It's election day, and things are starting to heat up in the Democratic primary. Will Kamala Harris or Donald Trump be the next president of the United States? We talk all about that and much more on this week's episode of Inverted World Live!
00:00:25.000Now, the email wasn't necessarily the counter-sniper saying, we have intelligence this will happen.
00:00:30.000It's him saying we have failed miserably, we take our jobs very seriously, and we cannot wait because we will likely see another attack before November.
00:01:20.000This guy is leaning towards Kamala Harris winning, and he's gotten, since 1984, every presidential election correct except for Al Gore and Bush, which is contested and strange.
00:02:03.000Also, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, because the members-only uncensored show will likely be very fun and very funny tonight.
00:02:10.000And if you want to join in, you got to go to TimCast.com, click join us.
00:02:14.000But also, don't forget, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with all of your friends and family.
00:02:20.000Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more, we got Charlie Spearing.
00:02:24.000Charlie Sperring, senior political reporter at the Daily Mail and author of the book
00:02:28.000Amateur Hour, Kamala Harris and the White House.
00:02:30.000And it was really funny because you have this book, Amateur Hour, and Viva Frye was also here,
00:02:35.000was like, wow, how did you plan for this? How did you know to write it?
00:02:37.000Yeah, I was here in January. We promoted it and I warned there's a very real chance that
00:02:41.000Kamala Harris could be the next president of the United States.
00:02:45.000And now it's looking like it's even closer.
00:02:48.000Yeah, it would be funny if Trump has to throw away all those 45, 47 hats, because if she gets in before the end of the year, she's 47 and then Trump would be 48.
00:02:56.000So thanks for hanging out, it should be fun.
00:03:28.000I voluntarily relinquished my Quebec license because it was only serving as a basis to people to file anonymous ethics complaints because they didn't like my tweets.
00:04:20.000I don't think my family will allow it.
00:04:22.000There have been some jokes about how if she becomes president, then the book will sell even more, and if she doesn't, then we're pretty much done.
00:04:45.000But usually it's like, well, with Joe Biden's age and his declining health, there's a very real possibility that he'll become the next president of the United States.
00:05:29.000Secret Service counter-sniper is warned of a potential assassination attempt within the next 30 days.
00:05:34.000An email sent on July 29th to the entire uniformed division.
00:05:37.000The individual strongly denounced the Secret Service handling of the rally in Pennsylvania where a would-be assassin attempted to kill former President Trump.
00:05:44.000The sniper claimed the man was not intercepted because agents and counter-snipers were forced to do their jobs with their hands tied.
00:05:54.000During the event, the gunmen fired multiple shots, this we know.
00:05:57.000The Secret Service sniper vowed to continue speaking out about the agency's failure until five high-level supervisors, one down, are either fired or removed from their current positions.
00:06:08.000Quote, this agency needs to change, if not now, when?
00:06:12.000The next assassination attempt in 30 days?
00:06:14.000Because we all should expect another attempt to happen before November, he wrote.
00:06:19.000We've exposed our inability to protect our leaders due to our leadership.
00:06:23.000The technicians who worked on 713 and Butler PA did their job with their hands tied.
00:06:27.000Sadly, we have fallen short four years.
00:06:30.000We just got lucky and look good doing it.
00:06:32.000I have conveyed these thoughts to not only supervisors, to include the current captain within CS, but those responsible for training us only to be brushed off as if those with less experience somehow knew more than me.
00:07:03.000If what happened in Butler, PA was intentional, either they pulled back intentionally knowing this guy was coming, saw him sneak in and said, let him do it, someone higher up, or there was direct official involvement in the actions of this individual, They would want to delete this email, saying we failed, it's going to happen again, and if it is going to happen again because they did fail, all the more reason to shut down this communication from a Secret Service counter-sniper warning we should expect another attempt.
00:07:35.000And whether it's an educated opinion or whatever, this is someone within the Secret Service who's worked there for some time complaining about what's going on, how it was handled, and that they should expect this again.
00:07:46.000I imagine this person has information that leads them to believe Again, let me stress, I'm not saying there's direct intelligence, that anyone's reporting this.
00:07:53.000I'm saying it's a person working in the Secret Service.
00:07:55.000They're going through their run-of-the-mill daily operations thinking, we may get another attempt before November and we need to be prepared for it.
00:08:01.000What you had and what we've witnessed in these congressional hearings, it's a public announcement, an invitation almost, and I'm not saying that to be cynical or every fear hides a wish.
00:08:11.000What they've displayed by level of incompetence, if you want to grant them that charitable interpretation of incompetence, is that the idiot today comes up and says, we lacked imagination in understanding that there's people out there who want to kill the president.
00:08:24.000No, you lack basic common sense to do the most basic thing where you can get a neurotic kid who's never served in law enforcement to say that roof should not be unsecured.
00:08:33.000Just to clarify, though, that was a quote from the hearing today.
00:08:36.000We lacked We were lacking imagination because we didn't understand that we live in a world with bad people.
00:08:42.000Their job is to anticipate that, but it's been a public announcement to the level of deficiency if you take them at their word, which I don't.
00:08:50.000In 2015, someone tried grabbing a gun from a police officer in an attempt to take Trump's life.
00:08:55.000The idea that they didn't know this could happen is laughably insane.
00:08:58.000Especially after the Iranian alleged increased threat.
00:09:01.000And when I say I don't take them at their word, this wasn't incompetence.
00:09:36.000She's very well sourced with the Secret Service.
00:09:38.000She helped uncover some of the details around that Kamala Harris protective detail agent that sort of went nuts and started attacking her superiors.
00:09:49.000And she definitely filed a lot of articles about the whole DEI affecting the Secret Service.
00:09:55.000I could imagine that what we're witnessing is the implosion of the deep state.
00:10:01.000And so I look at something like this and the question is with the fervent zealotry in the media about Donald Trump, I think maybe we underestimate the amount of threats to Trump and it is possible that this was I think what Buzz Patterson was calling it was intentional incompetence.
00:10:21.000The idea being that there are so many threats to Trump because of what the media does all day every day that they need only stand back and stand by and eventually somebody sneaks in and they just sit there and say, well, you know, if it happens.
00:10:40.000That this is secret services failing, like you mentioned, the agent going crazy, and this email, the chain of command is breaking, the intelligence agencies are in bedlam, because the deep state is in flames.
00:10:53.000As Brett Weinstein mentioned, they're just winging it now.
00:10:55.000And maybe something like this happens because they just have no idea what's going on anymore.
00:12:06.000They have different views on this whole thing.
00:12:08.000And so, you know, again, I'll go back to something I reference all the time, which is, you know, the Saturday after the RNC, I was waiting for my flight and watching CNN, and CNN was reporting that Trump's team Had no idea that there was a threat and that's why they sent him out on stage during the Butler rally.
00:12:23.000Which means that, and I assume Trump's team refers to his Secret Service team, meaning that there is a breakdown of communication with literally one agency that's at one place in Pennsylvania.
00:12:33.000I can't imagine what the breakdown, whether intentional or not, is like with the agency as it moves around, you know, from Washington to the satellite offices that are across the country.
00:12:44.000I mean, ultimately, I don't think it's a cooperating agency and I think there are lots of different people, you can see it in the sniper's letter, who are frustrated because they devote their lives to what they think is an honorable purpose only to sort of be misled and abused by whoever's currently calling the shots.
00:12:59.000Well, speaking of the lack of imagination, I went up to Butler, Pennsylvania the night of the attempted assassination.
00:13:06.000And as soon as you get to the site, the number one thing you see is that giant water tower there.
00:13:10.000And my imagination was like, well, if they had a Secret Service sniper up there, they would have easily seen the threat.
00:13:17.000Turns out they didn't have anybody on the water tower.
