The Shadoe Davis Show - October 01, 2025


Sept. 30th⧸2025- End of Free Speech?! With John Carpay of The JCCF


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per minute

147.13

Word count

10,456

Sentence count

243

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

23

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 So
00:00:06.940 .
00:00:15.280 .
00:00:18.360 .
00:00:23.600 .
00:00:23.960 Thank you.
00:00:53.960 Thank you.
00:01:23.960 Thank you.
00:01:53.960 Thank you.
00:02:23.960 We'll be right back.
00:02:53.960 guitar solo
00:03:23.960 guitar solo
00:03:53.960 hello everybody and welcome it is shadow at night for tuesday september 30 of 2025 before we begin
00:04:02.840 tonight i would like to give a warm loving birthday greeting to my son matthew who is turning 40 today
00:04:10.680 40 i know it's crazy but i was 20 years old when he was born so happy birthday my boy i love you
00:04:22.040 very much and hopefully i'll see you soon maybe thanksgiving grandma's been talking about it
00:04:30.440 john carpe is on the show tonight president of the justice center for constitutional freedoms
00:04:34.760 we have a lot to cover tonight including liberal bills c8 and c9 that could i suppose wipe out
00:04:42.520 free speech in this country they've been trying to do this now for the past what four or five years
00:04:46.760 and they're trying again i often wonder what's their motivation of course we know their motivation
00:04:53.700 maybe there's some newcomers to the show tonight that don't know exactly what's going on and if
00:05:00.160 that's the case feel free to ask questions in comments you are always welcome to do so my
00:05:05.620 friends let's see who's watching tonight on all the different platforms on rumble we have daisy
00:05:11.320 may and cosford sea cross notable world peace goshi 26 lawrence green a little purple stone
00:05:18.460 dyson's there as well over on rumble no not rumble we just checked rumble over on facebook
00:05:24.540 it's shelly and lulu and luella clint watching and hannah alberta that's the home of lanny
00:05:29.260 mcdonald i think lucette is watching in saint jean baptiste on facebook on youtube remote viewer 57
00:05:36.520 asking we still have free speech technically yes we do there's this thing called the charter of
00:05:42.580 rights and freedoms i know there's a lot of people that say the liberals use use it to wipe their
00:05:47.240 butts but hey you want to know what we have justice center constitutional freedoms this is
00:05:54.340 what john does rosanne is watching tonight tony is watching on youtube from cold stream british
00:06:00.320 Columbia Kev from Canada NanoSilver is on Facebook.
00:06:03.680 Cassandra, John in Dufferin, Manitoba.
00:06:07.080 Linda's watching in Stratford, Ontario.
00:06:09.520 Whatever platform you are watching on tonight,
00:06:11.660 wherever you happen to be watching,
00:06:13.500 please give a like and a share.
00:06:16.060 Let's get this out to as many people as we possibly can.
00:06:19.800 Again, John Carpe, Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms,
00:06:23.340 joins the show right after this break.
00:06:25.720 The Shadow at Night livestream, as always,
00:06:27.420 is brought to you by CanadaNanoSilver.com.
00:06:30.320 I've been struggling with acne for a while and my mom brought me Silverceuticals and
00:06:38.820 I did not want to try it at first because I hate all that stuff on my face, but I'm
00:06:43.400 super glad I did because it hydrates my skin, doesn't leave me dry, I don't use coconut
00:06:47.360 oil anymore and I'm super glad my mom showed me it and I'm glad she's showing other people
00:06:51.980 because I think it does wonders.
00:06:53.340 Some of the other things I love about Silverceuticals is that it's natural, it's not a pharmaceutical
00:06:57.580 and it just makes your skin glow and feel super hydrated.
00:07:00.760 You don't feel like dry at all
00:07:02.820 and it just keeps that way for the entire day
00:07:05.160 and that's awesome.
00:07:06.320 I've had a few people comment on how my face has cleared up.
00:07:09.300 It's mostly been family members
00:07:10.840 and once my mom told them what I was using,
00:07:13.080 they finally started using it too
00:07:14.460 and they're seeing great results as well.
00:07:16.340 If a kid told me that they were struggling with skin issues,
00:07:18.700 I'd 100% recommend SilverCeuticals
00:07:20.820 because it fixes everything and it's amazing.
00:07:27.580 canada nanosilver.com 204-808-9292 hello john thank you for joining once again good to have
00:07:41.840 you back just glancing off to the side reading up more on the horrors of bill c8 but i'm really
00:07:48.480 glad to be with you and your viewers and your listeners this evening we forgot to mention the
00:07:53.580 horrors of bill c9 as well that one's equally as disturbing uh before we get into these two bills
00:08:00.100 which i guess resemble c63 the trudeau liberals had in place or tried to have in place a couple
00:08:06.640 of years ago we have to talk about truth and reconciliation today is the day after all it's
00:08:11.840 national holiday for goodness sakes it is and i released a video this morning uh saying that
00:08:19.480 Truth and reconciliation are both worthwhile and they should be pursued.
00:08:25.260 And we are not going to get reconciliation when we put out false claims or misleading claims, nor are we going to get reconciliation if we have race-based policies, like in British Columbia, where non-aboriginals or non-indigenous, whichever term, cannot access some public parks in British Columbia.
00:08:48.100 So if you are African-Canadian, Asian-Canadian, European-Canadian, whatever kind of non-Aboriginal that you are, you cannot get into public parks.
00:08:58.400 It's a racist policy, and things like that are not the way to move forward towards reconciliation between different ethnicities.
00:09:07.800 So that's gotten like 15,000 views.
00:09:10.660 That was a few hours ago.
00:09:11.800 It's probably got more now.
00:09:13.900 Very nice.
00:09:14.860 You know, it's interesting that they keep trying to force this.
00:09:18.480 I guess it's DEI on steroids on us.
00:09:22.360 From CP24 in Ontario, Dufferin Peel Catholic School Board told to change flag policy to mark Truth and Reconciliation Day.
00:09:30.140 They had already voted that the only flags they were going to allow on school grounds were the Canadian flag, the provincial flag, and I believe the municipality flag.
00:09:41.260 And they were taking all other flags down.
00:09:43.840 but the education minister ordered them last week
00:09:47.320 to put that flag back up.
00:09:49.660 What's going on with the governments in this country?
00:09:51.920 Like virtue signaling, insane.
00:09:54.740 Well, too many woke people elected
00:09:58.560 and the non-woke majority has to wake up a bit more
00:10:02.240 and see to it that we start winning some elections
00:10:05.540 at the municipal, provincial and federal levels
00:10:09.320 because I actually think most Canadians
00:10:12.680 don't support these racist policies,
00:10:16.100 like the BC Parks policy,
00:10:17.960 where, again, it's not every park in the province,
00:10:20.460 but if it's one park, that's too many,
00:10:22.780 where you actually get turned away.
00:10:24.420 You cannot enter the park 1.00
00:10:25.500 unless you are the correct race,
00:10:28.060 and some people get upset about the word race,
00:10:30.020 but okay, the correct ethnicity,
00:10:32.260 the correct ancestry, the correct descent.
00:10:35.620 I'm sure, without having done any polling,
00:10:38.580 I'm sure the overwhelming majority of people
00:10:40.780 in british columbia don't support race-based access to provincial parks they should be available
00:10:46.860 to all members of the public and so you know it's that majority has to elect people and it's the
00:10:53.940 same with like at a school board most parents do not want their five-year-old son johnny being told
00:11:00.060 that he might be a girl and that he could become a girl if he wants to and he might not really be a
00:11:05.180 boy it's like no don't don't tell my five-year-old son that you know but it's that majority that is
00:11:12.980 often uh not active in the democratic process and stays home and doesn't vote and is not involved
00:11:18.820 and you have the this kind of woke minority that exercises an awful lot of power federally
00:11:25.960 provincially municipally and at the school board level i tend to agree with you i'm not sure if
00:11:30.860 You've seen the Leger poll today.
00:11:32.380 I'm going to get into this later on in the show.
00:11:34.040 But they're saying that 38% of Canadians,
00:11:38.460 out of a poll of 1,600 people, this is larger than normal,
00:11:42.280 say that Canada first belongs to the Indigenous peoples.
00:11:48.360 Now, I think that's got the Canadian nudge team's fingerprints all over it,
00:11:52.740 but if that's the way Canadians feel,
00:11:57.900 then we should just give this country back.
00:12:00.860 Like, just give it back already.
00:12:03.240 The way that question is worded, though, you could have somebody who is adamantly opposed to racist policies that treat people differently according to their ethnicity, but as a kind of a general philosophical historical recognition that Canada first belongs to Indigenous people.
00:12:20.500 I mean, I don't know if that's, you get a full 38% that would be okay with policy like in British Columbia where non-Aboriginals are denied admission into public parks.
00:12:32.300 There's a lot of signaling out there though, John.
00:12:34.820 I mean, a lot of orange t-shirts I saw today and I was disappointed by that.
00:12:38.560 Not because I'm against reconciliation or truth or any of that stuff.
00:12:43.100 Just because there has been so many stories told, especially in the past 10 years.
00:12:49.000 some true maybe some not they're looking for bodies in a in a waste dump in winnipeg
00:12:56.060 they haven't been digging for any bodies in kamloops after how long has it been five or six
00:13:03.000 years now where they had us fly our flags at half mast for what seemed like forever more than four
00:13:08.160 years they the uh the the kamloops indian band announced in may of 2021 that they had found the
00:13:15.940 remains of 215 children the truth was they had done ground penetrating radar which can which will
00:13:23.920 beep for any anomaly it could be a tree stump it could be a stone it could be an irrigation pipe
00:13:29.360 any anomaly will set it off it is simply not capable of identifying human remains now a skeleton
00:13:38.520 would also set it off but so would a an irrigation pipe or a tree stump or a stone or a rock
00:13:45.000 so the they were given 12 million dollars 12.1 million by the federal government i don't know
00:13:53.040 if they got that money in 2021 or 2022 but they they got the 12 12.1 million and have not done
00:13:58.700 any excavating that 12.1 million was given specifically for excavation because that's
00:14:04.480 the only way you have to excavate the area and see if you find some skeletons and i would add
00:14:11.800 250 children. I mean, it's a fabrication. Now, I would concede there is a tiny chance that it
00:14:24.500 might be true, but why are they not doing the excavation? Where is their love for truth? It's
00:14:31.380 like they got all this political mileage out of the unsubstantiated claim that there's 215
00:14:38.260 bodies of children buried here and you know the prime minister goes ape and lowers the
00:14:42.860 the flags go down for 161 days uh churches are burned to the ground uh across canada arson so
00:14:52.120 hate crimes against churches and you know here we are four years later they have not done an
00:14:57.900 excavation their refusal their unwillingness to do an excavation suggests that the claim was false
00:15:04.860 does it prove that the claim was false no it doesn't prove it but it strongly suggests
00:15:09.260 that the claim of 215 bodies is a false claim and if it's not false why don't you do the
00:15:16.020 excavation let's find out and if you're if you're lying about this then what else have you been
00:15:20.940 lying about you know i got into an interesting conversation with the first nations dude
00:15:24.900 a few years ago near the manitoba legislature they had had some teepees set up they were
00:15:30.520 protesting on the east side of the building and so I took the opportunity I was down there to
00:15:36.820 talk to a couple of these guys had a relatively reasonable conversation but one guy came out of
00:15:43.500 one of the tents on site and said I don't agree with you at all they're bringing bodies back now
00:15:50.820 they're talking about bringing bodies back now I want to see my loved ones again and I said
00:15:55.820 nobody has done any excavation there where are you hearing this from please give me your source
00:16:02.520 and then he grumbled yelled gave me the finger and walked away and so this is a culture that is based
00:16:10.400 a lot on passing stories down from generation to generation to generation i think that we can
00:16:18.660 acknowledge all of us can acknowledge that and so having said that how much of that is true
00:16:25.880 and how much is not you know what i mean i mean i know you don't like to get into speculation here
00:16:33.420 but if we're talking about stories i don't know what all of this residential school stuff is
00:16:39.920 actually based upon except for somebody's writings or stories that have been passed
00:16:44.480 down from generations within that culture well the let's assume that it's a fact that the
00:16:53.840 majority of aboriginals that attended residential schools that they were treated poorly and let's 1.00
00:17:02.420 just assume that that's a fact okay and we don't hear from people that speak positively by the way 1.00
00:17:07.480 Because back around the year 2000, 2001, the Alberta Report magazine interviewed aboriginals who said that they were grateful for their residential school experience.
00:17:25.600 They said if we hadn't gone to residential schools, the person would say things like, I would never have learned to speak English.
00:17:31.420 I would never have learned to read and write, and I've had a successful career because I went to a residential school and I got an education that I would not have gotten if I had stayed on the reserve.
00:17:43.920 And so there was, today, I think, I shudder to think of what would happen to an Aboriginal person who spoke positively about his or her experiences.
00:17:54.580 There was already a lot of pressure 20 years ago, but now you've got this daily propaganda about the horrors, which I think in some cases, perhaps many, I'm not accusing anybody of lying. 0.86
00:18:09.320 And if somebody says that they were treated horribly in a residential school, who am I to disagree with them?
00:18:15.580 That's their experience.
00:18:17.840 However, I also think that people who had a positive experience are not going to feel very free today to talk about having had a positive experience at the residential school.
00:18:31.720 But even if nobody had a positive experience, the way forward is not by doing things like, first of all, lying is not helpful, especially if you're supposed to be about truth and reconciliation.
00:18:43.340 If you're about truth, don't come out with this unsubstantiated claim that you've got the bodies of 215 children when all you've done is ground penetrating radar and it may have beeped because of some irrigation pipes and tree stumps and rocks.
00:18:59.440 Okay, that's not truth to come out and make.
00:19:02.080 If you want to make a claim like that, you've got to back it up.
00:19:04.480 So, on the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation, what the Kamloops, Indian band, they've got some, I don't know their pronunciation formally, it's just shorthand reference, that's not right.
00:19:19.520 And that's not how you get reconciliation, by putting out false claims.
00:19:25.540 Corey Morgan, our friend, Western Standard journalist, was doing an expose, let's just say, on, was it SICMIC?
