00:09:17.860I know you guys have been working on this feverishly for quite some time.
00:09:21.120And I know that Health Canada did this Moderna vaccine approval, but it's not something that we weren't expecting.
00:09:28.960Well, that's true. But there's been a lot of events that have happened recently that really brought this to the forefront.
00:09:36.540As you know, for the last four and a half months following the live hearings that we did in March to April,
00:09:45.420We've been working on the full report, and it's somewhere in around 1,100 pages long at this point.
00:09:52.840But in recent weeks, we've seen a whole bunch of stuff happen.
00:09:57.940The first thing is that just a couple of days ago, the FDA in the United States granted approval to a new COVID-19 vaccine.
00:10:06.440This is apparently in absence of complete clinical testing.
00:10:10.820And what's striking about this is that the approval of this by the FDA was given on the basis of the previous approvals of the previous COVID-19 vaccines.
00:10:24.540And then the next thing that happened is the CDC in the United States immediately issued an approval of it to be administered to children as young as 16 months of age.
00:14:05.880they set out a number of different criteria that a drug has to meet.
00:14:11.300But the two important ones that we want to talk about right now is that
00:14:14.400under the normal food and drug regulations, a proposer, in other words, a company that wants
00:14:21.140to have the drug considered, has to prove objectively that it is safe. And there's
00:14:29.580another item, they have to prove objectively that it's effective. Now, what do I mean?
00:14:35.520Notice I emphasize the word objectively. Objective is, I'm going to give you an example
00:14:43.380of an objective question objective question might be what is two plus two it's four it has an actual
00:14:49.220answer like a solid uh one answer to it it's not six it's not 12 well perhaps it is in our schools
00:14:56.100these days but two plus two is four about to say the same thing now and i have a story about that
00:15:03.260but we'll that's for another time okay but um what they did is to replace those objective requirements
00:15:09.140with subjective requirements and a subjective requirement is what's how do you feel about two
00:15:17.280plus two right so the difference i'm sure that's the correct answer i think it might be five or
00:15:25.000i'm scared or it doesn't you know so essentially what they did was they exempted the new covid
00:15:31.92019 vaccines under what's called an interim order it's different than united states united states
00:15:38.360you keep hearing about emergency authorization. That doesn't happen in Canada. They issued an
00:15:43.380interim order, and they authorized the use of the COVID-19 vaccines without having to objectively
00:15:51.620prove safety and efficacy. Now, in the normal process, the applicant, the drug company, will
00:16:00.260provide the evidence, the objective evidence of safety and the objective evidence of efficacy,
00:16:06.160And then the government, the Department of Health would or would then do a risk benefit analysis because, you know, every drug has side effects, every drug has risks.
00:16:17.340And so they would be able to weigh the risks and benefit ratio and decide whether or not that was a good drug to put onto the market, particularly considering when you were going to give it to everybody.
00:16:28.480You know, pregnant women, children, people with autoimmune deficiencies, and you were going to mandate it, despite the fact that all the officials are saying now they didn't force anybody or coerce anybody.
00:16:43.400So once you have the objective safety criteria and the objective efficacy or efficiency or effectiveness criteria, you can do a risk-benefit analysis and then you would approve the drug.
00:17:01.040But if you don't actually have objective numbers for the safety and efficacy, how in the heck would you do a risk-benefit analysis?
00:17:11.860If you don't know how effective it is and you don't know how safe it is, how can you figure out if there's a risk benefit to the to this new drug?
00:17:21.820So they went ahead and approved approved or sorry, authorized.
00:17:26.740They didn't approve it. They authorized it.
00:17:29.240So they authorized this drug without knowing what the safety of it was or how efficient it was.
00:17:35.100And then they did something more than that.
00:17:37.320In the normal course of events, when the government authorizes the use of a new drug, at any time, the Minister of Health, if something starts to go wrong, they can take back that authorization and remove the drug from the market.
00:17:55.340With the COVID-19 vaccines, they took that ability of the Minister of Health away, and they could not recall that drug for the first 12 months, which is really interesting.
00:18:09.460Do we know why this happened? Is it part of the conditions of the contract that was signed by our country and Pfizer or Moderna or both?
