Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - ALEX JONES RETURNS, Elon Musk Restores Jones, Rumble Hit By CYBER ATTACK w-Anna Perez

00:00:00.000 Alex Jones is back on X, formerly known as Twitter.

00:00:14.000 Elon Musk ran a poll.

00:00:16.000 The people spoke.

00:00:17.000 They said, we want Alex Jones back.

00:00:19.000 And so Elon Musk has restored him.

00:00:21.000 Following this, Elon Musk, Alex Jones, the Tate brothers, Vivek Ramaswamy, many others joined an X space, we call them X spaces,

00:00:30.000 and it was particularly interesting, talking about free speech and where we're currently at.

00:00:35.000 Alex Jones went on Steven Crowder's show talking about the PR firms that were going after him,

00:00:39.000 and interestingly, all day, Rumble has been under a sustained distributed denial of service attack,

00:00:47.000 which I can only assume is political, based on what's going on in the media, of course,

00:00:50.000 is losing their collective minds.

00:00:52.000 And another component of the story is that apparently, during the space on X, The Vape Krama Swami left his mic on and relieved himself in the bathroom while everyone listened.

00:01:04.000 And I don't believe that's true.

00:01:06.000 That's what they're claiming.

00:01:07.000 It actually kind of sounds like, I don't know, he was washing his hands or making an espresso or something.

00:01:11.000 It certainly does not sound like he's using the bathroom, but his mic was left on.

00:01:13.000 So we'll talk about that.

00:01:15.000 We got a bunch of other stories.

00:01:16.000 Ladies and gentlemen, it is a victory, victory, victory kind of day starting off, especially with the return of not just Alex Jones, but also Owen Schroyer, who's out of jail.

00:01:24.000 And we're also hearing that not just the president of UPenn, but also one of their board members, I believe the chair, have resigned over this major scandal.

00:01:32.000 And Saturday Night Live is getting slammed because guess what?

00:01:35.000 Guess who they sided with? 0.99

00:01:37.000 They made Elise Stefanik, the Republican rep, look stupid, they mocked her, and tried to make the presidents of these universities look good. 1.00

00:01:46.000 The interesting thing is, the president of Harvard apparently is now embroiled in a plagiarism scandal. 0.92

00:01:50.000 So we'll get into all that, but before we get started, my friends, head over to TheBestSongEver.com and click pre-order on Amazon, which you can see right there.

00:02:01.000 And, uh, buy the song for 69 cents.

00:02:03.000 Together Again is the best song ever written.

00:02:05.000 And I can say it because I didn't write it.

00:02:07.000 It was written by, uh, I don't know who the writing credits go to, but it is written and performed by Smokey Mike and the God King, who you probably know as Jeremy Boring and Michael Knowles of The Daily Wire.

00:02:17.000 And let me just give you the simple version.

00:02:20.000 They wrote this song essentially as a big F you to the music industry that says no outsiders and is captured by the woke and we wrote our cover of their song mocking modern music for much the same reason and the whole point of the song is basically just a mockery of the music industry being captured by woke institutions.

00:02:38.000 The music video and song drops December 15th so this Friday but you can pre-order right now And if we sell enough of these through iTunes or Amazon, we will hit the billboard charts and then that middle finger will be in their own industry.

00:02:53.000 And wouldn't that be something?

00:02:54.000 So if you want to support us in that endeavor, please do so.

00:02:56.000 Also, head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member if you would like to watch the members-only uncensored show coming up at 10pm.

00:03:04.000 And if you want to support our work directly, this is the best way to do it.

00:03:07.000 You'll also get access to our Discord server where you can hang out.

00:03:10.000 It's effectively a big chat room where you can hang out with like-minded individuals,

00:03:13.000 and they have pre-shows, they have after-shows, there's a whole bunch of content being made

00:03:16.000 there.

00:03:17.000 So don't forget to also smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show

00:03:21.000 with your friends if you really do like it.

00:03:22.000 Joining us to talk about this and everything else is Anna Perez.

00:03:25.000 Yeah, thank you for having me, Tim, and everyone else.

00:03:27.000 I'm really excited to be here, and I host a show called WrongThink on Conservative Daily.

00:03:36.000 I host a show called WrongThink Primetime on the Stu Peters Network.

00:03:39.000 So yeah, I'm really excited to jump in.

00:03:41.000 Obviously, we have a lot of news as it pertains to Rumble, so that affected me today, so I'm excited to talk about that.

00:03:45.000 A bunch of people's streams were shut down.

00:03:47.000 Yeah.

00:03:47.000 And interestingly, right around the time Steven Crowder was talking to Alex Jones, I couldn't get the site to load.

00:03:52.000 So yeah, we'll talk about it.

00:03:53.000 Thanks for hanging out.

00:03:54.000 And guess who's back?

00:03:55.000 Welcome back!

00:03:57.000 Beautiful and amazing human beings.

00:03:58.000 My name is Zorkadowski here of WeAreChange.org and it's an incredible time to be alive.

00:04:03.000 It almost feels like it's a renaissance.

00:04:05.000 We have an anarchistic president of Argentina that is firing bureaucrats about to shut down their central bank.

00:04:12.000 Owen Schroer was just released from jail Alex Jones was ... just reinstated and did a space with Elon Musk Andrew ... Tate Patrick bad David congressman Matt Gates holy ... freaking cow it definitely seems like the tide is turning ... I host of course the best political show.com and if ... you want to support me you can buy getting one of these ... wonderful shirts that I have right now perfect for family ... gatherings that to talk about how Christmas likes are like ...

00:04:38.000 According to blank, blank, blank, which you could find out what it says by going to, of course, thebestpoliticalshirts.com.

00:04:44.000 Guys, thank you so much for having me.

00:04:45.000 It's good to be back.

00:04:46.000 It is good to have you back, Luke.

00:04:47.000 I love you, man.

00:04:48.000 It's a pleasure.

00:04:49.000 Uh, yo, it does feel like something's changing.

00:04:52.000 Big time.

00:04:52.000 Like there's something's coming to a head that, like, people are separating the ones that are willing to risk and sacrifice their lives for what they believe in are standing out.

00:05:00.000 Like, it's really, really hit me hard the other night.

00:05:02.000 So let's just get to this, Serge.

00:05:04.000 What's happening, brother?

00:05:05.000 Good to have you back, Luke.

00:05:07.000 Sir?

00:05:08.000 Yeah, I'm Serge.com.

00:05:10.000 I'm ready when you are, too.

00:05:12.000 All right, ladies and gentlemen, the big news over the weekend, and we're using Snopes for our story here because, believe it or not, the least biased story about the return of Alex Jones, sort of, is Snopes!

00:05:25.000 Fact check, yes.

00:05:26.000 Alex Jones's ex-account was reinstated by Elon Musk, the founder of conspiracy theory website Infowars, was banned from Twitter, currently known as X, in 2018 and reinstated in 2023.

00:05:36.000 Now, I do want to just point out, If you're gonna call InfoWars a conspiracy theory website, I can call Snopes, CNN, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the list goes on.

00:05:49.000 We can call them all conspiracy theory websites.

00:05:54.000 Because they all run stories and have historically done so.

00:05:58.000 Like, the idea that the government was spying on us.

00:06:01.000 Conspiracy theory.

00:06:02.000 Oh, was that true?

00:06:03.000 How about Russiagate?

00:06:04.000 That was one that wasn't true.

00:06:06.000 They all run lies and conspiracies.

00:06:07.000 But they do use this photo of a very angry-looking Alex Jones.

00:06:10.000 Claim!

00:06:11.000 In December 2023, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones' Twitter account, RealAlexJones, was reinstated by Elon Musk after having been banned for abusive behavior since 2018.

00:06:19.000 True!

00:06:20.000 I love this one.

00:06:21.000 And then on, uh, they show a Reddit post.

00:06:24.000 Alex Jones and his conspiracy theories are allowed back on X. Here's the actual poll in question with 1,966,125 votes.

00:06:29.000 1,966,125 votes, reinstate Alex Jones on the platform Vox Populi, Vox Dei, and 70.1% said

00:06:39.000 yes.

00:06:40.000 Well, there you have it.

00:06:41.000 Of course, the media is absolutely losing their mind over the return of Alex Jones. 0.71

00:06:46.000 They're saying a whole bunch of really dumb things, and they're insulting Elon Musk over the whole thing, but let's just call this a major victory.

00:06:54.000 Well, conspiracy theories are really just spoiler alerts. 0.50

00:06:57.000 They're just news headlines six months ahead of the time, and I am pissed off at the cultural appropriation of something that I've been labeled for over 20 years.

00:07:05.000 Conspiracy theories have, of course, A new day and age on this internet as of course no one ... takes the term seriously anymore as a lot of the ... people who are accused of it have usually been right and it's ... beautiful it's amazing to see this kind of emotional ... hyperbolic freak out from CNN from the Rolling Stones from ... all these other establishment.

00:07:26.000 We are winning.

00:07:27.000 that are losing their minds at people just being able to speak for themselves and having

00:07:27.000 It's amazing.

00:07:27.000 It's beautiful.

00:07:32.000 discernment and having conversations that they can't control.

00:07:35.000 Al Gore recently came out and said the dangers to democracy are specifically because people

00:07:40.000 are able to get news outside of the corporate media control.

00:07:44.000 We are winning.

00:07:45.000 It's amazing.

00:07:46.000 It's beautiful.

00:07:47.000 And them losing their mind is a testament to just how far we have come.

00:07:50.000 Yeah.

00:07:51.000 And I think that that's exactly what they sought to do.

00:07:53.000 They really thought that they could get rid of Alex Jones.

00:07:55.000 And I think that's been really interesting to watch because if there's one thing that I've noticed in the past couple of years, it's that They can cancel you from certain platforms.

00:08:03.000 They can cancel you from certain corporate corporations.

00:08:06.000 But at the end of the day, if you have a certain following and you've been proven right time and time again, and that's certainly the case with Alex Jones, there's still going to be a population of people that want to hear from you.

00:08:18.000 They're going to seek you out.

00:08:20.000 And as far as a business owner, somebody like Elon Musk, if he owns X, then it's going to be the smart thing to do to allow him to be sought out on his platform.

00:08:30.000 So, I think what you see a lot with figures like Alex is they just, they try to, they think that if they remove the platform that they can remove him.

00:08:39.000 But he already has his following, and that wasn't going anywhere.

00:08:41.000 People were going to seek him out regardless.

00:08:42.000 Andrew Tate, on the show, on the X episode, if you haven't watched it after the show, you gotta watch the X show with all these guys on it.

00:08:49.000 Andrew Tate came in and he said, everything, people think they own things.

00:08:51.000 You think you own your house.

00:08:52.000 You have paperwork that says that if a government comes in and says now they sign some new paperwork, you don't have anything.

00:08:57.000 All you have is your integrity.

00:08:58.000 And that's something that Alex has stuck with for his entire career, which I appreciate.

00:09:02.000 And I think that's why he's still popular.

00:09:04.000 I think Elon Musk is doing the obvious thing in terms of free speech.

00:09:09.000 I don't believe that Elon Musk ever really bought the reason for Alex Jones's ban.

00:09:14.000 So when Elon buys Twitter, he says, well, you know, Alex Jones ragged on, you know, Sandy Hook families and said horrible things about him, so I'm not bringing him back.

00:09:22.000 I don't think Elon actually believed it.

00:09:24.000 I think what Elon was actually saying, and again, my opinion, I could be totally wrong about this because I can't read Elon's mind.

00:09:28.000 He was probably saying, guys, there's only so much I can do.

00:09:31.000 Like, give me time.

00:09:32.000 I think Elon was like, yeah, he didn't break the rules.

00:09:35.000 He just says crazy things.

00:09:37.000 But Elon's like, yo, we're trying to maintain control here and gradually move the line. 0.99

00:09:43.000 If we just go nuts and just unleash the damn right now, we can get shut down like they did to Parler. 0.97

00:09:47.000 But I think there's actually something really simple in all this too. 0.99

00:09:50.000 We can sit here and say Elon Musk is ideologically motivated and fighting the good fight, sure.

00:09:54.000 But let's be realistic about the business prospects of what he did on X. Like you mentioned, Alex Jones' audience still exists.

00:10:02.000 So the analogy I gave earlier on my channel was like, the poll Elon Musk did was like, imagine you owned a cupcake shop, and all your customers are in the lobby, and you just yell, how many of you would buy a pumpkin cupcake and they all raise their hand?

00:10:13.000 Well then you go and make it.

00:10:15.000 That's it.

00:10:16.000 Elon Musk is asking his customers what kind of product they want.

00:10:19.000 But here's the funny thing.

00:10:20.000 Just like with The Daily Wire, making all these movies, Elon Musk is looking at Alex Jones getting millions of views while being banned from everywhere and he's thinking, if I let Alex Jones on Twitter, I have a monopoly on Alex Jones.

00:10:32.000 All his content is going to be here.

00:10:33.000 It's going to bring all of his fans back.

00:10:35.000 It's going to bring engagement to the platform.

00:10:37.000 We're going to make money.

00:10:38.000 Let's roll.

00:10:38.000 And it pushes the Overton window.

00:10:40.000 And I think it's not an accident that a lot of this is happening on the heels of Apple, Disney, Comcast and other major corporations saying, hey, we're no longer going to advertise on, of course, Twitter and X. Elon Musk responded saying in a very French way, screw off.

00:10:58.000 And by doing so, this is he could say it.

00:11:02.000 But when his actions are met by bringing back Alex Jones, that's the biggest F off kind of moment that you could have that are far more powerful than just the words that he used.

00:11:14.000 But imagine, because it's not just these corporations, it's not just Facebook, it's not just YouTube, it's not individuals.

00:11:21.000 Banning Alex Jones from all these social media platforms.

00:11:24.000 There are federal agents that orchestrated all of this.

00:11:27.000 There are federal agencies that literally worked on silencing and making sure that no one could hear Alex Jones, his opinions, or his perspectives at all.

00:11:36.000 Imagine being that federal agent right now.

00:11:38.000 A couple of years ago, I'd be like, yes, we banned him on Spotify.

00:11:40.000 We banned him on all these other... LinkedIn.

00:11:43.000 He's not even on LinkedIn.

00:11:44.000 Doesn't matter.

00:11:44.000 We banned him here.

00:11:46.000 And now he's on One of the biggest shows with Elon Musk speaking to the world with millions of people listening to him.

00:11:53.000 And more and more people are going to go to that platform.

00:11:56.000 I know I am.

00:11:57.000 One of our Super Chats, Greg Duvier, says that he's asking the elites would still have control of Twitter if they didn't ban the Babylon Bee.

00:12:04.000 And I said, I bet they regret that every day.

00:12:06.000 I don't think that's the real reason Elon Musk bought Twitter.

00:12:09.000 And I say this because I was at a party in Austin with a bunch of big tech bros and people who are friends with with Elon and a bunch of other conservative commentators and libertarians, and the whole conversation was around how they use big tech to censor and control culture.

00:12:23.000 And I was arguing with them like, guys, culture is more important than technology.

00:12:27.000 Technology is important, but like winning the culture matters.

00:12:30.000 And their argument, Elon wasn't there or anything, but their argument was basically If they ban you, you can't make culture at all.

00:12:38.000 If on Twitter they have banned all instances of a certain word, then they have basically created a path, the only path you can go down.

00:12:47.000 And so, unsurprisingly, Elon ends up buying the platform.

00:12:50.000 It may be that the final straw was the Babylon Bee got banned.

00:12:54.000 I think that's a good narrative, especially for someone like Elon.

00:12:58.000 But I kind of feel like this is a long time coming.

00:13:01.000 I think Elon's paying attention to all this stuff.

00:13:03.000 He didn't adopt these views one day.

00:13:05.000 You know, it's not like all of a sudden he's like, what, they banned the Babylon Bee?

00:13:07.000 All of a sudden I'm for free speech.

00:13:09.000 He's probably supported this stuff for a very long time.

00:13:11.000 Yeah, I think it's a similar concept to kind of the psyop of every single conservative needs to move out of cities.

00:13:18.000 Here's the reality.

00:13:19.000 Somebody has to make a cultural difference.

00:13:21.000 And right now, the only way to really do that is to have some sort of Influence on in cities where the cultural hubs are now is that good culture that we have right now?

00:13:30.000 No, but it's the same thing as social media platforms like as much as we don't want to have to participate in you know walking around Walking on eggshells when it comes to these social media platforms like we did for so long with Twitter We have to have a presence on these apps, on these social media platforms in order to make some sort of cultural change as conservatives.

00:13:49.000 And so I think you're right.

00:13:49.000 Elon did the right thing.

00:13:51.000 Elon did something where he saw, OK, well, the only way for this for there to be a fair sort of cultural balance out there would be to give conservatives the opportunity to be on this app.

00:14:02.000 I think it wasn't necessarily like a political move per se, although he'll argue he's free speech.

00:14:07.000 I don't think the guy is.

00:14:08.000 I think that if he were, he would bring back Nick Fuentes, and I think that he wouldn't have created the poll, and maybe we differ on that or we disagree on that, but I think that the poll was all about self-preservation and was more about, and to be fair, feds would have come after him too, so to your point, like, You know there were feds involved in silencing people like Alex Jones and even Nick Fuentes and others like that so I think it's all about well I can point back to this was the people's decision and they might still come after him but at the end of the day like I do think that was partly an opportunity for himself to for him to protect himself but I think ultimately he did it for there to be some sort of balance out there which I think is good but again not necessarily politically motivated.

00:14:49.000 That's a good point.

00:14:50.000 Uh, if he was for free speech, he wouldn't need a poll.

00:14:53.000 He'd just say, Alex, you're fine.

00:14:54.000 Nick, you're fine.

00:14:55.000 Milo, you're fine.

00:14:56.000 You're back.

00:14:56.000 Don't worry about it.

00:14:57.000 They wouldn't have banned Kanye West.

00:14:59.000 Ye is still banned, right?

00:15:01.000 I believe so, and I think so is Milo as well.

00:15:05.000 Ye posted the Realism symbol, which looks like a Star of Dave with a swastika in it.

00:15:10.000 But Realism, like, what is it?

00:15:11.000 Like they believe aliens or something seeded Earth?

00:15:13.000 I don't know what they believe.

00:15:14.000 But to those who have no idea what it is, it looks like something meant to be offensive.

00:15:18.000 He gets banned for this.

00:15:20.000 I think if Elon was for free speech, he wouldn't need a poll.

00:15:21.000 That's a good point.

00:15:23.000 And I think maybe Elon's motivation is actually simple.

00:15:26.000 He wants to colonize Mars.

00:15:27.000 He wants a neural link.

00:15:28.000 And he's thinking, Look, that meme he posted where it's the left moving further and further left, he's realized what many of us have realized.

00:15:36.000 You said as conservatives.

00:15:37.000 I don't consider myself conservative and Luke doesn't consider himself conservative.

