New documents have been released from the Durham Annex, and oh boy, this one s a doozy. It goes on to explain how Hillary Clinton approved of a plan to smear Donald Trump as being supported by the Russians, and it was Obama s intel agencies that were helping.
00:02:43.000New documents have been released, and oh boy, this one's a doozy.
00:02:46.000In the documents released from the Durham Annex, it goes on to explain how Hillary Clinton approved of a plan to smear Donald Trump as being supported by the Russians, and it was Obama's intel agencies that were helping.
00:03:00.000When we put these stories together, what do you get?
00:03:05.000They were going to smear Trump anyway, specifically to cover up the Hillary Clinton email scandal and shift the view of the public towards Trump instead of her because she had broken the law and Comey refused to prosecute her.
00:03:18.000You combine this with the other documents that Tulsi Gabbard released, which show Obama ordered this directly, and things are getting a bit interesting.
00:03:26.000Now, on top of this, we've got the Pelosi story, the Pelosi Act, as it were.
00:03:31.000And Trump was initially mad at Senator Hawley, but Hawley says he talked to Trump, cleared it up, and Trump's actually on board.
00:03:42.000And then on top of that first story, we have a whistleblower.
00:03:45.000Apparently, there was a guy or an intel analyst who was threatened by the higher-ups that he had to sign off on bad intelligence to smear Trump.
00:03:53.000Hence, this looks like a conspiracy against Trump and when he was president, his administration.
00:04:00.000So we're going to talk about that and more.
00:04:02.000But before we get started, my friends, we've got a great sponsor.
00:06:28.000So it's actually fortuitous that we Have you because the Pelosi Act is a big story, and there's discussion about insider trading, how the ultra-wealthy are playing these games, how the politicians are playing this game.
00:06:37.000So it'll be interesting to get your insights on how this whole infrastructure and investing works.
00:07:21.000Hillary Clinton and Obama were in on this scheme to smear Trump as a Russian asset, claiming that Russians hacked it or that Trump was colluding with them or something like that, which didn't just affect the campaign, but went into his presidency, resulting in a multi-year-long investigation that cost tens of millions of dollars.
00:07:40.000Hillary Clinton signed off on a plan hatched by a top campaign advisor to smear then-candidate Trump with false claims of Russian collusion and distract from her own mounting email scandal during the 2016 campaign.
00:07:53.000According to explosive intelligence files declassified Thursday, the 24-page intelligence annex was compiled from memos and emails obtained by the Obama administration in the lead up to Election Day that laid out confidential conversations between leaders of the Democratic National Committee, including then-chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and liberal billionaire George Soros's Open Society Foundations.
00:08:17.000The plot, the brain shout of the Clinton campaign's then foreign policy advisor, Julianne Smith, included, quote, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump and subsequently steering public opinion toward the notion that it needs to equate the Russian leader's political influence campaign with actual hacking of election infrastructure.
00:08:39.000They say Smith would go on to serve as former President Joe Biden's ambassador to NATO.
00:08:44.000Quote, I don't have any comment, she told the Post when they phoned her on Thursday.
00:08:52.000In one document, it says Obama has no intention to darken the final part of his presidency and legacy by the scandal surrounding the main contender for the DP.
00:09:01.000To solve the problem, the president puts pressure on FBI Director James Comey through Attorney General Lynch.
00:09:08.000However, so far, without concrete results.
00:09:11.000That is to say, Obama knew Hillary Clinton was scandal-ridden.
00:09:38.000They go on to say Durham consulted the FBI and CIA, both of which assessed the information was likely authentic, but couldn't corroborate exact copies of the Bernardo emails with open study foundations.
00:09:48.000The CIA also determined that the intelligence was not the product of Russian fabrications.
00:09:53.000Smith was at minimum playing a role in the Clinton campaign's effort to tie Trump to Russia, Durham concluded.
00:10:08.000According to data from the election campaign headquarters of Hillary Clinton, obtained via the U.S. Soros Foundation, on the 26th of July, 2016, Clinton approved a plan of her policy advisor, Juliana Smith, from the TS, NAB, TSS's unknown acronym, to smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion by the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate.
00:10:34.000As envisioned by Smith, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump to the level of the Olympic scandal would divert the constituents' attention from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence.
00:10:47.000In addition, by subsequently steering public opinion towards the notion that it needs to equate Putin's efforts to influence political process in the U.S. via cyberspace to acts against a crucially important infrastructure, it would force the White House to use more confrontational scenarios vis-a-vis Moscow that as a whole suits Clinton's line of conduct.
00:11:07.000A relatively sluggish reaction by the administration to the events surrounding the DNC that led to the resignation of Chairman Deborah Wasserman Schultz provoked exasperation within the PC, possibly political convention, and the entire deep state, which may also be used by Clinton to reinforce her position among the security service agents.
00:11:28.000To simplify, Clinton's campaign wanted to get the bad press off of her and shift the focus to Trump.
00:11:35.000And they knew that making this scandal bigger would force the Obama administration to target Trump with actual law enforcement capabilities.
00:11:43.000And then we got years of Trump being accused of being a traitor to this country, secretly working with the Russians the whole time because Obama didn't want to get his hands dirty, ordering the release of information they knew to be false.
00:11:58.000Holy crap, ladies and gentlemen, the more that comes out, the more shockingly insane we learned this story to be.
00:12:05.000And I guess the question then is for everybody watching: will anybody get arrested?
00:12:11.000No, it's nothing ever changes, gang, over here.
00:12:14.000That's like why it's not shocking is we just keep finding out that we were right in our hunches and our conspiracy theories, and the truth eventually does come out.
00:12:23.000And I guess that's a happening, but nothing changes as a result.
00:12:28.000Do you see this leading to some type of prosecution?
00:13:19.000I went to the White House not that long ago, and the picture that Trump got, his presidential photograph, just looks identical to the mugshot.
00:13:26.000And I'm like, I think he did that on purpose.
00:13:28.000They gave him trace paper and just had him trace over.
00:13:30.000The dramatic lighting and that like raised eyebrow stern.
00:13:35.000He also looks thinner than like he looks thinner in that photo than he has.
00:15:28.000And I don't know where this falls on the timeline, this like news hit, but I'm just reminded of the big mic drop moment in that second presidential debate in 2016 between Trump and Hillary, where he says, maybe someone say tongue-in-cheek, like, you'd be in jail if I were in power, if I were, you know, in office, you would face criminal consequences for your private email servers while Secretary of State.
00:15:56.000And it was like this big, like, oh, like, he really just said that.
00:16:00.000But then he got into office and like, that didn't happen.
00:16:04.000And she didn't get arrested the first time for the same reason that she's not going to get arrested now.
00:16:09.000Now that there's evidence to, for the same reason that there is a little handshake between Trump and the deep state about the Epstein files now.
00:16:18.000So what's the point of all of this declassification and the release if they don't intend to actually go after anybody?
00:16:24.000I mean, just declassify all the other shit so that people stop asking about Epstein, I guess.
00:16:32.000This is a woman who did her dissertation on rules for radicals, and yet there are people at my company who still will refuse to believe that she had any part in this, no matter what you show them.
00:16:43.000They would swear to you that Santa Claus was real before they would possibly believe that Hillary Clinton could do something wrong.
00:16:50.000So I don't think there's anything that's going to come of this.
00:16:54.000Well, I still don't think that the Sega is debunked.
00:16:56.000But look at that video with, who was that?
00:18:15.000They claimed that he was colluding with Russia.
00:18:18.000And the worst person you know and your highly liberal aunt all believe it.
00:18:23.000And they ruined a lot of friendships and a lot of relationships running something that they knew was a lie.
00:18:27.000And like you said, there are plenty of people, even if you're not talking just about what they think about Trump.
00:18:32.000They could not imagine a world where Hillary Clinton was evil, despite the fact that the rest of the world knows that she's pretty evil.
00:18:40.000And I want to just make sure I include this other document.
00:18:43.000This is the 2020 ICA, which says, acting on President Obama's orders, DCIA Brennan directed a full review and publication of raw human intelligence information that had been collected before the election.
00:18:56.000CIA officers said that some of this information had been held on the orders of the DCIA, while other reporting had been judged by experienced CIA officers to have not met long-standing publication standards.
00:19:06.000Some of the latter was unclear or from unknown subsources, but would nonetheless be published after the election over the objections of veteran officers on the orders of DCIA and cited in the ICA to support the claims that Putin aspired to help Trump win.
00:19:22.000It was all one big scam, and it was Obama and Hillary.
00:19:25.000And I'm going to say it again, as I said before, I think likely what was going on is The Clinton Foundation was taking hundreds of millions of dollars.
00:19:33.000I wonder where that money was coming from.
00:19:35.000When Hillary Clinton lost the election, the money stopped coming in.
00:19:38.000So the presumption many people make is that her private server was collect, was the, was the, it was how they communicated for this illicit transfer of funds of U.S. government policy, private bribery, you can call it.
00:19:52.000And then when they said we want to see the server, Hillary Clinton had it destroyed.
00:20:17.000People keep saying that Donald Trump is distracting from Epstein, despite the fact the Obama Obama Russia Gate releases have been coming out well before the Epstein story came to prominence.
00:20:29.000Don't get me wrong, Pam Bondi, the DOJ, they've been screwing this one up royally, and Trump is acting real weird about it.
00:20:36.000But he's not distracting from it because these documents were getting released, and the conversation was happening well before the Epstein stuff happened.
00:22:38.000Like, wouldn't the whole point be that it doesn't come out?
00:22:40.000That she gathers the intel or uses her feminine wiles to blackmail him.
00:22:47.000And then the whole point is to keep it out of the public, not have it leak to the public.
00:22:51.000Yeah, I don't think she's smart enough.
00:22:53.000Well, then that's then Mossad needs to change their hiring practices if that's what they're doing.
00:22:58.000It does kind of show you this Orwellian society that we're living in, though, when you think of people like Saul Alinsky, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and just the lack of general information that people have about who these individuals are and this power apparatus that exists behind the Soros Foundation was involved.
00:23:17.000They were communicating over this stuff, which is weird.
00:23:21.000And everybody who brought up Soros was called a conspiracy theorist.
00:23:25.000I'll tell you guys, you want something interesting?
00:23:27.000When we first booked Mike Benz, who's been calling out USAID and all this stuff for a long time, I got spam blasted by weird liberals telling me that I shouldn't have him on the show.
00:23:48.000It is funny that you mentioned it, too, that you said that Hillary Clinton, she did her dissertation on rules for radicals.
00:23:54.000And what he mentioned was that they started accusing Trump of all of this stuff because it dirties him up so that they can't have accusations thrown back at them, which is right out of the playbook from the book.
00:24:03.000Right, but yeah, that's why I brought it up.
00:24:08.000And it is true also that we live in an age now as the internet becomes more prevalent that it's going to be, it's your parents and your grandparents that have this kind of a higher definition of what a politician might be because they were fed years of propaganda from mainstream media outlets,
00:24:24.000depending on whether they were left or right, whether it was Fox telling you that Democrats were evil or CNN telling you that Republicans were evil and the rest of us who have moved on to greener pastures, getting their information from other places or just have any level of common sense, understand that pretty much all politicians are awful on some level.
00:24:42.000Yeah, it's basically Democrats and Republicans for me is tantamount to Santa Claus and Mr. Bunny at this point.
00:24:49.000Let's jump to this next part of the story.
00:24:51.000We have a post from DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
00:24:54.000New whistleblower reveals how they were threatened by a supervisor to go along with the Obama-directed Russia hoax intelligence assessment, even though they knew it was not credible or accurate.
00:25:08.000Yesterday, we released the whistleblower's firsthand account of what happened in the crafting of the January 2017 ICA.
00:25:15.000Their years-long effort to expose the egregious manipulation and manufacturing of intelligence carried out at the highest levels of government and the intelligence community detailed in our previous releases and how they were repeatedly ignored.
00:25:28.000Thank you to this courageous whistleblower and others who are coming forward now, putting their own well-being on the line to defend our Democratic Republic, ensure the American people know the truth and hold those responsible accountable.
00:25:41.000So we have the whistleblower's explosive story and evidence, Tulsi Gabbard says here.
00:25:55.000Clapper crew threatened whistleblower who refused to sign off on fabricated intel assessment.
00:26:01.000A crony of then-DNI James Clapper threatened to withhold a promotion from a senior intelligence official unless he concurred in the fake intelligence community assessment on Russia's meddling in the 2016 election.
00:26:12.000Notes obtained by the Federalist show.
00:26:14.000The notes made public for the first time today recount a conversation the top analyst in the office of the director of national intelligence had with an unnamed superior who worked closely with then director James Clapper.
00:26:25.000The release of the notes represents the latest cache of documents declassified by the Trump administration official concerning the ICA, this we understand.
00:26:32.000According to a person familiar with the notes, the analyst documented his recollection of the conversation on March 31st, 2023, more than six years after the conversation occurred.
00:26:42.000The delay, the Federalist source explained, occurred because the analyst efforts to share his concerns first, the Inspector General of the IC, and then later with special counsel John Durham and Virginia Senator Mark Warner proved unsuccessful.
00:26:55.000Only later did the analyst receive an inquiry for more information about his claims, leading to the drafting of the summary of his recollections.
00:27:26.000We've been on the story for a few weeks now.
00:27:28.000We've been on the story actually for months.
00:27:30.000If you're talking about the statements made by Cash Patel and further made by Dan Bongino later on.
00:27:36.000I feel like, but with the amount of information that comes out every day, people are going to start kind of judging these things on who actually is punished as opposed to all of the details coming out because you could have all the information in the world.
00:27:47.000If nobody's held accountable, it doesn't really matter.
00:27:51.000Yeah, and there are a lot of people that don't think anything's going to happen, but I'm not convinced nothing's going to happen.
00:27:58.000And I'll put it this way: if something does happen, it just will feel like nothing.
00:28:02.000Like, when we say nothing ever happens or nothing ever changes, Trump did get arrested several times.
00:28:23.000Indeed, but that sounds like a cop-out.
00:28:25.000Maybe, maybe on the state level, like the ones who are attacking ICE agents might actually get arrested.
00:28:30.000But at the federal level, it doesn't feel like.
00:28:33.000And I think when people think of that idea, they're thinking of the Clintons, they're thinking of the Obamas, they're thinking of the Bidens.
00:28:40.000Well, we have a poll up, and the question is: Obama will be charged.
00:28:46.000The options are Obama will be charged, or nothing will happen, and nothing ever happens is at 63%.
00:29:16.000Well, I think there's this underlying hope that the system could change.
00:29:19.000I know deep down inside, I mean, I have this naive hope that the system can change if enough people are made aware.
00:29:25.000Do I think people like Clapper and guys like John Brennan are going to be held accountable?
00:29:30.000No, I think they might be held out there, but I question how accountable they could be held given that they know, I mean, where the bodies have been buried for how many years, you know, going back all the way to the Bush administration and really even before that.
00:29:45.000And so, you know, they have a lot of ammunition on their side as well.
00:29:50.000But the more people become aware of what's going on, then the more people can take an active role in potentially changing the system, right?
00:30:01.000On the broad scale, yes, because I think that the right decision isn't just to disengage from politics altogether, obviously.
00:30:11.000Although I think that Trump's victory and the last six months have actually made people on the right more complacent, and it's made them disengage because they haven't been delivered what they were promised.
00:30:24.000And I think the path forward is actually to just start imagining what this ideological side, if you want to call it that, should look like past the point of Trump.
00:30:35.000I mean, do you care about Hillary Clinton in 2016 accusing Trump of colluding with the Russians?
00:30:42.000No, and I don't think Trump does either, to be honest.
00:30:44.000So, you know, he was talking about getting retribution, and he has the option.
00:30:50.000He has the ability to do that, and he doesn't care to.
00:30:55.000I care more about this information coming out in its entirety to people that don't know it than I do about them actually being prosecuted.
00:31:04.000I would rather see people who have kind of lived under the lie of these people of this being some ridiculous movie of good and evil where one side is good and one side is evil and the side they happen to support just happen to be the good guys.
00:31:17.000I would rather see people who aren't currently awake to the evils of both sides.
00:31:24.000The reason why I ask is because my theory as to why nothing ever changes is because you need only stall a development for a year or two before there's no longer any will behind it.
00:31:37.000So when this stuff first happens, everybody's like, whoa, this is BS.
00:32:15.000So right now, Trump is putting out information asking a bunch of, let's just say, 15 to 20 year olds to care about this fight as they're entering the political arena.
00:32:25.000And people who are older are probably like, dude, this is 10 years ago.
00:32:30.000What's going on right now with jobs and the economy and the interest rates?
00:32:34.000And so that's why it's so hard to get accountability because the criminals are like, we only need to stall for a couple of years and then there will be no political will to go over this.
00:32:42.000And what are the Democrats going to say?
00:32:47.000I mean, I've kind of come to that sentiment with a lot of things recently, not just with this story, but with most things that involve the culture war, which is like, I'm focused on my life, like getting married, starting a family, and all the things that I can control.
00:33:01.000And the rest of it just kind of feels like, look, this is out of my control.
00:33:05.000And putting an extreme amount of focus on it just ends up hurting me.
00:33:09.000And there was a time, perhaps, when phones were new to your pocket and everybody started taking politics very seriously as some type of team sport mentality where it really like resonated with people.
00:33:20.000And now people are like, well, I can't afford a home.
00:33:23.000The interest, you know, everything is impossible.
00:35:47.000I mean, maybe I'm just speaking for myself, and I shouldn't say that I represent this huge swath of people, but I like could not be more disappointed with Trump.
00:35:58.000I mean, it's just cruel joke after cruel joke at this point.
00:36:02.000He's thinking of pardoning Diddy, more money for Ukraine, more money for Israel.
00:36:10.000We're bombing Iran, expanding a new visa program for foreign illegal aliens.
00:36:18.000And it just keeps getting worse and worse.
00:36:20.000And then you add the Epstein scandal on top of all that, and it's just wrapped in a little bow.
00:36:38.000It wouldn't bother me, but it would feel a little self-indulgent and it would feel like a huge distraction from what people really care about.
00:36:46.000But I mean, kind of to your point, I mean, but you know, in terms of people being focused on, you know, what they can control, wouldn't you say that things are a lot better than where they were, say, just two years ago under Joe Biden in terms of ability to have, you know, that kind of impact over your own personal domain in terms of your own civil liberties and ability to make choices and engage in the economy and, you know, and have your free speech restored and things of that nature.
00:37:11.000I think you could give Elon Musk more credit for restoring free speech and big tech platforms than Trump.
00:37:21.000I just think the culture has shifted back more to the middle where you're not walking on eggshells over everything you say.
00:37:28.000You know, we're not seeing as many men playing women's sports and kind of this.
00:37:33.000I mean, that's, I just feel like the right is like desperate for something that appears to be a huge W. And it's a lot of people in the deregulation.
00:37:43.000And, you know, with what you said about woke, basically, I don't actually agree that woke is dead, as everyone is saying.
00:37:50.000I think that it actually disguised itself more cleverly and it's just covert woke now.
00:37:55.000And we don't even know that we're woke.
00:37:58.000It's just sort of a software update that everyone went through.
00:38:47.000The powers that be, whether you have the international interest of the corporations, I imagine that they got together and said, guys, this force, this cultural force using racism and stuff didn't work In getting people controlled, let's give baby their bottle, but we are then going to go to the conservative woke route, which is, won't you think about the children?
00:39:32.000It's one thing if you said a naughty word on the internet and got banned from that platform, but you weren't banned from the other platforms.
00:40:21.000We may have won on some cultural grounds where what we describe as woke has been pushed back, but the censorship industrial complex is just trying to find new ways to control what we can think, what we can see, and what we can purchase.
00:40:34.000And now YouTube's going the age verification route with 18 Plus right after they suddenly started pushing shorts heavily, meaning that kids are the ones who spend hours a day glued to their phone looking at this is it's going to destroy most independent creators.
00:40:50.000When they age get your content, your views drop by something like 60, 70%.
00:40:54.000And it's not because the video is being served to children and they're saying, no, you kids, you can't watch this.
00:41:28.000No, I think these are all great points.
00:41:30.000I'm just making the point that our political freedom only goes as far as our economic freedom.
00:41:35.000And so we are still really, you know, early on in Trump's second term.
00:41:40.000And so if home ownership rates start to go up and MA activity has already picked up and IPO activity is starting to uptick and things are on the uptrend, then I would say that that's definitely a move in the right direction from where we are.
00:41:55.000Because if you don't have your economy, you have nothing.
00:42:21.000And I think, you know, he's winning there.
00:42:23.000And I think it's kind of allowed us to take control back on the global stage.
00:42:30.000I think it's too early to say because we have to see if the GOP is really going to follow up the big, beautiful bill with some, you know, with more resistance packages to try to get the debt under control.
00:42:39.000And if that's going to be our starting point or an end point.
00:42:41.000I'm just making the case that I think it's too early into a second term to call it a W or an L yet.
00:42:48.000I think that also has to do with the life cycle of the news, being if you're on the internet a lot and you're just blasted with news every single day.
00:42:56.000Like not as much time has passed as people feel because what is actually six months feels like 10 years sometimes because you're reading nonstop news every day.
00:43:05.000But the tariffs is one of the funniest examples to me of like when you hear about like I support the current thing was like I saw signs in local businesses talking about tariffs and I was like, you just know that the people who read those like they had to look up what a tariff was just to make sure that they were on the right side of whatever the issue was to the people that they're fighting with.
00:43:28.000I want to add to what we were talking about with YouTube.
00:43:30.000Users on YouTube who believe that their AI age verification system is incorrect are supposed to verify their age by uploading a government ID or something.
00:44:24.000The third-party company can then ban you for naughty words.
00:44:29.000And then when you go to the grocery store and you're like, yeah, here's my groceries, they'll be like, yeah, just, you know, scan your credit card right then.
00:44:35.000You'll tap it and it'll say, bam, banned.
00:44:37.000And they'll be like, we use age verification, third-party app, and they're saying that you're a banned user, so we can't verify with them.
00:44:49.000Just consolidated all of the data about American citizens that existed in each individual federal department, which is just yet another disappointment that I've heard.
00:45:01.000So you're saying I got to buy some Palantir stuff.
00:45:03.000First thing I did after that first Palantir story was to buy Palantir stuff.
00:45:08.000I told you, I told you guys this story that Ian busted into my, so when I had the studio in the front of the castle, like when we first, this like five years ago, yeah, it was like five years ago, Ian slams it open like Kramer.
00:45:19.000He's like, dude, you got to invest in Palantir right now.
00:46:24.000So if you go on Spotify and you want to listen to like EZE as he raps about injuring LGBTQ people with pistols in their genitals, which he did, maybe you just need to say, I want to listen to explicit content.
00:46:34.000And they say, okay, you got to prove you are.
00:46:36.000The problem then is they're creating databases.
00:46:38.000But the point I'm making is they're not doing that.
00:46:41.000They're just saying everybody, no matter what, needs to face scan and verify because they want your data.
00:46:46.000These big tech companies are like, oh, no, I guess we have no choice.
00:46:50.000They collect your data and now they can sell it.
00:46:52.000But Tim, there was a vibe shift and Mark Zuckerberg got a haircut.
00:47:07.000We were two votes away from losing our sovereignty.
00:47:10.000I mean, if not for Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin, right, like we would have lost our rights essentially as U.S. citizens because it was just, it would have been endless open borders in terms of having to show a voter ID when you vote.
00:48:40.000AI will assess whether an account belongs to an adult or teen.
00:48:44.000YouTube's going to start relying on AI to determine whether or not an account belongs to a teen or an adult and take action as a result.
00:48:50.000In a recent blog post, YouTube announced machine learning would interpret a variety of signals that help us to determine whether a user is over or under 18.
00:48:58.000My advice to 17-year-olds is just watch as much news as you can in between whatever it is you actually want to watch.
00:49:03.000If the A believes the account is being operated by a teen, it will automatically apply age-appropriate protections.
00:49:09.000Disabling personalized advertising, turning on digital well-being tools.
00:49:32.000They will, if they suspect a user is underage, restrict, make restrictions like disabling personalized ads and activating digital well-being tools.
00:50:41.000But, you know, aside from the weird narrative of Atlanta, it is rare that someone at a store would take your ID and copy it and put it in a binder that they're going to keep forever and say, we might lose it, but that's your problem.
00:50:51.000They do have the 16-plus requirements to go to the movies out by us out here.
00:50:56.000Like after a certain time, you have to be over a certain age to get it.
00:50:58.000That's probably because the kids are throwing popcorn.
00:51:05.000Yeah, I tried to see which digital well-being tools they have.
00:51:09.000They have reminders to take a break and bedtime reminders.
00:51:13.000Instagram's had that for like a while.
00:51:16.000Like you have to activate it yourself.
00:51:19.000And also, if we're talking about Instagram and Meta, they have been proven time and time again to purposefully target underage accounts with more sexual content than the rest of their user base.
00:51:32.000I think it was the Wall Street Journal that has released multiple reports about that.
00:51:38.000If you're an account on Instagram that is 13 years old, identified as 13 years old, you're immediately going to be fed more sexually suggestive content, usually pages that funnel into OnlyFans accounts.
00:51:52.000Yeah, I think the ID thing's a Trojan horse as we're seeing it applied now, the age verification verification thing.
00:51:59.000Again, they tried to go the woke route of don't be racist.
00:53:33.000Like I got my passport and I'm like, so on one hand, I'm happy because I didn't have to like file for like an extension and like an expedited passport.
00:53:43.000On the other hand, they looked at this document and were like, yep, that's fine.
00:53:47.000Rubber stamped it and sent it through.
00:54:16.000And I think the play is get conservatives on board with it by saying it's for the kids and then create this ID database where everybody's going online has to submit their ID.
00:56:02.000But like people say, oh man, the Babylon B, you know, I bet Twitter regrets making that ban because Elon wanted to buy this well before Babylon B. So the whole Milton Friedman, you know, or I can, that was all an act, getting, you know, paying people a million dollars to read the Constitution and all that stuff.
00:56:27.000I'm just saying that data is valuable.
00:56:30.000He wants to train his AI and he wants confirmed data.
00:56:34.000So what I imagine he's doing with X, the reason for verification is that he doesn't want unverified profiles feeding the X machine.
00:56:40.000So X AI is being trained on data and he's making sure that only people that they have verified as real humans with IDs are having their data fed into the training model.
00:57:02.000Every tweet that has high interaction, if you look at the replies, it's just more engagement bait in the replies, completely unrelated to the posts that you're looking at.
00:57:11.000There's no actual discourse happening.
00:57:23.000If you even look at a TikTok and then you send it to your friend who's sitting next to you on the couch and they open the same link and look at the comments, you guys are going to see totally different top-liked comments based on what the algorithm assumes you'll agree with and will interact with.
01:00:04.000But the whole point was like, I worked eight hours a day and then spent the rest of the time skating.
01:00:08.000But that's pretty, pretty rare these days because most people, if they're in that community, they're going to want to go and, if they're dedicated to doing it like all the time, they're going to go live with people.
01:00:24.000At that time, I mean, during COVID, it was interesting because when you go on later in life, like, how is that still desirable to those people?
01:00:38.000It's like if there was an activity that you really, really loved, you know, more so even than somebody, say, who plays an instrument, who can make time for that anytime, right?
01:00:47.000Like you go to work, you come home, you can do that.
01:00:49.000Skating is a little bit different for a lot of people.
01:00:52.000It takes up a lot more of your time because you literally travel to go do it all the time.
01:00:56.000And they're willing to sacrifice a normal life to go out and do that.
01:01:00.000Let's jump to this next story from the Daily Mail.
01:01:03.000Elon Musk makes bold play for an unlikely marriage with $3 trillion icon.
01:01:10.000Elon Musk has been openly hinting at a historic merger in the business world, suggesting that his company, XAI, should partner with Apple.
01:01:18.000Musk's company is the corporate face of his popular AI chatbot, Grok, which functions similarly to competitors like GPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot.
01:01:26.000Meanwhile, Apple has struggled to bring its own AI programs to consumers, notably delaying improvements to the Siri voice assistant.
01:01:33.000Venture capitalists started openly speculating this month that Musk and Apple make the perfect power couple in the AI world with XAI bringing Grok to even more people using iPhones through this proposed partnership.
01:01:43.000On the all-in podcast, investor Gavin Baker called XAI's Grokfor the best product in terms of ad chatbots right now, but added the best product doesn't always win in technology.
01:01:54.000I think there's a solid industrial logic for a partnership.
01:01:57.000You could have Apple, Grok, Safe, Grok, whatever you want to call it, said Baker.
01:02:01.000Musk quickly replied to the comment saying, interesting idea.
01:02:09.000Because when you pull up Nancy Pelosi's stock trades in May, she put $25 to $50 million in Apple, indicating Apple would be doing something.
01:02:52.000It's a sticky product, and it could just be that the stock is oversold.
01:02:55.000And I'm not saying that this is the case.
01:02:57.000I'm just playing devil's advocate there and saying that there are people who are Apple users like myself who will always be Apple users because it's the Apple universe that you really buy into.
01:03:14.000Perhaps some intelligence came across her desk where there is murmurings of a potential merger between, say, X or a partnership that would require some congressional oversight or something like this.
01:06:40.000But the reality is, and I don't know anything about this new bill that got passed, but unless that they can prove that they had insider information, it's just been pretty much sand and operating procedure for insider politicians who have all their ancillary knowledge as to what's going on with these companies to then add them to their portfolios.
01:06:58.000And that's why so many of them are so wealthy.
01:11:25.000Our culture is fractured a million ways.
01:11:28.000And you've got these sociopaths like Pelosi who won't just get out and leave.
01:11:35.000And then, with all due respect to the boomers, it's not all boomers, I get it, but boomers hold a disproportionate amount of wealth and they won't give it away.
01:12:00.000It was always weird to me when people would say, like, people will understand, people will fall in love with free markets once it gets bad enough.
01:13:44.000We're expected to live, but we can't own property anywhere.
01:13:48.000We've got foreign landlords and we've got an older generation that is living too long and they've got multiple homes and they use them when they see fit.
01:13:57.000You are going to get, it starts with the DSA, but the problem with the DSA is that they're woke and ineffective.
01:14:05.000Everybody saw that convention they had where they were like, point of personal privilege, my pronouns are actually, stop.
01:14:59.000It's a left-wing approach to things is to take somebody else's property and redistribute it.
01:15:04.000It's just authoritarian, authoritarian.
01:15:06.000Depending on the cultural slant of the individuals as they do it, if they're like white Christian, you know, traditionalists who are like, we're going to restore the American dream and the white picket fence, but we're going to need corrective measures, then we would call that right.
01:15:20.000But you're not allowing free markets to distribute those resources.
01:15:23.000You are relying on force or the government or some other means to redistribute those resources.
01:15:49.000The political scale is just like the fascists, the Nazis are ultra, they're authoritarian traditionalists, and the communists were authoritarian progressives.
01:15:58.000So it doesn't matter what strain of authoritarianism you get.
01:16:00.000Some might say, well, that's still left.
01:16:15.000Whether it's left or right is immaterial.
01:16:16.000I think young people, when the Gen Z today, there's no way a bunch of people in their 30s are going to be like, I am content with living five people in a single unit apartment in New York as the older generation sold us out to illegal immigrants.
01:16:30.000They're going to be like, nah, the power is ours now.
01:16:33.000We inherited this country and we're going to take what we want.
01:16:37.000It doesn't mean that they're going to seize and redistribute like commies.
01:16:39.000I wouldn't be surprised, however, if they say, we're going to take your homes and then put them on a market at a rate per square foot or something like that.
01:16:47.000Could it be that productivity just becomes so great as a result of post-labor economics and AI that there's no need for any redistribution?
01:16:55.000That's just productivity is so high that it automatically creates a system where people just aren't working because they lose the right to labor anyway because AI is so productive.
01:17:10.000You can, I mean, if the entirety of government went AI and regulation was just handled by machines, theoretically, it could be awesome because you don't got to worry about committees, meetings, fines, personal beefs.
01:17:22.000Unfortunately, in the short term, that's not going to happen.
01:17:24.000And so the issue I'm facing right now is I ask this question all the time, why is it so hard to get any job done?
01:17:31.000And we've assessed this over and over again.
01:18:28.000And I'm like, I'm sitting here wondering why we reach out to so many contractors, we reach out to so many people, and they all just say, we don't need it.
01:18:36.000And I'm like, well, is there no workers?
01:18:39.000Well, that supports my point, though, because a homeless person today has a higher standard of living than, say, the Pharaoh of Egypt.
01:18:46.000People are so spoiled, kind of what you were saying before.
01:18:50.000And so if a smaller percentage of the labor force has an exponentially higher level of productivity, there is this potential – I don't know about in the short term but in the intermediate term where we're living in this era of UBI and post-labor economics where the basic bare means of subsistence are provided for people.
01:19:08.000Then anything beyond that is just the – You're going to be eating mashed bug paste in a pod because they're not going to give you luxury.
01:19:18.000So I was hanging out and we were at this club where they have a fake beach at a lake.
01:19:23.000And I'm frustrated because we can't get people to do jobs.
01:19:27.000It's months out, it's weeks out, and they want insane amounts of money.
01:19:31.000And I'm watching all these, I see all these guys, young men, 20-year-old guys, and they're just sitting there on the beach not working.
01:19:37.000And I'm thinking to myself, we've offered double rate.
01:19:41.000We've said, like, we'll pay you extra.
01:20:28.000So you're not going to sell anything to anybody.
01:20:30.000And as the market begins to shrink, we're going to get, I guess we're going to get deflationary pressures and we're going to get a strain on the economy where I'll put it like this.
01:20:41.000Any ecosystem that reaches equilibrium with its principal organisms and its food supply, the organisms starve to, are half starving and suffering and covered in sores and lesions because they're getting just the bare minimum of required energy to survive because it's equilibrium.
01:21:02.000We need to constantly be slightly below.
01:21:05.000We need an excess of resources so that we're not constantly strained and starving.
01:21:10.000But with a shrinking population size, labor is going to decrease.
01:21:14.000And that means there's going to be a massive older population that doesn't want to work that has no choice but to work now.
01:21:18.000And it's going to get real bad because nobody wants to and young people don't have to.
01:21:22.000So I've talked about this in terms of the social security problem.
01:21:26.000Right now, I believe it's 2.8 workers pay for one social security recipient.
01:22:10.000You're going to give it to the older people who already own their generation owns the properties.
01:22:14.000So something's going to break because so it's either going to be before this happens, the government intervenes and seizes properties from people and we go communist or something, or Gen Z goes right wing and seizes properties from people to force the social transition of wealth.
01:22:33.000What about starting with seizing properties from corporations, well, China and also corporations?
01:22:40.000The argument is that these corporations, many of them are actually publicly traded corporations.
01:22:46.000And so it's actually, once again, the boomers that own the corporate securities in those holding companies.
01:24:39.000They're rather primitive, but there's weird advanced technology, gigantic animals and monsters that are made of machines.
01:24:46.000For those that don't know, it's a decade-old game.
01:24:47.000The story is: Earth was wiped out by AI bots that were consuming biomass until they destroyed the planet and turned to a barren rock.
01:24:54.000The solution launched by scientists was to build a bunch of underground terraforming bases so that after the biomass was completely consumed and the AI bots were destroyed because they had no energy, they would rebuild society with, you know, I guess incubation pods that would recreate humans.
01:25:11.000Something went wrong, humans are tribal.
01:25:13.000Tencent launched effectively a clone of the game with robot animals.
01:26:02.000The question is: can I make you look at me longer?
01:26:06.000And then your view of the world will be based upon those who have the ability to hold your attention the most, which creates really weird things like ElsaGate.
01:26:16.000I'm looking at this lawsuit and I'm thinking to myself, I mean, what's what was copied?
01:26:42.000Because he owns the idea of a certain kind of food.
01:26:46.000And when you go to your chicken store and there's robots making your food in kiosks where you order it, and you scan your palm or your retina to pay, and it's based on your government account, no one's working there.
01:27:18.000The future is going to be, quite literally, people on UBI, if that, and the people of imagination who are smart enough to conceptualize things.
01:27:28.000That seems to, that's one possibility of where we're going.
01:28:17.000As soon as this AI is powerful enough, I am remaking Revenge of the Sith so that when Anakin walks in and Mace Windu has the saber to the Chancellor and he goes, Don't let him kill me.
01:28:30.000And then Mace is like, He controls the courts, you know.
01:28:32.000And then what I'm going to change with the AI is that Mace is going to go, Anakin, you're right.
01:28:39.000Call more Jedi in and we'll have him tried.
01:28:42.000And then they come in and they arrest him, and Anakin never becomes Darth Vader, and that's the end of it because Mace Window just didn't have to be a dick.
01:28:46.000And the rest of the movies don't even need to happen.
01:28:49.000The funny thing about that is episode one, I mean, should have never happened, right?
01:28:53.000Episode two should have been episode one.
01:28:54.000Yeah, The Clone Wars should have been episode two.
01:28:58.000Amazon is dumping a bunch of money into AI, into AI-based streaming services, which is funny because they're closing up freevie, which is their free streaming platform.
01:29:08.000I'm guessing they're probably going to end up using the existing infrastructure from Freevy to build out whatever that ends up being afterwards because they're moving all the stuff that's on Freevy over to just Amazon proper.
01:29:19.000So they'll probably use the infrastructure from the free, like what is now the freevy app for that AI program once it comes out.
01:29:26.000Dude, that's going to be down the line.
01:30:18.000We played some of these shows, and they're just not good in any way.
01:30:22.000Well, the idea is like the next generation of iPod baby of iPad babies are going to be the ones who are going to go into the Showrunner app and just make their own shows without even really thinking about it.
01:31:34.000Because what if a person between the age of 35 and 45 is completely different than who they were from 20 to 25, and yet they're stuck with that being typecast based on who they were while they were in college and they were part of some bohemian frat or something.
01:31:50.000What if your boss is this lecherous movie producer who says, you know, if you want to move up in this company, you got to give me a little sugar.
01:31:58.000And then the woman goes, I'm not doing anything.
01:32:01.000I'm going to have to turn your score down.
01:32:04.000And then what if the inverse, your boss is some like purple haired feminist.
01:32:08.000And then you're like, I, you know, I'm here to do my job.
01:32:29.000Can you explain to us why it's so low?
01:32:31.000And you say, you know, to be honest, it's unfortunate, but sometimes it happens.
01:32:35.000I don't think my boss and I got along.
01:32:36.000And so I tried to leave amicably and they go, right, right.
01:32:41.000Well, look, I have another applicant with a seven 83 and I don't think you're really selling yourself and I'm not interested in taking the risk on a six 15, but I appreciate you coming in.
01:33:10.000I agree, but I don't know if they understand where, where it leads to.
01:33:13.000No, what I mean is there's going to be a regional manager at a, at a, like a fran, as a McDonald's franchise corporation that owns 50 locations.
01:33:21.000And the boss is going to be like, what's our turnover rate?
01:33:25.000And they're going to be like, it's high.
01:33:42.000Starting now require all employees to have it so we can track their scores and it's going to make it easier and safer and give us recourse for termination without HR, uh, lawsuits or I'm sorry, like civil, like workplace lawsuits.
01:33:54.000And then you're going to, you're going to be 18 or 17 or 16, whatever.
01:33:58.000You're going to say, I want to apply for a job.
01:34:00.000And they say, we require all employees to use gauge.
01:34:03.000here's the best part they're going to post your schedule on gauge and say this is where you get information on your schedule make sure you check it every day because it can change then your boss is going to send you a message on gauge and you're expected to answer and they're going to say i need you to come in on sunday i know you have off but we're we're it's it's it's a rush day and so we're asking you to come in and no longer can you say i didn't have my phone on me this is the future millennials want too because gen z is all about work-life balance and millennials are the ones that are answering their slack messages at 10 p.m i'm anti-background check
01:34:51.000Gage could be a two-sided platform where employers can rate their – their employees can rate their employers.
01:34:57.000You know, I think the issue is the direction.
01:35:02.000If you have a company with 50 employees and you get a bad score, something is going on at that company for all of these people to be mad at you.
01:35:10.000And maybe it's not necessarily your fault.
01:35:13.000But if you're an employer, one person who is bad, you can destroy 50 people's lives by giving them bad scores so they can never work again.
01:35:20.000Not to mention it is creepy for a boss to be like your score went down five points because you refused to mop the bathrooms.
01:35:31.000I just – I think this is a creepy thing to do.
01:35:33.000Stars being like I worked at this company.
01:35:39.000This is a literal social credit score from zero to 1,000 that follows you everywhere you go no matter what.
01:35:44.000If I own a company and the employees give it a bad score and it fails, I just shut the company down and open a new company.
01:35:51.000If you have one account on this app and you can't have two accounts and it's going to follow you everywhere you go.
01:35:56.000And so if you get one boss that hates you or like let's just go the feminist route.
01:36:01.000You get one boss that hits on you and then you're like I'm not interested and he gets really angry and just says fuck you and then he nukes your score.
01:36:09.000Well, I don't think that something like this would reach mass adoption because employers will know that there is room – plenty of room for situations like that in human error.
01:36:18.000I think – They wouldn't just assume that the score is objective just because it was provided by someone's previous employer.
01:36:26.000You at a corporation, a regional manager, a mid-level manager are confronted with 10 applicants for three available positions and you've got 800, 800, 800, 800, 400, 400, 400.
01:36:42.000You're not going to go – you're going to throw the 400 in the garbage.
01:36:46.000No, I have to disagree because I will want to actually speak to the 400s to understand why they're 400s and I would – I've learned through trial and error that I think I would throw the 800s maybe in the garbage before I throw the 400s in the garbage.
01:36:59.000I want to know why – I think that makes no sense.
01:37:01.000Well, I just think like rate my professor.
01:37:03.000It does seem illogical but sometimes that's how – rate my professor used to be a big thing when I was in college and I always – I started going on there trying to game the system looking for the easiest professors.
01:37:14.000And then I found that I actually got my best grades with the hardest professors.
01:37:18.000So I find that the candidates that have some type of unique story or whatever, that they tend to have more to prove.
01:37:25.000They have more to prove and so it's just – you got to get them at the right place in their career.
01:37:55.000And I've got legal protection when I say we only hired a certain threshold.
01:37:58.000It makes it that I can't be sued when I say no to a bad applicant.
01:38:02.000In fact, I just actually did this in practice not too long ago.
01:38:05.000I can't disclose the specifics, but I will say that I, you know, instead of the perfect candidate, I went with a candidate who really had nothing on paper and looked much more flawed and ended up.
01:38:17.000It's only been about three months, but we'll see.
01:38:20.000And that's entirely true that that will happen.
01:38:22.000The point is, at the macro scale, when companies have to hire 300,000 employees, or they have 5,000 hourly wage employees at a series of chains, they're going to tell their managers, I don't know or care.
01:38:46.000But I feel like this app is an inevitability because we're a small company and I've dealt with stupid government regulation and employment complaints.
01:38:55.000But like if you were using something like this, like me or Mary never would have been hired because we didn't have any history and like it's for hourly only anyway.
01:39:45.000They'll take out keywords for algorithms like work late, overtime, double shift.
01:39:54.000They'll make it one size one font and white, and they'll put it at the very bottom of the page where the AI can see it.
01:40:03.000So when people submit their resumes, the AI filters are specifically looking for certain keywords and their resume gets jumped to the top, despite the fact that they might already write, I'm hardworking, willing to work overtime, and I really want this job.
01:40:17.000By doubling up the words, the algorithms are weighing them more heavily.
01:40:57.000One of the first bits of advice you get when you're opening a business is anytime anyone calls your company to ask about an employee, you always just be absolutely neutral.
01:41:07.000You say, ah, yes, so-and-so did work here.
01:42:14.000You know, we're going to grab your super chats and Rumble Rant, but that uncensored members only show is coming up at rumble.com/slash Timcast IRL at 10 p.m.
01:42:57.000So I made a video about Australia is banning YouTube for under 16s, and it got almost no views.
01:43:04.000And so I'm like, okay, this is probably one of the most important stories on YouTube for people on YouTube that YouTube will be banned for teenagers, regardless of your opinion on it.
01:43:13.000And for some reason, it's not appearing in recommendations.
01:43:16.000But Tim, Mark Zuckerberg, got a haircut and does jujitsu.
01:44:19.000We used to go there and we were like, it's really cool that we have this local beer.
01:44:24.000And so we would buy like 600 tall boys from them.
01:44:28.000And then something happened where a few months, like we'd go in, we'd order like two months worth of beer and have it stocked in the fridge.
01:44:34.000And then when guests would come, people who drank, people don't really drink that much.
01:47:41.000You know, we live in a plutonomy, right?
01:47:44.000This country is all for and by the wealthy and always has been.
01:47:48.000And there was a report that was put out over a decade ago.
01:47:50.000It's almost 20 years ago now by a Citigroup talking about how the will of the American people has no bearing whatsoever on legislation.
01:47:58.000And there's actually these really great infographics where it's like 80% of the country can want something, but as long as 30% of the wealthy want something, they get it.
01:48:09.000It's like when you watch a show, it's like you watch something involving the U.S. government or like the CIA and somebody says, it's vital to U.S. interests.
01:48:17.000And then you say, what does that actually mean?
01:48:19.000Like, who is the person who decides what U.S. interests actually are?
01:48:23.000So, so what is what is he saying will determine whether or not he's successful?
01:49:14.000And it heats and cools as you sleep, which is good.
01:49:17.000But it's not like the heating and cooling thing isn't perfect, but it does try to adjust the temperature so they don't wake up either too hot or too cold, which is, it does work.
01:49:26.000But when I wake up in the morning, it shows me everything about my sleep.
01:49:29.000It tells me when I was in deep sleep, when I was in REM sleep, when I woke up, it's pretty amazing.
01:49:50.000That like they're going to be like, they're going to share this data and be like, sir, Tim Poole entered deep sleep at 2 a.m., lasted for one hour before entering a period of light REM sleep.
01:51:12.000The funny thing about it is that was before AI.
01:51:14.000That was just a basic algorithm that was like 90% of the time, women pick these things, men pick these things, and so we can make that prediction.
01:51:22.000Now, Facebook, based off of the weirdest of things, knows when you're going to poop.
01:52:37.000Like, I always imagine, like, if I was Google and I wanted government contracts, I would just, and they said, no, I would just shut down Google Maps for a day and then say, okay, let the peasants figure out where they're going.
01:54:30.000So when The Simpsons were coming on at, what was it, like 7 o'clock or 5:30, I'd go up to the TV, I'd pull the little thing forward, the TV would turn on, and I'd sit down.
01:55:24.000You know what's crazy is they still have, with all that, they still have you like go to each individual letter and select it and then go back.
01:56:15.000I think if I did it, I would take the movie Little Big League where King Griffey Jr. robs him of a home run at the end.
01:56:20.000I'd have him actually hit the home run and they'd win.
01:56:23.000You know what I would do is I would have Mace Windu accuse the Chancellor of colluding with the Trade Federation to steal the election and then bog him down with years of investigation so that he couldn't act his agenda.
01:57:04.000If a religious military faction is trying to assassinate the duly elected leader because he's of a different religion, you stop the person trying to kill the other guy.
01:57:14.000The Chancellor didn't go to the Jedi Temple and try to murder anybody.
01:57:17.000He was in his Chancellory quarters or whatever when the Jedi showed up and said, We just found out you have a different religion from us, so we're going to kill you.
02:00:42.000Of course, in their movies, they paint it as noble.
02:00:46.000But like, look how they use Jedi mind tricks, which we consider it to be a good thing to do to like a prey upon the minds of your everyday person because they're weak-willed, so you can get what you want.
02:01:20.000So if, like, I think you could easily remake Star Wars, where you could have, you know, Darth Vader, who's a disabled war veteran, resisting this fanatical religious zealotry that are trying to impose their religious will over a government to the point where they tried.
02:02:14.000So one of the old extended stories was that the Emperor was actually trying to mechanize the galaxy because an external galactic threat was coming.
02:02:21.000And there was a story written about it.
02:06:00.000And Obi-Wan would have been like, because you're dealing in absolutes.
02:06:04.000The problem is you're giving them ideas now because they love to retroactively go back to franchises and ruin it.
02:06:09.000Remember when they made the Jedi are selfless, though, and that's the key component there where the Sith are they rely on their passions and hatred, anger, you know, basically the things that destroy the human psych soul and that's what makes it so it makes them such a such a issue with this idea of the Jedi as like a as a story is that they've created so many characters that are flawed it's clear the Jedi are not selfless in any sense they're power driven no
02:06:39.000No, but if you think of the universe through this dichotomy of love and, you know, hate, fear, let's just say fear and love, right?
02:06:47.000Being the two things that drive the universe.
02:06:48.000And as you can get closer to these things, you can get either, right?
02:06:51.000Like, and the Jedi are as close as possible to love and the Sith are as close as possible to fear.
02:06:57.000And so that's really the, that's the, that's the propaganda though.
02:07:00.000Like if someone came to me and told me that and they, this is what we hear.
02:07:04.000We hear like, you know, Donald Trump, he just hates.
02:07:33.000And there are tons of religious zealots who are selfless who do.
02:07:37.000So I think the Jedi are evil as exemplified by the fact that those, those Jedi that came with Mace Windu to execute the chancellor had no problem showing up knowing they were going to murder the chancellor who was duly elected.
02:10:35.000But from the standpoint of like, what's see, the problem with the left is we live in this Orwellian society.
02:10:41.000And so what you're propagating is not actually the truth, though.
02:10:44.000Like, if you use the example of Elizabeth Warren, you know, they want to overly, you know, they want a police state that's overly regulatory.
02:10:52.000And like companies like mine wouldn't exist because they want to over-regulate and they want you to pay, you know, three, four million dollars to set up a broker dealer, which creates the barrier to the money.
02:11:15.000No, I'm saying Donald Trump, like the system that they're, this, this capitalist, you know, system that goes back to really, you can go take it back to the Puritans and the Pilgrims, setting up the system of liberty of, you know, running away from the monarchy in Europe.
02:11:29.000The Galactic Republic set up this free system under the Constitution.
02:11:32.000The Galactic Republic in episode one was overly regulating the trade federation, forcing, creating a separatist movement because of the way they were handling the marketplace and regulating businesses.
02:11:46.000And it resulted in conflict, which led to the, it was the blockade on the boo.
02:11:53.000So the civil war started because the Galactic Republic was overbearing in their regulations and laws, and they were bureaucratic and unable to move.
02:12:03.000The chancellor said, this is bullshit.
02:12:06.000And through his machinations, he was just a center time.
02:12:09.000He didn't have the power, started to seize control.
02:12:44.000And they've tried to kill him several times.
02:12:47.000So my joke, I'm joking when I say this, is that if you were to apply the politics of Star Wars outside of the battles and the narrative and the backstory of the Sith, the Jedi are Democrats.
02:12:58.000And Padme is going, this is how democracy dies with Thunder Suplus.
02:13:02.000Just like the Democrats claimed Trump's victory was the end of democracy.
02:13:05.000But what I'm saying is that Saul Linsky and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, those are the real Sith that are trying to overthrow.
02:13:11.000They're the ones trying to overthrow the system.
02:15:08.000My point is the Democrats and the Jedi are basically the same thing.
02:15:11.000And that's why I'm jokingly saying all the bad stuff they claimed the Empire did was lies and propaganda, just like we say in reality, when they accuse Trump of being a white supremacist, they literally will call Trump a Sith because they equate that as the evil villain.
02:15:24.000And it's like, oh, okay, so the Emperor wasn't really a bad guy because you're lying about Trump and you've made this up and you've claimed that Trump's victory is the end of democracy, just like Padme did.
02:15:32.000Does that mean that Natalie Portman plays Melania in this version of the movie?
02:15:36.000No, it means she's Elizabeth Warren or Slotkin.
02:15:39.000It means she's definitely not Natalie Portman, then.
02:15:42.000Liberty dying because Trump got elected.
02:15:44.000I was just making the case that it's the system, really.
02:15:48.000The system of the Republic, the system of the Constitution is much more in line with the ideals of the Jedi, even though I understand the argument that you're making, but I am just saying the system that allows all people to have freedom and liberty and choose their path and their religion as opposed to the groupthink mentality of the left.
02:16:07.000The Jedi were the groupthink of the left.
02:16:10.000But the Jedi were the groupthink faction.
02:17:27.000In the first movie, the only thing bad was blowing up Alderan.
02:17:30.000And that one's really easy because you could be like, if the justification for blowing up a military base with the estimate based on the size was something around 3 million private contractors, civilian workers, because we know military bases aren't stocked with just soldiers doing everything.
02:17:45.000So you've got this movie where they blew up a planet.
02:19:02.000If you want to talk about the two religions and how they're juxtaposed to each other, then that is accurate.
02:19:06.000But when you talk about systems, one is advocating a republic, a free market system that is generally peaceful, and the other is advocating for an authoritarian militant system that oppresses all those that are in its path.
02:19:20.000And where the Jedi want to literally uphold peace with lightsabers, which are swords, lasers.
02:20:29.000In Andor, they say a false flag so that they can lock down a planet, steal all its khyber, and blow it up.
02:20:36.000Yeah, Rogue One, then when they were handing off the disc with all the secrets on it, they killed all the people that were trying to get it.