00:18:18.980we don't know that because the report is based on the information provided by the 300 or so
00:18:26.160witnesses that we had and if folks already don't know what that was all about the national citizens
00:18:33.700inquiry traveled from coast to coast we visited eight cities over two and a half months and in
00:18:39.520each city we had three full days of hearings and some of those hearings went on for 10 12 14 hours
00:18:46.300in the day. And we had about 300 witnesses testify. And we had everyday Canadians like
00:18:54.080you and I testifying, you know, mothers and fathers and grandparents and sons and daughters
00:18:59.740and all kinds of Canadians that were brave enough to come out and tell their story. But on top of
00:19:05.000that, we had world renowned experts come out and testify at these hearings. And two of those
00:19:13.240that are pertinent to this interim report were sean buckley who's a constitutional lawyer and
00:19:19.200he spent oh and his and his resumes on the nci website i think he spent 25 years or something
00:19:25.180in the food and drug regulation process and deanna mcleod and so these are two very well-known very
00:19:32.420experienced uh experts that we we used to develop this interim report so we don't have an insight
00:19:41.020into why these drugs were approved but you know there's some there's some when you look at it in
00:19:49.480total like for instance if you look at at this time in the United States the CDC and the FDA
00:19:56.400approved new COVID drugs from both Pfizer and Moderna. In Canada they got the same information
00:20:03.260the Health Canada got the same information that the United States did but they only
00:20:06.600approve the moderna drug at this point so you have to ask yourself why is that and then your
00:20:12.860mind goes to well they're building a a huge mrna drug manufacturing facility in montreal
00:20:20.240that will produce 100 million doses a year so don't think this is over folks um now does that
00:20:27.380they're not going to have to bring these drugs into the country anymore either they can manufacture
00:20:32.400them here and what about the big pfizer plant in brandon i'm not sure what they manufacture there
00:20:37.060but i'm sure they could convert part of that plant into a mrna facility i don't know mrna is is is is
00:20:45.200not you see you bring up a whole issue here uh shadow because we're going to drift a little bit
00:20:52.780here that's all right you know they call that they called these things vaccines yeah and one of the
00:20:59.960things people don't, a lot of people realize or a lot of people heard in the press that, oh, you
00:21:04.140know, they changed the definition of what a vaccine was in 2014 or whatever it was, blah, blah, blah,
00:21:10.500blah. And so it's all okay. What people don't realize, and I discovered this during the research
00:21:16.420and writing the report, the overall report, was that that definition of what a vaccine was has
00:21:22.140been changed dozens of times since 2014. And as a matter of fact, it almost appears to me
00:21:29.940that each time something happened in the release of the vaccine, they tweaked the definition.
00:21:36.180Because folks, if you go to the CDC website, you'll find a definition of vaccine. Take that URL
00:21:43.020or the address and plug it into a website called the Wayback Machine. And if you do that, you'll
00:21:48.820see all of the times that they changed that definition. So they fooled around with what
00:21:54.720vaccine, the word vaccine meant. And it masks the reality that the vaccines, the COVID-19 vaccines
00:22:05.320are really what's called a biologic. And what a biologic drug is, is it's a drug that's very
00:22:12.200complex to make like there's a lot of very complicated steps in this and that this drug
00:22:20.260has it affects the the basic components of your cells as opposed to like a antibiotic or something
00:22:29.960this actually gets into your cell and affects the cell itself according to the testimony we had from
00:22:36.380a number of sources these these drugs had the potential theoretical potential to actually
00:22:44.220alter your dna yes now you don't hear that much but that was testified to um particularly by dr
00:22:52.460laura braden and truro i think it was day three of the truro um hearings so
00:22:58.480So calling this stuff a vaccine to begin with was, I don't know how to put this, was a real departure from medical practice.
00:23:14.880It should have been classified as a biologic, which meant that the testing process was much, much longer because, you know, the difficulties in manufacturing and the unknown ways that it may affect your body.
00:23:28.480Just for the listeners, some of the drugs that they give you where you're in chemotherapy, when you're getting treated for cancer, are biologic drugs.
00:23:38.000And so classifying this as a vaccine and then just letting it go through that process and then not even putting it through that process, it's just incredible.
00:23:49.300And now what's going on is they've got these new vaccines, which, by the way, were developed for a strain of COVID-19, which is no longer the prevalent strain.
00:24:00.520And then approving these new vaccines on the basis of the previously flawed approval is absolutely mind boggling.
00:24:10.040Now, what was the testing process for this new one?
00:24:13.440I understand that they tested, what was it, 50 people, something like that?
00:24:18.180There were no significant clinical trials, and we've tried to get information on that, and they don't have it.
00:24:25.880But it's interesting to note that the drug companies are now admitting in their product safety data that the side effects are unknown.
00:24:39.660And they also claim now the CDC admits that one of the one of the side effects of these COVID-19 vaccines are an increased risk of becoming infected with COVID-19.
00:24:56.180The CDC is now admitting that. So, you know, you you have to wonder.
00:25:02.300this vaccine is going to make you get it faster but don't worry you won't be hospitalized because
00:25:08.100you know it'll keep you i'll keep you safe but you'll get it yeah yeah and oh by the way we
00:25:14.540really don't know what the side effects are we're still researching that yeah so now now that's now
00:25:21.620you know you think i i i mean it's it's 8 30 at night and i would normally be telling my
00:25:26.620grandchildren fairy tale stories right now and and this kind of sounds like one because in Canada
00:25:33.680again unlike the United States in the United States they talk about emergency youth authorizations
00:25:38.920in Canada we had an interim order an interim authorization and then but that interim
00:25:45.820authorization only lasts for about a year and so they have to do something at the end of that year
00:25:53.300So what they did here in Canada is they took the exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines to prove safety and efficacy, and they've now put it into the regulation permanently so that the interim order is expired.
00:26:15.060But now this permanent exemption for the COVID-19 vaccines from now and into the future to be approved is now in the regulation permanently.
00:26:29.700But that never passed the House of Commons, did it?
00:26:33.480It doesn't have to. It's a regulation. It's not a law.
00:26:36.940You see, a lot of your that's a good point. A lot of your listeners may not understand this.
00:26:42.760something that's developed over the years in all levels of government is they pass very generic laws
00:26:49.740now and in that law they give the ability to pass regulations to an unelected board a good example
00:26:57.600the crtc if you look at the broadcasting act it's fairly broad what it what it talks about but then
00:27:03.600it gives the powers to enact regulations to this unelected board the crtc and so you never know
00:27:10.760what's coming down the pipe because it doesn't go through parliament again they just have the
00:27:14.260power to regulate and so that's what's going on here as well um i notice they're very careful with
00:27:21.280the terminology they use and you actually brought that up it's authorized but not approved meaning
00:27:27.660that if there's a court case to be had here over this stuff because people are getting sick with
00:27:32.540this with the side effects that the government does not acknowledge when the government comes
00:27:37.300on or any representatives of the government comes on they say and this happened in the theresa tam
00:27:42.760press conference a few days ago it's safe and effective it's a marvelous uh new drug a new
00:27:48.500weapon against covet 19 that is absolute hogwash what they're telling us but when they say
00:27:57.620authorized not approved does that give them some kind of a hole to jump through when it comes to
00:28:04.160possibly being taken to court over this well you know that's a little outside of my expertise but
00:28:09.860i can tell you uh and folks might not be aware of this but a politician in parliament can pretty
00:28:16.840much say anything they want and they have immunity uh to any kind of libel or slander laws if they're
00:28:22.520in parliament when they do it that's why you'll see them saying things in parliament they won't
00:28:26.120say outside of parliament right now the second as i understand it the other immunity they have
00:28:31.260is a government has an immunity against the certain results of policy.
00:28:39.960In other words, when government passes a policy,
00:28:43.380there's going to be winners and there's going to be losers.
00:28:46.220So they have protection against being sued by those losers.
00:28:49.780And I don't know what all of the details are,
00:28:52.120but they do have certain protections against whoever gets damaged by policy statements
00:28:56.700because, in other words, they couldn't govern.
00:28:58.740so how all of those immunities work into this and and their language and um ken these people must
00:29:06.680know that they're pushing poison i mean you know these are professionals these are educated
00:29:12.240professionals working for health canada theresa tam herself uh is a researcher she must know these
00:29:20.000things no no no no no no no no theresa tam to my i've done research on that and the best research
00:29:26.940i can find is that theresa tam graduated as a pediatrician in about 1996 or seven or five or
00:29:37.300something like that there's i could find no record of her ever treating a patient now i'm not saying
00:29:42.960she didn't but i couldn't find any records and then uh four or five or six or seven years later
00:29:49.660she shows up in the federal government as an expert in epidemics.
00:29:55.980So how do you go from being a pediatrician
00:29:58.660to becoming a world-renowned expert in epidemiology?
00:30:16.760well you know i hate to say it but maybe maybe she just fit what they were looking for
00:30:25.520you know yeah and she she also by the way was the head of um a certain i think it was the um
00:30:33.580the uh epidemiology group of the who she was the head of that and she's still part of the who now
00:30:40.900yeah and you so you have to wonder and again i'm not suggesting i'm just asking questions
00:30:45.580you have to wonder who's who's a lot who who is she aligned to is a canadian people or to the
00:30:52.960who and i can't answer well that question that question was asked by uh sloan with the cpc a
00:31:00.460few years ago and he got kicked out of caucus for asking it but taking theresa tam out of the
00:31:05.760picture for one second certainly there must be people within these departments whether it's
00:31:13.360uh health canada or any of the uh subsidiary divisions of it that know this stuff is poison
00:31:20.660well yeah or at least untested and and they they're still passing it off or trying to pass
00:31:29.380it off as safe and effective and that it blows my mind how these people can actually look in the
00:31:33.760mirror well you know just because it's in my mind right now i don't want to forget
00:31:38.600in order for the government to have passed an interim authorization of this drug there is a
00:31:47.360provision for that in the regulations so according to the regulations there's something called an
00:31:52.180urgent public need then they can do an interim authorization on something and it does allow them
00:32:00.240to change the requirements or relax the requirements based on urgent public need
00:32:06.160Now, the interesting thing about that is urgent public need is not defined anywhere.
00:32:11.980But even more interesting than that is that when the interim order was replaced, in other words, they took the COVID-19 exemption and put it into the regulation, there is no longer a requirement for an urgency.
00:32:28.740So now it's just this is how it works.
00:32:30.940You bring us a COVID-19 drug, and it gets to sidestep the requirement for proving objective safety and efficacy.
00:32:40.300Well, that shouldn't be, and there's many doctors out there I know, and I know that you've experienced this yourself, you know, being a commissioner with the National Citizens Inquiry and meeting many people in the medical industry complex,
00:32:57.920which is what it is, as opposed to the medical profession these days, who are just now waking
00:33:03.840up to this. Or maybe, maybe they've been awake the whole time and they've been yelling and
00:33:08.240screaming and they get hauled in by their colleges and censored over this very thing.
00:33:13.620Yeah. I mean, look, there were fundamental, fundamental rules of our society and laws
00:33:21.040that were broken in all of this, in my opinion. And I'll give you an example of one. And of course,
00:33:27.080one of the huge issues that we were have dealt with in the report and the overall report not the
00:33:32.960interim report is um is uh uh informed consent and medical practice is regulated provincially
00:33:45.460so the laws vary from province to province not by much but they do vary and in preparing the report
00:33:51.700we looked into this. And in Ontario, there is a law that goes into great detail about what
00:33:58.820informed consent was and what happens if you don't provide informed consent. Now, in addition
00:34:04.760to that, the medical profession themselves, the doctors, et cetera, and nurses have their own
00:34:09.720organization, but they're governed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Physicians and
00:34:15.780Surgeons passes additional regulations and particularly about informed consent. And we
00:34:22.300looked at Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons, and it's interesting how they define
00:34:27.860informed consent. You have to tell the patient, you know, the good and the bad, and they have to
00:34:32.100give them enough information they can make up their own minds. But the really interesting part
00:34:36.160of it is it says in there that a physician must respect a patient's decision as to whether or not
00:34:45.140they will take a procedure, and an injection is a procedure. It's defined as that. And in
00:34:52.400addition to that, it says that they must respect the decision of the patient not to take that drug,
00:35:00.020and they're supposed to do their best to educate them, and that's it. Well, that's on one page in
00:35:06.440the College of Physicians and Surgeons site, and on another page during the lockdowns, this is what
00:35:12.820it said, and I'm paraphrasing from my memory. It essentially said, if you have a patient that
00:35:18.660comes in that doesn't want to take the COVID-19 vaccine, you should subscribe them psychiatric
00:35:24.780drugs or send them for counseling. Now, how do those two things balance respecting a patient's
00:35:32.780decision and then sending them stuff for psychiatric help? You know, before I forget it,
00:35:40.680There was another section of informed consent.
00:35:43.400If the doctor is aware of any coercion from any other party,
00:35:49.180even if it's your spouse, an employer, whatever,
00:35:53.080then they can't perform the procedure.
00:35:56.140So this is a fundamental foundational block of medicine,
00:53:32.000I'm not sitting here singing the praises of the MLAs.
00:53:35.560I'm not singing the praises of anybody in that party, but I know that ideologically there's more common sense in that party right now than there is in the NDP.
00:53:45.820For example, you know, when we get together next Wednesday, and I'm so happy you're coming out to speak at the Walk for Kids at the Legislature.
00:53:55.060That's something that we know would fall on deaf ears if Wab Canoe were the premier of this province and the NDP were in power.
00:54:03.060But we know that Heather Stephenson has already come out publicly and said there will be a parental bill of rights in Manitoba if we are elected.
00:54:12.540We have that chance with the progressive conservatives.
00:54:15.500We will not have that chance with the NDP, never mind all of the other things they can do to destroy our province.
00:54:22.800So having said that, I say a vote for the PCs would be a very good option for anybody who is going to be voting in the Manitoba election.
00:54:31.320And, you know, I mean, I supported the UCP in Alberta a couple of months ago, too.
00:54:57.300but you know i i do want to point out to folks because you know in our last we analyzed the
00:55:06.1002019 provincial election in manitoba and folks should know that only about 55 percent of eligible
00:55:14.740voters voted and a lot of that apathy a lot of the reason folks don't vote is they've been convinced
00:55:21.820or they've convinced themselves that their votes don't matter well folks i'm here to tell you that
00:55:27.640we analyzed the results of the last election and there's four 57 seats in the manitoba legislature
00:55:34.580what that means is is that there's 57 people that represent the people of manitoba and we talked
00:55:40.300about ridings before well there's 57 ridings in manitoba and of that those 57 seats 14 of them
00:55:49.900fully 14 of them were decided in 2019 with a majority of less than a thousand votes.
00:55:56.780Two of those seats were decided, McPhilips riding in Winnipeg was decided, I think it was 101 vote
00:56:03.940margin. And another one, I can't remember which one it was, was like 110 vote margin. Now you
00:56:09.440can find this analysis on our website, on our blog, we have an August 11th post. Now, so 14 of
00:56:16.200the 57 were decided by less than a thousand votes also there was another 15 seats that were decided
00:56:24.860with a margin of less than 2 000 votes so fully 29 seats out of the 57 total were decided by less
00:56:33.320than 2 000 voters and you're right think about the people that didn't vote the 45 percent of
00:56:40.200eligible voters in this province that didn't vote that would be about uh 400 000 people that could
00:56:46.660be a major difference moving forward but i think you're right ken it's going to take some sort of
00:56:51.480initiative to get people excited to go to the polls as opposed to having to vote i mean i can't
00:56:56.340even believe the apathy that some canadian show not just in manitoba but all over oh i can't believe
00:57:01.840there's another election already i guess i have to go vote like are you kidding this is your chance
00:57:07.600to make a difference here because if there's one thing we've seen in the past three years
00:57:13.080three and a half years now is that government does directly affect our lives they come right
00:57:19.780into our home and they affect our lives and we can make change so i would suggest we get the
00:57:26.680the conservatives in power in manitoba for the next four years we hold their feet to the fire
00:57:31.420on every decision they make or don't make we don't let them off the hook of any promises they have
00:57:36.880made if they get in and then during during all this time we go ahead and make manitoba stronger
00:57:43.940together and quebec stronger together and so on and so on and so on thank you ken thank you for
00:57:50.320coming out tonight really appreciate you taking the time i love having you on that you're a great
00:57:53.640guest thank you i always enjoy our time together thank you i i appreciate you giving me the
00:57:59.040opportunity to speak to your uh your audience they're the probably the best educated audience
00:58:04.700and manitoba all right ken we'll see you next week man thank you thank you all right there is
00:58:09.820ken drysdale with manitoba stronger together with the national citizens inquiry of course
00:58:14.580uh ken rose to our awareness about a year and a half ago when he released the true facts
00:58:19.720c19.com which is still available online for you let's get to some other stuff here you guys we
00:58:26.460do have some other things that we want to take care of before we wrap it up for the weekend
00:58:30.460This story comes from TNC.news. Quebec education minister shuts down gender neutral bathrooms in schools. They will have, at least until a new government decides they won't have in Manitoba, they will have these gender neutral bathrooms in one of the school divisions in Manitoba. That would be Prairie Rose.
00:58:51.660They voted on that a couple of weeks ago, and I'm sure there are more school divisions, possibly your school division, that is talking about and voting on that thing right now, and you may not even be aware.
00:59:01.700As Ken said, you know, the idea about Manitoba Stronger Together is educating us on what we can and what we can't do.
00:59:10.120And basically, it's about staying informed with what all of these governments are doing, whether it's federal, whether it's provincial, whether it's local, whether it's a school board.
00:59:20.360Quebec schools are not adopting gender-neutral bathrooms anytime soon, the province's education minister says. Bernard Drainville is the education minister there. He said no to mixed-gender bathrooms in response to news that a secondary school in Royne-Oranda has plans to install gender-neutral bathrooms for their students for the following school year.
00:59:43.720officials of the school said that the stalls in the bathroom would run the length of the ceiling
00:59:48.300to the floor and that only the sink area would be shared we don't think that's a good idea he said
00:59:54.480the schools need to rectify that situation drainville cited privacy is the basis for his
00:59:59.620decision and worried about the possibility of boys teasing girls who are going through puberty
01:00:04.580yeah yeah that's one of the concerns i would suggest there are a few more but that's definitely
01:00:11.980one of them i wish these politicians would take a firmer stand sometimes a young girl 12 13 14
01:00:19.220years old who's starting to have her period for example and who leaves a stall and there are 13
01:00:23.66014 year old boys looking at her insult sarcasm humiliation a scenario we don't want so i think
01:00:29.760we have to draw a line in the line and we're drawing it now so there's good news coming out
01:00:34.700of Quebec. This is an interesting story out of the United States reported by Chester Tam
01:00:40.780on X. He says, breaking mandatory COVID vaccine for health care workers, the Providence
01:00:47.320hospital system, which has hospitals all across the United States, has announced a November 30th
01:00:54.220deadline for all care providers. Are the health care workers going to continue to allow the
01:01:00.400government to tell them what's good for their health? Or finally, are they going to take a
01:01:04.860stand? He says, do not comply. And here is the memo that was sent to all staff of the Providence
01:01:12.200Hospital System. We updated our COVID-19 vaccination policy and caregivers need to receive the most
01:01:19.720up-to-date COVID-19 vaccine available. Here are some key requirements we'd like you to be aware
01:01:24.840of so basically this is a very convoluted statement from providence hospital system they went on to
01:01:31.320clarify with a response to chester's tweet and that is the content of the notification letter
01:01:37.780originally shared appears to be somewhat confusing he says appreciate the response from providence
01:01:44.440which is this the health and safety of our patients caregivers and community are our highest
01:01:50.180priority as such, we ask that we ask that all employees receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine or
01:01:58.240booster. This is not the same as the vaccine mandates that we were required to implement
01:02:03.000by state law and CMS during the pandemic. Caregivers who choose or can choose to decline
01:02:09.300the vaccine, those who do not wish to receive it simply need to submit a declination form
01:02:14.720by November the 30th. They no longer need to request approval for a medical or religious
01:02:19.980exemption as many of our states and CMS required at the height of COVID. This policy has been our
01:02:26.340practice for many years with the flu vaccine, and we are now extending this to the COVID vaccine.
01:02:34.520The content of the notification letter originally, excuse me, originally shared appears to be
01:02:39.960somewhat confusing. He appreciates the effort to clarify the current COVID-19 vaccine requirements
01:02:46.280from previous mandates the wording might benefit from greater clarity to ensure
01:02:50.360everyone fully understand the process and their options remember clarity of phrasing like ken
01:02:56.760and i talked about at the beginning of the show clear and straightforward communication without
01:03:03.000changing the definition of certain words will go a long way and help minimize any potential
01:03:10.600confusion and ensure a smoother transition to the new policy fantastic report from this guy on x
01:03:18.320slash twitter you might want to follow him if you're there chester tam at island studio have
01:03:25.800a look for yourself all right in london ontario this was posted by our friend rob primo peaceful
01:03:32.140protesters outside of a liberal cabinet event got a good beat down from the london police force the
01:03:37.700police closed down the entire street because there were so many protesters. Then when protesters
01:03:43.220stepped onto the closed street, they went hands on. This tough 350 pound police officer must have
01:03:50.000felt like a really big man for assaulting this little woman. Let's have a watch. It's about
01:04:24.580I don't fucking touch me, I don't fucking touch me, I don't fucking touch me, that's what it's called, no, you don't tell me what the fuck you're doing, don't tell me what the fuck you're doing, you want to touch me again, you're gonna get charged, I'm an advocate in this city, you don't touch me, I know my rights, don't fucking talk, don't fucking tell me nothing, you are a disgusting woman,1.00
01:04:54.580You talk to me again and I guarantee you guys come on to the1.00
01:05:15.360fucking street you provoked it oh look at this look at this wow0.99
01:08:28.360leave the kids alone that's what we're asking for0.93
01:08:32.120the rally on wednesday being put on by the clowny the clown voice sorry f's and their crew who are
01:08:41.780trying to ban books and shut down drag shows etc well no no we're not trying to ban books we want
01:08:49.760them out of schools for children and we're not trying to shut down drag shows we're just trying
01:08:55.100to shut down drag shows in schools and libraries and public spaces where kids can be present.0.99
01:09:03.920It's not about your, go ahead and have your drag shows, but kids don't need to see that crap.0.98
01:09:08.700And I have shown you video after video after video, guys, of them, not kowtowing, but pandering0.99
01:09:16.820to the children. The mayor of a city of Malibu, was it? In California, got a spanking by a drag
01:09:23.780queen on video a couple of days ago in front of kids now it wasn't a full-on spank spank but it
01:09:32.620was definitely something that kids probably shouldn't see you can take probably out of that
01:09:40.160so anyway she goes on to give the details of this marches there are two there's one at city hall
01:09:45.780forming at the same time nine o'clock a.m and then at the forks that's ours and we're all going
01:09:50.480to be meeting at the legislature. She goes on to say, or he, I'm not sure if this is a man or a
01:09:57.500woman. I didn't look closely at the picture or something in between, whatever. They will be
01:10:04.160walking to the ledge and having a rally. They're encouraging children to walk out of school. So be
01:10:08.440aware children will likely be present. So that means that they could be more violent if kids
01:10:14.280won't be there there may be two rally sites but they are planning for the west side of the ledge
01:10:22.940i would imagine 9 30 and 10 shadow davis and that mike guy from voyage funeral homes i think are
01:10:28.280planning the forks and some guy called david and it looks like people from camp hope are planning
01:10:32.420the city hall city hall is probably the more volatile group heads up she says i don't know
01:10:38.800if i'll make it but a counter is being planned arriving at the ledge early to take up their
01:10:45.720space and deck it out in rainbow may be a solid strategy i will update as i hear more from the
01:10:52.040counter protest organizers organizers so essentially what is going on here is they're
01:11:00.180going to try and force us to take down their stuff and then they're going to record it they're going
01:11:06.920record us taking down their stuff and once they do that they're going to videotape it they're
01:11:13.080going to give it to the left-wing corporate media who will be there obviously as well
01:11:16.640and they're going to make us look anti anti anti which we are not obviously as i just pointed out
01:11:25.220so whoever you are you guys if you are trying to use these ridiculous antifa tactics on us if0.55
01:11:34.440you're going to try and bully if you're going to try and get physical with us if you're going to0.76
01:11:37.740try and spray us with any liquids or throw any frozen water bottles at us we are not going to
01:11:46.000retaliate on you that is not going to happen do whatever you want there will be plenty of police
01:11:54.720and security involved um i just want to keep it peaceful we're not going to be trying to chant
01:12:01.620you down or any of that stuff and by the way you won't be able to put any of your lgbt stuff
01:12:06.900on the west side of the legislature because we're going to have security in place there
01:12:10.780from the previous day so good luck with that good luck with that all right and besides
01:12:19.420well i'm not going to give away any details but
01:12:24.620let me just say that there are some things that you don't know
01:12:30.040the fight i'm talking to the antifas here not to you guys we do have to keep a couple of things
01:12:38.720secret sadly i'm sorry to have to say that but you'll find out everything that uh you need to
01:12:45.200know when you show up at the forks or city hall on wednesday morning and we're all going to be
01:12:49.360meeting down there at the legislature on uh on wednesday at around noon this is uh letting kids
01:12:55.760be kids seven-year-olds don't need to see drag queens spanking anybody seven-year-olds don't0.99
01:13:02.220need to know what fellatio is or gay sex is or cornholing or any of the other things that you0.99
01:13:08.060guys do keep your sex lives to yourself you're not gonna try to normalize this deviant it's not1.00
01:13:17.580happening we're not going to allow it we're not anti you again you go ahead and do you
01:13:23.980and when people turn 18 years old and they become adults and they can go ahead and legally decide
01:13:31.080for themselves what it is they want to do with their lives go ahead feel free have a blast fill
01:13:37.680your boots that's it the final story of the night guys is uh this one right here that comes from the
01:13:47.040toronto sun but but this was actually published all across north america uh from the associated
01:13:54.360press gen z gals red flag mega supporters guys torpedo commies so what's the biggest turnoff
01:14:01.700for women 18 to 34 and in that same age group young men looking to win over gen z beauties
01:14:08.620best put their mega hats in the closet and gush about how much they love the barbie movie oh no
01:14:13.860A new study reveals what turns off 18 to 34-year-old men and women in the United States, according to Change Research.
01:14:21.320The study surveyed 1,033 people, asking them whether certain behaviors or beliefs raise a green, a beige, or a red flag in a potential partner.
01:14:32.520Both genders agreed it was important for a partner to have hobbies and ask for details among the findings.
01:14:37.680a staggering. 76% of women said that men who support former President Donald Trump are a
01:14:44.100turnoff, while 64% of guys don't dig girls who identify as communists. And 59% of men in the
01:14:56.360cohort aren't big on Trump's fangirls. 54% of women say people who believe there are just two
01:15:04.280genders are a turnoff. Well, 34% of men agree. Oh my God. 54% of women in the 18 to 30. And again,
01:15:13.940this is only a thousand 33 person survey, but come on 54% of women in this survey say people
01:15:20.720who believe there are just two genders are a turnoff. Well, 34% of men agree. If those numbers
01:15:27.420are true, we've got a much bigger problem than we thought. Listeners of Joe Rogan's podcast also
01:15:33.600strike out with 55 percent of women claiming not to be interested in guys who are listeners well
01:15:38.30033 percent of men agree okay when it comes to politics 50 percent of women call a red flag for
01:15:45.740a potential partner not caring about politics at the same time 23 percent say they're talking about
01:15:50.600politics is a no-go identifying as a liberal is a deal breaker for only 19 percent more men 35
01:15:59.28025% are turned on by women who identify as conservative, then ones who say they're liberal at 29%. No hobbies. Ah, 66% of those surveyed say that's a red flag. For 29% of men, women who watch reality TV dating shows are kryptonite.
01:16:14.000and in addition 60 percent of men or women sorry in the left-leaning cohort don't like the phrase
01:16:21.200all lives matter and if you missed barbie greta gerwig's box office blockbuster turn off
01:16:27.540another 27 percent of women find owning a gun is a red flag and that's it
01:16:34.600for the show tonight don't forget you guys and i know i've talked about this i'm sure you said