00:15:40.000 This coalition of individuals who believe in free speech is wide.

00:15:44.000 Elon probably said, The majority of people think these things.

00:15:48.000 I wouldn't be surprised if he had like a marketing consultant and he was like, where is the sentiment?

00:15:53.000 Are they really, you know, lefty and woke?

00:15:54.000 And they're like, no, it's probably like 12%.

00:15:56.000 Elon's like, okay, so our path forward for popular success is going to be embracing these principles that people actually do like.

00:16:03.000 He probably sees the wind moving in a particular direction, especially with this election, and he's like, OK, how do we get ahead of it?

00:16:09.000 How do we put ourselves in a way where we could still win while the whole system kind of collapses onto itself?

00:16:15.000 So I agree with you on that one particular point.

00:16:20.000 Yes, he's trying to kind of protect himself with this poll, but I don't think it's even the poll.

00:16:24.000 I think it's even bigger than this.

00:16:25.000 If you look at his contracts with the defense industry, with the US military, with the Pentagon, when it comes to Starlink, when it comes to providing Ukraine and Israel satellite technology that are used for defensive and offensive capabilities, those capabilities are at his disposal to use and implement as he wants.

00:16:44.000 That, to me, in my opinion, is why he's going to be kind of protected here.

00:16:49.000 And if it wasn't for those kind of larger government contracts, And the larger kind of game that he plays with a lot of the bigger kind of players here, I think he would have been gone.

00:16:59.000 I think he would have been destroyed a long time ago.

00:17:01.000 And I think this really does play a central role in a lot of this.

00:17:04.000 So I got Alex Jones pulled over right here.

00:17:06.000 And one of his tweets from 22 minutes ago, Jack Posobiec issues emergency warning, deep state planning direct war with Russia as October surprise.

00:17:14.000 Now, excuse me, this is from Jack Posobiec, Alex Jones putting out this information.

00:17:19.000 This is exactly why they don't want Alex Jones having a voice.

00:17:23.000 Because y'all remember when Alex Jones went on the show and said that, come February, there's going to be a war, it's going to be big.

00:17:30.000 And then when Russia invaded Ukraine, everybody immediately was tweeting Alex Jones was right. 0.92

00:17:36.000 He predicted this.

00:17:36.000 They were all sharing this clip from several months prior.

00:17:39.000 My favorite thing about this, Is everyone's like, how did Alex Jones know a war was gonna start?

00:17:45.000 How did he know?

00:17:46.000 He's just so smart, he can see it!

00:17:48.000 And so I talked to him, and he was like, I just read the news, it was in the news!

00:17:51.000 Like, this is the funny thing.

00:17:54.000 Alex is a guy who reads the news and then says it, he like, looks at all these articles and brings them together.

00:17:58.000 Granted, he says a lot of crazy things, he gets crazy things wrong, like he was talking about cell phones and animal hybrids, whatever that's about.

00:18:02.000 But he gets a lot of things right when it comes to this stuff.

00:18:05.000 It wasn't shocking to anybody who actually listens to him that he accurately called out a war, because all he was doing was holding up, like, articles from the AP.

00:18:11.000 That's what he's doing here, retweeting Jack Posobiec.

00:18:14.000 Exactly, that's my point.

00:18:15.000 And it's not just him, it's members of the Polish government, members of the German government coming out.

00:18:20.000 One of Germany's top soldiers just came out and said that they are, of course, Planning on potentially even having a defensive war against Russia.

00:18:28.000 Of course, there's there's no such thing.

00:18:30.000 It's an offensive war.

00:18:31.000 But this is something that it's not just Alex Jones talking about.

00:18:35.000 Government officials are actually talking about this and setting down essentially the groundwork for what could be a big potential conflict that could potentially unfold, especially right before this election.

00:18:46.000 I want to pull up this tweet from Steven Crowder.

00:18:48.000 It is from his discussion with Alex Jones this morning.

00:18:50.000 He says, quote, This was a strategic Democratic party and PR operation.

00:18:55.000 Alex Jones clears the air on why his Twitter account was banned, how it feels to be reinstated on X by Elon, as well as what his future plans are.

00:19:03.000 So let's play this clip so we can hear it straight from Crowder's show.

00:19:06.000 Because of something to do with Sandy Hook.

00:19:09.000 A lot of people think that you were banned from Twitter because of something to do with Sandy Hook.

00:19:14.000 Elon clarified that the reason you were banned from Twitter had to do with that sniveling worm Oliver Darcy.

00:19:21.000 Nothing to do with Sandy Hook.

00:19:23.000 But the actual reason for suspending him was he basically insulted a journalist.

00:19:27.000 They de-platform us for a bunch of made-up crazy stuff.

00:19:31.000 The last thing was Oliver Darcy.

00:19:33.000 Later, before they ever sued me, They were saying I'm the Sandy Hook guy and I'm attacking the families and sending people to their houses and none of it was true and no one was even going to their houses and people were peeing on graves and none of it was true.

00:19:43.000 None of that was even shown in court.

00:19:44.000 They were like, I'll just get up and say it with no evidence because I was already found guilty.

00:19:48.000 And so I started saying, hey, I think it happened.

00:19:48.000 Right.

00:19:51.000 I'd already said that, by the way.

00:19:53.000 I did an apology tour on Joe Rogan and Patrick McDavid before I even got sued and said, hey, here I am years ago saying I think it happened.

00:20:00.000 And they said, oh, now you admit you lied and did it for money.

00:20:04.000 This was strategic Democratic Party.

00:20:08.000 I think so.

00:20:12.000 I think we know for a fact that right now as we're entering 2024, I mean so this is back in 2018, entering 2024 we have, I'm not gonna name the groups, you guys can if you want to, there are these Democrat PR, Democrat, non-profit, 501c4 type organizations, all they do is launch lawsuits in order to win elections.

00:20:33.000 If you think the 2024 election is simply how many people can go and cast their ballot, you're wrong.

00:20:38.000 A whole lot of it is going to be procedural fights, it's going to be court battles, and I think a big component Of why not just Alex Jones, because it was a coordinated move that got him banned.

00:20:48.000 Like, we can see him wiped from every platform instantly.

00:20:51.000 But there were many other people.

00:20:52.000 Paul Joseph Watson got banned from Instagram.

00:20:54.000 And what did he have?

00:20:55.000 He had pictures of him, like, smoking a cigarette by the sunset. 0.96

00:20:58.000 Just, like, ridiculous things.

00:20:59.000 Like, what are you banning him for? 0.94

00:21:01.000 It is political.

00:21:02.000 Moving into 2024, I would not be surprised if we see a ton of moves like this.

00:21:07.000 That being said, With Elon Musk owning Axe, it's going the other direction.

00:21:11.000 We're starting to win this one.

00:21:12.000 Especially with other institutions like Rumble out there.

00:21:15.000 Now, Rumble also has a very interesting lawsuit against some of these, you call them democratic organizations, I call them more government intel connected organizations that are also financed with billionaires, individuals' names, like George Soros, who of course do play a major role in our political discourse.

00:21:33.000 When you see the kind of coordinated attacks that happened a couple years ago, it wasn't social media.

00:21:39.000 It was government officials.

00:21:41.000 We found that out through the Twitter files.

00:21:42.000 We found that out through all the disclosures.

00:21:45.000 We found out that U.S.

00:21:46.000 government officials, FBI officials, Intel officials were saying, hey, we don't like what these people are saying.

00:21:51.000 Shut down these individual voices.

00:21:54.000 They're talking about this kind of news reporting that we don't like.

00:21:56.000 Shut them down immediately.

00:21:57.000 And they did.

00:21:59.000 Your tax dollars essentially financed a lot of this and I really hope that these new lawsuits really shed a light and we have a lot of discovery specifically when it comes to the larger involvement of outside forces, not just democratic organizations that are playing a major role here.

00:22:15.000 Well you mentioned Soros and I think that's actually a really crucial part to all of this because for so long the way that they got you to not ask questions or file lawsuits was they kind of associated insulting Soros, criticizing Soros with you being anti-semitic or you know calling you names, throwing labels at you and that was actually quite effective for a few years there I would say between Trump running in 2015 to about 2019, that was pretty effective to throw certain labels at you.

00:22:42.000 Then I think Americans started to wake up, by and large, people who weren't even political by nature, they started to realize, okay, these labels don't actually mean anything because my next-door neighbor is being called a racist for having a Gadsden flag or something like that.

00:22:54.000 They started to realize these labels didn't mean anything.

00:22:57.000 Then they started actually investigating it, who Soros really is.

00:23:00.000 I think more Americans are aware of These strategies that the left has used for so long are just the, you know, the uniparty at large to silence us.

00:23:08.000 This idea that you can't question anything.

00:23:11.000 Americans are aware more than ever before that we've been lied to about not just the government, but about who these people are that we're surrounded by in our communities.

00:23:19.000 And, you know, we look around like, you know, the people who were silenced very early on, and we're like, like Milo Yiannopoulos, for example, or Gavin McInnes, and it's like, these people are not who they told us they were.

00:23:30.000 You know, I know the exact moment when the tides turned.

00:23:34.000 It was when Taylor Swift called out George Soros several years ago.

00:23:38.000 I'm half kidding by the way, but Taylor Swift calls out the Soros family because they undercut her and I do think That does open the door a little bit for people to criticize George Soros.

00:23:50.000 A lot of conservatives are attacking Taylor, but I'm like, dude, she put up this big post talking about how her music was stolen from her.

00:23:55.000 It's not political at all.

00:23:56.000 But now, well now there are going to be a lot of people who are critical of George Soros in a completely apolitical context.

00:24:02.000 You can't call them all anti-semitic anymore.

00:24:04.000 Right.

00:24:04.000 And I think that's what it took to bring it into the mainstream, because Taylor Swift is in the mainstream.

00:24:09.000 I think that's a really, really good point.

00:24:10.000 I actually think it's like, it's true.

00:24:12.000 Like, I mean, like, I think that in order to make something to be effective, you need to somehow bring it into the mainstream.

00:24:18.000 It can't just be a, like, political junkie talking point.

00:24:21.000 This is why I think it's a psy-op, all these conservatives attacking Taylor Swift.

00:24:25.000 Because all of a sudden these accounts on Twitter are like, Taylor's working for George Soros, and I was like, well, she doesn't like the guy.

00:24:29.000 She's posted against him.

00:24:31.000 Take the opportunity, man!

00:24:32.000 Take the win!

00:24:33.000 You got- I think this would be a really great video for Freedom Tunes, where it's like a bunch of 17-year-old girls screaming, George Soros ripped off Taylor Swift, and the media's calling them all anti-Semites.

00:24:43.000 It's a shame that that guy's not here.

00:24:44.000 But anyway, I wanted to bring up another point here, what we were just talking about, because it was Alex.

00:24:51.000 It was Milo.

00:24:52.000 It was Gavin.

00:24:53.000 It was Robinson.

00:24:54.000 A lot of big, prominent individuals were censored.

00:24:57.000 But more importantly, a lot of kind of smaller, up-and-coming content creators were also censored and then obliterated and had their entire careers destroyed.

00:25:05.000 They weren't the big guys.

00:25:07.000 They weren't the big players that could sustain these attacks.

00:25:10.000 And I think truly the biggest damage that happened was on all the people that are coming up that we're going to have an impact now, that we're going to be prominent, that we're going to be big, but had no chance because the algorithm screwed them over, destroyed them, demonetized them, and hurt our kind of discourse more than we could even imagine.

00:25:28.000 Parlor would be Twitter right now.

00:25:29.000 Exactly.

00:25:29.000 That's crazy.

00:25:32.000 Wargaming, I mean, if we're really concerned with a war with Russia, we have to look at this as common sense, realistic as possible, that these centralized services are vulnerabilities.

00:25:40.000 Like, if Elon holds Twitter on a central service, Verizon can shut him down, the government can go in there and get his whoever, wherever they're hosted can shut him down.

00:25:48.000 They need to decentralize this service as quick as possible.

00:25:52.000 They need something like Briar or Noster or something where we can run it on our phones decentralized.

00:25:58.000 Because it's just inevitable, man.

00:26:00.000 Because especially with these infrastructure attacks, especially what happened to Rumble.

00:26:04.000 Rumble today.

00:26:06.000 And what will be happening probably to Twitter, as of course Twitter also had a lot of very important infrastructure problems.

00:26:12.000 And I think the next step, if they can't silence the person, if they can't silence the voice, they're going to silence the megaphone that people speak through.

00:26:19.000 And these are the attacks that we should be keeping an eye out right now.

00:26:22.000 So I wonder.

00:26:23.000 Elon Musk gives the big FU at that New York Times event.

00:26:27.000 These advertisers are cancelling and he says they're going to be the ones that destroyed this company.

00:26:32.000 I think we did briefly mention this a couple weeks ago.

00:26:34.000 Elon Musk could theoretically just say, I am federating X. Meaning, it will be a decentralized open source infrastructure that connects to all the other infrastructure.

00:26:45.000 And it will, X will never go anywhere then.

00:26:48.000 Because now you're integrated in this decentralized open source network.

00:26:52.000 He can easily offset tons of the cost through open sourcing and distributed, decentralizing servers and services through the, what's called the Fediverse.

00:27:02.000 And then there would be a major business loss.

00:27:05.000 The big challenge with this is that he took out loans to buy X. But if X is on the verge of collapse, this may play out poorly for him.

00:27:14.000 But I do think The richest man whose net worth is currently, as of today, estimated $244 billion.

00:27:19.000 I kind of think he can stand to lose $44 billion.

00:27:23.000 I think so.

00:27:23.000 And it's not just that.

00:27:24.000 Hold on.

00:27:25.000 There's investors involved.

00:27:27.000 They would lose a lot of money.

00:27:27.000 But what's the worst case scenario?

00:27:30.000 Elon says, all the advertisers pulled off in a coordinated fashion for seemingly political reasons.

00:27:35.000 You can't hold me responsible for that.

00:27:37.000 X is now done.

00:27:38.000 What do we do?

00:27:40.000 Open source decentralizes our best path to maintain the platform and retain memberships and advertising.

00:27:45.000 The Fediverse is great, although if they stay centralized on like big data centers or in AWS or cloud, wherever they're hosting, that can still get shut out of the Fediverse.

00:27:55.000 So you're looking at... Versus a mesh network?

00:27:57.000 Yeah, mesh networks, which are like really up and coming and they're challenging still to transmit video because they're, you know, cell phone to cell phone.

00:28:04.000 But yeah, 50 cell phones, 48 of them go down.

00:28:06.000 The other two are still connected with Twitter.

00:28:08.000 And then that's how it'll work.

00:28:10.000 But if the establishment is really desperate, right, and they're about to lose a lot of power, and they're about to be held accountable for all the horrible things they did to us, how far do you think they're going to go to stop that from happening?

00:28:22.000 I think we have to examine that in a very critical way, because I think they're willing to go very far.

00:28:27.000 I think they're willing to do a lot of crazy things that we can't even imagine right now, to just how far they will go to say, hey, There's going to be no accountability here.

00:28:37.000 There's going to be no truth here because as soon as the people find out the truth, it's game over for them.

00:28:42.000 They're so cornered.

00:28:44.000 They're so in a fragile situation that truly this is a very dangerous time for all of us.

00:28:51.000 Yeah, I think wherever we're thinking, they're thinking a step ahead.

00:28:54.000 Like, I think that they're aware that that would be our plan B or plan C. Like, I think they're fully aware of the direction this is headed in.

00:29:00.000 They wouldn't do the things that they're doing, or they wouldn't have done the things that they have done to us for years if they didn't, if they weren't able to think one step ahead.

00:29:07.000 I mean, it's the same argument you can make for Donald Trump.

00:29:10.000 Everybody's like, well, you know, we're so back, he's gonna win, whatever.

00:29:14.000 But, I mean, We're talking about the deep state here.

00:29:18.000 There's nothing that's too far for them.

00:29:21.000 I disagree completely.

00:29:22.000 The Titanic can crash into an iceberg.

00:29:24.000 There's a lot of conspiracies about that too.

00:29:27.000 If I'm using it as an analogy, I'm not making it literal.

00:29:30.000 You can build the biggest ship, you can design it to rip through ice, and then you come across bedrock and be like, we did not expect that to happen.

00:29:38.000 We calculated.

00:29:39.000 And then boom, we tore the hole and now we're sinking.

00:29:41.000 It's possible, sure, they can see far ahead and they may be thinking abandon ship.

00:29:46.000 Yeah, there's a lot of bankers there against the US Federal Reserve, but that's a different story.

00:29:49.000 But I do believe that you could be correct in your sentiments, but just understanding how they work and what they did to the people, especially within the last three years.

00:30:00.000 Especially within the last 22 years, especially what happened in New York City.

00:30:05.000 When you calculate all of their moves and decisions, nothing is out of the realm of possibility here to how far they will go to stop people from finding out what they're really up to.

00:30:17.000 Well let me pull up this tweet here from Chris Pavlovsky, the CEO of Rumble.

00:30:22.000 He tweets, I can confirm this attack has been unprecedented and has been happening since this weekend.

00:30:28.000 Rumble, for those that are just tuning in, has been under a cyber attack and this may be related to Alex Jones.

00:30:35.000 But look, let's be real, Rumble is really challenging the machine.

00:30:38.000 Alex Jones was restored on X and it was announced that he would be appearing on Steven Crowder's show.

00:30:43.000 This morning, all of a sudden, Rumble is slammed.

00:30:45.000 Viva Fry tweeted, I was planning to go live, but Rumble and Locals are down.

00:30:49.000 Apparently it is a massive, unprecedented attack, one that is likely politically motivated.

00:30:55.000 If I have any updates, I'll let everyone know.

00:30:56.000 Godspeed, Rumble.

00:30:57.000 Chris Pavlovsky followed up by saying, I also suspect it is political, coming from activists and or organizations who want to censor our creators and related to J6 videos being posted on Rumble.

00:31:09.000 2024 is two weeks away.

00:31:12.000 It is gonna be wild.

00:31:13.000 When he was in, I was like, you gotta decentralize this service.

00:31:16.000 And I know he knew I was right, and we also both know the momentous amount of effort that would require, and especially the challenge to stream video from, like, a mesh.

00:31:28.000 But I know Chris is thinking about it.

00:31:29.000 He's a server master.

00:31:30.000 But as long as that rumble thing is on local servers or centralized on big data, man, you are, it is target, target, target.

00:31:37.000 And it's like when you're a sitting duck, man, you're in a rough position as a tech company.

00:31:42.000 Now, who's really behind these attacks?

00:31:43.000 That's a question that I'm kind of asking myself.

00:31:46.000 I have my clear speculations.

00:31:48.000 I have a clear answer to who would be invested in stopping these conversations from happening.

00:31:53.000 But Rumble is on the up and up.

00:31:55.000 It's becoming a very serious contender to one of the biggest online media companies in the world, a monopoly on the industry that, of course, abuses their power routinely and hosts particular shows and platforms that are major.

