And, This Is The Chaos Within The GOP Featuring Ben Shapiro
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 5 minutes
Words per Minute
216.1187
Summary
It s a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we re resetting the way we talk about our health, which means being honest about what we know, what we don t know, and how messy it can all be.
Transcript
00:00:00.040
Either you uphold the principle or you don't uphold the principle.
00:00:02.720
If you don't uphold the principle, I'm going to call you out for not upholding the principle.
00:00:05.800
On his epitaph, we'll read 45th and 47th presidents of the United States.
00:00:11.280
Sanctuary jurisdictions have lower crime rates.
00:00:14.020
You move to a state that has higher insurance rate, higher car insurance, not just home insurance,
00:00:18.480
has higher property taxes, many of these red states.
00:00:20.840
And I think that we should start from a position in the United States of gratitude and recognition
00:00:25.060
that we live in a free country where the vast majority of decisions are your own.
00:00:44.700
And on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about our health.
00:00:48.300
Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all be.
00:00:56.540
Is there a chronotype for that, or am I just depressed?
00:01:01.200
Health Stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone.
00:01:04.920
Listen on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:10.280
This is Dr. Jesse Mills, host of the Mailroom Podcast.
00:01:14.260
Each January, men promise to get stronger, work harder, and fix what's broken.
00:01:18.620
But what if the real work isn't physical at all?
00:01:21.080
I sat down with psychologist Dr. Steve Poulter to unpack shame, anxiety, and the emotional pain men were never taught how to name.
00:01:27.880
Part of the way through the valley of despair is realizing this has happened, and you have to make a choice whether you're going to stay in it or move forward.
00:01:37.280
Listen to the Mailroom on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite shows.
00:01:41.840
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers.
00:01:48.280
But it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
00:01:57.100
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting the Long Island serial killer.
00:02:01.240
The investigation into the most notorious killer in New York since The Son of Sam.
00:02:06.660
Listen for free on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:02:13.220
Whether it is getting swatted or just hateful messages online, there is a lot of harm in even just reading the comments.
00:02:20.680
That's cybersecurity expert Camille Stewart-Gloster on the Therapy for Black Girls podcast.
00:02:26.120
Every season is a chance to grow, and the Therapy for Black Girls podcast is here to walk with you.
00:02:31.160
I'm Dr. Joy Harden-Bradford, and each week we dive into real conversations that help you move with more clarity and confidence.
00:02:39.280
This episode, we're breaking down what really happens to your information online and how to protect yourself with intention.
00:02:46.260
Listen to Therapy for Black Girls on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:03:01.580
Well, you know, Texas, that would have been more spicy.
00:03:04.600
But, you know, especially, come on, you're a Hollywood kid, at least Hollywood adjacent.
00:03:17.040
And you went, you know, and it's interesting because you were sort of a middle-class family, grew up, and I got a new book we're going to get to in a moment, Lions and Scavengers.
00:03:26.180
But in that, you talk about your home where, I think, six members of your family live in a two-bedroom home, one bathroom of Burbank, California.
00:03:35.060
And you describe it, at least briefly, as pretty bucolic, huh?
00:03:42.660
And I had the greatest privilege of all, right?
00:03:44.880
I'm an American, growing up in the greatest country in the history of the world, and I've got a two-parent household.
00:03:49.300
My parents love each other, and they take care of us, and they're able to make a middle-class income.
00:03:53.080
My mom started off as a secretary and worked her way up to become vice president of a small film and TV company.
00:03:58.960
My dad came out here to be a composer, and he ended up playing piano at a restaurant on Ventura Boulevard, I believe.
00:04:05.600
It was in – or actually, it was in – across from Universal Studios.
00:04:09.200
It was the Michelli's over there, not if you've ever been there.
00:04:11.280
And he was, I mean, like a five-night-a-week piano guy there?
00:04:14.820
He'd go in there and play jazz piano because he'd been playing since he was 14.
00:04:20.000
And, again, I think that that's the American dream is you start there, and then you end up making a better life for your kids,
00:04:26.600
and they end up making a better life for themselves.
00:04:28.920
And that upward trajectory is kind of what America's all about.
00:04:39.740
I started playing violin when I was five, and then I was pretty good.
00:04:44.320
Was it you were – it was your dad just saying, you're going, son, you will be?
00:04:48.200
I mean, they threw that at you, and they made you in your crying doing these lessons?
00:04:54.780
I was practicing by the time I was 16, maybe three hours a day or something.
00:04:59.320
And then I looked at sort of the life of a musician, and I thought, well, again, that
00:05:04.600
upward trajectory is very difficult, particularly in classical music.
00:05:08.880
And so I thought, you know, maybe I better shift career strategies here.
00:05:12.160
But when I went to UCLA, or I went to UCLA for undergrad, when I went to UCLA, I was 16
00:05:17.240
My parents didn't want me going out of state for school, so I was living at home because
00:05:21.500
And I thought I was going to double major in biology and in music, actually.
00:05:27.560
And I got on campus, and I found myself kind of drawn to politics, and, you know, the rest
00:05:35.740
Where do they end up in terms of their professional pursuits and careers?
00:05:43.860
I still have one sister who lives in Orange County.
00:05:46.860
I have a couple of sisters who live within a mile and a half of me in Florida.
00:05:50.600
So basically, the whole family ended up in Florida.
00:05:54.080
My in-laws, who lived in Sacramento, ended up near me in Florida.
00:06:00.440
We're going to get to all of that and a lot more.
00:06:04.500
Because not everybody knows your childhood, but it also connected, I mean, as you said,
00:06:16.540
Do you remember sort of a moment or issues or was politics part of the – even your
00:06:20.740
childhood was a part of the conversation around the dinner table?
00:06:26.960
I would say they were kind of Reagan Republicans.
00:06:29.960
And growing up, we would talk politics in the House.
00:06:32.860
But the thing that sort of sent me in a political direction overtly is I got to college campus
00:06:37.360
at UCLA and I picked up a copy of the UCLA Daily Bruin.
00:06:40.240
And this is back in the year 2000, there was an editorial from the Bruin editorial board,
00:06:47.380
I believe, comparing Ariel Sharon, then the prime minister of Israel, this would have been
00:06:54.140
And so I walked in and I said, I'd like to write a counter to that.
00:06:57.100
And that turned into a point-counterpoint column that I would write every week.
00:07:02.940
And then I went to my father one day and I said, do you think that my stuff is good
00:07:07.940
And he said, you know, it might be, let me do some research.
00:07:10.480
So he found this place called Creator Syndicate, again, out of California.
00:07:14.160
And they syndicate a bunch of columns to different newspapers around the country.
00:07:17.940
At the time, it was everybody from Molly Ivins on the left to David Limbaugh on the right.
00:07:22.220
And so I applied cold and they called me three weeks later, I was 17, and they said, we'd
00:07:27.440
So pretty much all of my bad ideas since I was 17 have been public, which is, you know,
00:07:32.300
So at 17, I mean, that's pretty remarkable, that young age.
00:07:36.920
And a few years later, 20, you have published, what, two books by then?
00:07:42.240
My first book came out when I was 20 from, it was sort of an expose of leftism on college
00:07:49.260
I think some might say it was a little ahead of its time.
00:07:51.640
And then I went to Harvard Law School at 20, and I wrote a couple of more books while
00:07:56.960
And when I came out, I came back to LA and I practiced at a real estate firm or real estate
00:08:02.980
wing of a major law firm called Goodwin Proctor.
00:08:06.400
I lasted for about 10 months, decided I hate it, quit.
00:08:09.160
I remember walking into the boss's office and saying, I hate it here and I want to leave.
00:08:13.440
And I remember him turning to me and saying, you're never going to make as much money as
00:08:17.720
And I've been wanting to send him some tax returns for a few years now, but it all worked
00:08:24.580
Politics was something that I was always very invested in.
00:08:27.080
And so my sort of political approach generally is that I'm much more invested in principles
00:08:33.480
I care much more about the ideas than I do about sort of the gossip aspect of politics.
00:08:40.100
I think that that's unfortunately becoming less common.
00:08:45.060
I think that it's great that you're having me on.
00:08:51.640
And so that's still, I hope, what animates me, what animates the show.
00:08:56.020
I mean, you're obviously known as, I mean, people have described you in so many different
00:09:04.260
I mean, obviously next level, um, uh, intellect ability to quickly distill facts and figures.
00:09:10.360
We, you talk about facts over emotion, et cetera, but were you that person in high school?
00:09:22.160
And so I was much younger and much shorter and much skinnier and much more of a wise ass
00:09:27.160
probably than some of the other kids in my high school class.
00:09:30.200
And so high school was not exactly a joy for, for that reason.
00:09:33.580
But I've said before that obviously bullying is terrible, but being bullied can be sort
00:09:41.000
Meaning that a lot of the people that I know who are very successful went through a lot of
00:09:47.740
And then you sort of develop an attitude and the attitude is, okay, I can either use this
00:09:52.480
as fuel and grist for the mill and, and say, listen, I'm going to take all of that negativity
00:09:57.700
and channel it toward, you know, more strength and more positivity and, and building.
00:10:02.420
And, and maybe you get a little bit of a chip on your shoulder sometimes, uh, or you
00:10:08.380
I mean, some of the specific instances where you sort of, where you had that kind of exchange
00:10:14.800
Was it, was it because, I mean, the fact you're always younger, uh, a little bit smarter,
00:10:20.820
I mean, was it, do you remember any political, interpersonal, um, but I remember, you know,
00:10:25.340
being the kind of kid who, when I was 16 years old, there was a program at, at the UC
00:10:31.020
system, uh, that was all about affirmative action at the UC system.
00:10:36.660
I remember there were about a thousand people who were protesting, uh, down in the plaza or
00:10:41.400
And I believe I was the only counter protester.
00:10:44.060
And I, and I would show up and do that, that sort of stuff.
00:10:46.260
Did you have, I mean, you had the, was it the confidence or was it gumption?
00:10:49.780
I mean, was it, was it something your parents distilled in you?
00:10:54.260
I think it was more stand up for ideals, but, but also, you know, from the time that I was
00:10:58.060
young, I, I never had any problem with being in crowds or, or, you know, being in front
00:11:05.660
And so if you, if you spend a lot of time playing, you know, a rigorous sort of set of
00:11:10.280
pieces in front of people and you do that over and over and over, it kind of gets rid
00:11:14.420
of whatever trepidation you might have about being in front of people and doing that sort of thing.
00:11:17.860
When did you, was there a moment when you sort of developed,
00:11:26.000
I will say, I don't think that it's ever good to develop next level confidence.
00:11:30.320
Meaning, I think you got to prep for everything.
00:11:32.820
One of the things that I try to do is really over-prepare for my show.
00:11:36.160
If I'm going to have a debate or a discussion with somebody, I really try to dig in and,
00:11:40.080
and get into what's true, what's, what's not true.
00:11:45.380
I think there's a certain level of insecurity that's good.
00:11:48.660
I think when, when you're overconfident, that's when you've made mistakes.
00:11:50.960
I think in my career, whenever I've made a mistake, it's typically because I didn't
00:11:54.220
take a challenge seriously enough or I sort of brushed it off.
00:11:58.500
People sort of rely on their native intelligence as opposed to assuming that you're not going
00:12:02.160
to be the smartest person in the room all the time.
00:12:04.940
Remember when I was in middle school, so I went to Walter Reed in, uh, in North Hollywood
00:12:07.800
and they had a magnet school, like a highly gifted program.
00:12:10.500
And I remember there was an IQ test actually, uh, kind of a rudimentary IQ test that was
00:12:16.260
And I, I got in, but I didn't get in by leaps and bounds.
00:12:20.320
And we, and we, you know, I remember first day of class, everybody was kind of passing
00:12:24.120
around their IQ scores and all this kind of stuff.
00:12:25.700
And one girl had, had, uh, above 180, a really, really, really high IQ.
00:12:30.140
And I remember going back home and talking to my father about it.
00:12:32.760
He said, listen, you should assume that you're never the smartest person in the room, but
00:12:35.760
you can always be the hardest working person in the room.
00:12:38.580
And that, that, that I think has been sort of the motto.
00:12:41.400
So you went, uh, you know, UCLA undergrad, here you are 17 national syndicated columnist.
00:12:46.660
A few years later, you got two published books, um, about issues around the university.
00:12:51.140
As you say, you may have been a step or two ahead of most in that respect.
00:12:54.340
And, and then issues around, I mean, it was interesting to the, the porn industry broadly
00:12:59.480
I was writing books about how the pornography industry was going to really carve out particularly
00:13:06.840
And at the time people were saying, oh, this is crazy.
00:13:09.980
Now, of course, uh, I think that there are a lot of young men who have fallen prey to that
00:13:13.660
industry who needs less family formation, less general happiness, less sex, actually, uh,
00:13:20.120
people who are, who are kind of falling out of the, the social fabric that's necessary
00:13:27.260
So even in my state of the state last week, I, I referenced just one of many different statistics,
00:13:31.760
but roughly half of young men have never asked a woman out in person on a date.
00:13:36.360
Uh, so your, your point and emphasis in that, and we, I want to unpack that a little bit
00:13:40.900
later as well in the conversation, but you started then to not only identify yourself in
00:13:45.660
the context of your intellectual pursuits and, and, and expressing your point of view through
00:13:50.680
writing also sort of gifted capacity to engage in debate and speech.
00:13:54.460
But then you found Andrew Breitbart, uh, was out and about, uh, in Southern California.
00:13:59.920
And, uh, and, and you took a job there, uh, working at Breitbart.
00:14:04.520
That went in 2012 during the, the 2012 election.
00:14:12.160
Uh, so I'd known him already for, for quite a number of years.
00:14:16.700
Andrew, so I think that there's sort of the, I mean, you're in public life, so you know,
00:14:19.560
there's for, for a lot of people that are sort of like the private person and there's
00:14:23.920
Uh, so Andrew, the private person and the public person were actually very much the same, I would
00:14:27.880
say up until the end, uh, toward, toward the end, I think that, that Andrew became very
00:14:33.260
frustrated with, with a lot of the political system, media coverage.
00:14:36.040
But the truth is that Andrew was for the vast majority of the time I knew him very garrulous,
00:14:41.280
willing to have conversations with nearly anyone.
00:14:43.040
I think that if you talk to people who knew Andrew really well, their, their best memories
00:14:45.880
of him are things like him just rollerblading in Venice and then just having like political
00:14:49.860
conversations, taking somebody to coffee, like a random person.
00:14:52.580
What I used to say to people about Andrew is that I knew Andrew for, you know, over a
00:14:59.220
And if you knew Andrew for five minutes, you knew him about 95% as well as, as I did, because
00:15:04.820
Like he was just on the surface, everything that, what you saw is what you got with Andrew.
00:15:08.420
Uh, so yeah, I joined Breitbart in, in about 2012, it was during the Romney, uh, the Romney
00:15:17.560
I believe I ended up leaving in 2016, like early 2016.
00:15:21.940
There'd been some sort of career transitions there in which I was taking other jobs at the same
00:15:28.060
Uh, there was a point again, going under that sort of working hard rubric, uh, there's
00:15:33.000
I was doing a morning show in LA where I interviewed you actually.
00:15:35.100
Uh, and then, uh, there was a, an afternoon show that I was doing in Seattle.
00:15:39.860
I was the editor at large Breitbart, which meant writing a piece or two a day for Breitbart.
00:15:44.040
Uh, and then I had also taken a job as the editor in chief of a website called Truth Revolt
00:15:51.200
Uh, and yeah, again, uh, my, my advice to young people, particularly you want to be successful,
00:15:56.600
say yes to doing everything, even if it's for free at the beginning, because eventually
00:16:00.440
saying yes a lot gets you the power to say no later on in your career when you can sort
00:16:04.500
of window down what, what will make you successful.
00:16:06.620
And people, a lot of folks know this, but a lot of folks don't.
00:16:09.320
Steve Bannon was down there, uh, working for Breitbart at the time.
00:16:16.740
Uh, and Steve is not the easiest person to get along.
00:16:23.180
I don't want to over index with Steve, but, uh, so you left in 2016, but 2015, you more
00:16:29.980
formally established what more commonly is identified with your data color, right?
00:16:36.060
So daily wire, we established formally, uh, in 2015, so it would have been in the middle
00:16:44.440
Uh, that's when, that's when we formally launched was a few months before the election of 2016.
00:16:49.480
Uh, I I'd been working at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
00:16:51.880
It was kind of a funny story there where we had Jeremy Boring and I, who are business partners.
00:16:56.600
Uh, he, he'd been working there and he basically hit upon what was a social media arbitrage plan.
00:17:03.080
And he basically saw that you could market on social media in new ways and that would
00:17:08.680
They legitimately did not understand what we were talking about because boards of nonprofits
00:17:12.460
are, are famously, you know, sort of elderly and non-tech involved.
00:17:17.960
Uh, Jeremy was, uh, kind of fondly known as the, as the stupid whisperer because we'd met
00:17:23.180
with many Congress people and, uh, I speak quickly and, uh, and Jeremy spoke slowly with
00:17:29.740
And so he would very often, you know, get across better and see those Congress people
00:17:34.380
Anyway, we met with the board, uh, Jeremy sort of explained the marketing plan.
00:17:39.440
They turned to me and they said, Ben, can you explain the marketing plan?
00:17:44.600
So I took out a napkin and I wrote on it, dollar sign, arrow, Facebook, arrow, website,
00:17:56.120
It was that you're going to spend money on social media in order to gain eyeballs.
00:17:59.540
Those eyeballs would then provide advertising on your website.
00:18:02.120
And then you would just direct that money back into Facebook.
00:18:05.100
And so it was kind of a flywheel and they fired Jeremy the next day.
00:18:09.400
Uh, I quit a couple of days later and then we basically took that plan out to market.
00:18:15.800
Uh, it was about $5 million in seed funding originally.
00:18:18.280
Uh, and we launched daily wire, which last year did $200 million plus in revenue.
00:18:25.380
We have, uh, about 220 employees at daily wire.
00:18:28.880
And you guys are doing the, I mean, well, we can talk more specifically, but I mean,
00:18:37.980
We've tried to turn it into a semi-major media company, right?
00:18:41.420
I would say it's probably the second biggest conservative media company in the country
00:18:49.080
Was, I mean, Andrew obviously had a big impact.
00:18:51.180
I assume in terms of your trajectory, who else was out there you were watching?
00:18:59.340
So, I mean, I think it was sort of a different thing in every industry.
00:19:02.100
So from a sort of ideological point of view, just being a great writer, be people like
00:19:06.420
Charles Krauthammer, which of course I love the writing.
00:19:09.060
That's actually my favorite thing that I do because I can sit there, organize my thoughts
00:19:15.820
And then, you know, from a radio or podcast point of view, obviously Rush, Rush is sort
00:19:24.140
And so Rush was the guy who I grew up listening to on talk radio, you know, him, Larry Elder,
00:19:28.800
like everybody who was sort of in the LA radio sphere when I was growing up.
00:19:32.100
And then in sort of social media land, obviously Andrew was a major force in sort of showing
00:19:40.620
And so I'd say that triumvirate would be a pretty good way of defining.
00:19:45.300
I mean, at the time, just even beyond those examples, were there books you were reading
00:19:53.000
I've been reading three to five books a week since I was probably old enough to read.
00:19:56.480
So, you know, the books that I was reading on economics were things like Hayek, right?
00:20:02.000
I spend actually less time engaging, I would say, with, you know, the non-traditional media
00:20:08.060
space than I do engaging with books and great ideas, I hope.
00:20:12.680
I mean, that's where I'd like to spend my time.
00:20:14.600
Also, you know, I'm lucky from Friday night to Saturday night, I can't engage with media,
00:20:18.960
I'm an Orthodox Jew, so all of the electricity goes away.
00:20:22.060
And so I read a lot of books, you know, fewer now than I used to because I have four kids
00:20:26.600
But that means that if I want to, what's great about that for what I do is that if a topic
00:20:31.880
comes up in the news, I have a pretty good memory bank to draw on in terms of a baseline
00:20:36.500
of knowledge that I can then supplement with sort of further research.
00:20:39.940
But I have a very strongly defined kind of worldview about everything from economics to foreign
00:20:45.140
policy to social policy that I hope is rooted in some fundamental values, which means that
00:20:50.860
I would say my level of political consistency has been pretty high over the course of the
00:20:56.360
I mean, I'm 42, about to turn 42 years old this week.
00:20:59.700
And I've been in this industry for a quarter century.
00:21:03.180
And if you read stuff from when I'm 17, if it wasn't highly dumb, which some of it is,
00:21:08.700
but if you were to find a column I wrote when I was 23 and it wasn't one of the ones that
00:21:12.360
was like trying to get attention and look at me, if it was one of my more serious columns,
00:21:15.840
it would probably look a lot like the stuff that I'm saying today.
00:21:19.700
What do you make of the current media landscape?
00:21:22.340
I mean, it seems to be the sort of dialectic between the old and the new, sort of the digital
00:21:28.500
I mean, obviously podcasts becoming at least part of the, it's a conversation.
00:21:33.200
I don't know if we can get into the merits to merits of overstating, over-indexing podcast
00:21:38.380
influence, but so much of what you seeded and influenced in terms of the right-wing media,
00:21:45.160
even now in some respects, what folks are trying to replicate with more progressive media
00:21:58.800
It's had tremendous benefits in the sense that you don't have three networks and you
00:22:06.700
It's bad in the sense that while gatekeeping is difficult and obviously can silo off information
00:22:13.080
that you need to have, if you have people who are algorithmically driven, who are desperate
00:22:18.220
for clicks and desperate for attention and don't seem to care very much about the truth,
00:22:22.160
and if there's kind of no pushback, then bad information can spin its way around very,
00:22:26.140
very quickly, and it doesn't take long for people to draw extremely hard narratives about,
00:22:33.960
And I think that, frankly, politicians sometimes have a position in doing this because if you're
00:22:40.640
catering to a base, and obviously, isn't everybody has to be aware of audience capture
00:22:44.500
in my industry, in politics, you have to be very aware of audience capture because
00:22:48.720
But, I mean, just to take as a recent example what happened in Minneapolis, I think that
00:22:53.200
the normie response to what happened in Minneapolis is this is obviously a tragedy from a sort
00:23:01.880
The intent of Renee Goode is not relevant to the question of the intent of the officer,
00:23:08.040
If you're going to prosecute the officer, then you'd have to determine whether an objective,
00:23:12.260
reasonable officer would have perceived that he was being threatened by her vehicle when
00:23:16.720
he shot her, and it seems to me that you could voice a fairly strong defense in a court of law
00:23:21.400
that an objectively reasonable officer, since he actually was nudged with the car at the
00:23:27.600
Now, this immediately broke down into two separate narratives, both of which I think
00:23:32.680
One was a narrative that was immediately pushed by the Trump administration and Secretary of
00:23:37.020
Homeland Security, Christine Ohm, that she was a domestic terrorist who was attempting to
00:23:40.020
run over officers with her car and was legitimately trying, not just this officer, but multiple
00:23:45.380
That was the original statement I said at the time.
00:23:48.960
And then your press office tweeted out that it was state-sponsored terrorism, which, I
00:23:54.400
mean, Governor, I do have to ask you about that.
00:24:01.060
I mean, our ICE officers obviously are not terrorists.
00:24:04.160
A tragic situation is not state-sponsored terrorism.
00:24:07.660
I mean, when it comes to ICE, I mean, I'll ask you this just generally about policy with regard
00:24:12.220
ICE because obviously it's become incredibly contentious given what the federal government
00:24:17.400
You know, it seems to me that there have been a number of deportations from red states where
00:24:22.000
there are governors and localities working with ICE.
00:24:24.640
California is a sanctuary state, which makes it much more difficult for local law enforcement
00:24:29.020
to hand over information to ICE about deportation status.
00:24:36.220
You talk about your pragmatism all the time—wouldn't best policy be to cooperate with ICE in the
00:24:42.320
So instead of ICE going to, as you say, hospitals and churches to pick people up, they'd be
00:24:46.760
That's exactly what they do in California, and we have over 10,000 that I've cooperated
00:24:51.940
We work very directly with ICE as it relates to CDCR, state prison.
00:24:57.920
California has cooperated with more ICE transfers probably than any other state in the country,
00:25:02.920
and I've vetoed multiple pieces of legislation that have come from my legislature to stop
00:25:07.300
the ability for the state of California to do that.
00:25:10.320
So when it comes to the issues of violent criminals, when it comes to felons, people
00:25:13.660
that are being released from the largest state system in the United States of America, California
00:25:20.980
Okay, but why is it then—what makes it a sanctuary state?
00:25:24.280
Well, the broader sanctuary policies that are established, and we had a policy that was established
00:25:30.520
You have city sanctuary policies that go back quite literally to the time Ronald Reagan was
00:25:36.120
governor, and it relates to some of the issues in Central America, sort of the origin stories.
00:25:40.320
But at bottom line, it relates to those policies, this notion that federal law should be enforced
00:25:45.780
by federal law enforcement agencies, that we should not consign local law enforcement to
00:25:52.580
Right, but shouldn't the states step in with localities and tell localities that they ought
00:25:55.900
to cooperate better with ICE, thus to facilitate?
00:25:58.300
Well, you know, I have sort of Rudy Giuliani's point of view, who made the point as an advocate
00:26:02.980
for sanctuary policy when he was mayor of New York.
00:26:05.900
He said it keeps people safer, healthier, and more educated.
00:26:08.800
Safer in the context that it allows community members to be more likely to participate as
00:26:13.240
witnesses of crime or victims of crime in going after the perpetrators.
00:26:16.980
More likely to get an immunization shot if they're not worried about the nurse turning them over to ICE.
00:26:21.660
More likely to go to school and get educated if they're not worried about the school crossing guard
00:26:26.920
crossing them and ultimately turning them over to ICE.
00:26:30.420
So it's the tool of pragmatism because of the complete abject failure of the federal government.
00:26:36.880
Sanctuary policy is unnecessary if we had comprehensive immigration reform and we had a federal response
00:26:41.720
that was adequate to the task, but in the absence of that, it's grown from the 70s and 80s and 90s, 2000s,
00:26:48.240
and obviously I got here as governor and we had an established framework before I got here.
00:26:53.200
But it is true that sanctuary policy obviously has had a massive impact as a driver of a tremendous number
00:26:59.260
of illegal immigrants in the state of California.
00:27:02.500
I mean, you see in a lot of states that don't have sanctuary policies, huge increase in immigration,
00:27:08.740
illegal immigration, massive increases, even far greater than the state of California.
00:27:13.680
But in terms of the cost structure, I mean, you recently, for example,
00:27:15.880
had to freeze the enrollment of undocumented immigrants in state health systems to save money.
00:27:26.240
There are 12 states that provide health care for undocs,
00:27:28.240
and we believe in universal health care regardless of the previous conditions.
00:27:30.700
My only point is that the cost structure is extraordinarily burdensome.
00:27:34.100
But I don't think it's, in unpacking it, I don't think it's the sanctuary policies that are driving that.
00:27:51.440
They don't have sanctuary policies in those states.
00:27:54.140
The state of California's policies, I don't think in that respect,
00:28:02.580
And I use those as, I think, proof points of that.
00:28:05.080
And that's a different—so the notion of how do you deal with people that are here 10, 15 years?
00:28:09.560
How do you deal with mixed status families in this state?
00:28:12.560
And how do you provide for health care as opposed to emergency care
00:28:16.080
in stabilized populations and community health?
00:28:20.140
It's one that we've been very transparent about.
00:28:22.440
It's one that's hardly unique because in every state they provide compensated care for undocs at the emergency room.
00:28:28.900
Many states provide it for children, many for seniors.
00:28:33.700
I mean, the biggest problem, though, as somebody who left the state,
00:28:36.480
is that the cost structure in the state has become so burdensome,
00:28:39.140
not just because of illegal immigration, but generally.
00:28:40.840
And so the idea that policy has no impact as a magnet for particular human behavior
00:28:46.580
or alienating people from a state, that's clearly untrue.
00:28:50.800
And when you look at the homeless population, for example,
00:28:52.980
friendlier policies toward providing services in Santa Monica led to—
00:28:57.220
But now you're getting a homeless policy, not an immigration policy.
00:29:00.300
If you want to stick with immigration policy, do you make it easier for illegal immigrants?
00:29:07.880
So we've established an important—I appreciate the question
00:29:10.860
because I'm glad we've established that we do cooperate with ICE in California,
00:29:15.140
in particular this governor who's, as I said, on multiple occasions vetoed efforts
00:29:19.000
to stop me from that coordination for dangerous criminals.
00:29:24.360
So it'd be wrong for—so when AOC said this week that ICE should be abolished, you disagree?
00:29:27.940
Oh, I disagree when I think a candidate for president by the name of Harris said that in the last campaign.
00:29:40.340
Number two, as it relates to the issue of sanctuary policy, I think it's important to establish,
00:29:44.300
because it's not well established, sanctuary jurisdictions have lower crime rates,
00:29:49.620
lower crime rates than non-sanctuary jurisdictions.
00:29:52.360
So this notion that it somehow increases crime is also, I think, contradicted on the basis of the facts.
00:29:59.100
So this notion that population, it becomes an attractive nature for population increases, I think, is contradicted by the facts.
00:30:08.380
As it relates to crime, it's contradicted by the facts.
00:30:10.420
But there's unquestionably—and you're right about this—as it relates to an expansion of services,
00:30:15.840
but not just for sanctuary jurisdictions, for population, diverse populations.
00:30:21.400
Yes, there are states like California that have chosen a different approach.
00:30:25.080
And that approach, I mean, means that when you came into office, for example, the budget was, what, $200 billion?
00:30:30.160
And your proposed budget last year or this year is $350 billion.
00:30:37.360
We have $42.3 billion additional revenue structure than we anticipated.
00:30:43.980
And California is now replenishing its reserves, $23 billion, paying down pension obligations, $11.8 billion.
00:30:52.000
There's no question there are cost pressures as rates to Medicaid and Medi-Cal in California.
00:30:58.060
And those pressures are going to be made worse because of the big, beautiful bill.
00:31:00.980
Well, I mean, I think that the main pressures in the state of California, in terms of kind of future costs,
00:31:06.060
looks like some of the programs that you mentioned, mainly, if we're going to look at it, CalPERS, CalSTARs,
00:31:11.600
the fact that you have perhaps $500 billion in unfunded liabilities going forward.
00:31:16.580
Well, they—in which we've substantially improved in the last seven years.
00:31:21.980
We've highlighted that in the state of the state to pay down long-term pension obligations.
00:31:27.020
STRS and PERS, their funded liability has been improving over the last five or six years.
00:31:34.480
You may recall a decade plus ago, we did reforms for new employees moving in.
00:31:39.620
We dealt with spiking and other issues and abuses in that space.
00:31:43.300
We're hardly unique in this country as it relates to unfunded liability.
00:31:49.020
And fraud issues, let's—we can talk about fraud all day.
00:31:52.520
I'd love to talk about that, and we could get back to that,
00:31:54.540
because I think it's an incredibly important topic,
00:31:56.620
and California has been actually out front on a lot of these anti-fraud efforts.
00:32:00.700
And, you know, I think there's a lot of, you know, a lot of BS in this space
00:32:05.540
as it relates to sort of targeted assaults and offense that obviously are paying our positive.
00:32:11.660
Hey there, this is Dr. Jesse Mills, director of the Men's Clinic at UCLA Health
00:32:17.420
Each January, guys everywhere make the same resolutions.
00:32:24.100
But what if the real work isn't physical at all?
00:32:26.700
To kick off the new year, I sat down with Dr. Steve Poulter,
00:32:29.520
a psychologist with over 30 years' experience helping men unpack shame,
00:32:33.780
anxiety, and emotional pain they were never taught to name.
00:32:37.260
In a powerful two-part conversation, we discuss why men aren't emotionally bulletproof,
00:32:41.480
why shame hides in plain sight, and how real strength comes from listening to yourself and to others.
00:32:48.160
Guys who are toxic, they're immature, or they've got something they just haven't resolved.
00:32:52.860
Once that gets resolved, then there comes empathy and some compassion.
00:32:57.600
If you want this to be the year you stop powering through pain and start understanding what's underneath,
00:33:02.760
listen to the Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite shows.
00:33:08.120
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers.
00:33:15.800
But it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
00:33:24.640
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting the Long Island serial killer.
00:33:28.800
The investigation into the most notorious killer in New York since The Son of Sam.
00:33:34.180
Listen for free on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcasts.
00:33:43.780
It's a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about our health.
00:33:48.460
Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all be.
00:33:57.200
Is there a chronotype for that, or am I just depressed?
00:34:01.200
We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight.
00:34:05.180
You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and just start doing that.
00:34:11.600
We break down the topics you want to know more about.
00:34:14.740
Sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health.
00:34:19.860
We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind, inside and out, healthy.
00:34:29.600
Health Stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone.
00:34:33.020
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:34:43.260
And I'm Cal Penn, and we are the hosts of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.
00:34:49.200
This week on the podcast, I am talking to film and TV critic, radio and podcast host,
00:34:55.040
and Harry Potter superfan, Rihanna Dillon, to discuss Audible's full cast adaptation of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.
00:35:05.500
What moments in this audiobook capture the feeling of the magical world best for you, or just stood out the most?
00:35:13.360
I always loved reading about the Quidditch matches, and I think the audio really gets it,
00:35:20.360
because it just plunges you right into the stands.
00:35:23.860
You have the crowd sounds, like all around you is surround sound, especially if you're listening in headphones.
00:35:29.660
Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:35:36.500
I want to go back, because we're going to get all this.
00:35:46.860
Of course, before we do, I just want to ask, there's sort of a general take that I have,
00:35:51.020
and that is, I heard the podcast theater with Ezra Klein.
00:35:54.700
You know, he and I disagree about nearly everything.
00:35:56.660
And I think Ezra's really, really a fascinating person, with a lot of really interesting and heterodox ideas.
00:36:02.020
And he talked with you a lot about sort of governance, and you talked with him a lot about how you were trying to remove regulatory barriers to, for example, building units, right?
00:36:10.600
Because when you came into office, you wanted to build, I believe it was 3.5 million units.
00:36:18.040
And then we created a legal framework of 2.5 million, which is under the renewables.
00:36:21.420
And it will come up way shorter than that, but it's like 2030, what is it, about 100,000, 150,000 units that are being created the year?
00:36:33.260
No, it's been a major national issue, you know.
00:36:35.400
And the macroeconomics of this with interest rate environment, sort of post-COVID environment, made this housing crisis across the country.
00:36:40.860
Although, to be fair, the housing crisis in California is particularly bad.
00:36:43.760
I mean, there are places like Phoenix or Austin or there's some places.
00:36:47.380
It's the original, I said yesterday or last week in the State of State, it's the original sin, our inability to get out of our own way and all the regulatory thickets.
00:36:54.240
And we blew through those in the last couple years, 61,000 reform bills we just passed.
00:37:04.460
I think finally, we Democrats broadly are moving now finally in the right direction.
00:37:09.240
After decades and decades, Democrats and Republicans in California neglect in this space.
00:37:16.280
And I think that one of the problems that people see, and there's been a big question.
00:37:20.580
You've talked about it a lot, actually, about the frustration that people have with politics and the disenchantment that people have.
00:37:26.420
And the feeling that no matter what they do, they can't get ahead.
00:37:28.980
And that's manifesting in a lot of political polarization.
00:37:31.860
And this gets to, I think, a sort of broader issue.
00:37:34.260
So I don't mean this to be a specific critique of you.
00:37:36.240
I think it's a critique of a lot of politicians that I have left and right.
00:37:39.620
And that is, you look at the system, you realize as the governor how complex the system is, how difficult it is to get things done, how much gridlock there is in the system.
00:37:47.840
But politicians, in order to get elected, have to make a lot of promises about how much things are going to change in the future.
00:37:54.180
And they usually are talking about using the power of government in order to facilitate and make that change happen, particularly on the Democratic side of the aisle.
00:38:02.160
And it seems to me that that is a recipe for disaster for the American body politic.
00:38:06.020
Because if you make promises that cannot be fulfilled because the system does not allow for it to be fulfilled, people inherently end up frustrated.
00:38:14.320
And I have relatives who still live in the state of California.
00:38:20.040
I have a sister-in-law and brother-in-law who live in L.A.
00:38:31.080
I believe the poverty rates in California on a cost-adjusted basis are some of the highest in the nation.
00:38:36.940
When you look at the Supplemental Poverty Index, when you look at poverty broadly defined, it's slightly above average.
00:38:42.300
Supplemental Florida and California right there.
00:38:43.960
If you're looking at real estate costs in particular are extraordinary in the state of California.
00:38:48.180
As you say, you're trying to remove regulations.
00:38:50.200
But the problem is that unless we are willing to recognize a fundamental reality, which is that the relationship of the American people with their government needs to change.
00:39:01.520
And what that means is that we need to radically, radically remove the regulatory structures that allow for more building.
00:39:08.220
That we need to radically stop perverting markets when it comes to how we make housing policy.
00:39:17.600
That we need to stop wasting money in taxpayer funding on things like, for example, a gigantic – you once called it a boondoggle – high-speed rail that is going to cost in excess of $100 billion.
00:39:28.000
In this state, the guarantee – and again, I see it rising on the populist right too, which is sort of a big government right, which is something I object to on a sort of classically conservative level.
00:39:38.820
The promises that are made that if you give government more power and more taxpayer revenue, that suddenly these problems are going to be alleviated.
00:39:46.820
And the actual result, which is less ability to move – to do what my parents did, to move from a two-bedroom small house in Burbank to a four-bedroom slightly larger house in North Hollywood.
00:39:56.140
And then for me to go to a great state school like UCLA, and then for me to go to Harvard Law School, and now to have a really, really nice house.
00:40:03.920
I did have a nice house in California before we left, obviously.
00:40:14.620
You made my speech and my argument last three years in terms of the housing reforms we pursued.
00:40:24.400
You know, talk about process and regulatory thickets, those environmental rules.
00:40:28.180
It was established, ironically, by Ronald Reagan himself when he was governor of California.
00:40:32.200
So we've been in the process of doing precisely what you're suggesting we need to do, and we've been doing it very meaningfully and been nation-leading reforms in this space.
00:40:40.240
Now, of course, the private sector needs to catch up in the context of interest rate environment becoming more favorable.
00:40:45.400
But now we are – cities and counties, we put on notice.
00:40:50.120
Maybe you recall when I first became governor, I sued Huntington Beach, the first city, because they were out of compliance with their housing element.
00:40:56.160
We established a legally binding goal of two and a half million units.
00:40:59.660
We talked about the stretch goal, what needed to get some equilibrium in our prices, the supply-demand imbalance.
00:41:05.720
But we created a legally binding goal of two and a half million.
00:41:07.820
So what could we done to make that happen in not Huntington Beach, but L.A., San Francisco?
00:41:12.100
Well, we've been – we created a housing accountability unit.
00:41:16.500
But I guess the question is from like the common man perspective, right?
00:41:19.120
From my perspective, where I left, I took my business, right?
00:41:22.140
From that perspective, how do we get to the material change?
00:41:25.660
And if we cannot, then perhaps that requires a complete rethink.
00:41:31.540
Now, come over to my classical libertarian economics here, governor, is I guess what I'm saying, and maybe recognize that the amount of tax revenue that's taken in in the state perverts the market incentives.
00:41:44.080
That what's been generated in the state is a middle class that is really struggling.
00:41:49.160
Vast social services for people who are at poverty line or below and slightly above, and then a group of people who are either so wealthy they don't care or so wealthy now that now they're leaving because of the prospective wealth tax, which I know you oppose.
00:42:03.500
So that's why I'm always a little bit bewildered when there are measures taken by the state legislature that end up perverting markets in fairly serious ways.
00:42:12.100
Well, we can get into the crony capitalism, state capitalism, and the tithings from NVIDIA and AMD and what's going on with Intel and what's happening with the Trump administration in that respect.
00:42:29.260
And you're talking about literally a 50-year trend line as it relates to the issues of cost of housing and affordability.
00:42:35.240
But I can talk in terms of the substantive actions we've taken, tripling their income tax credits for working families, creating a child tax credit, foster tax credit, doing more as it relates to pre-distribution opportunities.
00:42:47.340
How about radically lowering the income tax rates in the state?
00:42:56.820
They tax their low-wage earners more than California taxes its high-wage earners.
00:43:00.740
Let's talk about lowering those tax rates in those 16 states.
00:43:05.360
40% of the middle class in Texas pay higher taxes than they do in California.
00:43:09.460
The tax, we have the highest tax rate for the 1%.
00:43:13.660
But the overall tax burden, and there's been independent analysis after independent analysis, is marginally higher than the national average.
00:43:22.880
So the tax rate for the 1%, you're in that bubble.
00:43:28.520
As a person who grew up in California and spent my entire career in California, I paid every single tax rate in the state of California.
00:43:33.640
I started off making, when I first got out of school and I'd quit the law firm, I was making maybe $60,000 a year.
00:43:38.200
So you started out paying less than you would in a dozen plus other states.
00:43:45.200
The problem is that when I left, I also took 80 employees.
00:43:48.040
And there's somebody who's got to pay the bills for those employees.
00:43:51.260
And that's typically not the state, the person who is paying the bills for the employees.
00:43:56.940
By the way, you're talking to a guy who started right out of college, pen to paper, and started 23 small businesses.
00:44:06.140
So you know, as a person who ran a small business, you wanted to pay salaries to your people.
00:44:15.020
And I've been fighting against a lot of those same regulations.
00:44:16.840
And trying to fire people because of that stuff is awful.
00:44:19.280
And losing your profit margin, which allows you to hire more people, is a bad thing.
00:44:24.920
I mean, I've talked to major tech founders who say today that they would not-
00:44:28.560
If they had to do it over again, they would not found in California,
00:44:31.400
specifically because of the regulatory and tax returns.
00:44:33.300
Well, let's talk about the largest startup in world history.
00:44:35.780
Could have chosen any place to open its headquarters just recently.
00:44:40.180
OpenAI, and the folks there decided to open in San Francisco.
00:44:47.720
California has more Fortune 500 companies than it's ever had in 20-plus years.
00:44:53.420
To be fair, you have 40 million people who live here.
00:45:05.000
You look at the 3.1 million jobs that have been created since I've been governor.
00:45:09.800
I'm not denying its challenges, but those persist and exist in every other state.
00:45:13.520
You moved to a state that has higher insurance rate, higher car insurance, not just home
00:45:19.540
Many of these red states have higher murder rates, lower wages, lower productivity, less
00:45:25.700
They're less contributory to the GDP of this country.
00:45:28.040
And so, I mean, not to defend my current state, Florida.
00:45:31.040
I mean, obviously, you had a debate with Governor DeSantis where you guys had this discussion.
00:45:35.000
But I will say that some of the statistics that you use with regard to California are
00:45:40.340
aggregate statistics, not on a per capita basis.
00:45:42.780
So, I've heard you say, for example, that California is the top innovation state because
00:45:48.440
it has the highest number of new businesses founded on a per capita basis.
00:45:53.320
More Floridians move into California than Californians to Florida.
00:46:13.840
California, outside of immigration, has had a loss of population for the past several years.
00:46:18.460
But immigration is part of the secret sauce of California going back to its origin story.
00:46:22.980
But if you lose people like me and the 80 employees I took with me and members of my family-
00:46:26.080
I'm not happy about anyone leaving the state, but population's grown three years in a row.
00:46:29.920
Last time it declined, it went down with 11 other states.
00:46:34.360
If you're talking not about immigration, if you're just talking about people who lived in California
00:46:38.860
And again, I'm not blaming that on you because-
00:46:40.560
That will be the case in many, many states, as you know, across this country.
00:46:43.880
By the way, a lot of red states, which I'm surprised you guys don't talk more about.
00:46:48.060
What about the last few years, all these red states losing folks?
00:46:53.420
Louisiana, Mississippi, let's talk about those states.
00:46:57.380
Adding the top 10 murder rates in America are in red states.
00:47:01.920
The most regressive taxes in the country are in these red states.
00:47:06.360
I mean, the question really, again, you're the governor of California, not the governor of Louisiana.
00:47:10.740
If I'm speaking with the governor of Louisiana, I'd be very happy to talk about-
00:47:13.340
I just never hear anyone talk about the governor of Louisiana and the population.
00:47:17.360
Yeah, because I'm aware the governor of Louisiana probably wasn't running for president and also
00:47:25.000
Everyone else seems to be running for president.
00:47:33.200
No, I bet that Steve would run a vanity campaign in order to garner a few dollars and some more attention
00:47:38.480
I'm going to get back to all the California bashing here in a second because I know everyone
00:47:43.100
But I want to talk- I want to keep going a little bit and just in the interest of you
00:47:46.160
coming all the way out from that red state of Florida.
00:47:48.100
Because it is interesting just in terms of just as you laid out the framework of the
00:47:54.340
media environment in this country and how fragmented it's become, et cetera, this notion
00:47:58.920
of trust and truth and how things are weaponized and how everybody, you know, society becomes
00:48:03.800
how we behave and how you indict a little bit my press office, which I appreciated the
00:48:13.800
And I think about that all the time when we put up a mirror to Trump, we become more
00:48:19.460
Obviously, we've had things at our company that have been said.
00:48:22.420
I will say that I think that for elected politicians who are hoping for a better future where we
00:48:31.520
I've criticized it on the right to the sort of catastrophism that you see in a functioning
00:48:38.560
You know, when, for example, when the president decided to push for redistricting and then
00:48:43.000
you push back with your proposition, I actually didn't have a problem with that.
00:48:46.520
I thought, you know, that is a that is a normal use of the political mechanisms in order
00:48:51.940
What I do have a problem with is if you go on Stephen Colbert and say your word, there
00:48:56.060
won't be a legit election in twenty twenty eight.
00:48:59.500
I mean, if I believe that you really believe that, I really believe that.
00:49:02.160
But then why are you running or why would you consider?
00:49:05.000
I want to make sure those I because we have agency, we can shape the future.
00:49:09.840
But I didn't believe what President Trump said.
00:49:11.220
It's a President Trump said in twenty twenty he wants.
00:49:14.860
He tried to really believe that President Trump is going to try to run in twenty twenty eight.
00:49:17.700
No, I believe that he'll try to wire the outcome in twenty twenty eight.
00:49:20.500
I really see this sort of stuff is very dangerous.
00:49:21.940
I really because I heard it from the right in the aftermath of twenty twenty.
00:49:26.340
And you'll recall I was one of the few on the right who said this is not true.
00:49:30.220
That Joe Biden was legitimately, legitimately elected in twenty twenty.
00:49:33.460
And that if someone could provide me evidence that he was not, that was sufficient to overcome
00:49:39.520
Well, I mean, what what is the thing that you think?
00:49:41.020
I mean, he dialing up for twelve thousand votes in Georgia and a party.
00:49:48.640
I'm not justifying what he said to Brad Raffensperger over over in Georgia.
00:49:52.600
Brad Raffensperger, by the way, did the right thing.
00:49:53.980
I think Mike Pence did the right thing, by the way, in certifying the election.
00:49:56.300
But my point is that when it when it comes to if you want the country to continue to work
00:50:01.580
together, then if you set the predicate, if I lose, it was rigged.
00:50:07.520
And then then we need then we need some objective.
00:50:09.700
Then then if you're going to say that we need some objective metrics by which we can
00:50:13.300
adjudicate whether or not the election will be fairly decided.
00:50:17.700
And it seems to me that just in terms of how elections are conducted globally.
00:50:22.040
And again, I'm in favor of many of these sort of election reforms that have been proposed,
00:50:27.200
I think it's kind of silly to argue that you shouldn't have to show ID when you vote.
00:50:30.240
But do I think that we are at high risk in the United States of full scale national elections
00:50:35.460
with 150 million voters being stolen and that the the the elective leadership is then
00:50:41.780
fundamentally illegitimate, which leaves you with no choice, presumably, but to go to the
00:50:46.920
That sort of that sort of language, I think, is really dangerous.
00:50:50.160
But back to the point you were making earlier about the aggregate, we're talking about a
00:50:55.140
few thousand votes here and there that ultimately determine that election for the nation on
00:51:01.080
So I think it's more prone to concern than you may suggest.
00:51:05.480
But I think that concern, by the way, specific problems that we can actually agree on the
00:51:09.720
And that's why that's why I'm calling it out now.
00:51:11.380
And I've been I try to provide evidence to back up my point as it relates to the Department
00:51:19.540
Sure as hell seen it from Trump's part, some perspective, what they try to do with the
00:51:22.880
BORTAC teams on the day of the election here under Prop 50, where they send folks out
00:51:27.500
and these guys and all dressed up to try to chill free expression and free speech on
00:51:31.560
Election Day, where Trump tweets out that morning saying this is a rigged election.
00:51:35.440
The fact that he's out there suggesting that all the vote by mail is is illegal and a bunch
00:51:40.420
of immigrants, illegal immigrants are out there doing all all of these things.
00:51:43.960
You start stacking them, including trying to rid midterm elections as it relates to changing
00:51:47.880
the maps and what he tried to do on January 6th.
00:51:50.960
Yeah, I start getting a little bit concerned about those things in together because I don't
00:51:54.880
think they're all the same, but they're not all the same, but they stack together from
00:51:58.000
my perspective, not one action to some total of all of those things, including sending
00:52:03.940
On Election Day, which I'll repeat just occurred.
00:52:06.060
It's very difficult to argue over intentions because now I'm in the business of mind reading,
00:52:14.560
And I will criticize him when he says what he thinks.
00:52:18.040
So, for example, when he said 2020 was a rigged election, he said, you'll recall in 2020,
00:52:22.280
on the night of the election, he said, I won before all the results were in.
00:52:25.420
I came out before anybody and I said, that's wrong.
00:52:31.920
So I tried to, I try and I think the responsible thing to do is, and I don't always do this,
00:52:37.720
but I think that the responsible thing to do is to try and hone in on the specific behavior.
00:52:42.980
So, you know, you mentioned that it would be election rigging, you know, if President
00:52:46.460
Trump is pushing for gerrymandering in Indiana.
00:52:49.840
I don't think it's election rigging when you gerrymander in California.
00:52:51.800
I think that is a long practice part of American politics.
00:52:54.560
And I don't think that you did anything wrong, actually, in pushing for it in California,
00:52:58.080
as much as it does not benefit the party that I tend to vote for and of whom I'm a member,
00:53:03.780
So, you know, when the general tenor, and this is what I see in democratic crises that
00:53:10.660
you see around the world, one of the things that I see is both sides saying, if the other
00:53:17.520
I want to make, I'll double down on being crystal clear.
00:53:19.860
I can't stand that any more than you can stand that.
00:53:22.860
I'm concerned about the inputs between now and 2028, including concerned about folks
00:53:29.380
that you know well, Steve Bannon and others saying there'll be a third Trump term.
00:53:36.040
And by the way, I think that people should stop giving Steve attention for saying things
00:53:41.320
But should I give attention to Donald Trump when I sat there in the Oval Office for 90
00:53:45.760
minutes and he tells me to turn around and there's a picture on the wall or painting on
00:54:02.080
And my general answer to this is if we've watched Donald Trump for 10 years, 10 years,
00:54:06.400
and we're still doing the thing where we all take him explicitly, literally, I think
00:54:15.780
But one of the things that I remember, I would get this critique about President Trump
00:54:20.120
a lot is President Trump, who, as I've said multiple times on his epitaph, it will read
00:54:29.940
Um, you know, like the, the, the, the thing that I'm not going to pretend-
00:54:33.640
I take my presidents a little more seriously than most.
00:54:35.320
See, I don't, I don't, I see, I don't think you do.
00:54:36.900
And this is, this is the thing where I really, I really doubt it.
00:54:39.180
I see a lot of people who will, Trump will, will fire off a random tweet and everybody kind
00:54:47.760
If I'm going to pretend that that is coming from the same thought process as whatever comes
00:54:51.620
from Joe Biden's press office, which went through seven layers and maybe not the
00:54:55.300
president, then I, then I'm not going to, I'm not going to pretend that's the same
00:54:59.200
You know, and that's, I look, and by the way, I could not agree even more.
00:55:02.220
And that's, I think reflected in the humor I'm trying to put back in on my social media.
00:55:06.620
And actually, I think it's kind of a problem for you because I think that frankly, the
00:55:09.620
stuff that you're doing is more thought out than the stuff that President Trump does.
00:55:12.560
Meaning I think that President Trump is waking up at three in the morning if he went to sleep
00:55:15.600
at all and he's firing off stuff on truth social, right?
00:55:18.340
And so am I supposed to take that as seriously as you in a methodical fashion saying, you know
00:55:23.400
And I think that people on, you know, people who are your supporters do take you in that
00:55:28.140
way more literally than they would be apt to take President Trump.
00:55:32.760
I think, I mean, a lot of my support has been offended by, by what we're trying to do, but,
00:55:37.420
but no, look, and, and, and a lot, I think appreciate the humor that we bring to it.
00:55:41.980
And I do think it, I think it's reflected in, I think a sense of agreement that we have
00:55:46.760
in that respect as it relates to what Trump puts out all the time.
00:55:49.320
But like, if you win the 2028 election, I will call you President of the United States,
00:55:55.360
And if it's Jamie Vance or Marco Rubio or whoever else.
00:55:57.460
As I was, you know, as an American, I called Donald Trump President of the United States,
00:56:06.400
And the outcome, but that doesn't suggest that I believe for a second, and you haven't
00:56:11.620
respectfully convinced me, uh, that I'm wrong or errant, that he won't do everything in
00:56:21.240
If he was 20 years younger, I absolutely believe he'd run for a third term.
00:56:25.340
Uh, but it's time of life suggests that that's not going to be the case, but I do think he's
00:56:30.500
This also, you see the reason I'm, I'm concerned about this because it also implicates the guardrails.
00:56:36.660
So as you've talked about in your state, there's a lot of gridlock, right?
00:56:41.300
When you're trying to get something done at the state level, you've got local governments
00:56:44.680
You've got a legislature that can say no to you, right?
00:56:46.880
You've got a bunch of, you've got a judiciary that will, that will tell you no in, in certain
00:56:51.820
You know, there was, there was a ruling a couple of weeks ago that I, that I strongly agree
00:56:54.700
with from the judiciary with regard to, for example, uh, school districts and what
00:56:58.500
they can and should tell parents about, about their kids.
00:57:01.420
That's going to be thrown out, but I will get, but you know, when he test decision.
00:57:05.580
But when, when, when it comes to, you know, what president Trump is or is not trying to
00:57:09.700
do, the problem is when we say that he will try to, he will try to steal this issue, will
00:57:15.020
That relies now on a, an opinion about, for example, the Supreme Court of the United States
00:57:19.080
or an opinion about the various state legislatures and courts.
00:57:22.920
And, and so now you're not just implicating what president Trump might try to do.
00:57:26.440
You're now implicating pretty much every major institution that is electoral in nature.
00:57:30.620
Well, I, there's a lot of evidence and, um, I know both sides have, have argued a lot
00:57:35.580
of evidence as it relates to the weaponization of justice and the bias that's expressed in
00:57:42.520
Um, and, and it's, uh, yeah, it's a little alarming.
00:57:45.040
I mean, as a father of a judge, uh, who reveres the courts and, you know, as someone that I was
00:57:50.800
very proud of, my father may have been accused of being an activist judge, but he, I, in many
00:57:59.000
That's, that's where justice is found with an objective analysis, but no, I do worry about
00:58:05.100
I'm concerned about the Supreme court of the United States.
00:58:07.100
I'm concerned about what Donald Trump did after January 6th, the degree that he went,
00:58:12.320
uh, to, uh, ultimately try to stay into office.
00:58:15.720
I'm concerned about the actions he's taken, not any one of them from the midterm redistricting,
00:58:23.660
And yes, I'm concerned if we don't take back the house of representatives and we have no
00:58:27.400
oversight and we continue to have the supine Congress, uh, we may not have a country that
00:58:34.120
And, and it's fine to believe all of those things.
00:58:36.620
I will say that to articulate them as though they are all of equal levels of alarm or that
00:58:40.720
the sum total of them is that if we don't win the next election, the country's over,
00:58:44.780
which again is something that, that you hear very often from, from the right too.
00:58:48.200
I think that that sort of alarmism is quite bad for American politics.
00:58:51.180
And I don't think that anyone who's in electoral politics actually believes that because I
00:58:54.800
promise you that if a Republican wins in 2028, a Democrat will then run in 2032.
00:59:00.200
And if the reverse is true, the same thing will happen.
00:59:05.660
And I think the American people should know that because it gives them a sense.
00:59:08.380
I didn't win this time, but I might win next time.
00:59:10.420
And once American people start to believe they can never win or their side is always cut
00:59:15.640
The spirit of what you're saying, what you're saying, I completely concur with.
00:59:19.600
I just, I, I have a different level of anxiety based upon my own direct experience, not just
00:59:28.800
My concern about the rule of law, this notion of co-equal branch of government in your book,
00:59:33.100
you talk about sort of the fundamental Judeo-Christian values in this country with the best, the Greek
00:59:38.640
I worry about those principles of our family fathers.
00:59:42.080
And by the way, I think that the best way to do that, Ashley, and this would benefit
00:59:44.760
you as governor of the state, is devolution of more authority back down to the states,
00:59:48.820
devolution of more governmental authority back down to the local levels, and more robust
00:59:56.760
And I hope you remember that if you become president.
01:00:00.580
Yeah, I remember, I remember, you know, the red states were arguing for that during those
01:00:10.220
And I respect you, and I appreciate this opportunity to engage, even though, obviously, we have
01:00:14.780
fundamental disagreements on a lot of these issues.
01:00:16.680
Maybe not fundamental, just disagreements on a lot of these issues.
01:00:20.080
Let me go back to some of the disagreements, and I don't want to paint too much and color
01:00:24.400
this in, because as a Democrat, it's in my interest to do so.
01:00:28.420
But you got a lot of attention for going recently to AmericaFest, Turning Point USA.
01:00:34.980
You made a terrible decision of being the first speaker.
01:00:38.440
That's just me saying editorially, what the heck were you thinking?
01:00:45.900
Yeah, just your luck, because then every speaker can come on and tackle you.
01:00:49.320
You know, I got to say what I wanted to say, and then I said pretty much-
01:00:52.360
What did you say so people tuning in don't know what the hell we're talking about?
01:01:01.800
You had a lot of, you know, the sort of branded celebrities in the right, and Candace Owens was
01:01:12.340
And Bannon and Megyn Kelly, others, so many others.
01:01:22.820
So the reason that I chose the moment to say it is that Candace Owens, who has some issues
01:01:28.900
of her own, she has been saying since Charlie's death that there was effectively a conspiracy
01:01:34.840
She has implicated pretty much everybody, ranging from, believe it or not, French intelligence
01:01:40.640
to the Israelis to various friends and family members, possibly, of Charlie in his murder.
01:01:48.020
And there have been an enormous number of people in the influencer space on the right
01:01:52.900
who have gone along with this, who have massaged it, pretended not to notice it, tried to defend
01:01:57.160
her, tried to pretend that it was an aspect of, that questioning her was an aspect of free
01:02:00.880
speech, which, of course, was a violation of free speech, rather, which, of course, it
01:02:05.480
You know, criticism is not a violation of free speech.
01:02:08.540
And so I got up on stage, and I basically gave a speech saying our responsibility as
01:02:14.820
people with influence in the public space, we have some responsibilities, and those responsibilities
01:02:22.380
We ought to give you, we ought to be clear about what we believe.
01:02:25.920
We should not allow, quote unquote, friendship to trump what is true.
01:02:29.220
Just because you're friends with someone does not alleviate the responsibility for you
01:02:32.320
to say when they're doing something that is wrong or immoral.
01:02:34.800
We should not engage in audience capture just because our audience wants us to say a thing
01:02:41.500
And we ought to ensure that we are held responsible for the things that we say and also the people
01:02:48.740
that we have on and how we question those people.
01:02:51.560
So, of course, anybody has the right to have anybody on their show who they want, and then
01:02:55.500
they should treat those people how they want to treat those people.
01:02:58.620
I mean, if I were to have on somebody who is, you know, in a deeply adversarial position,
01:03:02.140
I think what's great about this conversation is you can see how adversarial we are.
01:03:04.800
With regard to some of our positions, but at the same time, still have the discussion.
01:03:08.660
You know, if you are going to have on, for example, as Tucker Carlson did, Nick Fuentes,
01:03:13.480
who is a self-stated Nazi apologist, and then you're going to treat him with kid gloves,
01:03:18.760
then you ought to be held responsible for that in the court of public opinion.
01:03:23.080
And if we as influencers do not do that job, if we lie to you, if we fib to you, if we make
01:03:29.480
predictions which we are then not held responsible for, if we hide behind, quote unquote,
01:03:32.840
just asking questions, this is one of my bugaboos, I hate it.
01:03:35.520
You hear this a lot in the influencer space, mostly on the right, but some on the left
01:03:40.120
This sort of, you know, I'm not putting out a theory, I'm just asking questions.
01:03:43.800
Well, there's a difference between seeking answers and just asking questions.
01:03:47.180
Seeking answers, that's what questions are for.
01:03:49.560
It's to get better information, more clarification.
01:03:52.220
You know, I should have a better idea after the question of the answer than I did before.
01:03:55.600
Just asking questions is usually a guise for willful ignorance and for positing a theory
01:04:00.380
without having to carry the responsibility for positing that theory.
01:04:04.120
So if I say, you know, I'm just asking questions about whether you have peculiar sexual proclivities.
01:04:08.900
I don't have any evidence, I'm just asking the question.
01:04:11.080
And then you say, well, where is that even coming from?
01:04:15.760
I'm obviously attempting to impute something to you.
01:04:23.520
I mentioned Megyn Kelly, who had sort of gone out of her way to massage Candace Owens
01:04:28.660
in her pursuit of bizarre conspiracy theories about Erica and Charlie's murder.
01:04:34.480
I mentioned Steve because I think Steve has been doing many of the same things.
01:04:41.420
And that you felt it was necessary to name names as opposed to imply you just felt it was
01:04:46.460
Yes, because I think that people should know exactly who they are listening to, particularly
01:04:49.420
since they were going to hear from some of those people at the same event.
01:04:53.080
And so I thought that people should, you know, be forewarned about the people they're going
01:04:56.880
Then they can make their own decisions and determine whether my assessment of those personalities
01:05:03.160
And the reaction was exactly as you anticipated?
01:05:07.600
I think that the reaction in the room was, I think, overwhelming because a lot of people
01:05:12.260
were very upset that people had been saying this about Charlie's murder, which, again,
01:05:17.000
was carried out by all available evidence, by a person motivated by hatred of Charlie's
01:05:28.620
And, you know, all the evidence points to Tyler Robinson as being the person who shot Charlie
01:05:32.780
And so I think that a lot of people in the audience were deeply offended and upset,
01:05:35.980
correctly so, at the kind of specious conspiracy theories that have been promoted by this group
01:05:42.980
The sort of blowback that came afterward was really interesting.
01:05:46.600
You know, there were a lot of people who obviously were very upset.
01:05:49.520
And many of the people who I'd named, I'm not surprised, came back and, you know, fired
01:05:53.160
I will say that I don't think any of them actually argued with the point that I was making.
01:05:56.620
They seemed to make collateral attacks, imputing intent to me, suggesting that my speech had
01:06:02.560
something to do with Israel, which is funny since I didn't mention Israel one time in the
01:06:08.720
And then obviously you've seen, you know, sort of the influence or wars going on.
01:06:12.080
But the whole point that I was making is here's a principle.
01:06:14.500
Either you uphold the principle or you don't uphold the principle.
01:06:17.140
If you don't uphold the principle, I'm going to call you out for not upholding the principle.
01:06:24.840
None of that has anything to do with the principle that's at stake.
01:06:28.880
Because if we want to have an honest discussion with one another, then we actually should be
01:06:34.700
But clarity before agreement, as my friend Dennis Prager says.
01:06:40.100
Hey there, this is Dr. Jesse Mills, director of the Men's Clinic at UCLA Health and host
01:06:46.420
Each January, guys everywhere make the same resolutions.
01:06:52.560
But what if the real work isn't physical at all?
01:06:54.860
To kick off the new year, I sat down with Dr. Steve Poulter, a psychologist with over 30 years
01:06:59.760
experience helping men unpack shame, anxiety, and emotional pain they were never taught to name.
01:07:05.260
In a powerful two-part conversation, we discuss why men aren't emotionally bulletproof, why
01:07:10.460
shame hides in plain sight, and how real strength comes from listening to yourself and to others.
01:07:16.600
Guys who are toxic, they're immature, or they've got something they just haven't resolved.
01:07:21.340
Once that gets resolved, then there comes empathy, as in compassion.
01:07:25.440
If you want this to be the year you stop powering through pain and start understanding what's
01:07:30.340
underneath, listen to the Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
01:07:36.580
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers, but
01:07:44.400
it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
01:07:53.080
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting the Long Island serial killer, the investigation
01:07:57.940
into the most notorious killer in New York since The Son of Sam, available now.
01:08:02.640
Listen for free on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:08:12.220
It's a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about
01:08:16.900
Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can
01:08:25.660
Is there a chronotype for that, or am I just depressed?
01:08:28.160
We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight.
01:08:34.220
You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and
01:08:39.940
We break down the topics you want to know more about.
01:08:43.180
Sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health.
01:08:48.300
We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind, inside and out, healthy.
01:08:58.180
Health Stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone.
01:09:01.900
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:09:11.680
And I'm Cal Penn, and we are the hosts of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.
01:09:17.160
This week on the podcast, I am talking to film and TV critic, radio and podcast host,
01:09:23.620
and Harry Potter superfan, Rihanna Dillon, to discuss Audible's full cast adaptation of
01:09:33.760
What moments in this audiobook capture the feeling of the magical world best for you,
01:09:41.800
I always loved reading about the Quidditch matches, and I think the audio really gets
01:09:48.580
it, because it just plunges you right into the stands.
01:09:52.320
You have the crowd sounds, like, all around you is surround sound, especially if you're
01:09:58.120
Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
01:10:04.940
I don't want to pretend that we were best friends or anything.
01:10:13.700
One of the things I said in the speech is I think that it's pretty rare, actually, in
01:10:18.880
These are usually not people you're going and hanging out with on the weekends.
01:10:22.820
Like, whenever you hear politicians, oh, we're best friends.
01:10:30.760
The reality is that they are business colleagues and associates in the same way that most people
01:10:34.920
have business colleagues and associates that they see at the office.
01:10:37.960
We see each other more rarely than you probably see your business colleagues or associates
01:10:42.220
You respected how he organized in the campus level?
01:10:44.800
I mean, again, all the echoes of things you were doing.
01:10:47.820
Listen, Charlie was incredibly gifted as an organizer.
01:10:51.040
I won't say that we agreed on everything politically, because clearly we didn't.
01:10:54.640
But I think that Charlie, as a person who was willing to go into fraught spaces, obviously,
01:11:01.920
and he was killed doing this, and to speak his principles to people who disagreed and do
01:11:06.980
so in what I think overwhelmingly was sort of an honest and decent fashion.
01:11:12.500
What, Tucker Carlson, and you, history, do you?
01:11:16.040
I mean, I'm not sure that we have a history so much as Tucker seems to object to my politics,
01:11:30.780
I was asked by somebody, you know, would Tucker and I ever be friends?
01:11:37.220
The question is his principles and the things that he says.
01:11:39.940
I think that Tucker, I gave a speech right before TPUSA at Heritage Foundation where I
01:11:43.360
pointed out that Tucker is not an advocate for conservatism in any way that I can identify
01:11:48.460
He's not in favor of a more limited government of checks and balances.
01:11:52.940
He's come out in favor of feudalism fairly recently.
01:11:54.780
Uh, he, he's not in favor of, you know, traditional institutions.
01:11:59.140
He seems to think that they have lost their way.
01:12:01.740
He is, he's in favor of what appears to me a sort of horseshoe theory, Noam Chomsky foreign
01:12:06.480
policy where America is always the, the, the bad actor in the world.
01:12:14.800
And, uh, and, and, and I think that, uh, you know, when, when the, the biggest thing that
01:12:18.280
Tucker engages in, I mentioned the just asking questions, which, which he's very fond
01:12:21.760
of, uh, is, and this is something again, that is a both sides problem.
01:12:25.200
Uh, and that is a general conspiracism about the world.
01:12:28.080
The worst thing happening in our politics is a grievance based politics that is being
01:12:32.300
set up by actors on both sides, which basically says the failures in your life are generally
01:12:39.620
You have no responsibility for them and you need to, and you need to shift the burden of
01:12:45.940
And so the systems could be free, the free market is responsible for your failures or
01:12:50.380
the, or the, the systems of history are responsible for your failures.
01:12:54.420
And listen, there are real conspiracies out there.
01:12:57.500
They exist and usually can provide evidence for them.
01:12:59.860
That's the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory.
01:13:02.300
But if your theory, your going theory is that the reason that you are lacking in life
01:13:07.120
is because the most successful people in your society have rigged the system on their
01:13:10.720
And therefore they must be brought low in order for you to succeed.
01:13:13.680
First, you need to show me that that's actually evidentially the case.
01:13:18.640
You can't just make that claim and then abdicate all responsibility for doing the right things
01:13:24.420
And the, the number one message that I would, that I constantly am trying to, you know, give
01:13:28.440
to what I would now call young people since, you know, I'm, I'm of the older generation
01:13:32.000
now and I, exactly, is get off your ass and do the thing.
01:13:36.840
I hear people complain, I can't, I can't get married.
01:13:38.820
It's just so hard to get married and no one can get married these days.
01:13:46.100
Your grandparents were way poorer than you and they got married and they had more kids.
01:13:50.900
You are, you are the richest, most privileged people in the history of the world living
01:13:54.740
in the United States today, just relatively speaking.
01:13:57.600
That doesn't mean everything's perfect because I'm not comparing it to perfect.
01:14:02.560
What you can say is that if you, if you are sitting around in a country that has a GDP per
01:14:07.380
capita among the highest on planet earth and open jobs and the ability to move to those
01:14:12.500
open jobs and the ability to vote on your leaders and not get shot in the streets like people
01:14:15.920
are getting shot in the streets in Iran, you should consider yourself pretty damned fortunate
01:14:19.640
and maybe you should start with what can I do to make my life better today before you
01:14:24.400
Now, that doesn't mean there aren't problems with the system.
01:14:26.060
And this is why I like these conversations and we can get very specific about policy and
01:14:31.540
But I think that the, the big, the American dream is you can make it, you can, right?
01:14:36.820
Get government out of your way, get everybody out of your way, right?
01:14:40.700
And we do need obviously a functional social fabric, right?
01:14:44.120
Which is why you've seen a lot of the, the institutions like I would say churches,
01:14:49.960
Breaking down is a massive problem because that's your safety net.
01:14:52.520
When family breaks down, that's your supportive safety net for, for when, for when things go
01:14:56.640
wrong, we need to, we need to, you know, on a social level, help restore all of that.
01:15:01.120
But the, the desire by politicians to say, I alone can fix, which is something President
01:15:06.240
Trump said, but has also been said by, you know, you've got Zarmamdani talking about
01:15:11.140
the warm embrace of collectivism, which is insane, by the way.
01:15:13.900
Nature of campaigns, campaign promises you may on day one, on day one, and also the Ukraine
01:15:21.420
Or give me more power and I will solve the affordability crisis or give me more power and I, and I will
01:15:26.260
ensure that you have a good paying job and you can buy a house on a single income the
01:15:34.280
The, the, the house your grandpa was buying in 1952, you wouldn't want to live in.
01:15:40.720
It was like a brick box in Detroit and your grandpa was working on a, on a Ford line riveting.
01:15:46.740
Now you're not, how many people are riveting today?
01:15:51.260
Like the, like the, the, we should recognize the reality of our situation as opposed to creating
01:15:56.040
either a false promise of utopia or a false utopian past that wasn't really existing in
01:16:02.420
The reason the United States, the reason we in the United States were able to survive
01:16:11.360
It's because, it's because the entire rest of the world did not, it had been destroyed.
01:16:16.560
Every place on earth had been destroyed as of 1952.
01:16:19.200
The United States was basically left untouched in the homeland by world war II and literally
01:16:25.740
And so that was all an export market for the United States so much so we had to prop up
01:16:28.700
our export markets by doing things like the Marshall plan.
01:16:30.980
So people would actually have money to buy things.
01:16:32.860
And then it turns out that, you know, by the 1960s, reality was setting in and many of the
01:16:37.280
union contracts that had been negotiated weren't sustainable and we were being outcompeted
01:16:41.340
You know, like let's just, again, ignorance of sort of economic history and how people have
01:16:45.900
actually lived throughout history leads to, I think on the right, a nostalgia for an economic
01:16:49.740
time that didn't exist and on the left to a sort of utopianism about what is possible
01:16:56.100
And I think that we should start from a position in the United States of gratitude and duty
01:17:00.400
and hard work and virtue and recognition that we live in a free country where the vast majority
01:17:07.300
And then if you, and then let's, and then let's deal with the problems.
01:17:10.420
And you laid all this out in lines and scavengers and in detail with historic context and traveled
01:17:16.100
I mean, each chapter begins with a sense of place from, you know, London, Oxford and
01:17:21.680
Poland, which is interesting that, that section with Elon Musk and others.
01:17:25.520
But let me ask just a little bit, it's interesting, the politics of nostalgia.
01:17:28.340
And I try to paint this, forgive me to keep going back to the state of the state I just
01:17:31.600
gave, but we talked about the politics of nostalgia, try to put America in reverse, but
01:17:35.660
sort of selling this notion of this utopian notion.
01:17:39.120
And it's interesting, you, you, you, you, you, you cast, you know, some critique, not
01:17:44.860
just on the right, but also on the left in that respect.
01:17:46.940
And I imagine you weren't a big fan of Elizabeth Warren's speech yesterday.
01:17:53.580
But Elizabeth Warren was much more interesting when she was a professor at Harvard Law.
01:17:56.540
I was there at the time and she's writing the two income trap, which was a much more
01:18:01.540
Let me just talk about, and I appreciate the trap of promises being promoted in politics,
01:18:07.000
the nature of politics, both political parties.
01:18:09.460
And Trump sort of trapped now on this affordability question.
01:18:12.640
He's in, as we, as we tape this, he's in Michigan.
01:18:18.620
You've been, and again, just to your credit, calling balls and strikes, you know, and it
01:18:24.680
goes back even your Breitbart days as you had some issues with the early aspects of Trump
01:18:28.840
in terms of this sort of just the character personality issues, but you've been a big supporter
01:18:33.260
Yeah, I did not vote for either candidate in 2016.
01:18:35.100
I voted for President Trump in 2020, and I actually campaigned on behalf of a bunch of
01:18:39.900
Senate candidates and did some events for President Trump.
01:18:42.720
And you've been very forceful in your support of what he did in Venezuela.
01:18:47.320
And I think more broadly, just in terms of looking at the picture across the globe, but
01:18:54.000
back here in the United States, as it relates to terror policy, you've-
01:18:58.580
You've been critical of the terror policy on other domestic issues.
01:19:03.860
How do you score the first full year of Donald Trump?
01:19:07.140
So I think that when it came, I think the number one domestic issue for President Trump
01:19:11.380
was closing the southern border, A plus, right?
01:19:13.320
I mean, that I think put the lie to the Democratic proposal that you needed comprehensive immigration
01:19:17.780
You also acknowledged for about six months, it was substantially, 87, 80, 90% closed when
01:19:23.180
Biden decided that he ultimately, to your point, could do something about it, which they
01:19:29.280
Right, and the fact that they had basically lied about that for several years, saying,
01:19:34.040
We need congressional action in order to shut the southern border.
01:19:39.280
Remember, I put almost 400 National Guard down at the border going back to 2019.
01:19:46.720
And of course, California, I do absorb a lot of that on our own with migrant facilities in
01:19:51.360
three major counties, five migrants that work into Jewish family services, Catholic charities
01:19:55.240
that did God's work, but at the same time, try to put a lid on what was an unacceptable set
01:20:02.940
So that's a big win for President Trump, for sure.
01:20:05.300
So much so that it's not even a top issue for voters anymore.
01:20:09.200
Well, I mean, I don't think he's forgotten about it.
01:20:10.840
I think that he made, again, I think a lot of promises with regard to mass deportations
01:20:14.660
that in practicality are probably not fulfillable.
01:20:17.420
And what you see is, you know, Tom Homan, his borders are, who's being a little bit more
01:20:26.400
We're going to go after criminal, illegal immigrants.
01:20:28.560
Those are the people who are mostly going to deploy resources.
01:20:30.980
And I think that overwhelmingly, by the numbers, that has been the case, as far as I'm aware.
01:20:42.940
As a general rule, I think that's a win for President Trump.
01:20:45.120
Obviously, I agree with the extension of the current tax rates and not allowing them to
01:20:53.180
I mean, this notion of a more progressive tax rate for corporations and the wealthiest among
01:21:00.240
And the reason I think that it's a bunch of nonsense is because corporations are just
01:21:07.620
If you tax a corporation that is still money that in the end is coming away from the people
01:21:11.840
You're sounding like Romney when you were covering them with Breitbart.
01:21:14.540
Well, I mean, this is just like basic black letter econ 101.
01:21:18.220
A corporation doesn't have a magical existence whereby it hires people.
01:21:25.800
Most people in the country are getting a paycheck.
01:21:27.200
All right, we have established you like the big, beautiful bill as it relates to the
01:21:31.060
You don't give a damn about debt, but that's another conversation.
01:21:33.280
Oh, no, I definitely give a damn about debt, but I do not think-
01:21:37.220
I don't think anyone seems to care very much about that governor.
01:21:41.120
Well, we balance our budgets, just for the record, just for the record.
01:21:50.600
So it's statutorily required that we are running, you know, the last several years, the budget
01:21:57.240
No, we just, I just submitted a balanced budget on a, I mean, a de minimis $2 billion, two
01:22:04.140
points up my billion dollar, which is a rounding error in the state.
01:22:10.140
And half a billion dollars of unfunded liabilities, increased tax rates.
01:22:15.800
I haven't increased any taxes, so that's just factually untrue.
01:22:18.840
I'm not, I'm not saying, I'm not saying that you increased taxes.
01:22:20.860
But your friends continue to believe Newsom's tax rates.
01:22:24.400
Anyway, let's go back to Trump, because I appreciate where you go down the rabbit hole
01:22:28.560
But I want to talk about, and it's interesting, so we established, from your perspective, he
01:22:32.280
fulfilled his promises on the border, mass deportations, a work in progress, and good
01:22:36.480
people can disagree as it relates to whether or not he'll achieve that.
01:22:42.720
When it comes to dismantling structures inside the federal government on DEI, I think that's
01:22:47.240
I think a meritocracy is what ought to be preferred.
01:22:50.100
What about the quality of our lives in the context of what we deal with day in and day
01:22:58.020
What has Trump done that has significantly benefited us in last year?
01:23:02.200
So, this is where I'll go back to my fundamental-
01:23:05.040
Well, this is where I'll go back to my sort of fundamental point, which is that I think
01:23:08.480
that the government guaranteeing that your life is going to be enormously better based
01:23:12.760
on what are, at best, marginal changes to the structure of the federal government, I think
01:23:32.600
The overall CPI is running at about 2.6%, 2.7%.
01:23:36.380
That's way down from where it was two years ago.
01:23:42.160
This is why I'm not in favor of, for example, lowering the interest rates.
01:23:47.880
Manufacturing factory jobs down 8,000 last month.
01:23:49.280
Yeah, tariffs have not helped in manufacturing.
01:23:55.920
Than they were last year on a margin, sort of on a low rate.
01:24:04.300
I've been a big advocate of getting rid of the tariffs since literally day one.
01:24:07.340
The biggest issue that I see with the Trump administration on the economy is that the
01:24:12.820
promise that Trump thought he was making is not the promise I think that actually came
01:24:16.500
So rhetorically, he was saying everything's going to become affordable again.
01:24:19.860
And what people mean by affordable is I want 2019 prices.
01:24:25.680
Unless we get into a stagflation and massive recession.
01:24:28.800
If we get into a recession, stagflation wouldn't know.
01:24:32.840
You need like an actual depression or a recession.
01:24:40.800
It's why I actually had some sympathy for when he said affordability is nonsense.
01:24:46.120
I think what he meant by that actually is that affordability, when have you ever thought,
01:24:52.780
Pretty rare in anyone's life to say things are just affordable.
01:24:59.740
And so specifically saying, specifically speaking, I think it's good that inflation is down.
01:25:07.160
And when the stock market is robust, that means there can be more investments in, for example,
01:25:11.400
infrastructure projects and data centers and all the rest.
01:25:14.700
I'm a believer that there is, in fact, a bubble that's going on in the stock market because
01:25:18.640
there's an enormous amount of momentum at the top end.
01:25:20.740
And most of the gains in the stock market are happening in AI.
01:25:23.840
It doesn't mean that AI won't be an amazing thing.
01:25:27.460
But I do think that there will be a winnowing at the top end of the market.
01:25:30.220
When that happens, then there will probably be a depression of some sort.
01:25:33.760
Not a great depression, but I mean like depressed prices in the markets.
01:25:36.740
I think that a lot of these stocks are trading at unsustainable PE ratios.
01:25:43.040
The main critique I have for President Trump on the economic front is that investors, what
01:25:48.520
they are really looking for is, number one, less regulation, ease of investment, but number
01:25:55.560
And the lack of consistency at the federal level is incredibly difficult for investors
01:26:01.900
And actually, I think that if the Supreme Court steps in and says no to the tariffs, you'll
01:26:05.040
actually see a rather large economic boost because of it.
01:26:08.420
Because the Supreme Court will have placed a limitation then on the executive branch that
01:26:12.820
That's the case that he can oppose with other means, though.
01:26:15.780
Yeah, but then the Supreme Court will likely step in at that point, too.
01:26:18.860
Six months, a year later, that's a problem, the lag.
01:26:21.580
Again, I'm very critical of the tariff regime here.
01:26:29.980
On foreign policy, which you put it to the side, I think Trump has been the greatest
01:26:36.200
I think he's been spectacular on foreign policy.
01:26:37.720
And that's with many of my critiques with regard to, for example, Ukraine, where I'm significantly
01:26:48.040
I was very much an advocate of his foreign policy.
01:26:50.200
I thought that in terms of his foreign policy, he is, as he said before, he's not got us
01:26:57.540
He's used the military six, seven significant times.
01:27:00.300
He has used the military in, I think, targeted and pinpointed ways that do not reinforce
01:27:06.400
the Iraq war syndrome, that we need to put hundreds of thousands of troops on the ground.
01:27:11.120
I think the president has a very good feel for-
01:27:14.500
The thing about foreign policy is it kind of works like the New York real estate market.
01:27:17.720
It actually is a sort of zero-sum win-or-lose game.
01:27:19.940
And President Trump actually is quite good at those.
01:27:21.780
I think that on domestic economics, the president tends to bring a zero-sum approach sometimes
01:27:26.160
to his economic issues that I don't agree with, because I think that you can expand the
01:27:31.200
But I don't think the same thing holds true generally in foreign policy, where when it
01:27:34.840
comes to geopolitics, there's a winner and there's a loser.
01:27:37.660
And it's all about relative power and power dynamics.
01:27:41.000
And the president seems to get that on a very gut level, which is why in the Middle East,
01:27:46.080
I think he's done the right thing with the Iran strike on the Forda nuclear facility.
01:27:49.780
I think he did the right thing in extraditing Nicolas Maduro.
01:27:53.460
I think that he has found ways to continue the funding of Ukraine via this sort of jury-rigged
01:28:02.360
I think that he has gotten a bunch of countries in Europe to increase their defense spending,
01:28:05.900
which is something that even Mark Rudy over at NATO has said is generally a good thing.
01:28:11.420
I mean, we can, boy, and if people are looking for us to unpack that, we can spend hours and
01:28:17.140
hours on every single one of these specific examples.
01:28:20.120
Let me ask you, and just before we get off the foreign policy, I am curious, Greenland,
01:28:26.440
I don't understand why we are attempting to make Greenland our 51st state.
01:28:31.380
It seems to me we already have defense agreements in place.
01:28:38.880
Listen, I think that Greenland, I think that, you know, despite the desire to rename it
01:28:46.520
But I'm just trying to deal with the Donnie doctor or whatever it is.
01:28:54.040
I think that the, you know, attempt to strengthen our bases in Greenland would be a good thing.
01:29:00.920
Which you can do tomorrow, which they've already agreed to.
01:29:07.860
Hey there, this is Dr. Jesse Mills, director of the Men's Clinic at UCLA Health and host
01:29:15.760
Each January, guys everywhere make the same resolutions.
01:29:21.920
But what if the real work isn't physical at all?
01:29:24.520
To kick off the new year, I sat down with Dr. Steve Poulter, a psychologist with over 30
01:29:28.880
years experience helping men unpack shame, anxiety, and emotional pain they were never taught
01:29:34.620
In a powerful two-part conversation, we discuss why men aren't emotionally bulletproof, why
01:29:39.820
shame hides in plain sight, and how real strength comes from listening to yourself and to others.
01:29:46.000
Guys who are toxic, they're immature, or they've got something they just haven't resolved.
01:29:50.700
Once that gets resolved, then there comes empathy and some compassion.
01:29:55.420
If you want this to be the year you stop powering through pain and start understanding what's
01:29:59.680
underneath, listen to the Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're
01:30:05.960
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers.
01:30:13.620
But it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
01:30:22.440
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting the Long Island serial killer.
01:30:26.600
The investigation into the most notorious killer in New York since The Son of Sam.
01:30:32.300
Listen for free on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:30:41.600
It's a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about
01:30:46.280
Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all
01:30:55.000
Is there a chronotype for that, or am I just depressed?
01:30:58.980
We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight.
01:31:03.000
You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and
01:31:09.480
We break down the topics you want to know more about.
01:31:12.600
Sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health.
01:31:17.740
We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind, inside and out, healthy.
01:31:27.500
Health Stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone.
01:31:30.820
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:31:41.100
And I'm Cal Penn, and we are the hosts of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.
01:31:47.000
This week on the podcast, I am talking to film and TV critic, radio and podcast host, and
01:31:53.240
Harry Potter superfan, Rihanna Dillon, to discuss Audible's full cast adaptation of Harry Potter,
01:32:03.360
What moments in this audiobook capture the feeling of the magical world best for you,
01:32:11.620
I always loved reading about the Quidditch matches, and I think the audio really gets it,
01:32:18.180
because it just plunges you right into the stands.
01:32:21.400
You have the crowd sounds, like all around you is surround sound, especially if you're
01:32:27.560
Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
01:32:34.300
I want to just, because you write about it in Lions and Scavengers, you talk about this notion of
01:32:46.600
What do you make of Trump's interventionist attitudes, not just overseas, but as it relates
01:32:53.060
So many disproportionately based out here, including MP Materials, which is-
01:32:59.300
I don't think the federal government should be taking stakes in private companies.
01:33:01.800
I don't believe in what has been called crony capitalism or state capitalism.
01:33:06.840
I'm not a fan of the idea that the government ought to be involved in command and control
01:33:15.260
So I've opposed that pretty much every step of the way.
01:33:19.780
I think that the market has a magical ability to make things better and cheaper over time,
01:33:25.100
And that includes, by the way, not interfering in the independence of the Fed?
01:33:30.260
Listen, I'm an Austrian school of economics guy.
01:33:32.100
I think that there's a good case to be made that the Fed really should not have control
01:33:36.080
I think the target inflation rate should be zero, not two.
01:33:39.340
And I think that we should allow interest rates generally to free float, because I think
01:33:43.420
that sometimes one of the great problems with the American economy is artificial bubbles
01:33:50.540
I think that's what helped lead to the Great Recession.
01:33:52.420
I think it's what also led to the inflationary spiral under Joe Biden.
01:33:58.040
And forgive me, this is, you know, we're zigging and zagging around a little bit, but I still
01:34:03.460
can't get over the fact that he sat down and had dinner with Nick Fuentes.
01:34:07.380
So I think that that was a bad thing to do, obviously.
01:34:13.340
I think that the president has, you know, an unfortunate tendency to make nice with people
01:34:21.520
He did come out this week, by the way, and, you know, in the New York Times said the Republican
01:34:25.660
Party wants nothing to do with people like Nick Fuentes, doesn't want to do with anti-Semites.
01:34:29.760
I'll continue to be critical of Republicans who flirt with this sort of stuff.
01:34:33.300
I wish that the Democratic Party were as critical of sitting Congress members who not only flirt
01:34:37.660
with this sort of stuff, but overtly traffic in this sort of stuff.
01:34:42.700
Zoram Amdani, literally in the campaign, in the campaign, he was asked on Fox News about Hamas,
01:34:48.060
and he refused to denounce it as a terrorist group.
01:34:49.720
They are a terrorist group, and they should have been announced.
01:34:56.460
This is where we have fundamental disagreements.
01:35:00.060
But staying in domestic politics for a second, it seems to have become a sort of de brigueur
01:35:04.680
requirement for Democrats who are running for office to now suggest, for example, Scott
01:35:10.920
He's running for Congress, that Israel committed a genocide in Gaza.
01:35:13.920
That is, forget about anti-Semitism and discussions of it, because I think that those have become
01:35:17.120
really loose, and people don't have a consistent definition of anti-Semitism.
01:35:24.340
I mean, we, as you know, have been struggling with that in California as it relates to a
01:35:28.820
Of course, anti-Semitism is a fundamentally different cat than, for example, racism.
01:35:32.580
It's basically a conspiracy theory about Jewish power in the world.
01:35:35.420
And it makes me sick to my stomach, and I say that clearly.
01:35:39.700
I mean, we've tried to lead in terms of our response, and we've called out and called
01:35:43.660
balls and strikes in terms of the outrageous things that have happened and continue happening.
01:35:46.920
I would, you know, in my own framework of anti-Semitism, I think that saying overtly
01:35:50.320
false things about the Jewish state is a form of anti-Semitism.
01:35:55.000
But I don't think that that is really important as much as it is, is it true or not?
01:36:01.520
So Democrats have now been dragged into this conversation, some drag, some run with, you
01:36:10.700
I mean, look, Israel did not commit a genocide in Gaza.
01:36:14.660
There is no standard by which Israel committed a genocide in Gaza, just on a factual level.
01:36:22.800
My opinion is, I understand the tendency for people to make that, to assert that.
01:36:32.540
On the basis of the images and the proportionality.
01:36:41.740
And international, and proportionality doesn't mean that if you kill my child and I then kill
01:36:47.040
seven criminals, that I've been disproportionate.
01:36:50.620
But I think the, but I understand that tendency on the basis of trying to reconcile the proportionate
01:36:59.480
nature of how the war was ultimately conducted and the devastation.
01:37:02.740
I have a question, why do you feel the need to create a permission structure for that sort
01:37:13.920
Look, I don't know the definition or I don't know the legal threshold.
01:37:17.560
So I don't, I don't share that opinion as it relates to genocide.
01:37:23.020
But you do understand that if you accuse Israel of committing a genocide, that now puts Israel
01:37:27.060
in the position of it should be a pariah state because states that commit genocide should
01:37:31.120
So granting legitimacy to that position inherently-
01:37:35.460
I'm just saying the, the, the devastation in Gaza at the human level, you're, you've
01:37:42.420
No, but, but I think it's also important to absorb that a little bit more just as it
01:37:46.120
was sick and we were clear in our condemnation, these people like me, as it relates to what
01:37:50.920
Hamas did in that act of barbarism and terrorism.
01:37:53.860
Yeah, but there's a difference between deliberate terrorism and wartime collateral damage, of course.
01:37:58.220
And if we refuse to acknowledge that reality, then we end up-
01:38:01.140
Collateral damage, I just, I have stronger opinions.
01:38:07.280
I think some of the double tapping issues, I have a lot of issues with how Bibi ultimately
01:38:14.180
And I have a lot of issues that are also painted on the basis of the conversation I
01:38:17.140
had a few weeks later, after October 7th, the way he talked about the Palestinians.
01:38:33.800
What is the thing that he said that you particularly-
01:38:36.840
I didn't like the way he talked about the Palestinian people.
01:38:41.520
I didn't, I don't want to get into the details of the conversation with the prime minister.
01:38:45.200
Because when you suggest that he is conflating Hamas and the Palestinians-
01:38:49.400
And of course, it does lead to the conclusion that you seem to be avoiding.
01:38:52.660
It was, I'm just saying the way he ultimately conducted it, I look back at that conversation,
01:39:07.280
And the devastation and destruction breaks my heart.
01:39:18.820
They hold them all the way until the end of the war.
01:39:20.600
Until the end of the war, there are hostages being held.
01:39:24.140
I'm with you in terms of the ultimate accountability and bringing the hostages home.
01:39:28.540
I like the clarity and conviction as it relates to getting all the hostages dead and alive home.
01:39:34.780
By the way, Hamas still has not been extirpated in the areas where Israel has left them alone.
01:39:39.320
And clearly this truce and detente is still a work in progress.
01:39:46.160
Well, because Hamas was supposed to be disarmed, and they didn't.
01:39:48.160
Look, there's no, I'm crystal clear about Hamas.
01:39:53.120
Right, but the point is that I think shifting blame onto-
01:39:56.240
And I'm also crystal clear of my love for Israel and my condemnation of Bibi.
01:40:01.120
I love my country, and I think that should be easy.
01:40:02.200
I'm just going to point out, listen, anyone is free to disagree with Prime Minister Netanyahu
01:40:09.920
But that's also important to say, because some people conflate that.
01:40:15.720
I've critiqued Bibi myself, mainly for not being right-wing enough, in my opinion, on many issues domestically,
01:40:24.500
I mean, we can get into perceptions of Netanyahu's leadership and all this.
01:40:31.140
Just I know many major politicians in Ukraine, in Hungary, in a wide variety of places.
01:40:36.400
In Israel, I happen to know the last several prime ministers.
01:40:39.740
If anyone outside of the state of Israel believes that Naftali Bennett or Yair Lapid, who's on the left,
01:40:46.360
Would not have been as forceful in their response.
01:40:50.940
And the IDF, by the way, operates largely independently, in some ways, of the prime minister's office.
01:40:56.420
It's kind of a strange dual system that they have over there.
01:40:59.180
And I know too many soldiers, I mean, I talk about one in the book, who had three limbs blown off going door-to-door in Gaza,
01:41:04.220
not using overwhelming air power to eviscerate millions of people.
01:41:08.800
I was in the hospital meeting victims on October 7th in Israel.
01:41:13.840
So I look, you know, and been to memorials and-
01:41:18.060
I want to be clear in the terminology we use about all this stuff, because right now, for example-
01:41:23.140
Where are the members of the Democratic Party protesting and wearing pins for the protesters in Iran who are getting mowed down, maybe by the tens of thousands this week?
01:41:37.300
And by the way, I also thought it was, I thought it was the right thing to do, that strike.
01:41:40.480
And I thought it was unbelievably effective and efficient, and had no problem saying that during the strike, not, didn't wait for the outcome.
01:41:49.320
So, yeah, I marched to beat a little bit of a different drum, a little bit more nuance here.
01:41:53.780
But there is, look, there's no, everything's so black and white.
01:41:59.580
But I think that the point that I'm making back to sort of where we originally departed here was that, you know, I'm trying to call out what I see as bad behavior, untrue, immoral behavior on my own side.
01:42:09.180
I'd like to see that more from a Democratic Party that seemed to be perfectly willing to wrap an arm around Zora Mamdani the minute he got a little bit of momentum.
01:42:16.220
The same man who had said that whenever the NYPD boot is on the throat of Americans, the IDF is lacing the boot.
01:42:25.120
No, I don't associate with those comments at all.
01:42:27.180
I mean, look, he doesn't speak for me in that respect.
01:42:29.300
Yeah, but how would Mamdani? Should Mamdani be the mayor of New York?
01:42:31.320
That's up for people in New York to make that decision.
01:42:33.680
That's not for me to be out here in California, thousands of miles away.
01:42:36.700
You don't believe President Trump should be president.
01:42:41.140
I mean, New York may indirectly, but I mean, it's a little bit of a different question.
01:42:45.940
I thought he ran an incredibly effective campaign.
01:42:48.040
I think there's a lot of interesting attributes that he has.
01:42:53.080
I think there are a lot of terrible people who say bright and capable things.
01:42:55.700
But, and I absolutely disagree with him on a lot of those comments.
01:42:58.700
And I was also, I also maintained that posture pretty consistently over a great period, a long period of time.
01:43:09.320
As it turns out, there weren't a lot of Cuomo fans.
01:43:12.740
I mean, you know, the Cuomo family, as a good Democrat, you know, his father, and there's some members of the family I like a lot.
01:43:22.760
And look, I appreciate your willingness to call balls and strikes.
01:43:26.420
And a lot of folks, you know, frankly, a lot of folks in your world, as we sort of castigate the right-wing media ecosystem, your willingness to call this stuff out.
01:43:36.740
This is the, well, you know, I think in general, this is the way, if we want to have a way forward in American politics, just to get a little general in it, it has to be predicated on certain basic premises about truth.
01:43:47.700
And that's why I keep saying, forget about, you know, categorization.
01:43:54.000
I think one of the major failings of the Democratic Party in the last election cycle is the unwillingness to say whether it was true or untrue that a boy could become a girl, for example.
01:44:01.140
I think a lot of people looked at that and they said, um, excuse me?
01:44:04.820
Forget about the political ramifications or the policy ramifications for just a second.
01:44:12.700
And I don't, we can go down, I mean, I feel like a year ago I was with Charlie having this conversation, which is remarkable.
01:44:21.680
I'm curious, did you, and this is not, I'm just honestly curious when I'm asking this, I'm not even, it's not, there's not a loaded question.
01:44:28.700
Did you or others in the right condemn the Trump policies as it relates to gender-affirming care for, including reassignment surgeries, in the federal prison system under the Trump administration's first term?
01:44:40.820
I mean, if I'd been aware of them, I would have condemned them.
01:44:42.460
My company was the only company in America, I believe, that on a media level refused to use preferred pronouns for anyone.
01:44:47.640
We use only biological pronouns since 2015, since we launched the company.
01:44:51.260
No, and I say that because it's just not well known, but the Trump administration's policies allowed for gender assignment, gender-affirming care, a bit of hormone treatment, an actual change, you know, the operations.
01:45:08.320
And I wish that, frankly, you would go further.
01:45:10.460
You've talked about the unfairness in sports, but to me, the bigger question is not unfairness in sports.
01:45:14.480
The bigger question is whether we should be allowing the administration of chemical or surgical mutilation of minors based on gender dysphoria.
01:45:21.720
Well, we're going to, I mean, the Trump administration has long opinions.
01:45:24.180
They've sued states like California, many other states, 20 plus states, and my position is that's between the physician, it's between the family member, and these patients themselves.
01:45:37.260
Are there any surgical or chemical interventions that you would oppose, even if the patient and doctor weren't?
01:45:44.980
Right, but I'm asking, I mean, it's a real question because it does have public policy implications, meaning in the state of California, there's a judicial ruling.
01:45:52.560
Well, that's a different, that judicial ruling was ridiculous on this basis.
01:45:56.280
Any teacher, and what you're talking about is a law that I signed, as it relates to this idea that you can fire someone for not telling on a child and saying that they're talking about being gay, not just trans issues, any LGBTQ issues, that you can be fired.
01:46:20.880
The law that I signed does not preclude these teachers from telling the parents.
01:46:26.200
No, it precludes school districts from going after them.
01:46:27.860
From mandating and firing someone for not, but it allows the teacher to make that judgment on the basis of seeing someone that's being bullied and the requirements they have under the law to keep people safe.
01:46:38.260
As a parent, don't you believe that a teacher should facilitate the passage of information to you?
01:46:46.620
If your kid has a headache, the teacher's going to call you.
01:46:47.540
I mean, if my kid decides to come out as friends at school.
01:46:49.680
If it's about safety, the law is pretty clear, and the teachers have that ability, and the teachers maintain that ability.
01:47:00.080
This is critical because there's been a lot of misinformation about this.
01:47:04.640
I mean, the school, what the law did is a prohibited school district.
01:47:08.660
And in many cases, look, anyone that's members of the LGBTQ community, how many stories that you've heard of people that say, I went to my parents with my teacher.
01:47:20.720
There's a lot of testimony in this space that I think should just provide a little bit of grace and humility.
01:47:26.880
Teachers can still, quote unquote, turn in a child.
01:47:31.120
I mean, but my question on that, and again, this is a subset of a broader issue, is why does the parent not have an absolute moral ability to receive that information?
01:47:46.640
There should be a requirement for teachers to turn over that information.
01:47:52.380
If a teacher truly believes that a parent is a threat to a child, they can report it to child services.
01:47:56.300
Yeah, so health and safety is still the standard.
01:48:01.120
There's a lot of wiggle room for a teacher to apply for parents.
01:48:02.940
Well, it's also, but it's a lot of law in terms of the weight of that law and that responsibility to take care of it.
01:48:08.820
But this idea that Trump says people are going to public schools and coming back, having surgeries, and coming back the next day is absurd.
01:48:16.900
No, but there are certainly cases in which kids are being, quote unquote, socially transitioned at school without parents knowing about it.
01:48:22.080
I know some of the parents to whom this has happened.
01:48:23.500
I mean, this is the fundamental question that lies at the root of all of this is the question that you're not wanting to answer, which is whether boys can become girls.
01:48:38.660
I also feel terrible for anybody who's suffering with any sort of mental or physical condition that's terrible.
01:48:44.580
I mean, I think it's been the case for generations for time immemorial.
01:48:50.320
I just don't understand why this is a hard one.
01:48:50.920
Because I don't know why it's such a, why is it such a, I'm curious.
01:48:58.820
But it's just how, it's so few, we're talking about so few people.
01:49:03.320
That are struggling with gender identity issues.
01:49:08.600
A lot of remarkable people, a lot of wildly successful people.
01:49:12.140
And they've gone on their life, have incredible lives.
01:49:15.380
There's so much hate and bigotry, so much condemnation, so much judgment.
01:49:19.460
Okay, so this is the part where I start to object.
01:49:26.880
There are lots of terrible people who say lots of terrible things.
01:49:29.380
But it is not an act of bigotry to say that a boy cannot become a girl,
01:49:32.740
nor should my children be taught in K through 12 public schools
01:49:37.800
That's an act of rationality and biological simplicity.
01:49:48.460
well-established rules, by the way, that predate me.
01:49:53.340
We're campaigning and advocating on these issues, as some suggest.
01:49:56.940
And, look, I'm with the governor, Governor Spencer Cox,
01:50:04.680
never so much attention been placed on so few people.
01:50:07.500
The problem is, I do think that on an electoral level,
01:50:10.000
to go to the politics, it is a barrier to entry for a lot of people.
01:50:17.320
And by the way, and I respect, if that's your barrier
01:50:19.560
to then listening to people on a myriad of other issues,
01:50:24.660
I just find it strange that even if you wish to have a public policy
01:50:29.920
we cannot just admit that boys and girls are two different things
01:50:39.720
And, you know, and I also respect Caitlyn Jenner.
01:50:55.340
I find different aspects of this at different layers.
01:51:02.500
So I was speaking at University of British Columbia.
01:51:06.500
And a person who identified as trans got up in the microphone.
01:51:09.880
And obviously, I do a lot of these things on campus.
01:51:14.760
The person started talking about his family's biological male.
01:51:18.960
Again, you can use whatever pronouns you choose to use.
01:51:21.960
But you can't force me to use pronouns that I believe are grammatically incorrect.
01:51:26.220
By the way, I'm not sitting here, you know, trying to browbeat you on pronouns.
01:51:31.280
So anyway, so this person gets up and starts talking about his family and how they treat
01:51:38.720
And I said, you know, I'd really appreciate if we're going to have a conversation on sort
01:51:41.860
of a general and philosophical level about this issue if you didn't invoke your family.
01:51:45.740
Because I don't want to be in a position of having to talk to you about what your family
01:51:50.620
And the person continued to invoke their family and said, well, you know, my family keeps saying
01:51:56.560
And finally, after about seven, eight minutes of this, I said, listen, you've now forced
01:52:01.360
me into the corner where I have to give my opinion.
01:52:02.720
My opinion is that your family is treating you with sympathy, but they don't actually
01:52:05.280
believe that you're a woman because they care about you and they love you.
01:52:07.840
But they will fib to you because they believe that it is better for you or that you will
01:52:12.820
not hurt yourself if you say this thing that is not true.
01:52:16.200
The person got very upset, rushed out of the room.
01:52:18.180
Now, normally, that's the kind of thing that ends up online as a, you know, destroys video
01:52:22.780
I went to the people who were in charge of the event.
01:52:24.600
I had them cut it from the tape because I was worried about the person's mental health
01:52:28.760
I called up a person who I knew who knew the person because they'd mentioned it to me.
01:52:33.060
And I actually had breakfast with the person the next morning to make sure that he was
01:52:37.080
So my only point here is not what a wonderful person I am.
01:52:40.080
It's that sympathy does not preclude truth telling.
01:52:42.100
And when you're making public policy, it is very important that sympathy not preclude truth
01:52:46.940
And I think that, again, it's not just the trans issue.
01:52:49.900
You know, if the idea is that I have to protect my friends and I have to attack my enemies
01:52:53.780
in politics, things get really squirrely really quickly because, again, public policy is for
01:53:03.520
We just see the world with a different set of eyes on this.
01:53:05.700
I appreciate your sort of intellectual argument and the sort of soundness and the firmness
01:53:10.280
I can't help but unpack the relationship to families and people and lives lived and the
01:53:18.040
grace and, you know, people's lives that are lost and people that are struggling and going
01:53:27.000
And to me, that does shape the way I make policy because it is, it's not just science,
01:53:42.720
And, and, and one has to sort of deal with the cards that are dealt as imperfect as things
01:53:49.680
But you're, you're, you're one of these, that's why you got the, what, 180 IQ?
01:53:58.720
By the way, when I was listening, reading Lions and Scavengers, this notion of,
01:54:05.300
victimization and envy, the scavenger mindset, I thought you were writing about Donald Trump.
01:54:11.580
Well, I mean, listen, when I was on with Ezra, Ezra said, it feels like you're talking about
01:54:17.820
I am talking about a lot of people on both sides.
01:54:20.520
I think that, you know, one of the points I make in, in the book, you know, is that the
01:54:24.980
model of Lions and Scavengers, it's really about kind of people who build versus people
01:54:29.720
And the point that I make is that's actually an internal battle inside of all of us.
01:54:33.540
If you go back to the book of Genesis and the story of Cain and Abel, it's a fascinating
01:54:39.440
story, obviously, for a variety of reasons, which is why it's lasted for several thousand
01:54:43.380
But what happens is that Cain actually initiates the idea of let's give sacrifices to God.
01:54:48.760
And then God takes Abel's sacrifice, but not Cain's.
01:54:55.500
And God actually goes to Cain and he says, listen, you have the ability to fix yourself,
01:55:03.500
But, and the word in Hebrew is timshel, you can overcome that.
01:55:07.860
And so in every human heart is the capacity to be the person who builds, makes things
01:55:12.040
stronger, makes, you know, if you're a politician, better policy, makes the country stronger
01:55:16.540
in terms of its social fabric, or the person who's going to grift, or the person who's
01:55:21.100
going to engage in conspiracy theories, or the person who's going to tear things down
01:55:24.280
because they're unhappy with their life and therefore have decided, falsely, with no
01:55:28.240
evidence, that the system is to blame for all that.
01:55:33.160
I think that sometimes I look at what President Trump says, and I think, you know, that's a
01:55:37.360
I think that sending the, you know, sending the B2s to Florida was a lion thing to do.
01:55:43.660
And then sometimes he says things, and I'm like, that is a scavenger thing to do.
01:55:46.700
So, you know, this week, for example, you know, he's doing some populist things on economics
01:55:50.980
that probably some members of the left would agree with.
01:55:55.220
I think that that is, again, externalizing people's debt problem to a place that does
01:56:02.040
not solve the problem, and in fact, is more likely to lead to people not being able to
01:56:09.660
What about rolling up all the corporate purchases of private single family owns?
01:56:14.480
I think that that's, I think that that is a ridiculous misdirect, okay?
01:56:18.380
The fact is that in the state of California, for example, exorbitantly low percentage.
01:56:29.120
And meanwhile, if you go over to Charlotte, North Carolina, where the real estate prices
01:56:32.080
actually have been diving, you actually do have pretty significant corporate ownership.
01:56:36.020
And here we're talking about large corporations, not like small mom and pop operations, where
01:56:40.640
Typically speaking, when a corporation invests in an area, like say Phoenix,
01:56:44.160
and then builds up an enormous number of rental units, because that's what happens.
01:56:48.420
They buy, let's say, a single family home, now they rent it out, okay?
01:56:50.800
So they just increased the stock of rent, right?
01:56:55.680
And then corporations typically are investing in areas where it's easier to buy and easier
01:57:02.000
Renovating is very difficult in places like New York and in certain parts of California.
01:57:05.080
It's a lot easier in, say, Austin or Phoenix or Florida.
01:57:08.080
And so what you've seen is actually there is not only zero correlation between corporate
01:57:12.020
ownership of real estate assets and price of rent, for example.
01:57:19.380
And so trying to refocus on, look at this terrible, it isn't BlackRock.
01:57:24.040
BlackRock doesn't own real estate assets in this fashion.
01:57:26.340
But if you look at Blackstone, it's Blackstone's fault that the real estate prices are going up.
01:57:35.300
So why is he pursuing two policies that you vehemently disagree with?
01:57:40.240
Flailing on the issue of the economy with the American people?
01:57:42.580
Governor, I think that it is politically beneficial for politicians to tell people
01:57:46.320
that their problems are easily solvable with the stroke of a pen,
01:57:49.620
and by blaming somebody who's richer than they are.
01:57:51.400
I think that is a very easy way to get away with really bad public policy.
01:58:02.340
Wait, why haven't we gotten into politics in Nigeria?
01:58:05.860
Or we can talk about Somaliland and we can get into some more interesting, nuanced issues.
01:58:13.140
And there is legitimately a lot of issues that I think are fascinating that will define more
01:58:19.140
But what do you make of, I mean, Republicans have no chance in this midterm, right?
01:58:23.780
I think that they are in for a world of hurt right now in the midterms.
01:58:32.860
That alone would put them behind the eight ball.
01:58:35.620
There are not a lot of swing districts that are kind of left because of all the redistricting.
01:58:39.220
But the swing districts that are left seem to be trending more blue.
01:58:42.660
President Trump isn't on the ballot, so he doesn't really have coattails among the low
01:58:46.800
But so, yeah, I think that Republicans are going to are going to have a rough ride.
01:58:50.880
On the scale one to 10, how big a mistake was not expanding the health care subsidies
01:58:56.300
So I have made the case that on just a raw political level.
01:58:59.540
And again, I will say that what I do is different than what you do.
01:59:02.340
I mean, like you're in the podcast space now, so this is my ballgame.
01:59:04.520
But the reality is that you're in the policymaking space.
01:59:07.140
And I've said this to Republican and Democratic politicians.
01:59:09.280
That's why I have to bring the human element into this, Ben.
01:59:13.080
See, this is where I would say you need to remove the human element, Governor.
01:59:15.220
But, you know, I would say that one of the things that I hope that people appreciate
01:59:21.200
about the difference is that in the podcast space, you can be a purist.
01:59:24.120
And in the political space, you try to get 70 percent of the pie.
01:59:27.480
And so when you are looking at, for example, extending the Obamacare subsidies, it is a
01:59:32.600
political loser, obviously, for Republicans not to extend the Obamacare subsidies and to
01:59:37.380
Then the question becomes, what can you do that shortens the duration?
01:59:41.200
If you're a conservative, if you're a Republican, what can you do that creates
01:59:45.200
a softer landing for people who are reliant on those subsidies and a transition to policies
01:59:50.360
that you believe will, in general, bend the cost curve down in the meantime?
01:59:54.240
Because if you have kind of a hard stop, then that's going to affect a lot of people.
01:59:57.940
There's a reason why purple state Republicans, purple district Republicans are trying to cut
02:00:01.800
deals right now with Democrats in order to extend those health care subsidies.
02:00:05.400
Hopefully, in return, they will get some provisions on fraud, maybe some release of certain regulations
02:00:17.740
If you and I were sitting and designing a health care system and there was none, then
02:00:21.980
I think that we might have very differing ideas of where it goes.
02:00:24.740
But trying to extricate ourselves from what is an incredibly difficult situation, I think
02:00:30.480
that the easiest and dumbest way to do policy is to just keep tossing money at it.
02:00:33.760
But I also think that on a political level, if you never have the power to do the better
02:00:38.760
things, then you never have the power to do the better things.
02:00:42.620
And that's the nature of pragmatism, as you are constantly talking about.
02:00:49.960
On the issue of subsidy, it's an important point.
02:00:51.980
I mean, we'd have to lower the cost of health care.
02:00:55.100
We created our own insulin-branded drug under CalRx.
02:00:58.780
We're just lowering costs, not subsidizing costs, which means socializing that cost on
02:01:03.840
the rest of the rate payers, more broadly, or premium payers.
02:01:08.560
But on the issue of Vance and Rubio, Vance or Rubio, Ben?
02:01:17.140
I mean, so I think that, look, J.D. Vance has already sort of been deemed by Marco Rubio
02:01:22.640
as the presumptive nominee, barring some sort of cataclysmic circumstance.
02:01:26.580
In terms of who I tend to agree with more politically, obviously, I would think that
02:01:29.580
the Secretary of State, Rubio, on foreign policy, I tend to be more aligned with.
02:01:34.300
Yeah, I think that the vice president, obviously a very high IQ guy.
02:01:37.580
There are certain areas of policy I agree with him on.
02:01:39.620
There are certain areas of policy I strenuously disagree with the vice president.
02:01:42.860
Right now, if you have to lay odds, then J.D. is the most likely nominee.
02:01:54.200
You know, again, yeah, in terms of, this is where you get into sort of the personality
02:01:59.700
But I think that it is significantly more likely that Pam Bondi is out before the Secretary
02:02:24.120
And on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about our health.
02:02:27.720
Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all
02:02:36.180
Is there a chronotype for that or am I just depressed?
02:02:40.040
Health Stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone.
02:02:44.340
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
02:02:50.280
This is Dr. Jesse Mills, host of the Mailroom Podcast.
02:02:53.700
Each January, men promise to get stronger, work harder, and fix what's broken.
02:02:58.040
But what if the real work isn't physical at all?
02:03:00.500
I sat down with psychologist Dr. Steve Poulter to unpack shame, anxiety, and the emotional pain
02:03:07.300
Part of the way through the Valley of Despair is realizing this has happened, and you have
02:03:11.460
to make a choice whether you're going to stay in it or move forward.
02:03:16.700
Listen to the Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite
02:03:21.260
A decade ago, I was on the trail of one of the country's most elusive serial killers.
02:03:27.700
But it wasn't until 2023 when he was finally caught.
02:03:36.520
I'm Josh Zeman, and this is Monster, hunting the Long Island serial killer.
02:03:40.660
The investigation into the most notorious killer in New York since The Son of Sam.
02:03:46.080
Listen for free on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
02:03:56.780
And I'm Cal Penn, and we are the hosts of Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club.
02:04:02.700
This week on the podcast, I am talking to film and TV critic, radio and podcast host, and
02:04:08.900
Harry Potter superfan, Rihanna Dillon, to discuss Audible's full cast adaptation of Harry Potter
02:04:18.360
What moments in this audiobook capture the feeling of the magical world best for you,
02:04:27.360
I always loved reading about the Quidditch matches, and I think the audio really gets it
02:04:33.760
because it just plunges you right into the stands.
02:04:37.340
You have the crowd sounds, like, all around you is surround sound, especially if you're
02:04:42.420
Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever