Glenn Greenwald: Dangerous New Escalation in Russia, & Our Blackmailed Politicians
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 57 minutes
Words per Minute
194.49454
Summary
Tucker Carlson: I think we're watching the most evil thing I've ever seen in my lifetime, allowing Ukraine, a proxy state of the U.S. to strike within Russia . Tucker: People in Washington misunderstand Vladimir Putin and they think he's a monarch with absolute power, which is not true . Carlson: Even the Biden administration, for all their hawkishness on Russia and Ukraine, feeding that war, fueling it .
Transcript
00:00:00.960
After decades of shaky hands caused by debilitating tremors,
00:00:04.760
Sunnybrook was the only hospital in Canada who could provide Andy with something special.
00:00:09.120
Three neurosurgeons, two scientists, one movement disorders coordinator,
00:00:13.180
58 answered questions, two focused ultrasound procedures,
00:00:16.680
one specially developed helmet, thousands of high-intensity focused ultrasound waves,
00:00:21.320
zero incisions, and that very same day, two steady hands.
00:00:25.840
From innovation to action, Sunnybrook is special.
00:00:31.460
I think we're watching the most evil thing I've ever seen in my lifetime,
00:00:34.300
which is the lame duck administration leaving the next administration with the world war,
00:00:38.940
with the nuclear conflict, by allowing Ukraine, a proxy state of the United States,
00:00:45.260
And I'll just have one editorial comment and then I'm just going to let you go.
00:00:47.920
But I think that people in Washington misunderstand Vladimir Putin
00:00:50.960
and they think he's a monarch with absolute power, which is not true.
00:00:54.320
And Russian politics is complex and it's lively.
00:00:56.680
And Putin is very concerned with his approval rating within Russia.
00:01:05.740
And if he can't hide attacks on him by the United States through Ukraine,
00:01:15.580
I think he will have no choice in his view but to launch like a serious response
00:01:21.960
against Ukraine or NATO countries or possibly the United States.
00:01:25.760
So this seems like the most reckless thing that's ever happened in my life.
00:01:48.640
We bring you stories that have not been showcased anywhere else.
00:01:52.960
And they're not censored, of course, because we're not gatekeepers.
00:01:55.980
We are honest brokers here to tell you what we think you need to know and do it honestly.
00:02:01.160
Check out all of our content at tuckercarlson.com.
00:02:04.920
So let me just say specifically what has been authorized.
00:02:09.320
This is something that some NATO countries, including the United Kingdom,
00:02:12.960
have been pressuring the Biden administration to do for quite a long time,
00:02:17.500
But going all the way back to the beginning of 2022,
00:02:22.220
which was that we have these guided missiles called Atakums,
00:02:25.400
which are very powerful for attacking inside Russia.
00:02:28.740
You can guide them specifically and very precisely to where you want them to go.
00:02:32.900
Obviously, you have to get intelligence about where you want to strike.
00:02:36.300
And the reason we never permitted the Ukrainians to use them is because the Ukrainians can't use those missiles on their own.
00:02:43.920
In other words, if they want to launch these missiles,
00:02:46.140
it's not just the U.S. giving them the missiles and then telling them,
00:02:49.420
It requires the direct involvement of the United States and or a major NATO country like France or the U.K. or Germany
00:02:56.540
because the Ukrainians don't have the guiding capability in order to know how to launch these missiles.
00:03:02.120
So this is not just us giving them missiles and saying, go attack deep inside Russia.
00:03:07.820
Imagine if some major country, China, Iran, Russia, whoever, gave missiles to Canada if we were at war with them or Mexico or Cuba
00:03:17.100
and said, we're giving you these specifically for you to use them inside the United States.
00:03:22.500
We would consider that a grievous act of war, not just on the part of the country shooting them,
00:03:30.800
He didn't just give Ukrainians missiles and say, feel free to use them inside Russia.
00:03:34.780
We are going to participate in the bombing of Russia, NATO and or the United States,
00:03:40.320
because there's no way the Ukrainians can launch these missiles on their own,
00:03:43.320
which means we are now, our military, our intelligence community,
00:03:47.120
are participating in missile attacks inside the country of Russia.
00:03:53.340
This is something that even the Biden administration, for all their hawkishness on Russia and Ukraine,
00:03:58.780
feeding that war, fueling it, preventing diplomatic resolutions because they wanted this war,
00:04:03.320
even they were unwilling to do it because they understood the dangers of the escalatory risks.
00:04:08.580
For Joe Biden, or whoever's acting in his name, to do this just two weeks after the country
00:04:15.100
resoundingly rejected governance by the Democratic Party and the administration,
00:04:20.220
and on his way out as an 81-year-old man, knowing that he has about six weeks left in office,
00:04:27.400
to just say, yeah, I know that these are massive risks, but I'm going to take them.
00:04:33.920
And then to make it so much more difficult for the following administration
00:04:37.560
to do what they promised to do during the campaign, which the American people voted for and wanted,
00:04:43.800
Instead, we're risking escalation with the world's largest superpower, nuclear power.
00:04:52.980
I mean, placed in context, too, this is without precedent.
00:04:59.700
But so 1956, Soviets invade Hungary and murder a ton of people.
00:05:08.420
68, they invade Czechoslovakia, murder a bunch of people once again.
00:05:11.800
These are all, you know, incredibly provocative acts, far more provocative than invading eastern
00:05:17.600
And this was the middle of the Cold War, and no American presidents, Democrats and Republicans
00:05:27.540
I mean, there's nothing like this has ever happened.
00:05:30.440
Well, this is, you know, my big breach with the left, my big permanent split with whatever
00:05:36.600
they thought I was in terms of associates with them.
00:05:41.180
And that all happened in 2016 when out of nowhere, Russiagate appeared.
00:05:46.500
And I remember, like it was yesterday, the very first ad from Hillary Clinton's campaign
00:05:50.540
with this like menacing baritone voice, you know, what does Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump
00:06:01.040
And journalistically, I just couldn't believe it because it was so redolent of McCarthyism,
00:06:08.600
I was taught it was like one of the worst civil liberties of the 20th century.
00:06:12.840
Yeah, I mean, you go around just accusing people of being Russian agents with no evidence,
00:06:17.500
destroying their reputation, their lives, kind of like what they're trying to do to Tulsi
00:06:20.540
Gabbard now, what they tried to do for Donald Trump for the last eight years.
00:06:23.580
So just on that ground, I was kind of offended by it.
00:06:25.880
And journalistically, I was so skeptical of it because when you have intelligence agencies
00:06:32.480
leaking anonymously unverified claims to the Washington Post and the New York Times,
00:06:37.380
and they put it on the front page and gather Pulitzers for them, that's usually a sign that
00:06:40.500
a huge disinformation campaign of deceit is underway.
00:06:42.960
That was the exact method used, for example, to sell the war on Iraq to the American people,
00:06:50.280
That's why these intelligence agencies need to be rooted out.
00:06:52.640
But what alarmed me most was that the climate was deliberately created in Washington,
00:06:58.880
especially once Hillary lost and they blamed Russia for it, that any communications with
00:07:05.340
Russia, anyone who visits Russia, anyone who talks to a Russian official is automatically
00:07:13.000
And as you said, during the Cold War, which dominated our American life for 50 years,
00:07:18.020
Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the evil empire.
00:07:20.760
They were infinitely more powerful, more threatening, more everything than Russia is now.
00:07:31.000
There were phones all over Washington that rang to the counterparts.
00:07:36.560
After Russiagate, there's basically no communication any longer between the Russian leaders and
00:07:48.280
That was something that in Washington got created because they blamed Russia and claimed
00:07:53.860
that Russia was our existential enemy because of the claim that they interfered in the 2016
00:08:00.120
The Obama administration and the Putin government cooperated in all sorts of ways around the world.
00:08:06.840
But it's the leadership of the Republican Party, too.
00:08:09.440
I had a conversation with the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, and he was about to
00:08:15.520
And I said, well, why don't you check with Putin?
00:08:18.640
You're number three in line from the presidency.
00:08:21.300
I said, well, I'll see if I can facilitate that.
00:08:33.220
Why wouldn't he just say, I mean, I'm not attacking Mike Johnson.
00:08:40.000
I said, you know, like, don't you have a moral duty to get as much information about
00:08:45.600
this war before you fund its continuation and the killing of all these people?
00:08:51.760
I think it is important to say that this war has been 100% bipartisan, although the
00:08:56.140
Biden administration, as the leader of the executive branch, is primarily responsible.