00:32:12.000 And when they see a competitor coming out and doing their job better and allowing the free market to actually speak and represent itself, Holy cow, that is a danger to their business.

00:32:23.000 That is a danger to their industry.

00:32:25.000 And I wouldn't be surprised if it's the competition saying, we got to shut it down before they take our cake.

00:32:31.000 It could be the Russians wanting you to think that by making you think that the enemy of your enemy is doing something to your enemy.

00:32:38.000 It could be three deep.

00:32:39.000 It could be someone trying to get you to think that it's Google doing it to rumble or getting you to think that it's the American government doing it to rumble to sow dissent.

00:32:46.000 But I think the most obvious answer is it's someone that didn't like the politics.

00:32:50.000 Yeah.

00:32:51.000 Whoever it is.

00:32:52.000 Well, I think I think you bring up a good point.

00:32:54.000 I think oftentimes we have an enemy like the CCP, for example, and a lot of times we see these cyber attacks and it gets blamed on the CCP.

00:33:02.000 And it's peculiar because even the people that do business with the CCP will say that, you know, people like Joe Biden and the administration and say, oh, it's the CCP.

00:33:10.000 It's the CCP.

00:33:11.000 Well, I wonder how many times they blame it on these other on our enemies when really it's them. 0.69

00:33:16.000 Like you saw with the whole balloon situation.

00:33:18.000 Oh, well, it's the CCP, but for some reason we can't shoot it down.

00:33:23.000 Well, we had our reservations about that.

00:33:25.000 We weren't exactly certain that that was the case, given what the government has done in the past, but I think that they do take advantage of our enemies and they blame it on that.

00:33:32.000 I think in the case of Rumble, obviously Rumble wouldn't be the ones to blame it on a fake enemy, but I can see like some sort of Story coming out blaming it on the CCP or something like that or maybe even Russia but I mean I just I think as people who are in tune with politics we have to be careful that we don't allow them to use our enemies as a way to as a way to get away from their own responsibility of the fact that they did it because the government's obviously never gonna tell us oh we did it or or YouTube's never gonna be like we did it you know.

00:34:02.000 I don't think we're ever going to find out who's really responsible here and who actually did do it.

00:34:06.000 It could be a lot of different people, too, working in conjunction.

00:34:09.000 Absolutely.

00:34:10.000 I think a lot about the CCP like that, because I, although I am concerned with that authoritarian economic, you know, autocracy, whatever, oligarchy, I guess, communist oligarchy, I don't want to, like, say that's just the purest evil on earth and every, because then it's just going to send the U.S.

00:34:26.000 to war with them.

00:34:26.000 And I don't want to do that.

00:34:27.000 I want to avoid that.

00:34:28.000 Well, it's the same thing they did with Russia. 0.63

00:34:29.000 I mean, they make Putin out to look a certain way, and it's like, they make him look like he's some evil dictator, but it's like, no one actually breaks down his reasoning for what he's doing, nobody actually- and it's a disservice to ourselves, because then we don't actually understand who we're dealing with.

00:34:43.000 Whoever side you're on, it's a disservice to not understand who your supposed enemy is.

00:34:48.000 But they don't want you to think about that, because if you did think about it, and you did start researching it, you might actually realize that they've lied to you about who he is, and who our enemies are in general.

00:34:57.000 So it's, they make it out to be like, oh don't question it, they're just your enemy.

00:35:01.000 It's just your enemy, don't question it.

00:35:02.000 But there are so many people who just don't want to be involved in politics and want to plug their ears and say la la la la la, they want to live in denial.

00:35:09.000 And you know man, I think they're the last ones off the Titanic if they even make it off.

00:35:15.000 The people who are, imagine this, you're on the Titanic and hit an iceberg and you were standing near the front of the ship and saw it happen.

00:35:22.000 Well, you knew what to do.

00:35:24.000 You knew, okay, bad thing just happened.

00:35:26.000 For all the people who are like down in the ballroom just having a good old time saying, we don't care, we're not paying attention.

00:35:31.000 Those people didn't make it.

00:35:33.000 There's going to be a lot of people who don't make it.

00:35:35.000 But at the same time, I, you know, I say that, but I think more than ever, people are getting the opportunity to finally speak to each other and find out what's really going on.

00:35:45.000 I think there is an opportunity to awaken a lot of people.

00:35:48.000 There are some people that still love to have their heads in the sand and their tickets up there laid for whoever wants to go out there and take it.

00:35:58.000 And those individuals, I think, more and more now, especially with Bidenomics, especially with the Build Back Better policies, are seeing the real cost of being ignorant to politics.

00:36:07.000 Of course, if you ignore politics, politics is not going to ignore you. 0.80

00:36:10.000 And a lot of people have been bamboozled, have been screwed over.

00:36:14.000 And now they're saying, hey, hold on, maybe I should be paying attention to what's going on here because this actually does have a real effect on my life.

00:36:21.000 So in one sense, yes, I do see people kind of being blind to certain situations, but I do see those blinds being lifted now more than ever.

00:36:30.000 I assume it's people with young children or people that want to have young children.

00:36:34.000 They have a reason to think outside the box about the future.

00:36:37.000 But like older people that are collecting their social security, they're just like, shut up and I want to just watch TV. 1.00

00:36:43.000 But there's a new data that was just released by a CNN poll.

00:36:47.000 Donald Trump, I think it's in Michigan, has a lead of 40 points among people who did not vote in 2020.

00:36:54.000 Trump's biggest gains are among non-voters.

00:36:57.000 Like people who didn't vote are waking up and they're deciding I'm voting for Trump and that's what's giving Trump the bump.

00:37:03.000 Good news!

00:37:04.000 And every time the corporate media attacks him viciously, unfairly, he just becomes more popular.

00:37:08.000 Every time the state brings more charges to him, everyone's like, hey, why are you doing this to this man?

00:37:14.000 As, of course, he's facing 750 years in jail, which is absolutely crazy.

00:37:18.000 The fact that a former president of the United States could be going to jail for multiple life sentences?

00:37:24.000 That's just a new level of craziness and, in my opinion, desperation by the establishment that has gone way too far.

00:37:30.000 But I've talked to a lot of people, man.

00:37:33.000 Trump's gonna be convicted.

00:37:35.000 Now, the interesting thing is, I could be totally wrong.

00:37:38.000 Why?

00:37:39.000 Trump has petitioned the Supreme Court, and I believe the Supreme Court has just said they will take up the case.

00:37:44.000 Trump said you cannot criminally charge a person for what they did as president, and I believe he is correct. 0.97

00:37:50.000 The president must be impeached first.

00:37:52.000 Impeached, then criminally charged.

00:37:56.000 The reason for this is war, conflict, crisis.

00:37:59.000 The people need to say that this duly elected representative is not fit because of high crimes and misdemeanors.

00:38:04.000 Afterwards, we can say what they do is criminal.

00:38:06.000 The reason being, if you could just criminally charge a president whenever you wanted, then every state would file criminal charges immediately against the president because they didn't want him to be president.

00:38:16.000 It would be like, imagine the Civil War.

00:38:18.000 After the Civil War, they're having elections.

00:38:22.000 Yeah, a former confederate state would just be like, we're criminally charging the president with these things.

00:38:27.000 The country would never move forward.

00:38:29.000 What's going to be the reaction of the people when he does get indicted, when he does get arrested?

00:38:34.000 He was indicted, he was arrested!

00:38:35.000 When he does get convicted and put in jail?

00:38:40.000 But there's probably going to be even more indictments.

00:38:40.000 Yeah.

00:38:42.000 There's probably going to be even more charges with the way that things are going.

00:38:45.000 But when he's in jail, how will the American people respond?

00:38:48.000 That's the question.

00:38:49.000 I think they're listening to people like us, and they're wondering, waiting for us to tell them what to do.

00:38:54.000 That's like the scary part, kind of, in a way, is like, not the responsibility, but also like how things are hanging by a thread right now.

00:39:00.000 People need guidance.

00:39:01.000 I know what they need to do.

00:39:03.000 They need to buy Casper brew coffee!

00:39:04.000 The greatest cup of coffee!

00:39:05.000 Also work out.

00:39:05.000 I'm kidding.

00:39:08.000 Because Tucker was talking about that the other day sort of he was saying like you know I've because of all of these indictments and everything like I've become a bigger Trump supporters what he's saying I think a lot of Americans feel that way and I think that would be a breaking point for a lot of people and I don't you know it's hard to say what they would do per se but I think that that would certainly be crossing the line for a lot of people who In the past, either voted for him because they liked his economic policies or thought he was a better option, but I think that as he gets indicted more and more, and that's not even my opinion, these are just statistics too, more people are supporting him openly and more fervently than ever before, and I think that means something for if that does happen.

00:39:48.000 What if they do throw him in jail?

00:39:49.000 I mean, that'll ultimately probably will mean he would die.

00:39:53.000 The guy's really old, and we all know that they would Possibly do something to him in prison, right?

00:39:58.000 How old is he?

00:40:00.000 Yeah, in his late 70s.

00:40:00.000 78?

00:40:02.000 But it doesn't even matter, like they would, you know, they'd probably kill him. 0.99

00:40:05.000 Like they would find some way to kill him. 0.90

00:40:07.000 And that's ultimately, like, I think they'd probably blame it on age. 0.75

00:40:11.000 But, you know, I mean, who really knows?

00:40:13.000 It could be that or... Well, Alex Jones warned about this.

00:40:16.000 Yeah.

00:40:17.000 The risk to Trump's life because of what's happening.

00:40:21.000 However, I do think it's also important to consider If we win enough culturally and shift the narrative enough in this country, it would make the option of going after Trump inviolable, right?

00:40:35.000 Going after Trump with violence only matters if they have the power to maintain control of a system.

00:40:42.000 If it becomes apparent that Bud Light's failure, Disney's failure, the expansion of X, If this becomes so apparent that we are going to win, what happens is the powers that be just say, oh, I was always for free speech, and they'll jump ship and quickly rush over because they want to preserve their own lives.

00:41:02.000 So I think all we have to do, stay the course, build culture, support Daily Wire and their movie efforts, Uh, support shows like Tim Cass, Steven Crowder, support Jimmy Dore, just anti-establishment individuals.

00:41:16.000 Buy The Best Song Ever, go to thebestsongever.com, buy our song, pre-order it, it'll be out Friday.

00:41:22.000 The reason is, we want to win the culture war.

00:41:25.000 Support a mug club.

00:41:27.000 Buy coffee brand coffee from Jeremy at the Quartering.

00:41:29.000 Just support all of the parallel economy.

00:41:31.000 Go to Public Square.

00:41:33.000 Buy all your products from Public Square.

00:41:34.000 Just hammer down all these cultural victories and make sure they know the money's not there, the confidence is not there, and if you take extreme action, you will lose.

00:41:45.000 There's also WeAreChange.chop that's also pretty good, but... And t-shirts!

00:41:49.000 The best political shirts.

00:41:52.000 What I wanted to say, to kind of add to your point, they are playing a very dangerous game.

00:41:56.000 It is extremely risky.

00:41:58.000 And some people have even theorized that they're trying to push the American people over the edge.

00:42:03.000 That they're trying to kind of spur a reaction to them that will create a problem that they're going to have a solution for.

00:42:09.000 So that's also something to kind of think about here, looking at everything else.

00:42:12.000 But as you mentioned, Tim, A lot of people are really banking and hoping that the election is going to solve a lot of problems for the individual.

00:42:21.000 It's not.

00:42:22.000 What will solve the problems are people taking personal responsibility for themselves.

00:42:26.000 Are people who are going to decide to vote with their clicks, their likes, their views, their dollars, saying, hey, I'm going to support the local farm over there.

00:42:34.000 I'm not going to support Walmart.

00:42:35.000 I'm not going to support big factory farming.

00:42:37.000 I'm going to go get some, you know, things like raw milk, if they're good for you.

00:42:41.000 I'm going to actually do some homework and research into the ways that we are being poisoned into the larger biological war that is being waged on men and women in this country.

00:42:50.000 I'm going to make sure I am the strongest, best version of myself, and I don't need the system.

00:42:54.000 I'm not going to feed the system.

00:42:56.000 I'm going to live outside of it in my own free, honest, real way.

00:43:01.000 That right there is a beautiful act of resistance.

00:43:04.000 I got a fact check, Patriot, with a good fact check saying, after being convicted on impeachment charges, Tim, President Trump was impeached.

00:43:10.000 He was not convicted.

00:43:11.000 So I'll clarify what I'm saying.

00:43:12.000 The argument from Trump is that you must be impeached and convicted, then you can be criminally indicted and criminally convicted.

00:43:20.000 Trump was impeached, which is effectively an indictment.

00:43:22.000 The Senate voted no, and then he was not convicted.

00:43:26.000 So until that happens and he is successfully convicted following impeachment, None of this matters.

00:43:32.000 But let's jump to this story from scnr.com.

00:43:35.000 Scanner.

00:43:36.000 Missouri AG launches investigation into media matters.

00:43:40.000 AG Andrew Bailey, quote, I'm fighting to ensure progressive tyrants masquerading as news outlets cannot manipulate the marketplace in order to wipe out free speech.

00:43:48.000 This is huge.

00:43:50.000 Attorney General Andrew Bailey says we have reason to believe Media Matters used fraud to solicit donations from Missourians in order to bully advertisers into pulling out of X, the last platform dedicated to free speech in America we have launched an investigation.

00:44:05.000 And it is quite simple.

00:44:07.000 According to data from Axe, as well as numerous reports, Media Matters appeared to have created fake accounts, or created dummy accounts using new accounts, following specifically advertisers and extremists.

00:44:21.000 That way, the content would appear next to each other, and they could then go to the advertiser and say, see, look, your content appears next to extremists, which is a disingenuous version of events.

00:44:32.000 That being the case, for Media Matters to claim this thing happened when according to X, their staff, Enyon Musk, it happened like two times, the argument is Media Matters is defrauding donors by tricking them into thinking they're actually solving a problem when in fact that problem doesn't even exist.

00:44:51.000 Therefore, the argument now is fraud.

00:44:54.000 This is huge.

00:44:55.000 But this is the law fair.

00:44:56.000 And it's not just Missouri.

00:44:57.000 I know that, I believe, Texas is filing several suits too, right?

00:45:01.000 The Attorney General there is doing that, yes.

00:45:06.000 Let me read the letter here so we can get the specifics here.

00:45:10.000 Andrew Bailey of Missouri says, this letter serves as a formal document, hold notice under federal and Missouri law.

00:45:14.000 The Missouri Attorney General's Office has opened an investigation into Media Matters for America regarding your firm's potentially unlawful business practices.

00:45:20.000 Full stop.

00:45:21.000 Media Matters is a, I believe they're a 501c4 non-profit, I could be wrong.

00:45:26.000 But they, all they do all day is watch what they view as conservative media and then post things.

00:45:33.000 Often times, they're out of context or manipulative.

00:45:37.000 But here's more, he says, as you are no doubt aware, a federal lawsuit has been filed against Media Matters, raising serious allegations that your firm falsely and deceptively manipulated the algorithm on Axe, formerly known as Twitter, through coordinated inauthentic behavior, and that you did so in an attempt to defame the organization and cause advertisers to pull their support from the platform, thus harming free speech.

00:45:56.000 The lawsuit alleges that you lied to the public, falsely suggesting that fringe extremist content regularly appears next to content from corporate advertisers, when in fact the opposite is true.

00:46:04.000 At the same time, you appear to have used this coordinated inauthentic activity to solicit charitable donations from consumers across the country.

00:46:10.000 I have reason to believe that your firm's alleged actions may have violated Missouri consumer protection laws, including laws that prohibit non-profit entities from soliciting funds under false pretenses.

00:46:19.000 I am especially concerned that Media Matters' actions, if proven true, have hampered free speech by targeting an expressly pro-free speech social media platform in an attempt To cause it financial harm while defrauding Missourians in the process.

00:46:30.000 You are thus hereby instructed to preserve all records that may relate to your alleged effort to engage in coordinated inauthentic behavior on social media platforms in order to generate false statements that were used to solicit charitable contributions under false pretenses.

00:46:44.000 You are instructed in particular to preserve all records that may relate to your webpage which expressly solicit funds at the following URL.

00:46:53.000 He then goes on to list several other documentation that must be preserved.

00:46:57.000 So this is a notice to preserve documents, which means the investigation is about to begin.

00:47:01.000 Missouri expects to get into the discovery phase, and it very well may be that as we enter 2024, the lawfare ramps up substantially more than just private actors filing lawsuits.

00:47:13.000 And on top of Missouri, we may see I gotta be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if every single state AG has some kind of lawsuit fired away in an attempt to advantage themselves in this election.

00:47:27.000 It's not just about votes, it's not just about vote policy, it's about speech capabilities.

00:47:33.000 It's about Media Matters trying to take down Axe, and now Missouri fighting to defend Axe because Axe is in favor of free speech.

00:47:43.000 2024 is going to be absolutely wild.

00:47:45.000 It already is wild.

00:47:46.000 I know!

00:47:46.000 I'm just saying it's going to get crazier!

00:47:48.000 It's going to get way crazier.

00:47:49.000 It's not just Media Matters.

00:47:50.000 It's so many other organizations like that that exist.

00:47:53.000 You could make an argument that they're doing the exact same thing.

00:47:56.000 I think this is huge.

00:47:58.000 This is really big to set this sort of precedent for, you know, we will come after you if you try to influence, you know, defraud people essentially. I mean,

00:48:07.000 that's the argument they're making here.

00:48:08.000 And, you know, you look at these other outlets like, you know, Right Wing Watch,

00:48:12.000 what's the other one, the big one, Patriot Takes and other ones like that, where they take

00:48:15.000 things out of context and they could be doing the same thing. I don't know. I mean, it's worth...

00:48:19.000 If they solicit donations.

00:48:20.000 Yeah.

00:48:21.000 So Rumble is suing CheckMyAds, I believe, the two founders.

00:48:26.000 And what this group does is they contact advertisers for various conservative outlets and then try to get the advertisers to pull out.

00:48:33.000 I can say they have made numerous deceptive statements about us and used that to solicit donations.

00:48:40.000 Notably, they claimed that I pushed the quote-unquote big lie, which the big lie refers to Donald Trump saying he won in 2020.

00:48:47.000 Anybody who's ever watched this show knows that I have never claimed Trump won 2020, and I actually argued with Bannon twice that Trump lost because people did not like him, and they didn't vote for Biden, they voted against Trump.

00:49:00.000 And Steve Bannon actually went, huh, I said Trump got anti-elected.

00:49:04.000 There's no enthusiasm for Biden, they were voting against Trump, and he goes, that's pretty good, anti-elected, yeah.

00:49:08.000 So I'm like, The fact that they would raise money off of making that claim, it shows these organizations are deceiving people in order to raise money.

00:49:17.000 For the record, they're a 501c3, Media Matters is.

