Roger Stone and Troy Smith break down the stunning development in a Manhattan courtroom in a Soviet-style show trial with an indictment which makes no sense whatsoever because it doesn't delineate a crime. But Donald Trump has been convicted in a record-breaking 11 hours on 34 counts. It's a pretty good indication that the jury was politically monolithic in their outlook. Here to help us bring that all into focus is my co-host Troy Smith, the editor-in-chief of Slingshot News and the host of the show The Stone Zone with Roger Stone, who joins me to discuss the verdict and the implications for the future of the Trump presidency. Roger Stone has served as a senior campaign aide to three Republican presidents. He is a New York Times bestselling author and a longtime friend and advisor of President Donald Trump. As an outspoken libertarian, Stone has appeared on thousands of broadcasts, spoken at countless venues, and lectured before the prestigious Oxford Political Union and the Cambridge Union Society. Due to his four-plus decades in the political and cultural arena, Stone is a pop culture icon. And now, here s your host, Roger Stone! The Stonezone, with legendary Republican strategist and political icon and pundit Roger Stone. Roger Stone joins me today to talk about the verdict in the Trump v. Mueller case, and his thoughts on the other side of the story and the parallels to his own experience in his own life and life in the early days of his marriage with his ex-wife, Donna Shalit, who served as his first wife, Donna's first wife. Theodosia. and now serves as the president of the Republican National Committee and is a Senior Counselor for the Republican presidential candidate, Ricketts. in the House of Representatives and is one of the most powerful men in the country in the campaign and has been a frequent guest on CNN's Meet the People s Most Powerful People. This is a must-listen to the latest episode of the newest show on the new podcast, The Daily Caller's "The Stone Zone." Subscribe to The Stonez Zone on Apple Podcasts and listen to the newest episode of The Stonezonz on the newest podcast The StoneZ Zone. Subscribe and share the show on your favorite podcast on social media and other social medias wherever you re listening to the news and social media platforms, wherever else you get your favorite podcasts are listening to it. Thank you for listening! -The Stonezone is produced and produced by Roger Stone
00:03:47.240There's the Donald Trump that I love, tough in the face of adversity.
00:03:52.460I have to tell you, Troy, when I first heard this result, at first I was numb.
00:04:00.080It kind of reminded me when I was in the first grade and I heard that President John F. Kennedy had been shot and then subsequently learned that he had been killed.
00:05:14.980They also rummaged through the Baron Trump, the president's son's room.
00:05:21.280What could they possibly have been looking for there?
00:05:25.040They rummaged through my wife's closet.
00:05:27.800My wife was held at gunpoint for 13 straight hours, unallowed to make or answer a cell phone call until her cell phone battery ultimately went dead.
00:05:40.700Then they wouldn't allow her to recharge it.
00:05:43.880My grandchildren were trying to call her.
00:05:46.480Our own children were trying to call to see if she and I were all right.
00:05:51.480Then, of course, you have the gag order, which is entirely unconstitutional.
00:05:58.400When I attempted to defend myself in the gag order, the judge in my case says it seems like the defendant likes publicity.
00:06:07.640You know, maybe she's not read the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, but I commend it to her.
00:06:13.620Yes, when MSNBC and CNN and the other scum in the fake news media are vilifying you, questioning your patriotism, claiming that you were the link between WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign or WikiLeaks and the Russians or the Russians in the Trump campaign.
00:06:37.380The government produced no evidence of any of it.
00:06:40.840Yes, I did want to defend myself, but that was, of course, not allowed.
00:06:47.900In my case, I think one of the reasons for the unconstitutional gag order, because my relatively modest social media following could not compete with the national news networks, was to hamper my ability to raise money for my legal defense fund.
00:07:05.980It wasn't very long in this process that my wife and I lost our home, our savings, most of our insurance, my car, the ability to make a living either speaking or writing because I was gagged.
00:07:24.980So just as they have went and gagged me, they gagged Donald Trump.
00:07:31.320Then there is our request for a change of venue.
00:07:34.540You just heard the president speak about that.
00:07:36.860We asked that the trial be moved somewhere besides D.C.
00:07:40.380Given the political makeup of the potential jury pool, denied by Trump's judge, denied by the judge in my case.
00:07:51.480Then, of course, both judges made prejudicial comments that really did mandate their recusal.