00:09:00.320
The primary—there's been about, I would say, five or six dozen anti-interventionist
00:09:06.580
Republicans, typically more Trump supporters, both in the House and Senate, who have spoken
00:09:10.960
out from the beginning against funding this war.
00:09:12.880
But the vast majority of Republicans, to the extent they have a criticism or had a criticism
00:09:17.840
of the Biden administration at all with respect to Ukraine, it was that they didn't do enough.
00:09:24.360
They didn't get more involved more heavily and earlier than they should.
00:09:28.820
But, you know, the thing that you said about encouraging Mike Johnson to speak to Putin,
00:09:34.060
which, of course, as the third in line to the presidency, as you said, when they're
00:09:37.280
proposing to escalate a major war, of course you should want to understand the Russian
00:09:41.920
This is what Tulsi Gabbard did in 2017 when she was a member of Congress and the Obama
00:09:50.180
administration had unleashed this billion-dollar-a-year CIA dirty war to change the government of
00:09:56.380
Syria, to dislodge Basra al-Assad from the government.
00:10:00.440
And we fought along ISIS and al-Qaeda, who also wanted Assad gone.
00:10:04.760
We were told those were our existential enemies for 15 years.
00:10:09.200
And so many of the weapons we sent ended up in the hands of al-Qaeda and ISIS and other
00:10:15.200
And Tulsi Gabbard, as a member of the military, but also as a member of Congress with constitutional
00:10:19.200
responsibility to authorize or disauthorize a war, wanted to go to Syria and see what was
00:10:24.460
And then she spoke with Syrian officials and got an opportunity to speak with the Syrian
00:10:28.260
And based solely on that, she's now accused of being a Russian agent, being some sort
00:10:39.300
This is the jingoistic climate that has been created, way worse than what prevailed in the
00:10:44.380
When Nixon went to China, Reagan negotiated all kinds of arms deals with the Soviets.
00:10:53.180
It's like we live in a Marvel cartoon for children where there's good guys and bad guys
00:10:57.720
where the good guys, you don't speak to the bad guys.
00:11:03.660
So her point, I don't want to speak for Tulsi Gabbard, our new director of national intelligence
00:11:07.760
nominee, but my view was, I don't have any feelings about Assad or Syria, but it's a
00:11:13.560
fact that that government protected religious minorities, including an ancient Christian
00:11:17.320
community there in the Alawites, of which he's one, in that country for a long time.
00:11:25.960
Like, what does, why should I be opposed to Assad in Syria?
00:11:33.040
I was not supposed to be opposed to the Soviets who were anti-Christian, but now you have a pro-Christian
00:11:38.460
Tell me, why doesn't somebody explain to me why?
00:11:40.880
As a 55-year-old American taxpayer, I should be against him.
00:11:43.300
So first of all, I think the principle is that, and this is what Donald Trump read explicitly
00:11:48.400
in 2016, was that we shouldn't be involved in wars designed to change the governments of
00:11:55.580
other countries, rebuild their governments, transform their societies, in part because it's
00:12:01.280
not our place to do it, and in part because we're terrible at doing it because they have
00:12:04.720
very complex, rich, long histories that American intelligence officials and political leaders
00:12:16.540
And we've proven that over and over in all these failed attempts.
00:12:19.420
But also when it comes to, I mean, Tulsi Gabbard's entire worldview, and I have spoken to her
00:12:25.300
about this, I've interviewed her about this, so I feel comfortable saying this, is that
00:12:31.200
She believes that we should be very militarily aggressive against, say, terrorist groups
00:12:35.920
that actually want to attack the United States or have done so, or American assets or American
00:12:40.960
Her argument is, is that we should not be involved in regime change wars of the kind
00:12:44.520
we did in Iraq, that she fought in, of the kind we did in Syria, of the kind we did in
00:12:48.560
Libya, of the kind that we did in Ukraine in 2014 when we actually engineered a coup on
00:12:55.020
Of the kind that we're trying to pull off in Russia right now.
00:12:58.520
Yeah, to weaken that regime, and to, the thing is, though, that what you said about
00:13:03.060
Putin is so important, which is, Putin's critics, he doesn't have very many liberal critics,
00:13:15.940
Who see him as weak or insufficiently militaristic when it comes to confronting the West, but particularly
00:13:21.860
They wanted, they wanted destruction of Ukraine.
00:13:26.280
And as you say, the Russian government has taken the position, warned the United States
00:13:31.240
government privately and publicly, that any use of these missiles involving, as they do,
00:13:39.240
direct US or NATO involvement in their launching against Russia will be seen as the entrance of
00:13:44.660
the United States and NATO as belligerents in this war, as a war against Russia, as World
00:13:48.820
War III, and he will have to treat it as such, even though he's been very constrained, even
00:13:56.100
There are a lot of people inside Moscow who do wield a lot of power who do, and who will
00:14:07.120
So I think, as you've said, I don't think we can say it enough, so much of this has been
00:14:13.540
conducted in bad faith, but also so much of that bad faith has been informed by ignorance
00:14:17.000
or uninformed by ignorance, not informed at all.
00:14:19.720
And I think that people really think that Putin is an absolute dictator who can do whatever
00:14:26.240
A lot of smart people in Russia, complicated political situation.
00:14:32.440
The view, I think, I know, from Putin is that Blinken is driving this, and that Blinken
00:14:39.780
has a lot of hostility, is reckless, but has a lot of hostility toward Russia that has nothing
00:14:50.040
I mean, I think Blinken, Jake Sullivan, that's kind of the brain trust as it is.
00:14:56.980
Obviously, Joe Biden has no involvement in this whatsoever, which I think has been a
00:15:05.840
Everyone saw what Joe Biden was long before that debate.
00:15:11.100
The only people who didn't say so were the media and Democratic allies.
00:15:14.880
After the debate, it became untenable for them to deny it any longer that this is an old man
00:15:21.780
Yet he's still the sitting president of the United States.
00:15:25.620
And you had the vice president, understandably, doing nothing for the last four months other
00:15:31.340
than working on her own empowerment through the campaign.
00:15:34.200
She obviously wasn't involved ever in any decision making, let alone when she became the
00:15:38.900
So the question has been all these consequential decisions we made, deploying massive military
00:15:43.360
assets to the Middle East, making decorations about when we would go to war in the Middle East
00:15:46.680
and for whom, escalating the war in Ukraine, now authorizing the use of these long-range
00:15:55.780
It's not a character flaw in his part, but it's just a disability, a clear disability.
00:16:01.600
He's obviously not making any of these decisions.
00:16:03.320
I do think that if you look at the national security crowd that emerged from the Obama
00:16:11.080
presidency, especially the people who were associated with the State Department run by
00:16:15.140
Hillary Clinton and then John Kerry, even before Russiagate in 2016, they had an obsession
00:16:21.240
In fact, when Hillary Clinton left the administration as Secretary of State and wrote her book, Hard
00:16:26.540
Choices, the only areas in which she was critical of Obama was her view that he wasn't willing
00:16:33.640
Obama had this view, like sort of this realist view from Brent Scowcroft.
00:16:37.440
Those are the kind of people who like Jim Baker, that why would we send lethal arms to Ukraine
00:16:45.060
Ukraine is not a vital interest to us, but it is to them.
00:16:48.080
He wanted to work with Russia and did to facilitate the Iran deal, to bomb terrorist targets in Syria.
00:16:54.000
And there was a faction in the Obama administration led by Hillary Clinton.
00:16:59.180
All these sort of national security people woven into the, you know, that Victoria,
00:17:05.800
That's how she made her way into the Obama administration.
00:17:11.860
The reason Putin hated Hillary Clinton was because when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State,
00:17:16.580
the United States openly spent millions of dollars funding opposition groups and organizing
00:17:25.420
I mean, we talk about Putin interfering in our sacred politics and our internal affairs.
00:17:30.900
Hillary Clinton was openly funding protests and anti-Putin agitators inside Russia in the 2010 election,
00:17:44.480
And they were obsessed with Russia well before that.
00:17:48.320
And I do think that Russia is disliked by a lot of people in Washington because of the perception
00:17:55.100
that they are detrimental to our interests in the Middle East and especially to Israel's interest in the Middle East,
00:18:01.560
including their support for Bashar al-Assad in Syria,
00:18:04.720
the fact that they have a good relationship with Iran.
00:18:07.820
It doesn't really always have a lot to do with the United States,
00:18:11.180
but with the interests of other countries as well.
00:18:16.320
Because it is true that Assad is only there because of Russia.
00:18:22.860
And it's been their ally in the Middle East for decades.
00:18:25.060
And just like we support our allies around the world, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt,
00:18:30.000
you know, very savage, brutal dictatorships, but at least to do our bidding,
00:18:35.000
They have a long-term relationship with Venezuela, with Cuba, going back to the Cold War,
00:18:44.440
And as a result, they end up being antagonistic to Israel,
00:18:48.920
which ends up being defined as U.S. interests as well.
00:18:51.980
Like there's no separation between the countries.
00:18:53.060
Strictly speaking, this has kind of nothing to do with us whatsoever.
00:18:58.980
Unless you see Israel as a part of the United States.
00:19:02.220
You know, I'm not hostile toward Israel, but I think it's a separate country.
00:19:04.600
It seems to me it would be a separate country as well.
00:19:10.180
So just from an American perspective, without wishing ill on any other country at all,
00:19:17.600
I have been struggling for really since the 2016 election,
00:19:21.220
but particularly since the war began in February of 2022,
00:19:24.100
to identify what exactly would be the U.S. interest in this.
00:19:30.840
But I just don't see what's in it for us at all.
00:19:41.100
who believes that their life is affected in any way by the question of
00:19:45.460
who rules various provinces in the Donbass, in eastern Ukraine.
00:19:49.920
Nobody thinks about Ukraine, let alone the Donbass, let alone eastern Ukraine.
00:19:54.500
It's an incredibly complex situation there in terms of the people's allegiances,
00:20:00.100
which are far closer to Moscow than they are to Kiev.
00:20:07.500
Should it be used as a buffer against the West?
00:20:09.920
The whole framework, as you well know, and as other people have pointed out,
00:20:14.200
when Russia agreed to the reunification of Germany,
00:20:17.000
which was obviously an extraordinary thing for the Russians to agree to,
00:20:20.480
given the Russian history in the 20th century with respect to Germany,
00:20:23.760
when the Berlin Wall fell and they allowed the eastern and the western parts of Germany
00:20:28.980
to reunite and to become part of the West and become part of the EU,
00:20:32.980
the only concession they extracted in exchange for that was,
00:20:37.480
okay, with reunification, NATO is now moving eastward closer to our border.
00:20:42.000
In a country that has devastated our country twice in two world wars,
00:20:47.080
invaded Russia twice, killed tens of millions of Russian citizens,
00:20:50.540
the only thing we need as a security guarantee in exchange for allowing that
00:20:54.080
is that NATO will never expand one inch eastward beyond what was East Germany.
00:21:01.080
And immediately in the 90s, under the Clinton administration,
00:21:03.920
the Clinton administration started talking about it and implementing NATO expansion eastward toward Russia,
00:21:09.280
exactly what was promised to Gorbachev the United States would not do
00:21:11.980
in exchange for them agreeing to reunification.
00:21:16.500
Why did we need to expand our influence eastward toward Russia?
00:21:23.320
it's going directly up to the Russian border on the part of their border
00:21:26.500
that has been invaded twice in Ukraine to destroy Russia in both of those world wars.
00:21:32.600
We also participated in the change of government.
00:21:35.840
We removed the democratically elected leader of Ukraine
00:21:37.940
before his constitutional term was expired in 2014
00:21:40.220
because we perceived him as being too friendly to Moscow,
00:21:48.360
and it was replaced by a government that was more pro-U.S.
00:21:51.320
Imagine if the Russians engineered a coup in Mexico
00:21:55.240
to take out the government because they were too friendly to the U.S.
00:21:57.880
and put in a hardline, pro-Russian, anti-American, anti-NATO president.
00:22:03.660
Imagine how threatening we would regard that as.
00:22:09.140
this has nothing to do with the national security of the American people.
00:22:12.380
No American is threatened by who governs Ukraine.
00:22:15.380
What they're threatened by is what the United States is doing in Ukraine,
00:22:20.440
Well, they keep telling you AI is going to make the world a better place.
00:22:23.700
That may be true, but you have to ask better for whom?
00:22:28.320
which could use it to calculate exactly how much to raise your premiums
00:22:41.400
Better for politicians who can use the information they take from you
00:22:49.000
And that's one of the reasons that we protect ourselves
00:23:08.960
that's vacuuming up information on everybody else.
00:23:21.840
It comes with a risk-free 30-day back guarantee.
00:23:25.060
That's one of the reasons that experts like CNET
00:23:50.880
with more than two in three residents being affected.
00:24:06.860
At United Way, we wake up to a different alarm every day.