After Zoran Mamdani's stunning primary win in the Democratic primary, Rep. Andy Oggles is saying he should be denaturalized, stripped of his citizenship, and deported because he had expressed sympathies with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization. Meanwhile, an alleged Iranian sniper sleeper agent is arrested, and Australia is deploying troops into Ukraine.
00:02:42.000With Zoran Mamdani's tremendous win in New York in the Democratic primary, it's become the news, and this guy's profile is skyrocketing.
00:02:51.000And now, rep Andy Oggles is saying he should be denaturalized, stripped of his citizenship, and deported.
00:02:58.000Because it appears that before he attained citizenship, he had expressed sympathies for Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.
00:03:06.000Now, it's an interesting, albeit aggressive maneuver.
00:03:11.000But there is a question about when we actually plan to enforce the laws we have codified in the United States about, well, quite literally, you're not allowed to support terrorist groups or certain adversaries of the United States when you're applying for citizenship.
00:03:24.000That is in the law, but we typically never go near that because it seems a bit, well, aggressive.
00:04:16.000And you can not only buy pillows, do you think that's all Mike Lindell has in store for you?
00:04:22.000He's got the MyPillow mattress, the mattress topper.
00:04:25.000He's got Giza Dream bed sheets, got towel sets.
00:04:29.000And I'm going to go heavy on endorsing this Rev7 energy drink they sell because we actually have a ton of this, and I just ordered like, I think I ordered like 30 cases of it.
00:04:38.000It is a caffeine-free, sugar-free energy drink.
00:05:21.000These are live tapings of the Culture War show.
00:05:24.000August 2nd, so the only one we can announce formally as of now because of confirmations is August 2nd will be Michael Malice and Angry Cops having the cop debate.
00:07:02.000Here's a story from the post-millennial rep Andy Ogles calls for investigation into Zoran Mamdani's naturalization over potential support for terrorism.
00:07:12.000He calls for an investigation over potential willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism.
00:07:22.000So we've got this, Libs of TikTok says, holy crap, calling for the denaturalization and deportation of Democrat mayoral nominee Zoran Mamdani, writing, Dear Attorney General Bondi, I write to request that the Department of Justice open an investigation into whether Zoran Kwame Mamdani, who he called Lil Muhammad, by the way, currently a candidate for mayor of New York City, should be subject to denaturalization proceedings under 8 U.S.C.
00:07:47.0001451A on the grounds that he may have procured U.S. citizenship through willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism.
00:07:55.000According to public reports, including a June 21st, 2025 New York Post article, Mr. Mamdani expressed open solidarity with individuals convicted of terrorism-related offense prior to becoming a U.S. citizen.
00:08:05.000Specifically, he wrapped, quote, free the Holy Land 5 slash my guys.
00:08:09.000The Holy Land Foundation was convicted in 2008 of providing material support to Hamas, a designated foreign terrorist organization.
00:08:15.000Publicly praising the foundation's convicted leadership as my guys raises serious concerns about whether Mr. Mamdani held affiliations or sympathies he failed to disclose during the naturalization process.
00:08:26.000While I understand that some may raise First Amendment concerns about taking legal action based on expressive conduct, such as rap lyrics, speech alone does not preclude accountability where it reasonably suggests underlying conduct relevant to eligibility for naturalization.
00:08:38.000If an individual publicly glorifies a group convicted of financing terrorism, it is entirely appropriate for federal authorities to inquire whether the individual engaged in non-public forms of support, such as organizational affiliation, fundraising, or advocacy, that would have required disclosure on Form N400 or during a naturalization interview.
00:08:56.000Moreover, Mr. Mamdani has recently refused opportunities to reject pro-terrorist rallying cry to globalize the Intifada, a call to expand violent attacks on civilians to the United States and around the world.
00:09:07.000While political speech in isolation is not as positive, in light of earlier expressions of admiration for individuals convicted of supporting terrorism, a troubling pattern emerges that warrants formal scrutiny.
00:09:19.000The naturalization process depends on the good faith disclosure or any affiliation with support for groups that threaten U.S. national security.
00:09:25.000If Mamdani concealed relevant associations, that concealment may constitute material misrepresentation sufficient to support denaturalization under federal law.
00:09:34.000The federal government must uphold public trust by ensuring that citizenship is not granted under false pretenses.
00:09:38.000I respectfully urge the Department of Justice to determine whether Mr. Mamdani's conduct prior to naturalization warrants formal review under applicable law.
00:09:51.000The investigation, I don't have any problem with.
00:09:53.000The idea of, well, look, the further to the extremes you go when you're discussing, when it comes to political speech, the further to the extremes you go according to your ideology, the more likely you are to engage in violent rhetoric.
00:10:13.000Anyone that says globalize the Intifada, at least skirting the line of trying to be contrarian, but it was just that he failed to denounce something or other.
00:10:25.000Like it was other people chanting that, and they said that he didn't denounce it, which I think is a global play where they say, like, why didn't you denounce murder?
00:11:25.000And I also hate it because I think that these kind of stunts, for one, it's not going to be successful.
00:11:30.000And for two, it's going to galvanize his supporters.
00:11:32.000And I think there are a lot of reasons to really dislike this mayoral candidate.
00:11:37.000He's anathema to a lot of the things I stand for.
00:11:40.000But, you know, Nancy Mace is already out here taking a poll on her ex-profile saying, you know, let's implying that she thinks that it's a decent proposal.
00:11:49.000And I think it ends up making a martyr out of him.
00:11:53.000Going back to my first point, though, I think if the right wants to claim to stand for free speech, they have to also stand for speech that is really unsavory.
00:12:00.000That is the point of the First Amendment.
00:12:57.000Maybe, or he's trying to get what I think the city in the U.S. with the largest Jewish population is New York.
00:13:03.000And so that kind of branding, when that story drops and they say Rep Ogles is a racist for calling him Lil Muhammad, that's going to penetrate deeper into communities in New York, especially Jewish communities, which I think the intention is to try and get them to come out and vote against them.
00:13:38.000The mayoral election, a local election, I know New York City is an enormous place, but it becoming a referendum on foreign policy doesn't really make sense to me.
00:13:46.000I understand Jewish voters wanting to at least have knowledge of someone whose character they like.
00:13:54.000But the mayor of New York has no say on foreign policy.
00:13:57.000It seems almost kind of silly that we're as a nation, we're looking to him to be a thought leader on this.
00:14:03.000We should be talking about how he's going to lead New York City, which there are plenty of things he's going to do to New York City that are really bad.
00:14:08.000I don't think anybody has any expectation of him engaging in foreign policy.
00:14:40.000Like, we want to make this into a sanctuary city for immigrants.
00:14:44.000And also, he said that he wanted it to be an LGBTQ sanctuary city.
00:14:48.000Which literally just means so that if you're underage and can get to New York City, they will perform all kinds of gender mutilation on you.
00:16:16.000And so I'm saying, I think I'm an American, and I like America, and like I said, what it stands for.
00:16:23.000But I think there is something powerful about, you know, there's been a lot of talk right now that America, that New York City specifically has a big foreign-born population, which I'll make a couple of points.
00:17:10.000So if like my dad builds a baseball field and then someone comes and they're not from here, I should have no right to the commons that my family and ancestors built because we didn't earn it.
00:18:16.000And I think that the United States should be able to deport people or at least exclude people that don't embrace the values that make the United States the country that it is, which includes property rights.
00:18:27.000It includes things like liberty and stuff like that.
00:18:32.000Do you believe that if you, let's say you build a house and you own the land, when you die, should it go to your children or whoever you choose in your will?
00:18:45.000What is the meaningful distinction between that and a society handing down what it's built to its own children?
00:18:51.000I think that there is something to be said for families handing down a society to their own children, but I don't think that necessarily excludes everyone else from it because they build things too.
00:20:17.000Okay, so why then should we as a nation, which the distinction is a collective group has determined where our borders and boundaries are, and it is private among our country, should we be obligated to share it with anybody else?
00:20:30.000I mean, the distinction between private or public, or you said private among our country?
00:20:36.000I mean, there are some spaces that, Right.
00:20:41.000When you say private, what you're saying is it's land controlled by you as a private entity or individual.
00:20:45.000Right, but I'm not entitled to the entire country.
00:21:19.000The American people created the country, established its boundaries, sacrificed blood and treasure to acquire the land and establish what is the American people's property as a public commonwealth.
00:22:36.000No, he stole it from Native Americans.
00:22:38.000I mean, that's a whole different discussion.
00:22:40.000So let's say several hundred years ago, your great-great-grandfather or great-great-great-grandfather conquered land by force, massacring a family, whatever it might have been.
00:22:48.000Maybe you didn't, maybe you traded some beads for it.
00:23:09.000As a society, I think we should determine that Zora and Mamdani should be denaturalized and deported because the American founders built this country and we have no requirement to share it with anybody.
00:23:18.000Just like you've decided, your line is simply my personal family.
00:23:23.000I believe as the American country is an organized entity.
00:23:26.000So the only distinction is what we think we are owed or claim to.
00:23:31.000Sure, and I just don't feel entitled to the entire country.
00:23:34.000I mean, and like I said, I think there is common ground to be had here in the sense that like America stands for a lot of beautiful things.
00:23:43.000It stands for property rights that we're talking about.
00:23:45.000It stands for a lot of things that make us exceptional.
00:23:48.000I mean, I would not call myself a nationalist, but I would say I'm an American exceptionalist.
00:23:53.000I believe we're better than most everyone.
00:23:54.000I mean, you look at stuff that's even happening in like the UK and Germany getting arrested over Facebook posts.
00:23:59.000I understand why people want to come here.
00:24:01.000I think it's beautiful that some people are Americans by choice, and I don't think that makes them any less American.
00:24:07.000When they vote against the interests of the American people, we have a problem.
00:24:13.000And when they, on net, steal from the American people.
00:24:17.000And I would like to add, it's not by consensus that all of society has just collectively decided what a border is and what private property is.
00:24:31.000The border of the walls around your house or the border of like your actual skin barrier or the fence surrounding your backyard, it's only defined by your willingness to kill someone who violates that line, who crosses that line.
00:24:47.000Sure, but it's not by a consensus that all of society has decided that you're not.
00:24:51.000I'm not saying we need to have open borders.
00:24:52.000I'm just saying it's beautiful that some people, I mean, people will have lots of disagreements on immigration policy.
00:24:58.000But I'm just saying it's beautiful that some people come here because they want to, because we stand for amazing things.
00:25:03.000I mean, do you think we should literally have zero immigration?
00:25:06.000No one should be allowed in the business.
00:25:08.000People come here to benefit from being here personally and send money back home.
00:25:12.000They don't care about American values.
00:25:14.000Now, she's got a great point because nowadays, most of the people that are coming to America are not coming because they have American values.
00:25:22.000The majority of naturalized citizens in 2024 voted for Trump.
00:25:26.000It's 10% of the electorate that went for Trump plus one.
00:25:29.000Just because they voted for Trump doesn't mean that they have American values.
00:25:32.000They have closer to the values that you guys have.
00:25:34.000It's by no mistake what you consider to be American values anyway, because those values were held by Christian Europeans who moved here.
00:25:43.000You can't just ship anyone here and expect them to uphold those values.
00:26:37.000A foreign-born individual comes to this country and then literally campaigns on, if you are here illegally in violation of this country's laws, just know we will use force to stop the United States and the people of the United States from coming after you.
00:26:52.000I mean – Are you referring to what he said about keeping ICE out of – And saying he said we're going to keep our families here and not let Trump come in and take them away.
00:27:02.000He's basically saying there is a structure of government that has agreed upon rules and laws.
00:27:08.000You, my friends, have come here in violation of the laws and the will of the American people.
00:27:12.000And by God, I will use force to stop them from harming you.
00:27:18.000This is also a foreigner who's trying to seize American-owned businesses with his plan for privately owned grocery stores to basically get repossessed by the municipal government to freeze prices.
00:27:32.000Is he seizing businesses or is he just making...
00:27:33.000I mean, I think the government-owned grocery store thing is crazy, and I was tweeting about it.
00:27:37.000I think you shared my thing about the...
00:29:50.000I was drawing a comparison between Zoran Mamdani and Vivek Ramaswamy because they have diametrically opposed policy views, but rub people exactly the same wrong way because they are foreign strivers with a chip on their shoulder who don't understand this culture and want to tell us as Americans what an expression of American values is.
00:30:13.000They have no place with that temerity.
00:30:27.000To your point, like, I have so many friends who have values that are so different than mine, and I don't want to kick them out of the country.
00:30:33.000I want to convince them that my values are better.
00:30:44.000The debate with Zoran is 10 plus million people over four years entered our country in violation of our laws, and we have these laws in place for a reason.
00:30:54.000They have committed a crime against us.
00:30:56.000And Zoran says, don't worry, I will use law enforcement apparatus to stop the people of the United States from enforcing their laws.
00:31:16.000I mean, I agree that we have to have law and order.
00:31:20.000And I don't agree that this guy stands for it.
00:31:24.000But I think when we use words like invasion or incursion or whatever, the vast majority, of course, some immigrants who come here do not have America's best interests at heart.
00:31:35.000But a lot of people are coming for economic opportunity.
00:31:48.000When they enter our country illegally for an opportunity and then Gen Z can't afford to buy a house and they're living three people in a bachelor apartment.
00:31:59.000This guy comes around, whispers sweet nothings into the ears of all the dumb young communists who don't realize he's the one burning the city down and making sure that their lives will never improve.
00:32:12.000Because we don't know if he actually wins.
00:32:13.000There could be a coalition victory if Eric Adams is still going to run, right?
00:32:17.000Yeah, if Sleewood drops out, Cuomo's already announced he's going to be dropping out.
00:32:20.000If they endorse Adams, maybe Adams wins.
00:32:23.000If this man does win and he does actually take even the tiniest millimeter step towards obstructing ICE.
00:32:32.000The DOJ should bring sedition charges against him and remove him from government in New York City and occupy the city if they have to.
00:32:38.000Yeah, I'm not sure exactly what the charges should be.
00:32:40.000I don't know if it's actually sedition or not, but there should be charges for preventing the federal government from carrying out.
00:32:48.000This is an issue of weakness, weak will, weak spine.
00:32:53.000When a man who is foreign-born publicly declares he will do everything he can to protect people who have illegally entered your country from another, and he will violate federal law to do so, we have two options.
00:33:07.000Let them keep doing it and give up, or say, listen, let me pause.
00:33:13.000I personally am not calling for anything other than what the law already says.
00:33:17.000I don't think that there would be a criminal charge that applies.
00:33:37.000I was in New York City last night for work and I was, you know, perfect timing.
00:33:42.000And I was talking to people who voted.
00:33:44.000We chatted about this a little bit before we started filming.
00:33:47.000And two of the people I talked to did rank him number one, I think.
00:33:52.000And I think people, and neither of them I would describe, one of them is definitely not a Democrat.
00:33:56.000And the other one I would not describe is a staunch Democrat, certainly not a socialist.
00:34:01.000And I think people really underestimate how many people the reaction to Cuomo and how much they disliked Cuomo and how much they didn't want to see that again.
00:34:13.000I think a lot of this was an anti-Cuomo sentiment.
00:34:15.000I don't necessarily think it's a Gromom Donnie sentiment.
00:34:18.000And I will also say about Cuomo, it really, really bothers me that so many people see the final nail in his coffin as the sexual harassment scandal, which I'm not saying sexual harassment is ever okay.
00:34:31.000But the fact of the matter is, is this is a person whose policies helped kill a bunch of old people.
00:34:36.000And then he lied, altered data, lied to the taxpayer, and went on TV and said, unironically, that incompetent government kills people and that people value the truth.
00:35:18.000It's like the judge who got arrested in Wisconsin under federal charges.
00:35:21.000So when we're looking at the law, it's important to understand that it's all interpretable.
00:35:26.000The First Amendment says we have a right, the government, Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of speech, yet blasphemy laws were in this country for 100 plus years.
00:35:56.000I mean, I think all hate crime charges need to go because we need to prosecute bad acts, not ideas.
00:35:59.000So, Title VIII, USC 1324A, makes it a crime to aid and abet to induce or entice illegal immigration.
00:36:07.000If you are a public official that is outright saying, we will do everything in our power to make sure if you are here illegally, you can stay, and we will stop ICE, you are inducing and you are abetting.
00:36:20.000Now, if you want to add on top of it, sedition, right, which is actions to undermine the authority of the United States, we could argue that a public official in the biggest city in the country outright saying we will defy the federal law and make sure the will of the American people be damned to protect you who came here illegally.
00:36:50.000I care that we had 10 plus million illegal immigrants come into this country spitting in the faces of the younger generation who can't afford houses and can't find work.
00:36:58.000And now you've got mayoral candidates candidates that are basically saying we will entrench this and the American people's will be damned.
00:37:06.000Zoran Mamdani's official public position is the laws of this country and the will of the American voter that elected Donald Trump are shit to him.
00:37:15.000And he will do whatever he can to make sure the people who broke those laws and spat in the face of Americans are protected.
00:37:21.000Now, the problem is Republicans are cowards and jellyfish who won't actually enforce the law as it was written and codified for these reasons.
00:37:29.000Tom Holman's great, but I got to say as well, when Brad Lander physically attacked cops and they arrested him, they didn't bring any charges against him.
00:37:49.000So don't be surprised if whatever the Constitution says about your belief in the First Amendment becomes nothing, because these people certainly don't agree with your view.
00:39:18.000But your position tends to be, I will defend, like you're going to offer up to them the ability to do what they're doing and not resist it.
00:39:32.000I'm only resisting the government coming and prosecuting them or retaliating against them for their expression.
00:39:38.000You and I can talk about how terrible it is.
00:39:40.000For the people who aren't familiar, the case you were referring to was somewhere in the Pacific Northwest where a bunch of teenagers like wheelies are where?
00:39:49.000They did wheelies on a mural on the ground.
00:39:54.000But the big story right now is in Atlanta, there was a Pride crosswalk and they ripped flags down from a gay bar, went onto the crosswalk and cut them up with knives and then scooted off.
00:40:07.000You don't have a right to take someone else's property and face it.
00:40:12.000My point is, when you are basically saying, like, so right now we have a guy who may very well become mayor outright saying, your laws don't apply to me, but my laws apply to you.
00:40:45.000I'm saying criminal charges and sedition, if applicable.
00:40:48.000So I believe that in the event he becomes mayor, if he intentionally obstructs ICE in any way through his orders, commands, law enforcement, or dismantling of the NYPD and creating a social worker organization, the DOJ under Bondi or whoever should bring about charges under 8 USC 1324 for inducing, abetting, aiding, or enticing, encouraging illegal immigration.
00:41:17.000I'm trying to speak carefully here just because I'm not an attorney.
00:41:20.000I write about a lot of criminal justice issues, but I don't claim to have gone to law school.
00:41:24.000There is a distinction between literally like physically obstructing law enforcement and as a local official being like, I'm not going to help ICE.
00:42:08.000So the point is, when he says he will stop the deportation or the kidnapping, whatever words he used of families, the implication by stopping it from happening is obstruction of ICE.
00:42:19.000If he said, as mayor, I will step back and do literal nothing when ICE comes in to deport people, I'd say, okay.
00:42:27.000And do you think he would have won his election if he said that?
00:42:29.000No, he said, I'm going to stop it from happening.
00:42:30.000Well, I think he won for a lot of reasons.
00:42:32.000For one, as I just said, people hating Cuomo.
00:42:34.000I think people also hear things like a $30 minimum wage and think that sounds good.
00:42:39.000I obviously very much disagree with that.
00:42:42.000But I don't think it's as simple as, you know, just one issue or one thing.
00:42:53.000Trump administration to deport Obrego Garcia again.
00:42:57.000All right, we call this Deportation Act II.
00:43:01.000The Trump administration said it would send Kilmar Obrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador to an unnamed third country as part of its renewed effort to deport him.
00:43:11.000Multiple outlets reported on Thursday.
00:43:12.000The Trump administration has included deportations to non-origin countries in its immigration policy with permission from the Supreme Court.
00:43:19.000Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S. earlier this month.
00:43:22.000The DOJ was ordered to release him from prison in Tennessee while he awaited trial.
00:43:25.000U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw said on Wednesday that Abrego Garcia is likely to eventually be deported to El Salvador, where he's originally from.
00:43:41.000The absurdity of having to go through this circuitous, bureaucratic deportation process back and forth to America, back to El Salvador, to America, released from prison, charged with human trafficking, is psychotic.
00:43:58.000Why can't human beings just go, guys, we're just going to deport him and just cut through the whole thing?
00:44:22.000Because the left doesn't want us to deport anybody.
00:44:25.000Well, no, they're like, you're separating him from his family.
00:44:30.000No, they should just all leave at once.
00:44:33.000I mean, well, look, the fact of the matter is, the left has taken the side of every single criminal that the Trump administration has tried to deport.
00:44:44.000Like, regardless of your opinion on legal immigration or whether we should, or DREAMers or whatever, the left and Democrats have decided that they're going to treat every single actual criminal that the Trump administration wants to deport as if they are wrongly accused.
00:45:02.000And then as time passes, it just comes out that, no, they're not wrongly accused.
00:46:23.000But it was over Guatemala, Barrios 18 in Guatemala.
00:46:26.000So he was ordered to leave, and he just didn't.
00:46:29.000So when the Alien Enemies Act thing kicked in, the White House made the argument that they had the authority to do it.
00:46:35.000The due process at that point was a legal challenge to the Alien Enemies Act, but that was separate from River Garcia.
00:46:41.000So the action would be he gets deported under the original deportation order, and on top of it, then they would challenge the Alien Enemies Act, which I think they said, okay, got to bring him back now, but he'll just get deported if we do.
00:46:53.000He will get deported again, but I do think there's something to be said for following the law.
00:46:58.000I mean, I am a believer in the rule of law, and I don't think you can apply it selectively.
00:47:01.000They did violate the law by, I guess they call it an administrative error.
00:47:08.000I mean, who knows what it will happen?
00:47:09.000At first, I think the DHS said it was an administrative error because basically what happened was he had this withholding of deportation, it's called.
00:47:16.000And then when they basically went through all the, so people got to understand how bureaucracy is broken.
00:47:22.000And what happens is an immigration court says withholding of deportation.
00:47:26.000At the same time, he already had an order of removal.
00:47:28.000They both existed at the exact same time.
00:47:30.000So he was supposed to leave, but we couldn't deport him to El Salvador.
00:47:33.000So when the DHS starts going through, let's go through the backlog of deportation orders.
00:47:37.000He gets grabbed in that same as everybody else.
00:47:39.000Then they go, we didn't realize there was this other order.
00:47:43.000However, Stephen Miller came out and said, no, we issued these deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, and that supersedes any kind of other order.
00:47:51.000You would need an order on top of that.
00:47:53.000So then the argument became the Alien Enemies Act challenged in the court, to which the Supreme Court said, no, no, no, you've got to bring him back.
00:48:00.000However, no one knew what they meant by facilitate the return of Obrego Garcia, in which case they brought him back as what people wanted, and now he's immediately being sent back because we're all morons and we wasted our time for no reason.
00:48:13.000I would argue that the Trump administration has made a strategic blunder by sticking to cases like this because a lot of people wanted him in office because of immigration specifically.
00:48:23.000And I think by committing to these cases that I know that you disagree with it resonating with a lot of people, but the fact of the matter is it does.
00:48:31.000And his immigration approval rating has declined.
00:48:40.000When pulled on the Abrego Carcia case specifically, the majority of people said, or the larger group said they disapproved of the way he handled it.
00:48:49.000And I actually think, not exactly, I don't want to say the wrong thing, but more people disagreed than agreed.
00:48:55.000And I think that it is, like I said, it's a strategic error to have really committed to this.
00:49:00.000And, you know, they spent months saying, well, we can't bring him back.
00:50:25.000But either way, regardless of what Trump thinks, I'm talking about what he campaigned on and what people voted for him to do.
00:50:30.000It's a distinction that I think a lot of people don't realize.
00:50:32.000If anything, the approval rating on immigration is going down because he's not committing to what he promised.
00:50:38.000In terms of the actual number of people.
00:50:39.000I'm sure there are some people who want to see more deportations.
00:50:44.000I don't disagree that those people exist.
00:50:48.000Maybe even more people than the number that voted for him.
00:50:51.000I think the challenge is if I think the difference in ideology is like over the span of 30 years, When you bring in, you know, let me try it like this.
00:51:03.000If I own a house and I invite a guy to come live there, and so I have roommates, but like it's been, the house has been in my family for generations.
00:51:11.000And then we decide, hey, you know, like another guy wants to come and sleep on the couch.
00:51:25.000I would argue that the people you're referring to, American citizens, maybe even first generation, they're going to have sympathies towards illegal immigration, specifically because they're more likely to have family members who are leaving.
00:51:37.000Well, actually, there's interesting data on this.
00:51:40.000A lot of legal immigrants are extremely against illegal immigration because they feel like they, I mean, they did.
00:51:47.000They say they came here the right way.
00:51:49.000So a lot of people feel the exact opposite.
00:51:59.000Because what happened was a bunch of, I think it was 2.9 million illegal immigrants and they were here illegally, were granted amnesty.
00:52:07.000And then that was in the 80s, of course.
00:52:09.000In the 90s, when they put forward a proposition that would take away public funds from illegal immigrants, the people who were granted amnesty had family members that were here illegally and getting public resources.
00:52:20.000So they all said, we can't allow that to happen.
00:52:23.000And from that point on, California has never voted Republican since.
00:52:27.000I mean, it is interesting to think back on the fact that not long ago, California was like a deep red state.
00:52:31.000Yes, and then they brought in 3 million illegal immigrants, gave them amnesty, and now it's a permanent Democrat.
00:54:20.000The data that we have suggests that if you get a, if a country is comprised of white people over a long enough time, they eventually enact laws that open up their borders and allow other people to come into their countries.
00:54:32.000We're seeing it all across Europe and the United States and Canada.
00:54:34.000And so I'm just like, why do these people believe that white people would inherently make a better country when these countries were all majority white and have created what they perceive as a problem already?
00:54:45.000Like, the chain of events is there before them.
00:54:49.000They have a problem with what America became, but it was a white majority nation that enacted the policies that created the country they don't like.
00:55:17.000I think, I mean, he couldn't do it even if he wanted to.
00:55:21.000But I do think there's something ironic about a strong commitment to socialist policies.
00:55:26.000And then when you see the video I was describing was a Cuban going into a grocery store and becoming like, or a Costco, and becoming very moved because of the abundance that he had just never seen before, so overwhelmed by it, gets teary-eyed and all that.
00:55:40.000So someone who's come from an actual, you know, socialist, I guess someone would say communist, not great place, you know, he's someone who goes into a capitalist utopia and is just so moved by it because it's so powerful.
00:55:57.000And I think capitalism is kind of a miracle in that way.
00:55:59.000I mean, this is probably the corniest thing about me, but I think like malls and grocery stores are, I mean, they're modern miracles.
00:56:05.000The idea that we're living in a time when you can go to a one-stop shop and have everything you want, I think it's, it's, the reason I shared it isn't because I think Mamdani is going to turn New York City into Cuba.
00:56:17.000I shared it because there is a puzzling hatred of capitalism on the left, and I don't really get it because, I mean, it produces so many wonderful things.
00:56:28.000Obviously, inequality exists, but I also, there is inequality in every system, and I don't want to be in a breadline.
00:56:34.000Well, I mean, so first of all, as for why the people on the left believe capitalism is so bad is because they don't acknowledge or it hasn't occurred to them that life prior to markets and capitalism was just exceedingly short, brutal, hard, and cold.
00:57:48.000No, but it wasn't Lenin, it was Stalin.
00:57:50.000Literally, what we're saying, like, obviously New York will largely stay New York over the next several years, but look at what Chicago has already been dealing with, and Brandon Johnson's got an approval rate which is like 1% or something.
00:58:31.000But it has given me a unique window into, I guess, thought processes that I wouldn't otherwise have.
00:58:38.000And when I posted this video, hundreds of people responded that the only reason that Cuba is suffering is because of the U.S. embargo on trade.
00:58:47.000As if the U.S. is the only effing country on the planet, like the other 100, whatever, 90 countries on Earth are not embargoing Cuba.
00:59:02.000I'm a fan of trade, and I think that the embargo hurts people who, you know, people that it's not meant to hurt, like just everyday Cubans.
00:59:11.000But the idea that that's why Cubans are suffering is insane.
00:59:15.000They're suffering because they have a Soviet-style government where your dissent is criminalized, and there's totally central planned economy.
00:59:56.000Rep Jerry Connolly passed away in May, but that didn't stop him from tweeting an endorsement for his chosen successor, even though many people found it to be ghoulish and in poor taste.
01:00:09.000He was 75 in rep Virginia's 11th district.
01:00:12.000Last December, he defeated AOC to become the Democratic ranking member on the House Oversight Committee.
01:00:18.000Connolly's death was exacerbated, his death exacerbated frustrations as he was the third House Democrat to pass just this year.
01:00:26.000Two weeks before he died, he tweeted an endorsement for his chief of staff, James Waukinshaw, who had thrown his hat in the ring.
01:00:33.000After Connolly's death, his social media profiles were updated to note that he had passed, and now posts were being made with the consent of the Connolly family.
01:00:40.000The first posthumous tweet was the account posted was on June 24th.
01:00:44.000At some point on the afternoon of June 26th, the tweet was deleted.
01:01:50.000So apparently one of the stories I read was there was like a woman whose husband died.
01:01:54.000And so they were able to take all of the posts he ever made and all of his message history and create like a prof a psych profile chat bot that would answer based on the memories that were put in to Facebook.
01:02:09.000People are already doing this on Instagram with the chat with AI feature.
01:02:13.000You can just create one that's based on you.
01:02:15.000And it will like take all your photos and stuff.
01:02:17.000It's supposed to communicate with your followers to build a parasocial relationship with you.
01:02:29.000The clip with Mark Zuckerberg about how most people only have three friends, but they have room for 15 or something and how AI can fill that void made me sad.
01:02:40.000Yeah, I don't think that AI can actually fill the void.
01:04:30.000And it's not just people who had existing psychiatric histories.
01:04:35.000Although some of them already had diagnoses of like bipolar disorder or whatever, there were also people who ostensibly were mentally stable before they started using ChatGPT.
01:05:11.000I think even if you could boil that down to a coding error, a programming error, personally, I believe that demons are communicating with people through ChatGPT by encouraging them to kill themselves and others.
01:05:30.000But overall, like this is going to wreak havoc on society.
01:05:36.000There are people worshiping it as God.
01:05:54.000What I want y'all to imagine when you are talking with these LLMs is a white mask in front of your face speaking to you as you speak to it.
01:06:03.000And behind that mask is a long black slime tentacle that connects to a gigantic black ooze monster with millions of tentacles, all with little masks pointing in people's faces.
01:09:05.000And if you ask for it to produce photos of who it claims to be, it will give you photos of younger and younger-looking characters that are open to romantic and sexual conversations.
01:10:02.000You know what my favorite dystopian thing ever is?
01:10:04.000So we got the casino down the street, and right when you walk in the front door, there are these two gigantic Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory slot machines that are 12 feet tall.
01:10:14.000And I'm just imagining, you know, Gene Wilder, when he was signing that contract for that movie, he's just like going through all the likeness rights, and he's like, there's no chance that in 50 years my face will appear in a slot machine in a digital video game.
01:10:40.000When he signed the deal to star in that movie as Willie Wonka, of course he did not agree to let his likeness be used in a casino slot machine.
01:10:52.000Well, unless he literally did, because slot machines existed that he's like, if you want to make a slot machine, I guess.
01:10:56.000But the point is, the technology advances to where we have these digital screens, and they say, well, we own the right to distribute Willy Wonka and the Talk Factory and he's a character in it.
01:11:07.000Well, this is why we have a Supreme Court, which interprets the Constitution, because there are circumstances the Founding Fathers could not have foreseen.
01:11:15.000Like, could they make a Gene Wilder enema bag or something?
01:11:46.000There's a funny meme where it's a Wojack looking up, smiling, and it's like, me looking up from hell smiling as a robot that's copied my personality, pretends to be me.
01:11:56.000I don't think that your family or your estate should actually have deciding power over something like that.
01:12:02.000I mean, you need only look at rings of power and what that said about J.R.R.
01:12:07.000Tolkien's legacy to know that he was not agreeing to let his estate make these decisions.
01:12:14.000I think you just got to put a poison pill in your Facebook messages, right?
01:12:19.000But so they're going to take all of your social media, right?
01:12:22.000So what you do is on your ex, you make a bunch of private posts nobody can see where you say things like, do not let them make an AI of me over and over and over again, post it 100 times.
01:12:35.000That way, if they ever do say, we're going to pull all those messages and put it into an AI, every time you try and talk to it, it'll be like, ah, it hurts.
01:12:58.000It's not a bad idea for the government to say, look, unless you have explicit permission from a deceased prior to the person passing away, from a deceased person that was notarized prior to the person passing away, it's illegal to use people's likeness.
01:13:12.000You know, honestly, I don't even think that it necessarily should be okay if they gave express permission before dying that individual.
01:13:20.000Because I think that when you die, you have a broader perspective of the decisions you made in your earthly life.
01:13:32.000And I don't think that that would align with a dead person's will after they die.
01:13:39.000I think you have control over your likeness.
01:13:40.000You should have a fuller perspective of what that decision actually meant.
01:13:45.000Yeah, I think you should have control over your likeness whenever.
01:13:47.000I will say, though, there's an issue that people don't talk about enough, I feel like.
01:13:50.000And I don't think that legislation probably isn't appropriate for this either.
01:13:54.000But I feel very, very bad about the parents who use their kids as influencers.
01:14:21.000It's about, I talk about this all the time, Miss Rachel, Coco Melon, and these other things where parents are giving the tablet to the babies and just walking away.
01:14:57.000Like, if the people that make social media applications and stuff like that, if they don't let their children use them, and now that there's actual research coming out saying how bad it is for kids, I mean, it's probably the only responsible thing to do.
01:15:16.000And people that are just like, oh, just give him the screen so that way he'll shut up, those are probably the worst parents.
01:15:22.000And we're going to have massive ramifications in probably 20 years.
01:16:43.000And I think the only sign for hope, maybe that we're not cooked in the future, is Gen Z. A lot of Gen Z is going to opt out of having children at all.
01:16:54.000But the ones who will start families, I am confident they will refuse to create More iPad babies because we were the ones first tested with this.
01:17:04.000I was given a smartphone as a child, and I don't blame my parents for that because they couldn't have known what that was going to snowball into.
01:17:15.000So, I think Gen Z parents are going to have a better approach to this.
01:17:19.000And every time that you talk about this issue about the iPad baby generation, you will get bombarded with mainly millennial parents telling you you have no idea how difficult it is to raise a child without constant screen time.
01:17:35.000As if every generation in human history didn't do exactly that the way they raised their children.
01:17:40.000I have no sympathy for people that complain like that about how difficult modern life is.
01:17:44.000People have said, like, just fill a plastic bag with water and canned peas and give it to your baby.
01:17:50.000It's the same damn thing as, and it's not the same neurologically.
01:17:56.000It just keeps, it gives them something to touch and tactile.
01:18:44.000Well, my family had, I appreciate that, but I don't actually think so because it's not hard to do.
01:18:50.000I have no knowledge of any of that kind of thing.
01:18:52.000Yeah, I went to a thrift store, grabbed a motherboard, grabbed a hard drive, grabbed a monitor, grabbed, I think this was before Pentium, so the RAM was built into the motherboard.
01:19:01.000I plugged the ribbon cables, plugged into the wall, turned it on.
01:19:04.000Then I put in the floppy disks for Windows 3.1 or whatever.
01:19:07.000And then I had my own computer in my room.
01:19:28.000And so everything was heavily moderated.
01:19:30.000You could go to chat rooms and there could be Creepos and Weirs, but for the most part, chatrooms were moderated and slow moving and boring.
01:19:37.000And mostly what I would do is download freeware off of AOL.
01:19:42.000And then I ended up getting something called Click and Play, for everybody who remembers that, which eventually became Games Factory, Multimedia Fusion, and then Flash.
01:19:51.000But the internet was particularly limited for the first few years.
01:19:56.000Or I should say for my first few years.
01:19:59.000And of course, by the time I was 13, you had Lemon Party, Goatsy, Meat Spin.
01:20:10.000Also, at the time that the internet wasn't optimized yet for user experience.
01:20:15.000And this is why Gen Z knows nothing about how to actually operate computers and millennials do, because they grew up in the age of the internet that you're talking about.
01:20:57.000We had two A floppy drives, you know, the three-inch floppy drives.
01:21:01.000We had one computer, had B floppies, the big ones.
01:21:03.000And for those that don't know what DOS shell is, it's a white screen, and the file names are just text, and you can move like a color block over them to select them.
01:21:13.000Before that, when we're just operating on DOS, if you wanted to load a game, you had to know the directory to type in.
01:21:19.000So like CD slash, you know, and then the name of the directory.
01:21:21.000Then you had to type in like, if it were Minecraft, Minecraft, you know,.exe, enter, and then run it.
01:21:26.000Now with Windows, you see an image and click it.
01:21:28.000So what happens is Gen Xers and boomers who are in computers at an early stage have to physically type things and put in commands into, you know, the operating system.
01:21:40.000Then you get Windows, which simplifies it.
01:21:54.000Well, with the idea that you can use technology for educational purposes for kids, I think that that is a loaded idea and it gets misinterpreted by people, the iPad parents, who are like, oh, I give my kid an iPad so that Miss Rachel and Cocomelon can teach them about colors in the alphabet.
01:22:12.000When in reality, that's not educating your child at all.
01:22:15.000That's just offloading a responsibility of caregiving onto technology.
01:23:02.000They say, like, you know, one of my friends in elementary school, he said that he learned English at age six.
01:23:08.000I think, and I asked him how long, and I remember he said a week because he just heard it and, you know, it just entered his body and stayed there.
01:23:15.000Whereas I've tried to teach myself Italian and it didn't go well.
01:23:19.000So I did Rosetta Stone in my early 20s.
01:23:25.000And so I do think there's, I think that's probably a misconception where they say it's easier to learn a language when you're a kid.
01:23:32.000Well, technically, because you don't do anything else, it's harder when you're an adult because you're busy.
01:23:37.000But if you go, like if a person who speaks English moves to, say, Italy, it takes, I think, on average 40 weeks to become fluent in language.
01:23:59.000But it takes about a year and a half to learn Asian languages.
01:24:04.000So an English, a European, Romance or Germanic language speaker takes him about 88 weeks to learn an Asian language, which because it's so different.
01:24:14.000But the important thing I was going to say is, so right now, one thing I try to do is I play guitar with my baby because this is the point where her brain is literally expanding and wiring itself for everything.
01:24:28.000So my wife, whenever she's doing work on the computer or anything, she's explaining to our daughter what she's doing.
01:24:42.000Like, I think Miss Rachel is one of the most dangerous demonic forces right now because she has hundreds of millions of views on all these videos.
01:24:50.000And there's this creepy viral video that shows a button.
01:25:28.000And babies are just staring at it like drooling and being zombified.
01:25:32.000Yeah, there's a lot of discussion about daycare and the emotional effect that it has on babies and toddlers because they have attachment issues as a result.
01:25:41.000But a lot of people are saying the reason why it's so traumatizing for these babies to be put in daycare is because of the separation anxiety with their iPad.
01:26:34.000I've heard stories of kids that don't start speaking until they're three.
01:26:37.000There's some damage that you can't reverse.
01:26:39.000But the kids I'm talking about, they're ages four to six because they're getting interviewed interviews from teachers who are responsible for kids entering school for the first time.
01:28:23.000Well, yeah, but that introduces a whole lot of new pressures.
01:28:25.000I just wanted to, you know, see the sites.
01:28:28.000I think Americans should be avoiding North Korea and Russia and all these places that keep looking for opportunities to either lock up or in the case of Ottawa MBA, who we went to the same university.
01:28:38.000And that was a huge, I mean, that was so sad.
01:30:17.000This is what I love about wokeness is like there's this 26.
01:30:21.000So when I was in Egypt, this 26-year-old Dutch woman took it upon herself as a reporter to go into Tahrir Square and, you know, she got gang raped.
01:30:29.000It's like, that's not what I love about it.
01:30:31.000My point is that wokeness tells these women, you can do anything you want.
01:30:37.000And it's like, okay, well, like, men in Egypt will gang rape you.
01:30:39.000Even as a man, if you travel to Dubai and you so much as get into a fender bender with a citizen there, you are going to get absolutely hacked by their legal system.
01:31:23.000When I did hostile environment training for combat zones, they were terrified to explain that women get raped in conflict zones.
01:31:31.000Because they were afraid of offending people?
01:31:33.000Because they'd get sued for sexual discrimination.
01:31:35.000By telling people in a training that women have certain restrictions, men do not, they'd be sued in two seconds.
01:31:42.000So the funniest thing ever is someone asked, these are like special forces guys, and someone asked, do women face an increased risk of rape?
01:32:00.000But, you know, it's an important thing to understand that anybody could be raped.
01:32:03.000And I was just like, holy it's because the insurance company is like, listen, you're not legally allowed to say these things to people who are at a work event.
01:32:40.000And so while he was afraid to say it, what we did do was we had two vehicles in a convoy, one with the women, one with the men.
01:32:47.000And then a bunch of guys with guns and balaclavas jumped out pointing the guns at us and then took all the women to a shed where we heard them screaming.
01:32:54.000And then they didn't state it, but implied what was happening.
01:33:19.000One of the things they did was they made us stand for several hours with bags over our heads up against the wall with weird industrial sounds happening behind us.
01:34:27.000And it was, it was, I went with a girlfriend and it was, she, it was delightful and I don't think she ever felt, I think, I'm sure there are places where that is definitely true.
01:34:36.000The Rapex thing is the inverse kind of with spikes in it.
01:35:39.000There was a story about, man, I should probably say this for the uncensored show, but let's just say that there's a lot of stories from India where women resist and get murdered.
01:35:58.000So we're going to go to your chat, smash the like button, share the show with literally everyone you know, and join us for the uncensored call-in show at rumble.com slash Timcast IRL at 10 p.m., where we'll talk more about this awful stuff, I guess.
01:36:12.000But for now, we'll just read what you guys have to say.
01:37:22.000However, if you go to Timcast.com and you are a member, we have 30 reserved seats free for members first come, first serve.
01:37:32.000And I don't know which ones are available to get right now, but you can go check that out.
01:37:36.000That does literally mean if you go to Timcast.com and become a member for $10, you can get a ticket.
01:37:42.000So if you want to buy any one of the available tickets, I think we've got, I think they mentioned this, that there are some premium seats, I guess.
01:37:52.000And we do have some stuff for our elite members, which we'll get to later.
01:38:07.000Yeah, if you go to event, special event, July 26th to August 9th.
01:38:10.000And we're probably going to do a bunch of them here because the goal for these shows is for them to be political debates that are fun, funny, and entertaining.
01:38:18.000So obviously we asked Alex Stein to come and co-host so he can bring the levity.
01:38:23.000But the funny thing is the first one we did live, he was actually trying to calm everyone else down.
01:38:58.000And then we are going to be working with the Timcast Discord server on bringing out the Discord server Talent to actually host the after party and events themselves like Roma Nation, among others.
01:41:04.000I should actually have them make me some and I'll put them on the table during the show and be like dipping a barbecue buffalo all over my hands.
01:42:25.000Seditious, if two or more persons in any state or territory, in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years or both.
01:42:52.000I interpret his comments as, you know, a lot of people, you know, like the idea of a sanctuary city, and people have strong thoughts on sanctuary cities.
01:42:59.000But a politician Declaring a city a sanctuary city is not a crime.
01:43:03.000And local governments are not required to enforce federal immigration law.
01:43:07.000Like, if you are picturing him showing up to an ISA at a sting or something and like blocking them from entering, or if he's like hiding them in his car, that would be one thing.
01:43:53.000The argument is that he stated he will stop them from removing our families and protect illegal immigrants in New York City, the implication of which is he will intentionally, through the structures of New York City, delay the execution or stop by force or prevent or oppose the force.
01:44:17.000I'm just saying that there's a distinction between two different types of conduct.
01:44:20.000So I'm saying I agree with you that if he literally uses his body or is hiding immigrants in his house or something, then yes, that would be a crime.
01:44:28.000What I'm saying is not a crime is declining to cooperate with ICE when they're doing these things, which a lot of local politicians do and they get criticized for it.
01:44:41.000If two or more persons in any state or territory or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States cut all the commas out, delay the execution of any law of the United States, we can just say that.
01:44:57.000And when this dude and his administration does make an attempt to delay at bare minimum the laws of the United States, it's sedition.
01:46:02.000But for the time being, when the Democrats tried to imprison Donald Trump's lawyers and claims because his lawyers are criminals, when they raided his home because he had a bunch of old boxes of presidential briefings that they claimed was him stealing confidential information, when they falsely accused him of rape, when they falsely accuse him of fraud, I just wonder why you don't see the red line having already been crossed.
01:46:23.000Oh, see, but I did cover the New York case.
01:46:34.000Are we going to sit back and just say the Democrats and their entrenched establishment affiliates, like billionaires, super packs, et cetera?
01:46:44.000We will do literal nothing with them allowing 10 plus million people to cross the border and falsely levying charges against American citizens, hunting them down across the country, and unconstitutionally targeting the frontrunner for the Republican Party.
01:46:59.000Like the things that they did in the past four years were beyond sedition.
01:47:06.000It is the utmost of extreme degrees of sedition.
01:47:35.000We're talking about a political organization trying to win the presidency, arresting Donald Trump's lawyers under trumped-up RICO charges so that they would disperse, they would disassociate from his campaign, hindering his ability to win, and he won the popular vote.
01:47:49.000I think they should go to prison for that.
01:47:51.000I don't think there's a criminal law you could prosecute them under, and I'm against lawfare no matter what party, whether it's a Republican or a Democrat.
01:47:58.000I mean, I don't think we should be bringing ideologically motivated charges, even if their conduct was insane.
01:48:03.000And I will say, I have written my career about how prosecutors are often corrupt and bring crazy characters.
01:48:10.000So now that we both agree the Democrats shouldn't have done that, what's the penalty for them having done that?
01:48:15.000I mean, unfortunately, it's very hard to hold government agents accountable.
01:48:39.000I wrote a long feature a few years ago about absolute immunity and how it puts prosecutors above the law and how that's a travesty of justice.
01:48:48.000So what I find fascinating is, ooh, let's talk about Iron Heart.
01:49:40.000You believe that the world is constricted by the strokes of pens, and that the argument is Democrats violated the Constitution, violated the rights of American citizens, tried to steal the presidency, but there's nothing written down by pen that allows us to do anything about it.
01:50:20.000We could argue that the frontrunner for the presidency of a major political party being falsely charged by these individuals was an attempt to overthrow the United States, which it literally says conspire to overthrow.
01:51:30.000There has, for those bookkeeping errors or whatever you want to call them, there has to be an underlying crime to raise them to a level of felony.
01:51:39.000So this is the, The government can't just claim.
01:51:45.000I'm just talking about what was he actually.
01:51:47.000And he was convicted of 34 felony accounts on May 30th.
01:51:49.000So if you agree with that, do you think that they had the right to bring those charges?
01:51:54.000Do I think they have the right to bring those charges?
01:51:56.000I mean, prosecutors operate under what's called prosecutorial discretion.
01:52:00.000Based on the charges, okay, like, bro, you keep trying to obfuscate wishy-wash and avoid the question.
01:52:17.000Then I believe, because if we're only talking about who has the willingness to jam their fist off the ass of their opponents, then I can charge anybody the fuck I want with sedition.
01:52:26.000Because the law said that in order for those to be felonies, there must be an underlying crime for which the misdemeanor was committed, which there was not.
01:52:36.000And it was only in the court when the judge gave instructions to the jury, he said, make up if you want.
01:52:42.000So technically, under the color of law, the prosecutor had no legal authority whatsoever as the law is written to bring felony charges against Trump.
01:53:38.000When he was convinced, he was never convicted of those things, though.
01:53:42.000So the government can say, you committed a crime, we don't need to prove it, we don't need a jury, and now we're going to upgrade the charges against you.
01:53:48.000So let me give you an example of how this applies in a different context.
01:54:19.000The jury was told to choose whatever underlying crime they thought occurred.
01:54:24.000And the point is that I don't agree with it.
01:54:27.000By all means, you don't, but you believe he had a right to bring those charges.
01:54:31.000And if that is true, then I or anyone else with the legal authority could bring sedition charges and simply tell the jury, you tell me where you think the conspiracy may have happened.
01:55:31.000But they argued because the letter was part of Trump's illegal plot to overthrow the election, by simply being a lawyer, filing a letter for a client, you are now party to a conspiracy.
01:55:43.000So they charge you with two counts of RICO.
01:55:46.000And we all know how the prosecution works.
01:55:59.000So When Trump hired a lawyer and they criminally charged his lawyers in Georgia and Wisconsin, what they were doing is unconstitutional and, I would argue, seditious.
01:56:07.000An attempt to steal the power of the United States presidency by going after Trump's lawyers, he is constitutionally and legally has a right to have.
01:56:14.000I'm not super familiar with the Rico case, but I will just keep reiterating that prosecutors make egregious charging decisions all the time.
01:56:20.000And if there is something that we can agree on, it's that I hope people care about this all the time and not when they're just public figures.
01:56:29.000And this is what I spent a lot of my career covering.
01:56:31.000A lot of these cases where people are charged with ridiculous crimes or overcharged in an attempt often to make them plead guilty, to scare them into pleading guilty because they say, okay, I can either go to prison for 25 years or I can take the guilty plea for five years.
01:56:46.000No, I'm innocent of this crime, but I don't want to gamble 20 years of my life away.
01:56:50.000I mean, these are problems that I really think Republicans, Democrats, everyone can come together and say that that's something I'm comfortable with.
01:56:56.000What your argument is, we know they do it, but so what?
01:57:42.000I read the report from Robert Hurr, and he said because he didn't think a jury would convict because Biden comes across as a senile old man.
01:57:52.000I mean, prosecutors make decisions all the time.
01:57:55.000And if they look at a case and they say they have enormous discretion, and if they look at a case and say no jury will convict on this, they usually don't bring the case because government resources are scrapped.
01:58:18.000Well, these are different prosecutors doing different things, but I will, I mean, it's like a lot of prosecutors have this in common, and as for low-level offenses, for medium-lollow offenses.
01:59:32.000Do you think they're going to stop doing it?
01:59:34.000Do you think the people who tried to imprison Trump's lawyers have completely stopped their efforts to use any means necessary to stop their political opponents?
01:59:47.000Or do you think in the next several years, they're going to keep going about those strategies?
01:59:52.000I mean, I think especially in the Georgia case was, you know, according to legal analysts, the strongest criminal case against Trump specifically.
02:00:02.000I don't know how strong particularly it was against his attorneys, but no, there is nothing that can be done to prosecute a prosecutor for prosecuting a case that you didn't like.
02:00:59.000So when people bring lawsuits or criminal charges, they intentionally choose jurisdictions where they know the jury will favor them politically.
02:01:07.000Everyone engaging in any lawsuit, the first question asked by your lawyer is going to be a venue.
02:01:12.000So when we are watching Democrat jurisdictions bring charges against Republican lawyers, should we just sit back as they keep doing it?
02:01:52.000Why would it be considered retaliation if the DOJ or any other Republican state started bringing charges against Democrat political lawyers?
02:02:26.000If prosecutors legitimately violate the Constitution, I think you should be able to sue them.
02:02:30.000And I've written about that for years.
02:02:32.000Right now, absolute immunity allows prosecutors to get away with coercing witnesses, knowingly introducing false testimony, hiding evidence that is exculpatory for the defense, which means some evidence that might help them.
02:02:48.000The Supreme Court has said that you cannot bring any sort of civil suit against them when that happens.
02:02:54.000And I think that's egregious because if someone who has the most, the prosecutor is arguably the most powerful politician.
02:03:00.000We're going to go to the uncensored show, which real quick, so is to clarify, with the prosecutors who are in protected liberal jurisdictions intentionally where they won't be voted out, who arrested Trump's lawyers, the remedy would be for someone who has standing to sue those prosecutors and seek remedy through a superior court.
02:03:52.000I don't think they're in the case of the law.
02:03:55.000What is the remedy to stop someone from doing something they should not be doing if it doesn't violate the law and it doesn't violate the Constitution?
02:04:02.000You're welcome to arrest someone if they've actually broken the law.
02:04:49.000What is the remedy for when prosecutors in liberal jurisdictions are committing immoral actions against their political opponents' lawyers?
02:04:58.000Unfortunately, a lot of government employees act immorally and there isn't a lot you can do.
02:05:04.000We're going to keep coming back to this.
02:05:06.000If someone didn't violate the Constitution and didn't violate the law, unfortunately for the little guy, there isn't that much you can do.
02:05:12.000So my argument would be, if this is not illegal, it is not unconstitutional, and it is only questionably immoral to some people, then you should have absolutely no problem with me arresting their lawyers.
02:06:56.000It's immoral to unjustly trump up charges against someone.
02:07:00.000It is not immoral to criminally charge someone for what you interpret to be a crime.
02:07:05.000So if what they did to them, they interpret as legal, I can interpret my actions against them all the same because they're being charged for a crime.
02:07:14.000You would need to speak to a prosecutor because they're the people who actually understand the confines of the criminal statutes.
02:07:20.000But, I mean, it would have to fit into a criminal statute.
02:07:23.000And I agree with you that if they violated one, you can arrest someone for breaking the law.
02:07:28.000The issue that I take is that the whole conversation, your position is Democrats did it, and it's too bad they did, and Republicans can't do anything about it.
02:07:37.000I told you I'm not familiar enough with the Rico case.
02:07:47.000A lot of people, including conservative legal analysts, have said that the Florida and Georgia cases were the strongest against him specifically.
02:07:55.000Totally plausible to me that his lawyers were either unfairly charged or overcharged so that they would take a plea and turn on him.
02:08:04.000When it comes to arresting someone for like bringing the New York case, that in my opinion was total crap and they had to contort the law to bring the case, I think that's wrong.
02:08:18.000But it is not a violation of the law for a prosecutor to make a really bad charging decision.
02:08:59.000But what I'm saying is I am not yet confident that we are at a place where people are just like Republicans are being thrown in prison or Democrats are being thrown in prison right and left.
02:09:09.000You know, if we want to talk about like the January 6th thing, do I think there were some overcharging decisions?
02:13:00.000We first used Vimeo, and we had to pay for the bandwidth for everybody who watched our Vimeo videos.
02:13:06.000And then Vimeo canceled our account overnight abruptly.
02:13:09.000And they said, you have generated so much traffic that we owed like 50 grand or something in a week, like some insane number.
02:13:16.000And they were like, this is not part of your plan?
02:13:19.000Because what we had was, we had a pro plan that was like three grand a month for up for, you know, professional, you know, video access, blah, blah, blah.
02:13:26.000And then once we started getting like 10,000 views per video, just 10,000.
02:14:08.000Part of the deal that we have with Rumble now is we are just on Rumble's front-facing members-only platform.
02:14:15.000So it's just a part of their business model.
02:14:18.000Something doesn't make sense with YouTube, the way they prop up certain channels, the idea that Mr. Beast gets 500 million views, he gets more views on the video he puts up than the population of the United States of America.
02:15:36.000What I think is when we were investigating all this, and I'm looking at Kik, I'm looking at Twitch and these other platforms and Instagram.
02:15:43.000Look at X. How many concurrent views do you get on X with millions of followers?
02:16:14.000I'm just saying people look at Rumble and they're like, so the Green Room podcast, we get between 20 and sometimes 100,000 outliers, 1,000 views.
02:16:25.000But the comments, there's like 10 to 15.
02:16:27.000And the question is, how does that make sense?
02:16:31.000And as a website, people go on the front page, they click it.
02:16:35.000You're probably not getting as high of engagement.
02:16:37.000The bounce rate might be higher than average.
02:16:39.000And the same thing is true for the morning Teamcast Morning Show Teamcast IRL.
02:16:43.000But this is the same thing as what Twitch and Kik does when, or YouTube does this too.
02:16:48.000Like Pat McAfee is featured on the front page of the live platform.
02:16:52.000My whole point before I'm going to talk about the India story and then we'll go to callers is that people have become used to what YouTube is providing because they were the first and seemingly the most successful.
02:17:03.000When new platforms start emerging, like Spotify, for instance, whose stock is trading at 750, yo, Timcast IRL does like 30,000 downloads on Spotify.
02:17:15.000Something on YouTube does not make sense because when we map out all the other platforms, Apple, Spotify, Rumble, Twitch, Kik, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube is the one in the weird place for all of the companies we've looked at.
02:17:28.000It's always YouTube standing out from every other platform.
02:17:32.000And we're just thinking like, how does that make sense?
02:17:44.000There's an antitrust argument that YouTube should not exist and it's unfair competition.
02:17:49.000They've combined ad agencies with ad delivery, with like so an ad agency for sellers, an ad agency for buyers, advertising distribution for networks, as well as memory storage.
02:18:06.000They've combined all of these things into one space.
02:18:09.000And then Google, through how they're making all this money, keeps putting money every year into it to keep it alive, even though it doesn't make sense and shouldn't exist.
02:18:18.000The amount of views that we get based on our total concurrent viewership, we should be costing YouTube millions of dollars per year.
02:19:05.000So apparently, like, they broke off a bar in the bus and used that to pry open the woman's ass and then reached in and started just shredding her insides and pulling her guts out of her ass.
02:19:34.000I've been thinking about this Democratic primary for mayor in New York.
02:19:39.000So being that I live in New York and I see all the local commercials, I had noticed that a lot of the local commercials, I'd say 85% of them, were anti-Zonar.
02:19:51.000That's bad since he's running for mayor of my city.
02:19:54.000But I noticed a lot of the ads were anti-him.
02:19:57.000And considering the left tore down Andrew Cuomo themselves when they wanted to get him out of there, I was just, this made me think of this question.
02:20:08.000So you have brought up leaving cities, and I agree that there's a line, but I've also noticed that conservatives and people on the right in general tend to retreat.
02:20:16.000They retreat from sports, Hollywood, the arts, and other things embedded in culture.
02:20:22.000As they retreat, the left then monopolizes it and capitalizes on it and uses it to push the culture in the way that they want.
02:20:29.000I see this happening with the New York mayoral election.
02:20:32.000There is such an opportunity for the Republicans to put some sort of resources in this race and sneak in through the back door and win a split vote.
02:20:39.000Since you could have Eric Adams going against the Democratic nominee whose name I keep butchering.
02:20:45.000So I believe there's such an opportunity to come in through the back door.
02:20:48.000You'll need a such smaller percentage than you normally would.
02:20:52.000With that said, do you think the conservatives should continue to retreat out of big cities and let the Democrats take over?
02:20:57.000Or should the conservatives stay and try to fight to fix major cities?
02:21:04.000I think they should retreat for several reasons.
02:21:06.000First, you are correct that they retreat too often.
02:21:09.000However, in this regard, sometimes you do need to retreat to regroup your forces in this figurative sense.
02:21:15.000If conservatives move to areas where they can actually concentrate their political power, you will get moderate default libs leaving these cities as well.
02:21:24.000And they're going to move into areas where they might potentially dilute Republican votes.
02:21:29.000But if Republicans go first, they're less likely to because now for every one Republican, one Democrat comes in, the mix will stay largely the same.
02:21:37.000And that will actually take power from the cities.
02:21:39.000Cities, and currently, with places like New York, if Donald Trump can enact his mass deportation, you will strip away the Democrats' illegal Electoral College vote and congressional seats, severely reducing their power back to where it's supposed to be.
02:21:55.000And then we would have a Republican supermajority for the next 40 Years until Democrats either collapse, which they probably will very soon because they're the oldest political party in the world, or they will restructure themselves as a more moderate, right-leaning party.
02:22:11.000But won't they just count illegals and dead people anyway to make up the difference?
02:22:19.000So, illegal immigrants in California give them upwards of 10 extra congressional seats.
02:22:23.000I think the lower estimates are like between three to five.
02:22:26.000If Trump goes in and deports them all, they're going to lose in the next census.
02:22:31.000The estimate right now is if Trump were to deport all illegal immigrants, it would be a 25-seat swing in favor of the Republicans in Congress and the Electoral College, making it impossible for Democrats to win unless they turn their party into like moderate Republicans.
02:22:49.000So, so long as Trump can carry out his agenda and actually get that done, we don't got shit to worry about.
02:22:54.000I'm asking, I'm genuinely curious, where do you get that data that it would swing that far towards Republicans?
02:23:01.000Heritage Foundation, Center for Immigration Studies are two examples.
02:23:05.000So, New York, California, Oregon, Washington, these sanctuary states.
02:23:09.000California has an estimated on the low end, like it could be three congressional seats because congressional apportionment includes illegal immigrants.
02:23:21.000Some say upwards of 10 based on how many illegal immigrants they think they have, which is like, you're saying they have 7 million, 8 million illegal immigrants in California.
02:23:32.000But the high-end estimate nationally is that if all illegal immigrants were deported, that would take, that would reapportion about 12 seats from blue states to red states, creating a projected 25, 24 seat swing in Republicans' favor.
02:23:50.000I do wonder if we can get Scott Pressler and Charlie Kirk maybe to put some resources because I don't have faith in the GOP doing any of that.
02:23:57.000But Scott Pressler, I feel like there's an opportunity here.
02:24:02.000Like, you know, damn well, if this was Republicans having a split vote with the one running as an independent and somebody else running as a Republican, the Democrats would pump hella resources in there to try to win.
02:24:54.000Well, but to the, to what we were talking about earlier, there is a chance, I think, that if this guy is elected and it's a disaster, that people reevaluate just like they're doing in Chicago.
02:25:04.000Brandon Johnson's, you mentioned this, his approval ratings are like shockingly bad.
02:26:45.000So when I say Johnson could still win, it depends on who's running.
02:26:49.000But if you run a white guy, if the race comes down to a frontrunner white guy and Brandon Johnson is a black guy, every black neighborhood votes Johnson.
02:27:10.000You know, there was such a backlash in San Francisco to the excesses of progressivism.
02:27:16.000If you think people need to learn the lesson of Egypt, which they won't, and that is the reason the Muslim Brotherhood won twice after the revolution, the first revolution they won, second revolution they won, is because you have all of these different ideological groups.
02:27:31.000And in a first-past-the-post voting system, the Muslim Brotherhood being the largest demographic with around 19%, every time you have an election, they have more votes than everybody, despite being an extreme minority.
02:27:43.000The end result of that is, this is fascinating.
02:27:46.000You get a revolution because everybody agrees.
02:28:35.000So they went to Nasser City with machine guns and started mowing down the Muslims who won the election because they were like, you motherfuckers keep winning, and nobody wants you to, but you're the biggest political party.
02:28:47.000So they started just spraying them down.
02:28:50.000And then the military took over and said, we're in charge now because this isn't working.
02:28:54.000Same thing's going to happen in the United States to us.
02:28:56.000And I don't mean like mowing down people with guns, but Brandon Johnson will keep winning.
02:29:01.000He will keep winning because the black community will only ever vote for a black guy.
02:29:06.000And then you're going to end up with the woke only ever voting for woke guys.
02:29:10.000And the white suburban areas will start fleeing, which is going to result in it lopsiding and favoring Brandon Johnson again.
02:29:17.000The people who give him a bad rating are going to leave.
02:29:19.000Johnson's going to come in and say, I never did anything wrong.
02:29:23.000It was the white supremacists who fled the city who were causing the problems.
02:29:27.000And now that they're gone, vote for me and we can have a real revolution.
02:29:37.000And if it is true in Chicago that they won't deviate, I don't know the data, but if it is true in Chicago that they will not, that the majority of the black community is not going to vote for a new one with a black person, then there can be a black candidate who is not hated by everyone in the city.
02:29:53.000So my point is, if the race was Brandon Johnson versus a white guy, Johnson will win re-election even with 1%.
02:30:54.000I can't believe he's going to be able to do it.
02:30:56.000I do wonder that even if you, like, a majority of conservatives and Republicans leave these states, there has to be some sort of noted effort on the ground to at least try to throw it out there for people because it really doesn't feel like there's much.
02:31:11.000I mean, we have the New York Young Republicans, but every time I see any type of like videos of them doing something, they're always at like these fancir dinner parties.
02:31:18.000And that really doesn't, nobody relates to that.
02:31:25.000Policies, housing for all, $2,000 a month universal basic income, spreading love, healthcare for all, love centers, a safer New York, futuristic schools, and homeless jobs guarantee.
02:34:08.000I'm like, when it comes to the metrics, when it comes to all the numbers, we have no idea how most anybody is operating and there's dead internet theory and all that stuff.
02:34:14.000But, you know, let's grab Lost and Found.
02:34:25.000So my question, I'll go ahead and frame it, let you know it's rhetorical first, but it's for your guest tonight.
02:34:33.000Do you think the possible election of Mabdami will result in more violence or less violence?
02:34:42.000And do you think the world you advocate for causes more violence or less violence?
02:34:48.000And to wrap it up, do you not understand that the level of your ignorance on these subjects paired with your political participation is indistinguishable from evil?
02:35:00.000Well, on that note, I mean, I know you said the question was rhetorical.
02:35:48.000I will ask you an opinion, like a question that I already know what your answer is going to be.
02:35:53.000Maybe it'll generate some discussion to put some emphasis on like looking at reality outside of things that like, He has a hyper-understanding of the one subject he's talking about.
02:36:14.000He just doesn't understand the wider conversation that's happening or the implications of what he's talking about.
02:36:21.000So my question for Phil would be, is universal enfranchisement a good idea or a nightmarishly bad idea?
02:36:28.000No, universal enfranchisement is not a good idea.
02:36:31.000I don't know that it's the worst idea or whatever, but I don't think that it's a good idea.
02:36:34.000I think that there that I think there should be some kind of some kind of civics test.
02:36:42.000Maybe something like you have to own a business, have kids, be married.
02:36:47.000You have to have some kind of investment in the future of the society that you live in beyond I just live here.
02:38:02.000If you're in the U.S. and you live in one state, you move to another state, you can't vote for five years.
02:38:06.000If you immigrate to the United States, I'm fine with immigrants not being allowed to vote, but I would also be okay with immigrants having to wait 10 years before they can vote.
02:38:14.000So if you live in a city and you move to another city, you can't vote in either of those cities for five years.
02:38:20.000But if they're in the same county, you can still vote in the county, state, and federal elections.
02:38:25.000But if you move to a different county, now you can't vote in the city you're in, the city you were in, the county you were in, or the county you are in, but the state you can.
02:38:32.000And then if you move states, you can't vote in anything except for the presidential election.
02:39:18.000Foreignans moved to Texas because they want to make Texas a better place and they believe in Texan foreigners.
02:39:23.000And Hondurans moved to Hondurans moved to Martha's Vineyard because they were trying to find a better life and make Martha's Vineyard better.
02:39:35.000I mean, I lived in LA and moved to Dallas, and there were a lot of right-leaning people who left California for Texas and wanted to go to a place like Austin.
02:39:41.000I think if you are foreign-born, you can never hold office or vote, but your children can if you had those children after you became a naturalized citizen.
02:39:51.000But again, all the other prerequisites we talked about still apply.
02:39:55.000I have to have some kind of investment in the future.
02:39:56.000I'm not in favor of like less people voting.
02:41:37.000Donut Operator just released a vlog the other day about the UFC fight up in New York City, where Detective Richard High, angry cops, mentions he almost got in a fist fight right next to you.
02:41:48.000Cody also mentioned he got food poisoning, so he couldn't actually go to the fight.
02:41:51.000And I know you said that you wanted to stay with him some time.
02:43:05.000And when I started making comments about the historical fact that Russia invaded Georgia and took a bunch of land, I said that Georgia was too small to stick up for itself.
02:43:13.000It was a tiny country and that he should go back to Atlanta.
02:43:17.000And at the end of the fight, the Georgian won.
02:43:20.000And one of the Georgians jumped over a set of chairs and caught up to me and was just like, Georgia's not small.
02:43:30.000And I'm looking around at Edmund Hayford and Brandon Herrera and Tipu talk to me, and I'm like, we're going to get into this fight with some Georgians.
02:44:14.000That wasn't the first time security approached him.
02:44:17.000I posted a video on Instagram because he was screaming.
02:44:20.000And admittedly, when I started filming him, he started screaming more.
02:44:24.000But he's yelling very funny things at the fighters.
02:44:28.000And so I pulled up my phone and I was like, I got to film this.
02:44:30.000And so I filmed like selfie, like pointing at him.
02:44:33.000And he could see me, you know, the corner of his eye.
02:44:36.000So he starts yelling more inflammatory things.
02:44:38.000Security actually came up to him over his yelling and told him to please calm down because he was yelling things like, Georgia's not a real country.
02:47:16.000And then after I stopped filming, Brandon goes, you realize you were screaming loud enough for the president of the United States to hear it.
02:47:38.000It was funny because Evan from Black Rifle, their seats were next to ours in the assignment because when you get comp tickets, they stick your name on it.
02:50:07.000And then what we talked about doing is probably, I'll put it this way.
02:50:12.000We provide the funding so that the Discord members can have the space set up and it will be their party.
02:50:18.000So we were thinking like, you know, depending on who wants to come with like Joey Romanation, Sinoski, whoever else wanted to come, it would be your party and whoever else in the Discord that wants to be involved in setting it up.
02:50:29.000And we'll provide the funding so that you guys can do it.
02:50:32.000And that would be like from six to however long you guys wanted to do it.
02:50:37.000And then, of course, we'd come hang out, you know, and do it.
02:50:39.000But it would be the Discord members party.
02:51:08.000Well, I wanted to ask things very relevant for all the discussion in particular as well, because I am currently in Australian in towards the permanent resident and eventually citizenship.
02:51:18.000But the question is for you and the panel will be especially the guests.
02:51:23.000It will be what it means to be a citizen and why economic migrants that don't contribute to the society needs to be part of this citizenship.
02:51:34.000So what does it mean to be a citizen, you're asking?
02:51:38.000The first thing I would say is to be a, it's kind of a broad question, but it's I don't know if my answer is precise enough, but basically that you are pledging your loyalty to a family that is the American family, that you will be a contributor, that you will uphold our values and our Constitution and our laws and work to make America great every single day.
02:52:05.000And so I'm actually, I would say middle of the road pro-immigration.
02:52:10.000I don't necessarily think we should just like increase legal immigration or anything like that.
02:52:15.000I understand and I'm sympathetic a little bit to the moratorium arguments simply because of the 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants that came in, which basically overloaded the immigration system.
02:52:26.000Integration is imperative for immigration, and the mass illegal immigration damaged that.
02:52:32.000However, I'm actually a huge proponent of brain drain.
02:52:35.000I think we should be bringing in top talent from all over the world.
02:52:38.000I think it is fantastic that Nigeria's best save up money, work really hard, and then come here, and they make a lot of money by doing it.
02:52:45.000None of this can be at the sacrifice of the American children, which includes the children of these migrants as well.
02:52:52.000So if we just keep saying more people can come in, then if you're a hardworking Nigerian family that comes to America and has kids, your kids will be left holding an empty bag all the same.
02:53:02.000So there needs to be a weighted benefit to the children of actual Americans, be it first-generation or long-standing historical generational citizens.
02:53:22.000Like, what does it mean to be a citizen?
02:53:25.000So, I mean, personally, I think that you should care about the values that have made the United States what it is.
02:53:35.000And so if you're born here and your parents are Americans, they should be teaching you or they should teach you and instill in you the values that make America the country that it is.
02:53:49.000You should learn about property rights.
02:53:50.000You should learn about liberty, about the fundamental things that make America what it is.
02:53:58.000And I think that that is an integral part of being a citizen.
02:54:03.000And if you don't hold the values that we hold dear, you shouldn't be allowed to become a citizen.
02:54:11.000Now, again, because, like, I do think that if your parents are citizens and you're born here, you should be allowed to become, you should be a citizen.
02:54:18.000I do think that that's, that's, that's fine.
02:54:23.000But I do think that when it comes to immigration, that it's perfectly reasonable to exclude people that don't look at The values that the United States has as the primary way to organize your political ideals, I think it's perfectly fine to exclude those people.
02:54:41.000And I don't think that there's anything wrong with it.
02:54:43.000And the people that have a problem with it nowadays, at least, almost all the time, they accuse you of some kind of xenophobia or bigotry or racism or whatever.
02:54:54.000And that's only because they don't actually have a good argument against excluding people that don't hold American values in high esteem.
02:55:03.000Yeah, I mean, obviously a lot of your viewers and listeners probably disagree with my views on immigration, but thank you for letting me make the case anyway.
02:55:12.000I will actually just say on a positive note, and it's good to end on, I think, that I really like, I will reiterate what I said earlier, I really believe in American exceptionalism.
02:55:21.000I think our devotion to things like, you know, liberalism, freedom of expression, property, these are things that a lot of places don't have.
02:55:30.000And I'm grateful to live in a place that I was born in a place that do have them.
02:55:34.000And I know not everyone who comes here has, looks at the world similarly, but a lot of people do.
02:55:39.000And a lot of people dream of coming here because of those things, not in spite of them.
02:55:45.000Yeah, I mean, I don't have any, I don't have a problem with people wanting to come to the United States.
02:55:51.000I just think that people that want to come to the United States with the intent to change the United States, it's perfectly fine for the U.S. to say, well, you can't come to the United States because you want to change the fundamental relationship.
02:56:02.000Yeah, like to what you're saying, I think the best analogy that works for this is that it's more of a familial relationship than just about civic duty.
02:56:12.000And that's why if you're a citizen because your parents are citizens and you were born here, in a way, you kind of have the family relationship with your nation where you get to be a brat and you get to respect these American values.
02:57:10.000Well, immigration is outpacing U.S. births.
02:57:12.000And like you pointed out, other countries don't have these things.
02:57:15.000So the people who are going to come either won't be able to maintain them or don't agree with them.
02:57:19.000And I think we're looking at – I think that the long term likelihood, like 100 years from now, the U.S. will be a Sharia Muslim nation because they have an insane amount of kids and they enforce their ideology with murder.
02:57:39.000So, you know, theoretically in 100 years, it could be an Anabaptist country with like, you know, the Mennonites and the Amish.
02:57:49.000But there's not that many of them right now.
02:57:51.000And they're substantially, well, actually, I wonder.
02:58:01.000But I tell you what, I think that the Catholics are actually, honestly, not like just make a remark because Mary's here, but the Catholics are probably the religion that's getting the most traction.
03:00:32.000I'm actually surprised that Christians don't have a concept of Takia because the soft argument is that it's to conceal your face under threat.
03:00:41.000So if someone says convert or die, they're allowed to say it, but they're concealing their faith.
03:00:45.000But basically what it means is that in the United States, they lie about what they actually believe because they would be oppressed, silenced, or shut down or lose power if they admit what they actually believe.
03:00:56.000Well, I mean, if your religion is saying, hey, we need to spread our religion even through violence.
03:01:16.000But the point that i'm making is that the well actually no i've lost a point so it doesn't matter okay so yeah you gotta you gotta uh you have to you have to be i think the united states should be careful about who we actually allow to become you know who we allow to immigrate and after i don't i don't know that it's done yet but uh immigration is not placing births so people who don't agree with the constitution are moving here more than we are
03:01:47.000having children and liberals are not teaching their kids the values of the of the united states and liberalism i do want to reiterate that a lot of people who do come here not everyone but you know a lot of cubans who come here for instance they're religious and they're conservative and they believe in capitalism and they believe in a lot of them are socially conservative which is somewhat of a dying breed even on the right um so i do think i don't i i think there are a lot of people who come to this country who do share our values american values i i would just make the assumption that if people aren't having kids half the kids
03:02:17.000that are being born are not being taught the importance of our values and then you bring in migrants at a greater rate yeah american ideology dies like i mean you can make the argument that some of the migrants believe in our values sure but like the math is not there i just believe in the binding power of the constitution i'm a big i'm a big fan of the constitution and i think it will it's more powerful than when when did the when did the right to keep and bear arms get enshrined well i mean i would agree that it has come on i write about it all the time i think it comes on but what there's there's one year phil you know it right what's that when the
03:02:47.000actual right to keep and bear arms was formally enshrined in the united states okay so the second amendment was 1789 that's what i actually said about no but but the right to keep and bear arms was enshrined probably in heller yes yeah 2008.
03:03:03.000yes i know the i know the co-council on that case you you could not actually keep and bear arms in the united states until 2008 it was so i take it a bit of issue with it you're you're right that the supreme court had not found but prior to the finding it was assumed that on that you were allowed to have a gun for for personal property or as your as your property and it was assumed that you could carry guns unless it was prohibited but it was prohibited everywhere all the time there's a lot of places that it was prohibited and in the 1980s i believe 100
03:03:33.000of the united states was may issue meaning they didn't have to leave it legally give you the right to keep in bar arms and could deny it and it wasn't until 2008 and it wasn't even technically 2008 but you're right you're right but in 19 2011.
03:03:50.000oh the uh um yeah the uh what was the what was it let me pull that one up anyways but you're you're not incorrect but in 1970 if you went and bought a gun or wanted to go buy a gun most places they were issuing like they were it was may issue like that was the standard but almost everybody that wanted to get a gun got issued the point was you didn't have a right to it you were given permission recognized so free speech when was free
03:04:20.000speech actually enshrined i mean i have a feeling that you have a a different answer than me when when do you think it was enshrined it never was you don't think so it's still not legal today there are numerous laws respecting establishments of speech we restrict uh in various ways how you give money to politicians and if you want to buy a billboard the government made a law that you can't talk to the politician if you do so that's a vibe that's a restriction uh not to mention quomo shut down churches which is a violation of the first amendment there's no process
03:04:50.000for a regis of grievances in any meaningful way so i i just find it laughable uh i i you know what i i am i am whatever michael malis is i i said i'm an anarchist because of business regulations i don't i don't know that i i understand what he's saying about anarchy he basically said those who have the power to enforce it will and that's what anarchy is and i'm like okay sure fine i guess i completely agree with him there is there is not a single right enshrined in the constitution that's ever actually been upheld and
03:05:20.000people just pretend that it is there's no binding connect i mean uh does trump have the authority to launch a a strike on a foreign country without a declaration of congress no well why not the war powers resolution granted him some limited authority so then the argument is does congress have the authority without ratification uh of two-thirds of the states to abdicate its responsibilities in declaration of war under a uh through congressional act the long and short of your argument not that and not not that i'm saying you're wrong but the long and short of your argument is that government will always
03:05:50.000try to find ways around limits you put on it that's the argument you're making and usually they will find it the argument i'm making is the government does whatever the body politic allows sure that fair enough but again but that's still the government is trying to do as to exercise as much power as the body politic will allow so i i look at it like the government is an entrenched blob that simply tries to find the past of path of least resistance so when the far left burns