Letitia James and her supporters may have been popping the champagne corks a little prematurely. A grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia yesterday refused or declined to bring indictments against the New York s leading law enforcement official for simple mortgage fraud.
00:06:58.740Every property she's ever purchased, she violated crimes.
00:07:02.900In the first home she bought, she claimed falsely that her father was her husband in order to use his balance sheet to obtain the mortgage.
00:07:12.360Yet on the deed for the actual property, she correctly reflected that the co-owners were daughter and father.
00:16:37.600In any event, as the listeners of The Stone Zone know, we have long predicted what would
00:16:46.400happen if New York City elected progressive jihadi mayor Zoran Mamdami, the ayatollah, as I called him.
00:16:56.320I know what the end result is of his soft on crime, high tax, redistribute the wealth policies.
00:17:06.980And now it is beginning to manifest itself.
00:17:09.520New York City mayor-elect Zoran Mamdami, who, by the way, has raised millions of dollars from
00:17:15.080special interests for his transition, so much for this being a people's movement, has stated
00:17:23.000that the city will no longer conduct sweeps of homeless encampments when he gets to be mayor.
00:17:28.920This will follow what has happened in cities like Portland, Oregon.
00:17:32.560And in the name of humanitarian compassion, they essentially let vagrants, homeless people run the streets.
00:17:41.600As a result, in places like Portland, drug abuse has skyrocketed.
00:17:47.740Parts of the city have been literally abandoned as the entire town devolves into a modern wasteland.
00:17:54.340That is ultimately what will happen in New York if Mamdami is allowed to implement his policies with no check from Albany or Washington.
00:18:08.040We've already seen the results of cashless bail in New York City.
00:18:12.920The New York City crime statistics is put forward by the New York City Police Department
00:18:17.620and submitted to the FBI are what my friends in law enforcement, the real professionals, call a fugazi,
00:18:25.260meaning they've been manipulated to try to persuade you that crime is down by reclassifying certain crimes as what they are not.
00:18:34.300There's a dozen ways to manipulate the crime statistics.
00:18:37.560I have to get my friend, former New York police officer Sal Greco, on the show to explain how crime is actually up in New York City,
00:18:44.920but how they've manipulated the facts.
00:18:47.620I'm Roger Stone. You're listening to The Stone Zone.
00:18:50.480When we come back, I'm going to tell you how three corrupt left-wing Democrat judges submarine the very legitimate case against FBI Director James Comey.
00:19:01.800So don't go away. We'll be right back.
00:19:07.260The Stone Zone. Entertaining and informative.
00:19:39.500Now I'm going to tell you how three left-wing Democrat judges dismantled the federal indictment of FBI Director James Comey in an outrageous example of judicial overreach.
00:19:53.860The American public expects prosecutors to prove cases and defendants to challenge them.
00:19:59.940But in the case of the United States versus James B. Comey, the former FBI Director, something very different than that occurred.
00:20:08.560A federal grand jury voted to indict the former FBI Director on two felony counts.
00:20:13.440And then three federal judges unraveled that indictment using conjecture, media narratives, personalized attacks on prosecutors,
00:20:23.600and procedural anomalies that would have had no precedent previously in federal criminal practice.
00:20:30.280Together, everything that happened reveals a pattern of inconsistent, a pattern completely inconsistent with the concept of judicial neutrality.
00:20:41.480These judges abandon their ethical obligations and they ignore the constitutional role of the grand jury.
00:20:49.160First, there is Judge Michael Moknemoff.
00:20:52.100He, of course, was appointed by Joe Biden.
00:20:55.480He engaged in extraordinary bias, open admission that he was relying on the media to ascertain the facts of the case and outright hostility towards the prosecutor, Lindsay Halligan.
00:21:09.560Judge Moknemoff began the case by introducing a loaded political framing of the U.S. attorney herself, Lindsay Halligan.
00:21:18.240He said that she was a stalking horse, a puppet, or for a better word, doing the president's bidding.
00:21:25.480Judge, you just revealed you're biased.
00:21:42.820The judge actually referenced specific stories and news reporting as a factual basis for his views.
00:21:50.760This was reported that the president said the following.
00:21:53.820The judge cannot rely on external reporting.
00:21:56.860Canon 3 of federal judicial presence forbids it.
00:22:02.300But this reporting shaped his skepticism towards the Department of Justice's independence.
00:22:07.580And he was so dumb, he actually said it from the bench.
00:22:10.900Can you say complaint to the Office of Professional Responsibility?
00:22:16.140Then, of course, he continually interrupted the prosecutor, all those interruptions being one-sided.
00:22:22.400So when prosecutors attempted to explain the internal process at the Department of Justice, the judge said, well, let me stop you right there.
00:22:31.720The government was repeatedly interrupted.
00:22:33.600The defense, Comey's lawyers were never interrupted once in their arguments, not once.
00:22:38.740Lindsay Halligan, the prosecutor, was interrupted numerous times by this hacked Democrat judge.
00:22:45.880The government then filed a notice correcting the record after silencing the U.S. attorney and first misstating the record.
00:22:55.900So in other words, the judge made a false statement regarding the case from the bench.
00:23:02.560When Halligan tried, respectively, to correct the judge, he ordered her to sit down.
00:23:09.160He was then compelled to file a notice correcting the record, basically admitting that his recounting of the facts before the grand jury had been factually wrong, biased.
00:23:22.920Then, of course, the judge also prejudged the prosecutorial independence.
00:23:27.320Most concerning, I think, was his statement that he would struggle to find independence, even if Halligan asserted it under oath.
00:23:35.640Given the sequences of event in this short time, it would be very difficult for the court to make a finding of the true independence and objectivity of the prosecutor.
00:23:43.620What about the independence of the judge?
00:23:45.560The evidence in this case was overwhelming.
00:23:51.960There is no question whatsoever that Comey made material statements under oath to Congress to hide his involvement in the Russian collusion hoax.
00:24:01.800But it really didn't matter because the judge in this case was going to dismiss anyway.
00:24:38.140Also, she said there was not legal reasoning in her arguments in case.
00:24:44.640That's a character belittlement, David Schoen, Alan Dershowitz.
00:24:49.240Everyone who's examined this case says it has merit and it's open and shut.
00:24:54.240But not when a left-wing Democrat judge is on the bench.
00:24:57.760It is also interesting that Curry, the judge brought in from South Carolina, said that she relied on media reports to explain the facts of the case.
00:25:14.380She said there was abundant newspaper reporting.
00:25:17.760Once again, under the canon of ethics, they're not allowed to make assumptions based on media points.
00:25:26.040Cases must be ruled by either evidence submitted to the court or sworn testimony.
00:25:33.000So, in other words, a judge from another state was brought in to overturn a Virginia indictment.
00:25:41.160There's really no explanation as to why a dispositive constitutional motion in the Eastern District of Virginia was routed to a judge hundreds of miles away for a decision.
00:25:52.540This creates the unmistakable importance of forum shopping.
00:25:58.620This is about as likely as the spin of the wheel giving Judge Boasberg in D.C., the federal judge, every single case that has to do with Donald Trump.
00:26:10.460Why hasn't the Trump Justice Department asked the clerk of the D.C. courts to see the evidence of the selection, the random selection, which by law must be maintained?
00:26:26.500You may remember when it was learned that Lisa Cole, I think her name was, who was a Federal Reserve Board governor who had also cheated on her mortgage forms.
00:26:44.360That case went to a federal judge that was assigned to a judge who was her sorority sister.
00:26:49.580Once again, the clerk of the D.C. courts should be asked to prove the judge was picked on a random basis as required by law.
00:27:00.620So this case of Comey just continues to shock me.
00:27:08.260Federal courts take extraordinary care normally to avoid even the appearance of judge shopping, especially in a highly charged, politically sensitive case like this.
00:27:17.460That was not the case in this case, however.
00:27:21.000A dispositive ruling in a high profile criminal case was made outside the district by a judge who was brought in by the federal judges, by a judge with no connection to the venue, with no record explanation for why this assignment was made, and no indication why the presiding judge ever had even reviewed the grand jury evidence.
00:27:44.160There's no evidence that the judges looked at the grand jury evidence.
00:27:48.080That's because they had pre-decided to dismiss this case.
00:27:54.120Also, by the way, the judge dismissed the indictment against James Comey, contrary to all legal precedents.
00:28:00.880Curry quoted the United States v. Calandra, a very famous case, saying the validity of indictment is not affected by the character of the evidence.
00:28:09.020She then dismissed the indictment based on the character of the evidence, evidenced by her own admission she had never even examined.
00:28:18.500Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick was the third of the three musketeers.
00:28:23.820This guy's just as crooked as the other two.
00:28:26.920I think he distorted the facts in this case.
00:28:29.260You hear from the bench conjecture, a number of false statements and other ethical breaches that violate the canon of ethics for a federal judge.
00:28:40.340Of the judges involved, I think Judge Fitzpatrick's actions represent the most extreme departure from our normal judicial standards.
00:28:49.320His rulings were built on altered transcript context, inverted suspicion, and full disregard for sworn clarifications.
00:28:59.480The government explains that Fitzpatrick did not simply misinterpret Halligan's instructions.
00:29:13.000Creating a meaning not present in the actual text of what Halligan submitted.
00:29:17.760In other words, he rewrote her proposal.
00:29:20.760He took one uninterrupted instruction and treated it as several parts of an independent document, essentially manufacturing complete confusion.
00:29:32.560The admitted part of the instructions for the jury was dispositive.
00:29:38.440It proved that the prosecutor acted incorrectly.
00:29:41.040In filings, Lindsey Halligan emphasized the gravity of what Fitzpatrick had excluded from her filings.
00:29:46.820The portion that Fitzpatrick omitted was dispositive of whether the prosecutor acted correctly, showing whether or not Halligan had given the jury correct legal instructions, meaning Fitzpatrick rewrote the judge's motion that would go to the jury to undermine her.
00:31:12.200That was contradicted by the transcript.
00:31:14.260The judge Fitzpatrick suggested that a gap in the transcript of Lindsay Halligan's presentation to the grand jury was somehow nefarious and claimed falsely that she had never presented two of the 12 counts against Comey to the grand jury.
00:31:33.440But he speculated about it from the bench.
00:31:37.100So, if you wonder why FBI Director James Comey was able to lie to Congress regarding material matters, lie repeatedly about whether he had leaked or ordered others to leak classified documents to the New York Times,
00:31:52.580and don't look to this case as the adjudicator of whether or not that happened.
00:32:01.780The manner in which this case was dismissed violates everything we know about our legal system.
00:32:08.840And it is analogous to what happened in the case of New York Attorney General Letitia James.
00:32:17.500The other thing that happened here that I found shocking was the judge in the Comey case ordered unprecedented disclosure of grand jury materials.
00:32:24.860Based on that distorted foundation, he ordered all grand jury materials, including the audio.
00:32:29.840This is a breach of secrecy that was later stayed by a higher court for lacking actual grounding.
00:32:38.560So, the fix was in on the Comey case, just as the fix was in on the Letitia Brown case.
00:32:45.320But my question going forward really is a broader one.
00:32:48.100In the larger case, of the largest single dirty trick in American history, the abuse of power and the seditious conspiracy behind the Russian collusion hoax, two false impeachments, the January 6th hoax, the so-called documents hoax, and this tsunami of lawfare in New York State,
00:33:12.360is anyone going to be held accountable now that all the documents have been declassified, showing the criminal actions of people like Brennan and Comey and Clapper and James and Adam Schiff and others?
00:35:08.340If judicial integrity matters, if what happens, of course, matters in the United States,
00:35:12.400then this case deserves far more scrutiny.
00:35:15.780But more importantly, it remains to be seen whether we will have justice in the greatest crime of the century,
00:35:23.000because there is no question now, based on the documents declassified by the director of national intelligence,
00:35:29.120Tulsi Gabbard, that there was a seditious conspiracy that began on April 17th,
00:35:34.100pardon me, April 12th, 19, 2016, to fabricate a narrative against Donald Trump to claim that his campaign was waged with the assistance of Russian intelligence.
00:35:48.920And we know definitively that they used two pieces of completely fabricated evidence to make that case.
00:35:56.480The Steele dossier, which the FBI and the DOJ knew was unreliable, knew had been fabricated and paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign.
00:36:07.020This was a report that claimed that Donald Trump had partied with Russian prostitutes when he visited Moscow as a private businessman.
00:36:15.500And then the false claim that the Russians hacked the DNC and they gave that that sensitive information about the Democrats and Hillary Clinton to WikiLeaks.
00:36:26.180And to this day, no one can produce any forensic evidence that proves that the Democrat National Committee was the target of an online hack by the Russians or anyone else.
00:36:36.160In fact, all of the forensic evidence shows that the data stolen from DNC was downloaded to hard drives and taken out the back door.
00:36:46.420We know that from the time of the download, the timing of the download.
00:36:51.800So they use those two fraudulent claims to claim that Donald Trump engaged with the Russians.
00:36:56.960Later, they would say Paul Manafort, his campaign manager, shared sensitive polling information with a Russian intelligence asset, except for the man they claim that Manafort shared data with.
00:37:08.440Constantine Clement has now been proven to be a U.S. intelligence asset.
00:37:13.380So will these people start at the top, Obama, Biden, National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, FBI Director, James Comey, the ringleader, CIA Director, John Brennan, admitted communist, Islamic convert.
00:37:32.040James Comey, again, the FBI Director, Andrew McCabe, his henchman, Robert Mueller himself, although he'll probably use an insanity defense at this point, epically corrupt prosecutor, Andrew Weissman.
00:37:52.360Will any of these people who engage in unconstitutional and illegal activities in order to execute a coup be prosecuted?
00:38:02.660It began in the Oval Office, but the seditious conspiracy continues through two fraudulent impeachments in which the two Vindman brothers show up and lie about what they heard on a phone call in the Ukrainian impeachment.
00:38:15.180It goes on to the January 6th nonsense and then the raid on Mar-a-Lago at Trump's home.
00:38:23.320If we don't hear something from the Southern District of Florida, where jurisdiction is, other than the fact that there were some subpoenas announced months ago, that many people in the MAGA movement are going to lose faith.
00:38:36.600Me? I'm praying for justice and accountability.
00:38:40.300Thanks for joining us today in The Stone Zone.