00:05:46.300We continue to run the risk of new variants.
00:05:49.540And every step of the way, we will continue to be guided by the very best science we can
00:05:54.920because our first and primary responsibility is to make sure we're doing everything we can to keep people safe.
00:06:03.800Does that include running around California without a mask on,0.99
00:06:07.020even though you tested positive for covid you scumbag and once again not answering the question0.99
00:06:14.320from rebel news um this was announced this morning at uh trudeau tweeted this out at 110.96
00:06:22.78023 or 11 13 it shouldn't say in the story here 11 12 my mistake at 11 12 eastern time this morning
00:06:30.420the prime minister of canada justin trudeau announced he had tested positive for covid 19
00:06:34.980So that would be roughly a half an hour after the maskless press conference that he held.
00:06:44.000This would imply that he will not be able to attend his own special fundraising event, which is supposed to be tonight at the War Museum, where he was scheduled to give a speech at 730.
00:06:54.500He says he's going to be isolating and says the only reason that he says he feels fine and the only reason he does feel fine is because of his three COVID-19 vaccine shots.
00:41:25.800Something more is coming with all of this.
00:41:29.380now you might not be able to convince the people that you know that that is the case but ask them
00:41:37.520why ask them why these mandates are still in place here in canada when every other country
00:41:43.560in the world has lifted them ask them a simple and ask them to answer it just can you answer
00:41:51.940me that question please now they might say well it's still dangerous and no no then how come it's
00:41:58.240not like that in France or the UK or the Netherlands or the United States who just
00:42:04.260lifted mandates this past weekend finally well actually the mandates were lifted but now you
00:42:09.180don't have to have a test anymore Mexico I don't know if they ever had any of these ridiculous
00:42:18.160mandates that's why people have been going down there even Australia but not here why
00:42:26.620all right let's carry on now this story caught my eye this comes from the counter signal
00:42:34.100radical climate change activists are blockading highways in british columbia right now and
00:42:41.000i really want to know how the rcmp and the federal government are going to deal with these people
00:42:46.660a group of radical climate change activists has restarted blocking highways in bc and they claim
00:42:52.980the blockades will only get worse save old growth an offshoot of extinction rebellion
00:43:00.420that's the big climate catastrophe group funded by george soros claims they're a group dedicated
00:43:07.380to saving forests in bc and stopping climate change members are open about their demands
00:43:12.180and post their blockades on twitter disruption will continue every day until the bc government
00:43:16.740acts to protect its people and passes legislation to ban all old growth logging across the province
00:43:22.280You know, this is, I find interesting, the government of British Columbia, probably the greenest provincial government in the entire country, still allowing all of those diesel ships off the coast and all that logging to continue.
00:55:24.800that's not justice that's not the rule of law
00:55:31.720so this guy well he well he rails on the police and in some cases justly so
00:55:41.000I would say that the Ottawa situation was different than any of those other situations we've talked about because there was, again, no destruction of property in Ottawa.
00:55:49.600Whereas when the Antifa crowd gets together and decides they're going to pull down a statue of Queen Victoria or Sir John A. MacDonald, that is destruction of property and that needs to be dealt with on site.
00:56:01.380I know Winnipeg police officers who said last year when they pulled down the statue of Queen Victoria, they were ordered to do nothing but stand there and watch them.
00:56:11.000Why? Because politics are getting in the way of the judiciary and law enforcement in this country, and that's why people are losing faith in our establishment.
00:56:26.180That's why a very, very large percentage of people now believe in so-called conspiracy theories.
00:56:32.400this is a good ruling you guys this came from the sudbury star public health wrong to fire
00:56:42.100sudbury nurse for refusing covet vaccine from an arbitrator so not a court an arbitrator
00:56:48.200there is a certain condition on this it's about creed and it goes uh with the human
00:56:55.140rights commission public health sudbury and districts discriminated against a nurse it
00:57:00.820fired because she refused to get a COVID-19 vaccination. A provincial arbitrator has ruled.
00:57:05.500In his ruling, arbitrator Robert Herman said it was wrong for public health, which has led the
00:57:10.620effort to get people in the Sudbury area vaccinated against blah, blah, blah, the deadly virus to
00:57:16.140terminate the nurse. She had sought an exemption from getting vaccinated for religious reasons0.92
00:57:21.400under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The employee is a devout Roman Catholic and a member of the
00:57:26.720latina mass a particularly strict part of the church kind of like opus day but not
00:57:32.620its believers object to the use of fetal cell lines in the development of vaccines fetal cell
00:57:39.000lines are cells grown in a lab based on aborted fetal cells collected generations ago members of
00:57:45.440the latin mass strongly object to abortion which they regard as murder and the use of fetal cell
00:57:50.380lines which come from aborted feel fetal cells herman said despite some inconsistencies in the
00:57:56.440nurses' evidence and behavior, the health unit should have granted her an exemption for religious
00:58:00.880reasons rather than firing her. There can't be multiple reasons for objecting to getting
00:58:06.180vaccinated, but, or sorry, there can be. But as long as one of the reasons is sincerely and
00:58:11.720legitimately based upon one's creed as subjectively interpreted and applied, an applicant would be
00:58:17.680entitled to an exception under the human rights code and the vaccine policy itself. All right,
00:58:22.080What about me saying, no, I think it's dangerous, it's untested, and I don't want it.
00:58:29.480When you have to go into somebody's creed or religion to get an exemption, that is outrageous.
00:58:35.740And even then, they really clamped down on those restrictions, didn't they?