00:49:20.000 Media Matters is a c3?

00:49:22.000 No, no, no, no.

00:49:23.000 Yes, I know they're a non-profit.

00:49:24.000 According to Wikipedia, they're a 501c3.

00:49:25.000 They're exempt from federal income tax.

00:49:28.000 So how does that change this at all?

00:49:29.000 Does it make it more or less... 501c3s can't engage in partisan political activity.

00:49:35.000 Yeah, and it's pretty clear that they are very partisan.

00:49:38.000 Super PACs, typically I believe they're 501c4s, that's the tax designation, 501 and then the C's and the parentheses and a 4.

00:49:45.000 And this, 501c4s don't have to disclose where their money goes, but it's not tax deductible.

00:49:51.000 And 501c3s, completely tax deductible, but you can look up all their information, their salaries, I recommend everybody do this.

00:50:00.000 Search for Tax Form 990 and insert non-profit and you can learn a lot about all these organizations.

00:50:09.000 So, good sleuthing everyone out there.

00:50:12.000 Have fun.

00:50:14.000 Uh, am I supposed to say something now?

00:50:18.000 I started to look at my 90 media matters, I was like, I'm one of those guys, I want to know.

00:50:23.000 I want to know who owns it, who runs it, who makes the money, how much do they make.

00:50:26.000 You can see the salaries.

00:50:28.000 And there's a lot, there's restrictions on this stuff.

00:50:28.000 That's good.

00:50:30.000 So, should be interesting, but I'm curious to see where all these lawsuits end up, but regardless.

00:50:39.000 You know, it's not even 2024 yet, okay?

00:50:41.000 Primaries haven't happened, we're a month away from the Iowa caucuses, and already people are starting to get crazy.

00:50:47.000 It feels crazy.

00:50:47.000 Did you guys hear Klaus Schwab?

00:50:49.000 I think this video is real.

00:50:50.000 He said that he was railing against anti-system and saying that the biggest threat to the system is libertarians.

00:50:56.000 The libertarianism.

00:50:58.000 It's like, on Twitter, it was freaking me out.

00:51:02.000 It's like, this is the mask-off moment.

00:51:04.000 If this is a real video, and he's speaking out against libertarianism... The people who believe in freedom are the biggest threat!

00:51:10.000 He had a mask on.

00:51:11.000 To freedom!

00:51:12.000 That's literally what they say!

00:51:14.000 I love when they tell us to our faces what they're trying to do.

00:51:17.000 It drives home the point that they know they don't have to be silent about it, or they think they have more power than they do.

00:51:25.000 Well, it's because the average person doesn't care.

00:51:26.000 That's true.

00:51:27.000 I can't tell you how many people I've met who go, oh, well, I don't pay attention to that stuff.

00:51:32.000 There's a viral video where this woman is like, I just went to Chipotle and my burrito bowl was 1982.

00:51:38.000 I know I got guac, but that shouldn't make it 1982.

00:51:41.000 Like, WTF is going on?

00:51:43.000 And it's like, well, as you sit there not paying attention, uh, your burrito bowls are becoming very expensive.

00:51:48.000 Now, for those of us that are paying attention, we're like, perhaps it was the several hundred billion dollars spent in foreign war garbage over the past couple years and the massive spending that, uh, resulted in hyperinflation.

00:51:59.000 I shouldn't say hyperinflation, being a little hyperbolic, but you get my point.

00:52:02.000 It's either that, you know, giving everyone $2,000 checks and big corporate bailouts.

00:52:05.000 That's also another big issue, another big problem that, of course, I think a lot of people need to deal with as well.

00:52:10.000 But we are not in a good situation.

00:52:13.000 There is a lot of lawfare.

00:52:14.000 Now some people say there's too much lawfare.

00:52:17.000 I would kind of agree with them, but right now it is very heavily one-sided.

00:52:21.000 It is essentially district attorneys financed by George Soros.

00:52:24.000 It is essentially a lot of the leftist organizations and groups that are kind of organizing themselves and suing and attacking everyone.

00:52:31.000 Alex Jones was sued for a billion dollars.

00:52:33.000 Elon Musk is being sued by those same individuals right now.

00:52:37.000 So we are sadly living in a day and age where lawyers are becoming more important, but also more powerful and more rich than they ever were before, since this is how we are seeing this kind of asymmetrical warfare being waged politically in a very dangerous gambit that is not good for America.

00:52:56.000 It's not good for its people.

00:52:58.000 And sadly, now everything you do and say has to be carefully monitored.

00:53:02.000 You have to watch yourself.

00:53:03.000 You make one mistake, you're going to get sued into oblivion.

00:53:07.000 And this is why the appeals case for what's happening to Alex Jones is so important, as of course, they found him guilty, and he owes a billion plus dollars for speech, which is absolutely crazy.

00:53:20.000 Well, he was found liable, but the important distinction here is that there was no trial.

00:53:26.000 People don't know this.

00:53:27.000 People are being told Alex Jones lost a lawsuit and is forced to pay over defamation.

00:53:31.000 No, he didn't.

00:53:32.000 It was a ruling in default.

00:53:34.000 The judge said, no trial for Alex Jones, you owe them.

00:53:39.000 Now we're going to have a hearing to determine how much you owe them.

00:53:41.000 And he couldn't defend themselves, and the major accusation was that he didn't provide discovery.

00:53:48.000 Uh, but according to Alex Jones, he was providing discovery.

00:53:51.000 He was providing a lot of the documentations that they were asking for.

00:53:53.000 He said that no matter what he gave them, they kept saying it wasn't it.

00:53:57.000 And that's, like, how do you, like, it's like torture almost.

00:54:01.000 You know, the torturer says, tell me the location of the Genesis device.

00:54:05.000 And the guy goes, I don't know.

00:54:06.000 So they hit him again.

00:54:07.000 Tell me or else.

00:54:08.000 I seriously don't know.

00:54:09.000 He's lying and they keep hitting you.

00:54:10.000 It's like, if you don't know, what are you supposed to say?

00:54:12.000 Just lie?

00:54:12.000 So they're like, we want these documents, and Alex Jones is like, well, there you go.

00:54:15.000 Okay, we want more.

00:54:16.000 He's like, that's it.

00:54:17.000 Nope, there's more.

00:54:17.000 You're lying.

00:54:18.000 And he's like, that's all I have.

00:54:19.000 And they're like, nope, default.

00:54:20.000 You lose.

00:54:21.000 Well, that's the danger of this litigious society, and it's kind of what we saw with Roger Stone, too. 1.00

00:54:26.000 They did the same thing to him.

00:54:26.000 They accused him of lying.

00:54:28.000 Oh, you didn't turn over all the emails, or you did this, and therefore you tried to lie about this.

00:54:32.000 And he was like, no, that's not what happened.

00:54:34.000 But they can keep pushing you, and they can keep pushing you, and they can keep it in the court system, and they can keep making it not only a matter of The court but also the court of public opinion too like they can keep you under their thumb that way and they'll just keep telling you you're lying you're lying you're lying and then they make you into a monster publicly and in the court as to who you really are and that's kind of what happened with Alex Jones it happens with a lot of people but I think you're totally right this litigious society we live in is so dangerous because it's like at what point do we stop because if

00:55:06.000 The enemy's going to be doing that, right?

00:55:07.000 If they're going to be throwing lawsuits at everybody left and right, then our only way to defend ourselves is to throw lawsuits at them in response, which is what you're seeing, for example, in Missouri.

00:55:16.000 I bet artificial intelligence will take that task on.

00:55:19.000 They'll start using artificial intelligence to counter-sue and sue and counter-sue, and it'll just, you'll see, it'll upskill by magnitudes more.

00:55:25.000 Oh yeah.

00:55:26.000 There's going to be AI writing, like, court documents.

00:55:29.000 It's going to be so weird.

00:55:30.000 Let's jump to the story, because this one's a good laugh.

00:55:33.000 Business Insider writes, Elon Musk's luck has finally run out.

00:55:39.000 Is this it?

00:55:40.000 It's the end for Elon?

00:55:42.000 Oh no.

00:55:43.000 It was a good run.

00:55:43.000 Lynette Lopez writing that Elon was on a heater.

00:55:47.000 From 2019 to 2022, it seemed if every single gamble he took was paying off, then he did what every risk-addicted blackjack player inevitably does.

00:55:54.000 He pushed his luck too far.

00:55:56.000 Overconfidence, confirmation buys, and delusions of control led to a string of bad decisions, and boom!

00:56:02.000 Elon's empire is in trouble again.

00:56:04.000 Oh no!

00:56:05.000 Oh, what's this?

00:56:07.000 The richest man in the world, Elon Musk?

00:56:08.000 $244.4 billion, thanks Tesla and SpaceX.

00:56:13.000 Hold on, I thought Elon Musk's luck ran out.

00:56:19.000 So what's the argument?

00:56:20.000 This is the narrative machine lying.

00:56:24.000 They don't want you to hear the truth.

00:56:27.000 Elon Musk engaged in political behavior.

00:56:30.000 Defending free speech, buying a big tech platform, and is winning.

00:56:35.000 He's got more FU money than anyone on the planet.

00:56:39.000 Tesla is slaying it.

00:56:41.000 Cybertruck is coming out.

00:56:42.000 Everyone's super excited.

00:56:43.000 SpaceX has the majority of all space launches.

00:56:47.000 And they're like, yeah, well, Elon Musk's failing because we don't like Twitter anymore.

00:56:51.000 Yo, Mark Zuckerberg barely even posts on threads anymore.

00:56:55.000 Nobody uses it.

00:56:56.000 But this is the narrative.

00:56:57.000 You know, what I think is happening is they're trying to scare their people out of doing what Elon Musk has done, particularly wealthier people.

00:57:03.000 But I think Americans in general, it's sort of they're using him as an example of, you know, this is what happens when you speak out, when you do something to go against, when you're a dissenter, when you go against what the state says is acceptable.

00:57:16.000 They want you to think that he's a massive failure.

00:57:18.000 They want you to think that if you were to even go, you know, even try to do what he's done or go even remotely close to that, That the same thing is going to happen to you.

00:57:26.000 That everybody who does something that gets involved in politics and takes an opposing position to the state will fail.

00:57:33.000 And you will fail, too.

00:57:34.000 I think that's what this is part of.

00:57:35.000 Because every time somebody ventures out and tries to do something and they're successful at it when it comes to creating either a parallel economy, being a part of that, or doing what Elon Musk is doing, which is actually quite unprecedented, honestly, so it's hard to compare it to anything else.

00:57:51.000 But I think, more than anything, they just want you to believe that you will fail if you speak out, if you do something against the state.

00:57:56.000 That's why these articles are coming out.

00:57:58.000 Yep! 0.80

00:57:59.000 They'll take your money, they'll defame you, they'll destroy you, they'll take everything that they love from you, but will they be able to stop you?

00:58:07.000 Absolutely not!

00:58:08.000 Look what happened to Owen Schroer!

00:58:09.000 Look what happened to Alex Jones!

00:58:11.000 Look what is happening to all these individuals that they did everything to stop!

00:58:15.000 And then they have risen once again back up again.

00:58:19.000 And this is a big sign.

00:58:22.000 This is a huge case right now that they desperately want to be true.

00:58:27.000 They need it to be true, because if it's not, it's showing people that free speech is popular.

00:58:32.000 It's more popular than what the corporate advertisers want it to be.

00:58:36.000 It's more popular than the federal government, and the feds want it to be.

00:58:41.000 And I think free speech is the big winner here, and even though they're saying all this stuff, it doesn't mean it's true.

00:58:47.000 Look at this image they made of Elon Musk.

00:58:50.000 His forehead getting red and his money disappearing.

00:58:52.000 The dude's worth $244 billion.

00:58:54.000 He could lose all of Twitter and it's $44 billion value, not to mention he didn't pay for the whole thing because he got loans, and he'd still be worth, let's say he ate the whole cost of Twitter and it collapsed, he's worth $200 billion.

00:59:09.000 I don't get it.

00:59:10.000 They're just trying to push a narrative, like you were saying, Anna.

00:59:13.000 They want you to think that you cannot succeed doing this stuff.

00:59:17.000 Who is they?

00:59:18.000 This is, I'm not understanding.

00:59:19.000 A deep state.

00:59:19.000 He works for a Democrat.

00:59:21.000 He's got SpaceX.

00:59:22.000 You're asking who is they, though?

00:59:23.000 It is Democrat and neocon party establishment shills who are mad that they can no longer control the narrative.

00:59:29.000 It is the CIA and the FBI who had a direct line to Twitter and lost it and were using it to manipulate narratives.

00:59:36.000 Tesla, and especially SpaceX, is tight with the Department of Defense.

00:59:40.000 They need that technology, and he's helping them and working with them.

00:59:43.000 Isn't he being sued by Merrick Garland or whatever?

00:59:45.000 What happened with that?

00:59:46.000 He has multiple lawsuits, including some going after him for not hiring enough refugees in SpaceX.

00:59:55.000 Strange reason.

00:59:56.000 The DOJ sued him in August for not hiring refugees despite the fact he's not legally allowed to.

01:00:02.000 I think they thought they could control him.

01:00:04.000 I really do think they thought that, okay, well, he's still somewhat one of us.

01:00:07.000 He's not really that into politics.

01:00:09.000 And then they failed and he's, you know, fighting back and now they're starting to realize, oh, Elon's not on our side.

01:00:15.000 I think that they're really, they've lost their guy.

01:00:18.000 They lost, because I think they, The government likes to control the wealthiest people in the country and when they lose them, when they start to lose them, that's a threat to them because they have more power and that's what's going on here and we kind of saw it with, and this isn't really as big of a deal because they're not quite as wealthy as Elon, but what happened with the company that made Sound of Freedom,

01:00:37.000 They came after them, the whole, I think it was Rolling Stone, that a few other articles came after that too, but they attacked him calling them QAnon and conspiracy theorists and it's like, they, this is, it's the same thing as this, they want to make you believe you can't be successful if you provide a perspective outside of what the accepted narrative, but yeah, I think he's a particular threat because he's so wealthy and they thought that they could control him.

01:01:03.000 I think they did think they could regain control of him.

01:01:05.000 So this is what happens with, we put out a bunch of songs, and a lot of things have happened.

01:01:12.000 The first thing is Pete Parata, formerly of The Offspring, we make contact with them, we work together, we make a song, and when our publicist Reached out to various entertainment publications to say, former drummer from The Offspring working with Tim Pool.

01:01:26.000 The responses we got back were, go F yourself and things like that.

01:01:30.000 Unbecoming of entertainment reporters.

01:01:33.000 By all means, they could have been like, we don't like this, you know, you know, we're not fans of you politically, but there's news there in what we're doing.

01:01:41.000 Instead, the response was, not only are we going to ignore this to make sure no one knows you're doing it because we don't want to give you any press, because they view press as a weapon, they actually emailed us back.

01:01:51.000 We got emails back from a variety of different entertainment outlets saying, F yourselves.

01:01:56.000 And we were like, wow.

01:01:58.000 When we reached out to... I want to keep it relatively vague for legal reasons, litigious reasons.

01:02:05.000 When we reached out to various music industry groups like, here's the standard process by which we publish music, they outright just, whoopsie, screwed the songs up, screwed up tracking, rejected it, and we were just like, wow, man.

01:02:19.000 And so the original idea we had was to make a song mocking the whole industry.

01:02:23.000 And then when I saw what Jeremy Boring and Michael Knowles did with Together Again, The story that Jeremy told was, they offered a substantial, like 100 times the market rate to play a song.

01:02:35.000 And they were rejected.

01:02:36.000 And so Jeremy was like, we're going to make our own parody version of this song from the 60s.

01:02:40.000 It's like basically our version of an F.U.

01:02:43.000 And spend six figures doing it.

01:02:46.000 And so that's why we have the song coming out this Friday.

01:02:48.000 I don't want to ham it up too much, but I am, you know, we are promoting it.

01:02:53.000 The issue is, we need to win the culture war.

01:02:58.000 The institutions are controlled.

01:03:00.000 The media is controlled.

01:03:01.000 The movie industry is controlled.

01:03:03.000 And so, it's not just about making music.

01:03:06.000 It's not just about making movies.

01:03:08.000 It's not just about Elon buying X. It's also important to understand these institutions will spit in your face publicly, will lie about you outside of the media.

01:03:18.000 So this is why we're doing TheBestSongEver.com.

01:03:20.000 This is why we're making culture.

01:03:22.000 And it's all aligned with I don't know how to explain it, I guess.

01:03:28.000 More than just what people realize is captured, right?

01:03:31.000 You'd think, oh, the big labels will only sign bans.

01:03:33.000 No, you don't understand.

01:03:34.000 The financial institutions banning people, like web services cutting people off, when Gab had their hosting seized, right?

01:03:44.000 It's been a long time.

01:03:46.000 There are thin threads of infrastructure in all of these different networks where people will give you the middle finger and try and shut you down.

01:03:55.000 I think that's why music is so powerful and that writing really good music over and over and over and just putting out consistently really good songs is not really unstoppable, but pretty close to unstoppable.

01:04:08.000 With the radio and shortwave radio, it doesn't require a lot of bandwidth to get a song across to somebody.

01:04:14.000 You don't really need centralized networks.

01:04:17.000 And it changes people.

01:04:18.000 And then the people go and they seek out who did the song and they want to listen to them.

01:04:21.000 And if you're under five firewalls behind some mesh network on some pirate radio out at sea, they're going to find you and listen to you.

01:04:28.000 And I think that's the way to do it.

01:04:30.000 And if the messages are in the song and people don't even realize, that's another way to manipulate the masses into doing good.

01:04:36.000 We are building probably the largest private East Coast skate facility for a show and we're spending several million dollars.

01:04:46.000 We're bringing out pro skateboarders and big industry individuals and we're filming videos and we're doing it because, you know, like, I think everybody who plays video games, everybody who likes sci-fi movies, has seen wokeness infect their culture.

01:05:02.000 And with comic books and video games, it became very apparent ten years ago with, like, Gamergate.

01:05:06.000 And for me, it's like, I play video games sometimes, you know what I mean?

01:05:09.000 I don't really pay attention all that much.

01:05:10.000 So I was like, wow, this is kind of crazy.

01:05:12.000 Here's what's going on.

01:05:13.000 Then it came into skateboarding and it's bad.

01:05:16.000 And now I'm like, substantially more irritated and aggressive because it's attacking something that I participate in and care about really, really badly.

01:05:26.000 I mean, the woke stuff in skateboarding is just absolutely getting crazy.

01:05:30.000 And we see it with Taylor Silverman.

01:05:33.000 She's a female athlete and she loses to males on more than one occasion. 0.98

01:05:37.000 And we're seeing more than just that in advertising, in sponsorships.

01:05:41.000 Companies no longer sponsor the best skateboarders.

01:05:44.000 It's still there for sure.

