Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Secret Service Warns Of ANOTHER TRUMP ASSASSINATION Attempt Coming w-Charlie Spiering | Timcast IRL

00:00:00.000 An email from a Secret Service counter-sniper warns of another possible attack on assassination

00:00:18.000 attempt on Trump's life, saying that the Secret Service should expect this before November,

00:00:23.000 possibly within the next 30 days.

00:00:25.000 Now, the email wasn't necessarily the counter-sniper saying, we have intelligence this will happen.

00:00:30.000 It's him saying we have failed miserably, we take our jobs very seriously, and we cannot wait because we will likely see another attack before November.

00:00:38.000 This is, it's crazy.

00:00:39.000 Apparently the agency deleted the email right away.

00:00:41.000 They're not happy.

00:00:43.000 Stuff's being said.

00:00:44.000 There was a hearing today.

00:00:45.000 Holly and many members of Congress, they were slamming the Secret Service over their failures.

00:00:50.000 And this seems like, these hearings, I gotta be honest, a big fat waste of time.

00:00:54.000 We're not getting clear answers.

00:00:55.000 We don't know exactly what's going on.

00:00:57.000 And this email is pretty damning.

00:00:58.000 So we'll talk about that.

00:00:59.000 Plus, the news surrounding Venezuela is getting crazy.

00:01:03.000 And there are questions as to whether an election like Venezuela's happening here in November Could we see similar things?

00:01:09.000 I'm not so sure, but it is interesting.

00:01:11.000 We've got undercover video from James O'Keefe of someone from the DNC saying, yeah, Kamala can't win.

00:01:16.000 At the same time...

00:01:18.000 The Keys prediction, they call it.

00:01:20.000 This guy is leaning towards Kamala Harris winning, and he's gotten, since 1984, every presidential election correct except for Al Gore and Bush, which is contested and strange.

00:01:30.000 But I don't know if I trust this guy.

00:01:33.000 So we'll talk about this.

00:01:33.000 We've got a bunch of other stories.

00:01:35.000 Maybe we'll get into the whole weird thing with J.D.

00:01:37.000 Vance once again.

00:01:38.000 Before we get started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com to buy coffee.

00:01:42.000 Why?

00:01:42.000 Because it's the best dang coffee you will ever have, and I'm allowed to say that because that's an opinion.

00:01:46.000 Right, Viva? 1.00

00:01:47.000 Yes.

00:01:48.000 All right.

00:01:48.000 My lawyer clears it.

00:01:49.000 I'm kidding.

00:01:49.000 He's not really my lawyer.

00:01:50.000 But buy Appalachian Nights.

00:01:51.000 It's everybody's favorite.

00:01:52.000 Rives with Alberto Jr., of course.

00:01:54.000 And we've got Alex Stein's Primetime Grind and Ian's Grappine Dream.

00:01:56.000 When you buy Cast Brew, you are supporting the show, and you're also getting a delicious cup of coffee.

00:02:02.000 So I strongly recommend it.

00:02:03.000 Also, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, because the members-only uncensored show will likely be very fun and very funny tonight.

00:02:10.000 And if you want to join in, you got to go to TimCast.com, click join us.

00:02:14.000 But also, don't forget, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with all of your friends and family.

00:02:20.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more, we got Charlie Spearing.

00:02:24.000 Charlie Sperring, senior political reporter at the Daily Mail and author of the book

00:02:28.000 Amateur Hour, Kamala Harris and the White House.

00:02:30.000 And it was really funny because you have this book, Amateur Hour, and Viva Frye was also here,

00:02:35.000 was like, wow, how did you plan for this? How did you know to write it?

00:02:37.000 Yeah, I was here in January. We promoted it and I warned there's a very real chance that

00:02:41.000 Kamala Harris could be the next president of the United States.

00:02:45.000 And now it's looking like it's even closer.

00:02:48.000 Yeah, it would be funny if Trump has to throw away all those 45, 47 hats, because if she gets in before the end of the year, she's 47 and then Trump would be 48.

00:02:56.000 So thanks for hanging out, it should be fun.

00:02:59.000 Viva Frye is also in town.

00:03:00.000 How's it going, everybody?

00:03:01.000 I was told to never leave a thing blank on the internet, so I'm just going to fill this in right now to state the obvious, people.

00:03:08.000 They'll still screengrab it. 0.98

00:03:10.000 Oh, crap. 0.99

00:03:11.000 I'm done. 1.00

00:03:12.000 It'll be white dudes for Harris later on. 0.74

00:03:17.000 My mother did call me a brat growing up, so maybe it makes sense. 1.00

00:03:21.000 I guess everybody knows me, Viva Frye, former Montreal litigator.

00:03:24.000 I'm not even a lawyer anymore.

00:03:25.000 So not only am I not your lawyer.

00:03:27.000 So your advice was bad.

00:03:28.000 I voluntarily relinquished my Quebec license because it was only serving as a basis to people to file anonymous ethics complaints because they didn't like my tweets.

00:03:37.000 Well, that's nice.

00:03:38.000 We got Shane Cashman hanging out.

00:03:39.000 Good to be back.

00:03:40.000 It's fun to talk about Charlie's horror book, Kamala.

00:03:43.000 I'm the host of Inverted World Live every Sunday, 6 o'clock Eastern.

00:03:47.000 Hannah Clare, what's up?

00:03:48.000 I'm happy that we're all here together, especially with apparently our soothsayer, the one who can predict the future.

00:03:54.000 Yeah, you made me laugh because you're like, well, basically I'm on a second book tour now, so this is really working out in your favor.

00:04:00.000 Maybe not the American public.

00:04:01.000 Did your book jump when this happened?

00:04:03.000 Definitely.

00:04:04.000 It's now like a one-week wait over at Amazon, so definitely check out some of these.

00:04:08.000 One to three weeks, so definitely check out some of the other sites.

00:04:10.000 I wrote a book about Kamala Harris being awful, and then she's the nominee for the Democrats now. 1.00

00:04:14.000 It's like, all right, well, that's perfect timing.

00:04:16.000 Does that make you want to support her because she's really helping your career?

00:04:19.000 Well, I haven't sunk that low.

00:04:20.000 I don't think my family will allow it.

00:04:22.000 There have been some jokes about how if she becomes president, then the book will sell even more, and if she doesn't, then we're pretty much done.

00:04:29.000 We've got to move on to the next one.

00:04:30.000 Yeah, it would be like writing a book about, like, Dukakis or something.

00:04:33.000 People would be like, at the time it mattered, now when it's brought up, it's like, who?

00:04:36.000 Well, that was the whole thing.

00:04:37.000 People were like, why are you writing a book about the vice president?

00:04:40.000 And, you know, we don't necessarily write books about Al Gore.

00:04:43.000 Or Dan Quayle.

00:04:44.000 You know you should have said.

00:04:45.000 But usually it's like, well, with Joe Biden's age and his declining health, there's a very real possibility that he'll become the next president of the United States.

00:04:53.000 I know, and you're right.

00:04:54.000 He will become the next president.

00:04:55.000 That logic is correct.

00:04:56.000 When someone says, why are you writing about Kamala?

00:04:58.000 And you're like, well, look at all these reasons.

00:05:00.000 It would have been better if you were like, I had a vision.

00:05:02.000 A frog spoke to me and told me this is going to happen.

00:05:05.000 And anyway, thank you for hanging out, everybody.

00:05:08.000 This is going to be fun.

00:05:08.000 Let's jump into this first story.

00:05:09.000 We've got this from SCNR.

00:05:12.000 Secret Service sniper warns of another possible assassination attempt within 30 days.

00:05:18.000 Quote, because we should all expect another attempt to happen before November.

00:05:23.000 Now, that's 97 days.

00:05:24.000 I guess technically that's 92 days.

00:05:27.000 But the story goes...

00:05:29.000 A U.S. 0.66

00:05:29.000 Secret Service counter-sniper is warned of a potential assassination attempt within the next 30 days. 0.66

00:05:34.000 An email sent on July 29th to the entire uniformed division.

00:05:37.000 The individual strongly denounced the Secret Service handling of the rally in Pennsylvania where a would-be assassin attempted to kill former President Trump.

00:05:44.000 The sniper claimed the man was not intercepted because agents and counter-snipers were forced to do their jobs with their hands tied.

00:05:52.000 Hands tied, huh?

00:05:53.000 I wonder if that was intentional.

00:05:54.000 During the event, the gunmen fired multiple shots, this we know.

00:05:57.000 The Secret Service sniper vowed to continue speaking out about the agency's failure until five high-level supervisors, one down, are either fired or removed from their current positions.

00:06:08.000 Quote, this agency needs to change, if not now, when?

00:06:12.000 The next assassination attempt in 30 days?

00:06:14.000 Because we all should expect another attempt to happen before November, he wrote.

00:06:19.000 We've exposed our inability to protect our leaders due to our leadership.

00:06:23.000 The technicians who worked on 713 and Butler PA did their job with their hands tied.

00:06:27.000 Sadly, we have fallen short four years.

00:06:30.000 We just got lucky and look good doing it.

00:06:32.000 I have conveyed these thoughts to not only supervisors, to include the current captain within CS, but those responsible for training us only to be brushed off as if those with less experience somehow knew more than me.

00:06:45.000 Now, I have to wonder.

00:06:47.000 We have this post.

00:06:49.000 Susan Crabtree, she's a political reporter for RealClearPolitics and she's posted this.

00:06:55.000 She says, the agency quickly deleted the email a knowledgeable source told RealClearPolitics.

00:07:00.000 Full email with name redacted below.

00:07:03.000 If what happened in Butler, PA was intentional, either they pulled back intentionally knowing this guy was coming, saw him sneak in and said, let him do it, someone higher up, or there was direct official involvement in the actions of this individual, They would want to delete this email, saying we failed, it's going to happen again, and if it is going to happen again because they did fail, all the more reason to shut down this communication from a Secret Service counter-sniper warning we should expect another attempt.

00:07:35.000 And whether it's an educated opinion or whatever, this is someone within the Secret Service who's worked there for some time complaining about what's going on, how it was handled, and that they should expect this again.

00:07:46.000 I imagine this person has information that leads them to believe Again, let me stress, I'm not saying there's direct intelligence, that anyone's reporting this.

00:07:53.000 I'm saying it's a person working in the Secret Service.

00:07:55.000 They're going through their run-of-the-mill daily operations thinking, we may get another attempt before November and we need to be prepared for it.

00:08:01.000 What you had and what we've witnessed in these congressional hearings, it's a public announcement, an invitation almost, and I'm not saying that to be cynical or every fear hides a wish. 0.99

00:08:11.000 What they've displayed by level of incompetence, if you want to grant them that charitable interpretation of incompetence, is that the idiot today comes up and says, we lacked imagination in understanding that there's people out there who want to kill the president. 0.94

00:08:24.000 No, you lack basic common sense to do the most basic thing where you can get a neurotic kid who's never served in law enforcement to say that roof should not be unsecured. 0.99

00:08:33.000 Just to clarify, though, that was a quote from the hearing today.

00:08:36.000 We lacked We were lacking imagination because we didn't understand that we live in a world with bad people.

00:08:42.000 Their job is to anticipate that, but it's been a public announcement to the level of deficiency if you take them at their word, which I don't.

00:08:50.000 In 2015, someone tried grabbing a gun from a police officer in an attempt to take Trump's life.

00:08:55.000 The idea that they didn't know this could happen is laughably insane.

00:08:58.000 Especially after the Iranian alleged increased threat. 0.96

00:09:01.000 And when I say I don't take them at their word, this wasn't incompetence.

00:09:04.000 This was something far more sinister.

00:09:05.000 And I'll revert back to my notepad here. 0.55

00:09:08.000 They made a public announcement that they're incompetent at best or corrupt at worst, in

00:09:13.000 which case, you know, expect something worse in the next month or two.

00:09:17.000 They wrote a haunting slogan there in that letter, we just got lucky and looked good

00:09:23.000 doing it.

00:09:24.000 That's the sound of a very frustrated agent who's dealing with a lot of bureaucracy preventing

00:09:30.000 him from doing his job and he's got a lot to say.

00:09:33.000 Susan Crabtree is a good reporter.

00:09:35.000 I know her personally.

00:09:36.000 She's very well sourced with the Secret Service.

00:09:38.000 She helped uncover some of the details around that Kamala Harris protective detail agent that sort of went nuts and started attacking her superiors.

00:09:47.000 So that was also just one more sign.

00:09:49.000 And she definitely filed a lot of articles about the whole DEI affecting the Secret Service.

00:09:55.000 I could imagine that what we're witnessing is the implosion of the deep state.

00:10:01.000 And so I look at something like this and the question is with the fervent zealotry in the media about Donald Trump, I think maybe we underestimate the amount of threats to Trump and it is possible that this was I think what Buzz Patterson was calling it was intentional incompetence.

00:10:19.000 Is that what he referred to it as?

00:10:21.000 The idea being that there are so many threats to Trump because of what the media does all day every day that they need only stand back and stand by and eventually somebody sneaks in and they just sit there and say, well, you know, if it happens.

00:10:35.000 I'm of two minds of this.

00:10:36.000 There is a slimmer possibility in my mind.

00:10:39.000 I could be totally wrong.

00:10:40.000 That this is secret services failing, like you mentioned, the agent going crazy, and this email, the chain of command is breaking, the intelligence agencies are in bedlam, because the deep state is in flames.

00:10:53.000 As Brett Weinstein mentioned, they're just winging it now.

00:10:55.000 And maybe something like this happens because they just have no idea what's going on anymore.

00:10:59.000 The chain of command is disrupted.

00:11:00.000 We have an incompetency crisis.

00:11:02.000 I believe we have a managerial crisis, partly due to DEI and things like this.

00:11:06.000 And maybe it's just we're worse off than we realize in terms of function of government.

00:11:11.000 At the same time, take everything I just said, but They intentionally want this to happen because they are

00:11:18.000 desperate and winging it and everything's falling apart and it's the only play they have. Either way,

00:11:23.000 I think we are witnessing the deep state, the permanent government, whatever it is, is

00:11:29.000 breaking apart.

00:11:30.000 You know, they didn't lack imagination when they wrapped DC in barbed wire for Biden's

00:11:34.000 inauguration, right? Like, they know to expect certain threats against him then.

00:11:39.000 This is a total collapse.

00:11:41.000 And I think it is a managerial problem and incompetence, but there's people behind the

00:11:45.000 scenes allowing nefarious actors to climb through all that.

00:11:48.000 And I think that's true for a lot of federal agencies, right?

00:11:50.000 I think of it as if you were remodeling an old house and it has linoleum.

00:11:54.000 Well, if you peel off one layer of linoleum, you might get the subfloor, but you might

00:11:58.000 also get five other layers of linoleum.

00:12:00.000 A lot of these agencies are comprised of people who were hired or installed during different administrations.

00:12:05.000 They have different goals.

00:12:06.000 They have different views on this whole thing.

00:12:08.000 And so, you know, again, I'll go back to something I reference all the time, which is, you know, the Saturday after the RNC, I was waiting for my flight and watching CNN, and CNN was reporting that Trump's team Had no idea that there was a threat and that's why they sent him out on stage during the Butler rally.

00:12:23.000 Which means that, and I assume Trump's team refers to his Secret Service team, meaning that there is a breakdown of communication with literally one agency that's at one place in Pennsylvania.

00:12:33.000 I can't imagine what the breakdown, whether intentional or not, is like with the agency as it moves around, you know, from Washington to the satellite offices that are across the country.

00:12:44.000 I mean, ultimately, I don't think it's a cooperating agency and I think there are lots of different people, you can see it in the sniper's letter, who are frustrated because they devote their lives to what they think is an honorable purpose only to sort of be misled and abused by whoever's currently calling the shots.

00:12:59.000 Well, speaking of the lack of imagination, I went up to Butler, Pennsylvania the night of the attempted assassination.

00:13:06.000 And as soon as you get to the site, the number one thing you see is that giant water tower there.

00:13:10.000 And my imagination was like, well, if they had a Secret Service sniper up there, they would have easily seen the threat.

00:13:17.000 Turns out they didn't have anybody on the water tower.

00:13:20.000 Not to mention a drone or any other things.

00:13:22.000 Not just that they didn't have a drone, they turned down an offer by the state What is a SWAT to have a drone?

00:13:29.000 And we say like I like the idea of intentional incompetence and who was it

00:13:32.000 that told me that you know, there might be whistleblowers within the agency.

00:13:35.000 I'm joking.

00:13:35.000 It was you Tim, you know that they're going to it was from the convention.

00:13:40.000 But this email that you're reading that's a sincere email from someone who

00:13:45.000 does want to do good in an institution where there's deliberate incompetence

00:13:49.000 and you can imagine the higher-up saying dude, shut the hell up the disarray

00:13:52.000 that you're complaining about is by design.

00:13:54.000 It's not by accident, but deliberate incompetence.

00:13:56.000 I don't like that.

00:13:56.000 Right when buzz said intentional incompetence or the phrase because

00:14:00.000 if if you want something bad to happen, so you deliberately line up the

00:14:05.000 pieces so that it will happen.

00:14:07.000 That's just deliberate.

00:14:08.000 That's just intentional.

00:14:10.000 It's the appearance of incompetence.

00:14:11.000 Yes.

00:14:11.000 It's like, oh, I'm sorry, I left the door open, I didn't realize your dog would get out, and that's my analogy.

00:14:15.000 Or, you know, leave something on the floor that you know the dog's gonna eat.

00:14:18.000 Pausable deniability.

00:14:18.000 It's deliberate.

00:14:20.000 It cannot be but deliberate.

00:14:21.000 And the guy says we lack imagination.

00:14:23.000 So we turned down a drone offer, which we would have accepted had we gotten it.

00:14:26.000 This was from today, a bait.

00:14:29.000 It's just, it is deliberate.

00:14:30.000 And I don't know what more anybody needs to hear before you come to the conclusion, it was a deliberate, let it happen on purpose or make it happen on purpose.

00:14:38.000 I think the Secret Service agent, Sniper, is correct. 0.98

00:14:41.000 And before November, there will be.

00:14:44.000 Another attempt on Trump.

00:14:45.000 I believe that if Donald Trump, on his own, with no security and no Secret Service, decided to go for a walk in New York, his life would be in serious jeopardy. 1.00

00:14:55.000 One crazy person with Trump Derangement Syndrome. 0.99

00:15:00.000 Trump needs serious security. 0.99

00:15:02.000 And for that matter, so does Kamala Harris.

00:15:03.000 They all do, yeah.

00:15:04.000 So does Joe Biden.

00:15:05.000 They should redouble all of their security, because I'm not trusting of anybody right now.

00:15:09.000 And you want to go full Blackpill conspiracy theory?

00:15:13.000 Kamala Harris might be more at risk from an opportunity perspective.

00:15:16.000 God forbid something happens to Kamala Harris. 1.00

00:15:18.000 They get to demonize the right.

00:15:20.000 They get to then say, it's too dangerous to have voting in person.

00:15:23.000 We've got to have mass mail-in voting. 0.97

00:15:25.000 And then they get to swap out or, you know, Hillary Clinton. 1.00

00:15:27.000 Put someone else in who's less popular because they know damn well that Kamala Harris is not popular. 0.86

00:15:31.000 As far as I'm concerned, from an opportunistic perspective of a deep state that wants to lock down this election by controlling the means, she would be the bigger target, not Trump.

00:15:38.000 I worry about a manufactured retaliation.

00:15:40.000 Absolutely.

00:15:41.000 That's what they want, because they've already developed this idea, this caricature of the MAGA extremist.

00:15:45.000 Well, the MAGA extremist is the guy who tried to shoot Trump.

