Glenn Greenwald: Dangerous New Escalation in Russia, & Our Blackmailed Politicians
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 57 minutes
Words per Minute
194.49454
Summary
Biden allows Ukraine, a proxy state of the United States, to strike within Russia. This is the most reckless thing a lame-duck president has ever done, and it's not even close to what Hillary Clinton would have done if she was still in office. Tucker Carlson explains why this is so dangerous, and why we should all be worried about it. Tucker also talks about how dangerous it is, and what it means for the future of our relations with Russia and the world, and how we need to prepare for the possibility of another attack by the Ukraine. Tucker also explains why the Biden administration should never have allowed Ukraine to attack within Russia and why it's a huge mistake. Tucker concludes by asking the question: Is this a mistake, or is it a good one? And what will the next president do in response to this reckless move by the lame duck administration? Tucker answers these questions and much more on this episode of The Tucker Carlson Show with Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight. Check out all of our new show episodes on the Tucker Carlson show wherever you get your shows on the internet, wherever you re listening to your favorite podcasting platform, and don't miss it! Subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe on iTunes Learn more at Tuckercarlson.co/TuckerCarlson Learn more about your ad choices. Use the promo code "UPLEVEL" to receive 10% off your first month's rate and discount code "upcoming ad discount when you shop at Upcoming at checkout. at Upleaf.co at Upfront.fm/tuckert@tuckerclintonshow.co Use coupon code "tuckercrcrcrarlson to receive $10,000 and receive $50 or more than $50,000 in total value when you review the offer of a product review and get a discount of $25,000 or $75,000 of your choice of a course discount during the course of $5 or more get $5, and receive a VIP discount during Upfront VIP membership? Thank you for listening to Tucker Carlson's "Tucker's Testo's "Upfront" and learn more about Tucker's new book, "Tune in to Tucker's "The Tucker's Guide to the world's Most Powerful Podcasts" at in his podcast, "Outro: Tucker's Top 5 Podcasts? and more!
Transcript
00:00:00.960
After decades of shaky hands caused by debilitating tremors,
00:00:04.760
Sunnybrook was the only hospital in Canada who could provide Andy with something special.
00:00:09.120
Three neurosurgeons, two scientists, one movement disorders coordinator,
00:00:13.180
58 answered questions, two focused ultrasound procedures,
00:00:16.680
one specially developed helmet, thousands of high-intensity focused ultrasound waves,
00:00:21.320
zero incisions, and that very same day, two steady hands.
00:00:25.840
From innovation to action, Sunnybrook is special.
00:00:31.460
I think we're watching the most evil thing I've ever seen in my lifetime,
00:00:34.300
which is the lame duck administration leaving the next administration with the world war,
00:00:38.940
with the nuclear conflict, by allowing Ukraine, a proxy state of the United States,
00:00:45.260
And I'll just have one editorial comment and then I'm just going to let you go.
00:00:47.920
But I think that people in Washington misunderstand Vladimir Putin
00:00:50.960
and they think he's a monarch with absolute power, which is not true.
00:00:54.320
And Russian politics is complex and it's lively.
00:00:56.680
And Putin is very concerned with his approval rating within Russia.
00:01:05.740
And if he can't hide attacks on him by the United States through Ukraine,
00:01:15.580
I think he will have no choice in his view but to launch like a serious response
00:01:21.960
against Ukraine or NATO countries or possibly the United States.
00:01:25.760
So this seems like the most reckless thing that's ever happened in my life.
00:01:48.640
We bring you stories that have not been showcased anywhere else.
00:01:52.960
And they're not censored, of course, because we're not gatekeepers.
00:01:55.980
We are honest brokers here to tell you what we think you need to know and do it honestly.
00:02:01.160
Check out all of our content at tuckercarlson.com.
00:02:04.920
So let me just say specifically what has been authorized.
00:02:09.320
This is something that some NATO countries, including the United Kingdom,
00:02:12.960
have been pressuring the Biden administration to do for quite a long time,
00:02:17.500
But going all the way back to the beginning of 2022,
00:02:22.220
which was that we have these guided missiles called Atakums,
00:02:25.400
which are very powerful for attacking inside Russia.
00:02:28.740
You can guide them specifically and very precisely to where you want them to go.
00:02:32.900
Obviously, you have to get intelligence about where you want to strike.
00:02:36.300
And the reason we never permitted the Ukrainians to use them is because the Ukrainians can't use those missiles on their own.
00:02:43.920
In other words, if they want to launch these missiles,
00:02:46.140
it's not just the U.S. giving them the missiles and then telling them,
00:02:49.420
It requires the direct involvement of the United States and or a major NATO country like France or the U.K. or Germany
00:02:56.540
because the Ukrainians don't have the guiding capability in order to know how to launch these missiles.
00:03:02.120
So this is not just us giving them missiles and saying, go attack deep inside Russia.
00:03:07.820
Imagine if some major country, China, Iran, Russia, whoever, gave missiles to Canada if we were at war with them or Mexico or Cuba
00:03:17.100
and said, we're giving you these specifically for you to use them inside the United States.
00:03:22.500
We would consider that a grievous act of war, not just on the part of the country shooting them,
00:03:30.800
He didn't just give Ukrainians missiles and say, feel free to use them inside Russia.
00:03:34.780
We are going to participate in the bombing of Russia, NATO and or the United States,
00:03:40.320
because there's no way the Ukrainians can launch these missiles on their own,
00:03:43.320
which means we are now, our military, our intelligence community,
00:03:47.120
are participating in missile attacks inside the country of Russia.
00:03:53.340
This is something that even the Biden administration, for all their hawkishness on Russia and Ukraine,
00:03:58.780
feeding that war, fueling it, preventing diplomatic resolutions because they wanted this war,
00:04:03.320
even they were unwilling to do it because they understood the dangers of the escalatory risks.
00:04:08.580
For Joe Biden, or whoever's acting in his name, to do this just two weeks after the country
00:04:15.100
resoundingly rejected governance by the Democratic Party and the administration,
00:04:20.220
and on his way out as an 81-year-old man, knowing that he has about six weeks left in office,
00:04:27.400
to just say, yeah, I know that these are massive risks, but I'm going to take them.
00:04:33.920
And then to make it so much more difficult for the following administration
00:04:37.560
to do what they promised to do during the campaign, which the American people voted for and wanted,
00:04:43.800
Instead, we're risking escalation with the world's largest superpower, nuclear power.
00:04:52.980
I mean, placed in context, too, this is without precedent.
00:04:59.700
But so 1956, Soviets invade Hungary and murder a ton of people.
00:05:08.420
68, they invade Czechoslovakia, murder a bunch of people once again.
00:05:11.800
These are all, you know, incredibly provocative acts, far more provocative than invading eastern
00:05:17.600
And this was the middle of the Cold War, and no American presidents, Democrats and Republicans
00:05:27.540
I mean, there's nothing like this has ever happened.
00:05:30.440
Well, this is, you know, my big breach with the left, my big permanent split with whatever
00:05:36.600
they thought I was in terms of associates with them.
00:05:41.180
And that all happened in 2016 when out of nowhere, Russiagate appeared.
00:05:46.500
And I remember, like it was yesterday, the very first ad from Hillary Clinton's campaign
00:05:50.540
with this like menacing baritone voice, you know, what does Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump
00:06:01.040
And journalistically, I just couldn't believe it because it was so redolent of McCarthyism,
00:06:08.600
I was taught it was like one of the worst civil liberties of the 20th century.
00:06:12.840
Yeah, I mean, you go around just accusing people of being Russian agents with no evidence,
00:06:17.500
destroying their reputation, their lives, kind of like what they're trying to do to Tulsi
00:06:20.540
Gabbard now, what they tried to do for Donald Trump for the last eight years.
00:06:23.580
So just on that ground, I was kind of offended by it.
00:06:25.880
And journalistically, I was so skeptical of it because when you have intelligence agencies
00:06:32.480
leaking anonymously unverified claims to the Washington Post and the New York Times,
00:06:37.380
and they put it on the front page and gather Pulitzers for them, that's usually a sign that
00:06:40.500
a huge disinformation campaign of deceit is underway.
00:06:42.960
That was the exact method used, for example, to sell the war on Iraq to the American people,
00:06:50.280
That's why these intelligence agencies need to be rooted out.
00:06:52.640
But what alarmed me most was that the climate was deliberately created in Washington,
00:06:58.880
especially once Hillary lost and they blamed Russia for it, that any communications with
00:07:05.340
Russia, anyone who visits Russia, anyone who talks to a Russian official is automatically
00:07:13.000
And as you said, during the Cold War, which dominated our American life for 50 years,
00:07:18.020
Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the evil empire.
00:07:20.760
They were infinitely more powerful, more threatening, more everything than Russia is now.
00:07:31.000
There were phones all over Washington that rang to the counterparts.
00:07:36.560
After Russiagate, there's basically no communication any longer between the Russian leaders and
00:07:48.280
That was something that in Washington got created because they blamed Russia and claimed
00:07:53.860
that Russia was our existential enemy because of the claim that they interfered in the 2016
00:08:00.120
The Obama administration and the Putin government cooperated in all sorts of ways around the world.
00:08:06.840
But it's the leadership of the Republican Party, too.
00:08:09.440
I had a conversation with the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, and he was about to
00:08:15.520
And I said, well, why don't you check with Putin?
00:08:18.640
You're number three in line from the presidency.
00:08:21.300
I said, well, I'll see if I can facilitate that.
00:08:33.220
Why wouldn't he just say, I mean, I'm not attacking Mike Johnson.
00:08:40.000
I said, you know, like, don't you have a moral duty to get as much information about
00:08:45.600
this war before you fund its continuation and the killing of all these people?
00:08:51.760
I think it is important to say that this war has been 100% bipartisan, although the
00:08:56.140
Biden administration, as the leader of the executive branch, is primarily responsible.
00:09:00.320
The primary—there's been about, I would say, five or six dozen anti-interventionist
00:09:06.580
Republicans, typically more Trump supporters, both in the House and Senate, who have spoken
00:09:10.960
out from the beginning against funding this war.
00:09:12.880
But the vast majority of Republicans, to the extent they have a criticism or had a criticism
00:09:17.840
of the Biden administration at all with respect to Ukraine, it was that they didn't do enough.
00:09:24.360
They didn't get more involved more heavily and earlier than they should.
00:09:28.820
But, you know, the thing that you said about encouraging Mike Johnson to speak to Putin,
00:09:34.060
which, of course, as the third in line to the presidency, as you said, when they're
00:09:37.280
proposing to escalate a major war, of course you should want to understand the Russian
00:09:41.920
This is what Tulsi Gabbard did in 2017 when she was a member of Congress and the Obama
00:09:50.180
administration had unleashed this billion-dollar-a-year CIA dirty war to change the government of
00:09:56.380
Syria, to dislodge Basra al-Assad from the government.
00:10:00.440
And we fought along ISIS and al-Qaeda, who also wanted Assad gone.
00:10:04.760
We were told those were our existential enemies for 15 years.
00:10:09.200
And so many of the weapons we sent ended up in the hands of al-Qaeda and ISIS and other
00:10:15.200
And Tulsi Gabbard, as a member of the military, but also as a member of Congress with constitutional
00:10:19.200
responsibility to authorize or disauthorize a war, wanted to go to Syria and see what was
00:10:24.460
And then she spoke with Syrian officials and got an opportunity to speak with the Syrian
00:10:28.260
And based solely on that, she's now accused of being a Russian agent, being some sort
00:10:39.300
This is the jingoistic climate that has been created, way worse than what prevailed in the
00:10:44.380
When Nixon went to China, Reagan negotiated all kinds of arms deals with the Soviets.
00:10:53.180
It's like we live in a Marvel cartoon for children where there's good guys and bad guys
00:10:57.720
where the good guys, you don't speak to the bad guys.
00:11:03.660
So her point, I don't want to speak for Tulsi Gabbard, our new director of national intelligence
00:11:07.760
nominee, but my view was, I don't have any feelings about Assad or Syria, but it's a
00:11:13.560
fact that that government protected religious minorities, including an ancient Christian
00:11:17.320
community there in the Alawites, of which he's one, in that country for a long time.
00:11:25.960
Like, what does, why should I be opposed to Assad in Syria?
00:11:33.040
I was not supposed to be opposed to the Soviets who were anti-Christian, but now you have a pro-Christian
00:11:38.460
Tell me, why doesn't somebody explain to me why?
00:11:40.880
As a 55-year-old American taxpayer, I should be against him.
00:11:43.300
So first of all, I think the principle is that, and this is what Donald Trump read explicitly
00:11:48.400
in 2016, was that we shouldn't be involved in wars designed to change the governments of
00:11:55.580
other countries, rebuild their governments, transform their societies, in part because it's
00:12:01.280
not our place to do it, and in part because we're terrible at doing it because they have
00:12:04.720
very complex, rich, long histories that American intelligence officials and political leaders
00:12:16.540
And we've proven that over and over in all these failed attempts.
00:12:19.420
But also when it comes to, I mean, Tulsi Gabbard's entire worldview, and I have spoken to her
00:12:25.300
about this, I've interviewed her about this, so I feel comfortable saying this, is that
00:12:31.200
She believes that we should be very militarily aggressive against, say, terrorist groups
00:12:35.920
that actually want to attack the United States or have done so, or American assets or American
00:12:40.960
Her argument is, is that we should not be involved in regime change wars of the kind
00:12:44.520
we did in Iraq, that she fought in, of the kind we did in Syria, of the kind we did in
00:12:48.560
Libya, of the kind that we did in Ukraine in 2014 when we actually engineered a coup on
00:12:55.020
Of the kind that we're trying to pull off in Russia right now.
00:12:58.520
Yeah, to weaken that regime, and to, the thing is, though, that what you said about
00:13:03.060
Putin is so important, which is, Putin's critics, he doesn't have very many liberal critics,
00:13:15.940
Who see him as weak or insufficiently militaristic when it comes to confronting the West, but particularly
00:13:21.860
They wanted, they wanted destruction of Ukraine.
00:13:26.280
And as you say, the Russian government has taken the position, warned the United States
00:13:31.240
government privately and publicly, that any use of these missiles involving, as they do,
00:13:39.240
direct US or NATO involvement in their launching against Russia will be seen as the entrance of
00:13:44.660
the United States and NATO as belligerents in this war, as a war against Russia, as World
00:13:48.820
War III, and he will have to treat it as such, even though he's been very constrained, even
00:13:56.100
There are a lot of people inside Moscow who do wield a lot of power who do, and who will
00:14:07.120
So I think, as you've said, I don't think we can say it enough, so much of this has been
00:14:13.540
conducted in bad faith, but also so much of that bad faith has been informed by ignorance
00:14:17.000
or uninformed by ignorance, not informed at all.
00:14:19.720
And I think that people really think that Putin is an absolute dictator who can do whatever
00:14:26.240
A lot of smart people in Russia, complicated political situation.
00:14:32.440
The view, I think, I know, from Putin is that Blinken is driving this, and that Blinken
00:14:39.780
has a lot of hostility, is reckless, but has a lot of hostility toward Russia that has nothing
00:14:50.040
I mean, I think Blinken, Jake Sullivan, that's kind of the brain trust as it is.
00:14:56.980
Obviously, Joe Biden has no involvement in this whatsoever, which I think has been a
00:15:05.840
Everyone saw what Joe Biden was long before that debate.
00:15:11.100
The only people who didn't say so were the media and Democratic allies.
00:15:14.880
After the debate, it became untenable for them to deny it any longer that this is an old man
00:15:21.780
Yet he's still the sitting president of the United States.
00:15:25.620
And you had the vice president, understandably, doing nothing for the last four months other
00:15:31.340
than working on her own empowerment through the campaign.
00:15:34.200
She obviously wasn't involved ever in any decision making, let alone when she became the
00:15:38.900
So the question has been all these consequential decisions we made, deploying massive military
00:15:43.360
assets to the Middle East, making decorations about when we would go to war in the Middle East
00:15:46.680
and for whom, escalating the war in Ukraine, now authorizing the use of these long-range
00:15:55.780
It's not a character flaw in his part, but it's just a disability, a clear disability.
00:16:01.600
He's obviously not making any of these decisions.
00:16:03.320
I do think that if you look at the national security crowd that emerged from the Obama
00:16:11.080
presidency, especially the people who were associated with the State Department run by
00:16:15.140
Hillary Clinton and then John Kerry, even before Russiagate in 2016, they had an obsession
00:16:21.240
In fact, when Hillary Clinton left the administration as Secretary of State and wrote her book, Hard
00:16:26.540
Choices, the only areas in which she was critical of Obama was her view that he wasn't willing
00:16:33.640
Obama had this view, like sort of this realist view from Brent Scowcroft.
00:16:37.440
Those are the kind of people who like Jim Baker, that why would we send lethal arms to Ukraine
00:16:45.060
Ukraine is not a vital interest to us, but it is to them.
00:16:48.080
He wanted to work with Russia and did to facilitate the Iran deal, to bomb terrorist targets in Syria.
00:16:54.000
And there was a faction in the Obama administration led by Hillary Clinton.
00:16:59.180
All these sort of national security people woven into the, you know, that Victoria,
00:17:05.800
That's how she made her way into the Obama administration.
00:17:11.860
The reason Putin hated Hillary Clinton was because when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State,
00:17:16.580
the United States openly spent millions of dollars funding opposition groups and organizing
00:17:25.420
I mean, we talk about Putin interfering in our sacred politics and our internal affairs.
00:17:30.900
Hillary Clinton was openly funding protests and anti-Putin agitators inside Russia in the 2010 election,
00:17:44.480
And they were obsessed with Russia well before that.
00:17:48.320
And I do think that Russia is disliked by a lot of people in Washington because of the perception
00:17:55.100
that they are detrimental to our interests in the Middle East and especially to Israel's interest in the Middle East,
00:18:01.560
including their support for Bashar al-Assad in Syria,
00:18:04.720
the fact that they have a good relationship with Iran.
00:18:07.820
It doesn't really always have a lot to do with the United States,
00:18:11.180
but with the interests of other countries as well.
00:18:16.320
Because it is true that Assad is only there because of Russia.
00:18:22.860
And it's been their ally in the Middle East for decades.
00:18:25.060
And just like we support our allies around the world, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt,
00:18:30.000
you know, very savage, brutal dictatorships, but at least to do our bidding,
00:18:35.000
They have a long-term relationship with Venezuela, with Cuba, going back to the Cold War,
00:18:44.440
And as a result, they end up being antagonistic to Israel,
00:18:48.920
which ends up being defined as U.S. interests as well.
00:18:51.980
Like there's no separation between the countries.
00:18:53.060
Strictly speaking, this has kind of nothing to do with us whatsoever.
00:18:58.980
Unless you see Israel as a part of the United States.
00:19:02.220
You know, I'm not hostile toward Israel, but I think it's a separate country.
00:19:04.600
It seems to me it would be a separate country as well.
00:19:10.180
So just from an American perspective, without wishing ill on any other country at all,
00:19:17.600
I have been struggling for really since the 2016 election,
00:19:21.220
but particularly since the war began in February of 2022,
00:19:24.100
to identify what exactly would be the U.S. interest in this.
00:19:30.840
But I just don't see what's in it for us at all.
00:19:41.100
who believes that their life is affected in any way by the question of
00:19:45.460
who rules various provinces in the Donbass, in eastern Ukraine.
00:19:49.920
Nobody thinks about Ukraine, let alone the Donbass, let alone eastern Ukraine.
00:19:54.500
It's an incredibly complex situation there in terms of the people's allegiances,
00:20:00.100
which are far closer to Moscow than they are to Kiev.
00:20:07.500
Should it be used as a buffer against the West?
00:20:09.920
The whole framework, as you well know, and as other people have pointed out,
00:20:14.200
when Russia agreed to the reunification of Germany,
00:20:17.000
which was obviously an extraordinary thing for the Russians to agree to,
00:20:20.480
given the Russian history in the 20th century with respect to Germany,
00:20:23.760
when the Berlin Wall fell and they allowed the eastern and the western parts of Germany
00:20:28.980
to reunite and to become part of the West and become part of the EU,
00:20:32.980
the only concession they extracted in exchange for that was,
00:20:37.480
okay, with reunification, NATO is now moving eastward closer to our border.
00:20:42.000
In a country that has devastated our country twice in two world wars,
00:20:47.080
invaded Russia twice, killed tens of millions of Russian citizens,
00:20:50.540
the only thing we need as a security guarantee in exchange for allowing that
00:20:54.080
is that NATO will never expand one inch eastward beyond what was East Germany.
00:21:01.080
And immediately in the 90s, under the Clinton administration,
00:21:03.920
the Clinton administration started talking about it and implementing NATO expansion eastward toward Russia,
00:21:09.280
exactly what was promised to Gorbachev the United States would not do
00:21:11.980
in exchange for them agreeing to reunification.
00:21:16.500
Why did we need to expand our influence eastward toward Russia?
00:21:23.320
it's going directly up to the Russian border on the part of their border
00:21:26.500
that has been invaded twice in Ukraine to destroy Russia in both of those world wars.
00:21:32.600
We also participated in the change of government.
00:21:35.840
We removed the democratically elected leader of Ukraine
00:21:37.940
before his constitutional term was expired in 2014
00:21:40.220
because we perceived him as being too friendly to Moscow,
00:21:48.360
and it was replaced by a government that was more pro-U.S.
00:21:51.320
Imagine if the Russians engineered a coup in Mexico
00:21:55.240
to take out the government because they were too friendly to the U.S.
00:21:57.880
and put in a hardline, pro-Russian, anti-American, anti-NATO president.
00:22:03.660
Imagine how threatening we would regard that as.
00:22:09.140
this has nothing to do with the national security of the American people.
00:22:12.380
No American is threatened by who governs Ukraine.
00:22:15.380
What they're threatened by is what the United States is doing in Ukraine,
00:22:20.440
Well, they keep telling you AI is going to make the world a better place.
00:22:23.700
That may be true, but you have to ask better for whom?
00:22:28.320
which could use it to calculate exactly how much to raise your premiums
00:22:41.400
Better for politicians who can use the information they take from you
00:22:49.000
And that's one of the reasons that we protect ourselves
00:23:08.960
that's vacuuming up information on everybody else.
00:23:21.840
It comes with a risk-free 30-day back guarantee.
00:23:25.060
That's one of the reasons that experts like CNET
00:23:50.880
with more than two in three residents being affected.
00:24:06.860
At United Way, we wake up to a different alarm every day.