The StoneZONE with Roger Stone


Kash Patel Joins Roger Stone To Talk About The Best Week In Donald Trump's Life | The StoneZONE


Summary

Roger Stone and his good friend Kash Patel discuss the Supreme Court ruling allowing President Joe Biden to be immune from prosecution for all of his actions while in office. They also discuss the recent debate between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden on whether or not the President should be able to be charged with a crime. And they discuss the other side of the debate, the one where Biden accused Trump of being a leaker of classified information. And, of course, they give their own takes on the Joe Biden/Zoe Lofgren debate. The Stone Zone is a production of the Cambridge Union Society and is not affiliated with the Republican National Committee or the Joint Congressional Committee on National Security. The opinions and views expressed here are our own, not those of our institutions, and are not related to any organization, political party, or political party. We do not endorse any political organization, position, or position on any issue referred to in this podcast. Please contact us directly if you have any thoughts or opinions on any of the topics covered in this episode. We are committed to fair and impartial administration of justice, impartial investigation, and fair hearing of all matters relating to all matters involving the rule of law and equal justice under the Constitution. Thank you for listening and supporting the show. We appreciate your support and look forward to hearing back from you! in the coming weeks. -The Stone Zone -Your continued support is greatly appreciated! -Kash P Patel, Senior Counsel and Chief of Staff to the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes, Sr. Mike Crowley, Chief of the Committee on Intelligence and National Security Adviser to President Trump, and Director of the Department of Defense Department, Director of National Security Agency, and Senior Counsel to President Donald J. McElveson, Sr., Sr. Michael McCartan, Jr., Sr., Jr., Jr. - Sr. - Senior Counsel, Chief Staffer, D. - D. C., D.C., R.J. Stone, R. J. Stone Jr., Esq., R., R, R, D., D., C.J., D, R., C., A.A., CZ, C. C.A. & D. J., Cz, D, A. B, D & D, S. A., B, B, A., C, G, E., D & B, E.E., G, G & S, C., S.E. & G, D).


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We'll be right back.
00:00:30.000 And the Cambridge Union Society.
00:00:32.360 Due to his four-plus decades in the political and cultural arena, Stone has become a pop culture icon.
00:00:37.660 And now, here's your host, Roger Stone.
00:00:45.160 Welcome, I'm Roger Stone, and yes, you are back in the Stone Zone.
00:00:50.040 My co-host, Troy Smith of Slingshot.News, is having internet problems, won't be joining us today,
00:00:57.880 which is a pity because there's so much to talk about.
00:01:02.480 Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling regarding the immunity of American presidents hit like a bombshell.
00:01:10.360 Here's a quick bite of Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren of California.
00:01:16.400 I'm going to ask our guest, Kash Patel, who will be with us here in a moment, his impression of this.
00:01:22.500 But let's roll it.
00:01:23.560 I guess, you know, theoretically, President Biden, acting within the scope of his official duties,
00:01:31.640 could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justices on the court, and he'd be immune.
00:01:37.800 That is, of course, an absurdity.
00:01:42.660 But here to break this down for us is my good friend, Kash Patel.
00:01:47.980 Kash Patel has served his country with enormous distinction, both as a federal prosecutor,
00:01:53.880 as a senior counsel to the House Intelligence Committee under Chairman Devin Nunes,
00:01:59.440 a great American patriot, as a national security aide to President Donald Trump,
00:02:06.180 and also as the chief of staff of the Department of Defense.
00:02:10.620 Kash Patel joins us today in the Stone Zone.
00:02:13.720 Kash, welcome.
00:02:15.680 Hey, Roger.
00:02:16.180 Thanks for having me back on the program.
00:02:18.160 Thank you for making time for us.
00:02:20.860 So you're a learned attorney, former federal prosecutor.
00:02:24.560 Give us your take on yesterday's Supreme Court decision regarding immunity for the president.
00:02:31.940 Well, I'll take it in reverse, sounding off on our esteemed congresswoman from California.
00:02:38.200 If people should not just listen to what she said, they should watch her say it with such glee.
00:02:43.980 It's disgusting to say something like that because she is saying it as a half-truth.
00:02:48.820 That's the only way the radical left knows how to take out the Supreme Court is by putting into the ether in the media
00:02:56.320 these ridiculous, absurd, harmful statements that now Joe Biden can somehow use the military.
00:03:03.580 It's not only an absurdity, it's completely unlawful.
00:03:06.100 But to the Supreme Court case itself, the Democrats aren't surprised.
00:03:09.980 They're just ticked off.
00:03:11.520 They know they want presidents to have presidential immunity for all official acts.
00:03:17.320 It's what you, Roger, have said the entire time.
00:03:20.440 It's what most Americans who read the Constitution and want the rule of law to succeed have said
00:03:25.700 for years.
00:03:26.460 It's not a Republican or Democratic thing.
00:03:28.660 If this ruling came down the other way and Joe Biden were kicked out of office, then his
00:03:33.500 next political opponent could go ahead and put him in prison for all of the acts that he
00:03:38.260 undertook while in office that are no longer covered by presidential immunity.
00:03:41.860 So I think it shined a light on their hypocrisy, but was a big win for constitutional law.
00:03:46.460 Well, the timing is certainly beneficial because the tsunami of lawfare, all of which pops up
00:03:55.380 in the last year of Joe Biden's presidency, is really just election interference.
00:04:00.900 If the president broke all these laws, why wasn't he charged in the first year of the Biden
00:04:06.380 presidency?
00:04:07.520 This is, I think, as most Americans recognize it, a contrivance.
00:04:12.700 People do need to understand what will happen now.
00:04:16.660 The case will go back to the district court.
00:04:20.180 Judge Chuckton will try to make a distinction, saying that when Donald Trump acted on January
00:04:25.460 6, he wasn't fulfilling his constitutional obligation to see that the election laws were
00:04:31.320 faithfully executed.
00:04:33.040 Surely part of his duties, they will try to argue that his actions that day were outside
00:04:38.740 the scope of his responsibilities or his authority.
00:04:43.460 She'll rule against him.
00:04:45.340 The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will rule against him, and I suspect we'll be back in
00:04:51.540 front of the U.S. Supreme Court with these issues, but not before the election.
00:04:56.120 And perhaps that is, in itself, the key.
00:04:59.480 Cash, I'd also like to get your take on that debate the other night.
00:05:05.080 I'm still in awe, personally, about what a tight, disciplined performance President Donald
00:05:13.260 Trump turned in.
00:05:14.440 He was strong.
00:05:16.520 He was confident.
00:05:17.540 He was funny.
00:05:18.520 He was presidential.
00:05:20.340 He didn't take the bait several times when Biden very feebly tried to bait him.
00:05:25.200 But then the other side of it, I think we saw the real Joe Biden.
00:05:30.440 And I don't know about you, but that's not the man I want with his finger on the nuclear
00:05:34.720 button.
00:05:36.620 And that's the place for me to start as a national security guy, that statement right
00:05:40.700 there.
00:05:41.480 You know, we as conservatives, as Republicans, however they want to label us, they just always
00:05:46.940 say we're rooting against the other party.
00:05:48.880 But I think President Trump put it brilliantly during the debate.
00:05:51.920 Joe, I'm cheering for you.
00:05:53.740 I'm supporting you because you're the commander in chief in charge of national security for
00:05:57.040 the United States of America.
00:05:58.480 That's the way we, as Americans, should feel and want for any president to succeed in safeguarding
00:06:04.640 the U.S.
00:06:05.920 And at least that level of certainty should be out there for any competent American.
00:06:11.260 And unfortunately, juxtaposition that with what you saw with Joe Biden, and you saw a horrific
00:06:20.800 failure in policy, in mental fitness, in acuity, in capacity of our current commander in chief
00:06:27.800 to execute the most important no-fail mission that is safeguarding our country and our citizenry.
00:06:33.320 And I thought Donald Trump was brilliantly effective in talking to a large audience that rarely
00:06:40.340 checks into politics and was able to substantively define what securing the border means and the
00:06:47.340 tragedies that have befallen us under Joe Biden, the CCP, the narco traffickers, terrorism
00:06:52.160 on the rise.
00:06:52.780 And he distinguished how his Afghanistan withdrawal, which I led for him at the DOD, where he had
00:06:59.380 no casualties compared to Joe Biden's politicized withdrawal and Joe Biden's maybe biggest lie
00:07:04.540 of the night, where he said no soldiers have lost their lives under his presidency.
00:07:10.020 Well, what about the 13 you blew up in Afghanistan because you let a suicide terrorist bomber out
00:07:16.480 of Bagram Detention Center if we told you not to let go of Bagram?
00:07:19.160 I mean, these were just some of the high points that stuck in my mind.
00:07:22.640 I think Americans received President Trump's debate really well, and they were just, as
00:07:28.360 you said, still trying to figure out how to even define what Joe Biden did.
00:07:34.320 I think it's interesting that the immediate, totally coordinated media counterattack kind
00:07:42.400 of was, well, Joe Biden may be comatose, he may be a vegetable, but at least he's not a liar
00:07:48.800 like Donald Trump.
00:07:50.040 Yet, as I go through Joe Biden's presentation, I'm still compiling lies because there's so
00:07:56.560 many of them.
00:07:57.740 He inherited 15 percent inflation.
00:08:00.560 No, he didn't.
00:08:01.100 It was 6.3.
00:08:03.260 No serviceman died during his watch.
00:08:05.980 As you just pointed out, we had those horrific, tragic deaths in Afghanistan.
00:08:12.740 No woman has an abortion in the eighth or ninth month of their pregnancy.
00:08:17.060 We've seen Democrat Governor Ralph Northam talk about it at length in a nauseating video.
00:08:24.760 This list goes on and on and on.
00:08:28.080 Yet, you read in Politico that Biden's handlers are blaming the moderators at CNN because they
00:08:35.820 didn't fact check President Donald Trump.
00:08:39.060 Fact check.
00:08:39.660 Joe Biden recycled the suckers and losers canard yet again.
00:08:46.060 Twenty people present in France at this cemetery.
00:08:50.480 Nineteen of them say Trump never said that.
00:08:52.660 The only guy who said it was General John Kelly, and he said it after he was fired by President
00:08:58.860 Donald Trump.
00:09:00.280 I call that debunked.
00:09:01.660 And then, of course, there is the, oh, Trump called Nazis in Charlottesville very fine people.
00:09:08.020 No, he didn't say that either.
00:09:10.260 Anyone who will look at the entire context of his quote or even look at Snopes, which is
00:09:15.300 certainly a left-leaning fact-checking operation, that, too, has been debunked.
00:09:21.440 Biden just continues to circulate lies.
00:09:24.580 I was a little disappointed that he wasn't confronted with one of his biggest lies from
00:09:29.760 the 2020 debates when he looked into the camera and said no member of his family had
00:09:35.680 ever taken a penny from any foreign entity.
00:09:39.720 We know that, thanks to the hard work of the House Oversight Committee, to be an egregious
00:09:45.340 lie.
00:09:45.700 We've seen the bank records.
00:09:48.020 This guy is the biggest liar in American politics.
00:09:51.280 He's basically made up his entire biography.
00:09:54.960 He's like Zelig, if you ever saw that Woody Allen movie, where if he's with Puerto Ricans,
00:10:00.540 he's a Puerto Rican.
00:10:01.560 If he's with truck drivers, suddenly he was a truck driver.
00:10:04.660 If he's with Jewish people, he was born in the synagogues of Wilmington, except, of course,
00:10:10.560 he wasn't.
00:10:11.740 This guy gets away with murder.
00:10:13.980 It's really quite extraordinary.
00:10:16.160 A political question.
00:10:17.340 Biden and his wife clearly now digging in their heels.
00:10:23.320 I've likened this to the situation surrounding Woodrow Wilson, who was elected president in
00:10:29.040 1912 in a three-way split because the Republican Party had a major divide.
00:10:36.560 Former President Theodore Roosevelt challenged sitting president William Howard Taft for renomination.
00:10:42.600 He failed.
00:10:43.500 Then he ran as a progressive or third-party candidate.
00:10:46.140 He called it the Bull Moose Party because he said he felt as fit as a bull moose.
00:10:53.180 That three-way split allowed Woodrow Wilson to become president.
00:10:57.060 But in 1919, Wilson had a debilitating stroke.
00:11:01.420 He was both mentally and physically incapacitated.
00:11:05.500 Now, in those days, it was much easier to hide the president of the United States.
00:11:09.520 And Edith Galt Wilson, the first lady of the United States, with the assistance of Chief
00:11:16.340 of Staff at Colonel Edward House, essentially ran the government.
00:11:22.680 She was the de facto president.
00:11:24.660 When it came to executing documents, she would put a pen in the president's hand and move it
00:11:29.420 along the paper for him.
00:11:30.700 Isn't that almost exactly where we are today?
00:11:33.980 Isn't Jill Biden, with the chief political advisor Hunter Biden, isn't Jill really running
00:11:40.340 the country?
00:11:40.900 Yeah, it's probably worse.
00:11:43.420 An unelected bureaucrat who is drunk with the power of the office of the presidency and the
00:11:50.460 fancy plane rides and the security details and the car rides and the extravagant jet-setting
00:11:55.400 adventures that the taxpayers fund so she can go watch her stepson be convicted in federal
00:12:01.300 court of crimes he should have been convicted of years ago.
00:12:03.940 So that's the lady in charge, and that's Jill Biden.
00:12:06.660 And she's the one, I believe, pulling the strings, demanding that Joe Biden stay in the
00:12:11.040 race.
00:12:11.540 Even after that epic meltdown and failure by Joe Biden in the last debate, they ran away
00:12:17.720 to Camp David and huddled up, and they say Team Biden emerged, but it was Jill Biden who
00:12:22.660 said, we're not getting out of this thing.
00:12:24.360 And I think you struck a quite acute and astutely, I should say, chord there when you delineated
00:12:38.440 how the mainstream media actually set this thing up from jump.