00:13:20.000Not to mention a drone or any other things.
00:13:22.000Not just that they didn't have a drone, they turned down an offer by the state What is a SWAT to have a drone?
00:13:29.000And we say like I like the idea of intentional incompetence and who was it
00:13:32.000that told me that you know, there might be whistleblowers within the agency.
00:14:30.000And I don't know what more anybody needs to hear before you come to the conclusion, it was a deliberate, let it happen on purpose or make it happen on purpose.
00:14:38.000I think the Secret Service agent, Sniper, is correct.
00:14:45.000I believe that if Donald Trump, on his own, with no security and no Secret Service, decided to go for a walk in New York, his life would be in serious jeopardy.
00:14:55.000One crazy person with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
00:15:20.000They get to then say, it's too dangerous to have voting in person.
00:15:23.000We've got to have mass mail-in voting.
00:15:25.000And then they get to swap out or, you know, Hillary Clinton.
00:15:27.000Put someone else in who's less popular because they know damn well that Kamala Harris is not popular.
00:15:31.000As far as I'm concerned, from an opportunistic perspective of a deep state that wants to lock down this election by controlling the means, she would be the bigger target, not Trump.
00:15:38.000I worry about a manufactured retaliation.
00:15:56.000Social media account with extremist comment could be tied to Trump gunman, FBI says.
00:16:02.000Now, I find this story really fascinating because they're basically saying this guy was anti-semitic.
00:16:06.000They say there were over 700 comments posted on this account.
00:16:09.000Some of these comments, if ultimately attributable to the shooter, appear to reflect anti-semitic and anti-immigration themes to espouse political violence and are described as extreme in nature.
00:16:17.000Now, I want to pause right there and say, Anti-immigration?
00:16:28.000Because we've already heard from Gab about law enforcement requesting information on an account they believe to be the shooter where he was defending Joe Biden as recently as two and a half to three years ago.
00:16:57.000Good luck figuring it out, because I think, as Shane and I were talking about this this weekend, they are flooding the zone with crap so that no one can figure out what is going on.
00:17:07.000It's like, oh my goodness story alone.
00:17:09.000It was like the gaming account that was initially linked is no longer there.
00:17:13.000And they don't even know that this account is.
00:17:15.000They're flooding the zone with garbage.
00:17:36.000And by the time this gets debunked or whatever, it's already controlled the narrative.
00:17:40.000And just to make sure we hit this point, From the hearings today, FBI deputy director says there's never been a doubt that Trump was hit by a bullet despite Director Wray spreading shrapnel conspiracy.
00:18:14.000I mean, the FBI is not saying, like, at least Gab is saying, we are a social media company that has been contacted by the FBI in the wake of this event.
00:18:22.000Here are screenshots of the messages they have requested.
00:18:25.000Like, what's so frustrating to me about the FBI is, you know, FBI Director Wray says, well, maybe it was just shrapnel from the teleprompter, which has been disproven over and over again.
00:18:34.000That night, his press person puts out a statement saying, no, it was definitely a bullet that hit Trump.
00:18:40.000And then now we have the deputy director saying, oh, no, it was never a question.
00:19:00.000So, you know, it's like, I think of, I forgot who it was online.
00:19:03.000They shared an image of someone who died, but it wasn't the wrong person.
00:19:06.000And they chose that image of the Pawn Stars son.
00:19:10.000Because they knew people would recognize that son, but the son who actually died wasn't the one on TV.
00:19:14.000So then everyone believed that post, and then that post was deleted, and now everyone… It's like a Mandela effect happening in real time.
00:19:22.000People will believe there was shrapnel, there was a bullet.
00:20:01.000It's why I forget the intelligence thing is, you know, you can't control what people know you can only control when they know it and so you'll have the information eventually Crystallized and in the meantime, it's as far as I'm concerned Christopher Wray for what he said last week should be fired because if that's not participating in the event It's participating in the cover-up in the confusion.
00:20:19.000And by the way, I got another one here dis array.
00:21:10.000And so when, you know, I saw so many social media posts after he was found not guilty of people being like, do not even talk to me about, like, liberals saying, like, don't even talk to me about this.
00:21:20.000If you think he's not guilty, then he, like, I can't, like, hysteria around this thing that, like, they won't even go back and just read the basic facts of the case.
00:21:29.000They have decided this person is guilty and they're not moving forward.
00:21:31.000I started thinking about that when people were watching the Rittenhouse video.
00:21:35.000And two people could watch the same video and walk away with completely different interpretations.
00:21:38.000And we're watching the same exact video.
00:21:41.000Well, apparently the Guardian watched the entire trial and after the conviction, after the acquittal, said he was acquitted of having killed three black men at a BLM protest.
00:22:24.000It's all just, I believe these hearings and the way they behave themselves and their smirks.
00:22:28.000There was a smirk, the guy Abate today had like a Peter Stroke type smirk.
00:22:32.000It's to provoke people into doing something stupid because they get so enraged listening to this.
00:22:36.000Oh, and by the way, there was something, apparently Peter Stroke was paid, settled $1.2 million, got a severance package or something, that came up today.
00:22:43.000And they were asking who in the FBI approved the $1.2 million settlement for Stroke and $800,000 for his lover there, Lisa Page.
00:23:39.000There are people who believe fake things about Trump, who are insane, and scream at the top of their- there's nothing that will convince them otherwise.
00:23:46.000Two, Do some of these people want Trump to die?
00:24:01.000And with those things all being true, and a story like this, they may flee the country in fear Is it possible that someone in law enforcement, someone in some federal capacity who hates Donald Trump, who believes the worst things about him, is terrified of going to jail and wants the worst for Trump, may engage in this untoward behavior?
00:24:20.000Let's just operate on the purely hypothetical, exaggerated, hyperbolic assumption that there are people within the FBI who would go to jail if their conduct were revealed through some form of investigation.
00:25:21.000How have we not redoubled, quadrupled, for all people under Secret Service protection?
00:25:27.000We've got to fire these people immediately.
00:25:30.000We've got to go in and, you know, you've got to brush, like you're brushing the hair to straighten it out, get the knots out.
00:25:37.000You've got bad people who don't know how to run this ship, whether intentionally or otherwise, there are serious problems, and there's a real threat to the lives of even people we may not politically agree with.
00:25:47.000And I will stress, all of us here, And I would say every single person watching wants the best for Kamala Harris.
00:25:54.000We want her to retire peacefully after she loses and she can go and dance with Megan Thee Stallion and do whatever it is she's going to do.
00:27:21.000This is where it's another act of provocation.
00:27:23.000They paid him 1.2 mil because he said they violated his privacy by revealing the fact that he was talking about an insurance policy against a Trump presidency that he never wanted to see.
00:28:40.000It's pretty interesting to see that internally at the Kamala Harris campaign, former Biden campaign, and at the DNC, this is not some low level guy.
00:28:49.000It's not the highest level guy, but they're outright admitting what everyone feels.
00:29:28.000I posted that Kamala's Project Special K will force women to get abortions and the military will go and kidnap Hondurans and bring them to America to force them to live in your home.
00:29:48.000And I get this wave of responses saying, you're weird, you believe insane things.
00:29:54.000And I'm like, dude, I don't believe for a second that the Krasensteins think that tweet's real.
00:29:58.000Because they tweeted me and I tweeted them all the time.
00:30:01.000But they're pretending like I'm literally saying there's a real thing called Kamala Project Special K. But the response was that it was like, you're weird, and I'm sitting here being like, Y'all don't know who you're dealing with.
00:30:21.000But this attack, they try it again and again and again, tweeting it, everybody calling them weird.
00:30:27.000I think it actually works on conservatives.
00:30:29.000Conservatives are getting so wound up over being called weird that they're doing this troll campaign where all of these leftists and liberals on X are just spam posting at people that you're weird.
00:30:49.000It's because, like, there was that document from the Republicans, as soon as Kamala was sort of de facto nominated, there was a talking point from Republicans that they were going to describe Kamala Harris as weird.
00:31:00.000So they're basically turning it right back on Republicans.
00:31:03.000Like, you You want to call Colin Harris weird?
00:31:10.000No, I've literally always taken being called weird because it's happened at least once or twice before.
00:31:14.000I've always taken it as a compliment because it does mean sort of not within the norm and curious and interesting.
00:31:20.000It's just the way they're using it now, like a grade school insult coming from the party that is recording, you know, anal sex in the Senate.
00:35:12.000And don't get me wrong, Trump did say early on, he's like, we gotta, you know, put a stop on Muslims under the country until we can figure out what's going on.
00:35:18.000The very fine people, the Muslim ban, as they called it, was actually seven countries, which included countries that were not Muslim.
00:35:23.000And Trump never called white nationalists very fine people.
00:36:56.000Like, I think they I think maybe they should have been more aggressive.
00:36:59.000But there has been a counter narrative to this the whole time.
00:37:01.000It's just sort of intense hysteria around Like, trying to make J.D.
00:37:05.000Vance into some kind of villain, because I think, to Javiva's point, they can't attack him for his family, so they have to attack him for... Kamala Harris.
00:37:36.000This required the explanation because there was a couch meme about him looking at a couch and the couch is playing like Barry White music and everyone's like, what the hell is this?
00:39:46.000And there are conservatives who are like, I think some of it is our terminally online society though, right?
00:39:53.000Like right and left, although I think, you know, a lot of left-leaning people tend to be more, especially young voters, tend to be even more active online.
00:40:01.000But, you know, being called weird or having people respond negatively to something you post or say, like, that hurts the psyche.
00:40:08.000for the online person in a way that is upsetting. Whereas like if you unplugged you're like,
00:40:12.000I don't actually care about any of your opinions. Like whether it's saying you guys are the party
00:40:16.000that thinks men can be women so I don't care about your judgment or just generally said like,
00:40:20.000I don't actually know any of you anonymous people who are calling me weird online. Like it doesn't
00:40:24.000actually matter. There's a lot of humorless people on the right wing Twitter too. Like you see them
00:40:28.000repeating Angela, that Angela, you know that Angela character everyone thinks like, I'm like,
00:41:45.000Not that it is the most reputable source, not to insult India Times, but they've written about this and this is the keys predictor.
00:41:53.000This is, what is his name, Alan Lichtman.
00:41:55.000Alan Lichtman has predicted correctly, they say.
00:41:59.000Every presidential victor since 1984 except for Al Gore.
00:42:02.000And I think it's actually, to be fair, that was a contested, disputed election that went down to the Supreme Court, so maybe you got it wrong.
00:42:08.000He's, apparently now, he's predicting likely a Kamala Harris victory so far.
00:42:14.000The criteria that he asks, simple true or false questions, Are in his mind so far leaning towards Kamala Harris, and I gotta be honest, it's a guy who's good at guessing.
00:42:28.000I think his questions are absurd nonsense, but his intuition must be pretty good to get this many elections correct.
00:42:37.000So they say the million-dollar question before the electorate is who's going to win.
00:42:40.000Alan Lichtman, who is an election forecaster, the professor who said that the key to the White House is with Kamala Harris, is also the Democrats' party's nominee, the prediction which is made in the present, blah blah blah.
00:42:53.000So it's leaning towards Kamala right now.
00:42:55.000His final prediction won't come until after the DNC.
00:42:58.000There's the Democrats who are likely to appoint Harris, blah, blah, blah.
00:43:01.000The Republicans, they say that she holds six keys, including primary contest, short-term economy, long-term economy, policy change, no scandal, no challenge, or charisma.
00:43:54.000There was a famous post on Twitter, back when it was Twitter, not X, I'm not deadnaming, and it said something like, I can't remember the sporting event, but it was like, football team is going to score the game-winning touchdown against this team in the Super Bowl with this amount of time left with this score.
00:44:28.000Of basically looking at the stats and the teams of all the things, and then every time a team got eliminated, he'd delete the post.
00:44:35.000And then all that was left was like 10 posts about what was gonna happen, and then when it went down one way, he deleted everything else, so there was one left, and everyone went, How did he do it?
00:44:44.000Well, I would go back and want to see the publications that Lichtman put out back 20 years ago.
00:44:49.000It's a lot easier to burn a piece of paper.
00:44:51.000Alan Lichtman, a history professor at American University who has accurately predicted past elections, said in an op-ed on Saturday that President Joe Biden can win against Donald Trump.
00:48:15.000He just pumped his fist and said fight, fight, fight after dodging a bullet.
00:48:19.000It's not just- Joe Rogan gets out every week practically talking about how Trump is a good stand-up comic in his delivery.
00:48:28.000When he walks into UFC, the place erupts.
00:48:31.000First of all, I think Lichtman now is full of schlichtman.
00:48:35.000And I would like to go back and see, I think he's been lying throughout his career, but it's easy to like, you know, when you go back and refer to the article where he said any one of things, and yeah, 9 out of 10, he's amazing.
00:48:44.000As soon as he said Biden could win, they should just be like, yeah, he's gone.
00:48:47.000Like, your predictions are done, because... Time to go back to the octopus.
00:49:23.000But, you know, so I can understand where, like, obviously this is false, but I can understand where someone who just doesn't like Trump has said, like, no, he's not charismatic because they're deluding themselves.
00:49:32.000I think the no primary contest is interesting because You know, no one has been allowed to challenge Kamala Harris.
00:49:38.000I mean, it was really fall in line immediately behind Kamala Harris.
00:49:42.000She wasn't actually involved in the actual primary.
00:49:44.000When people were casting ballots, she wasn't on the ticket as the top of the ticket.
00:49:49.000Her polling numbers are pretty good for someone who was just installed at the last minute by party elites.
00:50:30.000It says, for upcoming elections, Key Four's turn falls when a single third-party candidate consistently polls at 10% or more, indicating they're likely to receive 5% or more of the national popular vote.
00:50:40.000Perhaps because he's running as an independent?
00:50:41.000Didn't Ross Perot run as an independent?
00:51:26.000The point they're making is that when both parties blame the President for something, both parties have attacked Joe Biden for being mentally incompetent, unfit, to the point where he dropped out of the race.
00:52:18.000Scandal where she's directly connected.
00:52:20.000I think it's weird that Republicans have been trying to make this case that somehow she's guilty for this giant cover up, but it hasn't really taken root.
00:53:37.000If 18 to 34 year olds are more likely to align with the Republican view of things, I wonder what that says about their leanings this election.
00:53:48.000Independent voters, of course, they're going to say it's bad.
00:53:50.000There's no question, because Democrats live in WALL-E world.
00:53:54.000Just show your friends and family this.
00:53:55.000Be like, dude, if you're sitting here and you're saying that Kamala Harris is fine, Biden is fine, the economy is doing great, ask yourself why Republicans Well, I bet you that's the demographics of who, statistically, is more likely to be a Democrat.
00:54:12.000It's going to be young people who now see the prospect of a student debt loan being forgiven.
00:54:17.000It's young people who are not necessarily paying taxes out the wazoo or have a family to support.
00:54:23.000And as you get older, you get more conservative, and then you realize these things really have an impact.
00:57:28.000At least 16 people, including the soldier, have died and about 750 more arrested as a result of protests in Venezuela.
00:57:35.000Election officials declared the nation's autocratic leader Maduro the winner of another six-year term early Monday, saying he handily beat former diplomat Edmundo Gonzalez But the government... Didn't you say it was Maria the other day?
00:57:52.000Okay, maybe that's the opposition leader, but I thought it was Gonzalez.
00:57:55.000But the government has not released the full results in many countries, including the U.S., have said the vote was marred by widespread irregularities.
00:58:02.000So what we're seeing now is... I don't know if I have any tweets pulled up for this one.
00:58:25.000And, uh, what is the date on this one?
00:58:27.000They say it's from today, but, uh, Alerta Mundial.
00:58:31.000Uh, it says, the streets of Venezuela overflow to protest against Nicolas Maduro's fraud.
00:58:37.000So what I see here and why I find it interesting is that there's been some articles written about Civil War.
00:58:42.000I think it was like Rolling Stone wrote one.
00:58:43.000A bunch of them are writing and, you know, I should probably pull this up because I think people should, yeah it was Rolling Stone, and I think people should see what they're talking about.
00:58:55.000Not that I'm saying it's all, you know, true and correct or whatever.
00:58:59.000Let's see if we can get this article pulled up.
00:59:00.000Also, after that, pull up the BBC article from 2012 when Venezuela bans private gun ownership, if anybody wants to see what's going on in America under Kamala Harris.
00:59:21.000Quote, I'm afraid if we lose this one it's going to take a civil war to save the country and it will be saved.
00:59:26.000It's the greatest experiment in the history of mankind and if we come down to a civil war I'm glad we got people like bikers for Trump on our side.
00:59:32.000There's a dot dot dot so who knows what he actually said.
00:59:34.000He later wrote that he regretted the mark which was made in the excitement of the moment on stage.
00:59:38.000They go through many different people on the right who have talked about whether we're at war, whether it's a civil war.
00:59:44.000So the reason I think Venezuela is interesting is what happens when there is...
00:59:58.000Venezuela is much, much smaller than the U.S., and we have hyperpolarization and geographic polarization.
01:00:05.000As I was saying yesterday, there's no way anybody in West Virginia is going to be like, well, I wanted Trump, so I'm going to go drive to New York or D.C.
01:00:12.000In which case, why would you see clashes?
01:00:15.000However, that being said, you can take a look at what happens.
01:00:18.000I'm actually thinking that what's happening in Venezuela is more likely to happen if Trump does win.
01:00:23.000If Trump wins, then liberals in major cities go nuts and riot and smash, tear down posters and lose their minds.
01:00:30.000You remember the coup, the failed coup, Operation Gideon in 2020 with Venezuela?
01:00:35.000And they had the private security, private missionary firm from here, from Canada, became an American citizen and failed when they hit land.
01:00:44.000And then that's another one of those things where you don't know what's real or not, because Maduro said it was the CIA.
01:00:48.000And then his opposition says it's Maduro.
01:01:02.000It's like everyone knows the CIA does that stuff, so I think Maduro is like, well, we're going to frame America.
01:01:06.000But the idea that the fail—like, I was in Venezuela 10 years ago, and I can tell you that everything they try to do doesn't make any sense.
01:01:14.000The story I use to exemplify this is trying to buy a cell phone.
01:01:17.000Because they mandate jobs, because jobs are what give people access to currency, it took like five to six people to buy a cell phone.
01:01:25.000Whereas in America, you walk into a T-Mobile and you walk up to one guy and say, I want to get that phone.
01:02:55.000I was also just looking up the crime rate in Venezuela, given their gun laws, and I just found an article from Bloomberg talking about how the crime rates actually dropped because of Venezuelan migration.
01:03:05.000So that's also... Yeah, but where are they going?
01:03:10.000The issue to consider is that What we are seeing in Venezuela against Maduro is it's the people against the socialists, but it's the people in the cities.
01:03:33.000And then the question is, does it get bad enough to where it could actually destabilize things at a national level?
01:03:40.000I'm not so sure because each state is effectively one Venezuela.
01:03:44.000They have to deal with their own internals.
01:03:45.000Trump could very well just be like, good luck.
01:03:47.000Your riots in your cities have nothing to do with the federal government, and you have no ability to overturn or change anything at the federal government level.
01:04:11.000The reason why I say it won't look like what's happening in Venezuela is because people in West Virginia aren't going to go to New York or whatever.
01:04:18.000But you could theoretically see, I mean, we saw January 6th.
01:04:22.000On one side of the building you have people rioting, fighting with cops and attacking, you know, police and people are being attacked.
01:04:28.000Cops were throwing tear gas or whatever, flashbangs into the crowd, just abject chaos.
01:04:33.000On the other side they're marching around like tourists with the doors open by police, having no idea what's going on.
01:04:38.000So I think in the event of a Kamala Harris victory, let's be real, we don't even know if it's going to be Kamala, You may see something like January 6th.
01:04:47.000I mean, we already saw January 6th, but that's not going to be widespread chaos in cities.
01:04:52.000If Trump wins, I think you get Summer of Love x10.
01:04:54.000Well, you had the Women's March in 2016, the day after the inauguration.
01:04:58.000We woke up and walked out of the building and there was a massive Women's March that was relatively peaceful.
01:05:03.000So it's just a question of how angry they are going to be this time.
01:05:07.000I mean, there was a lot of rage, but at least it wasn't violence.
01:05:09.000Was that when she said she wanted to blow up the White House?
01:05:12.000She did make some weird threats that day, yeah.
01:05:23.000Get everyone on Twitter talking about us.
01:05:25.000Blow it up with love is what she wanted to say.
01:05:28.000She was like, no, like social media blow up, like, you know, when you tweet about somebody and then everyone's tweeting at them and it's like, yeah, nobody believes that.
01:05:35.000And then especially with what just happened to Donald Trump, especially with what the Secret Service is saying now, this agent being like, hey, we may see something.
01:06:27.000Vance is going to be... First of all, the idea...
01:06:30.000That we get a Republican Trump, and then J.D.
01:06:33.000Vance wins twice again, we get 12 years, it's very unlikely, because people adapt to their circumstance.
01:06:40.000So even if things are good, people will, depending on what the sentiment is nationally, you could have a good economy, but if people feel like, let's say in the first three years the economy goes up, and then in the last year the economy dips a little bit, now people are feeling like they're losing, you get a shift.
01:06:57.000So, I just don't believe that Trump, Vance, and the Republicans are going to march in with this mandate for leadership and be like, we are overhauling anything.
01:07:07.000No, they're going to go in and they're going to be like, I'd like to appoint this person.
01:07:09.000Democrats are going to be like, no, and they're going to go, aw.
01:08:39.000He held off on endorsing – I don't know if he – I haven't checked today if he's done it, but for a while he wasn't saying anything about Kamala Harris until I think you'll see the emergence of a class of Democrats that are sort of more in line with maybe Joe Manchin who are sort of saying like, we're not like those progressives.
01:08:55.000Like we have more shared values and so then when things presumably get better economically under Trump, they are more easily able to say like, look, I voted for some of those policies.
01:09:05.000I'm thinking of the Democrats who just voted against Kamala Harris in this House resolution on immigration, right?
01:09:14.000There are people who are starting to say, like, we're parting ways with the Biden-Harris administration.
01:09:18.000And so you might see people who posture more moderately and have success with Democratic voters in a way that this progressive wing is starting to see, you know, it just isn't working.
01:09:28.000I want to jump to this story from the Wall Street Journal.
01:09:30.000America's new political war pits young men against young women.
01:09:35.000A majority of men under 30 support Trump and Republican control of Congress.
01:09:39.000A sharp reversal from the 2020 race, young women strongly favor Democrats.
01:10:07.00012th grade girls overwhelmingly liberal, very few conservative.
01:10:10.000But for boys, it's inverted, overwhelmingly conservative.
01:10:14.000And then we have this from the Wall Street Journal.