00:19:34.480 i can't seeka seeka right so that's how i hear it pronounced here in alberta uh that's that's
00:19:42.160 a common pronunciation i don't know if it's correct but it's yeah seeka seeka okay so he
00:19:46.760 he was through that reservation stayed on all the public roads and highways and uh videoed
00:19:52.520 his experience going through there and was issued two tickets by the government of that nation for
00:19:58.900 what trespassing or sorry trespassing they said how is that even possible it's political
00:20:05.240 intimidation and so the justice center is is funding lawyers to provide representation to
00:20:12.600 cory morgan we're gonna we're gonna plead not guilty and set a trial date and it you know
00:20:18.220 maybe they'll withdraw the tickets prior to trial um that's that's up to the crown prosecutor
00:20:25.260 to uh to decide but if we proceed to trial our lawyers will have opportunity to present arguments
00:20:32.880 about the there's no it's not private property it's not like somebody you know if you owned
00:20:40.300 you live on an acreage outside of town but it is private property just because there's a road
00:20:45.740 there doesn't mean i can drive on it but then you would put up a sign saying private property no
00:20:49.760 trespassing. The Siksika reserve is analogous to a municipality and you can drive through
00:20:57.340 the municipality. There's no sign there saying private property, you have to be a resident of
00:21:05.760 this reserve in order to be here. So all of that will come out at trial. If we go to trial, I mean,
00:21:13.400 what i've seen the federal government never wanted to have a trial on the arrive can app and uh they
00:21:20.860 they uh you know they didn't want their policies to go to trial because they would lose because
00:21:26.280 there's no science uh to back up these federal policies during the lockdown years yeah exactly
00:21:32.280 so um all the best to cory by the way he was actually i i don't want to call it an expose i
00:21:39.920 I think he was just recording what he saw as he drove through there.
00:21:44.560 And what he happened to catch was a lot of poverty and a lot of squalor.
00:21:48.160 And because of that, I guess the government, the chiefs, the band was offended.
00:21:54.820 And they sent him these tickets to teach him a lesson, which is a kind of a sad commentary on our society today.
00:22:02.520 We have to move on to Bill C-8, Bill C-9, John.
00:22:06.920 These are two bills that could pretty much strip all public speech away from Canadians.
00:22:14.020 Have they worded these bills?
00:22:15.380 And I know you've had a look at them.
00:22:16.440 Have they worded these bills in such a way that they would be difficult to prove their unconstitutionality?
00:22:24.680 Bill C-8 is about the amendments to the Telecommunications Act.
00:22:31.020 Telecommunications, the definition is basically anything non-paper.
00:22:36.920 So the internet, podcasts, videocasts, emails, all of that is telecommunications.
00:22:44.720 So a new power given to the Minister of Public Safety is that if he feels that there's any threat, but threat is not defined.
00:22:51.980 If there's a threat to telecommunications in Canada, and that could include interference, manipulation, disruption, degradation, none of these are defined.
00:23:03.340 he can then order an internet provider to temporarily or permanently stop providing a
00:23:10.240 service to any individual. So what this means is that the minister could see some content on the
00:23:16.520 internet, like maybe this podcast videocast that we are doing right now, and the minister could
00:23:23.120 think that your podcast, your show is disruptive or degrading or manipulative, and order your
00:23:31.280 internet provider to stop providing services to Shadow Davis. And further, another section of
00:23:40.420 Bill C-8, the minister may order internet service provider to do a specific thing or to refrain from
00:23:47.220 doing a specific thing. Now, all of this is based on a standard whereby the minister has a, if the
00:23:55.860 minister has a reasonable grounds to believe that there's a threat to telecommunications.
00:24:02.960 That's pretty vague. I mean, reasonable as defined by whom and what is the threat. And so
00:24:10.240 this is giving power to the minister. And these orders can be secret, by the way. So the minister
00:24:16.640 could order your service, your internet service provider to cut off Shadow Davis because you are,
00:24:23.520 what you're doing is posing a threat to telecommunications
00:24:27.860 in Canada because the minister feels that you're being manipulative,
00:24:31.840 disruptive, or there's degradation, all of it
00:24:35.740 undefined. Degradation to what?
00:24:38.260 What am I degrading?
00:24:41.920 Maybe there was degradation when
00:24:46.360 we didn't follow the truth and reconciliation narrative
00:24:50.240 the way that the government would want us
00:24:52.740 to follow that narrative.
00:24:54.220 Who knows? 0.91
00:24:54.440 So we just degraded all First Nations in Canada 1.00
00:24:58.200 and therefore we must be hauled off too sweet. 1.00
00:25:01.480 Yeah, okay.
00:25:02.320 And this can be a secret order,
00:25:03.720 so you're not allowed to talk about it.
00:25:05.140 You could get into further trouble
00:25:06.840 if you talked about the order.
00:25:09.360 So you couldn't even tell your friends,
00:25:11.860 you know, hey, I got kicked off the internet.
00:25:14.260 Well, you'd have to phone your friends, I guess,
00:25:15.640 if you were truly cut off.
00:25:16.660 You couldn't send emails anymore.
00:25:18.020 But, you know, maybe you could go next door to your neighbor and have your neighbor send out emails or something.
00:25:25.940 But then that could be illegal if the order says that it has to remain secret.
00:25:30.240 So this is very broad, extremely broad power.
00:25:35.320 Other provisions.
00:25:37.060 So you can have the secret termination of essential services.
00:25:41.780 There is nothing for due process or judicial review.
00:25:46.700 the judges can rely on secret evidence that people are not allowed to see
00:25:55.040 and it's just full of vagueness but it gives gives the minister these powers to issue secret
00:26:04.280 orders compelling telecommunications providers or internet providers to do or not do whatever
00:26:10.660 the minister wants so just horrific clearly this has not been worded in a way that would be
00:26:17.480 difficult to fight in court like they are definitely impinging upon the charter of
00:26:26.020 rights and freedoms in our freedom of speech this particular usually the best way to mount a court
00:26:32.460 challenge uh against legislation is to have an actual person who got a ticket or who got a fine
00:26:40.700 that's usually the best way because you've got a concrete case and and if you're if you don't have
00:26:47.340 that if you're if you're fighting the government in the abstract it's easier for the government to
00:26:51.640 win this particular bill is so bad that it would probably be worthwhile to challenge it as soon as
00:27:00.560 it is proclaimed into force, even before we have a proper applicant who has standing because he or
00:27:08.720 she got a ticket. It is so poorly worded. Now, they've only just introduced this bill
00:27:16.360 into the House of Commons, so it's got a ways to go to make it through unless they try to slam it
00:27:21.560 through, and they have done that in the past with other types of bills. I'm not sure if they could
00:27:26.200 do it with this one. It's got to go through first reading, second reading. It's got to go to the
00:27:31.460 Senate. They've got to do first reading, second reading, possible committee. So this could be,
00:27:35.760 I mean, they've been trying this for years, John, as you know.
00:27:39.280 But it's a fresh start of what could be a four-year mandate. Now, what's a little bit
00:27:43.800 different in this parliament, in the previous parliament, we had the NDP led by Jagmeet Singh
00:27:49.720 was always voting with the Liberals, and the Liberals governed pretty much as though they
00:27:54.300 had a majority and and and the the NDP supported bill c63 which of course has now died but they
00:28:01.180 could bring it back but that was the online harms act with a lot of horrible provisions in it
00:28:05.300 this time it's a little bit different the NDP I think has learned its lesson from the election
00:28:10.060 that it shouldn't be you know saying go liberals go and and be the the cheerleaders with the with
00:28:16.760 the red pom-poms uh you know always supporting the government I think they've learned their lesson
00:28:21.520 you know however uh to defeat this you would need the NDP and the bloc both would have to join the
00:28:28.740 conservatives to vote down the legislation and then you get into this whole election readiness
00:28:35.080 thing because the liberal government could say well it's a confidence vote so if you vote down
00:28:39.480 this bill we're going to determine that that is a vote of non-confidence no confidence in the
00:28:45.400 government which will trigger an election and so you know that's sort of something that the
00:28:51.120 liberals could counter with that and say, well, we'll turn it into a confidence vote.
00:28:54.400 And then the question becomes, are the, the block and the NDP, do they have enough money
00:29:00.040 in their bank accounts right now to be able to go to the people in an election?
00:29:05.120 And if, if one of the parties is scared of an election, they're going to abstain and
00:29:09.380 this could still get through.
00:29:10.780 The other more important thing though, is for people to contact their own MP, because
00:29:14.240 even liberal MPs, if they get a lot of pushback on C8 from their own constituents, they're
00:29:19.560 going to have second thoughts.
00:29:21.120 i hope so but again it's it's like the difference between and we've seen this before
00:29:27.900 voting in favor of what your constituents want or voting against your your boss your party right i
00:29:34.320 mean you can't do that if you're being whipped into voting a certain way let's move to uh c9
00:29:40.320 now this is the hate bill we've got sean frazier he's he's been the housing minister what else was
00:29:45.840 he what else what other files has he screwed up now he's the minister of justice and the ag
00:29:50.320 and here's what he had to say.
00:29:52.220 We also have realized through many conversations
00:29:54.660 with those impacted by hate crimes in Canada
00:29:56.720 that hate is not limited to the doorsteps
00:29:59.160 of our religious institutions
00:30:00.860 but is prevalent throughout the entirety of our communities.
00:30:04.880 We see it in our streets, we see it in our parks,
00:30:07.060 we see it in our grocery stores.
00:30:08.540 Frankly, we see it almost everywhere.
00:30:11.180 In addition to the campaign commitments
00:30:13.740 around the crimes of obstruction and intimidation,
00:30:16.220 we are moving forward with establishing a new crime of hate.
00:30:19.180 this will operate by layering on top of existing criminal offenses with a new
00:30:24.340 offense that will specifically target hate where that crime was committed
00:30:27.500 because of their motivation of hatred towards the victim you can imagine that
00:30:32.420 it may be more morally culpable for a person who assaults another not just
00:30:36.200 because of a personal problem they may have but because of their belonging to a
00:30:40.040 community if a person robs a store because the owner comes from a particular
00:30:44.440 group, or if a person commits harassment against someone who is seeking to attend university
00:30:50.020 classes merely because they belong to a particular community of faith or race.
00:30:55.720 This behavior is not just morally culpable.
00:30:59.300 The impact has reverberations through the entirety of a community, and I would argue
00:31:03.000 tears at the seams of the social fabric of the nation.
00:31:05.720 yeah so has it has anybody defined exactly what hate is yet aside from being a human feeling
00:31:15.480 it's you almost have to laugh whenever politicians or even the judges on the supreme court when they
00:31:22.480 try to define hatred they just trip all over themselves and they they they they do triple
00:31:27.940 backflips and weird contortions and try to pretend that it this is really clear and obvious when it
00:31:34.420 isn't so what one of the provisions in c9 it tries to uh give a little bit more definition to hate
00:31:42.420 so get this uh dislike and disdain is not hate however filification and detestation is hate
00:31:53.780 um you can you can discredit humiliate hurt offend people okay you can discredit humiliate
00:32:02.660 hurt and offend that is not hate and disdain and dislike is not hate but do not cross into the the
00:32:11.780 zone of detestation and vilification so it's an emotion and the other crucial thing is that
00:32:20.480 criminal code already section 718 of the criminal code already empowers judges to impose a more
00:32:27.400 severe sentence on a criminal so after conviction i mean prior to conviction you know they're not
00:32:33.980 looking into it whether there's hate or not but if somebody murder robbery sexual assault
00:32:41.000 whatever any any kind of crime shoplifting uh so when at the time of sentencing if the crime was
00:32:50.000 motivated by hate, the judge can impose a more severe sentence. Whether that's a good thing or
00:32:59.000 a bad thing is debatable, but that's already in the criminal code right now. So if you rob a store,
00:33:07.200 let's say a convenience store in the middle of the night, you walk in there with a knife or a gun or
00:33:10.880 a baseball bat or something and you, you know, order, you know, give me all your cash, otherwise 1.00
00:33:16.000 I'll kill you. If you take it to the next level, and let's say that the clerk is Korean or Somali 1.00
00:33:23.980 or East Indian or whatever, and you start saying a lot of racial slurs, you could get a harsher
00:33:32.340 sentence. That's already the law. Now, what this does is it takes that existing discretion that
00:33:37.960 judges already have, and it puts it on steroids, and they can actually increase the penalty from
00:33:44.120 where the maximum penalty was two years, it can become five.
00:33:47.460 Where the maximum penalty was five years,
00:33:50.460 the maximum penalty now becomes 10 years.
00:33:53.220 Where the maximum penalty was 14 years,
00:33:55.520 the judge can impose a life sentence
00:33:57.840 because of the addition of hate.
00:34:01.500 So it takes an existing provision and puts it on steroids,
00:34:07.060 makes it much bigger than what it was.
00:34:11.620 John, what are the, and I'm not going to ask for all of them, I'm sure there's many, but you're aware of most of the hate crime laws in effect in Canada right now, and are they even constitutional?
00:34:26.840 I mean, you can hate somebody or something, and suddenly you're guilty of a crime. It just makes no sense at all to me.
00:34:35.900 well the the hate speech provision section 319 of the criminal code it's a criminal offense to
00:34:45.060 willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group in public so private conversations are
00:34:51.760 exempt but uh identifiable group as per their race ethnicity national origin religion sexual
00:35:01.300 orientation gender identity gender expression um vaccination status doesn't count profession
00:35:09.060 doesn't count so you can woefully promote hatred against people that didn't get the covid shot
00:35:14.000 you can woefully promote hatred against bankers and lawyers but don't woefully promote hatred 0.73
00:35:19.420 against uh you know jews or muslims or gay people so wait a minute how are jews identifiable 0.83
00:35:30.220 from anybody else and you know if you're if you're on the internet saying that jews are you know 0.97
00:35:35.940 blankety blankety blank and the world would be a better place without them that potentially you 0.76
00:35:41.080 could face a criminal charge for hate speech whether whether jews are identifiable or not 0.88
00:35:47.240 but if you say bad things about jews or muslims or or christians or gay people or women or old 0.64
00:35:55.360 people. Ah, age. You can't say that all the old people should all be euthanized because they're 0.96
00:36:02.220 all terrible. I mean, you could face hate speech charges for that. So those are the laws on the
00:36:11.320 books right now? They were narrowly upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, but it was
00:36:17.000 a tight decision. It was four to three. Beverly McLaughlin and two other justices said that the
00:36:22.520 hate speech laws were unreasonable unjustified violations of free expression and uh so it was
00:36:30.440 a narrow decision so they have been uh they have been on the books but you don't it's not a crime
00:36:36.320 to to hate somebody but it it could become a crime if you willfully promote hatred against
00:36:41.540 an identifiable group and then what this bill does is that actually it removes the current
00:36:45.980 restriction normally for a crime it's the local police local crown prosecutors they make a decision
00:36:51.680 whether to prosecute or not right and police and prosecutors have a discussion and ultimately the
00:36:56.620 the crown prosecutor decides for the hate speech it has to be reviewed and approved by the attorney
00:37:03.580 general of the province right so if you say you live in in manitoba so the attorney general of
00:37:10.980 manitoba has to be reviewed and approved he has he or she has to give a green light to say yes
00:37:17.080 we're going to proceed with this hate speech prosecution that provision is getting turfed if
00:37:23.440 bill c9 passes so it's going to unleash a flood of where the police and crown prosecutors locally
00:37:29.980 they just make their own decisions and if they feel something's hateful they can proceed to
00:37:34.800 prosecute and the process is the punishment so you might be acquitted at the end of the day
00:37:39.620 it no longer needs to go before the attorney general for a review so that is one of the worst
00:37:45.980 aspects of bill c9 so again we have to go back to what is hate because one man's hate is another
00:37:53.880 man's whatever like i could say i hate the edmonton oilers or i hate the buffalo bills
00:37:59.800 whatever right and and somebody out there who may be a bills fan or an oilers fan could take
00:38:05.360 exception to that because i believe that this one can be reported anonymously as well am i correct
00:38:10.320 in saying that oh sure yeah no there's no particularly something posted on the internet
00:38:15.960 right if if the police get wind of it uh they can say look get a secretary at the police department
00:38:23.680 will swear an affidavit that that he or she saw this on the internet and it doesn't really matter
00:38:28.280 who the complainant was and it is subjective you know you take this slogan that we've heard a lot
00:38:34.240 since October 7th, two years ago with the massacre
00:38:39.200 of civilians in Israel by Hamas.
00:38:42.720 And there's a slogan, it's been around for a long time,
00:38:45.000 but it goes, quote, from the river to the sea,
00:38:47.100 Palestine will be free, end of quote.
00:38:49.600 Now, I know some Jewish people, they say that it's
00:38:52.800 definitely anti-Semitic, it's definitely hateful,
00:38:55.420 it's saying that there should be no Israel, 1.00
00:38:57.460 that the Jews should be driven out, probably killed, 0.99
00:39:02.000 and and so on okay and other people say no it's it's a political slogan it's pro-palestine it 0.99
00:39:08.900 means that there should be a palestinian state and palestine should be free but you know it's
00:39:14.100 we're not talking about exterminating jews or ethnic cleansing there's a perfect example of
00:39:19.240 what can be seen as uh hateful or not hateful by people who will disagree on that i just i'm not
00:39:27.660 understanding how they can legislate feelings and you know it just it really makes people and i
00:39:35.940 believe this is probably designed this way makes people want to walk on eggshells and really watch
00:39:43.020 what they say in public and on online right and it's very political though sean fraser when he
00:39:49.360 was introducing this he said that uh this is a response to rising anti-semitism islamophobia
00:39:56.080 transphobia and homophobia conspicuous by its absence he says nothing about the dozens of
00:40:03.700 christian churches that have been burned to the ground in recent years especially since that may
00:40:08.460 2021 uh the kamloops indian ban making this uh probably false claim of 215 bodies of children
00:40:16.900 discovered and then prime minister lowering the flags at half mast and the media unthinkingly
00:40:21.800 repeating the allegation as fact and now you've got you know corporations and universities and
00:40:27.620 everybody's repeating this as a fact when it's it's a claim that's probably false
00:40:33.340 so uh but the minister says nothing about the burning of churches right he's saying well we
00:40:38.340 got to have this new legislation because of anti-semitism islamophobia transphobia and
00:40:43.620 homophobia and again the it's all very subjective okay because if uh if a transgender person or
00:40:51.780 a gay person gets assaulted uh that's illegal it's criminal offense right so what we need to
00:40:58.460 do is apply the law equally uh for everybody uh but we don't need this new legislation 0.65
00:41:04.800 so what happens if i or anybody else goes online and says uh by the way trans kids don't exist 0.60
00:41:11.760 there's no such thing as trans gender it's delusional it's a mental illness that could 0.98
00:41:18.240 probably lad me in hot water well see here's the thing you talk about walking on eggshells see this 0.99
00:41:24.560 is going to chill your speech because if if if that is you know whether it's your opinion or not
00:41:29.100 but if if somebody wants to go on the internet and say transgender doesn't exist and it's a mental
00:41:34.200 illness they they might want to think twice because maybe you could face uh maybe you could
00:41:40.120 face hate hate crime uh willful promotion of hatred against uh the based on gender identity
00:41:48.920 gender expression so there could be uh there could be a problem there although that's a problem
00:41:56.840 that's already existed since 2017 when that legislation was amended to add um gender identity
00:42:05.300 and gender expression were added as grounds to race religion age uh so on and so forth
00:42:12.140 but the local police and local crown prosecutors will now have this new discretion to prosecute
00:42:19.160 which previously had to first be reviewed by the attorney general before prosecution could go ahead
00:42:25.000 do you see a day john when like in the uk i'm sure you've seen many of the videos from the uk
00:42:32.000 where you've got police knocking on doors.
00:42:34.500 There was a recent one that came out, 1.00
00:42:35.900 a couple of female cops knocking on somebody's door 0.92
00:42:38.760 claiming that they need to seize a cell phone 1.00
00:42:41.660 because this woman's daughter had looked
00:42:43.860 at a social media post. 0.80
00:42:46.580 Do you see that coming here if these laws are passed?
00:42:50.280 Very easily and very quickly.
00:42:52.100 If you combine the Bill C-2,
00:42:54.700 which they call the Strong Borders Act,
00:42:56.200 but it should be called the Strong Surveillance Act,
00:42:58.640 all kinds of provisions there
00:42:59.900 that allow governments to seize computers
00:43:03.500 or to look at computers without a warrant.
00:43:07.720 Here, the minister can order the production of information
00:43:12.340 without a warrant, okay?
00:43:14.160 This is sort of going back to C8.
00:43:16.480 Under Bill C8, the Minister of Public Safety
00:43:19.280 can issue an order that you, Shadow Davis,
00:43:23.380 I want you to turn over this or this.
00:43:25.260 I want you to do this.
00:43:26.100 I want you to refrain from doing that.
00:43:28.080 This amounts to a search power
00:43:29.800 without a warrant and what we're and and bill c2 has got all kinds of search powers given to
00:43:38.440 government where they can search without a warrant why this is important uh and canada post
00:43:43.600 john they've sold that bill c2 as something to strengthen the borders right to stop all of these
00:43:52.380 and there are sections of it just to strengthen the borders but they've added in a whole bunch
00:43:56.320 of stuff has nothing to do with borders right like the authorized access to information act
00:44:01.680 is a part of c2 that gives government officials of all kinds not necessarily not just police
00:44:08.700 this right to demand information without a warrant and it's repute and and gives uh canada post can
00:44:17.240 open up letter mail uh without a warrant and this is really dangerous because we've got 158
00:44:24.220 rule tradition in Canada where the starting point is we have privacy rights and property rights and
00:44:30.420 they cannot be infringed by police unless and until the police they have to go before the court
00:44:35.220 with a an affidavit sworn saying that you know let's say Mark Smith you know no no offense to
00:44:42.060 any Mark Smiths that are listening but we think that Mark Smith is possessing and distributing
00:44:46.280 child pornography on his computer and so we want to do surveillance on his we want to get into his
00:44:53.520 computer system and we want to monitor his emails and we and we want to bust into his home when he's
00:44:59.560 not suspecting it and arrest him and take his computer and but they have to swear an affidavit
00:45:04.980 on which they can subsequently be cross-examined if there's any falsehoods in it and then the judge
00:45:10.080 can read the affidavit and say okay well you get a search warrant it's limited only to mark smith
00:45:15.080 and there's certain terms and conditions that's the way we've been doing it for 158 years we've
00:45:19.960 been respecting privacy rights, property rights, while still giving police the power to do good
00:45:27.380 law enforcement, but by targeting a search warrant at, you know, one person or maybe one criminal
00:45:34.820 gang or something, right? So warrantless searches are a huge problem that is leading us to a police
00:45:43.200 state so between c2 c8 and c9 we could find ourselves in a very authoritarian situation
00:45:52.080 very very quickly yeah because uh c well and then c63 which has not yet been reintroduced but we've
00:46:00.300 heard you know c63 can get you under house arrest wearing an ankle bracelet based on a neighbor's
00:46:07.320 suspicion that you might commit a speech crime uh bill c63 the online harms act which may be
00:46:13.280 reintroduced also has provisions to empower the canadian human rights commission to uh it just
00:46:22.560 broadens the the definition of hate way beyond uh what's already pretty vague in the criminal code
00:46:28.960 so if that's reintroduced you have bill the 289 and a new version of c63 we will be very likely
00:46:36.720 just like the united kingdom and uh have police knocking on the doors of canadians uh because
00:46:43.680 their speech is deemed to be islamophobic or homophobic or transphobic or or anti-semitic
00:46:51.240 or whatever uh it's you know there's a lot of people who have been messaging me in the last
00:47:00.180 few days shadow you haven't talked about any of these things i said relax i'm having john garpe
00:47:04.060 on soon we're going to cover all of this stuff you've been talking about the ostrich farm the
00:47:07.360 ostrich farm i say yeah i know they're saying that's a distraction i have been bringing these
00:47:11.580 things up but the way you talk about them this evening john these things are like terrifying
00:47:18.720 and everybody in this country right now should be chilled to the bone wow well people should
00:47:26.480 contact their MP and I don't care if your MP is liberal conservative block uh green NDP I think
00:47:35.480 I've got all five parties in the house right now uh because they need to hear from their constituents
00:47:42.200 now the nature of our democracy it's the conservatives are probably going to vote
00:47:47.480 against all these bills anyway because they're the opposition but they should still hear from
00:47:51.260 their constituents to enlighten and inform that that mps become more informed about these issues
00:47:58.060 but for the other parties you know if the ndp and the bloc and the conservatives are all against
00:48:04.040 this bill then uh it can't pass and if there's one or two or or 10 or 20 or 30 liberals that
00:48:11.800 are against this because it's such an assault on privacy and civil liberties uh you know we we have
00:48:18.900 to we have to contact our own member of parliament and tell him or her what our concerns are this is
00:48:24.880 going to call for speculation and you feel free to to not speculate but why are they doing this
00:48:31.740 i mean i ask these questions and with every level we get to i always have to say why what is the 0.99
00:48:40.380 rationale behind this because these people by and large i mean i've met some stupid politicians 0.95
00:48:46.440 i'll be honest but i i say that these people by and large are not stupid they've read the wording 0.99
00:48:53.980 of these bills they understand what they're trying to force through parliament they know what they're
00:48:58.700 doing so i have to ask why like do they want to be authoritarians yes they want to they want to
00:49:06.040 enforce a woke ideology and when you have free speech you can preach your own uh ideology and
00:49:13.520 you can try to persuade people, right? So if I'm woke and I want to get you to love equity,
00:49:19.840 diversity, inclusion, and blah, blah, blah, you know, I can persuade you and try and come over,
00:49:24.080 but I can't really force you. And so when you get rid of the free speech, then you can force this
00:49:32.540 agenda on Canadians and you can say, well, you know, we've got these woke ideas, everything's
00:49:37.980 about equity diversity inclusion and everything's about uh group rights and everything's about
00:49:44.600 oppression and so our whole universe we're looking at it through the lens uh that everything's all
00:49:51.580 about oppression and men are oppressing women and straight people are oppressing gay people 0.90
00:49:56.240 and colonizers are oppressing aboriginals and you know jews are oppressing muslims
00:50:04.300 in the middle east and etc everything's all about oppression now again i i i'm a free speech
00:50:10.040 advocate i i think anybody wants to promote that doctrine like go ahead and promote it but you see
00:50:16.380 now you've got a lot of people in government and in uh law societies uh the medical establishment
00:50:23.180 the bureaucracies federal provincial municipal bureaucracies you have lots and lots of people
00:50:28.320 who believe this stuff and now they want to impose it so one way to impose it right is is through
00:50:34.000 this kind of legislation you can silence people who disagree with woke ideology who are going to
00:50:39.360 say no uh you know i believe in the dignity of every human being i believe in free speech i
00:50:45.460 believe in freedom of religion i believe that the state should be our servant not our master
00:50:50.320 uh blah blah like you you can you can use the power of the state to silence your enemies
00:50:55.900 and so it appears to be that that this is where we're going where the government can
00:51:02.580 you know turn off your internet if they don't like what you're saying this is marxism this is
00:51:09.940 uh totalitarian dictatorship neo-marxism it's the old marxism was capitalist versus
00:51:16.260 proletariat the new marxism it's just it broadens out the oppression that it's all about
00:51:21.740 men oppressing women and uh light-skinned people oppressing dark-skinned people everything's about
00:51:27.780 oppression yeah critical theory and whatnot and you know i wonder why more people especially the
00:51:35.820 conservative party of canada this is something i was talking about on the show last night as a
00:51:39.420 matter of fact because polyev was caught on camera a couple years ago when he was out doing the
00:51:44.520 hustings with jamil giovanni in oshawa where he called trudeau a marxist uh he was talking to a
00:51:50.180 woman it got caught on camera global news did this big thing about polyev calling trudeau a marxist
00:51:55.760 And they brought on some university professor saying, no, he's not a Marxist, even though he has economic policies that resemble Karl Marx.
00:52:04.180 He's not a Marxist.
00:52:05.920 But I thought, well, you know, it's time to start calling this stuff out for what it is.
00:52:09.800 And yet, for some reason, the one hope that we have, politically speaking, the Conservative Party of Canada at this stage of the game still refuses to tell the truth.
00:52:21.600 Why do you think that is?
00:52:22.880 you'd have to you'd have to ask the uh conservative mps uh i know especially the
00:52:30.640 leader what you know what they're thinking what what was the conservative party thinking
00:52:34.280 when they joined uh the the woke folk in denouncing the uh alternatif uh for deutschland
00:52:44.180 the AFD, which is a conservative, small C
00:52:48.920 conservative party that anybody can go
00:52:53.360 online, read their platform and it reads
00:52:55.400 like, you know, somewhere halfway between
00:52:57.900 the Conservative Party of Canada and the
00:52:59.900 U.S. Republican Party, but it's kind of a
00:53:02.360 run-of-the-mill, small C conservative
00:53:05.980 party and you get Pierre Poilierva joins
00:53:10.160 the CBC and calling it, you know, far
00:53:12.260 right yeah by the way the cbc i had a column on this uh recently every anybody who disagrees with
00:53:19.800 the cbc is far right i mean you could be a conservative you're far right you could be
00:53:25.280 libertarian far right you could be a anti-marxist non-marxist you're far right everybody's far
00:53:30.340 right they said charlie kirk was far right charlie kirk was a u.s republican who had
00:53:36.320 predictable positions predictable beliefs about uh abortion about affirmative action about quotas
00:53:44.720 about the economy about national security about whatever conservative yes you know libertarian
00:53:51.520 perhaps far right the cbc denounces charlie kirk as being a fascist and right so if you disagree
00:53:58.060 with them you're far right fascist and it was disappointing to see pierre polyevra joining
00:54:04.360 the CBC, the liberals, the NDP, and denouncing
00:54:08.560 a conservative party in Germany. It's just ridiculous. 0.98
00:54:12.080 Pierre Polyev and his party were all over the truth and reconciliation 0.87
00:54:15.960 today, and whatever indigenous members they have in that party
00:54:20.200 were all over the internet today saying, well, truth and reconciliation,
00:54:23.980 it's time for our country to come together in love and peace. And I agree with
00:54:27.980 all of that. They're just doing it wrong. Oh, I agree with that too. We should
00:54:31.860 we should be coming together in love and peace, but we don't do that by divisive race-based laws.
00:54:37.960 It creates resentment. Okay. If you, if you're Aboriginal and I'm not, and you've got special
00:54:43.500 hunting and fishing rights, or if your kid gets an extra $5,000 for going to university and my
00:54:48.920 kid doesn't get that, or, you know, if you have exclusive Aboriginal access to a public park and
00:54:54.280 i don't any of that uh maybe you and i would still be friends in spite of that but you know
00:55:02.640 in terms of social harmony you don't get social harmony by giving people different rights based
00:55:07.740 on their ethnicity or ancestry you certainly don't uh one more thing john before we wrap up
00:55:13.080 tonight we haven't talked about chris barber and big red yet um the government wants it
00:55:18.020 They've had a couple of hearings, and by it, I mean the truck, Big Red.
00:55:23.780 I'm not sure if you heard back from Chris or his lawyers yet regarding this situation.
00:55:29.060 I know they've had a couple of hearings, and the latest one Chris's family was involved in.
00:55:36.820 I just checked my email there.
00:55:39.340 on the forfeiture of Chris Barber's truck, Big Red,
00:55:44.600 which has been in his family for two decades or more
00:55:48.500 and is his livelihood.
00:55:51.380 On that issue of forfeiture,
00:55:53.100 so that's separate from the sentencing, okay?
00:55:54.880 So the Tuesday, October 7th,
00:55:57.220 there's going to be a verdict.
00:55:59.800 The court is going to rule on a sentence,
00:56:02.200 hopefully no sentence,
00:56:03.240 but there's going to be a ruling issued
00:56:05.120 on October the 7th for Chris Barber,
00:56:08.900 The Crown's demanding eight years.
00:56:10.840 Tamera Leach, the Crown's demanding seven years for conviction on mischief.
00:56:17.900 Their defense lawyers being funded by the Justice Center and also by the Democracy Fund,
00:56:26.680 their defense lawyers are saying there shouldn't be any prison time.
00:56:30.100 That's coming up very soon, next week, October the 7th.
00:56:33.080 Now, this whole forfeiture application, next arguments are taking place in late November, the 25th or 26th, and then a decision thereafter.
00:56:43.080 So it's kind of a two track. You got the sentencing thing and then you got the forfeiture of the truck. Two separate things.
00:56:49.300 So the forfeiture of the truck, there is no precedence for this because they didn't impound the thing in the first place, right?
00:56:53.980 that's correct and the the criminal code does authorize the crown to apply for
00:57:00.360 the confiscation of a a tool used for crime so the legal issue is was was the tool i'm sorry i
00:57:08.140 have to laugh a tool used for crime i mean come on a knife a gun but you know they want it because
00:57:15.060 it's a symbol of freedom for millions of probably that's probably driving the prosecution but the
00:57:21.420 The legal issue before the court is, was this truck used to commit the crime?
00:57:31.500 And so Chris Barber's lawyer, as I understand it, is arguing that, no, he parked it where directed to park it by police.
00:57:40.280 You know, he, like so many other truckers in Ottawa at the time, were following police instructions, park it here, don't park it there.
00:57:46.700 so and when police asked him to move it he did move it uh there was a delay because and i don't
00:57:54.860 know if the delay was a few minutes or a few hours but there was a delay because uh chris felt it was
00:57:59.880 unsafe to move his truck at that particular moment but he did move the truck when requested
00:58:05.300 and you know hopefully those legal arguments will carry the day because it would be very tragic for
00:58:11.620 man to to lose uh what his livelihood depends on they're going to ground if they win this they're
00:58:19.160 going to grind that truck up into mulch and they're going to videotape it and they're going
00:58:23.320 to make it a freaking special on the cbc i i guarantee you that's what if they have any 0.62
00:58:28.640 brains they'll they'll try to sell it at an auction and and not uh not destroy it i'm i've
00:58:34.500 I've heard it's worth $150,000 and so, you know, even,
00:58:39.360 even if we sold it at two thirds of its value, but we'll have to hope that the
00:58:46.120 court will listen to reason and we'll just look at the facts and you know,
00:58:53.160 October 7th will be a big day. And then yeah,
00:58:58.200 afterwards the fate of big red will be a big decision as well.
00:59:02.640 John thank you for joining the show tonight really appreciate it hopefully we'll get you back soon
00:59:06.940 thanks for having me on your show have a good rest of the night you too there's John Carpe
00:59:11.440 Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms I have more for you and I'll be right back
00:59:17.140 shadow at night live stream brought to you by canadananosilver.com
00:59:21.040 silver is amazing it has several natural health benefits and it's been used for hundreds of years
00:59:26.460 for health and healing that's the main reason they made silverware from silver but seriously
00:59:31.440 this nano silver from silverseuticals is the best and safest silver you can find.
00:59:35.680 There are hundreds of studies and reports on it. I've read some of the studies myself and it's
00:59:39.840 mind-blowing. One of the things that sets silverseuticals apart is that it washes out
00:59:43.840 of your body in 24 hours. No silver buildup and no turning blue. And it won't even harm the good
00:59:49.520 bacteria your body needs. It's so effective they can use very small concentrations of silver,
00:59:54.960 like 10 and 32 parts per million, and still outperform other silvers that have up to 3,000
01:00:00.160 parts per million. It's safer and more effective at the same time. It is an incredibly small
01:00:05.940 particle that is small enough to work through your body, but big enough not to fall out
01:00:09.880 of suspension. They infuse it into almost all of their products. It works in facial
01:00:13.720 serums, toothpaste, gels, and even gummies that work to help your immune system.
01:00:30.160 all the politicians were out virtue signaling today we come together to recognize the national
01:00:41.320 day for truth and reconciliation and orange shirt day this day honors the survivors of residential
01:00:48.440 schools their families and the children who never came home it's a time to reflect on the lasting
01:00:55.960 impacts of these institutions and to acknowledge the truth of our shared history today is a
01:01:03.640 powerful reminder of the importance of standing in solidarity what truth is that doug
01:01:14.120 can you tell us
01:01:17.080 no then stop the lying stop the virtue signaling it's
01:01:22.920 it is just so transparent and contrived with our indigenous communities across the country
01:01:30.720 let us take this day to remember to learn and to move forward together thank you 0.98
01:01:37.520 no thank you a couple of other things here before we get into the extension tonight we've got a
01:01:46.780 choice for you all access nighthawks at shadow davis.com now i know excuse me we have a part
01:01:53.220 two to do tonight but we could do it tomorrow and run something else tonight i found something
01:01:59.780 that's actually very very very interesting that you guys might want to see instead
01:02:04.860 so if you're not a member at shadow davis.com at all access member go ahead and become one it's
01:02:12.460 like 12 or 13 bucks a month and if you get the all-annual pass it's cheaper you save like two
01:02:17.680 months yeah i think it works out to two months uh on the price of your regular monthly so it's a
01:02:25.600 good deal you get all the extra content and more community back there as well and if you are going
01:02:30.000 to join uh and by the way i do have to say you guys that it really does help to support the show
01:02:36.680 by becoming an all-access member at shadow davis.com just like it's spelled right down here
01:02:41.820 at the bottom of the screen make sure you join telegram first of all if you're not a member on
01:02:46.560 telegram or if you haven't gotten to count on telegram get one and then join the shadow at
01:02:52.320 night community there it's warm welcoming and full of lively debate every single night and there's a
01:02:59.140 lot of interesting content that the members post throughout the day as well so it's actually pretty
01:03:04.680 cool let's look at this poll here from left-wing corporate ctv we talked about this a little bit
01:03:11.700 earlier in the show. I guess we could take John's name off the screen now that he's not with us
01:03:15.720 anymore. As people across the country gather for the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation,
01:03:20.800 and I believe that Justin Trudeau forgot about this day, the very first one a few years ago,
01:03:25.380 and went surfing in Tofino instead, didn't he? He forgot.
01:03:34.000 There's a new poll that suggests Canadians are divided about whether the country belongs 0.99
01:03:38.460 primarily to indigenous peoples you see this is what all those land acknowledgements has got us
01:03:44.260 this is what all the indoctrination in schools over the past 20 years has gotten us that canada
01:03:50.680 essentially is no longer a country anymore and if if it's true that 38 percent of canadians
01:03:58.720 believe canada belongs first and foremost to indigenous peoples would they then be willing
01:04:05.500 to give it back all of it your home everything whatever property you might have outside of your 0.88
01:04:16.220 home everything are you willing to give it back if you're one of those 38 percent if not then sit
01:04:22.360 down and shut up 43 percent of Canadians who responded don't agree with that sentiment 19
01:04:30.720 percent of respondents say they don't know, which means they're scared to say, which means
01:04:35.480 they don't believe that the country belongs to First Nations. So let's put that 19 and 60 or 43
01:04:42.180 percent together, and we come up with 62 percent of people, and I know I'm assuming here, but I
01:04:49.320 think I'm assuming correctly, 62 percent of people in this country believe that Canada belongs to
01:04:55.560 canadians not first and foremost to aboriginal peoples and let me also remind you there's
01:05:04.140 something in canada that's called the canada impact unit we've talked about this before
01:05:09.100 it's known more accurately as the impact and innovation unit which houses the impact canada
01:05:15.340 initiative the iiu is a multidisciplinary team within the privy council office that works with
01:05:22.840 government departments to address complex public policy challenges using innovative approaches
01:05:28.900 like challenge prizes and behavioral science. I would believe that they probably manipulate polls
01:05:37.560 as well. They were especially prevalent, I believe, during the election campaign earlier this year.
01:05:46.100 Their goal is to deliver meaningful, measurable outcomes for Canadians by fostering evidence-based
01:05:52.480 decision-making and reducing barriers to innovation within the government, according to the Impact
01:05:57.620 Canada website. They're the ones that get favorable articles for the Marxists in all of the left-wing
01:06:05.780 corporate media. They're the ones who get skewed polls or are allowed to formulate the questions
01:06:11.840 of polls that then get asked by Leger, Ipsos, Nanos, and all of the other pollsters so they can
01:06:19.740 get back the answer they want and i believe also that if they don't get back the answer they want
01:06:26.980 they'll lie about it anyway because they're trying to get canadians to believe in certain
01:06:33.320 things and behave in a certain way and now with all these hate crime laws coming down the pipe
01:06:38.660 i i think they'll be expendable
01:06:42.040 i i honestly think dufferin peel catholic school board told to change flag policy to mark
01:06:50.720 truth and reconciliation day this story came out last week this ontario catholic school board
01:06:56.800 that made headlines for banning alternative flags like pride flags has been ordered by the
01:07:03.400 province's education minister to change that policy to fly orange flags on national day
01:07:08.860 the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation.
01:07:11.460 Paul Calandra's press secretary, Emma Testani,
01:07:15.440 said the minister has directed the provincially appointed supervisor
01:07:18.360 of the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board
01:07:20.620 to allow the display of the survivor's flag September 30th,
01:07:24.560 honoring those who were forced to attend residential schools.
01:07:28.860 We're going to wrap this story with a couple of funny ones for you.
01:07:32.880 Well, one that every politician should be saying,
01:07:37.180 and one that's kind of funny this is our friend jim mcmurtry he's been on the show a couple of
01:07:43.260 times jim a legendary school teacher in british columbia who was fired for refusing to teach this
01:07:50.760 lying curriculum of indian victimhood in his class and he's been fighting fighting fighting
01:07:58.900 this thing in court for the past three years here he is in a tim hortons today wearing an orange
01:08:05.280 shirt that says where's the bodies eating a what he called a victim donut
01:08:12.040 with somebody giving him the finger
01:08:15.880 love jim mcmurtry gotta have him back on and finally maxime bernier on this national day for
01:08:27.700 truth and reconciliation let's remember that no bodies were found that the residential schools
01:08:33.440 genocide is a hoax, and that reconciliation requires an end to the BS, the victim mentality,
01:08:40.000 the fake white guilt, and the grifting based upon it. Thank you, Max, for coming out and saying what
01:08:48.320 everybody is thinking. And even if only 62% of us in this country believe that Canada is for all
01:08:56.080 Canadians, I think it's higher, then we should all come out and say it to. Every last one of us.
01:09:06.520 And when I say that, what I mean is if you see an orange shirt out there, call it out. 1.00
01:09:14.380 Because they're full of shit. And most of them who are wearing those shirts today 1.00
01:09:20.380 are being forced to wear those shirts today through work or through school.
01:09:26.080 or maybe they were bribed.
01:09:28.740 Hey, you get to go walk in the parade this afternoon,
01:09:31.100 and you get paid.
01:09:34.040 I'm in.
01:09:35.000 All I have to do is walk and wear this orange shirt?
01:09:37.260 Yeah, and we all get to hang out together, too.
01:09:40.200 That's what happens.
01:09:43.060 All right, that's it for the show tonight, you guys.
01:09:45.420 The extension is coming up momentarily on ShadowDavis.com
01:09:48.620 for the all-access members.
01:09:50.080 Maybe you're one by now at ShadowDavis.com.
01:09:53.300 the Nighthawks. I'll see you in just a second. For everybody else, I love you all. I appreciate
01:09:58.140 you all. I want to thank John Carpe of the JCCF for being our guest tonight. I will catch you
01:10:04.780 tomorrow night at 8 o'clock central for another one. Have a great sleep. Talk to you later. Bye
01:10:10.060 for now.
01:10:23.300 We'll be right back.
01:10:53.300 We'll be right back.