The Pentagon Didn’t Fire Dan Caldwell Over Leaks. They Fired Him for Opposing War With Iran.
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 37 minutes
Words per Minute
172.7746
Summary
Dan Caldwell is a Marine Corps veteran who served in the Middle East. He was one of the strongest voices in the U.S. government against a war with Iran. And as someone who fought in Iraq, he was able to take that case to the principles with some force. Then he was fired from the Pentagon.
Transcript
00:00:00.560
Dan Caldwell is a Marine Corps veteran who wound up until three days ago
00:00:05.360
advising the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on military policy. He was one of the strongest
00:00:11.760
voices in the U.S. government in the Trump administration against the war with Iran.
00:00:17.120
And his rationale was simple. It's not in America's interest and many Americans will die
00:00:22.320
and billions will be spent on a war we don't need to fight. And as someone who fought in Iraq, he
00:00:27.840
was able to take that case to the principles with some force. Then, three days ago, he was fired from
00:00:34.320
the Pentagon. But not for his views on Iran, no. Dan Caldwell was fired because, reporters are told
00:00:41.200
off the record, he had leaked classified documents to the media. But what were these classified
00:00:47.200
documents exactly? Well, no one at the Pentagon could know the answer to that because Dan Caldwell's
00:00:52.960
phone was never examined. Nor was he given a polygraph. So actually, beneath the headlines
00:00:59.440
was nothing other than a false accusation. Was Dan Caldwell fired because he opposed the push to war
00:01:06.160
with Iran? You decide. Here's Dan Caldwell. So there is an enormous amount of pressure on this
00:01:14.000
administration to participate in military action against Iran. And the President's position has
00:01:20.560
been, I think, really clear for a long time, which is we don't want to run to get nuclear weapons.
00:01:24.640
That's bad for everybody. Yes. He sincerely believes that. He's against proliferation.
00:01:30.160
He's very concerned about nuclear weapons in general, I think. But we would strongly prefer a
00:01:37.680
diplomatic solution. And he's being attacked up and down, including by a lot of people in the
00:01:43.520
administration in private, who were trying to steer him toward military action. So leaving aside all
00:01:53.760
the, you know, internecine fights going on, just as a real life matter, what would happen if the U.S.
00:02:00.480
participated in a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites? So I strongly believe that for
00:02:09.040
diplomacy to work, there needs to be a credible military option. Yes. And the President needs
00:02:16.000
that. The Pentagon, where I used to work, needs to provide that. That is their role in American
00:02:22.080
foreign policy, is to provide that leverage for diplomatic solutions to work. Now, that's how it's
00:02:28.960
supposed to work. Does it often work that way? Unfortunately, the last 30 years have shown us
00:02:32.480
us that it really doesn't. But the Trump administration is trying to make it work
00:02:40.160
So we're pursuing diplomacy with the leverage of potential military action.
00:02:45.120
Correct. That is how it's supposed to work. Now, there's risks in that. You could create
00:02:48.800
a security dilemma, a spiral. So you have to be careful. But that is essentially why the DOD exists.
00:02:56.000
Now, with that said, there are obviously specifics I can't get into. But I think it is fair to say
00:03:04.480
that a war with Iran risks being incredibly costly in terms of lives and dollars and instability in
00:03:12.880
the Middle East. Lives and dollars, American lives, American dollars. The lives of Americans,
00:03:17.920
the lives of Iraqis, of Saudis, of Bahrainians, of-
00:03:23.360
Israelis, yes, of Israelis. And of course, Iranians. It could be an incredibly costly war. And I think
00:03:32.880
that that is very obvious to anybody who's been watching the region for a while. And I think that's
00:03:39.680
why over the last few years, you have seen certain countries in the region change some of their positions
00:03:46.880
on how they want to engage Iran. There are a lot of Gulf Arab countries, for example, who
00:03:55.360
they by no means view Iran as a benevolent force in the region. They're very aware of the threats
00:04:04.000
that they could pose. But they also recognize that a war for them would be extremely costly. And so
00:04:10.720
they're trying to adopt a different posture. And that's a recognition on their end of the costs
00:04:16.640
that a potential full-out war with Iran could have. And I think the president, vice president,
00:04:23.920
they know this. And that is why they are making sure they're prioritizing diplomacy. And let me just
00:04:30.560
say, thank God we have Steve Witkoff in the administration. He is truly doing the Lord's work
00:04:35.280
and trying to stop this war through diplomacy and also end another ongoing war in Russia, Ukraine.
00:04:41.040
And they're making sure that his effort is the main effort, not a military effort at the moment.
00:04:48.720
So just for people who haven't been following this, what you're alluding to with the Gulf states,
00:04:53.520
there are six of them, but two of the biggest ones and the closest US allies would be UAE and Saudi.
00:04:59.680
And those are primarily Sunni states run by Sunnis. And they are hostile to Iran for a bunch of
00:05:06.400
different reasons going back a long way. Iran's proxy forces in neighboring countries, there's a lot
00:05:11.200
here, but they've been basically enemies of Iran or perceived that way. And so the thought was,
00:05:15.760
well, they would back military action against Iran, but you're saying all of a sudden they wake up
00:05:20.400
and realize, no, they don't back it. They don't want a major war in the Middle East right now because
00:05:27.680
of what they're trying to do with their countries in terms of economic development, because they're
00:05:32.320
trying to give their people a better life. It's worth noting that Khalid bin Salman, the Saudi
00:05:38.240
defense minister, was in Tehran, I believe, a few days ago. And he's the brother of Mohammed bin
00:05:42.960
Solomon, the crown prince. Yes. And they recognize fully the threat that Iran poses,
00:05:49.520
and they take it seriously. But just like the Trump administration, they are prioritizing
00:05:55.840
diplomatic outreach and trying to achieve somewhat of a detente. And that doesn't mean you disarm and
00:06:02.720
you join hands and the Middle East becomes this, you know, happy, hippie, you know, circle jam band.
00:06:08.400
It means that people recognize it's in no one's interest to have a major war in the Middle East.
00:06:14.080
So the idea that it could become a major war is kind of absent from American news accounts. So the
00:06:20.560
idea is that the United States, probably in partnership with Israel or vice versa, Israel
00:06:26.560
in partnership with the United States, would take out the, I think, six Iranian nuclear sites,
00:06:34.720
and that would kind of be the end of it. That it wouldn't become a major war. I mean,
00:06:39.360
I don't think I've ever read any account that suggests it could become a major war, but you're
00:06:43.840
saying it could. Look, when the minute that the bombs or bullets start flying, you can never say
00:06:50.000
with certainty what exactly is going to happen. But I think that because of
00:06:58.800
the fact that Iran has been put on its back foot, and Iran is weakened, they've had a lot of
00:07:04.880
failures in the region. Um, I think that actually creates an opportunity for more and better
00:07:10.560
diplomacy, but there's some who argue that creates an opportunity for more military action. And again,
00:07:17.360
maybe, maybe that's true, but all indications are, is that any type of strike would likely incite a,
00:07:26.560
a major war in the, in the Middle East. And again, I won't get into specifics. Right.
00:07:29.840
That could entail, but that is a, a re that is a likely outcome of any, uh, sustained set of strikes
00:07:40.480
on certain, uh, certain parts of Iran. I saw a graphic the other day, um, that showed the number
00:07:47.360
of us military installations in that region around the Persian Arabian Gulf. And, um, I don't know if
00:07:54.320
it was a complete, uh, list, but there are a lot, there are a lot, and there's publicly available
00:07:59.600
information. There are a lot of American service personnel stationed in that region and different
00:08:05.120
places. And some of the places there aren't that many, they're not massive, well-defended bases.
00:08:09.200
They seem like small bases, including in Iraq, uh, and Syria, but others. I mean, why wouldn't those
00:08:16.960
It's not even just the service members. It's diplomats in these large embassies in places like
00:08:25.040
Saudi Arabia and the UAE and Kuwait. Uh, there are some places where there's actually
00:08:32.400
family members, uh, in the Middle East. Um, so it's not just service members that are at risk.
00:08:39.440
It is American government employees, primarily diplomatic staff. Uh, it's also a lot of American
00:08:45.760
workers in the region, working in the oil industry, working in the finance industry.
00:08:50.240
There are a lot of Americans that would be at risk, not just service members.
00:08:55.840
And that, that is, again, that is something that, as you point out very well,
00:09:00.800
is often overlooked in any discussion around military action.
00:09:03.520
Well, it's not even mentioned. It's not even mentioned. The threat to American lives
00:09:07.520
is not even mentioned. And that's of course not even considering,
00:09:11.440
you know, the potential for terrorism. I mean, 9-11 happened because
00:09:16.320
extremists disagreed with American foreign policy. I mean, they said so again, and again,
00:09:20.800
and again, and again, you're supposed to ignore that and think they did it because they hated our
00:09:23.760
freedoms. Um, what they did was evil. I'm of course not in any way excusing it, but they, they,
00:09:30.160
they said why they did it. We disagree with what you're doing. And, and they attacked the US
00:09:34.160
homeland and killed 3000 Americans. So is, I mean, there's got to be a concern given how many
00:09:40.880
Iranians came into the country under the Biden administration illegally, like that there are
00:09:44.880
probably agents of the Iranian government here. And like, there could be acts of terror here if we
00:09:51.600
I mean, that is, that is a risk with any overseas military op, uh, operation. I, I do think this is,
00:09:57.760
you know, another reason why we need to take, uh, homeland defense and homeland security more
00:10:03.360
seriously. Uh, but yes, that, that is, that is a real risk. Um, I will say, you know, the backing
00:10:10.800
up to nine 11 comparison is there was a series of mistakes, uh, in both American foreign policy
00:10:17.120
and American security policy that paved the road to nine 11. I mean, the, the inability of the FBI
00:10:22.720
and CIA to work together, the decision to, through friendly nations, to fund certain groups, to, uh,
00:10:29.840
allow, you know, the growth of certain forces to fight communism, which at the time was probably the
00:10:35.200
right decision because of the threat, the Soviet union post, but the road to hell is paved with good
00:10:40.400
intentions. And one of the reasons why we're in the situation we are in the middle East with Iran
00:10:45.440
is we have to be honest because of the war in Iraq. Saddam Hussein was a check against Iran is
00:10:53.280
that he forced Iran to devote resources to deterring Iraq that now Iran doesn't need to put against
00:11:02.240
deterring Iraq conventionally or through their own proxies. Now they're able to put that money into
00:11:08.320
places like Hezbollah, the Houthis, and also devote more resources to its missile program and
00:11:14.320
potentially its nuclear program as well too. That, that is, I think, one of the things that
00:11:19.680
you can't overlook when discussing foreign policy and that not enough people have the conversation
00:11:24.960
about how did we get here? It's like, people don't want to have a conversation about how we got to
00:11:29.120
where we are in Ukraine. You know, NATO expansion played a big role in that. Um, you know, 30 years
00:11:36.880
of failed American foreign policy towards Eastern Europe, uh, the support of, of certain revolutions,
00:11:43.360
the support of certain, uh, political figures. Uh, there were smart people from George Kennan to,
00:11:50.240
you know, even the former CIA director, whatever you think of him, Bill Burns,
00:11:54.240
who warned that this stuff would happen. And again, these decisions that we make in a certain moment,
00:12:00.880
very focused on one thing, have second and third order consequences that sometimes are very easy to
00:12:06.000
see that they're quite obvious. Like if anybody had any understanding of the region and the power
00:12:11.520
dynamics in the region, 2003, they would have known, geez, removing Saddam Hussein, however awful he was,
00:12:18.560
would inevitably benefit Iran. There was hardly any discussion of that in the lead up.