01:10:16.000AP VoteCast, showing that young men overwhelmingly lean Republican and women lean Democrat.
01:10:24.000So much less women Democrats, much more male Republicans.
01:10:29.000And men favor Trump and women favor Biden.
01:10:33.000I think that, you know, I've said this before, and I welcome the ire from the feminists.
01:10:38.000This will not play out well for women.
01:10:40.000And men lead, and it doesn't matter what these women want or think.
01:10:44.000And the issue is strongly that men can wait as long as they want to have families.
01:10:51.000And so what's going to happen for a lot of these women Not all of them, and maybe even a majority of them.
01:10:55.000But enough women are going to be approaching 35 with their doctors telling them, having a child at 35 is considered a geriatric pregnancy and you are at risk, you need to consider that you're getting too old for this.
01:11:09.000And these women are going to be like, oh no.
01:11:12.000And the men are going to be told by their doctors, looks good mate, have a nice day, come back when you're 40.
01:11:17.000So these young men and these women, they go on dates.
01:11:20.000And the woman's going to say something like, Kamala Harris or whatever.
01:11:24.000And the guy's going to be like, not interested.
01:11:29.000I want to buy a house and find someone that I'm going to be with.
01:11:32.000I'm not really interested in being with someone who holds these values that I think are detrimental to raising children.
01:11:36.000More importantly, a 35-year-old guy is going to be talking to a 28-year-old woman.
01:11:42.000And a 35-year-old woman is going to be trying to talk to a 35-year-old guy and they're going to say, not interested.
01:11:49.000Guys, and I know the feminists, they get really mad about this one on the left says, Tim's sexist.
01:11:53.000I'm like, okay, well, you know, do whatever you want to do.
01:11:55.000I'm just telling you what the data shows.
01:11:57.000So this, I think, ultimately lends itself to more and more women are going to be childless.
01:12:03.000Men will be selective, but this will result in more conservative children, like we're already seeing, and then give it 20 to 40 years and the Chelsea handlers of the world will be alone and isolated from culture.
01:12:16.000It takes only a small percentage shift culturally for the entire surface of culture to appear one political ideology.
01:12:24.000What happens when these women get artificial wombs and they don't need men anymore?
01:12:28.000It's just a bunch of single mothers with babies.
01:12:35.000It's going to be substantially easier for young men and conservative women to have families because the dad working and the mom raising the kid, and the mom does work too, but just less so while she's having the kid, versus women trying to maintain birthing pods, if artificial wombs even come to market in the next 10 to 20 years.
01:12:53.000Surrogacy is going to be out of reach, and many of these people just don't want kids at all.
01:12:58.000Here's what I see happening, based on the trends right now, and this is not accounting for variables.
01:13:03.000Chelsea Handler is coming out being like, I'm 50 years old and I can do drugs and wake up in the morning.
01:13:10.000As if that's the measure of happiness.
01:13:14.000The point is, when 20 years from now, someone born today What are they likely to be, conservative or liberal?
01:13:24.000The answer is plainly conservative, based on birthing fertility rates among conservatives versus liberals, based on trends among young people.
01:13:32.000If the next generation leans even 5% more conservative, the market shall provide.
01:13:38.000And so, this woke stuff won't play because they're not going to get memberships, and they're going to adapt to what the market wants.
01:13:44.000Chelsea Handler will find herself posting into the wind on social media, and people are going to be like, look, what you're saying is annoying and offensive, and it's not appealing to our customer base.
01:13:56.000She will be 70 years old being like, how did I lose touch with society?
01:14:03.000If 55% of this country says we want Patriot content, then these companies like Disney that just go, for every $100 we spend, how much do we make if we do liberal stuff?
01:14:19.000I don't believe these statistics in general.
01:14:21.000I mean, I find that they are sort of not self-fulfilling, but self-propagating.
01:14:26.000They put these out to try to rationalize what they want to see in the market, but let's assume that it's accurate.
01:14:32.000I try to understand what is the brain pattern that results in women being democratic.
01:14:39.000Is it just the one litmus test of abortion that's become such a prevalent question that They engage in what is basically what Gadsad refers to as suicidal empathy.
01:14:49.000It's so important on that one particular issue, they will sacrifice the rest of their country through open immigration, through foreign wars.
01:14:58.000I try to reconcile the idea that they're empathetic, so it's based on empathy.
01:15:03.000And yet they support endless foreign conflict, which is the sort of, maybe that's a uniparty, but Democrat policy right now.
01:15:10.000The abortion is so important that that's what young women— It's that women are more susceptible to social pressures than men.
01:15:37.000Women are more likely to look at the dominant narrative from the media and say, it's better to just, you know, fit in.
01:15:44.000And men are more likely to be like, no, I'm right and I'm going to do what I want.
01:15:48.000And most guys are wrong and crash and burn in economy or otherwise.
01:15:54.000But most women tend to be more average and aligned to the center.
01:15:58.000This is akin to the greater male variability hypothesis.
01:16:02.000Well, you also have to consider immigration in your formula, because we do have millions of people crossing the border, millions of immigrants who want to stay and probably will stay.
01:16:10.000So that definitely shakes up the formula.
01:16:13.000I don't think that changes the tendencies between men and women.
01:16:17.000It'll have an impact culturally for sure, but it still results in very similar things.
01:16:21.000If anything, I actually think that would be more detrimental to the left.
01:16:24.000The right likes to make the point that illegal immigrants, when they're granted citizenship or new citizens, tend to vote Democrat in their first time around or whatever.
01:16:33.000I don't think that changes the argument around liberals don't have kids and conservatives do.
01:16:38.000You can say we're going to have X amount of immigration, but how many immigrants are conservative versus how many are liberal, how many religious versus how many are not, that's not being factored in.
01:16:47.000So I think mostly it's a moot point, and the question actually is, when you look at voting patterns, which includes immigration, liberals are having substantially less kids than conservatives, and have been for 20 years, and that trend has only been exacerbated as fertility declines.
01:17:02.000Right, you see that argument made by some people who refer to Israel, how Israel used to be pretty in the middle of the road, but now they're growing even harder, right?
01:17:10.000Because the conservative Jews are having more kids than the liberal Jews.
01:17:15.000But I think you're right that immigration was marketed Two women as an empathetic thing.
01:17:19.000I think you're both picking up on this because it's like, what did Biden come out and say?
01:17:22.000He said, we're going to grant a pathway to citizenship to people who are illegal immigrants who are married to a citizen who've been, you know, most of them have been here for 25 years.
01:18:42.000Pew Research tracks the first time in 100 years that a generation has moved slightly more conservative on some issues.
01:18:48.000Traditionally, it was always a wave of, this generation is 10% progressive, then 30, then 50, then 60, and then Gen Z. Bill Clinton rocked the votes.
01:18:58.000Then Gen Z comes around, and all of a sudden, they are comparable.
01:19:03.000For the first time, on average, Gen Z and Millennials are comparable politics, but In some areas, Gen Z is actually slightly more conservative.
01:19:12.000Now, when this story first came out, Pew Research, I think it was from 2018, everybody on the right is going like, whoa, we're winning the argument with young people.
01:19:20.000Conservatives had more kids 20 years ago.
01:19:22.000That means there is just generally more conservative children who hold these views their parents gave them.
01:19:28.000The right makes the argument that the left is trying to indoctrinate in schools, which is true, but the right is also at war on that issue as well.
01:19:52.000They're going to say, what's our lowest common denominator marketing strategy to maximize sales?
01:19:56.000And they're going to say, 55% of people identify as American-loving conservative patriots, and 45 say other.
01:20:03.000And they go, okay, we'll go with the 55, we make more money.
01:20:06.000It is interesting, and the going-along-to-get-along aspect of women being more influenced by social media or those types of pressures would also explain why self-harm ideations on social media resulting from Instagram or whatever affects disproportionately significantly more girls than boys.
01:20:27.000I hadn't actually thought about the demographic shift.
01:20:29.000I'm trying to apply this all to my anecdotal experience.
01:20:33.000The family members that I have who have kids who are conservative-ish versus liberal progressive-ish, I'm noticing the gender issue, but I also thought it was more of the Andrew Tate influence.
01:20:44.000I can certainly see how Yeah, people are talking about why are kids listening to Andrew Tate?
01:20:49.000And I've heard this from parents where they're like, my young teenage kids were watching Andrew Tate the other day.
01:20:54.000And I'm like, you're like a conservative leading family.
01:20:58.000And, you know, also it's entirely possible that liberal families become overbearing and the kids rebel or whatever.
01:21:05.000But ultimately, liberals, infinitely more likely to have abortions than conservatives.
01:21:11.000Like, not literally infinitely, but like just substantially more.
01:21:15.000And conservatives just have more kids in general.
01:21:18.000So when you look at the fertility rate 20 years ago, I wonder if the fertility rates right now are taking into consideration abortion.
01:21:25.000I mean, probably they're just looking at how many children do liberals have, so that includes that liberals are just having tons of abortions.
01:21:31.000And yet the child replacement rate is still pretty significant low and dropping even further.
01:21:36.000For conservatives I think it's like 1.8 fertility, and for liberals it's like 1.
01:21:57.000I was flying through Chicago and the family restrooms have been turned into all-gender bathrooms.
01:22:01.000And I'm looking at this, there's like a men's room and a women's room, and right in the middle it says all gender, and I'm like, I know for a fact that bathroom's always been there.
01:22:10.000They didn't build a third bathroom to accommodate, you know, agender people.
01:22:15.000It used to be the family restroom with the baby changing station, and they just said, demand is not for baby changing stations, it's for gender ideology in Chicago, so they switched it.
01:22:23.000And there's baby changing tables in both men and women.
01:22:44.000Well, the employee list McDonald's where you go and you place your order on the screen and then go pick it up, it's the scariest thing I've ever seen.
01:22:50.000And I saw one in a downtown Toronto at night.
01:22:56.000You go and there's like one person behind the counter and I guess the people manually putting in, but there's no human interaction anymore.
01:23:10.000The thing is, don't go into a McDonald's late at night in Toronto.
01:23:13.000Holy hell did I think I was going to die.
01:23:15.000There's already a video of someone ordering a McDonald's and a robot arm makes everything.
01:23:21.000There's people working there, but the robot arm goes over and then it reaches down and scoops the fries and then moves them over.
01:23:28.000At the Taco Bell down the street over here, If you go in, there's kiosks, and there's people working behind the counter, and you can walk up to the counter and wait if you want, but why would you?
01:23:37.000You go to the kiosk and you go, boop, boop, boop, enter, and then you watch them make it.
01:23:45.000Going back to what I was saying is that, like Jack Pacific mentions with Pizza Hut nationalism, even fast food restaurants used to be family-oriented.
01:23:53.000Because the market demanded that people accommodate children.
01:23:56.000Because they're like, look, am I going to come to eat at your place?
01:24:20.000After school and it's like book it and you did well, it's like we're gonna go get your personal pizza I always thought it was really funny that you get the book it thing and then if you like read the book They give you the free pizza on the wheel Because my parents would just buy pizza and I'd eat you like if my parents ordered and get your personal pan pizza I would my point is whether I read the book or not.
01:24:38.000I was eating pizza We but once you got the thing then you were like, let's go to pizza and I get that little pizza Jack wants what he had when he was a kid and he wants to share with his kids.
01:24:47.000But because the fertility rate has gone way down and the market dictates, there's no opportunity for him to do that anymore.
01:24:53.000I always thought the playground issue was liability and hygiene.
01:24:56.000So that's I never even thought of that.
01:24:58.000But we had one of McDonald's on to carry in Montreal and they used to take the kids.
01:25:03.000If the cost of lawsuits and hygiene is less than the amount they make from having the family opportunity, they keep the playground.
01:25:13.000So they could say, look, it's a million dollars a year in liability, but we make two million from families who bring their kids in, so pay the cost, take the million dollar profit.
01:25:20.000At some point, they said, liability fixed cost is a million bucks, but we're only pulling in 800,000 from families.
01:25:26.000Some of this is so funny to hear you guys talk about because, well, we didn't grow up that far apart from each other, but, you know, I grew up in a rural area in Connecticut and there was a McDonald's, but it was like a drive to get there, right?
01:25:40.000We didn't, I can't even think of, I think, I can't think of where the closest pizza hut was.
01:25:44.000I never saw it growing up, but there were local pizza places.
01:25:46.000There wasn't the book yet, but the local library had a huge summer reading program.
01:25:50.000And so it's interesting to see, like, the idea that, you know, obviously it's true, corporations did what they could to be a part of culture and they drop stuff off, whether it's cost or people aren't interested in them.
01:26:02.000But also, like, all of these things that people want probably still exist.
01:26:05.000They're just not in the sort of one-stop shop.
01:26:08.000I still remember growing up in Wyoming the first day that a McDonald's was built in our hometown.
01:26:27.000I've had the internet since I was a little kid, as long as I can remember, there was internet.
01:26:30.000And it was a useful resource, but only when you're at home, you have to sit at the machine and use it.
01:26:35.000And then around 2007, 2008, mobile internet happened.
01:26:38.000And man, I remember Skating at Wilson Skate Park in Chicago in like 2005, and I have no idea what's happening in the world.
01:26:48.000I had a candy bar phone, I could receive texts, my friends would say, where you at?
01:26:52.000And I'd be skating, I'd go home, go on the computer, and then start reading what was going on.
01:26:57.000And then there was like over a year, all of a sudden, smartphones, touchscreen, the iPhone, now the internet was 24-7 no matter where you were, you knew exactly what was happening, and it just exponentially skyrocketed.
01:27:09.000All of a sudden now, you are wired into the machine 24-7.
01:27:12.000I had no internet until I was like 20.
01:27:27.000The rule in my house was you're allowed to go on the computer for one hour and then you have to let brother or sister, you know, my brother or sister use it next.
01:27:36.000So as soon as I got any conscious thought, it's wake up, bolt straight to the computer and then go on to get on the internet.
01:27:43.000And then as soon as my brother would come in, I'd be on for like 45 minutes.
01:27:46.000He'd be like, how long have you been on?
01:28:10.000And then I had, we had click and play stuff.
01:28:14.000So I got, first I got Click and Play, then I got Games Factory, then Multimedia Fusion, and Flash, Flash 4, and then I'm making websites, I'm making video games, but only for an hour.
01:28:42.000Like, you couldn't even see anything, and it was buffering.
01:28:45.000Every 10 seconds of buffering would give you one second to video, and we were just sitting with this tiny little thing on the screen to watch Dragon Ball Z, and we were like, yes.
01:28:52.000I remember going to a friend's house and watching him play Doom, and I was like, that's pretty cool.
01:31:47.000And then one day, I log in to AOL, and then I go and I open up AIM, and then I see my friend is online, and I message him and he doesn't answer.
01:31:58.000And then I see him just away, and I'm like, and then one day I see him and I ask him, I was like, were you just, like, leave your computer on?
01:32:11.000And so then I went home and I was like, because we had a second phone line and you'd be online downloading a song and then a telemarketer would call and it would knock you offline and then your download crashes.
01:32:23.000And then we got cable and all of a sudden the song started coming in so fast.
01:32:27.000I have a vivid memory of the only time I heard the dial-up internet sound.
01:32:31.000Like, I was pretty young and I only remember it once, but I think that was just in rural New Hampshire at the time where, you know, a lot of stuff hadn't progressed.
01:32:40.000It's crazy how quickly technology changes.
01:32:43.000Like, I think of my younger sisters who, you know, do most of their homeschooling through some sort of online assistance.
01:32:49.000Like, they will never have remembered a time without the internet.
01:34:02.000Because I've been trying to explain to people what Israel Derangement Syndrome is, and this nails it.
01:34:08.000The idea that you would actually support Kamala Harris, who is like one of the worst human beings imaginable, with no track record, unappointed, to actually see the United States suffer, and the economy fail because you hate Israel so much, is a level of derangement that is hard to exemplify.
01:34:30.000But in that single super chat, everyone now knows, oh, they're deranged.
01:34:37.000Well, I won't steelman that super tweet.
01:34:56.000What I always find funny is that the people who say, no more foreign war, and then also simultaneously say, down with Israel, which sounds like your objection is not just no more foreign war.
01:35:06.000I can understand the resentment, the issue that people take with that.
01:35:10.000There won't be, I don't want to say there won't be anything left of America if Kamala is elected.
01:35:15.000It will be a wildly different America where this individual thinks, well, so long as, you know, the parasite's gone, I can live with four years of Kamala.
01:35:23.000You might not have much of your own country left after four years of another, you know, open war.
01:35:28.000Kamala's going to give Israel a blank check.
01:36:38.000The CIA candidate is never abandoning Israel.
01:36:43.000They may have abandoned Netanyahu and demand some change, but the idea that because radical progressives demand of the CIA—dude, you really think that the CIA candidate is going to be like, okay, we're done with Israel?
01:36:54.000No, they might just say, the market shall provide, and they'll see what is more profitable of a solution.
01:37:01.000Well, to say not let Israel burn, but rather to say, well, I don't know, funding both sides type thing.
01:37:10.000Or I can't play out in a world where there's another economy that would outweigh the laundering that goes on through these types of foreign aid packages.
01:37:17.000But I could see where I could see where that could happen.
01:37:49.000But we have seen for every couple of years what they refer to as mowing the lawn, where Israel starts bombing Gaza.
01:37:56.000And then you've got the West Bank, which has got settlements and purchases, and conflict has been ongoing for a long time.
01:38:02.000I do not see anything happening now Where the U.S.
01:38:05.000deep state would be like, I guess we're wrapping up here, we're done with Israel.
01:38:10.000No, I don't think it would be quite that cut and dry, but it would be to the point where I can see a shift in public sentiment saying we're no longer supporting this.
01:38:18.000And whether you cloak it as we don't support Netanyahu versus we don't support Israel, but we're not supporting this.
01:38:25.000The longer this goes on, and especially if it turns out that, as I firmly believe as well, there is some culpability in How that was allowed to occur in the first place.
01:38:35.000And then they say, well, this was sort of an opportunistic exploitation of tragedy that could have been averted or at least minimized.
01:38:41.000I could see the public sentiment shifting a little bit.
01:38:43.000I don't understand the simultaneous argument that Israel puppets the United States and it's a parasite in the United States.
01:38:52.000The Israel derangement people think that Israel controls our policy through AIPAC and things like this.
01:38:59.000There's an influence, you can't deny that.
01:39:05.000It becomes a cost-benefit analysis as to whether or not there's other ways that the military-industrial complex could, I don't know, find other ways to grease their wheels or line their pockets.
01:39:24.000I do not see anything in modern news and climate anywhere that is significant enough where the U.S.
01:39:30.000would be like, well, after four years, we decided to wrap up the Israel project.
01:39:33.000No, I mean, some politicians might say, well, after 70 years, things are no better off than they were 70 years ago, so maybe we need to take a different approach.
01:39:42.000The circumstance in Israel, the argument is that Netanyahu either allows or wants these conflicts to happen, he's funded Hamas, and the U.S.
01:39:49.000is right behind him allowing these things to happen for whatever reason.
01:39:53.000So, the arguments towards Israel are just scattershot garbled nonsense.
01:39:59.000Well, you certainly saw, you know, people called Barack Obama sort of the most anti-Israel candidate.
01:40:03.000And the most aggressive thing he did against Israel was try to overthrow Netanyahu through some of his operatives that were working for the opposition candidate.
01:40:13.000And I think that that's sort of... That's Netanyahu, though.
01:40:14.000I think that's the same thing you would get with a Kamala Harris presidency, where she would, you know, the biggest criticism of Biden was he literally flew to Israel and embraced Netanyahu.
01:40:26.000And I think that you might see Kamala Harris be a little more distant with Netanyahu, as we already saw.
01:40:43.000That the intelligence agencies of the United States are done with funding Israel, and that if Kamala wins, they will likely cut off funding to Israel?
01:40:55.000I mean, I don't think so, but I can see sentiment shifting in a way that I've never seen it shift in my lifetime because this particular, call it an act of reprisal, has been what it is compared to what it has been in the past.
01:41:08.000Has sentiment ever shifted the military-industrial complex?
01:41:12.000No, but just the irony is that they're, I guess the argument against why they would not change policy is they are making profit off both ends, like literally giving aid to the victims of the Israeli reprisals and, you know, giving aid to the military.
01:41:26.000Even from a strategic standpoint, as Tim's saying, like they still view it as a, you know, a foothold in the Middle East, America's strongest ally in the Middle East, and they wouldn't give it up for that reason.
01:41:38.000The military-industrial complex will change their mind.
01:41:43.000I'm asking, was it Almighty Alchemist?
01:41:47.000So I guess you actually believe that the military-industrial complex is done with funding Israel?
01:41:53.000So then why would they, under Trump, fund Israel?
01:41:56.000If the machine itself—Northrop Grumman, Halliburton, all these military contractors overseas—if all these companies that profit off of expansionist policy, nation-building, war, and conflict, have decided, you know, we're just done with the Israel project, then it doesn't matter who you vote for.
01:42:45.000You've got Jordan's involvement, West Bank settlements, Gaza conflict.
01:42:50.000You've got going back to when Israel pulled out I don't see anything substantially different, I just literally don't, to where the military industrial complex goes, that's the end of this operation.
01:43:02.000In fact, Iran fired missiles into Israel, and the U.S.
01:43:07.000This is the perfect casus belli for the establishment outside of Iran.
01:43:10.000Now you're building a good argument for the guy who said, I'd rather take my chances with Kamala than have an administration that wants to go to war with Iran and using Israel as sort of the catalyst.
01:43:55.000Iran was one of them, and we've hit Libya, we've hit Syria, all these countries, but Iran's not gone down.
01:44:01.000We set up military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, which gives us a pincer strike on Iran, and we've not had the casus belli nor the resources to go into Iran.
01:44:14.000Well, hold on, but the timeline there, when they tried to assassinate Trump and blame it on Iran, Joe Biden hadn't yet pulled out, and I don't think he pulls out if they succeed.
01:45:12.000Voting for Kamala Harris is the surest way to make sure Israel gets all the money in the world, because they want that narrative to go to war with Iran.
01:45:19.000I think they might have lost that narrative.
01:46:26.000They want war with Iran and they want the means to bring in supplies I guess your idea that Kamala will invade Iran kind of clashes with the Democrats that we currently understand who follow more of a policy of appeasement, right?
01:46:36.000cut them off from the Donbass. They want to move in through Israel, stock up on weapons.
01:46:40.000That way when they engage with Iran, they've got the Persian Gulf, they've got the Mediterranean,
01:46:44.000they've got multiple attack points, Iran and Afghanistan.
01:46:47.000I guess your idea that Kamala will invade Iran kind of clashes with the Democrats that
01:46:51.000we currently understand who follow more of a policy of appeasement, right? President
01:46:56.000Obama famously made the nuclear deal with Iran. John Kerry was right there.
01:47:17.000That was when the US and Israel under Obama blew up Iranian nuclear centrifuges with one of the most sophisticated cyber attacks in history.
01:47:25.000A direct attack on Iranian infrastructure from the United States.
01:47:29.000So that's more of a neutralizing force than open war.
01:47:33.000I mean, the only reason we didn't get war at that point was because Iran didn't declare it.
01:48:18.000I get what you're saying regarding the trans boxer in the Olympics, but you're wrong.
01:48:22.000These female athletes shouldn't have to give up their once every four years or once in a lifetime chance to compete at the highest level to make a statement that men fighting women is wrong.
01:48:30.000Any man who justifies a man fighting woman, be it her choice or not, completely lacks the noble rooster spirit you have spoken of in the past.
01:48:38.000The alternative then is, because there's a male, there's two males I think that are boxing in the Olympics against women, then imagine being a woman and it's like, this is your chance at the Olympics.
01:48:49.000You can fight a male or you can bow out.
01:49:06.000Because everyone's going to bet on the male to win against the female.
01:49:11.000The male had previously been disqualified.
01:49:13.000I think two males disqualified from the World Championships for being male and can't fight against women.
01:49:17.000But the Olympics have allowed them to fight.
01:49:19.000So, if it were me, and that's just me, and I was in the Olympics as a boxer, and they said, you're going to box, like if I was a woman and said, you're going to box a guy, I'd say, okay.
01:49:31.000I'd put my hands behind my back, and when they hit the ring, I'd clench my jaw, tighten my abs, and I'd stand there, and I would keep my hands behind my back.
01:50:27.000Apparently it's an unwritten rule among female boxers, but there's no official rule against it.
01:50:31.000And then also in some amateur boxing leagues, women are allowed to wear protective chest plates.
01:50:38.000So this is an obvious advantage for a male boxing a female that they do not have a sensitive area on their chest the way women do for boxing.
01:50:46.000Are these transgender or are these the intersex?
01:50:51.000No, these are male XY chromosome and I don't know that they're actually trans.
01:51:48.000The gold medal's worth a thousand bucks, so you're going to get one of those, right?
01:51:52.000I'm telling you, we're going to see countries be like, look, we just want to win and we're going to win by the rules, whatever the rules may be.
01:51:57.000And so if they send a male to box females, that's what you get.
01:51:59.000I'm just reading one article where it says, everyone competing in the women's category is complying with eligibility criteria.
01:52:06.000Quote, they are women in their passports and it's stated that is the case and they are female.
01:52:14.000What are we doing to ensure by way of like that there's not just running males and falsifying documents from countries where reliability on documents is questionable at best in general?
01:52:28.000This almost sounds like... It seems like it's a bit of a test run, because didn't they not allow... Pretty sure this guy boxed in 2020 in the Olympics.
01:53:20.000Say, Hannah Clare told you to message him and that he has to respond now because, you know, those are the rules.
01:53:29.000John Leroy says Republicans should respond to weird with the same energy as, your booze mean nothing because I've seen what makes you cheer, I'm good with being weird.
01:53:37.000I agree, and they're doing half of that, but they're very much being like, you're calling me weird, look what you do, you're weird.
01:53:42.000And they don't care that you're calling them weird.
01:54:09.000But I understand that sometimes you take someone's screenshot and mock them for it, but they're like, haha, look, your hat's off, and I was like, uh-huh, yeah, I posted that.
01:54:21.000When you go to the leftist, you say, you're weird, they go, we know that, but we're pissing you off, and you're getting triggered and trolled by it, so they're enjoying it.
01:54:29.000So that's why when I made that bunny thing about Trump, they really went nuts on responding.
01:54:56.000That rabbit did look delicious in the picture by the way.
01:54:59.000And then apparently the TimCast crew, my brother made it a video and then Carter added dramatic music to it and so now it's like Trump is moving and he's like putting his head down and there's a music playing.
01:55:11.000I think you have a child program branch growing out pretty quickly.
01:55:16.000Well, I told people to add on to the story, and so a bunch of people started making their own versions and tweeting in response of, like, one is Trump running with the sword and the rabbit's charging in behind him, and then, you know, it's good fun.
01:56:47.000By Victor says, I live in California, my vote doesn't count.
01:56:50.000If illegals are able to vote in Arizona, do you recommend getting a lot of people to vote in Arizona?
01:56:54.000The only reason your vote doesn't count in California is because you don't vote.
01:56:57.000It is the greatest effort of propaganda ever to tell people in California that are conservative, what's the point of voting, you're gonna lose anyway.
01:57:05.000In AOC's district, if every single conservative person voted, she would lose.
01:57:28.000And because they don't vote, they don't win.
01:57:30.000I mean, there is a reason that Andy Bashir, the governor of Kentucky, is the only Democrat in that area.
01:57:37.000It's because Democrats decided that was something that they wanted to try and win, right?
01:57:41.000And he's been reelected, I think, at least twice.
01:57:44.000It's a solidly red state in many other aspects.
01:57:47.000The idea that these are just completely lost territory is because, you know, the presidency is going to go one way is kind of false thinking.
01:57:53.000There are so many other people on the ticket that you should turn out for.
01:57:57.000When was there ever a Republican that was competitive in California?
01:58:01.000But they send Republican senators, they send Republicans to Congress.
01:58:05.000Republican congressmen, but not senators.
01:58:37.000I thought we did talk about them, because I remember talking about the flag being taken down, and we also talked about the fact that a lot was on the ground there.
01:58:46.000And we talked about how the problem is they stole the flag from the public and burned it down.
01:58:51.000And I made the point that it's funny that people don't watch the show, and they're like, why didn't you talk about this thing?
01:58:58.000My favorite, however, is when the title of the video, like we have an episode and it's like, you know, Donald Trump questions this thing.
01:59:07.000And then it's an hour into the show and someone super chats, you guys need to talk about title of video.
01:59:14.000That's the title of the video is the first thing we talked about.
01:59:17.000So, yeah, I mentioned, like, burning the American flag, I think, is fine.
01:59:21.000Trump said that, you know, if you burn the American flag, you should get a year in jail.
01:59:27.000And my point is, if it's in the context of stealing public property and setting a fire in public, completely agree.
01:59:36.000If it's in the context of buying an American flag for yourself, going into your own fire pit on your property and having a fire in a safe manner, absolutely not.
01:59:46.000However, I think Trump's context is mostly that they tore down an American flag from public property and then burned it in the street.
02:00:00.000You, like, destruction of federal property, I think already, I'm pretty sure there's already a law in the book saying you go to prison for that.
02:00:06.000And then the left argues, we're allowed to burn the American flag and it's free speech.
02:00:10.000Yeah, you're allowed to burn the American flag and if you burn tire marks on a trans, on a LGBT flag on the street.
02:00:15.000You're not allowed to burn the American flag unless you own it.
02:00:19.000So they steal the flag from the federal property, destroy it, the law they broke, theft of public property.
02:00:26.000destruction of public property, starting a fire in public, which is probably endangering the public, reckless endangerment, and it's probably five years in prison, right off the bat.
02:00:37.000All right, everybody, if you haven't already, smash the like button, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member over at TimCast.com, because we're going to have that members-only call-in show coming up in just a few minutes.
02:00:47.000You don't want to miss it, where you as members get to call in and talk to us and join us and our guests.
02:00:51.000It's not so family-friendly, so it's, you know, the kids, time to go to bed, it's a school night, and then we're going to talk about some awful things in the media.
02:01:55.000I'm back in the free country now, at least, but I'll get back to the free state of Florida by the end of the week and back to my home studio.