00:20:51.140now she didn't couch it quite like that she didn't actually say the word right she was very0.83
00:20:56.840careful about that because she's a politician she had that speech written for her so they're
00:21:00.460not going to include the word censorship absolutely not but once you take away free speech
00:21:06.560from a nation that's it if we can't speak out if we can't fight back using our words what's left to
00:21:16.660us. Are there limits on free speech? Yes, there are, I believe, but very, very, very
00:21:26.380high limits. In other words, no targeted threats of violence. But other than that, go
00:21:38.140for it. That's bad. And she once said, I think about six months ago, for people to ignore
00:21:54.800everything they read on the internet when it comes to news about COVID-19, the pandemic in
00:22:01.620general, and listen only to the government, dismiss everything else. What did they call
00:22:07.700that in 1984 the bureau of you guys know this i can't remember but that's crazy what she's talking
00:22:16.680about and yes she is a lung a young global leader through the world economic forum just like justin
00:22:22.500trudeau no you know what if that if that if that comes to pass if trudeau starts talking in that
00:22:31.280same rhetoric we absolutely have to stand up at that point guys now i understand that it's very
00:22:39.260what do you think it's going to take for the people of this country to finally stand up and
00:22:45.060say no that's enough i mean we had it last year with the freedom convoy the truckers got upset
00:22:50.640and we all got on board with that because they were going to ottawa hell or high water we were
00:22:57.240going with him. What's it going to take? Because if Trudeau does this, if he tries to do this,
00:23:05.480and he is trying with Bill C-11, and hopefully that does not pass in the Senate. And I do have
00:23:11.820something coming, some video from the Senate a little bit later on in the show, but something
00:23:16.020else altogether. But if that passes, that bill, that's damaging to free speech. Shows like this,
00:23:22.800networks like rebel news and true north and the western standard they're all coming down
00:23:28.680eventually because trudeau will go ahead and bastardize the crtc and tell them to shut these
00:23:35.280agencies down because they're spreading misinformation that way the government can
00:23:39.960can pretty much only approve the news they want online think about that that's how bad that bill
00:23:48.780is that's why it's called the censorship bill it's called the censorship bill for a reason
00:23:54.740they're shutting us up they're trying to shut us down and these days the way to communicate
00:24:02.420is online like i do with you guys every single night right
00:24:05.620can they go into your instant messages apparently they can google is apparently censoring gmail now
00:24:15.900so i i'm gonna have to be changing my email address very soon i do have a proton mail but
00:24:21.680i don't use it very often but i think that's going to become my primary source of email
00:24:26.260in the next couple of days i'm not sure if you guys have heard that story but yeah google is
00:24:30.900apparently censoring your gmail account not letting certain messages through that's alarming
00:24:36.700what's going on in the world right now and she's pleading for more of it that's insane
00:24:41.900okay i have a story from a new source called the daily skeptic you guys might go that's the day
00:24:49.520the daily skeptic what's that well you guys know that i vet every single source that i put on this
00:24:57.020show every night and i make sure that they have hyperlinks to the actual source of their stories
00:25:02.020and this one does and if you want to find it first of all you go to the daily skeptic.org
00:25:07.400find it for yourself vaccination increases infection risk by 44 percent according to a
00:25:13.840study done by oxford one of the preeminent universities in the world two doses of the
00:25:24.180covet 19 genetic experiment make you 44 percent more likely to be infected a study from oxford
00:25:33.980university has found contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy which assumes vaccination
00:25:40.060significantly cuts incidents and transmission now you would think institutions like oh the
00:25:47.340university of western ontario among others would go what really well we have to this is crazy we
00:25:55.580shouldn't have this vaccine passport policy any longer have to read through this study to make sure
00:26:03.980The study published in The Lancet looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8th of 2020 to November 17th of last year, meaning it spanned the alpha and delta periods.
00:26:18.900It used a case control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors like age, sex, and underlying conditions to be controlled for while individuals with prior infection were excluded.
00:26:31.800The results for effectiveness against positive COVID tests, reported infection, which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.
00:26:42.060Now, you guys can't see that, but the writer of the article says, I've highlighted in yellow three key figures.
00:26:48.940The top two show that in the two weeks following the first jab, individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for COVID than their unvaccinated counterparts.
00:27:01.800This is further confirmation of the post-jab spike in infections that's often been noted and which there is evidence is a result of the vaccination temporarily reducing immunity.
00:27:13.340The third figure shows that two weeks or more after the second jab, which during 2021 was regarded as fully vaccinated,
00:27:21.940individuals were 44% more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.
00:27:27.000This is negative vaccine effectiveness, where infections are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated of minus 44%.
00:27:35.840This negative effectiveness is in line with what was seen in the raw data from England at the time and also in studies from other countries,
00:27:43.740but contradicts the government's official estimates, which claimed effectiveness to be 60 to 85% against Delta.
00:27:51.300The new study indicates the negative effectiveness was not just a result of confounding factors or a catch-up effect where the vaccinated have lower infection rates initially, then higher infection rates as the effect of the vaccine wears off, as some have claimed.
00:28:06.680acknowledging the figures the authors write surprisingly we observed a higher risk of test
00:28:14.060positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across all bmi groups which is contrary to
00:28:19.960evidence reported by the uk ons what they don't mention is that it it's fully in line with data
00:28:26.920from uk hse nor that the ons is known to overestimate infection rates in the unvaccinated
00:28:33.480because it underestimates the population.
00:28:35.600The ONS put the unvaccinated adult population at 8%,
00:28:39.600whereas the NIMS database puts it at 19%,