00:08:00.940Judge Merchant, despite his campaign contribution to Joe Biden and his daughter making millions off the Biden campaign, using this case as the focal point of her fundraising efforts, refused to recuse himself.
00:08:19.920In my case, the judge praised the jury forewoman, who we learned to be completely corrupted, she had said during jury selection and during the trial, that she was vaguely familiar with me, really didn't know anything about me or the case or the Mueller investigation.
00:08:42.660But an examination of her Twitter and Facebook page showed that she had been attacking me by name and in regard to this exact case in which she had been selected as a juror and that she'd been attacking President Donald Trump, claiming that anyone who supported him was a racist.
00:09:06.320But the judge denied a motion to recuse herself.
00:09:11.800And then there's the limitation on the defense.
00:09:15.560So just as I was not allowed to call Bill Binney, widely recognized as one of the country's experts on cyber terrorism and counterterrorism, longtime CIA official, who would have testified and provided forensic evidence that there never was any online hack of the Democratic National Committee.
00:09:43.080He was denied the right to trial, even though that was the underlying premise of my indictment.
00:09:50.720In this case, it's very clear that Alvin Bragg made the case to the jury that these transactions were either part of or were utilized to cover up a federal election campaign law violation.
00:10:14.180Otherwise, unfortunately, Judge Merchant would not allow Bradley Smith, who was the chairman, vice chairman and general counsel of the Federal Election Commission, probably the country's leading expert on the relatively complicated campaign finance law.
00:10:39.840That's so that Alvin Bragg and his cohorts could essentially imply to the jury that there was an underlying campaign finance violation here when there was none.
00:10:55.840Now you add all of that together and you see how I'm not surprised by this result.
00:11:04.420The only question now going forward, and I'm not a lawyer, is the conditions of Trump's release pending sentencing.
00:11:18.220The judge could theoretically put Trump under house arrest, could theoretically require him to wear an ankle bracelet, could theoretically limit his ability to travel and campaign.
00:11:33.200We're going to see what happens in that regard.
00:11:53.700You'd have to first go to the U.S. Court of Appeals before you could ultimately get in front of the U.S. Supreme Court because of the many violations of due process here.
00:12:11.780Never any chance of a fair trial for all of the reasons I listed.
00:12:18.000And I think the American people may be immune to it.
00:12:22.780In terms of people voting with their pocketbooks, I just read, correct me if I'm wrong, that the Trump campaign has raised almost $385 million.
00:12:35.340Is that correct in the short time since this verdict?
00:12:39.100It's been hundreds of millions of dollars, Roger, and we've seen high-profile donors that normally wouldn't support the former president that are jumping in now that he's been indicted.
00:12:50.120It seems to me that this is causing, as we've been alluding to here on the show for so long, Roger, there's a changing happening within the American voter base.
00:12:58.540There are people that traditionally would never support Republicans that are now supporting Republicans, and, you know, we have a video I want to play and get your reaction on, and I think it also speaks to what we're talking about here.
00:13:10.280There were several mainstream media figures, the regular culprits, the people on MSNBC and whatnot, Roger, that were celebrating this verdict, not realizing that the more they persecute Trump,
00:13:20.180and the more open this becomes as this verdict kind of opened up a whole new level of political persecution yesterday, the more people that were not politically inclined, that maybe would have never supported Trump, are supporting Trump.
00:13:34.420So let's roll that video and get Roger's reaction on the other side.
00:13:37.780Thank you to this judge. This is a moment of sort of democratic reset, small-d democratic reset for us as a country. Accountability is happening here.
00:13:47.760This was a jury that, throughout the process, was extremely attentive.
00:13:52.580Miracle is too strong a word, but a really, a day for celebration.
00:13:58.160The judge here, Judge Juan Marchand, who he's attacked repeatedly as corrupt without any basis for that, is a remarkable moment.
00:14:06.760This was a fair process, so you have to live with it.
00:14:14.580It's interesting that all of these liberal talking heads were essentially saying only days ago that they were disappointed in Alvin Bragg.
00:14:23.840They didn't think that Bragg's team had proved their case.
00:14:27.240They seemed to be bracing for a hung jury.
00:14:31.040Now, of course, they have a completely different outlook.
00:14:35.300I think that their euphoria will be short-lived.
