On today s episode of the uncensored show, we have a story about a woman who claims she used campaign cash to reimburse her then-boyfriend for luxuries he bought her and her husband. Is it a scam or is it an honest mistake? Plus, the Biden DOJ has just criminally charged a witness against the Biden family. And Rep. Thomas M. Massey joins us to discuss all that and much more.
00:00:04.000Today, Fannie Willis, the DA who brought the charges against Trump at all over trying to overturn the election 2020, testified and it is, it was pretty crazy testimony.
00:00:17.000Now, there's a viral claim going around.
00:00:19.000At one point, she says that she took cash out of her campaign And kept it, implying she used that cash to reimburse her then boyfriend for luxurious gifts.
00:00:31.000Okay, I'm sorry, not really gifts, because she paid him back in cash with no receipts.
00:00:37.000And, uh, you know, we're gonna have to break this one down because there are some people saying It was actually her money she loaned to the campaign in the first place and when the campaign ended she only paid back a small portion of it but it was a large sum of cash she kept in cash so it's not necessarily like campaign donations or anything like that but we have to break this one down and then go through the ridiculous claims.
00:01:08.000She claimed in filings she never received a gift from a prohibited person, for which her boyfriend would have been.
00:01:15.000And then to sort of clear it all up, they both said, oh, it's not a gift because she paid him back in cash and there are no receipts or statements or withdrawal forms or anything like that because it was just that she happens to keep $9,000 typically in cash lying around and she likes to travel around the world with large sums of money.
00:01:33.000It was so shocking that apparently someone burst out laughing in the courtroom and the judge told him to stop.
00:01:39.000Plus, you know, we were trying to figure out maybe this is the bigger story, but The Biden DOJ has just criminally charged a witness against the Joe Biden family.
00:01:53.000Okay, yeah, we're gonna talk about that.
00:01:54.000Before we get started, my friends, head over to eyesofadvice.com And you'll need to have iTunes already installed, otherwise it'll bring you to the Apple Music page, but if you want to pre-order the song to support our work, which is coming out February 23rd, it's the new single, go to eyesofadvice.com, which on an Apple device will prompt you to pre-order the song on iTunes, and if you have iTunes installed, this is the way we have to do it, because they're playing dirty games in how they track music sales these days.
00:02:20.000Apparently, I can't say too much, but, uh, I'll just put it this way.
00:02:25.000Congratulations to, obviously, Ben Shapiro and Tom McDonald, because they hit number one like two weeks in a row.
00:02:30.000Number 16 on the Hot 100 with their single, Facts.
00:02:33.000But, behind the scenes, there are Dirty Games afoot.
00:02:36.000So our new song's coming out February 23rd.
00:02:37.000You can pre-order it at eyesofadvice.com.
00:02:39.000Also, head over to timcast.com, click join us, become a member, support our work directly, and you'll get access to the uncensored members-only show coming up tonight at 10 p.m.
00:03:20.000I was going to be here tomorrow night, but they called off the Congress this week.
00:03:26.000Because we were supposed to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act so that the government would have to get a warrant to spy on you.
00:03:35.000But some folks blew all that up this week.
00:03:37.000They didn't want to have the vote because they sensed that Congress was going to be constitutional this week.
00:04:38.000I'm going to take this opportunity to crack my drink.
00:04:40.000We asked Grok, and it was a toss-up between, we asked who was the most based member of Congress, and it said Thomas Massie, Ana Paulina Luna, or Matt Gaetz.
00:04:49.000And then, you know, we were like, no, no, no, don't don't give us the list.
00:05:45.000She's the one who brought these charges against Donald Trump and basically everybody else.
00:05:50.000Now it's found out that basically it is believed she lied on government forums about a relationship she was having, funds she was receiving, she's basically funneling money to her boyfriend.
00:06:02.000It is a major scandal and even MSNBC has this viral clip where they're saying she's probably going to get disqualified.
00:06:10.000Many people are saying that she appears to have admitted to many different felonies trying to stumble over and cover up the potential crimes she's being accused of now.
00:06:20.000The wild thing about this case... I don't know, did you guys watch it?
00:06:23.000I watched about 10 minutes of it, or 15 minutes of it.
00:06:26.000I was watching the testimony, and then I also watched some Fox News, and I forgot the host's name, but she's a former... I think she's a judge.
00:06:36.000Fannie Willis is yelling at the lawyers.
00:07:03.000And then it finally got to the point where the lawyer's like, did he ever visit the place where you lay your head?
00:07:08.000And I'm like, where's the judge to be like, stop, what are you doing?
00:07:12.000Did you ever have a conversation with him?
00:07:14.000And she's like, I didn't have a substantive conversation with him.
00:07:17.000It depends on what the meaning of the word is, is.
00:07:21.000And Thomas Massey knows exactly what I'm talking about.
00:07:24.000This is 100% the playbook that Bill Clinton was using when he was being, when the investigation for Monica Lewinsky was going on.
00:07:33.000No, my favorite part of all of this was when they're asking her they asked both of them to like define the timeline of the relationship and both of them are like vaguely we started dating at this time we can say but he says the relationship ends like in June and she says it ends in August and she's like well he's a man he would say that.
00:07:58.000So basically, what this means is, let me pull this up to give everybody the context as we get into this.
00:08:04.000This is the Georgia election racketeering prosecution, the state of Georgia v. Donald J. Trump et al, pending criminal case.
00:08:11.000I have to imagine that following this testimony and this scandal, you are going to have every defendant, well, at least the ones who didn't plead guilty and then go crying on TV after funneling away hundreds of thousands of dollars, they're going to be filing challenges saying, like, this is malicious prosecution, it's got to be thrown out.
00:08:29.000This is an absolutely wild case to hear.
00:08:33.000If she does not get removed and criminally charged, I would not be surprised.
00:08:39.000But even if she gets removed, it's like, we'll be lucky to see any actual accountability in terms of any of this.
00:08:46.000If she gets removed, what happens with the case that she had been prosecuting?
00:08:50.000I think they'd have to remove both her and the lead prosecutor.
00:08:53.000Do they need to just call the case like a mistrial and start over?
00:09:21.000And they'll sell it as, well, crazy MAGA whoever went after poor Fannie Willis, who's just trying to live life and have an undefined relationship with this man while she collects money from her campaign.
00:09:31.000Ultimately, it's not going to be the same thing as clearing Trump's name.
00:10:24.000There's so much to go through here, and let me just state it this way.
00:10:27.000I don't know, we have this article, we can see what the New York Times says will happen next.
00:10:31.000So basically, she may have chosen her boyfriend to run this case, giving him a bunch of money.
00:10:39.000At question is, did she receive, there's like several questions, one of them is, she filled out a form saying she did not receive any gifts from prohibited persons.
00:10:48.000And that would be anything valued $100 or more from a variety of individuals, but personal relationships, you know, sexual or romantic relationships are included in that.
00:10:59.000When asked, she said, well, it's because those lavish vacations that are on record on credit cards with credit card statements and all the information proving it, we paid that all back.
00:11:10.000I paid that all back in cash that I just happened to have lying around.
00:11:14.000And then Hilarity ensues as there's numerous questions about, how do you have this cash lying around?
00:11:20.000You're going to Belize with thousands of dollars, and nobody believes it.
00:11:25.000It is the perfect, it is their only excuse.