00:12:23.360
Well, no, I was, I was, I was present in the country when all of that happened. And I,
00:12:27.440
and I didn't know anything, but it just seemed obvious if you have a majority Shiite country
00:12:33.200
and you force democracy, whatever that is on that country, and all of a sudden you get a Shiite
00:12:37.840
government, it's probably going to be aligned with Iran, right? It went from a bulwark against Iran to
00:12:43.600
an ally of Iran, which it remains, I think. It is effectively, the Iraqi government is effectively
00:12:48.960
Iranian proxy. Okay. So why would you do that? I don't, I mean, was it, and this weren't getting far
00:12:55.200
afield, but it's, it's, it's directly relevant to what's happening right now. Yeah. Even I,
00:13:01.200
as like a 35 year old journalist could see that this was going to have this effect.
00:13:07.680
Why were the geniuses in charge of our policy not thinking that, or maybe they were, maybe there was
00:13:11.840
some larger. Boy, that, that could be a three hour conversation in and of itself. So I think
00:13:18.320
there's a lot of reasons why we invaded Iraq, none of them good. But the one thing that should be
00:13:28.480
acknowledged is, is that even before 9-11, there was an effort to create the conditions for the United
00:13:35.360
States to go and invade Iraq. They thought that by overthrowing Saddam, that this would lead to an
00:13:43.600
outbreak of peace and democracy across the Middle East that predated 9-11. And you had things like
00:13:50.720
the project for new American century. You had Paul Wolfowitz at the tail end of the Bush administration,
00:13:56.400
very angry that George HW Bush didn't go all the way in terms of the Baghdad. And then you had this post
00:14:06.240
cold war moment where the United States was not simply a superpower. It was a hyper power. And we had
00:14:13.040
nobody who could effectively challenge us. Russia was a mess. China was still on the upswing. Some
00:14:19.520
people could, some smart people saw what was coming. But the assumption was we bring them into the WTO,
00:14:24.560
we do free trade, China's going to become a democracy. And so when, when you have nobody in the world
00:14:32.800
that can effectively challenge or check you, that can create political conditions domestically
00:14:40.800
that lead people to think that there will be no consequences for American foreign policy. And I
00:14:45.360
also think too, that our experience in the Balkans and how those wars went also convinced a large part
00:14:52.080
of the American security establishment that, oh, we can deal with Iraq rather cheaply and quickly,
00:14:58.240
and it'd be no big deal. And you saw a lot of that in the early days of the Iraq war,
00:15:02.320
people gloating, people assuming that, you know, once the statue of Saddam in Fido Square
00:15:08.640
fell down, which, by the way, was, you know, pulled down by Marines from 1st Marine Division,
00:15:14.400
that, you know, we'd be out there pretty quickly. And history showed that that was not the case.
00:15:19.920
No, it certainly wasn't. Well, whatever the motive, the actions of the US government under George W.
00:15:26.400
Bush greatly strengthened Iran. Great. I mean, removed the main
00:15:33.120
sort of bulwark against their expansion and freed up a lot of cash, as you just said.
00:15:38.880
So, so here we are, we're facing, you know, enormous pressure to go to war with a country
00:15:44.240
that's not Iraq, that's actually more powerful than Iraq. A lot of this is public information,
00:15:48.560
but to the extent, I know you're gonna, you're doing your best not to
00:15:52.240
reveal anything that's classified. But to the extent you can kind of characterize it using
00:15:57.680
publicly available information, what is the current strength of Iran, do you think, as a military power?
00:16:03.120
Well, again, they're quite clearly on their back foot. Anybody who's been watching
00:16:10.240
what has happened to them in the region in the last seven, eight months can see that. Yes.
00:16:14.960
Yes. Hezbollah has suffered significant defeats. Iran lost arguably its closest ally in the region in
00:16:24.240
Bashar al-Assad, lost a key pipeline of weapons and supplies into Lebanon, which restricts their ability
00:16:33.280
to help Hezbollah rebuild itself. They suffered some setbacks from some initial Israeli airstrikes
00:16:46.160
at the end of last year. And I just want to be clear about those airstrikes is that they were very
00:16:49.920
limited and they were very targeted. And the Iranian response was effectively, you can say,
00:16:57.760
looking at it. And again, I, I don't have any information if this is the case, but it was
00:17:02.720
telegraphed. And so the Israelis knew it was coming. They were prepared. They had American support to help
00:17:07.360
repel it. It was symbolic. It looked like to me. Yes. I mean, that's what it appears. Right. It appears.
00:17:12.640
So again, though, they, we can't deny that they have suffered some significant setbacks. However,
00:17:18.960
they still retain significant conventional military capabilities, um, a effective missile force.
00:17:27.360
They have effective proxies in Iraq. They have, um, uh, very effective, uh, drone program.
00:17:36.800
And those things, I think the Iranian missile force more than even a potential nuclear program,
00:17:43.600
and this is based on their experience. And they ran Iraq war. They, they very much view their missile
00:17:49.280
force as their ultimate guarantor of regime and national survival. And again, that goes back to
00:17:56.240
their experience. And they ran Iraq war when Saddam Hussein, sometimes with indirect or direct American
00:18:02.160
support, um, would use his Scud missiles and Tupolev bombers to effectively bomb and attack
00:18:10.080
Iranian cities. And the Iranians didn't have really an effective, uh, defense against them,
00:18:16.320
or even a effective way to counterstrike, uh, Iraq. They, they were able to get some Scud missiles from
00:18:24.160
Libya and other sources. It's interesting story. Gaddafi and Saddam had this kind of rivalry. So
00:18:29.520
Libya, even though being an Arab secular Arab socialist state, kind of like Iraq, they wound up backing,
00:18:35.200
uh, Iran, but they were never able to match, uh, Iraq's long range strike capabilities.
00:18:43.200
And so that is a big reason why they have invested so heavily in developing missiles, drones, cruise
00:18:50.320
missiles, and things like that, that can strike all across the region. And that is really the, the,
00:18:57.440
the real threat. And that is Iranian conventional weapons, missiles. Correct. As of right now. Yes.
00:19:04.640
Right. So when we hear that they're weakened, um, we're talking about their air defenses mostly. Uh,
00:19:11.680
I won't necessarily get into that, but there, I mean, part of their conventional, uh, capabilities have
00:19:19.040
been weakened, um, but not defeated and they still retain significant capabilities.
00:19:27.280
Everybody knows a good night's sleep is super important. It's actually one of the most important
00:19:30.800
things you can do for your health and your sanity. And that's why we are excited to tell you about
00:19:35.040
something that really helps beams dream powder. It's proudly an American product. It's run by
00:19:40.560
Americans, people who share the values that you have hard work, integrity, delivering results.
00:19:45.760
It's science backed. It's healthy. It's a blend pack with ingredients clinically shown to improve
00:19:50.400
sleep without poisoning you. So you wake up refreshed and ready to take on the day. A good sleep really does
00:19:56.320
make a big difference. Dream is made with a blend of all natural ingredients, including melatonin.
00:20:01.200
It's designed to help you fall asleep, stay asleep and wake up feeling not with a drug type hangover,
00:20:06.800
but feeling great and pure and refreshed. Plus it tastes good. It's already improved over 17.5
00:20:14.080
million. It's hard to read that because really 17.5 million nights of sleep. People across the country
00:20:19.440
wake up feeling ready for their day. Beam is giving our listeners, you, the best gift discount,
00:20:25.520
up to 47% off in honor of our 47th president, Donald Trump. So try dream powder, get up to 47%
00:20:32.080
off for a limited time. Go to shopbeam.com slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker at checkout. Shopbeam.com
00:20:40.480
slash Tucker, the code Tucker for up to 47% off in honor of President Trump. An American company,
00:20:46.560
a great product. They speak of darkness and danger, but totalitarian novels also give us
00:20:52.720
hope, showing us how to defend our society from the horrors of tyranny. In Hillsdale College's free
00:20:59.280
online course, Totalitarian Novels, Hillsdale president Larry Arnn teaches us lessons from
00:21:04.920
classic novels like George Orwell's 1984 that are as relevant today as ever. Sign up now for Hillsdale
00:21:12.640
College's free online course, Totalitarian Novels at tuckerforhillsdale.com. That's
00:21:20.800
Don Jr. here, guys. Are you receiving letters from the IRS claiming you owe back taxes? As penalties
00:21:26.440
and interest fees pile up, the IRS gives you no clear path to resolution. Don't speak to them on
00:21:31.460
your own. They are not your friends. To reach a team of licensed tax professionals that can help you
00:21:36.580
reduce, settle, and resolve your tax matters, go to tnusa.com and check them out. Solve your tax
00:21:43.300
problems today. Call 1-800-780-8888 or visit tnusa.com. That's 1-800-780-8888.
00:21:51.460
It sounds to me like people who thought a lot about this have reached the conclusion that if we were
00:21:56.900
to participate in a strike on their nuclear facilities, lots of Americans would die.
00:22:00.640
There is a real potential to that. Again, there's a saying in the military that no plan survives the
00:22:07.940
first contact. It's larger too that no assumptions survive the first contact, but it's still a
00:22:15.060
significant risk that that could happen. I think it's fair to say that that is weighing in the
00:22:23.060
calculus of a lot of people in the administration. The choke point for a lot of the global oil trade
00:22:28.520
is, you know, the very end, you know, the, the terminus of the entrance to the Arabian Gulf,
00:22:34.860
Persian Gulf, the Straits of Hormuz famously. And, um, do you think Iran is capable of shutting that
00:22:40.160
off? I think that is a real risk if not, you know, significantly curtailing, um, the ability to ship
00:22:48.480
energy through that, uh, vital sea lane. And what happens to global oil prices? They catastrophically
00:22:55.160
spike. Now over time, the oil market may, will sort itself out for sure. You know, you'll have
00:23:01.920
more production here domestically and elsewhere, um, oils fungible. Uh, but initially it would have
00:23:08.220
a pretty catastrophic impact on global oil markets at a time where, you know, the United States is
00:23:14.040
facing some economic headwinds. So you could see catastrophe both in the form of like a global
00:23:21.520
depression potentially, and the deaths of a lot of Americans in that region and here, uh, in the wake
00:23:27.940
of a war with Iran. The third point that I don't think is ever mentioned in any account I've ever
00:23:34.300
read about these plans to just bomb Iran and rid them of their nuclear program is the fact that Iran
00:23:39.660
is now part of a global coalition of big countries that oppose us. Now, see, this is, this is very
00:23:45.100
interesting. Tucker is what, why, why are they part of that coalition? And it's because of our own
00:23:52.020
stupidity. We force these countries together that don't naturally have aligned interests.
00:23:58.300
Okay. Iran is a Shiite theocracy. Russia is an authoritarian country run by Vladimir Putin and a
00:24:07.940
group of, of oligarchs, essentially. China is a quasi-communist, quasi-state capitalist state.
00:24:16.040
North Korea is one of the last true communist authoritarian countries on the face of the earth.
00:24:21.760
A lot of these countries should have natural tension. And there's been points in the post-Cold
00:24:26.280
War era where a country like Russia was willing to do things like not sell weapons to Iran because
00:24:35.100
they didn't want to inflict instability on the Middle East. Russia also traditionally,
00:24:41.840
despite the fact they've supported some of Israel's adversaries, did have a good relationship
00:24:45.900
with Israel. So Israelis along the United States were able to convince the Russians at key points
00:24:50.220
like, hey, don't sell these weapons to Iran or don't do this. And so while they were growing closer,
00:24:56.240
there were still gaps between them. And let's also be honest too, is Russia has had significant
00:25:01.100
problems with Islamic radicalism in their country. And they don't want to support a regime that in the
00:25:08.860
past has supported Islamic radicals, both Sunni and Shia across the Middle East and across other parts
00:25:14.120
of the world. They don't want them doing that in certain parts of the world. And so why are they pushed
00:25:21.200
together? Well, it's because we adopted this mindset, and even before the Biden administration
00:25:28.960
adopted this, is that this autocracy versus democracy. And again, it wasn't well-defined
00:25:35.880
before that, but we started just bucketing these countries together. Here's a great example,
00:25:42.260
axis of evil. When they said, we have this axis of evil of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea.
00:25:48.140
We just talked about it. Iran and Iraq hated each other. They were natural enemies. And by the way,
00:25:54.600
North Korea- And what does North Korea have to do with it?
00:25:56.540
Here's an interesting thing. Iraq and North Korea broke off relationships in the Iran-Iraq war
00:26:01.160
because they were so close to the Iranians. And the North Koreans, it appears, may have ripped off
00:26:08.040
the Iraqis in the 90s. They got them. This is, again, it hasn't been confirmed, but they may have
00:26:13.620
ripped them off when the North Koreans offered to sell them weapons. And the North Koreans are
00:26:18.840
actually kind of famous for this. They got the money and said, yeah, we can't give that to you.
00:26:24.120
They actually tried at one point in the early 90s. Again, I can't say if this story is for sure,
00:26:28.820
but I read this on a military blog. They try to pay for some Russian military equipment with used car
00:26:34.080
parts. So I bring this up in that, and again, Russia and China, these are two countries with
00:26:40.840
historical antagonisms. They've have a shared border that they've, you know, during the Soviet
00:26:47.100
times, they fought wars over. They have the Chinese look at Siberia and its resources, and it's growing
00:26:53.200
its own, its population I don't think is growing right now because they killed 100 million baby girls.
00:26:58.220
But this is an area with resources that they need and that there's been in the past conflicts over.
00:27:05.320
There should be tension between those two countries, but our foreign policy of bucketing
00:27:09.420
them all together, sanctioning them, treating them as one united front has kind of willed it into
00:27:15.220
existence. Has made them one united front. Yes, and it shouldn't be that way. We should be able to
00:27:19.980
pull them apart because they have interests that don't align. We should be able to be working more
00:27:25.740
with the Russians, and I hope that, you know, if, again, Steve Witkoff is successful and others in
00:27:31.840
the administration, there's a lot of great people in the administration working on Russia, Ukraine
00:27:35.820
right now. If they're successful, we can hopefully maybe get to a better place with Russia, and they
00:27:40.480
can help us with Iran. Let me just ask you to pause it. Everything you're saying is, by the way,
00:27:44.680
in the public sphere, you're not guessing about any of this. It's obvious. No honest person would
00:27:51.400
deny it. And it's so crazy, these policies, that it's almost like they were formulated by people
00:27:58.200
who are trying to tank the United States. I mean, these are policies that are hostile to American
00:28:02.480
interests, not indifferent. You know, I think maybe that's a possibility, but the more I've
00:28:11.040
interacted with some of these people and seen them up close, it's almost giving them too much credit.
00:28:14.080
I mean, I just... Never attribute to conspiracy what stupidity can explain? Is that what you're
00:28:20.140
saying? That's... There's definitely evil forces at play, but a lot of this is stupidity and laziness.
00:28:27.080
You know, in my, albeit short time in the Pentagon, like with Ukraine, a lot of people in the Pentagon
00:28:35.780
wanted to keep doing what we were doing in Ukraine. Some of them really had an ideological commitment
00:28:41.160
to the Ukrainian project. I think a lot of the officers that... A more transgender Eastern Europe.
00:28:50.560
You know, Zelensky has a savior of global liberalism. The... The war against Christianity,
00:28:57.100
they're all in. Yeah. The... So I think that because of their experience, in some ways you can somewhat
00:29:04.520
sympathize with it, is that they did sympathize with Ukraine. But, you know, I saw a lot of it,
00:29:09.900
and a lot of it was, it's easier to say we should keep doing what we're doing than admit that we had
00:29:18.080
been screwing things up and think of a different way to do things. I think that, more than ideology,
00:29:24.920
and ideology plays an important role, the belief that America needs to be the global hegemon to,
00:29:30.100
you know, enforce liberal hegemony. But really, for a lot of the people, and I think the same applies
00:29:36.420
as a State Department, it's just easier to say we should just keep doing what we're doing.
00:29:38.680
No, I believe that. I've spent a lot of time around the bureaucracy. I think that's right.
00:29:42.420
It's just like, there's a physics principle. Objects in motion tend to stay that way.
00:29:46.220
Yeah. So, no, I completely believe that. But big picture, just like swooping out a little bit,
00:29:52.940
another Middle Eastern war. Like, I think the overwhelming majority of Americans, and certainly
00:29:59.900
the overwhelming majority of Trump voters, like, wait a second, no. So, and in fact, the president
00:30:06.800
was elected to some large extent on the promise to not get us involved in another forever war.
00:30:15.060
So, I just have really been struck, but you're the expert by how much pressure is applied to the
00:30:21.520
administration to do this, to get us involved in another war in the Middle East. Did you feel that?
00:30:27.040
Yeah. I think there clearly is a very strong coalition within the United States that wants
00:30:35.600
us to see another war in the Middle East, and it crosses both parties. Just to point something out,
00:30:43.160
and I wrote about this in Foreign Affairs with a friend of mine, Reed Smith. You know, during the
00:30:49.440
campaign, the Democrats attacked Trump for being too dovish on Iran. And they attacked him for not
00:30:58.860
doing more after killing Soleimani, not doing more after some of the Iranian drone strikes on Saudi
00:31:05.780
Arabia in 2019. They accused him of being too weak on Iran. And the Democrat Party trotted out Liz Cheney,
00:31:13.900
of all people, and the endorsement of her father, had her going to battleground states talking about
00:31:20.100
the importance of staying, quote, strong in the Middle East and continuing to fund an unwinnable
00:31:26.440
war in Ukraine. And that was the position they adopted. So, it's kind of transcended the traditional
00:31:33.660
right-left way we think about American foreign policy that came into being at the end of the Cold
00:31:39.600
War. And, or even before that, it really predates the end of the Cold War. It goes back to the Cold
00:31:44.200
War where the, you know, in the post-Vietnam era, especially the Democrats were the doves,
00:31:49.100
Republicans were the hawks. It really kind of transcends that. And you have this trans-partisan
00:31:53.300
movement to keep America engaged in the world. And I think it's good for America to be engaged in
00:32:00.780
the world, but engaged in the world so that their primary purpose is not to protect American interests
00:32:05.900
or safety or the conditions of American prosperity, but to ensure that America is enforcing liberal
00:32:13.680
hegemony. So, getting back to Iran, there's a lot of reasons why people want war with Iran. I think
00:32:19.740
when it comes down to it is a lot of people still think you can do regime change wars successfully in
00:32:28.200
the Middle East. Regime change wars? I thought this was all about getting rid of the whatever half dozen
00:32:34.340
Iranian nuclear sites because we don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
00:32:38.860
Well, I think Donald Trump has exposed them because they're essentially, I mean, some of the
00:32:44.580
biggest advocates of war with Iran, whether it's groups like Foundation for Defense of Democracy,
00:32:52.360
writers at certain publications, essentially they are saying the problem with diplomacy is it doesn't
00:33:01.180
lead to regime change, is that the policy should be regime change. It's almost like the nuclear issue
00:33:09.740
is really about creating a pathway to regime change. And it really still goes back to this idea
00:33:16.640
is a lot of them deep down inside believe, and some of them say it out loud, that we could have made
00:33:24.340
Iraq successful. And Iraq is just a mess. It is an absolute just cluster. Well, it's a proxy of Iran
00:33:34.660
to the country they hate. Yes. Let me just make a note on this. The most deadly forces in the middle,
00:33:41.240
the forces that pose the most risk to the United States, United States forces, are the popular
00:33:49.180
mobilization forces in Iraq. They are an official arm of the Iraqi government that we created after
00:33:57.080
the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which we fund through aid and whose troops that we train
00:34:03.560
still with a couple thousand troops in Iraq. So American troops in Iraq right now are getting
00:34:12.440
attacked by people who are part of the same government that American troops are helping to
00:34:19.320
support and whose security forces they're helping to train. It is the most counterproductive and insane
00:34:24.100
foreign policy mission in the globe right now. And I hope the administration will make changes to that.
00:34:30.980
But that's, yeah, that's how I'm saying it is. I don't understand. So, I mean, in the last,
00:34:36.480
I don't know, 22 years, 24 years, I guess, since 9-11. Amazing. Our record with regime change in the
00:34:44.700
Middle East has been like 100% failure. Yeah. And if you go to Libya, you go to Syria. Yeah.
00:34:55.120
But failure on every level. It hasn't. Even Yemen, you can include Yemen because we back the old
00:34:59.880
government before it collapsed and Yemen devolved into a civil war. It hasn't made the United States
00:35:04.180
safer or richer. It hasn't, by the way, I would argue, made our allies safer either, however much
00:35:09.760
they may have wanted it. It hasn't been good for them either that I can see. And it's been a disaster
00:35:14.260
for millions of people, human beings, in those countries. But mostly it hasn't helped the United
00:35:19.080
States. So how could you, with a straight face, advocate for yet another regime change war against
00:35:24.420
a real country that's not Libya, not Iraq? It's Iran. It's the Persian Empire. Like, how could you say
00:35:29.720
that out loud? Are they actually saying that out loud? Yeah. I mean, some of them do say it out
00:35:36.000
loud, yes. Is that they think, oh, the Shah, you know, the Shah's son has reemerged. I mean, this guy
00:35:41.960
is the, he's the ultimate fail son, in my view. And then you have groups like the MEK,
00:35:50.360
People's Mujahideen of Iran, who pay a lot of American politicians to advocate for them and
00:35:54.580
advocate for regime change. They are essentially saying, hey, we have governments in waiting
00:36:02.080
that can just swoop in there and everything will be fine if you just get rid of the mullahs.
00:36:14.860
I mean, it's ignoring the most obvious facts of the last 30 years.
00:36:18.900
Yeah. It goes back to what I was saying about what I observed in the Pentagon, I think, is that
00:36:23.540
it's easier to advocate for the same things over and over again than to say we should do
00:36:27.980
something different. But what do you make of the senator? I mean, maybe you have a different
00:36:30.540
experience, but I just hear constantly about Republican senators. I'm sure there are Democrats
00:36:36.000
too, but I hear about the Republicans, Lindsey Graham being the most obvious, but many others
00:36:39.260
constantly applying pressure to the administration to have a regime change war against Iran. I'm not
00:36:46.540
going to confirm your nominees. We're going to hassle- I mean, like threatening the Trump
00:36:51.580
administration in order to force them to lead a regime change war against Iran. What could
00:37:02.020
Look, there- I think- and I've talked about this before in my past jobs. I think there's
00:37:08.740
a disconnect in Washington, D.C. among elected Republicans, with the exception of those in the
00:37:14.220
White House currently, between the base, with the base actually believes on foreign policy.
00:37:20.940
And so the base very much doesn't want new wars.
00:37:27.060
Like the voters you're talking about, people who put them there.
00:37:29.540
And time and time again, you saw the majority of Republican voters in a lot of these primaries
00:37:34.140
saying that they wanted fewer wars. The Republicans in a lot of cases were now less hawkish overall.
00:37:41.180
And, you know, polling, it doesn't tell the whole story all the time, but you saw voters-
00:37:48.740
generally, the Democrats are getting more hawkish primarily because of Ukraine, but you saw Republican
00:37:53.620
voters and independent voters becoming more and more wary of foreign wars. However, because foreign
00:37:59.240
policy for a lot of voters is often not a highly salient issue, it's not in their top three,
00:38:06.900
a lot of Republicans and Democrats are able to get elected despite having horrible records on foreign
00:38:14.580
policy. Now, there are elections where it makes a difference. 2016, for example, there's real
00:38:21.860
evidence that the fact that Donald Trump was viewed as less hawkish than Hillary Clinton
00:38:26.180
played a decisive role in him winning Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
00:38:31.340
The counties that flipped from Obama to Trump, they had higher levels of what you call military
00:38:37.960
sacrifice. So troops deployed, wounded, or killed than some of their adjacent counties. So that likely
00:38:44.620
contributed both to his 2016 and possibly his 2024 victory. Now, I have good dear friends of mine that
00:38:51.700
from a, you know, they're much smarter than me on polling and social science. They may disagree with
00:38:56.780
that. But there have been times where actually the political incentives are to be less hawkish,
00:39:03.320
but those don't show up in most elections. So you have a lot of Republican leaders in particular
00:39:11.820
that are just disconnected from the base. Now, I think the good news is, though,
00:39:16.080
is you're starting to see that change. And you saw that play out with Ukraine aid,
00:39:19.680
where I think the last major Ukraine aid vote, and it may actually be the last major Ukraine aid
00:39:26.120
vote yet ever. So I think you had over half of Senate Republicans vote against it, and more than
00:39:33.380
half of Senate or excuse me, House members vote against it. And that went from like you only had
00:39:39.980
six Republicans voting against the first big Ukraine aid package in 2022, and only 40 House
00:39:48.020
Republicans to now believe about 26, 27 senators, and then nearly 110, 113, somewhere in that range,
00:39:59.020
House Republicans voting against it. So you've seen changes. And definitely the Republicans elected
00:40:05.120
since 2018 in both the House and Senate, they're far less hawkish than people elected before then.
00:40:11.300
That's indisputable. Well, it hasn't worked. It hasn't worked. And I don't think anyone who puts the
00:40:17.400
interest of the United States first really does in his heart, could come around to another regime
00:40:24.340
change war in Iran. Like it's that's almost prima facie evidence that you are not putting your
00:40:30.000
country's interest first. That's the way it feels to me. Maybe I'm being uncharitable.
00:40:33.780
No, I think this goes back to a simple belief of what is the purpose of American foreign policy?
00:40:39.200
I believe, and I think President Trump, Vice President Vance, I believe even Secretary Rubio,
00:40:46.580
Secretary Hegseff, and others in the administration fundamentally believe the purpose of American
00:40:50.800
foreign policy is to ensure American safety and the conditions of our prosperity. That doesn't mean
00:40:56.200
we're going to ensure 3% GDP growth. It's the things that enable us to be prosperous. So like,
00:41:01.640
for example, prioritizing the defense of the Panama Canal over the negligible issue of which Eastern
00:41:08.960
European oligarch gets to loot the Donbass. Like they believe they believe that that, you know,
00:41:15.680
that is more important because the Panama Canal indisputably is more important to us than who
00:41:21.040
controls the Donbass or who controls some desolate patch of desert in the Middle East.
00:41:26.240
So nicely put. Well, Easter is finally here, and there's no better way to remember the story of
00:41:31.800
Christ. Jesus dying for your sins is the most powerful thing that's ever happened in history.
00:41:36.100
It is really the beginning of history, and it's worth celebrating. This Easter, embrace the freedom
00:41:41.380
of the resurrection on Hallow, which is the number one prayer app in the world. Join Liz Tabas,
00:41:46.720
who plays Mary Magdalene in The Chosen, actor Kevin James, and others in an immersive and jubilant
00:41:52.500
prayer experience worthy of Easter itself. Every single day, you learn how to walk in freedom
00:41:57.880
amidst the circumstances often crushing of your daily life and let go of the things that you're
00:42:03.220
attached to and that are causing suffering and instead embrace the peace and freedom that come
00:42:08.800
when you place your trust in God, which is the only place to place your trust. So enter the joy of
00:42:14.340
Easter with a brief prayer reflection meditation every single day that will help you continue the
00:42:20.300
habits that will change everything, the ones you establish during Lent. We love Hallow here. We
00:42:26.020
love the app. We know you will too. It's got thousands of prayers, meditations, music, help you
00:42:30.120
build a daily habit of prayer and to grow closer to God. Download Hallow today at hallow.com slash
00:42:36.700
Tucker. You get three months for free. You'll be grateful you did. Honestly, you will be.
00:42:41.080
I've got to say, almost everyone on our team looks suspiciously well-rested every morning. It turns
00:42:46.460
out most of them are using a product called Sambrosa. Sambrosa blends antihistamine with
00:42:51.000
a syrup of herbs and honey and is designed to help you sleep well, waking up, feeling refreshed
00:42:55.900
and revitalized. And based on the sunny, cheerful faces of the people I work with, it works. It's
00:43:02.740
inexpensive. It's less than 50 cents a night. And we know the people who own the company and
00:43:06.840
they are great people. They are faithful people and they are about the happiest family we've ever
00:43:12.280
run across. The product Sambrosa has a ton of five-star reviews. You can check it out on their
00:43:16.700
website, sambrosa.com. How did you get involved in all of this? What's your story? Um, and can I say,
00:43:24.860
I should have asked at the outset, what was your, you just left the Pentagon under circumstances I hope
00:43:29.500
we can talk about. What were you doing when you left? So I was a senior advisor to the secretary of
00:43:36.380
defense. I was focused on policy. I was the senior advisor in the front office for policy. And so my job
00:43:43.620
day to day was advising the secretary on policy, making sure that he was prepared for meetings, making
00:43:50.140
sure that he was prepared for giving certain speeches and talks, and then providing him policy advice as
00:43:57.440
needed. Uh, we had a very smart, um, policy team, uh, the undersecretary of defense for policy who just
00:44:05.120
was, uh, uh, confirmed, thank God, uh, Bridge Colby. He's doing a great job. But the way the Pentagon
00:44:10.060
works is you need somebody in the front office that can connect the secretary effectively to policy
00:44:14.980
and policy has so many jobs and so many things they have to focus on that you need somebody in
00:44:20.360
the front office that can help be that immediate policy advisor that is able to walk in and talk to the
00:44:26.120
secretary right away. Right. Okay. Is that the job that you dreamed about as a child? Like, how did
00:44:30.480
you wind up here? You know, it's funny. I, there was a part of me that didn't even want to go into the
00:44:36.700
Pentagon. It wasn't necessarily something that I, uh, I dreamed of. I mean, I think my first job I was
00:44:41.580
really obsessed with, like a lot of young boys is being a firefighter. And then, um, where'd you grow
00:44:46.440
up? I grew up, I was born in California, lived in Massachusetts for a while, but home is Scottsdale,
00:44:51.440
Arizona. That's where I consider home. My kids were born there. My parents still live there.
00:44:55.800
Um, my grandma still lives there. I still have a lot of family there and that's, that will always
00:44:59.500
be home for me. So how did you, you were in the military? Yes. The Marine Corps. You're in the
00:45:03.620
Marine Corps. How did that, how'd you wind up in the Marine Corps? So I went to, uh, a Jesuit all
00:45:10.600
boys school and the last two years are very intense. And the expectation was everybody's going to go to
00:45:16.020
college. And, um, by the end of, of my time in high school, I was, didn't want to do more academics.
00:45:24.200
I didn't want to go to college, but it was the thing you had to do. So I dragged myself down to
00:45:30.460
Tucson, uh, to go to the university of Arizona. And candidly, I was miserable. Um, I didn't have
00:45:38.740
any motivation to go to class or do stuff. And I just was hating life. Um, and then one day, my best
00:45:46.900
friend, uh, just a dear friend, I love him to death, James O'Connor, he was from high school,
00:45:53.780
from high school. He had dropped out of Arizona state university and enlisted in the army as a
00:45:59.060
paratrooper, like his dad and was attached to 101st as part of a pathfinder unit. And he was in Iraq
00:46:06.020
at the, uh, in the summer, he went to Iraq near the fall, 2005. And I remember him on AOL instant
00:46:13.420
messenger sending me a message saying, my, my team almost got hit by an IED. And I was kind of like,
00:46:22.040
what am I doing here? I need to get in the fight. Because growing up, you asked me what I wanted to
00:46:26.700
do is I was very interested in military history. And my grandfather, who is very important to me,
00:46:34.120
um, he, he was a paratrooper, but I became obsessed with the Marine Corps and he had me
00:46:40.580
read two books, the Nightingale song about amazing book. It's amazing book. I read, I still go and read
00:46:47.540
it every couple of years. Honestly. And the, and the, he released, I think he's passed away now.
00:46:52.260
He has Baltimore sun report, but, um, he released a longer version, kind of unexpurgated version,
00:46:58.000
which is amazing. And then he had me read fields of fire by Jim Webb. Oh my gosh.
00:47:02.240
And Jim Webb is one of my personal, those are both Vietnam books. Yes. Yeah. And so they had
00:47:08.960
an unvarnished view of the Marine Corps, but I still wanted to be part of that. And so, you know,
00:47:14.680
I, I, so James, I get the message from James and I say, I got to get out of here. Dropped out,
00:47:19.900
told my parents who are apoplectic. They weren't impressed. Yeah. I, I, they were scared.
00:47:26.140
And, um, uh, I still feel bad about that fear I put in them because I went and I enlisted in the
00:47:34.120
infantry. I didn't go in the Marine Corps. You enlisted. Yes. As an O three, uh, O three 11 in
00:47:40.300
the Marine Corps. Um, now my first two years in the Marine Corps. That's not, that's like the least
00:47:45.380
glamorous thing you can do. I, you know what? For some people, yes. And I know that you have some
00:47:52.220
Marines that work for you, but enlisted Marines. Yeah. And I'll do respect to them, but there was
00:47:57.400
a saying in the infantry is like, if you ain't infantry, you ain't shit. Yeah. And everything
00:48:02.960
the Marine Corps did from its fighter squadrons to its artillery, to its tanks was in support of
00:48:11.420
the enlisted riflemen locating with and destroying the enemy and repelling enemy assault by fire maneuver.
00:48:17.480
And so everything was in support of the O three 11 doing his job. And so I love being in the
00:48:24.720
infantry. And there was kind of this thing, like if, if you were infantry, like you were,
00:48:30.000
you felt whether it was true or not, you're cut above the rest, your life sucked more,
00:48:33.720
but that was a point of pride. And I love that. Um, and so, but my first two years,
00:48:40.600
so you just bottom line, you drop out of college and enlist in the Marine Corps during a war.
00:48:44.820
Yes. This was 2005, you know, things were going just swimmingly in Iraq.
00:48:50.900
Afghanistan was kind of on a, on a simmer, but it was, you know, still bad, um, before getting much,
00:48:56.620
much worse. Um, so my first two years, I, in bootcamp, I was selected for a program called
00:49:02.680
Yankee white. And I, this is the presidential support program. So if you ever seen the Marines
00:49:08.240
saluting in front of the white house, they're part of the presidential support program.