01:05:45.000 But now there are people who are getting major sponsorship deals for identity politics.

01:05:49.000 And I'm like, we're gonna shut it down.

01:05:52.000 And at least in terms of what I know, music, skateboarding, etc, we are going to invest heavily in pushing back on all these cultural areas.

01:06:00.000 I hope everybody else does as well.

01:06:02.000 So seeing Ripaverse, Eric July's comic books, is, is, man, the victories just keep stacking themselves up.

01:06:08.000 So let's make more of those.

01:06:09.000 It's almost as if everything is being weaponized.

01:06:12.000 Lawfare is being weaponized, entertainment is being weaponized, movies are being weaponized, and the hearts and minds of individuals, especially during a war, are key to win over.

01:06:24.000 And I think this is the kind of groundwork we are seeing for What could be potentially a bigger conflict out there?

01:06:30.000 They are trying to win the hearts and minds of individuals they're losing.

01:06:34.000 Look what happened to Disney. 0.71

01:06:35.000 The Disney turnaround with Snow White.

01:06:38.000 The Disney individuals who, of course, are pissed off at the company, which Elon Musk spoke out against, specifically giving a big kind of F you to the company, And many people unsubscribing from that particular platform also highlights a big kind of shift in people's energy and reaction towards this, as of course everything woke now is being met with distaste and disdain, and I think it's great.

01:07:02.000 A lot of the people said that Vietnam was ended because of the musicians of the time, like Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.

01:07:08.000 There was a riot at Kent State, 1970, May 4th, where all the students were out yelling, end the war, end the war, and they were throwing rocks at the National Guard, and the National Guard opened fire and killed four kids, four adults at that point.

01:07:18.000 And then Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young wrote a song called Ohio about that.

01:07:22.000 And it went hugely popular.

01:07:23.000 And it was also having the video cameras embedded in the war zone and seeing the horror that ended it too.

01:07:28.000 But those two things in conjunction woke the music, woke people up, seeing it.

01:07:32.000 We're in an age of deep fakes now, which is makes things a little strange.

01:07:35.000 I want to pull up this.

01:07:36.000 Did you want to finish?

01:07:37.000 No, you finished it for me.

01:07:38.000 Thanks.

01:07:38.000 I want to pull up this clip from Tucker Carlson, episode 49, the Dana White interview.

01:07:44.000 How many of you watched this?

01:07:46.000 Okay, it's basically just an ad for Bud Light, where Dana White says, I'll just grab a random point at this, let's just see what happens.

01:07:53.000 Support their people like Mexicans support their people, and you should be able to walk in with your country's flag, so I brought it back.

01:08:01.000 Were you under pressure not to allow it?

01:08:03.000 No, there's always, you know, when you deal with... I consider myself a proud American, I'm happy to be an American, I love this country, and you are way more aligned With Anheuser-Busch than you are with other beer companies.

01:08:15.000 That I guarantee you. 0.95

01:08:16.000 Have you taken any crap for it? 0.96

01:08:19.000 Listen, people are going to say what they're going to say. 0.91

01:08:21.000 I don't ever... I don't care what people... I know who I am.

01:08:24.000 I know what I stand for.

01:08:26.000 I know what I believe in.

01:08:27.000 And the people who are close to me know.

01:08:30.000 And, uh, I'm on the right side of this.

01:08:32.000 Basically, the first few minutes of this nine-minute clip is Dana White saying everyone should go out and buy cases and cases of Bud Light because they're more aligned with you than you know.

01:08:41.000 And I agree with him.

01:08:43.000 I agree with him.

01:08:43.000 I don't know how much he can say to drive the point home.

01:08:47.000 But you have a lot of people saying, no way, Bud Light is dead to me, etc.

01:08:50.000 And you know what?

01:08:51.000 I don't think it matters all that much either way.

01:08:52.000 But I'm on the buy Bud Light train right now.

01:08:56.000 We have Brian Krasenstein says, quote, Buy Bud Light.

01:08:59.000 Dana White agrees.

01:08:59.000 Do you?

01:09:00.000 I think it's silly to judge a company by one single advertisement partner they have.

01:09:04.000 Whether it's the UFC or Dylan Mulvaney, just buy products you like.

01:09:07.000 Stop trying to cancel every single thing just because you may or may not 100% agree with every political ideology they may have.

01:09:13.000 This is one of the greatest victories.

01:09:15.000 You know why?

01:09:16.000 The right boycotted Bud Light.

01:09:18.000 Bud Light sales tanked 30%.

01:09:20.000 Bud Light desperately tries to win back the customers.

01:09:23.000 They sponsor Harley Davidson.

01:09:25.000 Doesn't work.

01:09:26.000 Then, they do a massive deal with UFC.

01:09:29.000 And we all kind of groan, like, why would UFC do this?

01:09:31.000 And then Sean Strickland comes out and says, Bud Light has now sponsored everything I have to say.

01:09:38.000 And he said some things I can't repeat on YouTube.

01:09:41.000 Because of the censorship.

01:09:42.000 But very, I would say, to many people, offensive, though many of these people are offended by everything.

01:09:47.000 And that means Bud Light switched from underwriting wokeness to underwriting anti-wokeness.

01:09:54.000 There's nothing more you can ask for.

01:09:56.000 I suppose you could ask for an apology.

01:09:58.000 But money has changed hands.

01:10:00.000 And there were people commenting on the Tucker interview saying, what did Bud Light do besides money changing hands?

01:10:06.000 And I'm like, that's exactly it.

01:10:08.000 They're funding a bunch of based AFMMA fighters now, and UFC, and not Dylan Mulvaney.

01:10:14.000 That's a win.

01:10:15.000 Individuals like Conor McGregor, who are also becoming more and more outspoken politically, and might even run to be president of the United States.

01:10:22.000 Sorry, president of Ireland.

01:10:24.000 And so now when Brian Krasinstein says, come on everybody, stop boycotting, I say, hear, hear.

01:10:29.000 When the Liberals don't boycott Bud Light, but the Conservatives do, it creates an inverse pressure.

01:10:36.000 The pressure used to be that Conservatives won't boycott, but Liberals will, so give the Liberals what they want, because Conservatives will just roll with the punches.

01:10:43.000 But now that Conservatives are boycotting, and the Liberals saying, roll with the punches, it's going to create the inverse pressure system, where now companies are going to push in the opposite direction and cancel the woke.

01:10:53.000 Does it have like a $100 million contract?

01:10:56.000 Yeah.

01:10:57.000 So the company that owns Anheuser-Busch is a Belgian.

01:10:59.000 It's not an American company, Dana, just so you know.

01:11:01.000 It's Belgian.

01:11:02.000 It's called AB InBev.

01:11:04.000 They bought it.

01:11:04.000 They're worth $15.5 billion.

01:11:06.000 So this drop in the bucket of their money, I don't see what you're seeing, Tim.

01:11:09.000 I kind of understand the method.

01:11:11.000 It's Bud Light specifically.

01:11:12.000 Yeah, but he's like Anheuser-Busch.

01:11:14.000 Anheuser-Busch is owned by AB Invent, which is a Belgian company.

01:11:16.000 He said, he said, buy Bud Light.

01:11:18.000 And he was just saying in that clip that Anheuser-Busch is the best American company.

01:11:21.000 It's the best.

01:11:22.000 It's a Belgian company.

01:11:23.000 I don't think he said it was American.

01:11:27.000 I thought I heard you say that.

01:11:28.000 Taking from somebody who's in the know, who does business with beer companies, you are way more aligned with Bud Light than you are with any other beer company.

01:11:36.000 So I'm assuming, I mean, they didn't come into partnership with you by accident.

01:11:39.000 Obviously.

01:11:39.000 No.

01:11:40.000 We had multiple bidders on the table.

01:11:42.000 Did they seek you out?

01:11:43.000 We had multiple bidders on the table.

01:11:45.000 They were one of them.

01:11:46.000 And as I, you know, history has shown me with relationships that I've had with other beer companies, I, who lean more this way.

01:11:55.000 Yep.

01:11:56.000 I, who consider myself a patriot.

01:11:58.000 I don't go crazy over the whole patriot thing, but I consider myself a proud American.

01:12:02.000 I'm happy to be an American.

01:12:03.000 I love this country.

01:12:04.000 And you are way more aligned with Anheuser-Busch than you are with other beer companies.

01:12:09.000 That I guarantee you. 0.99

01:12:10.000 Have you taken any crap for it? 0.96

01:12:13.000 Listen, people are going to say what they're going to say. 0.91

01:12:15.000 I don't ever... I don't care what people... I don't think that they're an American company.

01:12:19.000 Well, he's talking about patriotism there, and then he talks about... He wants you to associate it with being American.

01:12:23.000 You can definitely get that vibe, even if he doesn't say, like, oh, it's an American company.

01:12:27.000 He uses the word patriot and proud American, and then he sells you on a Belgian company that has no free speech.

01:12:31.000 What we want is a circumstance in which Bud Light loses money when they go woke, and they make money when they go anti-woke.

01:12:40.000 So that every single other company will go, hey guys, if we sponsor woke people, we're gonna lose money, but if we sponsor anti-woke people, we'll make money.

01:12:47.000 If everybody still boycotts Bud Light, then it's a win either way.

01:12:53.000 Because then companies are going to say, look, don't go woke because you'll lose money, but going conserved doesn't help you either, just don't go woke.

01:12:58.000 Wouldn't you consider what he just did woke?

01:13:00.000 Like he just said, I'm a patriot, I'm an American, so buy a Belgian beer.

01:13:04.000 Like what?

01:13:04.000 That's woke as hell.

01:13:05.000 Do your research, Dana.

01:13:06.000 It's a Belgian beer.

01:13:07.000 It's not woke at all.

01:13:08.000 How does that help American patriotism to serve the Belgians? 0.95

01:13:12.000 What?

01:13:13.000 He's encouraging people to buy his Belgian beer.

01:13:15.000 Well, I'm kind of split on this because... But what does that have to do with anything?

01:13:17.000 He used patriotism to sell people on a foreign beer.

01:13:20.000 Yeah, it's disingenuous.

01:13:21.000 I agree with you on that.

01:13:23.000 And I think that it would have been... Yeah, I mean, I think he clearly wanted you to associate this beer with patriotism for America.

01:13:31.000 And so that's disingenuous.

01:13:32.000 But I'm split on the idea behind it, what Tim's saying, because it's like, on one hand, it's yeah, it's kind of a Pavlov's dog situation where it's like, we want to train these companies to You can't put them out of business.

01:13:43.000 Anheuser-Busch could subsidize Bud Light at infinitum.

01:13:44.000 So the best opportunity is to give them the incentive.

01:13:46.000 maybe it takes actually putting these companies out of business to send a

01:13:50.000 clear message. Maybe that was the end. Maybe that should be the end goal rather

01:13:53.000 than just to make them suffer a little bit. I don't know. I'm not saying that

01:13:57.000 like, you know, I see both sides. You can't put them out of business. Well,

01:14:02.000 Anheuser-Busch could subsidize Bud Light at infinitum. So the best

01:14:06.000 opportunity is to give them the incentive. Use the carrot, not the

01:14:09.000 stick. So then it goes, then the question then becomes like to what end would you

01:14:14.000 boycott them.

01:14:16.000 Like, what's the end goal?

01:14:17.000 That would have to be the decided answer, and then I think, you know, you're...

01:14:21.000 Economic damage, which was 30% in sales, and then they gave $100 million to UFC, and at first we all said, oh groan, we don't like Bud Light, they got woke, they go broke, a lot of people wanted to go to business, and then Sean Strickland came out and said a whole bunch of things on Twitter, laughing, saying Bud Light sponsored, thank you, this message brought to you by Bud Light.

01:14:41.000 We all laughed and said, we went from Dylan Mulvaney, and in six months, Sean Strickland.

01:14:46.000 We like what Sean Strickland says, so we want Bud Light to fund more of what Sean Strickland says, and then we want every other company to see, hey guys, if we go with the UFC dudes, we're gonna make a lot of money.

01:14:57.000 I'm not going to be happy until there's a can of Sean Strickland with a durag 0.98

01:15:01.000 presented to the American people. If they do that, then maybe I could give them a

01:15:06.000 chance. Personally, I don't like alcohol. I don't like booze.

01:15:08.000 It calcifies your pineal gland. It gives you Bill Gates moobs. That's beyond

01:15:12.000 the point here.

01:15:13.000 Does it really calcify your pineal gland?

01:15:14.000 A lot of beer is filled with fluoride.

01:15:16.000 Ah, okay. There you go. I see. Okay, it's important to clarify.

01:15:20.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah. But I think that, you know, I'm kind of like in the middle here as well,

01:15:25.000 Because I understand your point.

01:15:26.000 I understand your point as well here.

01:15:28.000 How do we kind of move forward here?

01:15:29.000 I would love to have an alternative company, an American company, come out and say, hey, we're going to take their lunch.

01:15:39.000 I would rather that, personally, myself.

01:15:40.000 We do have that.

01:15:41.000 We have ultra-right, conservative beer.

01:15:43.000 Yeah, conservative dad's ultra-right beer.

01:15:45.000 Personally, I'm like, don't do any of the food.

01:15:47.000 And Seth Weathers is going to be here.

01:15:49.000 On the show, I don't know, I think, maybe this week?

01:15:52.000 I think it's this week, yeah.

01:15:53.000 It's this week.

01:15:55.000 And what he's doing is fantastic, so, you know, you can check out his work as well.

01:15:58.000 But my point is just simply, it's not about destroying, it's like, look, do you want to raise the enemy village or take control of it to utilize its labor forces and resources?

01:16:12.000 Depends on the situation.

01:16:13.000 Certainly.

01:16:14.000 And in this situation, you have, you basically have a village of people who are all growing crops, bowing down to you saying, please, please, please, we'll give you our wheat, just please stop.

01:16:25.000 And instead it's like you've got people saying, no, no, just keep destroying everything.

01:16:27.000 But that's what they would do to us.

01:16:29.000 They would destroy us.

01:16:30.000 I want their resources.

01:16:33.000 I want to take all of their money and put it towards Sean Strickland and other based UFC fighters so they can go on Twitter and say anti-woke things.

01:16:41.000 Destroying it doesn't serve a purpose.

01:16:43.000 Well, if you're talking about, see in the metaphor, you've got the people, and then you have the resources, and the people are traitors, and they say, please, please, please, let us join you, but they're treacherous, then you might want to remove the humans from that situation to take the resources for yourself.

01:16:57.000 There are other times that you would actually let them serve you.

01:16:59.000 The resources is the human capital and labor.

01:17:02.000 Then you would put them in slavery or something like that.

01:17:04.000 This is just military talk, of course, that you would enslave the population and make them work for you if you didn't trust them.

01:17:08.000 Not really, you just take taxes from them.

01:17:09.000 Yeah, it depends on how treacherous they are.

01:17:11.000 In military, you conquer a city and you use its resources towards your military goals.

01:17:15.000 In this instance, we're talking about culture war. We can see Bud Light destroyed, or all of

01:17:20.000 that money they have can go towards anti-woke initiatives, and then we're actually being

01:17:25.000 armed culturally against the wokeness. 0.94

01:17:27.000 If I see a point- I have another nuanced point on this that might be diverting

01:17:31.000 it a little bit, because I brought up Bill Gates' moves here, and I just

01:17:35.000 remembered Bill Gates bought a whole bunch of stocks for Anheuser-Busch, and therefore, Tim, I

01:17:43.000 totally disagree with you.

01:17:46.000 I am within No, Bill Gates buying public stock to try and destroy the company makes sense to help Bill Gates and to help Wokeness. 0.80

01:17:54.000 He wants to make sure no one gets behind the company and they can't recover for this reason.

01:17:59.000 He's basically saying, scorched earth, if they claim Bud Light, then we are going to lose resources by buying into it.

01:18:07.000 He's going to get people like you to refuse to support the company that is funding UFC anti-woke personalities.

01:18:13.000 I did some numbers earlier.

01:18:14.000 The revenue of Anheuser-Busch was $15.5 billion in 2018.

01:18:18.000 $15.5.

01:18:19.000 The revenue of its parent company was $52 billion.

01:18:22.000 So, $15, $52 in 2019.

01:18:24.000 Anheuser-Busch is a skin suit. 0.57

01:18:26.000 It's not a real company.

01:18:27.000 It's owned by a Belgian company called Anheuser-Busch.

01:18:30.000 $52 billion in income and revenue in 2019.

01:18:33.000 So, unless they put like $6, $7 billion towards this stuff that we like, I'm not going to start to think they really care at all.

01:18:39.000 I don't think they care at all.

01:18:40.000 This is just about publicity stuff.

01:18:42.000 Of course, and it doesn't matter.

01:18:43.000 Woke leftists have captured the institutions and the argument from the right is to sacrifice the institutions instead of reclaiming them?

01:18:51.000 That makes no sense.

01:18:52.000 The goal should be to reclaim and control all of the cultural institutions so that we can then indoctrinate young people to American values.

01:18:59.000 Some of the institutions need to fail, I think.

01:19:03.000 That's what I think, too.

01:19:04.000 That's kind of why I'm in more of like the let them suffer.

01:19:06.000 And they would do that to us.

01:19:08.000 They want to destroy us.

01:19:09.000 They want to destroy everything.

01:19:10.000 And so if it was like a patriotic company, and this was happening, they'd be like, no, keep pushing them.

01:19:14.000 Don't buy anything from them.

01:19:15.000 That's why Like, whenever they cancel us, they have no forgiveness.

01:19:20.000 They have no grace whatsoever.

01:19:21.000 And it's like, why would we extend that to them?

01:19:23.000 Don't they need to suffer a little bit?

01:19:24.000 We're not extending it to them.

01:19:25.000 It's like saying, quick, burn down our own bridge that we've reclaimed because they would have burned it down too.

01:19:30.000 Why?

01:19:30.000 We need the bridge.

01:19:31.000 If we're going to build culture, why are we just going to destroy all of what they have built?

01:19:35.000 If we can just take it for ourselves and use it ourselves, why wouldn't we do that?

01:19:38.000 It makes no sense to get rid of it.

01:19:39.000 of the like it was a little bit like the one but one ring you know but light is

01:19:43.000 not a bullet is a factory You have woke forces and anti-woke forces.

01:19:49.000 Woke forces have taken over the factory.

01:19:51.000 As of the past few months, the anti-woke forces have reclaimed the servitude of the factory.

01:19:56.000 And now the argument is, quick, burn the factory down.

01:19:58.000 Why?

01:19:58.000 We have it.

01:19:59.000 It's ours.

01:20:00.000 We get it all.

01:20:01.000 Well, a reason why.

01:20:02.000 The anti-woke MMA fighters are getting paid more money, UFC is getting funded.

01:20:06.000 This means the public will recognize the statements made by these fighters are funded by Bud Light.

01:20:12.000 You have lost this cultural battle.

01:20:14.000 Except if the factory, if you're like, now that's our factory, but who is in that factory, running that factory, and who are their financial ties behind the scenes that I don't know.

01:20:21.000 So if I really want to leave that factory up and running, what's the risk?

01:20:24.000 I mean, the UFC is one of the most popular sports industries in the entire world.

01:20:29.000 They're not going to have problems.

01:20:30.000 They're financing one of the biggest kind of sports franchises in the entire world.

01:20:37.000 So what are they investing in?

01:20:38.000 I think that's a question that we should be asking ourselves because they will do anything for a buck.

01:20:42.000 They tried to sell tweens and small children alcohol by advertising with Dylan Mulvaney.

01:20:48.000 Is that something that is excusable?

01:20:49.000 That depends.

01:20:50.000 Is this something that we should be fighting for?

01:20:52.000 I don't know.

01:20:53.000 Let the audience decide.

01:20:54.000 If you think that we should be taking over the bridge, press 1 in the comment section.

01:20:59.000 If you think we should be, of course, punishing the woke bridge that tried to sell alcohol to children, press number 2 in the comment section. 0.72

01:21:04.000 So the issue would be like...

01:21:06.000 If you have a government that rules with an iron fist, eventually you will get revolt and collapse.

01:21:13.000 But if you rule through incentives and goals, you will have people enthusiastically supporting you.

01:21:20.000 If the anti-woke forces in the culture war send the message to big companies, no matter what you do, there is no coming back and we will destroy you, you know what their response is going to be?

01:21:31.000 Okay, well then we'll go woke because they'll at least give us money. 0.95

01:21:34.000 I think it's exhausting to do a boycott and it took the Bud Light, that Bud Light boycott was like a four month thing, three month thing to really, and it, to change, get people into the mindset of I'm done with that crap Bud Light.

01:21:43.000 I'm done with it.

01:21:44.000 I'm done with it.

01:21:45.000 Now to get them back into it doesn't sound good.

01:21:47.000 It sounds like you're going in reverse while you're going 80 on the highway and it's going to do more.

01:21:52.000 Confusion damage than worth it.

01:21:54.000 I think it boycotting this company's the right move It's just a multinational billion-dollar alcohol like we'll say this 30% sales are written off completely Stay the course and keep putting out pride ads, right?

01:22:06.000 They need like an off-ramp.

01:22:07.000 They need a place to go You can't just tell the world you're doing it wrong You have a wrong way to go and then not give them a chance to say hey, here's a better way Here's the way we the way forward you can't just tell them You know, that's what they're saying to us by cancelling us.

01:22:17.000 Dude, they spent $100 million trying to save themselves.

01:22:21.000 That's like next to nothing though compared to what they're worth.

01:22:24.000 $100 million to save themselves.

01:22:26.000 It's the biggest deal in UFC history.

01:22:28.000 It's 1 500th of their revenue.

01:22:30.000 That has nothing to do with the UFC getting the biggest deal in history.

01:22:34.000 Plus inflation.

01:22:34.000 The biggest deal in history.

01:22:36.000 Can I finish?

01:22:37.000 Yeah, go for it.

01:22:38.000 And the response from the anti-woke is, there is no recovery.

01:22:43.000 You are guaranteeing that the only thing Bud Light will do is say, then how can we get more beer from the left?

01:22:51.000 We have nothing, nothing to give the right, so cut them off, and never even try anymore.

01:22:56.000 It's like an abusive husband trying to come back.

01:22:57.000 Please take us back. 0.99

01:22:58.000 Like, dude, you screwed us. 0.84

01:23:00.000 Like, this company's been screwing the popu- I don't know. 0.94

01:23:02.000 This is why the right loses.

01:23:03.000 This is why the right has lost for so long.

01:23:05.000 Because the left marched through the institutions, and they said, now we have the New York Times.

01:23:10.000 Now we will use this to crush free speech.

01:23:12.000 And the right goes, let's just tear it all down.

01:23:14.000 I tell you, if Elon Musk buys AB InBev, I'm on board.

01:23:17.000 Sorry, Anna, were you gonna say something?

01:23:18.000 No, I was just going to say that I kind of agree with you.

01:23:20.000 I think that there needs to be some example of what happens.

01:23:24.000 I'm not saying that needs to be the approach every single time a company goes woke, but I think we need a couple examples of like, hey, you will go out of business if this is the case, or you will suffer to a point where this particular product is not even something people want to buy in this country anymore.

01:23:40.000 I think, yeah, we sent them sort of a message, but I don't really think it was I think that it needs to go further.

01:23:48.000 I do think that as far as we need to use your resources, we don't really.

01:23:52.000 We could just fund other beer companies.

01:23:55.000 There are other beer companies.

01:23:55.000 We don't really need Bud Light to exist.

01:23:57.000 Bud Light, if that is the course taken, will start giving more money to woke initiatives.

01:24:03.000 They will fund more Pride events, they will fund more Pride commercials, and the right will be like, why are they doing this?

01:24:09.000 Oh no, well it's because you told them screw off.

01:24:11.000 But then we will continue to not buy it.

01:24:12.000 But they're not dying because of it.

01:24:14.000 And all that will do is give the woke forces money. 0.71

01:24:18.000 You need Bud Light to commit 100% of their resources to anti-woke.

01:24:22.000 They'll never do that.

01:24:24.000 Right now, they've lost 30%.

01:24:24.000 They've lost 30% in sales.

01:24:27.000 We can tell them, hey, we'll give you that 30% back if you allocate your funding in our direction.

01:24:33.000 And they're saying, hmm, that sounds like it might work.

01:24:36.000 Let's try.

01:24:36.000 Let's give UFC $100 million.

01:24:37.000 And you've got people still saying, it'll never be good enough.

01:24:40.000 They go, eh, screw it.

01:24:41.000 That $100 million we're going to spend on UFC, give it to Dylan Mulvaney.

01:24:45.000 Is that what you want?

01:24:45.000 Because if these 30% of people never come back to Bud Light, they'll just give more money to Dylan Mulvaney.

01:24:51.000 Congratulations!

01:24:51.000 I mean, then you'll get more Pride events.

01:24:53.000 Or the inverse of it, because they could say, oh, you know, Bud Light could get away with this, they could advertise to small children, they could advertise Dylan Mulvaney, but if they just, you know, give a little bit money to the UFC, they're going to be cleared of all wrongdoing, and therefore, you know, why not get away with this even more?

01:25:09.000 Don't do it again, we'll lose the money.

01:25:10.000 The business guys are right now looking at their bottom line, and they're saying, we lost 30%.

01:25:13.000 How do we get it back?

01:25:14.000 We've got to get away from wokeness. 1.00

01:25:16.000 Before Dylan Mulvaney, we were at X amount of sales.

01:25:19.000 After Dylan Mulvaney, we're at X minus 30%.

01:25:21.000 To recover the 30%, we need to get away from wokeness and go towards something that's not woke. 0.96

01:25:26.000 If they give money to UFC and it works, they're going to say, never spend money on that stuff again.

01:25:30.000 If we say, no, you can never recover, they're going to say, we're at X minus 30.

01:25:35.000 We can't recover that 30%.

01:25:37.000 Stay the course, and at least we'll maintain the pride community. 0.87

01:25:40.000 They heavily know the choice at that point.

01:25:41.000 If they want to fail as a company, then they would be like, OK, well, I guess we're done.

01:25:46.000 I guess we are cancelled.

01:25:47.000 We quit.

01:25:47.000 If the investment caused a huge 30% loss, why do you think that they would continue that train of investment?

01:25:54.000 Because they've already lost at 30%.

01:25:56.000 There's no negative and there's no positive.

01:25:58.000 There's only negative.

01:25:59.000 No, there isn't.

01:26:00.000 They've already lost 30%.

01:26:02.000 And then they stopped doing it.

01:26:03.000 And so now they're saying, we've got people who are angry at us who are on the left, but the right won't forgive us at all ever.

01:26:10.000 So there's no point trying to recover that revenue.

01:26:12.000 Let's go back to the to the pride events and see if we can at least maintain that market.

01:26:16.000 That's like a I kind of want more from them.

01:26:19.000 I want more from Bud Light.

01:26:21.000 I want them to do more to show us that they're changing course.

01:26:24.000 I want reparations.

01:26:25.000 Yeah, exactly.

01:26:26.000 Give us some cultural reparations here.

01:26:28.000 Host an Irish Lives Matter protest in Ireland.

01:26:31.000 Let's do something like that.

01:26:33.000 Let's have Sean Strickland with the Durag on the can. 1.00

01:26:36.000 I want it.

01:26:36.000 I would then go out there and buy it.

01:26:39.000 I think we need just a little bit more from my perspective, but I might be asking too much.

01:26:42.000 I think what they're doing is too much of a wink-wink, nudge-nudge to the right, like, oh, we're on your side, guys.

01:26:47.000 But we're still kind of in the left's camp.

01:26:49.000 They're playing it safe.

01:26:50.000 Give me more.

01:26:51.000 Yeah, I agree.

01:26:52.000 I want more Clydesdale ads.

01:26:54.000 It's a Belgian company that wants the United States to fail, man. 0.99

01:26:57.000 It's just part of this international banking I'm listening to people who play chess being like, don't control the center of the board, it's pointless.

01:27:02.000 They wouldn't let us control it, so why should we?

01:27:04.000 And I'm like, what?

01:27:05.000 Take the factory! 0.87

01:27:06.000 Take the money!

01:27:07.000 Let's get that center out of the game so that we can play on a more equal ground.

01:27:10.000 You can't!

01:27:10.000 You cannot!

01:27:11.000 We can boycott companies to death.

01:27:12.000 Like, imagine a great general being like, don't take the field because they wouldn't let us take it either way, so we should run the other direction.

01:27:18.000 It's like, okay.

01:27:19.000 Let the world take all the institutions, let them take the universities, let them take the television networks, and then cross your fingers that ultra-right conservatives beer can rival the multi-billion dollar beer brand, and cross your fingers that Jeremy's Razors and Jeremy's Chocolates is going to beat Hershey's.

01:27:34.000 That's absolutely fine.

01:27:35.000 More power to you.

01:27:37.000 I just think if you have the option of occupying a major factor with billions of dollars and utilizing all of its resources to your end, you need to push that in your direction.

01:27:46.000 That's not what's happening.

01:27:47.000 Maybe the universities, maybe the media organizations need to fail.

01:27:51.000 Yeah.

01:27:51.000 That's my perspective.

01:27:53.000 The universities, with how much injustice they caused, with how much servitude and debt they caused the American people, with how much just woke nonsense and poison that they have put into America, let them fail.

01:28:03.000 That's my perspective.

01:28:03.000 They're not really reparable in my opinion.

01:28:05.000 They need to fail and maybe we build something else.

01:28:07.000 Exactly.

01:28:09.000 I agree at this point.

01:28:11.000 I don't know if we're at a point where we can fix it, even.

01:28:13.000 Yeah, everything's coming to a head.

01:28:15.000 Like they said, they're planning an October war.

01:28:18.000 It's no time to joke around right now.

01:28:20.000 The companies that are wrecking the American way of life need to fail, I feel.

01:28:24.000 But I think your point about it being not even American-owned, that's an important point.

01:28:28.000 I don't think it makes it woke, but I do think it begs the question, why are they advertising it as they want us to associate it with American patriotism?

01:28:35.000 I think that is an important part of it.

01:28:37.000 Why are we mad at Bud Light?

01:28:40.000 They tried to sell alcohol to children and culturally promoted the larger ideology that Dylan Mulvaney represents.

01:28:47.000 And so what would make us not mad at Bud Light?

01:28:49.000 Nothing?

01:28:49.000 Never?

01:28:51.000 Kleize lads. 0.68

01:28:53.000 Literally nothing?

01:28:54.000 I had my things what I wanted.

01:28:56.000 I've got personal investments they could start going with, like graphene tech and high tech, like revolutionary energy technology.

01:29:02.000 I want that do-rag can. 1.00

01:29:04.000 I really do.

01:29:06.000 I want more.

01:29:07.000 I want them to say, we made a mistake.

01:29:10.000 We're going to fix it.

01:29:11.000 This is us standing by something new in the culture war.

01:29:14.000 We're going to have just as big of an impact like we did with De La Moveni.

01:29:18.000 We're going to have it bigger on the other side.

01:29:22.000 They gave Dylan Mulvaney $180,000.

01:29:23.000 They gave UFC $100 million.

01:29:25.000 Like, if you can't accept that as a victory, you will lose.

01:29:28.000 Because they lost money for six months.

01:29:30.000 They want you to think it's a victory.

01:29:32.000 It cost them nothing.

01:29:33.000 Relatively nothing.

01:29:34.000 One five hundredth of their 2019 revenue.

01:29:37.000 Revenue is not profit.

01:29:38.000 What's their profit?

01:29:39.000 Operating income.

01:29:41.000 Net income.

01:29:42.000 Jeez, their total assets are $236 billion.

01:29:44.000 What's their profit?

01:29:45.000 Alright, it doesn't say.

01:29:46.000 Revenue is not profit.

01:29:48.000 Their margins could be 3% for all we know.

01:29:49.000 Their operating income is $16.5 billion.

01:29:52.000 Right, and so what's their profit?

01:29:53.000 The net income?

01:29:54.000 $9 billion?

01:29:54.000 No.

01:29:59.000 We need their profit, their margins.

01:30:01.000 Because for a beer company shipping liquids, I imagine their margins are going to be relatively small, but they're still probably making billions.

01:30:07.000 But it's a question of, like, how much money are they generating?

01:30:09.000 And it's not even the question.

01:30:11.000 The question is this.

01:30:13.000 What is victory?

01:30:14.000 Seriously, what is your condition of victory?

01:30:17.000 If woke institutions say, okay, you win, we're gonna fund 10,000 times more money towards you, and you go, no.

01:30:24.000 It's like, okay, well, then you have no win condition.

01:30:27.000 What's your win condition?

01:30:28.000 But if it's like 10,000 times more for you, but it's one 500th less for them, you gotta do that opportunity cost.

01:30:34.000 And if it costs them next to nothing to give you a 5,000% boost, you gotta see, is it really costing them anything at all to make me think I'm gaining something?

01:30:41.000 Well, I mean, I'm all for it.

01:30:42.000 Well, honest question, guys.

01:30:43.000 What's your win condition?

01:30:44.000 They fail.

01:30:45.000 They lose.

01:30:46.000 The establishment just stops operating in a hurtful way.

01:30:49.000 The universities get shut down.

01:30:51.000 The corporate media gets shut down.

01:30:53.000 And people learn to... I'm talking about Bud Light.

01:30:54.000 I just think recapping... What's the win condition?

01:30:58.000 I think they would have to be so obviously patriotic in order for them to have any hope of us accepting them again.

01:31:06.000 And I don't think this is enough.

01:31:07.000 I think this is just some guy being paid to say something that isn't even true, like the fact that it's such a patriotic beer.

01:31:13.000 And then in addition to that, I think that if they're not going to meet that expectation, which they won't, then yeah, I think we let them fail.

01:31:20.000 We let them fail on this particular product.

01:31:21.000 They won't fail.

01:31:22.000 I got a win condition.

01:31:23.000 Bud Light won't go out of business.

01:31:24.000 Anheuser-Busch loses so much money that they shutter it and Seth Weathers buys it.

01:31:28.000 Okay, well that's not going to happen.

01:31:29.000 Well, geez, yes it is.

01:31:31.000 What?

01:31:32.000 Their sales drop has stalled at 30% and it's stabilized.

01:31:32.000 That's my win condition.

01:31:36.000 Well, let's shut it down.

01:31:37.000 Sell it to an American company.

01:31:38.000 Get it back, make it American again. 1.00

01:31:40.000 If the people who already stopped buying it stopped buying it, how do you make their sales drop further?

01:31:43.000 Get more people to stop buying it.

01:31:45.000 I want it to be an American company again.

01:31:45.000 How?

01:31:46.000 That's my win condition.

01:31:48.000 Anheuser-Busch is an American company.

01:31:49.000 Okay, now my question is, how do you get Bud Light to be sold to an American company?

01:31:53.000 You gotta boycott it, basically.

01:31:55.000 Okay, that's already happened. What's next?

01:31:57.000 Keep the boycott going.

01:31:58.000 Right. So they've been now for 75% of the year at around, averaging around 28 to 30% sales drop off.

01:32:07.000 What's the next play?

01:32:08.000 You would have to just continue doing, I mean, it would be exhausting to go after

01:32:14.000 one multinational company and try and bankrupt it.

01:32:16.000 Are you saying that, like, after a year of minus 30% sales, a stable... a stabilized sales base, they will eventually just say, you know, we're going to sell the product?

01:32:25.000 Well, we don't really owe them anything.

01:32:27.000 So, like, if we just don't want to buy it because they don't represent what we believe in, then we just will continue to not buy it, you know?

01:32:32.000 Even if it doesn't put them out of business, per se.

01:32:34.000 So then the issue is, when condition is irrelevant, you just don't want to buy Bud Light.

01:32:39.000 I was really pissed off when they gave Dylan Mulvaney a commercial to sell beer to his audience, which was like 17-year-olds and stuff.

01:32:46.000 Young people.

01:32:47.000 I think it was 15 to 16-year-olds.

01:32:48.000 And that's like a beer company selling to that guy, having him sell to his audience.

01:32:51.000 That was really gross to me, like a total mismanagement.

01:32:53.000 Like, are they trying to poison our populace?

01:32:55.000 I know that people are sending fentanyl up across the southern border.

01:32:58.000 Like, what are they doing with Dylan Mulvaney and alcohol?

01:33:02.000 Well, just alcohol in general is a very net negative for your brain, for your health, but that's not talking about the conversation.

01:33:08.000 Tim brings up some good points that are worth considering.

01:33:11.000 For me, again, I'm just going to reiterate, maybe it's not the strategic, maybe it's not the smartest move, but I do think culturally a lot of what the corporations do matters.

01:33:22.000 If they're trying to appease the ESG social credit scorer, Klaus Schwab, Rothschild, Pope Connected, revisionist of capitalist individuals, if they're trying to do that, they deserve to fail in my opinion.

01:33:35.000 Got it.

01:33:35.000 We boycott UFC next.

01:33:37.000 Some people have said that.

01:33:37.000 that. Then that's the move we make right now and we give Dana White the middle finger.

01:33:41.000 Because if Dana White is going to accept Bud Light and you guys won't, then we must now

01:33:46.000 condemn UFC, Sean Strickland, Dana White, and any single one of them who advocated for

01:33:51.000 defending Bud Light. I thought it was a total sellout on Dana's part. I agree. And Sean

01:33:54.000 Strickland. I want you guys, like, we gotta call them all out. If Sean Strickland comes

01:34:01.000 out and says Bud Light's being rehabilitated by me, and you guys are saying no it's not,

01:34:05.000 then we call him out too.

01:34:06.000 Boycott him.

01:34:07.000 He just fought the other night.