00:14:40.000One thing I would caution our listeners and viewers about, which is when there is a huge, historical, even cataclysmic event like this, you cannot poll immediately.
00:14:54.800You can't take an objective poll within the eye of a storm.
00:14:58.760You do need to wait 48 to 72 hours for public opinion to settle before you can measure the effect on the election, which is the real key.
00:15:10.440I think you saw, Troy, the Trump battle cry, which is going to be the real decision will be made in November.
00:15:23.560But how they use this to hamper the president's ability to travel and campaign, well, that remains to be seen.
00:15:32.800I frankly think if they are too restrictive, that too will backfire with the American people.
00:15:38.760Well, Roger, my question to you would be, you know, how is it that the Democrats see, you know, I'm almost seeing a flip version of reality here.
00:15:49.320The Democrats see this as a sinking moment for President Trump.
00:15:53.280They see it as, oh, this is where we got him.
00:15:55.600And as we just played, they're celebrating.
00:15:57.980And yet politically, there is a somber tone, I think, of the Trump camp.
00:16:01.440But I think, as you said, the ultimate tone is, you know, the ultimate decision will be made in November.
00:16:27.840We should not sit here and pretend that the fake news media, the corporate-owned news media, which monolithically hates Donald Trump and has no resemblance to old-time journalism, where facts are presented and readers can make up their own mind, they do still have a major impact in the country.
00:16:48.980That impact is lessening with the rise of social media and the Internet as an information source.
00:17:01.480So I'm predicting that Trump doesn't drop in the polls.
00:17:06.520I am predicting that he actually has a modest gain.
00:17:10.640But the money flooding his campaign now in contributions, I think, is one indicator that this really just galvanizes his base.
00:17:23.980I also think, as we saw previously, there were major gains in the Black community because Blacks could identify with what they thought was the weaponization of the criminal justice system, where for many years, Black people have felt that they couldn't get a fair shake, certainly couldn't get a fair shake under the 1994 crime bill as written by Joe Biden.
00:17:51.480That's the bill that's the bill that requires the harsh mandatory penalties for the first-time nonviolent crime of possession of small amounts of drugs.
00:18:02.880You can understand, faced with a law in which people who are caught with rock cocaine face much harsher criminal penalties than those who are caught with powdered cocaine, the difference between poor people and, say, rich white lawyers is pretty obvious.
00:18:24.100So it is potentially possible that Trump will continue to make gains in that community, something we're going to be watching very closely.
00:18:37.320Well, Roger, we have a couple other videos that I want to get your opinion on because, like I said, an outpouring of support for the former president.
00:18:44.800There was an advertisement that was posted to his True Social page.
00:18:49.920This was the first thing that he put out following the verdict.
00:18:54.100It's an advertisement that I think is pretty powerful.
00:20:11.460I'm not prepared to explain it here today.
00:20:14.280But perhaps if I were the president right now, I would be talking to some of the top constitutional lawyers in the country to see if that that is a potential area of appeal.
00:20:27.020The president's lawyers have been surprisingly quiet.
00:20:32.400I saw Todd Blanche, who was the lead attorney for Trump, asked, I think it was on, perhaps it was CNN, maybe it was Fox.
00:20:41.660He was asked why he did not bring additional witnesses who could have testified in Trump's favor.
00:20:48.340And he said, because we live in America.
00:21:18.880Although in my case, it was clear that the judge did have the authority to maintain the gag order even after I was convicted and before I was sentenced.
00:21:31.440She could have even maintained it after after I was sentenced.
00:27:21.460Folks, coming up on the show, Gary Franchi of the Next News Network is going to join us to talk about Google and how Google manipulates information, particularly information regarding the upcoming election.
00:27:37.680There's a major movement in Texas where there's a formal investigation now into Google's activities.
00:27:45.920In the meantime, I want to talk to you for a moment about one of our sponsors.
00:27:51.060You may recall when AT&T's cell phone outage left millions, including me, stranded without the means to communicate with my family, my business associates, or even for emergency services.
00:28:07.900You see, the cell phone networks and towers are extremely vulnerable, vulnerable to hackers and terrorists, as well as vulnerable to hurricanes and other natural disasters.
00:28:22.520The system, as we have seen, can go down very quickly.
00:28:26.700That's why I went out and got the Iridium 9555 satellite phone, and I signed up for satellite service, meaning I'm now using a proprietary satellite network for my cell phones and text messages.
00:28:47.580Cell phones only cover about 7% of the Earth, while the Iridium system covers 100% of the Earth.
00:28:55.940You can literally call and text from any place where you can see the sky.
00:29:02.760The U.S. military and government uses these phones extensively.
00:29:08.200That's because they are completely and totally secure.
00:29:28.620Well, first of all, if you sign up for the Iridium system at a monthly contract of 24 months, it's a mere $95.95 per month, you get the Iridium 955 phone absolutely free.
00:29:49.820You can also sign up for a slightly lower cost plan with a slightly different phone.
00:29:58.260Of course, we also have a discounted family share plan that allows you to get up to three phones.
00:30:05.960So if you want your communications to be firstly reliable in the event, let's say, of an electric grid shutdown, a total blackout, well, then you need the Iridium 955 phone and service.
00:30:23.280How will you recharge your phone, you may be asking, since there would be no internet, no cell phones, no refrigeration of our food, no air conditioning, no heat, and no ability to recharge.
00:30:40.180Well, available also is the solar-powered recharger for the 955 Iridium phone.
00:31:16.120Roger, happy to have guest Gary Franchi of the Next News Network as our guest today.
00:31:22.560We have so much to talk about as it pertains to big tech and some of the censorship things that they're putting in place heading into 2024.
00:31:30.360So excited for this conversation today.
00:31:32.940All right, let's bring in our guest, Gary Franchi of the Next News Network.
00:31:41.980Thank you so much for joining us again.
00:31:45.100You know, I follow you on X, formerly known at Twitter.
00:31:50.180You really are an amazing journalist in terms of covering things that others are not covering that I think are vitally important.
00:31:58.640I've been aware of Google's manipulation of information, which has a deleterious attack effect on elections since 2016.
00:32:11.580I'm an avid follower of the work of Dr. Robert Epstein, who's done more in this area than perhaps anyone else.
00:32:20.320There were some major developments in Texas, really, recently that you were on top of, which is why I wanted you to come here today and tell us about it.
00:32:31.820Troy has had more time to study what transpired.
00:32:35.200But I thank you for coming on the show and lay out for us what happened in Texas.
00:32:39.900Well, Roger, it was a historic moment for free speech and for election integrity when Senator Brian Hughes,
00:32:54.880he had brought forth the whistleblowers from Google and Facebook, Zach Voorhees, Ryan Hartwig, Dr. Epstein, as you mentioned,
00:33:06.520and also Dan Schneider from the Media Research Center.
00:33:10.940And the testimonies that they provided were absolutely groundbreaking.
00:33:16.820And I encourage everybody to go and watch the full hearing of their testimony and their Q&A,
00:33:22.460because what was revealed there is absolutely shocking.
00:33:27.280The manipulation of search results, the suppression of independent voices on Google and on YouTube is rampant.
00:33:36.660And it's all designed to program the people.
00:33:41.640Because when you go to YouTube or you go to Google and you type in a specific keyword,
00:33:48.240you're going to get curated results that are designed to lead you into a specific direction.
00:33:56.800Now, you mentioned the 2016 election and our channel, The Next News Network on YouTube at the time,
00:34:42.980And that's when Donald Trump, you know, took that term and threw it back and said, you know, CNN is fake news.
00:34:49.760Now, following the election, my channel was targeted by multiple media outlets,
00:34:58.280Forbes, The Guardian, you know, multiple online and major networks.
00:35:04.880They were targeting us because of our effective reporting and because people were waking up to what we were talking about.
00:35:14.980So we were under a direct attack, and it was, you know, YouTube at the time, they said, well, we can't let this happen again.
00:35:25.260So come November of 2017, they did a radical shift in their algorithm, and they started weighting the search results specifically to suppress content.
00:35:37.440And we noticed overnight in that November an 80% drop in our views.
00:38:12.020At the bottom of the list is Next News Network at negative 3.35.
00:38:19.820Let me reiterate, the foreign propaganda outlet, Russia Today, was scored seven points higher than the Next News Network, one of the top YouTube news networks in America.
00:38:31.200Since my disclosure, Next News Network has been permanently demonetized and will soon be bankrupted.
00:38:39.480These sound more like the actions we'd expect from a Russian propaganda complex.