00:11:28.000Otherwise, she's basically caught having committed serious crimes.
00:11:32.000So now, we have this trial, and I guess the question will be, is the judge going to be honest and hold her to account?
00:11:41.000I think it's worrisome that she was acting up to an insane degree on the stand, insulting the lawyers, refusing to answer questions.
00:11:53.000When she was asked whether or not Nathan Wade had ever stayed at her residence, she goes, my residence?
00:12:29.000It just also reminds me of when Bob Mendez got charged with his most recent scandal and they asked him why you have all this cash on hand.
00:12:36.000He's like, well, as the child of immigrants, you know, this is just something we do because things don't always feel secure.
00:12:41.000Like, there was always a spin that you're sort of not supposed to question.
00:12:44.000And that's kind of what I'm waiting for now, like, for her to be like, Well, the reason this relationship and the way acted was okay is because insert insane reason here.
00:12:53.000The New York Times says that if she is disqualified, the case would be reassigned to another Georgia prosecutor, who would then have the ability to continue the case exactly as is or make major changes, such as adding or dropping charges or defendants, or even drop the case altogether.
00:13:09.000The decision to drop the case would end the prosecution of Mr. Trump and his allies for their actions in Georgia after the 2020 election, when the former president sought to overturn his loss in the state.
00:13:17.000It would be up to a state entity called the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia to find someone else to take up the case.
00:13:22.000More specifically, the decision would fall to the council's executive director, Pete Scandalakis.
00:13:37.000In an interview on Wednesday, he said that he could ask a prosecutor to take on Trump's case voluntarily, but he could also appoint a prosecutor to do the job, whether that prosecutor wanted to or not.
00:14:04.000Yeah, even if she gets disqualified, so what?
00:14:07.000Yeah, but if she used, um, if she took gifts, that's a big deal.
00:14:13.000And if she, uh, if she paid him back with money, cash that she'd received from previous campaigns, I think she actually said that on the stand, that she had cash left over from, like, old campaign donations, which is also illegal, and that no one really pressed her on it when she said it, but she said it.
00:15:29.000So this is the story that's a more inner component of this.
00:15:33.000Did Fanny Willis admit to committing a felony on the stand, or a series of them?
00:15:39.000In this clip that's going viral, several people are reposting it.
00:15:43.000When asked how she had the cash to pay back her boyfriend for these lavish trips, she said that, you know, when you go to the grocery store, you have 50 bucks lying around, you just keep the cash.
00:15:54.000My dad always told me to keep money, and I didn't.
00:15:56.000You know, if he found out how little money I'd have, he'd be mad at me, actually.
00:16:00.000She says she has around $9,000 lying around at any given moment.
00:16:03.000And she said that what happened was, When she took out large amounts of money from her first campaign, she kept that.
00:16:13.000Now, many people are pointing out that is a very serious crime, because not only is she saying she took out money from her campaign to keep for cash, she then used that to pay her boyfriend, who was buying her lavish vacations, and she was paying it back.
00:16:28.000Which sounds like very serious criminal territory, but there is some nuance.
00:16:32.000Let me play the clip for you, and you can hear from her what she said.
00:16:51.000And I don't keep cash as good in my purse like I used to, because I don't go on many dates.
00:16:57.000But when you go on a date, you should have cash in your pocket.
00:17:00.000So my question was, where did that cash originally come from?
00:17:03.000I'd just like to point out, she was asked where did the cash come from, and then she went on this diatribe about going out with guys and having to have cash because they could act a fool or whatever.
00:17:12.000She was accused several times of filibustering, that she's trying to pat her her way through not answering these questions, and so here's... She also says... I mean, my dad also gave me the advice, like, when you go out with a guy, bring cash, make sure you have a way to, like, pay or leave or do whatever, but That doesn't account for I left it at my house and it's $9,000.
00:19:02.000Well, this is the part, too, where she said, I took a lot of money out for the campaign and kept it.
00:19:09.000Now the question is, what did she mean?
00:19:11.000The most charitable interpretation of that is, she went to the bank, she took a lot of money out, and she put some of it in her campaign, and some of it in her pocket.
00:19:21.000But why would you take it all out in cash if you're going to give it to your campaign?
00:19:25.000That's not how... you don't give your campaign cash.
00:19:28.000Let me play that again, we can hear exactly what she said.
00:20:03.000Stephen Fowler of NPR says, Willis says elsewhere in the hearing, when I ran for judge, I took $50,000 of my personal money out of my retirement, and that money ended up being lost.
00:20:13.000According to her records, he says in her failed judicial run, she loaned herself $49,000 and only paid back $8,500.
00:20:21.000Before terminating that campaign, running out of money, she then ran for DA a few years later.
00:20:26.000However, I will add, it's not surprising that we're immediately going to get some kind of justification for what she did, how she did it, and how it makes sense.
00:20:34.000I don't think that actually changes the fact that we don't know the full context of what she did when she said she did it.
00:20:41.000Stephen Fowler is presenting a plausible reason that could make sense, and in his charitable interpretation, she took out $50,000 in cash from her bank, kept a large portion of it, and then put the rest into her campaign.
00:20:54.000But you're saying it's not normal for people to put cash into a campaign?
00:20:59.000No, you would do it with a wire transfer.
00:21:01.000But maybe, I'm trying to be super charitable here, maybe she means I put $49,000 or $50,000 in there, and then when I paid myself back, I just cashed those checks.
00:21:14.000Maybe that's what she means when she got the $7,000 or $8,000.
00:21:17.000And perhaps, I think either way, considering everything else she said, she should be investigated.
00:21:38.000This is a completely ridiculous argument to me.
00:21:40.000I don't know how much stock you want to put in it, but the fact that she's leaning away and touching her face is typically considered, like, deceptive body language.
00:21:45.000So there's obviously something weird in the fact that she won't just say, like, ah, yes, I cashed that one check and that's why I have this here.
00:21:51.000Like, Trying to make it so she can later say, oh, well, I went to Publix a lot, so that's how I built up $9,000.
00:23:19.000This is reminiscent of some of the Biden claims that these were just loans, you know, when they see a transfer and they say, oh, I was paying back a loan.
00:23:27.000And but there's no evidence of the loan because the loan presumably How much was it in that case?
00:24:18.000Half of it's not in cash, half of it we have a receipt for, and half of it- Look, can you criminally convict someone for not having a receipt?
00:24:26.000So it seems extremely likely that Fannie Will has lied over and over and over again, but this is why perjury charges almost never- never, uh, happen.
00:24:34.000It's- it- it- I gotta tell you, like, she knows what she's doing, okay?
00:24:39.000Someone says to me, like, did you ever order, uh, Papa John's to your house?
00:25:13.000Didn't you just say, well that's not my office, it's a office!
00:25:16.000So no matter what you do, no matter how the question's asked, you can give whatever answer you want, and they can't charge you with lying because for the most, they rarely can, because for the most part it's just, this is where I got to the point where she was asked, did he ever come to a place where you laid your head?
00:25:32.000It's like, I'm sitting here thinking, these lawyers don't know how to ask these questions.
00:25:36.000Eventually, one good lawyer got up and seemed to know how to ask her questions, and then the judge stopped him.
00:25:42.000Yeah, because if you ask her, did he ever stay at your house, and she says no, then you say, okay, he never stayed at your residence.
00:25:50.000And then you just clarify, he never did it, and then you move on.
00:25:53.000And if it's found out later that he did, she's the liar, she perjured herself.
00:25:56.000Rather than be like, are you sure you're telling me the truth?
00:26:18.000When you say, my friend's coming to stay with me, you might mean for a month or two or three.
00:26:22.000This is actually something a thing that happens in law frequently and it's it's something that they have historically covered with a reasonable person would say and that's really nowadays that is becoming harder and harder to kind of narrow down what a reasonable person to say but would say but that is something that if you look at laws there are laws all over the place where reasonable people is the standard and nowadays no one's fucking reasonable!
00:26:51.000You know what I would do if I was a lawyer in this case, guys?
00:30:20.000So, but my question is like, you know, you had these characters like Joseph Misfud, who just disappears into the ether, who was feeding this information to the FBI and to the U.S.
00:30:31.000government that turned out to be a hoax.
00:30:34.000Or the guy that compiled the dossier, did he ever go to jail?
00:31:14.000It has information pertaining to the start of the Russiagate hoax and the Crossfire Hurricane, basically the conspiracy to overthrow the United States government, as I would describe it.
00:31:48.000I mean, why did they write an article called the shadow campaign to save the 2020 election?
00:31:53.000And I'll mention this too because we're kind of all over the place right now, but if you think 2020 was a shadow campaign.
00:32:02.000You better damn well believe there's a shadow campaign going on right now instead of the 2024 election.
00:32:05.000What I think is happening, this is my bird's eye view hypothesis, is that we're transitioning from our liberal economic order, our 80 year old order, to this new world order and that there's people trying to facilitate that and they're willing to commit crimes in order to make that happen and at the same time cover up the crimes that they've been committing to make this happen.
00:32:57.000It does feel like the US government's been hijacked by global banking industries and they're just selling us out and moving us towards this new corporate governance.
00:33:10.000I mean, the whole term disinformation, for instance, you have to control the information to set up this new alternate reality, this utopia.
00:33:21.000Like, you know, on the Weaponization Committee, I've sat there, I've looked at the documents, the communications from the White House to the social media companies where they're trying to control all of this and all of the elements of a dystopian future.
00:36:57.000On the dimmest level it'll last eight hours, but when you put it on Adam Schiff in the elevator with me level, because I turn it up super bright, it'll only last about three hours at the Adam Schiff blinding level.
00:37:10.000But it's got to make a point when it's doing that.
00:37:12.000Yes, and I love getting stuck in an elevator.
00:37:17.000I asked you why are the Republicans so bad at everything.
00:37:20.000Why is it that, you know, Bob Menendez can be indicted more than once, be found with, what did he have, he had gold bars, is that what it was?
00:37:28.000Actually, gold bars with Egyptian markings on them, from the Egyptian government, likely.
00:37:33.000And immediately it's like, well, hold on, you know, we can't expel the guy, we gotta wait.
00:37:37.000And then George Santos has a bunch of accusations.
00:37:59.000And now we've got a small majority because of it.
00:38:02.000For what reason did these Republicans vote to expel George Santos?
00:38:06.000So the New York delegation did it to their own.
00:38:09.000They brought this Resolution to throw him out of Congress on their own member because they thought he was weighing them down and he might cost them their re-election.
00:38:19.000So they took out one New Yorker to save four.
00:38:22.000But why did all the other Republicans join in?
00:38:58.000And so people had already went out and said things about getting rid of George Santos before our leadership said what they, you know, don't do that.
00:39:49.000That's between you and your voters and a court of law.
00:39:53.000I said, but all of my interactions with you show me that you're a decent, competent, capable man and you're going to go on to do good things, I think.
00:40:05.000Because, you know, I was worried about, can you imagine, you're that guy, and you rose to that level, and then you just get kicked out one day, what do you do the next day?
00:41:00.000I love making this point because people will message me all the time being like, Tim, if you're mean to these people they won't come on your show.
00:41:36.000As you pointed out, he was indicted for some stuff, but he wasn't convicted.
00:41:40.000So now you're gonna get... I mean, we've lowered the bar so low that... My best case argument for compromise is, if someone is charged with a crime, at most what we do is, they'll be given a bail opportunity, and if no bail, they go to jail until their trial is resolved.
00:42:02.000And that means innocent people spend time behind bars.
00:42:17.000So if they came and said, okay, we're not gonna expel him, but we're gonna suspend his committees or something until the resolution of these criminal indictments, I'd say...
00:43:07.000But there's only like a small handful of Republicans I'd say should stay and each and every one of them gotta get voted out.
00:43:12.000We gotta do something because, I mean, if the issue with Santos is that they're waiting for leadership to figure out what is the principled thing to do or the long-term benefit and they don't know, that's bad leadership.
00:43:25.000Listen, let me tell you what the bar is on the Democrat side.
00:43:28.000There was a federal judge who took a bribe And on the day that the person was supposed to testify against him, the guy decided not to testify.
00:43:37.000But it was so obvious that this federal judge took the bribe that Congress impeached him.
00:44:58.000So I don't know if that needs to be said.
00:45:00.000I can respect and like that he's done some certain things.
00:45:02.000And even with that being said, Ilhan Omar's had, you know, Broken Clock is right twice a day, Rashida Tlaib as well, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, she's the one who started the whole January 6th was an inside job thing.
00:45:14.000And so I have tremendous respect for her coming out, Standing up on camera and saying, police officers were helping the J6ers.
00:45:24.000The thing about voting them out and expecting it to get better, I think is that, and sometimes that can happen, but a lot of people are driven by emotion.
00:45:36.000But if there is any member of Congress who has the engineering and scientific know-how to create a cloning machine and then clone himself and then take over Congress, it would be- We were talking before the show.
00:45:47.000We were talking about a direct representative democracy in that you would, the people would be voting.
00:45:52.000So for the George Santos expulsion, it would be like this 750,000 people would vote yes or no.
00:45:58.000And then whatever the majority is would go to their smart contract, yes or no.
00:46:02.000And so there'd be the people voting through proxy for these decisions instead of like this little cabal of like 200 people that are all, they all know each other and have emotions.
00:46:41.000And Ian has mentioned this before about the people voting on bills and stuff.
00:46:44.000And I pointed out This would create a bias towards people without jobs because they have more access, they have more time to actually go out and participate in these kinds of votes where people with jobs would be like, I'm working today, I can't do it.
00:47:25.000It's a landmark immigration bill, Republicans, you know, anything HR less than 10 is a big deal.
00:47:33.000I used to have a rule, I never vote for HR less than 10.
00:47:36.000Because it's like some messaging bill or the lobbyists had paid to get an HR that was a single digit.
00:47:44.000When I found out, if I was the very first person on the very first minute, the very first day of Congress, and I introduced a bill and it was HR 11, I was like, how did they do that?
00:47:56.000Well, I'm not voting for anything less than 10.
00:48:46.000First, OSHA was saying an employer can't force an employee to get a vaccine, but then OSHA flipped and said every company of a certain size, we're going to use this bureaucracy to enforce the vaccine mandate.
00:49:02.000So you would have to get a vaccine to get employed, and they would have the most efficient way to keep you from getting a job, which is called E-Verify.
00:49:12.000So when you voted against it, I mean, how did your Republican colleagues respond to this?
00:49:17.000Because this idea that, like, there are always going to be people who vote against bills that we feel strongly about and we have to understand their justification.
00:49:22.000I mean, I don't know that I would always want every representative to vote exactly the same on every bill.
00:49:27.000That seems like sort of the nature of the party.
00:49:29.000There was something very swampy that happened because I wasn't the only person opposed to E-Verify.
00:49:35.000So what they did is they gave a carve-out so that E-Verify wouldn't apply to ag workers.
00:49:48.000And so then all the people who were with me trying to get E-Verify out of an otherwise great bill, they gave up and they got the thing they wanted, which is free, you know, the ag part of it.
00:50:02.000And the unions were okay with it because it still applied to anybody that was in a union that, you know, that would threaten a union job.
00:50:10.000You know, ag workers aren't unionized.
00:50:12.000So anyways, it was really swampy the way they did this carve out after the bill had come out of committee.
00:50:20.000But nobody was mad at me, because honestly, they knew I was doing it on principle.
00:50:25.000And also, I think a lot of them knew I was right, but they weren't going to take that stand.
00:50:31.000You know, and I'm thinking about, you know, as I asked earlier, like, why can't the Republicans get anything done?
00:50:36.000And I envision these fiery speeches that, you know, you have given or I've seen like Rand Paul give, and it's like they fall on deaf ears very often because, you know, people just don't care.
00:50:46.000And then part of me thinks that there is no solution.
00:50:49.000And so I immediately just imagined, like, what would I do if I was in Congress?
00:50:55.000I would show up on the first day with two gallons of whole milk and I would dump it on the floor and then I would tell them to expel me and I'd leave.
00:51:01.000Because I don't know that there is anything else you can do or anything you can do at all.
00:51:06.000Well, so support my move for the direct Republic.
00:51:09.000If you don't think this is getting done, we need something new.
00:51:13.000I don't think that's a solution either.
00:51:14.000Let me tell you why Republicans are horrible on the budget and spending.
00:51:18.000So right now you would think, you know, with the debt and accelerating and Everything in such a bad condition right now that Republicans would get serious about spending, but here's the problem.
00:51:32.000We could limit the growth of government, we could even influence policy by putting riders on the budget, but there are about 40 Republicans who they will slit their own wrists before they allow us not to spend more money on the military.
00:51:49.000Like their whole goal is to increase military spending.
00:51:51.000Well, I imagine a lot of these guys come from military districts, where a lot of the funding is from, say, a military base or some kind of contracting job.
00:52:02.000I'm not justifying it, I'm saying they're going to be like, look, if we don't get the funding, this company shuts down, my district loses jobs.
00:52:11.000Yeah, I don't know how they get to where they get to, but they get there, and they will not accept any budget that doesn't spend another additional $50 billion this year on the military than it spent last year.
00:52:22.000Which means, if there's some deal to cut everything 1%, there's no way in hell they'll go for it.
00:52:29.000Have you considered being evil to get what you want?
00:52:32.000Abandoning your principles and just taking out a Machiavellian life.
00:52:43.000How come when the Republicans win the House, and we know the omnibus is coming, you don't just take a single sheet of paper that says, on this date, as you've done, the Department of Education will cease, and just slide it right in the middle of that 5,000 tall stack of paper on that I did something like that.
00:53:03.000Let me tell you what I did this summer, and a lot of people didn't pay attention.
00:54:22.000You know, next year was so far away, they just figured we'll figure out some other way to screw the American public when we get to that bridge.
00:54:32.000So how about you say then in 10 years, you know, on December 31st, 2034, the Department of Education will cease operations.
00:55:30.000He said, we're going to force every school to publish their curriculum and every library, local library at a school, to put out the list of library books.
00:55:49.000By the way, I do have the bill to get rid of the Department of Education, and there's only one tool that the federal government has to enforce what they wanted to do, and that was the Department of Education.
00:56:06.000And I told the speaker, There's no way I could vote for that bill because you are giving more power to, now the kind of power I would like and you might like, but ultimately you're giving more power for the federal government via the Department of Education to tell states and local school boards what to do.
00:56:33.000I said, you let me insert an amendment vote on whether this department should even exist at all.
00:56:39.000For the first time since Jimmy Carter, you let me have a vote on the floor of the House on whether to eliminate the Department of Education or not.
00:57:32.000So it's like if they try and block you here, then you go here.
00:57:33.000Can you do that with legislation, right?
00:57:35.000So what I mean is instead of just coming out right with a bill and saying the Department
00:57:39.000of Education will cease or like the Federal Reserve will be audited.
00:57:42.000What you do is, you put pieces of it in various places that all start triggering one at a time, and then eventually, some, like, member of Congress will be wearing, like, an Indiana Jones hat, running through, piecing together all the bills, like, My God!
00:57:57.000Stick them together and it's like, this abolishes the Federal Reserve!
00:58:08.000So none of the bills can outright say something like, the Department of Education will cease.
00:58:13.000It has to be something like, in a circumstance of X, Y, and Z, funding from the Department of Education will be reallocated to other areas, including military, whatever.
00:58:23.000And then what happens is, piece by piece, things keep happening until eventually the DOE is just crippled and evaporates.
00:58:31.000Well, I mean, that's one of the reasons I got on the Rules Committee.
00:58:36.000If you want to peel back the layers of Congress and how the American people gets the football pulled out in front of them, like Lucy taking the football from Charlie Brown, you need to look at how the sausage is made.
00:58:50.000Every bill, after it comes out of its committee, before it goes to the floor of the House, goes through the Rules Committee.
01:00:27.000So let's say a bill comes out of committee.
01:00:30.000And the chairman didn't want to deal with something, and the bill's going to come to the floor, but the bill needs changed in some way.
01:00:40.000People don't want to vote on changing the bill, so they sneak a self-executing amendment in the Rules Committee on the bill, so that when you vote for this rules resolution that you've been trained since your freshman orientation, it's just a procedural vote.
01:00:54.000You are actually voting for a rule that automatically passes an amendment and could change the whole nature of the bill.
01:02:06.0002, had E-Verify in it, and these ag congressmen were upset, and so they didn't want E-Verify, but they got bought off by this idea of self-executing amendment, and nobody got their hands dirty.
01:02:20.000Oh, we don't know how E-Verify doesn't apply to ag anymore.
01:02:24.000The bill magically somehow did that on its own.
01:02:28.000And then the other was an ethanol thing.
01:02:33.000We were rolling back a bunch of Biden tax credits or energy things, a bunch of Green New Deal stuff, OK?
01:02:41.000But what it turns out that it was going to affect ethanol in some of these states like Iowa.
01:02:47.000And so they couldn't get the bill passed, but they also did not want Republicans voting for ethanol handouts on the floor of the House.
01:02:55.000But they didn't have enough votes to pass this bill with the thing that punished ethanol or took out the ethanol subsidies.
01:03:03.000So they made a self-executing amendment to fix it magically and nobody... I'm telling you, I'm like one of 12 people who understands that that's how that got done.
01:03:15.000So you said they train you about this when you're a freshman.
01:04:08.000Cause that's been in the box for like six months, and the rate has gone up more.
01:04:13.000So it needs to also get the right... So, the Democrats are really good at being evil, right?
01:04:18.000Like, they lie about stuff all the time, while accusing the Republicans of lying about stuff.
01:04:23.000The Democrats are organized, they march in lockstep with each other.
01:04:26.000I think the January 6th committee is a really good example of, like, the malice.
01:04:30.000Jamie Raskin, for instance, included a video of me reporting, reading a news article, rather dryly as I do, and acting as though I was encouraging people to go to January 6th.
01:04:41.000There were people on video, and this guy's 20 minutes from here, Raskin.
01:04:46.000We have people who work here who are, like, he's their rep.
01:04:48.000And so he plays the video, he's like, here's people encouraging January 6th, and there's some guy saying, like, it's gonna be a red wedding, storm the gates, or whatever.
01:04:54.000And then it's me going, Fox News reports Donald Trump says there's going to be a rally.
01:04:58.000Then it cuts to someone else, cuts to me, and I'm like...
01:05:01.000Now I've had people say, like, oh, you know, I saw the thing where you were included.
01:05:06.000I mean, it's been good, I would actually say.
01:05:08.000I had a friend hit me up, I hadn't talked to in 10 years, say, I saw you on the news.
01:05:12.000It was kind of weird because it was all these people calling for January 6th, but then it was like you reading news or something.
01:05:16.000And I'm like, yeah, it was kind of weird.
01:05:58.000Maybe it's because I grew up in, you know, like a Democrat, in Chicago, among Democrats and activists and organizers, and I worked for non-profits.
01:06:06.000The first thing I'd have done, when they announced January 6th, I'd say, yes, we would also have the May 29th insurrection committee, when thousands of far-left extremists firebombed the White House, St.
01:06:15.000John's Church, injuring 100-plus federal officers, forcing the president into a bunker, disrupting official proceedings.
01:06:22.000So you do January 6th, we'll do May 29th.
01:06:24.000Instead, nobody even knows what May 29th is.
01:06:27.000I've had Republicans come in here, in Congress, and I ask them, why nothing on May 29th?
01:06:32.000And I'm like, now why do you know about January 6th, but not when the President was forced into an emergency bunker as the White House grounds were firebombed?
01:06:40.000They literally threw firebombs at the White House grounds.
01:06:44.000John's Church across the street was set on fire.
01:06:47.000A guard post at the White House was set on fire.
01:06:49.000Here's what both of those events, those dates have in common.
01:06:52.000Without question, the government was involved, was inciting in both of those instances.
01:07:00.000This is incredibly frustrating to hear, right?
01:07:03.000Like, we're sitting here, we've got a congressman who's been there for over a decade in Congress, right?
01:07:08.000So it's not like he doesn't understand how Congress works or what's going on.
01:07:12.000He's generally considered one of the most constitutionally sound congresspeople, and he's literally telling us that we have lost control of our government.
01:07:31.000For control to work, there has to be a feedback loop.
01:07:33.000And in that sense, yes, the feedback loop is broken.
01:07:36.000Because there's either not enough transparency in what's happening in Washington, D.C.
01:07:42.000for people to understand how to fix it through the ballot box, I think that's intentional with the Department of Education, which is something we harp on here all the time.
01:07:53.000It's like I was saying, the self-executing rules stuff.
01:07:56.000Like, the best thing that I can do as one person in there is to help provide transparency.
01:08:03.000So, you know, this summer we forced over 700 votes.
01:08:08.000Like, being on the Rules Committee, Chip Roy and Ralph Norman and I forced over 700 recorded votes this summer.
01:08:15.000That means they would not have been recorded votes if it wasn't for the fact that they made a stink.
01:08:21.000Congress's whole point is to vote on legislation, and they're doing their best to not vote on legislation because then they have to be responsible, or they could be held responsible by their constituents.
01:08:33.000Nobody wants to work anymore, Phil, come on!
01:08:36.000Why can't you just get the vote on the DOE again?
01:09:18.000I get nervous about mob mentality, but the internet video is so powerful.
01:09:22.000Like, you can raise hundreds of thousands of millions of people to go call their congressman at a certain time on a certain day tomorrow.
01:09:30.000We could tell everyone at two o'clock tomorrow to call Congress, and then we could remind them tomorrow, do it tomorrow again, and get what we want.
01:09:39.000But it's like, then that's like the mob, and I don't... I'm very concerned about creating a mob Okay, we're missing something here, right?
01:09:46.000Marjorie Taylor Greene came here and she said that basically what happens for a lot of bills is there's like 10 Republicans and 10 Democrats and they just go, meh, meh, no one actually votes and then she's like forcing a vote on it, right?
01:09:57.000So there are bills that get passed without a vote.
01:10:00.000Not as much anymore because when, you know, I started forcing votes and then three or four years ago a group of people like Marjorie started showing up and started forcing the votes.
01:10:29.000Why is it that with the Omnibus, they can squeeze in all this psychotic garbage, they can pass bills without a vote, but when it comes to the things that are reasonable that would be good for this country, it's like, we just can't do it.
01:10:38.000Well, now you're talking about FISA this week, which we got to the brink of having a vote.
01:11:26.000It doesn't have to be Osama bin Laden.
01:11:28.000Of course our CIA is spying on every head of state and every one of their chief deputies.
01:11:34.000So if you are targeting those foreigners, then you collect a lot of information.
01:11:40.000And there's Americans in that information, like your emails may be in there because it went through the same server, okay, that Angela Merkel's chief deputy stuff went through.
01:11:52.000So now they say they don't, the FBI and all these organizations, they claim they don't need a warrant to go into that database, which is enormous, and search for Temple's emails.
01:12:03.000And they don't even need probable cause.
01:12:06.000And so this has become known over the years that this is going on.
01:12:09.000First of all, Congress had to find out it is happening.
01:12:12.000And then the next people had to start caring.
01:12:40.000And it has some other good reforms in there.
01:12:42.000Right now the government buys information about you that they would otherwise need a warrant for But because they can buy it, they say they don't need a warrant to get it.
01:12:54.000So for instance, everybody's phone knows that you're speeding.
01:13:07.000But they sell stuff, not that kind of material, but very similar kind of stuff.
01:13:13.000And the government should need to get a warrant to buy that.
01:13:15.000Anyways, so we put all that in this bill.
01:13:18.000This week, we got it to the Rules Committee.
01:13:21.000There was an argument over jurisdiction, the Intel Committee, which meets in secret, and they're responsible for overseeing CIA, NSA, all those departments.
01:13:34.000Judiciary claim jurisdiction on the bill.
01:13:36.000The reality is there's joint jurisdiction.
01:13:39.000But if it's domestic spying, that is definitely the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee.
01:13:45.000Well, the Intel Committee said, we're going to blow this whole thing up if you don't agree to our terms of engagement on the floor of the House.
01:14:42.000Yeah, so literally the Intelligence Committee, which is prevented specifically by this specific amendment, is literally derailing Congress so that way they are not limited by the thing that exists currently to limit them.
01:15:25.000We didn't like them, but we said, OK, as long as we can have a fight and force everybody to take this vote on the floor of the House on whether you need a warrant or not.
01:15:33.000And then they... So it's Mike Johnson's fault?
01:15:37.000I don't want to say his fault completely.
01:15:42.000Like, if he had forged forward and tried to get it to the floor, they were going to take down the rule.
01:15:49.000Now that means they were going to try to keep the bill from coming to the floor because they were going to vote against the rules for the bill.
01:15:56.000Which is, again, one of those procedural things that nobody gets blamed for, right?
01:16:14.000The Intel Committee is called a select committee.
01:16:17.000What that means is, There's no meritocracy, there's no steering committee that decides who goes on Intel Committee.
01:16:24.000The Speaker of the House puts them on that committee.
01:16:26.000So, if the Intel Committee refuses to play ball, they refuse to be involved, then the Speaker should remove them from the committee and put people on that are willing to go?
01:16:37.000But, okay, so let's say the Speaker does that to 20 Republican members of the Intel Committee, including the Chairman of the Intel Committee.
01:16:44.000What if two of them just get ticked and quit Congress?
01:16:47.000Then there's fear that you're gonna... Then we're not in the majority anymore.
01:16:51.000This is the weird situation that we're in.
01:16:53.000Anybody can form a gang, and so this week the gang was the Intel Committee.
01:16:58.000Last week it was the four New Yorkers who took out Santos, who started that.
01:17:04.000They formed a gang and demanded to have a vote on what's called the state and local tax deduction, where you can take your state and local taxes off of your federal taxes, which at first sounds like a good idea.
01:17:16.000Nobody wants to pay more taxes, but it actually benefits blue states like California and New York who are taxing the crap out of their citizens.
01:17:24.000And what it means is somebody in New York who makes, let's say, $200,000 a year won't have to pay as much for our military as somebody in Kentucky who makes $200,000 a year because the person in New York pays less federal tax because their state has taxed the crap out of them.
01:17:39.000So the New Yorkers were trying to make a political win, so they took the whole Republican conference hostage.
01:17:46.000A couple weeks ago and got a vote on that, which they lost.
01:17:50.000I think the reality is there's no Republican majority.
01:17:52.000There is a handful of Republicans that are actually Democrats.
01:17:59.000That's so it's like if they were to resign, I feel like having that's like, it's just like... Maybe it's more worse than having them be rogue.
01:18:07.000Like, Ken Buck may as well be a Democrat.
01:18:49.000There will be no trial, there will be no... There needs to be a significant majority that the Republicans can actually do something with, that's not paper thin, because right now they're like, with the MAGA kind of, you know, America First conservatives, and then the, what would probably be called the Establishment conservatives, they'll harpoon each other's ideas.
01:19:10.000You know, and I mean, I obviously have my own personal opinions on what should be done.
01:19:15.000I'm a small government kind of guy and, you know, I want it to be as small as we can make it and still function the way that we need to.
01:19:21.000But like, there's going to be significant pushback from not just the Democrats, but anything that actually shrinks the government is probably going to get pushback from the more establishment Republicans.
01:19:33.000The fiscal conservatives, and again, I've been following Thomas Massie's career since he got into Congress, and these guys have been pushing back against the same Leviathan forever.
01:19:43.000They've always, you know, Thomas Massie catches a lot of hell because he votes no on foreign aid stuff, and he's trying to be fiscally conservative.
01:19:52.000And it's just an uphill battle and then the government itself doesn't want to be regulated.
01:20:39.000I feel like we need more people that are willing to dispense with political parties and do what's right for the Constitution and the country.
01:20:45.000Like, it was George Washington's main thing, stay away from political parties, they're bad news.
01:20:57.000It tells the federal government, no, you can't do this, no, you can't do that, no, you can't do this, no, you can't do that.
01:21:02.000The federal government fucking hates that shit.
01:21:05.000Like, they want to be able to do stuff.
01:21:07.000Now we've got the federal government, you know, busy trying to get into, you know, bathrooms and whether or not you use the right pronouns and should that be something the government talks about.
01:21:16.000These are things the government has no business being involved in.
01:21:19.000I understand in modern technology with internet and the ability for countries to spy on us, we do need an adaptation to our constitution.
01:21:26.000We can't just sit here with our thumbs up our butts and be like, yo, just mail me your vote later.
01:21:30.000There's an amendment process that's fair enough, totally fine if you want that, if you believe that 100%, and maybe you're right, but there's a process and nobody wants to do the process because it's hard, and nobody wants to do anything hard.
01:22:08.000It's actually the basis of my lawsuit against Nancy Pelosi, which I'll find out Friday or Monday whether the Supreme Court's going to take up.
01:22:16.000So during COVID, I refused to wear a mask.
01:22:20.000I played along for a while because I thought, okay, I got to represent my constituents and if I can't speak and I don't But eventually Pelosi said, they said, when will you get rid of the mask mandate?
01:22:31.000And she said, when everybody gets vaccinated.
01:22:33.000And I said, whoa, I ain't letting this morph from a mask mandate to a vaccine mandate.
01:22:38.000So I led 10 members of Congress to the floor of the House during a C-SPAN footage and showed none of us were wearing masks.
01:22:45.000And so then I got fined by Nancy Pelosi, and the only way she could get that money from me was to reduce my salary.
01:22:56.000But the 27th Amendment, which doesn't have a lot of case law because it wasn't ratified until 1992, says you can't change a member's salary without an intervening election.
01:23:10.000And the founders debated this on why you couldn't, they were, the reason our, for instance, our salaries paid out of the Treasury and not by the states in the House of Representatives is the founders were worried that the states might withhold our salary and that we should be accountable to the people as House of Representatives, not to the states.
01:23:29.000The 27th Amendment, no law varying the compensation for the services of senators and representatives, shall take effect until an election for representatives shall have intervened.
01:23:38.000And that means that they would have to have, like, you'd have to run against someone that wanted to run against you in order for your salary to be changed after that election?
01:23:46.000And most people think it was just to increase it, but Founding Fathers said, if you can control a person's sustenance, you can bend their will.
01:23:54.000Would it have been that they'd have an election with just you?
01:23:57.000If she just wanted to change your salary, would it just be you would have to have an election, or all of Congress would be up for election?
01:24:02.000They did vote for a rule, which counts as a law in the House of Representatives.
01:24:06.000They voted for a rule on how to fine us, how to reduce our salary.
01:24:11.000So if she had put that in before the election, She could implement that rule and probably reduce my salary individually using that rule, but that rule was not in place for fining people for not wearing a mask.
01:24:25.000So she's in violation of the 27th, and when do you say you're going to hear from her?
01:25:15.000It says we can't be held accountable for anything we say in the House or do in the House of Representatives.
01:25:22.000That means he can go to the floor of Congress and claim that Ian Crosland kicks puppies for a living, makes money off it, and you can't do anything about it.
01:25:30.000And it sounds like a bad thing at first, but if you go look at what the King was doing to the Parliament, he would just bring up these little things and just tie you down.
01:25:39.000There'd be a Fonny Willis, there'd be ten of them for every member of Congress trying to litigate every word we say or everything we put on X. But now you get people like, you know, Jamie Raskin or Adam Schiff who will Correct, and that's the price you pay.
01:26:18.000So the judges in the circuit court, the district court, they said two things.
01:26:22.000You get to make your own rules and Nancy Pelosi is covered by the speech or debate clause because this was an official activity that she undertook as a member of Congress.
01:26:31.000And to your point, Tim, the 27th Amendment, if they don't take up our case and reverse this, the 27th Amendment's not enforceable.
01:26:39.000We should just go give ourselves a pay raise because it's an official action covered by the Speech or Debate Clause.
01:26:46.000Saying what she wants to say is different than changing your salary.
01:26:49.000What's Speech or Debate about salary here?
01:26:52.000Well, she had to basically like utter the words to make the bill come into existence, so it's covered.
01:27:00.000There's a lot of case law that says that's covered.
01:27:03.000I, you know, maybe we just need some Republicans to start accusing Democrats of egregious activities.
01:27:11.000Well, I don't want to repeal the speech and debate clause because that would be bad for senators to get down.
01:27:19.000Lie about them as much as you can, and if you can lie and throw them in jail, lie and throw them in jail.
01:27:24.000We have a republic that works with an ethical society.
01:27:32.000So I have a theory that liberalism has a blind spot and liberalism is vulnerable to authoritarian ideologies because authoritarian ideologies don't value things like honesty, integrity, truth.
01:28:05.000And you're right because the way that it plays out, that is the function.
01:28:09.000But from my perspective, the point that I'm trying to make is it does boil down to a difference of like entire philosophy of the way that the world works and how government should be approached and stuff.
01:28:21.000And we talk about the rules and we talk about all of these protections that are in the Constitution, etc.
01:28:26.000But if the people, as in the population, don't want representatives that care about those things, and apparently, if you look at the people that make up Congress, they don't want those things, these things don't matter to the population, what do you do?
01:29:29.000And what you do is, there's clever things you do.
01:29:31.000So, there was this guy who made this video, where he bought the Apple Vision Pro, right?
01:29:36.000He's driving in his car, wearing it, and doing the weird little things with his fingers, And he literally was driving his car while wearing a headset.
01:29:43.000He then, in the video, it shows cops behind him with their lights on, and he's looking, and he's making it seem like he got arrested, when in fact what he did was, they drove until they saw police, pulled over, and made it seem.
01:29:55.000So what you do is, when Adam Schiff, at any point, gets up and like runs out of the room, you film it, and then you can tweet, Adam Schiff soiled himself.
01:31:00.000I mean, I know people want us to fight, but some of the fights just don't make a lot of sense.
01:31:09.000You said last time, I think you were on the show, you're talking to this like emotional people have become like emotionally overridden in that reason or logic or something.
01:31:16.000Well, look, I mean, that's the default setting.
01:31:18.000I made the point about taking two full gallons of whole milk and dumping them on the floor.
01:31:22.000And it's because my attitude right now is There is a tidal wave washing everything away, and all we're talking about doing is swimming against it.
01:31:33.000So, when you're saying there's certain fights that don't, it doesn't make sense to fight those fights, and then there are some where it's like, we gotta get this one done, for every 100 negative things, there's like, what, two or three good things, and it's just, we're rolling downhill.
01:31:46.000At a certain point, I'm like, just chuck the gallon of milk on the floor and just make it smell bad or whatever, and then I'm out.
01:31:52.000It does nothing, but what else could be done?
01:31:55.000Here's the one fight we should be having, and if everybody cared about winning, they'd be focused on it, and it's the funding fight.
01:32:02.000Because the only bill that has to pass every year is the spending bill.
01:32:07.000Everything else can be paused, suspended.
01:32:16.000We control the House, we don't control the Senate, we don't control the White House, but we do know the Senate is going to pass the spending bill, and we do know Joe Biden's going to sign it.
01:32:24.000So literally 99% of our effort, if we're just trying to win a victory instead of be symbolic and preen and virtue signal to our constituents, 99% of our efforts should be on that spending bill.
01:32:39.000But it does sound like the intelligence agencies will walk into Speaker Johnson's office and they'll have a manila folder they'll place on the desk and slowly open it.
01:32:48.000There's a picture of JFK that will slide across the table and he'll say, I will do anything you say.
01:33:05.000You could be walking from a supermarket in a botched robbery!
01:33:09.000You could be like an IT guy who's like, working on an email server, but you're on your way home from work, and then all of a sudden someone tries to rob you and you die, but they never actually take your stuff!
01:33:17.000Yeah, is the crime in DC actually a cover for the government using, like, authoritarian thug tactics?
01:33:25.000Like, you send people up to beat up people walking around?
01:33:27.000Is that why they want the crime to go up?
01:33:29.000So that way you can just be like, it's plausible deniability?
01:33:55.000One of the early episodes, a congressman does cocaine in a trailer with this college friend to get some dirt on another college guy.
01:34:03.000And I thought, that's just ridiculous.
01:34:04.000And I had just gotten elected to Congress.
01:34:06.000I was going to say, were you in Congress yet?
01:34:09.000I had just gotten elected, that's why I was watching the show.
01:34:11.000And then I was like, that's stupid, I'm going to quit watching.
01:34:14.000Two weeks later, my colleague gets arrested for buying cocaine at Union Station.
01:34:20.000Trey Radle, from Florida, a congressman.
01:34:25.000I like Trey Radle, but if there was anything he was guilty of, it was lack of imagination.
01:34:30.000You can't imagine that they're waiting at Union Station to arrest congressmen who are buying cocaine.
01:34:36.000Can you get somebody to go buy it for you?
01:34:41.000If you're a member of Congress and you're caught buying drugs, I'd imagine the first thing they'd do is say, you're going to vote the way we want you to vote from now on.
01:35:08.000You were expecting certain people to pass you in the hallway?
01:35:11.000I was getting PTSD on the weekends watching this, but then I realized there's one element of the whole House of Cards that got wrong that is nothing like Congress.
01:35:20.000I couldn't watch it again once I saw this.
01:35:22.000In House of Cards, there's a guy with a plan.
01:35:27.000There is nobody in Congress who's had a plan that's lasted more than two weeks.
01:35:35.000At least, you know, what was his name?
01:35:52.000I think the piecemeal bills, putting ten pieces of one bill scattered about in a bunch of other bills that get passed, that activate upon, you know, certain conditions.
01:36:11.000I was thinking more like Exodia from Yu-Gi-Oh.
01:36:15.000If anybody understands that right, Dane is probably cheering right now.
01:36:18.000If it, like a plan, like retrofitting our economy to a hydrogen fuel-based hybrid gasoline-hydrogen fuel economy, would you, if someone had that plan and they talked about it a lot in Congress, inspired other congressmen, stood up and talked about it in speeches, gave numbers, patterns, like that kind of thing, are you going to run?
01:37:43.000If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, and head over to TimCast.com.
01:37:49.000Click join us, because the members-only uncensored show will be a whole lot of fun.
01:37:54.000We're gonna talk a bit more about Congress, and there's certainly more questions to be had, but for now we will read your Super Chats.
01:38:00.000Alright, Zachary McCoy says, first baby!
01:41:22.000A state seceded from another state and it stuck.
01:41:25.000I'm torn on it because it was dirty, but I'm glad it happened.
01:41:29.000So the general idea is when all of the Virginia men who lived in the area were off fighting, the people who were not fighting voted to secede.
01:41:40.000Then after the war ended, Virginia was like, yo, this is not legit, and the Supreme Court was like, it's totally fine, and they get to stay.
01:41:45.000And now West Virginia is like, second most, second most based.
01:41:48.000Wyoming, I guess, is considered the most based.
01:41:51.000But that's because they're actual people who know how to survive.
01:41:53.000West Virginia's got a lot of mountain people, so they know what's up.
01:41:56.000But West Virginia is best Virginia, so.
01:41:58.000All right, Barely a Millennial says, Rep Massey, how do you prepare yourself to go into the lion's den every day?
01:42:03.000Is it really so difficult to not be corrupted?
01:42:05.000Also, shout out to my rep, Victoria Spartz.
01:42:27.000I have the Cluck's Capacitor, which is an invention of mine, which is basically a giant Roomba with several, a bunch of chickens in it that moves in the yard and takes the chickens with it.
01:42:50.000You know, that may be impressive to some, but we have a chicken city, and we're gonna be building Neo Chicken City.
01:42:57.000So first, we had the small chicken coop, double layer fencing in this box, and there was a little thing I would lift up to open the door in the morning so the chickens could come out.
01:44:23.000I want to lay it down, partially buried, and put the chicken's roosting bar across over it so that every day we have a live camera and you see Lenin's face getting spattered with chicken shit.
01:44:36.000And I think it would be one of the greatest accomplishments of my life, and I think the audience of this show would greatly appreciate it.
01:44:43.000I think that Chicken City could become one of the most popular shows among conservatives and libertarians, and just anyone who hates communism in general, and they can just know that no matter how bad your day gets, you can always go to chickencitylive.com and watch a chicken take a dump on Lenin's face.
01:46:39.000Yeah, and then just put the roosting bar right above it, and so just every day it's just... And you can watch, and it will bring joy to those who have suffered under the hands of communism.
01:46:49.000I hope one falls right here, so it looks like he's crying chicken shit.
01:47:10.000There's so many things that are less than $60 billion that we could do that we say we don't have the money for, but when it comes time to send it to Ukraine, nobody asks how you're going to pay for that.
01:47:28.000You know, Biden sent a letter to the House of Representatives recently extolling the virtues of all the military spending.
01:47:35.000They don't call it the military industrial complex anymore, they call it the Defense Industrial Base.
01:47:41.000So the MIC is now the DIB, if you're keeping up with the terminology, but he listed all the states that would benefit from spending all this money in Ukraine.
01:47:51.000I just, I want to go back to the Lenin thing.
01:47:53.000I just, I'm thinking about if we made our own statue of Lenin and had, it just doesn't punch.
01:48:39.000It's important because, ask yourself what matters in this world, right?
01:48:44.000If someone came to you and said, I will give you a great castle for which you can live in, I ask myself, well, who will take care of the castle?
01:50:34.000The Statue of Lenin has its own Wikipedia entry.
01:50:39.000When we buy this and desecrate it, they will update its Wikipedia entry and the image of it will no longer be this beautiful picture from Seattle.
01:50:49.000Remember who's going to do the update?
01:50:58.000But so right now, if you go to the Wikipedia for Statue of Lenin, it shows just the statue and there's a tree and there's like a walkway and it's in the city.
01:51:06.000But, if we take it, and we cover it with chicken shit, that will be the photo they must use.
01:52:02.000When I'm on my deathbed, people are gonna ask me, like, what did you do with your life that mattered the most?
01:52:08.000And the first thing I'm gonna say is the people I care about my life, my family, everything we do is for them, obviously.
01:52:14.000But if you're asking me about career and accolades and accomplishment, I don't know what could top taking the Statue of Lenin and having chickens shit all over it.
01:52:25.000You know, like, if I was ever to run for office and was, like, in Congress, I'm sorry, Rep Massey, but I would not care at all relative to having chickens shit all over Lennon.
01:52:34.000I mean, that's something that can't be bought.
01:53:10.000That being said, they may be a bit more academic and say, that's kind of crude and we're trying to be very serious and highlighting the terrors of communism.
01:53:20.000And I would just be like, I just don't like communists, you know, so we want to do this, but you know, we'll figure it out.
01:53:27.000All right, Ricky M says, since Donald Trump is gaining popularity among Gen Z, how long until the Dems start shouting, we need to repeal the 26th?
01:54:31.000And also, I mean, I'm not, I'm not, everyone knows that I'm not the biggest democracy lover and the fewer people vote, the better, the happier I am.
01:54:37.000I have a bill that's in this zip code.
01:55:33.000In judiciary, I passed a bill out of committee, and I got every Democrat and every Republican to vote for it, and it's a pro-Second Amendment bill.
01:56:08.000They use phonetically similar names and similar birthdays.
01:56:12.000They don't even go on exactness, because they kind of want it to be sloppy, because the more people that get denied, the fewer guns there are.
01:56:19.000But what I discovered in talking to some people who've studied this, is that's inherently racist.
01:56:26.000The system is, if you're a black male, you're three times more likely to get falsely denied purchase of a firearm than a white male.
01:56:35.000Within ethnic groups and races, you share similar first names and surnames.
01:56:43.000And if you are, because there's so many black males incarcerated, Or have been, and we can talk about over-incarceration, some of that is wrong.
01:56:55.000You are more likely, when you go to buy a gun, to share a similar name with somebody who's, if you're a black male, with a black male who has a disqualifying condition, i.e.
01:57:07.000So the bill that I got passed today in the Judiciary Committee, the House of Representatives says the FBI has to give us all of that data they already collect on the form 4473 and tell us statistically, we don't want individual knowledge of these people by race, ethnicity, country of origin, and sex.
01:57:29.000What the denial rates are and what we are going to prove and the FBI is going to give us the data is that this sloppy Knicks background check system has a racial bias in it.
01:58:31.000All the commies in Seattle and all the leftists will collectively lose their minds.
01:58:34.000And you know, I gotta be honest, if they find out that I'm doing this, if we actually make big moves on this, they may get into a bidding war to try and protect their communist statue.
01:58:46.000Sean says, Tim, make a shirt with a toppled Stalin statue and chicks furiously pooping on him and his quote, you have to crack a few eggs to make an omelet.
01:59:03.000Some of the statues are hard to get a hold of, like all of the Civil War monuments that have been removed.
01:59:08.000of Lenin. Who cares? It's sort of funny to me how people are like, I've already looked into this. I've already
01:59:13.000considered this idea. We were going to build a statue but it's too much money. Some of the statues are hard to get a
01:59:17.000hold of, like all of the Civil War monuments that have been removed. They make it very, very difficult
01:59:21.000for people to get their hands on them. This apparently was a Lenin quote.
01:59:24.000If you want to make an omelette, you have to be willing to break a few eggs.
01:59:27.000Cord Wilkinson says, I will pick up the statue and deliver it, no charge.
01:59:32.000I really, really want to make this happen.
01:59:34.000We have to do trenching, which can cost a little bit, because we need to dig out enough to where we can position it at an angle.
01:59:39.000And then, I just think it would be so fantastic to see chickens just jumping up on it and pooping and doing chicken stuff.
01:59:44.000But alright, my friends, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, and you can watch the members-only uncensored show coming up in just a few minutes with Rep Tom Massey, and it's gonna be a lot of fun.
02:00:00.000We will, usually not so family-friendly, but we hope to see you there.
02:00:03.000As a member, if you sign up right now at, well, it may be too late to get your questions in, but for our uncensored shows, if you're a member for at least six months, or you sign up at the $25 per month level, We screen it by time or money to keep the weirdos out and the activists and the people who hate us, but you can submit questions and actually call into the show.
02:00:20.000You gotta join the Discord server, hang out with like-minded individuals, and that's where you can participate in the Uncensored show.
02:00:26.000So don't forget to also follow the show at TimCastIRL.
02:00:29.000You can follow me personally at TimCast.
02:00:32.000Rep Massey, do you want to shout anything out?
02:00:44.000And that's the freshest debt possible because you put in your Wi-Fi credentials and it's gone to Treasury and it displays the born on date of the debt right there in the upper window so you can see the Treasury published it.