01:34:08.000 No, no, did he fight recently?

01:34:10.000 No.

01:34:11.000 Sean Strickland?

01:34:11.000 Yeah.

01:34:12.000 He fought a couple of weeks ago.

01:34:13.000 That's right, that's right.

01:34:13.000 He became champion of the UFC.

01:34:14.000 He's out then.

01:34:15.000 He's going to be fighting soon.

01:34:16.000 Then don't watch it.

01:34:17.000 I really like him.

01:34:18.000 I like Dana White.

01:34:19.000 You cannot.

01:34:21.000 You cannot simultaneously condemn Bud Light, but then defend the people who are defending Bud Light.

01:34:26.000 I agree, I agree.

01:34:27.000 I actually think this is totally fake, this whole UFC thing, this, oh, we're gonna support Bud Light now.

01:34:32.000 I don't like it.

01:34:33.000 I think that it's... And I don't like the way... And I never picked up on this before, you pointed it out, but the way he wants us to associate...

01:34:41.000 Supporting Bud Light with patriotism, like that's just slimy, especially when it's not owned by an American company.

01:34:47.000 So I actually agree.

01:34:48.000 I think you're right.

01:34:49.000 I would do the same.

01:34:49.000 Okay.

01:34:50.000 The next move is we boycott it for everybody who thinks Bud Light should not be rehabilitated.

01:34:54.000 We have to call out Dana White.

01:34:56.000 We have to boycott UFC.

01:34:58.000 We have to call out any UFC personality supported this and refuse to watch or purchase any or tickets to their fights and demand that Shawn and any other UFC fighter Refuse to participate in UFC until they cancel their sponsorship with Bud Light.

01:35:13.000 Wait, I do wonder though, and I don't know, maybe it's true, but did UFC specifically make a deal with them or was it just the fighters?

01:35:19.000 UFC.

01:35:20.000 And then Strickland came out saying that he was going to save Bud Light because he said a whole bunch of anti-woke stuff on Twitter and said, brought you by Bud Light.

01:35:20.000 Okay.

01:35:29.000 If that is unacceptable, then we need to call out anybody who's standing alongside Bud Light.

01:35:33.000 I actually think that's a fair thing.

01:35:35.000 I think that to stay consistent, I think that is fair.

01:35:37.000 And I think that I would support that.

01:35:39.000 Well, right on.

01:35:40.000 So you guys in favor of boycotting UFC?

01:35:42.000 I don't watch UFC anyway.

01:35:43.000 I do like watching guys fight, because it's a cool sport.

01:35:46.000 Luke, you won't do it.

01:35:47.000 But the sellout Dana White... I'm thinking about it.

01:35:49.000 I like watching the UFC.

01:35:50.000 That's right.

01:35:51.000 I'm just being honest and transparent here.

01:35:53.000 It's easy for you to boycott Bud Light.

01:35:54.000 You don't drink alcohol.

01:35:55.000 Is it easy for you to boycott the UFC?

01:35:58.000 I mean, Dana sold his idea.

01:36:00.000 He said, patriotism, patriotism, buy Belgian company.

01:36:03.000 And it's like, yo, Dana, that ain't American.

01:36:05.000 So maybe he just wanted the money, a hundred million bucks.

01:36:07.000 He's going to keep the company solvent for another three years or whatever the hell.

01:36:10.000 And he wants to sign another deal with them later.

01:36:12.000 That's why he's talking so highly of him right now.

01:36:13.000 It's easy to boycott a product you never bought in the first place.

01:36:16.000 That's fair.

01:36:16.000 I don't really watch UFC, so it's hard for me to say that.

01:36:19.000 And Luke's a big UFC fan.

01:36:20.000 But are you going to support UFC after they just- I thought about that.

01:36:24.000 I heard Dana White's arguments and I heard this endorsement and it kind of rubbed me the wrong way.

01:36:29.000 And I was like, it kind of does seem like profit is a little bit more important than the kind of culture war here.

01:36:35.000 That was my initial reaction from it.

01:36:36.000 Am I wrong?

01:36:37.000 I could be.

01:36:38.000 I'm not always right.

01:36:39.000 I'm not always perfect myself.

01:36:41.000 I at first said Sean Strickland was wrong.

01:36:43.000 Dana White was selling out.

01:36:44.000 And then I actually listened to what Sean Strickland was saying and I realized he was right.

01:36:49.000 That this is a major win.

01:36:51.000 But if that is unacceptable, and I'm wrong, then we cannot just accept that UFC took a hundred million dollars from a corporation that has no intention of actually standing up for our values.

01:37:01.000 And we cannot allow... That would mean Dana White's a traitor. 0.99

01:37:05.000 A sellout, and that means all of these UFC fighters are willing to fight in the ring with the Bud Light logo, don't care about our values either.

01:37:12.000 You know, I'm not too worried about international business.

01:37:15.000 It's not my fight.

01:37:17.000 I don't like that they sold beer to a child market through Dylan Mulvaney.

01:37:21.000 That was, like, over the line.

01:37:22.000 But I don't necessarily want to go after every multinational corporation just because they're multinational corporations and they get into ESG.

01:37:33.000 Like you said, there's always so much mind focus that one can do, and to do a constant boycott of every company that touches every company I don't like, I don't like doing that kind of thing.

01:37:44.000 Well, I don't see the logic in saying Bud Light can never recover, but we're absolutely on board with companies colluding with these unrecoverable companies.

01:37:54.000 Like, when UFC first announced this major deal with Bud Light, the immediate reaction was, boycott UFC.

01:38:01.000 And that's what everybody was saying.

01:38:04.000 Let's go to Super Chats!

01:38:05.000 If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, click join us.

01:38:13.000 We're gonna have a members-only show coming up for you in about 23 or so minutes.

01:38:16.000 It's gonna be fun because we got some interesting subjects to talk about.

01:38:19.000 We're gonna rag on Bill Maher.

01:38:21.000 Because Bill Maher triggered a woke activist talking about transgender issues, and I think we should break this down.

01:38:27.000 So before all that, we'll read what y'all have to say.

01:38:29.000 Clint Torres wins first place.

01:38:32.000 He got the first super chat saying, howdy people.

01:38:34.000 Howdy.

01:38:35.000 Howdy, with a little waving emoji and a cowboy man.

01:38:38.000 Alright, Andrew D843 says, Congress said they didn't have $9.7 billion over 10 years to fund the major Richard Starr Act, but can send $75 billion plus to Ukraine this year.

01:38:50.000 Over 50,000 troops who got injured in combat and medically retired don't get retirement to this day.

01:38:55.000 And that's why we all hate Congress.

01:38:57.000 Because that is corruption right there.

01:39:00.000 Money for... what is it?

01:39:01.000 They got money for the war but they can't feed the poor?

01:39:02.000 Who said that?

01:39:03.000 What was that quote?

01:39:04.000 That's a good line.

01:39:04.000 I don't remember who said that.

01:39:05.000 It was something like... was it Tupac?

01:39:08.000 Luke's yelling it from the bathroom but I can't hear him.

01:39:09.000 Luke knew.

01:39:10.000 Luke's yelling it from the bathroom but I can't hear him.

01:39:12.000 He yelled Tupac?

01:39:14.000 Was it?

01:39:14.000 What did he say?

01:39:15.000 Joe Mitchell?

01:39:16.000 Joe Mitchell.

01:39:16.000 That was the first name that came up.

01:39:17.000 I couldn't... he was yelling from the bathroom.

01:39:19.000 Oh yeah, it was Tupac.

01:39:20.000 Thanks, Luke.

01:39:22.000 Alright, here we go.

01:39:23.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

01:39:24.000 says... I did not know that Tupac quote.

01:39:26.000 Tupac quote.

01:39:27.000 Tim, I knew the quote, I just didn't know it was him.

01:39:29.000 Tim, it's indisputable that the line is being forwarded, culturally and politically.

01:39:34.000 There's been too many recent positives to not see the line moving.

01:39:37.000 I completely agree.

01:39:38.000 Mike Cernovich had a great tweet.

01:39:39.000 He said, imagine going to 2020 and claiming that the presidents of Harvard, Penn, and MIT were facing removal for anti-Semitism, and that Alex Jones had been brought back to Twitter, which is now called Axe.

01:39:53.000 You'd be 51-50.

01:39:54.000 Great point.

01:39:55.000 Brilliant point, too, because he's absolutely correct on that.

01:40:00.000 Jacob Paradis has just saw The Shift over the weekend.

01:40:03.000 Highly recommend.

01:40:03.000 If you don't know already, Sean Astin gives one of the best lines so far.

01:40:07.000 Quote, I'm always packing.

01:40:09.000 Well, alright.

01:40:11.000 Codex says sign up for X today.

01:40:13.000 Just to have my account vanish on logging out right after I paid for premium.

01:40:17.000 X support sent an auto message saying can't verify the account doesn't exist.

01:40:20.000 Man, Elon makes it hard to support free speech.

01:40:23.000 Well, you gotta understand.

01:40:24.000 Twitter was a disgusting sinking ship and Elon has been working tirelessly to try and fix it.

01:40:31.000 I will say, unfortunately, however, and we'll get into this in the members only, Grok is woke.

01:40:34.000 Oh yeah?

01:40:35.000 Super woke.

01:40:36.000 You've been testing it?

01:40:37.000 Dude, Grok is so woke.

01:40:42.000 So, we'll save this for the members only, but yeah, I've been testing out Grok, which is Twitter's large language model.

01:40:47.000 We call him AI, I guess.

01:40:48.000 And if you ask it a question, a fact-based question, it won't give you the answer.

01:40:52.000 It'll give you a non-answer related to some woke issue.

01:40:55.000 Oh no, that's not good for the future of AI.

01:40:57.000 We know it's all gonna be woke.

01:40:59.000 But I'll show you exactly what I mean.

01:41:01.000 If you look at my Twitter, you can see it, but I'll save it for the members only.

01:41:03.000 People are saying I just did a Vivec.

01:41:05.000 A Vivec?

01:41:07.000 Your mic wasn't hot.

01:41:09.000 It sounded like he was making espresso or something.

01:41:11.000 I think it was a sink that was on.

01:41:12.000 Yeah, that's what it sounded like.

01:41:13.000 He could have peed and then washed his hands.

01:41:15.000 Both could be true.

01:41:16.000 I listen to it and I'm like...

01:41:19.000 Yeah.

01:41:20.000 Okay, I gotta be honest.

01:41:21.000 If that was urinating, Vivek's got a seriously damaged and enlarged prostate and he's having trouble urinating.

01:41:26.000 Like, that doesn't sound like a man going to the bathroom, especially a 38-year-old.

01:41:31.000 It sounded like he was making a coffee or an espresso or something.

01:41:33.000 I don't know, whatever.

01:41:35.000 I don't know, I don't know!

01:41:36.000 Whatever.

01:41:38.000 Alright, alright, let's read some more Super Chats.

01:41:42.000 What do we have here?

01:41:43.000 Waffle Sensei says, funny how they told us to build our own platforms to share our opinions, now they team up with the government to try and destroy those platforms.

01:41:51.000 Sounds like they did that with Parler.

01:41:53.000 I'm willing to bet the government was involved in getting Parler taken down.

01:41:59.000 Buster Ruckus says, are we not going to talk about the black woman who tried to burn down MLK's house?

01:42:05.000 We all know who the media would blame if she hadn't been caught. 0.50

01:42:08.000 That's a crazy story, I don't know enough about it though, but yeah, there was like some black woman was caught trying to burn down Martin Luther King Jr.' 's house. 0.91

01:42:15.000 You mean a white supremacist? 0.94

01:42:16.000 I mean, they'll call him that, I guess.

01:42:18.000 Was it Larry Elder?

01:42:22.000 Kyle Beckham says, there is a mobilization happening.

01:42:25.000 I have it from Navy buddies that deployment will occur in August to the Pacific.

01:42:29.000 Interesting.

01:42:30.000 I'm hearing a lot about that too, but it's hard to discern if it's true or not.

01:42:34.000 That Panama Canal.

01:42:35.000 That a lot of troops are being called up.

01:42:37.000 Interesting.

01:42:38.000 Panama.

01:42:40.000 Over Venezuela?

01:42:40.000 No, no, no.

01:42:41.000 I mean, Venezuela also, there's another war there brewing as well.

01:42:45.000 The Panama Canal is super valuable, though.

01:42:46.000 It's like the Suez. 0.56

01:42:47.000 It's just so important to have control of that thing.

01:42:50.000 All right, where are we at?

01:42:52.000 Paul Tascalo says, SNL irony.

01:42:54.000 Fired Shane Gillis in 2019 for an offensive joke.

01:42:57.000 Shane is currently one of the most successful stand-up comedians and sketch actors. 0.97

01:43:01.000 SNL now making tone-deaf, unfunny, offensive garbage. 0.99

01:43:05.000 Get woke, go broke. 0.99

01:43:06.000 I had to correct you there, Paul.

01:43:07.000 You made a mistake.

01:43:08.000 It's get woke, go broke, as it's been for 10 years.

01:43:11.000 But yeah, SNL.

01:43:13.000 Did you guys watch that opening?

01:43:14.000 I couldn't even finish it.

01:43:15.000 No, I couldn't.

01:43:16.000 I couldn't get through it.

01:43:17.000 Yeah, but I did hear a little bit of it.

01:43:18.000 It wasn't funny in any way, and the weirdest thing is they attacked Elise Stefanik, and they added things that were not part of the hearing.

01:43:28.000 It was clear they were not engaged in making jokes.

01:43:31.000 Elise Stefanik said, Is it a violation of your rules to call for the genocide of Jews? 0.95

01:43:36.000 In the SNL version, she goes, Antisemitism is up your a**! 0.96

01:43:39.000 And it's like, what?

01:43:41.000 And then the woman, then the president of one of the organizations goes like, we try to limit hate speech against all students, including Jewish students, Muslim students.

01:43:49.000 And then Elisa Fonik goes, nope, nope, nope, not that one, not that one.

01:43:53.000 And I'm like, I don't understand what the joke is, because Elisa Fonik in no way insulted Muslims.

01:43:58.000 Yeah.

01:43:59.000 They're just trying to... This is what they did when Tina Fey made fun of Sarah Palin and said, I can see Russia from my house!

01:44:07.000 And then liberals all believed Sarah Palin actually said that.

01:44:11.000 Sarah Palin actually said, when it comes to negotiating with Russia, we actually do negotiate every year because of the Bering Strait, because we have ships moving through territorial waters.

01:44:20.000 And interestingly, in the westernmost point of Alaska, you can actually see with the naked eye Russia. 0.97

01:44:24.000 So as these ships are coming through, like a very articulate and composed statement about international relations, in order to discredit her as a politician, Tina Fey says something dumb, and then people think Sarah Palin actually said something dumb. 0.95

01:44:37.000 There you go. 0.90

01:44:37.000 I figured out where the joke is. 0.90

01:44:39.000 The joke's on Lorne Michaels. 1.00

01:44:41.000 That show sucks, Lorne. 0.99

01:44:43.000 It's time to pack it in, man, or sell it or something. 1.00

01:44:46.000 Get a better cast.

01:44:49.000 Is he still around?

01:44:49.000 Yeah.

01:44:50.000 He kickin' it.

01:44:51.000 Man.

01:44:53.000 Alright.

01:44:54.000 Let's grab some more.

01:44:56.000 Voice of the People says Luke is right.

01:44:58.000 My account was nuked on YouTube for asking questions about the jab.

01:45:01.000 I'm picking up slowly on Rumble with listening to the Senate and committee hearings.

01:45:05.000 It's wild what they say themselves.

01:45:08.000 Yeah, they try to destroy independent media and they were ruthless with it.

01:45:12.000 The smaller creators I think had a bigger impact than some of the bigger guys that got hit because that really changed the people who would be bigger players now that are that are not.

01:45:22.000 And that was the big thing with.

01:45:25.000 Twitter censorship going back several years.

01:45:28.000 They'd make arguments like, we didn't ban conservatives, and that was a mistake, and they were restored.

01:45:33.000 Ah, but what was happening was, they rolled out an algorithm on Twitter, back in the day, where it was banning anybody who said hashtag learn to code, unless you were on a whitelist.

01:45:42.000 That's why when I tweeted hashtag learn to code, nothing bad happened.

01:45:45.000 But that's why when the editor-in-chief of, I think it was the Daily Caller, tweeted it, he got banned.

01:45:51.000 And they went, whoops, that was an accident, sorry about that, that wasn't supposed to happen.

01:45:56.000 The only issue, all the small accounts who tweeted it got banned, and they had no advocates, and no PR, and were unable to actually get their accounts restored.

01:46:04.000 So they were getting rid of all of the grassroots sentiment opposed to the media industry, That's how they did it.

01:46:11.000 It's like the movie Scream.

01:46:12.000 The groups all walk in and one guy gets yanked from behind and they just keep walking.

01:46:16.000 They don't know what's happening.

01:46:17.000 That kind of thing.

01:46:18.000 Yeah, it is sneaky.

01:46:20.000 Purple says, what is SCNR?

01:46:22.000 Switching it up with no explanation.

01:46:24.000 You know, this is one of the bigger challenges with any show.

01:46:27.000 Good Sir Purple, if you watched every episode of Timcast IRL, you'd know exactly what SCNR was.

01:46:33.000 But the issue is, I think on average a person will watch between 2.5 to 6 I say that it's wide range because different platforms have different metrics.

01:46:43.000 On audio versions, it's like two and a half podcasts per person.

01:46:47.000 And then a little bit more, maybe it's like three.

01:46:49.000 And then on YouTube, it's like seven or eight.

01:46:53.000 So if you skip an episode, you're going to be like, what's this?

01:46:57.000 Well, you know, to be continued, you got to go back and watch all the old episodes, which, you know, is not reasonable.

01:47:02.000 Put them all on at the same time.

01:47:03.000 It's a wild sound.

01:47:04.000 You know what is funny?

01:47:05.000 There was this woman who wrote this fake academic study where she, it was called the Alternative Influencer Network or something, where she claimed that a bunch of like anti-establishment YouTubers were all secretly connected. 0.57

01:47:17.000 And she connected Chris Ragon, who does like video game content, to Richard Spencer.

01:47:21.000 These two guys who have never met before.

01:47:24.000 And so she got roasted for it.

01:47:26.000 And then I guess because of that, she did a research paper on me specifically, where she said she watched all of my content, and I gotta be honest, I was flattered.

01:47:37.000 And I was like, yo, that's like six, at the time it was four hours of content, Monday through Friday, and two hours, Saturday and Sunday, because this was back in, what is this, 2020, when I was doing Weekends.

01:47:51.000 I was zero days off.

01:47:52.000 Weekends I would record until like three, and then Monday through Friday was three, and then also IRL.

01:47:58.000 And she actually wrote a paper saying she had watched every single one of my videos and back catalog.

01:48:03.000 And then she was like, he's liberal.

01:48:06.000 I'm like, wow.

01:48:08.000 Think about how, like, mentally unwell you'd have to be to watch every Tim Pool video ever.

01:48:13.000 There's a lot of people out there being like, uh... I think she wants to date you. 0.95

01:48:16.000 I like you.

01:48:18.000 Oh, man.

01:48:18.000 You know, good for her, though.

01:48:19.000 It's like, wow.

01:48:20.000 That means she had to have watched, in order, like, I was tracking from when she finished the articles, like, a couple years after.

01:48:27.000 I was like, that means she had to have watched three days of my content every day, Monday to Sunday, non-stop.

01:48:35.000 Maybe she had them at two-point speed. 0.85

01:48:37.000 I gotta be honest.

01:48:38.000 Two-time speed, yeah.

01:48:40.000 Sure, but she still had to watch three days worth of content.

01:48:42.000 It could also be she's lying.

01:48:46.000 That's Occam's razor at work.

01:48:46.000 How about that?

01:48:48.000 No.

01:48:48.000 Slicing the truth in half.

01:48:50.000 These shady individuals connected to Indel, Agent Caesars, and George Soros don't lie.

01:48:56.000 Gustavo Gutierrez says, I'm Venezuelan and want to clarify a factor regarding Esequibo, Zona de Reclamation.

01:49:02.000 The land was Venezuelan from the get-go. 0.87

01:49:04.000 I do not agree with how Maduro is going about the reclaim of the land.

01:49:07.000 Please read the history.

01:49:08.000 Very interesting.

01:49:08.000 That's true.

01:49:09.000 There's a big fight brewing there.

01:49:11.000 And even Google's long had a dotted line for the border.

01:49:14.000 It's been disputed.

01:49:16.000 But it is kind of funny that they're like, hey, there's oil here.

01:49:18.000 And then Maduro's like, we should reclaim our land.

01:49:21.000 Oh, there's value there now.

01:49:22.000 And, you know, it's a good reason for us to go in.

01:49:26.000 Let's grab some more.

01:49:28.000 Legama says, I disagree about Bud Light.

01:49:30.000 Corporations must understand going woke will be their end.

01:49:33.000 They must perceive it as an unacceptable risk that nobody dares to bring up in boardrooms for fear of being fired.

01:49:39.000 This is how we crush the woke without Boogaloo. 0.98

01:49:42.000 So there's another way of looking at it.

01:49:44.000 We want companies of their own volition to invest in anti-woke initiatives.

01:49:49.000 We don't want neutrality.

01:49:51.000 We want to win.

01:49:52.000 So the message should be, get anti-woke, make lots of money.

01:49:57.000 That's it.

01:49:58.000 If the message is, enter politics in any fashion and you lose, it's still a win, you know, because companies will just be like, I don't want to get political.

01:50:06.000 But we win faster if companies were like, A, sponsor more anti-woke channels.

01:50:11.000 It's tough with these big public companies because Vanguard and BlackRock and Statesphere are so heavily across the board, but private companies can twist and turn a lot easier.

01:50:20.000 So sometimes it's better for one big woke company to fail and a new one to start up than it is to try and change that big behemoth of an organization.

01:50:30.000 Andrew says, hey Tim and cast, the Obamas produced a film called Leave the World Behind, which showcases the breakdown of society during a cyber attack.

01:50:37.000 Thoughts?

01:50:37.000 There's also a scene going viral where a woman says, don't trust white people.

01:50:42.000 I don't know what that's all about, but, you know, it's in the movie, whatever that means.

01:50:46.000 Bleach white people?

01:50:47.000 Context is important, because I doubt it, but for all we know, she's not a good guy in the film.

01:50:53.000 You know, she's saying things like, I'm racist, blah blah blah, and then they're like, showing her saying that, but I'm assuming the assumption is she's just, you know, like... Being woke.

01:51:02.000 Yeah, and it's a woke film.

01:51:04.000 I watched the trailer, it definitely seems like a very woke film that the Obamas produced.

01:51:08.000 We've said the word woke so many times in the last three minutes, it's so funny.

01:51:11.000 Project Additon says, just make Bud Light the 51st state.

01:51:14.000 Yes.

01:51:15.000 Well there you go, problem solved.

01:51:16.000 Oh, corporations are states now, as well as people?

01:51:18.000 That's an Ian argument. What do we got here?

01:51:26.000 Michael Jackson, the Michael Jackson says, Do y'all really think Dana doesn't have a cancel clause?

01:51:32.000 Then Dana is hardcore against Bud Light.

01:51:34.000 It's a possible lose-lose for Bud Light.

01:51:37.000 So then, if the point is Bud Light can never recover, we have to force UFC into canceling their Bud Light contract.

01:51:47.000 The biggest victor over Bud Light would be, if you want it to be a nuclear bomb in terms of Bud Light sales, having UFC break their contract and kick them out would be the most devastating defeat Bud Light could face.

01:52:00.000 That would be awesome, and you should have Dana White on The Culture War.

01:52:03.000 That would be awesome, to defend why he did that.

01:52:06.000 That would be so cool.

01:52:07.000 Because he might have a good reason for taking the $100 million.

01:52:09.000 There might be more to it.

01:52:10.000 I mean, obviously.

01:52:11.000 Yeah, he's got a hundred million reasons.

01:52:16.000 But if that's not enough, that you have to boycott UFC.

01:52:21.000 The only problem is, I don't think you can boycott UFC.

01:52:24.000 I don't think the fans will boycott UFC.

01:52:27.000 And UFC did not do anything as egregious as Bud Light.

01:52:31.000 They've simply aligned themselves with Bud Light.

01:52:34.000 So you can accept Sean Strickland going anti-woke and taking Bud Light money, and taking, claiming, sticking his flag in the Bud Light factory, or you can say, no, we reject this, you're collaborating with the enemy, and tell Sean Strickland, no, we don't accept what you're saying, Dana White, you've sold out, UFC, be gone.

01:52:50.000 Yeah, I mean, I think that it's mostly in theory, the argument.

01:52:52.000 I don't think people would actually boycott UFC.

01:52:55.000 I think it's what would need to happen to make the point, but I don't think you would be on enough of a grand scale.

01:53:02.000 People just like, especially conservatives, they like UFC too much.

01:53:06.000 I think Luke's silently breathing a sigh of relief as you said that.

01:53:09.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

01:53:10.000 says, I gotta say, the whole Bud Light convo was fantastic.

01:53:13.000 Do you get hold the line or forward it?

01:53:17.000 Hold it with boycott or forward it by using honey for bees?

01:53:21.000 Eric Max says, Tim is right.

01:53:23.000 The more money for the anti-woke, the better.

01:53:27.000 Frog Boogers says, Bud Light never apologized.

01:53:29.000 Hold them accountable.

01:53:30.000 Supporting them again gives them an opportunity to just sweep what they've done under the rug.

01:53:35.000 So, uh, don't ever buy Hugo Boss or Volkswagen either.

01:53:39.000 For real.

01:53:39.000 Because they serve the Nazis?

01:53:40.000 Yeah, absolutely.

01:53:41.000 IBM as well?

01:53:41.000 But I mean, seriously.

01:53:42.000 Yeah, IBM.

01:53:43.000 No, no question.

01:53:43.000 Don't buy any IBM computer parts or IBM machines.

01:53:47.000 Uh, go Mac.

01:53:48.000 You know?

01:53:48.000 Oh, wait.

01:53:50.000 No, Mac used the Foxconn labs where all those people were marching off the roofs in suicide.

01:53:54.000 Okay, um, you ever see Ancient Technologies on YouTube?

01:53:58.000 No.

01:53:59.000 Where the guy, like, builds cool stuff from, like, mud? 1.00

01:54:02.000 Pools and stuff.

01:54:03.000 Oh, this life awaits you.

01:54:05.000 And I don't mean that, I'm only half kidding.

01:54:07.000 It looks so awesome and fun to, like, you ever see those guys, they build a swimming pool?

01:54:12.000 Are those the two Indian guys?

01:54:13.000 Yeah, I've seen those.

01:54:14.000 Come on, that stuff's awesome.

01:54:15.000 It turns out they had machines behind the scenes.

01:54:18.000 Really?

01:54:19.000 It's not real.

01:54:20.000 Oh, I was tricked!

01:54:21.000 Yeah, that is disappointing.

01:54:23.000 You know they did that with little hand trowels and stuff like that?

01:54:26.000 I want to believe it, okay?

01:54:28.000 I was told that it's fake, but it could be wrong.

01:54:31.000 There could be people that do it for real.

01:54:33.000 There could be.

01:54:33.000 That's a good point.

01:54:34.000 It could be both things.

01:54:36.000 Waffle Sensei says, the action of going anti-woke is more important than the apology.

01:54:40.000 I want to win.

01:54:41.000 Sam T says, people who are calling for Bud to go down clearly never had a dog.

01:54:45.000 You encourage good behavior and discourage bad behavior.

01:54:48.000 Simple.

01:54:49.000 Anyone with intel stats over three will figure that one out.

01:54:51.000 Yeah, but they're using math.

01:54:52.000 There's no dog to entice in this situation.

01:54:54.000 It's all mathematics and machine algorithm work.

01:54:57.000 So, like, you've got to just play the numbers on this one.

01:55:00.000 Logic Plague says, Wokeness has infected something we all love.

01:55:04.000 At some point, I'd rather see those things reclaimed than destroyed.

01:55:08.000 Yeah, like, we're retaking the ground.

01:55:10.000 We've lost the ground.

01:55:11.000 Why aren't we retaking it?

01:55:11.000 We should be happy we're retaking it.

01:55:12.000 That's the way I see it.

01:55:14.000 Mr. Big says, Tim's argument is baseless.

01:55:16.000 Twitter X isn't real.

01:55:17.000 Nothing has changed at Bud Light except Tim's attitude towards it.

01:55:21.000 Bud Light execs are laughing.

01:55:23.000 No, my attitude was, Sean Strickland is wrong and Dana White sold out, and then Sean Strickland made a bunch of statements on Twitter under the banner of Bud Light, and Bud Light said nothing.

01:55:33.000 And I was like, whoa!

01:55:35.000 Bud Light wouldn't even dare denounce the things said by Sean Strickland, and he claimed it was sponsored by them!

01:55:43.000 And I'm like, that's it.

01:55:44.000 They are cowering right now.

01:55:46.000 But if you'd rather see them destroyed, then by all means, you have to stop collaborators.

01:55:50.000 You have to boycott the collaborators.

01:55:53.000 I don't see anything other than hypocrisy for the people who are like, well, I'll keep watching UFC, but I don't like Bud Light.

01:55:57.000 Why?

01:55:58.000 No, I agree with that.

01:55:59.000 I just think in theory, it makes sense, but on a mass scale, it wouldn't be effective enough.

01:56:03.000 And also, there's always going to be a conservative that will sign on to some sort of deal like that, because it is so much money.

01:56:10.000 Even if you were to boycott UFC, it's going to be somebody else who's going to endorse them.

01:56:14.000 And whether or not that's going to be effective enough to get people to buy the beer again, I don't know.

01:56:20.000 There's just always going to be somebody who's willing to do anything for money.

01:56:23.000 Nobody's gonna boycott UFC.

01:56:24.000 Yeah, I don't think so either.

01:56:30.000 The statement is, we're still mad at you, Bud Light, but we won't boycott UFC.

01:56:34.000 Now they're laughing. 0.99

01:56:35.000 And Bud Light's saying, we got you by the balls. 0.98

01:56:37.000 We know you're not willing to boycott UFC. 0.94

01:56:40.000 So we can give them money.

01:56:41.000 We can win.

01:56:42.000 And y'all won't do anything about it.

01:56:44.000 So you can take the PR victory and say, we've won and Bud Light has caved to give us their money.

01:56:51.000 Or you can say, you're right.

01:56:53.000 We can't stand up for our convictions.

01:56:55.000 We will not condemn UFC.

01:56:56.000 We will not condemn these fighters.

01:56:58.000 And that's it.

01:56:59.000 Bud Light wins.

01:57:01.000 I think that they only care if they make money, so we're gonna see if people... Sales have not recovered, no.

01:57:07.000 If they buy it, if they don't, I think that's going to be the big tell here.

01:57:10.000 As of the latest report, which is in 2 December, I believe, their sales are still down year over year by 30%, which means...

01:57:18.000 So, it's not dropping every month by 30% more.

01:57:21.000 It means that December 2023 sales compared to December 2022 sales, they've seen a decline of 30%.

01:57:26.000 That means they've stabilized.

01:57:30.000 30% boycotted Bud Light over Dylan Mulvaney, and their sales have stabilized at this number and not changed.

01:57:35.000 In fact, it's fluctuated a little bit up and down.

01:57:39.000 Well, from 22 to 23, they're down 30%.

01:57:41.000 Are they in a downward trajectory?

01:57:43.000 No, they are not.

01:57:44.000 They're stable.

01:57:45.000 Bud Light sales are stable at 70% of their previous number.

01:57:49.000 So every time they say, sales this month are down 30%, they don't mean month to month.

01:57:54.000 That indicates that the people that were triggered by the Dylan Mulvaney event have already done the boycott.

01:57:58.000 They boycotted, and everyone else just wasn't necessarily triggered by it.

01:58:01.000 Right.

01:58:01.000 And so what's going to happen is, by April... When was the boycott?

01:58:05.000 May?

01:58:06.000 Is when it started?

01:58:07.000 By May of next year, Bud Light's going to show that their sales have recovered, and they're going to say sales have gone from... So what's going to start happening is, Once they get to the beginning of May, they're going to say, sales are now down 20%, sales are now down 15, sales are now down 7, sales are now down 9, and the media is going to report en masse, Bud Light sees massive recovery.

01:58:28.000 And what may end up happening at that time, is that right before that happens, Bud Light will do something sort of woke.

01:58:35.000 And then when the sales start recovering, because they're not really recovering, it's just that year-over-year sales are stable, that means the percentages will go to zero.

01:58:46.000 They'll claim, our sales recovered from 30% losses by doing this campaign, and they can make that campaign whatever they want it to be.

01:58:54.000 And that'll be the PR narrative.

01:58:56.000 So either you guys defeat Bud Light 100% and they lose completely before May of next year, or You force UFC fighters to say a whole bunch of shockingly anti-woke things, and you force Bud Light to answer for it.

01:59:10.000 That's way more fun.

01:59:10.000 Yeah.

01:59:11.000 Dana, would he fire the fighters if they started talking about Bud Light nasty?

01:59:16.000 Well, Sean Strickland already did.

01:59:18.000 He said my speech brought to you by Bud Light and then said things I can't say on YouTube.

01:59:23.000 Oh, awesome.

01:59:23.000 And Bud Light did nothing about it.

01:59:25.000 I mean, that's crazy.

01:59:26.000 You've got celebrities that fart and then issue apologies.

01:59:29.000 You know what I mean?

01:59:30.000 And here you've got a UFC fighter, a champion, saying this stuff and... Like, Bud Light does nothing about it.

01:59:37.000 But regardless, ignore my opinion.

01:59:39.000 Understand this.

01:59:40.000 Once we get year over year into May, they're gonna compare May's sales of, let's just say 100 units.

01:59:47.000 Let's just use generic units.

01:59:49.000 Bud Light sales were at 100.

01:59:51.000 Boycott hits, they go to 70.

01:59:53.000 Every month after that, they're selling 70 units.

01:59:57.000 So the metric they're reporting in the press is minus 30%, minus 30%, minus 30%.

02:00:02.000 Once they get to next May, they're gonna say, this May we sold 70 units, and last May we sold 70 units, our sales are at 0%.

02:00:08.000 0% growth.

02:00:10.000 And now they're gonna say, we've recovered.

02:00:12.000 We're back, baby.

02:00:14.000 70's the new normal. 0.53

02:00:15.000 Exactly.

02:00:16.000 They shut down 30% of their production capacity or something.

02:00:19.000 If some of the sales come back for any reason, they're going to say, we're now up.

02:00:23.000 Their stock will start to recover.

02:00:25.000 Their sales will start to recover.

02:00:27.000 So the issue is going to be, what move can you make right now to prevent that narrative from happening?

02:00:34.000 Because now's your chance.

02:00:34.000 You got five months.

02:00:35.000 If it went, okay, so it's down 30%, that would mean if you can knock it down another 15%, I think that would indicate a collapse of the company.

02:00:46.000 If you could knock it down to like 55%.

02:00:48.000 There needs to be another sales drop-off before May.

02:00:53.000 Yeah, and it'd have to impact people that already didn't.

02:00:55.000 It didn't impact already.

02:00:56.000 It'd have to have new people that are saying, okay, now I'm politically aware, and I'm willing to stop drinking Bud Light altogether.

02:01:01.000 Or, the narrative can be, Sean Strickland said a bunch of transphobic things, and their sales recovered.

02:01:08.000 Pick your narrative.

02:01:09.000 It's up to you.

02:01:10.000 If you haven't already, my friends, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com because we are going to talk about these issues, Bill Maher and jokes and comedy and offense culture on the members-only show coming up in about a minute.

02:01:24.000 You can follow the show at TimCastIRL.

02:01:26.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast.

02:01:28.000 Anna, do you want to shout anything out?

02:01:29.000 Yeah, you can follow me on Twitter at AnnaPerezDC.

02:01:33.000 Sorry, I'm not in the microphone.

02:01:34.000 AnnaPerezDC and then also you can follow me on Instagram at WrongThinkAnna.

02:01:38.000 Anna, that was great.

02:01:41.000 Thank you so much for coming on.

02:01:42.000 I am now officially partnered with Rumble and that's why I launched TheBestPoliticalShow.com.

02:01:49.000 We actually will be having Dave Smith on tomorrow 6 p.m.

02:01:52.000 Eastern and then the day after that James Lindsay So definitely go check it out.

02:01:56.000 Membersoflukenfiltered.com gets to call in, and it is thebestpoliticalshow.com.

02:02:02.000 And I'm Ian Crossland.

02:02:02.000 Follow me on the internet everywhere at Ian Crossland.

02:02:04.000 Subscribe on YouTube.

02:02:05.000 I just did an interview with Dave Landau.

02:02:07.000 It was spectacular over the weekend.

02:02:09.000 Great guy.

02:02:09.000 Go check it out.

02:02:11.000 Talk to me about it, Serge.

02:02:12.000 Yeah.

02:02:13.000 Thanks for coming.

02:02:13.000 Appreciate it.

02:02:14.000 Thanks for having me.

02:02:15.000 Of course.

02:02:16.000 Yeah.

02:02:17.000 I don't know.

02:02:18.000 Find me on the internet.

02:02:19.000 Serge.com.

02:02:19.000 We'll see you all over at TimCast.com in about a minute or so.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - December 12, 2023

Timcast IRL - ALEX JONES RETURNS, Elon Musk Restores Jones, Rumble Hit By CYBER ATTACK w-Anna Perez

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript