00:09:18.940now that was early on in the rally clearly there are not 5 000 or 10 000 people there
00:09:24.820but having said that i've never been to the alberta legislature in edmonton so i don't know
00:09:31.340how big the grounds are normally i'm fairly good at guesstimating a crowd size have been since i
00:09:37.120was a kid for some reason i can't tell you exactly why that is but at that rally very difficult to
00:09:43.580judge we hear anywhere between five and ten thousand and again that drone footage was taken
00:09:49.020before the proceedings had even begun for the day they did take some more later on
00:09:54.060it's not up online just yet we had some great speakers this past weekend in edmonton here's
00:09:58.860dr dennis modry about this ladies and gentlemen in 1910 the tax rate was six percent in alberta
00:10:07.580In 1950 it was 18%. In 2010 it was 36%. Today it's 43%. Can you imagine what it
00:10:18.260would be like if we were completely out from under all federal regulation and
00:10:23.580taxation? Can you just imagine? Can you imagine the circumstance where everybody
00:10:35.360pays nothing more than maybe five, eight percent maximal. Think about the benefit to you. Think
00:10:42.380about the sovereignty that you have as an individual. Well, that certainly sounds good
00:10:49.580to me. Tanya Clemens is a social worker and a farmer from Okotoks, Alberta. She's been involved
00:10:57.800with the Alberta Prosperity Project for the last couple of years, and she spoke as well.
00:11:02.140In Alberta, where the wealth we generate stays here, where income tax is eliminated, where our Constitution protects property rights, freedom and family, and where a direct democracy returns the power truly back to the people.
00:11:32.140That's not a dream. That's Alberta sovereignty. That's the harvest of freedom we've been planting
00:11:40.640for over 120 years. And I know the thought of forming a new nation is intimidating. It's
00:11:46.380scary. I feel that. We've never done this before. But here's the truth. Much of the
00:11:51.760world is looking to Alberta to succeed, to be the light of freedom and prosperity that
00:11:56.920our world needs. And we can be that. I mean, think about that. Canada has the third largest
00:12:11.160oil reserves and the fourth largest natural gas reserves in the world. Now, if you take the rest
00:12:19.080of Canada away from Alberta, they still have the third largest gas reserves and fourth largest
00:12:26.180natural gas reserves did i say gas oil third largest oil reserves fourth largest natural gas
00:12:33.620reserves in the world that country would be insanely rich and when dr modry talks about
00:12:45.260five to eight percent taxes all in that's everything in i think he's maybe being a bit high
00:12:52.460with that estimate lastly keith wilson our attorney friend had a few words to say
00:13:00.980that no matter what happens in that process and this is critically important that next year
00:13:09.300whether it's in the spring or the fall there will be a province-wide referendum
00:13:14.680but we cannot for the sake of our children underestimate the magnitude of that challenge
00:13:30.080we have to get like 1.8 million albertans to vote yes that means that means every single one of you
00:13:41.220is now charged with a mission. And that mission is to talk to your friends, talk to your colleagues
00:13:49.200at work, the guys on your shift or your hockey league, everybody that you encounter, to have the
00:13:57.620awkward discussions, to get them to understand the opportunity that's before us, the opportunity
00:14:04.100that how they will benefit, how their family will benefit, how their community will benefit,
00:14:09.340how their kids will benefit by voting yes.
00:14:12.800That is the imperative that we all have.
00:34:02.960Because once we get to the point where we can have a debate, then we can expose them.
00:34:10.180Recent developments in the United States offer an opportunity for public debate in Canada
00:34:14.780concerning the cost and impact of our government's embrace of net zero climate policies.
00:34:20.080On July 29th, the U.S. Department of Energy published a clear-eyed report on the state of climate science.
00:34:26.520Well, on the same day, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed withdrawing the endangerment finding that greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, are a threat to human health and welfare.
00:34:38.840For four decades, activists, politicians, many scientists and mainstream media have told the public that the science is settled.
00:34:49.520Human greenhouse gas emissions cause dangerous climate change.
00:34:52.980They've enforced this orthodoxy by shutting down debate
00:34:56.100about the causes and consequences of climate change.
00:34:59.300The ClimateGate emails hacked in 2009 revealed a campaign
00:35:02.700to ensure climate realists were increasingly shut out.
00:35:07.860Left-wing corporate media then effectively censored climate skeptics,
00:35:11.380labeling them climate change deniers, unworthy of being heard.
00:35:15.040yet thousands of dissenting scientists have signed the global warming petition project
00:35:21.800which says there is no convincing science scientific evidence greenhouse gases are causing
00:35:28.320or will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the earth's atmosphere
00:35:32.620and disruption of the earth's climate while hundreds more have been cited in the various
00:35:36.640reports of the non-governmental international panel on climate change canada has its own
00:35:43.340prominent climate realists climatologist tim ball economist ross mckittrick who appears frequently
00:35:49.180in the national post steve mcintyre founder and editor of climate audit and organizations like
00:35:54.840friends of science we've had them on and the international climate climate science coalition
00:35:59.160they've argued that the causes and effects of recent modest climate changes are largely unknown
00:36:05.660and there's little evidence they're making weather worse or otherwise threatening human
00:36:11.040health or welfare. But the billions of dollars donated by international foundations, philanthropists
00:36:17.600and governments to environmental NGOs have allowed activists to drown out the voices of climate
00:36:23.300realism. Government agencies have also been weaponized against them. For example,
00:36:29.020in May of 2016, following a complaint by the environmental organization Ecojustice,
00:36:34.500Canada's Competition Bureau, of all places, notified three climate-skeptical groups they
00:36:39.580were being investigated for publishing supposedly misleading statements about climate change.
00:36:48.820The Bureau's investigation ended mid-2017 when it notified two of the groups being investigated
00:36:54.780that although further action would not be taken at that time, the inquiry could reopen at any time.
00:37:02.060The most recent assessment report of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
00:37:07.560the IPCC, acknowledged in Chapter 12, Table 12, page 1856, that there's little to no evidence
00:37:16.360that emissions have caused identifiable changes in the frequency or intensity of natural disasters.
00:37:22.040For example, the IPCC assessed low confidence for observed changes in the magnitude or frequency of
00:37:27.820floods at the global scale, yet neither climate science nor climate policy effectiveness is
00:37:32.780properly debated at UN climate conferences. In Canada, the situation is dire. The federal
00:37:39.500government has spent between $150 and $220 billion on climate change in the past 10 years,
00:37:46.880but with no meaningful impact. Mark Carney has long been dedicated to the net zero framework
00:37:52.700and remains so. All of the largest Canadian banks have withdrawn from the global financial
00:37:57.800alliance he headed up, GFONS, each says it will continue to pursue net zero goals and develop
00:38:03.560climate mitigation strategies outside the alliance. The banks, of course, the banks are going to do it.
00:38:10.760With the federal debt standing at $1.25 trillion and proposals in place to continue spending
00:38:17.860billions, if not trillions more dollars to address climate change, Canadians are owed a
00:38:24.740thorough review of progress to date. The new U.S. report provides an opening for such discussion.
00:38:31.220Among other things, it debunks claims climate change is causing worsening extreme weather
00:38:35.760events, explains why rising CO2 levels may have a declining influence on global temperatures,
00:38:41.500and encourage global greening that will reduce starvation, and examines the many poorly understood
00:38:47.380natural factors that complicate the attribution of climate change to human energy use. All this
00:38:53.920is forcing American climate alarmists to start taking seriously problems climate realists
00:38:58.700have realized for such a long time with predictions of pending climate catastrophe.
00:39:03.800The same debate should be happening in Canada, not least because the EPA's withdrawal of the
00:39:08.960endangerment finding means Canadian industries will become even less competitive unless Ottawa
00:39:14.780rescinds its own determination that CO2 is a toxic pollutant. As a leading player in our economy,
00:39:22.800Canada's financial sector should take the initiative in sponsoring open discussion,
00:39:27.120perhaps including televised debates on the benefits and harms of our present path to net zero.
00:39:33.340For the first time, many Canadians will hear that costly efforts to stop climate change
00:39:38.580are futile and unnecessary waste of resources that threatens the country's prosperity and unity.
00:39:46.060Our children and their children will not forgive us if we let this opportunity pass.
00:39:51.840That was by John Zacharias, the director of Canadians for Sensible Climate Policy.
00:40:00.760Of course, we won't get that, not from a Mark Carney-led government, but we can keep pushing.
00:40:09.100Oh, and speaking of food banks, this is from Food Banks Canada.
00:40:13.200In March of 2025, there were nearly 2.2 million Canadians going to food banks, the highest number in history.
00:40:19.800the highest number in history food bank usage has doubled since march of 2019 it is 5.2 percent
00:40:31.020higher than it was in 2024 wow i think i have a video of pierre polyeb in the house of commons
00:40:39.740just today talking about it let me see if i can find this yeah here it is right here have a watch
00:40:47.280The Prime Minister released its report today, Hunger Count 2025, showing the number of Canadians relying on a food bank has more than doubled since this Liberal government took office.
00:40:57.900It shows that 39% of the population experienced food insecurity, 82% did not have enough to eat, 34% went an entire day without eating, 53% missed a meal to afford something else, 28% went hungry at least once a week.
00:41:14.120Now the Prime Minister says Canadians will have to make even more sacrifices.
00:41:18.280How many meals will Canadians have to sacrifice for yet another costly liberal budget?
00:45:31.000in addition to everything that Canada is already paying a tariff on.
00:45:34.820This is over and above all because of the commercial that Doug Ford said he was going to pause
00:45:40.620but decided to play dirty, and these are Donald Trump's own words, by not taking it down.
00:45:46.420Donald Trump literally said, I can play dirtier.
00:45:49.500I'm going to play a lot dirtier, and he did.
00:45:52.040I won't read everything he wrote, but it starts off by basically saying Canada was caught red-handed,
00:45:56.720putting up fraudulent advertising on Ronald Reagan's speech on tariffs.
00:46:00.060And he said the sole purpose of the fraud was Canada's hope that the United States Supreme Court would come to their rescue on tariffs that they used for years to hurt the United States.
00:46:08.460Because of their serious misrepresentation of facts and hostile act, I am increasing the tariff on Canada by 10% over and above what they are paying now.
00:46:17.480Thank you for attention to this matter.
00:49:23.720The people promoting DEI are the ones dividing us based on skin color.
00:49:28.460And the people who want opportunity distributed fairly and public services distributed fairly
00:49:39.000regardless of what you look like or where you come from those are the people seeking to bring us
00:49:43.720together i would ask you very humbly since you seem to have a problem with big corporations
00:49:49.080why do you think rogers and bell advertise their dei policies while charging canadian
00:49:54.200soup consumers some of the highest cell phone bills in the entire world why do the big banks
00:49:59.720who seem to do just fine in our economy despite the youth unemployment rate continuing to rise
00:50:04.760promote DEI policies? Do you believe it's because they have a genuine interest in making things fairer or easier for the average Canadian consumer, or is it because it's a way to virtue signal and make it look like they care about the average person when they're really actually putting forward policies and a way of doing business that makes life harder and harder for the average person?
00:50:25.440So I would say with great confidence, great confidence, that in pushing back against DEI, we are actually increasing the likelihood that all people are treated fairly, that people can come together, and that we might hold those powerful corporations you're concerned about accountable for what they're actually putting people through, which is a cost of living crisis.
00:50:45.420and we have been the party to push back against oligopolies more than anyone else in ottawa
00:50:50.900whether it's through groceries banking telecommunications we believe the average
00:50:55.780canadian consumer deserves more choice and that we will benefit from more competition and that's
00:51:00.740what you get when you emphasize the role of the private sector in our economy it's not about
00:51:05.020giving money away to big business it's about saying no one small collection of businesses
00:51:10.940deserve to control the industries that we all depend on in order to see he's talking
00:51:16.020about stakeholder capitalism which is what they're trying to jam down our throats right now
00:51:22.120he's talking about divvying it up there are some good conservatives out there
00:51:27.680and i don't know what he believes deep in his heart jimil giovanni here but he certainly makes
00:51:34.340a lot of sense doesn't he function and survive in this society so that's the answer to your second
00:51:39.120question. Do you want to ask a follow-up? Because I went kind of hard on you there. I'm happy to,
00:51:47.500you know. And thank you for the present. Yeah, appreciate it. I can respond to the second
00:51:53.440question if that was the intention. If not, that's okay. No, if I didn't answer any part of your
00:51:58.840questions, you're welcome to clarify. No, the second question was good. I think we definitely
00:52:03.580agree on not liking monopolies and oligarchies. Although I think historically, looking at the
00:52:09.500policies of the Conservative Party, it usually seems to benefit the big businesses already in
00:52:15.200power more than the small businesses trying to stir it up. And there's still the issue of relying
00:52:20.780on for-profit organizations in the first place. Well, there's certainly some services that I'm a
00:52:28.380believer that the public sector should provide. I mean, we are in a country that prides itself on
00:52:34.040someone never having to go broke because they're sick. And I think that's something you should
00:52:37.900always stand by and fight for. I really believe that. I'm a cancer survivor. I'd probably be six
00:52:43.560figures in debt right now if I was in another country. But because I was in this country,
00:52:48.060diagnosed at 30 years old, I was able to be taken care of and I didn't have to worry about my mother
00:52:52.500my sisters right so but at the same time i believe that monopoly is always going to be a problem if
00:53:01.860you don't have balances of power and when the federal government continues to grow as the
00:53:05.940private sector shrinks as more and more people become dependent on the government in order to
00:53:11.380earn a living we are giving an increasing amount of power in the hands of bureaucrats who sit around
00:53:16.180in ottawa and as someone who has to drive to ottawa every week i can tell you the bureaucrats in
00:53:21.940out of don't understand your life they don't know what you're going through and they shouldn't have
00:53:25.900more power than is absolutely necessary to determine what our country is like and the
00:53:30.140opportunities that are available to you he's a smart guy i wonder if he's fully aware of the
00:53:37.360agenda and you've got the conservatives like danielle smith you don't know which way she's
00:53:42.900coming from at the beginning of the show we told you she said we're trying to achieve net zero by
00:53:48.4002050 i started a carbon sucking machine in alberta last week but then she goes ahead and does an
00:53:53.840interview like this to what you're saying about censorship and government intervention but then
00:53:58.460i'm thinking about the book ban uh that alberta right it's been described that way was looking
00:54:03.800into right and it's kind of like it's the opposite of that because you're did you look in any of the
00:54:09.740images of the books that we're trying to take out of out of elementary schools you're saying
00:54:13.820they're pornographic. There's a picture of a threesome. A picture of a threesome. There's a
00:54:19.120picture of oral sex, both male oral sex and female oral sex. There's a picture of an adult pulling
00:54:26.300down the pants of a child. These are images that are in books, that are in libraries for K to 12.
00:54:32.940Good question. But we had parents say, why are these books in the library? And that's when we
00:54:37.600said, we've got to take those out. Now, the first order, I think, was written in a way that was
00:54:42.400probably not as clear as it should have been okay she goes on and on and on about why and how and
00:54:47.460bottom line but ultimately they're right those books have no place in schools within the reach
00:54:56.400of little little kids and they were and now in alberta they're not but on the other hand she
00:55:04.100just opened up a great big carbon sucking machine in the middle of alberta and we're going to be
00:55:09.780net zero by 2050 what danielle come on you gotta stop kowtowing to the climate change crew
00:55:17.760you've got to start standing up and saying hey you know what we got to talk about this because
00:55:22.440there is no settled science and why are conservatives so afraid to do that maybe
00:55:29.740it's because probably their largest donors both provincially in alberta and federally
00:55:34.800are making billions and billions and billions of dollars off this new green economy that's just a
00:55:42.460guess you guys know tim pool pretty big podcaster in the united states and today he was talking
00:55:52.480about canada ceding land back to the indians watch this indian city tells disarmed citizenry
00:56:00.200their homes belong to native tribes after pivotal court ruling ramifications across the country
00:56:05.560imagine one day you get a letter in the mail and it says they're laughing at us they're laughing
00:56:10.680at us you are now on native american land we gave it back this is what's happening not a joke here's
00:56:17.240the letter from the city of richmond here we go please take note that the recent bc supreme court
00:56:20.980decision coach on tribes v canada made some very important decisions which could negatively affect
00:56:24.840the title to your property a briefing paper prepared by the city of richmond staff is attached
00:56:27.680to your reference. If you look at the draft map attached to the briefing, your property is located
00:56:30.880within the claim area outlined in green. For those whose property is in the area outlined in black,
00:56:35.540the court has declared aboriginal title to your property, which may compromise the status and
00:56:39.000validity of your ownership. This was mandated without any prior notice to the landowners.
00:56:42.720The entire area outlined in green is claimed on appeal by the Kawachan First Nations.
00:56:46.540Given the serious implications of this court decision and the pending appeal,
00:56:49.100the city is hosting an information session, blah, blah, blah, please call this number.
00:56:52.160Well, they got the map in here. If your property is located within this black area,
00:56:56.620they just ruled by court order you are no longer in the united states you are now on the land of
00:57:02.960the kawachan tribes and they own your house that's awesome in the green area they are the
00:57:09.200cow he's he's talking about canada not the united states he just made a little bit of a slip john
00:57:14.540is appealing saying this whole area belongs to them why because in the 1800s and before
00:57:19.740they had what's called the summer village the kawachan natives in the summer would come here
00:57:25.380and fish before leaving therefore it's their land and when the white settlers came and built there
00:57:30.900they did it with that proper transfer of title therefore your land is now their land your home
00:57:35.960is now theirs congratulations it was promised to them 300 years ago yeah uh-huh if there's
00:57:41.940competing tribes can they like fight each other for this land like you know you have different
00:57:45.740i think yeah the court should yeah that would bow an arrow yeah i want to see that you know
00:57:50.420they used to do they would take an arrow and they would roll it in dung yeah and they would
00:57:53.980Effective chemical warfare exactly because then one hit you were dead like you hit in the arm you die just a matter of time
00:58:00.180That's because before like antiseptics, right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, if that went in you the infection was unstoppable
00:58:06.680That's crazy. You turn to your buddy. Hey, take a dump on this thing real quick before she did at the white man
00:58:13.920So what did they do here the eminent domain did?
00:58:17.460The natives were like a yo, that's my land and the court was like yes
00:58:20.580Yes. Well, hey, look, I said this, OK? King Charles gave Canada back.
00:58:25.620Do you remember that? King Charles showed up and he's like, I'd like to acknowledge
00:58:29.120we are on the unceded lands of the Algonquin Oneshibe people.
00:58:34.580And it's like unreal. He came back real.