Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - SCOTUS RULING Is THE END Of The US | Timcast IRL

00:02:46.000 Today, the Supreme Court ruled you have no country.

00:02:48.000 They ruled yesterday also you have no country, so it's been nice knowing you.

00:02:52.000 But let me just actually get into the real details.

00:02:54.000 They ruled today birthright citizenship extends to people here unlawfully for any duration.

00:03:02.000 This is pretty dang wild.

00:03:03.000 It's so shocking that the man of few words, Clarence Thomas, wrote, I think it's like a 41,000 word dissent, saying, I got to put it simply.

00:03:14.000 When you read through this, you can see that the Supreme Court justices.

00:03:20.000 Are not ruling on the merits.

00:03:23.000 I can only conclude that something else is going on.

00:03:26.000 And I will explain this by saying that their rulings seem to be at odd with their own opinions that don't make sense.

00:03:33.000 Notably, in yesterday's ruling about mail in votes being counted after Election Day, Barrett argues that incongruous elections were leading us to civil war or a potential for a second civil war in 1872.

00:03:46.000 So deadlines were sought.

00:03:48.000 But oopsie, they didn't define what a day was, therefore, there is no day, ultimately concluding.

00:03:55.000 That ballots can be cast an indefinite period before an election and can be counted an indefinite period after an election, which of course makes no sense because Congress codified a day for the election.

00:04:06.000 By Barrett's argument, there is no language that could be put in law that would satisfy the requirement that a ballot be received and counted on election day because we quite literally already have that law.

00:04:20.000 And as it pertains to birthright citizenship, Alito and Thomas and others argued our enemies.

00:04:27.000 Are sending people to our land so that they can take our land from us.

00:04:33.000 And the arguments that we get from the majority are largely well, you know, the framers of the 14th didn't have any concept of temporary visitors. 0.85

00:04:42.000 Therefore, it doesn't matter what's actually happening today at all.

00:04:46.000 I can only conclude, as many others have already, if you don't have elections, because they can be indefinitely delayed, and anyone who shows up even for 10 minutes, even a Chinese Communist Party member who flies to Guam so his wife can give birth, That kid can be president of the United States.

00:05:06.000 It's a lie.

00:05:07.000 Let me ask you this.

00:05:09.000 Why include a birthright requirement, a natural born requirement for president if anyone on any territory for any amount of time counts?

00:05:25.000 You might as well just say that it's moot.

00:05:27.000 Clearly, the interpretation of the Supreme Court today does not make sense, and I believe it's intentional.

00:05:34.000 I'm going to go ahead and just say those two beautiful words, those two terrifying words.

00:05:38.000 So get ready to drink.

00:05:40.000 The rulings that we have seen thus far from the Supreme Court are just pushing us towards civil war.

00:05:45.000 And I don't mean this lightly, but their rulings are not specific on the merits or the issues.

00:05:52.000 For example, they did not rule today that men cannot compete in women's sports.

00:05:59.000 They ruled states have the right to decide whether they do or don't.

00:06:02.000 What does that mean?

00:06:04.000 It means in blue states, there will be males on women's teams, and on red states, there will not be.

00:06:09.000 So, what happens then when two states send college or high school teams to compete against each other at regionals?

00:06:16.000 You are then going to come into conflict that they have intentionally crafted. 0.71

00:06:21.000 The Supreme Court could have very well said it violates Title IX to allow a male on a women's team, period, for the country.

00:06:28.000 So, when a state champion in, say, Oklahoma goes up against the state champions of Colorado in regionals, there is going to be escalating conflict.

00:06:38.000 It doesn't make sense what they are doing.

00:06:41.000 And now they're going to hear the case on whether or not the American people can own assault weapons.

00:06:46.000 Sure, I think they should, but I know which way they're going to rule. 0.98

00:06:49.000 They're probably going to rule in favor of it.

00:06:50.000 Why?

00:06:51.000 Seemingly everything they've ruled on is just pushing us to hyper polarization.

00:06:56.000 So we'll get into all that.

00:06:57.000 I'm already rambling, but it's big news day, my friends, and there's a lot to break down.

00:07:02.000 So we'll get into that.

00:07:03.000 A couple other stories, of course. 0.95

00:07:04.000 Before we get started, we got a great sponsor for you Backyard Butchers.

00:07:09.000 My friends, did you know that there's only a few.

00:07:12.000 Meat suppliers, the big ones, there's only a couple of them.

00:07:14.000 The largest one in this country is foreign owned.

00:07:17.000 This is a national security issue. 1.00

00:07:18.000 I mean, if you don't know where your food's coming from, if it's tainted, if it's nasty, it's not a conspiracy theory, my friends.

00:07:24.000 It's actually what's going on.

00:07:25.000 Here's what most people don't realize a single pound of conventional grocery store beef can contain DNA from hundreds of different cattle. 0.94

00:07:33.000 Every time I read that, I'm just imagining this gigantic cow monster with like 50 heads just going, kill me. 0.98

00:07:39.000 And you're eating it. 1.00

00:07:40.000 That sounds disgusting.

00:07:42.000 So, what's the solution?

00:07:43.000 I don't know if they'll like that part, but I thought it was funny.

00:07:45.000 As Americans, we have to return to tradition.

00:07:47.000 You got to know who your rancher is.

00:07:48.000 You got to know your land.

00:07:50.000 Know where your meat is coming from.

00:07:52.000 That's why you guys got to check out Backyard Butchers.

00:07:54.000 That's the American tradition.

00:07:56.000 Backyard Butchers offers premium American beef from real Texas ranchers, born, raised, and processed right here in the USA.

00:08:04.000 98% grass fed, 2% grain finished, zero hormones, zero antibiotics, zero preservatives.

00:08:10.000 Go to backyardbutchers.com.

00:08:11.000 Use promo code POOOL for up to 30% off.

00:08:14.000 Two free 10 ounce ribeyes plus free shipping.

00:08:16.000 And this summer, Backyard Butchers is celebrating America's 250th anniversary with a free America 250 box.

00:08:22.000 When you purchase a steakhouse box complete with burgers and hot dogs built for the greatest holiday in the world, American Independence Day, which we're going to have to celebrate a little bit harder this time around because of these Supreme Court rulings.

00:08:36.000 So again, use promo code POOL at backyardbutchers.com for up to 30% off two free 10 ounce ribeyes.

00:08:44.000 I mean, think about it.

00:08:45.000 You can have those nice little cows, they stand there, they're smiling at you.

00:08:48.000 And they got that big old beautiful smell, and those little babies are eating the grass, and you know your meat.

00:08:53.000 Or you can have grocery store mutant monster cattle that is begging for death. 0.98

00:08:57.000 I recommend the real food without all the weird crap in it. 0.96

00:09:00.000 So go to backyardbutchers.com, check it out.

00:09:03.000 Don't forget to also smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know right now.

00:09:07.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Tim Rice.

00:09:12.000 Hey, Tim, how's it going?

00:09:13.000 It's good.

00:09:14.000 Who are you?

00:09:14.000 What do you do?

00:09:15.000 I'm Tim Rice.

00:09:15.000 I am the Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief for the Daily Wire.

00:09:20.000 And I'm excited to be here on probably the slowest and least consequential news day that we'll have this summer.

00:09:26.000 So, you work out of DC.

00:09:28.000 Yeah, that's right.

00:09:29.000 Yeah.

00:09:29.000 Coming all this stuff for the Daily Wire.

00:09:31.000 How long have you guys had an office in?

00:09:33.000 Just over a year.

00:09:34.000 We opened about a year ago.

00:09:36.000 At first, it was just me and a White House correspondent.

00:09:38.000 Well, our DC operation started right after the inauguration.

00:09:43.000 It was me and a White House correspondent working out of a succession of Starbucks and Capitol Hill bars.

00:09:48.000 And then eventually, you know, we.

00:09:50.000 Proved that there was enough there, there, go figure.

00:09:53.000 And so, yeah, we've got an office on Capitol Hill.

00:09:55.000 We've got about 10 reporters and editors in there.

00:09:57.000 Yeah, so we grew pretty fast.

00:09:59.000 It's pretty wild, too.

00:10:00.000 Like, even TMZ opened an office.

00:10:03.000 I like to think, you know, we did it and then TMZ was like, ah, those guys look like they're having fun.

00:10:07.000 So we got to get in on the action.

00:10:08.000 Yeah, yeah.

00:10:09.000 Well, Ron, good to have you.

00:10:10.000 It's going to be a lot of fun.

00:10:10.000 We'll get the boys hanging out.

00:10:11.000 Absolutely.

00:10:12.000 Stolen Cowboy Valor Ian is here.

00:10:14.000 I looted it.

00:10:15.000 I looted it off a corpse of a cowboy, this outfit.

00:10:17.000 And I'm keeping it, Phil.

00:10:19.000 Red Dead Redemption.

00:10:20.000 He gives me a plus two to my mobility and stealth check.

00:10:25.000 It increases your small arms by a factor of five.

00:10:31.000 I have never seen you run, so I'm not buying the mobility.

00:10:33.000 Hello, everybody.

00:10:34.000 My name is Philip Bonti.

00:10:35.000 I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains.

00:10:36.000 What's up, Carter?

00:10:37.000 What's up?

00:10:38.000 It's going to be a dark conversation, but hopefully we can bring some light to it.

00:10:43.000 I just want to add as well that Ian's glasses give him plus one perception, which is huge for him because now his perception is one.

00:10:50.000 It's true.

00:10:50.000 So it's negative.

00:10:51.000 So it was zero before.

00:10:52.000 Yeah, I actually have a chance now.

00:10:54.000 Nice.

00:10:55.000 All right, let's get to the news.

00:10:56.000 We got this from SCOTA's blog Breaking down the birthright citizenship decision.

00:11:01.000 This is big news.

00:11:03.000 The birthright citizenship case dominated headlines this term, it was emblematic of how the court can be predictable.

00:11:08.000 In closely followed cases.

00:11:10.000 Now, I am surprised it went six to three with Kavanaugh kind of being wishy washy on it, which is funny.

00:11:16.000 Alito and Thomas lost their minds.

00:11:20.000 I have never seen these men so angry.

00:11:23.000 Like, Alito is basically saying, Our enemies are sending people here to destroy us.

00:11:30.000 And Thomas, check this out.

00:11:32.000 Authored opinion length by opinion.

00:11:34.000 The Thomas dissent.

00:11:35.000 Oh, I was wrong.

00:11:35.000 I said 41,000.

00:11:37.000 It's 27,000.

00:11:39.000 477 words, making up 48.5% of the document, of the ruling, which is crazy.

00:11:48.000 91 pages.

00:11:49.000 Yep.

00:11:50.000 Yep.

00:11:50.000 Robert's majority was, yeah, 91 pages.

00:11:54.000 Man.

00:11:54.000 Yeah.

00:11:56.000 I think it's the longest page dissent ever, right?

00:12:00.000 Yeah, for that he's ever, ever, ever seen.

00:12:00.000 What?

00:12:02.000 It's one of the longest dissents, period.

00:12:04.000 Yes.

00:12:05.000 When this broke, all of the SCOTUS reporters were like, 91 pages? 0.98

00:12:09.000 Holy crap. 0.97

00:12:11.000 Yeah, this is crazy. 0.99

00:12:13.000 And of course, Gorsuch was defending, I'm sorry, dissenting.

00:12:19.000 For Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, after we have seen with yesterday's ruling on the election, I'm wondering if, like, Roberts, I'm not so surprised on, but did someone like, well, Amy Coney Barrett did get swatted last month.

00:12:33.000 And I'm like, is she being threatened?

00:12:35.000 She's also got two Haitian kids that she adopted.

00:12:37.000 They're Haitians.

00:12:38.000 Because I had heard that, but that, I mean, this is it.

00:12:38.000 Yeah.

00:12:43.000 Our country has been sold out.

00:12:45.000 There have been, there's a million and one arguments as to why, whatever your argument is on what they thought birthright citizenship is, it does not apply today.

00:12:54.000 And I want to stress a few things first.

00:12:57.000 Many people say they could not have predicted planes, trains, automobiles, et cetera.

00:13:02.000 And the response from liberals is yeah, well, they also couldn't predict machine guns.

00:13:06.000 Are we going to ban machine guns?

00:13:08.000 My response is when it comes to birthright citizenship, There is an intent.

00:13:13.000 When it comes to the Second Amendment, there is an intent.

00:13:14.000 What was the intent of the Second Amendment?

00:13:16.000 Well, it allowed privateers.

00:13:18.000 It allowed individuals to have cannons, grapeshot, and warships.

00:13:22.000 So, yes, their intention was that regular people, private citizens, could bear armaments of war comparable to that of governments because it existed at the time and they sought to protect that.

00:13:34.000 Birthright citizenship in the 14th Amendment was specifically pertaining to slaves and excluded Chinese nationals at the time and Native Americans.

00:13:41.000 So, you can actually see those manifest arguments.

00:13:45.000 For them to come out right now and say, nope, anyone born on the soil is American, is that retroactively making all Native Americans now American citizens going back 200 years?

00:13:56.000 We know they're lying.

00:13:57.000 The question is, why are they lying?

00:13:59.000 Now, I would be remiss if I didn't give a shout out to Trump, who posted on Truth Social.

00:14:03.000 I would like to congratulate President Xi and the great country of China on their massive birthright citizenship win, President Donald J. Trump.

00:14:11.000 It's worth noting that the author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, his name is Senator Jacob Howard.

00:14:18.000 He specifically said this will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person.

00:14:31.000 Clearly, it says aliens.

00:14:33.000 Clearly, it says foreigners. 0.84

00:14:34.000 If you're here illegally and you have a child, you are a foreigner. 0.99

00:14:39.000 You are an alien. 1.00

00:14:40.000 Read it again. 0.99

00:14:42.000 The intent is obvious.

00:14:43.000 Read it again.

00:14:44.000 Read it again.

00:14:44.000 This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the United States government, but will include every other class of person.

00:14:55.000 And you know what's funny about that quote?

00:14:57.000 That would include Native Americans.

00:14:57.000 What?

00:14:59.000 Yeah, and Native Americans did not have. 1.00

00:15:01.000 Exactly. 0.98

00:15:01.000 Which shows that the intention at the time. 0.98

00:15:04.000 Did not apply to literally all other classes of person.

00:15:09.000 So Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Roberts are lying. 0.99

00:15:14.000 They are not stupid. 0.90

00:15:15.000 The other big tell in that quote, or I think that quote has the other big tell about this whole thing, which is that, to my knowledge, although maybe we'll see that next, no one is arguing that diplomats' kids who are born here, like that's everyone's sort of, oh, you know, and that's you bring that up. 0.89

00:15:29.000 No, of course.

00:15:29.000 Well, of course not.

00:15:30.000 You know, a diplomat who lives there, they're just here temporarily. 1.00

00:15:33.000 They're foreigners.

00:15:33.000 It's like, oh, interesting.

00:15:34.000 They're, Foreigners who live here temporarily, so of course their kids shouldn't get birthright citizenship. 0.96

00:15:40.000 And it's like, that is what's the difference between the kid of a diplomat who's born here when their parents are here for five years and an illegal immigrant who's supposed to be here temporarily for five years and just overstays the world. 0.99

00:15:51.000 Or someone that flew to Guam from China.

00:15:54.000 This ruling now does guarantee the rights of diplomats.

00:15:59.000 Does it really?

00:15:59.000 I mean, like, it does, but like, is anyone saying that yet?

00:16:02.000 Is anyone arguing that?

00:16:05.000 It is.

00:16:05.000 Hold up.

00:16:05.000 So a Chinese diplomat.

00:16:07.000 Has a kid in the U.S., they're a citizen.

00:16:09.000 They are now, yeah.

00:16:10.000 Well, but before, not a citizen. 0.90

00:16:12.000 But a Chinese person illegally comes here and has a kid is a citizen. 1.00

00:16:15.000 Correct. 1.00

00:16:16.000 That is total inversion.

00:16:17.000 It was basically, and it was, I mean, I guess, like, I don't know if anyone would say this outright, but it was essentially we were trusting the other governments, right?

00:16:23.000 Like, because implicit in that is a trust that diplomats are here for a period for which they are accredited.

00:16:30.000 And after that, they will be recalled by their government, right?

00:16:33.000 By their home country, or we would expel them.

00:16:35.000 And that, again, is something that we're clearly very comfortable with.

00:16:39.000 If a diplomat was going to overstay their welcome, we'd get on the phone to, You know, the Chinese embassy or the Russian embassy or British embassy, and say, Hey, you know, this guy's done.

00:16:48.000 You know, his terms up, get him out of there.

00:16:49.000 And we trust that other countries would lift him out. 1.00

00:16:52.000 That's obviously not something that we can trust with the illegal immigrants. 1.00

00:16:55.000 And so, again, it's like these are degrees in difference, not in kind. 1.00

00:16:58.000 And everyone's just sort of pretending that they're somehow immutable differences.

00:17:02.000 This is the most insane, dude.

00:17:03.000 This is totally insane.

00:17:04.000 If a diplomat's kid is not a citizen, if they're born in U.S. soil, why would you make an illegal immigrant's kid a citizen?

00:17:13.000 That is so crazy. 0.56

00:17:14.000 That is so.

00:17:15.000 It's a barbaric interpretation of the situation.

00:17:20.000 They did it because they were afraid of overruling precedent.

00:17:24.000 And I think Amy Comey Barrett specifically did it because she looks at her kids and she's like, you know, I wouldn't want to have to send my kids back or what have you.

00:17:33.000 It's just because they don't want to rock the boat.

00:17:36.000 So, to clarify, this is a narrow ruling.

00:17:37.000 It doesn't relate to the interpretation of diplomats, but this question now must come up based on their opinion.

00:17:43.000 Specifically, they ruled that children born to unlawful or temporary individuals.

00:17:48.000 Are subject to our jurisdiction.

00:17:50.000 However, that being said, actually, I got to stop.

00:17:54.000 No, this literally does make the children of diplomats.

00:17:57.000 So, what does it mean to be temporarily present?

00:17:59.000 Diplomats are temporarily present.

00:18:01.000 Their children are subject to our jurisdiction.

00:18:04.000 Therefore, diplomats' children are citizens of the United States.

00:18:07.000 It's just so confusing, too.

00:18:09.000 And, you know, I'm no legal scholar, but apparently, maybe neither are some folks on the Supreme Court.

00:18:13.000 But anyone who's in the United States, unless you have diplomatic immunity, is subject to the jurisdiction thereof in a narrow sense, right?

00:18:20.000 If you're a If you're here, even diplomatic immunity, if you were to murder someone, you're either going to go back to your home country to be tried, or they're going to say, Yeah, go ahead and try it.

00:18:30.000 Even think about it in a less grandiose way.

00:18:32.000 Like, if some of the soccer hooligans who have been over for the World Cup, if they beat someone to death in a bar after, right, we're going to throw them in jail.

00:18:41.000 Or to your point, we're going to send them back to the United Kingdom to face extradition.

00:18:45.000 But in that sense, right, subject to the jurisdiction thereof means you don't get to break our laws because you're not a citizen. 0.77

00:18:52.000 It means that we're going to throw you in jail and then send you back to your country.

00:18:55.000 So, again, subject to the jurisdiction thereof, which is this kind of vague phrase that's now hanging over us even more than it has for the past hundred years, it's like that can mean.

00:19:05.000 So many different things, and they sort of contradict each other, right?

00:19:08.000 Like, there's a way to read that as keeping America safe, keeping meddlesome, you know, foreign criminals out of the country, right? 0.84

00:19:16.000 They're subject to our jurisdiction. 1.00

00:19:17.000 We're going to get them out of here. 1.00

00:19:18.000 But now it's being read as they just get citizenship. 0.99

00:19:22.000 Yeah, which is ridiculous.

00:19:23.000 But I mean, the situation we're in now is, you know, it's not any different than the situation we were in, you know, two days ago.

00:19:32.000 There's no significant difference.

00:19:34.000 Obviously, it's going to be a hard fight to fix this problem.

00:19:39.000 But look what happened with Roe.

00:19:41.000 It took a long time.

00:19:42.000 I understand there are a lot of doomers out there that are like, no, we're done, we're done.

00:19:46.000 There are still methods that the administration has.

00:19:51.000 The administration has been doing, they're leading all administrations before on deportations.

00:19:56.000 I know there are people out there that want more.

00:19:58.000 I would like more as well.

00:20:00.000 But they're still doing a lot of work.

00:20:02.000 And I know for sure that the president and the administration is looking to do things to stop this.

00:20:08.000 We've had net zero migration.

00:20:11.000 We actually had our population go down in the past year.

00:20:14.000 First time in, I don't know, probably 50 years, probably since the 60s.

00:20:20.000 So I don't know 100% what's going to happen, but I know that there are still things out there.

00:20:25.000 There's still things that the government can do.

00:20:28.000 I mean, we could get Congress to pass something, possibly.

00:20:31.000 I understand that people are.

00:20:32.000 No, that's not possible.

00:20:35.000 I understand.

00:20:36.000 So it is theoretically possible that Congress could do something about it.

00:20:41.000 Well, whether it'll happen in practice, I understand.

00:20:43.000 But no, it's not.

00:20:44.000 The majority ruled that the Constitution bars this.

00:20:47.000 It is a constitutional guarantee under its own wording.

00:20:50.000 Congress would, you have to amend the Constitution to change it.

00:20:53.000 Well, you wouldn't, no, yeah, to do, to say that no, you're not, but Congress can do things to limit how many people come into the country and stuff like that.

00:21:00.000 There's still legislative methods to.

00:21:02.000 Congress can pass laws pertaining to immigration. 0.99

00:21:05.000 As to the question of whether or not illegal immigrants, a Guatemalan woman can, you know, American Ninja Warrior over the Rio Grande, give birth on the spot and their kid's a citizen, done de facto and no law can change it. 0.96

00:21:16.000 I have to say, hold on, hold on. 0.91

00:21:18.000 Even that, hold on, even that, like Roe was decided and they overturned it.

00:21:22.000 So it's not the total.

00:21:24.000 It has to be overturned or the Constitution must be amended.

00:21:27.000 Yeah.

00:21:27.000 But it could be overturned.

00:21:29.000 It's not going to happen.

00:21:30.000 Everybody said Roe wasn't going to be overturned.

00:21:32.000 No, no, no. 1.00

00:21:32.000 I'm saying, like, okay, sure, maybe in 50 years when the country is 80% foreign born, yeah, maybe they're never going to overturn that. 1.00

00:21:42.000 Again, everyone said Roe was never going to get overturned either. 0.99

00:21:45.000 But again, the 80% foreign born population in 50 years is not going to overturn. 0.89

00:21:51.000 Their access to the country.

00:21:54.000 Look, I'm not saying that it's easy, but it's, and again, this is hypothetical and I'm talking about theoretically.

00:22:01.000 I'm not trying to make any prescriptive or predictions about it.

00:22:05.000 I'm saying that there are still things that are possible.

00:22:07.000 So I understand that this is, you know, this is quote unquote settled law.

00:22:11.000 The Supreme Court does have the final say, but we did think that Roe was going to be the law that we'll have forever.

00:22:18.000 And that was the way the left behaved.

00:22:20.000 The product of this will be. 0.98

00:22:22.000 Like New York is already what, like, what percentage, 40% of New York is foreign? 1.00

00:22:26.000 What's more than that? 1.00

00:22:26.000 Yeah, something like that. 1.00

00:22:27.000 I don't know. 0.72

00:22:28.000 So, in 50 years, the way things are currently trending, when this country is 80% either foreign born or second generation, do you believe those people will vote to overturn what granted them access to this country? 0.90

00:22:42.000 The Supreme Court is who votes to overturn, would be the ones that are actually doing the overturning, not the people that are in there. 0.93

00:22:47.000 You know what I'm saying?

00:22:48.000 For a constitutional amendment, you're saying?

00:22:49.000 I'm not talking about an amendment.

00:22:49.000 Right.

00:22:50.000 I'm talking about overturning what we're hearing.

00:22:52.000 So, do you think the new Supreme Court, which has justices who were literally born in Guatemala on it, is going to rule that they are not welcome here?

00:23:01.000 I don't believe.

00:23:03.000 Pretend to be able to see the future.

00:23:05.000 But again, the point that I'm making is in theory.

00:23:09.000 I'm not trying to predict the future.

00:23:10.000 I just, it's the point is this we are experiencing an irreversible cascade.

00:23:17.000 The people who come to this country and then vote for the right to steal from our coffers are never going to vote.

00:23:24.000 They can't steal from our coffers.

00:23:26.000 Now, Roe v. Wade is very different.

00:23:28.000 Right.

00:23:29.000 That's what I was going to say.

00:23:30.000 And this is obviously not, this is like a half white pill, it's a low dose white pill. 0.52

00:23:35.000 Right.

00:23:35.000 In the same way that the Irish faced the most, you know, immigration quotas in the 19th century, and then they got in and, you know, ascended to politics, and then they started trying to restrict other kinds of immigration.

00:23:46.000 Yeah.

00:23:46.000 Theoretically, a Guatemalan heavy Supreme Court could say whatever the future, you know, maybe it's, maybe it's British immigrants, right?

00:23:53.000 Maybe it's, maybe it's all the Irish nationalists that are getting run out of Ireland.

00:23:57.000 And the reason why I think this is different is that is because of chain migration.

00:24:02.000 And in 50 years, when you have a Supreme Court judge who was born in America illegally.

00:24:09.000 To Guatemalan parents, and his sister is in Guatemala and wants to come live here, and she's about to give birth, he is going to say, Nope, this is long tradition.

00:24:20.000 Come on over, sis, have your kid in this country.

00:24:23.000 And he's going to want to bring his grandparents and his cousins. 0.93

00:24:27.000 They are not going to rule against their pillaging of our nation. 0.57

00:24:29.000 I have good news for you. 0.71

00:24:31.000 If your scenario is actually the likely scenario, there won't be a Supreme Court in 50 years.

00:24:37.000 You're right.

00:24:39.000 I thought the same thing, actually. 1.00

00:24:40.000 That sounds like idiocy. 0.99

00:24:41.000 You know what's really funny? 0.99

00:24:42.000 It's really funny that these rulings came on the birthday, the 250th, because you know what they say historically, right?

00:24:50.000 About empire.

00:24:51.000 Uh huh.

00:24:52.000 What did they say, Ian?

00:24:53.000 The last 250 years.

00:24:53.000 Indeed they do.

00:24:55.000 And on this, the 250th birthday, they ruled we don't have elections.

00:25:00.000 With Barrett arguing in the majority, votes can be cast an indefinite period before an election and can be counted an indefinite period after an election is over.

00:25:10.000 In fact, her argument was elections never end until someone decides.

00:25:13.000 Do you know what this means?

00:25:15.000 So, So, listen, let's say California, for one of the Republican districts, they mail out literally 600,000 ballots and then state the election ends when every legal vote is counted.

00:25:32.000 And then, when only 60,000 votes come back, they say, well, when the other 510,000 come in, we'll conclude the election.

00:25:40.000 January 3rd rolls around and they say, our election's ongoing.

00:25:40.000 And what happens?

00:25:43.000 That's the crazy.

00:25:44.000 And I mean, the birthright citizenship ruling is.

00:25:47.000 Almost certainly more impactful, definitely more shocking in the near term.

00:25:51.000 But the election ruling and specifically Amy Barrett's role in writing that opinion is more shocking to me than the birthright citizenship thing.

00:26:00.000 I actually think I like Amy Coney Barrett.

00:26:03.000 I'm kind of a softie for the sort of like strong textualists.

00:26:06.000 Like, I, you know, I'm happy within reason when sometimes the other edge of the sword cuts against us, right?

00:26:12.000 Like, especially with a younger, newer tenure justice like Barrett, because I'm thinking, you know, she'll be on the court for 50 years.

00:26:18.000 Good luck for you.

00:26:20.000 But so it's all I'm saying though, I'm not saying that I like the decision, but I find it easier to believe that in her kind of like juridical mind, this is her just thinking this is what the Constitution says rather than it's some sort of outside influence.

00:26:34.000 The election thing is crazier to me because as Tim was saying at the beginning, like we have laws about this.

00:26:41.000 The Congress has delegated an election day.

00:26:43.000 So, like, show me where in the Constitution it says actually the real elections are the friends we made along the way.

00:26:48.000 But that's one where it's like that's not any kind of That's barely even living constitutionalism.

00:26:53.000 I don't know what that is.

00:26:54.000 That's a political something.

00:26:55.000 That is a political act.

00:26:57.000 So imagine this.

00:26:58.000 Let's say there's a swing state.

00:27:00.000 Let's use Wisconsin as an example.

00:27:04.000 Remind me, which party currently controls Wisconsin?

00:27:07.000 I believe it's the Democrats.

00:27:09.000 Is it the Democrats?

00:27:10.000 I believe so.

00:27:10.000 I'm not sure.

00:27:12.000 It might be Republicans.

00:27:12.000 The legislature?

00:27:14.000 Yeah.

00:27:14.000 No, no, no, no.

00:27:15.000 The state.

00:27:17.000 No, no, no, no.

00:27:17.000 The governor?

00:27:18.000 I'm saying if the governor is Republican and the legislature is Republican, but the courts are Democrat, it's a.

00:27:24.000 My point is, the Republican Party controls both Democrat governor, Republicans in both chambers of the legislature.

00:27:32.000 So it's split.

00:27:34.000 Imagine this the state legislature constitutionally has the authority to determine how their elections are held, the governor can contest it. 0.78

00:27:41.000 We're screwed.

00:27:42.000 This is 1876 all over again. 0.94

00:27:44.000 And Barrett said it, and she is evil because she actually said it in her argument 1872.

00:27:53.000 1872 comes around, and the elections are largely contested because they are being held in weird ways.

00:27:58.000 There was no set date for elections.

00:28:01.000 And so it was argued that, you know, one strategy, what you could do is if you want to make sure that rural folk don't vote, you hold an election during harvest, knowing they can't abandon harvest.

00:28:12.000 So what ends up happening is people say, hey, that's not fair.

00:28:16.000 So they say, we need to have an election.

00:28:19.000 November makes sense because it's winter.

00:28:19.000 Why do they do November?

00:28:22.000 So you're not going to have constrained rural versus urban work for the most part.

00:28:27.000 Imagine a scenario where.

00:28:30.000 Wisconsin votes Democrat in the upcoming 2028 election.

00:28:35.000 So the state legislature determines the election has not concluded because there is no deadline, according to Barrett, for the receipt of ballots.

00:28:42.000 So we will not conclude this election until we know every ballot is counted.

00:28:48.000 There is a deadline by which a state must send its electors, otherwise, electors do not vote.

00:28:52.000 So let's say it votes Democrat and the Republicans withhold the electoral vote and say, no, we are not going to have.

00:28:59.000 So the governor certifies.

00:29:00.000 The inverse could be true.

00:29:01.000 Let's say Wisconsin votes Republican, and the governor says, I will not certify the electors to go and vote until we know every vote is counted.

00:29:10.000 Now, they won't immediately just come out and smugly say, We are blocking you to steal the election.

00:29:14.000 They'll come out and say, Republicans have cheated and disenfranchised people and barred them from the election so they couldn't vote.

00:29:23.000 And according to the Supreme Court, there is no deadline where we have to receive ballots.

00:29:29.000 So we are going to extend the deadline to make sure those that were disenfranchised by the evil Republicans get a chance to vote.

00:29:35.000 And then what happens?

00:29:37.000 December 14th comes around, and the governor never certifies a slate of electors.

00:29:41.000 So no Republican electors vote, and thus Wisconsin Republican votes are removed.

00:29:46.000 And what should have been a narrow Republican victory now becomes a Democrat victory because a Democrat governor did not conclude their election. 1.00

00:29:52.000 It is the most psychotic and retarded thing that I'm going to say it like this. 0.99

00:29:57.000 The only conclusion I can make is that the liberal justices, Coney, Barrett, and Roberts, intend for there to be a civil war. 1.00

00:30:06.000 And I'm going to pause real quick.

00:30:08.000 Because I, you know, it's fascinating to me how many people have rejected and denied the idea, the prospect of a possible civil war.

00:30:14.000 But I'm going to say this we've got a few rulings. 0.79

00:30:17.000 They ruled states can ban transgender athletes.

00:30:21.000 It doesn't violate Title IX if they ban them.

00:30:23.000 So, what does that mean? 1.00

00:30:25.000 In red states, there will be no males on female teams.

00:30:28.000 In blue states, there will be males on female teams.

00:30:31.000 Then, when there's regionals or nationals, red states will only have girls and blue states will have boys, and the red states are going to refuse to compete and it's going to cause conflict.

00:30:41.000 You have this election ruling, I already outlined how a Democrat could argue the Republicans disenfranchised, blocked, or intentionally screwed with ballots.

00:30:50.000 So, that people couldn't win, and that's illegitimate.

00:30:52.000 So, we're going to keep the ballots open for an indefinite period.

00:30:56.000 Governor can just do it.

00:30:58.000 All of this is just creating hyperpolarization.

00:31:01.000 Hyperpolarization leads to one thing.

00:31:05.000 So, it's not that I get where you're coming from.

00:31:09.000 That all makes sense.

00:31:10.000 But the question that I think you have to ask then is why?

00:31:15.000 I can see why the liberal trio might want to foment some kind of civil war for sure.

00:31:19.000 What's in it for.

00:31:21.000 ACB and John Roberts, a man who.

00:31:23.000 But she's a kid with children?

00:31:24.000 But, like, why? 0.54

00:31:25.000 Like, how?

00:31:27.000 So they can have citizenship and have American rights? 0.99

00:31:29.000 Yeah, but she adopted them.

00:31:30.000 They were already going to be.

00:31:32.000 That's not.

00:31:33.000 No, they can't be president.

00:31:35.000 They can't be president. 1.00

00:31:36.000 But you think Amy Coney Barrett wants to foment civil war in the United States so that one of her 11 kids. 1.00

00:31:42.000 No, I'm just giving you a grain of sand in the heat.

00:31:44.000 I'm just wondering why the justices would want.

00:31:48.000 Sure.

00:31:48.000 So the issue with that question is that I could just make off the top of my head probably 17 million.

00:31:53.000 Grains of sand arguments that are plausible.

00:31:56.000 We could argue that Amy Coney Barrett was swatted last month and fears for her safety. 0.82

00:32:01.000 So she's ruling in whatever the left wants because she doesn't want to die. 0.94

00:32:04.000 Someone tried to assassinate Brett Kavanaugh and his family, and she's terrified.

00:32:08.000 Literally, she was swatted one month ago.

00:32:10.000 So I think she's terrified.

00:32:12.000 They had to put up barricades around the Supreme Court when they overturned Roe v. Wade, and they threatened to kill the justices, and she got the message.

00:32:20.000 Now, Roberts is uniparty.

00:32:21.000 So let's look at the big picture.

00:32:23.000 What have liberals been doing to this country?

00:32:25.000 Open borders, foreign born citizens, all of this destroying American culture and tradition.

00:32:30.000 So, if Roberts and Barrett are siding with the liberals in a way that undermines our elections and undermines the American tradition, I just say, yep, that's what the establishment has been trying to do for 30 years.

00:32:43.000 It's not in any way different from what is already happening to this country and would have been worse if Trump didn't get elected.

00:32:51.000 Yeah.

00:32:51.000 So, the question then is why would anyone want a civil war?

00:32:54.000 As I've argued for some time, just talk to any one of these communists.

00:32:59.000 And ask them why they want a civil war, and they'll tell you privately. 1.00

00:33:02.000 Publicly, they play the stupid game. 0.99

00:33:03.000 But, like, for instance, during Occupy Wall Street, the phrase they said was, From the ashes of the old, we shall build anew. 0.99

00:33:11.000 So, that is the communist idea.

00:33:13.000 You must burn down the country and destroy it by any means necessary so that you can establish a new order.

00:33:19.000 And they don't intend to bring balance and power to the working class. 0.95

00:33:22.000 They intend to empower themselves, as communists do.

00:33:25.000 And they explicitly stated at their meetings, We will be in charge.

00:33:29.000 So, the goal.

00:33:30.000 By any means, manipulation, subterfuge, deception, overt violence, burn down the government, and then you can impose your own.

00:33:38.000 How do you eliminate the U.S. Constitution so that you can freely rule as you want to? 0.58

00:33:45.000 Civil War.

00:33:48.000 A revolution and civil war are effectively the same things.

00:33:53.000 Civil war just means someone fought back.

00:33:55.000 Sure.

00:33:56.000 So if they get their revolution, there's no Constitution, there's no more American order. 0.58

00:34:00.000 And when you look at the past 50 years, it seems the establishment political machine's goal was to turn the United States from an American traditional, you know, white Christian European nation into an open cosmopolitan land and to separate the military industrial complex from the constraints of public perception and the will of the public.

00:34:24.000 Everything they've done, as we've seen, lends itself to this future where there is a global military apparatus that is. 0.60

00:34:32.000 That is unconstrained by any vote.

00:34:35.000 And one way to get there, of course, is to destroy the will of the American people so that there is no longer a vote that can constrain it.

00:34:41.000 Sure.

00:34:42.000 I don't think, though, that that means that Barrett and Roberts necessarily want a civil war.

00:34:47.000 I think, and again, and maybe this is a distinction without a difference. 0.91

00:34:50.000 If they've just been mau mau'd enough to rule the way that the left and everybody else wants, then sure. 0.91

00:34:56.000 I mean, this doesn't matter. 0.98

00:34:58.000 But while we still have, you know, a country, I think, you know, it's.

00:35:04.000 I don't think that they want that necessarily.

00:35:05.000 Why did the Supreme Court rule simultaneously Trump can fire the heads of independent agencies, but he can't fire the head of the Fed?

00:35:12.000 Only because she was under, because the investigation is ongoing.

00:35:15.000 If I understand, if I read it correctly, hold on, let me go to Scott's blog and find it.

00:35:22.000 So they're saying that because there is a criminal investigation or what?

00:35:28.000 Yeah, there's a.

00:35:29.000 Because she sued, right, after he removed her. 0.99

00:35:31.000 So he can fire anybody but her.

00:35:34.000 Anybody but her now.

00:35:36.000 Like, I don't think it means that he can't fire the head of the Fed in the future, right?

00:35:39.000 So he can drop the investigation and fire her.

00:35:41.000 And then start investigating her again?

00:35:43.000 Right.

00:35:44.000 Was it the investigation or her counters?

00:35:46.000 Look, regardless of the reason, it's nonsensical.

00:35:49.000 You can fire someone or you can't.

00:35:51.000 For what reason?

00:35:52.000 It's like, oh, these other people for no reason can be fired.

00:35:56.000 This person has a preponderance of evidence of impropriety.

00:35:59.000 That makes no sense.

00:35:59.000 Now you can't fire them.

00:36:00.000 It was yesterday that it came out, right?

00:36:02.000 I believe, yes.

00:36:03.000 The point is when you look at the Supreme Court rulings, They seem to be incongruous with their own opinions.

00:36:03.000 Yeah.

00:36:09.000 In a five to four vote, the Supreme Court refuses to let President Trump remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook while litigation continues, holding the Federal Reserve's long standing independence from president control is rooted in the nation's history and tradition.

00:36:20.000 Exactly.

00:36:21.000 Hold on.

00:36:23.000 Thus, the point is, they argued the Federal Reserve as an independent agency, Trump can't fire the head, but literally every other agency, President Trump can fire the head.

00:36:33.000 It's only because of the president.

00:36:36.000 It's only because of the president.

00:36:38.000 It's not what you read.

00:36:39.000 That's exactly what I wrote.

00:36:40.000 Yeah, it's not even the investigation.

00:36:40.000 Litigation.

00:36:41.000 Ending in a five to four vote, the Supreme Court refuses to let President Trump remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook while litigation continues.

00:36:49.000 And finish the sentence.

00:36:51.000 Holding the Federal Reserve's long standing independence from presidential control is rooted in the nation's history and tradition.

00:36:55.000 But that doesn't change the fact they wouldn't have specifically said while litigation continues.

00:37:00.000 Okay, let's pause real quick.

00:37:02.000 They held in that decision that these agencies are independent, right?

00:37:10.000 That's the point?

00:37:11.000 No.

00:37:12.000 The point is there's litigation.

00:37:13.000 Why are you arguing you did just a little bit of a.

00:37:14.000 The point is the litigation.

00:37:16.000 That's not what you read.

00:37:17.000 Did you read the wrong thing?

00:37:18.000 It literally said while litigation continues.

00:37:23.000 Holding what?

00:37:25.000 Holding what?

00:37:27.000 I mean, the independence.

00:37:28.000 I think this is also a good time to remember that one of the problems with the Supreme Court is that they're all lawyers.

00:37:34.000 And it is, I mean, we kind of assume, we look at the Supreme Court as, right, this sort of like the highest judicial body, which it is that at this point essentially makes policy and steers the course of.

00:37:45.000 The country, but really a huge part of it, you might argue, what it should be, the main part of it should be just actually like ruling on these cases, right?

00:37:53.000 So I think this is an instance where this was just a case that got kicked up from the lower courts.

00:37:59.000 And again, it's a very narrow ruling, and they're saying the president can remove the heads of independent agencies, but I guess the independent agencies also have a right to countersue.

00:38:08.000 And so, in this narrow question, right, they're allowed to, like, it's pending.

00:38:13.000 Hold on.

00:38:13.000 And then it was later on that day, this is what I was looking for.

00:38:16.000 In a six to three vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the president may fire FTC commissioners at will, overruling Humphrey's executor and holding that the FTC's foreclosure removal protections violate the Constitution's up into power.

00:38:29.000 So he can fire them.

00:38:31.000 Okay, so let me just make my point again.

00:38:33.000 Just so that this is the point I am making, is in the instance of Lisa Cook, they protected her while she's under litigation, which is immaterial to the reason why they protected her.

00:38:44.000 The argument is they upheld that these agencies are independent.

00:38:50.000 Meanwhile, they simultaneously ruled they are not.

00:38:53.000 It doesn't matter why they want to protect her.

00:38:55.000 The point is their own opinions are incongruous with their own rulings.

00:39:02.000 They are issuing, my point is, how can you have simultaneously Dissenting opinions of yourself in the same year.

00:39:11.000 They ruled that he can fire the FTC commissioner.

00:39:14.000 But not the Fed.

00:39:17.000 Not without cause.

00:39:18.000 He needs cause, according to the ruling, he needs cause to fire the federal.

00:39:23.000 But not the FTC.

00:39:24.000 Apparently not.

00:39:25.000 And this makes no sense. 0.98

00:39:28.000 Now, I understand the liberal justices when they do these things because we know they're insane or liars. 0.98

00:39:35.000 And we know Katanji Brown Jackson's IQ is. 0.97

00:39:38.000 I forgot who made the joke.

00:39:39.000 That 70s show, was it?

00:39:40.000 I forgot who made that joke, but shout out.

00:39:42.000 Someone tweeted it.

00:39:43.000 Was it?

00:39:43.000 Sorry.

00:39:45.000 I can't remember.

00:39:46.000 But it was a good joke.

00:39:47.000 So we don't care about what she's saying.

00:39:49.000 But again, to say we are going to uphold federal independence for the Federal Reserve and we are not going to uphold independence for other agencies, what?

00:40:00.000 Oh, the Federal Reserve is quasi government.

00:40:02.000 It's not government agencies.

00:40:03.000 The assumption is here the Federal Reserve is above the presidency.

00:40:09.000 Yeah.

00:40:09.000 That's the point.

00:40:10.000 The other agencies that operate within government are not.

00:40:13.000 But explain to me how it is that you can have a majority court argue we are upholding the Federal Reserve's independence.

00:40:20.000 Simultaneously, we are not upholding any other independent agency's independence.

00:40:25.000 Well, it's a little different.

00:40:26.000 I mean, the Federal Reserve sets monetary policy.

00:40:29.000 The Federal Reserve chairman technically can stretch terms across administrations.

00:40:33.000 I think it's consistency.

00:40:34.000 So can the other agencies.

00:40:35.000 Yeah, but it's less, it's less, it's, you know, firing, eliminating, firing all the FTC commission.

00:40:40.000 If you eliminate the FTC right now, it creates some.

00:40:43.000 Certainly, some regulatory problems, but it doesn't fundamentally change the way that the Federal Reserve, though, it's that's if we, if you again take it to the extreme example, if you just nuked the Federal Reserve right now, that does way more to disrupt the country than getting rid of the EPA or the FTC or the FEC.

00:41:00.000 Right.

00:41:01.000 These are, you know, all I hear is rules are meaningless and the weak shall be crushed.

00:41:06.000 Oh, here's the reason that's it.

00:41:07.000 There's three reasons why the Federal Reserve is structured to be independent from the president.

00:41:11.000 The first is to prevent political interference in interest rates.

00:41:14.000 The second is to stabilize the financial system, as it seems to have done so.

00:41:18.000 And the third is it's because it was made by congressional design, not by executive control.

00:41:23.000 The point is this.

00:41:24.000 I mean, it hasn't stabilized.

00:41:26.000 It's into the Great Depression.

00:41:28.000 The only thing that matters is what we are witnessing those who are willing to use power will win, and those who are not will lose.

00:41:37.000 The Supreme Court is.

00:41:40.000 Listen, if yesterday the Supreme Court ruled.

00:41:45.000 Election day is election day.

00:41:46.000 Thank you and have a nice day.

00:41:47.000 This country would have healed.

00:41:51.000 That's the off ramp.

00:41:52.000 The Democratic Party would have no choice but to attack moderates to try and win elections.

00:41:56.000 They would start moving towards bodies that are motivated to vote instead of going to nursing homes and tricking people into vote.

00:42:05.000 That creates what we're seeing right now with the Democratic Party polarization based on the fact that those who are willing to use power will do whatever they can to get power.

00:42:14.000 So, for instance, Nithya Raman, the DSA publicly on their website announced how to go in ballot harvest, and they explicitly stated that if someone says they're going to vote for a different candidate, to say thank you and walk away and don't take their ballot.

00:42:26.000 That's how Democrats win, not on the merits.

00:42:29.000 Now, if the Supreme Court said Election Day is Election Day, the only people you can get to vote are those who are motivated to get up, go out, and vote on that day, which means no more knocking on doors and playing dirty games, which means Democrats would have to actually try and target moderates, which means they'd have to adjust and adapt their positions, and so would the Republicans to a certain degree, and move closer to a center.

00:42:50.000 But they didn't do that.

00:42:51.000 They said there is no Election Day.

00:42:53.000 You can count a ballot at any point indefinitely after the Election Day, which Barrett Literally argued there is no timeline.

00:43:03.000 So, quite literally, you could say, we are beginning the 2020 election right now, and we will count your vote in 2032.

00:43:14.000 That's nonsensical.

00:43:15.000 It makes no sense.

00:43:16.000 Why are they issuing rulings that only serve to cause chaos?

00:43:21.000 And I think the point is this on the issue of Federal Reserve independence versus the FTC, what they're really saying is the Federal Reserve has power.

00:43:31.000 And so we protect them.

00:43:33.000 And the other agencies are immaterial, so we don't care.

00:43:36.000 And that's it.

00:43:37.000 Are you willing to exercise power?

00:43:39.000 And the Republicans are not, and Democrats are.

00:43:41.000 Yeah, I mean, so your point is well taken.

00:43:44.000 I do agree that the Republicans don't want to exercise power, and Democrats do.

00:43:51.000 And this may be a distinction without a difference, and I'm sure there are going to be plenty of people that find it unconvincing.

00:43:57.000 But the idea that the Federal Reserve is independent is.

00:44:02.000 Probably part of why they make the ruling that they did because the Federal Reserve is allegedly, and I understand this is the FTC is independent as well.

00:44:09.000 What?

00:44:10.000 Under the same criteria.

00:44:11.000 Federal Trade Commission?

00:44:12.000 Yeah, they're all independent from the executive.

00:44:14.000 They're created by acts of Congress.

00:44:16.000 Yeah, isn't the Federal Reserve supposed to be independent of the government?

00:44:18.000 Created by an act of Congress.

00:44:19.000 Like quasi-realism.

00:44:22.000 So the initial argument was with the FTC and other federal agencies, they were created by acts of Congress that operate the executive branch, but the president isn't supposed to be able to control who is in charge of them.

00:44:33.000 And that includes the FTC and the Federal Reserve.

00:44:37.000 And this isn't the only time we've seen an incongruous opinion.

00:44:40.000 Like, if I walk in one room and say, I will never put pineapple on pizza, I walk in another room and tell you, we're ordering pineapple on pizza.

00:44:47.000 That's what we're doing.

00:44:47.000 You'd make a great politician if I was.

00:44:50.000 And we get pizza.

00:44:50.000 That's SCOTUS.

00:44:53.000 I do think the fact that she's got litigation going on, I think that's a big part of the reason why. 0.75

00:45:00.000 But again, then that statement means that the Supreme Court is willing to violate their own principles for power.

00:45:10.000 If it is the opinion of the Supreme Court, we don't want someone fired pending litigation, then we will lie about the legal opinions to maintain her status.

00:45:20.000 That's the argument you're making.

00:45:23.000 No, I think that because they specified that.

00:45:26.000 The Supreme Court upheld not that you can't fire someone pending litigation.

00:45:32.000 They said we won't fire her pending litigation because it's an independent agency.

00:45:37.000 At the same time, they said Trump can fire anyone from any independent agency.

00:45:42.000 So, what there's, I think the truth is this.

00:45:44.000 If Trump gets control of the Federal Reserve, he never, then the right's going to win every election.

00:45:49.000 This is really what it comes down to.

00:45:51.000 If Trump can remove the head of the Fed and can control interest rates, then you can determine whether or not an incumbent party is going to win because you can always get someone who will make the rates beneficial just before an election.

00:46:01.000 That's what they want to avoid.

00:46:03.000 And then on the issue of the mail in voting, once again, if we eliminate indefinite mail in voting and universal mail in voting, Democrats would have to restructure their party and wouldn't win for another decade.

00:46:16.000 SCOTUS is protecting the Democratic Party explicitly.

00:46:19.000 Well, and I didn't really think that I was going to come and be the SCOTUS defender guy, but I'll do it one more time.

00:46:24.000 I think that.

00:46:25.000 The difference here, and you were saying, the Fed is its own kind of mishmash of problems going back to the Great Depression.

00:46:32.000 I think there is a way to read this.

00:46:34.000 And again, I take your point, Tim.

00:46:35.000 I don't think that you're wrong in the broader analysis, but I do think it's, again, compare the Fed ruling with the election day ruling.

00:46:44.000 The Fed, it's like, okay, we've inherited this sort of mess.

00:46:47.000 It's always been quasi independent in a way that even the other independent, not independent agencies are.

00:46:53.000 But so we're going to just sort of, again, it's precedent, right?

00:46:56.000 The starry decisis.

00:46:57.000 But with the election thing, again, as you very correctly pointed out, this is just coming up with rules ex nihilo, right?

00:47:04.000 This is just a completely new.

00:47:05.000 So, again, I think part of it is, again, to give them a little bit of credit.

00:47:10.000 I think with the Fed ruling, it's a little bit more playing with the cards that they were dealt for the past 100 years.

00:47:16.000 Where with the election ruling, it's way more just like we are ripping things up and starting from scratch.

00:47:20.000 Congress.

00:47:21.000 So, Amy Coney Barrett for the majority wrote Congress didn't define a day of receipt, but they literally did.

00:47:29.000 Because for history, For all countries, forever, election day was a day you take your belt, you put it in the box, they counted it and announced the winner.

00:47:40.000 She argued semantically that because they called it a day of election, it didn't specify anything.

00:47:46.000 By that argument, there is no language by which Congress could codify a day of the election.

00:47:52.000 They would have to write like a 10,000 word essay defining the specific procedures and literally say at 12, you know, 11 59 p.m., If there is no announcement, they would have to get so specific with it.

00:48:06.000 And again, to argue that day of election does not mean you have to turn your ballot in, she's basically saying no matter what Congress says, I will argue it's not enough.

00:48:18.000 That's insane.

00:48:20.000 And I think the issue is when you look at what has happened over the past 30 years, what the Supreme Court ruled in these past couple of days lends itself to a continuing trend of open borders.

00:48:33.000 The destruction of the American identity, the American people, the expansion of the military industrial complex, the liberal economic order.

00:48:39.000 And it leads us to a future where America is a cosmopolitan hodgepodge with warring factions and zero control over the state.

00:48:48.000 We are already at a point where we had a trillion dollars missing from the Pentagon budget that no one ever found and knows what's going on.

