00:11:07.240And from there, you can send them an email because, man, you can make yourself some shekels on the side or get some free product, whatever it is you want to do.
00:11:14.440And they're great people to deal with as well.
00:11:16.600Kevin and Anna with CanadaNanoSilver.com.
00:11:19.160All right. Before we get into the is Trudeau gay stuff, there was a vote in that. This is the important stuff. There was a vote in the House of Commons today. Non-confidence motion, as a matter of fact, which was tabled last week by Pierre Polly Evan. And it was basically a simple premise. We've lost confidence in the government of Canada. And so let's vote him out. Well, here's what happened on a video from TNC dot news.
00:11:44.660All those opposed to the motion will please rise.
00:11:49.160Mr. Macaulay Cardigan, Mr. Sajan, Mr. Blair, Mr. Holland, Ms. Ganey, Mr. Blanchet, Mr. St-Marie,
00:12:04.820Mr. Therrien, Mr. Singh, Mr. Massey, Ms. Matheson, Ms. McPherson, Ms. Idlaut,
00:12:19.160The table will now compile the results of the vote.
00:12:22.300Yes, four hundred and twenty-seven bank.0.98
00:12:24.160Nays, count two hundred and eleven just not only.
00:12:38.560OK, so we had a couple of interesting things happen in the House of Commons today.
00:12:42.080There was the usual verbal parry thrust between Pierre Polyev and Justin Trudeau.
00:12:48.700But this video is going to give you some insight as to what his caucus members and cabinet members, more importantly, actually think of Trudeau as he's standing up there bellowing, screaming, yelling, nonsensical B.S.
00:32:04.100And she is urging all MPs to vote in favor of her Bill C-223, which will establish or seek to establish a guaranteed basic income for all Canadians.
00:32:17.040It's good to be with you today from unseated Algonquin territory to talk about my private members bill, something that has been supported by the entire NDP caucus to put in.
00:32:29.540Now, before we continue on with this, I want you guys to understand that this bill has been in progress now for at least two years.
00:32:36.540I think it's more like two and a half years.
00:32:38.460And it's just now getting to its third reading.
00:32:43.300So it's very, very slow moving, as private members' bills usually are.
00:32:48.840But it's something that's supported by a good deal of the Senate.
00:35:23.860If you can't work, you've got a bad back, your back just won't, or you're in a wheelchair or crutches for the rest of your life where you can't work, then yes, of course, there should be societal safety nets.
00:38:21.380My fellow Albertans, I have some exciting news to share with you today about an important
00:38:26.180step forward for our province in protecting the rights and freedoms that are central
00:38:30.320to our identity as Albertans. In a few weeks' time, our UCP government will be introducing
00:38:36.080legislation to amend and strengthen the Alberta Bill of Rights, a document that has stood as a
00:38:41.420safeguard for our civil liberties and freedoms for decades. Since its inception, the Alberta
00:38:46.960Bill of Rights has been a reflection of our shared values, recognizing the fundamental rights and
00:38:52.540freedoms that are essential to a free and democratic society.
00:38:56.420It enshrines the principles that every Albertan holds dear.
00:39:00.180Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to equality before the law, among other fundamental rights.
00:39:06.240It serves much like a constitutional document, in that it ensures all provincial laws and policies must align with those listed rights and freedoms.
00:39:16.440Now, the Bill of Rights has served its purpose well over the years.
00:39:19.900But as our society evolves, so too must our laws to ensure our rights and freedoms remain properly protected in an ever-changing world.
00:39:28.640One of the amendments we are making to the Bill of Rights is to reinforce the right of every Albertan to make their own choices regarding the medical treatments they receive.
00:39:37.480This includes ensuring that every individual in our province who has the mental capacity to do so will have the right to decide whether or not to receive a vaccination or other medical procedure.
00:39:48.140In recent years, we've seen the challenges and hardship that can arise when that right to bodily autonomy is not adequately protected.
00:39:56.840It is my firm conviction that no Albertan should ever be subjected or pressured into accepting a medical treatment without their full consent.
00:40:04.480For me, this addition to the Bill of Rights is about recognizing that in Alberta, we believe that individuals have the right to make informed decisions about their rights.
00:40:13.140Okay, before we go on any further, I'm seeing in the comments here that you guys are saying,
00:40:17.680I don't believe her. I don't believe her at all. Interesting. Interesting.
00:40:26.000Now, if you listen to what she's saying, she's saying that, yeah, you're going to have the right
00:40:30.600to refuse that. But we always had the right to refuse. It's just what happens to you when you
00:40:39.720do refuse are businesses going to have the right to say you're fired because you refuse still
00:40:45.800is the government going to to say well we've got the right to say you can't travel unless you you
00:40:53.100we've always had the right to say no that's the thing and that's the one thing the other side has
00:40:57.580always said well you always had a choice see how we did we had to pay dearly for it we were
00:41:03.000ostracized cut off from community this is cultural marxism what i was talking about before they used
00:41:09.560it in COVID. They use it with the climate change. They use it with the trans stuff. They use it
00:41:15.420with Palestine. It's their playbook, their cultural Marxist playbook. And so what Danielle1.00
00:41:21.900Smith said there, well, I'm sure well-meaning, or maybe it is just a smokescreen, means absolutely
00:41:28.920nothing. But let's hear what else she has to say. Their own bodies, without fear of undue pressure
00:41:33.280or interference by government. The amended Bill of Rights will also strengthen property rights.
00:41:38.820another cornerstone of living in a free and democratic society the amendments will ensure
00:41:43.780that no albertan can be deprived of their property without due process of law and just compensation
00:41:49.520this is a reaffirmation of your right to own and enjoy the property that you've due process of law
00:41:55.920and with the right to compensation okay so laws are being changed all over the places we know
00:42:03.720ICLE is trying to change land use bylaws in every municipality in this country over 500 so far
00:42:11.880would that be what she's talking about when she says by law
00:42:16.680and when the government says we're going to take your land we're going to expropriate your land
00:42:22.340we're going to pay you fair market value for it what we decide fair market value is not you by
00:42:26.860the way now when the government tries to tell you what fair market value is you should never ever
00:42:32.320believe them because they don't know what fair any marxist government which it seems is all we
00:42:40.640have in canada does not follow the free market would they leave that land on sale for two months
00:42:48.680or three months to see exactly what the market will pay for it of course not they're just going
00:42:53.060to say well you know what this is comparable to this land this land this land this is what we're
00:42:56.660to pay you that's the final offer and that's it done so what she's saying here is again
00:43:04.660smokescreen means nothing let's move on to the next work so hard for there will also be an
00:43:11.400amendment to make clear that in alberta we respect the right of individuals to legally acquire keep
00:43:17.180and safely use firearms for many albertans firearms are critical to their livelihood and
00:43:22.380way of life. I personally feel that law-abiding firearms owners have been unfairly targeted by
00:43:27.260our federal government for decades, and it is my hope that these amendments will better protect
00:43:32.060the rights of our farmers, ranchers, hunters, and sport enthusiasts going forward. I'd like to
00:43:37.640share that in my view, these amendments to the Bill of Rights are not just legal changes.
00:43:41.900They are a reaffirmation of the values that make Alberta one of the freest jurisdictions on earth.
00:43:46.940They are about protecting our rights, our freedom. Okay, okay, okay. So look, the last thing, the gun
00:43:51.860thing yeah i can see that because trudeau wants your guns he wants your guns he hasn't figured
00:44:00.160out a way to get them yet that's the thing he's asked the the military they said no you can go
00:44:05.160pound sand we're not interested in going door to door and getting people's guns he asked canada
00:44:09.740post i believe at one point and they said no we're not doing that that's outrageous so he can't
00:44:16.680figure out a way to do it he's talked to i think the opp or at least he asked doug ford to talk
00:44:21.660to the opp in ontario or the rcmp nationally and they said no we're not doing that that's dangerous
00:44:28.320that you you want us to send officers and how many different homes
00:44:33.100how long would something like that take going to get guns going door to door
00:44:36.880what kind of a free country is that so trudeau talks and talks and talks about it but they
00:44:44.960They can't do it unless they send the military.
00:47:08.740Unless, of course, the left wing corporate media was playing that all over their BC newscasts last night, which could have been because, you know, they do not want any conservatives in power in their province.
00:47:19.740You can bet on that. But here's the latest results in polling in British Columbia.
00:47:24.520That election is about three weeks away now, and it looks like the conservatives are leading.
00:47:33.480Believe it or not, new data from Angus Reid Institute has found a statistical tie between
00:47:38.600the NDP and the Conservative Party in BC. The Conservatives have got 45% of the vote, the NDP
00:47:44.940has got 44% of the vote, and the Green Party, believe it or not, has got 10% of the vote.
00:47:52.680Now, keep in mind, keep in mind that this vote is province-wide and where the votes are placed is going to be the difference between who gets to form government or not.
00:48:07.740So what's been going on in British Columbia is obvious.
00:48:11.960Most of the conservative votes are outside of the cities.
00:48:15.660And when I say the cities, I mean Vancouver and Victoria, which is where most of the writings are.
00:48:22.420So what you may get, I think, how many seats do they have in BC? 93. So what it looks like right now is the NDP are going to get 47. The conservatives are going to get 45 and the Greens are going to get two.
00:48:38.360you know the greens will vote with the ndp every single time so it looks like it's going to be
00:48:45.320a now again this is according to polls and things could change because as the polling
00:48:50.180has continued these last three months especially since bc united or the liberal party of british
00:48:55.940columbia just kind of went uh the conservatives have picked up all of their votes plus they've
00:49:01.980picked up a lot of green voters as well surprisingly so the conservative uh share of the vote has been
00:49:07.360going up and up and up like crazy for the past few months in polling there, and it could continue
00:49:13.620on that trend. I think maybe we've hit a plateau here, though. The B.C. NDP, 44, and the Conservative
00:49:20.100Party, 45. So if it goes up for the Conservatives, that means the NDP comes down. It's possible they
00:49:25.720could win a very tight government, which would be awesome. I mean, can you imagine first day,
00:49:33.040bonnie henry you're fired see you later speaking about the vaccines
00:49:39.220the public health agency of canada is not alarmed by the trend by what trend what what
00:49:47.640tamara ugolini are you trying to tell us a trend there's a trend oh wait we got to go to the top
00:49:51.800here the public health agency of canada just confirmed the dire warnings of anti-vaxxers
00:49:56.380and conspiracy theorists oh in response to an order paper question from conservative mp
00:50:02.860Kathy Wagenthal, the agency released startling data acknowledging that booster recipients have
00:50:09.020a noticeably higher COVID-19 death rate than the unvaccinated. Of course, of course,
00:50:14.420they're cautioning people not to read into this too deeply, even though the data indicates a
00:50:19.140three to five fold increase in death rates among those with two or more vaccine doses compared
00:50:23.980to the unvaccinated across all data groups. While PHAC is not alarmed by this trend and wants you
00:50:30.600to consider the caveats, they ignore their own inherently skewed data definitions, which Tamara
00:50:36.060highlights in this full report. We're not going to give you the full report. We'll give you the
00:50:39.360shortened version of the full report, which is two minutes and 31 seconds. Here's Tamara.0.99
00:50:43.520Well, well, well. The Public Health Agency of Canada has just admitted that those with more
00:50:48.160boosters die at a higher rate than the unvaccinated. We're all in this together.
00:50:54.060Before Parliament took a summer recess, Conservative MP Kathy Wagenall tabled a question to Parliament
00:50:59.280requesting clarification on delays in reporting excess mortality data by Statistics Canada,
00:51:04.060the approval investigation processes for this data, communication with health authorities and
00:51:08.200the Prime Minister's office, discrepancies in mortality statistics, the handling of COVID-19
00:51:13.040death counts by vaccination status, and directives from the Privy Council office regarding this
00:51:18.920reporting. While many of her questions went entirely unanswered, the Public Health Agency
00:51:24.120of Canada did confirm that those with more COVID-19 shots were dying in higher numbers
00:51:30.160than those without, but says not to confuse this with the fact that more people were getting
00:51:35.680vaccinated, which they say skewed the data. Let's dig in. Based on cases following vaccination
00:51:41.520reports on the COVID-19 Epidemiology Update webpage from June 10th to August 28th, 2022,
00:51:48.100weekly COVID-19 deaths were as follows. Between June 13th to 27th, the average number of
00:51:54.100deaths reported was 23.3 among unvaccinated cases, 1 among not yet protected cases, 8.3 among
00:52:02.120partially vaccinated cases, 73.3 among fully vaccinated cases, and 144 among fully vaccinated
00:52:09.780cases with an additional dose. Between July 4th to 18th, the average number of weekly deaths reported
00:52:16.920was 13 among unvaccinated cases, 23.5 among fully vaccinated cases, 63 among fully vaccinated
00:52:24.200cases with an additional dose, and 20 among fully vaccinated with two or more additional doses.
00:52:29.640Between July 25th to August 29th, the average number of weekly deaths reported was 28.7 among
00:52:36.340unvaccinated cases, seven among cases with primary series completed, 109.3 among cases with primary
00:52:43.660series completed and one additional dose, 46.3 among cases with a primary series completed
00:52:49.900and two or more additional doses. That's upwards of three to five fold differences between the
00:52:56.000unvaccinated and those having either two or more shots across all date categories. The Public
00:53:02.240Health Agency of Canada confirms this in their order paper question response. Across all weeks
00:53:07.480in the time period of interest, the number of deaths were highest among those with a primary
00:53:12.380series and one additional dose. So this is the data that we have for you, but don't believe it
00:53:20.500because it's skewed. That's what the Public Health Agency of Canada wants you to believe.
00:53:26.220Do not believe your own eyes and ears. Here's an interesting piece from the Brownstone Institute
00:53:31.640that was sent to me earlier today, I thought dovetailed nicely with that story there from
00:53:36.620Tamera Ugolini. A vaccine manufacturer based in India launched a defamation proceeding against
00:53:43.260researchers who published a study that reported adverse events in people following their vaccinations.
00:53:50.720The manufacturer also sued the editor of the international journal that published the study
00:53:56.040and demanded that the offending article be retracted immediately. The study at the center
00:54:01.520of the controversy is a post-marketing safety analysis of Covaxin, one of India's homegrown
00:54:06.880COVID-19 vaccines. The researchers concluded that serious adverse events of special interest
00:54:12.140after vaccination might not be so uncommon after all. And the majority of AESIs in people persisted
00:54:19.780for a significant period. Of the 635 participants involved, one-third reported developing one of
00:54:25.960these conditions such as new onset skin disorders, nervous system disorders, and menstrual and ocular
00:54:32.320abnormalities. Serious AESI such as stroke and Guillain-Barre syndrome were experienced by one
00:54:40.260percent of the participants, but no causal link could be established in the study. The researchers
00:54:45.040called for enhanced awareness in larger studies to carefully examine the potential for long-term
00:54:49.820harms of this shot. The study was published in the journal Drug Safety May 13th of this year after it
00:54:55.740was examined by two independent peer reviewers and the editor of the journal, but they got sued
00:55:00.700anyway, or at least the attempt to sue them, scare them, was brought on by one of the pharmaceutical
00:55:08.900manufacturers. They will stop at nothing. Here's an interesting substack by Jeffrey Saxon. Jeffrey
00:55:16.200Saxon is a health journalist, a researcher, and a writer appearing in his weekly segment,
00:55:20.680the jackson report on the high wire with dell big tree recently now this is kind of disturbing
00:55:26.520actually because i did this before covet started i'm adopted so i wanted to see if if there were
00:55:31.480any relatives out there that i shared dna with and so i wasn't 23 and me it was the other one
00:55:38.920that i did so my stuff is already in their system which sucks anyway recently all of 23 and these
00:55:45.640independent directors resigned from its board. The exact specifics of the move were shrouded in
00:55:51.560relative corporate secrecy. The popular genetic testing company's co-founder, Ann Wojcicki,
00:55:57.260had been jockeying to take the company private. The directors said their departures were for the
00:56:01.940best due to Wojcicki's concentrated voting power and a clear difference of opinion
00:56:05.860on the company's future. This is according to the Associated Press. Starting in 2006,
00:56:11.44023andMe was the first company to offer what are called autosomal DNA tests, which analyze the
00:56:17.520chromosomes you inherit from both parents. Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum had an eye on 23andMe
00:56:24.960from its inception, choosing the genetics company to be the World Economic Forum's 2008 technology
00:56:30.540pioneer. Forbes described the company as one of the world's hottest startups for its meteoric rise
00:56:35.700and star-studded celebrity spit parties at davos and new york fashion week the early facade of
00:56:42.920giving up your genetic information for fun quickly evaporated what started as a front-facing
00:56:48.400designer genetics company for consumers was aggressively angling in the background to
00:56:52.500towards becoming a full-fledged biotech player collaborations with pfizer pfizer gsk and others
00:56:59.480to use 23andme's consumer genetic data for drug development signaled the company had aims
00:57:04.300other than low-level boutique ancestry musings we have real labs what jicky company founder and ceo
00:57:12.780said in an interview last year scientists pipettes doing functional genomics experiments we have
00:57:19.060100 people doing therapeutics research we've gone entirely from genetic data hypothesis
00:57:23.920early research to filing an ind and actually in human studies with a phase 2a program
00:57:29.540the stark reality of having large swaths of highly prized genetic information available
00:57:38.600in the digital age came in focus as covid hit as the public's awareness was kept complacent
00:57:44.240with childlike interpretations of what genetic testing can accomplish governments and international
00:57:48.500players were storming the gates rapidly expanding artificial intelligence machine learning
00:57:54.240and quantum computing were now meeting with genetic and biological research for competitive
00:57:58.840leverage espionage and even global control of humanity jeez where are we man i just got to take
00:58:08.040a step back from this for a second like whoa what in 2021 a report by the u.s national counter
00:58:15.660intelligence and security center warned biotech can be misused to create virulent pathogens that
00:58:21.540can target our food supply or even the human population genomic technology used to design
00:58:29.940disease therapies tailored to an individual can also be used to identify genetic vulnerabilities
00:58:35.260in a population large genetic databases to allow people's ancestry to be revealed and
00:58:40.900crimes to be solved also can be misused for surveillance and societal repression
00:58:46.000good grief in particular the intel reports cites china as a primary threat to this
00:58:55.980global data grab as they already operate a domestic military civil fusion policy and
00:59:00.960a national intelligence law requiring all chinese entities to share technology and information with
00:59:06.100the prc military intelligence and security services oh it's going to be like that0.98
00:59:10.700very soon here don't worry about it we'll catch china
00:59:15.48023andme the private sector's genetic testing front runner paid little heed to these u.s
00:59:22.340intelligence warnings claiming their customers genetic info was secure yet looking at the top
00:59:27.760direct to consumer genetic testing companies including 23andme consumer reports found in
00:59:32.2202022 the company services over collect personal information about you and overshare some of your
00:59:38.020data with third parties. CR's privacy experts say it's unclear why collecting and then sharing
00:59:43.740much of this data is necessary to provide you the services they offer. They can track us
00:59:51.820through our DNA. I wonder if they're trying to track Trump through his DNA. They got to be able
00:59:56.580to find him somehow, some way. Are they using satellites? Are they using drones? Are they using
01:00:01.720dna technology dan bongino in this clip says donald trump is being fellas let's go so guys
01:00:11.240listen this morning the suspect in the second sadly we've got to like delineate which assassination