00:49:12.420
Um, and as part of that, I went to be part of the Marine security force of camp David. So I spent,
00:49:16.740
I think almost two years up there about that, uh, while president Bush was president. Um, and that
00:49:23.160
was a great duty station. I loved it. Some of my closest friends still to this day, I serve with up
00:49:30.280
there and it was a great command. I had a great first sergeant, great commanding officer, great
00:49:34.480
platoon sergeant. So I spent two years there. And then once, uh, I, my time was up there, I went to
00:49:40.360
second battalion, first Marines, which is very lucky. I got put in another great company,
00:49:44.640
Fox company two, one, and we did a workup and we need a deployment to Iraq. And this was end of
00:49:50.340
eight, 2009. I'll be honest. It was, it was not as bad as it was in Ramadi and Fallujah a few years
00:49:58.300
before. And it was mostly an uneventful deployment with some exceptions. There was, you know, some,
00:50:04.800
some incidents and things like that, but you kind of left Iraq at that time thinking, okay,
00:50:11.900
this isn't going to be like the new, uh, you know, this isn't going to be Scottsdale, Arizona anytime
00:50:19.400
soon, but this could kind of work. You know, this could kind of be like Tijuana, Mexico. Um,
00:50:24.880
but, um, strip clubs. Yeah. But five years later, with the exception of Al-Assad, every,
00:50:31.540
every place that I was at in Iraq was under the control of ISIS.
00:50:35.940
The places you were personally? Yes. That you had been? From, from the city of Hitt to South Sinjar,
00:50:41.100
the mountain where, um, those, the Yazidis were trapped, uh, where there was those massacres and
00:50:47.920
they enslaved, um, all the women. Yeah. I was, we were all around Mount Sinjar. We spent a lot of time
00:50:54.500
with Yazidis. Just very interesting people. Their religion is very interesting. Uh, they worship
00:51:00.640
what the West, a lot of Westerners would call the devil. I don't think that's very accurate,
00:51:05.060
but they were very pro-American. They were, they were always dressed in colorful outfits and they
00:51:09.940
come and wave at us. And, um, whereas when you were in the SUNY parts, they just kind of ignore you.
00:51:14.640
And they're like, when are you guys going to leave? You know? Uh, and so five years after that,
00:51:20.400
all had fallen apart. And that was, and a lot of those people who waved at you were dead
00:51:23.960
or sex slaves. Yeah. I have a picture of myself on my Twitter with, uh, two young Yazidi boys and,
00:51:34.420
uh, they're either dead or they're in a refugee camp. I, I, maybe they were able to go back, but,
00:51:41.840
um, that's probably the reality of that, of that, unfortunately. Where were you by five years
00:51:48.020
later by the time you saw this? I was working at Concerned Veterans for America. Uh, that's where
00:51:52.280
I met Pete Hegshef. And one thing, you know, one thing that happened over those five years and,
00:51:59.680
and continue to happen as I saw. So I did two things. I learned a lot about why the war started,
00:52:08.000
learned about the decisions that brought us there. And I didn't have an overnight transition.
00:52:13.720
It took a while for it to happen, but I saw the impact on my community of veterans. Um,
00:52:21.120
and it's only gotten worse since then. What was the, I'm sure you could talk for hours on it,
00:52:26.200
but if you could sum up the effect of the Iraq war on guys, you knew, what would it be? Um,
00:52:32.160
so three Marines that I served with, uh, either in two, one or camp David were killed in action.
00:52:39.340
Um, a half dozen were seriously wounded, including some of their double amputees.
00:52:44.460
So all in Afghanistan, well, a few in Iraq. Um, as we sit here, believe about 20 have committed
00:52:54.040
suicide or died as a result of service related injuries. 20? That's for people who serve in the
00:53:00.860
infantry. That's very common. Uh, there were infantry units who fought in the battle of Fallujah
00:53:05.980
and Ramadi and other very intense conflicts that have suffered more Marines who've killed
00:53:13.840
themselves than were actually killed in action. And it, you know, you really try to navigate this
00:53:22.400
topic without being filled with hate. You don't want to become a hater, but it's hard when you hear
00:53:27.220
stuff like that. And you think of someone like David from not even an American screaming at people,
00:53:32.700
calling them bigots for not wanting to engage in another regime change war. I mean, it's like,
00:53:37.360
it's hard. It's a disgrace that, that he is allowed in good and proper company. Um, I think
00:53:43.080
the Iraq war was a monstrous crime. That's the only way I can describe it as a crime first and foremost
00:53:47.680
against the Iraqi people. And then the Syrian people, because those two wars are clearly connected.
00:53:52.840
You know, ISIS essentially was formed in American prisons in, well, ISIS sprung out of Zarqawi's
00:54:01.340
group, but the leadership like Baghdadi and even the new president of Syria, Jelani, they were
00:54:07.700
in American prisons and they met people that would eventually help form their core leadership teams
00:54:15.060
in Al-Nusra, which is the Al-Qaeda, uh, branch and then ISIS. You know, Baghdadi met in prison,
00:54:23.860
an American prison, you know, Iraqi military leaders and, and started to learn more about
00:54:29.320
military tactics. And a lot of those people he was in prison with would be the people that would
00:54:32.860
help him take over most of Iraq and Syria. What did it, you're not the first person I've asked this
00:54:38.920
of, but what did it feel like as someone who actually served there, um, who wanted to serve there,
00:54:43.760
dropped out of college to enlist, not go into ROTC, but to enlist in the Marine Corps. What did it,
00:54:50.560
you gave your whole life to it. And then to see the carnage, the Americans whose lives were destroyed,
00:54:56.280
like, and then realize this was all kind of fake, like what effect did that have on you?
00:55:02.860
It started really pushing me to where I'm at now in foreign policy. Like we need to do something
00:55:09.800
differently. And it kind of radicalized me in a certain way on this. And really
00:55:16.600
there's an argument that you need to be, when you're talking about foreign policy,
00:55:21.840
you kind of need to be cold and detached. Like some people say that realists need to be cold
00:55:25.740
and detached. I don't necessarily buy that. Um, but you know, when I hear about launching a new
00:55:36.260
military operation and somebody talk about something, my first thought is what's it going
00:55:41.280
to be like for the guys, what's going to be like for the, the, the boys that are going to be in the
00:55:44.780
front. Um, and you know, men, men, women too. Uh, it just, that's kind of the, the, you can't help,
00:55:55.620
but look through it for that prism. And it's sometimes you do have to attach yourself from it,
00:55:59.860
but yeah, that's, you know, that's, that's what I, I really think of. But the big thing is like,
00:56:05.120
we have to stop this from happening again. This cannot happen again.
00:56:10.240
I couldn't agree with you more. And, um, I wish more people would articulate this perspective.
00:56:15.160
I think it's, it's pretty, so among the guys you serve with in the Marine Corps in Iraq,
00:56:19.260
like, would you say many agree with you? Yes. Yes. Um, right, left, most of them are
00:56:27.140
rabidly anti-interventionist. Some of them make me look like Paul Wolfowitz.
00:56:34.340
And you're talking about the guys who served, who carried rifles in Iraq. Yes. Yeah. And we did
00:56:39.080
at Concerned Veterans for America, we did a lot of polling when I was there and we consistently found
00:56:43.560
that the veterans and military family population was more opposed to new wars by pretty noticeable
00:56:50.160
margins than the general population as a whole. It's, it's interesting. So you mentioned, um,
00:56:55.280
death, killed in action. You mentioned injuries, um, profound injuries. You mentioned suicide,
00:57:01.820
psychological injuries. And I, I'm sorry, I didn't even mention broken families.
00:57:05.340
Well, that's it. That's what I was about to ask. Keep going.
00:57:10.020
High rates of divorce. We were talking before we were on the air. I know a lot of
00:57:13.120
enlisted Marines. My dad was one. I don't know. I don't think I know any guys who enlisted the Marine
00:57:20.320
Corps during the war on terror who aren't divorced. I'm sure there are, but am I imagining this?
00:57:24.780
There are some combat arms and special forces, uh, uh, communities that have 90% divorce rates.
00:57:36.840
We undervalue that. Like that is a disaster for the people involved and for their children. Like
00:57:44.940
that's a true tragedy. Um, true tragedy. Divorce is a death. And so if you've got 90% divorce rates,
00:57:52.960
like that, I, I, I don't know why no one pauses to say, how can we, how can we not do this to
00:58:00.040
people? Yeah. Do you agree? Yes. Now look, I mean, divorce has always been a problem in the
00:58:06.500
military. You have a lot of guys, you know, getting married too young to get out of the
00:58:10.520
barracks. We were talking about that beforehand, but it's the strain of deployments on these
00:58:16.160
specific units that just spikes divorce rates in certain units. And when you have guys that are
00:58:23.540
spending 70, 80% of their time away from home, either training to be deployed or deployed,
00:58:28.820
it's hard. And military services is always going to be hard, but the increased deployment tempo we've
00:58:35.740
had, particularly post nine 11 is exacerbated that. Well, that's the first thing I noticed when I
00:58:41.480
started covering all this stuff or going over there. It's like the, these guys were doing like
00:58:45.520
a crazy number of deployments. And I just think you're going to destroy a man over time if you
00:58:50.700
keep sending him to war. No. Yeah. How could you not? Yes. I think everybody has a breaking point and
00:58:57.500
there are, there are guys who are able to do, I mean, there, there are people in ranger units that
00:59:04.180
are on their 15th, 16th deployment, you know, guys who've been in for over 20 years.
00:59:08.400
What does that do to you? I mean, it, there's so many things that can do to you. I mean,
00:59:14.260
there's some people that are able to just turn it on and off and put it in a box, but I would say
00:59:21.020
that for everybody, just physically, it's, it breaks you down. You know, you got 38 guys that have
00:59:27.380
bought a 38 year old guys that have bodies of 60 year olds and just mentally, it just can,
00:59:32.220
can wear you down as well too. I've argued with Dan Crenshaw in public a lot. I made fun of him a lot.
00:59:38.380
And I mean this with true sincerity. I look at that guy and I'm like, you were damaged by war.
00:59:44.460
I'm sorry. I mean, I don't, you know, I don't know, Dan Crenshaw, but I do know a lot of people
00:59:48.740
who have been damaged by their experience, like really damaged by their experience.
00:59:52.520
You know, I'd say that he's kind of an outlier too in the community where he's still,
00:59:56.840
for whatever reason, is supporting American primacy and the status quo. And, you know, most of his,
01:00:04.600
increasingly, most of his fellow veterans in the Republican side are actually rejecting that.
01:00:09.060
Well, they hate him. And I understand, certainly understand why, but he's unbalanced. Like that
01:00:14.160
guy's, it's not that we have like a disagreement over policies. Like that guy, there's something
01:00:18.140
really wrong with him. And maybe I'm being too generous, but I just have to suspect knowing
01:00:23.800
Well, I can understand why you said that. I mean, he did, right. He threatened to kill you.
01:00:27.740
He threatened to kill me. You know, I'm not worried about that. I just like,
01:00:30.600
yeah, I'm trying to be Christian and generous about this. Like he's a very damaged person
01:00:35.500
and perhaps he always was, but I know a bunch of damaged people who went through those experiences.
01:00:42.420
Do you, I mean, you must also, it's been devastating on, on our community. It really has.
01:00:48.400
Oh, and there's some people that say, oh, the word damp, like they try to soften it. Oh,
01:00:52.020
you shouldn't use the word damaged. That's the proper word to describe it.
01:00:55.920
I'm saying that with love and compassion and gratitude for everything they've done for us
01:01:00.800
and for their patriotism and decency. And I, I'm not saying that as a criticism. I'm saying that as,
01:01:06.680
as you would about someone you care about and you hate to see them hurt. I mean.
01:01:13.340
Um, so you get out of the Marine Corps. What do you do? You, you, so I finished up college. Um,
01:01:19.740
I didn't really want to go to college, but I blew through in like two, two, two and a half years
01:01:25.620
to work for member of Congress for a couple of years. How, how, how were you feeling when you
01:01:30.520
got out of there? Did it have lasting effects on you? You know, my first few months out of the
01:01:35.200
Marine Corps were, were tough. There was some stuff in my personal life that was happening. My,
01:01:38.660
my father, this is when the economy is really bad. My father passed away from a drug overdose and
01:01:45.900
then leaving the Marine Corps, leaving a group of guys you had thought were your brothers and
01:01:51.600
living in an apartment by yourself that had a negative, like that was not a fun time. I thought
01:01:57.240
it was going to be blast. You know, I have a bunch of money saved up from deployment. I'm going to go
01:02:01.300
on the GI bill. I'm going to, you know, a party school. And I just eventually just said, Hey,
01:02:08.500
I'm just going to get through college. I want to get a job. I got married. And so I just blew through
01:02:14.740
college. And then I got a job working for member of Congress out in Arizona. And I was primarily
01:02:19.860
focused on veterans, constituent work at first. And that was actually fulfilling, helping veterans
01:02:24.780
get benefits. And I learned a lot about how dysfunctional the VA was and how dysfunctional
01:02:30.140
Department of Defense was too, because, you know, helping guys with problems with the DOD. And after
01:02:36.060
two and a half years there, you know, just to be candid, I needed to make more money. I had,
01:02:40.840
by that time I had a child. And so a friend of mine introduced me to Concerned Veterans for America,
01:02:46.920
which at the time was run by Pete Hegseff. And I was recruited there first as somebody doing some
01:02:54.780
field work, and then eventually as a legislative and one of the policy directors. How long were you
01:03:00.980
there? I was with, I was affiliated with Concerned Veterans for America in one capacity or another for,
01:03:06.840
gosh, almost nine years. Wow. I was eventually the executive director. And then even when I moved
01:03:14.400
to a new job, I retained a senior advisor role. Huh. And were you close to Pete the whole time?
01:03:22.900
When he was with Concerned Veterans for America, yes, we worked very closely together along with
01:03:29.020
Darren Selnick, who's another individual that left the Pentagon last week. And I was primarily
01:03:35.300
working with him on policy and comms, mainly focused on our efforts to fix Department of Veterans
01:03:40.080
Affairs. So fast forward to the 2024 campaign, Trump wins in November, and there's a mad scramble
01:03:49.520
to staff the administration. What role did you play in that? So early on, even before the election,
01:03:57.680
it was very informal because, you know, President Trump didn't initially do a formal transition that
01:04:03.200
you'd seen before, which actually, I think, in some ways was a good idea. At the time, I maybe
01:04:08.680
didn't understand why, but but because of all the leaks and stuff that had hurt him in the first
01:04:14.980
campaign, it ultimately became a much better run transition. And I think a lot of the credit goes
01:04:20.420
to, of course, the president himself, but Susie Wiles, and I think Sergio Gore as well, too, was heading
01:04:25.520
personnel. So I was working with a group of people early on to identify people that could serve in the
01:04:31.620
Department of Defense. And one day, I get a call from someone and was told, hey, what do you know
01:04:39.860
about Pete Hegseth? I give, you know, a few bullets about what I know about him. And then, you know, I
01:04:46.800
call Pete. And we had not, I mean, we had still stayed in touch, but we weren't, you know, working as
01:04:55.040
closely together as we watched before. It was like, hey, just so you know, the transition was asking
01:05:00.780
questions about you. And he says, yeah, I know I'm being considered for the role of Secretary of
01:05:04.260
Defense. So, wow, okay, that's, that's, that's cool. And so a few days later, through Veterans Day
01:05:12.820
weekend, he gets the job. And I started working with him during his confirmation. I helped him
01:05:21.140
during the confirmation, helped him defend against a lot of the attacks that were made against him,
01:05:26.160
help with strategy. But what I eventually took over was being his main link to the personnel
01:05:32.380
operation. So helping to vet and place personnel within the Department of Defense. And so I'd fly
01:05:40.140
down to Florida a lot and work with some really great people on the PPO. They're now on the PPO team
01:05:45.520
and doing that. And so I did. So you're not working for the government at this point? No, I'm doing this
01:05:50.900
on a volunteer basis. And, you know, I was paying out of these flights out of my own pocket. Really?
01:05:56.500
Yeah. Did you get reimbursed? As of now, no. Now we're sure you've heard plenty of those free phone
01:06:01.360
promises from America's biggest wireless carriers. If those deals sound too good to be true, it's
01:06:06.320
probably because they are very often too good to be true. They come with layers of fine print
01:06:10.800
requiring you to sign up for four lines, plus activation fees, plus, plus, plus this, that,
01:06:17.700
the other thing. You don't even understand what you're signing up for. And by the time you're done,
01:06:20.340
you've paid for that free phone, 3X. It was a pretty expensive free phone.
01:06:26.200
It's kind of a scam, honestly. Our wireless company is called PureTalk, and it's got a much
01:06:30.840
better and much more straightforward offer. And it comes with no strings whatsoever attached.
01:06:35.640
With a qualifying plan of just $35 a month, you get legitimately the brand new Samsung Galaxy A26
01:06:42.660
for free. It's actually free. There aren't hidden costs. You're not signing up the rest of your life
01:06:47.120
for promising to name your kid after them or something. From virtually indestructible gorilla
01:06:52.080
glass to next-generation camera lenses, the phone has basically everything that you want.
01:06:56.720
All you need to do is switch to PureTalk. $35 a month for unlimited talk, text, and 15 gigs of data
01:07:02.540
with mobile hotspot, all on America's most dependable 5G network. Go to puretalk.com slash talker to claim
01:07:09.680
your free Samsung Galaxy with qualifying plan when you switch to PureTalk.
01:07:17.600
Go to Point S if your car sounds like this. No stress with Point S.
01:07:26.340
Go to Point S if your tires sound like this. And to help you drive stress-free, get free installation
01:07:37.480
when you buy four selected Pirelli tires. Offer valid until April 27th. In-store only. Details at
01:07:48.180
So you're paying your way down to help Pete Hegseth. You're obviously strongly in favor of
01:07:53.500
Pete Hegseth. Are you doing that? Correct. Yeah. I was very strongly supportive of
01:07:57.520
him becoming Secretary of Defense. Yeah. Yes. I know him. I know him obviously very well. I work with
01:08:03.020
him. He's such a good guy. And I would just say, you know, there's a lot of stories eventually
01:08:08.800
written about me and the personnel that I was, you know, the puppet master and that I had ultimate
01:08:13.880
decision rights and that I was trying to block people that supported this or that or oppose this
01:08:18.380
and that. It was all nonsense. I mean, let me tell you, again, I've already used this already,
01:08:25.360
but there were people on the PPO team that were much more hardcore foreign policy than I was.
01:08:31.380
And so in a lot of cases, I didn't even need to block unaligned people. They were already getting
01:08:37.380
blocked by people, you know, earlier in the process. Well, I must say, I don't think a fair
01:08:43.020
listener could accuse you of being radical in any sense. You seem totally mainstream to me.
01:08:49.580
Nothing you've said seems ideological or crazy or fringe or anything like that. You served in the
01:08:54.420
Marine Corps during a war. You didn't think that our policy was serving the country or the people
01:08:59.820
who defend it. And you're just trying to keep that foremost in mind as you help create policy
01:09:05.620
for the next generation. Yes. Is that a fair? I think that's, yeah, I mean, I obviously bias. I
01:09:11.020
think it's totally fair. And I just sort of point out is that one thing that was amazing about working
01:09:16.340
on the transition, it was tough sometimes, it's frustrating sometimes. And then in the administration
01:09:20.980
was there are so many good people in this administration. I remember I worked a lot,
01:09:27.280
I never went in, but I worked a lot with the first Trump administration. And you can see me
01:09:31.360
on the internet. I was standing behind the president when he was signing veterans bills all the time.
01:09:35.500
President tweeted about one of my media appearances once. I remember where I would have people from the
01:09:42.200
White House and from the VA trying to talk me and Concerned Veterans for America out of supporting
01:09:48.540
something the president wanted, particularly VA choice is giving choice to veterans or making
01:09:54.840
it easier to fire bad VA employees. These are political appointees saying, why do you want to
01:09:59.660
do that? That's too radical. You know, just we need to fix this or that on the margin. And in this,
01:10:05.160
in this time around, you have, I think, you know, just like any administration, there are people
01:10:09.020
that aren't on board with the president. But one of the coolest things I would just say working
01:10:14.100
in the administration was having friends and people that share your mindset across the interagency
01:10:20.240
and being able to call them up and bounce ideas off each other. And, and that, that was, that was a really
01:10:28.500
good experience, I will say. And you saw that transition too.
01:10:32.260
Well, you, and you feel it, you feel it. And it, it, I'm not involved at all. I'm just watching, but it
01:10:37.980
seems like the fastest way to derail the whole project, the Trump administration and the United
01:10:45.740
States of America is a war with Iran. And that's why I've just been watching it as carefully as I
01:10:53.140
can, because I feel like, again, if you hated Donald Trump and you hated what the administration is
01:10:57.740
doing on immigration, trade, anti-wokness, whatever, and you wanted to stop it, the first thing you would
01:11:05.760
do is apply pressure to have the U S military engage in a war with Iran. I mean, that that's
01:11:13.120
my perspective on it anyway. I would think that, and also continuing to do what we've been doing
01:11:18.240
previously in, in Russia. Oh, for sure. For sure. Though it, I don't know why, well, I'm going to
01:11:23.380
ask you all about this, but it feels like Wyckoff is, is helping a lot there. God bless. He's, I mean,
01:11:29.540
I've already said he's a godsend. God bless Steve Wyckoff. I couldn't agree more, uh, as a man and as a,
01:11:34.460
an instrument of peace and a figure now out of history. Um, okay. So you did make just from an
01:11:42.200
outsider's perspective, one maybe career mistake by, um, giving on the record interviews before you
01:11:48.760
went in describing your foreign policy views, which I think are fully within the mainstream of the
01:11:53.420
world in the U S but out of the mainstream among, you know, warmongers in Washington. So like there
01:12:01.340
were people knew that you weren't fully on board with the regime change program. Is that fair to
01:12:05.440
say? Yeah, I was very open about it. I was very on the record about it. And most of the time when I
01:12:12.380
was saying that we shouldn't do this, it was actually in support of, you know, the president's
01:12:18.580
stated preferences, like the president clearly doesn't want this. In the first term, there were
01:12:23.240
people in his administration that wanted it. He didn't clearly, he clearly didn't want it.
01:12:27.040
And so it was supporting people who didn't want the war. And so I was essentially,
01:12:33.400
Donald Trump had said, has said, and now his actions make perfectly clear,
01:12:37.300
he would strongly prefer a diplomatic solution. Correct. I don't want to speak for the president,
01:12:41.960
but it's fairly obvious that that's what he wants. Well, he said it. I mean, he said it again,
01:12:46.840
and he ran on it. So it's not a crazy position. And now things are getting so bonkers in this country
01:12:53.460
that saying that makes you a bigot or something, a Nazi. It's like, it's, I'm just going to ignore
01:12:58.460
all that. And I just want to get back to your experience. So I'm just watching this from the
01:13:01.780
outside. And I'm thinking, having spent my life in DC, I was like, Dan Caldwell's got a target on
01:13:08.340
his back. I don't know if he knows that. Yeah. And then I read all of a sudden that you're a trader.
01:13:16.400
You're like marched out of the Pentagon for leaking, for leaking. Right. And then the whispering
01:13:25.740
campaign, the character assassination campaign begins, and it hears its outline. I don't want
01:13:30.780
to upset you. You may not even be aware of this. Dan Caldwell leaked classified information to liberal
01:13:38.800
media outlets, to the media, to NBC News, for example. So I just want to be totally direct with
01:13:45.520
you. Did you leak classified information against the wishes of your superiors to media outlets?
01:13:51.280
Absolutely not. Did you photograph classified material and then text pictures of that material
01:13:57.020
to an NBC News reporter? Absolutely not. And I have not spoken to an NBC reporter while at the Pentagon.
01:14:05.040
Are you, do you know what you've been accused of? No, I don't. Sitting here right now, myself
01:14:12.500
and Darren Selenick and Colin Carroll, the other two individuals that were escorted out of the
01:14:17.980
Pentagon, initially placed on leave and then fired on Friday. We have not been told as of this
01:14:24.160
recording. One, is there what we were being investigated for? Two, is there still an investigation?
01:14:32.640
And three, was there even a real investigation? Because there's a lot of evidence that there is
01:14:38.300
not a real investigation. But again, sitting here right now, there are a lot of unknowns about this.
01:14:44.960
As a former Secretary of Defense would say, there's a lot of unknown unknowns. There are some things
01:14:49.840
that are pretty clear, but we have no idea what specifically reinvestigated for.
01:14:55.180
So we can know some things just by the details. So here are a couple. Have you been polygraphed?
01:15:00.080
No. I've never been hooked up to a polygraph machine since I've been in the Department of Defense.
01:15:04.500
Okay. Have you given up your private communications devices, your private phone,
01:15:09.260
your phone? No. To anybody? No. Okay. So that raises the obvious question. I'm trying not to
01:15:15.780
use the F word here because the lying is just driving me insane. You're being accused of leaking
01:15:20.340
classified information, but the people accusing you would have no way of knowing whether you did
01:15:24.520
that or not because they haven't polygraphed you or taken your devices, your private devices,
01:15:28.380
correct? I mean, there are- You can't even make the allegation because there's no conceivable
01:15:33.220
way you could prove that. And let me just say, there are so many different things that would
01:15:38.620
prevent me from doing the things that you've laid out. And again, I don't even know if that's what
01:15:43.840
I'm really being investigated for. Again, if there's a real investigation, but all these- The point
01:15:48.180
is, is so what I have told some people who have asked me about what's going on is I would repeat
01:15:54.300
something that I heard in the Marine Corps in our work up to Iraq. I believe it was in something
01:15:58.740
called a combat hunter course, which isn't what it sounds like. It's actually about observing things
01:16:03.760
better. And I remember an instructor very clearly saying, when you're in this environment, believe
01:16:11.880
nothing of what you hear and only half of what you say. And I think this needs to apply to this
01:16:15.820
situation. Yeah. The problem with it is, it's just a very serious allegation that you betrayed your
01:16:21.440
boss and friend, Pete Hegseth, who you've worked with for like over a decade, who you supported
01:16:26.880
from the very beginning. I think that's all in my, I don't want to speak for you, but you're being
01:16:31.180
accused of betraying Hegseth, who's under attack from people who want a war with Iran. Let's just
01:16:39.440
be totally blunt about it. And so you're being accused of betraying him, betraying the president
01:16:45.980
and, and committing a crime. That's a crime. So this is not just like, Hey, Dan Caldwell's got,
01:16:53.900
you know, bad taste in neckties. This is like Dan Caldwell's a criminal. Yeah. It's just,
01:16:59.420
you know, there's sometimes I think it just hasn't fully set in with me and what's going on. And,
01:17:10.720
and, you know, I just, I want to talk about two, the two other gentlemen that were,
01:17:17.760
that are going through this with me and what's going on with them in some ways is more infuriating
01:17:27.580
because as you said, I have a public profile. I took some, what shouldn't be controversial
01:17:33.300
positions, but are, and, you know, I, I was out there, you know, advancing things that a lot of
01:17:43.760
people in the foreign positive establishment didn't want. It doesn't justify what's happening
01:17:48.580
to me, but that like, let's just be honest. That is the nature of the games played in DC.
01:17:53.120
You know, Darren Selnick and Colin Carroll are patriots. Let me talk about Darren a little bit.
01:17:59.360
Darren's another person that worked with Secretary Hegseth for over a decade. He is somebody who's
01:18:04.900
spent decades working around veterans and military health issues. He served in the first Bush
01:18:11.020
administration at the VA. He served a critical role in the second, or excuse me, the first Trump
01:18:16.920
administration. He was a key player in advancing the VA Mission Act, one of the greatest accomplishments
01:18:22.340
of the first Trump administration, which fundamentally reformed how the VA delivers healthcare. Darren,
01:18:27.600
I think, can go to bed every night saying he saved thousands of veterans' lives because of the
01:18:31.820
reforms he helped advance. He's an Air Force veteran. In between his, his stints in government,
01:18:37.100
he worked at Concerned Veterans for America with me and Pete, helping develop revolutionary reform to
01:18:42.480
the VA that in large part were implemented by the first Trump administration. To come back, he picked up,
01:18:49.580
left his, his nice life in Oceanside, California. His wife, you know, stayed behind and he got,
01:18:55.920
you know, a crummy apartment in Arlington, Virginia and worked sometimes 16, 17 hour days to advance
01:19:03.780
his secretary's agenda. He played a key role in ripping out woke and DEI nonsense from the
01:19:10.980
administration. Darren was a key driver of that. Um, and you know, it's so by your description of
01:19:17.800
Darren Selnick, he doesn't sound like he is engaged in like the policy fights or he's like some crazed
01:19:23.080
audio log. So before I talk about Karen or excuse me, Colin, you know, Colin has not transitioned
01:19:28.780
as far as I know. Um, but I don't actually know what Darren Selnick and Carl, Colin Carroll think
01:19:35.920
about Iran. Darren could, Darren Selnick could be a secret 12 or Shia for all I know. Colin Carroll
01:19:43.060
could want to, you know, nuke Iran until the sand glows. Darren was a, he was deputy chief of staff
01:19:49.900
focused on backend office operations and personnel and military health policy. Colin Carroll. Let me
01:19:55.000
talk about Colin because he's, I think, an incredible individual too. Colin's a Naval Academy
01:19:59.100
graduate. He served as a recon Marine in combat. Then he literally became a rocket scientist working
01:20:05.080
in tech, working in companies like Andrel. And he was Steve Feinberg's chief of staff. Colin's focus
01:20:11.100
was on science, R&E and budget. He was down and in. And we, these, these, these gentlemen were patriots
01:20:23.260
and they did not deserve, none of us deserve to get traded this way, but in some ways angers me more
01:20:29.140
than what's going on with them. So we did an amazing interview with Alex Jones the other day. It got huge
01:20:34.200
numbers all over the internet, but then we heard from YouTube. They're partially demonetizing the video
01:20:39.680
because it had a forbidden word. It had, and we're quoting now, extreme profanity. What did we say in
01:20:47.320
that interview that was extreme profanity? We use the word tranny. Tranny, tranny, tranny, tranny, tranny.
01:20:53.200
It's mildly hilarious. We didn't even think about it when we said it. It made the most powerful people
01:20:58.120
in our society mad. And that's why they demonetized us. But we're not intimidated at all for a really
01:21:04.700
simple reason. We're not controlled. We are funded by the people who watch us. And that's why we have
01:21:11.000
the freedom to say exactly what we want and the freedom also to make jokes that include the word
01:21:15.560
tranny. It's a huge blessing. You can become a member and help support free speech by going to
01:21:22.560
tuckercarlson.com. And we will continue to be as honest as we possibly can and also tell mild jokes
01:21:29.320
once in a while. Not extreme profanity, but it's possible we will use the word tranny because it's
01:21:33.860
hilarious. Thank you for supporting us. And it's not even clear. I mean, I should say at the outset
01:21:41.020
that depending on DOD is the largest human organization in the world, has more people than
01:21:45.760
any, I think, in the history of the world. And there's a lot at stake. The future of the world's
01:21:53.100
state gets DOD. They have nuclear weapons. And so the pressure exerted on that agency from outside,
01:22:00.760
but also the fighting within it, make it like one of the most complicated and treacherous work
01:22:05.600
environments ever created. Is that fair? That is fair. And I will say the one thing we had in common,
01:22:14.720
there was a couple of things we have in common, was we were threatening a lot of established interests
01:22:21.640
in our own separate ways. And we had people who had personal vendettas against us. Yes. And I think
01:22:27.560
they weaponized the investigation against us. I think that's part of what's going on here. But
01:22:31.820
look, Colin, and let me just say Steve Feinberg, I didn't know him before this. I have a lot of
01:22:37.380
respect for him. I do too. I think he's going to be a fantastic deputy secretary. Steve Feinberg and
01:22:42.260
Colin were going to shake up how acquisitions are done, how the budgeting is done, how we do science
01:22:49.400
and research. And Colin, Colin's got one speed and that's go. And he, you know, he wasn't afraid
01:22:56.560
to challenge people when they're acting stupid and wanted to keep doing the same thing. Darren's the
01:23:00.280
same way. Darren upset a lot of the people that want to keep doing using the military to be a giant
01:23:07.020
social science experiment. Right. So we, and of course, I have some views about the role of America
01:23:13.880
and the world, you know, as we've discussed, are a little controversial. All of us in our own ways
01:23:18.320
threatened really established interests. Those, your views are only controversial in Washington,
01:23:23.800
D.C. Let me tell you that as a matter of fact. Correct. They are not controversial anywhere else
01:23:28.220
in this country or the world. We, we threatened a lot of established interests inside the building
01:23:33.000
and outside the building. So I just want to restate because this is the, this is why you're here
01:23:37.800
because you got bounced out and you're being accused of betraying your boss, your president,
01:23:42.780
your nation. You have, I don't want to speak for you, not leak classified information to the news
01:23:50.680
media. You've never undergone a polygraph exam and you've never handed over your personal phone.
01:23:55.760
Are all those statements true? That is all 100% correct. And let me just say, actually,
01:24:02.080
my first instinct when they came and escorted me out of my office was I actually thought that they
01:24:09.600
were going to try and get me to testify against the secretary because the secretary over the whole
01:24:15.460
signal gate stuff is under an inspector general investigation. That was my first instinct was this
01:24:21.460
was part of it. So, um, there was an investigation into leaking. Um, I think the president, like all
01:24:29.020
presidents doesn't want leaking. I mean, no, nobody wants leaking, right? If you're in charge, you don't
01:24:33.100
want your employees to be leaking against you. So there was this leak investigation, um, that was
01:24:37.980
ongoing for weeks, right? Uh, what, what were you, was your access to classified information limited
01:24:45.340
during that time? Not at all. Uh, in fact, the day I was escorted out of the, escorted out of the
01:24:49.580
building, I went into, I won't get specific, the highest of high level intelligence briefings. And up until
01:24:56.980
the minute I was pulled up my office, I was on highly classified systems doing my work.
01:25:02.320
So you were looking at highly classified information up until the moment they brought you outside
01:25:08.400
and separated on the basis of the claim that you were leaking classified information.
01:25:12.460
I was doing my job. Part of my job entailed looking at, at intelligence, helping make recommendations
01:25:19.680
as the secretary, giving my thoughts, working with a policy team. And most of our work was done
01:25:27.380
on classified systems. The reason I'm pressing on this is that doesn't make any sense.
01:25:32.940
It doesn't make any sense to me. Right. So if you're, I mean, cause just to be clear,
01:25:36.700
you don't want people leaking classified information from the Pentagon.
01:25:40.080
Let me be clear. That is a problem at the department of defense. There has been things
01:25:45.980
that have been shared with the media, particularly, I would say this, the Panama stuff that,
01:25:52.720
that, that is unacceptable. And I've been the recipient of classified information for decades,
01:25:58.360
including from the Pentagon in the form of leaks. And every journalist who's doing his job has been.
01:26:03.300
So like, there's a lot of leaking of classified information. I can tell you,
01:26:07.000
but let's be honest, everyone knows where that's coming from. It's from the career staff who don't
01:26:13.100
look like what the president and the secretary and vice president want to do. There's people on
01:26:18.760
the joint staff that I've come to respect, but a lot of them are incredibly hostile to the secretary,
01:26:24.640
to the president and the vice president's worldview. It's pretty obvious that that's where most of the
01:26:30.200
leaks are coming from. There's a less obvious place. I just want to point something out.
01:26:33.240
As we sit here today, Tucker, and this could change by the time this is aired. But as we sit
01:26:40.200
here today, Susan Rice, Michelle Flournoy, Eric Edelman are still in good standing with the Department of
01:26:46.880
Defense. What? That is correct. They are still...
01:26:52.460
Yes. Susan Rice is still on the defense policy board.
01:26:57.440
As we speak, sit here today, by the time this is released, that might change. But as we sit here
01:27:02.320
today, she is still on the defense policy board. Now, that doesn't mean she can go in the building
01:27:06.380
and get access to whatever she wants. But it means that she works with DOD employees, she can interact
01:27:11.260
with them, and has the credential and the affiliation with the Department of Defense.
01:27:17.480
But Susan Rice has no relevant experience for a job like that at all. She's a political hack.
01:27:23.420
Correct. Yet, as we sit here in April of 2025, about 100 days into the president's first term,
01:27:31.720
she and a bunch of other people who are incredibly hostile to the president and his worldview remain
01:27:39.520
You can go on the website and check it right now. And I checked with Colin and Darren, and
01:27:51.220
And again, I would just say, if you want to look where leaks are maybe coming from, that would be a
01:27:59.840
So, but just back to your story, and I won't linger on it. Every time I mention this, your jaw tightens,
01:28:08.640
Well, I'm completely convinced that this is nonsense and sinister nonsense. But if you were
01:28:19.380
the subject of an investigation, a leak investigation, if the investigators had determined that you
01:28:23.640
were leaking classified information to the news media, you probably wouldn't have continued
01:28:29.280
to receive access to classified information, correct?
01:28:31.940
Correct. And I probably wouldn't be sitting here today.
01:28:33.700
You'd be in jail, dude. You'd be, you would have been handcuffed, correct?
01:28:37.240
If, if I, if, if I had leaked, well, again, I just want to be clear here. I still don't know if,
01:28:44.260
if the term they used is, and that you see the DOD using, is unauthorized release of information.
01:28:52.500
If, if, I think there's a lot of rumors and people are exploiting this that we can talk about.
01:28:57.600
If, if I actually did some of the things that, that anonymous people on the internet and in the
01:29:03.000
Pentagon are saying I did, I'd, I'd be in handcuffs.
01:29:10.080
I'd be like reality winner or, uh, Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden or one of those people.
01:29:15.540
It's very obvious to me, um, having far fewer details than you have, uh, that you're one of
01:29:23.080
the people who is perceived to be standing in the way of a regime change war in Iran. And that,
01:29:28.940
that was kind of your crime. That, that's, seems obvious to me.
01:29:31.880
I think it's, it's complicated. There's other layers to this, but based on what has been
01:29:37.740
happening since then, I, I, I think that is a factor is that I think, and it is being weaponized
01:29:43.780
against me is I think that they want to also go after. And I think that had, I can't say this with
01:29:53.100
certainty, but just speculating that had somebody in the white house not said, okay, we need to put a
01:29:59.340
stop to this. There've probably been more people treated the same way that, that Colin, uh, Darren
01:30:09.000
So the fastest way to, uh, knock someone out of commission and eliminate his influence and in
01:30:14.860
your case, his job is to tell the person that he works for that, that person's betraying you,
01:30:19.920
that person's betraying you. Um, and so, I mean, it sounds to me, again, I'm keep putting words
01:30:26.520
your mouth, but it sounds to me like you have felt, it sounds like you still feel that your,
01:30:31.260
your views are aligned with those of the president.
01:30:34.180
100%. I wouldn't have joined this administration if I didn't feel that way. Again, I don't speak
01:30:38.540
for the president, but here's the other thing too. I had this attitude in the, in the pen and
01:30:44.420
Pentagon, and maybe this was, you know, I saw this attitude that I was still, you know,
01:30:50.620
in the Marine Corps. It's like, Hey, when it, when a decision is made, when we've decided on a course
01:30:55.700
of action that we're going to do this, we're going to make sure it's executed properly. Yes.
01:31:01.360
And you still raise concerns. You still, if you see something happening, then you can do that.
01:31:06.920
But if you are so repulsed by what's happening, then you should resign.
01:31:11.220
So I think what you're saying is that you, uh, you were serving your boss bosses, um, even when
01:31:20.900
you personally disagreed. Correct. As you did in the U.S. Marine Corps. Correct. Okay. Um, how does,
01:31:27.880
I don't even want to ask you, but I'm going to, how does this make you feel? I mean, you must feel
01:31:31.060
like you're living in a dream, a nightmare. I said earlier, sometimes I feel like it hasn't fully set in
01:31:40.840
because it does feel like a dream. It's like, what am I going to wake up at zero four 30 and
01:31:45.960
just get, get ready for work and, you know, walk my dog, drop her off at doggy daycare and then roll
01:31:52.380
into the river entrance back in the Pentagon. I feel like on some level that's happening and, and it,
01:31:59.820
you know, it, I feel like it hasn't fully hit me, but it's been awful. I mean,
01:32:05.620
the impact on my family, you know, I'll just say I wanted to try and hide this from my mom as long
01:32:15.300
as possible because I was worried. She's a worrier. I love her to death. She's, she's a saint. I, I,
01:32:20.920
I didn't want to tell her. Then an hour later, some, somebody leaked to Reuters describing exactly
01:32:28.100
what had happened to me. And then six hours later, they pulled the same stunt with Darren. And then 12
01:32:33.240
hours later, they pulled the same stunt with Colin. And so, you know, it's been devastating
01:32:39.460
and it's caused a lot of stress to, to my family. Just one thing I want to say is
01:32:45.000
I've, I've been a friend and supporter of Pete Hegseth for a long time. And I'm, I'm just
01:32:54.420
personally devastated by this. It's, it's, it's just awful and, and whatnot. And, and
01:33:01.480
but at the end of the day, putting all this aside,
01:33:10.700
Pete Hegseth needs to be a successful secretary of defense and the entire department of defense
01:33:19.120
cannot be, continue to be consumed by chaos. They have a great team there. They have a great deputy
01:33:27.800
secretary. We just talked about Steve Feinberg. They have a, I think one of the leading lights of
01:33:34.120
the America first foreign policy movement in bridge Colby, a dear friend of mine running the policy
01:33:39.740
shop. Now effectively the Pentagon's number three, he has a lot of great mid-level and junior staffers
01:33:45.080
under him. You're going to have some great undersecretaries coming in. These are just world
01:33:49.240
class people. These are not political hacks. You know, people like Mike Duffy at ANS, people like
01:33:54.560
Emile Michaels and ANS's acquisition and sustainment at research and engineering service secretaries.
01:34:00.380
I think are going to be great. Dan Driscoll, even though he has a secondary job running an agency
01:34:05.280
that shouldn't exist, ATF. I think he's proven to be a great army secretary. And look, one of my
01:34:11.000
favorite things, Tucker, is admitting you're wrong about people. One person I was wrong about was John
01:34:15.820
Phelan. I was skeptical of him being Navy secretary. And so far, I have to say him and his team are off
01:34:21.160
to a great start. I think Troy Mink is going to be a fantastic Air Force secretary. And so there's
01:34:27.680
this fantastic team underneath the secretary that can enable him to be incredibly successful.
01:34:36.380
He has to move past this. He has to get a solid team around him in the front office. And this isn't a
01:34:43.360
plea to hire me back. I, I can't really just want to move on and go back to the doing what I was doing
01:34:50.580
before and being an advocate on the outside. But, but, you know, without Darren and I and others, he, he, he
01:34:58.040
needs to get a strong team in there. And there's some great people that I think could could do that.
01:35:03.220
Oh, I have to say, this is interesting you bring him up. Chairman Dan Raisin Cain,
01:35:10.440
incredibly impressive. And I actually think, if I'm being honest, one thing that has incited the
01:35:16.320
building against President Trump and the secretary was a selection of him. They want a lot of people
01:35:22.280
wanted the secretary and the president to go the normal route, including some people in the
01:35:26.740
administration, and pick a combatant commander, you know, a General Carrillo, or an Admiral Paparo.
01:35:33.800
I actually like Admiral Paparo, but they wanted him to go that route. No, instead, they did something
01:35:38.880
that needed to happen, is they pulled a very accomplished guy out of retirement, somebody who
01:35:46.740
didn't do all the right things and check all the right boxes in his career, but who's incredibly
01:35:53.180
smart, who's incredibly thoughtful about how he approached his problems to be the chairman.
01:35:59.020
And that upset so many career paths. Like, if you look at these books, where they kind of lay out,
01:36:05.340
like, how you promote generals, is they have, like, little maps about where people are going to go.
01:36:09.060
And there's a lot of people that are going to go to this role in the, you know, the chairman of the
01:36:14.060
Joint Chiefs of Staff, the vice chairman, they're going to be the chief of staff of the army.
01:36:18.180
And by elevating Kang, they upset so many career paths. And it's hard to overstate how much of a
01:36:26.120
middle finger that was to a lot of the uniform leadership of the United States military. And I
01:36:31.980
think that was one of the reasons why we started to see more leaks really starting around the middle
01:36:36.920
of March. And they weren't coming from you? No, absolutely not. And again, it's obvious to
01:36:42.520
anybody who's worked in the Pentagon, where these were coming from.
01:36:48.000
I really appreciate your spending all this time.
01:36:50.540
Tucker, it's been an honor to be here. And I just want to say,
01:36:55.020
I think you should feel proud, because you have played a key role in helping stop some really bad
01:37:04.520
stuff in foreign policy. Your platform has really helped turn the tide, I think, in a lot of different
01:37:10.420
ways. And I think you deserve a lot of credit for that. I just want to be useful. But I appreciate
01:37:14.320
it. Dan Caldwell, thank you very much. And Godspeed.
01:37:21.160
We want to thank you for watching us on Spotify, a company that we use every day. We know the
01:37:25.340
people who run it, good people. While you're here, do us a favor, hit follow and tap the bell so you
01:37:31.520
never miss an episode. We have real conversations, news, things that actually matter. Telling the truth
01:37:36.760
always, you will not miss it. If you follow us on Spotify and hit the bell, we appreciate it.