00:15:47.000 You know, an anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant guy shoots the president who, Trump, who's called anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant.

00:15:54.000 Let's bring this up.

00:15:54.000 We have this from NPR.

00:15:56.000 Social media account with extremist comment could be tied to Trump gunman, FBI says.

00:16:02.000 Now, I find this story really fascinating because they're basically saying this guy was anti-semitic.

00:16:06.000 They say there were over 700 comments posted on this account.

00:16:09.000 Some of these comments, if ultimately attributable to the shooter, appear to reflect anti-semitic and anti-immigration themes to espouse political violence and are described as extreme in nature.

00:16:17.000 Now, I want to pause right there and say, Anti-immigration?

00:16:21.000 Why would they go after Trump?

00:16:22.000 That's the case.

00:16:23.000 But the real issue here is not that the account exists.

00:16:26.000 It's the story.

00:16:28.000 Because we've already heard from Gab about law enforcement requesting information on an account they believe to be the shooter where he was defending Joe Biden as recently as two and a half to three years ago.

00:16:41.000 About three years ago.

00:16:43.000 Now we're getting a story that actually was anti-Semitic and anti-immigration.

00:16:47.000 Meanwhile, the other comments were pro-Biden and defensive of their policies.

00:16:52.000 I'll tell you this.

00:16:55.000 You choose.

00:16:56.000 Good luck, everybody.

00:16:57.000 Good luck figuring it out, because I think, as Shane and I were talking about this this weekend, they are flooding the zone with crap so that no one can figure out what is going on.

00:17:07.000 It's like, oh my goodness story alone.

00:17:09.000 It was like the gaming account that was initially linked is no longer there.

00:17:13.000 And they don't even know that this account is. 0.75

00:17:15.000 They're flooding the zone with garbage. 0.98

00:17:17.000 But not just that. 0.85

00:17:17.000 I mean, if the story turns out to be true, these are comments from 2016, from four years ago, 2020, when the kid was 16. 0.85

00:17:25.000 And talk about flooding the field with crap or poisoning the well. 0.92

00:17:29.000 You got Christopher Wray comes out last week saying it might have been shrapnel that hit Trump's ear. 0.98

00:17:34.000 And then people ran with that story.

00:17:35.000 Now they're going to run with this.

00:17:36.000 And by the time this gets debunked or whatever, it's already controlled the narrative.

00:17:40.000 And just to make sure we hit this point, From the hearings today, FBI deputy director says there's never been a doubt that Trump was hit by a bullet despite Director Wray spreading shrapnel conspiracy.

00:17:51.000 It is intentional.

00:17:52.000 They are trying to make sure... Let me put it this way.

00:17:56.000 Democrats are going to be like, the head of the FBI said that!

00:17:58.000 They don't even know if it was a bullet.

00:18:00.000 And then you're going to be like, no, the deputy director says it was.

00:18:02.000 And they're going to be like, what are you talking about?

00:18:03.000 Then you're going to come out and you're going to be like, we had this story from Gab.

00:18:06.000 The Post was pro-Biden. 1.00

00:18:08.000 Are you nuts? 0.97

00:18:09.000 We got the FBI saying that the guy was anti-Semitic. 0.99

00:18:12.000 He was anti-immigration.

00:18:14.000 I mean, the FBI is not saying, like, at least Gab is saying, we are a social media company that has been contacted by the FBI in the wake of this event.

00:18:22.000 Here are screenshots of the messages they have requested.

00:18:25.000 Like, what's so frustrating to me about the FBI is, you know, FBI Director Wray says, well, maybe it was just shrapnel from the teleprompter, which has been disproven over and over again.

00:18:34.000 That night, his press person puts out a statement saying, no, it was definitely a bullet that hit Trump.

00:18:40.000 And then now we have the deputy director saying, oh, no, it was never a question.

00:18:43.000 One hundred percent.

00:18:44.000 There's so much internal disarray to the point where it's like, of course people call for the end of all of these agencies.

00:18:50.000 They're not functional.

00:18:51.000 What did you call it?

00:18:52.000 Reality buffet?

00:18:53.000 Yeah.

00:18:54.000 The buffet of reality.

00:18:55.000 It's the offshoot of my post-reality thing, because anything you want to be true, you can just go find to be true.

00:19:00.000 Yep.

00:19:00.000 So, you know, it's like, I think of, I forgot who it was online.

00:19:03.000 They shared an image of someone who died, but it wasn't the wrong person.

00:19:06.000 And they chose that image of the Pawn Stars son.

00:19:10.000 Because they knew people would recognize that son, but the son who actually died wasn't the one on TV.

00:19:14.000 So then everyone believed that post, and then that post was deleted, and now everyone… It's like a Mandela effect happening in real time.

00:19:22.000 People will believe there was shrapnel, there was a bullet.

00:19:25.000 Anything you want.

00:19:26.000 So where we are now is a liberal-will Google search, and Google's going to send them the sources that they're likely to click on.

00:19:34.000 Google's going to say, we're not doing this for politics.

00:19:36.000 The algorithm is sending them what we think they want to see.

00:19:38.000 And what do they want to see?

00:19:39.000 Trump was not shot.

00:19:41.000 And then conservatives.

00:19:42.000 So you're going to be at family dinner.

00:19:44.000 Your liberal aunt's going to come over. 1.00

00:19:45.000 She'll be like, he wasn't even shot.

00:19:47.000 It was glass.

00:19:47.000 And you're going to be like, that's not true.

00:19:49.000 That's when the buffets clash.

00:19:49.000 You're going to pull up the story.

00:19:51.000 You're going to go, look, look at this story.

00:19:53.000 And she's going to go, that's fake.

00:19:54.000 I'm going to pull it up.

00:19:55.000 Then she's going to pull up NPR and go, see?

00:19:57.000 And then you're going to be like, good luck proving to your family what's true or what's not.

00:20:00.000 Good luck knowing.

00:20:01.000 It's why I forget the intelligence thing is, you know, you can't control what people know you can only control when they know it and so you'll have the information eventually Crystallized and in the meantime, it's as far as I'm concerned Christopher Wray for what he said last week should be fired because if that's not participating in the event It's participating in the cover-up in the confusion.

00:20:19.000 And by the way, I got another one here dis array.

00:20:21.000 Oh Ha ha ha, look at that.

00:20:23.000 Bada bing, bada boom. 1.00

00:20:24.000 Okay, I'm never having a whiteboard again.

00:20:25.000 I just need everyone to know it was wrapped in plastic and not open when he sat down.

00:20:32.000 So he didn't have to pick up this whiteboard.

00:20:33.000 But the compulsion drove me. 0.96

00:20:37.000 They're beyond corrupt.

00:20:38.000 This is Christopher Wray giving that narrative feed that he needed to change the story.

00:20:43.000 What they did in 2020.

00:20:45.000 Intelligence lied about the Hunter Biden laptop story.

00:20:48.000 They suppressed it when Baker was the, you know, in Twitter.

00:20:50.000 They're doing the exact same thing mutatis mutatis now.

00:20:53.000 Intelligence is lying and the internet or Google and meta are censoring.

00:20:57.000 It actually also reminds me of the Rittenhouse, Kyle Rittenhouse's trial, right?

00:21:00.000 There were so many people who believe that he shot three black people and that was never true.

00:21:05.000 They identified as black, by the way.

00:21:07.000 We now know that.

00:21:08.000 Oh, okay.

00:21:08.000 Sure.

00:21:09.000 That's not true.

00:21:10.000 And so when, you know, I saw so many social media posts after he was found not guilty of people being like, do not even talk to me about, like, liberals saying, like, don't even talk to me about this.

00:21:20.000 If you think he's not guilty, then he, like, I can't, like, hysteria around this thing that, like, they won't even go back and just read the basic facts of the case.

00:21:27.000 They have decided on the narrative.

00:21:29.000 They have decided this person is guilty and they're not moving forward.

00:21:31.000 I started thinking about that when people were watching the Rittenhouse video.

00:21:35.000 And two people could watch the same video and walk away with completely different interpretations.

00:21:38.000 And we're watching the same exact video.

00:21:41.000 Well, apparently the Guardian watched the entire trial and after the conviction, after the acquittal, said he was acquitted of having killed three black men at a BLM protest.

00:21:48.000 I mean, this was years after.

00:21:49.000 You don't know that you watched the trial!

00:21:52.000 That's the thing, though.

00:21:53.000 There are certain things that are concrete.

00:21:55.000 With the Butler rally, the teleprompters weren't broken, so it cannot be this glass shrapnel thing.

00:22:01.000 Is that a whiteboard or a mirror?

00:22:02.000 That's what I would look like if I ever turned Hasidic, by the way. 0.95

00:22:05.000 Now Tim is going to get accused of a great many things.

00:22:10.000 It's a picture of Eva!

00:22:12.000 I was looking at you and I drew it.

00:22:14.000 You can keep it.

00:22:16.000 Another whiteboard, no!

00:22:19.000 That's my whiteboard now.

00:22:20.000 Sign it and snap it.

00:22:21.000 That's new shirts for you.

00:22:24.000 It's all just, I believe these hearings and the way they behave themselves and their smirks.

00:22:28.000 There was a smirk, the guy Abate today had like a Peter Stroke type smirk. 0.98

00:22:32.000 It's to provoke people into doing something stupid because they get so enraged listening to this. 0.86

00:22:36.000 Oh, and by the way, there was something, apparently Peter Stroke was paid, settled $1.2 million, got a severance package or something, that came up today. 0.97

00:22:43.000 And they were asking who in the FBI approved the $1.2 million settlement for Stroke and $800,000 for his lover there, Lisa Page.

00:22:52.000 The FBI tried to frame Trump.

00:22:54.000 The FBI, with authorization for deadly force, raided his Mar-a-Lago place when they had no reason to do it. 0.98

00:23:00.000 They want him dead.

00:23:01.000 And so what I've watched now is confirmation of this in real time.

00:23:05.000 Well, and think about like the Gretchen Whitmer case, like the kidnapping case and how involved FBI was with that.

00:23:09.000 There are so many times that the FBI as an agency acts questionably and it's somehow allowed to just sink back into the shadows.

00:23:15.000 That's what they're there for!

00:23:16.000 That's what they're there for!

00:23:17.000 To destroy us!

00:23:18.000 But if you question it, then you're an extremist, right?

00:23:22.000 Let's pull up a story from June.

00:23:23.000 It's from Fox's ex-FBI honcho McCabe says, Intel community members scared of being jailed by Trump may flee the country.

00:23:30.000 Um, and so the questions I asked when this went down, and I believe you were there Viva, was, does Trump derangement syndrome exist?

00:23:37.000 The answer is, of course it does. 0.86

00:23:39.000 There are people who believe fake things about Trump, who are insane, and scream at the top of their- there's nothing that will convince them otherwise. 0.94

00:23:46.000 Two, Do some of these people want Trump to die? 0.96

00:23:49.000 This is a fact.

00:23:50.000 We've seen people on the street ask the question, and they wish for it.

00:23:53.000 They post about it.

00:23:54.000 They're getting fired for doing these things.

00:23:55.000 And three, is it possible some of these people work in intelligence and law enforcement?

00:24:00.000 And the answer to that is yes.

00:24:01.000 And with those things all being true, and a story like this, they may flee the country in fear Is it possible that someone in law enforcement, someone in some federal capacity who hates Donald Trump, who believes the worst things about him, is terrified of going to jail and wants the worst for Trump, may engage in this untoward behavior?

00:24:20.000 Let's just operate on the purely hypothetical, exaggerated, hyperbolic assumption that there are people within the FBI who would go to jail if their conduct were revealed through some form of investigation.

00:24:31.000 Those people exist hands down.

00:24:33.000 Clinesmith, who falsified that document that they submitted to a FISA court, that's the tip of the iceberg.

00:24:39.000 So take for granted there are literally people within the FBI who would go to jail if their conduct was exposed.

00:24:44.000 What would they do to prevent that?

00:24:45.000 I would like to see the FBI shattered and scattered into the wind, as they say.

00:24:49.000 But I also think, as JFK said, right before something happened.

00:24:52.000 But I also believe that if that happens, there will be rogue domestic terrorists now that left

00:24:59.000 the FBI, you know, and they're just waiting to perform violence. So I want to I do want to get

00:25:05.000 into the Venezuela thing in just a second. I don't. It is hard to predict how this all plays out.

00:25:11.000 But I want to stress from the previous segment, Secret Service, counter sniper writing that they

00:25:17.000 fear another attempt on Trump's life before November.

00:25:20.000 Bye.

00:25:21.000 How have we not redoubled, quadrupled, for all people under Secret Service protection?

00:25:27.000 We've got to fire these people immediately.

00:25:30.000 We've got to go in and, you know, you've got to brush, like you're brushing the hair to straighten it out, get the knots out.

00:25:37.000 You've got bad people who don't know how to run this ship, whether intentionally or otherwise, there are serious problems, and there's a real threat to the lives of even people we may not politically agree with.

00:25:47.000 And I will stress, all of us here, And I would say every single person watching wants the best for Kamala Harris.

00:25:54.000 We want her to retire peacefully after she loses and she can go and dance with Megan Thee Stallion and do whatever it is she's going to do. 1.00

00:26:00.000 Absolutely.

00:26:01.000 And Joe Biden can sit in a rocking chair with his grandkids as they're playing.

00:26:04.000 Well, his grandkids are probably in their 40s or something.

00:26:06.000 The grandkids that he acknowledges are the ones that he doesn't.

00:26:09.000 They won't play with him.

00:26:11.000 I'm just saying, like, I hope that we get a Trump victory.

00:26:16.000 Trump brings us a marginally good administration.

00:26:20.000 It's not going to be dictator, Iron Fist, Project 2025, Donald Trump, because Project 2025 doesn't even prescribe these things.

00:26:28.000 Donald Trump's going to appoint some moderately bad people.

00:26:30.000 We're going to get some decently good policy.

00:26:32.000 Economy will probably improve a little bit.

00:26:34.000 Border security will be a little bit better.

00:26:36.000 We'll wind down some of these wars.

00:26:38.000 And we'll be marginally satisfied.

00:26:40.000 And I hope that's what we get.

00:26:42.000 We are not going to get Iron Fist Trump going and arresting people.

00:26:45.000 There's not going to be military tribunals.

00:26:47.000 None of that's going to happen.

00:26:48.000 I don't really see him throwing agents in jail.

00:26:51.000 Absolutely not.

00:26:53.000 I mean, McCabe's clearly overreacting because he was also a former agent that was in the crosshairs and he just got a nice deal.

00:27:00.000 He's talking about himself.

00:27:01.000 A nice network deal.

00:27:03.000 He's doing just fine.

00:27:04.000 Tim, I sent it to you.

00:27:05.000 Former FBI official Peter Stroke reaches $1.2 million settlement with Justice Department over Trump-related texts.

00:27:13.000 Former FBI Special Agent Peter Stroke, he reached $1.2 million.

00:27:16.000 Claims that the department violated his policy.

00:27:19.000 They paid him 1.2 million dollars.

00:27:21.000 This is where it's another act of provocation.

00:27:23.000 They paid him 1.2 mil because he said they violated his privacy by revealing the fact that he was talking about an insurance policy against a Trump presidency that he never wanted to see. 0.84

00:27:32.000 It's a freaking bizarro universe.

00:27:35.000 You know Cheadle's gonna get a deal after this too.

00:27:38.000 She's gonna get some job, some nice- Maybe a book deal? 1.00

00:27:41.000 Definitely a book deal.

00:27:41.000 Maybe a Netflix deal.

00:27:42.000 I think she's going back to what, like Frito-Lay or whatever she was doing before?

00:27:45.000 Yeah, that's right.

00:27:46.000 There's a joke in there that I will not make, but she'll get a lifetime supply of Pepsi and Cheetos. 0.53

00:27:50.000 Let's jump to the story from the Postmillennial.

00:27:53.000 From OMG, O'Keefe Media Group, DNC compliance manager says Kamala is weirdly unpopular, won't win in 2024. 0.64

00:28:00.000 I like Kamala Harris, but I don't think she'd win this year.

00:28:03.000 This is Joyce De- how do you pronounce it?

00:28:05.000 DeSource?

00:28:06.000 No idea.

00:28:06.000 Sure.

00:28:07.000 Let's go Game of Thrones.

00:28:09.000 In a new undercover video released by O'Keefe Media Group on Tuesday revealed DNC and Kamala

00:28:16.000 Harris campaign compliance manager, oh wow, Ancom, Joyce DeCirce, saying that Harris will

00:28:21.000 not win this year, adding, she's weirdly unpopular. 1.00

00:28:24.000 I like Kamala Harris, but I don't think she'd win this year.

00:28:27.000 She's weirdly unpopular.

00:28:28.000 I think a lot of that is racism and misogyny.

00:28:30.000 And the vice president is so easy to attack, right?

00:28:33.000 She doesn't have any accomplishments to speak of because she's vice president. 1.00

00:28:36.000 She doesn't make laws. 1.00

00:28:40.000 It's pretty interesting to see that internally at the Kamala Harris campaign, former Biden campaign, and at the DNC, this is not some low level guy.

00:28:49.000 It's not the highest level guy, but they're outright admitting what everyone feels.

00:28:53.000 Kamala?

00:28:55.000 She can't win.

00:28:56.000 By the way, I just went to his Twitter feed.

00:28:58.000 These posts are protected.

00:29:01.000 And the biopic, for anybody who's interested, is he's wearing a face mask.

00:29:05.000 So that tells you a lot of what you need to know.

00:29:07.000 But it's an amazing thing.

00:29:09.000 Weirdly unpopular, their word of the week is weird.

00:29:12.000 And it's weird that they're using it to describe their adversaries when clearly they're using it internally to describe themselves.

00:29:18.000 They're trying so hard with the weird thing.

00:29:21.000 And I just I don't think they know.

00:29:24.000 So they've been tweeting at me like crazy.

00:29:27.000 I can't remember what I posted.

00:29:28.000 I posted that Kamala's Project Special K will force women to get abortions and the military will go and kidnap Hondurans and bring them to America to force them to live in your home. 1.00

00:29:38.000 800 wars.

00:29:39.000 800 new wars will begin.

00:29:40.000 That means four new wars for every country on earth and some more than one.

00:29:46.000 Some more than four.

00:29:48.000 And I get this wave of responses saying, you're weird, you believe insane things.

00:29:54.000 And I'm like, dude, I don't believe for a second that the Krasensteins think that tweet's real.

00:29:58.000 Because they tweeted me and I tweeted them all the time.

00:30:01.000 But they're pretending like I'm literally saying there's a real thing called Kamala Project Special K. But the response was that it was like, you're weird, and I'm sitting here being like, Y'all don't know who you're dealing with.

00:30:13.000 Like, weird?

00:30:15.000 You wanna see weird?

00:30:16.000 I bought a 95 foot tall billboard in Times Square off my rooster!

00:30:20.000 We'll play weird.

00:30:21.000 But this attack, they try it again and again and again, tweeting it, everybody calling them weird.

00:30:27.000 I think it actually works on conservatives.

00:30:29.000 Conservatives are getting so wound up over being called weird that they're doing this troll campaign where all of these leftists and liberals on X are just spam posting at people that you're weird.

00:30:39.000 That's weird.

00:30:40.000 And people are actually freaking out.

00:30:41.000 They're like, I'm not weird.

00:30:42.000 You're weird.

00:30:42.000 Don't call me weird.

00:30:43.000 Here's you weird.

00:30:44.000 And they're posting pictures of Democrats and things like this.

00:30:46.000 And I'm like, bro, I'm weird.

00:30:47.000 I love it.

00:30:48.000 It's kind of an odd jujitsu, right?

