00:12:12.720Westminster parliamentary system that has served us well for 200 years but the result that we're
00:12:18.160seeing right now with liberals gaining majority that was not elected is not a democratic result
00:12:25.640and i'm mindful of the criticism but that is not what canadians elected thank you
00:12:33.820well he's right it's not what canadians elected let's get back to this
00:12:39.400can expect a fierce fight from opposition parties the question might then become do the liberals
00:12:45.760deploy the controversial guillotine that is closure a procedural tool that allows them to
00:12:51.360abruptly end debate and put a motion to vote what about prorogation this would be the easy way to do
00:12:57.700it for carney actually only if the liberals love pain there are a number of reasons why proroguing
00:13:04.740isn't the panacea that some commentators and media reports have suggested in recent weeks
00:13:09.340First of all, since committee composition was set up in the standing orders to last the entirety of this parliament, which lasts until the next election, prorogation would have no effect on them.
00:13:21.720The House of Commons would eventually resume sitting, a new parliamentary session would start, but that part of the standing orders wouldn't change.
00:13:27.840Second of all, it would erase the slate of legislation the liberals still have on the table, including their criminal reform, C-16 and C-22.
00:13:35.300Carney spoke about C-22 earlier today.
00:13:37.380This is legal access for the cops and shutting us down on the Internet if they think that we're being too conservative.
00:13:47.420The long-awaited redux of their failed attempt last year to update the lawful access regime for law enforcement.
00:13:54.120Third and most importantly, it would oblige the liberals to face a confidence vote on the new speech from the throne that is required upon resumption from the House of Commons.
00:14:02.820But hey, they've got their majority. Why should they care about that?
00:14:07.380They may have a majority, but it's a very slim one, meaning all it takes is a couple of MPs to miss or be unable to vote,
00:14:13.800and the government could unintentionally lose the vote and be sent back to the polls.
00:33:56.440Why do the Liberals take these half measures?
00:33:59.040Why don't they really follow a conservative policy
00:34:01.400and eliminate all of the Liberal taxes on fuel
00:34:05.280so Canadians can afford that summer vacation we'd all love to take?
00:34:13.680Well, it kind of makes sense, doesn't it?
00:34:16.440How much money did we lose by not building pipelines over the past 10 years?
00:34:20.660That was a question asked today in the Standing Committee on Canadian Energy by a Conservative MP to the chief economist of the Canada Energy Regulator.
01:07:49.440okay so documented did she go to the police is the question this is 2018
01:07:56.400we understand there's a lot of women who don't go to the police
01:08:01.380after an incident like this because of embarrassment
01:08:04.520so we don't know she only just spoke out today it was even difficult before the show finding her
01:08:12.020name which we still didn't get but that's accuser number five on eric swalwell this guy
01:08:19.620anna paulina luna is a republican congresswoman and she was on fox news last night with an
01:08:30.840explosive accusation here is that many people on the hill knew about this many reporters have
01:08:38.980come forward even in talking to me saying that they had heard stories about this but i do think
01:08:43.540that he has serious criminal problems on his hand and i do think that he might end up in jail jesse
01:08:48.060And if I could just share with you for a moment, not only did I receive forensic reporting showing that, you know, that infamous video of him in the hotel room was indeed him.
01:09:15.480it appears to show Swalwell on a bed, maybe another guy making out with a girl.
01:09:22.120That's it. That's all we know. But if what you're saying is true, and we don't know,
01:09:26.120but if that's true, that is very, very, very bad news. But back up. You're saying reporters
01:09:33.060on the Hill knew Swalwell was a shade ball, but didn't investigate? Because why? Because he was a
01:09:38.920Democrat? I don't know why they didn't push this further. I think that there's a lot of
01:09:45.160kind of backscratching taking place on the Hill in general because it's happening within our own
01:09:49.880party as well. But yes, they knew about it. They did not report on it. And you're seeing now that,
01:09:55.320I mean, I don't know about you, Jesse, but I don't have 50 staffers, let alone 50 staffers
01:09:59.680that would come out and say that this is wrong and that you need to resign from office, right?
01:10:03.880So it was clearly a pattern. And as you're seeing with some of the text messages coming out,
01:10:08.200and I think, again, with this criminal investigation, there's a lot there with him.
01:10:12.180So, yes, he resigned, I think, to maybe save his family going through this.
01:10:16.320But ultimately, at the end of the day, when he did what he decided to do, just based on the grounds of him having an inappropriate relationship with a staffer.
01:10:23.840But now we're looking at the criminal activity.
01:10:25.820And I stand by what I said because I saw, again, the forensics report of that video.
01:10:31.000And if that is true, I would suggest that the Manhattan D.A. look into that.