00:38:44.900But shockingly, it's the actions of Google.
00:38:47.660So, Gary, it was amazing to me, reviewing this information, how much of an effect Google really has on and a stranglehold on information across this country.
00:38:57.840As somebody who has been really at the forefront of the attacks against these, what do you think should be done?
00:39:02.760Do you think the way to address this is to go through Section 230?
00:39:06.460How do you think that these entities can be regulated?
00:39:08.940Because it seems to me they just have unregulated control over all of the information, basically, in the United States.
00:39:45.920And we can only say the reason they're suppressing the content is because they have an agenda and they surface the political thought that is beneficial to them or their agenda.
00:39:58.720So I – it's – Section 230, I'm not sure how we can address that specifically.
00:40:05.440But what's good to know is that what came out of this hearing is subpoena power has now been placed in this committee.
00:40:16.160And I know for a fact subpoenas are being drafted that are in their hands, and they are quite powerful requests of Google and YouTube.
00:40:26.760So we need to have more information from them specifically.
00:40:30.880See, when they demonetized my channel, they didn't tell me what exactly I did wrong or who or what was said or which video was the offending piece of content.
00:40:42.040Now, the original video that caused our demonetization was a video that discussed the Clinton body count as it relates to the suicide or supposed suicide of an individual who checked Jeffrey Epstein into the White House 14 times, the Clinton White House.
00:41:01.300Now, if you recall, this individual was hung from a tree, and there was a shotgun, and it was ruled a suicide.
00:41:09.940Initially, there was no shotgun found at the scene, so everyone was like, what, this is totally bizarre, and of course, with the Epstein connection.
00:41:16.000So we covered that topic, and immediately after that video was published, we got a message from YouTube that says,
00:41:22.460Are you feeling okay? Are you having thoughts of suicide? If you are, know that YouTube is here, and we care about you.
00:41:31.940Okay, well, that's bizarre. So something in the video triggered this algorithmic review, and then that sent my channel into a secondary manual review.
00:41:41.300And after they went through the channel, they said, oh, we've got to get rid of this guy.
00:41:44.640Okay. Now, after five reapplications and appeals and pruning content from the channel, we actually deleted 28,000 videos and over a billion views, 10 years of work, and they still would not remonetize us.
00:42:02.440So in these subpoenas, it specifically is asking for information related to our channel so that we can have an understanding of, once our channel, our channel is basically like a test case.
00:42:16.880Once they reveal what specifically triggered, what words, themes, or ideas triggered the rejection of these appeals,
00:42:26.320Now you've got a framework to understand where and what they are suppressing and the keywords related to it.
00:42:32.600Right now, they just say, oh, well, you have to go look at the terms of service and just figure it out.
00:42:39.460Well, if you look at the terms of service, they're so broad, you can't determine exactly.
00:42:43.880And when you have 28,000 videos, how do you even know that the – what – I mean, we – the meta-searching and the work we had to do on the database back end to try to isolate anything related to themes or topics in their terms of service, a daunting task.
00:43:00.620And that's why we just said, well, we're going to have to nuke it.
00:43:03.220And they still came back and rejected us.
00:43:05.640So back to your original question, I think we need to have a clear understanding of Section 230.
00:43:11.660We need to have a bill of rights for the internet so that due process can occur so that when someone tries to demonetize you or deplatform you,
00:43:22.400that you have a specific course of action that's not vague and just a scattershot, here, follow these rules.
00:43:31.500You need to have specific information, and that's where they don't provide that.
00:43:37.340So I'm not sure if you want to run clip four.
00:43:41.100This is a really interesting piece of video where he talks about the blacklists and subpoenaing Google,
00:43:50.260which now we know that the Texas Senate has the authority to do.
00:43:55.700What recommendations would you have for this legislature to take action to address the issues you address?
00:44:01.780My recommendation is subpoenas would be filed against Google for any documents that have the name blacklist.txt related to Google, YouTube, and their news search corpuses.
00:44:16.100I would also ask that you subpoena their documents related to rankings of media outlets.
00:44:26.700I've provided a supplemental showing a slide deck including such a list that is four years old.
00:44:35.980The open question now is what are the updated rankings of the media outlets that they have?
00:44:41.680Also, you know, machine learning fairness is so huge.
00:44:48.940I don't even know how you would even swallow that.
