Prince Andrew is off the hook, Virginia Dufraya takes her own life, the State Department lays off 800 workers, and James Gunn makes fun of Mike Cernovich in a new movie, "Joker"
00:02:20.000The Trump DOJ has officially ended the probe into Prince Andrew over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, meaning he's now free to travel, he's off the hook, and what?
00:02:31.000He's literally in a photo with Keylane Maxwell and Virginia Dufray, but all right, I guess.
00:03:35.000We've got a bunch of other really big stories.
00:03:37.000We've got the State Department's going to be laying off a massive reduction.
00:03:41.000I believe it's around 1,800 staff members.
00:03:44.000A district court judge in New Hampshire has said that Donald Trump cannot block birthright citizenship, establishing a class, that is, infants of undocumented parents.
00:04:04.000I don't think there was anything overtly political in it.
00:04:06.000And actually, in some ways, I think you could argue it was anti-woke.
00:04:10.000So all in all, I thought the movie's actually pretty good.
00:04:12.000Though James Gunn certainly has a chip on his shoulder about getting canceled because of mean tweets at Hex or people pulling up his tweets, which were, you know, inappropriate jokes.
00:04:21.000And there's a scene in the movie which really hurt the film, but seems like James Gunn wanted to make fun of Mike Cernovich, I guess.
00:04:28.000So we'll talk about that and more before we get started.
00:05:29.000What I appreciate the most is that it's not some gimmicky quick fix like other things.
00:05:33.000Beam Dream is a science-backed blend of magnesium, alphaanine, and other natural ingredients to help your body genuinely relax and recover without leaving you feeling groggy the next morning.
00:05:42.000It's also got zero added sugar and just 15 calories.
00:05:45.000It's already improved over 18 million nights of sleep, including mine.
00:05:49.000So make sure you guys go to shopbeam.com slash TimPool.
00:05:57.000And I'm just going to throw this in there.
00:05:58.000The reason why I think, you know, I was having a hard time with recovery and why sleep was so important is I learned about HGH and testosterone production in the male body during certain periods of sleep.
00:06:11.000And if you're not getting enough REM or deep sleep, then your body is not going to be producing the hormones it needs to actually recover.
00:06:17.000So that's why I think improving my sleep with the help of Beam especially has made me feel a lot better.
00:06:50.000Now, if you want to come up on stage and debate, you got to get tickets now while you still can, because we're actually going to bring up people from the audience onto the show to be a part of the live debate.
00:07:18.000Typically try to cover stories that the mainstream media won't, like East Palestine, Ohio, Maui, Western North Carolina, and now the Hill Country down there in Texas.
00:07:26.000I just got back from there literally like two hours ago.
00:07:30.000So running on fumes over here, but you know, it's an important story to keep talking about.
00:07:36.000And you were talking about sleep earlier in the Ad REIT with Beam and a little life hack about sleep.
00:07:40.000Sleep and rest are not the same thing.
00:07:42.000So if you want to make sure you get restful sleep, have good digestion from my experience.
00:07:46.000So when you sleep, lay on your back with your arms over your head like this, and it lifts your diaphragm and you'll start hearing like gurgling in your stomach, this digestion kick on.
00:07:54.000And then you'll get like what'll feel like two hours of sleep in like 15 minutes.
00:07:58.000You'll, you'll, you ever, if you ever feel like that, it's this.
00:08:01.000So the connection between rest and digestion, try it out.
00:08:04.000Let me know what your, what your results are like as well, Phil.
00:08:08.000Have you told anyone who you are yet tonight?
00:08:32.000I wonder if there was any evidence that he was involved with Epstein and Maxwell and there were victims.
00:08:38.000Could it be perhaps the statements from the victim and the picture of him with the victim and they're letting him just go?
00:08:45.000I'm pretty sure that the powers that be are not going to appreciate us constantly staying on this story.
00:08:53.000And I would not be surprised if we face a massive censorship from the algorithm over it and smear campaigns, because they'd certainly appreciate if we talked about something else.
00:09:02.000You can see how flustered they're getting.
00:09:06.000Prince Andrew can finally end his self-imposed travel ban after a leaked memo revealed that the FBI is closing its investigation into the Royals Epstein links.
00:09:14.000The disgraced Duke of York, 65, has left the UK once in the last six years over fears of an arrest.
00:09:22.000Now it appears as though the scandal-scarred prince, who has been kept at arm's length from the royal fold, is able to venture out of the UK without fear of repercussions.
00:09:30.000He has been abroad once since the scandal erupted, a source told The Sun.
00:09:34.000He has always been very nervous about going abroad and felt he'd always be looking over his shoulder as he could be subject to civil action or worst, being arrested.
00:09:42.000Hopefully with this out of the way, it means that he can at least leave the country.
00:09:47.000What's he supposed to do with the rest of his life?
00:09:48.000He hasn't been convicted of any crime and can't sit around doing nothing at Royal Lodge forever.
00:09:54.000I suppose the big question is, is the U.S. going to issue an arrest warrant for him and then demand the U.K. extradite him?
00:10:45.000I mean, just the weird stuff like this.
00:10:47.000I mean, if you're not going to give any sort of answers as to why you would drop the investigation into the Epstein case in general, at least give us some answers as to why you're going to let this creep walk free and not even try to, you know, even if the UK police or whatever don't take him into custody, at least like show us that he is a pedophile.
00:11:08.000In the court of public opinion, we'll convict him.
00:11:10.000Well, they have said that the administration is alluding to the possibility of more information coming out, right?
00:11:15.000I've seen at least some reports on that.
00:11:17.000Judicial Watch put out our report saying that they're still reviewing Epstein files.
00:11:20.000So, I mean, if that could, you know, produce some kind of answers, I'm sure that it's not going to be enough, but I mean...
00:11:29.000You guys remember when three months ago, Virginia Duffrey, the alleged victim of Andrew, killed herself?
00:11:41.000And how weird it was where, like, a week before that or whatever, she was in the hospital, all bruised and battered, saying, I'm in the hospital dying from a car accident.
00:12:37.000Like, not only is it this level of the people that run the world, the 12 families, the bloodlines that are in control of the monetary system, the liberal economic order, whoever they are, there's that level of people playing with Jeffrey Epstein.
00:12:48.000Then there's the American government, which doesn't have to take the bullet for this one.
00:12:52.000It's not the American government's responsibility to take the heat for Epstein.
00:12:56.000Epstein was a global consortium, this whole thing.
00:12:59.000The U.S. government, like, I don't blame them for not wanting to bear the brunt of this, but at the same time, Cash looked like, or Dan Bongino looked like he was in a hostage situation.
00:13:09.000I literally, I think that they came and people think that these people are like video game villains or like movie villains that aren't real.
00:13:15.000But I think he was approached and they're like, if you tell people what is going on, we're going to kill your family and not just your immediate family, your entire bloodline.
00:13:23.000And we're going to choose when they die and we're going to choose how.
00:13:26.000And it's going to, this is called a blood vendetta.
00:14:06.000I don't have any sense as to whether or not they're telling the truth.
00:14:11.000I know that everything looks suspicious as hell, and that's why I'm hoping for more answers when the, I'm hoping they'll release more information, and hopefully there are some answers there.
00:14:20.000But just because I don't know doesn't mean that I think that Cash and Dan Bongino are now a part of the conspiracy.
