00:20:11.600hopefully will transition away from that.
00:20:13.200But I don't think they will, as long as this enmity between the United States and Iran is as intense as existential as it has been in the last couple of years.
00:20:23.680So, again, what do you think drove both sides to this?
00:20:28.980I think at the end of the day, both of them absolutely need this deal.
00:20:33.560I understand, I think, why Trump needs it, because the economy is going to fall apart if it's not resolved quickly.0.99
00:43:33.600If the region now understands, there is no such thing as an external security guarantor for them.
00:43:40.980Similar to what I mentioned with the Saudis realized that the U.S. is not going to come in and support them.
00:43:45.240They're going to have to deal with their security issues on their own.
00:43:48.800They're going to have to, through diplomacy, see if they can build a security architecture that intensifies economic integration and other things, perhaps transitions towards collective security thinking in order to create stability.
00:44:02.860That I think is a blessing for the United States
00:44:05.040because it actually enables the U.S.0.99
00:44:07.120to also extract itself finally from the Middle East
00:44:10.440while supporting an effort by the region itself
00:44:57.600Now, I don't think Israel will get destroyed at all,0.76
00:45:00.600But Israel is going to have to deal with the region in a completely different manner, not based on domination or, you know, creating all of this chaos that they have helped fuel in order to keep everyone else weak.0.76
00:45:12.960The goal of the war was not to, in my view, was not to eliminate the Iranian nuclear program.0.51
00:55:38.240What they have done that is really difficult to undo is that, I'm not saying that the system in Iran has necessarily gained popularity.
00:55:48.340I don't think the actual support base of that system is more than 15 to 20 percent.
00:55:53.400And then you have 60 or so percent, 15 to 20, 15 to 20. Oh, it's that unpopular. Yeah. 60 or so percent of the population that absolutely would like to see a different type of a government, but they're not willing to risk war or revolution over it. They want to see gradual change.
00:56:06.800And then perhaps 20 or so percent of the population that are just so fed up with how this system has been so repressive, so corrupt, so incompetent in many different ways, mismanaging the economy, that they've gone so desperate that they're willing to try almost everything, right?
00:56:25.400But what has happened because of this war, which always happens in these types of wars, is that you have a rallying around the flag phenomenon.
00:56:32.600is not necessarily made the system more popular,
00:56:36.920but the performance of the Iranian military
00:56:40.140in all of this has made the confidence
01:02:47.420It is a talking point that they always use in the United States because it was necessary to try to get the United States to make Iran its top national security threat, which in and of itself is absurd.
01:03:01.880Not to say that Iran is not a challenge, but to be the top national security threat.
01:03:07.040When the drug cartels control New Mexico, which they do, and parts of Texas and Arizona and like our own countries collapsing, the biggest threat is Iran.
01:03:46.060three consecutive heads of the Mossad openly said Iran is not an existential threat. Iran is a1.00
01:03:52.180threat, but it's not an existential threat. Ehud Barak, former prime minister, defense minister,
01:03:57.420already back then said to say that Iran is an existential threat is to diminish Israel's own
01:04:02.420power. But it was a very effective talking point to push the United States towards believing that
01:04:09.140the United States needs to attack Iran or sanction Iran, or just treat it as a top national security
01:04:15.280threat because it is an existential threat. And in New York Times and all of these papers,
01:04:20.260it's just as religion repeated that the Israelis view Iran as an existential threat. Never question
01:04:26.540as to whether that is really how they see it. Well, what's never questioned is why that would
01:04:30.980be our problem, true or false. That's an even deeper question that would never occur. Okay,
01:04:34.840I'm sorry that you don't get along with one of your neighbors and you feel deeply threatened.
01:04:38.600I, you know, good luck resolving that. What do we have to do with that?
01:04:41.100I, you know, I wrote my dissertation on Iranian Israeli relations and I spent some time in Iran and in Israel interviewing top officials about this issue. I wanted to get to the heart of the matter. I didn't want to rely on secondary documents and I couldn't get access to the primary documents. Of course, they don't have that type of transparency. So I needed to sit down with them.
01:04:59.120And one thing that always came through
01:15:47.280Take it away now. Make it very clear. They're not going to be able to drag the U.S. into another war. So creating false flags or creating these things is not going to lead to the U.S. reentering the war. Once that is entirely clear, the incentive to do so is, or at least the incentive to use those methods to do so, is going to be significantly diminished.
01:16:07.920So I think there are a lot of means by which foreign countries exert influence in the United States up to and including violence and blackmail.
01:16:17.980But on the most basic and powerful level, it's campaign contributions.
01:16:23.440It's the donors pushing policies that the public doesn't want that's not good for the United States.
01:16:28.800That's why Tom Cotton exists and Lindsey Graham and the rest.
01:16:32.580So for the Republican Party to be a party that serves the interests of its own country, an America First Party, it has to break with these donors.
01:16:42.160You can't have Miriam Adelson, who's not even an American, use her gambling fortune to hijack the political process.
01:16:50.840Like, do you think the Republican Party, Democratic Party is hopeless in my view, but the Republican Party, there was hope.
01:16:56.640And now it seems like until they break that addiction, there's no hope.
01:19:47.080And the problem is, as you pointed out, the neoliberal economic system that is just destroying societies off the right, atomizing them, combined, and again, there is a strong link between that and this essentially empire type of a foreign policy.
01:20:03.960You know, I helped co-found the Quincy Institute and we named it after John Quincy Adams, because we wanted to remind Americans that there's a long tradition of American foreign policy that actually is nothing like what we're seeing right now.
01:20:17.980He gave that speech on July 4th, 1821, in which he said, America goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.
01:20:24.960And later on in the passage, he points out,
01:20:27.540if she does, she can become the dictresses of the world,
01:20:31.180but it will come at the expense of her own liberty
01:26:02.640but the State Department itself came out and denied this
01:26:05.640and made clear that they have no plans of doing so,
01:26:07.840at least not for now, they said, obviously.
01:26:09.260So this ran in Barry Weiss as a free press, which exists to promote the interests of a foreign country, Israel.
01:26:16.540I mean, that's the reason there is a free press, is to promote the Israeli government.
01:26:21.500The elements that have been constantly trying to silence me have come from that direction.0.57
01:26:27.080And it's a lot because of, you know, I wrote my dissertation, which ended up becoming my first book, Treacherous Alliance, on Israel and Iran.
01:29:24.900If people start to question the very foundational premises of this foreign policy in a structured and in a rational way, it's going to collapse.