00:44:51.620But if you could do, like, you know, ask them, file a subpoena.
00:44:57.560Ask them for documents related to machine learning fairness.
00:45:01.100And that is going to be such a huge bombshell that it just needs to get into the public disclosure.
00:45:07.380So it's those three things, machine learning fairness, blacklists, and their media rankings is just is the start of the entire.
00:45:17.040What might be a really cheap way to get at this information is to ask what the decision process was for demonetizing Next News Network.
00:45:27.240Right. Like they're very large. And if you can get that information related to that case, I think that that's going to sort of illuminate what their decision making processes were for that demonetization.
00:45:38.640Like they're still demonetized. They've been demonetized for like six months, like the top conservative news network on YouTube.
00:45:44.620And the question is, why did they get demonetized?
00:45:47.560And if we have the answer to that, we're going to get the answers to a whole bunch of other like censorship activities with the company.
00:45:58.420You know, I've always thought often thought about whether there was a federal fix here.
00:46:02.980Clearly, the federal government has an interest in all of this.
00:46:07.600But then when you start to look at who has contributed money to the key Republicans on the key committees that have oversight, you'll find that Google is among the largest contributors.
00:46:21.100I also find it entertaining that Nicole Shanahan, who is the vice presidential running mate for Robert Kennedy.
00:46:32.020Suddenly, if you follow her feed on X, formerly known as Twitter, suddenly she's very, very concerned about Internet censorship.
00:46:42.840To which I said, Nicole, if you're concerned.
00:47:19.340Well, Roger, you bring up the federal element.
00:47:21.980I think if you have had a chance to look at the the Weaponization Committee report that was recently published, I believe it was about a week or so ago.
00:47:36.020And that document is absolutely stunning because it shows direct pressure coming from the White House to the social platforms to suppress content.
00:47:51.660And initially, what's interesting is that YouTube kind of pushed back a little bit because they're like, well, this content does not violate our terms of service.
00:48:00.220So they move the goalposts and and bow down to White House pressure to censor American speech.
00:48:13.200These are directives from the White House.
00:48:16.100So the White House is in direct putting direct pressure to destroy the Constitution of the United States by directing these social networks to to bow down to them.
00:48:28.860And when you talk about what happened, going back to the state level, from what I understand, what is happening, what we what we witnessed in Texas is basically like this is the first this is the first salvo.
00:48:46.200And from what I understand, this is they're going to find other states that have sympathy for this this this type of Internet suppression, free speech suppression.
00:48:58.940And they're going to hold more hearings at the state level and then take it all the way to the federal level.
00:49:05.560Because at the end of the day, Texas House Bill 20 is designed to, you know, give people that due process.
00:49:15.960And if we can codify something at the federal level, taking a look at the bill that came out of Florida and the House Bill 20, which is currently going to be reviewed by the Supreme Court because it's been challenged.
00:49:29.400House Bill 20 in Texas was challenged.
00:49:31.260Now it's got to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
00:49:32.720So we've got a lot of different tracks that are taking place here with respect to what Texas is doing, going to the federal level with the Supreme Court.
00:49:40.260And then, of course, taking that House Bill 20, codifying it at the federal level.
00:49:45.420Now, in clip two, if you meant it, Zach brings up machine learning fairness.
00:49:52.940And you talked about how Robert F. Kennedy's running mate is connected to Google and she's talking about Internet censorship.
00:50:04.620Well, let's let's take a look at what Zach Voorhees discloses regarding machine learning fairness.
00:54:42.660And we were always reporting stuff that would eventually, like, I always had like this, this picture in my mind of Sean Hannity's producers or Tucker Carlson's producers over at Fox.
00:54:56.660And they're secretly watching Alex Jones or secretly watching the next news network, because I suddenly find that the narratives that we're presenting eventually make their way into the mainstream news.
00:55:11.640And then, and then I, I always like point back to it.
00:55:15.100See guys, look, look what they're saying now.
00:55:17.320It's remarkable, but it's been going on for a very long time.
00:55:43.560I want to thank our good friend, Gary Franchi from Next News Network for joining us today and helping expose the manipulation of information by Google.
00:56:19.460You can go there and use promo code STONE.
00:56:22.720Whether it's the dog beds or the pet blankets or the incredibly absorbent bath towels or the luxurious bedsheets or so many other great products.