tied to the idea of suicidal empathy.
00:36:54.640 The title of his upcoming book, it is visiting professor and global ambassador at Northwood
00:36:58.840 University.
00:36:59.300 Dr. Gad Saad.
00:37:00.340 Always love talking to you, Gad.
00:37:01.480 Thank you so much.
00:37:02.080 Thank you, sir.
00:37:02.560 Thank you, Will.
00:37:03.120 Cheers.
00:37:03.400 Take care.
00:37:04.060 Bye.
00:37:04.260 Bye.
00:37:04.280 Bye.
00:37:04.300 Bye.
00:37:04.320 Bye.
00:37:04.340 Bye.
00:37:04.360 Bye.
00:37:04.380 Bye.
00:37:04.420 Bye.
00:37:04.440 Bye.
00:37:04.460 Bye.
00:37:04.500 Bye.
00:37:04.560 Bye.
00:37:04.580 Bye.
00:37:04.600 Bye.
00:37:04.620 Bye.
00:37:04.640 Bye.
00:37:04.660 Bye.
00:37:04.680 Bye.
00:37:04.720 Bye.
00:37:04.740 Bye.
00:37:04.780 Bye.
00:37:04.880 Bye.
00:37:04.900 Bye.
00:37:04.940 Bye.
00:37:04.960 Bye.
00:37:05.020 Bye.
00:37:05.060 Bye.
00:37:05.080 Bye.
00:37:05.100 Bye.
00:37:05.140 Bye.