00:02:34.000Last night, the DSA trio swept in New York City.0.81
00:02:39.000They're calling them Mamdani's commies.
00:02:41.000And the fascinating thing is that one of these candidates has explicitly called for bringing violence to America to destroy the American empire.0.63
00:02:49.000There's an organization she was a part of, a couple of them, that said that their explicit goal is the destruction of Western civilization to bring violence to America and to destroy the American empire.
00:03:01.000The fact that these people are now effectively being elected to Congress because it's a Democrat default district is insane.
00:03:08.000And I don't know how anyone in this country thinks that the right and the left of these totally divergent moral worldviews can ever live together.
00:03:17.000I'm not trying to be hyperbolic or anything, but do you think, honestly, guys, right now, you can comment.
00:03:24.000Do you believe we as the United States can have a member of Congress who stated explicitly they are here to bring violence to America to destroy the American empire?
00:03:33.000What do you think their intentions will be in Congress?
00:03:36.000Do we think it'll be the betterment of this country or of New York City?
00:03:40.000Well, my friends, Democrats are certainly learning and they're freaking out, saying, We didn't mean for this to happen when they backed all these squad members and far leftists.
00:04:00.000So you have massive voting blocs that do not like America, do not want to support America, that are now voting for representation in our wealthiest city.
00:05:02.000Gaia is a streaming platform dedicated to exploring consciousness, disclosure, alien disclosure, ancient wisdom, and the deeper nature of reality.
00:05:10.000Rather than treating disclosure as a single event or official announcement, Gaia examines a broader perspective, one that asks whether it's also connected to human awareness.
00:06:31.000Sued my way back on with the help of a lawyer who represents us both, the great James Lawrence.
00:06:38.000And now I have the Unreported Truth Substack, which is my main form of communication.
00:06:46.000I've got a couple hundred thousand readers who, you know, generally I'm generally writing about health and the slow motion collapse of the American medical system.
00:06:58.000You're winning this lawsuit over censorship and stuff is still ongoing.
00:07:06.000They put me back on in July of 2022 before Elon bought it.
00:07:13.000As far as I know, I'm the only person ever to have forced my way back on after a ban rather than being let on, like Elon kind of let everybody back on.
00:07:23.000And then in 2023, I sued the federal government and Pfizer over their role in coercing Twitter to ban me.
00:07:31.000And that lawsuit, I've settled the federal portion of it.
00:07:34.000I settled it last month with the federal government and received a payout and an acknowledgement that the government had put what they called substantial coercive pressure on Twitter to ban me in 2021.
00:07:46.000But I'm still suing Scott Gottlieb, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, and Dr. Albert Borla.
00:07:52.000Scott Gottlieb is the former FDA commissioner under Trump, who moved.
00:08:00.000He's back in sort of private industry.
00:08:01.000He's on the Pfizer board and he helped.
00:08:06.000Coerced Twitter to ban me, and Albert Borla is the chairman of Pfizer.
00:09:53.000But I think five years ago, there was a lot going on at the White House and with Pfizer with the Biden administration in the summer of 2021 that I personally would like to know about.
00:10:02.000And I think it's relevant to my lawsuit.
00:10:04.000And I think it'll be relevant to a lot of people.
00:10:27.000He tweeted, Yes, most Americans don't know what socialism is.
00:10:31.000But last night, Democrats elected candidates who want to abolish prisons, defund the police, who believe deporting even violent criminals who are in this country illegally is wrong, who believe America was to blame for 9 11, who believe capitalism is evil, who believe Israel is evil, and who want to eliminate all private health insurance.
00:11:31.000Daria Lisa Avila Chevalier is a founder of CUAD, which is Columbia University Apartheid Devestment.
00:11:38.000The organization's stated intention is to undermine and eradicate America through the use of violence in America, explicitly stating: Devestment is not an incrementalist goal.
00:11:46.000The true divestment necessitates nothing short of the total collapse of the university structure and American empire itself.
00:11:52.000It is not possible for imperial spoils to remain so heavily concentrated in the metropole and its high cultural repositories.
00:11:59.000Without the continuous oppression of all populations that resist the empire's expansion.
00:12:04.000To divest from this is to undermine and eradicate America as we know it.
00:12:09.000Stating at the end, we act in full support of the Palestinian resistance.
00:12:12.000This action is first and foremost an effort to extend the successes of the Palestinian resistance to the heart of the empire itself, to translate their resilience in Gaza to unrest and violence in America.0.85
00:12:25.000And these people were just voted to Congress, so I propose, panel, She should be barred.0.87
00:13:56.000At the very least, does the government not have the right to ask her, like, look, you have a formal connection to a group like this that has language like this?
00:14:05.000Can you either retract what you've said or divest yourself from this group?
00:14:41.000But if someone clearly states that their goal is to destroy the society, it is perfectly reasonable for the governing body of that society to say, you're not allowed to.0.77
00:14:54.000To sit in the position to represent the people of whatever district she's in.
00:14:59.000I would even argue that if the idea was that she said that she wanted to radically change the society into a vision of her own making, that's different from the idea of destroying the society itself.
00:15:08.000I mean, look, part of the Communist Control Act is still in, could be still used.
00:15:13.000Like, it hasn't been taken off the books.
00:15:15.000Part of the Communist Control Act, the Supreme Court has said is unconstitutional, but there are parts that are still, you know, still could be enforced.
00:15:24.000I don't see a problem with enforcing the Communist Control Act personally.
00:15:39.000All right, I'm going to make assumptions here, but likely she thinks that we should have direct elections, get rid of the Electoral College.0.60
00:15:47.000Likely she thinks that we should abolish the Senate.
00:15:50.000Okay, so I'm saying that I haven't read anything specifically where she said that.
00:15:54.000I'm guessing at what she means because of.
00:15:57.000The typical person that is on the left, the typical things they want get rid of the electoral college so it's a direct election, popular vote all the time, and get rid of the Senate because states don't need representation.
00:16:09.000Which, I mean, arguably, since the 17th Amendment when they made it a popular election for senators, arguably, the Senate doesn't perform the function that it used to perform prior to the 17th Amendment.
00:16:23.000But the proper solution is to get rid of the 17th Amendment, not get rid of the Senate.
00:16:28.000Part of a group that has made some extreme statements.
00:16:30.000So I don't know, and if she was one of the founders, even, but if I founded a company that then they went off and published something and I was like, What?
00:16:36.000I mean, I'm not, I didn't say that, you guys.
00:16:38.000Like, that's those people at my company said that.
00:16:41.000But I'm saying, even if she says this stuff directly, it is political rhetoric.
00:16:46.000There's political rhetoric on both sides that's offensive to the other side.
00:16:49.000And I don't want to be in the position of telling people in New York or Texas or anywhere else, you elected this person, but I'm not going to seat them.
00:16:57.000You're not in Congress, so you don't have to be in that position.
00:16:59.000Well, so do we have an empire in the country?
00:17:02.000Is there a point at which you would feel there is a threat to the United States continuation?
00:17:12.000Like, what would a person have to do for you to be like, okay, this is a threat to our country's existence?1.00
00:17:16.000Well, if the president of the United States started saying he should have a third term unconstitutionally, I'd find that a threat to the United States.
00:18:13.000What if there was the Kill the Jews party?
00:18:15.000And they were like, their political position is if elected, they would just.
00:18:17.000I mean, the DSA is kind of the Kill the Jews party.
00:18:19.000Well, I'm making a metaphor intentionally.
00:18:23.000I'm not explicitly saying the DSA has come, but I do believe that if you go to a private meeting of the DSA, they're going to be saying things very much like this.0.55
00:18:29.000The point is, if a political party emerged where they were, like, let's say the Neo Nazi Party of America emerges and they're like, if elected, we absolutely will start massacring and genociding people.
00:20:11.000What if she said, I will position several armed, angry people high on methamphetamines with rifles outside of your house for the purpose of destroying your home when I'm police chief?0.99
00:20:23.000Would you still allow her to be police chief?
00:21:31.000What if he was like, leave it up to a vote among all the people?
00:21:33.000Or even worse, he would be like, sorry, wait, The point is she was elected.
00:21:39.000And the question we have now is: should we let this person into the engine room who has stated she's going to blow up the engine and sink the ship?
00:21:45.000Is there political rhetoric that bans you from being elected?
00:22:37.000I can cite for you decades of history and structure as to why they are lying, how they're lying, what they're doing, why they're doing it, why we're right.
00:22:47.000And I think you know full well, especially based on COVID and the vaccines.
00:22:50.000What those people were intending to do to all of us and how they try to stop you from exposing them.
00:22:57.000So when they come out and they say, We want to bring violence, and we already have, we've got an anti-fagot who shot a cop, the neck gets 100 years in prison, and they say, But they're just activists.0.97
00:23:13.000And Trump never said that he was going to destroy the country, that it was an insurrection, that he was trying to overthrow the government.
00:23:20.000These people have specifically said, Their goal is not just to destroy Western society.
00:23:28.000They're specifically saying to bring violence to America.
00:23:50.000And I think the reason they like them is actually quite simple.1.00
00:23:53.000When you have 40% of the city foreign born, And they're going around saying, we're going to burn this country to the ground and steal their stuff.1.00
00:23:59.000Yes, non Americans are celebrating and voting for it.0.99
00:24:02.000Tim, what was the greatest gift the left gave the right in the last 15 years?0.96
00:26:29.000I would argue that the question of how do you define how bad something is, let me put it like this.
00:26:39.000After the Battle of Fort Sumter, we historically say a civil war began.
00:26:44.000No one in the United States thought a civil war happened.
00:26:46.000In fact, nobody in the United States actually used the phrase civil war publicly and officially for years.
00:26:51.000And after Fort Sumter, in which we all agree the civil war started, they had picnics at the Battle of Manassas because they thought there was no civil war.
00:26:59.000They were oblivious to the things that were happening around them.
00:27:03.000I think when you take a look at the fact that over the past several decades, New York has fundamentally transformed and now has a mayor who explicitly says he will use the power of violence and law enforcement against the American people and the federal government, it's time to send in the feds to shut that down.0.92
00:27:17.000We should not allow our cities to be taken over by foreigners who explicitly state they are here to fight the American, the American voter, and the American will.0.86
00:27:25.000I mean, that's look, he was elected.0.61
00:27:28.000I don't live in the city anymore, I live upstate, but he was elected by the people of New York City.
00:27:34.000And he has not done anything like that.
00:28:08.000That's an awesome part of our culture.
00:28:10.000So if somebody is elected, okay, and everything they do is legal, they don't take any actions outside of legislation.
00:28:20.000They wait for their legislative body to pass the law before enacting things.
00:28:24.000But things are getting serious to that point.
00:28:25.000Like, let's say Mamdani gets city council to pass the Immigration Protection Act, in which police are instructed to, if necessary, use force to stop ICE.
00:28:36.000Would you believe he should then be removed?
00:28:38.000I mean, I don't know what the details of that are.
00:29:09.000Mamdani speaks before them and says, pass this bill to empower New York police to use force if necessary to stop ICE from kidnapping our neighbors.
00:30:35.000The question is, as you stated, If he tried to codify empowering police to use force against feds, that's illegal.
00:30:42.000Okay, so Trump should send the feds in and go arrest Newsom.
00:30:46.000Okay, that's so now we're, this is like really tricky issues of federalism, right?
00:30:50.000Like what state laws should be, what, when federal laws trump state laws, who has the power of law enforcement, which in the United States is supposed to be the states, not the federal government, okay?
00:30:59.000The federal government is supposed to handle borders, military, states are supposed to handle law enforcement.
00:32:00.000So the question is from a moral point of view, I'm trying to figure out where your line is because I got to ask you, you don't seem to have one.
00:32:09.000When should the federal government say, You have passed illegal laws, you are in violation of the Constitution, and we are sending in law enforcement to stop this.
00:32:18.000If the federal government, if the Department of Justice believes that that California law is illegal, then it should go to court, federal court, and get it overturned.
00:32:35.000And if federal courts say, if the Supreme Court says that states do not have the right to regulate federal law enforcement that way, That will control.
00:34:23.000I mean, the lengths they've gone to protect a guy who beat his wife.
00:34:26.000Who was already caught smuggling people, admittedly, who was adjudicated twice as a member of MS-13, and they have lied about it endlessly?
00:34:34.000Yes, they're absolutely trying to keep wife-beating human traffickers in this country.
00:34:39.000So at a certain point, you have to ask yourself if you are a man of action or if you are going to sit by as everything burns down around you.0.80
00:35:09.000In fact, the revolutionary period was over 20 years and they didn't sign the Declaration of Independence until a year after the war already began.
00:35:18.000It's worth making the argument that the consequences historically of these kind of people being in positions of authority or having a majority has been disastrous for countries.
00:35:31.000The actual question is at what point do you actually say we're not going to allow this to happen to our country and take some kind of legislative action or some kind of law enforcement action to prevent this stuff from turning into what they're literally calling for an actual revolution?
00:35:53.000Let's just go Godwin's law, full Godwin's law.0.91
00:35:55.000Should Hitler have been prevented from taking office?0.99
00:35:59.000Obviously, in retrospect, everyone's going to say yes.0.94
00:36:25.000Merrick Garland and Joe Biden fabricated a criminal case against two people who nobody knows exist, targeting a Tennessee based company with zero evidence.
00:36:34.000And they use that as a weapon to try and destroy us because we're.
00:36:39.000We have no connection to the Trump administration.
00:36:41.000We are regular people who are speaking out in pubs and bars, angry at the tyranny of the established machine that you know exactly what they were doing.
00:36:50.000Let me just throw in something to the mix.
00:36:52.000Did you read the Stanford report on the mRNA vaccines from December?
00:36:56.000That said that men 30 and under had a 1 in 16,000 chance of getting myocarditis, which shortens their lifespan on average seven years.
00:37:07.000Telling young men to get something that they knew.
00:37:10.000One in 16,000 is not a rare side effect.
00:37:13.000That is a terrifying side effect that was not disclosed and they knew and lied.
00:37:17.000So, when these people are trying to make billions of dollars off of something they know as a side effect they won't disclose, and then they lie about me, yes, they say a lot of things about me, but we know they're lying and we know they're evil.
00:37:28.000And your point about, oh, well, you know, they say the same things about you.
00:37:32.000To Tim's point, they are lying about what the right says and what the right wants.0.53
00:37:37.000They're specifically saying, they say that, oh, Donald Trump is a fascist, he's a threat, et cetera, et cetera, he's going to do this, he's going to do that.
00:37:52.000None of the stuff that they talk about is actually materializing.
00:37:56.000These people have presented legislation to defund the police.
00:37:59.000These people have presented legislation to expropriate property.
00:38:03.000These people have presented legislation.
00:38:05.000They're actually trying to enact the things that will destroy this country.
00:38:09.000So I understand that they do say, oh, hey, you know, Donald Trump is this big bad guy, but these people are actually taking action to do it.
00:38:19.000Why do you think it's okay to take away someone's vote?
00:38:22.000Because that's what you're doing if you're so close to the Constitution.
00:38:24.000Oh, they're trying to take away people's property.
00:38:41.000If you could promise me that the Constitution is actually sacrosanct and the rights protected in the Constitution are actually untouchable, I would throw my vote away in a second, in a heartbeat.
00:38:52.000I have no illusions about what my vote means.
00:38:58.000There's something like 175 million Americans that can actually vote.0.98
00:39:01.000My vote doesn't actually mean shit.0.89
00:39:03.000And we lie to people and tell them, your vote's so important.0.98
00:39:06.000It's so important that you vote for this, and blah, blah, blah.0.78
00:39:08.000And then we allow people to think that if you elect a president, you're electing a king, and he's just going to come in and fuck it, and blah, And this is on the right, too, because there are people that are pissed off at Donald Trump because he hasn't done things that they wanted him to do that he never had the power to do.0.64
00:39:22.000I will say, with respect, being the Timcast IRL foil, I appreciate you sitting here as we're all, you know, angry and debating, but let me ask you some questions.0.73
00:39:31.000Let's say we're going to have an election on who should be in charge of this property, right?
00:39:40.000And you're here too, and you say, I'd like to be in charge, or I don't have a vote, right?
00:39:45.000So today will be the vote, and everyone in this room will cast a ballot, we'll put it in a box, and then we're going to count those ballots to figure out who's going to be in charge.
00:40:40.000I'm asking you a question so I can get to there.
00:40:43.000Is it a legitimate election when you can receive a ballot seven days later, hand dated?
00:40:48.000It's got a picture of Mickey Mouse as a signature, and it requires two independent adjudicators to disqualify with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
00:41:51.000Understanding we have a system where ballots are sent to every address, doesn't matter if you wanted one or not.
00:41:57.000This means homeless shelters get hundreds.
00:41:59.000Signatures can be a doodle, which is unverifiable, and they can be hand dated.
00:42:05.000And when a hand dated ballot is delivered, it's not supposed to count, but only two independent officials who can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it came after the election day can disqualify it.
00:42:15.000We ask then what is the majority of people voting this way, and should they be allowed to do this?
00:42:21.000So the beginning of the question of enfranchisement is not.1.00
00:43:03.000And now you are once again asking yourself the question of Is this country better when people who don't want to vote, don't know who to vote for, are enticed, coerced, or paid to vote?
00:43:14.000So encouraging people to vote, paying people to vote is not the same as encouraging people to vote.
00:43:20.000But here, I would say That's why I didn't say that.
00:43:22.000But here's what Offering money, coercing, or otherwise.
00:43:25.000I think the Republican Party should think a lot about this because there's been this notion on both sides that low, you know, what are called low propensity voters, people who don't vote very often, right?
00:43:35.000They might vote in a presidential election and nothing else, are going to go Democratic, right?
00:43:41.000Turns out that that's not really true.
00:43:42.000I don't care about the Republican Party.
00:43:45.000So I think we should be encouraging everybody to vote.
00:43:49.000So the analogy that's often used is your plane is in the air and the pilot has a stroke and dies, and the co pilot says, I'm going to take the plane.
00:44:00.000And everyone goes, whoa, We're going to vote and figure out who should fly this plane.
00:44:25.000I think the point would be if you had a pilot trained to fly and you had a.
00:44:31.000Four star general with decades of military experience, public service, charismatic, and the vote was only held by a certain subset of learned individuals who have active participation in the country.
00:44:45.000And this could be a broad, this could be almost everybody.
00:44:48.000They're going to say the guy trained for governance and military leadership should be the president.
00:44:53.000Instead, Donald Trump is president because he's charismatic.
00:45:16.000And the system that we have in place, because everyone gets to vote, instead of being honest, politicians lie about everything because they want to maximize the lowest common denominator.0.95
00:45:26.000I would love it if what I've proposed is in order to vote, you have to sign up for a selective service.
00:45:34.000So, men and women, when you turn 18, you go to the DMV, you fill out, you get your license, and you check the box I would like to vote and be eligible for the draft.
00:45:45.000I think that would solve 20, 30% of the problem overnight.0.97
00:45:49.000Low propensity, ignorant voters who are manipulated, coerced, or otherwise, who don't know who they're voting for and don't know why, will stop voting.0.62
00:45:56.000And you will then have, again, a plane is being flown.0.99
00:46:51.000There are elites that are elected out of universal enfranchisement.
00:46:55.000They're elite because USAID was funneling money to various NGOs, propping up people who did not work, funding basically everybody in like Fairfax and Loudoun who have exorbitant salaries because they're lawyers or they work for NGOs because USAID gives them money for BS reasons.
00:47:11.000Lee Zeldin found a nonprofit was formed after one month, was given $7 billion.0.95
00:47:18.000So these people are elites because they trick stupid people to vote for them, they cheat these systems through ridiculous codification, then once they get in government, they cement themselves as a uniparty machine.0.95
00:47:29.000In what world do you think the guys running Pfizer and ExxonMobil and OpenAI and Goldman Sachs are not going to find their way into this system that you're promoting?0.99
00:47:38.000But the criteria by which someone gets to vote that I'm describing is not that you're wealthy.
00:47:43.000I'm saying that if you eliminate low propensity, ignorant, and easily manipulated voters and universal mail in voting, it becomes increasingly more difficult.
00:47:51.000So the reason why, like our audience, for instance, you can't lie to them.
00:48:11.000So when you have lemmings who are willing to march off a cliff because they hate, and that's all that matters to them, criminals and the corrupt will exploit that against the good.0.82
00:48:20.000But here's the thing on the right, you have disparate factions that are constantly fighting.0.91
00:48:26.000The libertarians have turned on Trump, they're mad over the war.
00:48:28.000You've got the, I guess, America First anti Israel faction also.
00:48:33.000Angry and what made up the mega coalition has broken.
00:48:36.000Maha is increasingly angry with them, too.
00:48:38.000So, Maha is out there, all fractured, but none of these people like the Democratic Party, which is consolidated, even when what they say makes no sense.
00:48:47.000And I'll give you an example of a tweet that I put out the other day.0.93
00:48:49.000I tweeted, Medical assistance and death is a good thing, it's the white privilege that's the problem.0.58
00:48:55.000We need to prioritize LGBTQIA people and black and brown bodies for made.0.89
00:49:00.000In fact, white people shouldn't be allowed to have this until the point I'm making with that is.
00:49:06.000The insinuation is horrifying, but the left doesn't apply that way.0.94
00:49:11.000When it comes to medical assistance and death, the overwhelming majority of people who get it are white, despite the fact it's a medical treatment that should be given to the marginalized.0.83
00:49:18.000But you're never going to see a liberal advocate for medically assisting suicides of black people.0.96
00:49:54.000It is insane that in this country we have people who are blind only because they have no access to this service and a game show had to do it.
00:50:02.000In that critique, I mentioned, I do not support the military industrial complex dumping money into Congress, so then they send weapons to all these foreign countries.
00:50:09.000Why are we giving Ukraine $200 billion?
00:50:14.000He reacted to my reaction, mocking me.
00:50:20.000So, first, so he agreed the military industrial complex.
00:50:25.000So, basically, what happened was he says in his video, the military industrial complex is bad, funding all these wars.
00:50:30.000I reckoned him saying, I agree with Assad, the military industrial complex is bad, Ukraine's a great example.
00:50:35.000He then laughed at me saying, Yo, bro, literally thinks we shouldn't support Ukraine because these people don't have any actual policy positions or vision.
00:50:45.000It's literally, are you in or are you out?
00:50:48.000And what that leads to is politicians like Adam Schiff.
00:50:51.000It leads to politicians like Zorhan Mamdani.
00:51:01.000So it seems like, from what your whole description earlier about what happened to you is just, it sounds like a massive overreach on the behalf of social media companies, but as well as the government, right?
00:51:11.000So I guess the question is like, in lieu of what happened to you as an individual, shouldn't it give us pause, perhaps, that somebody would have such an egregious.
00:51:21.000Now, to be fair, This lady did not make that statement herself specifically, but it's very likely she hasn't withdrawn her support from this organization.
00:51:28.000Should it not give us pause that somebody with such an egregious claim as the eradication of Western civilization would be allowed anywhere near power in a country that's already proven that even those less radical than she is have the capability of ruining someone's life?
00:51:47.000I mean, I just think it's a chance that we take as.
00:52:49.000They also said that they, well, I don't know of, did they actually, the federal government arrested people who said Christ is not king?
00:52:55.000Well, there was one instance where a man said, not literally, Christ is not king.
00:53:01.000But this was a famous case in Massachusetts, and I think it was like 1828.
00:53:05.000I always get the date wrong, where it went to the Massachusetts Supreme Court, where he said something to the effect of Christ is not our Lord and Savior.
00:53:11.000He was a universalist or something, and they arrested him, and he went to jail for it.
00:53:33.000I don't believe that blasphemy should be illegal.
00:53:36.000That was a founding principle of the First Amendment.
00:53:39.000Man, I'm sort of taking your word on this one, and you did quote this case to me, but I. Blasphemy was illegal in the scripture for a long time.0.79
00:55:50.000No one actually believes in the Constitution.
00:55:53.000They believe in their moral interpretation of what the Constitution provides for them.
00:55:57.000And that's why liberals say hate speech is not protected under the First Amendment, and the right says it is, because it's a different moral worldview.
00:56:03.000They're both claiming the Constitution belongs to them.
00:56:06.000The Founding Fathers disagree with everybody.
00:56:26.000If you take a look into shall issue or may issue permitting, before the 80s, states did not have to grant you the right to keep and bear arms.
00:56:34.000It was culturally normative that people had guns and the state wouldn't arrest you for it.
00:56:39.000But it was actually quite difficult in many circumstances to get permits.
00:56:42.000And only recently, did you know that the right to keep a gun on your person only exists in the United States as of 2010?
00:57:24.000If we believe the Second Amendment was intended to say the federal constitution is supreme, you cannot ban people from having guns, then I could carry a gun across state lines whenever I wanted to, but you can't.
00:57:52.000Well, that's why I once again challenge this notion that there is a constitution that people adhere to because if you believe the federal constitution is supreme, how is there even a question that I would go to prison if you're in Pennsylvania?
00:58:06.000And you cross the bridge on accident with your handgun, you are going to prison for four years.
00:58:44.000The only reason she got off, she had a good lawyer.
00:58:46.000And there was a case in New Jersey where some athlete was caught with a gun and they cut him a sweetheart deal because he was famous.0.99
00:58:51.000So they said, We're going to make a big stink about this because you're going after a little old lady when you let this football player go.
00:58:57.000So they cut a deal and said, Never come back.
00:58:59.000But there are many instances where people cross that bridge on accident and they're in prison right now.
00:59:03.000I know a dude who was from California.
00:59:06.000He was driving to New York and he was driving through Illinois and he had like three or four long guns in his trunk.
00:59:12.000He exits the federal highway to get gas, and a cop walks up and says, I'm searching your vehicle, finds the guns.
01:00:30.000I am saying the message and the rights guaranteed by the constitution do not functionally exist in the United States, they are only a basis by which people try to assert political authority over others.
01:03:29.000The fifth says basically 1985 only applies to black people, only black people can have its protections.0.99
01:03:36.000The second, because New York is liberal, Has extended in a lot of directions, same sex couples, you know, disabled people.
01:03:44.000So, if I were bringing it in a conservative circuit, if they were going to follow their precedent at all, they'd have to toss it immediately.0.67
01:03:50.000It's because I'm in the second that I have a chance.
01:03:53.000So, the procedural issue here is that a network of precedents are created specifically in this circuit, and you are challenging the base, the foundational stone that if they rule against you could disrupt the other plans they have.
01:04:07.000The point ultimately is this no one is going to court.
01:04:16.000Because I've been involved in more than enough lawsuits to understand that the first thing the lawyers tell you is we got to find the right venue.
01:04:23.000Because we're looking for a judge who agrees with us morally and politically.
01:04:26.000And then it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong.
01:04:28.000In fact, I was dealing with a copyright lawsuit and I was explicitly told listen, if we bring this suit in California where the record labels are, you lose in two seconds.
01:04:38.000It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong.
01:04:39.000They are there in the pocket of the major labels and they're not going to threaten their economy for some guy from West Virginia.
01:04:45.000If you sue in West Virginia, the inverse is true.
01:04:48.000The conservative people here are going to be like, Tim Poole brings money to the state.
01:06:03.000I'll say that all judges are unethical, or to claim that none of them are ethical.
01:06:08.000Well, let me finish my point so you can understand.
01:06:11.000If you go back to the 90s, you'll find that the political leanings of Democrats and Republicans are almost identical.
01:06:15.000There were a few wedge issues that disagreed on how much taxes we should have progressively and what are the limits on abortion.
01:06:22.000But when you look at Pew's research, which has famously been analyzed a million and one times ad nauseum, you can see that the peaks for each party overlap and they're only slightly different.
01:06:31.000Today, you can see left and right are completely divergent.
01:06:36.000If a person came into your courtroom who was in a lawsuit and the goal of winning the lawsuit was to sterilize and castrate a bunch of little boys, are you going to allow that person to do it as a judge?
01:06:49.000I tell you this a conservative judge is going to be like, it's not happening.
01:06:51.000To be fair, a lot of conservative judges will be like, I am constrained by the law because I'm a man of principle and they let the left do whatever they want.0.77
01:06:58.000I'd imagine if you were a judge, you'd say, it's unfortunate that you have the legal right to sterilize and castrate children, but I will let you do it.
01:07:06.000Your moral worldview in the instance of Dari Eliza, we have a more strong moral stance in if someone's explicit goal is to kill or destroy my country, my people, and the things that I've supported, we will not allow them to take office.0.58
01:07:21.000Your position is they're voted for it, so they should be allowed to do it.0.59
01:07:25.000Like, I get it because I'm more wishy washy in a lot of ways as well.
01:07:29.000But I guess the idea is like you said, I don't think it's wishy washy.
01:07:32.000No, for me specifically, it's like I'm not a hard one, I don't have a lot of hard line stances on a lot of things.
01:07:36.000But for me specifically in this, You mentioned you consider yourself a constitutionalist.
01:07:42.000Assuming that she believes what was said in that statement, she hasn't disavowed it.
01:07:46.000She doesn't believe in the Constitution.
01:07:48.000She believes that as an enemy of the United States or somebody who wants to end Western civilization, that she would theoretically have a problem with the Constitution.0.96
01:08:32.000She argued that white Europeans coming here was an explicit evil that needs to be stopped.
01:08:37.000You're going to need to pull up exactly what she said because we started this clip off with a conflation of a company she's connected to making a claim.
01:09:03.000For context, the thing she's called for, she's called for abolishing police, prisons, and borders.
01:09:07.000She clarified her position on defunding the police by writing in it that her vision means ending police, full stop, no more police ever at all.
01:09:14.000She retweeted literally abolish the border.
01:09:18.000She called the United States a fucking disgrace, referred to the U.S. as occupied Native American land, and joked about wiping her dirty hands on American flag.0.99
01:09:25.000She wrote favorably about communism, wrote, seize the means of production, called for nationalizing utilities, pharmaceutical companies, and seizing all properties from landlords.0.99
01:09:34.000Wrote that pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me.0.90
01:09:39.000She called Joe Biden a rapist and a war criminal and said she wouldn't vote for him.0.84
01:09:43.000She said, F Kamala Harris and criticized Bernie Sanders and AOC for being too pro Israel.1.00
01:09:48.000And she wrote that black and Arab men fetishize ugly colonizer women.1.00
01:09:52.000You said that she said to steal all land from all landlords.1.00
01:09:56.000She said, let me make sure that I'm actually saying it correctly.
01:09:59.000She said, seizing all properties from landlords.
01:10:43.000And my point is when you pull up, like, if a journalist reads the book or like I read the manifesto, right, from the Montreal shooter, and I can tell you that he did not hate women, he actually loved women, but he hated modern society, capitalism, hypergamy.
01:11:00.000You would say, What did he say specifically?
01:11:02.000And I'd say, I am paraphrasing from reading 104 pages.
01:11:06.000If you want his quotes, go find them or tell me you don't trust him.
01:11:09.000Don't bring up his quotes if you don't have them.
01:15:37.000The attacks on all the Tesla facilities, where a man showed up with a rifle and unloaded.
01:15:41.000There was the guy in Spokane, Washington, who showed up with a rifle, a ghost gun, and Molotov started firebombing an ICE facility and unloading.
01:15:54.000And the perception of your run of the mill conservatives is like the left hates guns, even though the left is ardently pro gun.
01:16:01.000And they have the John Brown Gun Club, the Red Guard, just to name some examples.
01:16:06.000And they march around taking over blocks of their cities.
01:16:09.000There's the Autonomous Stone in Portland.
01:16:11.000There was for two years an autonomous zone, George Floyd Square, where a guy on a roof had a rifle on a tripod aiming at people.
01:16:20.000And the Babylon B and these run of the mill conservatives are sitting there being like, aren't we so smart?
01:16:25.000So I tell you this my vision of what a second civil war would look like, at least based on how they view it, is that far leftists would show up with a bunch of AR 15s and switches, like Glocks with switches, and they'd instantly take over the small suburb town, seize the guns from the sleepy suburbanites who have them, and then kill a bunch of people who resisted, and you will get a conflict.
01:16:47.000Then the Republicans are going to go, now, now, everybody, there's not much we can do.
01:16:51.000I mean, This is a local matter, so the federal government's not going to get involved.
01:16:56.000And then the Democrats in the state where it happens, let's say it's Illinois, are going to be like on TV.
01:17:05.000And not just that, if one of them does manage to get arrested, somebody running for president for the Democrats will put in their bio about how you can donate to the fund to get them out.
01:20:31.000My point is you thought you were responding to the Chevalier question when I had already changed the point broadly to talk about enemies coexisting in a similar space.
01:20:42.000You're not saying he didn't move the goalpost.
01:20:44.000Similar but different questions back to back and just like berating me for answering one of the two.
01:21:29.000Yeah, I understand what you're saying, that it's not a quote that came directly out of her mouth.
01:21:33.000I understand what you're saying by that.0.93
01:21:34.000But the reason I brought up the question about a black guy screaming, I'm going to kill a white person, is to create a clear, flat moral picture.0.97
01:21:43.000We're not having, in the context, we're not having a debate and we are in a physical conflict.0.96
01:21:47.000And I'm not saying this in relation to Chevalier.
01:21:50.000I am saying in a literal circumstance, and there is only one obvious answer.
01:21:55.000And the point is, again, see, I'm going to tell you, Ian.
01:22:37.000Now we're going to move backwards and broaden the moral scenario to include variables.
01:22:44.000This is a method of understanding in conversation.
01:22:47.000But when you interrupt me because you don't want to answer the question because you think it's a gotcha, you are just disrupting the point.
01:23:32.000Is that what do you think the odds are that somebody with.
01:23:35.000Political positions that extreme is open to the idea of being, of having her opinion changed on stuff as fundamental as like the America, as America as a country, right?
01:23:46.000Like, I understand the idea you go to the House floor, whatever, to argue policy or to argue legislation.
01:23:52.000Somebody wants to pass this law, somebody else doesn't.
01:23:55.000And then you go back and forth about it.
01:23:57.000You'd have a whole argument about whether that's effective, anyways, all that.
01:24:00.000But when you get down to the brass tacks and the person doesn't even believe that the country she's currently representing.
01:25:38.000If I was in a field in a small town and it was my town, I'd probably get a posse together and I'd say, it's time to get this guy out of here.
01:26:03.000I wouldn't let him take a seat in city council.
01:26:05.000I would say anything he says is a lie intended to destroy us as his explicit stated intentions.
01:26:10.000The problem we have right now is conservatives who are doing one of two things.
01:26:16.000I'm going to ignore this and hope it goes away.
01:26:18.000Which it hasn't for decades, and the others, which are saying, it is my intention to be principled and find understanding.1.00
01:26:25.000And the other guy sitting there with a smile on his face being like, what an idiot.1.00
01:26:27.000I'll stab him the first chance I get.1.00
01:26:31.000So choose to live with these people.0.99
01:26:32.000But, you know, that 19 year old girl who was butchered in New York City by that roving band of gangs, or the dad who got shot and killed while walking his daughter across the street, this is the world that we have gotten because of this idea of just let these people do what they want and ignore them.
01:26:48.000I see, I am so weakened by people burying their heads in the sand.
01:27:59.000And so, what's happened consistently is this happens all the time the principled conservative judges say neither of them created an imminent threat, so you can't charge them.
01:28:10.000I think we're talking something that's very fact specific.
01:28:22.000It's the right that has made everything about his death about nothing except what it's actually about.0.51
01:28:31.000In other words, Charlie Kirk was shot almost certainly by a guy who did it for his, you know, transgender girlfriend because he didn't like Charlie Kirk.
01:30:11.000So we've been dealing with this for a decade as it pertains to Antifa because this is how they do it.
01:30:16.000They don't explicitly say, they don't go on Twitter and say, everybody come to this spot and commit a crime.
01:30:22.000They break the sentences up so that no individual is responsible for the direct threat.0.83
01:30:27.000They did this in Colombia with Jewish students.
01:30:30.000And then when a Jewish student showed up and everyone started attacking them, it was like, well, they got their marching orders, but no one had to tell them who to go after.0.75
01:30:36.000We can't exist in a country where we allow fragmented death threats.0.76
01:30:42.000So I don't believe that, you know, I believe that there's an interesting question on the flag burning stuff to expand the free speech conversation.
01:30:52.000Trump says flag burning should be illegal.
01:30:54.000Obviously, stealing someone else's flag and burning it should be simple property crime.
01:30:58.000I believe if you own it, it's your, you can do whatever you want.
01:31:11.000But when we get to the point where people are advocating for the murder of other people, and just because they're not saying go right now and kill a person, does not mean what they're saying should be considered free speech.
01:31:24.000So, Charlie Kirk, and like, like, With Trump right now, every single one of these Gen Zers who goes on TikTok and says, someone needs to do it, and then clicks off, arrested.0.96
01:31:35.000You know, again, if you're naming the president.0.98
01:31:59.000And then turn it off, that person should be arrested.
01:32:01.000Now, what will be required is proving that what she was saying was related, was political.
01:32:08.000Because if she had a video before it where she was like, I wish I had a cup of cookie dough, can't someone go buy it for me?
01:32:13.000And the next video was, Someone go do it, do it right now.
01:32:16.000Then the context is clearly not assassinations.
01:32:19.000But we know most of these people have political profiles, are posting about how they hate Trump, and then they say, Go do it, lock them up.
01:32:24.000Unless, of course, cookie dough is a dog whistle for Donald Trump.
01:32:29.000I view the world as in there was a point in this country where we were one country and rights applied to those of this country who disagreed.
01:32:37.000But we are no longer one country, we are two countries.
01:32:39.000Wait, you don't think rights apply to people you disagree with?
01:32:54.000We're talking about blowing up members of Al-Qaeda?
01:32:58.000Abdurrahman al-Awlaki was not a member of Al-Qaeda.
01:33:00.000He was a 16-year-old kid from Boulder, Colorado, who grew up in San Diego, who was visiting his family in Yemen, and Barack Obama blew up the restaurant he was eating food at.0.94
01:33:19.000So the obvious reality is this there is obviously an area of contention in the United States where we have two distinct nations within the borders of one country, but there are two institutional mechanisms in place by which you can't just go around killing people because this is what a civil war ultimately is.
01:33:36.000But it is a fact that we do not grant rights to people of other countries.0.65
01:34:46.000Anybody who I think fairly assesses the political worldview of the left and the right would find that they are incongruous with each other and disastrously so.
01:34:55.000Look, we're in a state that exists because of the Civil War, right?
01:35:43.000So we also then know that, I think at this point, it's largely known she married her brother illegally to grant him immigration benefits, which is immigration fraud.
01:36:58.000Let me ask you another side question and we'll come back to this one.
01:37:01.000If you were walking down the street in New York and you saw a man on his knees crying and another man was pointing a gun at his head, And you had a crowbar in your hand, would you intervene to save that man from getting shot in the head?
01:38:27.000If a woman was about to get an abortion and a doctor had the forceps and he looked at you dead in the eyes and says, and now I kill the baby by stipping its spinal cord, would you shoot him?0.81
01:38:37.000I mean, to be consistent, the answer is yes.
01:38:42.000I think even the sort of really hardcore pro lifers, and this is why you have to make.
01:38:47.000Practical compromises in the real world, even the hardcore pro lifers blanch from we're going to imprison doctors and women for abortion.0.86
01:38:56.000So, the issue that's the problem because we know intuitively and inherently that this is something that you really can't stop women from doing.0.76
01:39:05.000So, no matter what, let's say there's a woman in Oklahoma, Oklahoma's completely banned abortion, but let's just say it's not even about it.0.98
01:39:48.000Like, let's say she's sitting at a diner and she's with a woman, and the woman's like, I'm going to drive you to Colorado and we're going to abort this baby, abort it dead.
01:39:56.000And she goes, I can't wait to get this thing out of me.0.99
01:41:44.000Okay, and then I will come back with a.
01:41:45.000Because this question has nothing to do with abortion.
01:41:48.000It was to figure out what your morals are.
01:41:51.000So, that I can provide for you a scenario and understand what you would think would happen and what we should do about it, which is I don't care if women want or don't want abortion to be, this is not what we're talking about.
01:42:03.000What we're talking about is a man whose baby has been taken by the mother and is about to be killed.
01:42:09.000And what do you think that man will do to save his child?
01:42:12.000So, you, there are arguments that don't have any right answer, there are moral positions that cannot be squared.
01:43:39.000You said that you didn't see a scenario in which this country could get to that point.
01:43:43.000I am giving you some scenarios to consider your moral worldview on so that we can come to the final question Do you think it's possible a 35 year old man would use violence to save his eight month gestated viable child from being killed?
01:43:58.000Yes, I think there's a scenario where that happens.
01:44:00.000What happens in a scenario where you have a country where states bordering each other have hyper bifurcated views on these things, where a woman committing a felony. Is not breaking the law in one state.0.99
01:44:13.000And you have state law enforcement trying to stop her.1.00
01:44:16.000In fact, I think it might have been Mississippi that sought to charge them with conspiracy to commit abortion because she was planning to flee the state.
01:44:22.000My point here is the moral distinction between the multicultural democracy and the constitutional republic are at such extreme ends that neither can coexist.
01:44:32.000At a certain point, the bridge breaks.0.89
01:44:35.000A woman says, I'm going to get a nine month abortion so I don't have to live with this man.
01:44:39.000And the man says, she's going to commit a felony kidnapping my child.
01:44:43.000The liberals say it's not a child, it's a fetus.0.77
01:44:47.000Now you have a breakdown where the police in Colorado will protect her because she's not committing a crime and they will not allow another state to come in.
01:44:56.000And a father who says, I will get every man who will stand by my side and we will stop anyone who dares to kill my child.
01:45:04.000We're not there yet, but we are dangerously close when states like California kidnap children for sex changes.
01:45:10.000When Washington passes a law saying a stranger on the internet can kidnap a child from Arizona.
01:45:16.000Bring them to Washington for a sex change and the state will protect them having done it.
01:45:21.000We are at a dangerous point where these laws are only recently passed.
01:45:24.000But what happens when a mom and dad, their 14 year old daughter goes missing?
01:45:29.000And then they find out a 46 year old man, a pedophile, picked her up in his car and drove her to Washington to get her sterilized, to give her puberty blockers and testosterone.
01:45:38.000And Washington says what he did is heroic.
01:45:41.000Do you think those parents are going to be like, guess our child's gone?
01:45:55.000We also have foreign born individuals who have explicitly stated they're going to extract money for the betterment of their home countries to their own people, and their constituents have been smuggling money out of the country.0.94
01:46:05.000We have seen massive fraud in Minnesota, Ohio, and California in the Somali community.0.89
01:46:10.000This country is being extracted, and there is an ever shrinking population of American traditionalists, constitutional republicanists, I guess you can call it, who believe in the founding fathers, their vision for the constitution, the evolution of the constitution through amendments.1.00
01:46:23.000And other individuals who are either communist ideologues or foreign born and want to destroy this country.
01:47:27.000It's pretty wild how, like, Virginia called up all of the men from the area that was known as, like, the Kanawha region, which they wanted to name the state, West Virginia.
01:47:36.000And when all those men were no longer there to defend their state or their values, the remaining individuals broke the state off and ran.
01:48:02.000There's no longer a group of people saying, I mean, maybe there's a few saying, you know, the Bible gives me the right to own the children of Ham.
01:48:08.000And there's a lot of people who think slavery is fine, but I think it's based on, I think most Americans, their immediate view of slavery is based on chattel slavery and like farm work.
01:48:18.000And the people who agree, at least to a certain degree privately, but maybe they don't want to publicly say it, the arguments they tend to make is that slavery.
01:48:28.000As depicted in media, is not actually how slavery was.
01:48:30.000And only 3% of Americans in the South own slaves.0.99
01:48:33.000I thought you were going to go somewhere else and say that most of the people in the United States who believe in slavery now are from Africa and Saudi Arabia.0.80
01:48:42.000If you talk to a lot of Southerners about the issue of slavery, they'll usually default to, no, no, like we don't think slavery should be allowed.
01:48:48.000But, and then they'll say things like, there were slaves who earned a living, made money, and worked as cobblers.
01:49:10.000A lot of these people, you'll find people who don't.
01:49:16.000But the question I have for you on the issue, I don't know if you want to hit a point before I go on this.
01:49:19.000The point was that now the far left, similar to what this lady is espousing here, believes that almost that same thing exists, except for it's CEOs and they keep you trapped via economic means because nobody can get out.
01:50:37.000Okay, do you think that by 1863, With armies marching up and down this ground in Pennsylvania and Maryland, people weren't aware that there was a civil war happening?
01:51:15.000Let's not go to nitty gritty for no stupid reason.0.94
01:51:17.000Seven states seceded, and it was after Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and the calling up of troops that four other states joined in.0.95
01:52:13.000The Civil War started for a variety of reasons.
01:52:15.000You can lay it out in a bunch of different ways, but there's no real, like, one issue.
01:52:19.000We usually just say slavery because the Southern states, the slave states, were fearful that with Abraham Lincoln's election, despite the fact he said, we would not.
01:52:29.000Ban slavery, we would just not expand it.
01:52:37.000We had seven years of bleeding Kansas, so shooting and fighting was already happening in these territories.
01:52:42.000So when Abraham Lincoln gets elected, it's actually, I think it was January, before he was even inaugurated, seven states decided to secede.
01:52:48.000In fact, Texas secession was hilarious.
01:52:50.000They only seceded because of geography.
01:52:53.000Several state senators, I don't know the exact individuals, but they had written, We can't be attached to a union.
01:55:16.000However, the civil rights era was also civil strife.
01:55:19.000Civil strife is academically defined as a period when at least 70 people are killed for political reasons per year or something of that effect.
01:55:31.000So, we don't know exactly if this will result in a civil war or not, but the potentiality is absolutely there academically.
01:55:36.000What we're seeing, I would argue, to the point of Abraham Lincoln, is the people of this country saw a battle.
01:55:44.000But what about when Biden sent the feds against the Texas National Guard?0.54
01:55:48.000Now, don't get me wrong, nobody was shooting each other, but it was getting tense, and we were like, holy crap, the Texas National Guard is now head to head with federal law enforcement.
01:55:57.000This could kick off in a very dangerous way.
01:55:59.000I would argue that is dangerously close to a Fort Sumter moment.
01:56:03.000Nope, they weren't shooting at each other, but they were given laws against, they were given directives against each other.0.88
01:56:07.000So that's why we're like, holy crap, one accidental discharge and we're in a civil war.0.94
01:56:13.000Donald Trump took a bolt inside of the head and people said we were two millimeters from a civil war.0.96
01:56:17.000Abraham Lincoln suspends habeas corpus, creating a corridor from Philadelphia down to D.C. because Maryland was a slave state and the Maryland legislature was sympathetic to the Southern cause.
01:56:26.000There was going to be a riot in the war, too.
01:56:28.000He was like, sent in federal law enforcement.
01:56:30.000To arrest a third of the Maryland legislature to stop them from being able to vote against him.
01:56:35.000He then arrested people without cause throughout this corridor and locked them up for years.
01:56:41.000It was only two years later that Congress, after he wiped out his enemies, approved retroactively the suspension of habeas corpus.
01:56:48.000My point ultimately is one could argue there would have not been a civil war had Abraham Lincoln not decided to fight one.
01:56:54.000The Southern secession may have just been a secession, and we'd have two different countries right now.
01:56:57.000There was a Baltimore riot on April 19th, and it's so close to the Capitol, that's why he suspended their.
01:58:25.000That was the big issue of contention with Biden.
01:58:27.000The argument, Texas was like, we can't deport or deal with these illegal immigrants or arrest them because it's a federal, it's a constitutional executive authority.
01:58:34.000Congress designated that authority to the executive branch, the INA.0.95
01:59:01.000When the Civil War was kicking off, do you think people walked outside their homes and there were fires and there was insurrection and people with pitchforks?
02:01:36.000Last, when the Minnesota, like into the winter, the reporting was that only around 70% were actually criminals and Trump was actually going after bakers.0.77
02:02:14.000I think the Republican Party has been sitting on their hands.
02:02:18.000I think the American people have been sitting on their hands.0.95
02:02:21.000I think there's one simple question that needs to be asked by how do the American people benefit by bringing these people into our country?1.00
02:03:12.000I thought it was the other way around because, and so I would just say I'll defer to the immediate fact check, but my concern is not trusting these sources because what they like to do is claim Kilmar Alberto Garcia was a Maryland father instead of saying he was an adjudicated MS 13 gang member.
02:03:31.000This is that for 2025, ICE data and independent analysis show a very different pattern.
02:03:40.000We had a debate with some liberals where they said, I can't remember what it was.
02:03:42.000They said only 70% have actually been criminals.
02:03:45.000The rest have been just run of the mill, you know, undocumented workers and blah, That could be where I'm confusing the number because I was debating someone and I assumed that that was right and it was actually wrong.
02:03:55.000But I think if you pull up ICE numbers, it'll probably say something different.
02:04:15.000Uh, for Father's Day, it is essentially a conservative defense of fathers and fatherhood and masculinity.
02:04:21.000Which I can't believe that I'm the one writing, and I can't believe that this has to be written, but it does because you know, for 40 years, the left has been mocking fathers and fatherhood.
02:04:33.000Uh, really, it started with married with children and it's never stopped.
02:04:36.000Um, and so this is, you know, it's very short.
02:04:40.000Uh, as Charlie, who is not here, said to me, it's he's gonna read his copy on the bathroom.
02:04:45.000Which, you know, I think you read it wherever you like.
02:04:48.000But it is, it's sort of 20% philosophical defense of a conservative vision of fathering that's not gentle parenting.
02:05:01.000I was told by Bing Crosby, you got to beat the kid with a sack of sweet Valencia oranges because it'll show him who's boss but won't leave a bruise.
02:05:09.000I don't know if I'd go quite that far, but it's actually not true.
02:06:54.000My magnetic field is interfering with the Earth's magnetic field, thus, logically, it would dictate there is some connection between your body and the weather.
02:08:24.000You know, the only the only real the argument I have against civil war at this point is just that Trump is winning and crushing everything about the left.
02:08:31.000So it's not perfect, but New York is alarming.
02:08:35.000But I think there's a decent probability that Republicans hold the midterms based on redistricting and the current polling and Watson v. RNC, which may come down tomorrow, which would end counting bouts after Election Day.
02:09:04.000And then, sure enough, over the next two weeks, Democrats just started flipping and winning somehow because they were like, well, a bunch of ballots came in after Election Day.
02:09:17.000When I say that, I'm like, I take the most pragmatic and surface level approach to politics.
02:09:23.000In the same way, I talk about a woman who says, I want to eradicate Western civilization.0.97
02:09:28.000I'm like, maybe we shouldn't let her in the office.0.94
02:09:29.000I'm like, If they say you won on election night and then two weeks later you didn't win, my brain just says, that just doesn't seem real to me.
02:09:37.000You know, like without doing any, you know, you have to do your research, you have to look into it, sure.
02:09:42.000But I think like the rational person is like, that just seems like a bad idea.
02:10:40.000I mean, they were, you know, there's a guy named Ralph Barrick, who's a virologist at the University of North Carolina, who was like the world's expert on coronaviruses, who was talking to the Chinese and building these viruses with the Chinese in the basically through 2015.0.97
02:11:57.000Do you believe the conspiracy theory that COVID was released early because of Trump and they intended to release it well after they had control of the media?
02:12:16.000And the intention was to release it sometime in the early 2030s when they had a stronger control over media, in which case there would be no dissent.
02:12:24.000There would be no censorship needed, only top down communications and everybody would get their shots and march in lockstep.
02:12:30.000But Trump won and they didn't expect for him to win.
02:12:33.000I mean, the uniparty, the deep state, didn't expect for him to win.
02:12:35.000So then in 2020, they decided release it now and we'll use it to beat Trump.
02:12:48.000I believe that once it was released, there were people on the left and in the mainstream legacy, elite media, whatever you want to call it.
02:12:58.000And that is the left, basically, right?
02:13:04.000I'm not telling you anything you don't know, but I think that these people saw immediately that COVID was very bad for Donald Trump and was going to prevent him from being reelected in 2020.
02:13:15.000I actually think that conspiracy theory has got a decent probability chance of happening, especially as I get as conspiratorial as possible, thinking that.
02:13:22.000With Lizzo's album sales, you saw them?
02:13:39.000I just was at the labels, I saw this happening.
02:13:41.000Rolling Stone immediately rushed to issue this whole breakdown of why he's wrong, claiming that he said the CIA stopped rock, which he did not.
02:13:49.000He said, Some people claimed it's CIA, but above my pay grade.
02:14:10.000And Lizzo can't sell any albums anymore.
02:14:12.000So we know that USAID's purpose was effectively international culture building.
02:14:17.000But I would argue that it was domestic as well.
02:14:19.000They just keep that under wraps because it would be criminal.
02:14:23.000Now we're looking at this big picture, which here's the conspiracy theory.
02:14:27.000There's been a plan in place to create a global homogenized culture for a very, very long time, probably going back to the liberal economic order in the 50s.
02:14:34.000In the 1970s, they started working on DARPA and AI technologies first began.
02:14:39.000This is when you get the birth of the Malthusian worldview.
02:14:43.000So imagine, if you will, in the early 90s, they say, okay, we're going to start implementing in the next few years the winding down of American traditions.
02:14:53.000This means we want to see less baseball, we want to see less football, we want to see more soccer, we want to see less even hockey, less rock music, which is very American.
02:15:02.000We need a lowest common denominator entertainment.
02:15:08.000There's nothing more American than rap.
02:15:09.000It's lowest common denominator entertainment, meaning if you look at a song like Gangnam Style, there's a reason why it blew up internationally.
02:15:47.000He's literally singing about sitting in a room when he comes across the Bible and he reads it and begins contemplating all the things in his life he's done wrong and his regrets and how he just wishes he could be a better person, be forgiven, and go to God's house.
02:16:00.000Now, when asked about it, Chris Cornell was like, no, no, it's just, that's absolutely not true.
02:16:03.000And I'm like, for the love of all that is holy.
02:16:05.000Listen to that song, and it's like he's literally saying, I'm reading the Bible.
02:16:11.000Shots, You could play that in literally any country on the planet.
02:16:16.000So, the conspiracy theory is not that they turned rock off overnight, but that they were like, we want a new American culture built around music that is generic and bump, bump, bump, bump.
02:16:29.000Something's got to be the lowest common denominator.
02:16:31.000Something anyone, anywhere can just bounce to.
02:16:34.000American rock is very specific to the American tradition.
02:18:51.000But the point is, rock music is identifiable to Americans as American culture and elicits emotion that the movie is trying to convey that rap does not.
02:19:02.000So, rap and pop don't end up as soundtracks in films because they don't elicit emotion in Americans.
02:19:10.000Guardians of the Galaxy is a really great example.
02:19:12.0002016, 2019, and the soundtracks to those are 70s, 80s, and 90s.
02:19:17.000And it actually put those songs back on the charts.
02:19:20.000If it is true that rock music instantly charts when it's put in these movies, why are the record labels not promoting and running more rock music?
02:19:31.000That's not a conspiracy, that's a question.
02:22:55.000The way marketing and promotion has always worked is the reason why we had specific guitar music for 30 years is because kids are listening to the music of their parents.
02:24:48.000What I'm saying is when you play rock music when you're growing up, those kids will only get into rap if their peers are into rap and they go off to hang out with them and want to fit in.
02:24:58.000They're not going to randomly just one day manifest rap music.
02:25:01.000It has to come from somewhere the internet or from other people.
02:25:42.000The point is if parents raise their kids with rock music and the record labels sell rock music to a 30 year old, you're not listening because you think you're so smart.
02:26:19.000The music I was raised on, the intonation, the beat counts, the style, the vocal melodies, and the ideas resonated with me only because my parents influenced me with the music from their youth.
02:29:30.000Some are naturally physical, some are not.
02:29:32.000There's actually a criteria that academics believe that.
02:29:35.000One of the mistakes we make in institutionalized learning is that we expect boys who are tending towards physical learning to do book learning.
02:29:42.000Some humans learn through reading, some through observation, some through manipulation.
02:29:47.000So the schooling system has proven itself to be a failure.
02:29:50.000And the idea that parents, for the first time, it only started in the early 1900s, gave their children to other people to influence, that's a new phenomenon.
02:31:53.000What's fascinating to me is that if you look at the American tradition and if you look at human tradition in general, blood is thicker than water.
02:32:00.000Now, the funny thing is, there's a longer phrase that actually means the inverse, but we talked about that before.
02:32:06.000If you go back in history, you will find that almost every instance of family, the children did not rebel against their parents.
02:32:14.000And then with the Industrial Revolution and the mechanization of learning facilities, the institutionalized learning facility, children all of a sudden became rebellious.
02:32:21.000The reason was children were no longer being influenced by their parents.
02:32:36.000They were completely dependent on their parents in a way they aren't now.
02:32:40.000No, the reason why children believed different things from their parents was not because of field work, it's because they put them with different people.
02:32:49.000Would you rather live in the Amazon where basically children are hunter gatherers at this point and the family unit is sacrosanct and there's no school?
02:33:26.000That works for them, and it worked for you.
02:33:30.000Attitude, you might have rebelled more.
02:33:32.000So, would you, you, so if, um, if the child goes and listens to Lizzo at a friend's house, they get grounded for going to a friend's house and listening to Lizzo?
02:33:39.000That's a particularly extreme example, I would argue.
02:33:42.000My point is, I am not going to create circumstances by which my kid is going to be like, I want to hang out with a bunch of gangbanging rappers who are twerking on a car.
02:34:41.000If you come to me and say, look, college, I'll say, you have to break it down mathematically so I can see all of the steps to the logic and make a conclusion.
02:34:49.000If you just come to me and tell me college good, I'll say, prove it.
02:34:54.000And the story I love to tell is there was an economist who worked, I think, in the Bush administration who said, if you go to any investor and you tell them, give me $40,000, and after four years, You'll owe me $40,000 plus 5% interest.0.99
02:35:06.000They'll tell you that's the stupidest investment they've ever heard of.0.74
02:35:09.000And so that's what we're telling all of the kids to do in college.1.00
02:35:12.000And so I looked at that and I was like, my parents are completely wrong about this.
02:35:15.000He broke down the math saying, if you're 16 years old, get a job at McDonald's, do not quit and work there 40 hours, be on time, work hard, dress right, speak right.
02:35:43.000You are an assistant manager with a small salary or maybe a slightly higher hourly wage with a savings and no debt.
02:35:49.000The college graduate has no job and is looking for prospects, but has $40,000 in debt plus interest that they have to add to their monthly budgets.
02:35:58.000Now their cost of living is higher by default, and you already have a savings.
02:36:02.000If you continue this course traditionally, the college drop, the kid who never went to college retires with $1.5 million, and the college graduate retires with $500,000.
02:36:13.000College is a mistake unless you're going for a passion, it's free, it's a scholarship, or it's a requirement, like you want to be a doctor or academic or otherwise.0.94
02:36:22.000So I looked at all that stuff and I said, holy shit, everybody's wrong.0.97
02:38:41.000And I was skateboarding and playing music, and I do those things.
02:38:45.000So right now we live in a country where the overwhelming majority of babies are raised by parents who do not give them any education from zero through five.
02:40:14.000Now, it is entirely possible for any human being.0.99
02:40:18.000I'm being hyperbolic here because I know some people are retarded to learn these things between the ages of zero through five, but we don't do this.1.00
02:40:33.000But this is a separate issue from what we were talking about before, which is how much control you're going to have over your children's lives and experiences as they age.
02:40:44.000I mean, here's sort of the basic way to look at this, okay?
02:40:48.000At least half of your kid's outcome is factory installed, it's 50 percent genetic or more.
02:40:54.000Agreed, the rest, which let's say it's 40 to 50 percent, let's be optimistic, is every single other influence where you live, who you are, their siblings, their friends, their school, the larger environment, everything.
02:42:21.000You're not controlling her entire world, you're controlling where she's living.
02:42:25.000She's still going to be among other people in that new place, right?
02:42:29.000But the point is, I can control who those people are again up to a certain point, and then you're you know.
02:42:35.000So, like, if there's a bad kid and I say we're moving, and then we go to a new place and there's another bad kid, we move again, I can literally control who she's around.
02:42:42.000Do you think that's going to be good for her constantly uprooting her because you think someone bad is in her environment?
02:42:46.000That would be good for her, like, if there's a kid who's doing heroin, yeah, we're moving, okay, or you could just.
02:44:12.000It's not like that would be like, dude, if my dad did not smack my ass and my mom did not yell at me, like I'd be a shithead in the gutter.1.00
02:44:21.000I know so many people who grew up whose parents were like, I guess, you know, like, so many people that I grew up with whose parents were like, I guess I can't stop them from doing it.
02:44:31.000One of them's dead, two of them are dead.
02:44:32.000You have to stop them, but you can't make them do other things.
02:44:35.000Yeah, well, where I grew up, you can make them play sports and stuff like that.
02:44:39.000One chick was 14 when she died of a heroin overdose because her parents were like, well, she's at school.
02:45:30.000When record labels know they can sell a product to a parent and that the parent will play it in the presence of their kids and other kids will also already like rock music, why change the genre instantly and overnight for everybody?0.77
02:45:43.000It correlates with the Soviet Union coming down, too.
02:46:15.000If there's a parent who likes warm, sticky cinnamon buns but refuses to ever make them for their kids, that kid won't know about it, right?
02:46:30.000What I'm saying is a kid who grows up never having a sticky bun is not going to scream, I want sticky buns.
02:46:35.000The point is this if the parents have primed the child to like certain things culturally, why would you spend extra money on something they don't know about?
02:46:44.000Why not sell them something they are primed to already purchase?
02:46:48.000I just don't think the music companies are in the.
02:46:50.000You think demographic shift in America had something to do with that because the music doesn't appeal to everybody?
02:46:55.000Or that they're winning the first two albums.
02:46:56.000And it's to create a lowest common denominator of music.
02:47:41.000Yeah, she was selling stadiums on the Guts tour and she's expected to on the Unraveled tour.0.97
02:47:46.000Because we went over this, I think she was the only one, she was the only Gen Z superstar.
02:47:51.000You could even make the argument that she's rock.1.00
02:47:53.000And that Olivia Rodrigo is this industry plant, given she's about to do an all female tour and all the proceeds are going to abortion.0.97
02:48:01.000But actually, this still lends to the whole point that after the end of USAID evaporated, Lizzo can't sell shit and a Gen Z rock star is doing well.0.95
02:48:42.000They're not perfect, but they're pretty awesome.
02:48:44.000I just think when you say to other people, you will learn as if your experience is universal, is a refusal to admit that other things could be done.
02:48:52.000You're the one saying that you can hide, you believe on no evidence because you haven't parented anybody who's big enough to walk away.
02:52:08.000Anyway, hopefully, my question resets the tone a little bit, but it's for Alex.
02:52:15.000Now that we know that USAID taxpayer money flowed through the EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan Institute for coronavirus research, on top of the NIH funding they were already getting, and with the recent declassification reinforcing the lab origin, does this point to the leak being more of a simple accident?
02:52:41.000Was it a reckless gain of function research that got out of control?
02:52:45.000Or do you see signs that it could have been intentional to trigger exactly the kind of global response and control we saw?
02:52:56.000And then I think that a bunch of people in public health decided that this was a chance to do some stuff that they'd been hoping to do or talking about doing for a long time in terms of seeing how they could get people to stay inside and try lockdown.
02:53:13.000And, you know, people proved to be more pliable than I think a lot of us would have hoped.
02:53:19.000So, you know, it's sort of between two and three.1.00
02:53:23.000I think the release of COVID was accidental, it was a Chinese screw up.0.99
02:53:27.000And then I think a lot of people decided, you know, we're going to try to frighten the world into staying inside and did so quite successfully.0.98
02:53:36.000You think Klaus Schwab rushed out that book, COVID 19, The Great Reset, because of the accidental leak?
02:53:42.000No, I think, you know, I think it took him about 24 hours to write because it's not a great book.
02:53:48.000Um, so yeah, I mean, I tend not to believe in big conspiracies.
02:53:53.000I tend to believe that people kind of act in their own self interest, and sometimes when these processes get started, they're you know, it's like a ball rolling downhill.
02:54:01.000Um, you know, so yeah, but but I but but do I think there are a lot of people who we ideally would hold accountable for this and we have not?
02:54:12.000Yes, you know, is it ever going to happen?
02:54:14.000No, yeah, that's kind of my read on it.
02:54:29.000I mean, you can see Fauci, as soon as he locked in on this in late January 2020, he was immediately concerned about the idea that this had come out of this lab.
02:54:40.000And he certainly knew, you know, Peter Dazak had spoken, or Barrick had spoken, Ralph Barrick, who's the American virologist in the middle of all this, to a group at NIH in 2013.
02:54:54.000You know, two years ago, this is one of these things that I wrote about two years ago, and I thought the story should have gotten, you know, 100 million views, and it didn't.
02:55:17.000And they spent the next, you know, seven years talking about how dangerous all this stuff was and how they needed to do gain of function research and they needed to go into every, you know, Cave in China and swab every bat's asshole to find the most dangerous possible virus.0.96
02:55:33.000And then, when they couldn't find one that was dangerous enough, they did all this, you know, they did gain a function to create these chimeric viruses that would be more dangerous.0.99
02:55:41.000Eventually, the Chinese screwed up and one of them leaked.0.99
02:55:44.000And this is all really, you know, at our door.
02:55:47.000It's like if the robots come and destroy the world, it will be Anthropic and OpenAI's fault, even if it's a Chinese robot that does it, because the US is the engine behind all of this sort of technological advancement.0.89
02:56:02.000And then, you know, then the Chinese take it and they mess it up.0.95
02:56:06.000Or they build their own version of it and we lose control of it.1.00
02:56:09.000And that definitely, to my mind, is what happened with COVID.
02:57:25.000So currently there's a court martial case, one of the more egregious cases of COVID retaliation and reprisal, Davis Siance's firm has seen.
02:57:33.000What are your thoughts on the ongoing COVID purge within the U.S. military, and how do you think the administration should be handling this?
02:59:19.000Well, I'm glad I brought it to your attention, and maybe your viewers can look into it as well because it's quite egregious and it's really been a hardship on myself and my family and my husband.
02:59:32.000And I just feel like more awareness needs to be brought to light about the situation.
03:01:46.000They do the billboards where it shows two candies, and one is unwrapped, it's got flies buzzing around it, and the other is wrapped and it's sparkling.0.83
03:01:54.000And they started spending money putting up these billboards saying everybody should wear hijab.0.87
03:01:58.000The mandatory enforcement only comes after a generation when everyone's already doing it and then they can start beating you.0.68
03:02:04.000So, an example is I'll ask you this question.
03:02:09.000If your wife grabbed a 40 and started walking around New York City drinking it, would you stop her from doing that?
03:02:18.000Like, if you were walking with your wife and she pulled out a King Cobra and cracked it and started drinking it in public, would you tell her to stop?
03:02:29.000When the public drinking law was passed, the city councilman who passed it said, Let it be said, no one will ever construe this law to mean that a worker can't enjoy a beer when they're having lunch at work.
03:02:41.000The purpose of the law is explicitly to stop drunkards ravaging about the city.
03:02:47.000Well, after a generation, that was erased.
03:02:50.000All that it was is you just can't drink in public.
03:02:52.000So, what used to be, you could drink a beer in public so long as you weren't disorderly, now you literally can't just drink for no reason.0.75
03:02:59.000So, to the argument of the hijab thing, you say, I don't think it's going to happen.0.91
03:03:42.000It's all part of the protest of the West.0.97
03:03:44.000And so what happens is as you get an expansion of Islam, you're going to have natural hijab.0.79
03:03:48.000Then you're going to have the cultural encouragement and the social fitting in.
03:03:52.000Once it is relatively commonplace, they're not like within the next 20 years, you're not going to see cops ticketing people for hijab.0.73
03:03:59.000But maybe in the next 40 years, if the trends continue the way they are, you will absolutely get to the point where they will have, oh, it's a petty offense to not wear hijab.0.55
03:04:06.000And then in 100 years, you're getting lashes.0.53
03:04:09.000But again, it's 100 years since they banned public drinking.
03:04:13.000It's been like, what, 50 years since they banned drinking and driving?
03:04:16.000Yeah, I was just mentioning, have you seen the video of the guy who's pissed when he realized he can't drive home with a beer anymore?
03:04:48.000With the hijab situation, I normally take the route of rather than trying to create more laws to ban a potential outcome, you just ridicule it culturally.1.00
03:04:57.000As ridiculous as it is, and then create a stigma culturally to prevent it from ever coming to you.1.00
03:05:01.000You are correct, and they're doing the inverse.0.57
03:05:03.000Well, that's why I'm doing the inverse of the inverse.0.81
03:05:06.000The goal that they have is to make it National Hijab Day, for instance.0.92
03:08:57.000I think there's an inevitability to whether it be civil war or some kind of conflict because you can't have like certain cultures are diametrically opposed to each other to the point of violence.0.95
03:09:07.000So, like, if you saw a guy beating his wife with a stick who was in a niqab, you'd stop him, right?0.97
03:09:13.000Well, the Sharia police would beat the shit out of you and arrest you for it because men are allowed to beat their women under Sharia.0.99
03:09:19.000So, if you went to a Muslim Culture and then insulted the prophet, you don't have free speech.1.00
03:09:24.000They will chop your fucking dick off.1.00
03:09:25.000I sort of like rely, I'm like, please, technocracy, protect us.1.00
03:09:29.000Like, I'm like, I think that the spy tech will stop a civil war from occurring.
03:09:33.000Like, Abe Lincoln, they didn't have that's why three months after they pulled up 70,000 troops, they still didn't know there was a conflict because there was no media.