01:00:18.800plot we're freaking talking about because president trump is being hunted
01:00:24.280i use that word deliberately some people will know what i mean if they're listening
01:00:31.980some people who really care listen to me
01:00:36.200listen to me trump is being hunted by professionals who know exactly what they're doing
01:00:46.080and because i hate teases is the secret service compromised now i know you say well dan you
01:00:53.580brought that up last week is there a mole whether intentional or unintentional in the secret service
01:00:58.020i'll talk about that but some someone let's just say who can be trusted
01:01:06.700i spoke to last week at the end of the week has informed me that their communication system for
01:01:15.500the secret service may be almost entirely compromised in other words people trying to
01:01:22.300hunt and kill Donald Trump may know more about what Donald Trump is doing than Donald Trump is
01:01:26.560doing. Folks, we got a serious problem. And the problem is the people in charge of the
01:01:33.440Secret Service right now are not serious people. The people at the top are too busy trying to
01:01:38.460cover up their own role in the substandard security plan for President Trump. Nothing
01:01:43.460is going to change. We are in real trouble. I'm not trying to scare anyone. I'm not trying to
01:01:48.120panic anyone i'm trying to tell you this isn't over you thought it was over after the first one
01:01:52.860we had the second one you thought it was over after the second one folks there's more he is
01:01:57.860being hunted right now now to a neighborhood crime alert for hang on a minute a few weeks ago in the
01:02:11.200debate we were kind of watching parts of it here live on the show remember that and then he started
01:02:17.580talking about, they're eating pets in Springfield. And I went, oh my God, what are you doing? What
01:02:23.980are you doing? Now, I still stand by that. He probably shouldn't have said that on a national
01:02:28.960debate. On the other hand, because he said that in a national debate, millions and millions of
01:02:34.860people started paying attention to Springfield, Ohio. And other people started finding stories
01:02:40.860that go back a ways regarding pets being captured killed in springfield ohio including this story
01:02:48.480it goes back this is from news for jacksonville florida goes back to november the 14th of 2022
01:02:56.880look at this pet owners in springfield oh no i gotta reload this now come back
01:03:02.320please come back there go pet owners in springfield on edge after don't play automatically
01:03:08.760all right i'll start again pet owners in springfield on edge after multiple
01:03:15.700family cats disappear including two later found dead in a dumpster ashy the cat was the latest
01:03:22.760cat abducted in the neighborhood neighbors say so again this video goes back almost two years
01:03:31.520this report from Jax 4 in Jacksonville regarding pets going missing in Springfield, Ohio.
01:03:39.400In the Springfield neighborhood, after really a disturbing incident caught on camera,
01:03:45.400the owner of this cat tells News for Jax Ashy was attacked and killed on her front steps
01:03:52.380and then taken Saturday night. This happened on Red Wing Street near Maine. This comes as
01:03:57.860Springfield neighbors say several cats have gone missing recently.
01:04:02.320News for Dr. Porter Eric Avanias spoke to one witness, and we want to warn you, the details are disturbing.
01:04:09.460Multiple incidents of in- and outdoor cats coming up missing have one thing in common.
01:04:14.920A neighbor who witnessed the latest incident says he pulled out his cell phone and recorded something he could not believe.
01:04:21.220Saturday night around 11 a suspect described as a skinny man believed to be in his mid to early 30s with a thin mustache wearing all black clothing and black boots was seen attacking a family's cat named Ashy.
01:04:32.380Carlos Spencer witnessed the incident while sitting in his car across the street.
01:04:35.980He says Ashy was sitting on her owner's front steps when the man first walked past the home and placed a white tarp on the ground.
01:04:42.060And he came back and started coaxing the cat like, you know, communicating the cat.
01:04:47.620And once he put his hand up, he just grabbed it.
01:04:51.220quickly took it down, walked it over here, and just kneeled on top of it.
01:04:55.880Spencer says that's when he took out his cell phone
01:04:58.040and started recording video of the man attacking the cat.
01:05:00.740I was able to film him, bound the cat some kind of way,
01:05:04.880and put it in a plastic tarp and walk away.
01:05:08.660This is a surveillance video from another neighbor's house
01:05:10.960showing the man walking down Red Wing Street.