Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - August 29, 2024


Grand Jury Empaneled In Trump Assassination, Maybe 2nd Shooter Or CIA w- RC Maxwell | Timcast IRL


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 3 minutes

Words per Minute

204.32014

Word Count

25,145

Sentence Count

1,970

Misogynist Sentences

29

Hate Speech Sentences

28


Summary

A grand jury is being brought in to investigate the Trump assassination, Kamala Harris says she and Tucker Carlson don t always agree, and more. Plus, Nate Silver's predictions for the 2020 Democratic primary are swinging wildly, and we have a special guest to talk about it all.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Absolutely wild story coming out of human events.
00:00:15.000 We've got a grand jury being impaneled in the Trump assassination.
00:00:20.000 We don't know exactly who this is for, but this is to consider criminal charges.
00:00:24.000 There's a lot of wild speculation, but again, we have no idea.
00:00:27.000 Some are saying, could there have been a second shooter?
00:00:30.000 No idea.
00:00:30.000 Some are saying, could it be maybe just a fall guy?
00:00:33.000 So that they can pass the buck off to someone and say it's their fault, they're the reason for the security lapse, and they'll call it negligence of some sort.
00:00:39.000 We don't know.
00:00:40.000 What we do know is that thanks to human events and America First Legal, we have gotten confirmation of a grand jury being impaneled in the Trump assassination attempt.
00:00:48.000 This is huge news.
00:00:49.000 So we'll talk about that, plus a bunch of other stories.
00:00:51.000 Nate Silver, his predictions are swinging wildly.
00:00:54.000 He now has Kamala Harris.
00:00:56.000 Potentially, or probably the win is only slightly, slightly beyond Donald Trump.
00:00:59.000 So it's a pretty, it's a tough call.
00:01:02.000 Then, of course, we have—this one was weird.
00:01:04.000 This morning or yesterday, Kamala Harris put out this letter from Tucker, a conservative who doesn't agree on everything, and it really did feel like she was trying to trick people who only read headlines into believing that Tucker Carlson Gave her a, you know, a fist bump and a nod.
00:01:24.000 Not really an endorsement, but I know we can work together on certain gun control issues or whatever.
00:01:28.000 And she said, thanks, Tucker.
00:01:30.000 I know we don't always agree, but yes, we can.
00:01:33.000 And, you know...
00:01:35.000 A lot of these liberal pundits are like, yeah, it sounds like Tucker Carlson.
00:01:38.000 The liberal media then says, oh, it's a conspiracy theory, but come on.
00:01:41.000 For what reason would Kamala Harris say, thanks, Tucker, I know we don't always agree?
00:01:45.000 So we're going to talk about that.
00:01:46.000 Before we get started, my friends, head over to casprew.com and buy Casprew Coffee.
00:01:49.000 We have delicious coffee.
00:01:50.000 We've got Appalachian Nights, Rise with Roberto Jr., and of course, Ian's Graphene Dream.
00:01:55.000 I'm hearing rave reviews about it.
00:01:56.000 It's great.
00:01:58.000 People are saying it's actually really, really good.
00:01:59.000 So, wow.
00:02:01.000 Glad to see people are enjoying it.
00:02:03.000 Casperoo.com, but also head over to TimCast.com.
00:02:05.000 Click join us to become a member and support our work directly.
00:02:09.000 As a member, you will be helping us in our battle against fake news.
00:02:13.000 So if you like Like the morning show, which is over at youtube.com slash TimCastNews, Monday through Thursday at 10 a.m.
00:02:18.000 I recommend you subscribe.
00:02:19.000 If you enjoy the morning show and TimCast IRL, then please become a member at TimCast.com so that we can sustain this company and our mission, and you can help keep me alive as I work 60-hour days.
00:02:30.000 But also don't forget to smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends.
00:02:34.000 And I'll add, I didn't have a show this morning.
00:02:36.000 Um, because at some point, 16 hour days crashes into your face like a tractor trailer.
00:02:42.000 And so, uh, this morning I just, I was, I was just wiped out and I wanted to prioritize being able to get this nightly show up for you guys.
00:02:48.000 So here, here I am.
00:02:49.000 Uh, we'll be back tomorrow morning, so definitely subscribe.
00:02:52.000 Again, smash that like button.
00:02:53.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is R.C.
00:02:56.000 Maxwell.
00:02:58.000 Thanks for having me on, Tim.
00:02:59.000 Glad to be here finally as a guest.
00:03:01.000 I came with other people as the man behind the cloak, but it's finally to get some shine here.
00:03:07.000 Well, who are you?
00:03:07.000 What do you do?
00:03:08.000 I'm a political consultant.
00:03:10.000 I like to say I'm an ethical consultant because I generally work with America First candidates and PACs.
00:03:15.000 I work with two Trump-coordinated PACs right now, Turning Point Action, which you guys are probably
00:03:20.000 very familiar with, and the Pennsylvania Chase.
00:03:22.000 You guys have had Cliff on as well.
00:03:24.000 We're up in Pennsylvania trying to win there and trying to win in Arizona and Georgia and Michigan
00:03:29.000 and Wisconsin through Turning Point Action.
00:03:31.000 So I'm very, very, very busy, and I just had a little newborn myself.
00:03:36.000 So enjoying family life, and I'm glad to be here talking about the topics of the day.
00:03:41.000 Right on.
00:03:41.000 Well, thanks for hanging out.
00:03:42.000 It should be fun.
00:03:43.000 Ian is back.
00:03:43.000 I'm back, man.
00:03:44.000 And I'm glad you mentioned ethics.
00:03:45.000 That's one of my favorite things to talk about.
00:03:47.000 I love it.
00:03:48.000 I love it.
00:03:48.000 That's what I do with Mines for like a decade while we were starting that company is just the ethics of social media and like how addictive should you... I just love it.
00:03:55.000 And also a special shout out to Casper's Graphene Dream.
00:03:57.000 I do think it is delicious.
00:03:58.000 It's light and crisp, low acidity.
00:04:01.000 I like to mix it in because I tend to drink coffee on the weeks where I do it every day.
00:04:04.000 I'll have like Graphene Dream two, three, four days of that week usually.
00:04:08.000 Did you end up doing a live taste test of a graphic novel?
00:04:11.000 Yes, I have a recording of it.
00:04:12.000 I looked so faded.
00:04:13.000 It was like I just woke up.
00:04:14.000 You really needed the coffee.
00:04:15.000 But I have the video.
00:04:16.000 I should upload it.
00:04:16.000 It'd be funny.
00:04:17.000 It was delicious.
00:04:18.000 Well, I'm glad you're both here tonight.
00:04:19.000 I'm Hannah Clare Brimlow.
00:04:20.000 I'm a writer for scnr.com, Scanner News.
00:04:22.000 Let's get started.
00:04:23.000 Here's a story from Human Events.
00:04:25.000 Scoop!
00:04:26.000 U.S.
00:04:27.000 attorney has impaneled grand jury to consider criminal charges in Trump assassination investigation.
00:04:33.000 The Western District of Pennsylvania has impaneled a grand jury to investigate the attempted assassination of Donald Trump on July 13th in Butler, PA.
00:04:40.000 A letter obtained by Human Events from America First Legal reveals that a records request for information on would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks was denied because those records are within the scope of a grand jury subpoena.
00:04:52.000 So I'm going to pause real quick.
00:04:54.000 I know the speculation is, could there have been a second shooter?
00:04:57.000 Could this be someone in intelligence?
00:04:59.000 It could be as simple as they want to charge his dad.
00:05:03.000 They say that the gun may have come from his father.
00:05:06.000 This may be similar to other stories we've heard in the past where they say the father was required to keep the gun secure.
00:05:11.000 We don't know exactly what this could be.
00:05:13.000 And I'm not trying to imply that the father did anything wrong or in any way committed a crime.
00:05:17.000 I'm just saying some people may want to jump immediately to, I bet they're going to have a patsy for this and they're going to say someone did something criminal.
00:05:25.000 It may be like a local street dealer named Crazy Gun.
00:05:30.000 Sold him a gun illegally or something.
00:05:32.000 It could be something really, really light.
00:05:33.000 However, it is still big news because it implies they are seeking to actually find criminal culpability in how the Trump assassination happened.
00:05:41.000 They're going to say the letter from the Community College of Allegheny County in response to attorney Wally Zimelong denies the request for records on Crooks pertaining to his student files, records, documents, communication, disciplinary records, or other data containing his name.
00:05:53.000 Quote, Please be advised that your request is denied on the basis that it requests records that relate to an ongoing criminal investigation which are exempt from disclosure.
00:06:02.000 Specifically, the records that you have requested are within the scope of a grand jury subpoena issued to CCAC.
00:06:10.000 By the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, in which the U.S.
00:06:14.000 Attorney's Office has confirmed relate to an ongoing criminal investigation.
00:06:18.000 The purpose of a federal grand jury is to consider criminal charges against a target or range of targets.
00:06:24.000 This is the first indication that a grand jury has been impaneled in the district to investigate the attempted assassination.
00:06:29.000 So Jack Posobiec was talking about this earlier.
00:06:31.000 It may actually be something really simple.
00:06:35.000 But it could be something even much more complicated.
00:06:39.000 Perhaps a cover-up.
00:06:40.000 Perhaps Crooks was supposed to be the fall guy, but he is no longer living.
00:06:44.000 You don't criminally charge someone who no longer exists.
00:06:47.000 So maybe they need a patsy.
00:06:49.000 Not even a patsy, but a scapegoat to say this is the person responsible for what happened, and then pass off the responsibility from themselves.
00:06:56.000 And the special agent from the Pittsburgh, the FBI's Pittsburgh field office did have a meeting with the press today where he said, based on our investigation so far, we have not been able to determine a motive, although it wasn't, you know, clearly political.
00:07:10.000 He definitely crooks acted alone.
00:07:13.000 Here's a picture of the IED we found in his car.
00:07:15.000 Here's a picture of the gun.
00:07:16.000 So they are sort of trying to posture as if they are making progress in this investigation.
00:07:22.000 My mind tends to be the simplest explanation.
00:07:24.000 They're going after his dad.
00:07:25.000 We saw this with Ethan Crumbly, the high school shooter.
00:07:27.000 Absolutely.
00:07:28.000 And his parents were both found guilty and incarcerated in relation to their inability to keep a gun out of, you know, what they, you know, everyone, the government has said it was a trouble, a clearly troubled student's hand.
00:07:41.000 And the difference in that case is that Ethan Crumbly's parents never called the cops at any moment in time.
00:07:46.000 Now, Crooks' parents at one point in time were notified police.
00:07:50.000 They were concerned Crooks was missing, the rally was happening.
00:07:53.000 It's a material fact that they notified police.
00:07:55.000 So that almost gives credence to the fact that they knew something and maybe they didn't divulge enough information.
00:08:00.000 And Crumbly was a minor in the care of his parents, right?
00:08:03.000 Crooks was 20 years old.
00:08:04.000 He may have lived at home, but he is an adult.
00:08:06.000 That's very different.
00:08:08.000 I want to put something also important on this radar, is that, you know, during Black Lives Matter, there was not a prosecution after a grand jury convened for Michael Brown's death.
00:08:17.000 For the first time ever, we saw the Washington Post and the New York Times crawl into statistics on federal grand juries, how often, when they convene, do they lead to indictments, and they said 99.9% of cases, when they convene, an indictment happens.
00:08:31.000 So that's certainly bad news.
00:08:32.000 Or conviction.
00:08:33.000 A conviction happens.
00:08:33.000 The conviction rate is now 100%.
00:08:36.000 So this is bad news for whoever maybe have done something.
00:08:38.000 The fact that a grand jury certainly exists, and they did not want this news to come out.
00:08:41.000 This is just an accidental faux pas as a result of this community college.
00:08:46.000 Yup.
00:08:46.000 Newb in the room.
00:08:47.000 Grand jury means that there's no judge?
00:08:49.000 Is that what that means?
00:08:50.000 Why is the jury grand?
00:08:51.000 What's the difference of a grand jury and a jury?
00:08:53.000 It's just the name.
00:08:54.000 A grand jury is convened to determine if there's a preponderance of evidence so that an indictment can be issued.
00:09:00.000 So, this is actually really awesome.
00:09:02.000 It's really awesome.
00:09:03.000 The state can't just be like, we're gonna arrest Ian on these very serious life-altering charges.
00:09:08.000 They have to actually empanel jurors and say, we think this guy should be criminally charged and here's the evidence why.
00:09:15.000 Now, it's not adversarial.
00:09:17.000 Sometimes in the grand jury proceedings you can testify, but usually you don't.
00:09:20.000 You just get arrested and indicted.
00:09:22.000 But at least there's that first level.
00:09:24.000 The indictment is not a statement of guilt.
00:09:27.000 It's, we think this guy may have committed this crime, so there should be a trial over this.
00:09:32.000 If the jury agrees, and it's very easy to get an indictment, then you move to the next stages, which may be arrests, Or, it really depends on the crime.
00:09:42.000 So, instead of getting an arrest warrant, they have to go through a jury, a grand jury, to get the warrant, basically?
00:09:48.000 I'm not a lawyer, so a lawyer would probably explain way better, because I don't actually know why.
00:09:52.000 That is correct.
00:09:53.000 You cannot, before, without a grand jury indictment, unless there's enough preponderance of evidence to initially arrest, but once you're actually charged, usually there's an indictment.
00:10:02.000 Right.
00:10:03.000 That comes with that, yeah.
00:10:05.000 Well, so, in some instances, they just go and arrest you.
00:10:08.000 Right.
00:10:08.000 If they catch you with coke or something, you're just getting arrested for possession.
00:10:11.000 Then you have to see the judge.
00:10:13.000 You've already been arraigned.
00:10:13.000 You've already been indicted.
00:10:14.000 There's evidence.
00:10:15.000 Oh, so they gotta get the warrant from the grand jury.
00:10:18.000 I'm sorry to ask a stupid question.
00:10:19.000 They get a warrant from a judge.
00:10:20.000 The indictment from the grand jury.
00:10:22.000 Yeah, if you're suspected of being a coke dealer, they have to prove you're a coke dealer to actually arrest you.
00:10:27.000 You get indicted.
00:10:28.000 Usually a district attorney will decide, I want to have this person indicted before you're charged with a significant felony like distribution of narcotics.
00:10:36.000 And I do think they can issue their own indictments.
00:10:39.000 I mean, again, I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know exactly the process, but there have been instances where people have been arrested before the indictments were issued.
00:10:46.000 And I don't know what's proper or not, but what I can say is, grand juries will look at the evidence, not determine guilt, just determine that there should be a trial over this.
00:10:55.000 So if there's like a video of a guy beating a woman, and then she's found dead, and then they find, you know, a bloodstained glove in his house, they say like, look, this guy should be arrested and charged, we think this is why, they say okay, arrest him, and then bring the evidence to trial and let him out as a defense.
00:11:07.000 Then they issue the indictment, they go arrest the guy, So there's a grand jury that'll get the arrest going and then there's an actual, just a jury that will decide if they're guilty or not.
00:11:16.000 If it goes to trial.
00:11:16.000 And they're not the same jury.
00:11:18.000 Maybe you want to bench trial.
00:11:18.000 The grand jury just determines probable cause for the arrest.
00:11:21.000 Again, like we said, sometimes the officer conducts that probable cause himself.
00:11:25.000 And in this case, there's a grand jury that's being supplied with evidence right now for some sort of action that is unknown.
00:11:31.000 Yes.
00:11:32.000 And it's potentially like negligence to the parents for leaving the gun out.
00:11:35.000 No, who knows?
00:11:36.000 I mean, as you guys mentioned, he was an adult, so that shouldn't apply.
00:11:40.000 But they should have their gun in a safe, and maybe they didn't have a locked safe.
00:11:43.000 I don't think that matters in PA.
00:11:45.000 I believe there's a law basically, most states have a law about children having access to weapons, but these are minor children, these are young children.
00:11:51.000 If you own a rifle, you store it how you want to store it, it might, if it gets stolen, it's not your fault someone stole it, it's the criminal who stole it.
00:12:00.000 Interesting.
00:12:00.000 And there are reports about Matthew McCarthy- Depending on the state, some states might just be like, don't know, don't care, they're evil, you know?
00:12:05.000 The reports about Matthew Crumbly come from this report that he's hired a big lawyer and that, you know, he's been speaking with the FBI and stuff like that.
00:12:11.000 I think that's why people feel like it's the simplest explanation because we're now seeing this pattern of parents of gunmen being investigated as part of the crime.
00:12:20.000 It doesn't mean that's what this is.
00:12:22.000 The Pennsylvania, the local cops kind of got dragged through it on this one.
00:12:26.000 Like they got blamed for a lot of the mismanagement that the Secret Service was supposed to be overseeing.
00:12:30.000 So if they're like, yo, we're going to actually look into if there was negligence by the secret, can they like charge the Secret Service with with crimes?
00:12:37.000 Well, the FBI, again, when they did their their special agent, Kevin Rojek, who was doing this press conference today, was saying, you know, The man who took out Crooks in the end was ultimately a Secret Service sniper, and we're so grateful for the support we've gotten from local police.
00:12:53.000 And, you know, they're kind of, I think, trying to offer a united front, mended fences approach, because I think you're right.
00:13:00.000 Initially, Director Kim Cheadle really seemed to be saying, oh, yes, we're in charge, but also it was the local police who messed up by not securing that building.
00:13:09.000 And I can only imagine if you're a local policeman on the ground saying, What the heck?
00:13:16.000 Like, you guys are in charge of this, you don't give us any support, and then you're blaming us?
00:13:20.000 Oh, in a community that favors Trump, if you were in charge of the local police that got blamed for not putting Overwatch on that building?
00:13:29.000 Like, the entire community.
00:13:30.000 It's supposed to be Secret Service.
00:13:32.000 Yeah.
00:13:33.000 And the FBI is in charge of this investigation now.
00:13:35.000 And don't forget that the FBI placed five Secret Service agents on leave.
00:13:39.000 So we don't know if that's what level of negligence the FBI is placing on these people, but certainly the FBI believes five individuals should be placed on leave.
00:13:48.000 And is that in relation to this grand jury?
00:13:49.000 I mean, it's... That's not been confirmed.
00:13:51.000 Right.
00:13:51.000 There's so little information.
00:13:53.000 And that's why I find, again, the timing of this press conference today where they're saying, well, we did actually get access to Thomas Crooks' encrypted emails.
00:14:01.000 You know, they weren't that sophisticated.
00:14:04.000 We were able to access them and, you know, we're just looking at them.
00:14:06.000 Like, they keep saying they're trying to find motive and they are still not telling us anything, but yet they are clearly moving forward on some front.
00:14:13.000 What if it's as crazy as they actually criminally charge Secret Service for either negligence or even crazier, some kind of involvement?
00:14:23.000 Conspiracy, yeah.
00:14:24.000 Yeah.
00:14:25.000 They put agents on leave.
00:14:27.000 There's disciplinary action being taken.
00:14:29.000 That would rattle- There's an investigation.
00:14:31.000 Yeah, it would.
00:14:32.000 But it would be a great scapegoat for whoever actually wanted harm to come to Donald Trump.
00:14:38.000 I think it just- Find a patsy, find a fall guy.
00:14:40.000 It begets more questions.
00:14:42.000 If Secret Service agents are placed on some sort of criminal charge for negligence, it certainly begets more questions who instructed them.
00:14:49.000 I mean, Secret Service has become politicized, arguably, ever since Secret Service put the kibosh on an agent coming forward during the armed forces investigation into whether or not troops were left in Vietnam.
00:15:01.000 I don't know if you guys know about that.
00:15:02.000 No, what's that?
00:15:04.000 Essentially, a Secret Service agent testified that he heard a conversation between a US president and someone from Vietnam negotiating troops that were left behind and apparently Vietnamese left behind troops they didn't give them all give the United States all the troops back because they wanted the United States to pay reparations and apparently as late as the 80s someone testified that
00:15:26.000 This was being discussed with Nixon.
00:15:30.000 And then ever since... And what happened is this person was going to testify in front of the Armed Forces Committee that McCain was the chair of.
00:15:38.000 And lo and behold, the Secret Service kind of got in control of this guy and said, you know, we don't, you know, the Secret Service has known not to speak up for secrets.
00:15:45.000 They're not whistleblowers.
00:15:46.000 So this would have been a phenomenal moment.
00:15:49.000 I certainly implore you guys to do some research into this Armed Forces Committee investigation and the Secret Service agent who said, I think we left people behind in Vietnam.
00:15:59.000 One of the darkest stories in US history, whether or not we did.
00:16:02.000 And John McCain's involvement potentially in that.
00:16:05.000 Oh wow.
00:16:09.000 I think the Secret Service is not supposed to require, necessitate, usually, American, you know, trust.
00:16:14.000 I mean, Secret Service is supposed to be an apolitical entity protecting the president, but obviously, you know, recently it's become politicized, you know, not being distributed for RFK, you know, being used for Obama and his daughters.
00:16:28.000 Decades, you know, a decade after his administration.
00:16:31.000 So we've seen something happen to the Secret Service that we've seen happen to every other agency in DC, which is they become politicized, they're in control of the left, and, you know, they kind of operate in symbiosis with the FBI and this kind of deep state.
00:16:45.000 So yeah, I think Secret Service is less of a problem than the FBI, but certainly the fact that this is an open investigation gives now Feds more control over the situation.
00:16:55.000 You know, remember, the feds are still investigating whether or not James O'Keefe stole Ashley Biden's diary.
00:17:00.000 He's not been indicted.
00:17:01.000 He's not got his devices back.
00:17:03.000 They're still investigating three years later.
00:17:05.000 I think a lot of Americans are, especially in this day and age, prepared to question actions of intelligence agencies.
00:17:12.000 They're prepared to question the military.
00:17:13.000 They're prepared to question CIA, FBI.
00:17:15.000 But I think, probably to your point, Because the Secret Service is sort of in the background, right?
00:17:20.000 We just associate them with sort of shepherding around presidents and high-ranking government officials.
00:17:25.000 People don't think to say, oh, there could be corruption there.
00:17:27.000 But of course, if you're attached to the American government bureaucracy, anything could happen.
00:17:32.000 Yeah, I didn't question them at all until 150 yards away from Trump, the rooftop was left completely open for a shooter.
00:17:40.000 Like, now I have many questions about the Secret Service.
00:17:42.000 Despite them being warned several times by local police that this was a point that needed to be secured.
00:17:46.000 Yeah.
00:17:47.000 And then, do I need to say it?
00:17:49.000 Three hours, one hour, 26 minutes, 10 minutes, three minutes.
00:17:52.000 They never once responded to all of the warnings.
00:17:55.000 And there's a photo of Crooks walking around the rally with a rifle.
00:17:59.000 Like, them, RFK Jr.
00:18:01.000 not getting Secret Service protection.
00:18:03.000 I didn't place the blame on the Secret Service.
00:18:05.000 I placed it on whoever's in, like, the executive branch, Biden.
00:18:09.000 I was like, it's his fault.
00:18:10.000 But now, with the Secret Service being in charge of the protection of Trump during the Butler rally, and them leaving that You know what was also suspicious?
00:18:19.000 When I was a Project Veritas press secretary, we submitted information about a CNN producer who was involved in some questionable sexual activity with some minors, and there was this odd police department spokesperson I was dealing with, and he was very political from the onset.
00:18:35.000 Which is fine, we deal with it, but this guy was especially political.
00:18:38.000 This guy is now the Secret Service spokesperson, Anthony Guglielmi.
00:18:42.000 And when I saw his name at a hearing... He pops up everywhere, doesn't he?
00:18:45.000 My jaw dropped.
00:18:46.000 I said, this guy, he got promoted from the Fairfax County Police Department, this guy, Anthony Guglielmi, who stifled us in that investigation.
00:18:53.000 And now he works for the Secret Service.
00:18:55.000 So they very obviously promoted someone to that role, who has a history of kind of burying information and working within the symbiosis of corrupt government.
00:19:03.000 And if you know Fairfax County, you know, they're kind of one of the arguably one of the most corrupt police entities, you know, they've been accused of all
00:19:11.000 sorts of corruption, you know, they're so close to DC. Who is that guy you're
00:19:14.000 talking about?
00:19:14.000 Anthony Guglielmi. Yeah, who's that? He's the former spokesperson of the
00:19:19.000 Fairfax County Police Department, so anything that happened in Fairfax County,
00:19:23.000 you know, he was the one communicating to the media.
00:19:26.000 And like I said, he stifled us in that investigation.
00:19:28.000 I thought nothing of it, but when I saw that he was now promoted to Secret Service Spokesperson, I knew the only reason he got promoted is because he is a, you know, he's a competent chill.
00:19:39.000 He does his job effectively.
00:19:40.000 I think there's something else weird in his resume too, but I can't remember what it is off the top of my head.
00:19:44.000 I'm skeptical.
00:19:45.000 I know there were a lot of people that were like, this guy?
00:19:47.000 This guy is here?
00:19:48.000 But I mean, I think that's true for, you know, the fact that the head of the Secret Service was actually someone who was specifically assigned to Biden's detail and had left, who didn't stay with the agency during Trump's presidency.
00:20:00.000 That, to me, indicates some sort of political devotion to a certain party over another.
00:20:04.000 I mean, if you were really like working your way through the Secret Service, wouldn't you either stay with the Secret Service always, because like you said, it's supposed to be apolitical, or He's their chief communications officer.
00:20:14.000 That's right, he was the spokesperson during the Jesse Smollett stuff.
00:20:16.000 Yeah, okay, that's what it is.
00:20:17.000 In Chicago?
00:20:18.000 Yeah, in Chicago.
00:20:19.000 And then they moved him to D.C., and then they moved him to the Secret Service?
00:20:23.000 Pretty sure there's a bunch of stories where he pops up as a spokesperson.
00:20:27.000 Everyone's like, why does this guy keep popping up?
00:20:28.000 It's like, well, he knows where the jobs are supposed to be, I guess.
00:20:30.000 I got this concern just as you were talking, Arsene.
00:20:32.000 You're right, he was on Chicago.
00:20:33.000 Yeah, he was the Jesse Smollett CPD spokesperson too, I think.
00:20:37.000 That the establishment in DC, the federal establishment, has been consuming their own propaganda refuse.
00:20:47.000 The media scares people about Trump, and then the politicians watch the media and they're like, now I'm more scared.
00:20:52.000 We got to make sure that the media tells the people how really horrible it is.
00:20:55.000 And then they do even more horror stories, and then the politicians get even more scared.
00:21:00.000 And then they're like, we need to politicize the Secret Service.
00:21:03.000 He's too dangerous.
00:21:05.000 That's ridiculous, but I have no concern with that yet.
00:21:08.000 Let's jump to this story from SCNR.
00:21:09.000 FBI says would-be Trump assassin had no identifiable political ideology.
00:21:14.000 Quote, we have not uncovered any credible evidence indicating the subject conspired with anyone else, said Special Agent Kevin Rojek.
00:21:21.000 Now, we did talk about, just a moment ago, in the previous segment, for those that are just joining in this segment, we talked about the grand jury that has been impaneled in the Trump assassination attempt.
00:21:32.000 I'm going to go ahead and say, just with as much confidence as I've said repeatedly, I believe there's official capacity involvement in the Trump assassination, whatever that form may be.
00:21:42.000 Attempt.
00:21:43.000 He was not assassinated.
00:21:44.000 Right, the Trump assassination attempt.
00:21:45.000 And we have this from Fox 35.
00:21:47.000 FBI releases photos of the gun used in Trump assassination attempt.
00:21:50.000 You can notice two things.
00:21:51.000 They've disassembled the weapon and then point out the collapsible stock, they call it.
00:21:58.000 This is amazing.
00:21:58.000 The photos show the firearm's collapsible stock, which investigators say may have been used to conceal the rifle at the site.
00:22:03.000 Well, I'd like to point something out.
00:22:05.000 To the average person, who does not know anything about weapons, they see a photo of the gun broken into two different pieces, and they assume collapsible stock probably referenced something about the gun being broken into two pieces, and that he was easily able to put in a backpack.
00:22:19.000 Okay.
00:22:21.000 Well, collapsible stock is the stock right here, and it moves like four inches.
00:22:25.000 So, to imply that he could move the stock 4 inches in one direction or the other, if it's even 4 inches, and that's how he concealed it, is an absurdity.
00:22:34.000 But they're trying to trick people, it would seem.
00:22:37.000 Now, there's already been reporting that he was photographed walking around with the weapon anyway.
00:22:41.000 So, why they keep doing this?
00:22:44.000 Your guess is fine.
00:22:45.000 Thank you for pointing that out.
00:22:45.000 That's been a cognitive dissonance for me.
00:22:47.000 You said that he was seen carrying the rifle.
00:22:49.000 I was hanging out with Luke Rutkowski doing The Best Political Show, and he was talking about the collapsible stock, meaning that you could take the gun apart into two pieces and conceal it in a backpack, but maybe Luke was wrong about that.
00:22:58.000 A collapsible stock?
00:23:00.000 Is different from what kids so there are there are certain weapons where you can break them into two pieces There are certain weapons where they actually can fold as well.
00:23:07.000 Yes.
00:23:08.000 I don't know if this is that I'm not a gun guy I can just tell you that the stock see okay.
00:23:12.000 Look look at look look on the screen This right here that little piece you press it and you can move the stock forward and backward They have those at all the gun stores over here all the time.
00:23:22.000 And they're like, here's a collapsible stock.
00:23:24.000 And they go, it makes it so that you can adjust it for your arm length needs or whatever.
00:23:29.000 But they're using that to imply that's how he concealed it, and that's silly.
00:23:32.000 Right.
00:23:33.000 Certainly, he could have concealed it in some other ways, I guess.
00:23:35.000 I don't know.
00:23:35.000 That's why it's obviously presented with a backpack.
00:23:37.000 And again, this is all part of this press conference that I was talking about today.
00:23:42.000 You know, it's really, to me, seems like they are trying to start steering the ship on this narrative with Rojek, you know, he said he gave a lot of information.
00:23:53.000 One of the things that he covered was this timeline saying there were reports that he, you know, Crooks was spotted here at this time.
00:23:59.000 We can confirm with visual surveillance evidence that he was actually over here at 426 outside the security perimeter.
00:24:08.000 You know they give the timeline of he was only on the roof for about six minutes.
00:24:11.000 We can confirm this through body camera and local business footage that he fired off eight rounds.
00:24:16.000 Like they are acting as if they are confirming and giving you the full story but I think obviously the fact that they are now we're over a month out from this and they're still saying we don't know what the ideology is and there's really nothing to say in his emails or his online information. They did talk a lot about his search history
00:24:31.000 today. One of the lines that stood out to me was how far was Oswald, how far
00:24:36.000 was Oswald from Kennedy and the fact that he was specifically googling like
00:24:39.000 where Trump was going to stand on stage. You know, they they'll point
00:24:44.000 out that he was Who made this announcement?
00:24:47.000 of 2023 he would research campaign Trump campaign events and when is he going to be in Pennsylvania
00:24:52.000 and occasionally would Google the it looks like the Biden campaign as well but then he seems to
00:24:57.000 continue to just be fixated on Trump. It's hard for me to believe that they are still sort of
00:25:01.000 discerning a motive when also these searches seem to be pretty specific. Who discovered these searches
00:25:08.000 who who made this announcement? The FBI. Okay. That's where this photo came from too. Okay.
00:25:12.000 I'd love to hear FBI give a statement on the status of these international bank accounts that the shooter allegedly had.
00:25:19.000 I mean, I heard that that was a confirmed report.
00:25:22.000 They didn't talk about it today?
00:25:23.000 That he had international bank accounts.
00:25:24.000 So my question is...
00:25:27.000 Are we tracking transfers there?
00:25:30.000 Are we looking into anything?
00:25:31.000 Are the parents giving you access to the bank accounts?
00:25:35.000 Do you have his mobile device?
00:25:36.000 Can you access the bank accounts there?
00:25:37.000 I mean, there's so many questions I'd love to ask.
00:25:39.000 Obviously, it's an open investigation.
00:25:41.000 However, the media, the ones who has access to the FBI, now unfortunately these are New
00:25:47.000 York Times national security reporters and stuff like, you know, Adam Goldman and people
00:25:51.000 like that.
00:25:52.000 They're not obviously asking FBI the real questions.
00:25:55.000 They're not using their sources to find out real information.
00:25:58.000 Hopefully, I don't know, James O'Keefe gets a scoop about this because I think without
00:26:02.000 a whistleblower, we're just going to rely on the FBI.
00:26:04.000 Yeah.
00:26:05.000 And to me, this is the equivalent of, you know, authorities in Tennessee saying the
00:26:09.000 Covenant school shooter had no kind of motivation.
00:26:11.000 They can't tell what the motivation was, even though they obviously have a manifesto there.
00:26:15.000 I think that they are just not wanting to incite any kind of tension before an election that could indicate that, you know, It's a left-wing motivated person.
00:26:25.000 Obviously, I don't know that for sure.
00:26:27.000 They haven't definitively proven it either way, but it's hard for me to believe that after all of this time, they're basically saying like, oh, he has multiple encrypted email accounts.
00:26:38.000 We got into them, but we're still looking through them.
00:26:41.000 Initially, they were saying he didn't use social media and then it appears that he was on some kind of account.
00:26:46.000 If this guy was a Nick Fuentes incel right-wing extremist, they would have divulged that information quickly because, you know, it would have been brief.
00:26:53.000 You know, Nick would have had his meeting with his FBI agent and they would have briefed it.
00:26:58.000 But yeah, you know, if this was actually a right-wing person, the FBI would have released it.
00:27:01.000 So clearly this indicates the fact that they don't know anything.
00:27:04.000 I mean, He has parents.
00:27:06.000 I mean, we're not doing any sort of character analysis.
00:27:08.000 The FBI, who found grandparents, tracked them down, who took one foot on the Capitol.
00:27:15.000 We're expected to believe the FBI is not incapable of knowing anything.
00:27:18.000 They still can't figure out this guy's motive.
00:27:20.000 I mean, to be fair, they got their hands tied with this January 6th thing.
00:27:24.000 Yeah, that's true.
00:27:25.000 You may have heard of it, and they're very busy, so they can't be bothered by this.
00:27:30.000 This foreign bank account narrative thing is, first I've heard that Crooks had multiple foreign bank accounts.
00:27:36.000 Do you know what companies, what banks they were with?
00:27:39.000 Has that been released, the information?
00:27:41.000 It's a great question.
00:27:43.000 It was it was confirmed an AP.
00:27:45.000 I'm trying to look into this right now.
00:27:47.000 I don't know much.
00:27:48.000 His name was crook kind of like everything that's interesting.
00:27:50.000 It's like it was revealed and then never followed up on.
00:27:53.000 That's I mean, for a 22 year old is 22 was he to have net foreign 20 years old to have foreign bank accounts.
00:28:00.000 That's not normal.
00:28:02.000 But again, I don't know.
00:28:03.000 I've heard this rumor.
00:28:04.000 I don't know if it's true.
00:28:05.000 What's interesting, you have MSN saying Shooter had three encrypted overseas accounts, and then you have the USA Today doing a fact check saying he didn't have these accounts.
00:28:13.000 But the FBI said that they were overseas-based encrypted email accounts.
00:28:16.000 That's what they said today.
00:28:17.000 Email accounts.
00:28:18.000 That's different than bank accounts, I see.
00:28:19.000 Right.
00:28:20.000 I mean, I can understand that there are a lot of people trying to get some information out there.
00:28:27.000 If you're in a position where you don't really trust what the FBI is going to say.
00:28:30.000 I mean, this says, at a congressional briefing with the FBI and Secret Service, they divulged that Crooks had accounts in Germany, New Zealand and Belgium.
00:28:37.000 Accounts?
00:28:38.000 Does that mean bank accounts or email accounts?
00:28:40.000 It says offshore accounts.
00:28:41.000 See, that would imply banking to me.
00:28:43.000 But again, they only talked about overseas email account, overseas encrypted email accounts today.
00:28:48.000 And they also connected that, by the way, to the Iranian plot.
00:28:51.000 So this was, remember, two weeks ago or three weeks ago, a part of that, which was totally a national security leak.
00:28:57.000 But they're also saying that he acted alone, that there's no indication that anyone else is involved.
00:29:01.000 So are we going to tie it to Iran?
00:29:02.000 It's just like, stir the pot, make it as crazy as possible so you have no idea what ingredients are in there because we got an election coming up.
00:29:08.000 That's what it sounds like is being done right now.
00:29:11.000 They want to take away the political power that Trump would get from what a massive story this is.
00:29:17.000 I think that's a big part of it.
00:29:18.000 I think that after the Kamala Harris is now the nominee bump, especially after the DNC, the media is now going to sort of calm down on that a little bit.
00:29:29.000 She's not really releasing any policy.
00:29:30.000 She hypothetically is going to talk with her, you know, best friend Tim Walz tomorrow.
00:29:36.000 The media is now kind of ready to turn back to the assassination attempt, and I think that's why the federal government is trying to get out ahead of the narrative right now, because there are a lot of Americans who rightly have questions.
00:29:47.000 I mean, even if you are not a huge Trump fan, the fact that one of the most influential politicians in our country could be attacked like that on stage, that Cory Comptor could die because of it, and that two other men could be severely injured, I mean, it just, it doesn't make people believe that we are as safe as, you know, Hypothetically, the government is trying to say we are.
00:30:08.000 No, we're like, I was thinking earlier how we live in like this organized danger of a system.
00:30:13.000 We drive by a car at 50 miles an hour.
00:30:15.000 They're going 50 miles an hour.
00:30:16.000 No one swerves and hits each other.
00:30:19.000 Presidential candidates walk outside in the middle of a crowd and just talk like, and we just trust that no one's going to open fire for the most part.
00:30:27.000 Yeah, because the fear mongering that we get from Democrats on guns is BS.
00:30:34.000 They didn't even have Trump on stage when they had all the victims of gun violence on stage.
00:30:38.000 That's true.
00:30:39.000 How dedicated are they to this cause?
00:30:41.000 They lie all the time.
00:30:41.000 They claim that AR-15s are dangerous and need to be banned because of mass shootings, when handguns are typically what's used in mass shootings.
00:30:48.000 It's just not correct.
00:30:49.000 It's all lies.
00:30:50.000 Or pharmaceuticals.
00:30:51.000 I mean, not that they're actually doing the shooting, but people that go crazy tend to be the reasons for mass shootings.
00:30:56.000 More people are dying from peanuts, I believe.
00:30:59.000 You know, like peanut allergies.
00:31:01.000 And so the argument always then goes like, but that's an accident.
00:31:04.000 We're talking about people with the intention to use weapons of war, blah, blah, blah.
00:31:07.000 Okay, then why are you bringing up fake ones?
00:31:09.000 And for that matter, how come Maryland has banned the M1A as an assault weapon, literally, but the SCAR-20S is not?
00:31:16.000 The M1A Garand?
00:31:17.000 Is that what that is?
00:31:18.000 No, the M1 Garand is the M1A.
00:31:20.000 The M1A is an assault weapon banned in Maryland, specifically on their list of banned weapons.
00:31:27.000 And I'm like, okay, I guess?
00:31:30.000 And then the SCAR-20S, which is a, I don't know, people will probably argue, but it's a much more modern and better gun.
00:31:37.000 Totally fine.
00:31:37.000 Both semi-automatic?
00:31:39.000 Both semi-automatic.
00:31:40.000 SCAR's lighter.
00:31:41.000 SCAR's lighter, right?
00:31:43.000 I would presume, yeah, M1s are pretty big.
00:31:45.000 You would more likely use the lighter weapon in an assault, if you need to run through a trench.
00:31:49.000 I'm just saying, I'm just thinking about it, because Luke had one, and Luke's was pretty heavy.
00:31:53.000 And so I'm like, when we were at the range, I don't know, Luke's was pretty heavy.
00:31:56.000 And so, I learned this specifically because, I'm in West Virginia, but I've got an M1A, and, well, you can't bring it to Maryland, it's an assault weapon.
00:32:05.000 And I'm like, what?
00:32:06.000 I think it could hold 10 in the magazine, at least mine.
00:32:12.000 And then Luke's got a SCAR-20S with a 30-round magazine.
00:32:16.000 I think it's .308.
00:32:17.000 I'm not sure.
00:32:17.000 It's been a minute.
00:32:21.000 762.
00:32:22.000 All I know is that they fire the same thing, one's more modern and better, but for some reason they ban it.
00:32:29.000 It's because they're lying about why they're banning these things.
00:32:30.000 They're banning these things for no reason.
00:32:32.000 They're fear-mongering to make money and get donations, and they want to terrify people, and guns are scary.
00:32:38.000 That's it.
00:32:39.000 But as you're pointing out, 99.9% of the time, people are walking around and ain't nothing happening.
00:32:46.000 Yeah.
00:32:47.000 Right, but gun lobbyists, they get paid big bucks, anti-gun lobbyists, excuse me.
00:32:50.000 There's lots of organizations shelling out money for anti-gun lobbying.
00:32:53.000 And they have to, you know, they have to figure out a way to justify their salary.
00:32:56.000 They got to do something.
00:32:57.000 So they drum up all this fear and all this propaganda.
00:33:01.000 I always liked the phrase, an armed society is a polite society.
00:33:05.000 I'm not sure who said it.
00:33:07.000 It was someone very influential from the past.
00:33:09.000 In the chat, you might know who that was.
00:33:10.000 And it's true.
00:33:12.000 When you think that everyone around you is armed with a weapon, with a gun, ain't no one going to be talking crap.
00:33:17.000 It's very rare that you're going to get in someone's face and provoke them if you think they're armed.
00:33:21.000 Like in Miami, I feel so safe walking around thinking like, everyone around me is armed right now.
00:33:27.000 We're good.
00:33:28.000 Even if like, if there's an external threat, we're good.
00:33:31.000 If there's an internal threat, we're good.
00:33:33.000 We're good.
00:33:34.000 And then people look at me and they're like, And then people look at me and they're like,
00:33:35.000 he's probably armed.
00:33:36.000 We're good.
00:33:37.000 It's just a great feeling.
00:33:38.000 I didn't think I would think that as an adult.
00:33:43.000 You know, you respect the potential for catastrophe, and there are a lot of people out there who think they can do whatever they want, because there's no one who can do anything back to them, and this leads to bad circumstances.
00:33:53.000 And then you look at places where people get to be armed, and they think twice.
00:33:58.000 Do you want to get into a fight on equal footing with these people?
00:34:00.000 No, but bullies, you know, you create a jurisdiction where only criminals have guns, and criminals are gonna enjoy that.
00:34:05.000 I'm gonna look up who said that quote, by the way.
00:34:07.000 Let's jump to the story from the Daily Dot!
00:34:10.000 Why is Kamala Harris getting accused of trying to frame Tucker Carlson?
00:34:14.000 The letter was from an Alabama, a man in Alabama named Tucker, because she did this.
00:34:19.000 And right away, anybody who's saying that's exactly the game she's playing.
00:34:24.000 She learned this from Tim Waltz, I imagine, because Waltz is the master of assumptive manipulation.
00:34:30.000 Make a statement that you know will mislead people because of the assumptions they will make from it, and then let them believe falsehoods.
00:34:37.000 Kamala Harris tweeted, Tucker, thank you for writing to me.
00:34:41.000 While we may not agree on every issue, we both know that every person in our nation
00:34:45.000 should have the freedom to live safe from gun violence.
00:34:47.000 The majority of Americans stand with us in support of common sense gun safety legislation.
00:34:51.000 And there's this letter that looks like it was written by a, you know, 12th grade or whatever.
00:34:56.000 Vice President Harris, one of my absolute favorite things in America is how people of different backgrounds and beliefs have the freedom to communicate with each other.
00:35:03.000 We're so blessed to live in a country, blah blah blah.
00:35:05.000 In the spirit of establishing common ground, even though I am fairly conservative and we may have our disagreements, blah blah blah.
00:35:10.000 All the best, Tucker.
00:35:12.000 Now, immediately, everybody says, Tucker Carlson, we get the point.
00:35:17.000 Ed Krasenstein, you know him, you'll love him, says, I bet this letter is from Tucker Carlson.
00:35:21.000 To which I responded, remember when I called you evil?
00:35:24.000 Tucker Carlson responded with a fake letter of his own from Kamala.
00:35:29.000 Letter from a fan, dear Tucker, I can't believe I'm writing you this letter and there's hearts over every, you know, and then it's signed Kamala.
00:35:37.000 This looks like—so why is she being accused of trying to frame Tucker?
00:35:41.000 Well, it's not so much frame.
00:35:42.000 It's she's trying to trick people into thinking Tucker has been cordial with her and offered her up some support, when he absolutely has not.
00:35:49.000 Because most people only read headlines, you're going to hear rumors of, oh, Kamala—here's their intention.
00:35:57.000 Their intention is that someone's going to say, oh, did you see that thing where Kamala was thanking Tucker because they, like, found some common ground on gun control?
00:36:03.000 That's going to what we call Purple Monkey Dishwasher into liberals being like, even Tucker Carlson was saying we should have gun control!
00:36:11.000 That's the manipulation play.
00:36:13.000 We only see it because we're on the internet every single day.
00:36:15.000 But if this was back 20 or 30 years, this would have landed on the news and people would have just genuinely believed that it was a conservative praising Kamala Harris.
00:36:25.000 I was reading, it's Robert Heinlein, beyond the horizon, an armed society is a polite society.
00:36:29.000 That's the quote.
00:36:29.000 But this, did it say it's signed from Tucker?
00:36:32.000 Is that Tucker?
00:36:33.000 Yeah, it's vague on purpose, and there's even a mention that even though I'm conservative, I think XYZ.
00:36:38.000 And then she says, Tucker, thank you for writing me.
00:36:40.000 We may not agree on every issue.
00:36:42.000 It's really sounding like she's having a conversation with a prominent conservative person that she personally knows she doesn't agree with.
00:36:49.000 Otherwise, it makes no sense.
00:36:51.000 A constituent who writes to you and says, I may be conservative, you don't be like, well, we may not agree.
00:36:54.000 Why would you say that?
00:36:56.000 If it's someone prominent who has publicly disagreed with you, you'd say, thank you for writing me.
00:37:00.000 I know we don't agree.
00:37:02.000 It's a manipulation game.
00:37:04.000 Tim Walz does it when he says stuff like, you know, when I deployed and the things that I saw, and then I come back and they say, you're on your own, buddy.
00:37:13.000 I just can't believe our mental health issues in this country.
00:37:16.000 And then he wants you to believe.
00:37:18.000 He wants you to imagine in your mind, there's shelling going on.
00:37:22.000 So what he actually said was, he was at a hearing on mental health for veterans.
00:37:25.000 And he says, when those of us who deployed for enduring freedom, we come back, they give us the horse whisperer and they say, be nice.
00:37:33.000 Well, we're not going to be nice.
00:37:35.000 We?
00:37:35.000 Bro, you were in Italy.
00:37:37.000 And the joke was that he's got PTSD from getting bad spaghetti or something.
00:37:41.000 Granted, he was doing security work in Europe.
00:37:43.000 That's not where the war was, but he wants to trick you.
00:37:46.000 He wants you to assume, when he says, when we were deployed for Operation Enduring Freedom, we came back and they gave us the horse whisperer and said, you play nice.
00:37:56.000 Or when he says, you know, millions of families like mine have been affected by IVF, right?
00:38:00.000 But actually, he didn't use IVF as a fertility treatment.
00:38:03.000 He used a different fertility treatment that doesn't involve creating an embryo outside of someone's body.
00:38:07.000 Like, you know, he is implying this.
00:38:09.000 EV Magazine had a post on X where they basically, they're saying, The Harris campaign is basically girl bossing and gaslighting.
00:38:15.000 Like, that's how they're going to win this election, they think.
00:38:17.000 And I just find that to be kind of sick and gross.
00:38:20.000 I mean, they will tell you that Trump is the captain of misinformation and false news,
00:38:25.000 and he has to constantly be fact checked.
00:38:27.000 And then they pull a stunt like this.
00:38:29.000 Like, he's got an actual speech where he said something to the effect of,
00:38:34.000 you know, we deployed for this country and Operation Enduring Freedom.
00:38:39.000 And he's like, and I had, you know, my kids and they did this.
00:38:42.000 One night, I remember being on the Air Force Base in Bagram, and I saw this and blah, blah, blah.
00:38:47.000 It's called Assumptive Manipulation.
00:38:50.000 So what he did there was, I was in the military and was deployed.
00:38:54.000 Man, my kids, I got to see her because I came back right away.
00:38:57.000 But I remember being in Bagram one day, trying to make it seem like he was deployed.
00:39:02.000 Break for plausible deniability.
00:39:04.000 I was at Bagram.
00:39:05.000 He was at Bagram as a member of Congress, not on a deployment.
00:39:09.000 But that's the game you play.
00:39:10.000 And the family is like mine.
00:39:12.000 Millions of families like mine have been influenced, but not my family, but families like mine.
00:39:16.000 Exactly.
00:39:17.000 And then he tells this story on stage about the treatments.
00:39:20.000 We didn't know if they were going to work.
00:39:21.000 And then he's like, oh, those are my kids right there.
00:39:23.000 I love them.
00:39:24.000 And then his kids crying.
00:39:25.000 I love you, dad.
00:39:26.000 That's my dad.
00:39:27.000 And I'm like, your dad's on stage a lot.
00:39:29.000 With this, I bet they got the thing, they're like, oh my god, his name's Tucker.
00:39:32.000 We gotta run this.
00:39:32.000 No.
00:39:33.000 No way, dude.
00:39:34.000 Oh, I think it's a real letter from some kid named Tucker.
00:39:37.000 How many views on this tweet?
00:39:38.000 2.9 million.
00:39:39.000 But who doesn't sign their full name?
00:39:42.000 You're gonna write a letter to Kamala Harris and be like...
00:39:45.000 From Ian.
00:39:46.000 It could be fabricated.
00:39:47.000 It could be.
00:39:48.000 But if it wasn't, I could see them being like, ooh, let's hit this one hard.
00:39:51.000 Let's just say Tucker.
00:39:52.000 People will think it's Carlson.
00:39:53.000 Let's just make a big thing out of Tucker.
00:39:57.000 If Tucker truly got a letter from a girl named Kamala, that would be something he might be like, thank you, Kamala.
00:40:01.000 So what you do is, you go and find someone, you ask your assistant, find me someone named Kamala who wants to write a gag letter.
00:40:08.000 We'll pay him 50 bucks.
00:40:09.000 And then you can literally say, this letter actually came from Kamala.
00:40:12.000 Here she is.
00:40:14.000 And so they'll be able to be like, Tucker actually wrote this, but I got a question.
00:40:17.000 Um, it's written in pencil, handwritten, and there's no last name sign to it.
00:40:22.000 Who just- Tucker!
00:40:24.000 Was vague intentional.
00:40:24.000 That's me.
00:40:25.000 Vague intentional.
00:40:25.000 I don't sign my full name.
00:40:27.000 I just say Ian.
00:40:27.000 But that's me.
00:40:28.000 I have to give the campaign credit.
00:40:30.000 As annoying, and I think you called it evil, you know, all the factual inaccuracies.
00:40:35.000 Look, they're trying to win an election.
00:40:37.000 So the Trump campaign, be aware.
00:40:40.000 Kamala Harris is pulling on all the stops to win an election.
00:40:43.000 Dude, it's the dirtiest thing.
00:40:45.000 Saying that Trump is a threat to democracy and then the Democratic Party installing a candidate with no primary is the threat to democracy.
00:40:53.000 And they say, accuse your opponent of what you are doing.
00:40:56.000 This is like an old tactic.
00:40:57.000 Linsky.
00:40:59.000 Saul Alinsky rules for radicals.
00:41:01.000 That's like what the is that like a antifa origin of anti Marxist code book essentially they they live and die by that book.
00:41:09.000 Marxism is the idea of if you want was that just about getting power is like making your movement successful.
00:41:16.000 Yeah, it is the most blatant, dumb manipulation.
00:41:19.000 But if people aren't ready for it, then I guess it's easy to find if you hear it enough times.
00:41:24.000 Well, the next headline is going to be, you know, conservative political commentators freak out about Kamala Harris level like they're going to act like the response is calling it sort of a manipulation tactic.
00:41:35.000 is actually just like conservative hysteria. I mean, this is the thing. It's do something wrong,
00:41:40.000 get caught, and then just act like the other people are being unreasonable. And we'll do
00:41:43.000 this over and over again until we get to election day. And I think that, you know, should be a
00:41:48.000 concern for Democratic voters, right? Obviously, you know, Republicans are Kamala Harris fans. But
00:41:55.000 if you're a moderate or independent, and this is her strategy, which is to sort of be manipulative
00:41:59.000 to get her way, what do you think she'll be like in the White House? It'll get worse,
00:42:04.000 because at that point, she has no reason to try and sort of even play moderate at all. And I think
00:42:09.000 American people, we were talking about this a little before when we're talking about low trust and intelligence agencies and the FBI and CIA.
00:42:16.000 If you think your president is just there for herself and is going to do or say anything to promote left totalitarianism to her own benefit, I don't think that she is beloved enough to pull that off.
00:42:31.000 Clarification, it was not Marx, nor Rules for Radicals, to accuse your enemy.
00:42:36.000 It was the Nazis.
00:42:37.000 It was Goebbels.
00:42:38.000 Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propagandist.
00:42:40.000 Accuse the other of that you are guilty.
00:42:43.000 It is so blatant, and I don't know what the right adjective is to describe what that is.
00:42:50.000 I mean, you should know by now that that is a totalitarian tactic.
00:42:55.000 If you study Nazism, which you should, and understand the history of how a small political party can seize control of a government, it's pretty blatant.
00:43:04.000 You repeat a lie enough times and then people will start to believe it.
00:43:06.000 That was another one of their tactics.
00:43:08.000 I mean, Marx may have said something similar, too.
00:43:10.000 You accuse your enemy of what you are doing.
00:43:13.000 That is... Well, that's how they got out of the Burisma scandal.
00:43:19.000 Joe Biden was guilty of a quid pro quo.
00:43:21.000 He committed crimes in Ukraine.
00:43:23.000 He went to the president of Ukraine and said, I want a personal political favor in exchange for the United States' congressionally approved loan guarantees.
00:43:31.000 And they said, you have no authority to block that.
00:43:32.000 He says, call the president, see what he says.
00:43:33.000 If you don't fire the prosecutor in six hours, you're not getting a billion dollars.
00:43:37.000 So they did it.
00:43:38.000 When Trump found out, because Biden bragged about it, Trump calls, I think it was Zelensky, he calls and says, what was this?
00:43:44.000 There's this video of Biden saying something about, you don't get the billion dollars, you're not fined unless you fire the prosecutor.
00:43:50.000 What was that all about?
00:43:51.000 And he's like, I don't know.
00:43:52.000 He's like, well, take a look into it.
00:43:53.000 I want to know what this is about.
00:43:54.000 And so with that, they go after Trump and say he did the quid pro quo.
00:43:59.000 So Joe Biden breaks the law.
00:44:01.000 Trump trying to investigate it is Trump breaking the law.
00:44:04.000 That's the game they play.
00:44:06.000 Then, when we come out and say Joe Biden did a quid pro quo, they go, oh, nice try, because Trump did.
00:44:11.000 And this is actually fairly common in all scales of law enforcement.
00:44:14.000 Whoever calls the cops first wins.
00:44:16.000 Period.
00:44:16.000 And it's not absolute, but...
00:44:20.000 Uh, there's an old, uh, con artist trick where what they'll do is they'll take a dummy wallet with their ID in it, empty, wait for you to leave an ATM.
00:44:28.000 Most people, like, you can see the screen, you can see, uh, their receipt, you know how much money they took out, or you pick a small number.
00:44:34.000 If you don't take money out of the ATM, they get at least 20 bucks.
00:44:37.000 Reverse pickpocket, call the cops and say, I'm following the pickpocket who's got my wallet right now.
00:44:41.000 The cops show up, you point them and say, that person stole my wallet.
00:44:43.000 The cops search the person, find your wallet, and then you say, and that 20 bucks was mine, and they give you the money.
00:44:48.000 Whoever calls the cops first wins.
00:44:50.000 The cops play, it's a game of timestamps.
00:44:54.000 If two people get into a fight, whoever calls the cops first wins.
00:44:57.000 That's the majority of times.
00:44:58.000 Majority, yeah.
00:44:59.000 You'll get, I saw a video of domestic violence, a woman called the cops, the cops came and they're like, they didn't know, and the kid, there was a third party, so the cops were able to discern that actually the woman was the guy beating the dude, so they arrested her, the woman that called the cops.
00:45:13.000 But probably, like you're saying, bias.
00:45:15.000 It's like confirmation bias.
00:45:16.000 It has to do psychologically with what comes down to who do you give presumption to.
00:45:20.000 In any situation, when there's two competing clauses, you have to give presumption to someone.
00:45:26.000 So psychologically, whoever makes their claims first is assumed presumption.
00:45:30.000 And when the cops are like, well they called for our help, they must be the good guy.
00:45:34.000 So I love in Airplane GTA, what you do is, if the character, if you push somebody, you know what you can do in GTA is if you keep bumping into someone, they'll eventually fall over and try and fight you.
00:45:46.000 So you instigate the fight, then run away from them, they follow you, and then find a cop car, and then once they hit you, the cops come out and arrest the other person.
00:45:52.000 Sounds like NATO.
00:45:54.000 Pressing up on Russia.
00:45:55.000 Hey, they attacked us.
00:45:57.000 That's right.
00:45:59.000 But anyway, yeah.
00:46:01.000 I think that, I mean, it's like accusing the Russians of trying to conquer Europe when it's the liberal economic order that put military bases in Germany and has basically created NATO.
00:46:09.000 And has taken over Europe.
00:46:09.000 Yeah.
00:46:10.000 And Iraq and Libya and the attempt in Syria.
00:46:14.000 You know that new Reagan movie is coming out?
00:46:17.000 And they have that cover version of Everybody Wants to Rule the World, Tears for Fears.
00:46:20.000 What a great song.
00:46:21.000 I know.
00:46:21.000 And I'm just like, you know, guys, you got it wrong.
00:46:24.000 Everybody doesn't want to rule the world.
00:46:26.000 They really don't.
00:46:27.000 I know it's a fun song, but I'm just thinking about it and they're playing it with the movie Reagan, making a point about presidential power and the conflict and all that stuff.
00:46:35.000 But it's just like the reality is most people just want to be left alone and they want to Watch the game and have a pizza with their kids, and they want to make sure their kids are getting a good education, and then they're doing the right by their family.
00:46:47.000 Very few people actually want to rule the world.
00:46:49.000 Vladimir Putin, I do not believe, is one of them.
00:46:52.000 I should say this.
00:46:53.000 It's possible Vladimir Putin wants to rule the world.
00:46:56.000 He certainly doesn't have the capability to do so.
00:46:57.000 I don't think he's a good guy.
00:46:58.000 I think he's a power-hungry, you know, maniac who's maintained power in Russia for decades by manipulating the political system.
00:47:05.000 But he is not someone that I view as a Prominent threat?
00:47:09.000 China's a bunch bigger threat to the United States in terms of economic expansion and the exploration and colonization they're doing.
00:47:15.000 But NATO has taken over and colonized Europe, and is trying to take Ukraine.
00:47:22.000 NATO's got Latvia, Estonia, they're bordering Russia already.
00:47:25.000 Russia's got Belarus, and then NATO's trying to take Ukraine.
00:47:28.000 And Ukraine's got a Russian base in Sevastopol, and that's their access to the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, and NATO tried to take it away from them.
00:47:37.000 And so, yeah, sorry, like, Russia was there and the U.S.
00:47:41.000 came in.
00:47:43.000 And when the pro-Russian regents of Ukraine said, yeah, we're going to declare this little decree and we're going to say we're pro-Russia, Ukraine was quite literally about to go F their shh up.
00:47:53.000 I don't know if you're aware of what happened.
00:47:56.000 Mariupol, similar stuff happened.
00:48:00.000 What happened?
00:48:00.000 Well, Russia maintains that their whole operation was to protect the individuals of the pro-Russian separatist regents from the Ukraine government.
00:48:11.000 There's been, and there were lots of skirmishes between the Ukrainian government and the pro-Russians.
00:48:15.000 Look, lots of pro-Russian Ukrainians have gotten quite literally taken out of their house and tied to trees.
00:48:20.000 We've seen many of those viral videos.
00:48:23.000 So yeah, the Russian, the Ukrainian government is not very kind to the pro-Russian regions of Ukraine.
00:48:29.000 Well, and so he's saying right now there's no reason to even talk about a ceasefire.
00:48:33.000 He's going to talk to Biden next month and we'll just press forward.
00:48:36.000 I thought they were this oppressed underdog that we had to spend millions and millions and millions of dollars on.
00:48:41.000 I don't think people have an accurate picture of the dynamic between.
00:48:45.000 There's a very interesting through line between what happened to Germany after World War I and what happened to the Soviet Union after the breakup of the Soviet Union.
00:48:53.000 In World War I, Eastern Germany was split off and given to Poland.
00:48:58.000 And then the Polish government started excising the Germans, the actual Germans that lived there.
00:49:03.000 And Hitler, that was one of his complaints.
00:49:05.000 You can't just genocide Germans just because you control the land.
00:49:09.000 So when the Ukraine was split off from the Soviet Union, and then there's Russians living in eastern Ukraine, they start abusing those people because they're ethnically not, whatever, borderland Ukrainian.
00:49:20.000 And then the Russians are like, you can't just slaughter native Russians.
00:49:23.000 Like, that's a very similar danger that can lead to like, we're going to take our land back so that you can't oppress the people or slaughter the people.
00:49:30.000 I wish I had more information about what they did to the Germans in Poland.
00:49:33.000 We got some big news.
00:49:34.000 This is Chuck Colesto tweeting, breaking now, Brazilian Supreme Court minister summons Elon Musk.
00:49:39.000 Musk has 24 hours or X will be banned.
00:49:43.000 And then we have this tweet from Nicholas Ferreira.
00:49:46.000 I don't know... We've got an STF official tweeting this.
00:49:49.000 This is the Supremo Tribunal Federal, looks like Brazilian Supreme Court, issuing a statement.
00:49:56.000 The Brazilian Supreme Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes has issued a summons for Elon Musk and threatened to ban Axin Brazil in 24 hours.
00:50:05.000 Dictatorship continues.
00:50:06.000 So again, this is coming from... This is really interesting.
00:50:11.000 Global Government Affairs on Ax, verified, says last night Alexandre de Moraes threatened our legal representative in Brazil with arrest if we do not comply with his censorship orders.
00:50:21.000 He did so in a secret order, this is from the 17th by the way, which we share here to expose his actions.
00:50:27.000 Despite our numerous appeals to the Supreme Court not being heard, the Brazilian public not being informed about these orders, and our Brazilian staff having no responsibility or control over whether content is blocked on our platform, Moraes has chosen to threaten our staff in Brazil Rather than respect the law or due process, we then have this post from STF, which has got the government seal on it, Brazil, and will translate it by Supreme Court Federal, the highest instance in the judiciary works to guarantee your rights.
00:50:54.000 The Constitution is yours, they say.
00:50:56.000 Posting this, and I can only assume this is the mandate for Elon Musk to appear.
00:51:01.000 Elon Musk appears in it.
00:51:02.000 I don't speak Portuguese, so give me a second to translate this, but, well, following the Pavel Durov story.
00:51:09.000 Didn't we just learn from Francis this is a bad time for tech billionaires who have controversial social media platforms to be traveling internationally?
00:51:16.000 I mean, it is wild to me that this would come the day that Pavlodourov is indicted in France and told he can't leave the country, has to check in at a police station every couple days, or I think it's like twice a week.
00:51:28.000 You know, Elon Musk is in a different position because he's, I would argue, even more high profile than Pavlodourov, but you know, Keep in mind, they're threatening his legal representative with jail.
00:51:38.000 They're threatening a lawyer with jail time.
00:51:39.000 So if you've been following the Brazilian Supreme Court, they've been overrun by radical leftists.
00:51:45.000 By the way, this is what they want to do in America.
00:51:47.000 They want to have judicial activists on the court, people who will interpret the law and do a bunch of things.
00:51:51.000 So this has been coming down the pipe for a while.
00:51:54.000 By the way, this is the same Supreme Court that indicted Bolsonaro for not doing enough during COVID.
00:52:01.000 So the Supreme Court in Brazil has become very politicized.
00:52:05.000 They've detained actual U.S.
00:52:06.000 citizens, some people who are some pro-Trump folks in Brazil before, so it's a scary time for Brazilian nationalists in that area, and certainly it's a scary time for anyone associated with X in Brazil, because I would not be surprised if Brazil actually throws someone in jail.
00:52:22.000 Again, their Supreme Court has a bunch of power, and their Supreme Court is acting as activists, so this is certainly concerning for X, but Do you think Elon Musk will go, though?
00:52:32.000 No way!
00:52:34.000 Elon will never set foot in Brazil if he has any brains, no.
00:52:37.000 So I took the image and I put it in Google Translate, and this is what came out.
00:52:41.000 It says, Reporter, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, Petition Federal District, Brazil, August 20th, 2024.
00:52:47.000 Minister Alexandre de Moraes, reporter, I like how they spelled it, in accordance with the decision handed down in the aforementioned proceedings.
00:52:54.000 The Judicial Secretariat of the Federal Supreme Court proceeded with the intimacy, by electronic means, of Elon Musk, of the decision handed down in the aforementioned proceedings, which determined the indication within 24 hours of the name and qualifications of the newly-representative ex-Brazil in the national territory.
00:53:08.000 So, it's gonna be all garbled, because it's translated, of course.
00:53:12.000 There you go.
00:53:12.000 They are going to shut down X in Brazil.
00:53:14.000 Wow.
00:53:14.000 at social network X, formerly Twitter, until the court orders are effectively complied
00:53:18.000 with and the daily fines paid in accordance with Article 12, Item 3 of Law No. blah blah
00:53:23.000 blah given it passed.
00:53:24.000 There you go.
00:53:25.000 They are going to shut down X in Brazil.
00:53:28.000 Wow.
00:53:29.000 That's amazing.
00:53:31.000 This is, I think these are inevitabilities of social networks.
00:53:34.000 We had this with Mines.
00:53:35.000 The Chinese wouldn't run Mines in China unless we complied.
00:53:38.000 So we just said we're not going to run in China, which sucks.
00:53:41.000 And China's done that with a lot of stuff.
00:53:42.000 I mean, LinkedIn doesn't even exist in China at this point.
00:53:44.000 And then, so now to go after CEOs like what we saw with Pavel Durov.
00:53:48.000 Is that how you say his last name?
00:53:50.000 Pavel Durov?
00:53:51.000 of Telegram in France, which is, we should talk about that for a while.
00:53:54.000 I think the solution is you decentralize a platform so that you, as an owner of the system, have no control over it, that it's meshed device to device, so there are no central servers to shut down, and then let the protocol function.
00:54:08.000 Because really, it's the function of X that's valuable, not the ownership, not the money.
00:54:14.000 Elon can make his money off SpaceX and just oversee the protocol translation.
00:54:19.000 That would be really great for humanity, because I'd love to see X proliferate.
00:54:23.000 They're going to, obviously, in Brazil, try and stop it from being on the Play Store.
00:54:27.000 That doesn't mean people can't find it on, like, Pirate Bay or, you know, dark web stuff in Brazil and find it against the law down there and use it anyway, which sometimes if governments go totalitarian, they'll lock you up.
00:54:39.000 In Brazil?
00:54:40.000 I mean, we're doing that kind of thing?
00:54:41.000 There's no free speech in Brazil.
00:54:43.000 It'll massively thwart your ability.
00:54:45.000 Look, there's been a lot of discourse on X in Brazil.
00:54:47.000 Like there's lots of, if you're an American, if you're talking about Catalonian issues, you're getting a bunch of follows from Brazilian accounts on X. The intention is to shut down all that discourse.
00:54:56.000 So they're actually probably, I don't know if they'll arrest people for accessing X because that just makes them look like tyrannical a-holes.
00:55:03.000 But I think it's just going to massively shut down the conversation to where Certain free-flowing of information isn't happening, things aren't getting organized, rallies, people aren't meeting for events.
00:55:13.000 That is the intention, to shut down X as a discursive tool in Brazil.
00:55:18.000 So if I could access X from another network, like I don't, I agree with you.
00:55:22.000 Some people like you will, but it's going to be a smaller percentage of, you know, Like if it was interoperable with other networks like YouTube, Facebook, Mines, Rumble, if you could be on Mines and access your X account or access other people's X accounts, then no matter what they, you know, obviously not no matter what they try and censor on X, but you'll still have access to the platform without being on the platform.
00:55:44.000 That could be kind of a way around it.
00:55:46.000 You know, dictators always will always try and just shut it down with brute force.
00:55:50.000 Right.
00:55:51.000 But, you know, metaphorically speaking, the chat will never get that big in Brazil, right?
00:55:56.000 If you do all these underground ways of interacting on X, whether through proxies or whatever, it'll never be as many people as it is in the status quo.
00:56:04.000 And that ultimately is the goal of the Brazilian government.
00:56:08.000 And I think they're going to probably succeed because, again, they've been researching this ever since April.
00:56:14.000 And what is their goal is just to either have them do specific censorships on the entire platform or just on the Brazilian part of the platform?
00:56:23.000 They think that Elon Musk is fueling disinformation.
00:56:27.000 That's the crux of it.
00:56:28.000 It's a small group.
00:56:28.000 They don't think that.
00:56:30.000 They know that Elon Musk is allowing people to speak freely, so they're claiming it's disinformation.
00:56:33.000 They're claiming that, right.
00:56:36.000 Okay, and then with the Pavel Durov stuff, is it the same plan by the French government?
00:56:40.000 They're claiming women, abuse of women.
00:56:41.000 Yeah, they're saying that the platform allows child trafficking and drug trafficking and criminal activities that he's not appropriately moderating.
00:56:48.000 And they say we moderate to the standards set by the EU, and you're going after us unfairly.
00:56:54.000 That's like going after cops for the cops not finding the criminals.
00:56:59.000 You're saying, you're at fault because crime is happening in society and you're not stopping it.
00:57:03.000 They're like, dude, we can't stop all the crime in society.
00:57:05.000 Well, it's actually much simpler than that.
00:57:06.000 It's the lie they're telling stupid people who believe it, when what they're really doing is saying, this guy's Russian and French.
00:57:13.000 If the FSB, if Russia gets a hold of him, then they're going to have him unlock Telegram and all of its users to Russia, take him in France, have him give access to Western forces instead, and then we'll use Telegram against the Russians.
00:57:29.000 The rumor going around is that Macron invited Durov to dinner.
00:57:34.000 And so he flew to France to meet with Macron and was greeted instead by a bunch of police officers who arrested him.
00:57:41.000 Now he's not allowed to leave the country.
00:57:43.000 Keep in mind, this guy is very anti-Putin.
00:57:49.000 And the UAE, where he's also a citizen, has started saying they're asking for the ability to meet with him in a consular capacity.
00:57:55.000 So it's interesting because it's really opening kind of an international skirmish over him because, again, Telegram's headquartered in Dubai.
00:58:03.000 So France is now going up against a company that's not even based there and saying, you guys are doing something that we don't like.
00:58:10.000 It's very messy.
00:58:11.000 I mean, similar, very similarly to X.
00:58:14.000 The UAE just said they're not going to do something with the French, that they're going to violate some contract they have with the French.
00:58:20.000 Did you see that?
00:58:21.000 Yeah, was it the plane thing?
00:58:23.000 I can't remember what it was.
00:58:23.000 Oh man, it was like a big deal, like a $550 million, $400 million.
00:58:26.000 It's like they're willing to take some sort of economic reaction.
00:58:30.000 They were suspending a fighter jet deal.
00:58:31.000 Fighter jet deal, right?
00:58:33.000 With the French over this Pavel Durov situation, so there's a boycott.
00:58:37.000 Man, it's shocking.
00:58:38.000 I don't know.
00:58:39.000 And that's just a way to diplomatically send a signal, hey, this is a priority.
00:58:44.000 All other diplomatic channels are now shut down until this issue gets resolved, which is a pretty big sign for the UAE to send.
00:58:52.000 It means they value him, which I don't think Europe really thought much about.
00:58:57.000 And they believe that Europe is not protecting his interests.
00:58:59.000 They believe that Europe is not engaging in free Western democracy.
00:59:03.000 They're not protecting his interests.
00:59:04.000 They feel the need to make these brash measures.
00:59:07.000 Certainly not buying fighter jets is a brash measure because you're interfering with your country's national security.
00:59:14.000 because of this humanitarian issue with someone who's not even a citizen.
00:59:17.000 So the UAE is not buying the fighter jets from France?
00:59:20.000 He's a citizen of the UAE.
00:59:21.000 Oh he is.
00:59:21.000 He's got a lot of citizenship which is why it becomes interesting.
00:59:24.000 He's a Russian native but then like you pointed out he left Russia because of conflicts with
00:59:29.000 the Kremlin.
00:59:29.000 And it's not just him it's also his brother, I think his name is Nikolai,
00:59:34.000 who France has also issued an arrest warrant for.
00:59:37.000 So it's just clearly targeted at these two guys who are in charge of an app that they would like more access to, but he has different countries vying for, you know, willing to step in to protect him.
00:59:49.000 There were similar conversations coming out of Russia being like, the circumstances are very unclear to us and we want more information from France.
00:59:55.000 I'm thinking about World War II and how Einstein fled to the United States.
00:59:58.000 It was like they wanted some scientists to work on the Manhattan Project.
01:00:01.000 They didn't have to arrest them and force them to do it.
01:00:03.000 Like, if they arrested Pavel because they want to force him to use Tik—not TikTok, but Telegram—as part of the war effort, well, you shouldn't have to arrest the guy.
01:00:12.000 He should want to go help you.
01:00:14.000 Like, that's what Einstein and the scientists did.
01:00:16.000 And he probably said no.
01:00:18.000 He definitely said no.
01:00:18.000 They've already talked to him on numerous occasions, and he's refused to comply with what they want.
01:00:23.000 So as the story goes, they first will offer you, they'll first ask, then they'll offer you money, and then they'll use brute force.
01:00:29.000 He's refused to create a backdoor for child porn investigations.
01:00:33.000 And this is what the Feds have leaked previously.
01:00:35.000 I don't know if that's true.
01:00:36.000 Hasn't he responded that that's not the case, and he has allowed them to do that?
01:00:40.000 This is what the Feds have said.
01:00:41.000 Feds have said previously.
01:00:42.000 Or the French Feds?
01:00:44.000 No, this is the U.S.
01:00:45.000 government.
01:00:45.000 When the U.S.
01:00:46.000 government The U.S.
01:00:47.000 government previously requested a backdoor over child sex crimes or something.
01:00:53.000 That was the reason why they wanted it.
01:00:55.000 Now, this is typically what the government will say every time it's a sexual investigation, obviously to gain sympathy, but I think it's a principle issue for this guy.
01:01:05.000 It's encrypted, his app.
01:01:07.000 I mean, it's not... I'm sure he'd love to help those kids, but for him, it's just...
01:01:13.000 He's created a secure app.
01:01:14.000 He doesn't work with governments.
01:01:15.000 Yeah.
01:01:16.000 And Telegram is one of the biggest messaging platforms in the world, second only to Meta's WhatsApp.
01:01:20.000 Is France going to bring in Mark Zuckerberg and say, hey, we know that people use WhatsApp for nefarious reasons.
01:01:26.000 I don't know that for sure.
01:01:27.000 I'm just making an assumption.
01:01:28.000 People use all kinds of communication channels to do all kinds of terrible things.
01:01:32.000 Why specifically are we going after this encrypted platform?
01:01:36.000 Because of its ties to Russia.
01:01:37.000 No, it's because Zuckerberg is neutered and WhatsApp's not encrypted.
01:01:40.000 He gets a call and they say, do it.
01:01:41.000 And he goes, yes, sir.
01:01:43.000 Yeah, there's already a problem.
01:01:44.000 But if their problem is, you know, the exploitation of cyber channels for all kinds of malicious things, whether it's, you know, sexual exploitation of children or money laundering or whatever it is, like, shouldn't you just be doing this to all apps?
01:01:55.000 Why just Telegram?
01:01:57.000 They don't let you?
01:01:57.000 Well, I think they do, actually.
01:01:59.000 I think the Feds have free reign with Apple and Microsoft.
01:02:02.000 That's in America, but I'm wondering about France.
01:02:05.000 Does France treat everything the same way?
01:02:06.000 Five eyes, I would imagine.
01:02:07.000 Right.
01:02:08.000 I think that France would get the five eyes treatment.
01:02:10.000 I don't know.
01:02:10.000 Meaning that, what is it?
01:02:12.000 England, United States, New Zealand, Australia, and who's the fifth eye?
01:02:16.000 Is it France?
01:02:16.000 They cooperate very extensively.
01:02:18.000 Yeah, they trade spy data.
01:02:19.000 So, yeah, France would have that.
01:02:22.000 Or is it Germany?
01:02:23.000 God, who's the fifth eye?
01:02:24.000 Come on, guys, tell me.
01:02:26.000 Five eyes?
01:02:27.000 It's the US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the UK.
01:02:30.000 It's the British Empire, basically, plus America.
01:02:33.000 Israel, right there.
01:02:35.000 Israel, yeah.
01:02:35.000 They're not part of Five Eyes.
01:02:37.000 How convenient for them.
01:02:38.000 Yeah, they're part of Five Eyes, I would imagine, too.
01:02:41.000 There's more than five.
01:02:43.000 The sixth eye, your pineal gland.
01:02:47.000 Anyway, it's brutal.
01:02:49.000 What should Pavel do?
01:02:51.000 Should he flee France?
01:02:55.000 I can't say it.
01:02:56.000 I can't, I can't commit, I can't encourage this guy to commit a crime on TV.
01:02:59.000 So I'm just concerned for his life, his livelihood and the progeny of Telegram.
01:03:03.000 He's restricted to France.
01:03:04.000 Yeah, he has to check in at a police station twice a week.
01:03:08.000 I mean, I don't think he should flee.
01:03:10.000 He's too high profile.
01:03:11.000 And I think- Where's he gonna go?
01:03:12.000 Yeah, where's he gonna go?
01:03:13.000 And also, you know, if he flies, except for maybe the UAE, you know, I think any other European country would be like, we're gonna send you back to France.
01:03:21.000 And if he goes to Russia, he's basically becomes the enemy of the I also think the look would be bad, right?
01:03:27.000 It would be marketed as him fleeing from the consequences of his terrible actions.
01:03:33.000 If he really has nothing to hide, if Telegram is acting in good faith and they have the right to behave the way they are, which I actually assume they do, then him fleeing makes him look more guilty than he is.
01:03:44.000 It's kind of what France wants.
01:03:46.000 Man, the end-to-end encryption's important.
01:03:48.000 I don't... Like, I look at two futures of the world.
01:03:50.000 There's one where we all know all of each other's thoughts.
01:03:53.000 Except for the people that control the system and don't want you to know what they're thinking.
01:03:56.000 But that we're all in, like, this Borg-like neural net where there is no encryption and everyone is moving as you do.
01:04:01.000 There was a queen...
01:04:02.000 Yeah, a Borg queen that you couldn't read her mind, or maybe you could.
01:04:06.000 She was unique and had her own will.
01:04:09.000 Yeah.
01:04:09.000 So even in a system where you think we're all going to be unencrypted and know each other's thoughts, there's going to be people that are watching and you don't see, unfortunately.
01:04:17.000 But then there's the other system where there's all this encrypted secrecy going on, and then you have room for error, room for crime, room for horror, and the destruction of individuals and societies in secret.
01:04:27.000 And that's like, that's what it's always been up to this point, is you could have a secret conversation in your home with somebody, and then they built spy satellites and they could tap your phone and stuff, and we're like moving towards the Borg.
01:04:38.000 Like, crap.
01:04:39.000 Perhaps, but let's pull up this tweet.
01:04:42.000 I got this tweet from Radio Genoa.
01:04:44.000 An Englishman, so the story goes, posted a British flag on Facebook, and the police actually tried to arrest him for being offensive.
01:04:53.000 Now, there's no real reporting on this.
01:04:54.000 I don't know exactly what happened, except for this video's got millions of views.
01:05:00.000 And, uh...
01:05:01.000 If you're refusing to take out your mobile phone, I'm going to ask you those questions.
01:05:04.000 And that is not for people who have no other choice but to arrest you in all the possible ways.
01:05:08.000 Yes, well...
01:05:09.000 What crime?
01:05:14.000 Tell me what crime.
01:05:15.000 1, 2, 7.
01:05:16.000 Which says what?
01:05:17.000 Which says what?
01:05:18.000 Where you post something that causes gross misconduct, gross offence, or of a menacing character,
01:05:22.000 which causes a person anxiety.
01:05:25.000 I'm sorry, these videos are so annoying.
01:05:27.000 Well, they put music, so it makes it impossible to hear what the police are saying, but they're saying you're in violations of the Communications Act for posting something grossly offensive.
01:05:35.000 The guy says what I posted, the flag, to 30,000 followers, and then they move to arrest him, and then these other guys basically pull out, I am Spartacus, and then they back off.
01:05:47.000 This is social media in the UK, and you can Google all of the stories of people who have been arrested in the UK.
01:05:52.000 Take a look at going back to Count Dankula in Scotland.
01:05:55.000 He made a video of his dog raising its paw, and then he was basically having the dog do a Nazi salute as a joke.
01:06:01.000 His joke was to have the cutest thing do the most disgusting thing imaginable.
01:06:06.000 And he actually had to go to court over this.
01:06:07.000 They arrested him.
01:06:08.000 They charged him.
01:06:09.000 I believe he got convicted.
01:06:10.000 He had to pay a fine.
01:06:11.000 This is the UK on social media.
01:06:13.000 You post your opinion and now apparently it's the flag of your country.
01:06:16.000 And they're going to try to arrest you.
01:06:19.000 What was the context of that post?
01:06:21.000 I wish I could see it.
01:06:22.000 I imagine it's something like maybe he responded to somebody by posting the flag or something.
01:06:28.000 But either way.
01:06:30.000 The UK is screwed.
01:06:31.000 Yeah, a lot of these arrests, you'll hear these reports, it'll be like 70 year old man sentenced to five years behind bars for something he posted wherever.
01:06:39.000 The UK is such a bizarre place because they view people who say like, hey, I like being British and I like my country as some sort of threat now.
01:06:48.000 That's how you lose your country, right?
01:06:50.000 I mean... Oh, they lost it.
01:06:51.000 It's one thing to be actually threatening, but these kinds of, you know, and I feel this way about hate speech in America, these kinds of vague claims of like, like this co-op is saying, well, you post something that could give someone anxiety.
01:07:02.000 Well, I think it's coming to America.
01:07:04.000 If you look at what Tim Wall said the other day on the news, a right to free speech isn't guaranteed.
01:07:11.000 The left in the United States are already talking about some things being beyond the pale of being protected under free speech.
01:07:17.000 So, I mean, this is just an omen to just cherish what we have in America even further.
01:07:21.000 You can't rely on other people to give you free speech.
01:07:25.000 We need to build systems that are free.
01:07:27.000 The freedom is integral in the system.
01:07:29.000 It used to be Where you just had gun rights, property rights, get off my lawn, I can say what I want, we're all armed, we're not gonna mess with each other, we agree.
01:07:37.000 But when you have central overlords trying to mute this and that, you need systems that can't be censored if you want free speech, literal free speech.
01:07:46.000 Of course, that doesn't mean there's no consequence for certain types of speech.
01:07:49.000 Dude, it's been a decade.
01:07:52.000 Where are any of these CEOs to actually do this?
01:07:54.000 Jack Dorsey was talking about, well, you've got to make a system where you can have encryption and then people can't be censored, and then he did nothing.
01:08:04.000 I think because the video is so slow on decentralized systems, on mesh networks, it takes so long for BitTorrent to load a video or something.
01:08:15.000 And so people just go to what's convenient.
01:08:17.000 And I mean, God, the technology is amazing.
01:08:19.000 Without YouTube and Google Central Systems, this TV show, the ability to produce at this level is phenomenal for our consciousness as a species.
01:08:28.000 But the danger of centralized systems getting hijacked is paramount.
01:08:32.000 Free speech allowed us to get to the point where we could build this stuff.
01:08:35.000 We needed to argue and make better stuff.
01:08:38.000 And Fuck the government.
01:08:40.000 I mean, that's the way we build, as a private entity, these amazing systems so that we can have a great government.
01:08:47.000 And that's why we have a First Amendment of freedom of speech and assembly, to make these kinds of things.
01:08:54.000 But so I feel like it's out there that the threat is coming from out there.
01:09:00.000 I know it's just like it runs through every man like like the desire to censor and we need censorship when it's righteous.
01:09:07.000 Damn, man.
01:09:08.000 This is it's just a tumbling cascade of what do we do?
01:09:11.000 We are moving in the direction of global totalitarianism.
01:09:14.000 Especially when you evaluate how many links are disappearing from the internet.
01:09:18.000 I don't know if you've also done analysis on that.
01:09:20.000 There are so many links going away from the internet.
01:09:22.000 Information, old articles, paid for hosting.
01:09:26.000 Hosting platforms are just getting taken off.
01:09:28.000 Links are just going away.
01:09:30.000 They want to control information.
01:09:32.000 Information's currently at your fingertips.
01:09:34.000 So this is why what Elon's doing is such a big problem.
01:09:37.000 This is why I support the mission however I can, pay for Twitter blue, encourage others to get on, because what Elon is doing is contrary to what the World Economic Forum is pushing, right?
01:09:49.000 This idea of controlling information.
01:09:52.000 The censorship is certainly out of control, and the United States, we just need to cherish what we have access to.
01:09:57.000 There are these technologies called the PermaWeb, where it's like Arweave is a company that works on the PermaWeb, where it can't be censored.
01:10:04.000 It can't be changed.
01:10:05.000 Once something gets written to the database, it's permanent.
01:10:08.000 But the problem with that is if you're 14 and you post some racist joke, and you don't know any better, it's permanent forever.
01:10:15.000 Like, you can't delete your post.
01:10:16.000 Like, oops, I made a mistake.
01:10:18.000 That's there forever.
01:10:20.000 There's a value to being able to kind of like, walk away from your past and become a new better person without it following you everywhere.
01:10:28.000 You used to be able to just move to a new city and kind of start a new life.
01:10:31.000 And if there's a permanent database of everything you've ever said and done, then that's also kind of dangerous.
01:10:40.000 But for some authority to be able to change and twist your life from a distance digitally, that's super dangerous and crazy.
01:10:49.000 I think the problem is the authority, especially right now in America, has one bent, right?
01:10:55.000 They don't treat people who espouse extremist ideology on either end of the political spectrum the same way.
01:11:02.000 There's one side that is bad, and there's one side that we just don't really talk about.
01:11:07.000 You know, I could understand the idea like, oh, you know, people post things online they don't really mean or it's a bad joke or whatever else and you want them prosecuted for that.
01:11:15.000 But also maybe we should become a culture that doesn't post all these things online.
01:11:19.000 And obviously, a little bit intense for me to be here on an internet-based podcast to say that.
01:11:24.000 On the other hand, you know, I think that people Do make their bones right now on the internet saying shocking things to get attention and to build a base and sometimes they use that platform for good and sometimes they don't.
01:11:38.000 But you know, we should all realize that our words have consequences and the reality is You don't want to live in a world where, because you hold some views, you are treated worse than others.
01:11:52.000 I mean, that's why I think hate speech laws are kind of, you know, one of the clear signals of the end of free speech in America.
01:11:59.000 Because who is anyone to say, well, you can't say that thing?
01:12:02.000 Because ultimately, that means that there is a higher power discerning and policing your speech.
01:12:06.000 Yeah, context of what you're saying, like the emotion behind what you're saying.
01:12:10.000 There are things that I won't type on Twitter, that I won't post in text, that I will say live with my voice, because you can hear my intention.
01:12:18.000 You can sense what I mean when I'm saying these.
01:12:21.000 What might even be considered cruel in text, they're not.
01:12:24.000 It's just they have to be communicated properly.
01:12:27.000 properly. Imagine tweeting at Ian, you smell bad, right?
01:12:31.000 Yeah. The interpretation of that tweet would be insulting, derogatory. But imagine Ian was hanging
01:12:36.000 out with a good friend and they went, you smell bad. Yeah, I'd be like, thank you. Yeah, it's
01:12:40.000 like they're not trying to insult you, they're trying to give you a heads up like, hey man, you
01:12:43.000 stink. Whereas online it's like, you smell bad. Right.
01:12:46.000 The context is missing.
01:12:47.000 And then you might discern it as hate.
01:12:49.000 It might be conceived as hate.
01:12:50.000 And then they'll be like, we got to go after that account.
01:12:52.000 And they're like, don't.
01:12:52.000 I wasn't hating.
01:12:53.000 I was expressing the danger of the corruption.
01:12:55.000 Here's another one.
01:12:57.000 What if someone tweeted at Ian, Ian, you're funky.
01:13:00.000 How would you interpret that on X?
01:13:02.000 Imagine someone went up to Ian and went, yo, Ian, you're funky.
01:13:05.000 Totally different context means something totally different now.
01:13:07.000 You know what I mean?
01:13:08.000 Like, we got to understand text is very different from speech.
01:13:11.000 I got the funk.
01:13:12.000 You know what I'm saying?
01:13:14.000 Or what if someone said, Ian, you're funky, and he was playing bass?
01:13:17.000 Exactly.
01:13:18.000 You know what I mean?
01:13:19.000 All that's lost in text.
01:13:20.000 And, like, there's some songs where, like, if you wrote the lyrics of the song on a Twitter post, they'd be, like, ban the account.
01:13:27.000 Yeah.
01:13:27.000 It'd be crazy.
01:13:29.000 But if you sing it... Every rap song is, like, hate speech against a fellow African-American.
01:13:33.000 It's out of context.
01:13:34.000 And threats of violence.
01:13:35.000 And that's why we protect free speech for arts in the creative space.
01:13:39.000 That's another beautiful Outcome of free speech is these wild, crazy songs about beating women like guns and roses.
01:13:47.000 Their Appetite for Destruction album wouldn't have gotten made in a totalitarian society.
01:13:51.000 And just for clarification for everyone in the chat, whenever Ian walks into the room there's an immediate aroma of bakery fresh cinnamon buns.
01:13:59.000 Mmm.
01:14:00.000 That's my fault.
01:14:00.000 Indeed.
01:14:01.000 Yeah, it's his perfume or cologne.
01:14:03.000 Cinnamon.
01:14:03.000 You did make me laugh when I first started working here because you said you would go out and you would buy like goat soap or like just cool fancy things.
01:14:10.000 But it always ended up being soap.
01:14:12.000 And you're like, I think I might be accidentally implying he needs to bathe, which I'm not.
01:14:15.000 I think your mom said something about that too.
01:14:17.000 He just knows you're into holistic products.
01:14:19.000 Because Ian's like, you know, like a hippy dippy lentil eating dude.
01:14:23.000 Whenever Allison and I are out and we see like hippy dippy stuff, it's usually handmade soaps.
01:14:28.000 And I'm like, I bet Ian would dig like handmade soap.
01:14:30.000 Big time.
01:14:30.000 And then it was like the fifth time.
01:14:32.000 I was like, the only items we ever actually see that make sense for Ian are soap.
01:14:36.000 And I keep buying him soap.
01:14:38.000 I wonder if he thinks we think he stinks.
01:14:41.000 Not anymore.
01:14:43.000 So you did take it that way?
01:14:45.000 No, I mean, I think subconsciously I understood the message.
01:14:48.000 Goat milk soap.
01:14:49.000 It's just so good for your skin.
01:14:50.000 How can you resist?
01:14:51.000 It was literally not, we were not implying Ian Stank.
01:14:53.000 We were like, oh, it's like a holistic, like a healthy, natural oil, goat milk based soap.
01:14:57.000 I'm like, this is the kind of thing Ian would like.
01:14:59.000 We also got him little mushrooms, the little stone mushrooms.
01:15:01.000 Yeah, those mushroom crystals.
01:15:02.000 I should bring them back.
01:15:03.000 But it did make me laugh when you were like, I feel like I might be sending him a message.
01:15:07.000 You know, I guess ultimately that we need to move away from central authority, only because the pendulum has swung so far towards it.
01:15:17.000 And it's not that we always need to escape central authority.
01:15:20.000 There'll be a time when we need to go back towards a central authority.
01:15:23.000 But at the moment with social media, we need to kind of distance ourselves from central servers.
01:15:27.000 I'm begging you guys that are running the code at Google.
01:15:31.000 Decentralize it.
01:15:32.000 Open source it.
01:15:33.000 Make it AGPL-3 free software code.
01:15:35.000 Get it out of your hands so that other organizations can't come and try and stop you and take it.
01:15:40.000 Let's jump to this story from the Silver Bulletin.
01:15:43.000 Nate Silver has got his new forecast and he's basically saying RFK Jr.
01:15:48.000 actually may be boosting Donald Trump after all.
01:15:51.000 He says that Kamala Harris's lead peaked at 4.3 points on the national average the day Kennedy dropped out.
01:15:58.000 Now it's down to 3.5 in the now RFK-less version of our model.
01:16:03.000 It's not bad.
01:16:06.000 With the convention bounce adjustment the model is applying, the November forecast is about as close to 50-50 as it gets.
01:16:15.000 Then he goes on to say he's off to England or whatever.
01:16:18.000 But right now he's got this forecast model.
01:16:20.000 Where he talks about where the states are currently at, his polls, the polls he trusts and what he uses, or whatever.
01:16:25.000 And what he said in a Twitter thread was that if Kamala is ahead nationally by two points, then Trump has an 88% chance to win.
01:16:36.000 I'm getting it wrong.
01:16:37.000 If she's ahead by 1-2 points, Trump has a 66-33.
01:16:38.000 If she's ahead, I'm getting it wrong.
01:16:39.000 Yeah, I think two points, or no, no, no, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm wrong.
01:16:43.000 If she's ahead by one to two points, Trump has a six, it's 66 to like 33.
01:16:46.000 If Kamala is three to four points ahead, then she has an 88% chance to win.
01:16:53.000 He is forecasting her as being ahead over three points, which would give her this massive bump.
01:16:59.000 However, now I suppose he's saying, considering that they're adjusting for the convention, it's looking like it's actually close to 50-50.
01:17:05.000 I don't know how correct he is, but when you go to the RCP battleground average, the place that actually matters, Trump's actually doing really well.
01:17:17.000 So in the battleground states, I think... Oh, did they get rid of the actual average?
01:17:21.000 It looks like Harris has taken the... It's tied.
01:17:25.000 Absolutely tied right now.
01:17:26.000 This would imply Donald Trump is expected to win the battleground states.
01:17:30.000 Unless there's some weird dramatic thing where, like, Texas flips, it's looking good for Donald Trump right now, but nowhere near guaranteed.
01:17:38.000 Which is what we always thought since day one.
01:17:41.000 We've not known this is going to be a close election.
01:17:43.000 If you follow what, you know, the folks, you know, Tyler Boyer and Charlie Kirk, I mean, and they built the ballot chase program that I'm working on.
01:17:51.000 We won Wisconsin by 23,000 votes in 2016.
01:17:53.000 And then we lost it by 20, just over 20,000 votes in 2020.
01:17:55.000 in 2016 and then we lost it by 20, just over 20,000 votes in 2020.
01:18:00.000 So it's going to be just around that margin again.
01:18:03.000 It's going to be very close.
01:18:04.000 There's going to be a lot more Black Swan events from now until the end of the election.
01:18:10.000 And I don't think they'll matter.
01:18:11.000 It's going to come down to the normie, individual people who don't know anything about politics.
01:18:16.000 They are quite literally going to determine this election.
01:18:18.000 Take a look at this graph that Nate Silver's got.
01:18:20.000 He says, how big is the electoral college bias?
01:18:25.000 So he says, if the popular vote is from 0 to plus 1—all right, let me show you.
01:18:30.000 RealClearPolitics currently has Harris at 1.7.
01:18:32.000 If it's 0 to 1, Trump's got an 85.5% chance of winning.
01:18:35.000 If it's 1 to 2, Trump has a 61.4% chance of winning.
01:18:41.000 Well, real clear politics has Harris at 1.7, and if that fits his model, Trump's looking at about a 2 to 1 chance to win right now.
01:18:48.000 However, he says if it's 2-3, Harris has 69.3% of Trump's 29.9% and of course, Nate Silver
01:18:55.000 has Kamala Harris at 3.5%.
01:18:59.000 So Nate Silver is basically saying she's got an 88% chance to win this one.
01:19:03.000 There's a compounding effect between 2 and 3, where it drops from 85 to 61, that's 24%.
01:19:06.000 Then it goes from 61 to 29, which is 32%.
01:19:07.000 That's 24%. Then it goes from 61 to 29, which is 32%.
01:19:11.000 Why is the difference in one point 24% but then it's 30?
01:19:16.000 You have to ask Nate Silver how he models out his predictions
01:19:22.000 and whether or not anyone should care.
01:19:24.000 Yeah.
01:19:25.000 I don't think anyone should care.
01:19:26.000 None of this data correlates with each other.
01:19:28.000 So like, for example, Kamala can just do really well in California and she can win the national vote by a certain percentage and that necessarily wouldn't coordinate into how things will shake out in the Electoral College.
01:19:38.000 So look, Nate Silver is often wrong.
01:19:41.000 I think what you're seeing from a lot of pollsters is they're trying to create the illusion of
01:19:45.000 momentum for Harris, everyone within the Borg of pollsting.
01:19:49.000 There was no reason to do that when Biden was running because he was a corpse and we all knew
01:19:53.000 it. But I think they're really trying to put on the fact that Harris can win. And this obviously
01:19:57.000 helps Democrat fundraisers. This helps them say, hey, look, we're just close on the margin. Your $2
01:20:02.000 million is going to push us over the edge.
01:20:04.000 I think that's the reason why you see this grift taking place the way you do, because there hasn't been a bump for Kamala in Georgia amongst suburban voters.
01:20:13.000 And that's where she's headed right now.
01:20:14.000 I mean, they're about to spend some time in Georgia.
01:20:16.000 What swing states are you expecting Kamala to win versus Trump?
01:20:20.000 But I do think Kamala is going to win.
01:20:23.000 I think she's going to win Virginia, if we count Virginia as a swing state.
01:20:27.000 I think she's going to win North Carolina, if we count that as a swing state.
01:20:30.000 Arizona, I think Democrats are going to get trounced in, specifically because Turning Point is based there.
01:20:36.000 And what we saw in the primary was increases in voter turnout in pretty much every precinct in Maricopa County because of the work Turning Point's doing there.
01:20:44.000 I think that's going to translate to Georgia.
01:20:46.000 I think that's going to translate into Wisconsin.
01:20:48.000 And I don't think a lot of You know, your blue dog Dems aren't excited for Kamala.
01:20:53.000 Let's do this.
01:20:55.000 This is the 270 to win map using the polls from Nate Silver on Silver Bulletin.
01:21:00.000 So you can see that Trump is only heading Georgia and Florida in the battleground states.
01:21:04.000 So if we go here and we apply it, Kamala Harris has got 303 to Donald Trump's 235.
01:21:09.000 But let's start with what you're saying.
01:21:10.000 You gotta take Arizona off the map.
01:21:11.000 You say Arizona's going red?
01:21:12.000 Gotta take Arizona off the map.
01:21:14.000 Arizona's going red?
01:21:14.000 We're also hearing that Virginia could be getting close to flipping.
01:21:20.000 You think it's gonna go blue?
01:21:22.000 Everything I've heard indicates Junkin was a fluke.
01:21:25.000 He had to run so moderate even to win, and a lot of those independents now don't like Junkin because he's been- But he just mandated paper ballots.
01:21:34.000 We don't know what the effect of that is going to be on the state.
01:21:37.000 It's hard to know for sure.
01:21:39.000 Now what about Michigan, Wisconsin, and PA?
01:21:42.000 I'm feeling good for Wisconsin and PA.
01:21:46.000 I'm unsure about it.
01:21:47.000 I was there for the People's Convention.
01:21:48.000 I've seen the work we've put in.
01:21:50.000 If Trump wins Wisconsin, Michigan, and Arizona, that's it.
01:21:53.000 He said PA, red.
01:21:54.000 Michigan, unsure.
01:21:56.000 Yeah.
01:21:56.000 Oh, you said PA is red.
01:21:58.000 Yeah.
01:21:59.000 And then Michigan is unsure.
01:22:01.000 Yeah, Trump still wins.
01:22:04.000 This'll be interesting.
01:22:05.000 Is there a lot of mail-in voting in these states?
01:22:08.000 I can't imagine Wisconsin, honestly.
01:22:10.000 He's gonna have to win somewhere else.
01:22:13.000 I don't see how Wisconsin goes red.
01:22:14.000 Do you think it'll take Nevada?
01:22:15.000 Nevada?
01:22:16.000 I don't think so.
01:22:17.000 I don't know.
01:22:18.000 I do not think so.
01:22:19.000 Yeah, that's tough.
01:22:19.000 Arizona makes sense because of TPUSA and their massive outreach efforts.
01:22:23.000 But we'll see.
01:22:24.000 Maybe Steven Crowder pulls off a miracle.
01:22:27.000 But North Carolina?
01:22:28.000 You think North Carolina goes blue?
01:22:29.000 I think North Carolina goes blue.
01:22:30.000 Interesting.
01:22:32.000 Well, it's not looking good then, is it?
01:22:35.000 So he'd need either Michigan or Virginia in that case, which is interesting.
01:22:40.000 Let's just say...
01:22:42.000 What does he need?
01:22:43.000 Four electoral votes?
01:22:46.000 Could still win North Carolina.
01:22:47.000 We won our Senate race there in 2020.
01:22:51.000 If this map happens and New Hampshire goes for Trump, it's a tie.
01:22:57.000 Let's go, New Hampshire.
01:22:58.000 You can do this.
01:22:59.000 There are actually a lot of different outcomes that create a tie.
01:23:04.000 And New Hampshire going red is unlikely, but in the realm of possibility.
01:23:09.000 And the rest of these states are all in the realm of possibility.
01:23:12.000 I would imagine there's a very low probability of happening, but wow, it would be a Trump-Harris presidency.
01:23:18.000 That'd be so awesome.
01:23:21.000 Oil and water, man.
01:23:22.000 Oil and water.
01:23:23.000 That's what I want to see.
01:23:24.000 Very, very weird buddy cop sitcom.
01:23:25.000 Yeah, that's the way politics, I was going to say, should be.
01:23:28.000 I mean, at one point in history, we did have that kind of thing.
01:23:32.000 I don't remember who, but— 538 says 58 times out of 100?
01:23:36.000 This is interesting.
01:23:37.000 The chance of a tie is increasing.
01:23:39.000 They now say there's a—it looks like they're arguing there's a 0.5% chance of a tie.
01:23:46.000 It looks like a 0.5% chance.
01:23:47.000 Yep.
01:23:49.000 Point five.
01:23:51.000 That ain't nothing.
01:23:53.000 You know?
01:23:54.000 So there is a chance.
01:23:55.000 What would happen if there's a- they'd literally be the president and the vice president?
01:23:59.000 The House would choose the president and the Senate would choose the vice president.
01:24:02.000 So it would be Trump-Harris.
01:24:04.000 Wow.
01:24:05.000 Yep.
01:24:06.000 Look at this.
01:24:07.000 That's a compromise.
01:24:07.000 Five circumstances in their prediction model that resulted in no winner.
01:24:12.000 I think our country is so broken that that might be what helps pull us out of this.
01:24:19.000 If Trump and Harris were having to govern together, we're in a place in politics where no one is willing to say, I could be wrong.
01:24:27.000 No one in politics, Zuckerberg did, recently, which was pretty prolific.
01:24:31.000 If Trump wins, there's no way Democrats have the Senate.
01:24:36.000 I mean, let me pull up the- Well, they're saying, there's people who are saying, the police association just endorsed Trump and then they endorsed Kerry Lake's opponent.
01:24:45.000 There's more than just that archetype in Arizona.
01:24:47.000 I'm saying it's hypothetically possible Arizona goes for Trump and then they elect, they send a Democrat to the Senate.
01:24:52.000 Is Ohio going Trump?
01:24:55.000 Oh, I think so, yes.
01:24:55.000 Then Ohio is going to go red.
01:24:59.000 I think so.
01:25:00.000 Then you've got 51.
01:25:01.000 I'd say it's over.
01:25:03.000 I don't see a reality in which Trump wins and doesn't have the Senate.
01:25:06.000 It'll be interesting.
01:25:10.000 What this means is, if Kamala Harris is the VP in a contingent election, she does nothing as VP.
01:25:16.000 There's no tie-breaking vote for her to cast.
01:25:18.000 If the Senate's 50-50, and Kamala is VP through a contingent election, she can disrupt Trump's plans by blocking Republican policy by casting tie-breaking votes in favor of Democrats as VP in a Trump administration.
01:25:29.000 Which is crazy.
01:25:31.000 Which is crazy.
01:25:32.000 There's no reality where Ohio, at the very least, goes red and doesn't also elect a Republican.
01:25:43.000 Right.
01:25:43.000 Because Ohio is less like Arizona with all these independents and the McCain factions.
01:25:48.000 Or Montana.
01:25:49.000 Come on.
01:25:50.000 Ohio's going to send Bernie Marino to the Senate.
01:25:53.000 And you think Montana?
01:25:54.000 Montana's a toss-up right now.
01:25:56.000 That's what they're saying.
01:25:57.000 But do we really think Montana's a toss-up?
01:26:00.000 I think it really depends on how much people rally around the Republican there.
01:26:04.000 But I think there are, like every major, or a lot of these rural states, like in Colorado it's largely red outside but Denver's really blue.
01:26:14.000 I think that, you know, You're right.
01:26:16.000 There is a blue influence in Montana.
01:26:19.000 I just think Don Tester is not doing that well.
01:26:21.000 As far as I know, he still hasn't endorsed Kamala Harris.
01:26:23.000 So it makes me think that there is a chance that he loses his seat.
01:26:26.000 If he felt more secure, if he thought it would benefit him to line up behind Harris, he would have done it by now.
01:26:32.000 I'm just over here making my forecast map.
01:26:36.000 A sweep?
01:26:39.000 What is this purple garbage?
01:26:40.000 No, we're making it red.
01:26:41.000 Get out of here.
01:26:42.000 There we go.
01:26:43.000 There you go!
01:26:44.000 69 Republicans!
01:26:46.000 That's... Oh, wait, what's this?
01:26:47.000 Rhode Island, Connecticut.
01:26:48.000 They're too small.
01:26:50.000 You can barely even click on Rhode Island.
01:26:52.000 We'll click it right there.
01:26:52.000 There you go.
01:26:53.000 Rhode Island.
01:26:54.000 Alright, and, uh... What's a VP?
01:26:58.000 Vice President?
01:27:00.000 Ah, that's right, that's right, that's right.
01:27:02.000 And then we'll make a Hawaii red as well.
01:27:04.000 And 71.
01:27:05.000 Just the whole country. Wouldn't it be amazing if Hawaii went red this year?
01:27:09.000 That's not going to happen. Yeah, and the vice president.
01:27:11.000 This will be really interesting.
01:27:14.000 So does the VP. They usually don't count it. Oh, I see. The VP is just literally the little tie
01:27:20.000 breaker in the middle. So Ohio goes red. Now, I got to tell you what's alarming is the forecast
01:27:26.000 that Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are going to go Democrat senators. That doesn't
01:27:30.000 bode well for a presidential election either.
01:27:32.000 I mean it.
01:27:33.000 It's not going to make a lot of sense that hyper-partisan voters are going to be like, oh, vote for Donald Trump, but the Democrat.
01:27:40.000 Because people who hate Trump hate Trump.
01:27:41.000 Democrats are not going to vote for Trump.
01:27:43.000 I mean, I wonder if they're posturing the same way that Tester is, right?
01:27:47.000 Like Tester's not endorsing Harris to try and seem more moderate.
01:27:51.000 You know, the Democrats have this Unusual phenomenon where they have several independents who caucus with them, which makes me think that there is a wavelength of Democrat aligned voters who think, oh, but the party isn't all that it should be.
01:28:08.000 This isn't right.
01:28:09.000 Like you get lots of People who ultimately run as Republicans who, you know, identify with libertarian politics.
01:28:15.000 But the fact that, like, the three independents I can think of that are in Congress right now all ultimately caucus with Democrats or, I mean, Joe Manchin's kind of not.
01:28:23.000 He's done a lot of work with Republicans recently.
01:28:26.000 It makes me think that this party isn't as unified on every level of government as they are necessarily on the federal level, or at least when it comes to presidential elections.
01:28:34.000 You see this right here?
01:28:36.000 Now how does this make sense?
01:28:37.000 Oh my gosh, I love that area.
01:28:38.000 See, you see this blue?
01:28:39.000 That part that wants to secede into West Virginia?
01:28:42.000 Yes, and right above it, dark red, dark red, dark red, dark red, all around it, yet for some reason, it's because of, I believe, Frederick, right?
01:28:51.000 I think so.
01:28:51.000 It turns the whole thing blue, and the people who live surrounded—this is megacountry over here, no question.
01:28:56.000 You go there, this is the place where all the bars have pictures of Donald Trump riding a velociraptor with a machine gun.
01:29:01.000 In Maryland, western?
01:29:02.000 And it's blue.
01:29:02.000 And yeah, in the western panhandle of Maryland.
01:29:04.000 That's all the Potomac River there, that's at the border on the south.
01:29:08.000 That's why it's carved like that.
01:29:09.000 You go out there and hang out, and it's megacountry.
01:29:12.000 Yet it's being represented by a Democrat.
01:29:15.000 That's ridiculous.
01:29:17.000 Yeah, it is interesting that that—I was deeply studying the C&O Canal going from the Chesapeake Bay up the river, and they wanted to connect the Ohio River to the Chesapeake Bay, the Potomac.
01:29:29.000 That area is like mountainous and not the same at all anymore.
01:29:37.000 They only carved it that way because it made sense probably to control the riverways and the canals back in the day, but the canal's gone now.
01:29:43.000 It got destroyed by a flood.
01:29:45.000 They use cars.
01:29:46.000 I mean, the trains, they still have trains, but almost like Maryland could split in half and it would be fine.
01:29:50.000 It would maybe be ridiculous to have Western Maryland be its own state because it's not that populous.
01:29:56.000 Well, the counties in Western Maryland asked if they could join West Virginia and West Virginia's capital was like, we would love that.
01:30:02.000 But now you have to talk to Annapolis, the capital of Maryland.
01:30:06.000 They should not have to at all.
01:30:08.000 We're a nation built upon a Declaration of Independence.
01:30:13.000 Any county should be able to declare in their state, like, we held an election in this county.
01:30:20.000 We have hereby democratically chosen to join another state.
01:30:23.000 They're not changing the amount of representatives.
01:30:26.000 They're not changing the structure of the federal government.
01:30:30.000 And they should be allowed to do it, so long as the state agrees to accept them.
01:30:34.000 The other state... If we had that function, imagine what would happen.
01:30:38.000 The people who lived in these counties in Maryland would say, we have hereby voted to secede.
01:30:43.000 The state would then say, wait, wait, wait, wait, what do you want to not do that?
01:30:47.000 And they would actually have to offer up something to the people who lived there.
01:30:50.000 Instead of saying, shut up, you can't do anything about it, or you'll go to, you know, do we tell you or else?
01:30:56.000 Imagine you actually could just say, no, no, we're going to secede and go join Idaho or something.
01:31:00.000 It would give them a bargaining power that I think, especially more of rural areas in states like Maryland, where there are two more dominant cities, they just don't have right now.
01:31:09.000 They really are held captive by people who don't have their interests in heart and don't care about the way they live.
01:31:13.000 Yep.
01:31:15.000 Also in Maryland?
01:31:16.000 Yeah.
01:31:17.000 I haven't been to Cumberland yet.
01:31:18.000 I want to go there.
01:31:19.000 That's like the old... You haven't been there?
01:31:20.000 No, I don't think so.
01:31:20.000 I've been there several times.
01:31:21.000 That's the old railroad capital.
01:31:22.000 I mean, that's where the, what was it, the Potomac splits, goes north and south, and it's like...
01:31:28.000 Will's Creek, I think, is there in Cumberland.
01:31:30.000 George Washington had a fort there.
01:31:32.000 George Washington was obsessed with building canals and connecting.
01:31:35.000 Anyway, I don't want to—this is what I've been studying over the weekend intensely, because I walk by the canal, the remnants of the canal, the C&O Canal every day.
01:31:43.000 Well, often.
01:31:44.000 Do you do a lot of on-the-ground work with the stuff you're doing right now?
01:31:47.000 Yes, most of my work is on the ground in both Pennsylvania and Arizona.
01:31:51.000 So I'm not usually that type of person, but this election, this has just been my calling to just really dig in here and just try to, you got to keep in mind, Republicans have never had a traditional get out the vote effort that has nudged people in this kind of way ever, which is kind of disappointing, but you know, there's, I think there were 141,000 people in Pennsylvania who were Republicans who requested a mail-in ballot who never turned it in.
01:32:17.000 Um, so when you look at the people, the amount that should have requested a mail-in ballot, that number doubles.
01:32:22.000 So you're talking about right there 300,000 Republicans who were just left just by the wayside because we don't put the money into staff to knock on folks' doors.
01:32:33.000 I feel very good about our chances in these states that I'm seeing the groundwork.
01:32:37.000 That's why I don't feel great about New Mexico, because I haven't seen the work there.
01:32:40.000 And I feel less positive about Michigan, because I'm just not quite so sure how that's going to shake out.
01:32:48.000 But we'll find out more toward the end of September.
01:32:50.000 Toward the beginning of September and the end of September, that's when all these ballot chase operations are going to have door knockers on the ground, and then usually there's a 30-day period open for mail-in voting, for early voting.
01:33:00.000 And now for the first time, you have Republicans saying, hey guys, election day is actually the last day to vote.
01:33:06.000 It's not the day to vote.
01:33:07.000 Election day is your last day to vote, so please vote beforehand.
01:33:10.000 So I think that's going to be significant, and we're going to see significant gains in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Arizona.
01:33:16.000 What about, like, online voting, you know, incisions, like, getting people to vote through, like, online campaigns?
01:33:24.000 Is it just that the people online are already activated and are going to, and it's more about the people that aren't online that you've got to go to their house and be like, hey, vote?
01:33:31.000 Or what is your experience with that?
01:33:33.000 Is it illegal to get people to be like, remember to vote with, like, internet, targeted internet ads?
01:33:37.000 Like, if you live here, then you're going to get an email or a Facebook notification?
01:33:42.000 Nothing can replace the in-person reminder to nudge to vote.
01:33:46.000 You associate it with a face.
01:33:48.000 We're also doing a lot of just long game on some of this stuff.
01:33:51.000 So we're building connections with these individuals.
01:33:54.000 So by the time we're getting to election day, we've already seen these individuals two to
01:33:57.000 three times.
01:33:58.000 We have respect with them.
01:33:59.000 We have credibility.
01:34:00.000 We can say, hey, you got your ballot.
01:34:02.000 Can you get it in?
01:34:03.000 It's like a neighborly approach as opposed to last second shotgun.
01:34:08.000 This is what like, you know, um, young Americans for Liberty last second, you know, they usually send out a bunch of kids at the last second to just like drop little leaflets.
01:34:15.000 We're not doing that.
01:34:16.000 We're doing long game, getting to know people.
01:34:20.000 And that's going to be key.
01:34:21.000 That's going to be essentially the crucial.
01:34:22.000 I mean, some of this time, some, some of this stuff is handwritten notes.
01:34:25.000 I mean, Henry, you'd be surprised the amount of people who respond to handwritten notes left on their door as opposed to a business card.
01:34:32.000 Um, so the personal touch, it's more costly, but the Democrats have invested in this quite literally billions.
01:34:38.000 I wrote an article on ballot chasing for red state.
01:34:40.000 You can read this and you can read the amount of investments Democrats have put into ballot chasing.
01:34:44.000 It's just a drop in the bucket comparatively to what Republicans are finally doing, but at least we're doing something.
01:34:50.000 Where's the article?
01:34:51.000 It's on RedState.
01:34:52.000 RedState?
01:34:53.000 What's the website?
01:34:54.000 RedState.com.
01:34:55.000 It's Maxwell.
01:34:56.000 What is ballot chasing and why have Republicans finally embraced it?
01:34:59.000 What were you gonna say?
01:35:00.000 I was gonna ask how you got involved with what you're doing now.
01:35:02.000 I was working for James O'Keefe in 2020 trying to confirm that voter fraud was happening in our country and I felt like we proved voter fraud happened at a massive scale throughout to the country in Georgia.
01:35:14.000 I think we've proved it.
01:35:16.000 However, we still lost and I felt like my work was meaningless.
01:35:19.000 So I kind of decided that, you know, in 2024, I'm not going to just, you know, indirectly do something for the election.
01:35:27.000 I'm going to go old school like I did in 2016 and really get involved.
01:35:31.000 So like I said, I have three jobs currently and I'm doing a lot and I just I just feel this is the key.
01:35:37.000 I know we always say it's the most important election of our time, but quite literally, You know, this is life or death.
01:35:44.000 You know, I don't want to reveal people's personal information, but I can reveal tonight that one of the persons who was indicted over the fake elector situation, you know, one of their spouses just passed literally today.
01:35:56.000 So this woman had to literally split time between these trials and her dying husband.
01:36:02.000 And I know this woman.
01:36:02.000 She's just a MAGA mom in Arizona.
01:36:04.000 She's a great lady.
01:36:04.000 So yeah, I'm all in invested in this election because they are quite literally trying to imprison my friends.
01:36:11.000 Alright, we're gonna go to Super Chats, so if you haven't already, smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, and share the show if you like it.
01:36:17.000 Head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, because without your memberships, the show doesn't exist.
01:36:23.000 And if you like the work that we do, we rely on you guys as members.
01:36:27.000 So, instead of doing sponsor spots, the decision ultimately was, let's promote memberships instead, and it's just, it's a healthier show, you're not gonna do ad reads mid-show, and if we're gonna shout anything out, we'll shout ourselves out.
01:36:40.000 Gives us more control, and hopefully that spiel convinces you guys to go to TimCast.com and become members, and help sustain what we do.
01:36:49.000 Alright, Polly Puree says, am I first?
01:36:51.000 Indeed, Polly, you are!
01:36:53.000 You win!
01:36:54.000 You nailed it.
01:36:55.000 Kenny Cabb says Roger Stone for FBI director.
01:36:59.000 I hope just Trump wins and then just does all of that.
01:37:01.000 I've seen Stone all over the place.
01:37:03.000 Yeah.
01:37:03.000 I keep seeing his face pop up.
01:37:06.000 The Clay Way says, ever heard of Colin Rogers, the Trump supporters?
01:37:10.000 No.
01:37:10.000 Moving on.
01:37:11.000 I'm just kidding.
01:37:12.000 Anybody heard of that guy?
01:37:13.000 No?
01:37:14.000 Nope.
01:37:14.000 Okay, well that's a no from everybody.
01:37:16.000 So not sure.
01:37:17.000 Not sure.
01:37:18.000 Serge didn't answer though.
01:37:20.000 Here in gaming news is after watching your segment on RFK I've decided I would like to party with the man.
01:37:24.000 We need more fun and relatable people in politics.
01:37:27.000 Amen.
01:37:28.000 Indeed, he does sound like a fun guy.
01:37:29.000 Yeah.
01:37:30.000 You know there's another story where the bear story came from.
01:37:32.000 I just, I have to know what he was up to.
01:37:34.000 I gotta be honest, he might be one of those dudes where it's like we're hanging out and we're like you wanna go do something?
01:37:40.000 And then someone would be like we can hit up Bobby and see what he's up to and we're gonna go ugh.
01:37:43.000 Dude.
01:37:44.000 Maybe.
01:37:45.000 Because he's the kind of guy where you're sitting around and he goes, Guys!
01:37:48.000 There's a dead whale on the beach!
01:37:49.000 Let's go get its skull and mount it!
01:37:51.000 And you're like, Bring a carving knife!
01:37:53.000 And so it's like, when you were 19, the best memories of your life, but now you're in your mid-30s and you're like, Bobby, I have kids.
01:38:01.000 I got kids too.
01:38:03.000 Did you see the, someone said he ate a dog?
01:38:05.000 And then he made the video.
01:38:06.000 That was great.
01:38:07.000 I would never eat guys.
01:38:08.000 Making meat for his dog.
01:38:11.000 He's like, the fake news offended my dogs and he's cooking their, yeah, he cooks them like liver and beef and puts it in their food.
01:38:17.000 Those dogs are happy.
01:38:18.000 Yeah.
01:38:19.000 All right.
01:38:19.000 Barrett says, I'm selling at Spring Mills Flea Market this Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
01:38:23.000 Please thank Ian for stopping the rain over those three days.
01:38:27.000 Kid clothes and shoes.
01:38:28.000 It's my pleasure.
01:38:29.000 I put a little positive energy in the clouds before the show started because there was some heavy thunder.
01:38:32.000 It seemed to work.
01:38:33.000 No, a storm was pretty bad the whole time.
01:38:35.000 I don't hear it anymore.
01:38:36.000 Well, we asked you to stop the storm before the show started.
01:38:39.000 I wasn't channeling super hard because I was socializing.
01:38:41.000 Yeah, right.
01:38:42.000 And Ian said he ate seed oils.
01:38:43.000 It's a channeling spell.
01:38:44.000 Yeah, inflammation.
01:38:46.000 It interferes with the ability to confluence the energy.
01:38:49.000 That I noticed because I ate cheesecake over the weekend and I had cheese puffs with like safflower oil or some junk in it.
01:38:55.000 No, that cheesecake was legit.
01:38:57.000 It tasted great, that's why I ate it.
01:38:58.000 There was no garbage in it.
01:38:59.000 But the inflammation.
01:39:00.000 There was like chocolate, like sugar, I don't know what it was, but it was a lot, a lot of sugar for me.
01:39:06.000 And I noticed if you can feel the inflammation in my muscles because a lot of that energy goes through your musculature up out of you.
01:39:12.000 What kind of energy?
01:39:14.000 Positive energy and negative energy.
01:39:16.000 That's where I'm at now.
01:39:18.000 Those aren't forms of energy.
01:39:19.000 Let's investigate.
01:39:20.000 You know, there's like kinetic energy.
01:39:21.000 Should go on an energy retreat.
01:39:22.000 Thermal energy.
01:39:24.000 Oh, I think it's magnetic resonance.
01:39:27.000 Magnetism.
01:39:28.000 I'm vibrating and creating resonance.
01:39:29.000 Resin?
01:39:31.000 Resin.
01:39:32.000 Vibrations.
01:39:32.000 Actual resonance.
01:39:34.000 Yeah, actual resonance.
01:39:36.000 There's some sort of recharge of batteries, pun, going with the energy retreat, but I just didn't get there fast enough.
01:39:42.000 Graphene anodes. Jonathan Peter says Tim was there no morning show or was it shadow band? There was indeed no
01:39:47.000 morning show I don't know
01:39:51.000 I just had a headache and it was hard to focus.
01:39:54.000 And then I was like, man, I've just been burning the candle at both ends.
01:39:58.000 You're one of the only people I know who could need to take a personal half day or whatever.
01:40:02.000 Half day.
01:40:03.000 And people would be like, but are you shadowbanned?
01:40:05.000 You could be like, yes, I was.
01:40:07.000 I didn't have anything personal to attend to.
01:40:09.000 I was shadowbanned.
01:40:10.000 What got you inspired to do The Morning Show?
01:40:12.000 I like it.
01:40:13.000 I see you killing it with like 25,000 people and stuff.
01:40:17.000 Because I record a morning segment at 9 a.m.
01:40:20.000 I would record at 9 and publish at 10 and then instead of, there's a difference in the show, it used to be that I record four segments from between 9 a.m.
01:40:28.000 Well I'd start doing research and everything at 8 and then record at 9 and then after that 22 to 30 minute segment start doing more work and research and then throughout the day I've got between 10 a.m.
01:40:41.000 and 6 p.m.
01:40:41.000 segments going up.
01:40:43.000 And then the week we went to the convention, it was just a lot easier to go live with the breaking news, the assassination attempt.
01:40:51.000 And so I was like, this news is too big to not be a live show.
01:40:53.000 And then I figured, I don't know, it's just easier to go live for two hours.
01:40:57.000 And so now I come in at like 8, start pulling up stories, plus I already know a ton of stories, I've already retweeted and shared things, line up, and then during the livestream people might submit stories, but then by noon I'm basically wrapped.
01:41:10.000 That's cool, so they bring the news, some breaking news and stuff.
01:41:12.000 Yeah, a couple times we've had people... You clip it, and then do clips throughout the day?
01:41:16.000 Yep, I press record during the livestream for the segments, and then upload them.
01:41:21.000 Awesome.
01:41:21.000 So there's a morning... So, everyone listening, subscribe at youtube.com slash timcastnews.
01:41:28.000 Monday through Thursday, 10am, I'm live for two hours and it's just me talking.
01:41:31.000 And then I do like 30 minutes super chats, 30 minutes super chats, then like 10 minutes, 10 minutes.
01:41:38.000 And, you know, people will like send in stories and be like, yo, the story just broke and then I'll pull it up and then we'll do we'll do a segment on it.
01:41:44.000 I like it.
01:41:45.000 But then I get wrapped around noon, and then I finish doing all of the logistical work for it, like uploading the podcast version by like 12.30, and then probably have a snack, and then by 1, I'm exercising.
01:41:58.000 Oh, that's great.
01:41:59.000 And then by like 3, I'm eating food, and then there's usually just like ancillary work stuff, you know, paperwork, signing things.
01:42:06.000 Meditation.
01:42:07.000 None of that.
01:42:08.000 Nope.
01:42:09.000 Maybe a cold plunge here or there.
01:42:11.000 Oh, you got one?
01:42:12.000 No, I just, uh, our cold water is like 50 degrees.
01:42:16.000 We do have a cold plunge, but I just felt the bathtub and the water's near freezing.
01:42:22.000 It's crazy.
01:42:22.000 Oh man.
01:42:23.000 I don't have that at the castle.
01:42:24.000 I got to get, I got the sauna.
01:42:26.000 People keep being like, get the cold plunge, get the cold plunge.
01:42:29.000 I have had tremendously good results from the cold plunge.
01:42:32.000 God, they're amazing.
01:42:33.000 So, after I'm done skating, my right calf has been really knotted up, and so I need to use a Theragun on it, and so it's hard to walk.
01:42:42.000 I brought my Theragun with me here.
01:42:44.000 It's great.
01:42:44.000 That's how old I am.
01:42:45.000 What is it?
01:42:46.000 A massager.
01:42:47.000 Yeah, it helps get knots out and stuff.
01:42:48.000 So, after I skate, probably about an hour after, I do a five-minute cold plunge.
01:42:54.000 You don't want to overdo it because it can inhibit protein synthesis.
01:42:56.000 What temperature?
01:42:57.000 I think it's around 50 degrees.
01:42:59.000 Yeah, it's cold.
01:43:01.000 I couldn't believe how cold our cold water got, but it is pretty dang cold.
01:43:06.000 I don't know why.
01:43:06.000 I've seen them oscillate from like 52 to 39.
01:43:09.000 It's like stingingly painful, the real low, like the 39.
01:43:14.000 I tried it in Austin.
01:43:15.000 Really?
01:43:16.000 I think I got in the 42 degree one and I was like, this hurts.
01:43:18.000 It actually hurts my skin.
01:43:20.000 Like the surface pain.
01:43:22.000 The other one was just like bone chillingly cold.
01:43:24.000 And you do the, do you have the, uh, the respiratory?
01:43:28.000 Oh yeah.
01:43:28.000 Yeah.
01:43:28.000 Do dragon breath, Wim Hof dragon breath.
01:43:30.000 No, no.
01:43:30.000 When you, when you get splashed with cold, when you get splashed with cold water, you have a breath response.
01:43:35.000 Sharp intake, long, hard exhale, and your body temperature will go up.
01:43:39.000 That's how Wim Hof can walk in.
01:43:41.000 The goal of the cold plunge is to compress the capillaries and force out lactic acid.
01:43:47.000 You don't need to heat your body up when you're in a cold plunge.
01:43:49.000 You need to be cold.
01:43:50.000 So you like that feeling where your body's like, shocked?
01:43:54.000 Go shocked or whatever it is?
01:43:55.000 I don't know.
01:43:56.000 Like?
01:43:57.000 Just do it.
01:43:59.000 I want to control it.
01:44:00.000 I want to dive into ice cold water and be fine.
01:44:04.000 Just do it?
01:44:05.000 Just do it.
01:44:06.000 I mean, that's the thing.
01:44:07.000 We get NAD frequently.
01:44:11.000 And there are a lot of people that don't want to get the IV and it's just like, I don't know, it hurts.
01:44:19.000 Grow up.
01:44:19.000 This is welcome to life.
01:44:20.000 Like, what do you, I don't know, man.
01:44:22.000 You know, like the nurse is going to be like, okay, here comes the needle or whatever.
01:44:26.000 We're going to give you the IV.
01:44:27.000 And it's just like, yeah, it hurts.
01:44:28.000 And then I'm like, wow, that's, that's very painful.
01:44:31.000 I, at a certain point in your life, maybe not everybody goes through this, but I don't know.
01:44:37.000 At a certain point of falling and busting my shins and whacking myself in the legs and all of that, I'm just like, you're not- like, pain isn't doing anything for me.
01:44:45.000 Thank you, body, for notifying me of the damage.
01:44:49.000 There's no point in dwelling on it.
01:44:50.000 So you don't feel pain?
01:44:51.000 No, I feel pain.
01:44:52.000 But like- You're like Batman.
01:44:54.000 I don't- so, I'll put it this way.
01:44:58.000 When we're getting an AD, and the nurse says, you know, they're gonna find a vein, they're gonna give you an IV drip, I just sit there and I'm like, okay, like, here comes the IV and it hurts, but what am I supposed to do?
01:45:09.000 Cry, whinge, scream, go, eh?
01:45:11.000 I'm just like, okay.
01:45:11.000 There's different kinds of pain.
01:45:12.000 There's pain that indicates damage and pain that indicates growth.
01:45:16.000 And like, if you know that the pain is something good is going to come out of it, I think it's way easier to tolerate.
01:45:19.000 That's exactly it.
01:45:20.000 It's like the pain reaction I might have where I like jump back is going to be an unknown reaction.
01:45:25.000 Like if something stings me or bites me, I'm going to move because like, hey, whoa.
01:45:30.000 But I kind of feel like I'm at the point where I don't know what pain is doing for me.
01:45:35.000 I don't know.
01:45:36.000 Maybe when I was younger, you get hurt, you cry or whatever, but as an adult, I'm just like, yes, it hurts.
01:45:42.000 I don't know how to react other than that.
01:45:45.000 Thank you for the pain.
01:45:46.000 I'm not happy it's happening.
01:45:48.000 It's just, I don't understand why me...
01:45:51.000 Well, I just, I don't get why going like, I'm like rocking back and forth or groaning.
01:45:58.000 It's not doing anything.
01:45:59.000 That's what I would do if you saw me getting a cold.
01:46:01.000 I just can't handle any pain.
01:46:02.000 I whine.
01:46:02.000 You can ask my wife.
01:46:03.000 She'll tell you.
01:46:03.000 But I just don't know.
01:46:04.000 So good.
01:46:05.000 So I do.
01:46:06.000 I do a cold plunge.
01:46:07.000 I just, I, there, there is no hesitation.
01:46:09.000 I just go and I go in it.
01:46:10.000 And I hear people say like, Oh, it's going to suck so bad.
01:46:12.000 And I'm like, I don't get it.
01:46:13.000 Like, It's just, these are things that exist and they have to happen.
01:46:17.000 But those shock proteins are really good for autophagia, I think, where your body starts eating its own refuse.
01:46:23.000 Like, the immune system kicks into high gear.
01:46:25.000 Starts cleaning itself up when you're in, like, intense states of temperature trauma.
01:46:30.000 And same with stress shock proteins.
01:46:32.000 There's heat shock proteins and stress shock proteins.
01:46:35.000 Heat's a type of stress.
01:46:37.000 I think at a certain point, pain just makes me angry.
01:46:41.000 Mike, I just get really angry.
01:46:43.000 Hey, last question about the cold plunge before more Super Chats.
01:46:45.000 Do you put your head under?
01:46:46.000 Yes.
01:46:47.000 Not the entire time, though.
01:46:49.000 But for a little bit.
01:46:50.000 And then I just do about five and a half minutes.
01:46:52.000 I do the low end.
01:46:52.000 It's beast mode.
01:46:54.000 You sit in there for five minutes straight?
01:46:56.000 Yeah, but it's not an ice plunge.
01:46:57.000 It's a cold plunge.
01:46:58.000 I'm not sitting in a bucket of ice.
01:47:00.000 Have you done a handiclap?
01:47:01.000 You should upload a video of yourself doing this.
01:47:03.000 Oh yeah.
01:47:03.000 If you did it with the beanie, it'll probably perform very well.
01:47:07.000 It's hilarious.
01:47:07.000 Give me the beanie!
01:47:08.000 Give me the beanie!
01:47:09.000 It'd be so cool.
01:47:09.000 It's like 50 degrees.
01:47:10.000 And then I read that you're not, like, it was like, apparently that's like intermediate and you're supposed to start at like 60 something.
01:47:15.000 I was like, what?
01:47:16.000 That's just like a bath.
01:47:17.000 60.
01:47:19.000 Ease into it.
01:47:20.000 That's probably for the common man.
01:47:22.000 Yeah, I don't know.
01:47:23.000 I just saw on the internet someone jumped in a bucket of ice, so I...
01:47:27.000 Got the water up, it's like 50-some-odd degrees.
01:47:29.000 I think it's like low 50, 50-ish.
01:47:32.000 Maybe because it comes from the well, where it's usually about 55 degrees underground or whatever, but our water's cold!
01:47:36.000 In Austin, there was like three tanks in the same room.
01:47:39.000 50, 40, and 30, basically.
01:47:41.000 Well, 35.
01:47:42.000 Have you done it before?
01:47:43.000 I've done it a couple times and, you know, sometimes I do think there's, especially if you're training a lot, I feel like it is good for muscle recovery.
01:47:50.000 What I remember doing more was when I was younger and ran track and all this stuff, if you get shin splints, like if you submerge your calves or whatever in ice for a long time, I really think that does help any kind of inflammation or injury.
01:48:01.000 But it's not something I do regularly.
01:48:02.000 There's some foot baths in Miami.
01:48:04.000 I bought this machine that heats up on its own.
01:48:06.000 You pour the water in and then it heats up the water and bubbles and then you put salts in there.
01:48:10.000 Those are great.
01:48:10.000 When I was little, I was watching X-Men the animated series.
01:48:14.000 I think this is what it was.
01:48:16.000 And Beast gets hurt and then he says to himself, what is pain to overcome it?
01:48:22.000 And as a little kid, that one stuck with me.
01:48:24.000 And so, you know, whenever I'd get hurt, I would think about it and I would Analyze it, and it kind of neutralizes the reaction.
01:48:32.000 Yeah, when I messed up my elbow, I had to, I rammed on the wall, I had to rip the skin, it was like hanging, so I pulled, ripped the skin off.
01:48:38.000 I was like, well, that didn't, that didn't feel good.
01:48:40.000 And then I took nail clippers and like clipped off the skin around the wound to make sure that it didn't get dirt underneath it.
01:48:46.000 I was like, this hurts, but this is good pain.
01:48:48.000 This pain indicates that I'm going to be healthy in the long-term.
01:48:50.000 You know what the Marines say, right?
01:48:52.000 Pain is weakness leaving the body.
01:48:53.000 There you go.
01:48:54.000 There's a level of like, you kind of have to tough some stuff out.
01:48:57.000 Alright, let's grab some more Super Chips.
01:48:58.000 We got Wyatt Caldenberg.
01:49:00.000 He says, I had to appear before a grand jury for two weeks.
01:49:02.000 The DOJ and FBI didn't know-ish, and they were fishing to find who to frame for the crime.
01:49:07.000 This will be a fishing trip, too.
01:49:08.000 They are trying to redirect blame.
01:49:11.000 Yep.
01:49:12.000 I'd imagine.
01:49:13.000 I'd imagine.
01:49:15.000 Yeah, I can see that.
01:49:16.000 Ian says, dude, that's a normal AR-15.
01:49:18.000 The bag is too short to hide the upper, though.
01:49:21.000 Yeah, and someone else pointed out, wasn't his gun shot and damaged?
01:49:25.000 No, well, that's what I've heard, but then today when they were doing this press conference, Rojak, the FBI agent, was saying, we've tested the gun and it's still intact, still works.
01:49:34.000 Was it shot?
01:49:36.000 Was the gun hit with fire?
01:49:37.000 The FBI is currently saying no, I had heard reports that it was, but you know, Crooks was killed with a singular shot to the head, so I don't know how much gunfire was actually directed at him.
01:49:48.000 Alan Smithy says, it's not a collapsible stock, it's an adjustable stock.
01:49:51.000 Every AR has them.
01:49:52.000 You are being gaslit like the shoulder thing that goes up and the barrel shroud.
01:49:57.000 But if you do Google search collapsible stock, you literally get, alternately, an adjustable stock.
01:50:02.000 And the terms are used interchangeably on the internet.
01:50:05.000 And there are gun shops that call it this.
01:50:07.000 And the gun shops that I've been to out here have called them that as well.
01:50:11.000 So I don't know.
01:50:13.000 I'm not a big gun person.
01:50:14.000 All I know is that that's what they've said.
01:50:17.000 And then there was one shop that I went to where they had the one that folds all the way in.
01:50:22.000 Those are cool.
01:50:23.000 I like those.
01:50:24.000 Folds all the way in.
01:50:25.000 Those can drop in a backpack.
01:50:26.000 And then there is one... I don't think we got it, but it was really cool because...
01:50:32.000 I think it's a Ruger 10-22, except you can snap, twist, and take off the upper, or whatever it's called, and then switch it for a different caliber or something.
01:50:43.000 Something like that.
01:50:44.000 I can't remember.
01:50:44.000 I don't know.
01:50:45.000 That one I might have.
01:50:47.000 I don't know.
01:50:47.000 I live in West Virginia.
01:50:49.000 Guns are everywhere.
01:50:49.000 You're allowed to have them.
01:50:51.000 Alright, Sean Saiz says, Tim, I read a news article that says immigrants commit less crimes than native citizens.
01:50:58.000 In these types of studies, are they adding illegal and legal migrants together?
01:51:01.000 Maxwell was smeared in article.
01:51:05.000 In the article?
01:51:06.000 You gotta read the crosstabs.
01:51:07.000 You gotta read the studies.
01:51:08.000 Some do and some don't.
01:51:10.000 But I'll tell you this, the crime rate among undocumented migrants is 100%.
01:51:17.000 If I call them illegal immigrants, it's kind of implied they're all criminals.
01:51:20.000 And if you didn't get caught, did you commit a crime?
01:51:23.000 Yes.
01:51:24.000 Technically?
01:51:25.000 Have you ever met someone who got away with it?
01:51:28.000 I don't know.
01:51:29.000 The answer is usually no, because people go around bragging that they got away with it.
01:51:32.000 Don't get away with it for long.
01:51:33.000 Yeah.
01:51:36.000 There was a, you know we talked about, there was a, in Wheaton, Illinois, and Glen Ellyn are on this area, the West Suburbs, there was a bank robber who operated for a couple decades.
01:51:46.000 And he got away with it.
01:51:48.000 They never caught him.
01:51:49.000 Never figured out.
01:51:50.000 It's real simple.
01:51:51.000 He just never told anybody, probably.
01:51:53.000 And then there was one point at which, like, multiple banks got hit right at the same time, and they think it was his retirement.
01:51:59.000 Yeah.
01:51:59.000 One last one.
01:52:00.000 Did he walk in with, like, a face mask on and demand the money?
01:52:03.000 Yep.
01:52:03.000 I can't remember the exact story, but it might have been a motorcycle, duffel bag, ski mask, and gun.
01:52:09.000 And then he walks in, fills it up, walks out.
01:52:14.000 That's it.
01:52:14.000 He's gone.
01:52:15.000 So wild.
01:52:15.000 Yeah.
01:52:17.000 I mean, the scary thing is, people don't realize this, but premeditated murder is almost never solved.
01:52:23.000 It's terrifying.
01:52:24.000 People think, you know, crime is like CSI, like, they find a dead body, then the cops come in and they're like, tape it all off and we're gonna do all these crazy things.
01:52:32.000 They don't.
01:52:34.000 Very few jurisdictions have the capability to do that high-level stuff.
01:52:37.000 And so premeditated murders, they'll find a body and be like, we have no idea how the person died.
01:52:44.000 We'll figure it out maybe in a week.
01:52:48.000 Whatever, I don't know.
01:52:49.000 That's just it.
01:52:51.000 That's scary.
01:52:52.000 They try, though.
01:52:54.000 All right, let's go.
01:52:55.000 I did find this New York Times article that I mentioned in, and they do make the claim that Trump's surrogates are claiming that illegal immigrants are committing crimes without evidence.
01:53:05.000 Illegal immigrants literally committed a crime to enter the country.
01:53:07.000 It's 100%.
01:53:08.000 Yeah.
01:53:11.000 All right, let's see.
01:53:13.000 It always seems like certain superchats just disappear from the chat.
01:53:17.000 Cause I'll see some and be like, oh, here's a good one.
01:53:19.000 I definitely want to make sure we read that one.
01:53:20.000 And now I'm here and it's like, it's gone.
01:53:24.000 The super jet is nowhere to be found.
01:53:25.000 Uh, let's see.
01:53:28.000 Let's see if I can find another one.
01:53:31.000 Dim Sum Nim Sum says, wasn't, wasn't there a Democrat commercial to stop a bill for mechanics having codes for cars because they said mechanics will do naughty in parking garages?
01:53:40.000 I have no idea.
01:53:42.000 Here's one.
01:53:43.000 Max Revensky says, oh my god, please open Google Maps on Black Sea and check how much of the coastline Russia has and where Sevastopol is.
01:53:51.000 Quote, only access to the Black Sea, LMAO.
01:53:53.000 Yeah, but Sevastopol's a giant industrial seaport.
01:53:56.000 That's the thing, is they didn't have one of those before.
01:53:58.000 They had like one, I think, east, on the east side of the sea, were you going to say?
01:54:02.000 Yeah, but I don't think they control Abkhazia very well.
01:54:04.000 And I think that's their only other port.
01:54:06.000 It's not as big.
01:54:07.000 And so this is actually, you know, this is a really good example, Max.
01:54:10.000 Come on!
01:54:12.000 You see, this is the problem.
01:54:14.000 The problem here is we're talking about a naval base that was Soviet.
01:54:21.000 After the Soviet Union broke up, Russia retained control of and paid Ukraine in a lease and is a massive naval base, an industrial center for bringing in goods.
01:54:30.000 They're not just going to build one of those overnight or establish trade routes overnight.
01:54:35.000 They want to maintain control of one of, if not their only warm water sea port.
01:54:40.000 Where they get access to the Black Sea, move through the Bosphorus, into the Mediterranean, and sell their energy.
01:54:46.000 So, to imply that, well, of course Russia has some coastline along the area.
01:54:51.000 It's not developed.
01:54:52.000 So they're not going to give up a multi-billion dollar naval port, as well as, I believe it's the home of their Black Sea fleet, naval forces.
01:55:02.000 They've got weapons there.
01:55:03.000 They've got military personnel there.
01:55:05.000 They have food there.
01:55:06.000 And they're not going to go, well, we do have barren coastline over there.
01:55:09.000 Let's just give it up to NATO.
01:55:12.000 Let NATO take control of our naval base and seize all of our infrastructure, and then we'll go build somewhere else, and maybe in 20 years we'll have something comparable.
01:55:20.000 So, when I'm talking about their only access to the Black Sea, it's in reference to their shipping lane, trade routes, and massive industrial port, as Ian mentioned, and naval base.
01:55:30.000 They also have ships in Tartus, so they do have other—in Syria, but it's—they're different things.
01:55:37.000 They're different things.
01:55:39.000 By all means, make the argument they should start building now.
01:55:42.000 And if Putin was smart, he'd be like, we should start building a massive industrial infrastructure in territory we can better secure.
01:55:49.000 Or he probably weighed the options and said, we're not going to let NATO take Sevastopol.
01:55:53.000 It's ours.
01:55:54.000 It's been ours for 100 years, and we're not going to give it up now.
01:55:57.000 So there you go.
01:55:59.000 Let's go.
01:56:00.000 We'll read some more.
01:56:01.000 All right, where are we at?
01:56:04.000 Jake T says, bring back Ian's crystal corner on the table.
01:56:08.000 That was really funny.
01:56:09.000 The guests didn't.
01:56:11.000 This is dusty.
01:56:12.000 It got too dusty.
01:56:13.000 Well, no, it's because sometimes unlike Culture War, we have four guests and you're not here.
01:56:17.000 And other people sit in that chair too.
01:56:19.000 What am I forced to do?
01:56:20.000 And they sit down and it's just they're in a crystal cave.
01:56:22.000 It's vibrating me.
01:56:24.000 I should bring like a crystal.
01:56:25.000 Maybe I'll bring one.
01:56:26.000 And just leave it here.
01:56:28.000 Andrew the Great says, we need a meme of Trump as Captain America with Thanos in Endgame.
01:56:33.000 JD flies in on your left, then Tulsi, RFK, and others portal in to help finish the job.
01:56:38.000 I veto.
01:56:39.000 Yeah, I'm tired of the Avengers meme.
01:56:42.000 And RFK said Justice League anyway.
01:56:47.000 Veto.
01:56:49.000 I don't know.
01:56:51.000 Look, the memes that really helped Trump in 2016 were more like Pepe memes and jokes about issues.
01:57:00.000 Now it seems Trump is the issue, and I think that's bad for him.
01:57:04.000 So you'd see memes in 2016 about things, you know, like a bunch of dudes jumping over a wall or something like that, right?
01:57:13.000 And it represented the border crisis.
01:57:15.000 Or you'd see like Barack Obama, you know, like something related, like political cartoon related to him bombing some country and George W. Bush lying.
01:57:23.000 The memes that we were getting were jokes mocking everything.
01:57:26.000 Pepe the Frog would be like a little guy pulling a lever and a wall dropping down on the border.
01:57:32.000 Now the memes are like Donald Trump dancing.
01:57:35.000 You know, and they made a whole bunch of them and they're like, this is cool.
01:57:37.000 And I'm like, that's what Hillary did.
01:57:39.000 Hillary had memes of her dancing.
01:57:41.000 And that's why Harris can run a campaign where she still has not given us a platform, but instead she's running on the let's talk about Trump all the time campaign, right?
01:57:49.000 Like the vibes campaign is actually completely Trump focused, but not in a way that benefits Americans.
01:57:55.000 When it was Trump focused and they were saying, well, he's talking about the border while it's 2016 and people hadn't really embraced the issue the way they have now, it was different.
01:58:03.000 But now it's really just about Trump as this larger-than-life supervillain that the Democrats think that he is.
01:58:09.000 And, you know, I think that's to the detriment of everybody.
01:58:12.000 I'd love to see a bit technical, his campaign, because I don't like emotionally when he's like, there are really bad people.
01:58:18.000 I'm just tired of that crappy meme.
01:58:20.000 I feel like the Harris-Walz campaign does that more.
01:58:23.000 I think that you're more likely to get a policy suggestion from the Trump-Vance campaign.
01:58:28.000 Good.
01:58:28.000 Yeah, we need to talk about, like, specifics about industry because he's the captain now.
01:58:32.000 He already won the game.
01:58:34.000 Now he just needs to show us, like, what is the plan.
01:58:36.000 I personally asked Trump, how do you deport?
01:58:38.000 And he said, you know, oh, you got it.
01:58:40.000 We got to do it.
01:58:41.000 But how do you do it?
01:58:43.000 And he says, local police.
01:58:44.000 And I'm like, OK, there you go.
01:58:47.000 That actually is the best answer I think we could hope for.
01:58:50.000 We don't want mass military mobilization for deportations.
01:58:53.000 We don't want this extreme people being loaded in buses, local police receiving warrants and then going methodically and slowly to deport, starting with criminals, as J.D.
01:59:03.000 Vance pointed out.
01:59:03.000 You start where we know we can start, with criminals.
01:59:06.000 And we deport them.
01:59:07.000 And then after that, we figure out where we can go next.
01:59:09.000 And Trump flat out just said, we will have local police begin this process.
01:59:13.000 Kamala Harris doesn't answer any of these questions.
01:59:15.000 She doesn't, she won't even do an interview.
01:59:16.000 I don't even know what she wants to do.
01:59:18.000 Mars is pre-recorded, right?
01:59:20.000 It's pre-recorded and Walls is, you know, there to hold her hand.
01:59:23.000 Look, I would try to hint, oh, what I'm going to do is I'm going to build 3 million new housing developments.
01:59:29.000 She was eventually, immediately beat back by Democrats who said, no, no, no, that's too pro-developer.
01:59:35.000 And then union groups came out and said, hold on, we haven't heard about this.
01:59:39.000 We're concerned about it.
01:59:40.000 So Kamala, even when she tries to steal Trump's thunder and mention a policy idea that she knows she can't get passed, she's getting beat back by Democrats who are like, hold on, that's not progressive.
01:59:50.000 We didn't agree.
01:59:51.000 Or Trump's ideas.
01:59:52.000 We didn't agree.
01:59:52.000 The wall and taxing tips.
01:59:54.000 We're going to go to the members' call-in show now, and if you'd like to hang out, go to timcast.com, click join us, become a member, and we have this massive library of all of our call-in shows.
02:00:04.000 You as members actually can submit questions, call into the show, join us and our guests, and ask anybody you want a question.
02:00:10.000 And the way it works is, You propose your question, the community then decides which question they think is best to be on the show, and that elevates it.
02:00:18.000 So we usually have some pretty great callers who bring up some really interesting points that often people have not considered.
02:00:24.000 One, recently, was that the shadow campaign will be to fraudulently vote for Trump.
02:00:31.000 If the Democrats think they're going to lose no matter what, then the shadow campaign would be make obvious fraudulent votes for Trump so when he wins, they can grab select ballots and say, aha, look, we found Trump was the one who committed fraud and throw the whole election into question.
02:00:45.000 Not saying it's true.
02:00:46.000 Someone called and entertained that and no one had brought it up before.
02:00:48.000 So I think it is interesting.
02:00:49.000 So definitely check out the Members Only Show.
02:00:51.000 Smash the like button.
02:00:52.000 Subscribe to this channel.
02:00:53.000 Share the show.
02:00:53.000 If you do like it, you can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
02:00:57.000 Arcee, do you want to shout anything out?
02:00:59.000 Hey, check out the Pennsylvania Chase, and if you're interested in ballot chasing, we're asking everyone to Commit 100.
02:01:04.000 You can sign up at Commit100.com.
02:01:07.000 I think it's Turning Point Action, actually, slash Commit 100.
02:01:09.000 And then you can work with people like me.
02:01:12.000 We'll tell you how to ballot chase.
02:01:13.000 We'll probably even ballot chase with you.
02:01:15.000 So that's the way we're going to win this election.
02:01:16.000 Every individual, every patriot actually saying that they're going to reach out to individuals of their neighborhood and their community.
02:01:23.000 You can do that.
02:01:24.000 Follow the Pennsylvania Chase.
02:01:25.000 Follow Turning Point Action.
02:01:27.000 No need to follow me unless you want to get lectured on racial consciousness.
02:01:31.000 That's hot.
02:01:31.000 Where can they follow you if they want to?
02:01:33.000 Follow me on Twitter.
02:01:33.000 I'm Black Hannity.
02:01:34.000 Look up R.C.
02:01:35.000 Maxwell.
02:01:35.000 You can find me online.
02:01:37.000 I write for Human Events, Red State, and American Thinker.
02:01:40.000 And I'm Ian Crossland.
02:01:41.000 I got asked to do a movie.
02:01:43.000 I'm going to go fly out to L.A.
02:01:44.000 and shoot a movie next month, I think.
02:01:46.000 Still, everything's in the works, so I haven't confirmed anything.
02:01:48.000 I'll tell you more about it as it progresses.
02:01:51.000 Also, I want to see us start taking Boyan Slat's ocean cleanup project, Plastic, Sending it down to Rice University and turning it into graphene, or sending it to wherever Universal Matter uses their flash jewel heating process to turn this plastic into graphene, proof of concept, and then we'll do like a global revolution of energy that way.
02:02:08.000 And also, I've been crushing Diablo 4 lately with my Frost Sorcerer.
02:02:14.000 Elon's got me inspired to start streaming on X.
02:02:17.000 He's like, I think he's like tier 174 druid, and it's hilarious to watch him just blasting these end bosses and taking forever because he's a druid.
02:02:26.000 So I've got a glass cannon, and maybe I'll go, maybe I'll play multiplayer with him if he's got eternal.
02:02:31.000 But if he's seasonal, then I don't know if our characters are cross-compatible.
02:02:35.000 Yeah, me too.
02:02:36.000 I wonder.
02:02:36.000 Diablo's hot.
02:02:38.000 That game's fire.
02:02:39.000 I've owned it for a while, but I just got into it pretty hard over the weekend.
02:02:42.000 Right on.
02:02:43.000 See you later.
02:02:44.000 I'm Hannah-Claire Brimlow.
02:02:45.000 I'm a writer for SCNR.com, Scanner News.
02:02:47.000 You can follow all of our work at TimCastNews on the internet.
02:02:50.000 I say this the same way almost every single night.
02:02:52.000 If you want to follow me personally, I'm on Instagram at HannahClaire.B.
02:02:55.000 I'm on X at HannahClaireB.
02:02:57.000 Thanks for everything you guys do.
02:02:58.000 You're definitely the backbone of the show.
02:03:00.000 Have a good night.
02:03:01.000 We will see you all over at TimCast.com in about one minute.