00:12:43.540 And I believe that.
00:12:44.480 I don't want to put words in your mouth, but I believe that this whole CNN thing was a stage
00:12:49.380 for them to start the process to get rid of Joe Biden.
00:12:52.340 There's no way the entire mainstream media outlet from CNN to MSNBC to everybody else
00:12:57.940 is in lockstep the minute the debate ends to say, we must replace Joe Biden.
00:13:03.220 I believe they knew that this was their opportunity to showcase him to the world, to showcase the
00:13:08.160 real Joe Biden that they had been lying for for the last three and a half years.
00:13:11.560 And then they would say, we could go in and get our new candidate.
00:13:14.500 So I think they're having an internal fight that they didn't necessarily see was coming.
00:13:19.000 And I still believe that Joe Biden will not be their nominee.
00:13:23.140 I agree with your analysis.
00:13:25.260 I think it is a very shrewd analysis.
00:13:28.140 However, I don't claim to understand the Democrat Party nominating system as well as I do the
00:13:34.860 Republican system.
00:13:36.720 You read in Politico, for example, that Biden has a strong hold on the actual 7,000 delegates.
00:13:43.620 He got 95 percent of the vote in the Democratic primaries.
00:13:47.380 News yesterday that the Biden-controlled Democratic National Committee is trying to expedite his
00:13:55.060 nomination virally without going to convention so that he can't be removed.
00:14:01.480 I would note it's already too late to get his name off the ballot in Wisconsin or Nevada,
00:14:07.280 two swing states.
00:14:09.480 Democrats can't afford, cannot win without one or both of those.
00:14:15.360 They really have an enormous problem.
00:14:19.020 I do think Barack Obama's immediate post on X, formerly known as Twitter, supporting Joe Biden
00:14:27.400 was disingenuous, as I believe he is now moving aggressively behind the scenes to try to get
00:14:34.060 Joe to take a dive.
00:14:35.680 And the way I think that could happen, since Biden is notoriously stubborn and his wife
00:14:43.300 doesn't want to go anywhere, and of course, no one in the family wants to have Joe lose
00:14:49.060 the authority to pardon himself, his brother, his son, and other members of the Biden crime
00:14:56.040 family, would be if Barack Obama were to assemble a majority of the cabinet privately, as well
00:15:04.440 as Kamala Harris, who has an obvious interest, and just go to Joe privately and say, look,
00:15:09.440 we have the votes to remove you under the 25th Amendment.
00:15:13.360 That's not what we want to do.
00:15:15.000 If you will simply announce that you're not running for re-election, we'll let you fill
00:15:18.860 out the balance of the term.
00:15:20.980 Is that too diabolical, too conspiratorial?
00:15:24.780 Not when it comes to the Obamas.
00:15:26.760 I think it's entirely possible.
00:15:28.940 Your take?
00:15:30.600 Well, it's really interesting to me that we are now talking about the 25th Amendment.
00:15:36.920 Remember how they misapplied that to Donald Trump for purposes of political retribution,
00:15:42.360 and the media tried to use that as a noose.
00:15:45.060 Remember, his own deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, went to his own attorney general,
00:15:49.820 than Ron Rosenstein, and said, hey, you guys got to wear a wire when you're in the Oval
00:15:54.500 Office next so we can use that as evidence to implement the 25th Amendment.
00:15:59.320 I mean, just think about the total weaponization of the government by Republican-appointed leaders
00:16:05.460 of the DOJ and FBI, who were working in conjunction with the media by leaking to them, had willingly
00:16:11.120 implemented an operation.
00:16:13.400 And this is not me saying that.
00:16:14.620 This is the FBI's own 302s that we forced to be released during one of my investigations,
00:16:19.580 saying that they would do so.
00:16:21.960 And as you know, Roger, the 25th Amendment was not to be implemented if you disagree
00:16:28.380 politically with the Commander-in-Chief.
00:16:30.380 And they tried to make that equate to he is not mentally fit.
00:16:34.860 Now we fast forward and see an actual scenario where the Founding Fathers did envision a case
00:16:42.960 where the 25th Amendment could be used.
00:16:45.380 And that is against Joe Biden after that debate test showing.
00:16:50.000 And I think you're right.
00:16:51.380 Americans are now keenly aware that the media has been covering for Biden's falls, both literally
00:16:59.200 and figuratively, his lapses in memory, his inability to speak, to fumble, stumble, and freeze
00:17:06.860 before the world.
00:17:08.640 And now I think Obama is smart enough, as you outlined, to say, we don't need to go the
00:17:14.940 convention route.
00:17:16.400 We can actually go the 25th Amendment route, but we don't even have to actually implement
00:17:20.560 it.
00:17:21.200 They'll just go to him behind closed doors.
00:17:22.820 I think that's a very conniving plan by Obama.
00:17:29.260 But I think it's a really good analysis by you on how they take him out.
00:17:33.440 And that could be, in fact, the way it's done.
00:17:36.860 You know, one thing is consistent about the fake news media and their handmaidens in the
00:17:42.880 Democratic Party.
00:17:43.780 And that is, it doesn't matter how debunked, disabused, completely discredited anything
00:17:50.260 is.
00:17:50.740 If you just wait a few days, they'll recycle it.
00:17:54.520 So let's speak to the question about whether or not President Donald Trump offered National
00:17:59.940 Guard troops to the mayor of D.C., and de facto, therefore, to Nancy Pelosi, to keep
00:18:06.580 order on January 6th.
00:18:08.920 They continue to say this isn't a lie.
00:18:11.160 And I've seen you document it on numerous occasions.
00:18:15.120 You were at DOD then as the chief of staff.
00:18:18.780 Tell us exactly what happened.
00:18:20.580 Yeah, I find myself in the middle of the two biggest disinformation campaigns, in my opinion,
00:18:25.760 in modern American history.
00:18:27.180 Russiagate, where I was the lead investigator and exposed the FBI fraud and the politicization
00:18:31.200 of DOJ and the unlawful surveillance of Americans.
00:18:34.300 And now, and later, when I was chief of staff of the Department of Defense, when I was in
00:18:38.520 the Oval Office days before January 6th, Donald Trump preemptively authorized 10,000 to 20,000
00:18:43.500 National Guards, men and women.
00:18:44.980 And as I've been saying and testifying to it, both in courts and before the unselect committee, the way the
00:18:52.160 Constitution has been interpreted by the Supreme Court is that the president must authorize step one, the
00:18:58.680 National Guard, and step two, the local convening government must request it in order for there to be a
00:19:06.960 deployment.
00:19:07.320 And in here, as you say, it's Washington, D.C., so it's D.C.
00:19:11.140 Mayor Bowser and the Capitol Police who report to then Speaker Pelosi.
00:19:16.740 And the law is set up that way, Roger, because we don't want a president to have the uniform
00:19:22.560 ability to deploy the military because that would be an insurrection.
00:19:27.080 But then we went and got Mayor Bowser's rejection in writing.
00:19:31.280 We went to the Capitol Police and they rejected the National Guard in writing.
00:19:34.920 And we put that out there.
00:19:35.840 I put that in my book.
00:19:36.980 You're showing it on screen.
00:19:38.720 And they wanted the political chaos so they could have the political narrative that Donald
00:19:44.160 Trump somehow committed insurrection.
00:19:45.640 Yet to date, no one's been charged with insurrection.
00:19:47.660 Not Donald Trump, not anyone else, because there was no insurrection.
00:19:51.240 And finally, two plus three years later, we are putting to bed the bogus hoax that was the
00:19:57.580 insurrection narrative.
00:19:58.860 And we have finally laid blame where it squarely belongs that Nancy Pelosi and Mayor Bowser's
00:20:03.420 feat. And now the world knows Nancy Pelosi on January 6th.
00:20:06.760 On January 6th, the Speaker of the House, who was in charge of whether or not there should
00:20:10.780 be National Guard's men and women there, was caught videotaping herself to make a film.
00:20:16.200 And she finally stated on that film, the National Guard failure was my fault.
00:20:21.360 Of course, we only now just got to see the clip from her film that she was busy making
00:20:26.240 while there was this, according to her, monstrous riot on January 6th.
00:20:30.920 Cash, we know that after you were a key person in the investigation into the Russian collusion
00:20:39.520 hoax, you learned that the government was spying on you.
00:20:43.680 You were a staffer for a member of Congress.
00:20:46.960 That seems to me to be fairly outrageous.
00:20:50.120 You have written a terrific book, Government Gangsters.
00:20:53.320 You've had a difficult time getting it out because the government tried to hold you up
00:20:57.940 since you obviously had a previous position and they're supposed to look at what you publish.
00:21:03.280 This book is chilling, folks.
00:21:05.420 We're going to show you in a second here where you can get it.
00:21:08.720 But tell us a little bit about your book.
00:21:10.420 There it is, governmentgangsters.com.
00:21:12.340 Folks, you want to order this book today.
00:21:14.940 If you really want to find out what happened in the entire Russian collusion hoax,
00:21:19.900 this book will actually make the hair on the back of your neck stand up when you find out
00:21:25.400 the outrageous tactics that were used.
00:21:27.700 Tell us a little bit about the book.
00:21:29.920 Thanks so much, Roger.
00:21:31.040 Yeah, luckily, we had the support of President Trump who called it the roadmap for 2024 and
00:21:36.260 the blueprint on taking out the deep state.
00:21:38.540 To me, they're the biggest enemies the American people face.
00:21:41.220 So I walk Americans through my history, not just Russiagate, but my tenure in the Trump
00:21:44.660 administration, the January 6th events that we're talking about.
00:21:47.640 We put the receipts in the back of the book.
00:21:49.780 We name the government gangsters, Democrat and Republican, by name and title, and show
00:21:54.040 you how they've corrupted our agencies and departments.
00:21:56.180 But most importantly, we give you all solutions to every department and agency and how we can
00:22:01.620 fix it and how it is fixable under President Trump's leadership.
00:22:04.920 And yes, Joe Biden took 10 months to suppress my manuscript.
00:22:08.600 I had to go to federal court, sue them, and win.
00:22:11.120 And of course, they basically redacted nothing.
00:22:13.120 They just wanted to censor it.
00:22:14.440 And a cool bit of good news, Roger, we've turned government gangsters into a film, and
00:22:19.320 it should be debuting here in two weeks at the RNC.
00:22:23.280 So hopefully people will come and find this and check it out there.
00:22:26.700 Folks, please go order your copy today.
00:22:29.160 If you buy one book this month, this should be it.
00:22:33.000 I was bowled over and I learned so much that I didn't know.
00:22:37.340 And I was in the middle of this particular storm, as you know.
00:22:40.920 Cash, I guess the House Judiciary Committee has now announced that they're suing Merrick
00:22:48.500 Garland over his failure to obey a subpoena regarding the audio of Hunter, pardon me, of
00:22:59.260 Joe Biden's interview with Robert Herr, the special counsel.
00:23:03.080 Now, Garland argues that he's released a transcript and that that should be sufficient and that
00:23:09.240 the tape is covered by executive privilege.
00:23:11.900 This argument sounds very familiar because it's the same one that Richard Nixon mounted
00:23:16.020 over his White House tapes.
00:23:18.640 He published a full transcript, but that was insufficient for the courts or for the Congress or for the
00:23:24.840 American people.
00:23:25.720 I happen to think Nixon versus Fitzgerald was wrongly decided, but that's just a layman's
00:23:33.820 position.
00:23:34.800 What do you think of this move by the Justice Department to sue Garland as opposed to using
00:23:40.520 their authority to have the Sergeant of Arms compel his testimony because these are co-equal
00:23:46.240 branches of government, the executive and the legislative branch?
00:23:51.280 I think this scenario highlights everything we've been talking about that is wrong with
00:23:56.920 Congress, Washington, D.C., the White House, the deep state, the media, etc.
00:24:01.240 You have the hypocrisy, as you just laid out, that this attorney general and president have
00:24:05.680 said, we are an independent DOJ.
00:24:07.440 No one tells me what to do.
00:24:08.860 But then you have the president of the United States, Joe Biden, order his attorney general
00:24:12.680 that those tapes are executive privilege.
00:24:14.940 The very executive privilege that they were trying to deprive Donald Trump with all this bogus
00:24:19.920 unconstitutional litigation that he had to take to the Supreme Court just to get it exercised.
00:24:24.840 Then you have Congress putting aside for a second the content of the tape.
00:24:29.860 Then you have Congress, which is controlled by the Republicans, at least the House is, who
00:24:34.100 have subpoenaed this tape.
00:24:36.360 They have issued a uniform lawful subpoena from a co-equal branch of government.
00:24:43.240 And the attorney general is saying to them, I'm breaking the law.
00:24:48.000 I'm not going to provide it for you.
00:24:50.160 And the Republican response to that is, I'm going to sue you?
00:24:54.520 You're going to take them to federal court in Washington, D.C., and two years later get
00:24:58.960 a rejection?
00:24:59.980 That's a headline grab.
00:25:01.600 It's a cheap fake.
00:25:02.960 And I'm disgusted that that's the action that they're taking.
00:25:06.040 You control the House strings.
00:25:08.060 You control the purse.
00:25:10.140 I'm not saying defund DOJ and the FBI, but take Merrick Garland's fancy fleet of cars.
00:25:15.780 Stop their G5 jets from taking off.
00:25:18.720 Shut down their European junkets until they comply.
00:25:22.260 I don't understand why we are allowing this taxpayer-funded illegality and two-tier system
00:25:28.840 of justice to proceed.
00:25:30.820 I'm almost more ticked off at the Republicans right now than I am Merrick Garland for breaking
00:25:35.500 the law because we are being deprived of the truth.
00:25:38.300 And America needs to see what's on that video.
00:25:40.180 As you pointed out, the transcript does not speak to the video.
00:25:43.020 And that's why they don't want it out.
00:25:44.800 And in what universe is Merrick Garland allowed to unilaterally tell Congress, you don't get
00:25:51.300 X because I say so?
00:25:53.440 It's just unheard of.
00:25:55.660 And we're going to use, I thought, our inherent contempt of Congress powers for this exact scenario,
00:26:01.320 which the Constitution and the law gives to Congress directly to say, you, the Speaker
00:26:06.940 of the House and the Sergeant-at-Arms can go and arrest anyone who's in violation of a
00:26:10.900 congressional subpoena for this very instance because we can't have the Attorney General
00:26:15.220 enforce the laws upon himself because we see how politically corrupt he is.
00:26:20.560 And now I'm told that the inherent contempt move is being sidelined for a daily fee of $10,000.
00:26:25.640 It is totally feckless and meaningless, and I'm really sad that that's the move they tried
00:26:31.720 to make.
00:26:32.740 Yeah, neither have the House Republicans.
00:26:35.220 For example, Chairman Tom Cole of the Appropriations Committee used the purse strings to try to pressure
00:26:41.880 the Department of Justice in what I think is an illegal and an illicit investigation of
00:26:49.300 President Donald Trump.
00:26:50.580 It was interesting yesterday to see Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in his comments,
00:26:57.660 question the legitimacy of Jack Smith's appointment.
00:27:01.960 No leftists, that doesn't mean I've talked to Judge Thomas, who I do not know, but I can read.
00:27:09.000 And I still think that there's some probability, and I base this totally on the great reporting
00:27:15.160 of Julie Kelly and reading all the submissions in the so-called Florida Documents case, I still
00:27:21.100 think that there's a reasonable probability that she's going to find that Jack Smith was
00:27:25.520 unconstitutionally appointed because he was never confirmed by the Congress.
00:27:32.800 There is no statute under which his position is created.
00:27:36.540 We're operating under regulations, written by bureaucrats, never approved by the Congress.
00:27:42.480 It's also a question about the funding.
00:27:45.040 This is going to be very interesting as it unfolds.
00:27:48.660 All right, I'm afraid we have to move along.
00:27:51.020 I want to thank my good friend, Kash Patel.
00:27:53.200 I want to ask you one more time, grab his great book, Government Gangsters.
00:27:57.640 It is an amazing read.
00:27:59.880 We're going to throw that there.
00:28:00.720 You see the cover.
00:28:01.680 Let's throw up the website one more time.
00:28:03.800 Go right there to governmentgangsters.com and order your copy today.
00:28:08.180 Kash, God bless you, and thank you so much for joining us in the Stone Zone.
00:28:13.200 Thanks, Roger.
00:28:14.160 God bless.
00:28:15.920 Well, folks, are you one of those people who owe back taxes?
00:28:20.580 I am.
00:28:21.480 I have to pay them for the rest of my life.
00:28:24.340 I own the IRS, almost $2 million, of which 75% is interest and penalties.
00:28:31.660 But if you have tax problems, you really realize that the IRS kicked off this year by spending
00:28:39.700 over 5 million Americans pay up letters and by opening new offices and hiring more agents.
00:28:48.300 So don't waive your rights and speak with the IRS on your own.
00:28:52.580 They're not your friends.
00:28:54.100 Tax Network USA, a trusted tax relief firm, has saved over $1 billion in back taxes for
00:29:01.940 their clients, and they can help you secure the best possible legal deal.
00:29:08.120 Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, I believe they can help you.
00:29:14.000 Whether it's a business or a personal tax matter, whether you have the means to pay or you're
00:29:20.320 on a fixed income and you need to pay over time, they can help you finally resolve all
00:29:26.200 of your tax burdens once and for all.
00:29:29.000 So folks, check it out.
00:29:30.520 Please call 1-800-245-6000 for a private, free consultation or visit tnusa.com slash stone.
00:29:42.780 If you owe back taxes, these folks are the consummate professionals, and they absolutely can help you.
00:29:51.520 All right, we're going to move on.
00:29:54.420 Watergate is, in the minds of many Americans, a settled issue.
00:30:00.460 And unfortunately, the mainstream media has largely adhered to the Washington Post,
00:30:08.560 Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein narrative, which is, as it turns out, a fraud.
00:30:16.700 Joining us now is Nick Bryant.
00:30:19.340 Nick Bryant is literally one of the best investigative reporters in the country today.
00:30:25.520 He's not a Republican.
00:30:27.060 He's not a conservative.
00:30:29.000 He is neither pro-Nixon or, to say the least, pro-Trump.
00:30:34.300 What he is is an honest reporter.
00:30:36.260 He is the first man in the country to essentially break the Jeffrey Epstein story.
00:30:41.900 Long before anyone else, his pieces at Gawker exposed what Epstein was doing.
00:30:48.100 It was Nick Bryant who had the little black book.
00:30:51.220 It was Nick Bryant who first reported on the FAA manifest lists that told us who was going to Epstein's
00:30:59.260 island.
00:30:59.620 Then Nick Bryant went on to expose one of the greatest sex trafficking scandals in American history
00:31:06.580 regarding the Franklin scandal, another amazing book.
00:31:11.740 But now, Nick Bryant has written what is, without any question, the definitive book on Watergate.
00:31:20.260 It's called The Truth About Watergate, The Extraordinary Tale of Lies and Liars.
00:31:25.980 This book, in some places, had me laughing out loud.
00:31:30.700 Nick Bryant, welcome to The Stone Zone.
00:31:34.720 Glad to be in The Stone Zone, Roger.
00:31:37.840 Nick, what's amazing about this book is, you say right up front, you did no new and original research.
00:31:44.840 All you did was go through all of the authoritative reporting that has been done by authors like Jim Haugen and the late Len Kaladny, who was a good friend of mine, Phil Stanford, many others.
00:31:59.280 And you have pulled it all together in a very concise, understandable way.
00:32:06.720 I find this interesting.
00:32:08.140 This fellow, Garrett Graff, has written a new history of Watergate, which is really just the old history of Watergate, recycled.
00:32:17.040 He gets nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.
00:32:19.940 This book is the book that should get a Pulitzer Prize.
00:32:22.900 You make Watergate understandable.
00:32:25.380 You don't pull any punches.
00:32:26.700 You're not a fan of Richard Nixon by any means, but what we have here is the unvarnished truth that Richard Nixon was taken down in a coup, and that the real villain, if you have to name the foremost villain of the entire Watergate drama, well, that would have to be General Alexander Haig.
00:32:48.280 Nick, tell us about this amazing book.
00:32:51.060 Well, I have read all the Watergate books over the years.
00:32:56.320 I've been fascinated by Watergate because at the heart of Watergate is a CIA honey trap.
00:33:01.880 And I've written two books about CIA honey traps.
00:33:04.840 And that's what really piqued my interest with Watergate.
00:33:08.880 And as I dug deeper and deeper and deeper into Watergate, the cover story just disintegrated.
00:33:15.820 The cover story for Watergate is mind-boggling.
00:33:19.140 It even – even the laws – it contravenes the laws of physics.
00:33:27.380 And yet it stands as the unvarnished truth.
00:33:31.880 And Alexander Haig was Nixon's chief of staff.
00:33:34.980 And a lot of people who are Republicans look up to Alexander Haig as someone who was there.
00:33:40.160 And actually, he's been portrayed as a hero who might have – Richard Nixon was supposedly this unhinged president on drugs and drinking, and he was going to nuke somebody.
00:33:52.100 But not that – but not with Alexander Haig.
00:33:54.640 Alexander Haig came along and saved the day.
00:33:58.140 Well, that is the story that Alexander Haig gave Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward.
00:34:05.020 He was their primary source.
00:34:08.280 Now, Woodward has lied about Haig being his primary source.
00:34:12.200 But Haig and Woodward knew each other going back to the Pentagon in 1969 and 1970.
00:34:18.760 And I'm amazed.
00:34:20.960 There are so many things in Watergate that amazes me that the mainstream media has whiffed on.
00:34:25.600 But to put Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein on the Mount Rushmore of journalism is really a sad commentary on journalism.
00:34:35.640 Because as I show in my book, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein tell a lot of lies.
00:34:43.180 And they lie when they don't even need to lie.
00:34:46.700 And I wanted to determine whether that was serial lying or pathological lying.
00:34:51.780 So I googled serial lying, and it came back as pathological lying.
00:34:56.460 So I guess I'd have to conclude at this point that Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are pathological liars.
00:35:04.540 Yeah, there's so much in this book that I had even forgotten.
00:35:09.640 The fact, for example, that Jeb Stuart Magruder, who I believe is the man who approved the funding for the Watergate break-in and other dirty tricks,
00:35:20.720 actually admitted to Len Kolodny, the author of Silent Coup, that John Mitchell never approved the Watergate break-in.
00:35:29.320 In fact, he rejected it numerous times.
00:35:32.220 On his deathbed, of course, Magruder would change his tune entirely, claiming that Nixon knew in advance about the Watergate break-in,
00:35:40.520 which, of course, there is no evidence to support that whatsoever.
00:35:45.280 I grabbed a Garrett Graff's book, just to look quickly in the index.
00:35:50.960 I went to the local Barnes & Noble.
00:35:53.280 I wasn't willing to actually pay for it.
00:35:55.500 I looked up the Maura Radford scandal in the index.
00:36:00.680 It doesn't seem to be there.
00:36:03.240 It's amazing that the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs, were actually actively spying on President Richard Nixon because they distrusted his movements for detente.
00:36:15.620 They were opposed to a strategic arms limitation with the Soviets.
00:36:18.880 They were opposed to ending the war in Vietnam on the expedited schedule that Nixon and Kissinger favored.
00:36:27.780 They also were opposed to his overtures to China, which, at the time, they were taken in out of the cold.
00:36:38.480 China was a backwards, dirt-poor, agrarian society with no technology.
00:36:43.940 The people today who blame Nixon for essentially giving the Chinese government its legitimacy, he had no way of looking 30 years down the road to see that the Bushes would give the Chinese most favored nation trading status,
00:37:01.560 and the Clintons would sell them some of our most top military secrets, including missile-targeting secrets in return for illegal campaign contributions.
00:37:12.960 It is those acts that really make China the powerhouse that it is today.
00:37:19.120 You're right about one thing.
00:37:22.720 There are many things going on at once during Watergate.
00:37:25.960 That's why it's so hard to understand.
00:37:28.440 There are a lot of complexities.
00:37:30.380 Not everybody involved in the Watergate break-in was involved for the same purposes.
00:37:35.600 We now know, thanks to recently declassified documents, that without any question, the Central Intelligence Agency knew in advance about the break-in,
00:37:46.400 and they infiltrated the Watergate break-in team, the burglar team, with numerous CIA assets, some of whom were even still on the CIA payroll.
00:37:58.080 For my book on Watergate, I interviewed 91-year-old Eugenie Martinez, who still lives in Miami and is in extraordinarily good health for his age.
00:38:12.720 You really, I think, lay bare the CIA's knowledge and involvement here.
00:38:18.640 The idea that James McCord and E. Howard Hunt, both veteran CIA operatives, that they didn't know each other, well, that's absurd.
00:38:28.080 Well, it's really important.
00:38:31.360 The Maura Radford spy ring that was perpetrated by the Joint Chiefs is really an important part of this story because it shows that the Hawks in the Pentagon didn't trust Nixon
00:38:43.940 and that they actually put together a spy ring, an espionage ring, against Nixon.
00:38:49.640 And when Len Kolodny—unfortunately, this book got published after Len Kolodny's death, but I was talking to him when I was writing it.
00:38:58.080 And he said, did you include the Maura Radford affair?
00:39:01.000 And I said, oh, of course.
00:39:02.600 And then he knew that I was on the right track.
00:39:06.340 And the thing is, once the Nixon administration outed the Joint Chiefs hijinks,
00:39:13.380 then it was the CIA that started infiltrating the Nixon administration.
00:39:19.340 McCord and Hunt infiltrated Butterfield, Alexander Butterfield, who would eventually spill the goods on Nixon's taping system.
00:39:28.380 He also infiltrated the—and we don't know how many people, how many CIA people infiltrated the Nixon administration.
00:39:36.880 But the—and when you're looking at Watergate from a different perspective, Jaworski, the special prosecutor, he also had ties to the CIA.
00:39:52.660 So you've got a lot of people—Leon Jaworski—so you've got a lot of people involved in Watergate that have these CIA ties.
00:40:00.260 And Ben Bradley at The Washington Post also had CIA ties.
00:40:06.000 Now, he adamantly denied it, and Jaworski adamantly denied it, but they were both lying.
00:40:10.660 And what I'm saying in my book is, why would these guys lie about having former CIA ties?
00:40:20.260 The primary reason that I can think of is the reason why they lied is because they still had CIA ties.
00:40:29.380 And if they were outed as being CIA assets or working for the CIA, then that would have brought the whole Watergate cover story into question by the American people.
00:40:39.840 So these lies by not only Woodward and Bernstein and Alexander Haag, but Leon Jaworski and Ben Bradley, there are a lot of people telling a lot of lies.
00:40:51.480 And John Dean was the hero of Watergate because he supposedly saw the moral turpitude in the Nixon administration, and he decided to blow the whistle.
00:41:01.900 He is also a major liar.
00:41:04.580 He tells so many lies.
00:41:08.360 It's funny.
00:41:09.140 He wrote a book called Blind Ambition about his experience with Watergate, and he wrote it with an esteemed historian.
00:41:16.020 And when his book didn't align with his various testimonies before the Watergate committee and also in the trial of Mitchell, Halderman, and Ehrlichman, he said that this esteemed historian made up his story out of whole cloth.
00:41:35.960 These are the kind of lies that John Dean tells.
00:41:39.420 And one lie that I think is really pertinent, Maureen Dean had a connection to Heidi Reichen, who ran an escort service that was hooked up to the Democratic National Committee.
00:41:53.820 And if you were a Democratic big shot, you go to the sixth floor of the Watergate, and a woman named Maxie Wells, the secretary of Maxie Wells, would show you a list of prostitutes, and you would choose the prostitute that you liked, and they would
00:42:09.420 be at the Columbia Plaza, which was a block away from the Watergate.
00:42:13.120 And once you went into that brothel of Heidi Reichen's, it was a CIA honey trap.
00:42:18.680 There were cameras, and ultimately, that individual would be compromised.
00:42:24.220 Now, according to John Dean and also Maureen Dean, they met in Los Angeles when John Dean was on business.
00:42:32.100 And people like Liddy had accused Maureen Dean of being a prostitute, and that never made sense to me because he immediately moved in with John Dean.
00:42:44.960 According to their cover story, John Dean met her in L.A., and then they had a whirlwind romance, and then she immediately moved in with John Dean.
00:42:53.580 And why would she have to be a prostitute?
00:42:56.260 She's working for—she's basically the girlfriend and then the wife of John Dean, who's consul of the president, who's making a lot of money, who's from an affluent family.
00:43:07.280 But I found a passage in the Washington Post that they met actually in Washington, D.C.
00:43:14.340 Now, that really changes the perspective of John and Maureen Dean.
00:43:19.300 If they met in Washington, D.C., you can throw out that timeline, and also you can throw out the idea that she was never a prostitute.
00:43:31.180 Interestingly enough, just to follow up on that same line of reasoning, when Eugenio Martinez, one of the Watergate burglars, was arrested,
00:43:40.800 he attempted to swallow a key that he had, which opened the draw where the portfolio of call girls available to D.N.C. dignitaries was available.
00:43:54.220 He told me that himself.
00:43:56.980 So at least one of the motives here was to secure that material.
00:44:03.780 I think that was John Dean's motive.
00:44:06.080 Now, we know that Jack Caulfield and Tony Ulasiewicz, two former New York City police officers who essentially worked first for John Ehrlichman as investigators for the White House Counsel's Office,
00:44:19.140 but were inherited by John Dean, both say in their oral histories that John Dean sent them to the Watergate to case the joint many weeks before the break-in.
00:44:29.960 This would indicate that John Dean is the man who not only conceived of the Watergate break-in, but who pushed relentlessly for the funding of it,
00:44:40.900 then lied to Nixon for 19 straight months, insisting that no one in the White House was aware of this operation,
00:44:50.460 when he knew that some of the bugging reports had been sent to Gordon Straughn, an aide to H.R. Bob Haldeman.
00:44:59.140 In Dean's book, The Nixon Defense, which he claims is the definitive printout of all of the Watergate transcripts,
00:45:10.040 he conveniently leaves out conversations between he and Nixon in March of 1973,
00:45:18.200 in which he's not only coaching Nixon about how to commit perjury, but lying to him repeatedly.
00:45:24.140 Now, as you know, Nick, John Dean has been very litigious.
00:45:30.700 He sued Len Kolodny and Robert Getline for their book, Silent Coup.
00:45:37.920 He threatened to sue James Rosen for his amazing book, The Strongman, a biography of John Mitchell.
00:45:46.140 I tried to get him to sue me over my book, Nixon's Secrets, The Truth About Watergate, the cover-up and the pardon.
00:45:55.580 He wouldn't take the bait.
00:45:57.920 I saw him last night on CNN opining about this Supreme Court decision.
00:46:03.980 This guy is, he's a psychopath.
00:46:07.720 There's no other way to put it.
00:46:10.020 And he's reinvented himself, as you point out, as some kind of courageous whistleblower.
00:46:16.840 He's the guy who I think conceived, pushed, covered up, delivered hush money,
00:46:23.140 and lied repeatedly to Nixon about what was really going on in Watergate.
00:46:29.620 Nixon, I think, at this point was overwhelmed.
00:46:32.320 He never knew the truth about what was happening.
00:46:35.980 I think he made bad decisions.
00:46:37.920 And as I think all Americans agree, it was the cover-up that brought him down, the cover-up.
00:46:44.780 But what amazes me is how you have synthesized this.
00:46:50.840 Let me ask you out straight out.
00:46:52.460 Do you fear a lawsuit by John Wesley Dean?
00:46:57.660 Well, there's always that possibility of a lawsuit by Dean.
00:47:01.280 But James Rosen said something pretty interesting when The Strongman got published,
00:47:08.220 which also addresses the malfeasance of John Dean.
00:47:11.880 He said that the last guy in history who really tried to rewrite history and actually make himself out to be a hero was Albert Speer.
00:47:27.160 And he compared Albert Speer to John Dean.
00:47:30.820 And Rosen said that everything, these things are coming out about John Dean.
00:47:36.480 And his place in history is not going to be that of a courageous whistleblower, but that of someone who is extremely tarnished.
00:47:45.460 And my book and other books really show that John Wesley Dean is a liar.
00:47:52.820 You call him a psychopath.
00:47:54.300 Now, with Woodward and Bernstein, I didn't know whether they were serial liars or pathological liars.
00:48:01.380 With John Dean, I don't know whether he's a psychopath or a sociopath.
00:48:07.860 I should talk to a psychiatrist to delineate that.
00:48:11.520 But what he did throughout Watergate, John Mitchell was the attorney general, and he had immense respect in the Nixon administration.
00:48:20.560 Nixon and John Mitchell had been partners in a law firm in New York City.
00:48:26.520 And John Mitchell was a very, very prominent individual in law circles and also within the Nixon administration.
00:48:36.960 And what John Dean was doing was he was proposing cover-ups and various types of malfeasance to Ehrlichman and Halderman, the number two and number three guys in Nixon's administration.
00:48:53.520 Halderman was the chief of staff and Ehrlichman was the domestic czar.
00:48:58.600 And he was proposing these things and saying John Mitchell said that we have to do this, like John Mitchell suggested that we use the CIA to cover up Watergate.
00:49:09.860 That came from John Dean.
00:49:12.580 And both Ehrlichman and Halderman talk about that.
00:49:15.680 And John Mitchell didn't realize this until years later, but he called these things Dean's gambit.
00:49:23.220 Because Dean was gambling that if he said that John Mitchell suggested it, that they would do it.
00:49:32.220 And although and Dean was doing all of this to protect himself, not John Mitchell, not the administration.
00:49:40.080 And when he realized that the cover up that he was perpetrating was collapsing, then he became a government witness.
00:49:48.540 Let's go back to the most popular question regarding Watergate, and that is Deep Throat.
00:49:56.100 Now, Deep Throat is not mentioned in the Woodward-Bernstein book, All the President's Men.
00:50:01.360 Deep Throat is never mentioned in any of their reporting in The Washington Post.
00:50:05.560 Deep Throat is not highlighted in their movie.
00:50:11.080 I believe a couple things.
00:50:14.080 First of all, I think, by and large, Deep Throat is a composite of multiple sources.
00:50:19.800 But the leading source, and I think Ray Locker laid this out brilliantly in his book, Haig's Coup, it appears to me that General Alexander Haig is Deep Throat.
00:50:31.020 It is absolutely clear that Haig believes his job is, A, to protect himself, because he was deeply involved in the illegal wiretaps in 1969 at the very beginning of the Nixon administration, driven by Henry Kissinger, who was livid about the Pentagon Papers release.
00:50:51.420 Nixon's initial reaction to the Pentagon Papers release was, well, all this is is damning for Lyndon Johnson and John F. Kennedy.
00:50:59.780 There's no reflection on the policies of this administration to end the war.
00:51:05.000 But it was Kissinger who insisted, no, Mr. President, you can't conduct foreign policy under these circumstances.
00:51:12.320 That led to the illegal wiretaps of journalists, government officials, White House staff members.
00:51:20.180 And there's no question that Haig was deeply involved and had knowledge of those wiretaps, something he was always able to keep out of the public eye.
00:51:30.220 Your assessment on Deep Throat?
00:51:32.320 I mean, Deep Throat is a composite, but the most damaging information definitely came from Alexander Haig.
00:51:40.320 The most damaging information was the tapes, what was on the tapes.
00:51:45.540 And Mark Felt was the number two man in the FBI, but he was fired in May or June of 1973.
00:51:53.780 And the most damaging information that came from Deep Throat was in November of 1973.
00:52:02.320 And Bob Woodward said that his communication with Deep Throat was that he would move the pot, the flower pot on his balcony.
00:52:10.040 And because Felt had been fired, he was living in Virginia.
00:52:16.400 So Woodward wants us to believe that Felt was driving into Washington, D.C. every day and looking at Woodward's balcony for the flower pot that moved.
00:52:27.300 And to actually see Woodward's balcony, you had to go down an alley and get out of your car and then walk about 50 feet and look straight up.
00:52:39.020 So Woodward is telling us that Mark Felt drove to Washington, D.C. from Virginia every day, went down an alley, walked 50 feet and looked straight up.
00:52:52.580 So Woodward definitely went a bridge too far when he named Mark Felt as the sole source of Watergate.
00:53:03.000 And then their communication was also where Felt would, on a certain page of The New York Times, felt ostensibly put down a time, a clock, that delineated a time that they would meet.
00:53:16.400 But here's the thing about that.
00:53:20.200 Those newspapers, all the newspapers were just thrown in a pile.
00:53:24.800 Woodward's New York Times wasn't delivered to him at his door.
00:53:28.600 He had to go to this pile of newspapers and dig through and find a copy of The New York Times.
00:53:36.020 So that, again, disintegrates the cover story of Bob Woodward.
00:53:40.740 And hopefully, at this point, we can start getting some truth about Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.
00:53:49.420 It is amazing the extent to which everyone just accepts as a fact that former FBI official Mark Felt was deep throat.
00:53:57.120 By the time Woodward said that, and by the time that Felt's family confirmed it, because Felt had been felled by a stroke, could no longer speak, and had severe financial problems, I think Felt was convenient for Woodward and Bernstein.
00:54:15.120 There were more and more questions about their book, their conclusions, and their assertion regarding deep throat, and I think he was a fall guy.
00:54:26.980 The timing, as you point out, doesn't work.
00:54:29.600 He would not have been in the loop, information-wise, at the time that he allegedly was deep throat.
00:54:37.640 Folks, if you want to know more about John Dean, I have a website up.
00:54:40.920 It's called watergateweasel.com, watergateweasel.com.
00:54:44.120 I have listed, I think, 12 or 14 questions that John Dean will never answer, questions that he should answer, questions that I think would prove, the answers to which would prove that he was the man who planned, pushed, covered up, and then lied about Watergate.
00:55:01.800 The federal prosecutors knew that there were substantial contradictions between his testimony before the grand jury, his interviews with the federal prosecutors, and his testimony before the Senate Watergate Committee.
00:55:17.840 But it didn't matter, because the idea was to get Nixon.
00:55:22.340 As Tucker Carlson recently pointed out, Nixon went from being one of the most popular presidents in the country, with a 49-state sweep and a landslide, to being removed from office about a year and a half later.
00:55:37.060 Folks, I recommended Kash Patel's book in the first segment, but if you are interested in this subject, or even if you're not, if you just want to have a correction, a course correction on history, the book, again, let's throw up the cover.
00:55:51.420 The Truth About Watergate, A Tale of Extraordinary Lies and Liars, by the brilliant investigative reporter Nick Bryant.
00:56:00.000 You can get it any place where books are sold.
00:56:02.080 You can go to Amazon.
00:56:03.140 You can go to Barnes & Noble.
00:56:05.060 I have bought five copies to send to friends.
00:56:07.980 I just mailed a copy to Tucker Carlson, who's extremely interested in this subject.
00:56:13.920 But even in his presentation, he repeats the canard that Mark felt is deep throat.
00:56:20.460 So hopefully we can bring his education a little forward.
00:56:25.440 This is an amazing accomplishment.
00:56:28.720 I cannot tell you what an engaging read it is.
00:56:33.000 Nick, you're a very funny writer.
00:56:34.980 There were times you actually made me laugh out loud.
00:56:38.480 You talked about the fact that Heidi Reichen, I believe it was, was married to two guys at the same time, but she hadn't converted to Mormonism at that time.
00:56:49.860 It was one of the funniest lines in the book.
00:56:52.880 Folks, if you want to know what really happened in Watergate, get this terrific book.
00:56:56.900 I'm afraid that we are out of time.
00:56:59.020 Nick, I'd like you to come back and talk about these new Jeffrey Epstein files that have just been released.
00:57:04.340 My producer will reach out to you and schedule that.
00:57:07.200 There is no one more knowledgeable about the Epstein scandal than Nick Bryant.
00:57:12.100 We look forward to having you back in the Stone Zone.
00:57:14.800 Folks, go get this book as soon as you can.
00:57:16.760 Nick, thank you, and God bless you for joining us today in the Zone.
00:57:23.120 All right, folks, I'm afraid that's it for today.
00:57:27.500 We'll be watching the drama surrounding the deepest division in Democratic Party history, where the party leaders clearly want to jump, dump Joe Biden.
00:57:37.120 But Joe Biden now with his son as his chief political advisor, Hunter Biden, and his wife digging in their heels.
00:57:43.720 It's unclear who will be the Democratic nominee for president.
00:57:49.120 In the meantime, President Donald Trump has asked for, and I believe been granted, a delay in his July 11th sentencing.
00:57:56.720 We'll have more about that tomorrow.
00:57:58.900 Thank you for joining us today in the Stone Zone.
00:58:01.280 Please go to rumble.com slash Roger Stone and hit that follow button, rumble.com slash Roger Stone and hit that rumble follow button.
00:58:13.960 You can also watch us at WorldviewTube every single day at 4 o'clock Central, 5 o'clock Eastern.
00:58:21.320 So if you don't catch it midday, you can see the show at night.
00:58:25.620 Thank you, and God bless you for joining us on the Stone Zone.
00:58:28.540 Until tomorrow, God bless you and Godspeed.
00:58:32.100 A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going, and he's smart, and he's strong, and people love him.
00:58:40.880 Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
00:58:43.340 Roger Stone.
00:58:44.380 Where's Roger Stone?
00:58:45.500 We're gonna go.
00:59:08.200 We love it.
00:59:08.600 We love it.