00:15:32.000You can't say you have all these files on your desk, you have all these videos, all this information, and this binder is only phase one, and we're going to release so much more and then say, oh, well, poof.
00:15:45.000As much as they think that this is just another piece of news where it's just going to, people are going to forget about it and move on.
00:15:50.000I'm telling you, if they don't explain themselves and they're not transparent about this process, what made them close the case?
00:15:57.000What made them decide they're not going to release any information?
00:16:01.000This is going to be a stain on the administration if they don't act on it.
00:16:05.000Last night, the conversation came up that if it were revealed and it completely destroyed the world order, like the Saudi princes, the Russian magnates, all the Chinese bureaucrats, all the people that were involved in this somehow turn on the people that released the data, the American government, and then they blacklisted, they stopped working with the American, just fucks up the entire order.
00:16:25.000Would you be the one to pull the trigger?
00:16:29.000If there was not only it's not going to, like, what would it solve?
00:16:32.000We're talking about child rapists, because the fact that none of these people are being held accountable is the reason that they're going to continue.
00:16:48.000The idea that if you don't hold them accountable, it will only produce more.
00:16:52.000Even if you hold them accountable, there will be more.
00:16:55.000For all of human history, wealthy people, powerful people have taken advantage of children or taken advantage of their positions of power and broken the law.
00:17:07.000So the idea that this would solve that, no.
00:17:12.000If it prevents one child from being raped, it's worth doing.
00:17:15.000It would be justice for the people that actually have broken the law, and that's good.
00:17:19.000That's something that we should go for.
00:17:21.000But there are a lot of people that are like, oh, this will fix everything.
00:17:39.000If there's a CEO of a company and he gets fired, you put a new CEO in.
00:17:41.000He's going to be functionally doing the same thing.
00:17:43.000But if there is a CEO who's a pedophile and you remove him and you put a new CEO there who's not a pedophile, then you've gotten rid of the pedophile.
00:19:10.000Those people, but it won't inhibit the people that come after them or other rich people.
00:19:17.000No, the point that I'm making is rich people, powerful people have always felt that they're above the law, and they've always done things that are outside of the law.
00:19:25.000So yes, the people that have broken the law, we should punish them.
00:19:29.000I think that they should release all the information.
00:19:31.000Like if there are people that have violated children, they should be prosecuted, go to jail, whatever the maximum punishment for the law is.
00:19:39.000Yes, but to say that doing this will fix a problem, no, no.
00:19:43.000That's trying to fix the human condition.
00:20:01.000Which is more or less murder when we enforce against murder?
00:20:04.000I think there's probably the same amount.
00:20:06.000I don't think that there's more or less.
00:20:07.000So there's no point in enforcing against murder because- The reason that you have laws against them is so that you punish the people that do.
00:20:17.000I don't believe that it's a deterrent, though.
00:20:58.000I'm pretty sure there would be a substantially greater amount of murder, particularly coming from the left as a good example, if they thought there would be no enforcement action against them.
00:21:12.000I'm pretty sure the antifa guys who lured those cops out and shot them in the neck would have just been much more overt about it and walked up to the building in a line with rifles, blasting into the building.
00:21:20.000No, because the reason that they didn't do that isn't because of the law.
00:21:51.000Well, the people that advocate for killing cops, but that don't do it, they're not the kind of people that generally are murderers.
00:21:57.000Look, if you have someone break into your house and you're in a state that's not a stand-your ground state, most people are not going to say, F you, I'm going to shoot you, even to save their own lives.
00:22:06.000They're going to try and get out of there because they're afraid of killing people, not because they're afraid of what's going to happen.
00:22:13.000Why is that gangbangers in Chicago have other people commit murders for them?
00:22:17.000Well, I mean, there's a lot of reasons for that, right?
00:22:18.000Because they put people in a position so that way they break the law, so they go into the system.
00:23:15.000I think when it comes to violence and stuff like that, I don't think that when it comes to murder and stuff, I think the people that will commit murder are the kind of people that will commit murder.
00:23:24.000And I don't think that they're the best.
00:23:25.000I think both directions of this argument are valid because there are people that will commit acts regardless of the law, and especially people that feel like they're above the law or people that are so psychotic they don't even care about the law.
00:25:24.000It looks like, holy, holy crap, from Breaking 911, left-wing terrorists appears to open fire on ICE agents during a raid at a farm in Southern California.
00:27:38.000You can activate the National Guard in California and activate the National Guard in Texas, but I don't know about the military that's full-time.
00:27:47.000Federal agents clash with protesters during ICE raid at Southern California Farm.
00:27:51.000And as you can see here, this is just the general video.
00:27:54.000Some federal agents there who appear to have been carrying out a large-scale immigration enforcement.
00:28:00.000This is about 50 miles northwest of Los Angeles.
00:28:03.000And at one point, federal agents were seen throwing smoke canisters towards the protesters, sending the crowd running in the opposite direction.
00:28:12.000Now, just to orient you again, about 50 miles northwest of LA.
00:28:17.000This is just outside of Oxnard, California.
00:28:21.000For those of you familiar, some protesters were seen holding flags, appearing to poke military vehicles that were passing by.
00:28:27.000At least one person has been arrested and another was seen pinned to the ground.
00:28:31.000We'll continue to bring you updates when we have them.
00:28:34.000So again, going back to this video, this was posted 20 minutes ago.
00:28:40.000So, you know, right after we start the show, and once again, it looks like, because it looks like similar footage, they appear, these people appear to be running from tear gas.
00:29:47.000And they've got gas masks, tear gas, and pepperball guns.
00:29:51.000At what point do they need to come out with live ammo?
00:29:54.000I mean, like, do they need to be at least having some guys on the ground with rifles prepared to return fire in the event?
00:30:02.000We don't know exactly what happened, but this video looks like one of these protesters, terrorists, I guess, just pulled out a handgun and opened fire.
00:30:11.000And the principal assumption I'm going to make is it's a nine millimeter or something.
00:30:16.000Yeah, I mean, look, most of the time, there's a guy, there's at least a couple guys doing overwatch when they line up like that.
00:30:22.000So there'll be guys like back on like a truck with like a DMR designated marksman rifle.
00:30:28.000So there's probably, there's definitely dudes that have lethal force capacity there.
00:30:34.000But the guys on the line, usually they're just with pepper balls and gas masks and stuff.
00:30:38.000This sounds like the perfect use case to actually start integrating the military into these large-scale raids.
00:30:45.000Is there anything on the books at this point that's really going to stop the president from fully federalizing the California National Guard?
00:30:52.000I know Newsom keeps trying to fight it, keeps trying to take back control of the National Guard.
00:30:58.000But if that doesn't work, then at the end of the day, what is stopping the president from invoking the Insurrection Act and actually using that to help with these ICE raids?
00:31:09.000So far as my understanding, when Trump sent the Marines in, he did not need to invoke the Insurrection Act because they were protecting federal property.
00:31:20.000Because of something called posi comitatas, U.S. military can't enforce domestic laws.
00:31:24.000If Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, they can.
00:31:28.000Citing the reckless, like the lawlessness, the law is not being enforced locally, so we will come in and federally enforce it.
00:31:34.000I think California and New York especially right now, Trump should be sending in the troops.
00:31:41.000And you know what they did when, who was this?
00:31:44.000Was this, was it Jon Stewart on Daily Show, whatever?
00:31:48.000They were heavily criticizing Bannon and Pesobic and others for saying send in the troops, but they twisted what was being said as if, and then it might have been clapped.
00:31:59.000I don't know if it was Jon Stewart, but he was like, they are saying to send the troops against us, against us.
00:32:06.000I think Donald Trump needs to send federal law enforcement and if military, if necessary, because they are opening fire, shooting law enforcement in this is now, it's Thursday, in less than one week.
00:32:22.000We have three instances where leftist terrorists have opened fire on law enforcement.
00:32:27.000I want to see, I want to see National Guard, the Marines, whoever else, protecting these guys and making sure when they carry out their constitutionally sworn duty of enforcing the law as Congress has passed it, that terrorists will not kill them.
00:32:45.000You guys talked about Kent State, the Kent State Chief.
00:33:45.000We already had at that No Kings protest, those liberal guys unloaded indiscriminately into the crowd and killed an innocent person.
00:33:53.000And so that was, they were targeting an Antifa guy, which is weird, but they were trigger-happy lunatics who pulled out their guns, started shooting.
00:34:01.000The police need to be able to stop someone from killing people.
00:34:22.000Pepper spray, tear guessed, none of these are guarantees.
00:34:24.000In fact, through all of those, the guy was getting tear guessed as he was shooting.
00:34:29.000Unfortunately, the reality is, if someone is an active shooter trying to kill police and probably could have killed other bystanders who are protesting, you need to neutralize the threat to maximize the saving of lives.
00:34:42.000That's why they have, like I said, that's why they have designated marksmen.
00:34:46.000But the thing is, there's all those people around and the police are just not going to start shooting into the crowd.
00:34:51.000Like if there's a guy in the crowd shooting, the police are not going to start shooting back into the crowd.
00:34:57.000Because then the chances of hitting someone innocent is way too much.
00:35:02.000And the Trump administration can't afford that.
00:35:05.000So no matter how much you want the emotional satisfaction of getting the guy that was trying to kill the cops, you can't because once the bullet hits the guy, it goes through him.
00:35:19.000They don't stop in people, you know, and you're responsible for every round that comes out of the gun.
00:35:24.000I'm also thinking about it from the other perspective, which I tend to do, of if you were being suppressed by a government and the government was trying to stomp out your protests and you're like, this is our land, get out of our territory, as the citizens of California might be feeling, maybe occupied.
00:35:40.000Like the desire to fight back doesn't stop.
00:35:48.000A protester is seen firing some kind of weapon at federal agents.
00:35:52.000You know, many of us believed, I falsely believed, I think many of us believed that during the 2020 riots, these liberals in the cities were going to learn their lesson from the violence and that it might change their minds.
00:37:04.000And if that's not enough, then you Insurrection Act and you put a couple of people on the street corners where these people are shooting at cops.
00:37:11.000Yeah, look, I mean, considering, like, we just talked about, this is the third attack.
00:37:21.000So, I mean, look, it's time to put the foot, you know, bring the boot down.
00:37:25.000Like, you know, start rounding people up.
00:37:28.000Start saying, no, you can't protest at these things.
00:37:31.000If you, you know, gather for a protest when ICE is trying to do an operation, we're going to arrest every last one of you so that way ICE can do the operation that they need.
00:38:35.000You can see right there, just off frame, he's raising the weapon.
00:38:41.000It's an unprecedented time because you're talking about bringing down the boot, rounding people up, saying you can't protest, which is just antithetical to the essence of the protests in the United States.
00:40:21.000Zoran Mamdani allegedly has this blog.
00:40:23.000I don't know if it's actually his, but it's been going viral, where he talks about how he wishes he was white and how he feels such envy because he just wants to be white, but he can't.
00:40:32.000And so this is what motivates these people, disdain and jealousy.
00:40:36.000So this guy is basically saying in his campaign, when Donald Trump is elected, because he says illegal immigration is bad.
00:40:44.000So people say, okay, Trump, get the illegal immigrants out of this country.
00:41:02.000But the left doesn't call these people terrorists.
00:41:04.000They'll call them rebels or freedom fighters or heroes, probably.
00:41:10.000When Zoran Mandani says protecting families, he's saying the people who broke our laws have spit on our Constitution and have nothing but disdain for our way of life, our traditions, and our laws.
00:41:20.000And when he says he will stop Trump from deporting them, he is telling everyone in the United States, you as an American, your will be damned.
00:41:29.000I will stop your president from doing anything about what we are doing.
00:41:33.000What I ultimately mean to say by this, Ian, you say, I never would have dreamed on opening fire on a cop.
00:41:37.000Well, yeah, because that cop is an American just like you.
00:41:40.000These people don't view themselves as American.
00:42:03.000One American doesn't do it unless they're a criminal thinking, I don't care about anybody but myself.
00:42:08.000Yeah, I mean, at this point, they're also portrayed as martyrs, too.
00:42:13.000I mean, you go back, I do believe a little bit of this has to do with the Luigi effect, right?
00:42:17.000Where this guy has been raised up to the point where he is a saint in the eyes of so many people because he murdered a healthcare CEO in cold blood.
00:42:25.000And now with all these politicians out there, obviously Democrats, coming out and calling these guys Nazis, Gestapo, you know, every name in the book, constantly villainizing these people, they're empowered to go out and do this.
00:42:40.000And I mean, they're like, spend a few minutes on Reddit and look what they have to say about these kind of people.
00:42:45.000I mean, it is a disease at this point.
00:42:48.000And I don't know how we pull out of this.
00:42:49.000It's going to continue getting uglier unless we put the foot down.
00:42:53.000Can we just take a pause for a second and point out how ABC said, quote, a protester was seen firing some kind of weapon?
00:43:02.000I think the moment you're looking at a person opening fire, you say insurgents or terrorist.
00:43:08.000Yeah, they've broken ranks with the protest if they're opening fire on cops.
00:43:11.000They're no longer part of the protest.
00:43:14.000No, the protest has become a riot or an insurgent action.
00:43:19.000Because I'll tell you what's going to happen.
00:43:21.000Not everybody in the group obviously is going to agree with a guy shooting at someone.
00:43:24.000They're probably going to freak out and be like, I ain't sign up for this.
00:43:26.000But I guarantee you, a bunch of these people are going to be like, we will hide you and protect you.
00:43:30.000But you might also have an agitator in the crowd with them, and then they open fire.
00:43:35.000So you don't want to blame the whole crowd for one guy stepping out and doing.
00:43:42.000Because when they all wear black masks and jeans and hoodies so that you can't prosecute and figure out who is doing the shooting, and then when they're told, show up doing this to obfuscate and cover it up, you got yourselves a unified action.
00:43:53.000So going into it with the black block, just know you're part of whatever any of these other black block people do is what you're saying.
00:44:02.000They're going to where ICE is trying to conduct operations.
00:44:04.000They can go downtown, hold up signs, and protest these blah, blah, blah operations and stuff without actually trying to prevent the police from doing what the police are supposed to do.
00:44:14.000So if they go there where the police are actually trying to perform operations, round them all up, put them in jail, even if it's only vicious conspiracy.
00:44:53.000What would happen is they'd go to court, they'd say jury trial, and then to the jury, the defense would say, what clothing was the defendant wearing?
00:45:03.000He was wearing a black hoodie with a black mask, sunglasses, and black jeans.
00:45:08.000And was there anyone else wearing this?
00:45:15.000Then they say to the jury, do you really believe, imagine in your own mind, that there is a crowd of 300 people all wearing the exact same clothes.
00:45:24.000You can say beyond a reasonable doubt, you grabbed the correct person, especially in the mayhem Of pepper spray and rocks being thrown.
00:45:40.000The government tried charging them with conspiracy by saying, when you show up wearing these clothes so that you can cover up for the people who are violent, you're in a conspiracy.
00:46:15.000If two or more persons, if two or more persons in any state or territory in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States conspire to overthrow, put down, destroy by force the government to levy war against them or to oppose by force the authority thereof or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprison not more than 20 years or both.
00:46:42.000If you are dressing up to cover up for other people, when you say we can't blame the whole group, I understand what you're saying, but I will counter with this.
00:46:51.000They know violence is a high probability and is likely.
00:46:55.000They know the reason they wear those clothes is to protect others who engage in violence.
00:47:00.000If someone then draws a gun and opens fire, it's exactly what these people signed up for.
00:47:05.000And considering that five days ago, a group of people, currently there's an FBI manhunt underway for one of the accomplices in the shooting on an ICE facility.
00:47:15.000There is no excuse, in my opinion, that you have a group of people launching fireworks at an ICE facility.
00:47:22.000And when they come out, a guy in the woods shoots a cop in the neck.
00:47:25.000And these people are going to feign ignorance.
00:47:47.000I'm thinking about like in military conflict, if you are fighting against an enemy platoon and only one of them had a rifle and they're shooting at you, you don't like let all the other ones go.
00:48:25.000Leftists in three different instances have opened fire on law enforcement who have sworn an oath to the Constitution to uphold its laws and enforce them as they have been passed by Congress.
00:48:52.000I am surprised at the restraint of these law enforcement, considering in the past week, we've seen two ambushes.
00:49:00.000You'd think these officers would already be coming out with at least one guy prepped to use lethal force to put down an armed terrorist ambush.
00:49:09.000With a group like this and one guy pulling out a gun and opening fire, they all must be arrested and charged.
00:49:17.000We cannot be sitting here saying, no, no, no, no, hold on, guys.
00:49:20.000Let's just err in the benefit of the doubt that these people had no idea that there was going to be another armed ambush for the third time in a week.
00:49:27.000These people need to be made aware of a few things.
00:49:30.000One, we believe that based on the news, let me pause it like this.
00:49:37.000These protesters know more about the protests than you do, than I do, than anyone, any of us here or anyone online, because they're directly involved in the organization of these things.
00:49:45.000So you have to go to me and say, who do you think knows more about the planned actions?
00:49:51.000The actual people on the ground in that moment or strangers on the internet?
00:49:57.000And I'm going to say, I'm pretty sure the people who are there, who are told when to be there and why they should be there, know more.
00:50:10.000Because these people are having meetings about resistance to ICE.
00:50:15.000So the probability they know that there is violence against cops, two cops have been shot, is substantially greater than the average American.
00:50:23.000When they show up within the same week and a guy draws a gun, I say, if you are in these groups of people that are attempting to kill law enforcement, you will get arrested and charged.
00:50:40.000That means they get a charge with accomplice to attempted murder or assaulted an officer, whatever it might be.
00:50:46.000But they all must be arrested and charged for the actions of the one guy with the gun.
00:50:49.000Makes me think of January 6th with all those people getting arrested that were just there, trespassing, the Trump up charges, and similar with the riot or it is completely different, Ian.
00:51:00.000If there had been a riot at the Capitol and then three days later, another riot at the Capitol, and then a week later, a thousand people showed up and there was a riot at the Capitol, I'd say, at what point are we going to be like, yo, those people knew a riot was going to happen?
00:51:12.000Like, it's the third time it happened.
00:51:13.000Well, the government said they knew beforehand.
00:51:31.000No, it was the people who were punching cops and smashing windows and forcing their way into the window.
00:51:35.000The people were blocking, standing between that guy and the other cop.
00:51:40.000So you're saying the people who are involved in the riot and there is evidence that they were violent towards cops and smashed and vandalized, you charge them for sharing.
00:51:48.000And that guy that fired the gun, you charge him for firing the gun.
00:51:52.000Because this is the third time and, right, this is the third time we've had an ambush on law enforcement and these people are coordinated and organized, it's a little bit different.
00:52:02.000If there was a random group of people that, okay, after the shooting, let's say right now, because this is live, let's say they disperse.
00:52:09.000Then seven people walk up and are walking around, pointing cameras.
00:52:13.000If the cops went to those random people and arrest them and charge you with conspiracy, I completely agree.
00:52:21.000For the people on January 6th who walked up to a building on the other side where there's no riot and the doors were already open and they're like, I don't know, it's a public building.
00:52:32.000Anybody who was in the riot, I believe, should have been charged.
00:52:34.000Now, I agree with the pardons on J6 because three years is long enough.
00:52:38.000It's a little too long for a riot, in my opinion.
00:52:40.000A couple of years is fine for assaulting an officer and vandalizing and desecrating or whatever you want to call it.
00:52:46.000I think you would have to prove that the people in the crowd with that guy who opened fire had been there before in order to say that they were conspiring.
00:53:25.000But the state went after people who didn't do anything.
00:53:29.000People who an hour later were walking around on the grass, or Owen Schroyer, who never went in the building, or Brennan Strzok, who never went in the building.
00:53:36.000I am saying these people are actively in a small group during the same week where two other immigration officers were fired upon, and they're dressing in a way where they were told to dress to coordinate their actions.
00:53:58.000Again, if there was a riot at the Capitol, and then three days later, there was a riot at the Capitol, and then three days later, there was a riot at the Capitol.
00:54:08.000At that point, I'd argue, I think the people who are showing up are well aware that the intention is to riot at the Capitol.
00:54:14.000Now, I don't know about hunting them down across the country and trying to give them 20 years.
00:54:18.000Like I said, three years was too long.
00:54:20.000But for these people who are shooting cops, nobody on January 6th shot a cop.
00:55:22.000Maybe when people who show up and provide cover for armed terrorists who are trying to murder cops, maybe when they get arrested and charged, and again, I'll say this, for the people that are party to that group who are apprised of the meeting and the action and the plans, maybe they'll say, I had no idea he'd draw a gun.
00:55:40.000Okay, well, you still get a year in jail for that.
00:55:43.000You are party to a group that tried to murder police, okay?
00:55:46.000Maybe when that happens, people stop showing up and giving cover to armed terrorists who are trying to murder law enforcement.
00:55:53.000If you're there in a uniform, man, and somebody else with your uniform on opens fire, commits a crime, I mean, your organization should be called a terrorist for one.
00:56:10.000You're an accomplice, even though you didn't know.
00:56:11.000You might get a reduced charge if you truly didn't know what was going on, but I would imagine you'd be implicated.
00:56:18.000Yeah, but you were talking about the issue where people are afraid, especially on the Republican side, of being called fascists or whatever.
00:56:24.000But the political ramifications of that, I don't think, you know, outside of like MSNBC pundits and such, that run-of-the-mill Americans are not going to side with you on cracking down on rioters that are opening fire on police officers.
00:57:07.000Nobody wants to see people hurting cops.
00:57:09.000Nobody wants to see illegals staying in the country and taking spaces at the hospital, taking up spaces on any kind of government assistance roles.
00:57:20.000The American people have made it very clear that they want to see deportations of illegal immigrants, not just criminal aliens, but actually the ones that are committing crimes, but even people that are here illegally.
00:57:31.000And if they're just trying to keep their head down, the American people want to see illegal sent home.
00:57:36.000This is not a hard problem for the administration.
00:57:38.000So what are we waiting for at this point, though?
00:57:41.000I mean, do we have to wait until one is actually killed before we put the boot down?
00:58:05.000They say the FBI believes Song purchased four of the firearms connected to the premeditated attack, which was allegedly carried out by a North Texas anti-facelle.
00:58:13.000Ten heavily armed members of the cell have been arrested and charged with attempted murder and other crimes.
00:58:19.000On July 4th, local and federal officers were lured to the area outside an ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas, and found themselves fired upon by a group of heavily armed militants dressed in black military-style clothing, according to the criminal complaint, one officer was shot in the neck but survived.
00:58:34.000Authorities said the gunmen fired approximately 20 to 30 rounds of ammo using AR-15 style rifles.
00:59:15.000They say the FBI believes Song hid in the woods for roughly 24 hours after the ambush before escaping on foot.
00:59:22.000An FBI agent wrote in the court filing that Song's cell phone was traced near the scene of the crime beginning at 11.30 p.m. shortly after the attack and remained in the area through the day of July 5th.
01:00:09.000They acted like routine protesters launching fireworks.
01:00:12.000And when the cops walked out, they unloaded with a rifle.
01:00:15.000This is like, okay, they say there's sleeper cells in the United States, potentially, from all this illegal people coming in.
01:00:20.000Of course, they're not gonna come out and be like, nine of them be like, "We are from Iran, and we will take..." They're going to go into an Antifa protest.
01:00:28.000They're going to be the one with the gun, try and get all their other American protesters arrested.
01:01:59.000California is doing that with fireworks.
01:02:00.000There's a guy that's going to get off $100,000 fine because in the LA area, because he was setting off fireworks and the police had drones just, you know.
01:02:12.000And even if it's at your house and you're not there, you still get charged with it because they passed a law that social happenings at your dwelling are your responsibility, so you get fined for it too.
01:02:24.000So if I go into my neighbor's vacation house and start blasting off fireworks for July 4th, he gets charged with it.
01:02:47.000Who have showed up to vehemently protest what's going on here.
01:02:51.000And just for the last Border Patrol helicopter has entered the scene here.
01:02:57.000They are landing in the middle of the farm as we speak.
01:02:59.000It will appear that they were not planning to be here as long as they have been.
01:03:04.000And so this helicopter that you're looking at here, guys, apparently just made a run over to Van Nuys Airport for some cases of water, which is what they're bringing into the scene here.
01:04:26.000We have this conversation like every other week, almost, where we ask the question amongst ourselves, what is the logic behind a de-escalation?
01:04:33.000It would only be to enhance stability, domestic stability, in case there's a global conflict and a war.
01:04:39.000Like the Russians in 1916, the Russian Revolution screwed the Russian empire out of World War I. They couldn't even fight in the war because there's domestic.
01:05:15.000And I tell you, communism, fascism, global tyranny would love probably the most thing they would love at all to see the United States fall is to see this democracy kill itself.
01:05:23.000It would be the ultimate win for, like you said, this experiment of freedom where we're all kind of legally equal.
01:06:12.000And it's like, okay, well, the reason why we're seeing this degree of violence is because when the far left came out with explosives, they didn't get arrested.
01:06:20.000And so the college kids and the people they were recruiting, they were like, look, if you come out and join us, you won't get arrested.
01:07:05.000I know it's probably cliche to see if we go down the Roman Republic route and the Republic, as we'd call it, crumbles and it becomes something else.
01:07:14.000I mean, we called it the Roman Empire after the fact, but I don't know that we would do that because people have an aversion to that.
01:07:19.000Begging for a strong man like Caesar, that would be Trump, and then giving him massive authorities.
01:07:24.000Caesar took it, or they basically gave it to him.
01:08:09.000Like, you scare the shit out of the people that are doing it.
01:08:11.000They should have one cop right there armed with a rifle for the phone where the cipher bullets come from where you can't even see kind of thing.
01:08:17.000So people are like, I just don't even want to go outside.
01:08:25.000I'm saying they should all be arrested and charged as accomplices so that the other people, these young people who join these riots, know you can't be party to these things.
01:08:38.000But when I say it gets 100 times worse, I don't know that there's theoretically any reasonable thing Trump can do to prevent it from getting 100 times worse.
01:08:49.000If the far left organizes in a short period of time and decides to go out in the streets with rifles and start unloading on law enforcement, that's not something that we just predict is going to happen.
01:08:58.000Unless you're suggesting Donald Trump begin a mass surveillance program of these people and then arrest them before it can happen.
01:09:06.000That's the problem with mass surveillance.
01:09:10.000My point was what we are seeing here, some people are suggesting in the comments that these are cannabis growers, probably cartel linked, and that's why they're opening fire.
01:09:20.000If it does turn out, cartel interests say this is now war, and it is 100 times worse, meaning you are seeing rifle fire from the shrubs, it's the bushes at cops.
01:09:30.000Cops are in armored, you know, APCs are taking fire.
01:10:12.000What we are seeing right now is Donald Trump's agenda, the will of the people, and the response to the left.
01:10:19.000There's an institutional conflict happening where judges are trying to stop Trump and the people's agenda.
01:10:24.000And then you have in the streets, people are shooting at Donald Trump.
01:10:28.000I'm sorry, they're shooting at Donald Trump's agenda is what I mean to say.
01:10:32.000They're using guns against law enforcement to prevent the agenda from happening and targeting what we want, you know, stopping what the American people have voted for.
01:10:41.000So right now, I want to ask you guys some questions and so we can address how Trump responds to what's been going on.
01:10:47.000Let me just, for the sake of it, for clarity, people may be just joining this segment for the first time.
01:10:52.000We have just gotten within the past hour a report and a video of a man opening fire on law enforcement in these raids northwest of L.A. Monday, we had an armed rifle, a man with a rifle ambush CBP officers shooting a cop.
01:11:06.000And Friday, an organized, militarized group ambushed police outside of an ICE facility.
01:11:12.000So with that being said, I have a question for you guys.
01:11:15.000What do you think would have happened if Abraham Lincoln said, after seven states seceded from the Union, if he said, okay, I guess?
01:11:24.000There would have been two countries, the North and the South, and then they would have went to war.
01:11:27.000It probably would have been 10 times the blood.
01:11:29.000Because Two countries can't exist on this continent together alone.
01:11:33.000Canada and the United States currently exist on this continent.
01:11:35.000Because New England wants the Gulf of Mexico sea access.
01:12:07.000So four years later or three years later, I think, yeah, it would have been four years later because the secession happened before he got in.
01:13:10.000The point I'm making is the Civil War started because Abraham Lincoln put his boot down and said, we are not going to let the Union dissolve.
01:13:16.000The South was content to sit where they were and said no.
01:13:19.000And Abraham Lincoln said, well, actually, Fort Sumter was Abraham Lincoln, it was basically the U.S. government saying, look, this is our base.
01:14:32.000Because if it was mid-war, my point is the beginning of the war established territories.
01:14:39.000The U.S. government, Abraham Lincoln, basically said, we need a corridor between Pennsylvania and D.C., and Maryland is a slave state with Southern sympathies.
01:14:49.000So he arrested a third of the Maryland legislature because they were sympathetic to the South and a slave state so that they would not rise against him.
01:14:56.000And he suspended habeas corpus in a corridor from Pennsylvania to D.C. so that they wouldn't be obstructed.
01:15:01.000It was the Baltimore riots of 1861 right at the beginning, considered the first bloodshed of the American Civil War.
01:15:06.000Huge riot broke out in Baltimore and then they had military clampdowns.
01:15:09.000And so my point is the right is so afraid of being called fascists and that they don't enforce the law as it's written, let alone what Abraham Lincoln did.
01:15:19.000Had Abraham Lincoln not done that, that probably the United States would not be here today.
01:15:24.000And so my point is, all I'm saying is that Donald Trump should use the laws placed before him within the constitutional powers that have already been adjudicated, the Insurrection Act, for instance.
01:15:37.000He just won on the National Guard case last month and shut down these extremists how he needs to so that we do not escalate to that point.
01:15:46.000And my counter is you are the process that you commit.
01:15:50.000So what we do, how we get there is going to dictate what we are when it's over with.
01:15:54.000But at the same time, Lincoln shut down habeas corpus and then brought it back.
01:15:58.000Like you don't have, just because you do a horrible tyrannical thing or just a dangerously powerfully tyrannical thing doesn't mean that that's always going to be how it is forever after that.
01:16:07.000Like there are going to be moments of crackdown.
01:16:11.000So the way I look at it right now is there will come a time where a line is drawn and we don't know what that line will be or when it will be or how or where.
01:16:23.000He could have said, hey guys, I'm getting into office in a couple months and these seven states have declared secession.
01:16:29.000There was a period where for several months, they were just operating as if they were the Confederacy.
01:16:35.000Then Abraham Lincoln, so after Abraham Lincoln got elected, he was president-elect, they declared they were seceding out of fears that he would shut down slavery, which would damage their economy.
01:16:45.000The actual argument from Lincoln was, no, no, you can keep your slaves, just no new slaves anywhere else.
01:16:50.000That was still a threat to them because you had bleeding Kansas for seven years where people were shooting each other over slaves like John Brown.
01:17:12.000And then the Battle of Bull Run was bloody.
01:17:15.000And I believe it was after that Abraham Lincoln, because they were defeated, called upon to send like 15, was it like he called 15,000 troops or something like this.
01:17:23.000Whatever he ended up doing it, he called for troops to go quell the rebellion, which resulted in four more states seceding and joining the Confederacy, which I think included Virginia.
01:17:32.000I don't know if, I don't think Virginia seceded initially.
01:17:36.000And then because of the actions of Lincoln, basically saying, Constitution be damned, they went, holy crap, this is, we don't want this.
01:17:43.000And then he said, don't know, don't care.
01:17:45.000I am going to do whatever it takes to preserve the Union and stop you.
01:17:49.000You're asking where that line is, it seems like.
01:17:52.000I think the line is kind of obvious at this point, in my opinion anyway.
01:17:55.000As soon as you see a situation like this where somebody is opening fire and an ICE agent is actually killed, I think that's the line.
01:18:01.000I think once you cross that, I think the political pressure on Trump by itself is going to force him to act in a swift and strong manner, which is going to require the military.
01:18:12.000What more assets can DHS bring out on their own?
01:18:15.000I mean, at this point, they got to be close to tapped out.
01:18:19.000I mean, you can bring more manpower and stuff in, but at that point, if you're getting ICE agents and such killed, just look at the base.
01:18:27.000Look at what the base is going to do at that point.
01:18:29.000They're going to freak the hell out, and President Trump isn't going to have a choice.
01:18:32.000I think he's going to have to bring in the military.
01:18:34.000If it's cartel stuff, that got mentioned earlier.
01:18:38.000If it's actual cartel stuff, I mean, are they considered terrorist organizations at this point?
01:19:12.000It's far closer to what we fought, what the U.S. fought in Afghanistan than it is to, you know, any kind of just, you know, police action stuff.
01:19:20.000So they were, they would need legitimate military assets to actually engage.
01:20:16.000A district court judge in New Hampshire has blocked Trump's birthright citizenship order in a class action challenge.
01:20:22.000So this was filed by the ACLU, and they sought to create a class of people that was future people or current people born after February 20th and illegal immigrants as their class.
01:20:36.000So the judge ruled only existing infants are subject to this ruling, but that does mean infants in the entire country.
01:20:45.000Trump cannot enforce the ban on birthright citizenship for now.
01:20:52.000The interesting thing about it is that because of the way the Supreme Court ruled on district courts and class actions, Trump just needs to create a new class himself.
01:21:00.000So like make an executive order saying if anybody wants to register their child for their birth, register their birth, they need to have two, they each have to have a legal form of ID on them at the time of, and then what happens is then they're going to be like, that's not fair.
01:21:17.000And then they're going to, then ACLU will be like, anyone who doesn't have a legal form of ID is our, within our class.
01:21:23.000And then Trump could just keep doing it.
01:21:25.000But this is the second case here where they have circumvented this Supreme Court ban on nationwide injunctions by deciding that it's all of a sudden a class action lawsuit.
01:21:34.000It's not like these infants or their parents signed on to the lawsuit.
01:22:18.000Leto specified that this was a downstream effect.
01:22:21.000So the Supreme Court should step in and say.
01:22:22.000The Supreme Court said Trump could not enforce the ban for 30 days, specifically to create leeway for groups to challenge his executive order.
01:22:55.000They used this, I believe last week, too, this same little loophole thing where they decided that all asylum seekers are a class as well.
01:23:02.000And so they should be allowed to go through the regular asylum process at the southern border again, you know, after Trump made the executive order kind of shutting that entire thing down.
01:23:12.000So, I mean, it, but, you know, I don't know the legality of this.
01:23:16.000I'm assuming that the Trump administration is going to very quickly challenge these two cases, but it seems like we're back where we started.
01:23:25.000I mean, we're essentially still facing nationwide injunctions under a different name.
01:25:45.000So right now, this injunction stops Trump from enforcing the registration of babies as U.S. citizens, effectively, of the children of non-citizens.
01:25:56.000So they've put this stay on specifically these kids, which is interesting because it's actually really interesting.
01:26:02.000Trump actually has a big victory here.
01:26:04.000If this is the, I want to read this look.
01:26:08.000It says, the decision applies nationwide to babies who would have been subject to the executive order, which included the children of undocumented parents and those born to academics.
01:26:18.000My question then is, what about the children born to a tourist?
01:27:32.000It says, in light of the above, this court grants petitioners' motion and provisionally certifies the following class for the purpose of preliminary injunctive relief.
01:27:39.000All current and future persons who are born on or after February 2025.
01:27:44.000And then it goes on to add, where that person's mother was unlawfully president of the United States, the person's father was not a U.S. citizen, or a lawful permanent resident at the time of said birth, or the person's mother's president of the U.S. was lawful but temporary, and the person's father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident time.
01:28:00.000They have just certified future persons as a class deserving of representation and injunctive relief.
01:28:07.000I should have just read the direct order.
01:30:34.000I mean, I think they do literally mean someone who was conceived a year from now as well, but they're trying to sneak that in there.
01:30:39.000They're basically saying a baby in the womb, not yet born, is a future person, and they have legal standing as a class to be represented according to this judge.
01:30:51.000This means any pro-life group should file with the exact same judge or citing this ruling, argue They would seek injunctive relief to block any abortion so long as this is in effect.
01:31:06.000Like, is it illegal to kill a future person?
01:31:10.000The argument is simply this: if you can get injunctive relief granted to a future person for the issue of citizenship not yet received, you better damn well be able to protect their life from indeed they're a future person, and you are protecting them from the termination of their life and the inhibition of their future personhood.
01:31:28.000So, are you saying so are you going to the point where you can say that, okay, a class action lawsuit could be filed by moms for life or something like that, and that class is future persons who were born on or after February 20th, 2025?
01:31:48.000This same judge is probably going to be a liberal or just be like, no.
01:31:52.000And then we need this to happen right now.
01:31:55.000Every single pro-life group tweet it out, share it.
01:32:00.000They need to be filing tomorrow to this same district judge in the same district because he needs to then explain why in one instance he would allow legal standing as a class of future persons for illegal immigrants, but not for those about to be aborted.
01:32:17.000And then if you simultaneously have in both instances, I do not grant this as a class, then we get to ask the question, why is that?
01:32:28.000And then you say, all right, before you can abort a baby, the baby gets representation and that person will represent them before a court.
01:32:36.000You just, having all the abortion, anti-abortion, pro-life activists saying, I need to legally protect my future child, my future child makes no sense.
01:32:49.000It violates every norm of the abortion debate.
01:33:22.000This is actually, it needs to be adjudicated in the 14th Amendment, which I've pulled up time and time again.
01:33:27.000And my belief is that abortion will be abolished because of the 14th Amendment.
01:33:32.000I think it will too, but that's because they're going to put neural nets in the infants in the womb and be like, oh my God, they're smarter than I am.
01:33:38.000All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside, period.
01:33:44.000No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.
01:33:50.000Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
01:34:02.000All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
01:34:09.000So what they've stated is that citizen is a word that means person who has been born or naturalized in the United States.
01:34:17.000And was subject to the jurisdiction at the time.
01:35:32.000Because they said future person in their class, not unborn persons, because they knew what that would mean.
01:35:39.000The problem is, so long as future persons have legal standing as a class to be represented, to seek injunctive relief, anyone should be able to sue on behalf of a class, the unborn, seeking injunctive relief against their own termination.
01:35:53.000Now, the problem here is, if they say, no, the baby can be terminated, the argument is, why can future persons be granted injunctive relief on something that has not yet happened in one instance, but not the other?
01:36:06.000I think the ACLU has walked themselves into a pit trap.
01:37:27.000There's only one political comment in it.
01:37:30.000And it was a joke mocking, it wasn't really mocking anybody.
01:37:34.000It was just an overt general statement that didn't direct anything towards anybody.
01:37:38.000I will get into spoilers in a little bit, but I'll give you guys a heads up so we can talk a little bit about it right now and address the political stuff.
01:37:43.000It was not about immigration, it was not political in any way.
01:37:50.000From the trailers, you can see, so this is not a spoiler.
01:37:54.000You know, Superman's basically like he stops a war between two nations.
01:37:58.000That's technically as political as it gets.
01:38:01.000The motivations of the villain have nothing to do with wokeness, Marxism, critical theory.
01:38:05.000It is classic Lex Luther versus Superman.
01:38:21.000So a while ago, there was a leak that in the movie, there were interdimensional monkeys that were spamming Twitter, insulting Superman to make him angry.
01:38:32.000And I thought someone made that up to mock James Gunn Superman by throwing some stupid idea out there.
01:39:56.000And it improved so dramatically, in my opinion, that I gave the film an eight out of 10.
01:40:01.000And I probably would have given it a 10 out of 10 if they didn't do the monkeys thing and the beginning was a little bit stronger.
01:40:07.000You know, movies, music, they tend to take the shape of if the beginning and the end are awesome, it's really the middle is not too important.
01:40:15.000It's how you feel when it starts and how you feel when it's over.
01:40:24.000Now, I will stress the whole movie's already been spoiled because a few days ago before the movie came out, a review was leaked that basically laid out the entirety of the plot.
01:40:33.000Some people have tried making claims there's an Israel-Palestine reference in it.
01:40:38.000The two nations that Superman stops from going to war is a wealthier Eastern European nation and a poorer tribal South Asian nation like India or Pakistan.
01:40:50.000I think they intentionally avoided getting, like, they were like, let's not make it easier.
01:40:54.000I think they intentionally avoided making it look like Ukraine and Russia or Israel-Palestine.
01:41:54.000It was done for you is basically the motivations of the villain.
01:41:57.000I still wouldn't call it woke, like political in any way.
01:42:01.000But if you really wanted to squeeze it in there.
01:42:03.000It sounds like they attempted to depoliticize it so extremely that they took truth, justice, and the American way out of it and they replaced it with the human way.
01:42:11.000Like they deeply, I'm fairly certain never in the movie was it ever brought up.
01:42:52.000And the poorer nation is actually kind of a backwards bad country.
01:42:57.000And there's anger at Superman because he didn't, like, why you don't have the authority to go around and just do whatever you want.
01:43:03.000Lois Lane criticizes, and this is actually in the trailer.
01:43:05.000She's like, did you consider what was going to happen if you did this?
01:43:09.000And Superman is being criticized because there's negative repercussions after the fact that there's a reason why the U.S. doesn't just intervene wherever they want, whatever they want, despite the fact they tend to.
01:43:19.000And Superman's unilateral actions can result in collateral damage after the fact and other conflicts.
01:43:24.000Did the military industrial complex complain about all their profit losses towards Superman and build a kryptonite weapon?
01:43:53.000The army of monkeys thing, if it had been AI, if it had been an army of AI robots or just like a supercomputer Doing it, would it have not been cheap?
01:44:03.000The reason why James Gunn had interdimensional monkeys typing on Twitter was because he was intentionally insulting the people who got him canceled, which is Mike Cernovich.
01:44:35.000The only reason that was in the film, because it's unrelated to literally anything in the plot, was that James Gunn wanted to say the people who are posting nonsense hate on Twitter are monkeys.
01:44:45.000And there's that old adage of if you put a million monkeys in a room for a million hours, they would write Shakespeare.
01:44:51.000Sure, but he had hardwired the brains of the monkeys to be able to type smart things and insults.
01:45:06.000And I had, look, I had read all the stuff saying he was going to be woken about immigration.
01:45:10.000And I was like, I don't know if I believe it.
01:45:12.000Then Sean Gunn said some stupid comments that were sounding political.
01:45:18.000James Gunn, what Brett was saying, and I could be wrong after ask Brett later, but I'm pretty sure he was saying, the person who interviewed James Gunn took his comments out of context to try and make it political.
01:45:30.000And I think there's a lot of people trying to make the movie political because, I don't know, online zeitgeist hate on the movie.
01:45:52.000For those that are not familiar, he's a child prodigy who becomes a billionaire.
01:45:56.000He becomes oppressed after losing his family in an accident and then is convinced by some other superheroes to use his wealth and technology and resources to be a superhero himself.
01:46:05.000And he's got these things called T-Spheres.
01:46:07.000So he basically walks around and he has drones that he uses to project energy, force fields.
01:47:37.000Well, maybe somebody, fan fiction, someone should AI create a scene where Superman goes into the monkey room and just heat rays all of them, blast them.
01:47:46.000There's one point someone brought up that I will address too, a major negative for the film that I knew the moment they did it, they couldn't correct it and they damaged Dolore miserably and I'm pissed about.
01:47:56.000But so we, as Slain Hope says, they made Superman's real parents into space Nazis.
01:48:49.000And he's like, I don't know what the rest of the message is, but I will try to live up to that message to be good and to bring the truth of Krypton.
01:48:57.000Lex Luther breaks in and his cybernetic henchman, she's got nanobots, breaks into the mainframe and it was able to download the message.
01:49:08.000And by downloading it, recovers the corrupted data in which they go on to say, take as many wives as you can, have as many babies as possible.
01:49:16.000The humans are weak and stupid and you can control them and enslave them and blah, blah, blah.
01:49:22.000And then, you know, and then the mom is like, take as many wives as you can and have many babies so that they will grow up with your DNA and bring the strength of Krypton, blah, blah, blah.
01:49:32.000And I was like, okay, that's ultra cringe.
01:49:37.000It wasn't overtly political, but it is not true to the characters.
01:49:41.000And it is insulting to what they could have done with Jorrell.
01:53:15.000So do you think that came about because of the backlash and the, well, not even just backlash, but the financial just catastrophe that Snow White was for Disney?
01:54:40.000But not really in that Lex Luther, like, is a billionaire who built up.
01:54:46.000So it's not, it doesn't really play that way.
01:54:48.000But then I'm like, Jorrell telling his child, the people of the country are of the planet are dumb and to outbreed them, to rule over them and take as many wives as you can.
01:54:58.000I'm like, if that's the message of immigration James Gunn was sending to people, he pikes.
01:56:27.000You know, you can kill someone with a sling press.
01:56:28.000Well, they were throwing rocks through the windshield of ice suburbans at one point.
01:56:34.000I mean, if that rock would have gone through the windshield and actually hit one of the ice agents in the head, I mean, that's the definition of deadly force.
01:56:40.000I mean, at that speed, throwing a huge boulder through the window.
01:56:54.000But I think it was the control of information as to why we feel this way in that every time you turned On the TV, the narrative was controlled, and you felt stable.
01:57:21.000I think what it is, you need to feed back into the system.
01:57:23.000It is good to get away from the input and like just blockade the negativity so that you can grow and become healthy and then put into the data.
01:57:31.000Like you want to give, and I think video is the best way to do that.
01:57:34.000Text just is a wall of scratching, but video, you hear the tone, you see the eyeballs.
01:58:15.000So it's T-E-N and then capital N-A-P-E-L.
01:58:18.000Big G says, watching Superman, and I feel like I am watching the cartoon from when I was a kid in the 90s.
01:58:23.000It's awesome watching it now with my son.
01:58:25.000Guys, I'm telling you, it's the like, to be fair, the script is a little cluttered, you know?
01:58:33.000I don't know that I, I think someone's telling me like Nerd Roddick said, one thing happens, then one thing happens, so then one thing happens.
01:58:37.000And I'm like, well, I wouldn't say it like that.
01:58:40.000Like you can follow along why the things are happening.
01:59:26.000I wonder if they talked about that and they're like, well, we should do, because they would have had to hire a young actor to play young Superman if they wanted to show him doing that stuff growing up.
01:59:47.000He's not as weasel as Jesse Eisenberg's Luther, but he is still kind of a he had more anger and more force within him, but he still isn't enough tea.
01:59:57.000Like, I like the Superman cartoon Lex Luthor, where he's tall, fit, and has a deep voice, like he's an imposing figure.
02:00:09.000But I also really love that Justice League line when he was running for president and the question confronts him and he's like, what's your plan, Luthor?
02:00:17.000And he's like, why do you want to be president?
02:00:19.000And he goes, do you have any idea how much power I would have to give up to be the president?
02:00:55.000Lex doesn't have the strength to beat Superman, but utilizing tools that he has to fight Superman with strength, but his mind behind it to control the fight, he beats Superman because he's smarter.
02:01:06.000So it's like, that was a great contrast to what Superman was versus Lex Luther and why Lex Luther is such a great villain.
02:01:12.000He's an industrialist, super intelligent man, and Superman is this physically strong demigod.
02:01:18.000And Lex Luther is able to feed him by his intelligence.
02:01:21.000And like the legal system manipulating him.
02:02:50.000But let's just say there's a scene where a street vendor is being, let's just say, interviewed by Lex Luthor while Superman is incapacitated.
02:03:04.000And it ends rather abruptly because Lex Luthor is a villain and you should not be laughing, but Raymond was laughing.
02:03:12.000Anybody who's seen the movie, they're going, oh, geez.
02:03:29.000Just, Everybody, just don't forget about the people down there in Texas.
02:03:33.000This happens every single time there's a natural disaster.
02:03:35.000These people end up being abandoned, and once they're abandoned, the government has no incentive to actually get these people back up on their feet or at least help to do so.
02:03:44.000So, you know, if you're a praying person, say a prayer for them tonight.
02:03:47.000And, you know, everybody down there definitely appreciates their support.
02:03:51.000I'm not going to ride your jock too much, bro, but you went out of Texas like day one.
02:03:55.000And I mean, you were like a hero with the getting the Starlink for the people in rescue.
02:04:03.000Your work, I mean, if you haven't followed Nick's sorter yet, watching you bloom over the last couple of years has been really thanks.
02:06:27.000But he was talking today about the Epstein case in particular, and him saying that he thinks that the cover-up is just, there's just way too many things that are lining up for it to be cover-up and just thinks that, yeah, that's why he's angry.
02:06:39.000He pointed out the video that I think it was like Coffeezilla on his second channel put together a video of a bunch of all the different times of Trump talking about it, other people in the administration talking about it, Cash talking about it, Dan Boncinha talking about it.
02:06:52.000I don't know if that was the most recent video, or what was the reason he said he was most angry about it?
02:06:56.000I just saw a video thumbnail today yesterday.
02:07:23.000There's this funny World of Warcraft video gamer because I'm just thinking, we're getting this, I want to get this developer, video game developer, on a show sometime, and that we should talk more about video games because of the way it influences the culture.
02:10:05.000it could get to the point where you're making so much money on Twitch that you hire a dedicated Twitch admin that just plays with the chat during the show and makes sure all the bits are kicking and the hearts and the emojis are cool looking and all that stuff.
02:10:17.000So, I got to ask you something about you guys here, you are monitoring the chat a lot of the time, right?
02:10:22.000Tim, I'm sure you monitor the chat, you know, a lot of the time.
02:10:25.000How much shit talking goes on against any?
02:10:28.000Because I don't watch the chats when I'm on something.