00:30:49.000 It's because, like, there was that document from the Republicans, as soon as Kamala was sort of de facto nominated, there was a talking point from Republicans that they were going to describe Kamala Harris as weird.

00:31:00.000 So they're basically turning it right back on Republicans.

00:31:03.000 Like, you You want to call Colin Harris weird?

00:31:05.000 No, you're weird.

00:31:06.000 And then the childish food fight.

00:31:08.000 I love middle school.

00:31:09.000 It's fun to be here.

00:31:10.000 No, I've literally always taken being called weird because it's happened at least once or twice before.

00:31:14.000 I've always taken it as a compliment because it does mean sort of not within the norm and curious and interesting. 0.97

00:31:20.000 It's just the way they're using it now, like a grade school insult coming from the party that is recording, you know, anal sex in the Senate. 0.98

00:31:29.000 I don't care for that line. 0.99

00:31:30.000 I'm just like, okay, I'm weird. 0.98

00:31:30.000 titties on the White House lawn. These are programs and they're going to turn around 0.98

00:31:34.000 and call somebody else weird? Seriously? I mean, first, it is a compliment. It's it means you're

00:31:39.000 unique. But the people doing it, they're not weird. They're degenerates and hypocrites.

00:31:43.000 But it is, you know, it's funny. I don't I don't care for that line. I'm just like, 1.00

00:31:48.000 I okay, I'm weird. Yeah, I've always been and always will be and endeavor to do so.

00:31:55.000 You're reminded of the deplorables line that Hillary Clinton used against Trump, 1.00

00:31:59.000 and everybody proudly embraced the term.

00:32:01.000 We are deplorables. 0.90

00:32:02.000 What's very interesting, why aren't the Republicans this time being like, yes, we're weirdos. 0.94

00:32:06.000 We're weirdos for Trump.

00:32:08.000 And again, to Viva's point, who is calling you weird?

00:32:12.000 Their main candidate for being weird is J.D.

00:32:14.000 Vance, who is married, successful, and has a family.

00:32:17.000 And served in Iraq.

00:32:18.000 Weird.

00:32:18.000 Weird guy, that fellow.

00:32:20.000 That should have been the retort.

00:32:21.000 If that's weird, I want to be weird.

00:32:23.000 No, the response is, OK.

00:32:25.000 I think that's the thing, though.

00:32:26.000 It just doesn't matter what they think, and I think part of it is this is all turning into a very hyper-emotional moment.

00:32:33.000 The reality is...

00:32:35.000 Kamala Harris was a progressive prosecutor who did terrible things, and I don't want her to lead the country.

00:32:40.000 I think she's not a good pick. 0.89

00:32:41.000 There was a reason that she couldn't secure the Democratic nomination in the first place.

00:32:45.000 So they can say J.D.

00:32:46.000 Vance is weird, and her party can acknowledge that she's weirdly unpopular. 1.00

00:32:49.000 I mean, what's telling about this is, like, it's not weird that she's unpopular.

00:32:52.000 She's not likable. 0.98

00:32:53.000 She was never popular.

00:32:55.000 But ultimately, like, this is just some sort of narrative storm that we'll get for, what, these two weeks.

00:32:59.000 She'll formally be installed.

00:33:00.000 The media thing will move on.

00:33:02.000 And we're going to continue the march of the celebrities endorsing Harris, making her cool.

00:33:06.000 She was just down campaigning in Georgia with a big crowd.

00:33:09.000 Megan Thee Stallion, twerking on stage.

00:33:14.000 We are the establishment. 0.97

00:33:15.000 You're the weirdos.

00:33:16.000 And are these the celebrities that you like?

00:33:19.000 Do you want to model your life after these people?

00:33:22.000 I don't know.

00:33:23.000 So, uh, here's a clip from The Daily Show that, uh... Here, we'll play this clip.

00:33:30.000 Vance, because of how odd he's turned out to be.

00:33:30.000 So about J.D.

00:33:36.000 Hold on, like, full stop.

00:33:37.000 Like, what?

00:33:39.000 It's comedy.

00:33:39.000 It's laughter.

00:33:40.000 No, but I mean, like, he says how odd he's turned out to be.

00:33:43.000 I'm like, no, seriously, like, what?

00:33:45.000 I've read the news all day every day.

00:33:47.000 It looks like he's wearing eyeliner.

00:33:49.000 His deep blue eyes are very weird.

00:33:51.000 I actually find his... Is that what they're arguing?

00:33:53.000 I don't know.

00:33:54.000 I don't know.

00:33:54.000 My point is this.

00:33:55.000 They're not saying anything.

00:33:57.000 And listen to what Jon Stewart says.

00:33:58.000 Let me play this.

00:33:59.000 Boy, did that dude drop a turd on launch.

00:34:01.000 Like, I've never seen anything like it.

00:34:03.000 Listen, listen, listen.

00:34:04.000 One day they were like, the heir to the MAGA fortune and the MAGA... The Prince JD shall march!

00:34:11.000 And he comes out and he's like, I hate cat ladies! 1.00

00:34:15.000 This is almost on par with Bill Maher being like, Jack Prosobic says we endeavor to end democracy.

00:34:18.000 But hold on, like, this is almost on par with Bill Maher being like,

00:34:23.000 Jack Prosobic says we endeavor to end democracy.

00:34:27.000 Like, Jon Stewart saying that, I'm just kind of like, okay.

00:34:32.000 I don't know.

00:34:34.000 What's odd?

00:34:35.000 A guy criticized cat ladies?

00:34:37.000 Simpson's made fun of cat ladies for 10 years! 1.00

00:34:39.000 I figured it out. 0.98

00:34:40.000 What's weird is that he married an immigrant and the Democrats are the party of racists. 0.91

00:34:44.000 So flip it around that way.

00:34:46.000 It's weird that he married an immigrant, he's married happily with two kids, served in Iraq, had a successful business. 1.00

00:34:50.000 That is weird to a bunch of degenerates who demand... My point is... He's over replacement level.

00:34:55.000 My point is that there's no substance to this in any way, and it's not even as strong an attack as it were.

00:35:01.000 I mean, they lie about Trump so much.

00:35:04.000 They say Trump said he wants to ban all Muslims from the country, and he called Nazis very fine people, and I'm like, that's a lie! 0.92

00:35:10.000 Those are egregious! 0.78

00:35:12.000 And don't get me wrong, Trump did say early on, he's like, we gotta, you know, put a stop on Muslims under the country until we can figure out what's going on.

00:35:18.000 The very fine people, the Muslim ban, as they called it, was actually seven countries, which included countries that were not Muslim.

00:35:23.000 And Trump never called white nationalists very fine people.

00:35:26.000 He actually literally denounced them.

00:35:27.000 They will outright lie in the press, run those lies.

00:35:31.000 And I'm like, that's egregious.

00:35:32.000 This time they're like, he's odd.

00:35:34.000 And I'm like, okay.

00:35:35.000 Well, Trump's team deserves a huge part of the blame, right?

00:35:37.000 Because they weren't there to fill in the gaps.

00:35:40.000 Nobody knew, really knew who J.D.

00:35:42.000 So, the Democrats leapt at the opportunity to define him as a weirdo and then...

00:35:42.000 Vance was.

00:35:48.000 Propose all the other details about him and who he was.

00:35:52.000 And the Trump campaign wasn't filling in the gaps.

00:35:54.000 Even supporters of J.D.

00:35:55.000 Vance were not out there defending him or filling in the gaps or really explaining who this guy was.

00:36:00.000 They just left it a big vacuum.

00:36:01.000 They're not saying anything.

00:36:02.000 If they came out and said J.D.

00:36:03.000 Vance kicks dogs for fun, I'd be like, wow, that's crazy.

00:36:06.000 What are they talking about?

00:36:07.000 That's weird.

00:36:07.000 I would call that a little bit more projection from Biden.

00:36:10.000 All Buttigieg did is go, how odd is he?

00:36:12.000 And then he's like, he says, I don't like cat ladies. 0.51

00:36:13.000 And I was like, oh, did he?

00:36:15.000 And Trump did defend Vance pretty recently.

00:36:18.000 He's like, he loves family, right?

00:36:21.000 They finally got to it, but that was a week ago when they started this.

00:36:25.000 See, I just think it's because it's sort of weird and irrelevant.

00:36:28.000 It's kind of hard to respond to.

00:36:29.000 And these comments are from 2021.

00:36:31.000 Like, Vance was on Megyn Kelly's show.

00:36:34.000 Oh, Cat Lady. 0.95

00:36:35.000 Right.

00:36:35.000 Like, it's been this weird slow roll of the Cat Lady thing.

00:36:37.000 At first they were like, the Cat Lady.

00:36:38.000 Widely known.

00:36:39.000 They were trying to hype it up.

00:36:40.000 Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney complained about that.

00:36:42.000 He tried to say, oh, well, he's actually anti IVF.

00:36:45.000 Remember Kamala Harris's team put out a happy world IVF day to everyone but JD Vance, but he never attacked.

00:36:50.000 He's also there are like resurfaced comments of him being like, if you can't have family, if you try to, we should have empathy for you.

00:36:55.000 That's very sad.

00:36:56.000 Like, I think they I think maybe they should have been more aggressive.

00:36:59.000 But there has been a counter narrative to this the whole time.

00:37:01.000 It's just sort of intense hysteria around Like, trying to make J.D.

00:37:05.000 Vance into some kind of villain, because I think, to Javiva's point, they can't attack him for his family, so they have to attack him for... Kamala Harris.

00:37:13.000 Kamala Harris is boring. 1.00

00:37:15.000 Right after the convention, J.D.

00:37:18.000 Vance went shopping with his kids to Walgreens, and that was like a perfect image to display him as a family man.

00:37:24.000 Oh, look, he's out with his kids.

00:37:25.000 And then he just kind of went back in the bunker.

00:37:27.000 You realize that whole couch thing, the rumor or the joke that he...

00:37:33.000 Pleasured himself to two seats of a couch.

00:37:35.000 You haven't heard that?

00:37:36.000 This required the explanation because there was a couch meme about him looking at a couch and the couch is playing like Barry White music and everyone's like, what the hell is this?

00:37:43.000 There's a rumor.

00:37:44.000 Someone misquoted him from the book as having admitted to having pleasured himself between two seats of a couch.

00:37:49.000 It's a lie.

00:37:50.000 And yet the left has run with that and memed it and Mark Hamill has done it.

00:37:53.000 By the way, did you know that even Snopes confirmed that the Fine People hoax was false?

00:37:58.000 I send this to somebody Here's the issue.

00:37:58.000 Seven years later.

00:38:01.000 The issue is that conservatives genuinely don't like being called weird, and that was the point of the attack.

00:38:04.000 believe the lie. I don't think you have to counter their stupidity with much merit. 1.00

00:38:09.000 And I don't know how you can own that. Yes, if he's weird, I want to be weird. 1.00

00:38:12.000 Here's the issue. The issue is that conservatives genuinely don't like being called weird, and

00:38:18.000 that was the point of the attack. Not that there was anything actually weird. It's that

00:38:22.000 conservatives are offended by it, and they're trolling and triggering them, and they're

00:38:26.000 riling conservatives up.

00:38:27.000 And honestly, I find it to be quite hilarious watching conservatives on X lose their minds and be like, you calling me weird?

00:38:33.000 I'll call you!

00:38:33.000 Here's a picture of you!

00:38:34.000 You can't call me!

00:38:35.000 And I'm just like, I'm weird, bro.

00:38:37.000 I posted a picture of Trump hugging a giant rabbit.

00:38:40.000 It didn't work.

00:38:41.000 So I added storyline to it.

00:38:43.000 I'm showing you this.

00:38:44.000 I try to keep it as weird as we can.

00:38:46.000 It's a work of art.

00:38:48.000 This is my magnum opus.

00:38:50.000 I'm so happy.

00:38:51.000 This is my magnum opus, everybody.

00:38:53.000 This is a picture of Trump in paladin armor hugging a giant rabbit, and it says, You'll never know want or loneliness again, Trump said.

00:39:00.000 The world was cruel to you, but you have Trump now.

00:39:03.000 You see, I posted one of these, and it got a couple hundred retweets. 0.91

00:39:06.000 And that's usually what happens when I post my AI nonsense.

00:39:09.000 This one has got four million views.

00:39:12.000 You've got to write a short story to this now.

00:39:14.000 A children's book.

00:39:15.000 Do you think you're in the market for a children's book?

00:39:18.000 It's a runaway bunny.

00:39:19.000 I just want to tell you, the response from the left has been like, boy, these MAGA people are weird. 0.98

00:39:24.000 Boy, you're all weird.

00:39:24.000 And I was like, guilty as charged.

00:39:26.000 And they're like, that's what a weird person would say.

00:39:28.000 I'm like, my dude, I'm not running for office.

00:39:30.000 If I was ever president, I would abolish Social Security.

00:39:33.000 I'm never going to run for office.

00:39:35.000 You never want to see me run for office.

00:39:37.000 I will say whatever I feel like saying.

00:39:38.000 And you can call me whatever you want.

00:39:40.000 I'm rolling in it, baby.

00:39:41.000 Like, this makes me laugh.

00:39:43.000 I'm busting out laughing at myself.

00:39:45.000 And they're like, you're weird.

00:39:45.000 I'm like, uh-huh.

00:39:46.000 And there are conservatives who are like, I think some of it is our terminally online society though, right?

00:39:53.000 Like right and left, although I think, you know, a lot of left-leaning people tend to be more, especially young voters, tend to be even more active online.

00:40:01.000 But, you know, being called weird or having people respond negatively to something you post or say, like, that hurts the psyche.

00:40:08.000 for the online person in a way that is upsetting. Whereas like if you unplugged you're like,

00:40:12.000 I don't actually care about any of your opinions. Like whether it's saying you guys are the party

00:40:16.000 that thinks men can be women so I don't care about your judgment or just generally said like,

00:40:20.000 I don't actually know any of you anonymous people who are calling me weird online. Like it doesn't

00:40:24.000 actually matter. There's a lot of humorless people on the right wing Twitter too. Like you see them

00:40:28.000 repeating Angela, that Angela, you know that Angela character everyone thinks like, I'm like,

00:40:34.000 Balcamino?

00:40:35.000 Yeah, whatever.

00:40:35.000 Yeah, like, that's a character.

00:40:37.000 And everyone's like, this is an example.

00:40:39.000 She got 30 million views!

00:40:42.000 And we're blowing her cover.

00:40:44.000 People are like, when I tweeted this, they're like, come on, Tim, let it happen.

00:40:47.000 She always posts these things about how she's a bold, childless lib. 0.99

00:40:51.000 And it's just her strutting towards the camera and walking away.

00:40:53.000 And conservatives go nuts.

00:40:55.000 And she posted one where she was dancing.

00:40:57.000 And she's like, this 42-year-old, child-free lib is loving life.

00:41:01.000 Conservatives so mad.

00:41:02.000 And she got 30 million Like a lot of people.

00:41:05.000 She got me so many times before I could finally determine that it was a parody account. 0.99

00:41:09.000 I felt stupid. 0.74

00:41:11.000 I never got angry. 0.99

00:41:11.000 I was like, is she for real? 0.99

00:41:13.000 Because it's like, I don't know if she's for real.

00:41:15.000 I don't want to pick on her.

00:41:16.000 I feel bad for her.

00:41:17.000 But Mike, she's amazing.

00:41:18.000 She's amazing.

00:41:19.000 Well, it's very interesting that the election is really kind of come down to having kids or not having kids.

00:41:25.000 I'm so glad that fatalism is taking center stage.

00:41:27.000 And that Kamala Harris' number one issue is abortion rights. 1.00

00:41:31.000 And that's sort of what this election is coming down to.

00:41:34.000 Are we really going to turn it into a fight between the childless and the family people?

00:41:39.000 They want to fight for Supreme Court changes too.

00:41:42.000 This is from the India Times.

00:41:45.000 Not that it is the most reputable source, not to insult India Times, but they've written about this and this is the keys predictor.

00:41:53.000 This is, what is his name, Alan Lichtman.

00:41:55.000 Alan Lichtman has predicted correctly, they say.

00:41:59.000 Every presidential victor since 1984 except for Al Gore.

00:42:02.000 And I think it's actually, to be fair, that was a contested, disputed election that went down to the Supreme Court, so maybe you got it wrong.

00:42:08.000 He's, apparently now, he's predicting likely a Kamala Harris victory so far.

00:42:14.000 The criteria that he asks, simple true or false questions, Are in his mind so far leaning towards Kamala Harris, and I gotta be honest, it's a guy who's good at guessing.

00:42:28.000 I think his questions are absurd nonsense, but his intuition must be pretty good to get this many elections correct.

00:42:37.000 So they say the million-dollar question before the electorate is who's going to win.

00:42:40.000 Alan Lichtman, who is an election forecaster, the professor who said that the key to the White House is with Kamala Harris, is also the Democrats' party's nominee, the prediction which is made in the present, blah blah blah.

00:42:53.000 So it's leaning towards Kamala right now.

00:42:55.000 His final prediction won't come until after the DNC.

00:42:58.000 There's the Democrats who are likely to appoint Harris, blah, blah, blah.

00:43:01.000 The Republicans, they say that she holds six keys, including primary contest, short-term economy, long-term economy, policy change, no scandal, no challenge, or charisma.

00:43:09.000 This is all utter nonsense.

00:43:11.000 So a lot of people are actually saying, oh, this is brutal.

00:43:13.000 This guy's predicting Kamala Harris.

00:43:15.000 Man, that's bad for Trump.

00:43:16.000 But let's break this down.

00:43:19.000 On the 21st, a professor who accurately predicted past elections says Biden can win.

00:43:24.000 I'm gonna go ahead and say you're wrong, Alan.

00:43:27.000 You are way wrong.

00:43:28.000 Is that the same professor?

00:43:29.000 Yeah, it gets even worse.

00:43:31.000 Dynamite.

00:43:32.000 On June 30th, I sent you this.

00:43:33.000 I'm just looking at this while you talk.

00:43:35.000 On June 30th in USA Today, historian who predicted nine of the last ten elections results says Democrats shouldn't drop Joe Biden.

00:43:44.000 I agree with them.

00:43:45.000 They should have kept it.

00:43:46.000 This is the problem.

00:43:47.000 When you make both A and not A predictions, you can just go back and select whichever one you want and say, hi, I got it right.

00:43:52.000 This guy sounds like a crock.

00:43:54.000 There was a famous post on Twitter, back when it was Twitter, not X, I'm not deadnaming, and it said something like, I can't remember the sporting event, but it was like, football team is going to score the game-winning touchdown against this team in the Super Bowl with this amount of time left with this score.

00:44:11.000 And it was made like a year before.

00:44:14.000 And then it went viral after that happened, and everyone went, holy crap, how did he predict it?

00:44:20.000 How do you think he predicted it? 0.51

00:44:21.000 He made 75 predictions.

00:44:23.000 He made like 700 posts.

00:44:27.000 Every possibility.

00:44:28.000 Of basically looking at the stats and the teams of all the things, and then every time a team got eliminated, he'd delete the post.

00:44:35.000 And then all that was left was like 10 posts about what was gonna happen, and then when it went down one way, he deleted everything else, so there was one left, and everyone went, How did he do it?

00:44:44.000 Well, I would go back and want to see the publications that Lichtman put out back 20 years ago.

00:44:49.000 It's a lot easier to burn a piece of paper.

00:44:51.000 Alan Lichtman, a history professor at American University who has accurately predicted past elections, said in an op-ed on Saturday that President Joe Biden can win against Donald Trump.

00:44:59.000 No, he can't.

00:45:00.000 Your prediction was wrong, sir.

00:45:02.000 But let's pull up the record.

00:45:03.000 Yeah, his record must be bad.

00:45:09.000 The Keys to the White House is a prediction system for determining the outcome of presidential elections in the United States.

00:45:13.000 It was developed by Alan Lichtman and Russian geophysicist Vladimir Kailas-Borak in 1981.

00:45:19.000 It's 13 questions, a checkpoint, that assesses a situation.

00:45:23.000 So what are these?

00:45:24.000 Let's start.

00:45:25.000 Party mandate.

00:45:26.000 After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S.

00:45:30.000 House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.

00:45:35.000 So the incumbent party does not hold more seats.

00:45:40.000 So that would be false.

00:45:41.000 No primary contest.

00:45:42.000 There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.

00:45:45.000 Yes, there was.

00:45:47.000 Incumbent seeking re-election, no third party.

00:45:50.000 Alright, let's do this.

00:45:51.000 Let's jump down to the current predictions that he has for Kamala Harris.

00:45:59.000 Party mandate.

00:46:00.000 Does the incumbent party hold the House of Representatives?

00:46:02.000 False.

00:46:03.000 That's an easy true or false, right?

00:46:05.000 True.

00:46:06.000 What are you talking about?

00:46:08.000 R.F.K.

00:46:09.000 Jr.

00:46:10.000 and Dean Phillips, there was an absolute attempt at a primary.

00:46:14.000 They just shut them out.

00:46:15.000 So, false.

00:46:19.000 False.

00:46:22.000 That one's funny.

00:46:23.000 No one in no one believes that Kamala Harris was secretly running the country while Joe Biden was.

00:46:28.000 Now look at this.

00:46:28.000 No third party.

00:46:30.000 Likely true.

00:46:31.000 RFK Jr.

00:46:32.000 is polling in double digits.

00:46:34.000 So that's false.

00:46:35.000 Short-term economy.

00:46:38.000 Okay, I mean, this one becomes more subjective.

00:46:40.000 But does anybody, like, do the polls show people are confident in the economy right now?

00:46:46.000 I just skipped ahead, I'm sorry.

00:46:47.000 I saw no social unrest.

00:46:49.000 Likely true.

00:46:51.000 What flipping world is this guy living in?

00:46:53.000 Hold on, hold on.

00:46:54.000 Let's play this game, okay?

00:46:55.000 Here you go.

00:46:56.000 How would you rate the condition of the national economy right now?

00:47:00.000 For all groups, 37% fairly bad, 27% fairly good, 23% fairly bad.

00:47:03.000 It looks like it's going down.

00:47:04.000 27% fairly good, 23% fairly bad.

00:47:07.000 It looks like it's going down.

00:47:09.000 Right, and so we're looking at 60% in the bad category.

00:47:14.000 So when we jump over here and they're like, short-term economy is good.

00:47:18.000 Most people are saying the short-term economy is really, really bad.

00:47:20.000 Strong long-term economy.

00:47:22.000 I don't know, again, how you break those apart, but how are these true?

00:47:26.000 It's false and false.

00:47:27.000 Major policy change.

00:47:29.000 To be fair, I'd probably give that one true because commonly has no record.

00:47:33.000 No social unrest.

00:47:35.000 There was massive protests and riots and occupations over Israel only a few months ago.

00:47:40.000 So yes, social unrest.

00:47:42.000 No scandal.

00:47:42.000 Are you kidding?

00:47:43.000 Biden just dropped out!

00:47:44.000 We still have the month of August.

00:47:46.000 So we're looking at false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false.

00:47:53.000 No foreign or military failure.

00:47:54.000 How are we defining that part?

00:47:55.000 False.

00:47:56.000 Israel, Russia, Ukraine.

00:47:58.000 Major foreign or military success.

00:48:00.000 False.

00:48:00.000 There's nothing.

00:48:01.000 Charismatic incumbent.

00:48:03.000 False.

00:48:03.000 Agreed.

00:48:04.000 Uncharismatic challenger.

00:48:06.000 True. 1.00

00:48:06.000 Are you nuts? 1.00

00:48:07.000 Trump may be one of the most charismatic presidents challenging we've ever seen. 0.98

00:48:11.000 The entire thing should be false.

00:48:14.000 Predicting a Donald Trump victory.

00:48:15.000 He just pumped his fist and said fight, fight, fight after dodging a bullet.

00:48:19.000 It's not just- Joe Rogan gets out every week practically talking about how Trump is a good stand-up comic in his delivery.

00:48:28.000 When he walks into UFC, the place erupts.

00:48:31.000 First of all, I think Lichtman now is full of schlichtman. 0.97

00:48:35.000 And I would like to go back and see, I think he's been lying throughout his career, but it's easy to like, you know, when you go back and refer to the article where he said any one of things, and yeah, 9 out of 10, he's amazing.

00:48:44.000 As soon as he said Biden could win, they should just be like, yeah, he's gone.

00:48:47.000 Like, your predictions are done, because... Time to go back to the octopus.

00:48:51.000 Here's the interesting thing.

00:48:52.000 There's no incumbent, right?

00:48:54.000 Incumbent seeking re-election, false.

00:48:56.000 These shouldn't even apply to Kamala Harris, who's an unknown.

00:49:00.000 So, like, you are not dealing with an incumbent versus a challenger, but I love that he put uncharismatic challenger true.

00:49:10.000 Donald Trump, who people can't shut up about.

00:49:15.000 Except for never-Trumpers, right? 0.99

00:49:16.000 Never-Trumpers are always like, well, he's so brash and he's gross. 0.99

00:49:20.000 Weird. 0.97

00:49:20.000 He doesn't laugh. 0.97

00:49:21.000 Weird, weird, weird.

00:49:22.000 Not Brad.

00:49:23.000 But, you know, so I can understand where, like, obviously this is false, but I can understand where someone who just doesn't like Trump has said, like, no, he's not charismatic because they're deluding themselves.

00:49:32.000 I think the no primary contest is interesting because You know, no one has been allowed to challenge Kamala Harris.

00:49:38.000 I mean, it was really fall in line immediately behind Kamala Harris.

00:49:42.000 She wasn't actually involved in the actual primary.

00:49:44.000 When people were casting ballots, she wasn't on the ticket as the top of the ticket.

00:49:49.000 Her polling numbers are pretty good for someone who was just installed at the last minute by party elites.

00:49:55.000 The polling numbers are nonsense.

00:49:57.000 It's a question of manufacturing consent and not reflecting reality.

00:50:01.000 I just went to his Twitter feed.

00:50:03.000 His title is Distinguished Professor of History, American University, author of 12 books.

00:50:08.000 Wow.

00:50:09.000 This is crazy.

00:50:09.000 It says no third party is turned false when there is a major candidate other than the nominees of the Democrats and the Republicans.

00:50:16.000 RFK Jr.

00:50:16.000 is in the double digits.

00:50:18.000 But they refuse to acknowledge him as a major candidate.

00:50:20.000 I mean, there's really, really resistance to acknowledging that he could have an impact on the election.

00:50:25.000 You think he links it to November?

00:50:27.000 Yeah, well, he might endorse Trump.

00:50:29.000 I do think it's a possibility.

00:50:30.000 It says, for upcoming elections, Key Four's turn falls when a single third-party candidate consistently polls at 10% or more, indicating they're likely to receive 5% or more of the national popular vote.

00:50:40.000 Perhaps because he's running as an independent?

00:50:41.000 Didn't Ross Perot run as an independent?

00:50:43.000 Ross Perot ran as an independent.

00:50:44.000 Yeah, it's ridiculous that they're not...

00:50:47.000 They're not mentioning RFK Jr.

00:50:49.000 right now.

00:50:50.000 No scandal when there is bipartisan recognition of serious impropriety directly linked to the president.

00:50:56.000 Biden's debate performance was panned by both parties.

00:51:00.000 Look, if this guy's prediction with Kamala Harris turns out to be correct, then it's all fake.

00:51:07.000 There was no scandal for Obama?

00:51:11.000 Oh yeah, he was a scandal for you.

00:51:13.000 There was no major bi-partisan.

00:51:15.000 He was directly connected.

00:51:19.000 The Fast and the Furious, the sicking the IRS on the Tea Party.

00:51:23.000 But bi-partisan.

00:51:25.000 So, bi-partisan. 0.50

00:51:26.000 The point they're making is that when both parties blame the President for something, both parties have attacked Joe Biden for being mentally incompetent, unfit, to the point where he dropped out of the race.

00:51:37.000 Biden could not win.

00:51:38.000 And now, perhaps they're saying, Kamala, Kamala's got no scandal.

00:51:43.000 Well, House Democrats just joined Republicans in voting to say that Biden and Harris were

00:51:49.000 responsible for the crisis at the border.

00:51:51.000 And I would consider that a pretty big scandal.

00:51:54.000 Let's not manufacture the scandal.

00:51:55.000 Let's just make sure that it materializes.

00:51:58.000 Republicans file impeachment proceedings against Kamala Harris for dereliction of duty at the

00:52:02.000 border and for lying about Joe Biden's fitness for office.

00:52:06.000 She participated in covering up Joe Biden's mental unfitness and knowingly basically planning to steal his 14 million votes. 0.96

00:52:13.000 So you can impeach her on two things.

00:52:13.000 Impeachable.

00:52:14.000 She'll never get convicted.

00:52:16.000 But that's a legit scandal.

00:52:18.000 Scandal where she's directly connected. 0.93

00:52:20.000 I think it's weird that Republicans have been trying to make this case that somehow she's guilty for this giant cover up, but it hasn't really taken root.

00:52:28.000 Here's what I love.

00:52:29.000 If you look at the civics polling and you choose 18-34, 67% are in the bad category.

00:52:36.000 Only 28% of 18-34 year olds think the economy is good.

00:52:42.000 But let's play this.

00:52:44.000 What do you think will happen if I pick Democrat?

00:52:48.000 How would you rate the condition of the national economy right now if you pick Democrat?

00:52:53.000 And then we have to go with those options.

00:52:55.000 Fairly good.

00:52:56.000 Say 39% say fairly good.

00:52:59.000 But just like, do you think it'll be, the plurality will be that it's good?

00:53:02.000 I don't think so.

00:53:03.000 Or bad.

00:53:03.000 I don't think so.

00:53:04.000 Let's find out.

00:53:05.000 Democrats, 49, look at that.

00:53:08.000 Absolutely incredible.

00:53:10.000 Well it's still not 50%.

00:53:11.000 Still not 50%.

00:53:12.000 But that, no, no, well that's 49% fairly good and 27% very good.

00:53:15.000 22.

00:53:15.000 22, so they're at.

00:53:16.000 Oh man, why would they put that underneath?

00:53:19.000 Yeah.

00:53:20.000 That's how they did fairly good and very good.

00:53:20.000 What do you mean?

00:53:22.000 So only 24% of Democrats think the economy is bad right now.

00:53:26.000 It's because the bounce back from COVID.

00:53:27.000 What do you think Republicans are going to say?

00:53:29.000 Oh, it's going to be like so bad.

00:53:30.000 Well, you can average it out now that you know the... Bang!

00:53:34.000 64.

00:53:35.000 Now let's play this game.

00:53:37.000 If 18 to 34 year olds are more likely to align with the Republican view of things, I wonder what that says about their leanings this election.

00:53:45.000 And let's jump to independent.

00:53:48.000 Independent voters, of course, they're going to say it's bad.

00:53:50.000 There's no question, because Democrats live in WALL-E world.

00:53:54.000 Just show your friends and family this.

00:53:55.000 Be like, dude, if you're sitting here and you're saying that Kamala Harris is fine, Biden is fine, the economy is doing great, ask yourself why Republicans Well, I bet you that's the demographics of who, statistically, is more likely to be a Democrat.

00:54:12.000 It's going to be young people who now see the prospect of a student debt loan being forgiven.

00:54:17.000 It's young people who are not necessarily paying taxes out the wazoo or have a family to support.

00:54:23.000 And as you get older, you get more conservative, and then you realize these things really have an impact.

00:54:26.000 So it just might be the demographics.

00:54:28.000 Young people tend to be Democrat and are, you know, totally oblivious to what's actually going on in the world. 0.98

00:54:33.000 It's down to who's a parent and who's not.

00:54:36.000 You might be able to.

00:54:38.000 Is it the childless cat ladies? 1.00

00:54:40.000 Who works for the government and who doesn't?

00:54:44.000 There may actually be like an advanced internal thing when you sign up for the crosstabs, but let's do men and women. 0.78

00:54:49.000 Let's do men and women. 1.00

00:54:51.000 What do you think men say about the economy? 1.00

00:54:53.000 Men are going to tend to be fairly bad and women fairly good. 0.99

00:54:59.000 Yeah, so 35% of men say it's in the good category, and then you have 37% saying very bad, 25% saying fairly bad.

00:55:05.000 Among women, it's fairly comparable. 1.00

00:55:08.000 What do you think about racial breakdown?

00:55:12.000 White people say that it is mostly bad.

00:55:16.000 41% very bad, 24% fairly bad, and only, what do we have, 32% saying it's in the good range.

00:55:22.000 Black or African American, Think it's actually good right now. 1.00

00:55:26.000 Fairly good.

00:55:27.000 That's interesting because I have to wonder, we know that the Democrats are really worried about losing this vote.

00:55:33.000 It may be that they're intentionally prioritizing the black community with programs trying to earn those votes.

00:55:40.000 Hispanic and Latino think it's actually bad. 1.00

00:55:44.000 And other I appreciate that Asians fall into other, and they think it's bad as well.

00:55:49.000 Do you have a religion drop tab there?

00:55:51.000 There's not.

00:55:53.000 Let's get politically incorrect while we're at it.

00:55:54.000 There's college degrees.

00:55:55.000 What do the immigrants think?

00:55:56.000 Post-graduates.

00:55:56.000 Oh no, do college degrees, because that, I guarantee is going to be way skewed in the fairly good, very good.

00:56:03.000 It's like 50-50.

00:56:05.000 It's like 50-50.

00:56:07.000 33 saying fairly good, 14 very good.

00:56:09.000 No, go to post-graduate.

00:56:10.000 I am post-graduate.

00:56:10.000 Oh, okay.

00:56:11.000 Yeah, I'm wrong.

00:56:12.000 Yeah, postgraduates are fairly split.

00:56:15.000 Seems pretty in the middle.

00:56:16.000 College graduates, uh...

00:56:18.000 Looks like they're leaning towards it's bad, and non-college graduates are probably going to say it's the apocalypse.

00:56:23.000 Yeah, they say it's really bad.

00:56:23.000 65 plus, they're having an okay time, but they still think it's mostly bad.

00:56:29.000 Everybody seems to think the economy is bad.

00:56:31.000 1834.

00:56:31.000 Do we do that already?

00:56:32.000 Yeah.

00:56:33.000 They think it's bad.

00:56:34.000 Very bad.

00:56:34.000 67%.

00:56:35.000 So I'm just looking at basically every group except for black Americans think the economy is very, very bad. 0.99

00:56:42.000 How could they claim that the economy is good for Kamala Harris right now, for her to win?

00:56:46.000 Yeah, that's pretty setting for good old Alan Rickman.

00:56:52.000 Lit Alan Rickman is to me!

00:56:54.000 Who probably has tenure, right?

00:56:56.000 So he's just like, I don't know, it seems fine to me.

00:56:58.000 I don't have to worry about anything.

00:57:00.000 Let's talk about Venezuela.

00:57:02.000 Not because, to be honest, I care about Venezuela all that much, but we have this story from the New York Times.

00:57:06.000 Street clashes turn deadly as Venezuela's power struggle deepens.

00:57:10.000 The fatal violence comes as both President Nicolas Maduro and the opposition claim victory in the presidential

00:57:15.000 election.

00:57:16.000 More protests were taking place on Tuesday.

00:57:19.000 Is this a CVS receipt they're holding up?

00:57:21.000 Maybe that's the cost of groceries.

00:57:23.000 I'm not trying to be funny.

00:57:24.000 Probably the election tab, to be completely honest.

00:57:26.000 But it's just so long, I'd assume.

00:57:28.000 At least 16 people, including the soldier, have died and about 750 more arrested as a result of protests in Venezuela.

00:57:35.000 Election officials declared the nation's autocratic leader Maduro the winner of another six-year term early Monday, saying he handily beat former diplomat Edmundo Gonzalez But the government... Didn't you say it was Maria the other day?

00:57:47.000 I did.

00:57:48.000 The opposition leader, they said it was Maria.

00:57:50.000 In the Al Jazeera thing.

00:57:52.000 Okay, maybe that's the opposition leader, but I thought it was Gonzalez.

00:57:55.000 But the government has not released the full results in many countries, including the U.S., have said the vote was marred by widespread irregularities.

00:58:02.000 So what we're seeing now is... I don't know if I have any tweets pulled up for this one.

00:58:07.000 Oh, yeah, take a look at this.

00:58:07.000 This is from Visegrad.

00:58:09.000 The streets of Caracas packed to the brim with protesters out to support opposition leader Maria Karina Machado.

00:58:15.000 Yeah, that's what you said during her first major speech since the election.

00:58:19.000 Interesting.

00:58:21.000 I never know if these things are real, though.

00:58:22.000 Could be three years ago.

00:58:24.000 Right.

00:58:25.000 And, uh, what is the date on this one?

00:58:27.000 They say it's from today, but, uh, Alerta Mundial.

00:58:31.000 Uh, it says, the streets of Venezuela overflow to protest against Nicolas Maduro's fraud.

00:58:37.000 So what I see here and why I find it interesting is that there's been some articles written about Civil War.

00:58:42.000 I think it was like Rolling Stone wrote one.

00:58:43.000 A bunch of them are writing and, you know, I should probably pull this up because I think people should, yeah it was Rolling Stone, and I think people should see what they're talking about.

00:58:55.000 Not that I'm saying it's all, you know, true and correct or whatever.

00:58:59.000 Let's see if we can get this article pulled up.

00:59:00.000 Also, after that, pull up the BBC article from 2012 when Venezuela bans private gun ownership, if anybody wants to see what's going on in America under Kamala Harris.

00:59:09.000 So take a look at Rolling Stone.

00:59:12.000 And here's a quote.

00:59:14.000 This is from, this is George, let's see, Ohio State Senator George Lang was warming up the crowd ahead of a speech from J.D.

00:59:21.000 Vance.

00:59:21.000 Quote, I'm afraid if we lose this one it's going to take a civil war to save the country and it will be saved.

00:59:26.000 It's the greatest experiment in the history of mankind and if we come down to a civil war I'm glad we got people like bikers for Trump on our side. 0.91

00:59:32.000 There's a dot dot dot so who knows what he actually said.

00:59:34.000 He later wrote that he regretted the mark which was made in the excitement of the moment on stage.

00:59:38.000 They go through many different people on the right who have talked about whether we're at war, whether it's a civil war.

00:59:44.000 So the reason I think Venezuela is interesting is what happens when there is...

00:59:50.000 I don't know, indeterminate election.

00:59:51.000 Or at the very least, the way to describe it is, no one accepts the result of an election.

00:59:56.000 We're not Venezuela.

00:59:58.000 Venezuela is much, much smaller than the U.S., and we have hyperpolarization and geographic polarization.

01:00:05.000 As I was saying yesterday, there's no way anybody in West Virginia is going to be like, well, I wanted Trump, so I'm going to go drive to New York or D.C.

01:00:11.000 or Philly.

01:00:11.000 They're going to stay where they are.

01:00:12.000 In which case, why would you see clashes?

01:00:15.000 However, that being said, you can take a look at what happens.

01:00:18.000 I'm actually thinking that what's happening in Venezuela is more likely to happen if Trump does win. 0.86

01:00:23.000 If Trump wins, then liberals in major cities go nuts and riot and smash, tear down posters and lose their minds.

01:00:30.000 You remember the coup, the failed coup, Operation Gideon in 2020 with Venezuela?

01:00:35.000 And they had the private security, private missionary firm from here, from Canada, became an American citizen and failed when they hit land.

01:00:44.000 And then that's another one of those things where you don't know what's real or not, because Maduro said it was the CIA.

01:00:48.000 And then his opposition says it's Maduro.

01:00:51.000 Right.

01:00:51.000 And it looked like it could be him lying to make it just kind of like a Venezuelan Northwoods.

01:00:56.000 You look at the failure that is Venezuela, and it's funny when the leftists are like, that's because the CIA is doing it to them. 0.98

01:01:01.000 It's like, shut up, dude.

01:01:02.000 It's like everyone knows the CIA does that stuff, so I think Maduro is like, well, we're going to frame America. 0.85

01:01:06.000 But the idea that the fail—like, I was in Venezuela 10 years ago, and I can tell you that everything they try to do doesn't make any sense.

01:01:14.000 The story I use to exemplify this is trying to buy a cell phone.

01:01:17.000 Because they mandate jobs, because jobs are what give people access to currency, it took like five to six people to buy a cell phone.

01:01:25.000 Whereas in America, you walk into a T-Mobile and you walk up to one guy and say, I want to get that phone.

01:01:30.000 And they go, OK.

01:01:30.000 And they pull out their tablet and they start swiping.

01:01:32.000 And can I get your ID?

01:01:33.000 And then they, here's the phone.

01:01:34.000 And then, OK, swipe here.

01:01:36.000 And then we'll fill this out.

01:01:37.000 It takes like 15 minutes.

01:01:38.000 You sign it.

01:01:38.000 One guy, you're done.

01:01:40.000 In Venezuela, you go to one guy and say, I'd like to buy a cell phone.

01:01:42.000 He says, OK, fill out this form.

01:01:43.000 Okay, now you have to go to cell phone acquisition.

01:01:44.000 So that's upstairs and around the corner.

01:01:45.000 Then you go to cell phone acquisition and say, here's a list of phones you can buy.

01:01:48.000 And say, okay, I want this one.

01:01:49.000 He goes, okay, here's your ticket for that phone.

01:01:51.000 Now you're gonna go to warehouse retrievals.

01:01:53.000 And then you walk over to one guy and he goes, there's your ticket, thank you.

01:01:55.000 And he walks in the back, he finds the phone, he brings it back out.

01:01:57.000 Says, okay, now you're gonna go to, you know, to purchasing.

01:02:00.000 Then you walk over, and I'm just like, why?

01:02:03.000 And the guy I was with, who's Venezuelan, was like, the government mandates the creation of jobs. 0.88

01:02:07.000 So they require all of these companies to have as many jobs as possible.

01:02:11.000 and it doesn't work. It drains the economy. It fails. So this is what Venezuela is. So when you

01:02:17.000 see like this coup stuff and they're like, it's not Maduro.

01:02:19.000 Maduro was on camera giving a speech to his country and he grabs an empanada out of his drawer

01:02:24.000 and eats it. This dude is not competent. 0.86

01:02:26.000 Right. But anyway, I digress. You made an interesting point as to where we're most

01:02:30.000 likely to see violence. And it would most certainly be if Trump wins, because you go

01:02:35.000 back to the summer of love where you have a convicted felon who likely died of at least

01:02:40.000 drug-contributing overdose George Floyd and a summer of riots.

01:02:44.000 You have Donald Trump nearly assassinated live on TV.

01:02:47.000 There wasn't one window broken.

01:02:49.000 Imagine what there would have been had such a thing occurred to Joe Biden.

01:02:54.000 So a thousand percent right.

01:02:55.000 I was also just looking up the crime rate in Venezuela, given their gun laws, and I just found an article from Bloomberg talking about how the crime rates actually dropped because of Venezuelan migration.

01:03:05.000 So that's also... Yeah, but where are they going?

01:03:09.000 Where are the Venezuelans going? 0.99

01:03:10.000 The issue to consider is that What we are seeing in Venezuela against Maduro is it's the people against the socialists, but it's the people in the cities.

01:03:20.000 In the United States...

01:03:22.000 People in red rural areas are not going to go out and, as you mentioned, someone tried to kill Trump, not a broken window.

01:03:28.000 When Trump wins, the people will behave like this.

01:03:31.000 They're going to attack their own cities. 0.60

01:03:32.000 They're going to riot.

01:03:32.000 There's going to be mass unrest.

01:03:33.000 And then the question is, does it get bad enough to where it could actually destabilize things at a national level?

01:03:40.000 I'm not so sure because each state is effectively one Venezuela.

01:03:44.000 They have to deal with their own internals.

01:03:45.000 Trump could very well just be like, good luck.

01:03:47.000 Your riots in your cities have nothing to do with the federal government, and you have no ability to overturn or change anything at the federal government level.

01:03:54.000 Have a nice day.

01:03:55.000 Well, Trump supporters certainly aren't going to go rally on the National Lawn and then go take a look at the Capitol.

01:04:02.000 Current administration has made it pretty clear that they're not going to stand for that.

01:04:05.000 Trump supporters are going to volunteer to run down to the Capitol to protest.

01:04:10.000 But that's the interesting thing.

01:04:11.000 The reason why I say it won't look like what's happening in Venezuela is because people in West Virginia aren't going to go to New York or whatever.

01:04:18.000 But you could theoretically see, I mean, we saw January 6th.

01:04:22.000 On one side of the building you have people rioting, fighting with cops and attacking, you know, police and people are being attacked.

01:04:28.000 Cops were throwing tear gas or whatever, flashbangs into the crowd, just abject chaos.

01:04:33.000 On the other side they're marching around like tourists with the doors open by police, having no idea what's going on.

01:04:38.000 So I think in the event of a Kamala Harris victory, let's be real, we don't even know if it's going to be Kamala, You may see something like January 6th.

01:04:47.000 I mean, we already saw January 6th, but that's not going to be widespread chaos in cities.

01:04:52.000 If Trump wins, I think you get Summer of Love x10.

01:04:54.000 Well, you had the Women's March in 2016, the day after the inauguration.

01:04:58.000 We woke up and walked out of the building and there was a massive Women's March that was relatively peaceful. 0.99

01:05:03.000 So it's just a question of how angry they are going to be this time.

01:05:07.000 I mean, there was a lot of rage, but at least it wasn't violence.

01:05:09.000 Was that when she said she wanted to blow up the White House? 0.98

01:05:12.000 She did make some weird threats that day, yeah.

01:05:14.000 Yeah, it was crazy.

01:05:16.000 Who was that?

01:05:17.000 Madonna.

01:05:17.000 Oh, Madonna.

01:05:18.000 Yeah, yeah.

01:05:19.000 She meant that she was saying she wanted to put them on blast.

01:05:22.000 That's right.

01:05:23.000 Get everyone on Twitter talking about us.

01:05:25.000 Blow it up with love is what she wanted to say.

01:05:28.000 She was like, no, like social media blow up, like, you know, when you tweet about somebody and then everyone's tweeting at them and it's like, yeah, nobody believes that.

01:05:35.000 And then especially with what just happened to Donald Trump, especially with what the Secret Service is saying now, this agent being like, hey, we may see something.

01:05:42.000 I don't know.

01:05:43.000 We're on a powder keg.

01:05:44.000 What I'm hoping for, Trump wins.

01:05:47.000 The cities are in control of what I, like, dude, like, New York, do what New York does, okay?

01:05:50.000 I got, I'm not gonna tell New York what to do.

01:05:52.000 West Virginia, we're gonna be fine.

01:05:53.000 There's not gonna be any riots here, I'm not worried about that.

01:05:55.000 Uh, New York's gotta deal with New York problems.

01:05:57.000 But I think Trump may just be like, I'm not, I'm not gonna do anything.

01:06:00.000 There's not gonna be an insurrection act, there's not gonna be National Guard, I'm not going to get involved.

01:06:04.000 States, deal with your own problems.

01:06:06.000 That's not the federal government's problem.

01:06:08.000 And then after a month or two, it dies down.

01:06:11.000 Trump starts taking action, and once again, we get a marginal presidency that we're all kind of like, oh, that's okay, I guess.

01:06:17.000 Yeah, well, a marginal presidency followed by Touchwood, Pupuk and Nahora, eight years of J.D.

01:06:23.000 Vance, who might have some more transformative elements.

01:06:26.000 No way.

01:06:27.000 J.D.

01:06:27.000 Vance is going to be... First of all, the idea...

01:06:30.000 That we get a Republican Trump, and then J.D.

01:06:33.000 Vance wins twice again, we get 12 years, it's very unlikely, because people adapt to their circumstance.

01:06:40.000 So even if things are good, people will, depending on what the sentiment is nationally, you could have a good economy, but if people feel like, let's say in the first three years the economy goes up, and then in the last year the economy dips a little bit, now people are feeling like they're losing, you get a shift.

01:06:57.000 So, I just don't believe that Trump, Vance, and the Republicans are going to march in with this mandate for leadership and be like, we are overhauling anything.

01:07:07.000 No, they're going to go in and they're going to be like, I'd like to appoint this person.

01:07:09.000 Democrats are going to be like, no, and they're going to go, aw.

01:07:12.000 I don't know.

01:07:12.000 I'm anticipating mass deportations if Trump actually gets in.

01:07:18.000 I say mass deportations, not in the order of tens of millions, but beginning with objective criteria of criminals or criminality.

01:07:26.000 I don't believe Trump will be the wrecking ball he's promising.

01:07:29.000 He's only got four years to do it.

01:07:32.000 I don't think we see mass deportations.

01:07:34.000 I think we see deportations.

01:07:36.000 The question of masks might be the qualification, but I do think we see deportations.

01:07:40.000 And I think at some point it does get bad enough that even the Democrats will say, Trump wasn't all that bad.

01:07:40.000 I think we see that.

01:07:47.000 We're going to maybe go back and revisit 2016 to 2020.

01:07:49.000 It wasn't that disastrous until 2020.

01:07:52.000 And I think other people have roles to play in that.

01:07:55.000 But the nightmare that they fear when they get into the reality won't be as bad as they thought it was.

01:07:59.000 And they might actually see that things will I don't know.

01:08:02.000 I can see that.

01:08:02.000 Stabilize.

01:08:03.000 I can actually see Trump on Colbert at some point.

01:08:05.000 Like, a big turnaround.

01:08:07.000 Because they're going to be so desperate.

01:08:09.000 Wasn't he already on Colbert?

01:08:10.000 Well, yeah, I mean, but that was pre-everything.

01:08:12.000 Right.

01:08:13.000 When they were trying to... He was on Fallon, Fallon did the hair thing, and then Fallon got... Oh, he wasn't on Colbert, it was Fallon.

01:08:18.000 He might have been on Colbert at some point, but yeah, I see that happening at some point.

01:08:22.000 If he gets elected and there's like a, it could be a turnaround.

01:08:24.000 I actually think this is kind of, you know, telling because I'm thinking of John Tester's Senate race in Montana.

01:08:31.000 And this is, you know, one of these contentious races where they're saying Montana is effectively a red state.

01:08:36.000 You know, it's got- Tester always wins somehow.

01:08:39.000 He held off on endorsing – I don't know if he – I haven't checked today if he's done it, but for a while he wasn't saying anything about Kamala Harris until I think you'll see the emergence of a class of Democrats that are sort of more in line with maybe Joe Manchin who are sort of saying like, we're not like those progressives.

01:08:55.000 Like we have more shared values and so then when things presumably get better economically under Trump, they are more easily able to say like, look, I voted for some of those policies.

01:09:04.000 My record isn't like that.

01:09:05.000 I'm thinking of the Democrats who just voted against Kamala Harris in this House resolution on immigration, right?

01:09:14.000 There are people who are starting to say, like, we're parting ways with the Biden-Harris administration.

01:09:18.000 And so you might see people who posture more moderately and have success with Democratic voters in a way that this progressive wing is starting to see, you know, it just isn't working.

01:09:28.000 I want to jump to this story from the Wall Street Journal.

01:09:30.000 America's new political war pits young men against young women.

01:09:35.000 A majority of men under 30 support Trump and Republican control of Congress.

01:09:39.000 A sharp reversal from the 2020 race, young women strongly favor Democrats. 1.00

01:09:44.000 This is from America 2100.

01:09:44.000 We'll pull this up.

01:09:47.000 Will young men vote Democratic in 2024?

01:09:50.000 Percentage identifying as Republican.

01:09:53.000 In 2023, 49% of young men identified as Republican.

01:09:58.000 What was the age of the young men?

01:10:00.000 It didn't say.

01:10:01.000 And then we have this here.

01:10:02.000 This is, of course, what many people have seen.

01:10:04.000 This is an old survey.

01:10:07.000 12th grade girls overwhelmingly liberal, very few conservative.

01:10:10.000 But for boys, it's inverted, overwhelmingly conservative.

01:10:14.000 And then we have this from the Wall Street Journal.

01:10:16.000 AP VoteCast, showing that young men overwhelmingly lean Republican and women lean Democrat.

01:10:24.000 So much less women Democrats, much more male Republicans. 0.99

01:10:29.000 And men favor Trump and women favor Biden.

01:10:33.000 I think that, you know, I've said this before, and I welcome the ire from the feminists. 1.00

01:10:38.000 This will not play out well for women. 1.00

01:10:40.000 And men lead, and it doesn't matter what these women want or think. 1.00

01:10:44.000 And the issue is strongly that men can wait as long as they want to have families.

01:10:51.000 And so what's going to happen for a lot of these women Not all of them, and maybe even a majority of them.

01:10:55.000 But enough women are going to be approaching 35 with their doctors telling them, having a child at 35 is considered a geriatric pregnancy and you are at risk, you need to consider that you're getting too old for this. 0.56

01:11:09.000 And these women are going to be like, oh no. 1.00

01:11:12.000 And the men are going to be told by their doctors, looks good mate, have a nice day, come back when you're 40.

01:11:17.000 So these young men and these women, they go on dates.

01:11:20.000 And the woman's going to say something like, Kamala Harris or whatever. 1.00

01:11:24.000 And the guy's going to be like, not interested.

01:11:26.000 I'm sorry.

01:11:27.000 Look, I'm looking to have a family.

01:11:28.000 I want to have kids.

01:11:29.000 I want to buy a house and find someone that I'm going to be with.

01:11:32.000 I'm not really interested in being with someone who holds these values that I think are detrimental to raising children.

01:11:36.000 More importantly, a 35-year-old guy is going to be talking to a 28-year-old woman.

01:11:42.000 And a 35-year-old woman is going to be trying to talk to a 35-year-old guy and they're going to say, not interested.

01:11:49.000 Guys, and I know the feminists, they get really mad about this one on the left says, Tim's sexist. 1.00

01:11:53.000 I'm like, okay, well, you know, do whatever you want to do.

01:11:55.000 I'm just telling you what the data shows.

01:11:57.000 So this, I think, ultimately lends itself to more and more women are going to be childless. 0.99

01:12:03.000 Men will be selective, but this will result in more conservative children, like we're already seeing, and then give it 20 to 40 years and the Chelsea handlers of the world will be alone and isolated from culture. 0.99

01:12:16.000 It takes only a small percentage shift culturally for the entire surface of culture to appear one political ideology.

01:12:24.000 What happens when these women get artificial wombs and they don't need men anymore? 1.00

01:12:28.000 It's just a bunch of single mothers with babies. 1.00

01:12:30.000 They're going to struggle.

01:12:33.000 Same issue.

01:12:35.000 It's going to be substantially easier for young men and conservative women to have families because the dad working and the mom raising the kid, and the mom does work too, but just less so while she's having the kid, versus women trying to maintain birthing pods, if artificial wombs even come to market in the next 10 to 20 years.

01:12:53.000 Surrogacy is going to be out of reach, and many of these people just don't want kids at all.

01:12:58.000 Here's what I see happening, based on the trends right now, and this is not accounting for variables.

01:13:03.000 Chelsea Handler is coming out being like, I'm 50 years old and I can do drugs and wake up in the morning.

01:13:10.000 As if that's the measure of happiness.

01:13:13.000 That's fine for her.

01:13:14.000 The point is, when 20 years from now, someone born today What are they likely to be, conservative or liberal?

01:13:24.000 The answer is plainly conservative, based on birthing fertility rates among conservatives versus liberals, based on trends among young people.

01:13:32.000 If the next generation leans even 5% more conservative, the market shall provide.

01:13:38.000 And so, this woke stuff won't play because they're not going to get memberships, and they're going to adapt to what the market wants.

01:13:44.000 Chelsea Handler will find herself posting into the wind on social media, and people are going to be like, look, what you're saying is annoying and offensive, and it's not appealing to our customer base.

01:13:56.000 She will be 70 years old being like, how did I lose touch with society?

01:13:59.000 Why am I the odd person out?

01:14:03.000 If 55% of this country says we want Patriot content, then these companies like Disney that just go, for every $100 we spend, how much do we make if we do liberal stuff?

01:14:13.000 Eh, you might make $30.

01:14:15.000 What if we do conservative stuff?

01:14:16.000 $31?

01:14:16.000 Okay, go conservative.

01:14:18.000 You make more money.

01:14:19.000 I don't believe these statistics in general.

01:14:21.000 I mean, I find that they are sort of not self-fulfilling, but self-propagating.

01:14:26.000 They put these out to try to rationalize what they want to see in the market, but let's assume that it's accurate.

01:14:32.000 I try to understand what is the brain pattern that results in women being democratic. 1.00

01:14:39.000 Is it just the one litmus test of abortion that's become such a prevalent question that They engage in what is basically what Gadsad refers to as suicidal empathy.

01:14:49.000 It's so important on that one particular issue, they will sacrifice the rest of their country through open immigration, through foreign wars. 1.00

01:14:58.000 I try to reconcile the idea that they're empathetic, so it's based on empathy.

01:15:03.000 And yet they support endless foreign conflict, which is the sort of, maybe that's a uniparty, but Democrat policy right now.

01:15:10.000 The abortion is so important that that's what young women— It's that women are more susceptible to social pressures than men.

01:15:10.000 Or the litmus test.

01:15:17.000 That's it.

01:15:19.000 That's sexist, Tim.

01:15:20.000 It's true, right?

01:15:22.000 I'm joking, I don't know.

01:15:23.000 It is scientifically proven that women are more agreeable than men.

01:15:28.000 Men are hard-headed and make decisions about what they want.

01:15:31.000 Women are more agreeable and willing to work with a group. 0.97

01:15:34.000 This makes total sense when you look at evolutionary biology.

01:15:36.000 So what does it result in?

01:15:37.000 Women are more likely to look at the dominant narrative from the media and say, it's better to just, you know, fit in. 1.00

01:15:44.000 And men are more likely to be like, no, I'm right and I'm going to do what I want.

01:15:48.000 And most guys are wrong and crash and burn in economy or otherwise.

01:15:54.000 But most women tend to be more average and aligned to the center. 1.00

01:15:58.000 This is akin to the greater male variability hypothesis.

01:16:02.000 Well, you also have to consider immigration in your formula, because we do have millions of people crossing the border, millions of immigrants who want to stay and probably will stay.

01:16:10.000 So that definitely shakes up the formula.

01:16:12.000 I disagree completely.

01:16:13.000 I don't think that changes the tendencies between men and women.

01:16:17.000 It'll have an impact culturally for sure, but it still results in very similar things.

01:16:21.000 If anything, I actually think that would be more detrimental to the left.

01:16:24.000 The right likes to make the point that illegal immigrants, when they're granted citizenship or new citizens, tend to vote Democrat in their first time around or whatever.

01:16:33.000 I don't think that changes the argument around liberals don't have kids and conservatives do.

01:16:38.000 You can say we're going to have X amount of immigration, but how many immigrants are conservative versus how many are liberal, how many religious versus how many are not, that's not being factored in.

01:16:47.000 So I think mostly it's a moot point, and the question actually is, when you look at voting patterns, which includes immigration, liberals are having substantially less kids than conservatives, and have been for 20 years, and that trend has only been exacerbated as fertility declines.

01:17:02.000 Right, you see that argument made by some people who refer to Israel, how Israel used to be pretty in the middle of the road, but now they're growing even harder, right?

01:17:10.000 Because the conservative Jews are having more kids than the liberal Jews. 0.95

01:17:13.000 Yep, that's it.

01:17:14.000 So how long does it take?

01:17:15.000 But I think you're right that immigration was marketed Two women as an empathetic thing.

01:17:19.000 I think you're both picking up on this because it's like, what did Biden come out and say?

01:17:22.000 He said, we're going to grant a pathway to citizenship to people who are illegal immigrants who are married to a citizen who've been, you know, most of them have been here for 25 years.

01:17:31.000 It's emotional.

01:17:32.000 They're saying we have to be nice and we can't disrupt their lives and never mind the fact that there are cons to illegal immigration.

01:17:37.000 Don't talk about that.

01:17:38.000 It's people fleeing to stable countries.

01:17:40.000 You have to let them in.

01:17:41.000 We have to do something.

01:17:42.000 There's a reason it's called amnesty, right?

01:17:44.000 Like it's sold to women as a humanitarian act and women are susceptible to that. 0.98

01:17:49.000 And I think that's one of the challenges of all of these issues, which is that men, I

01:17:54.000 think, still feel a certain traditional pressure to do masculine things, to like provide for

01:17:59.000 their families, to have children.

01:18:01.000 Women are told to ignore a lot of their biological instincts, don't have children, delay having 1.00

01:18:06.000 them, don't settle down. 1.00

01:18:07.000 And so they're actually functioning very differently in society.

01:18:10.000 You should look at, you know, South Korea is a good example of this.

01:18:13.000 They had a similar narrative going on during their last presidential election, where it

01:18:16.000 was the conservative candidates supported by young men and young women supported the

01:18:20.000 more progressive candidate because they ultimately don't have the same goals anymore.

01:18:24.000 It's not like everyone is trying to line up and achieve the same thing.

01:18:27.000 So your point 20 years ago, we were looking at, I bring this point up a lot, so I know

01:18:33.000 people have heard it, but for those that haven't, liberals were having 1.43 kids, conservatives

01:18:38.000 having 2.05.

01:18:39.000 Bye.

01:18:40.000 Fast forward 20 years.

01:18:42.000 Pew Research tracks the first time in 100 years that a generation has moved slightly more conservative on some issues.

01:18:48.000 Traditionally, it was always a wave of, this generation is 10% progressive, then 30, then 50, then 60, and then Gen Z. Bill Clinton rocked the votes.

01:18:58.000 Then Gen Z comes around, and all of a sudden, they are comparable. 0.94

01:19:03.000 For the first time, on average, Gen Z and Millennials are comparable politics, but In some areas, Gen Z is actually slightly more conservative.

01:19:12.000 Now, when this story first came out, Pew Research, I think it was from 2018, everybody on the right is going like, whoa, we're winning the argument with young people.

01:19:19.000 I'm like, no, you're not.

01:19:20.000 Conservatives had more kids 20 years ago.

01:19:22.000 That means there is just generally more conservative children who hold these views their parents gave them.

01:19:28.000 The right makes the argument that the left is trying to indoctrinate in schools, which is true, but the right is also at war on that issue as well.

01:19:35.000 So I'd say that's a moot point.

01:19:37.000 Give it 20 more years, and you're going to see the country skew a few percentage points towards conservative.

01:19:42.000 And at that point, dominant culture, the pressures will exist.

01:19:46.000 There will be a market for progressivism, but it will be a minority market.

01:19:49.000 Stadiums, Coca-Cola, whatever.

01:19:52.000 They're going to say, what's our lowest common denominator marketing strategy to maximize sales?

01:19:56.000 And they're going to say, 55% of people identify as American-loving conservative patriots, and 45 say other.

01:20:03.000 And they go, okay, we'll go with the 55, we make more money.

01:20:06.000 It is interesting, and the going-along-to-get-along aspect of women being more influenced by social media or those types of pressures would also explain why self-harm ideations on social media resulting from Instagram or whatever affects disproportionately significantly more girls than boys.

01:20:25.000 That's interesting.

01:20:27.000 I hadn't actually thought about the demographic shift.

01:20:29.000 I'm trying to apply this all to my anecdotal experience.

01:20:33.000 The family members that I have who have kids who are conservative-ish versus liberal progressive-ish, I'm noticing the gender issue, but I also thought it was more of the Andrew Tate influence.

01:20:44.000 I can certainly see how Yeah, people are talking about why are kids listening to Andrew Tate?

01:20:49.000 And I've heard this from parents where they're like, my young teenage kids were watching Andrew Tate the other day.

01:20:54.000 And I'm like, you're like a conservative leading family.

01:20:57.000 You're not liberals.

01:20:58.000 And, you know, also it's entirely possible that liberal families become overbearing and the kids rebel or whatever.

01:21:05.000 But ultimately, liberals, infinitely more likely to have abortions than conservatives.

01:21:11.000 Like, not literally infinitely, but like just substantially more.

01:21:15.000 And conservatives just have more kids in general.

01:21:18.000 So when you look at the fertility rate 20 years ago, I wonder if the fertility rates right now are taking into consideration abortion.

01:21:25.000 I mean, probably they're just looking at how many children do liberals have, so that includes that liberals are just having tons of abortions.

01:21:31.000 And yet the child replacement rate is still pretty significant low and dropping even further.

01:21:36.000 For conservatives I think it's like 1.8 fertility, and for liberals it's like 1.

01:21:40.000 Something I've noticed.

01:21:41.000 Maybe less.

01:21:41.000 I wonder if you guys notice with your families that a lot of liberal areas, if you're traveling through them, are anti-family.

01:21:46.000 Like they just feel like kids aren't welcome.

01:21:49.000 Well, super pro-dog.

01:21:54.000 I hate that phrase.

01:21:55.000 I was mentioned several times.

01:21:57.000 I was flying through Chicago and the family restrooms have been turned into all-gender bathrooms. 1.00

01:22:01.000 And I'm looking at this, there's like a men's room and a women's room, and right in the middle it says all gender, and I'm like, I know for a fact that bathroom's always been there. 0.63

01:22:09.000 I used to work at O'Hare.

01:22:10.000 They didn't build a third bathroom to accommodate, you know, agender people. 1.00

01:22:15.000 It used to be the family restroom with the baby changing station, and they just said, demand is not for baby changing stations, it's for gender ideology in Chicago, so they switched it.

01:22:23.000 And there's baby changing tables in both men and women.

01:22:26.000 Yeah.

01:22:26.000 Well, I changed a lot of diapers when my kids were born.

01:22:29.000 And I did, too.

01:22:30.000 That's why they had family bathrooms. 1.00

01:22:32.000 Even though they had to put them on the sink.

01:22:35.000 And also, one thing we mentioned, too, is McDonald's used to have a play place.

01:22:39.000 Yeah.

01:22:40.000 Like, that's all going away?

01:22:41.000 It's family-oriented?

01:22:43.000 It is.

01:22:44.000 Well, the employee list McDonald's where you go and you place your order on the screen and then go pick it up, it's the scariest thing I've ever seen.

01:22:50.000 And I saw one in a downtown Toronto at night.

01:22:53.000 How does it work?

01:22:55.000 There's a frickin' LCD screen.

01:22:56.000 You go and there's like one person behind the counter and I guess the people manually putting in, but there's no human interaction anymore.

01:23:02.000 Oh, yeah, yeah.

01:23:03.000 The Taco Bell down the street, it's exactly that.

01:23:04.000 I mean, I don't like it, but also when your order gets screwed up, it makes it very difficult.

01:23:08.000 No accountability.

01:23:10.000 The thing is, don't go into a McDonald's late at night in Toronto.

01:23:13.000 Holy hell did I think I was going to die.

01:23:15.000 There's already a video of someone ordering a McDonald's and a robot arm makes everything.

01:23:21.000 There's people working there, but the robot arm goes over and then it reaches down and scoops the fries and then moves them over.

01:23:28.000 At the Taco Bell down the street over here, If you go in, there's kiosks, and there's people working behind the counter, and you can walk up to the counter and wait if you want, but why would you?

01:23:37.000 You go to the kiosk and you go, boop, boop, boop, enter, and then you watch them make it.

01:23:42.000 That's the future.

01:23:43.000 But, you know, more to the point.

01:23:45.000 Going back to what I was saying is that, like Jack Pacific mentions with Pizza Hut nationalism, even fast food restaurants used to be family-oriented.

01:23:53.000 Because the market demanded that people accommodate children.

01:23:56.000 Because they're like, look, am I going to come to eat at your place?

01:23:58.000 I got kids.

01:23:59.000 So McDonald's says, build a playground in our fast food restaurants.

01:24:02.000 Now they don't need it anymore.

01:24:03.000 They got rid of it.

01:24:04.000 Pizza Hut used to be a tradition in my family and other families in my area.

01:24:06.000 It was like, that was part of your weekend night of going Pizza Hut, then movie.

01:24:10.000 Living large.

01:24:11.000 It was great.

01:24:12.000 That was living large, dude.

01:24:13.000 Those red plastic cups, man.

01:24:15.000 But here's the Jack Posobiec talks about it, and it's fascinating.

01:24:18.000 Jack remembers.

01:24:20.000 After school and it's like book it and you did well, it's like we're gonna go get your personal pizza I always thought it was really funny that you get the book it thing and then if you like read the book They give you the free pizza on the wheel Because my parents would just buy pizza and I'd eat you like if my parents ordered and get your personal pan pizza I would my point is whether I read the book or not.

01:24:38.000 I was eating pizza We but once you got the thing then you were like, let's go to pizza and I get that little pizza Jack wants what he had when he was a kid and he wants to share with his kids.

01:24:47.000 But because the fertility rate has gone way down and the market dictates, there's no opportunity for him to do that anymore.

01:24:53.000 I always thought the playground issue was liability and hygiene.

01:24:56.000 So that's I never even thought of that.

01:24:58.000 But we had one of McDonald's on to carry in Montreal and they used to take the kids.

01:25:01.000 The market shall provide.

01:25:03.000 If the cost of lawsuits and hygiene is less than the amount they make from having the family opportunity, they keep the playground.

01:25:13.000 So they could say, look, it's a million dollars a year in liability, but we make two million from families who bring their kids in, so pay the cost, take the million dollar profit.

01:25:20.000 At some point, they said, liability fixed cost is a million bucks, but we're only pulling in 800,000 from families.

01:25:26.000 Get rid of it.

01:25:26.000 Some of this is so funny to hear you guys talk about because, well, we didn't grow up that far apart from each other, but, you know, I grew up in a rural area in Connecticut and there was a McDonald's, but it was like a drive to get there, right?

01:25:37.000 It didn't go often.

01:25:38.000 It didn't have a play place.

01:25:40.000 We didn't, I can't even think of, I think, I can't think of where the closest pizza hut was.

01:25:44.000 I never saw it growing up, but there were local pizza places.

01:25:46.000 There wasn't the book yet, but the local library had a huge summer reading program.

01:25:50.000 And so it's interesting to see, like, the idea that, you know, obviously it's true, corporations did what they could to be a part of culture and they drop stuff off, whether it's cost or people aren't interested in them.

01:26:02.000 But also, like, all of these things that people want probably still exist.

01:26:05.000 They're just not in the sort of one-stop shop.

01:26:08.000 I still remember growing up in Wyoming the first day that a McDonald's was built in our hometown.

01:26:08.000 Right.

01:26:13.000 So it was a pretty radical change, even though we had a pizza hut.

01:26:19.000 I think the major problem we have is mobile internet.

01:26:26.000 Internet's always been fine.

01:26:27.000 I've had the internet since I was a little kid, as long as I can remember, there was internet.

01:26:30.000 And it was a useful resource, but only when you're at home, you have to sit at the machine and use it.

01:26:35.000 And then around 2007, 2008, mobile internet happened.

01:26:38.000 And man, I remember Skating at Wilson Skate Park in Chicago in like 2005, and I have no idea what's happening in the world.

01:26:48.000 I had a candy bar phone, I could receive texts, my friends would say, where you at?

01:26:52.000 And I'd be skating, I'd go home, go on the computer, and then start reading what was going on.

01:26:57.000 And then there was like over a year, all of a sudden, smartphones, touchscreen, the iPhone, now the internet was 24-7 no matter where you were, you knew exactly what was happening, and it just exponentially skyrocketed.

01:27:09.000 All of a sudden now, you are wired into the machine 24-7.

01:27:12.000 I had no internet until I was like 20.

01:27:15.000 Like I didn't have a computer.

01:27:17.000 Yeah, we're kind of a rare generation.

01:27:19.000 We can remember a time without the internet.

01:27:21.000 When I was 7, it was whoever wakes up first gets on the computer.

01:27:26.000 Because here's how it worked.

01:27:27.000 The rule in my house was you're allowed to go on the computer for one hour and then you have to let brother or sister, you know, my brother or sister use it next.

01:27:36.000 So as soon as I got any conscious thought, it's wake up, bolt straight to the computer and then go on to get on the internet.

01:27:43.000 And then as soon as my brother would come in, I'd be on for like 45 minutes.

01:27:46.000 He'd be like, how long have you been on?

01:27:47.000 I'd be like, like five minutes.

01:27:48.000 Yeah, of course.

01:27:49.000 In another hour!

01:27:50.000 Are you gaming?

01:27:51.000 Enough time to download a song.

01:27:53.000 Everything, right?

01:27:54.000 Downloading songs took like five hours, six hours.

01:27:56.000 Right.

01:27:57.000 If we even had them.

01:27:58.000 I mean, I'm like seven.

01:28:00.000 I'm on AOL and I'm downloading games.

01:28:03.000 So always just trying to find, like AOL was crazy, trying to find different games that were available for DOS or whatever.

01:28:09.000 And then playing them.

01:28:10.000 And then I had, we had click and play stuff.

01:28:14.000 So I got, first I got Click and Play, then I got Games Factory, then Multimedia Fusion, and Flash, Flash 4, and then I'm making websites, I'm making video games, but only for an hour.

01:28:22.000 Very productive, Tim.

01:28:24.000 Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:28:26.000 I think I downloaded a movie trailer once, successfully.

01:28:29.000 Well back then, I don't know if you actually could, it was a crazy moment.

01:28:32.000 I remember me and my friend were at his house, and we were trying to watch Dragon Ball Z.

01:28:38.000 On Real Player Live, at like 40p.

01:28:42.000 Like, you couldn't even see anything, and it was buffering.

01:28:45.000 Every 10 seconds of buffering would give you one second to video, and we were just sitting with this tiny little thing on the screen to watch Dragon Ball Z, and we were like, yes.

01:28:52.000 I remember going to a friend's house and watching him play Doom, and I was like, that's pretty cool.

01:28:55.000 And that was it.

01:28:56.000 And then I went home and I just had a farm.

01:28:58.000 You never got to play.

01:28:59.000 Winamp.

01:29:00.000 You could only watch.

01:29:02.000 Who remembers that?

01:29:03.000 You remember Winamp?

01:29:04.000 Did you have that?

01:29:05.000 Yeah, I'm older.

01:29:07.000 I think older than everybody here.

01:29:08.000 I don't ever remember 45.

01:29:09.000 And I don't remember not being connected.

01:29:13.000 I got my first email address in 96.

01:29:15.000 And it was Roadrunner David.

01:29:16.000 Yeah, so you were late.

01:29:17.000 Yeah, but people still email you there.

01:29:20.000 Go ahead.

01:29:21.000 Wait, where did you grow up again?

01:29:22.000 Montreal, but Canada.

01:29:23.000 I always feel I felt like I was always connected in the same way.

01:29:27.000 The internet's one thing.

01:29:28.000 I just like having a video recording device, and I've always been into that.

01:29:32.000 I don't mind being connected this way.

01:29:34.000 Wherever you are, you can upload a video.

01:29:35.000 It's pronounced Mung-ray-all.

01:29:37.000 Oh, I get in trouble.

01:29:39.000 Apparently, I don't pronounce it.

01:29:40.000 It's Montreal or Montreal, and I go apparently the wrong way.

01:29:43.000 How do you say, like, the part of the French, when I went there?

01:29:45.000 Montréal is how they say it.

01:29:46.000 Exactly, Montréal.

01:29:47.000 I just, I anglicize it, Montréal.

01:29:49.000 So you're already the home of Kamala Harris.

01:29:52.000 She went to school up the street for me, like, I was bracing myself.

01:29:55.000 It's a very nice neighborhood from what I understand.

01:29:57.000 She's as Canadian as I am and I think I'm more American than she is.

01:30:01.000 I was going to put together a montage like the unburdened diva saying he's more American than Kamala.

01:30:06.000 Did you used to go with your friends to Dépanneur?

01:30:08.000 Dépanneur, of course.

01:30:09.000 Dépanneur in French is the word for dépanné is to figure something out with, you know, minimal resources.

01:30:14.000 Is that what that means?

01:30:14.000 Yeah, dépanné.

01:30:15.000 Dépanné.

01:30:16.000 So just that's how they refer to like... You go to Dépanneur to get whatever you need because it was sort of like, oh, you're missing something.

01:30:22.000 It's great.

01:30:24.000 In New York, they call them bodegas.

01:30:26.000 In Chicago, we call them corner stores.

01:30:28.000 Mmm.

01:30:29.000 Corner store.

01:30:30.000 Go to the corner store and then New York it was like the bodega.

01:30:33.000 The first time I went there I was like the what?

01:30:35.000 And then I went to a bodega and I said can I I want to get a like a roast beef sub and they went a what?

01:30:35.000 Bodegas.

01:30:40.000 And I was like a roast beef sub sandwich like that and I pointed to the hero roll I'm like that's a hero and I was like man.

01:30:46.000 Culture shock.

01:30:47.000 The Chicago Bull language.

01:30:49.000 It is kind of crazy though.

01:30:50.000 I just didn't realize that different languages.

01:30:52.000 And then I asked the guy for giardiniera and he went, what?

01:30:56.000 I don't even know what that is.

01:30:58.000 I was like, I can't get giardiniera.

01:30:58.000 I had a panic attack.

01:31:00.000 You got to go to Potbelly's though because they're everywhere and they have it.

01:31:02.000 But they don't know what giardiniera is either.

01:31:04.000 They call it hot peppers.

01:31:05.000 Never got food from bodegas.

01:31:06.000 We just go there for vanilla dutches, which is for bad things I don't do anymore.

01:31:11.000 No food at our bodegas.

01:31:12.000 You couldn't trust it there.

01:31:14.000 What the heck is a vanilla Dutch?

01:31:15.000 A vanilla Dutch?

01:31:17.000 It's a cultural hour we're having.

01:31:20.000 For blunts.

01:31:20.000 Remember the internet?

01:31:22.000 That was fun!

01:31:23.000 It used to go on AOL.

01:31:25.000 It was stationary.

01:31:27.000 That was the last one except we upgraded to cable internet.

01:31:27.000 56k.

01:31:31.000 I remember one time I lost- You mean cable or did you go through the fiber at any point?

01:31:35.000 Fiber was way later.

01:31:37.000 I think we had 26.6k.

01:31:37.000 So I had 56k.

01:31:38.000 Or was it 24k?

01:31:38.000 I think we had 26.6, or was it 24? I think it's 24. I don't remember.

01:31:46.000 Um, yeah, dial up.

01:31:47.000 And then one day, I log in to AOL, and then I go and I open up AIM, and then I see my friend is online, and I message him and he doesn't answer.

01:31:56.000 And I was like, oh, that's weird.

01:31:58.000 And then I see him just away, and I'm like, and then one day I see him and I ask him, I was like, were you just, like, leave your computer on?

01:32:03.000 He's like, I have cable.

01:32:04.000 And I was like, you have what?

01:32:06.000 And I was like, what is that?

01:32:06.000 He's like, cable internet.

01:32:08.000 And he's like, oh, it's just your internet's on 24-7.

01:32:09.000 And I was like, what?

01:32:11.000 And so then I went home and I was like, because we had a second phone line and you'd be online downloading a song and then a telemarketer would call and it would knock you offline and then your download crashes.

01:32:23.000 And then we got cable and all of a sudden the song started coming in so fast.

01:32:27.000 I have a vivid memory of the only time I heard the dial-up internet sound.

01:32:31.000 Like, I was pretty young and I only remember it once, but I think that was just in rural New Hampshire at the time where, you know, a lot of stuff hadn't progressed.

01:32:40.000 It's crazy how quickly technology changes.

01:32:43.000 Like, I think of my younger sisters who, you know, do most of their homeschooling through some sort of online assistance.

01:32:49.000 Like, they will never have remembered a time without the internet.

01:32:53.000 And that was not that long ago.

01:32:55.000 They won't know what a fax machine is.

01:32:57.000 Unless they need dental records sent.

01:33:01.000 Now it's a digital fax.

01:33:02.000 It's a PDF by email.

01:33:04.000 I was checking out to see if anything broke on the news because you never know what happens.

01:33:08.000 I want that acting deputy director to resign or be fired or be charged or something.

01:33:12.000 We're going to go to Super Chat, so if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button?

01:33:16.000 One like equals one fight, fight, fight.

01:33:19.000 Become a member by going to timcast.com and clicking join us.

01:33:23.000 And you can hang out for the Members Only Call-In Show, where you as members call in, talk to us on the show, join in.

01:33:28.000 It'll be a lot of fun.

01:33:29.000 Not so family-friendly.

01:33:30.000 In the meantime, we will read your Super Chats.

01:33:32.000 Polly Puree says, or is it Polly Puree? 0.99

01:33:34.000 It's two E's, so I say Puree.

01:33:34.000 I don't know.

01:33:36.000 Am I first?

01:33:37.000 Indeed, you are first.

01:33:38.000 Congratulations, you've won.

01:33:41.000 Tim is controlled, opposition says.

01:33:43.000 Trump said, if you don't vote for me, you won't have Israel for very long.

01:33:47.000 I hope he's right.

01:33:48.000 I hope he loses.

01:33:50.000 Not voting Trump this time. 0.99

01:33:51.000 I can survive four years of Kamala if America's parasite is gone. 0.99

01:33:56.000 Super Cheddar, dear Super Cheddar, I thank you.

01:33:59.000 So much for that tweet.

01:34:02.000 Because I've been trying to explain to people what Israel Derangement Syndrome is, and this nails it. 0.81

01:34:08.000 The idea that you would actually support Kamala Harris, who is like one of the worst human beings imaginable, with no track record, unappointed, to actually see the United States suffer, and the economy fail because you hate Israel so much, is a level of derangement that is hard to exemplify. 0.53

01:34:30.000 But in that single super chat, everyone now knows, oh, they're deranged.

01:34:37.000 Well, I won't steelman that super tweet.

01:34:40.000 Super tweet?

01:34:42.000 Super tweet.

01:34:43.000 I won't steelman it.

01:34:44.000 I can understand what the resentment is that people are saying foreign countries are taking too much of our tax dollars.

01:34:51.000 Like Ukraine. 0.61

01:34:52.000 Like Ukraine. 0.61

01:34:53.000 I mean, I can understand people saying that.

01:34:53.000 Like Israel.

01:34:56.000 What I always find funny is that the people who say, no more foreign war, and then also simultaneously say, down with Israel, which sounds like your objection is not just no more foreign war.

01:35:06.000 I can understand the resentment, the issue that people take with that.

01:35:10.000 There won't be, I don't want to say there won't be anything left of America if Kamala is elected.

01:35:15.000 It will be a wildly different America where this individual thinks, well, so long as, you know, the parasite's gone, I can live with four years of Kamala. 0.64

01:35:23.000 You might not have much of your own country left after four years of another, you know, open war.

01:35:28.000 Kamala's going to give Israel a blank check. 0.80

01:35:30.000 I'm not sure about that.

01:35:31.000 She's still out there.

01:35:32.000 She doesn't want to call Islamic terrorism.

01:35:33.000 She's going to give Israel a blank check. 0.79

01:35:35.000 And Gaza, too.

01:35:36.000 No, no, no.

01:35:37.000 Dude, dude, dude.

01:35:38.000 Kamala is a uniparty establishment candidate.

01:35:41.000 The CIA, FBI, all 17, however many intelligence agencies, are going to say, OK, Kamala, we're funding Israel however much money they want.

01:35:50.000 That much I can understand. 0.97

01:35:52.000 She is a war whore and, say, a military-industrial complex tool of the highest order. 1.00

01:35:59.000 Is that in your book? 0.99

01:36:00.000 Is this a quote from your book?

01:36:01.000 No.

01:36:01.000 No, no, no.

01:36:02.000 Sorry, I cut you off.

01:36:03.000 For a second, no, I actually thought the amateur, I thought it said something else on the amateur hour and a bada bing bada boom.

01:36:08.000 No, I could see that part.

01:36:10.000 But no, I think there might be a rift developing within the Kamala Brat party and the Jewish support.

01:36:16.000 I don't, I don't, we'll see how it plays out.

01:36:18.000 But I think... Amala, the rift is only superficial for political reasons right now to earn votes.

01:36:23.000 There is no way the establishment backs off Israel.

01:36:28.000 Donald Trump says he supports Israel in much a very superficial way.

01:36:33.000 He likely will provide them.

01:36:34.000 There is no candidate that's going to abandon Israel.

01:36:37.000 It's just not reality.

01:36:38.000 The CIA candidate is never abandoning Israel.

01:36:43.000 They may have abandoned Netanyahu and demand some change, but the idea that because radical progressives demand of the CIA—dude, you really think that the CIA candidate is going to be like, okay, we're done with Israel?

01:36:54.000 No, they might just say, the market shall provide, and they'll see what is more profitable of a solution.

01:37:01.000 Well, to say not let Israel burn, but rather to say, well, I don't know, funding both sides type thing.

01:37:10.000 Or I can't play out in a world where there's another economy that would outweigh the laundering that goes on through these types of foreign aid packages.

01:37:17.000 But I could see where I could see where that could happen.

01:37:21.000 What is the argument that the U.S.

01:37:24.000 government would have to stop supporting Israel right now?

01:37:26.000 It would be the idea of genocide.

01:37:30.000 It would be the idea of some international human rights violations where they say we can no longer support what you're doing in Gaza.

01:37:35.000 So, like, what about protective edge?

01:37:38.000 The 2014 operation, they call it mowing the lawn, when Israel starts bombing Gaza to an extreme degree.

01:37:45.000 This time with October 7th, it's particularly bad.

01:37:47.000 It's particularly bad.

01:37:49.000 But we have seen for every couple of years what they refer to as mowing the lawn, where Israel starts bombing Gaza.

01:37:56.000 And then you've got the West Bank, which has got settlements and purchases, and conflict has been ongoing for a long time.

01:38:02.000 I do not see anything happening now Where the U.S.

01:38:05.000 deep state would be like, I guess we're wrapping up here, we're done with Israel. 0.98

01:38:10.000 No, I don't think it would be quite that cut and dry, but it would be to the point where I can see a shift in public sentiment saying we're no longer supporting this.

01:38:18.000 And whether you cloak it as we don't support Netanyahu versus we don't support Israel, but we're not supporting this.

01:38:23.000 And I can see that happening.

01:38:25.000 The longer this goes on, and especially if it turns out that, as I firmly believe as well, there is some culpability in How that was allowed to occur in the first place.

01:38:35.000 And then they say, well, this was sort of an opportunistic exploitation of tragedy that could have been averted or at least minimized.

01:38:41.000 I could see the public sentiment shifting a little bit. 0.81

01:38:43.000 I don't understand the simultaneous argument that Israel puppets the United States and it's a parasite in the United States.

01:38:52.000 The Israel derangement people think that Israel controls our policy through AIPAC and things like this.

01:38:59.000 There's an influence, you can't deny that.

01:39:01.000 And why would the U.S.

01:39:02.000 stop giving Israel money?

01:39:05.000 It becomes a cost-benefit analysis as to whether or not there's other ways that the military-industrial complex could, I don't know, find other ways to grease their wheels or line their pockets.

01:39:16.000 Things evolve.

01:39:17.000 What are we dealing with, 70 years?

01:39:20.000 Of U.S.

01:39:22.000 pro-Israel policy.

01:39:24.000 I do not see anything in modern news and climate anywhere that is significant enough where the U.S.

01:39:30.000 would be like, well, after four years, we decided to wrap up the Israel project.

01:39:33.000 No, I mean, some politicians might say, well, after 70 years, things are no better off than they were 70 years ago, so maybe we need to take a different approach.

01:39:40.000 But it's intentional.

01:39:42.000 The circumstance in Israel, the argument is that Netanyahu either allows or wants these conflicts to happen, he's funded Hamas, and the U.S.

01:39:49.000 is right behind him allowing these things to happen for whatever reason.

01:39:53.000 So, the arguments towards Israel are just scattershot garbled nonsense.

01:39:59.000 Well, you certainly saw, you know, people called Barack Obama sort of the most anti-Israel candidate.

01:40:03.000 And the most aggressive thing he did against Israel was try to overthrow Netanyahu through some of his operatives that were working for the opposition candidate.

01:40:13.000 And I think that that's sort of... That's Netanyahu, though.

01:40:14.000 I think that's the same thing you would get with a Kamala Harris presidency, where she would, you know, the biggest criticism of Biden was he literally flew to Israel and embraced Netanyahu.

01:40:26.000 And I think that you might see Kamala Harris be a little more distant with Netanyahu, as we already saw.

01:40:32.000 I thought she was.

01:40:32.000 Let me get this straight.

01:40:33.000 I don't think you're going to see any major... Almighty Antichrist in chat saying I'm wrong.

01:40:38.000 You think that the deep state doesn't want to fund Israel anymore?

01:40:42.000 This is the argument?

01:40:43.000 That the intelligence agencies of the United States are done with funding Israel, and that if Kamala wins, they will likely cut off funding to Israel?

01:40:50.000 Is that what people think?

01:40:51.000 I don't think so.

01:40:51.000 And Trump will keep it going?

01:40:53.000 I don't think so.

01:40:53.000 Is that what you think?

01:40:55.000 No, I don't think so.

01:40:55.000 I mean, I don't think so, but I can see sentiment shifting in a way that I've never seen it shift in my lifetime because this particular, call it an act of reprisal, has been what it is compared to what it has been in the past.

01:41:08.000 Has sentiment ever shifted the military-industrial complex?

01:41:12.000 No, but just the irony is that they're, I guess the argument against why they would not change policy is they are making profit off both ends, like literally giving aid to the victims of the Israeli reprisals and, you know, giving aid to the military.

01:41:26.000 Even from a strategic standpoint, as Tim's saying, like they still view it as a, you know, a foothold in the Middle East, America's strongest ally in the Middle East, and they wouldn't give it up for that reason.

01:41:38.000 The military-industrial complex will change their mind.

01:41:40.000 Good luck with that.

01:41:41.000 I'm with Tim.

01:41:43.000 I'm asking, was it Almighty Alchemist?

01:41:47.000 So I guess you actually believe that the military-industrial complex is done with funding Israel?

01:41:53.000 So then why would they, under Trump, fund Israel?

01:41:56.000 If the machine itself—Northrop Grumman, Halliburton, all these military contractors overseas—if all these companies that profit off of expansionist policy, nation-building, war, and conflict, have decided, you know, we're just done with the Israel project, then it doesn't matter who you vote for.

01:42:12.000 Vote for Trump, doesn't matter.

01:42:13.000 Trump's gonna go to them and say, no, we're not interested in taking those contracts anymore.

01:42:16.000 We'll give you, we'll give you 60 billion dollars.

01:42:17.000 We want iron-dump defense. 0.87

01:42:18.000 No, we're not interested.

01:42:20.000 Okay?

01:42:20.000 And then, with the, like, I just don't understand the argument.

01:42:23.000 I don't see anything happening in Israel that is substantially different.

01:42:27.000 You can argue that the scale of death is more.

01:42:29.000 I don't know, man.

01:42:31.000 Go back to all of the wars throughout every decade.

01:42:35.000 Go back to every single operation carried out by Israel. 0.92

01:42:38.000 Look at how Egypt's handled it. 1.00

01:42:41.000 Israel and the Sinai Peninsula.

01:42:43.000 All of these things.

01:42:45.000 You've got Jordan's involvement, West Bank settlements, Gaza conflict.

01:42:50.000 You've got going back to when Israel pulled out I don't see anything substantially different, I just literally don't, to where the military industrial complex goes, that's the end of this operation. 0.68

01:43:02.000 In fact, Iran fired missiles into Israel, and the U.S.

01:43:05.000 wants to go to war with Iran.

01:43:07.000 This is the perfect casus belli for the establishment outside of Iran. 0.92

01:43:10.000 Now you're building a good argument for the guy who said, I'd rather take my chances with Kamala than have an administration that wants to go to war with Iran and using Israel as sort of the catalyst.

01:43:19.000 It's Kamala!

01:43:21.000 It is.

01:43:22.000 When Trump nearly died, the official narrative that popped up a day later was, oh, by the way, Iran was trying to kill Trump.

01:43:28.000 And so the belief is that was their initial plan. 0.65

01:43:32.000 Trump gets assassinated.

01:43:34.000 They blame Iran for it. 0.61

01:43:36.000 And that's the cat's belly.

01:43:37.000 Iran, that's how you get all the Trump supporters to get behind war.

01:43:39.000 Nikki Haley becomes the nominee.

01:43:41.000 Then you get Kamala Harris or Nikki Haley and both want war with Iran.

01:43:44.000 John Bolton won a war with Iran.

01:43:46.000 The U.S., there was a plan.

01:43:48.000 Who was the military officer who came out in the late 2000s and said there are seven nations?

01:43:52.000 I always forget his name.

01:43:54.000 You know who I'm talking about.

01:43:55.000 Iran was one of them, and we've hit Libya, we've hit Syria, all these countries, but Iran's not gone down. 0.98

01:44:01.000 We set up military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, which gives us a pincer strike on Iran, and we've not had the casus belli nor the resources to go into Iran. 0.83

01:44:09.000 Iran fires on Israel. 0.55

01:44:11.000 Kamala Harris gets elected.

01:44:12.000 We are looking at war with Iran. 0.69

01:44:14.000 Well, hold on, but the timeline there, when they tried to assassinate Trump and blame it on Iran, Joe Biden hadn't yet pulled out, and I don't think he pulls out if they succeed.

01:44:23.000 Pull out of what?

01:44:24.000 Biden hadn't withdrawn yet.

01:44:25.000 Uh-huh.

01:44:26.000 So I think the timeline there, I appreciate that they were trying to blame this on Iran in some candidature.

01:44:31.000 Nikki Haley becomes a Republican nominee.

01:44:32.000 For sure, for sure.

01:44:33.000 No, but then I don't think Biden pulls out.

01:44:35.000 So the Kamala factor is not yet in.

01:44:37.000 I think Biden was always going to pull out though.

01:44:38.000 Out of?

01:44:40.000 I don't think.

01:44:40.000 Just being a nominee.

01:44:42.000 Oh, Afghanistan? 0.96

01:44:43.000 Yeah, but this was already after the debate.

01:44:45.000 No, no, I'm sorry.

01:44:46.000 Hold on, hold on.

01:44:46.000 But either way, the Biden administration is pro-war.

01:44:50.000 They want war with Iran.

01:44:51.000 No question.

01:44:52.000 Agreed.

01:44:52.000 Nikki Haley would be as well, no question, without Trump.

01:44:55.000 And they say Trump was killed by Iran.

01:44:57.000 Nikki Haley has the next most amount of delegates. 0.95

01:44:59.000 The RNC could be in revolt, but they probably would have gone for Nikki Haley, who has second highest amount of delegates. 1.00

01:45:04.000 And then you've got a guarantee whoever gets elected, it's war with Iran, or at least that's the direction we're going. 0.86

01:45:10.000 Why would they back off Israel? 0.98

01:45:12.000 Voting for Kamala Harris is the surest way to make sure Israel gets all the money in the world, because they want that narrative to go to war with Iran.

01:45:19.000 I think they might have lost that narrative.

01:45:22.000 That is the hypothetical.

01:45:24.000 I agree with everything.

01:45:24.000 Leslie Clark, Luke, sorry, Luke, change.

01:45:27.000 Leslie Clark, that is correct.

01:45:29.000 He said there were seven countries the U.S.

01:45:31.000 was planning to go to war with, and we've gone to war with like, I think it's all but Iran or something. 0.88

01:45:36.000 Iraq and Afghanistan surround Iran.

01:45:38.000 The purpose of those was very clearly the U.S.

01:45:40.000 is targeting Iran and has been for a very long time, and we surrounded their country, and we've needed that casus belli. 0.99

01:45:49.000 John Bolton wanted it.

01:45:51.000 We never got there.

01:45:52.000 John Bolton said when Trump appointed him, which was a huge mistake, and this is like, what is this, 2017?

01:45:57.000 Next year we'll be celebrating in Tehran. 0.98

01:45:59.000 And I'm like, this guy's nuts! 0.88

01:46:01.000 Kamala Harris is the military-industrial complex. 0.95

01:46:04.000 They are not going to back off Israel. 0.70

01:46:05.000 They're going to dump as much money as they can in that country because they want to use it as staging operations for their war with Iran. 0.68

01:46:11.000 They need the territory control to bring things into the Mediterranean.

01:46:15.000 Joe Biden tried building the pier.

01:46:16.000 What's the pier for in the Gaza?

01:46:18.000 That was a beachhead for the invasion of Gaza. 0.92

01:46:21.000 That is support for Israel.

01:46:22.000 They say, oh, we're going to bring in supplies.

01:46:25.000 B.S.

01:46:26.000 They want war with Iran and they want the means to bring in supplies I guess your idea that Kamala will invade Iran kind of clashes with the Democrats that we currently understand who follow more of a policy of appeasement, right?

01:46:36.000 cut them off from the Donbass. They want to move in through Israel, stock up on weapons. 0.98

01:46:40.000 That way when they engage with Iran, they've got the Persian Gulf, they've got the Mediterranean, 0.93

01:46:44.000 they've got multiple attack points, Iran and Afghanistan.

01:46:47.000 I guess your idea that Kamala will invade Iran kind of clashes with the Democrats that

01:46:51.000 we currently understand who follow more of a policy of appeasement, right? President

01:46:56.000 Obama famously made the nuclear deal with Iran. John Kerry was right there.

01:47:01.000 Hillary Clinton was right there.

01:47:02.000 They all pursued this idea that they were trying to neutralize Iran as a nuclear threat, but certainly not ready to go to war.

01:47:11.000 Stuxnet.

01:47:12.000 That was Obama.

01:47:15.000 Stuxnet, what's that?

01:47:17.000 That was when the US and Israel under Obama blew up Iranian nuclear centrifuges with one of the most sophisticated cyber attacks in history.

01:47:25.000 A direct attack on Iranian infrastructure from the United States.

01:47:29.000 So that's more of a neutralizing force than open war.

01:47:33.000 I mean, the only reason we didn't get war at that point was because Iran didn't declare it.

01:47:37.000 But Stuxnet, it's an insane move.

01:47:40.000 They said, let's infect every machine on the planet until this thing finds Iranian nuclear centrifuges and then blows them up. 0.92

01:47:47.000 And it did.

01:47:48.000 And it was the U.S.

01:47:49.000 and Israel who did it, and that was under Obama.

01:47:51.000 Well, and Trump certainly launched the airstrike against Soleimani, which was also very provocative.

01:47:57.000 And that's why I'm saying, I don't get the argument.

01:47:59.000 It doesn't matter who you vote for.

01:48:01.000 The military-industrial complex wants this war to happen.

01:48:05.000 You're better bet we got no new wars under Donald Trump.

01:48:08.000 That's probably why the military-industrial complex hates him so much.

01:48:11.000 But we'll move on to other Super Chats, because otherwise we'll talk about Israel forever. 0.95

01:48:15.000 Here, Clint Torres is back.

01:48:18.000 Howdy people, Tim.

01:48:18.000 I get what you're saying regarding the trans boxer in the Olympics, but you're wrong.

01:48:22.000 These female athletes shouldn't have to give up their once every four years or once in a lifetime chance to compete at the highest level to make a statement that men fighting women is wrong. 1.00

01:48:30.000 Any man who justifies a man fighting woman, be it her choice or not, completely lacks the noble rooster spirit you have spoken of in the past.

01:48:38.000 The alternative then is, because there's a male, there's two males I think that are boxing in the Olympics against women, then imagine being a woman and it's like, this is your chance at the Olympics. 0.78

01:48:49.000 You can fight a male or you can bow out.

01:48:52.000 Either way, you've lost.

01:48:54.000 My view is, you're already not participating in the Olympics.

01:48:58.000 They're basically putting on an exhibition match where you're likely going to lose.

01:49:02.000 The male fighter is actually the favorite in the betting market.

01:49:04.000 Surprise, surprise, it's minus 150.

01:49:06.000 Because everyone's going to bet on the male to win against the female. 0.95

01:49:11.000 The male had previously been disqualified.

01:49:13.000 I think two males disqualified from the World Championships for being male and can't fight against women.

01:49:17.000 But the Olympics have allowed them to fight.

01:49:19.000 So, if it were me, and that's just me, and I was in the Olympics as a boxer, and they said, you're going to box, like if I was a woman and said, you're going to box a guy, I'd say, okay.

01:49:31.000 I'd put my hands behind my back, and when they hit the ring, I'd clench my jaw, tighten my abs, and I'd stand there, and I would keep my hands behind my back.

01:49:37.000 I just have a question, though. 0.99

01:49:38.000 Is the boxer allowed punching her penis? 1.00

01:49:43.000 Like, below the belt. 1.00

01:49:45.000 Below the belt is not allowed in boxing.

01:49:47.000 Look, I'm trying to work a joke in this somewhere.

01:49:50.000 The real question is chest shots.

01:49:53.000 Because I do believe that in female boxing there's some restriction on punching in the chest, in the breasts. 1.00

01:49:58.000 So that may actually be an interesting factor.

01:50:01.000 I mean, outright, let's just consider this.

01:50:03.000 The fact that in women's boxing, there is a sensitive area in the breast that has, I believe there's restrictions. 1.00

01:50:11.000 You're not allowed to strike.

01:50:12.000 In boxing, you can hit in the chest.

01:50:13.000 It doesn't affect guys the same way.

01:50:14.000 So that's an advantage for the male competitor.

01:50:17.000 But I mean, I suppose to his point, he's saying she should just fight.

01:50:23.000 And my point is, I'd boycott.

01:50:26.000 I'd say no.

01:50:27.000 Apparently it's an unwritten rule among female boxers, but there's no official rule against it. 1.00

01:50:31.000 And then also in some amateur boxing leagues, women are allowed to wear protective chest plates. 0.99

01:50:38.000 So this is an obvious advantage for a male boxing a female that they do not have a sensitive area on their chest the way women do for boxing. 0.99

01:50:46.000 Are these transgender or are these the intersex?

01:50:51.000 No, these are male XY chromosome and I don't know that they're actually trans.

01:50:54.000 This is an important distinction.

01:50:55.000 The story did not say they were trans.

01:50:57.000 I don't know what trans means.

01:50:58.000 XY chromosome.

01:50:59.000 They're not that rare genetic disorder.

01:51:01.000 They're XY chromosome males. 0.84

01:51:03.000 Their sex test came back as XY.

01:51:05.000 That's what the news report said.

01:51:06.000 Sex tests.

01:51:08.000 Were they born with... X, Y. Yeah. 0.68

01:51:09.000 X, Y. Were they born with, like, female genitalia? 0.99

01:51:12.000 The news report said these are X, Y males and they were disqualified.

01:51:16.000 That's all it says.

01:51:17.000 So all that matters is the issue is they are not listed as transgender competitors.

01:51:22.000 That was not what Reuters or any of these other articles said about it.

01:51:25.000 They said they are she-her, they used she and her pronouns for them, and said that they listed themselves as female.

01:51:32.000 Look, my understanding is that a gold medal in the Olympics is $30,000.

01:51:36.000 This one guy's from Algeria.

01:51:37.000 What's the GDP of Algeria?

01:51:39.000 It's by country.

01:51:40.000 Like, America gives $30,000 to our gold, but... Ah, OK, OK.

01:51:44.000 Either way, you want to win.

01:51:48.000 The gold medal's worth a thousand bucks, so you're going to get one of those, right?

01:51:52.000 I'm telling you, we're going to see countries be like, look, we just want to win and we're going to win by the rules, whatever the rules may be.

01:51:57.000 And so if they send a male to box females, that's what you get.

01:51:59.000 I'm just reading one article where it says, everyone competing in the women's category is complying with eligibility criteria.

01:52:06.000 Quote, they are women in their passports and it's stated that is the case and they are female. 0.98

01:52:14.000 What are we doing to ensure by way of like that there's not just running males and falsifying documents from countries where reliability on documents is questionable at best in general?

01:52:27.000 I don't know.

01:52:28.000 This almost sounds like... It seems like it's a bit of a test run, because didn't they not allow... Pretty sure this guy boxed in 2020 in the Olympics.

01:52:35.000 This male.

01:52:36.000 Against women or? 0.95

01:52:37.000 Against women. 0.99

01:52:38.000 Yeah, there's a photo of it.

01:52:39.000 Let's read some more.

01:52:39.000 We got Berenstain Wolf says, I've been trying to figure out how to reach you in pop culture crisis.

01:52:43.000 There's some more bad Mr. Beast stuff to come, and I was witness to and victim of it.

01:52:49.000 I was a contestant for Beast Games.

01:52:51.000 I can back up everything I say.

01:52:53.000 I've got receipts and additional witnesses.

01:52:56.000 Interesting.

01:52:58.000 Is that a story that you'd be interested in looking into?

01:53:00.000 Well, Chris Burtman's been our one covering it, but I can direct him.

01:53:02.000 How can we get in touch with him?

01:53:03.000 It's always hard to, like... He's ManofBurt on Twitter.

01:53:06.000 He's been covering, like, this whole situation for Scanner.

01:53:09.000 So, tweet... X post?

01:53:13.000 Post at ManofBurt and say, Hannah Clare... DM's open.

01:53:17.000 Yeah, our DM's open.

01:53:18.000 I'll text him right now.

01:53:20.000 Say, Hannah Clare told you to message him and that he has to respond now because, you know, those are the rules.

01:53:29.000 John Leroy says Republicans should respond to weird with the same energy as, your booze mean nothing because I've seen what makes you cheer, I'm good with being weird.

01:53:37.000 I agree, and they're doing half of that, but they're very much being like, you're calling me weird, look what you do, you're weird.

01:53:42.000 And they don't care that you're calling them weird.

01:53:43.000 They say, keep Austin weird, keep Portland weird.

01:53:46.000 They like being called weird.

01:53:47.000 So when you're like, you're calling me weird, here's a picture of you, they're like, uh-huh, that's what I did.

01:53:51.000 It's like there's this picture of me with no hat on, and I have no hair.

01:53:53.000 I am indeed bald.

01:53:55.000 And then they post it, like they're making fun of me.

01:53:57.000 I'm like, my guy, that's a picture I took of myself and posted on the internet!

01:54:01.000 What?

01:54:01.000 Like, it's a selfie of me with no hat.

01:54:03.000 I posted, I went online, I said, took a picture of myself, and I posted it online.

01:54:07.000 And they're like, haha.

01:54:08.000 Very transparent of you.

01:54:09.000 But I understand that sometimes you take someone's screenshot and mock them for it, but they're like, haha, look, your hat's off, and I was like, uh-huh, yeah, I posted that.

01:54:17.000 I've posted that picture.

01:54:19.000 I just, okay.

01:54:21.000 When you go to the leftist, you say, you're weird, they go, we know that, but we're pissing you off, and you're getting triggered and trolled by it, so they're enjoying it. 0.84

01:54:29.000 So that's why when I made that bunny thing about Trump, they really went nuts on responding.

01:54:34.000 This is the funniest thing.

01:54:36.000 I wrote, you know, Trump saying, you know, the world is cruel to you, but now you have Trump and he's hugging the bunny.

01:54:40.000 And the poster's being like, wow, you're so weird.

01:54:43.000 I respond to one guy and I'd be like, appreciate it.

01:54:45.000 And they go, that's a weird response.

01:54:46.000 And I'm like, dude, doubling down doesn't change the fact I enjoy not being status quo, normal, whatever.

01:54:51.000 We're like, we're going to continue to do abnormal things.

01:54:54.000 Call it whatever you want.

01:54:56.000 That rabbit did look delicious in the picture by the way.

01:54:59.000 And then apparently the TimCast crew, my brother made it a video and then Carter added dramatic music to it and so now it's like Trump is moving and he's like putting his head down and there's a music playing.

01:55:11.000 I think you have a child program branch growing out pretty quickly.

01:55:16.000 Well, I told people to add on to the story, and so a bunch of people started making their own versions and tweeting in response of, like, one is Trump running with the sword and the rabbit's charging in behind him, and then, you know, it's good fun.

01:55:28.000 Yeah, Trump and the giant rabbit.

01:55:30.000 A tale for all children.

01:55:33.000 Let's go!

01:55:33.000 Richard Coffey says, my first super chat, check out K. Flay, Weirdo.

01:55:38.000 I like K. Flay.

01:55:40.000 High Enough.

01:55:40.000 That's a good song, isn't it?

01:55:42.000 Rich C says, we need to replace the label of progressive and only use the word degenerate to label them.

01:55:48.000 Perhaps.

01:55:50.000 Omega Rosetsu says, Tim, I predicted every election since 1984 and the only one I got wrong was 2020 because of the shadow campaign.

01:55:56.000 I'm willing to say Trump 2024.

01:55:58.000 That proves it!

01:56:00.000 The real Nostradamus.

01:56:02.000 How old is this person?

01:56:06.000 Born in 1989.

01:56:08.000 What have we here? 0.99

01:56:10.000 Tyler McFarlane says, I think people need to spread the clip of Kamala calling 18- to 24-year-olds stupid again. 0.99

01:56:16.000 Remember that? 0.98

01:56:18.000 It's an easy, rebuffed video clip.

01:56:24.000 What was the best one recently?

01:56:25.000 Recycle the media talking about how incompetent and detested Kamala Harris is. 0.57

01:56:31.000 What we're witnessing with her right now, it's straight out of 1984.

01:56:34.000 Everybody was saying that she's unlikable, unliked, unelectable. 1.00

01:56:39.000 Like that, within a week, the media says she's the greatest thing since sliced bread. 0.74

01:56:42.000 Play Tulsi destroying her at the debate.

01:56:45.000 Yeah, that's an important one.

01:56:47.000 By Victor says, I live in California, my vote doesn't count.

01:56:50.000 If illegals are able to vote in Arizona, do you recommend getting a lot of people to vote in Arizona?

01:56:54.000 The only reason your vote doesn't count in California is because you don't vote.

01:56:57.000 It is the greatest effort of propaganda ever to tell people in California that are conservative, what's the point of voting, you're gonna lose anyway.

01:57:05.000 In AOC's district, if every single conservative person voted, she would lose.

01:57:10.000 And she would lose by, like, 20%.

01:57:13.000 She gets around 100 or so thousand votes, like 120 or something, what is it, 117 maybe?

01:57:16.000 Might be 150.

01:57:17.000 what is it, 117 maybe? Might be 150.

01:57:19.000 And her district is around, I think, like 180 to 200,000 conservative-leaning people.

01:57:26.000 They just don't vote.

01:57:28.000 And because they don't vote, they don't win.

01:57:30.000 I mean, there is a reason that Andy Bashir, the governor of Kentucky, is the only Democrat in that area.

01:57:37.000 It's because Democrats decided that was something that they wanted to try and win, right?

01:57:41.000 And he's been reelected, I think, at least twice.

01:57:44.000 It's a solidly red state in many other aspects.

01:57:47.000 The idea that these are just completely lost territory is because, you know, the presidency is going to go one way is kind of false thinking.

01:57:53.000 There are so many other people on the ticket that you should turn out for.

01:57:57.000 When was there ever a Republican that was competitive in California?

01:58:01.000 But they send Republican senators, they send Republicans to Congress.

01:58:05.000 Republican congressmen, but not senators.

01:58:08.000 That's what I mean.

01:58:08.000 Maybe you might not get Trump elected from California, but he's not the only race this year.

01:58:13.000 Right.

01:58:13.000 Justin Conrad says, Tim, you've avoided the protests in D.C.

01:58:16.000 and the 24th like the plague.

01:58:18.000 Tonight you said protests months ago.

01:58:20.000 It was days ago.

01:58:22.000 I wasn't talking about in D.C.

01:58:23.000 I said there's unrest across the country over Israel, like at all these different universities.

01:58:28.000 Avoided the protests in D.C.

01:58:30.000 like the plague.

01:58:30.000 Like, what do you mean?

01:58:33.000 Am I supposed to go there?

01:58:35.000 Not that far away.

01:58:35.000 I don't know.

01:58:37.000 I thought we did talk about them, because I remember talking about the flag being taken down, and we also talked about the fact that a lot was on the ground there.

01:58:46.000 And we talked about how the problem is they stole the flag from the public and burned it down.

01:58:51.000 And I made the point that it's funny that people don't watch the show, and they're like, why didn't you talk about this thing?

01:58:58.000 My favorite, however, is when the title of the video, like we have an episode and it's like, you know, Donald Trump questions this thing.

01:59:07.000 And then it's an hour into the show and someone super chats, you guys need to talk about title of video.

01:59:12.000 And I'm like, what?

01:59:14.000 That's the title of the video is the first thing we talked about.

01:59:17.000 So, yeah, I mentioned, like, burning the American flag, I think, is fine. 1.00

01:59:21.000 Trump said that, you know, if you burn the American flag, you should get a year in jail.

01:59:27.000 And my point is, if it's in the context of stealing public property and setting a fire in public, completely agree.

01:59:36.000 If it's in the context of buying an American flag for yourself, going into your own fire pit on your property and having a fire in a safe manner, absolutely not.

01:59:46.000 However, I think Trump's context is mostly that they tore down an American flag from public property and then burned it in the street.

01:59:53.000 Federal property.

01:59:54.000 Federal property, right.

01:59:55.000 And so you go, you're in jail for that.

01:59:56.000 I'm like, yeah, absolutely.

01:59:57.000 You could probably make that happen.

01:59:59.000 Absolutely.

02:00:00.000 You, like, destruction of federal property, I think already, I'm pretty sure there's already a law in the book saying you go to prison for that.

02:00:06.000 And then the left argues, we're allowed to burn the American flag and it's free speech.

02:00:10.000 Yeah, you're allowed to burn the American flag and if you burn tire marks on a trans, on a LGBT flag on the street. 0.89

02:00:15.000 You're not allowed to burn the American flag unless you own it. 0.71

02:00:18.000 That's the point.

02:00:19.000 So they steal the flag from the federal property, destroy it, the law they broke, theft of public property.

02:00:26.000 destruction of public property, starting a fire in public, which is probably endangering the public, reckless endangerment, and it's probably five years in prison, right off the bat.

02:00:37.000 All right, everybody, if you haven't already, smash the like button, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member over at TimCast.com, because we're going to have that members-only call-in show coming up in just a few minutes.

02:00:47.000 You don't want to miss it, where you as members get to call in and talk to us and join us and our guests.

02:00:51.000 It's not so family-friendly, so it's, you know, the kids, time to go to bed, it's a school night, and then we're going to talk about some awful things in the media.

02:00:59.000 Should be fun.

02:01:00.000 You can follow the show at TimCastIRL everywhere.

02:01:03.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast on X and Instagram.

02:01:07.000 Charlie, do you want to shout anything out?

02:01:09.000 Yep.

02:01:09.000 Kamala Harris and the White House, Amateur Hour, still for sale.

02:01:12.000 Get it.

02:01:13.000 If you can't find it on Amazon, try some of the other sites.

02:01:15.000 Did anybody think that you had just written it, like recently?

02:01:18.000 Yes, actually, I did do an interview where they're like, I see that you wrote a preview of what's going on today.

02:01:23.000 And I was like, no, I wrote that in January 2023, where I examined what it would look like when Biden stepped down.

02:01:29.000 Wow.

02:01:30.000 It's scary.

02:01:30.000 Alan Lickman's gonna hit you up.

02:01:33.000 It scarily came true.

02:01:35.000 It's very surreal at this point, but do check it out.

02:01:38.000 As we go into this election, it's important to know more about Kamala Harris than just hashtag word salad, hashtag Willie Brown.

02:01:45.000 It'll give you all the facts that you need to know.

02:01:47.000 Right on.

02:01:49.000 VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com, TheVivaFry on Twitter, and Viva Fry on Rumble.

02:01:54.000 I'll be back in the free state.

02:01:55.000 I'm back in the free country now, at least, but I'll get back to the free state of Florida by the end of the week and back to my home studio.

02:02:00.000 Right on.

02:02:01.000 It was good to be here again.

02:02:02.000 You can find me at Shane Cashman everywhere.

02:02:04.000 The show is Tales from the Inverted World on YouTube.

02:02:07.000 After last night's IRL bump, we're almost at 45,000 subscribers.

02:02:11.000 So make it happen.

02:02:13.000 We go live every Sunday at 6 p.m.

02:02:16.000 Eastern Time.

02:02:16.000 We'll see you there.

02:02:18.000 I'm glad all of you could join us tonight.

02:02:19.000 I think it's been really interesting.

02:02:21.000 I'm Hannah-Claire Brimel.

02:02:21.000 I'm a writer for SCNR.com.

02:02:23.000 That's Scanner News.

02:02:24.000 Follow all our work at TimCastNews on the internet.

02:02:26.000 I'm also on the internet at HannahClaireB on X and at HannahClaire.B on Instagram.

02:02:33.000 Thanks for everything you guys do.

02:02:34.000 Have a good night.

02:02:34.000 We'll see you all over at TimCast.com in about one minute.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - July 31, 2024

Secret Service Warns Of ANOTHER TRUMP ASSASSINATION Attempt Coming w-Charlie Spiering | Timcast IRL

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript