00:01:12.000And then, almost out of nowhere, Digwa pulls out an eight-inch-long knife and begins stabbing Henry Nowak, the 18-year-old college student, and ultimately kills him.
00:01:24.480stabbed him five times, including in the chest and the heart.
00:01:28.780Now, it's worth noting that knife crime in England is famously on the rise.
00:01:33.440In fact, to such an extent that knives are difficult for ordinary people to buy in London.
00:01:38.340Try to buy a set of kitchen knives next time you're over there.
00:06:16.800There was a non-white man claiming racism.
00:06:18.880There was a white man claiming he'd been stabbed.
00:06:20.800But they took only one claim seriously, and they arrested the man who'd been accused of racism.
00:06:25.260If that looks familiar, it should, because that is a standard not simply in the UK, but in Australia, in Canada, in much of Europe, and in the United States.
00:06:34.640Racism is regarded as a more grave crime than murder.
00:06:39.740Now, no one will say that, and statues don't reflect that, but in effect, that is true.
00:09:53.420And at the same time, that very group is lectured as privileged, as having unearned advantage because of their skin color.
00:10:02.800There's an entire academic discipline devoted to attacking white people on the basis of the fact, the supposed fact, that they have unearned privilege.
00:10:14.220And yet, of course, the opposite is true.
00:10:57.600is that an accident? Could it be that recent arrivals from Punjab and Lagos are just that
00:11:03.900much more impressive than the products of the fabled American education system? Probably not.
00:11:10.680It's almost like it's intentional. And of course, it is intentional because it sends a message.
00:11:16.720Don't get too comfortable in your own country. Don't assume that you have rights because you
00:11:20.820were born here. Don't take pride in anything your ancestors built. Stay on edge. Now, what
00:11:27.540would be the motive of people sending that message to the indigenous population of a country? This
00:11:32.960isn't yours. It belongs to people you've never met. That is the message. We can only guess at
00:11:39.220the motive, but we can say that throughout Europe and throughout the Anglosphere, that is the message
00:11:45.680from our superiors. And so you have to ask yourself, why are we putting up with this?
00:11:53.860Because it's not enough just to look at the stats and say, oh, the people whose ancestors built this country are failing, are held to a different standard of justice, aren't allowed to arm themselves while new arrivals are, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, are disadvantaged in job seeking and admissions to college and federal grants.
00:12:12.060all true. But you also have to remember that that group of people is not only put at a grave
00:12:21.100disadvantage because of their ethnicity, the greatest systemic racism ever practiced in the
00:12:27.060West is being practiced against the people who built the West, all true. They're also being
00:12:32.320browbeaten and lectured and finger-wagged into silence, which is to say it's not enough to hurt
00:12:39.020people, you have to humiliate them as well. The only crime, the only real crime in any of these
00:12:48.920countries, and the United States would be among them, is complaining about what they seem to be
00:12:56.260doing to you and noting the obvious. So London, second biggest city in Europe after Moscow,
00:13:03.660a beautiful city, and in many ways, I have to be honest, still probably a little nicer than the
00:13:08.900biggest city in our country, New York, but still much reduced in quality of life from
00:13:14.32040 years ago and dramatically in decline as compared to 100 years ago.
00:13:22.580Anyone who notes that London is not as nice as it once was is the crime, is the criminal.
00:13:30.740Here's Sadiq Khan, the longtime mayor of London, often referred to in the United States as a
00:13:35.620as a radical Muslim, who's nothing of the sort.
00:13:39.260He's just a conventional white liberal with an Islamic-sounding name.
00:13:42.820But here's Sadiq Khan explaining why people would criticize London on social media.
00:13:48.800Most people's experience of London is very different to the version you see on social media.
00:13:56.100We've done some research and looked into what's going on here.
00:13:59.260Basically, you've got a combination of people using the algorithms on social media that monetize negativity and hatred, but also a combination of state actors, whether it's China, Russia, or MAGA influences, being unhappy that a city that is progressive, liberal, diverse is incredibly successful.
00:14:22.100I mean, we are the antidote, the antithesis of nativist populist movement.
00:14:27.620So don't be surprised if you've got people on social media
00:14:31.360spreading misinformation, disinformation, and lies.
00:15:00.940It's the one thing we know that diversity is our strength.
00:15:04.620Now, if it turns out the diversity is not our strength,
00:15:06.860we can't admit it because that would be apostasy.
00:15:10.600So we have to keep chanting it again and again and again.
00:15:13.680And you almost, as you listen to Sadiq Khan, wave away any criticism of the city that he's so gravely mismanaged for so long as state actors spreading disinformation and lies, which are not the same thing, by the way.
00:15:29.140Disinformation is information that we don't want to hear.
00:40:24.220Learn how at Ontario.ca slash Safer Ontario.
00:40:27.340Paid for by the Government of Ontario.
00:40:31.000yeah well i think you've you've answered the question in the back of my mind since you began
00:40:38.540speaking which is why aren't you the most famous living philosopher in britain uh who as you should
00:40:44.100be um and you aren't because you are committing this and you just described by asking questions
00:40:51.060pointing a finger to the cause of the problems and not just hyperventilating about the problems
00:40:56.540themselves as i did for example on fox news for so long so um congratulations to you shame on me
00:41:02.520but notice you know who had a higher paying job so i guess that kind of you're making your point
00:41:07.940or i'm admitting that your point is true it is true to my shame i'm i'm toxic to money and uh
00:41:14.200you know it doesn't like me and uh there it is i don't care you know i'm i'm used to that i'm not
00:41:19.220going i'm not blaming you personally no the the thing is is that we we all we've when we we think
00:41:26.520about blaming people really even in some of the worst most offensive and in fact almost
00:41:32.620unforgivable cases you have to look at people and really genuinely ask can you honestly just
00:41:38.120blame them people are responsible for what they do but we have all been raised i've been raised
00:41:45.260you've been raised in this total political technique, which has formed our consciousness
00:41:50.400about the world, which has distorted our moral sensibilities, which has given us false aspirations
00:41:56.240and the worship of false idols. And so can you blame people when they're misled? Can you blame
00:42:02.140people when they become subject to mass delusions that send them into frenzies? Because the system
00:42:08.100has been designed to do that. And if you think that this is speculative, the giant of post-war
00:42:16.040American diplomacy, George F. Kennan, who was a genius at preventing the outbreak of nuclear war,
00:42:23.340and so should be commended for that. But in 1948, and you can read this in the congressional record,
00:42:28.580he published a paper called On the Inauguration of Organized Political Warfare. And in that paper,
00:42:33.520He said that he should use the CIA, which had been created a year before in 1947, to basically create cultural propaganda through the direct sponsorship and creation in some cases of things like modern art, sponsoring speakers such as Sir Isaiah Berlin, the international and greatest champion of the liberal idea in the 20th century, the art critic Clement Greenberg, touring musical operations and orchestras and so on.
00:43:00.200And this became, if you like, the seminal point of the development of cultural production in the mid to late 20th century, where you find now, if you look at it through this prism, you can see that practically everything that's produced in our mass culture is in some way a form of propaganda for the liberal political economy that rules us all.
00:43:23.020so basically everything that you see everything that you consume all the avenues that you have
00:43:28.520to navigate to earn a living and to communicate with people and even to get access to your own
00:43:33.080money these are all contingent on some kind of tacit acceptance or submission to a series of
00:43:38.920ideological rules that you're never asked about and you don't really have any chance to object to
00:43:43.940or you risk your meager livelihood for your increasingly worthless money and so when you
00:43:49.760notice that this is another reason why people are losing belief in this system. And it's not because
00:43:54.860of radicals and online extremists like me and bigots like you, Mr. Coulson. It's because of
00:44:02.180reality. The awful reality we live in is unignorably bad and no amount of sophisticated
00:44:07.960cultural production and propaganda can persuade you otherwise. So it's finished.
00:44:13.080It does seem like the final bet, though, of the organizers of the system, the maintainers of the
00:44:19.240system, the stewards of our system is technology, is supercomputing AI. And the point of that,
00:44:27.720I'm starting to sense, is coercion. Like, it doesn't matter whether you agree with a system
00:44:33.620or like it. When the control grid is in place, you have to obey. Well, here's another problem
00:44:41.320about the political technique of the 20th century. Every time something has been made possible by
00:44:46.420technology. We've seen our political economy adopted wholeheartedly without any real attempt
00:44:53.300to mitigate any serious threats to the dignity of human life, to whether or not it's going to
00:44:58.420improve, maximize human flourishing, or indeed immiserators. And so you see that every time
00:45:05.880something's invented, you invent, the liberals invent a new series of kind of moral values,
00:45:13.040what they call ethics, to permission its use. You've seen this in the development of technology
00:45:18.320to sterilize and mutilate children, for example, which has perniciously been presented as a human
00:45:23.220rights issue. That was made possible by technology. Now, just to use that example, and to use the
00:45:29.880example of artificial intelligence, as it's so called, just because we can do something,
00:45:35.060it doesn't mean to say we should do. And that's a very important question for political power.
00:45:41.320and I think that's one of the duties of the state, to look into how can we best use this for the
00:45:47.140purpose of the human flourishing of mankind, which should be the duties of the state. And if it is
00:45:52.260good, great. But let's be careful with it and let's see what good we can do with it, rather than have
00:45:58.560it just used, misused, or indeed unleashed and ravaged through our lives. And one of the reasons
00:46:05.220why this may very well get permissioned by the ruling elite that's currently installed is because
00:46:11.040they've reduced the value of human life to price. Our economy sees human life as disposable. It can
00:46:17.600be simply eliminated as a matter of convenience, and that's celebrated as the pinnacle of women's
00:46:23.740liberation to basically kill your own children because they disadvantage you by being alive.
00:46:29.400And the same thing with the elderly. We're effectively disposable. These arguments,
00:46:33.520I believe, are now moving outside of the traditional Catholic Christian base,
00:46:39.340and even atheists and liberals are beginning to realize hang on a minute we live in a vast
00:46:44.320evil machine that sees us all as not only replaceable but disposable it's a disposable
00:46:49.800political economy and i think we should dispose of it before it disposes of us and this is the
00:46:55.620reason why i've been on about surrogacy for so long because that was permissioned in 1993 in a
00:47:02.460law in the united states which astonishingly established the right to buy a human life
00:47:08.200and that's what surrogacy is it's the hire of women to produce a human life for sale and this
00:47:15.360if this is not the um one of the if you like the lowest points of human degradation in history i
00:47:21.940don't know what is but i will finish by saying this in his notes towards a definition of culture
00:47:27.740around the middle of the 20th century t.s elliott said there is no limit to the depths to which man
00:47:32.160can fall so we shouldn't expect that just because something is shockingly morally degrading
00:47:37.760like surrogacy, that people will wake up and go, oh, no, that's enough. No, if we don't actually
00:47:44.320stop it, we will continue to fall into the abyss. And I think we've all got that sense of falling
00:47:49.400now. You know, when you have a nightmare and you're falling, then suddenly you snap and wake
00:47:53.640up. I think we're all waking up at the moment. If I could just ask a question about motive.
00:47:59.380So you said at the outset that the design of the system
00:48:02.600was to create sameness, uniformity globally as a standard, a universal standard in belief,
00:48:11.360in economy, in culture. And that's obviously worked. But what was the motive behind that?
00:48:17.960Why would anyone or any group of people want that, do you think?
00:48:22.760Well, if you look at the, by the way, this is not speculative and it takes place in the record
00:48:28.720of the Federal Reserve and the United States Congress and so on. This isn't speculative
00:48:32.940fiction. It isn't some kind of grievance narrative. There are several major interests
00:48:38.100involved in this that I can call to mind immediately. Obviously, one of them financial
00:48:42.420people like J.P. Morgan and later on the Rockefellers, who could see the enormous
00:48:46.840potential of having, if you like, a debt issuance system that was globally exportable,
00:48:53.240a standard model, where whatever you wish to permission in these new liberal democracies
00:48:58.520that you were going to create, you could finance it by simply printing money. And that's what they
00:49:03.280did. And that's partly the reason why liberal democracy failed in the first 15 years of its
00:49:07.940life. It failed along the 1920s through the 30s. And all the liberal democracies that were installed
00:49:14.100shortly after the Great War, they just dissolved. Because they couldn't answer the financial crisis
00:49:19.860that their new economic model had created, and they had no political answer to Bolshevism.
00:49:24.860But apart from that, you had the international financiers who wanted a global standard economic
00:49:29.800system for their own interests. You had people like Bertrand Russell and John Dewey, these kind
00:49:36.480of atheist, pragmatist, rationalist philosophers, who actually sold you the idea that if we had a
00:49:43.120one-world government, we could end war, and that they would sell that to you with these humanitarian
00:49:49.180principles in mind and I think Bertrand Russell was quite convinced of that I mean I don't find
00:49:55.040that a convincing argument because there's a profound reason why that's wrong and that's
00:49:59.680because liberals believe that man is perfectible and that according to the the myth of progress
00:50:04.700that man just gets better every day because the calendar flips over but the inexorable moral
00:50:10.800progress of mankind is a myth and the British philosopher John Gray has expanded that very
00:50:15.500cleverly in his seven types of atheism showing that this is just a fantasy it's a utopian delusion
00:50:20.720but those people sincerely believed it and these people are dangerous they're fanatics
00:50:25.120and this is where utopian thought leads you like the british thinker and journalist peter hitchin
00:50:31.280said you know the trouble with utopia is you have to row across an ocean of blood and you never
00:50:36.340arrive but but that that has meaning in reality so you did have well-meaning liberal fanatics like
00:50:43.840Bertrand Russell. And John Dewey actually wrote a series of essays in the 1930s called Towards a
00:50:49.520Common Faith. And he said that we should supply, we the liberal elite, should supply a kind of
00:50:56.000global Christless religion, a common faith, so these plebeians could believe in it and we could
00:51:02.000somehow unite this new global system of interdigitated liberal democracies, which are all
00:51:07.720identical in having bicameral systems, and incidentally all identical in the fact that you
00:51:12.200can only vote for left liberals right liberals extreme liberals or bolshevists which is what
00:51:17.660you could actually vote for in the first instance yes so whilst whilst you're in this new happy
00:51:22.040utopia we're going to give you this belief system and bear in mind that comes from um a thinker
00:51:27.700called matthew arnold who wrote a book in 1863 called culture and anarchy and i'll finish with
00:51:33.640this that he said that because we're going to liberalize the world and democratize it but
00:51:39.780obviously we're going to subtract religion because we liberals don't believe in christ
00:51:43.280we're going to retain the outward structure of the church and the armature if you like of our
00:51:49.720civilization but we're going to remove the supernatural and christ and god himself
00:51:54.960from the center of that and he said we should replace it with culture or we'll have anarchy
00:52:01.220so from the 1860s the liberals had this idea of standardizing the world beneath their own
00:52:09.020godless standards but they recognized that without the foundational christianity of our civilization
00:52:14.220there would be anarchy and so matthew arnold imagined that he would he would promote things
00:52:18.760like poetry and classical art and classical music but instead you got like taylor swift and televised
00:52:24.200sports and then of course nowadays you get like the current thing craze where you all put on some
00:52:30.040crazy hat or or kneel for an obvious criminal or something but these are all elements of the mass
00:52:35.900production of culture which generates mass belief and literally does drive people insane because it
00:52:41.580is fundamentally counter-reality this is account is this is a revolutionary ideology and all
00:52:47.780revolutions are basically revolts against the natural order uh the changeless order of being
00:52:53.520in reality created by god of course and so what they do instead is they create this kind of make
00:52:59.280belief reality for you to live in and so the final thing i'll say about this is a foundational figure
00:53:04.400in the creation of the liberal system was a man called Walter Lippmann. And Walter Lippmann said
00:53:09.500that in order to rule these new democracies, where all these awful ordinary people will have the vote,
00:53:15.580what we must do is create a pseudo-reality, his words. And he said we should use mass
00:53:21.020communications to do this. And when we can get people to believe that the advertisements and
00:53:26.480mass communication picture of the world is the real world, then we can change that picture at
00:53:31.280will, and that's how we'll rule them. And that is the foundational moment of the political technique
00:53:35.400of the 20th century. Things around the world are moving so fast right now, it's impossible to keep
00:53:41.480up with all of the changes. But we do know that when those changes happen, markets change too,
00:53:47.940and nothing changes faster than the price of precious metals, gold and silver. It just shifts
00:53:53.420in an instant because it is a reaction to and against what's happening in the world. So timing
00:53:58.980is essential. If you're thinking about adding precious metals, and you definitely should,
00:54:03.640we do. You need to know when prices are going to move and why they're moving.
00:54:08.300And Battalion Metals makes that all really simple. You can buy the dip when it happens.
00:54:12.840So if you want real-time alerts sent directly to your inbox when gold and silver prices move,
00:54:17.740go to battalionmetals.com slash alerts. Markets move fast to stay ahead of them.
00:56:26.100and it has and it is because you can see how the refinement of that has taken place from
00:56:32.360the paper and cinema age through the radio and then the television and the internet age
00:56:38.200but you can see that the technique has become refined and that it's become ever more subtle
00:56:43.220and now you have a form of addiction towards a constant stream of mind rot that just burns out
00:56:48.200your brain and i'd like to remind everybody that melting down due to information overload isn't
00:56:54.180just for your political enemies so you know practice some informational hygiene every now
00:56:58.540and then because otherwise that kind of laser beam of slop will just burn a hole directly
00:57:04.300through your cerebral cortex and you won't notice it because you'll just be numb
00:57:08.800you're synaptically inactive so that's what happens similarly right i've got to say this
00:57:16.340you live in this system where you're supposed to live without complete moral restraints and
00:57:21.160they say it's fantastic to just indulge all your sensations because that's how you can sell more
00:57:25.480things. And that's how you can sell everything to anyone. Just say, look, liberate all your
00:57:29.480desires, have no restraint. But if you have no informational restraint or any moral restraint,
00:57:34.620you end up with the jaded appetites of the Marquis de Sade. And I've unfortunately read
00:57:40.240the Marquis de Sade's work. I have too. Well, they're not some fascinating account of adventure.
00:57:46.140you can just see a man degraded by the fact that he saturated himself with ever more extreme
00:57:52.440pursuance of his unrestrained and repugnant desires until eventually he feels nothing
00:57:57.860and he's dead to the world. That's what you end up like when you are saturated with information
00:58:04.360and desires and pornification and the constant stimulation of wants in place of needs and it
00:58:11.700impoverishes you it doesn't liberate you it liberates you into a void actually annihilates
00:58:16.060you and so why is that technique not going to work now despite it being so sophisticated
00:58:21.120it's because we can all see that this has not produced the paradise on earth that the adverts
00:58:27.460are telling us that it is in fact it's produced the opposite and again it's that reality that
00:58:33.420is making people not just disaffected oh i think i'll make a different political choice this time
00:58:38.080It's like, what have we done? What has happened to our lives? What does my life mean anymore? Who am I? This is a profound existential crisis for the West. And it's necessary because it permissions the replacement of this distorted, indeed, diabolical system with a return to reality.
00:58:56.060before i ask you what comes next what's what's the next reality um can you describe what this
00:59:05.420system replaced what what came before liberal democracy and in what sense was it better
00:59:11.240well quite a lot of people reference the the wonderful writing of the long neglected historian
00:59:18.240ajp taylor and he's lovely and he's written lots of volumes about the origins of the first and
00:59:23.800Second World War, which is a remarkable history, by the way, far better than the slop that passes
00:59:28.280for history nowadays. But A.J.P. Taylor wrote this piece about what Britain was like before
00:59:33.760the Great War. And he said the average Englishman would have absolutely no contact with the state
00:59:38.340whatsoever, except when he went to the post office. And of course, when your team phoned
00:59:43.380me up earlier on, I was trying to go to the post office to have some tangential contact with the
00:59:48.560state, which I tried to avoid as well. It's very difficult nowadays because it penetrates every
00:59:53.160area of your life. But, you know, we didn't have things like income tax, passports, universal
00:59:58.600suffrage, and so on. And that might sound like a terrible thing. But at the height of the British
01:00:03.120Empire, most of our political arguments at the elite level were about how to interpret Christianity
01:00:08.280in the form of the management of the state and the world. And they really were. And even a liberal
01:00:13.040like Robert Toomes, in his History of the English, admits that. And his chapter on that is absolutely
01:00:19.040fascinating. So what basically the liberal system replaced after the great industrial revolution of
01:00:26.340the First World War was the Christian civilization that we'd inherited from the monastic tradition of
01:00:32.340the church a thousand years ago. You had a Catholic hierarchy in Belgium. You had Catholic
01:00:38.900monarchies in Europe. You had Christian nations. And we had a very different way of living,
01:00:45.220which didn't have this administrative bureaucracy infused with this mad ideology that taxes us to
01:00:52.600death to police us with this kind of awful commissariat lanyard class, for example.
01:00:57.600So it became bureaucratized, managerialized, and formalized, and gradually normalized,
01:01:03.460because what that system has done is it subtracted practically every historical memory that we had,
01:01:09.280that there was ever anything before it, and also that there could be ever anything else after it.
01:01:15.220And so it gives itself this idea of a false eternity or permanence, and that's basically evil.
01:01:21.040And it reminds me of the title of a book about the end of the Soviet Union written by a bloke
01:01:24.420called Yurchak. It's a terrible book, don't buy it, but the title's brilliant. And it says,
01:01:29.360everything was forever until it was no more. And that's the moment that we live in now.
01:01:34.880So you think this is the end of that system?
01:01:38.440Oh, yes. There's another and far more distinguished tweedy northerner called John
01:01:44.320Gray I've mentioned him before and for years he's been talking about um the end of the liberal idea
01:01:49.520generally like liberalism finished you know not just the political ideology but it's it's economics
01:01:55.040its system the lot he could see the writing on the wall um a number of years ago maybe 10 years ago
01:02:00.680I went to see him personally and listened to him he's a brilliant man and uh he's also well I think
01:02:07.540one of the most remarkable things about his work is that he said it so long ago but why would he
01:02:12.640know. He was a student of Sir Isaiah Berlin, who was the greatest champion of the liberal idea in
01:02:17.30020th century. So he's been saying that for a long time. It's not just me. And it's very difficult
01:02:23.640to persuade people because they see this total system and they think, well, how can you ever
01:02:29.060get rid of it? But one of the major ideas that I can supply to you that will have practical value
01:02:34.880to you in your life and probably give you a lot of realistic hope, not false hope, but real hope,
01:02:39.860is that practically no one ever talks about the central role of belief in the political technique
01:02:46.340of the 20th century. That means belief is foundational to the way that we are ruled.
01:02:52.660And as you can see, millions and millions of people worldwide every day are losing belief
01:02:58.620in the way they are ruled, despite the fact that the machinery of manufacturing that belief is more
01:03:04.760omnipresent and refined than ever. They have lost control of the foundational political technique
01:03:11.580that secures their power. This is how they make belief is the title of one of my pieces on it,
01:03:17.620and I show you how they made that mass belief, and I also show you why it's not working anymore,
01:03:22.900and again, because it's effectively a contradiction to the awful reality that that same political
01:03:28.440system has created around us all, practically everywhere we go, in what's increasingly an
01:03:33.380international nowhere land. What do you think replaces it?
01:03:40.280Well, I think what replaces it is a politics and an economics that's actually for us and not for
01:03:47.540itself. I mean, the economy, what's it for, is a good question. It's a wise question, because we
01:03:54.180appear to be for the economy now. We're disposed for the economy, we're replaced in our own nations,
01:04:00.500because the economy demands it rather than be disposed of by the economy i think we should
01:04:06.040dispose of it before it disposes of us but what comes next one of the fascinating things that i
01:04:11.440think is interesting is that it's absolutely terrifying to elites if ordinary people uh
01:04:18.680such as suspicious men with moustaches who turn up on streets by accident if they get involved
01:04:24.620in politics they get interested in it it's terrifying to them like like for very good
01:04:29.960reason, you're painfully aware of this, most people should sensibly spend their lives never
01:04:35.280having a single political thought because it's a terrible business full of awful people. And why
01:04:40.120would you think about that? People have to think about politics now because it won't leave them
01:04:45.380alone and it's ruining their lives. Now, in Britain, there was a study done after the 2024
01:04:50.600general election that returned what was effectively a supermajority to the stricken and, well,
01:04:56.820the panic-stricken-looking Dalek-voiced man Keir Starmer,
01:06:25.880And that, I think, is very interesting to anyone who has an interest in being political successful.
01:06:32.600Because I've said before, anyone who comes along and says, right, look, we're going to stop the madness and do some common sense politics for a chair, you'll clean up.
01:06:41.420That's practically all you have to do.
01:06:43.780But, of course, common sense is toxic to this system.
01:06:47.560And they'll probably call you terrible names if you come out with it.
01:06:50.300But if you couldn't suffer a few voodoo curses for being sane in public, then yes, you probably have a very promising political career.
01:06:58.880But what if the system refuses to allow that?
01:07:01.180What if you were to say common sense things in public and you got arrested, which is happening throughout the West?
01:07:07.740What if the system wouldn't allow your political party or you as a candidate to run because you were too extreme?
01:07:15.140I mean, at a certain point, is the system capable of being reformed using the system?