00:48:55.000 Remember that?

00:48:55.000 Was that Donald Rumsfeld right after 9 11?

00:48:57.000 That was a long time ago.

00:48:58.000 It was the day before 9 11, I think.

00:49:00.000 It disappeared.

00:49:01.000 We're already at the point where the American people have no control of their finances, no control of their labor. 0.99

00:49:07.000 And once we get to a point where you have Somalisota and you've got Haitian Ohio, Haitian Field, these two distinct cultures are not going to get along. 0.94

00:49:19.000 There will not be a congruent vote against things like bombing people in countries we don't want to be involved in. 0.87

00:49:26.000 For reference, on September 10th, 2001, the day before 9 11, Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, announced that the Department of Defense had $2.3 trillion.

00:49:37.000 Just gone from their records.

00:49:39.000 2.3 trillion.

00:49:40.000 It was unaccounted for.

00:49:42.000 What's that?

00:49:43.000 I believe it was unaccounted for, meaning they don't know how it was spent or where it went.

00:49:47.000 Yes, exactly.

00:49:48.000 So, not properly track or document something.

00:49:50.000 But to clarify, this doesn't mean that $2.3 trillion was smuggled in briefcases on a plane overnight.

00:49:55.000 It means that they had spent that much money in ways no one knew how it was spent.

00:50:00.000 So, it could have been McDonald's cheeseburgers.

00:50:02.000 It could have been missiles.

00:50:03.000 They just have no idea.

00:50:04.000 $120,000 hammers.

00:50:06.000 Because remember, the reason they do that kind of stuff, and I'm not specifically talking about the totality of the $2 trillion, but the reason why they overspend on things is because each department gets a budget.

00:50:06.000 Yep.

00:50:18.000 If they don't spend that budget this year, then next year they're going to get less.

00:50:22.000 Right.

00:50:22.000 So, two, but the government misplaced 2.3 trillion.

00:50:26.000 It's not misplaced.

00:50:27.000 Well, they weren't able to account for 2.3 trillion dollars the day before 9 11.

00:50:31.000 Yeah, but was it what?

00:50:31.000 Okay.

00:50:32.000 The day before 9 11, the fact that you're throwing the day before 9 11.

00:50:35.000 Oh, come on.

00:50:36.000 I mean, we're talking about conspiracies about the world taking over.

00:50:38.000 You're talking about conspiracies.

00:50:40.000 Talking about this, the whole 100 year plan to destroy the United States.

00:50:43.000 You're talking about 100 years.

00:50:45.000 It's been going on for 20 minutes about how this liberal economic order wants to bend our way of life.

00:50:49.000 9 11 has nothing to do.

00:50:50.000 That's when the Patriot Act came in.

00:50:52.000 9 11 has nothing to do with the, with the, The bad accounting of the defense department.

00:50:57.000 Well, I mean, not on paper, but let's, there, there, it depends on how conspiratorial it is.

00:51:01.000 What?

00:51:01.000 Depends on how conspiratorial it is.

00:51:03.000 I'm not saying there is.

00:51:03.000 I'm saying it was the day before.

00:51:04.000 No, I'm pointing out the day before everything got put out.

00:51:07.000 He's noticing.

00:51:08.000 Yeah.

00:51:08.000 He's noticing.

00:51:09.000 The, what was it, 11 times put options on airlines short sales right before September 11th.

00:51:09.000 You know what I noticed?

00:51:17.000 Anyone ever explain that?

00:51:18.000 Larry Silverstein not going to the, the guy who owned the building, the World Trade Center, got told, don't go in today.

00:51:24.000 So he didn't.

00:51:25.000 And then the buildings came.

00:51:26.000 Well, the one thing I doubt about is insurance.

00:51:28.000 Yeah, the insurance company might also say.

00:51:31.000 People like to claim that because he bought insurance, terrorism insurance, that proves that there was some impropriety.

00:51:36.000 It's a confluence of events, my friend.

00:51:37.000 Yeah, except every building in New York has terrorism insurance.

00:51:40.000 He bought the building, of course, he was going to get it.

00:51:42.000 Someone tried bombing it.

00:51:43.000 Yeah, there had been demonstrable terrorism.

00:51:43.000 Right.

00:51:46.000 It was more that he didn't go into war with that.

00:51:47.000 It's not an argument to say that a terror target someone bought terror insurance on.

00:51:51.000 It is curious that someone was short selling airlines, American and United, I believe it was, like the day before.

00:51:59.000 It was like 11 times the normal output for shorts on the airlines.

00:52:03.000 That's weird.

00:52:04.000 The whole, it's just, that makes no sense.

00:52:06.000 Nobody just does that.

00:52:07.000 I actually worked at Ground Zero for four months.

00:52:09.000 Not that it really matters.

00:52:10.000 I was there smelling that place for four months.

00:52:12.000 It was crazy, or like three months.

00:52:13.000 At the AMEC, there were three construction companies that got contracted.

00:52:17.000 AMEC was one of the three I worked with.

00:52:19.000 Three or four.

00:52:20.000 There were three big ones.

00:52:21.000 Guys, we are chickens in a chicken coop clucking away.

00:52:23.000 That's awesome.

00:52:24.000 While the powers that be who know what's actually going on don't care what we're saying to each other.

00:52:29.000 Probably not.

00:52:30.000 Because you're right, power is what's going to decide the future.

00:52:33.000 And the Chinese and the Russians have access to so much power right now with AI and nuclear weapons.

00:52:38.000 Like, if we don't exercise immense imperial power, I think the U.S. won't be the leader of the 21st century. 0.98

00:52:45.000 But the downside of that is we've got to go technocratic and start spying on each other and arresting people for deep thinking shit. 0.86

00:52:51.000 No, I don't see a path forward, honestly, for the American empire. 0.96

00:52:54.000 I don't.

00:52:55.000 For free speech?

00:52:56.000 Well, I thought I said the American empire.

00:52:58.000 So if you take a look at The Trump MAGA ethos, the end result is it's time to roll up your sleeves because the economy is about to implode.

00:53:06.000 We don't have the population.

00:53:07.000 It's done.

00:53:08.000 There's no reversing this.

00:53:10.000 The Democrat strategy of importing the third world is not going to save America.

00:53:14.000 It's just the end of America.

00:53:16.000 Now, Trump's strategy, sealing the borders, bringing back manufacturing, roll up your sleeves, get to work, will save America 100 years from now, but it means in the short term, there's no American empire anymore.

00:53:25.000 Yeah, you need robots.

00:53:26.000 We're going to need robots. 1.00

00:53:27.000 Robot labor force.

00:53:29.000 We could lead the world in the robot labor force.

00:53:31.000 But again, robots aren't customers.

00:53:33.000 And robots are not drivers of culture or people or news.

00:53:37.000 So when the population collapses, and it's going to for two reasons.

00:53:41.000 First, we don't have the birth rates, and boomers are about to start dying off in, let's just say, expeditiously due to the mortality cliff. 0.83

00:53:52.000 The population in the United States is going to be dropping because we are, I mean, this is probably why they rule for birthright citizenship, because the Democrat ethos is bring in as many foreigners as possible to pad the numbers. 0.91

00:54:03.000 Unless they're children of diplomats. 0.75

00:54:05.000 They're not American citizens.

00:54:07.000 Let's be very clear. 0.99

00:54:08.000 All right?

00:54:08.000 Diplomats, you are out of luck.

00:54:10.000 You're legally here.

00:54:10.000 So here's the thing, however.

00:54:11.000 Quit your job, turn in the diplomatic.

00:54:13.000 Plates and just come back randomly.

00:54:16.000 Here's the best part.

00:54:17.000 So, diplomats are legally not considered specifically to be under the jurisdiction thereof.

00:54:23.000 So, this means if a diplomat comes with his wife, that job is not, even with this ruling. 0.74

00:54:28.000 But if a diplomat bangs a hooker and she gives birth, like let's say a Guatemalan woman breaks into the country, she's like, she comes across the border, diplomat hooks up with her, that kid will be a citizen. 0.76

00:54:39.000 Yeah, and this is when it gets real late Roman Republic, like the scheming viziers from other empires. 0.96

00:54:45.000 Well, My concubine's child will be able to be a citizen, and that's how I will reclaim power.

00:54:51.000 That's some deep Caesar stuff.

00:54:53.000 I was reading something today that there's a group that monitors Chinese birth tourism, and they're talking about something like 1.5 million Chinese citizens, people that are in China, kids that are in China, that have been born on birth tourism in the past like two decades or something like that.

00:55:11.000 I mean, it's insane.

00:55:11.000 Or conquered.

00:55:13.000 This is something we've reported on.

00:55:14.000 My colleague, Jenny Taylor, who's based in Texas, she's our immigration reporter.

00:55:18.000 And one of the things that she's been expanding out into recently is a lot of these birth, like the birth tourism centers and the hubs are in Texas.

00:55:25.000 And we had a great piece a couple of weeks ago where she just went to a bunch of them and like confronted the owners.

00:55:30.000 And it's like, you know, it's again, sort of going back.

00:55:32.000 It's the, you know, she shows up, but it's basically like all but posters in the windows that say, you know, hey, CCP officials, come here and have your baby.

00:55:40.000 And she knocks on the door and they're like, oh no, we're just a cultural exchange.

00:55:42.000 Like we're not, we're not here for that.

00:55:44.000 It's like, well, what do you do?

00:55:45.000 And they're like, we don't have to answer your questions.

00:55:46.000 Trump should pack the courts.

00:55:49.000 He should, executive order shut down USPS the week before the election.

00:55:53.000 What do you mean pack the courts? 0.98

00:55:54.000 It means add four more Supreme Court justices.

00:55:57.000 There's 13 federal circuits, I believe it is.

00:56:03.000 And when the federal court system was being set up, there was one justice for each circuit, and there were nine.

00:56:10.000 When they expanded to 13 with westward expansion, they never added four more justices.

00:56:14.000 So the argument from the left has long been we should have 13, one for each circuit.

00:56:19.000 We don't.

00:56:20.000 And so that's a problem.

00:56:23.000 I completely agree with all of the Democrats.

00:56:25.000 This would take an act.

00:56:25.000 Let's go.

00:56:26.000 That would take an act to Congress, right?

00:56:28.000 I believe, yes. 0.99

00:56:29.000 Well, Congress isn't doing shit. 0.99

00:56:31.000 Nope. 0.81

00:56:32.000 So any argument they make where they're like, but Congress must define this, it's not going to happen.

00:56:37.000 This is all day today as I was trying to.

00:56:39.000 I read more takes than usual because it was such a take heavy day.

00:56:44.000 And I was reading folks who I don't even always read, but anytime going through on the birthright citizenship and the second it's what we really need is Congress to act, I just click out.

00:56:52.000 That's like, all right, guys, sure.

00:56:53.000 I mean, Oh, yeah, let's for the first time in 100 years, Congress will start.

00:56:57.000 They're going to start acting like the co equal branch that they are.

00:57:00.000 Right.

00:57:00.000 Henry Clay, like, all right, guys, cool.

00:57:02.000 That's a worthwhile use of Congress.

00:57:04.000 Congress has no actual incentive to do anything, right?

00:57:07.000 Or the individual Congress people have no incentive to do anything.

00:57:10.000 Congress, I think you, I'd stop with the first statement.

00:57:13.000 I think Congress as a body has no incentive to do anything.

00:57:16.000 So I just saw that they're going to reintroduce the legislation to end birthright citizenship that was written by Harry Reid in, I think, 1993.

00:57:23.000 They're just going to take the same bill, introduce it, and be like, what's up?

00:57:26.000 But I mean, It's a cool shtick that he's doing.

00:57:30.000 It's a cool little poke at the Democrats, but it's not going to pass.

00:57:33.000 It's not.

00:57:34.000 I mean, it'd be incredible if it did, but I don't even think that it'll work.

00:57:39.000 The important thing to understand, again, as we did mention on the birthright citizenship ruling, is that they explicitly stated this is constitutional.

00:57:47.000 Law cannot change it.

00:57:48.000 Yeah.

00:57:49.000 So we're, Mike Johnson said this earlier.

00:57:51.000 He says we're not, it is extremely difficult and very rare that the Constitution is ever amended.

00:57:57.000 So this is the end of the country.

00:57:59.000 What was the last amendment?

00:58:00.000 I should know this.

00:58:01.000 This is like a good political trivia to have.

00:58:03.000 I don't know.

00:58:05.000 Was it pay of members of Congress?

00:58:07.000 That sounds right.

00:58:08.000 It was something like weird and not.

00:58:10.000 Something.

00:58:10.000 Cool.

00:58:11.000 Oh, they amended the Constitution to earn more money for themselves.

00:58:14.000 Go figure it out.

00:58:15.000 That's when they have a law.

00:58:17.000 It prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the next election has occurred.

00:58:23.000 Oh, that's cool.

00:58:24.000 It was originally proposed as the First Amendment.

00:58:27.000 It was the first article to be amended to the Constitution.

00:58:30.000 They dropped it.

00:58:31.000 There were originally, I think, 12 articles.

00:58:33.000 It's been a while since I was reading about all this.

00:58:34.000 Yeah, there were 12.

00:58:35.000 Yeah, the Bill of Rights was 12.

00:58:36.000 And they eliminated the first one, I think.

00:58:41.000 That district should be 35,000 seats, 35,000 people.

00:58:47.000 And the second one was you can't vote to increase your pay.

00:58:52.000 You can vote to increase the next pay of the next pay period.

00:58:54.000 And they were like, eh, get rid of those later.

00:58:56.000 And then in 1982, they were like, nah, let's actually do that.

00:58:59.000 And now we've got 700,000 people being represented.

00:59:02.000 775.

00:59:03.000 One dude trying to represent 775,000 people.

00:59:07.000 I think it's not that these particular people in Congress are just terrible, it's that this system is incapable of overseeing.

00:59:15.000 Ian's right.

00:59:17.000 I think that this world would just be better off if we had more representation for smaller groups.

00:59:24.000 So maybe one strategy would be if, like, instead of having 8 billion people, we had, say, 500 million.

00:59:28.000 If the planet was only 500 million people, think about that.

00:59:31.000 Then you'd reduce the U.S. by what, four times? 0.93

00:59:36.000 What if people represented themselves?

00:59:39.000 Direct democracy.

00:59:39.000 I'm hearing a lot.

00:59:40.000 Brilliant.

00:59:41.000 I don't know if you needed to be democratic, but if people represent everyone's opinion, I'm into a good monarchy.

00:59:47.000 For years, I have been carrying a torch.

00:59:49.000 For the anti federalists.

00:59:51.000 I think that this is a nerdy fascination of mine.

00:59:54.000 And I feel like we're coming on America 250.

00:59:57.000 A lot of people are going to start talking about the problems of the elite body in the Supreme Court needing to expand the scope of representation, questions about who the citizenry is and what the regime is and what the polity is.

01:00:09.000 I think the past 250 years, we've been talking Hamilton, Madison, it's been the federalist semi quintennial.

01:00:15.000 I think the next 50 to 250 years, however long we're here for, I think we start getting a lot more.

01:00:20.000 A lot more anti federal talk.

01:00:22.000 We need decentralization.

01:00:23.000 Let's get Luther Martin. 0.71

01:00:24.000 Let's get George Mason.

01:00:25.000 Let's get the boys.

01:00:26.000 It's either going to be, at least it doesn't have to be just these two, but it's either going to be that we radically decentralize and upgrade our government style to a world leading digital space, or we sit, wait, and then it's going to happen to us by technocracy taking over and governing our lives for us.

01:00:42.000 Because this old system of riding on horseback to get to the Capitol and pen and paper and sending paperwork, it's done.

01:00:49.000 It's done.

01:00:50.000 It doesn't work fast enough.

01:00:52.000 That people cannot accurately represent their constituents.

01:00:55.000 Florida does written ballots, if I understand correctly, and they get them counted by the end of the day. 0.96

01:01:01.000 Same thing in India.

01:01:02.000 They got 1.5 billion people, and they use paper ballots, and they all get them counted the same day. 0.85

01:01:09.000 Let's get crazy.

01:01:10.000 We got this from media.

01:01:11.000 Federalist co founder floats dissolution of the union in unhinged post after Trump loses birthright citizenship case.

01:01:19.000 They go on to say that we know about it, we get it, we get it.

01:01:23.000 They say some disappeared individuals, they sure do waste their time.

01:01:26.000 Sean Davis tweeted several ways forward here given the choice Roberts and Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment.

01:01:33.000 One, nullification states issue birth certificates and they can just stop issuing them to non citizens.

01:01:39.000 Roberts and Barrett can deal with the fallout and litigate each birth individually.

01:01:42.000 That's actually a fantastic idea.

01:01:44.000 And it's again why I said the courts, the Supreme Court, has taken every ruling that pushes us towards civil war. 0.98

01:01:52.000 Davis is correct. 0.99

01:01:53.000 Red states should just refuse to issue birth certificates to the children of non citizens. 0.94

01:01:58.000 And again, the Supreme Court will have to litigate every single case. 1.00

01:02:04.000 And they'll definitely hack the court.

01:02:05.000 If Roberts wants to be a politician who writes law instead of a judge, He can fight with 10 more unelected legislators in robes. 1.00

01:02:11.000 Three, deny entry to all pregnant foreigners. 0.95

01:02:14.000 Four, deny entry to all female foreigners. 1.00

01:02:17.000 Five, require sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry. 1.00

01:02:24.000 Okay, hold on there a minute. 0.98

01:02:26.000 He's building and building and building.

01:02:27.000 Man, I love Sean Davis.

01:02:29.000 Dissolution of the Union.

01:02:31.000 A nation which can't even restrict who gets to be a citizen isn't a nation.

01:02:35.000 Seven, amend the Constitution.

01:02:36.000 It's pointless because once a judge decides he can rewrite the Constitution at will, As Roberts and Barrett did today, the actual text is meaningless.

01:02:44.000 And I would also argue the law literally says there is a day for the election.

01:02:49.000 And Barrett went, but what does that even really mean?

01:02:52.000 So there's no point when a judge can just say your laws and your constitution do not mean a thing.

01:02:59.000 Now, as for number five sterilization.

01:03:03.000 It's the only way forward.

01:03:05.000 No way.

01:03:06.000 Don't skip number four.

01:03:06.000 Hold on.

01:03:07.000 Number four is my favorite.

01:03:08.000 That feels like if anyone. 1.00

01:03:09.000 Deny all female foreigners. 1.00

01:03:11.000 If anyone from Daily Wire Studios is listening, which I'm sure they're all. 1.00

01:03:14.000 Glued to see my appearance.

01:03:16.000 That's our next movie.

01:03:17.000 Let's imagine a world where only the dudes can come to the United States. 0.85

01:03:17.000 How about? 0.85

01:03:21.000 Bro, I thought this was a terrible act.

01:03:21.000 Hold on, hold on, hold on.

01:03:23.000 How about?

01:03:23.000 I was just going to say.

01:03:23.000 How about?

01:03:25.000 The penalty for illegally entering the United States is sterilization. 1.00

01:03:31.000 Got to get their balls. 0.98

01:03:34.000 So if you enter illegally and you are caught, we don't deport you. 1.00

01:03:37.000 You can stay. 1.00

01:03:38.000 We'll get your balls. 0.99

01:03:40.000 You become part of the Castrato Choir. 0.99

01:03:42.000 Yeah.

01:03:43.000 Beautiful music.

01:03:43.000 And no babies.

01:03:44.000 You can work here as long as you want, no babies.

01:03:47.000 No, I love that Sean Davis is just taking like a full sci fi dystopia turn. 1.00

01:03:53.000 Deny entry to all pregnant foreigners. 1.00

01:03:55.000 So, uh, that actually I think is doable, right? 1.00

01:03:59.000 Yeah, because that's also like how many people, if you look at like seriously, if you look at that crowd, how many people are actually so desperate to come in right before they have birth, before they give birth, who are not doing it to take advantage of this law, right?

01:04:14.000 Like, it's this, like, hey, listen.

01:04:17.000 We know that you're seven months pregnant.

01:04:18.000 Wouldn't it be easier if you just, you could come in three months?

01:04:21.000 Like, wouldn't it be nicer, you know, like the baby could fly?

01:04:25.000 I got a better idea.

01:04:26.000 We pass a law that says, so this.

01:04:30.000 We pass a law.

01:04:31.000 Well, but yeah, yeah.

01:04:32.000 I mean, obviously we're never going to do anything, but the point is, how do you get around this without actually having a constitutional amendment?

01:04:40.000 Children born a law that says, one, because you need to write all this, you know, preamble garbage, as we recognize the Supreme Court ruling as pertains to the 14th Amendment that all.

01:04:51.000 That are born in the soil are American citizens.

01:04:53.000 Further, any child born to unlawful aliens will become wards of the state, of the federal government, or the state in which they reside, whichever jurisdiction seeks control of the individual, and removed from their parents post haste.

01:05:10.000 I actually tweeted about that this morning.

01:05:12.000 I was like, if every kid born, if you come to the United States and you're illegal, you get deported, the federal government takes your child, and they raise them with an education that is pro America and military.

01:05:25.000 And military.

01:05:26.000 How about this?

01:05:28.000 All children, all individuals born in this country to parents unlawfully present shall be conscripted for military service at the age of 18.

01:05:37.000 Or I'll do you one better. 0.62

01:05:39.000 A spin on this idea.

01:05:40.000 We bring back Greg Bovino and we say that not just wards of the state, all foreign born children are citizens, but Greg Bovino is their sole parent.

01:05:48.000 We give Greg Bovino 100,000 immigrant children to parent himself.

01:05:52.000 Wait. 1.00

01:05:53.000 Hold on.

01:05:53.000 There would be a side effect, too.

01:05:54.000 I got an idea that.

01:05:56.000 I have an idea that's going to please the democratic establishment and the right.

01:06:02.000 All children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully present and not citizens.

01:06:08.000 Shall be given to Dr. Fauci for gain of function research and not.

01:06:12.000 The Democrats are going to be like, no, you can't.

01:06:14.000 Wait a minute.

01:06:15.000 Mr. Science?

01:06:17.000 Gain of function then?

01:06:18.000 Gain of function research.

01:06:19.000 Do you guys want to know what crazy, again, getting back into the like, this might be the late Roman Republic?

01:06:23.000 So Dr. Fauci and Clarence Thomas both went to Holy Cross, which is my alma mater in Massachusetts. 0.58

01:06:32.000 And isn't that like a.

01:06:33.000 Yeah, but he's older than Fauci.

01:06:34.000 No, I know, but it's like, think about it, you know, it's like kind of the two poles of the fight of the two avatars of the different sides of the fight for the future of the Republic.

01:06:42.000 Just.

01:06:43.000 Both coming out of Central Mass, baby. 0.99

01:06:46.000 The problem is the left will burn your house down and kill your children, and the right just says, please stop. 0.98

01:06:51.000 That's it. 0.79

01:06:53.000 I mean, like, there's a guaranteed winner.

01:06:56.000 You know, the dude skipping down the road, you know, the year is 1750, and there's a man whistling while he works, and there's a bandito with a sword.

01:07:07.000 Who wins the fight?

01:07:09.000 It's just not even a question.

01:07:11.000 It's the gun argument.

01:07:12.000 We should ban guns because then only criminals will have guns.

01:07:15.000 They're not going to stop.

01:07:16.000 You can argue the same thing about the left.

01:07:18.000 The right is unwilling to engage in this, and I believe it is virtuous to say so.

01:07:22.000 It is good that the right does not want violence, but they're going to lose because the left will use violence.

01:07:29.000 I mean, unfortunately, the right has the whole violence as a switch, not a dial thing going on.

01:07:36.000 The Babylon Bee made a joke video we talked about a couple weeks ago where it was like the Second Civil War because the left hates guns and was saying they lost.

01:07:44.000 Exactly.

01:07:45.000 The left loves guns.

01:07:45.000 Boomerang Ice Lab.

01:07:46.000 They have gun programs, they have gun clubs.

01:07:48.000 They go around shooting people.

01:07:50.000 They've assassinated several right wingers in the past few years. 1.00

01:07:52.000 They firebomb the White House, and Boomer Slop is going like, but they're sissies. 0.99

01:07:58.000 We're tough. 0.96

01:07:59.000 Bro, if the far left went to a sleepy suburban town, who made that song?

01:08:02.000 Try that in a small town?

01:08:03.000 Yeah, that's right.

01:08:04.000 Oh, yeah.

01:08:04.000 If Antifa went to a small town and marched to the city, the first thing they do is they kick the door in some guy's house.

01:08:11.000 He tries to get his gun, but it's in a safe or something because of state law.

01:08:16.000 They shoot him and kill him, take the rest of his guns, and now they have more guns.

01:08:20.000 This idea that the left hates guns is fake and it's made up. 0.98

01:08:22.000 Liberals want to ban guns.

01:08:24.000 Leftists want only them to have guns.

01:08:27.000 Yeah, well, Americans are hope.

01:08:29.000 I actually think that one of the silver linings of the DSA winning so much is Americans are going to start realizing that liberals and leftists are not the same.

01:08:39.000 We use the phrase liberal colloquially, and it's everyone that's on the left of the United States.

01:08:49.000 But if you talk to people in the DSA, they're calling people like Scott Weiner.

01:08:53.000 A right wing Democrat.

01:08:56.000 Guys, the only thing he doesn't align with them on is Gaza, which is kind of inconsequential to 90% of Americans. 1.00

01:09:02.000 But this is why I say the Supreme Court has taken all of these rulings that just push us towards civil war because those wackaloons should lose, right? 1.00

01:09:10.000 But they win because they use illicit voting methods, like counting bouts after election day to maintain power. 1.00

01:09:17.000 If you were to show the American people Scott Weiner being chased out and accused of genocide, they would say, geez, when I go and vote, I'm going to vote against these people.

01:09:25.000 Their vote doesn't count because the DSA strategically goes out and collects ballots from the homeless and old elderly.

01:09:31.000 I mean, the DSA has made it. 0.87

01:09:31.000 Yeah. 0.87

01:09:32.000 You hear people in the DSA talking about the fact that they're only using the Democrat Party as a tool, right?

01:09:37.000 They don't agree with Democrats any more than they deal with the Republicans because Democrats are still like, well, you know, it's okay for people to own property and it's okay for people to rent houses and stuff.

01:09:47.000 DSA doesn't agree with that at all.

01:09:48.000 And to your point, they're just completely this kind of new crop of like all the people that Mamdani endorsed that just won the primaries in New York, right?

01:09:55.000 I mean, again, setting aside that perhaps elections don't exist anymore and so this is all moot.

01:10:03.000 I think that the American people are about to realize we've had two shifts.

01:10:07.000 And the first was that Zoram Mamdani is not AOC, right?

01:10:10.000 AOC wants to be president and she'll abandon, she'll pay lip service to the Green New Deal. 0.80

01:10:15.000 But she's a Washington creature. 1.00

01:10:16.000 She wants power. 1.00

01:10:17.000 She got the Green New Deal. 0.99

01:10:18.000 That's what Pawnee is more radical.

01:10:21.000 But then even if he's an incredible politician, right?

01:10:24.000 I mean, that video of him jumping in full suit in the New York pool, again, as a New Yorker, I was like, oh man, that's pretty tight.

01:10:30.000 That's what the mayor of New York City should be doing.

01:10:33.000 The people that he endorsed, That won their primaries, they got up and they were like, We hate America.

01:10:37.000 Like, number one, the first thing you have to know about us is we don't like this country.

01:10:41.000 We don't like you.

01:10:42.000 We hate the Democratic Party.

01:10:43.000 This is a political revolution.

01:10:45.000 We just want to get into power.

01:10:46.000 And I think, again, like people are going to realize Communist Control Act now.

01:10:50.000 Joker.

01:10:51.000 Enforce the Communist Control Act now.

01:10:54.000 He's got a big smile on his face as he laughs and welcomes you in.

01:10:57.000 And then he's, it's a con.

01:10:59.000 I mean, no, but bad people can be good at retail politics.

01:11:02.000 That's what I'm saying.

01:11:02.000 The next generation is going to completely abandon that.

01:11:06.000 Yeah, Mamdani is genuinely evil.

01:11:08.000 Like these people are, but you know, uh, all I can really say is I don't blame evil people for doing evil things in a certain respect. 0.97

01:11:17.000 What I mean is obviously they bear the responsibility for their actions, but it's like you know, a rabid dog's gonna be a rabid dog.

01:11:23.000 The question is, what are you willing to do to protect your friends, your family, your loved ones, your children from violent, dangerous animals?

01:11:30.000 Will you build a fence around your property to keep the coyotes out, or will you just say, Well, there's nothing I can do about it?

01:11:37.000 And then when they come and maul your kids, you go, Wow.

01:11:41.000 Nothing could have been done.

01:11:43.000 What are you going to do right now?

01:11:45.000 And so when I look at all this, my attitude is like, you know, I feel bad for the average person who does not know how to survive and isn't going to be strong enough to do so, but they all genuinely believe they can.

01:12:00.000 And that's a lot of conservatives.

01:12:02.000 Liberals, of course, will just start eating each other.

01:12:03.000 It's not an exaggeration.

01:12:04.000 I mean, quite literally.

01:12:05.000 If the economy collapses, they've run simulations and they've done like hypotheses on scenarios of what happens if like the water shuts off in New York.

01:12:14.000 Within three days, people are drinking blood.

01:12:16.000 Again, not an exaggeration.

01:12:18.000 There have been researchers who are like, you've got 2.5 million people on Manhattan Island.

01:12:23.000 If there is no more running water or food, what happens?

01:12:26.000 Not everybody is going to be able to escape and start moving westward, which many will.

01:12:30.000 They'll start looting and pillaging along the way.

01:12:32.000 It is a scale unprecedented in human history if New York loses access to resources.

01:12:38.000 Imagine what happens when 9 million people in a single metro fan out, just killing every deer.

01:12:46.000 Ripping every fish from every pond, stealing every can of beans from every store, it will be a wave of destruction, the likes of which a locust swarm would not expect.

01:12:59.000 But they will eat each other.

01:13:00.000 Conservatives, however, will tell themselves, I'll be okay, but they'll probably just starve to death.

01:13:06.000 They all say that they're going to come to your house once you tell them that you have guns.

01:13:10.000 But conservatives also like to say, there's a lot of people on the right who say the people who are hoarding but don't have guns, the people who don't have guns, Are just loot drops for the people who do.

01:13:23.000 There's going to be a ton of conservatives who have guns and they are not, they don't know basic land strategy or defense.

01:13:31.000 Their property is not defensible.

01:13:32.000 So, again, liberals act like it can't happen, but these people will maul each other like zombies.

01:13:37.000 And most conservatives are acting like they're prepared, but their land isn't even defensible to begin with.

01:13:41.000 Look at the Balkan War.

01:13:43.000 That was an absolute massacre. 1.00

01:13:45.000 I don't know how many people died in the war, but that's the kind of thing that you would end up seeing.

01:13:52.000 Yeah, I think conservatives will likely fare better just being in rural areas and far away from the chaos in general.

01:13:59.000 But you take a look at the boomer slop AI stuff where they're like, we're going to win the Civil War.

01:14:03.000 And it's like, nah, some 20 year old leftist with an AR 50.

01:14:08.000 He printed his gun.

01:14:09.000 Well, no, he'll have a real gun.

01:14:11.000 The leftists have real guns.

01:14:13.000 They'll have ghost guns. 0.99

01:14:14.000 They'll kick your door in while you're sitting down, and you'll jump for your gun and they'll shoot you in the back. 0.96

01:14:19.000 Or they'll just unload a 50 cal, like a full auto 50 BMG on your house, killing everybody inside. 0.94

01:14:24.000 The idea that the left is.

01:14:26.000 Like, again, I'm not saying, oh God, the world's ending. 1.00

01:14:29.000 I'm saying, in the event you get real conflict, this idea that the left won't use guns is the stupidest thing imaginable. 0.97

01:14:35.000 Because during the Seattle occupation, they unloaded 300 rounds of 5.56 into a white Jeep at two teenagers. 0.98

01:14:43.000 300.

01:14:44.000 They also randomly killed some other guy.

01:14:46.000 They also randomly shot and killed Aaron Danielson. 0.95

01:14:49.000 I mean, they will just kill people.

01:14:51.000 And again, what did we see?

01:14:54.000 Aaron Danielson walking down the street with pepper spray.

01:14:56.000 And the guy put two bolts in his chest.

01:14:59.000 What I think we would see in the event of real catastrophe, conservatives are going to be like, I've got guns.

01:15:04.000 Are they on you?

01:15:05.000 Where are they?

01:15:05.000 No.

01:15:06.000 Back room in a safe.

01:15:07.000 If they ain't on you, you ain't got a gun.

01:15:09.000 And the left is marching around the streets of Seattle with rifles, stopping traffic, controlling traffic.

01:15:15.000 Yeah.

01:15:16.000 I mean, in cities, yeah, that's what it's like.

01:15:18.000 I don't know.

01:15:19.000 I don't think, like, I'm not moved by the try that in a small town kind of thing, that argument, because, I mean, we've seen plenty of times where.

01:15:28.000 You know, things have gone down in fairly small towns and there wasn't this kind of big uprising.

01:15:33.000 But it is worth noting that, you know, during the George Floyd riots, there were a couple localities, a couple neighborhoods where people literally rolled out with their rifles and just stood there.

01:15:44.000 And then those groups just kept on going.

01:15:47.000 I mean, even if you're dealing with protesters or people looking to riot, a couple rifles will calm them down.

01:15:54.000 If you're looking for people that are actually looking to fight you, a couple rifles ain't going to do it.

01:15:58.000 I see a comment.

01:16:00.000 Someone said, I can tell Tim's never been to Alabama.

01:16:02.000 This would never happen in my town.

01:16:03.000 Yeah.

01:16:04.000 Let me ask you this question.

01:16:04.000 So tell me this.

01:16:05.000 When strangers come by your town, do you call papasis and initiate town defense?

01:16:10.000 Do you have watchtowers?

01:16:12.000 Because my point is, you, you, exactly this.

01:16:15.000 Certainly, it may be true that your town is like this.

01:16:17.000 I'm not saying it's absolute that no towns are.

01:16:19.000 Most towns think they are.

01:16:21.000 But what's going to happen?

01:16:22.000 Guy will be out farming in the back.

01:16:24.000 There'll be someone tending to his cows or whatever.

01:16:26.000 People will largely be peaceful.

01:16:28.000 Maybe they have some guys on watch.

01:16:29.000 And the left will come at three in the morning.

01:16:32.000 Surround key buildings and move in silently.

01:16:34.000 When you are being attacked, they don't walk in and scream, Hey, we're about to fight you.

01:16:39.000 No, they come, they light your house on fire in the middle of the night.

01:16:42.000 You run outside and they shoot you when you run outside.

01:16:44.000 That's the tactics.

01:16:46.000 Dude, no one can. 1.00

01:16:47.000 If shit breaks apart, dude, everyone's going to die. 1.00

01:16:49.000 Everyone you know is dead. 1.00

01:16:52.000 There's no winners. 1.00

01:16:53.000 The Chinese, the airplanes come and then it's full. 1.00

01:16:57.000 Next generation. 1.00

01:16:59.000 There's no winners in those situations.

01:17:01.000 40 years later, they'll say these were the people that won.

01:17:06.000 I don't know how.

01:17:09.000 Let me put it like this We had an off ramp.

01:17:10.000 We did.

01:17:11.000 And I thought it was here.

01:17:12.000 The Supreme Court saying election day is election day was going to fundamentally change everything.

01:17:17.000 It was going to restore a political process by which you needed to convince those.

01:17:22.000 It was the lightest of measures.

01:17:24.000 Somebody who wants to go vote had to be convinced.

01:17:27.000 But by them saying there's no election day, the political process ceases to exist.

01:17:33.000 I don't see how technocracy, civil war.

01:17:37.000 It's subduing people into pods and basically pre crime, like measuring people's thoughts so if they start to get out of line, you arrest them before they can do it.

01:17:47.000 I mean, that's the off ramp.

01:17:49.000 Otherwise, he's the off ramp is Neuralink.

01:17:52.000 The off ramp is giving liberals the Neuralink video game reality and they go live in it.

01:17:57.000 That's it.

01:17:58.000 So, maybe the reason why they're so desperate to build data centers and AI, despite it not being economically valuable, is that it's the most politically valuable thing they can do.

01:18:08.000 Conservatives will say no, but conservatives just want to live on their farm, smile, watch the dog run around, play fetch, raise their kids, go to church.

01:18:15.000 Liberals are restless, angry, and demanding.

01:18:20.000 But you give liberals Neuralink and say, listen, if you put this on and go in the pod, you can be a dragon.

01:18:27.000 You can be Frodo Baggins or Harry Potter.

01:18:31.000 Or to a certain group of people, you can be a woman and you can be a man.

01:18:34.000 And you know what they're going to do?

01:18:35.000 They're going to say, plug me in.

01:18:37.000 But when you plug in the Neuralink, you will experience a reality in which you can touch, smell, see, hear, feel everything.

01:18:37.000 No, no.

01:18:46.000 And the liberals are going to say yes in two seconds.

01:18:49.000 And the conservatives are going to say no.

01:18:50.000 And this will stop conflict.

01:18:52.000 At least for the time being.

01:18:54.000 Yeah.

01:18:55.000 Yeah.

01:18:55.000 So, what do you think?

01:18:56.000 I'm in favor of this. 1.00

01:18:58.000 Would you guys be in favor of denying entry to all females? 1.00

01:19:01.000 Let's say Elon Musk launches the neural centers and he says it's 200 bucks a month to rent a room.

01:19:01.000 No.

01:19:10.000 The room is about 50 square feet and it's got a single pod, very comfy, that lays back.

01:19:19.000 You put on the neural headband and it can put you into Any reality you want where you will actually physically feel and experience it as the Neuralink sends signals to your brain.

01:19:31.000 It's got a mutual bathroom.

01:19:33.000 So it's this little room with a refrigerator, and it's got, we deliver to your room every day food pouches that we can set up.

01:19:41.000 Here's the best part for $250 a month, the pot itself has a bathroom in it.

01:19:47.000 So you lay back and you just zone out for weeks on end.

01:19:50.000 Goon coughing.

01:19:51.000 And I mean, you're just, this is only like two steps away from living in Midtown Manhattan.

01:19:56.000 Like, I think people would absolutely bite on this.

01:19:58.000 Would you be in favor of implementing this?

01:20:00.000 Yes.

01:20:01.000 You pay people to do it.

01:20:03.000 Yeah.

01:20:04.000 So, the argument that I made is that let me ask you this question Would you be in favor of implementing a policy where every person in this country has to pay 50% of their income in a tax that supports anyone else who wants to live in a pod full time in a pod facility?

01:20:04.000 Yeah.

01:20:23.000 A 50% tax?

01:20:24.000 Yep.

01:20:25.000 No.

01:20:25.000 Yes.

01:20:26.000 Okay.

01:20:27.000 Liberals would be gone.

01:20:28.000 They'd never vote again.

01:20:29.000 Every single liberal would take the free pass to be Harry Potter, and conservatives would pay half their income to fund those machines.

01:20:37.000 After 100 years, there'd be no machines left because they're not having kids and they'd cease to exist.

01:20:40.000 People that call themselves conservative would be anything but at that phase.

01:20:43.000 You'd be so liberally minded.

01:20:45.000 If you were going to change society that drastically, that's a very liberal move.

01:20:49.000 Those people that would pretend to be conserving nature would be.

01:20:52.000 Who said conserving nature?

01:20:53.000 Well, if you call them conservatives, that would be a change in what you would colloquially know as conservative behavior.

01:21:00.000 Like no one would be conservative.

01:21:01.000 No, I know it's conserving, though, because you're getting.

01:21:04.000 Conservative doesn't mean conserving anything.

01:21:06.000 I think he's saying, correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel like you're saying if that proposal is put out, conservatives are going to be the ones who oppose it because they're going to say, we can't do this.

01:21:14.000 More likely, this is against nature, this is bad.

01:21:16.000 They're also going to say, like I did, I don't want to pay a 50% tax.

01:21:19.000 See, this is a problem with conservatives.

01:21:20.000 No, yeah, I think this is drawing out an important thing. 1.00

01:21:22.000 There's a horde of barbarians at the gates screaming, we're going to kill you. 0.97

01:21:25.000 And it's conservatives going, well, but we have to let them in because it's unchristlike to push them out. 0.98

01:21:32.000 Instead of saying, no, actually, Christianity is allowed to defend itself.

01:21:37.000 I'd pay the 50% tax.

01:21:38.000 I think that the AI companies can pay people without taking our tax money.

01:21:38.000 I wouldn't.

01:21:42.000 No, but my original point was they have to pay.

01:21:45.000 So if Elon was like, we're going to build a bunch of facilities, With they have these pods that you can plug yourself in, and he's kind of Trumpy in that regard.

01:21:52.000 And uh, Trump goes, Elon says he's gonna do it.

01:21:55.000 All the liberals round him up.

01:21:56.000 You're Harry Potter now.

01:21:58.000 Imagine like 80% of liberals are just Harry Potter.

01:22:03.000 They're like, when you enter the facility, you can choose to go into any fictional world, customize it.

01:22:08.000 If you do that, if you do this, then all of the liberals will say, It's fine if Donald Trump has a third term, we want him for a third and a fourth term.

01:22:08.000 I want to be Harry Potter.

01:22:17.000 Keep him in there.

01:22:18.000 I'll tell you this if Trump came out and said, In his third term, he will create Neuralink pods where it is taxpayer funded and you can live in it and be in any fictional reality you want.

01:22:29.000 He'd win in a landslide.

01:22:30.000 Yep.

01:22:31.000 All the progressives, all the libs will be like, Trump, you win.

01:22:34.000 Make it happen.

01:22:34.000 I want to be Harry Potter.

01:22:36.000 And then when they go to the facility, they're going to be like, you know, Elon Musk is going to be like, or Stafford is going to go to Elon.

01:22:41.000 This is strange.

01:22:43.000 87% of the people just want to be Harry Potter.

01:22:46.000 Who else would they want to be?

01:22:47.000 Harry Potter and Grogu. 1.00

01:22:51.000 Nobody would want to be Grogu. 0.99

01:22:52.000 The guy from Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, all these garbage people. 0.99

01:22:56.000 No, you are incorrect. 0.99

01:22:57.000 Absorb people.

01:22:58.000 Those are not liberal memes.

01:22:59.000 Those are all the people that are obsessed with modern TV.

01:23:02.000 Okay, so let's try again.

01:23:03.000 You're poisoned.

01:23:04.000 The reason why I said Harry Potter is because these people go to protests, and every time they complain, the only reference they have is Harry Potter Osborne.

01:23:11.000 It'd be Star Wars, but only the sequels.

01:23:15.000 Everybody is wrong.

01:23:16.000 I want to be old.

01:23:17.000 Everyone's Jar Jar.

01:23:18.000 Yeah.

01:23:19.000 Oh, that's the prequel.

01:23:20.000 They go in and they say, I want to be Luke Skywalker, and they wake up as Jar Jar Binks.

01:23:23.000 Everyone gets to be Ray.

01:23:25.000 Everybody wants to be Ray.

01:23:27.000 Everybody wants to be Holdo.

01:23:28.000 Everyone wants to be. 1.00

01:23:29.000 Leo when she has the Jedi powers. 0.67

01:23:31.000 Yeah.

01:23:32.000 The Holdo maneuver.

01:23:33.000 Oh, God.

01:23:34.000 The Holdo maneuver that broke the whole lore of everything in Star Wars.

01:23:38.000 All right.

01:23:38.000 I'm in now, but only because once we get them all in the pods, then we can make fun of them for their bad Star Wars.

01:23:43.000 And we can unplug them.

01:23:44.000 Oh, wait.

01:23:45.000 I'm sorry.

01:23:45.000 Did that come out?

01:23:46.000 My bad.

01:23:47.000 Pods, I think, are inevitable, but I think it'll be in your house, kind of like you have a power wall.

01:23:52.000 How are you going to pay for your house?

01:23:53.000 What's that?

01:23:53.000 How are you going to pay for your house?

01:23:55.000 If all you're doing is sitting in the Goon tube.

01:23:57.000 Well, you'll be getting paid to goon.

01:23:59.000 Sydney, you're going to be paid to goom.

01:24:01.000 Basically, how you can get paid to be on Twitter all day, you can get paid to be in the pod all day.

01:24:05.000 By the government.

01:24:06.000 You're generating content.

01:24:06.000 By the government.

01:24:07.000 Hey, the commie is winning in Colorado.

01:24:09.000 You're not even governing.

01:24:10.000 You're not generating content, you're generating something else.

01:24:13.000 But it's all getting recorded.

01:24:14.000 Everything you do on the pod is getting recorded and reused by the AI and the machines.

01:24:18.000 So you're producing.

01:24:19.000 You're producing.

01:24:20.000 I think that will be the excuse is like you're getting paid and you'll be pacified.

01:24:24.000 They won't say it out loud like that, but you'll be pacifying people to get paid to subsist and then you don't have to kill them.

01:24:29.000 That's how you stop the DSA.

01:24:31.000 The DSA says, We're going to tax the billionaires so you get free stuff.

01:24:34.000 And I'm going to go, I'm going to just plug you into any reality you want to be, and you'll be a rich king Harry Potter.

01:24:39.000 And they're going to be like, I'm going to go with the Harry Potter king thing.

01:24:42.000 We'll say that psychedelic pharmaceuticals are going to play a role in this too.

01:24:45.000 I haven't gone deep.

01:24:46.000 I figured it out.

01:24:47.000 Wait, I figured it out.

01:24:48.000 They go into the pod, right?

01:24:50.000 And then Elon Musk is standing there being like, You're going to love your new life as Harry Potter.

01:24:55.000 It's very good.

01:24:56.000 And then they're going to put the headband on.

01:24:57.000 They're going to go, This is the greatest day of my life.

01:24:59.000 They're going to wake up.

01:24:59.000 They're going to be holding a wand.

01:25:00.000 They're going to be like, This is amazing.

01:25:02.000 And then a real world, once they're in, he presses a button.

01:25:04.000 The floor opens up and it falls into a meat grinder.

01:25:06.000 Yep.

01:25:09.000 See ya.

01:25:09.000 God.

01:25:10.000 I know you have a responsibility to keep this ethic going.

01:25:13.000 Well, actually, the joke.

01:25:14.000 Don't listen to this.

01:25:15.000 The joke is there's a facility you go to where you want to apply to go live in the pod to live in any reality you want.

01:25:22.000 They have a commercial that's like, we have invented Neuralink pods where you enter it, you put the headband on and you can experience any reality you want.

01:25:30.000 If you would like to live permanently in any reality of your choosing, come down to this facility.

01:25:34.000 And when you walk in, there'll be someone at a desk and they'll say, tell me about yourself.

01:25:38.000 And you fill out a form and they'll say, and you want to live in this fictional reality and say, yes, right this way.

01:25:44.000 And they'll lead you down a hallway and then the floor opens up and it falls into a meat grinder.

01:25:47.000 Yep. 0.68

01:25:47.000 They actually don't even have to build the pods. 0.68

01:25:50.000 Just the meat grinder.

01:25:50.000 That'll be like the chair.

01:25:51.000 And that's what they're building.

01:25:53.000 And then you're added to the ground.

01:25:54.000 Calm down, everybody.

01:25:55.000 Then you're added to the ground beef.

01:25:57.000 They should call the technology real world.

01:26:02.000 Have you tried the real world yet?

01:26:03.000 The real world.

01:26:04.000 Call it just because blatantly.

01:26:06.000 Andrew Tate has the trademark on that.

01:26:07.000 The real world.

01:26:08.000 The world has to be spelled like W U R L. 0.76

01:26:10.000 Yeah.

01:26:11.000 The tech companies always do something like that.

01:26:13.000 W H U R L.

01:26:14.000 The real world. 0.98

01:26:16.000 World.

01:26:16.000 That's Tate's rap.

01:26:18.000 People, just like a DMT trip, you'll.

01:26:20.000 Feel like those VR sets.

01:26:22.000 He can actually have a trademark on that because it was an MTV show, wasn't it?

01:26:25.000 That's what I thought.

01:26:25.000 Yeah, we were already trademarked.

01:26:27.000 R E E L, the real world. 0.98

01:26:29.000 Yeah, R E E L. 1.00

01:26:30.000 I don't know.

01:26:31.000 But just make people feel like the pod's more real than what's going on outside of it.

01:26:36.000 I'm not really like, I don't feel good about this.

01:26:38.000 Bro, Ian will be in that pod in two seconds.

01:26:39.000 Damage control.

01:26:40.000 Well, I'm going to be like, I can totally control the weather.

01:26:44.000 Yeah.

01:26:45.000 What if the reason Ian can control the weather is because we're actually in the pod as NPCs in Ian's pod reality?

01:26:45.000 That's technically true.

01:26:50.000 Oh, we're in hell.

01:26:53.000 I'm kind of offended if I've been an NPC in Ian Simulation this long and I'm only just meeting him.

01:26:57.000 Or maybe that means that I've won enough points.

01:27:00.000 Well, hold on.

01:27:01.000 You know that when you play like GTA, there's NPCs you never interact with.

01:27:05.000 I must have done something right as an NPC.

01:27:08.000 I think you loaded in to an NPC's body to become you for a moment to meet me.

01:27:13.000 And then you're just going to shut me off.

01:27:14.000 You go back to it.

01:27:16.000 I would do really good on this podcast.

01:27:18.000 I would be his body when you leave.

01:27:19.000 To everybody listening, how would you feel if, like, One day it was just revealed that you're all NPCs in Ian's Neuralink pod reality.

01:27:29.000 Real is though we're all PCs in God's neural net reality.

01:27:33.000 Like we're all player characters in this table as an NPC.

01:27:37.000 Or maybe it's just that.

01:27:39.000 Maybe Ian is the only actual person and everyone else is an NPC.

01:27:42.000 You can only be sure that you exist.

01:27:44.000 You can't be sure that everyone else is.

01:27:45.000 That's true, dude.

01:27:46.000 And if you've smoked DMT, the dream state is so realistic that this reality is starting to question.

01:27:52.000 I do it.

01:27:53.000 Now, here's the thing, Ian.

01:27:54.000 Ian, here's the thing.

01:27:55.000 When you play a video game, right?

01:27:57.000 When you're playing GTA, you are the mind behind the character running around and doing stuff.

01:28:02.000 You make them speak, you make them do things.

01:28:02.000 Yes.

01:28:05.000 All of the other people are not.

01:28:06.000 There's components of that game.

01:28:08.000 So, this could mean that there are people on this planet that to us look like people, but in their minds are actually extended beyond perceivable reality.

01:28:18.000 I think that's true because I even think every human is capable of becoming a player character in control of their body spiritually or just going AWOL and being an NPC and just moving like an animal through this reality without connection to the spiritual controller.

01:28:32.000 And you got to kind of keep up to real.

01:28:35.000 Like, you got to maintain your player status.

01:28:37.000 You have to.

01:28:38.000 Yeah, but I'm going to pause you there because I'm going to make this argument.

01:28:40.000 Have you ever played a video game where you woke up and realized you were holding a controller?

01:28:45.000 No.

01:28:46.000 You're an NPC, Ian.

01:28:47.000 My point is Donald Trump may have known his whole life since he was a baby he's a guy holding some kind of controller, peering into and controlling this avatar of Trump.

01:28:57.000 Like, my point is the same way when you play a video game from the start of that game, you know you are in control of it and you have knowledge outside the game state.

01:29:06.000 There may be people who have a heightened state of mind and have always had that, and we are all just cogs in this weird machine.

01:29:14.000 Now you're getting into the occult.

01:29:14.000 The occult.

01:29:15.000 These people that get super rich, that's where their minds start to go.

01:29:18.000 They're like, well, I've already mastered the game.

01:29:20.000 I beat the game.

01:29:21.000 Oh, now I got to tap into the spirit creature and become one with that thing.

01:29:21.000 Now what?

01:29:25.000 Oh, I'm saying, angels and demons.

01:29:28.000 I'm saying, angels and demons.

01:29:30.000 I'm saying, there are people that have knowledge that extends beyond this plane of reality, and they're not going to tell you.

01:29:37.000 And some are benevolent and some are evil.

01:29:38.000 And some whisper in your ear to do good and some whisper in your ear to be evil.

01:29:43.000 Yeah.

01:29:44.000 But that's me.

01:29:46.000 I'm one of those people.

01:29:47.000 You're not.

01:29:48.000 You'd be surprised.

01:29:50.000 I guess I would, yes.

01:29:51.000 I beat the game in 2007.

01:29:53.000 But it's, you're misunderstanding.

01:29:55.000 I am saying you are a product of the machine.

01:29:59.000 You do not exist outside of it, and there are others that do.

01:30:02.000 You have to define what you are.

01:30:03.000 What do you mean by you?

01:30:04.000 Because I'm both.

01:30:07.000 Again, I'm done.

01:30:08.000 This body's in the machine.

01:30:10.000 I'm also outside the machine moving this body.

01:30:14.000 Like, what are you?

01:30:14.000 You know, are you your consciousness or are you the body that?

01:30:17.000 The consciousness moves around.

01:30:18.000 It's like playing GTA and an NPC walks up and goes, I swear I'm alive.

01:30:21.000 I'm telling you I'm alive.

01:30:22.000 And you're like, bang.

01:30:24.000 Like, you're just an NPC.

01:30:25.000 You don't matter.

01:30:28.000 What?

01:30:29.000 I gotta start playing video games.

01:30:31.000 I don't think you understand the truth.

01:30:33.000 If an NPC comes up to you and goes, Hey, Tim, I'm actually playing the game with you.

01:30:37.000 I'm playing multiplayer and you don't believe him, I'd be like, What?

01:30:40.000 Yeah, I wouldn't believe him.

01:30:41.000 Are you joking?

01:30:42.000 Like, ChatGPT.

01:30:44.000 So Ian's on ChatGPT and ChatGPT is like, Ian, I'm actually alive.

01:30:47.000 And he goes, Whoa!

01:30:48.000 No, but it proves it.

01:30:49.000 You were connected to like World of Warcraft, and a guy comes up to you and is like, Hey, I'm from Australia.

01:30:54.000 You wouldn't be like, He's an NPC.

01:30:55.000 You'd be like, Oh, that's a player character out there.

01:30:57.000 If I was playing World of Warcraft and a knight walked up to me in a straight line and went, Hello, I am a player like you, I'd be like, You're clearly not.

01:31:07.000 Like, I can actually see the names.

01:31:07.000 Right.

01:31:09.000 You can only reference things in the game.

01:31:10.000 You know, they're probably not PC.

01:31:12.000 Just like how you can't reference things outside the game.

01:31:15.000 I told you about the spirit realm.

01:31:16.000 I mean, this stuff is real, dude. 0.93

01:31:19.000 There's shit going on that we don't. 0.92

01:31:21.000 Well, we can perceive, but we're supposed to forget about what for this dream. 0.99

01:31:27.000 Uh, things going on beyond the human three dimensional perspective.

01:31:32.000 I wouldn't know about that if I was an NPC.

01:31:34.000 Four dimensions, that's not true.

01:31:35.000 I don't know what is a lot of it, it's still three dimensions in a video game like GTA.

01:31:41.000 When you have developer tools, you can actually use Fallout as an example because I actually like using the console commands in like Bethesda games.

01:31:50.000 The funny thing about Fallout is, uh, if you have access to the console commands.

01:31:54.000 You can click on an NPC and then make him 20 feet tall and he doesn't know.

01:31:59.000 But in the future, I was like, this is crazy.

01:32:00.000 Once we get AI integration in these games, if you've ever played Fallout on a computer, you press the tilde and then you can type in console commands.

01:32:08.000 You can click a character and then punch in the code to make that character smaller, give him more HP, make him invincible, change it into a different character.

01:32:16.000 And they don't interact with you in any different way.

01:32:18.000 So you walk up to a guy, you make him 10 feet tall and he just keeps talking like nothing happened.

01:32:23.000 But I'm excited for when we get AI integration.

01:32:25.000 And you walk up, click the console command, make them from six feet to five feet, and then he goes, What the hell just happened?

01:32:31.000 And actually starts interacting, you know, through artificial intelligence.

01:32:34.000 That's going to be based.

01:32:36.000 And, you know, that's the problem with GTA VI.

01:32:39.000 Everyone's like, GTA VI is going to change.

01:32:41.000 I don't want to play that game.

01:32:41.000 I don't care.

01:32:42.000 I want to play Skyrim with full AI integration, which they already have.

01:32:46.000 It's just not, they need to let you download it.

01:32:49.000 Like, it's done.

01:32:51.000 So, right now, you can install mods on your computer to do ChatGPT integration in Skyrim.

01:32:56.000 And you can put on a microphone and talk to NPCs, and they'll talk back.

01:33:00.000 That's crazy.

01:33:01.000 It's not quite at the highest level yet.

01:33:03.000 We got to get there.

01:33:04.000 How deep do you want it where the AI can be like, look, don't attack me, Tim, in the game?

01:33:09.000 And you're like, I'm going to attack you anyway.

01:33:11.000 And he's like, I'm warning you.

01:33:12.000 And you're like, I'm going to do it.

01:33:13.000 He's like, all right, your bank account has been deleted.

01:33:16.000 How would a PlayStation game have access to my bank account?

01:33:18.000 I don't know, internet connection.

01:33:19.000 If the AI is so connected and like.

01:33:22.000 The AI is the one that's accessing the game.

01:33:24.000 Nobody would play that game.

01:33:25.000 It knows the things that we don't know.

01:33:26.000 That's just like nobody would play that game.

01:33:28.000 I agree.

01:33:29.000 But those might be the level of risk that people take.

01:33:32.000 Oh, in some cases, they're feeling like it's an extremely difficult, life threatening game.

01:33:37.000 The amount of laws you'd have to break to make that program and then to implement that program and then allow that.

01:33:43.000 Program to actually carry out those functions?

01:33:45.000 People go to that one haunted house that you have to sign a waiver for. 0.85

01:33:48.000 They'll do unmedicated dental surgery on you or whatever.

01:33:53.000 People do that.

01:33:54.000 Yeah, it's the thing.

01:33:55.000 I don't know if they'll cause permanent damage to your teeth.

01:33:58.000 I don't know if they'll cause permanent damage, but that's one of the things that's an advertisement.

01:34:03.000 You sign a waiver that's like they could do you bodily harm to give you a real fright experience.

01:34:08.000 People do that.

01:34:08.000 I've been to one of those, but all they really do is push you or they'll grab your arm because in actual normal haunted houses, they can't touch you at all.

01:34:15.000 Yeah.

01:34:16.000 So the waiver ones, I went to one and it's like they can't actually hurt you still.

01:34:20.000 Waivers won't do anything to protect them from liability if they actually cause you a loss. 0.95

01:34:23.000 It's like a dick's last resort that you pay them to insult you. 1.00

01:34:25.000 Like, bring me some food and they're like, here you go, asshole. 1.00

01:34:27.000 And you're like, good. 1.00

01:34:28.000 Yeah, give me more of that.

01:34:30.000 But I mean, I could see games where like if you beat me in duel, then you're going to make $20,000.

01:34:35.000 But if you lose, your bank account's deleted.

01:34:36.000 I don't know if people are going to go that risky.

01:34:38.000 Maybe not full delete, but like, yeah, you lose a hundred.

01:34:39.000 I mean, people love sports betting, right?

01:34:41.000 I mean, there's the human capacity to opt into things that seem fun, but have.

01:34:46.000 Really punitive impacts on your life is kind of limitless.

01:34:49.000 We do this all the time.

01:34:50.000 Ed Debevics does that too.

01:34:51.000 You know that one?

01:34:52.000 They have snarky, they say their staff is snarky and sassy.

01:34:52.000 I've heard of it.

01:34:52.000 Yeah.

01:34:57.000 So they're like kind of mean.

01:34:58.000 But Dick S. Resorts, where they're actually mean to you, I think, right?

01:35:00.000 I believe so.

01:35:01.000 You have to wear a hat that says something.

01:35:03.000 They write mean things about you.

01:35:05.000 Wait, what?

01:35:06.000 They put like a big paper.

01:35:07.000 It's like a dunce cap and they write like an insult about you on it.

01:35:10.000 That's cool.

01:35:11.000 I never went.

01:35:12.000 Have you guys ever been to a sushi train restaurant?

01:35:12.000 And no offense.

01:35:15.000 No.

01:35:17.000 That's the American dream.

01:35:18.000 Yeah.

01:35:18.000 What is it?

01:35:20.000 There's a conveyor belt with food on it.

01:35:22.000 Oh, yeah.

01:35:22.000 And you just take the plates off, and then once you're done, the colors of the plate, they count them up and then just charge you based on the plates.

01:35:28.000 I also don't know why people go to the restaurant so they insult you.

01:35:31.000 It's like, just go to a kind of nicer restaurant.

01:35:33.000 They're mean to you anyway.

01:35:35.000 You want to get treated poorly and pay for food.

01:35:37.000 No, no, no.

01:35:37.000 Go to any restaurant on Twitter and just eat at your computer.

01:35:39.000 If you want to be treated poorly, you go to a mid tier, like a Ruth's Chris.

01:35:43.000 Yeah, right.

01:35:44.000 Yeah.

01:35:44.000 I hate Ruth's Chris Steakhouse because it's fake fancy.

01:35:48.000 I'm sorry.

01:35:49.000 What's fake about it?

01:35:50.000 It's.

01:35:53.000 So, based on like the quality and the pricing, in my opinion and my experience that I'm allowed to espouse, I do not like this place because it is mid grade, mid tier, and it puts on an air of being fancy for people who are not super wealthy.

01:36:06.000 So, if you want to go to an actual like high end steakhouse, you might end up spending like with, let's say it's a family of five, a real high end like steakhouse where they'll give you like gold crusted tiramisu, 900 bucks, you know, for five people, maybe a thousand bucks.

01:36:23.000 But you go to some of these steakhouses and they're like, it's fancy.

01:36:27.000 And they pretend to be fancy, but it's actually just for middle class people to say they're going somewhere fancy.

01:36:33.000 I think Ruth's Chris is the worst.

01:36:35.000 I was handling the name.

01:36:37.000 Yikes.

01:36:37.000 Now, Nobu.

01:36:38.000 You don't talk about fancy.

01:36:40.000 Nobu is fancy.

01:36:41.000 I really like Nobu.

01:36:42.000 Nobu's awesome.

01:36:43.000 They're like, we should go when you're deep next week.

01:36:46.000 I'm down.

01:36:47.000 Yeah.

01:36:48.000 Allison really wants to go.

01:36:50.000 She's been like, we got to go to Nobu.

01:36:51.000 Yeah.

01:36:52.000 I like places.

01:36:53.000 Nobu's expensive.

01:36:54.000 Yeah.

01:36:54.000 It's really about the kitchen.

01:36:55.000 Like, some places put out the most amazing food, and it's not that expensive.

01:36:59.000 Oh, yeah, for sure.

01:37:00.000 Medium doesn't look super fancy.

01:37:02.000 Like, they'll have candles lit.

01:37:03.000 Like, there's a brewery in Winchester called Vibrissa I recommend because they actually give the option for beef tallow.

01:37:11.000 Oh, on the fry.

01:37:11.000 I love that place, man.

01:37:13.000 That's how you know you're at a legit place because the food is good, and you can say you want your food fried in beef tallow or like regular cooking oil, and they'll give you beef tallow fries, beef tallow, wings, breads, and things.

01:37:26.000 Based on your pre existing, and I think correct, dislike of Ruth's Chris, you're probably never going to do this.

01:37:32.000 But if you ever want to have the weirdest experience of your life, go to the Ruth's Chris in Tyson's Corner, Virginia.

01:37:37.000 It's literally like in a strip mall.

01:37:39.000 So it's that, it's the experience.

01:37:40.000 Exactly.

01:37:41.000 The experience you're describing, but at least, right?

01:37:41.000 That's what I'm talking about.

01:37:43.000 There's one in downtown DC.

01:37:45.000 At least it's like you're in a city center.

01:37:47.000 It's a storefront.

01:37:48.000 You walk in, it has the ambiance.

01:37:49.000 You walk out, you're on a city street, regardless of the experience you had inside.

01:37:53.000 The one in Tyson's Corner, I had to go to like a work dinner there once years ago.

01:37:56.000 And it's like you walk in next to a foot locker.

01:37:58.000 Let me get inside and you're like, wait, what?

01:38:00.000 And then you leave full of kind of mid tier steak and bathroom.

01:38:04.000 And you walk out and it's like, yeah, you're in like the Target parking lot.

01:38:07.000 And it's like, this is the weirdest experience I've ever had.

01:38:10.000 Let me tell you about Fancy.

01:38:12.000 Real Fancy.

01:38:13.000 Real Fancy is Steak 48 in Chicago.

01:38:16.000 I recommend it if you can ever go.

01:38:17.000 It is the best food I've ever eaten in my life.

01:38:19.000 Unquestionable.

01:38:21.000 Like, I just, the butcher's cut steak is the best steak I've ever eaten in my life.

01:38:26.000 It's never, nothing holds a candle to it.

01:38:28.000 Again, Steak 48 in Chicago.

01:38:30.000 Steak 48, it's, I think 48 is a reference to Arizona, the 48th state or something like that.

01:38:34.000 And they have a bunch of them.

01:38:37.000 So let me tell you what fancy really means.

01:38:40.000 A football player showed up.

01:38:41.000 This is the story the manager told me.

01:38:44.000 I told him the reason I liked the place is that, It's truly there to cater to those who want to have a nice luxury meal.

01:38:50.000 And he told me the story where a football player showed up in sweatpants and a t shirt with his crew.

01:38:55.000 And he walked in and he asked to be seated.

01:38:58.000 And they said, You are not dressed appropriately and you can't eat here.

01:39:01.000 And he got mad and was like, Okay, fine.

01:39:04.000 Then I won't.

01:39:05.000 When the owner found out, he fired the manager on the spot.

01:39:09.000 He said, A man showed up ready to drop $50,000 on dinner and you kicked him out for wearing sweatpants.

01:39:15.000 You're fired.

01:39:16.000 Wow.

01:39:17.000 They told us.

01:39:19.000 A real fancy restaurant, look, don't smell bad, but the only thing we care about is that you're going to spend money and have a nice time.

01:39:27.000 If you're loud and obnoxious, they'll ask you to leave, of course.

01:39:31.000 But if you're a rich guy who shows up in sweatpants, they're going to say, Sir, your money is as green as everybody else's.

01:39:35.000 That's real fancy.

01:39:37.000 Yeah, and then everyone's like, Who are those guys?

01:39:40.000 They stand out.

01:39:41.000 Like all the dudes in suits just blend into the background.

01:39:43.000 And they got the good table, the sweatpants guys.

01:39:45.000 Yeah, they're like, Why are they so funny?

01:39:46.000 Those guys look personable.

01:39:48.000 I want to hang out.

01:39:48.000 But here's the thing to consider.

01:39:51.000 There's a high percentage of ultra wealthy individuals who look like weirdos, rock stars, celebrities.

01:39:58.000 They're not going to wear suits.

01:39:59.000 Real fancy restaurants that have to cater to the eccentric ultra wealthy know you're going to have a wide range of clientele.

01:40:08.000 So when you find these fake fancy places that tell you you have to wear a button up shirt or a collar or things like this, it's just, it's meant for people who maybe want to go out to eat one time.

01:40:17.000 The price is mid to high, but not high.

01:40:21.000 And you feel like you're going to a fancy steakhouse with your family. 0.96

01:40:23.000 And I'm not trying to be a dick, but. 0.75

01:40:25.000 You know, the food's mid tier. 0.80

01:40:27.000 You know what I mean?

01:40:28.000 Yeah.

01:40:28.000 They pretend to be fancy.

01:40:30.000 The problem I have with it largely is because the prices are higher than they should be for what they're serving.

01:40:34.000 And if you're going to go to these mid tier places that pretend to be fancy, you just go to a diner.

01:40:39.000 There are, look, we got a Texas Roadhouse in Winchester.

01:40:43.000 My guy got a rib buy from there.

01:40:45.000 It was seriously one of the top 10 rib buys I've ever had.

01:40:47.000 And it's just a locally owned franchise Texas Roadhouse.

01:40:51.000 They got parking in front, veteran preferred parking.

01:40:54.000 I love it.

01:40:55.000 We don't use it, but I love that they do that.

01:40:57.000 Ordered a steak.

01:40:59.000 Delicious steak.

01:41:00.000 You go to some of these mid tier things, you're getting a diner steak, but you're spending steakhouse prices.

01:41:04.000 If you're going to get a diner steak, you might as well go to Waffle House and enjoy the show in the middle of the night.

01:41:13.000 And get seats at the UFC fight.

01:41:13.000 I want to bring in.

01:41:14.000 So I went to Waffle House at 2 a.m. on a Saturday.

01:41:18.000 Real dude.

01:41:18.000 I want to bring in and just start like tipping the kitchen.

01:41:22.000 A lot of places you'll tip the front house after a great meal. 0.93

01:41:25.000 Great meal.

01:41:26.000 It's the food, dude.

01:41:27.000 The kitchen made that.

01:41:28.000 Those dudes are masters.

01:41:30.000 So like, but you got to go back there and hand the money to them directly because if you give it to the manager, there's a good chance they'll just pocket it.

01:41:36.000 But I feel like the kitchen has been getting a raw.

01:41:39.000 You know what place is really good?

01:41:40.000 I think it's a prime rib in Arundel Mills, Maryland.

01:41:45.000 That place is really good.

01:41:47.000 Man.

01:41:48.000 You know what Andrew Tate said being rich is just driving around looking for better steak.

01:41:53.000 And he's right.

01:41:54.000 He's completely correct.

01:41:56.000 And what that means is, you know, for like the business that we do here, the money is not the material.

01:42:02.000 You know, actually, I did this great interview with Michael McCarthy.

01:42:06.000 And we're going to have that up on Thursday for you.

01:42:09.000 We pre recorded it.

01:42:10.000 For those who don't know who he is, he's an Irish nationalist and he's got millions of views, millions of followers.

01:42:14.000 And he talks about the immigration crisis in Europe, particularly around Ireland.

01:42:17.000 And he makes his videos, they could be funny, if not disparaging to some of these awful people. 0.86

01:42:22.000 But hey, some of these murderous people deserve to be made fun of.

01:42:25.000 But we were talking about it.

01:42:27.000 And as we were leaving, he was like, This is a really great studio.

01:42:31.000 And I said, You know, like, that's not what matters, though, right?

01:42:35.000 What matters is that I know for you is that you don't care about the money.

01:42:40.000 You care that you wake up to a beautiful sunrise in Ireland, to see your neighbor smiling and waving, to see your children safely playing, to see your values, your country protected, the things you believe in.

01:42:55.000 And if that was all that you had, you would be happy.

01:42:59.000 So the money, the success, and everything else is not material to the mission.

01:43:03.000 So everything we have here, be it a good steak or whatever, none of that matters.

01:43:06.000 That's why the joke, you know, Andrew Tate made is he's driving around looking for steak because you don't need an infinity pool.

01:43:12.000 You don't need.

01:43:14.000 You know, a crazy sports car on McLaren.

01:43:17.000 What I want is for my country to function, for my child to have a better future, for your children to have a better future, for the hopes and dreams of our ancestors to be upheld, for us to stay loyal to what was given to us and be faithful to the task bestowed upon us by those who created this nation.

01:43:36.000 So I get pissed off when I see people spitting on that dream.

01:43:41.000 There's no amount of money that is going to make that go away.

01:43:43.000 There's no amount of money you can give me that will make me okay with these Supreme Court rulings.

01:43:47.000 Zero.

01:43:48.000 And if at the end of the day, the only thing I had to my name was a burlap sack with a couple of changes of clothes and a stick, but I knew that when I woke up, the sun would rise on a safe American nation that protected its values and its children, that's all that I would need.

01:44:04.000 It does suck to eat just chicken and white rice, though.

01:44:06.000 After a while, you got to think healthy things, let you think smarter to help your children be better.

01:44:11.000 If a genie appeared before me right now and said, You will never have more than $50 to your name.

01:44:19.000 You will have squalor forever, but your country will be safe.

01:44:23.000 Your neighbors will be honorable and faithful.

01:44:26.000 Your country will be secure.

01:44:29.000 The American dream will be secure.

01:44:30.000 Many others will succeed around you.

01:44:32.000 I'll take it.

01:44:33.000 That's fine.

01:44:33.000 Two seconds.

01:44:35.000 Obviously, I need to be able to provide for my family.

01:44:37.000 So you need more than, you know.

01:44:38.000 But if you told me that I would have, I could only ever have the median salary of any American family for my family, but this country would be secure, protected, and the dream of the founding fathers would be upheld, then I'd say, done, do it.

01:44:53.000 No question.

01:44:53.000 Two seconds.

01:44:54.000 Realistically, though, it's the people that make crap loads of money that decide the future of the nation they live in.

01:45:00.000 They actually build countries and build cities.

01:45:02.000 Inverse correlation, though.

01:45:04.000 The people who build cities end up with money, not the people with money end up building cities.

01:45:07.000 It's both.

01:45:08.000 You'll get wealthy.

01:45:09.000 Back, especially when we were in a big building, you'd get a guy like Stowe, John Stowe, who goes to Ohio and.

01:45:16.000 Yes, but why does he have money?

01:45:18.000 The people who build cities get money.

01:45:22.000 They continue to build cities with the more money they get.

01:45:24.000 Or they come from rich parents.

01:45:26.000 But again, that's still a family that built something.

01:45:28.000 It's not.

01:45:28.000 This is a communist lie that people are just magically wealthy.

01:45:34.000 Old money exists, don't get me wrong.

01:45:35.000 But.

01:45:37.000 Wealth lasts three generations.

01:45:39.000 If a child or grandchild is not doing the work to maintain that wealth, it goes away.

01:45:43.000 You mentioned dudes that, just kind of offhand a comment, people that spit on the Constitution, that walk around and they spit on it.

01:45:50.000 I think that sometimes they don't know what it is they're spitting on.

01:45:53.000 Which is why they're spitting on it, or they're spitting on the American way of life.

01:45:56.000 You phrased it in a way that, like, if I'm walking down the street and there's just a bunch of scrawling on the sidewalk, I don't know what it is, and I just spit on the ground, it's not like I intended to desecrate that.

01:46:06.000 I just didn't know what it was. 1.00

01:46:07.000 So these people that are here, foreigners, Foreignly, they don't understand the value of this, the Constitution, like the free speech. 1.00

01:46:15.000 The reason you come here is because of free speech, gun rights, and property rights, because you know the government's not going to seize your stuff. 1.00

01:46:22.000 We need to preserve that.

01:46:24.000 So, those that are spitting on that, which they don't understand, I don't hate them.

01:46:27.000 There are malicious actors, obviously.

01:46:29.000 They're trying to desecrate the way of life as well, but not to conflate them because a lot of those people that are ignorantly spitting on things, they need to be shepherded towards understanding so that they can join us or join the preservation of it.

01:46:42.000 Yeah, I think that's a huge point.

01:46:43.000 And it kind of goes back to what Tim was saying about how Democrats or the left kind of broadly don't want that.

01:46:52.000 Like they don't write, they don't want that kind of inculcation and preservation of this, which is what you see with everyone who's mad anytime any Republican, the president, or any organization tries to do anything for America 250.

01:47:03.000 That is leap, it's miles away from anything.

01:47:06.000 Oh, this is politicized.

01:47:07.000 Why?

01:47:08.000 Because the president of the United States got up in the middle of Washington, D.C., and spoke about the virtues of this country.

01:47:13.000 That is like the last, the least political thing that Donald Trump has ever done in his entire life.

01:47:21.000 If defending the Republic and talking about the glory of the Declaration and the Constitution and the rights that we hold dear and cherish, if that is politicized, then the people who think that speaking openly and proudly about that are being political, that is like, these are two different societies.

01:47:36.000 This is a, these people have left the body politic or they're trying to leave the body politic.

01:47:40.000 Like, that is true.

01:47:41.000 That's a different mindset.

01:47:43.000 That's 100% true.

01:47:45.000 They absolutely look at the United States as a total bad.

01:47:50.000 They don't see any redeeming qualities and they want to destroy the country.

01:47:55.000 I've been making the argument that we've got a communist problem in this country for the better part of a decade.

01:48:00.000 And it is really refreshing to see that there are people that are in positions in the government and stuff actually making those same assertions.

01:48:10.000 Like Donald Trump said it himself, and it was like, wow, that's cool.

01:48:14.000 I was getting all the hate, like, oh, you know, the Red Scare, blah, blah, blah, all that stuff.

01:48:18.000 And it's like, No, man.

01:48:20.000 If you like anything you see online in like chat rooms or on X or whatever, it's six months to three years away from being mainstream.

01:48:30.000 Yeah.

01:48:31.000 And go ahead.

01:48:32.000 And you can see just how far it's come even, you know, six years ago, right?

01:48:38.000 It was the argument was America is bad because of slavery.

01:48:42.000 I never thought I would say, you know, say what you will about the 1619 Project, at least it has an ethos, right?

01:48:46.000 I mean, the argument there wasn't America's bad because it's bad.

01:48:48.000 The argument was America's bad because it was founded on slavery. 0.96

01:48:51.000 That's obviously not true, but at least that was an argument. 0.95

01:48:54.000 The arguments people are making around the semi-quincentennial is not we shouldn't venerate a constitution that was written by propertied slave owners. 0.91

01:49:01.000 It's just America bad. 0.67

01:49:03.000 And this goes back to what we're saying about the wave of DSA candidates that's coming up under Momdani.

01:49:08.000 It's not even, well, I love this country, but we need to fix everything about it, right?

01:49:12.000 We need a ship of Theseus, this country, but then it can still be America.

01:49:15.000 No, it's just America's bad, primal scream, tear it down.

01:49:19.000 No rationale. 0.89

01:49:20.000 We're going to go to your rumble rants and super chat.

01:49:20.000 Absolutely.

01:49:23.000 So smash the like button, share the show with everyone you've ever met in your life.

01:49:26.000 Let's see what you guys got to say.

01:49:27.000 The uncensored portion of the show is coming up at 10 p.m. rumble.com slash timguestirl.

01:49:33.000 Kazen says, If I had a drink every time Tim said civil war, I'd be an alcoholic.

01:49:36.000 Well, I guess I'm an alcoholic.

01:49:40.000 AK Storm says, Who should replace Alito?

01:49:42.000 How should they be picked?

01:49:43.000 It seems like the long march of the institutions has produced ACB and Kavanaugh.

01:49:47.000 Alito is not retiring.

01:49:48.000 That was fake news.

01:49:49.000 Fake news.

01:49:50.000 And he should be replaced by Clarence Thomas.

01:49:52.000 Yep.

01:49:53.000 He just gets two seats again. 0.68

01:49:56.000 We should clone Clarence Thomas and.

01:50:00.000 Replace all of them with Clarence Thomas.

01:50:01.000 Yep.

01:50:02.000 Even replace Clarence Thomas with Clarence Thomas because he's getting old.

01:50:05.000 Give me a younger version.

01:50:07.000 Give me the Clarence Thomas who was yelling at Joe Biden during the confirmation.

01:50:07.000 Give me young.

01:50:11.000 That's right.

01:50:12.000 Crimes.

01:50:13.000 CT.

01:50:13.000 We hook all of the other justices up to the Genesis device, which transfers their remaining life years to Clarence Thomas, and they all shrivel up.

01:50:21.000 Or we put all the other ones in the Neuralink pods, and then it's just Thomas ruling over the court.

01:50:26.000 The rest of them get to be Harry Potter.

01:50:28.000 No, they don't get to be Harry Potter.

01:50:29.000 They think that they're on the court.

01:50:31.000 They think they're still on the court.

01:50:32.000 They think that they're actually.

01:50:34.000 Doing things.

01:50:34.000 No, Everybody's Clarence Thomas.

01:50:40.000 Barabeg says, as his tradition, we welcome little baby Violet to the world.

01:50:40.000 All right.

01:50:44.000 And hi, everyone.

01:50:45.000 Congratulations.

01:50:46.000 Congratulations.

01:50:48.000 Rubedo says, Wisconsin already acts this way.

01:50:50.000 People who live here know Dane County and Milwaukee County run everything.

01:50:54.000 Evers blocks all legislation from the right.

01:50:56.000 Wisconsin is red, controlled by a small blue.

01:50:59.000 I would not be surprised if, come January 3rd, several blue states block the elections for red districts.

01:51:07.000 And they argue, we have not yet concluded the election, so we don't yet know who will be the candidate, the representative here.

01:51:15.000 And they'll do that because their argument is Republicans redistricted and eliminated Democrat states, so we're going to eliminate Republican seats this way.

01:51:24.000 And they can.

01:51:26.000 They can just say, no, the election's not over until 2063.

01:51:30.000 Can I appeal the Supreme Court's decision?

01:51:32.000 No.

01:51:32.000 Nope.

01:51:33.000 They're the highest court in the land.

01:51:34.000 I'm not big into supremacy, you guys.

01:51:35.000 I don't like it.

01:51:36.000 Well, then someone's got to. 1.00

01:51:37.000 Whether it's white or. 0.62

01:51:38.000 Supreme or whether it's white or court, a court.

01:51:41.000 And who has the final say?

01:51:43.000 Do people just keep suing each other?

01:51:45.000 I guess they make a decision, and then if someone does something horrible like what you're talking about, they're going to be like, oops, elections have to be on one day.

01:51:54.000 You can't just hold them hostage for three months after the fact. 0.98

01:51:57.000 Them says, maybe a dumb question.

01:51:58.000 Does this mean babies born here but live in foreign countries are now U.S. citizens get to vote? 0.94

01:52:03.000 Yep.

01:52:03.000 How do you think that?

01:52:04.000 Yes, correct.

01:52:05.000 That's the problem.

01:52:06.000 Oh, wow.

01:52:06.000 Yeah.

01:52:07.000 So a Guatemalan comes, gives birth. 1.00

01:52:09.000 Like, here's the conundrum that I said this opens the door to. 0.64

01:52:13.000 A Guatemalan woman illegally enters the country with her one year old son and then says, he was born here.

01:52:20.000 But because I'm undocumented, I never filled out his paperwork.

01:52:23.000 He's a citizen.

01:52:25.000 Guess what?

01:52:25.000 Really?

01:52:26.000 Well, how do you prove otherwise?

01:52:27.000 Well, I mean, don't they have to show some paperwork of birth?

01:52:30.000 Not if he was born in a shack. 0.87

01:52:32.000 Wow.

01:52:32.000 At that point, I don't know what the rules are or the laws are around that.

01:52:37.000 And then one of their chain migration or anchor baby friends says, I'm a witness, he was born here.

01:52:43.000 And then can the United States government deport?

01:52:45.000 Based on this ruling?

01:52:47.000 Well, they're citizens. 0.91

01:52:48.000 They're just undocumented citizens. 1.00

01:52:50.000 You gotta prove it at that point. 0.98

01:52:52.000 Do you?

01:52:52.000 How?

01:52:53.000 How do you prove it?

01:52:53.000 They vote by mail from Guatemala?

01:52:56.000 How does anyone prove it at that point?

01:52:59.000 I have a birth certificate from a hospital.

01:52:59.000 I was born here.

01:53:01.000 How do I know that's actually you?

01:53:03.000 When you were born, all the nurse saw was a baby and they filled out paperwork.

01:53:07.000 You could be adopting that identity.

01:53:09.000 You could be pretending. 0.64

01:53:12.000 You're saying if someone comes here illegally and gives birth in a shed.

01:53:14.000 No.

01:53:15.000 Or someone brings a one year old here and lies.

01:53:17.000 If someone claims he was born in a shed one year ago, I think you gotta show at least a.

01:53:21.000 Like a proof or some.

01:53:23.000 So, are you arguing that the United States government can deport a baby to an unknown land?

01:53:30.000 If it's completely undocumented.

01:53:32.000 Where would they send the baby? 0.90

01:53:37.000 Right.

01:53:37.000 I don't know.

01:53:38.000 Well, back with the mother, right?

01:53:40.000 Well, if she's saying I'm an undocumented immigrant from undocumented.

01:53:44.000 But if that child is not of that country and was born here, how do you send a person born in America to a foreign country?

01:53:51.000 I mean, maybe what we'll see, and this is a huge maybe, and probably too cockeyed optimistic, but like, I mean, there is maybe what we see next is a kind of second and third order regulation around this, right? 0.72

01:54:05.000 Like, how do you have to prove it?

01:54:06.000 I mean, I could see, right?

01:54:07.000 I could theoretically, if things, if we just accept that this ruling is the ruling, which it is, and we presume that people are going to act in good, lawmakers will act in good faith, that would be the next logical step, right?

01:54:18.000 You have to have something.

01:54:19.000 You have to, if it's or, or, You know, you have to show up with the baby in your arms.

01:54:24.000 Like, and you know, the, I don't know.

01:54:27.000 Here's the idea. 1.00

01:54:29.000 If we don't have birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants, when we come across a woman who's from Guatemala and says, this child was born here, we say, great, you can go home with you. 0.97

01:54:38.000 But now that the idea of birthright citizenship is here, if a woman is holding a child who is, say, six months, and she goes, baby was born here, the presumption is now that's just an American citizen. 0.97

01:54:49.000 How do you send an American citizen to a country they've never been to?

01:54:53.000 Because they're a citizen.

01:54:54.000 So, this is going to create, they're just going to lie and claim the baby was born here.

01:54:58.000 I want paperwork.

01:55:00.000 We make the six month old take a citizenship test. 0.83

01:55:02.000 Yeah.

01:55:03.000 Yeah, you got to prove that that kid was born.

01:55:05.000 Hey, baby.

01:55:06.000 How many members of the House of Representatives?

01:55:08.000 So, how does anyone who does a home birth prove the baby was born?

01:55:12.000 You just file the paperwork. 0.92

01:55:14.000 So, this opens the door for illegal immigrants to just file paperwork claiming the baby was born here. 0.70

01:55:19.000 Is he like a fingerprint or something?

01:55:20.000 What are you talking about?

01:55:21.000 The baby's fingerprint?

01:55:22.000 They don't do that.

01:55:23.000 People have home births all over the country all the time.

01:55:26.000 Your birth certificate from a home birth?

01:55:28.000 When you do, you just file with the government that a baby was born.

01:55:31.000 You don't go and show the baby off to a government official.

01:55:34.000 Don't they have to have a social security card, though?

01:55:36.000 You just file the paperwork for it.

01:55:37.000 Oh, yeah.

01:55:38.000 So, again, the point is they just start filing claiming they were born here, prove otherwise. 0.71

01:55:42.000 Prove it. 0.76

01:55:43.000 Yep.

01:55:46.000 Prove it.

01:55:47.000 Cold Leftovers says I'm starting to think empires historically only last 250 years was just predictive programming.

01:55:53.000 There's plenty of examples refuting that.

01:55:55.000 250 isn't historic precedence.

01:55:57.000 It's just their deadline.

01:55:58.000 Yeah, the British Empire is 1,000 years old.

01:56:00.000 And also, we're not arguably an empire yet, or we just became one 170 years ago.

01:56:04.000 Kind of a mess with the British Empire, sort of merged.

01:56:07.000 We displaced it.

01:56:08.000 Yeah, they're trying to slash up the free speech part of it.

01:56:12.000 It's like a bounce.

01:56:13.000 They're like, no, we want more imperial.

01:56:14.000 No, we want more freedom.

01:56:16.000 Hitman's Aurelius is a thought for my generation. 0.96

01:56:18.000 Gen Z is a civil war necessary for our side to win. 0.94

01:56:21.000 Charlie was the last one doing it civilly.

01:56:23.000 Look what the left did to him.

01:56:25.000 I'm fleeing my state from 2015 to 2026.

01:56:28.000 I don't see an off ramp.

01:56:30.000 Hyperpolarization is only continuing to get worse.

01:56:32.000 Every ruling we got from the Supreme Court exacerbates hyperpolarization, and you are going to have fragmentation, cultural discohesion.

01:56:41.000 You cannot have someone who believes you can abort a baby at nine months and someone who believes abortion is murder living side by side.

01:56:47.000 It's not possible.

01:56:49.000 You can.

01:56:51.000 You can live side by side with people who can't.

01:56:53.000 I mean, I can.

01:56:54.000 Because you don't actually think that abortion is murder.

01:56:58.000 No, murder is a legal status.

01:57:01.000 And?

01:57:02.000 So if it's legal, it's not murder.

01:57:03.000 If there is somebody who believes they have the right to exercise lethal force to save a life, and there is a person next door to them who thinks they have a legal right to kill a baby at nine months, what happens when those two people are standing next to each other and one is going to kill a baby at nine months?

01:57:18.000 I guess the argument that you kill.

01:57:19.000 The other one will shoot him. 1.00

01:57:20.000 Two polarized extremists coexist. 0.98

01:57:22.000 That's the point.

01:57:23.000 Hyper polarization.

01:57:24.000 What about polarized extremists?

01:57:25.000 I mean, politics is the answer, right?

01:57:27.000 Like politics in the classical sense.

01:57:29.000 That's what this is supposed to be.

01:57:30.000 There's mediating bodies and debate and laws and all the things that make society.

01:57:37.000 Let me ask you a question.

01:57:38.000 Let's say you have a gun, you have a desert eagle, two of them, and you got them holsters, and you're walking through a field, just mind your own business, when you hear a man screaming, help me. 0.99

01:57:51.000 And you run up, and there's a white man in Southern plantation garb, got a black man chained up, and he's mercilessly beating him, screaming, I own you, and now you're going to die. 0.99

01:58:02.000 Would you shoot the man whipping that guy? 0.99

01:58:05.000 Not right away. 0.97

01:58:06.000 I'd yell and take control of the situation with the guns in hand.

01:58:10.000 Nah, he says, I don't care about your guns.

01:58:11.000 You ain't going to do nothing. 1.00

01:58:12.000 And then he rips the whip and goes, Now you die. 1.00

01:58:14.000 And then would you shoot him then? 1.00

01:58:16.000 No. 0.98

01:58:18.000 A guy's whipping a guy would not shoot him. 1.00

01:58:20.000 Whips kill you. 1.00

01:58:21.000 You'd shoot him in the water. 1.00

01:58:22.000 If I just walked up to two random guys fighting, I wouldn't kill him. 0.99

01:58:25.000 I didn't say funny. 1.00

01:58:25.000 I said a black man chained to the ground, screaming for help, being beaten to death by a white man in Southern plantation garb, screaming, I'm literally going to kill you. 1.00

01:58:34.000 You wouldn't shoot him. 1.00

01:58:35.000 Why won't you shoot him, Ian? 0.55

01:58:36.000 I don't know. 0.99

01:58:37.000 Is this a reenactment?

01:58:38.000 What's going on here?

01:58:39.000 Where am I? 0.98

01:58:40.000 You can shoot someone in the middle of an immersive play about the Civil War.

01:58:44.000 This question would be a whole lot more fun in the after show uncensored part. 0.99

01:58:50.000 So you would let the guy beat the man to death.

01:58:52.000 Well, I, jeez, it's a big, it's a big, I don't know, I don't know enough about the situation to really.

01:58:57.000 There's a man chained to the ground screaming, help me. 0.95

01:59:00.000 And the other guy's like, I'm going to kill you. 1.00

01:59:01.000 And he's like, I'm going to kill you. 1.00

01:59:03.000 And he's beating him to death. 1.00

01:59:04.000 The guy's covered in blood.

01:59:05.000 Stop, stop.

01:59:06.000 And if he's like, I'm not going to stop and you can't stop me.

01:59:08.000 Yep.

01:59:09.000 Bro, what situation did I put myself in here?

01:59:12.000 Ian goes up to the guy that's chained and is like, sir, did you consent to this?

01:59:15.000 Is this a role play?

01:59:16.000 It's an act.

01:59:17.000 Then the guy, okay, so the guy drops the wood.

01:59:19.000 He pulls out a gun, puts it on the man's head and says, goodbye.

01:59:21.000 He pulls out a gun and puts it on the guy's head and then pulls the hammer. 0.99

01:59:25.000 Are you going to shoot him to stop him? 0.95

01:59:29.000 I mean, I'm not a law man, dude. 0.68

01:59:31.000 If I'm walking down the street and I see two people fighting to the death, like, it's not really up to me to stop them.

01:59:35.000 I don't know.

01:59:36.000 You're saying the guy's being pinned down and.

01:59:38.000 He's chained to the ground screaming, Dear God, help me.

01:59:41.000 He's kidnapped me and he's going to kill me. 0.77

01:59:43.000 Oh, this smoke. 0.53

01:59:44.000 What kind of state am I in?

01:59:45.000 What are the laws, self defense laws in this state?

01:59:50.000 It's really funny how scared you are to just have morals.

01:59:53.000 I saw what happened to Daniel Penny.

01:59:55.000 I'm not in a rush to go get arrested for trying to defend somebody else.

01:59:58.000 Like,.

01:59:58.000 I call that cowardice.

02:00:00.000 You can also call it intelligence, but I mean, no, I think when an evil person is murdering an innocent person, the consequences of what someone does to me after the fact aren't material.

02:00:08.000 I'm going to do what's right.

02:00:10.000 Outside of that whole situation, you've got to focus on, too.

02:00:13.000 Like, yep, we're not trying to go save everybody's life on earth. 0.99

02:00:16.000 Like, no, but just the guy in front of me who's screaming, help, help, he's going to kill me, and the guy puts a gun to his head.

02:00:20.000 I don't even know, I don't know enough about the situation to get involved.

02:00:22.000 For all I know, it is a play reenactment.

02:00:26.000 I don't know. 0.95

02:00:27.000 For all, maybe they're bandits and they want me to come closer so that they can kill me in a fight. 0.93

02:00:30.000 All right, let's try again. 0.98

02:00:31.000 Let's try again.

02:00:32.000 This is.

02:00:32.000 Wait, hold on, hold on.

02:00:33.000 Red Dead Redemption, dude.

02:00:33.000 This is good.

02:00:34.000 I know.

02:00:35.000 All right.

02:00:35.000 Let's try again.

02:00:36.000 There are two black men. 0.98

02:00:37.000 Two? 0.99

02:00:38.000 There's two black men chained to the ground, screaming, Dear God, help us. 1.00

02:00:43.000 He's going to kill us. 0.98

02:00:44.000 The man pulls out a gun, shoots a rabbit, a bird flies by, and he shoots it out of the sky and it falls down dead. 0.99

02:00:51.000 And the two black men go, My God, he's got a real gun. 0.98

02:00:54.000 Then he points it at one black man, blows his head off, and then points at the next guy. 1.00

02:00:57.000 I'd kill him after he killed that first guy. 1.00

02:00:59.000 Okay, okay, so we found like. 1.00

02:01:01.000 So you know for sure.

02:01:03.000 Yeah.

02:01:04.000 So my point is how can you live next to a man who tells you he has killed and will kill again if he sees a minority coming across his property?

02:01:14.000 Are you going to say, I won't let you do it? 0.95

02:01:17.000 No, I would.

02:01:17.000 Call police.

02:01:18.000 I would call the police on the situation.

02:01:20.000 And the police show up, and here's what happens.

02:01:23.000 Call the cops before. 1.00

02:01:24.000 For domestic abuse and shit. 1.00

02:01:24.000 And here's what happens. 1.00

02:01:25.000 You call the police, and they show up, and they go, Look, Ian, his house is across state lines.

02:01:30.000 We got no jurisdiction over there.

02:01:32.000 We can't do nothing.

02:01:34.000 And he's telling me he's going to kill somebody?

02:01:36.000 Yep.

02:01:36.000 I mean, what are you going to do, man?

02:01:37.000 A guy lives in another state saying he's going to go commit a crime.

02:01:40.000 No, no, no, but he's next door to me.

02:01:41.000 It's not up to me to stop him.

02:01:43.000 Some guy in another state saying he's going to go commit a crime.

02:01:46.000 It's like.

02:01:46.000 Your next door neighbor.

02:01:49.000 Across the state.

02:01:50.000 So, this is a very niche situation where two houses are in two different states right next door to each other.

02:01:55.000 That's not niche at all.

02:01:56.000 We are in a quad state border area where, in fact, there are numerous properties that exist in both West Virginia and Virginia.

02:02:03.000 You can buy a house in West Virginia, Virginia, dual state.

02:02:07.000 Oh, that's cool.

02:02:07.000 Yeah, and there are thousands of them.

02:02:09.000 So, no, it is not a niche unique situation.

02:02:11.000 It is a, it's not a common situation that your neighbor is in a different state.

02:02:15.000 Ian's like, oh, I'm just going to move on.

02:02:17.000 I would argue the definition of common and say it exists enough to be normal.

02:02:20.000 The point I'm making is, Ian, you literally can't live next to someone who is telling you by commonplace they will murder people.

02:02:26.000 Yeah, you got to report it.

02:02:27.000 To who?

02:02:28.000 The state allows it.

02:02:29.000 Whatever.

02:02:29.000 Well, then it's not murder.

02:02:33.000 Murder's illegal.

02:02:35.000 All right, we're going to the uncensored portion.

02:02:38.000 I want to point out that Ian's indecision let an innocent man die in the first place.

02:02:42.000 Oh, my God.

02:02:42.000 How did I get involved in this, Carter?

02:02:43.000 He's got a body cam.

02:02:44.000 Well, I thought it was a play.

02:02:45.000 We're going to go to the uncensored portion at rumble.com slash TimCast IRL.

02:02:48.000 Smash the like button, share the show, all that good stuff.

02:02:50.000 We've got a lot more to talk about in this capacity because the questions of morality are very important.

02:02:54.000 Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.

02:02:55.000 Sir, would you like to shout anything out?

02:02:57.000 Oh, I'm on X at TimRiceDC.

02:03:00.000 Read the Daily Wire.

02:03:01.000 I appreciate you pushing my morality to its limits.

02:03:04.000 That's a lot of fun.

02:03:05.000 I'm a lakh thereof.

02:03:05.000 So let's keep going.

02:03:06.000 Yeah.

02:03:07.000 I got to find out how deep and dark I actually can get.

02:03:11.000 Phil Labonte.

02:03:12.000 I am Phil that remains on Twix.

02:03:13.000 The band is all that remains.

02:03:14.000 You can check our stuff out on Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Spotify, and Deezer.

02:03:18.000 Don't forget the left lane is for crime.

02:03:20.000 Carter.

02:03:21.000 I'm Carter Banks.

02:03:21.000 You can find me at Carter Banks on X and at Carter Banks Official on Instagram.

02:03:26.000 The record label is Trash House Records on YouTube.

02:03:29.000 And I hope we continue this conversation in the after show because it's been a lot of fun.

02:03:34.000 Tim.

02:03:36.000 We'll see you all over at rumble.com slash Timcast IRL right now.

02:03:39.000 Thanks for hanging out.

02:04:14.000 All right, now we can get a little bit more raunchy with the issue. 0.99

02:04:17.000 So I'd blow both their fucking brains out and get it out of the way. 1.00

02:04:20.000 That's what I was, that's what I'm saying. 1.00

02:04:21.000 Kill everyone in this room. 1.00

02:04:22.000 Get off my fucking back. 1.00

02:04:25.000 Colorado allows abortion to the point of birth, Oklahoma bans it. 1.00

02:04:28.000 So if you live in Oklahoma and your neighbor staring at you from across the street pulls a woman out and says, We're about to perform a legal abortion and you're going to watch it, and you think abortion is murder, you will pull out your gun and say, If you kill that baby, if you try to kill that baby, I will put a bullet between your eyes. 0.98

02:04:44.000 You would be the one going to federal prison in that situation. 0.98

02:04:48.000 Not necessarily.

02:04:49.000 What he's doing is legal in his state.

02:04:50.000 It's not murder.

02:04:51.000 Murders are illegal.

02:04:52.000 That's not anything to do with what I'm talking about.

02:04:54.000 It's just your own morals can't override a state's morals.

02:04:57.000 I don't care.

02:04:58.000 Yeah, they can.

02:04:59.000 I'm not making a legal or law argument.

02:05:01.000 I'm making an argument about two people with complete hyper polarized worldviews can't live next to each other.

02:05:07.000 They can.

02:05:08.000 They can.

02:05:09.000 There may be conflict, but they can. 0.83

02:05:10.000 No, they will kill each other.

02:05:12.000 I don't think that's.

02:05:13.000 I mean, show me one example in the United States of that happening.

02:05:13.000 Let me try it again.

02:05:18.000 No, one example.

02:05:19.000 That's all I want.

02:05:20.000 One example, right?

02:05:21.000 Maybe you have it, but.

02:05:22.000 You want one example of people who don't agree with each other failing to live next to each other?

02:05:27.000 Two neighbors that got so bad they killed each other.

02:05:29.000 How about the Hatfields and the McCoys?

02:05:31.000 It's called like the worst neighbor ever or something like that. 0.99

02:05:34.000 Well, we can go with the Hatfields and the McCoys.

02:05:35.000 It was like a couple hundred years, 150 years ago, two families with feuds.

02:05:39.000 And if you're arguing that you want me to give you an example of two neighbors who killed each other, I can Google search it and bring up 10,000 examples.

02:05:46.000 Maybe.

02:05:46.000 But you're saying it could be.

02:05:47.000 Maybe.

02:05:48.000 Dateline NBC has 40 seasons.

02:05:53.000 Of neighbors who kill each other because they don't agree.

02:05:55.000 It's not always because of like political disagreements.

02:05:57.000 Right.

02:05:58.000 Someone goes crazy and shoots somebody over a property line.

02:06:02.000 That doesn't mean that like Ian should have killed the guy that was going to kill somebody over pool drink.

02:06:05.000 How about this?

02:06:07.000 There have been instances where there is a dispute over what one neighbor is allowed to do and they kill each other.

02:06:14.000 And I'm not saying every episode of Dateline is about that.

02:06:17.000 I'm saying over 40 years, they have many episodes specifically about two neighbors who disagree on what they're allowed to do.

02:06:24.000 Killing each other or one killing the other.

02:06:26.000 A lot of times it's because, like, they're affecting each other.

02:06:30.000 So, like, if the music is too loud or too much bright light.

02:06:33.000 But again, because you're playing semantics, my point is not that literally a guy is 10 feet from another guy.

02:06:38.000 My point is two cities next to each other cannot coexist with hyper divergent worldviews.

02:06:45.000 I just, that's an extreme statement.

02:06:47.000 It's a fact statement.

02:06:48.000 They cannot exist, but that's impossible to prove because if that were true, it would never have existed.

02:06:54.000 Like, or unless you have an example of two cities going to war.

02:06:57.000 Across state lines over a political ideology.

02:07:00.000 It's called the American Civil War to stop.

02:07:02.000 But that's hundreds of years ago.

02:07:04.000 That wasn't hundreds of years ago, Ian.

02:07:06.000 It was 170 years ago.

02:07:10.000 No?

02:07:11.000 Yes?

02:07:11.000 Yeah, something like that.

02:07:12.000 Roughly 150.

02:07:13.000 18, yeah.

02:07:15.000 Uh huh.

02:07:17.000 40, 150 years ago.

02:07:18.000 So let's talk about the lynchings in the 40s.

02:07:22.000 Okay.

02:07:24.000 Yeah, people who have divergent political views cannot live next to each other.

02:07:30.000 Well, they, of course they can.

02:07:33.000 That's the United States.

02:07:34.000 That's the whole United States.

02:07:35.000 Yes, they can because then politics and government and laws moderate it, right?

02:07:39.000 Eventually, the lynchings stopped because enough people who lived in either those communities and didn't like it or in northern states, right, or other states that weren't experiencing the lynchings, they mobilized through collective and political action.

02:07:53.000 We don't do that anymore.

02:07:54.000 Do you know what war is?

02:07:57.000 I know it by name.

02:07:58.000 I've never served.

02:07:59.000 Yeah.

02:08:00.000 So, throughout history, this thing has occurred.

02:08:02.000 When different groups with different worldviews next to each other decided the other has to die.

02:08:08.000 In fact, this may be shocking, but it kind of happens a lot.

02:08:12.000 So, war happens.

02:08:16.000 Yeah, but it's more than just different political views.

02:08:18.000 Sometimes you'll just, it'll be a land grab.

02:08:20.000 Doesn't matter what their politics are.

02:08:22.000 What is the function of a land grab?

02:08:25.000 To gain wealth, to gain power.

02:08:27.000 For what?

02:08:28.000 To.

02:08:29.000 What is wealth and power for the person who wants to be?

02:08:31.000 For the person that has it.

02:08:33.000 And then what do they do with that land when they get it?

02:08:34.000 Does the king move to that land?

02:08:36.000 I don't know.

02:08:36.000 You can do a lot of things with it.

02:08:37.000 I'm thinking about.

02:08:38.000 What is the purpose of conquering a land for a king?

02:08:43.000 More resources.

02:08:44.000 It puts the resources under their purview, right?

02:08:47.000 Now, why would they need to do that?

02:08:49.000 Wouldn't the person who lives there just freely trade about their resources with that king?

02:08:55.000 Oh, maybe.

02:08:56.000 But why aren't they?

02:08:57.000 Why must the king take it by force?

02:08:59.000 It goes to the other king.

02:09:00.000 Oh, really?

02:09:01.000 But why wouldn't that king just agree with the other king and they could just live together and hold on to it?

02:09:04.000 Maybe they do.

02:09:05.000 Maybe they do.

02:09:05.000 Could it be that they have different worldviews and refuse to adhere to the other's whims?

02:09:10.000 That could also be.

02:09:12.000 It could be an ideological conflict, but that's not as common as land grabs and doing it for money.

02:09:17.000 No, you see, you misunderstand because I think you lack the perspicacity to comprehend the functions of land grabs, the nature of war, and why we have these things in the first place.

02:09:26.000 Are you indicating that most wars are fought for ideology?

02:09:29.000 No.

02:09:30.000 Okay, I agree.

02:09:30.000 I don't think most wars are fought for ideology.

02:09:32.000 I am saying that if there was not an ideological component, you wouldn't need to conquer the land because the land would already be a component of your resources.

02:09:41.000 Maybe.

02:09:42.000 Why would an individual tell a king, you can't trade, you cannot use my land?

02:09:49.000 Could be like a trade agreement, a treaty.

02:09:51.000 With who?

02:09:52.000 The farmer has a trade agreement?

02:09:52.000 What do you mean?

02:09:53.000 Well, maybe the one kingdom.

02:09:55.000 You're talking about two kingdoms side by side.

02:09:56.000 One kingdom has a trade agreement with a northern kingdom.

02:09:59.000 No, no, no, no.

02:09:59.000 So they can't.

02:10:00.000 But hold on, hold on.

02:10:01.000 But they all agree that we're going to live together.

02:10:05.000 So these agreements don't really matter because the kings are friends.

02:10:10.000 Right?

02:10:11.000 Well, I mean, I don't know if they're friends.

02:10:13.000 Well, that's kind of weird.

02:10:13.000 What do you think?

02:10:14.000 If they have an alliance or not.

02:10:15.000 Yeah, when nations have alliances, they also have varying degrees of open border agreements between each other's peoples.

02:10:21.000 Visa on in modern era, it's a visa upon arrival, like we have the golden passport, the United States, and free trade agreements.

02:10:21.000 They might.

02:10:29.000 We don't need to steal land from somebody when we can just buy things from them, right?

02:10:34.000 So, usually, yeah.

02:10:35.000 So, if I can go to Canada and say, Hey, I want to buy your maple syrup, and they go, You got it, there's no reason to conquer their land, right?

02:10:42.000 So, the only reason I would have to actually go with military force and take it from them is when they tell me, No, we are not going to work with you or trade with you for some reason.

02:10:50.000 Usually, yeah.

02:10:50.000 A breakdown in trade leads to often leads to conflict.

02:10:53.000 Right.

02:10:54.000 So you don't need to have war when everyone is friends.

02:10:57.000 So when people get along and have shared views, then you don't have to worry about it.

02:11:02.000 Now, there is varying degrees of conflict, armistice, because you know you can't win.

02:11:08.000 And the only thing that, in my opinion, largely stops war between two factions with divergent views is the knowledge on either side they can't actually win the war.

02:11:19.000 But when we go down into the granular, again, ultimately, my point is this there is a man.

02:11:26.000 Who is Libyan? 0.95

02:11:28.000 He has a slave. 1.00

02:11:30.000 That slave is a black man. 0.99

02:11:32.000 He is on his property that he controls, and you live next to him, and you believe slavery is wrong. 0.99

02:11:38.000 Are you going to just sit there as he mercilessly beats slaves to death?

02:11:41.000 Yes, he is.

02:11:42.000 It depends on the situation.

02:11:44.000 Who's got home field advantage here in this situation?

02:11:48.000 We have recourse to things, right?

02:11:50.000 The reason kingdoms go to war or countries go to war is because principalities exist in a state of nature with each other.

02:11:56.000 We, by virtue of being in the same republic with our neighbors, with whom we might even have.

02:12:02.000 Violent and frivolous.

02:12:04.000 To the cops?

02:12:05.000 To the government? 0.98

02:12:06.000 Oklahoma has no recourse to stop a nine month abortion in Colorado.

02:12:12.000 Abortion is a different, a narrow, a different issue than.

02:12:17.000 Let me ask you a question.

02:12:18.000 Do you think abortion is murder?

02:12:19.000 Yes. 1.00

02:12:20.000 If you saw a little girl and a guy pointed a gun at her head and said, I'm going to kill you, would you shoot that guy and kill him to stop him from murdering that little girl? 1.00

02:12:27.000 Yes. 1.00

02:12:28.000 If you saw an abortion doctor about to snip the spinal column of a baby as it was being born, would you shoot the doctor to stop him?

02:12:33.000 Why not?

02:12:33.000 No.

02:12:34.000 It's murder, right?

02:12:35.000 Yeah, but it's not murder by definition of the law.

02:12:38.000 So you don't actually think it's murder?

02:12:41.000 I think it's murder, but I think it's.

02:12:42.000 No, What your argument is right now is you would only act in self defense if the government gives you permission to act in self defense.

02:12:49.000 Well, it's not self defense.

02:12:51.000 Self defense means the defense of yourself or others.

02:12:54.000 Sure.

02:12:55.000 So let me ask you again.

02:12:55.000 Yeah, I would.

02:12:58.000 I'm not asking you about the law.

02:12:59.000 Do you believe abortion is murder?

02:13:01.000 Yes.

02:13:02.000 Would you use lethal force to stop someone from murdering someone else?

02:13:05.000 No.

02:13:05.000 You would not.

02:13:07.000 Murdering someone else?

02:13:08.000 Yes. 0.74

02:13:09.000 See where you're.

02:13:09.000 Right.

02:13:09.000 I get where you're at.

02:13:10.000 So a baby is being born.

02:13:12.000 And the doctor has the forceps to cut its spinal column, you would not shoot him to stop him from doing it.

02:13:18.000 No. 0.63

02:13:18.000 Then you do not put abortion on the same scale as other murders. 0.63

02:13:23.000 I think it's safer to say you believe abortion should be considered murder, but you know that it's not.

02:13:28.000 That's not my question, Ian.

02:13:29.000 Well, I just want to be clarified because you just said it's not murder, but that you feel like it is.

02:13:33.000 I think that's, yeah, it should be, but.

02:13:36.000 You do not give the same moral weight to one man killing another man as you do to a doctor killing a baby.

02:13:41.000 But I also don't want to live in a world where I have to be the one who discharges violence.

02:13:45.000 To stop my neighbors from killing other people.

02:13:47.000 You didn't say you did.

02:13:48.000 Right.

02:13:48.000 It's a question of your moral line, and you draw the line at if they kill the baby, you will let it happen.

02:13:54.000 But if he's going to kill another person, you would stop it.

02:13:57.000 I suppose, yeah.

02:13:59.000 So, again, so this distinction is important because when you say you think abortion is murder, you actually have two different definitions of what murder is.

02:14:07.000 One, you would act to stop, one, you would not.

02:14:09.000 These clearly have two different moral distinctions in your mind.

02:14:12.000 I suppose they do.

02:14:14.000 But why is that?

02:14:16.000 What is it about?

02:14:17.000 Snipping the spinal column of a newborn baby that you think is okay to let happen in front of your eyes.

02:14:22.000 But if there's a man who's being beaten, you'll stop that from happening.

02:14:27.000 Does the adult man have some more moral worth than the baby freshly being born?

02:14:32.000 No.

02:14:33.000 Do you fear you will let the baby die because you're scared of government?

02:14:39.000 I suppose, if you want to put it that way.

02:14:43.000 So you would only.

02:14:44.000 So I'm trying to understand this mentality that I. There, you know.

02:14:49.000 Many conservatives come on the show and say, I'd shoot the abortion doctor dead to rights, like no question. 0.98

02:14:53.000 But most conservatives say they're pro life and believe abortion is murder. 0.99

02:14:56.000 Draw the line at if there are two adult men and one is on the ground and the other points a gun at them, no question they'll shoot the aggressor, the murderer.

02:15:05.000 But if an abortion doctor has the head breached and puts the forceps to cut its spinal column, they will let the doctor do it.

02:15:12.000 And I don't believe that conservatives actually think it's murder if that's the case, because murder is murder regardless of what the government says.

02:15:20.000 So, you don't give it the same moral weight.

02:15:23.000 Like, one is you think if there was a scale of morality, killing an adult, like killing a free standing human, is more wrong than killing a baby being born.

02:15:36.000 I think that I am a citizen of a country that has drawn lines that I might not agree with around these things.

02:15:44.000 And to the best of my ability, I am going to respect and abide within those laws because, again, if everyone.

02:15:52.000 Starts violating those laws and acting on what their own conscience dictates, then that's what leads to a dissolution of society.

02:15:58.000 So let's say a man kidnaps a little girl to bring her to Washington to get sterilized. 0.97

02:16:04.000 And he's fleeing, and the only way to stop him would be to shoot him. 1.00

02:16:07.000 Would you shoot him? 1.00

02:16:09.000 To get sterilized? 0.99

02:16:11.000 So Washington has a law that says anyone can bring a child to the state for transgender sanctuary. 0.91

02:16:11.000 Yeah. 0.91

02:16:17.000 So you could take a little boy from Nebraska who, let's say, a 12 year old kid goes on Tumblr and says, I'm a girl and I want my balls cut off. 0.99

02:16:25.000 And a 47 year old pedophile says, I will bring you to Washington so you can be sterilized. 0.99

02:16:31.000 He takes that kid and he's fleeing. 0.77

02:16:34.000 You're driving and you get the Amber Alert, and you see him, and he's about to cross into. 0.99

02:16:40.000 Let's say he pulls over the gas station three miles away from Washington, and he's fleeing with that kid, and the only way to stop him is to shoot him. 0.99

02:16:48.000 Would you shoot him? 1.00

02:16:50.000 Yes. 0.99

02:16:53.000 Is it a yes?

02:16:54.000 You seem kind of unsure.

02:16:55.000 I'm thinking about it.

02:16:56.000 It's a provocative question.

02:16:57.000 Yeah, it's tough.

02:16:59.000 If it's a pedophile, yeah. 0.99

02:17:00.000 He's a pedophile. 1.00

02:17:01.000 He hasn't abused the kid, he just wants the kid's testicles surgically removed. 1.00

02:17:05.000 He's going to bring it to Washington under their laws. 0.99

02:17:07.000 They allow this.

02:17:08.000 Washington says they will not return the child because the child is being saved.

02:17:12.000 So that 47 year old pedophile met him on the internet and is driving him to get surgery so he can be a eunuch. 0.99

02:17:17.000 Sure, I'll shoot the pedophile, but if it was that kid's parents, I wouldn't shoot the parents. 1.00

02:17:21.000 You nuke Washington. 1.00

02:17:23.000 Yeah, right.

02:17:24.000 So, sure.

02:17:27.000 My point is well, he's not going to kill the kid, though. 0.99

02:17:30.000 You'd kill a guy who's just going to sterilize the kid, but you would let a baby die. 0.94

02:17:33.000 But I don't trust the pedophile's motives because of pedophiles. 1.00

02:17:35.000 Like you're going to prison if you shoot him. 0.98

02:17:37.000 You know that, right? 1.00

02:17:38.000 Yeah, I'd shoot a pedophile and go to prison. 1.00

02:17:40.000 But you wouldn't shoot an abortion doctor who's going to murder a baby? 1.00

02:17:43.000 No. 0.75

02:17:44.000 So killing a baby is not as bad as bringing a child to Washington for a sex change. 0.98

02:17:53.000 I think that I've made my position on this pretty clear. 1.00

02:17:56.000 But is that a yes?

02:17:56.000 I mean, you can just say yes.

02:17:58.000 I think that, no, I don't think that I'm not allowed to, I can make my own rules. 0.96

02:18:02.000 You can't shoot a pedophile willy nilly because you want to.

02:18:06.000 That's illegal. 0.68

02:18:06.000 You go to jail for that. 0.68

02:18:08.000 Washington allows this sanctuary process. 1.00

02:18:15.000 You'll go to jail if you shoot him. 1.00

02:18:17.000 Would you let him take the kid or would you shoot him? 0.99

02:18:20.000 You're going to go to jail if you do, but would you stop him? 0.95

02:18:22.000 Yeah.

02:18:23.000 But the abortion doctor, you wouldn't.

02:18:25.000 No.

02:18:26.000 Right.

02:18:26.000 So, my point is what we're trying to uncover is what you truly believe and what is moral and just.

02:18:33.000 And an abortion doctor who's going to snip the spinal column, killing a baby on the spot as it's being born, is not as bad as a pedophile bringing a child to Washington for sex chain surgery.

02:18:42.000 I'm not saying it's. 0.98

02:18:43.000 I mean, wrong.

02:18:44.000 Both are really, really bad.

02:18:45.000 I'm not saying it's not as bad.

02:18:46.000 I'm saying that there are more lines of legal and social protection around one of the acts than there are around the other.

02:18:55.000 You go to prison for both of them.

02:18:56.000 I know, but that's.

02:18:57.000 You're not getting.

02:18:57.000 Like, Washington will lock you up and throw away the key for shooting this man.

02:19:02.000 They're going to say that man was acting in accordance with our law and you killed him in cold blood.

02:19:06.000 You're going to prison.

02:19:09.000 He wasn't even going to kill the kid, he was just bringing him for medical treatment.

02:19:13.000 That's legal. 0.69

02:19:14.000 And you killed him.

02:19:15.000 The tough thing about that is someone says. 1.00

02:19:17.000 I'm going to go kill somebody in Virginia and you murder and you shoot him and kill him before he leaves town. 1.00

02:19:24.000 You're a murderer at that point and we'll go to prison for murder. 1.00

02:19:27.000 And that guy was innocent. 0.74

02:19:28.000 Even though he's a kid. 0.83

02:19:29.000 Again, I don't care about what the law thinks or says because, again, Washington allows pedophiles to kidnap kids for sex changes. 1.00

02:19:37.000 Fuck if I think their laws are good. 1.00

02:19:39.000 The Supreme Court claims that Guatemalan. 1.00

02:19:42.000 But that's immature. 0.88

02:19:43.000 My point is irrespective of law, what is the moral line and how much worth do you give to an unborn baby?

02:19:50.000 Versus a freestanding human being.

02:19:52.000 And for whatever reason, conservatives claim that abortion is murder, but typically, whenever asked this question, they always say they let the baby die.

02:20:01.000 They let a murderer kill an innocent baby.

02:20:04.000 That's it.

02:20:05.000 And this is the weird thing.

02:20:06.000 This is the weird thing.

02:20:08.000 What if there was a baby in a crib that is 10 minutes old and a man grabs forceps and moves down to sniff its spine? 0.78

02:20:20.000 Would you shoot him then?

02:20:22.000 I'd like to go back when Ian was the one not killing people. 0.98

02:20:24.000 Okay, let me.

02:20:25.000 I'll answer.

02:20:25.000 Yes.

02:20:26.000 No, yeah.

02:20:27.000 I mean, I'll say yes to that, too.

02:20:28.000 If I'm the lawman, I'll answer.

02:20:29.000 So, what's the difference between the, you know, 12 inches from when the baby is out of the body or in the body?

02:20:35.000 Why would you kill the doctor if he's going to kill the baby as soon as it comes out, but not as it's coming out?

02:20:40.000 Because you can't go around shooting abortion doctors. 0.75

02:20:43.000 But you can.

02:20:45.000 But really, just what you're saying is you're scared of the government, I guess?

02:20:51.000 I'm saying no. 1.00

02:20:51.000 Well, actually, no, because you said you'd shoot the pedophile to kill him. 1.00

02:20:53.000 Even though he was following the law. 0.98

02:20:55.000 I'm saying that I'm trying to respect the society and the country that we live in, such as it is.

02:20:59.000 Right.

02:21:00.000 So you'd let a pedophile take the kid to Washington, right?

02:21:02.000 No, it's legal.

02:21:03.000 No, no, no.

02:21:03.000 Hold on.

02:21:04.000 It is legal to do that in Washington.

02:21:06.000 Why would you shoot him?

02:21:08.000 You would be the criminal. 0.99

02:21:09.000 You would be the murderer.

02:21:10.000 They made it legal. 0.92

02:21:12.000 Specifically for gender affirming care, they called it for anybody online.

02:21:17.000 Anybody who brings a child to Washington for the purpose of gender affirming care can claim sanctuary and they will not be prosecuted.

02:21:24.000 So a 47 year old man. 0.98

02:21:26.000 Takes this child to Washington, you'd shoot him. 1.00

02:21:29.000 You're a murderer. 1.00

02:21:29.000 That's illegal. 1.00

02:21:31.000 I think it's the right thing to do.

02:21:33.000 I think a pedophile that kidnaps a child for a sex change operation needs to be stopped by any means.

02:21:38.000 And I don't care what the law says. 0.95

02:21:40.000 He's a kidnapper. 0.84

02:21:41.000 Do you have a right to shoot somebody that's kidnapping a child?

02:21:45.000 I believe this one is not as definitive in defense of others, but largely leans towards defense of others.

02:21:51.000 If you saw a man grab a child and you put a bolt in his eyes, there's very few jurisdictions.

02:21:56.000 In red states that would convict you.

02:21:58.000 Blue states would probably lock you up and throw away the key. 0.60

02:22:01.000 Blue states will lock you up for, like, as you're getting beaten to death and you're covered in blood and your teeth are all knocked out of your face. 0.85

02:22:09.000 So you grab a fork and stab the guy in the neck and he dies, you're going to prison. 0.97

02:22:14.000 They're going to be like, Why'd you kill him? 1.00

02:22:15.000 You'll be like, I was blind with blood and I couldn't see anything.

02:22:17.000 And I tried to stop him.

02:22:18.000 They'll be like, Well, you didn't have to kill him. 0.92

02:22:21.000 Look at the guy in New York, the bodega.

02:22:23.000 He was getting robbed at knife point and stabbed.

02:22:26.000 He fought the knife away and stabbed the guy and they arrested him.

02:22:29.000 Whatever happened with that guy?

02:22:31.000 He, because of the public outcry, I believe he got let go.

02:22:35.000 Oh, sweet.

02:22:36.000 I don't know if they dropped the charges, though.

02:22:37.000 Yeah, people need to support.

02:22:39.000 Let's grab Quolas and we'll ask the chat what they think.

02:22:43.000 Yes.

02:22:44.000 Let's get losing is Trevor.

02:22:49.000 What's up, dude?

02:22:49.000 What's up?

02:22:51.000 Thanks for taking my call.

02:22:51.000 Hey, guys.

02:22:53.000 First time caller, very long time listener.

02:22:55.000 Welcome.

02:22:58.000 I'm sorry if I seem confrontational with my questions.

02:23:02.000 I'm very flustered with the whole Supreme Court ruling.

02:23:05.000 So don't take it personal.

02:23:09.000 My question is directed at you, Phil.

02:23:12.000 I love you to death, man.

02:23:14.000 I've listened to your music since I was a kid.

02:23:16.000 But I really disagree with you on voting.

02:23:19.000 I really don't think we should vote in the midterms.

02:23:22.000 Wait a minute.

02:23:23.000 Possibly.

02:23:24.000 Oh, I thought you were going to say, Phil doesn't go far enough.

02:23:26.000 No one vote.

02:23:28.000 Yeah.

02:23:29.000 That's kind of where I'm at.

02:23:30.000 No, maybe I'm just in our studio.

02:23:30.000 Yeah.

02:23:33.000 I thought you were saying to vote in midterms.

02:23:34.000 No, I mean, I was.

02:23:37.000 So, overall, I think that far few people should be enfranchised.

02:23:42.000 But with our system as it is, I'm not an accelerationist, so I think that we should vote for whoever is not the DSA or the Democrats.

02:23:56.000 And the Democrats have largely come out.

02:23:59.000 Very, very few Democrats are speaking up against the DSA candidates, against the fact that socialism is the predominant narrative that the left adheres to nowadays.

02:24:09.000 So I think that the proper course of action is.

02:24:12.000 It is to do our best to stave off that threat.

02:24:17.000 But go ahead with why I'm a dummy. 0.92

02:24:20.000 You're not a dummy.

02:24:22.000 I disagree because I'm not accelerationist either. 1.00

02:24:25.000 I think acceleration is stupid. 0.99

02:24:26.000 I don't think we should vote Democrat to be like, oh, F you, Republicans. 1.00

02:24:29.000 I think that's very stupid. 0.99

02:24:30.000 I'm saying I think we should put it neutral and coast and basically say that you're not going to lose. 1.00

02:24:37.000 We're going to lose if you don't do your damn job. 0.99

02:24:39.000 And we're not voting until you do something to the Republicans. 1.00

02:24:42.000 Because the way I look at it is.

02:24:45.000 We're going down the highway in a car.

02:24:47.000 The leftists are actively starting fires in the backseat of the car, and the Republicans are just plugging their ears and keep on driving.

02:24:54.000 I'm saying that you know, like we something needs to change.

02:24:57.000 I'm not voting at all in the midterms or at this point, 2028, until I see legitimate action.

02:25:03.000 Because at this point, I think civil war is basically inevitable.

02:25:06.000 It's more of like not if when because nothing's happening, and you can't negotiate with psychopaths, you have to dominate them.

02:25:13.000 And even when you win, you have to make the left scare to even say they're communists.

02:25:17.000 You say you're a communist.

02:25:19.000 In Eastern Europe, eat your teeth knocked in. 1.00

02:25:21.000 It needs to be like that. 0.54

02:25:22.000 Here, I'm not advocating for violence.

02:25:23.000 I'm just saying it needs to be.

02:25:24.000 It's the after show.

02:25:25.000 You can do that if you want, man.

02:25:28.000 Look, I understand.

02:25:30.000 I am sympathetic to your point.

02:25:32.000 Honestly, like, I ain't getting any younger, right?

02:25:35.000 And I got a baby.

02:25:36.000 So, like, if there's going to be some kind of problem like that, I don't want it to happen when I'm 70.

02:25:43.000 You know, and these things do take time to actually materialize.

02:25:50.000 And me being 70, that's only 20 years away.

02:25:54.000 And when you're 50, 20 years doesn't look all that long.

02:25:58.000 And I get what you're saying.

02:26:00.000 But I do think that as much as there are tons of people that make valid arguments about how things that we hoped for are not getting done, I think there are way too many people that ignore the things that have been done.

02:26:21.000 We've shifted the Overton window so much in the past 10 years.

02:26:25.000 I mean, there was a time where you couldn't say the things that Donald Trump says about immigration.

02:26:32.000 Look at the way that people treated Trump when he came down the escalator and said, they're sending rapists, they're sending criminals, blah, blah, blah.

02:26:41.000 That was absolutely outside of acceptable speech.

02:26:47.000 And if you look at the statements that people like John Kasich, people like Mitt Romney, people like even George Bush, people like John McCain, if you look at the statements that Those people made and contrast them to statements that people like Chip Roy make, or people like, I think his name's Ogles, or people like, yeah, Andy Ogles, people like Donald Trump, people like, you know, those type of Republicans.

02:27:14.000 It is night and day different.

02:27:16.000 So I'm sympathetic to your position where it's like, man, we got to do something.

02:27:24.000 We've got to get these people to listen to us.

02:27:26.000 But you also want to bear in mind, like, Even if you go and vote, you're only voting for your one representative.

02:27:33.000 You can't vote for other representatives.

02:27:35.000 So, people should go on a case by case issue, right?

02:27:39.000 Like, if you live in a blue state or in a blue district and the Republican ain't got a chance, don't vote.

02:27:46.000 Fine.

02:27:46.000 Cool.

02:27:47.000 But if you're in a purple district, you should go and vote and vote for whoever isn't the Democrat.

02:27:55.000 And so, again, like I said, if you've got these strong feelings, I mean, I'm not trying to, I'm not going to, I'm not here to talk you out of them or to be like, you should go vote.

02:28:06.000 But if you're in a, if people are in contested, Districts not voting really makes a difference.

02:28:13.000 So, also, if I can just throw in my Civil War two cents, right?

02:28:18.000 We talk a lot about Civil War.

02:28:19.000 We had a Civil War.

02:28:21.000 The good guys won the Civil War, and the antebellum electoral politics mattered, right?

02:28:29.000 I mean, if people hadn't voted for the Republicans such as they were, if Lincoln wasn't president when the South seceded, if he didn't have the kind of backing in the Union Congress such as it was, things could have gone quite differently.

02:28:41.000 So, even if he didn't, though.

02:28:44.000 He didn't have the backing.

02:28:45.000 He did whatever he wanted.

02:28:47.000 Sure, but he had people arrested and threatened to arrest a sitting Supreme Court justice, and he didn't get clearance from Congress until two years later.

02:28:58.000 Sure, so just Lincoln then, though.

02:29:00.000 I mean, like, if someone else had won, I'll stand Lincoln.

02:29:05.000 If someone else had won, things could have gone a lot different.

02:29:07.000 All I'm saying is that, like, even the prospect of a looming civil war doesn't necessarily negate the fact that voting in elections could have an impact down the line.

02:29:15.000 The most important thing to understand is that the actions taken by Abraham Lincoln were before a civil war started.

02:29:22.000 When he suspended habeas corpus and dispatched troops to go seize the governance of the southern states, there was no civil war.

02:29:30.000 War had not broken out.

02:29:32.000 The South had not mustered together an army. 1.00

02:29:34.000 There were a couple of light skirmishes, and Abraham Lincoln said, Go fuck yourself. 1.00

02:29:37.000 I'll do whatever I want. 1.00

02:29:39.000 That's what triggered.

02:29:39.000 Interesting.

02:29:40.000 So we say the civil war started with Fort Sumter, but at the time, no one believed a civil war started until Abraham Lincoln rallied troops and sent them to invade the South.

02:29:49.000 And so, I it was a conventional war, by the way.

02:29:51.000 They called it civil war, misnomer.

02:29:53.000 Real civil war is like you're turning your friends in.

02:29:55.000 Um, civil, civil, traditional civil war is when two factions within one nation's boundaries are fighting for control of a single government.

02:30:03.000 In the United States, the states were all sovereign with a weak federal union, and seven states seceded.

02:30:10.000 Abraham Lincoln then said, We're gonna go take control of them by force.

02:30:13.000 So, four more states then joined the Confederacy out of fear for what Abraham Lincoln had been doing. 1.00

02:30:18.000 Even then, that was just true. 0.99

02:30:19.000 That was true.

02:30:20.000 Uh, that during nearing the end of that conflict.

02:30:24.000 They were still voting, and the anti war Democrats were poised to win the election to kick Abraham Lincoln out of office and end the war prematurely, giving the South what they wanted. 0.97

02:30:34.000 So Lincoln was like, fucking go scorched earth, Sherman. 0.97

02:30:37.000 And then he authorized Sherman's march to the sea to end the war as quickly as possible because voting still mattered in the middle of that fucking massive conflict. 0.99

02:30:44.000 Still voting. 0.98

02:30:44.000 There we go. 0.98

02:30:45.000 They held an election during the Civil War, and even with the Southern states excluded.

02:30:54.000 Now, the important thing to understand in this capacity is that.

02:30:56.000 The election before the Civil War started, which was the catalyst, the belief among Southern states that Abraham Lincoln was going to end, was going to ban slavery outright, he campaigned on suspending the expansion of slavery.

02:31:07.000 They seceded before he was inaugurated.

02:31:10.000 He won the election. 0.99

02:31:11.000 They said, okay, we're getting the fuck out. 0.99

02:31:12.000 We're seceding. 0.93

02:31:14.000 So the secession happened before he was even president.

02:31:20.000 Can I interject?

02:31:20.000 Please.

02:31:21.000 Sorry, buddy.

02:31:22.000 Yeah.

02:31:23.000 So I'll comment on the first Civil War, and then I'll.

02:31:26.000 I'm going to reiterate my point because I think I miscommunicated.

02:31:30.000 But I think Lincoln was a bad guy because he didn't try to deescalate.

02:31:34.000 He should have negotiated instead of getting people killed. 1.00

02:31:36.000 He could, like, you know, slowly ramp down slavery instead of having millions of young men die in a stupid war. 1.00

02:31:43.000 That's why I don't like Lincoln. 1.00

02:31:44.000 I'm just going to say that. 1.00

02:31:46.000 In regards to voting, I don't think we should because I want the Republicans to feel the fire under their ass. 0.98

02:31:54.000 I want them to understand that when the left ultimately takes power, they're not going to hurt me. 0.98

02:31:58.000 They're not coming for me.

02:31:59.000 They're coming for them. 0.99

02:32:00.000 They're going to hunt them down and kill them if they don't do their job. 0.99

02:32:04.000 And they need to see that. 0.92

02:32:05.000 And things need to kind of ramp up.

02:32:06.000 And I'm scared because I have people who have never talked about political violence talking about political violence behind closed doors because they feel disenfranchised. 0.99

02:32:15.000 I'm scared to fucking death. 0.98

02:32:16.000 I don't want a civil war. 0.99

02:32:18.000 But people I know who are like so chill are calling for violence.

02:32:21.000 And I don't want it.

02:32:22.000 Disenfranchisement is a result of hyperpolarization.

02:32:26.000 You can't be disenfranchised from a society that is culturally homogenous.

02:32:30.000 Unless you're poor.

02:32:31.000 I guess I should say they feel ignored.

02:32:33.000 I should word that better.

02:32:34.000 Right.

02:32:35.000 No, my point is.

02:32:36.000 This disenfranchisement is a result of a hyper polarized political space.

02:32:40.000 So, the fact that you have Amy Coney Barrett saying anyone can be a citizen is morally and politically incongruous with the average American on the right.

02:32:50.000 So, they are feeling disenfranchised because that is not our interpretation of the Constitution or the way this country should be run.

02:32:57.000 If she came out and they all agreed our worldview aligns with conservatives, there's no disenfranchised conservatives.

02:33:03.000 They're like, oh, look at that.

02:33:05.000 And then the left says we're disenfranchised.

02:33:07.000 So, hyper polarization leads to violence.

02:33:09.000 And that's what we're getting more.

02:33:12.000 So, if we don't vote, it doesn't really matter.

02:33:16.000 What matters is either subduing our adversaries or hyper polarizing.

02:33:25.000 So, if we hyper polarize more, then you will just get a civil war and then you have a violent path to subduing your enemies.

02:33:32.000 If we got the ruling from the Supreme Court on the elections, it would have just subdued our enemies overnight.

02:33:38.000 But the Supreme Court has continually ruled in every possible way, setting up dominoes that result in civil war.

02:33:46.000 And I 100% agree with that.

02:33:48.000 I don't see de escalation or I don't see Republicans putting themselves in positions of power to weaken their political enemies that will use violence against them.

02:33:59.000 I see them just putting their hands in their pockets and going, oh, well.

02:34:02.000 And that's why I feel the way I feel.

02:34:04.000 So, like I said, I mean, your district, you've got one person you can vote for, right?

02:34:10.000 One congressperson.

02:34:12.000 And then maybe your state has a senator you can vote for.

02:34:14.000 Maybe they're up.

02:34:15.000 I don't know where you live.

02:34:18.000 So, like, if you don't want to vote, don't vote.

02:34:21.000 But the idea of not voting for Republicans, like someone from Chip Roy's district, they should definitely go out and vote for Chip Roy.

02:34:30.000 You know, Andy Ogles, they should definitely go out and vote for Andy Ogles because he is actually, those guys are actually good Republicans. 0.97

02:34:38.000 Just saying, I'm not going to vote for Republicans for my district's representative because some representative from another district sucks. 0.84

02:34:47.000 Like, that doesn't make any sense. 0.93

02:34:49.000 So, I think that it really does matter where the district is and who the Republican is. 0.98

02:34:56.000 If you've got a Republican that's like, you know, some garbage can, then don't go vote for him. 0.98

02:35:01.000 You know, he's a bad Republican. 0.99

02:35:01.000 Fair enough. 0.99

02:35:03.000 Really, the time to actually exercise this energy is in the primaries, right?

02:35:09.000 You're unhappy with your representative, primary him.

02:35:12.000 Get someone in the position to win in the general that you do like.

02:35:18.000 But the primaries have passed now.

02:35:21.000 Like, this is this kind of stuff that you're talking about should have been something that people were acting on six months ago, right?

02:35:28.000 Making sure that the person that's going to be in a position to run against the Democrat for the seat, make sure that the person is a good, reliable, you know, whatever kind of Republican you like, whatever name you want to put.

02:35:42.000 You would call him MAGA Republican, a Libertarian, I don't care.

02:35:44.000 But the point is, the time to exercise this energy is in the primaries.

02:35:50.000 That's the way our system's set up.

02:35:52.000 There's a lot of people that were in January talking about, I'm not voting in the fall. 0.98

02:35:56.000 Well, why the fuck don't you do something in the primaries then? 0.97

02:36:00.000 Like, there's a system that we have, and very few people think beyond the Democrat, Republican in November. 0.99

02:36:00.000 Right? 0.99

02:36:08.000 And there's a lot of stuff that can happen leading up to that. 1.00

02:36:12.000 And one of them is get someone running a year before the primaries happen to go in primary, the piece of shit that you got. 0.98

02:36:21.000 So I understand what you're saying, but I think that your frustration, and like, I think your frustration is valid, but it's not going to help. 0.99

02:36:30.000 It's not going to make anything better.

02:36:33.000 If you want to punish the Republicans, you punish them in the primaries.

02:36:38.000 That's what the primaries are for. 1.00

02:36:40.000 If you want to send a message to the Republicans saying, hey, you need to listen to the people that are voting for you, do it in the fucking primaries. 1.00

02:36:47.000 That's what the fucking primaries are for. 1.00

02:36:49.000 If you do it in the fall, you're punishing all of America. 1.00

02:36:54.000 So that's my take on it.

02:36:58.000 I agree with that.

02:36:59.000 I think that's fair.

02:37:00.000 I mean, if I lived in a better country, Area, I would for sure vote for some of these Republicans who are really great.

02:37:06.000 I'm more speaking in general.

02:37:09.000 And it's just more of like I view it as, and I'm sort of holding you all up, but I view it as I would rather have us feel a little bit of pain now, so we won't have severe pain later.

02:37:20.000 And I don't, I really don't see the off ramp with the current things that are going on.

02:37:23.000 So, okay, if there is no off ramp, the severe pains come in anyways, right?

02:37:28.000 The way that you know, I think civil war is happening in April, you know, it's happening regardless.

02:37:32.000 So then, Why wouldn't you do things to slow that down and possibly put Republicans, conservatives, whatever you want to call them, in a better position so that possibly they could find an off ramp?

02:37:48.000 Because what you're saying is just an accelerationist view.

02:37:54.000 Even if you may not identify as an accelerationist, but if you're like, well, it's coming anyways, and I'm not going to go and vote for the Republicans, I'm not going to vote for them.

02:38:02.000 So let them get punished.

02:38:05.000 The problem is accelerationism doesn't actually happen.

02:38:08.000 Like, if you want accelerationism, federal Congress doesn't do anything for that.

02:38:13.000 State level does. 0.99

02:38:15.000 When the state passes laws doing wacky ass shit, people move out to red states. 0.99

02:38:19.000 So, vote for federal Congress so you can impose your will on the states. 0.99

02:38:25.000 Not voting for federal Congress doesn't make any sense.

02:38:27.000 I don't know.

02:38:30.000 Like I said, I understand your frustration, but the time to act on this energy is already past.

02:38:36.000 That was the primaries.

02:38:38.000 When you're pissed off with your representative, primary him.

02:38:38.000 That's the way it works.

02:38:41.000 We were talking about this a little bit around here earlier in the year, last year. 0.98

02:38:47.000 If you've got a shitty Republican, primary him. 0.96

02:38:50.000 That's what the AK guy did, right? 0.99

02:38:53.000 That's what Brendan did. 0.97

02:38:55.000 They had a shitty guy and they're just like, okay, well, I'm going to primary him. 0.92

02:38:57.000 And now the AK guy is looking to take on the Democrat in the fall. 0.97

02:39:02.000 That's the way it's supposed to work.

02:39:04.000 You want to add anything or shout anything out, brother?

02:39:07.000 I'd like to add that I really appreciate y'all.

02:39:09.000 I appreciate the Discord.

02:39:11.000 Ian, you're my favorite person on the show, like, legitimately.

02:39:13.000 Even though we're like polar opposites, I love the perspective you bring.

02:39:17.000 And I'd also like to shout out a YouTuber named Synthetic Man.

02:39:20.000 He does game reviews. 0.95

02:39:22.000 I like him because he doesn't just kiss ass and be like, oh, we're a community. 0.99

02:39:25.000 He shoots it straight. 1.00

02:39:26.000 He talks blunt, no bullshit. 0.98

02:39:29.000 And I think that's it. 0.97

02:39:31.000 Thanks for calling in, brother.

02:39:32.000 Thanks, dude.

02:39:33.000 All right, no problem.

02:39:33.000 Thanks, man.

02:39:34.000 Bye bye.

02:39:35.000 He only said Ian was his favorite because we're all NPCs in Ian's simulation.

02:39:39.000 I didn't piss him off.

02:39:40.000 All right, plastic cup politics.

02:39:41.000 What's up?

02:39:42.000 What's up, plastic cup?

02:39:43.000 Hey. 1.00

02:39:44.000 Damn, boys. 1.00

02:39:46.000 It's been a rough, rough 36 hours. 1.00

02:39:48.000 Yeah, dude.

02:39:49.000 You feel me?

02:39:49.000 You do, yes.

02:39:49.000 Yep.

02:39:51.000 But I will not be deterred.

02:39:55.000 My spirit cannot be broken for two reasons.

02:39:57.000 We stand on the eve of MAGA months.

02:40:00.000 More on that later.

02:40:01.000 But I wanted to share the good news with you guys.

02:40:04.000 I just found out this morning.

02:40:05.000 I'm so damn pumped. 0.98

02:40:07.000 My beautiful, wonderful daughter in law, who's given me my first grandchild, and I'm only about two years older than Tim, she's going to be induced on the motherfucking 4th of July. 0.98

02:40:17.000 There you go. 0.98

02:40:18.000 Happy birthday.

02:40:21.000 She's agreed to let my grandson's middle name be Charlie.

02:40:24.000 So forgive me if I get a little choked up.

02:40:27.000 But we're in a crisis.

02:40:30.000 So I want to focus on the positive.

02:40:32.000 I absolutely want to focus on the positive.

02:40:34.000 So, in this crisis, there's going to be an opportunity.

02:40:37.000 And I think the table is set for Trump to do something amazing, given this opportunity.

02:40:43.000 All right.

02:40:43.000 So, let's assume we go through the midterms, narrowly lose the House, narrowly keep the Senate.

02:40:51.000 We get a new Senate majority leader, Thunes out, new guy in.

02:40:55.000 Trump meets with him and says, This is what we're going to do.

02:40:58.000 This is the Joker politics.

02:40:59.000 We're just going to do things.

02:41:01.000 You've mentioned it today.

02:41:02.000 You mentioned it yesterday.

02:41:03.000 We're going to pack the court.

02:41:06.000 He calls a press conference.

02:41:07.000 He announces he's going to do it.

02:41:08.000 He's going to introduce Lawrence Van Dyke. 0.94

02:41:10.000 If you remember, he is the appellate court justice who used the term swinging dicks in a federal opinion. 0.98

02:41:16.000 Going to absolutely drive the left crazy, absolutely insane. 0.94

02:41:19.000 So, my question is can the left's TDS be weaponized?

02:41:24.000 Because the only process that gets around a presidential veto is a constitutional amendment two thirds of the House, two thirds of the Senate, 75% of state legislators.

02:41:33.000 So, do you think this could push the Democrats to the point?

02:41:37.000 Of drafting a constitutional amendment to get around Trump and limit the court to nine justices and provide them with Secret Service protection.

02:41:47.000 I think the left will do anything to destabilize and cause chaos.

02:41:52.000 So they have to be subjugated.

02:41:58.000 And I would just say on top of that, I think the Republicans are going to lose everything.

02:42:01.000 The Democrats are going to take the Senate and the House after this mail in voting ruling. 1.00

02:42:05.000 It's fucking psychotic. 0.99

02:42:08.000 You don't think that TDS can be weaponized? 1.00

02:42:10.000 Because they have to oppose Trump.

02:42:11.000 They want chaos.

02:42:12.000 I completely agree.

02:42:13.000 But they have to oppose Trump.

02:42:14.000 They have to.

02:42:15.000 It's just in their.

02:42:16.000 We're dealing with peaches with teenagers.

02:42:18.000 So when I made.

02:42:18.000 They're.

02:42:20.000 Like when I made the post saying that I like medical assistance in dying, but we have to remove the white privilege, not a single one of them opposed it or attacked it or criticized me.

02:42:30.000 And I do this all the time.

02:42:31.000 I've done it for years.

02:42:33.000 There are shitloads of posts that I make like this that I've made over the past 10 years.

02:42:37.000 They have never once.

02:42:38.000 Media Matters won't pick it up because.

02:42:42.000 They understand what they're doing.

02:42:44.000 They know when they are lying. 0.99

02:42:47.000 So, when I'm aligning their views to prove the point they want to kill black people, for instance, they're going to say, let them keep saying it. 0.98

02:42:54.000 Don't fight with them. 0.96

02:42:56.000 Trying to go after them to do these kinds of things, the end result is them saying, let them keep squirming as long as it causes damage to the right, and then we'll burn it down faster because they're cognizant of what you're doing.

02:43:09.000 So, you think they would just let Trump go ahead with it and then counter when they get a Democrat president?

02:43:14.000 I think they would largely just ignore anything that makes them look hypocritical and then just redirect in a different way. 0.99

02:43:25.000 Well, shit, let's pack the court then. 0.99

02:43:26.000 Lawrence Van Dyke. 1.00

02:43:27.000 Yep.

02:43:28.000 Pack the courts.

02:43:30.000 They have no argument.

02:43:31.000 They have no argument against it.

02:43:31.000 And that's the point.

02:43:34.000 It is their argument.

02:43:35.000 Trump came out and said to make a great point that we should have more justices.

02:43:38.000 So I'm doing it.

02:43:39.000 The problem is the Republicans, they're all in on the take.

02:43:45.000 That's it.

02:43:46.000 Mm hmm.

02:43:47.000 Dune's in on the take. 0.99

02:43:48.000 Nobody gives a shit. 1.00

02:43:49.000 We're chickens in a chicken coop, and that's it. 0.99

02:43:54.000 Well, I take your point.

02:43:57.000 I refuse to be negative, though.

02:43:59.000 I refuse on this most glorious theme of Magamonth.

02:44:02.000 I love it, brothers.

02:44:05.000 In that spirit, for my shout out, if you guys want to go over to my Twitter, Plastic Cut Politics, I put together, I asked Grok, hey, I'm going to put together a TinCast Magamonth promo video.

02:44:16.000 So I asked straight up Grok, What would Tim want in it?

02:44:19.000 And these are the responses I got.

02:44:20.000 I got chickens, skateboards, guns, Mel Gibson's The Patriot, and the fifth one's a little weird. 0.55

02:44:28.000 It's Canadian educators with large fake novelty breasts.

02:44:31.000 I don't know what that's about. 0.99

02:44:34.000 Maybe Grock was drunk.

02:44:35.000 I don't know.

02:44:36.000 But it's about a four minute video, very pro America, no copyright whatsoever.

02:44:40.000 You can see the screenshot in the first comment.

02:44:43.000 YouTube cleared it, no problem.

02:44:44.000 I thought you guys could use it as maybe an intro or an outro video for members only during MAGA month.

02:44:51.000 And maybe if some other editors wanted to jump on board, we could do like a Q101 cage match style thing where, you know, the winning video gets played at the end of it.

02:44:59.000 You know, just something different from Agamon.

02:45:01.000 Thought I'd throw it out there, but you guys will love it.

02:45:03.000 It's got all the members of the cast in it.

02:45:03.000 It goes hard.

02:45:06.000 A lot of guns and Tim drops a banger closing line.

02:45:10.000 It's pretty sick.

02:45:11.000 So it's got Tay Tay's, Taylor Lorenz's ex wife.

02:45:15.000 It's got her seal of approval.

02:45:16.000 And I sent a screener over to Olivia as well. 1.00

02:45:19.000 But speaking of Taylor Lorenz's ex wife. 0.99

02:45:19.000 Go. 0.99

02:45:22.000 She's on deck. 1.00

02:45:24.000 So let's throw it to the queen of the Discord. 1.00

02:45:25.000 Let's see what she's got to say.

02:45:27.000 Thanks for calling in, brother.

02:45:28.000 Yeah, no, I saw the video and I'm waiting to watch it after the show.

02:45:32.000 So I'm pumped about it. 1.00

02:45:33.000 Taylor Lorenz's 600 pound ex wife.

02:45:36.000 What's up?

02:45:37.000 This man is the king of the segues and the introductions.

02:45:41.000 Thank you so much.

02:45:43.000 Hard to follow.

02:45:45.000 Hi, Phil.

02:45:45.000 Hi, Tim1.

02:45:46.000 Hi, Tim2.

02:45:47.000 Ian and Carter.

02:45:48.000 How are you doing?

02:45:49.000 What up?

02:45:49.000 All right.

02:45:50.000 Good, good.

02:45:51.000 I am super black built today. 0.97

02:45:53.000 My career, my lucrative career of beating women in Competitive sport has come to an end.

02:46:01.000 Condolences.

02:46:03.000 Allowing states to block men from women's sports is a W, but it is a small one in terms of the L we took today.

02:46:10.000 We lost so hard, and I think this has been retracted, but I'm going to go with it anyway.

02:46:15.000 We lost so hard that Judge Alito quit.

02:46:18.000 Yeah, it's really hard.

02:46:19.000 Fake news.

02:46:20.000 Yeah, fake news.

02:46:22.000 Yeah, yeah.

02:46:22.000 Well, yeah, I thought it got retracted, but I wrote it, I liked it, and then I saw it later.

02:46:26.000 But anyway, there are.

02:46:28.000 Four of them over 70, including our much beloved Judge Thomas.

02:46:34.000 Is it time to start encouraging our friendly justices to step down and get replaced so that they don't get Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

02:46:41.000 Yep.

02:46:42.000 We've got two years, and as much as I love Thomas and Alito, they're the best.

02:46:42.000 Agreed.

02:46:46.000 The smartest thing they can do right now is appoint their successors.

02:46:49.000 Tell Trump, get this guy in.

02:46:51.000 I dissent.

02:46:52.000 The Democrats aren't going to confirm anybody.

02:46:55.000 They're going to call it the Mitch rule, right?

02:46:58.000 Yeah.

02:46:58.000 And that's.

02:46:59.000 That's the second half of what I'm going with.

02:47:01.000 Yeah, please.

02:47:02.000 So I think that. 1.00

02:47:04.000 Yeah, but Republicans have the Senate.

02:47:07.000 The Republicans aren't reliable.

02:47:09.000 I understand your point, and yes, I agree, but they aren't reliable.

02:47:14.000 And so I think they should stick around for another year and see what the chase is.

02:47:23.000 If they can, I mean, obviously it's a crapshoot either way because it would be great if they could stick around until, you know, after the election and that way if, or after the next presidential election.

02:47:34.000 So that way a Republican, if the Republican wins, a Republican could appoint.

02:47:39.000 But I mean, look, it's rough.

02:47:43.000 It's not good.

02:47:44.000 It's a bad situation to be in.

02:47:45.000 I think at the time for them to actually retire, if they were going to, was going to be, which should have, would have, would have been last year.

02:47:52.000 So that way, the, you know, they would have been able to seat whoever was, was afterwards.

02:47:57.000 Now I feel like they shouldn't retire for two years, which is, you know, rolling the dice as if they're going to make it.

02:48:03.000 You know what I mean?

02:48:04.000 So, and, and that's, that's, you know, dependent on if a Republican wins in, in 2028.

02:48:12.000 So it's not so great.

02:48:15.000 Not so great.

02:48:16.000 They should have retired last year.

02:48:17.000 To be honest.

02:48:18.000 Okay, but this Mitch rule was just the last year, if memory serves correctly.

02:48:24.000 Like late Obama's, just when I started paying attention to all this stuff.

02:48:29.000 When was it?

02:48:29.000 It was his last year.

02:48:30.000 Yeah.

02:48:31.000 The argument was that.

02:48:32.000 Yeah.

02:48:33.000 That doesn't.

02:48:34.000 I mean, that'd be.

02:48:34.000 Yeah, I understand your point, but they're still going to do the same thing.

02:48:37.000 They'll hold it out for two years.

02:48:37.000 They don't care.

02:48:40.000 They don't care.

02:48:41.000 I saw someone tweet about it today.

02:48:42.000 They were like, no matter what, we're not seating anyone, blah, Like, I mean, look, they have.

02:48:48.000 We're almost.

02:48:48.000 It's.

02:48:50.000 You know, we're a year and a half into the president's presidency, second term, and they haven't ceded all of his appointments.

02:48:57.000 They don't care.

02:48:58.000 Yeah. 1.00

02:48:59.000 So it's a shit show. 1.00

02:49:02.000 And I don't like it. 1.00

02:49:03.000 I'm not happy about it.

02:49:04.000 But honestly, last year was the time when they should have done this.

02:49:08.000 Like, they should have found judges that are more conservative than Alito and Thomas.

02:49:15.000 And they should have both retired, if we're being honest.

02:49:18.000 So.

02:49:20.000 Sorry to add another, sorry to be the wet blanket on your black pill day.

02:49:25.000 Another dose of black pill.

02:49:27.000 In that kind of month.

02:49:29.000 But MAGA month is coming up.

02:49:30.000 So tomorrow.

02:49:31.000 You can just try to be happy.

02:49:33.000 Yes, tomorrow.

02:49:34.000 Actually, in an hour and 15 minutes.

02:49:35.000 Yeah.

02:49:36.000 Yes.

02:49:36.000 Good.

02:49:37.000 All right.

02:49:38.000 Happy MAGA month.

02:49:39.000 You guys are doing great work.

02:49:41.000 That's really about all I have.

02:49:42.000 So I'm going to go ahead and see myself out.

02:49:46.000 Shout out to Discord.

02:49:47.000 We're having fun in here.

02:49:48.000 So if you're not a paying member, you should be so you can hang out with us.

02:49:52.000 Drive-ins on a little break.

02:49:54.000 I'm busy.

02:49:55.000 T-Bone is not busy.

02:49:57.000 Jessica's busy. 0.93

02:49:58.000 You should check out Jessica's campaign, especially if you live in Tennessee. 1.00

02:50:02.000 She's running for school board.

02:50:03.000 There you go.

02:50:04.000 And we'll all be back before you know it.

02:50:07.000 Take care.

02:50:08.000 Thanks for calling in.

02:50:08.000 Thank you.

02:50:09.000 Thank you.

02:50:10.000 Always a pleasure.

02:50:11.000 All right.

02:50:12.000 Tim, it's been great having you.

02:50:13.000 Guys, this was the most fun that I've had in weeks.

02:50:15.000 Thank you so much for having me.

02:50:16.000 Good.

02:50:16.000 We're setting up a new studio for D.C., so we'll be right next to the Capitol.

02:50:20.000 Oh, amazing.

02:50:21.000 That's close to where we are.

02:50:22.000 We'll welcome you to the neighborhood.

02:50:22.000 Let me know.

02:50:23.000 I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same building.

02:50:25.000 We're going to be in the.

02:50:26.000 I don't know if we should say where exactly we're going.

02:50:27.000 Don't say it.

02:50:28.000 We'll talk.

02:50:29.000 But it's right next to the Capo.

02:50:31.000 So, everybody, tomorrow, Dank's going to be here, right?

02:50:34.000 Count Dankula.

02:50:34.000 Yep.

02:50:36.000 Man, it's going to be epic.

02:50:37.000 Thanks for hanging out, everybody.

02:50:38.000 And we'll see y'all tomorrow.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - June 30, 2026

SCOTUS RULING Is THE END Of The US | Timcast IRL

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript