Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - FBI TAKES OUT Man Who Threatened Action Against Biden In Raid w-Reed Coverdale

00:00:00.000 We got breaking news out of Provo, Utah.

00:00:26.000 A man who was posting threats against the president had his home raided by the FBI, where he was shot and killed.

00:00:32.000 And this story is currently spreading hundreds of thousands of tweets as everyone's talking about it, and there's a couple different views.

00:00:38.000 Either way, I see it as escalation.

00:00:41.000 You either have the story of a deranged man on the internet threatening to harm the president, Or, you have the story of an overzealous FBI targeting a morbidly obese elderly man who was a threat to no one.

00:00:53.000 Either way you break it, both sides are looking at this as some kind of escalation.

00:00:57.000 And there's a lot more than just that.

00:00:58.000 We're now learning that Twitter was fined $350,000 for snubbing the FBI subpoena.

00:01:05.000 They were trying to dig into Trump's social media, and apparently Twitter, in some way, obstructed them.

00:01:11.000 Elon Musk has previously stated that the government had full access to everyone's private messages, their DMs, and it seems, in all likelihood, Elon was actually blocking this.

00:01:22.000 So we'll talk about that.

00:01:22.000 We've got a bunch of other stories that we can get into.

00:01:25.000 Before we do, my friends, head over to castbrew.com.

00:01:28.000 We have big news!

00:01:29.000 If you want to support the show, you can buy our coffee brand, which is Cast Brew, and we have K-Cups available now!

00:01:35.000 So if you want to get all of your favorite coffee blends, you can buy them.

00:01:38.000 We got Rise with Roberto Jr., we got Appalachian Nights, Mr. Boca's Pumpkin Spice, we got Sleepy Joe Decaf, Unwoke Decaf, we got Stand Your Ground.

00:01:45.000 Take all of it.

00:01:46.000 Buy it.

00:01:46.000 Support the show.

00:01:47.000 But I also have an announcement to make.

00:01:49.000 We are going to be...

00:01:51.000 Retiring the official brand of Rise with Roberto Junior because Roberto Junior has passed away unexpectedly yesterday.

00:01:59.000 He had a heart attack.

00:02:00.000 However, the coffee will just be renamed a new package in memory of Roberto Junior and will introduce a new blend for his father, Return of the King, Roberto.

00:02:11.000 So, What we have available right now in terms of the Rise with Roberto Jr.

00:02:15.000 original art, once that sells out, we will not be printing any more of these bags.

00:02:21.000 We'll be making a new art in memory of Roberto Jr.

00:02:24.000 So, you know, buy it now if you want them.

00:02:29.000 It's one of my favorites, of course.

00:02:30.000 And buying Castbrew supports the show.

00:02:32.000 You can join the Castbrew Coffee Club.

00:02:34.000 Also, head over to TimCast.

00:02:35.000 Click join us, become a member if you'd like to hang out in our uncensored members only show.

00:02:40.000 Now I know a lot of people are asking about what happened to last night's episode.

00:02:42.000 This happened before. It's on Rumble's end.

00:02:45.000 You know, I'm not trying to drag them. We're big fans. We love Rumble.

00:02:48.000 But sometimes there are errors and there's nothing we can do to remedy it.

00:02:51.000 We can try to re-upload, but then sometimes you get the same error.

00:02:55.000 Usually it resolves itself, but we're, we'll try our best.

00:03:00.000 And I think, you know, one of the issues is that by the time we find out,

00:03:04.000 because the live members only goes up.

00:03:06.000 We're all here, we're all watching, everything's fine.

00:03:08.000 By the time we find out the next day that it's down, the crew's not here, and then we could potentially re-upload it, we get the drive and all that stuff, so we're gonna try and figure out a methodology which will rectify this if it should happen again.

00:03:19.000 It usually posts anyways.

00:03:20.000 It fixes itself later, but for everybody who wants to watch it the next day, it's like, it's not there, so.

00:03:25.000 But become a member.

00:03:26.000 We're gonna have an episode on Uncensored live tonight at about 10 p.m.

00:03:29.000 And we'll take your calls.

00:03:31.000 Calls from the audience.

00:03:32.000 You can call in and talk to us and our guests.

00:03:34.000 Smash that like button.

00:03:35.000 Subscribe to this channel.

00:03:36.000 Take the URL right now for this YouTube livestream video and share it wherever you can.

00:03:40.000 That really, really does help.

00:03:41.000 Word of mouth is how podcasts grow.

00:03:43.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and a whole lot more is Reid Coverdale.

00:03:47.000 Hey, Tim.

00:03:48.000 Thanks for having me back on.

00:03:49.000 Absolutely.

00:03:49.000 Who are you?

00:03:49.000 What do you do?

00:03:50.000 Yeah, I have the Naturalist Capitalist podcast, which I actually haven't done lately just because I've been working so much, but I'm from New Hampshire.

00:03:57.000 I'm a libertarian.

00:03:59.000 The shirt I'm wearing, if I want to get one thing out, is Defend the Guard.

00:04:03.000 This is legislation that we're trying to pass around the country.

00:04:06.000 We haven't officially declared war since World War II and every police action that's taken place since then.

00:04:12.000 The National Guard has been sent overseas, which is unconstitutional.

00:04:15.000 If each state passes this, The president can no longer send troops overseas without declaring war, so that's something we definitely need to pass. 0.57

00:04:23.000 Right on.

00:04:23.000 Well, thanks for hanging out.

00:04:24.000 We got Phil hanging out.

00:04:25.000 How you doing?

00:04:26.000 I am Phil Labonte, lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains, anti-communist and counter-revolutionary.

00:04:32.000 Ian Crosland.

00:04:33.000 What's up, everybody?

00:04:34.000 Let's rock and roll.

00:04:35.000 Yeah, Surge.com.

00:04:37.000 Yeah, regarding the rebel thing, you heard it here from Tim, so stop contacting me on Twitter.

00:04:41.000 Thank you.

00:04:41.000 All right, everybody, here's the big breaking news.

00:04:44.000 We got this from the Daily Mail.

00:04:45.000 Utah man Craig Deliu-Robertson was shot dead by the FBI in raid after posting on Facebook a credible Joe Biden death threat ahead of the president's visit to Salt Lake City.

00:04:57.000 They say Craig Robertson, 75, was gunned down on his doorstep by agents in Provo, an hour from Salt Lake City, after they were alerted to his posts about the president.

00:05:05.000 Messages posted on what is believed to be his Facebook page on Tuesday included bloodthirsty content about how he would... I'm gonna be light on this one, but... Posts and death threats.

00:05:14.000 Very serious stuff.

00:05:16.000 Saying the state would be famous for the actions he would commit.

00:05:19.000 Really, really messed up stuff.

00:05:20.000 Now...

00:05:21.000 The commentary that we're seeing from many on the right is that this guy is 300 pounds, he's elderly, he can barely walk even with a cane, and wasn't a threat to anyone.

00:05:31.000 So I'm going to give you my immediate speculation in a second, but I want to say this first.

00:05:35.000 You've got the left basically saying, this is the danger of the far right, far right extremists threatening the president, oh heavens help me. 0.97

00:05:42.000 You have people on the right being like, dude it's some old fat guy posting on the internet, it's ridiculous. 0.86

00:05:46.000 But the best response that I've seen is, Every single time someone threatened Donald Trump, nothing happened. 0.96

00:05:55.000 All of these prominent leftists, high profile individuals made death threats against Donald Trump, nothing happened.

00:05:59.000 Kathy Griffin held up a mock severed head of the president, nothing happened.

00:06:06.000 This guy posts really awful things, nobody should be posting that stuff.

00:06:10.000 The FBI immediately shows up to his house, he gets gunned down.

00:06:13.000 Now here's what I think.

00:06:15.000 I bet.

00:06:16.000 You know, they see these posts, so they're gonna go and they're gonna knock on his door and they're gonna figure out who he is, what he's doing.

00:06:21.000 They're probably gonna arrest him.

00:06:22.000 Many people have faced similar things.

00:06:24.000 I'm willing to bet this guy showed up armed and that was it.

00:06:29.000 Yeah, look, I mean, first of all, like, there's no part of me that's gonna defend this dude because, like, you can't threaten to kill the president.

00:06:43.000 At all.

00:06:45.000 I think the whole thing is funny because he's dead. 1.00

00:06:48.000 It's dumb to threaten to kill the president. 0.99

00:06:52.000 And then, was he like 500 pounds or something? 1.00

00:06:55.000 People are saying he was 300 pounds.

00:06:56.000 He couldn't walk.

00:06:57.000 75 years old.

00:06:59.000 He's a big dude, but, like, when the cops come to your house, you don't need to- like, it's odd to get into a gunfight with the cops.

00:07:06.000 Like, that should be thought of as- as a- that should be infrequent, you know?

00:07:10.000 I- I think this is indicative of escalation, because what I think happens is, sure, this guy may not be able to actually carry out any of the things he's threatening, because he's morbidly obese and elderly, but he certainly had some kind of intent.

00:07:22.000 Now, look, maybe I'm wrong.

00:07:24.000 Maybe the cops showed up, knocked on his door, and he was sitting in his couch, you know, covered in Cheeto dust, and said, hey, look, man, I was just posting nonsense, and they were like, too bad, and then shot him, which I really doubt.

00:07:33.000 Yeah.

00:07:34.000 What likely happened is he was angry and said, oh, you want to come to my house over my, you know, you know, from my cold dead hands.

00:07:40.000 I bet he said something about freedom of speech to get off my property kind of thing.

00:07:44.000 Yep.

00:07:44.000 And then he was probably armed because we know the dude had a bunch of weapons.

00:07:48.000 And so This is what happens.

00:07:51.000 But I will stress, did we get any raids when people were threatening Donald Trump?

00:07:56.000 No.

00:07:56.000 I've heard stories of people getting their doors knocked on and guys being like, don't you do that.

00:08:00.000 I have a question. 0.82

00:08:02.000 His posts were direct statements that he was going to do something where the Kathy Griffin thing is more of like, I hope this guy dies.

00:08:11.000 Well, hers was just her standing there with a severed head. 1.00

00:08:14.000 I mean, what does that even mean?

00:08:15.000 Yeah.

00:08:17.000 Were there documented cases where people were literally threatening to assassinate Trump?

00:08:23.000 There was a dude who rushed the stage and tried grabbing a weapon from a cop.

00:08:23.000 Yes!

00:08:28.000 And I'm pretty sure that dude's still alive.

00:08:30.000 There was that moment where the guy rushed the stage and then Trump grabs the podium, spins around, Secret Service tackles him.

00:08:35.000 There was another moment where a guy went into a theater and tried grabbing a gun from a cop and they fought him and stopped him.

00:08:40.000 And there were tons of people posting threats on social media.

00:08:43.000 And we're all sitting here going like, yo, this is crazy.

00:08:45.000 These people are losing their minds.

00:08:47.000 So I think everybody's.

00:08:49.000 That's why I'm saying escalation.

00:08:51.000 Because this guy may not be a threat, but yo, What is the saying, those who say don't know and those who know don't say?

00:08:58.000 There are people out there who probably feel the exact same way as this guy and they ain't saying anything.

00:09:03.000 They're not going to go on social media and post about what they're going to do or what their plans are.

00:09:08.000 And this is the threat of complete and total destabilization.

00:09:11.000 The best case scenario is the Republicans launch a massive ballot harvesting operation.

00:09:17.000 They utilize ground activists to go door-to-door.

00:09:21.000 Donald Trump wins in 2024.

00:09:23.000 They clean up the corruption.

00:09:25.000 They fire tons of people.

00:09:26.000 There are criminal charges and trials.

00:09:29.000 We move on.

00:09:29.000 And that's it.

00:09:30.000 The worst case scenario in any capacity is anyone escalating this to some kind of high-level conflict.

00:09:36.000 I don't know about high-level conflict, but I definitely see more escalation in the future.

00:09:41.000 Right.

00:09:46.000 People need to understand, dude.

00:09:47.000 I still don't see the off-ramps, you know.

00:09:48.000 I agree.

00:09:49.000 People need to understand what life is like when conflict erupts.

00:09:55.000 And I think one of the reasons why, in history, there are stories of countries that undergo revolution, and that's it.

00:10:01.000 And there are stories of countries that undergo civil war.

00:10:04.000 And I think the issue is that, for people in these countries that face revolution, things get so bad, most people just say, whatever, because I'm gonna try and survive.

00:10:15.000 When civil wars break out, it's highly political, and people are like, there's a better way to do things, they fight each other over the way things need to be.

00:10:23.000 My concern here is, it feels like either we enter some kind of dystopian nightmare, or it turns into some kind of full-on conflict.

00:10:32.000 Yeah, I think with this particular incident, it's like Phil said, it depends on what happened when they showed up.

00:10:38.000 I mean, if we find out more, if he started shooting back at them right as they showed up, I mean, that's just kind of what you expect to happen if you start shooting at the FBI.

00:10:46.000 Especially if you're not able to move.

00:10:51.000 But I mean, I do think the escalation thing is a problem.

00:10:55.000 On your point about, you know, the Republicans sweeping all this corruption out, Do you foresee that happening in any capacity?

00:11:03.000 Because Christopher Wray, the FBI director, he was appointed by Trump.

00:11:07.000 And predicating what Trump will do based on what he did is a mistake.

00:11:11.000 They betrayed Trump.

00:11:12.000 Trump's angry and wants revenge.

00:11:14.000 So I expect something different from him.

00:11:16.000 That being said, I'm not saying it's the best probability, but who else are you going to vote for?

00:11:23.000 Like, Ron DeSantis ain't doing it.

00:11:25.000 If it's a 20% chance that Trump would successfully clean out the government, that's way better than anyone else that would be affected.

00:11:34.000 I'm not going to bet on Donald Trump being a good dude who wants to save America.

00:11:38.000 A lot of people are.

00:11:39.000 That's their bet.

00:11:40.000 My bet is that they betrayed Trump and Trump wants revenge.

00:11:44.000 I think Trump wanting revenge is something you can count on.

00:11:48.000 Yeah, see, I'm actually—this has surprised a lot of people, but I plan to vote for Trump currently, even though I've been one of his largest critics for how he handled lots of things.

00:11:58.000 But I don't necessarily see him actually fixing anything or beheading, you know, figuratively beheading a lot of his past appointees.

00:12:07.000 I just think he's going to drive people crazy, and that's enough for me. 0.93

00:12:10.000 Like, just to drive the liberals insane and make everybody mad. 0.92

00:12:12.000 He's definitely going to drive people crazy.

00:12:14.000 I don't think the deep state will let him win.

00:12:15.000 I don't think— They can't stop him.

00:12:17.000 Well, I mean, if they have proprietary voting machines, they can stop anyone.

00:12:21.000 They didn't stop him in 2016.

00:12:21.000 I know.

00:12:22.000 And they realized their mistake and then they stopped him.

00:12:25.000 Well, he was stopped in 2020, we should say.

00:12:27.000 I think Republicans screwed up in 2020.

00:12:30.000 I think Republicans were in on it.

00:12:32.000 It was Republican legislatures in certain states who are passing these universal mail-in voting laws.

00:12:38.000 In Pennsylvania, they're the ones who helped Democrats bypass their own constitution.

00:12:43.000 So I'm not worried about the deep state.

00:12:45.000 I'm worried about the Republican Party.

00:12:47.000 But I think if Donald Trump and his supporters recognize the threats when it comes to these shady or illicit voting strategies, which were done legally by the way, they're just, I call them shady, if they recognize that, and Trump seems to be, Trump's going to win.

00:13:04.000 And look, I think it's plainly obvious.

00:13:04.000 And they know it.

00:13:06.000 They would not be indicting him unless it was possible for Trump to win.

00:13:10.000 If they if they knew they could control voting machines and they could do all this, they would not go anywhere near Trump.

00:13:15.000 They'd be like, oh, geez.

00:13:16.000 Here's Trump.

00:13:16.000 Oh, no.

00:13:17.000 It wouldn't matter who ran.

00:13:18.000 They'd say, please run.

00:13:19.000 Get all your supporters riled up.

00:13:20.000 No, no, no.

00:13:21.000 They are so desperate to stop him.

00:13:23.000 They're talking about indicting him in Georgia next week.

00:13:25.000 They're throwing everything and the kitchen sink at him in a desperate bid to stop him because they're not confident they can.

00:13:33.000 Yeah, you know, the only person who can stop Trump is Trump.

00:13:37.000 He's his own biggest hindrance.

00:13:42.000 And I mean, in 2020, regardless of all the things you're talking about, Trump was just, he was running an awful campaign.

00:13:49.000 In 2016, it was great.

00:13:50.000 He was the new guy on the block.

00:13:51.000 He was anti-establishment.

00:13:53.000 He was going to go in and kick everybody out who was ruining the country.

00:13:56.000 In 2020 it was kind of hard to make that claim after he'd been in there four years and everything was falling apart and we're passing all these giant spending bills.

00:14:04.000 So I think it's really on him, if he wants to win, is to really, you know, listen to his base and try to understand what they're empathizing with him on.

00:14:13.000 Because over the last couple years he's been A little bit off, you know, like he's cheering on stuff that they didn't support and he's even getting booed at rallies occasionally.

00:14:22.000 And when he did his CNN town hall, I saw the old Trump kind of come back when he was pushing back, I forget her name, to the CNN interviewer there.

00:14:31.000 And he was making all the jokes that he had made in 2016.

00:14:34.000 He was talking about how we need to end the war in Ukraine.

00:14:36.000 I was like, okay, this is the 2016 Trump that can win an election.

00:14:40.000 So I think it's really up to him if he wants to win.

00:14:43.000 I agree.

00:14:44.000 I don't want to push my hopelessness on you, but there's no way.

00:14:48.000 There's no way that the deep state will not stop that guy.

00:14:51.000 There's no way.

00:14:52.000 It's just funny that it's like in 2016 he won and it's like he can't win, it's impossible, but he did win.

00:14:56.000 Yeah, but he won because they weren't expecting it.

00:14:59.000 They made sure Bernie Sanders wasn't able- What do you mean they weren't expecting it though?

00:15:01.000 They propped him up.

00:15:02.000 They thought he was going to lose to Hillary.

00:15:03.000 They got rid of Bernie because they wanted Hillary and they got an easy opponent in Trump and then they saw their mistake and they're like, we can never make that mistake again.

00:15:10.000 I think anybody who's telling you that Trump can't win is actively trying to sabotage our path.

00:15:17.000 Well, anyone saying he can win and fire everybody and save the world is also leading you down a dark path.

00:15:23.000 No, I completely disagree.

00:15:24.000 It is our only solution.

00:15:25.000 The FBI just raided a guy's house who was threatening death and they killed him.

00:15:29.000 The solution's in the private sector.

00:15:30.000 It's not these politicians.

00:15:31.000 The solution to the weaponization of government?

00:15:34.000 Private sector.

00:15:35.000 We need control over social media.

00:15:36.000 Communication technology.

00:15:38.000 You need to be able to talk to your community and rally and organize and support each other.

00:15:42.000 I would agree on a cultural level, especially with Elon Musk buying Twitter and then blocking government access to a lot of the information that they've been illegally, I would say unconstitutionally, stealing.

00:15:53.000 But we have got deeply corrupt individuals who are weaponizing government now.

00:15:57.000 The stories that I introduced today, not even all of them, that the FBI was systematically going after Catholics.

00:16:03.000 They're criminally charging people who are walking on a lawn in DC.

00:16:08.000 Antifa is free to go in every respect.

00:16:11.000 You've got story after story of death threats, violence, the left.

00:16:14.000 They're getting away from it.

00:16:15.000 It is a multifaceted conflict.

00:16:17.000 I certainly believe culture, and yes, to be fair, Private sector is going to play an outsized role in this.

00:16:23.000 But when it comes to what is happening in government, I am specifically referring to how do we solve direct, short-term political conflict.

00:16:31.000 And when you have people threatening death, what we need is someone who's going to go in, Fix the justice system in any way, even if it means firing people.

00:16:40.000 And people who keep saying, no, he can't win!

00:16:42.000 Trump can never win!

00:16:43.000 I'm like, dude, you might as well just go to El Salvador right now.

00:16:47.000 Because if you think everything they're doing with weaponizing the DOJ is unsolvable, because it's happening before our eyes, and they're going after, they're going after now Giuliani and Sidney Powell, Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman.

00:16:59.000 If you are going to sit back and say it is inevitable, it is hopeless, then you should not be in this country, you should run.

00:17:04.000 You should have run a long time ago.

00:17:05.000 You can acknowledge the deep state and the power they have over elections without being black-pilled and giving up.

00:17:05.000 No, no.

00:17:11.000 I mean, but it doesn't mean you gotta bang your head against a wall to create a hole.

00:17:14.000 Like, there are other ways, I think.

00:17:16.000 Like, Vivek Ramaswamy is a far superior candidate.

00:17:18.000 And to act like Donald Trump's a better vote because he's more popular, I think is a mistake.

00:17:24.000 You should go for the best candidate.

00:17:26.000 The guy... Always go for the best candidate.

00:17:29.000 That's how the best candidate wins.

00:17:30.000 Well see, Trump is actually my number three as far as quality of candidate goes.

00:17:36.000 I actually like RFK the most probably, and then probably Vivek, and then Trump.

00:17:42.000 I'm going to vote for Trump just because he's going to cause the most chaos and the most anger from people I hate.

00:17:50.000 That's honestly what I care about.

00:17:51.000 I love how you think.

00:17:52.000 But you would go with RFK?

00:17:57.000 I mean, there's a lot of issues I have with it.

00:17:59.000 Before Vivek?

00:18:00.000 Slightly.

00:18:01.000 Because I'm totally not on the RFK wagon at all.

00:18:05.000 I'm not either, by the way.

00:18:06.000 I'm not a fan.

00:18:08.000 I'm opposed.

00:18:09.000 I like the fact that he's counter to basically the official narrative or to the establishment or however you want to talk about it.

00:18:18.000 But all of his past positions are awful.

00:18:22.000 Oh, it's bad, dude.

00:18:25.000 His position on the Second Amendment, his position on climate change and what to do about it, and if it's, you know, the amount of human input on climate change and all that kind of stuff, all those things are terrible.

00:18:38.000 So I'm super not into the RFK guy at all.

00:18:43.000 I know there's a lot of libertarians that have bought into that and I'm just...

00:18:48.000 I'm extremely apprehensive.

00:18:51.000 I completely understand.

00:18:52.000 The thing is, the position he's running for, the things he's terrible on, he doesn't have much control over.

00:19:00.000 Where the things he's mostly good on, he would have a lot of control over.

00:19:03.000 And the things that he's good on, that he'd have control over in the executive, I slightly prefer him to Vivek and Trump.

00:19:10.000 Well, let's jump to this story from the post-millennial, because we got more big news in the destabilization of this nation.

00:19:15.000 Breaking, Biden-DOJ fines Elon Musk $350,000 after he refuses to give them access to Trump's Twitter account.

00:19:23.000 The district court held Axin contempt for missing the deadline, and the social media platform was fined $350,000.

00:19:28.000 I think for Elon, it's probably a drop in the hat.

00:19:32.000 But, uh, wow.

00:19:34.000 Massive credit to Elon and X for basically telling the government to go shove off.

00:19:40.000 We were talking about this a little bit earlier and Reed did mention back when Apple told the FBI to go piss up a rope when the FBI was trying to get them to unlock a terrorist's iPhone.

00:19:56.000 They were just like, we're not gonna do it.

00:19:57.000 But then they eventually just figured out a way to break in.

00:19:59.000 Yeah, but at least Apple didn't help them do it.

00:20:03.000 And credit to them.

00:20:04.000 And this, to me, is kind of the same kind of situation.

00:20:10.000 Credit to Twitter, because anyone that pushes back against the feds when it comes to this type of thing, I think is good.

00:20:18.000 We also need to protect that Twitter account at all costs.

00:20:21.000 Donald Trump's Twitter.

00:20:22.000 Oh yeah.

00:20:23.000 That belongs in the Museum of American History.

00:20:27.000 He needs to get back on it.

00:20:28.000 He truthed.

00:20:29.000 We have this truth from real Donald Trump.

00:20:33.000 Reposted by Election Wizard, he says, just found out that crooked Joe Biden's DOJ secretly attacked my Twitter account, making it a point not to let me know about this major hit on my civil rights.

00:20:43.000 My political opponent is going crazy trying to infinge on my campaign for president.

00:20:47.000 Nothing like this has ever happened before.

00:20:50.000 Does the First Amendment still exist?

00:20:51.000 Did deranged Jack Smith tell the unselects to destroy and delete all evidence?

00:20:56.000 These are dark days in America.

00:20:58.000 I completely agree.

00:20:59.000 The sitting president Is trying to.

00:21:03.000 This is beyond Watergate.

00:21:05.000 What is this?

00:21:06.000 Joe Biden just tried to steal private communications from his main political rival.

00:21:10.000 Yes.

00:21:10.000 Let me just repeat that for everybody.

00:21:12.000 We now know.

00:21:13.000 And Elon Musk obstructed this.

00:21:14.000 Joe Biden running for president just tried to steal the private communications unconstitutionally from Donald Trump, from his private account.

00:21:24.000 And only because of Elon Musk, they're obstructed.

00:21:27.000 Incredible.

00:21:28.000 I think technically, and I could be wrong, Twitter owns that account.

00:21:32.000 So it's technically Elon Musk's data and account.

00:21:35.000 So they'd be, if they were stealing it, they'd be stealing it from Elon, but it looks like they asked him for it.

00:21:39.000 So it wouldn't have been theft.

00:21:41.000 That sounds like something the NSA would say.

00:21:43.000 Well, we don't own any of our social media data.

00:21:45.000 Any reasonable person would argue that our data belongs to us.

00:21:49.000 I would like it to, but I think legally at this point it doesn't.

00:21:52.000 But it should.

00:21:53.000 On some sites maybe it does, if it's in their terms.

00:21:56.000 A lot of sites want to own your stuff. 0.92

00:21:58.000 I gotta tell you, I don't care what ridiculous, psychotic, totalitarian, Nazi BS the government tries to argue about why they have a right to take my private communications. 0.95

00:22:08.000 They don't. 0.96

00:22:09.000 The Fourth Amendment extends to what is my private communications.

00:22:13.000 And they can make all the arguments in the world that when you transmitted the message over Twitter, you gave that message to Twitter.

00:22:20.000 Nah.

00:22:21.000 That's a BS argument from psychopaths who are trying to bypass our constitutional protections.

00:22:25.000 It would be like if you went into somebody's house and had a conversation with somebody else in that house, and they were recording you in their house, and then you left.

00:22:32.000 Like, technically, that person that owned the house would own that communication now.

00:22:36.000 That's kind of like Twitter.

00:22:37.000 No, it's more like you rent a mailbox at a big... So, out in the middle of nowhere, people don't have mailboxes in front of their houses.

00:22:48.000 Depending on where you live, they'll actually have a mailbox building, where everyone goes and collects their mail, despite having private houses, they go to one spot.

00:22:56.000 So, you know, where we are up in the mountains, these mail trucks can't get on some of these roads.

00:23:01.000 So it would be more like they said, that mailbox isn't actually yours, it's property of the post office, therefore anything inside of it is our fair game to open and read.

00:23:11.000 I think the post office can open and read your mail.

00:23:14.000 They need probable cause, the Fourth Amendment protects us.

00:23:17.000 So I will make the fair point that they're saying a judge ordered this, but that means very little to me when it is the president trying to steal the private communications of his chief political rival.

00:23:30.000 That's a whole degree of effed up.

00:23:32.000 Yeah.

00:23:33.000 I mean, just because there's a political campaign going on or just because Donald Trump is persona non grata doesn't mean that the federal government can just look into his private communications.

00:23:43.000 And there is an expectation of privacy that people have when they use platforms like this.

00:23:50.000 That's why they call them private messages.

00:23:52.000 That's a big mistake.

00:23:53.000 That's why you need to encrypt your messages and have end-to-end encryption.

00:23:56.000 Anything that is unencrypted is viewable by every government.

00:24:00.000 Most of the governments on Earth, I would imagine, at this point.

00:24:02.000 You're totally right, but the average person doesn't, you know.

00:24:06.000 But that's like saying... Ignorance is not excuse, you know?

00:24:09.000 That's like saying the government can spy on you unless you build a house inside of a Faraday cage.

00:24:13.000 It's like, no, the Constitution is to stop them from doing it.

00:24:17.000 If you don't have curtains on your windows, no constitution is going to stop the cops from looking inside your house.

00:24:21.000 That's not a fair analogy.

00:24:23.000 Because when you're sending a private message, the average person does not believe they're standing nude in front of a window.

00:24:32.000 They think the curtains are up.

00:24:34.000 So it would be more like the government has goggles that can see through your curtains and said, well, it's your fault for only having regular curtains.

00:24:41.000 It's like, what am I supposed to do?

00:24:42.000 You gotta put up lead curtains.

00:24:43.000 You do.

00:24:44.000 You do.

00:24:45.000 Because the Chinese government... That's unreasonable. 0.99

00:24:46.000 Well, I know.

00:24:47.000 Yeah, sure, the foreign governments.

00:24:48.000 We're talking about the United States government trying to steal Trump's communications.

00:24:52.000 Well, anybody can do it.

00:24:53.000 Any government could do it.

00:24:54.000 And that's not my concern.

00:24:55.000 My concern is the U.S.

00:24:57.000 government violating the rights of American citizens and Joe Biden trying to steal communications from Trump to cheat an election.

00:25:04.000 Well, I mean, I think you, did you just point out it's not, he got a judge's, did a judge sign off on this?

00:25:08.000 That means very little when the DOJ, Joe Biden, is targeting his political opponent.

00:25:15.000 I don't care.

00:25:17.000 Criminally charging Trump, I don't care.

00:25:19.000 They've crossed the line.

00:25:20.000 They're engaged in civil war. I don't disagree with you, but I have no

00:25:23.000 empathy for people that continue to text on their phones with proprietary software to type on direct

00:25:27.000 messages on Twitter and YouTube without saying this stuff like that is trackable data. I get it

00:25:32.000 through your head. I have no empathy.

00:25:34.000 I have tons of sympathy for people who eat Splenda and drink fluoride and do a whole bunch

00:25:39.000 of other really awful things because the government tells them it's fine. Yeah, well, they should be

00:25:42.000 because there are there are people who should know these things, but it's not the job of the

00:25:45.000 average person who's a plumber or a carpenter or who works at an insurance company to read the

00:25:50.000 the news and do the research every day.

00:25:51.000 That's what we do.

00:25:52.000 And so we try to inform them.

00:25:54.000 We try to tell people, hey man, you gotta encrypt your messages.

00:25:56.000 Hey, you gotta eat healthy, you gotta exercise, and you gotta pay attention to what's going on to the best of your abilities.

00:26:02.000 But the point is, the average person, yo, people are out there building houses.

00:26:07.000 Okay, they're working 8-12 hour days.

00:26:09.000 They're not going to go online and research fluoride for 27 years to figure out what's going on with the water, or atrazine, or sucralose, or other stuff like that.

00:26:17.000 So they come to shows like this, and we do our best to inform them to the best of our abilities.

00:26:22.000 So I do have sympathy for people.

00:26:23.000 They think their messages are private because it's only between them and another person.

00:26:28.000 If there was a big red stop sign on the thing that said, anyone can see this, they would take it much more seriously.

00:26:34.000 But they're not being told that, they're being misled.

00:26:36.000 Outside of all of that, the most important thing to consider, it doesn't matter whether or not Donald Trump can be spotted by China or Australia or any other country, it doesn't matter if private messages are not secure, what matters is, Even if I paint a big picture and I put it in my bedroom, the federal government does not have a right to come and take it without a warrant.

00:27:01.000 In this instance, the chief political rival is being targeted by the sitting president for political purposes.

00:27:07.000 You're not going to make an argument about warrants in that case.

00:27:09.000 The Constitution has been ripped to shreds and Joe Biden is cheating to try and steal 2024.

00:27:17.000 I think it's interesting that the federal government often uses foreign governments as a scare tactic to let them just, you know, have open season on your private messages too.

00:27:28.000 Like the Restrict Act, that's what the TikTok ban is what it was being sold as because China's harvesting our data or whatever, but then the Restrict Act was just basically a Patriot Act for all social media companies.

00:27:39.000 Yep.

00:27:39.000 Five Eyes Spy Club.

00:27:41.000 This is what they do.

00:27:43.000 The United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the UK, each of them go to each other and say, it is illegal for us to spy on our citizens.

00:27:53.000 You spy on them, then share the data with us, and now it's allowed.

00:27:56.000 That's how they bypass our human rights.

00:27:59.000 And you know that they, they've, there's stories that I've heard that there are people that abuse it.

00:28:04.000 Like dudes are asking people, hey, can you watch my ex-girlfriend and that kind of stuff?

00:28:09.000 Like, you know?

00:28:10.000 Oh yeah.

00:28:10.000 Yeah.

00:28:10.000 I think the Snowden revelations showed that, right?

00:28:13.000 Yeah.

00:28:13.000 Because they, because they, if you're, you know, if you're working in the Intel community and stuff, you're going to end up getting friendly with other, you know, with other, uh, other countries with other people in, in the Intel community for other countries.

00:28:26.000 I've worked on the social media from the inside, and it feels like walking down dark alleys at night in big cities, like, don't do it.

00:28:33.000 Don't post your data publicly in direct messages on Twitter if it's not encrypted.

00:28:37.000 Do not do it, because you're putting yourself in a vulnerable position if you do that.

00:28:40.000 And if you're taken advantage of, yeah, you can blame the victim, but like, Like, oh, she had it coming because of what she was wearing.

00:28:46.000 But like, just don't go down.

00:28:49.000 If you continue to go down those dark alleys, I mean, I just don't have sympathy for those people. 0.98

00:28:53.000 If you know that there's a risk involved, but you're going to do it anyway, just because you're lazy or you don't care, screw off. 0.99

00:28:59.000 Like, you deserve it. 0.99

00:29:00.000 Like, eat it.

00:29:01.000 I don't know what to tell you.

00:29:02.000 Reality is reality.

00:29:03.000 Like, if you're not going to protect yourself, you're not going to be protected.

00:29:07.000 Yep.

00:29:08.000 The problem with end-to-end encryption is that if the person on the other end of your message shares that message with somebody, your stuff's not private.

00:29:16.000 That's true.

00:29:16.000 If you go to someone and say, hey, don't tell anybody, but, you know, X, Y, and Z, and then they go, hey, everybody, X, Y, and Z. Seeker was meaningless.

00:29:22.000 But Elon's doing a great job.

00:29:23.000 I think he's working on end-to-end encryption for all direct messages.

00:29:26.000 I'm not sure if they've implemented yet, but it's probably for this reason.

00:29:29.000 I think Elon would prefer not to get fined, you know, $350,000, and it's easier if everything's just encrypted.

00:29:37.000 He can go, here you go, and it's a bunch of gobbledygook.

00:29:39.000 Exactly.

00:29:40.000 He doesn't have the thing to give them, so they can't fine him.

00:29:43.000 That's how Mines does it. 0.99

00:29:44.000 They don't hold the keys.

00:29:45.000 Only the keys only belong to the people that are sending the messages.

00:29:49.000 It's crazy what's going on right now in this country, man.

00:29:51.000 We have this story from the Post Maloneal Fourth indictment against Trump expected in Georgia next week.

00:29:57.000 Willis has stated that she plans to announce potential charges by September 1st at the latest.

00:30:02.000 I don't know what to tell you, man.

00:30:04.000 Everything we see happening, what do you think is going to happen in 2024?

00:30:09.000 You think it's going to be some peaceful, everyone comes and shakes hands and smiles?

00:30:14.000 With a degree of psychotic behavior?

00:30:16.000 I mean, they just gunned a guy down and killed him in his house.

00:30:19.000 I'm not making a comment on anything other than that, that a guy died.

00:30:24.000 With the level of intensity that now I feel like it's a kind of calm before the storm kind of thing because it has been really chill like news-wise when it comes to the actual election and stuff.

00:30:41.000 There hasn't been any kind of big developments to talk about.

00:30:45.000 I mean we keep talking about You know, DeSantis kind of just petering out.

00:30:50.000 That's been the big story for days and days and days.

00:30:52.000 Or, you know, maybe Vevek is getting some traction and stuff.

00:30:56.000 But still, it's mostly very chill, you know, not big announcements or anything like that.

00:31:02.000 So I feel like, you know, it is the calm before the storm.

00:31:07.000 I feel like it's going to be really, really weird with AI and the way that's going to affect... Oh, the defakes aren't even coming.

00:31:15.000 They've only just begun.

00:31:16.000 Yeah, and I think that, like I said, now is the calm before the storm, but I think that once the election starts, or once the campaigning starts going in earnest, it's going to be really weird with... people aren't going to know what to believe, and it's going to be really weird.

00:31:31.000 I don't know that...

00:31:32.000 I don't know that anyone's ever going to feel confident about who won an election ever again just because they're going to feel like they... I don't know that people are going to feel like they confidently can say that they made an informed decision that was actually informed by the truth as opposed to, you know, really propagandized.

00:31:52.000 So I think it's going to be a mess whether Biden or Trump becomes the next president.

00:31:58.000 And I don't think we're on the verge of some, like, civil war.

00:32:00.000 I think people are too lazy for it still, honestly.

00:32:03.000 Like, you might have a few people who are real amped up.

00:32:06.000 But I mean, the FBI has been murdering people for a long time.

00:32:09.000 That's, you know, I understand that this is politically charged, but everything, every murder the FBI has ever committed in the past has been politically charged.

00:32:17.000 So I don't think this is necessarily a new thing and you know if you're not online all the time you talk to people like they're a little worried about stuff but not nearly at the levels that everyone is on Twitter and social media so I don't think that we're at the verge of any sort of conflict.

00:32:32.000 When people, one of the things that I think when people say that is I think of the idea that There's only a certain small percentage of people that are involved in any kind of like political, whether it be activists or whether it be, you know, just going out and demonstrating or protesting or whether it be people that actually do, you know, get violent and stuff.

00:32:56.000 It's always a small minority of people that get into that stuff.

00:33:01.000 Tim's talked multiple times about how when he was in Egypt, the Arab Spring was literally kicking off in Egypt, but at the same time there were people that were at cafes just going about their normal day.

00:33:15.000 And I feel like the people that are on Twitter and stuff are most likely the people that would be the ones that would be at least...

00:33:24.000 The most likely to be politically informed, so it seems to me to make sense that those people would be the most likely to be politically active, up to including, you know, violence.

00:33:35.000 I think you nailed it.

00:33:36.000 It's never the majority.

00:33:39.000 I don't think there's, for the most part, a conflict in history where the overwhelming majority of a population was actively participating in a conflict.

00:33:49.000 Even in World War II, we're looking at, you know, what is like a million-some-odd conscriptions in a country of, at the time, what was it?

00:33:57.000 How many people were around then?

00:33:59.000 It's a fraction.

00:34:00.000 Yeah, it's a fraction.

00:34:01.000 I bet that maybe, well, like 60 to 100 million or something like that.

00:34:04.000 Probably less.

00:34:06.000 Yeah.

00:34:06.000 In 1941?

00:34:06.000 What is it?

00:34:07.000 132 million!

00:34:07.000 132 million.

00:34:08.000 And how many soldiers did we conscript?

00:34:09.000 A million?

00:34:13.000 I don't know.

00:34:14.000 It's somewhere around there, yeah.

00:34:15.000 So that's like, you know, what, 0.7?

00:34:17.000 Yeah, it's a small percentage.

00:34:21.000 That were actively engaged in the conflict, and the reality is the people who were conscripted weren't actual participants in the conflict in the political sense.

00:34:27.000 It was, like, I gotta tell you, I bet most people didn't care!

00:34:31.000 And if you went around, I bet there are people going like, yeah, but if you ask your neighbor, they don't care about Germany or what's going on.

00:34:37.000 Yet somehow we found ourselves in that conflict.

00:34:39.000 So what I see happening, you get this guy who's posting on social media saying this horrifying stuff, you get Antifa, you get violent extremists who go out and the majority of people will cower, but conflict happens.

00:34:49.000 Eventually what happens is the question of who is in charge.

00:34:52.000 There's that moment Matt Taibbi wrote about where two cars speed towards the police station, two men in suits jump out, run full speed up to the door, run inside and run to the police chief and say, arrest that man and point to each other.

00:35:05.000 And now the police chief says, which one do I arrest?

00:35:09.000 Who's in charge?

00:35:10.000 What happens then?

00:35:11.000 There's a bunch of different ways these things like this go.

00:35:14.000 You have revolution.

00:35:16.000 You have military takeover.

00:35:17.000 In Egypt, the military took over.

00:35:19.000 The military just decided, you know what?

00:35:21.000 The civil unrest is too much, and they removed the president twice in the span of, I think, like a year.

00:35:27.000 But most people aren't paying attention to that.

00:35:29.000 I look outside and there's a guy sitting in McDonald's watching soccer.

00:35:32.000 He doesn't care.

00:35:33.000 I went to the mall in Heliopolis.

00:35:35.000 While the revolution is taking place in Egypt, And people were just shopping for cell phones.

00:35:40.000 And if you asked anyone of them, not a single person cared.

00:35:43.000 And then a day later, the military removed the president who was duly elected.

00:35:47.000 Why?

00:35:48.000 He was a Muslim.

00:35:49.000 And the secular people in the country, there were more secular people than Muslim Brotherhood supporters, but the Muslim Brotherhood was the largest faction of voters, so they won.

00:35:59.000 It was a legitimate first-past-the-post election.

00:36:01.000 The military said, we don't care. 0.82

00:36:02.000 But the average person, out shopping.

00:36:05.000 I go to a cafe, I'm having coffee, nobody's talking about it.

00:36:08.000 Now, you actually go out and you'll hear people talk about it.

00:36:12.000 So it's worrying to me in that I don't expect the average person to care.

00:36:17.000 I'm concerned about the people who are politically active and motivated, and I'm concerned with, look, if the reality is, you're right, nobody cares and no one's gonna do anything, then we're dealing with a federal government that has just amplified their corruption 100-fold to the point where they're, like, Watergate was a scandal.

00:36:35.000 This, apparently Joe Biden's still the good guy.

00:36:37.000 That is a degree of corruption and malfeasance we have never seen in this country before.

00:36:42.000 And what?

00:36:43.000 Nothing's happening?

00:36:45.000 It breaks down.

00:36:46.000 If nothing happens, if we don't have the best case scenario for everybody, Trump or Vivek or even Ron DeSantis, any one of these guys who pledges to fire people, the best case scenario is they do get elected, they do fire people, they do start weeding out corruption, and we turn this ship upright and we start saving it.

00:37:06.000 Otherwise, the two scenarios are overt conflict between angry political factions or Revolution.

00:37:13.000 Yeah, what bothers me- Psychotic despots go around and mercilessly beat, arrest, and lock up innocent people.

00:37:18.000 What gets me about these faction conflicts is that I think if there's an enemy of the United States, they would want that to happen.

00:37:24.000 It's very easy to destroy or take over or surpass an enemy if they're in fighting, if they're in the middle of a- half the country's fighting itself.

00:37:31.000 So they want people to walk outside and be like, hold on there.

00:37:34.000 I think you're the enemy.

00:37:35.000 And the other person's like, no, no, no, hold on there.

00:37:37.000 You're the enemy.

00:37:38.000 They're like, no, I saw it on TV.

00:37:38.000 I saw it on TV.

00:37:41.000 That's what they want.

00:37:42.000 So if people are brainwashed or afraid or dumbed, then they might do that.

00:37:46.000 But if so, not only do we need to weed out corruption within the government itself, we need to control the media in a way, or at least influence the media so that people are not afraid of each other.

00:37:56.000 I think that's naive.

00:37:58.000 I think when you have people like these leftists who have come on this show, or The Culture War, who directly advocate for giving children sexual explicit content, I don't know what you're arguing for.

00:38:09.000 You tell those people, I'm sorry, I am not going to allow you to present this book of adult pictures to children, you should be in prison.

00:38:17.000 And they argue, I've got 80 million people at my back that tell you to STFU.

00:38:22.000 Now you've got a problem.

00:38:25.000 I mean, throwing people in prison for advocating for a book is different.

00:38:29.000 I didn't say anything about throwing them in prison.

00:38:30.000 You just said you should be in prison.

00:38:31.000 You just said that.

00:38:33.000 For giving the pictures to children.

00:38:35.000 No, you said the people that came on this show.

00:38:36.000 No, no, no.

00:38:37.000 I'm saying the people who are giving these books to kids should be in prison.

00:38:41.000 The 80 million people at their back voting in support of it.

00:38:44.000 And you ask them and they'll deny it.

00:38:46.000 They'll say, well, I don't know about that.

00:38:47.000 But they're certainly complicit in it.

00:38:49.000 Were you saying?

00:38:50.000 I was just going to say, I think the federal government's a lost cause and trying to kumbaya everybody into peace again is not going to happen.

00:38:58.000 So I think that separation and people going to places where people think the same way they are is the ultimate solution.

00:39:06.000 I mean, at this point, You know, when I see conservatives crying about the streets of San Francisco and, like, how horrible it's become, I'm just, like, I don't take them seriously anymore.

00:39:16.000 It's like, why do you care about San Francisco anymore?

00:39:18.000 It's so obviously toast and gone.

00:39:21.000 Or Chicago.

00:39:21.000 Because they vote in our federal elections, which have an impact on whether we're going to war.

00:39:25.000 That's the problem right there.

00:39:26.000 We're not protecting our borders, whether or not the government is increasing the tax rate.

00:39:26.000 Exactly.

00:39:31.000 So when you have California bringing in non-citizens and using that to inflate their census numbers so they get more votes in Congress and in the Electoral College, we've got a very, very serious problem with what San Francisco is doing.

00:39:41.000 Yeah, well that's the problem right there, that they have control over us and the solution is trying to decrease the control that these other states have over us.

00:39:49.000 The federal government needs to decentralize.

00:39:52.000 Instead of trying to fix it and just get better people into these positions, we need to go back to a more decentralized approach like the Tenth Amendment actually provided for.

00:40:01.000 That's the only solution.

00:40:03.000 But I don't completely agree with that.

00:40:05.000 I maybe would have agreed with it a while ago, but now we see the issue of these West Coast states Passing laws where people can kidnap children and then sterilize them and the state will protect the kidnapper.

00:40:19.000 So there's a problem then when we say, everybody just pick your state and then shut up.

00:40:24.000 Okay, what happens when you're in Oklahoma?

00:40:27.000 And, uh, is it Oklahoma?

00:40:29.000 Let me make sure I have my states right.

00:40:31.000 What happens if you're in, it might be Kansas.

00:40:33.000 I gotta make sure.

00:40:34.000 I think it's Oklahoma.

00:40:36.000 What happens when, hold on.

00:40:38.000 Yeah, adjacent to Colorado.

00:40:40.000 Yeah, that's the point I was going to make.

00:40:42.000 What happens when you're in Oklahoma, I think it's actually either of them, and a woman, you know, you're with a woman, she gets pregnant, and then she decides six months on she doesn't want to be with you, so she flees to Colorado.

00:40:54.000 Colorado, no limit on abortion.

00:40:56.000 Oklahoma, ban on abortion.

00:40:59.000 So what happens?

00:41:00.000 Yeah, I mean, I understand why people are uncomfortable with that thought, but at this point, that's the only thing that I think is going to save pockets of society.

00:41:09.000 So I'm asking you, what happens next?

00:41:10.000 She goes to Colorado and gets abortions. 1.00

00:41:12.000 And that man says, well, I guess she's gonna kill my son, and then just sits there and twiddles his thumbs?

00:41:16.000 Well, that's the way it is now.

00:41:18.000 I mean, to be fair, so... Right now, there is a... It's that way now.

00:41:24.000 That's exactly what I'm talking about.

00:41:25.000 It wasn't that way before.

00:41:27.000 It used to be that there was a certain like, yes, these things would happen.

00:41:30.000 Yes, there are bad stories.

00:41:32.000 But the more people geographically polarize from from each other, the more you're and the more the culture divides and escalates.

00:41:41.000 Maybe abortion isn't the issue, but you run into that wall of there's going to be a kid kidnapped. 0.99

00:41:49.000 There's going to be a there's going to be a guy who lives in a neighborhood.

00:41:52.000 And he's going to have a creepy smile and he's going to go on TikTok and say, kids, don't listen to your parents.

00:41:57.000 Your parents are bad.

00:41:58.000 You should do whatever you want.

00:42:00.000 I support you.

00:42:01.000 He's going to get a message from a kid who says, actually, I live a few blocks away and I want to get sterilization surgery.

00:42:06.000 And the guy's going to say, I will drive you personally to California to make this happen.

00:42:11.000 He's going to kidnap the kid, go to California.

00:42:13.000 Do you think the parents are going to be like, well, guess my kid's sterilized?

00:42:16.000 Or do you think there's going to be a conflict between the major growing cultures between states?

00:42:21.000 Yeah, I get your point.

00:42:22.000 Is it the case where a third party not related to a child could take a child to it?

00:42:30.000 Yes.

00:42:31.000 Wow.

00:42:32.000 Yep.

00:42:34.000 I think that might be specifically in Washington, however.

00:42:39.000 Washington State?

00:42:40.000 Yeah.

00:42:41.000 I think Washington State was the one that explicitly said, anybody who helps a child receive gender-affirming care will not face prosecution in their state.

00:42:50.000 So, when we live in a post-rational society, which we do, there's no universal reason anymore, and we live in a quasi-democracy where The people of the country get to decide what is right and wrong, basically.

00:43:04.000 I mean, where is the win in the end there?

00:43:08.000 Getting rich.

00:43:11.000 I mean, there's no moral win in the end, because you're dealing with people who don't believe in the same thing you do.

00:43:17.000 So that's why I'm saying, at this point in the game, you should move places where people do agree with you, because it's the only hope.

00:43:23.000 You're never going to convert the country back into it. 0.97

00:43:25.000 Sure, sure.

00:43:26.000 I don't completely disagree.

00:43:27.000 My point is just that you have to ask yourself, what happens after everyone geographically polarizes?

00:43:35.000 I think the liberal cities are going to continue to fall apart.

00:43:38.000 I mean, I don't think it's sustainable.

00:43:40.000 And then what happens when people in cities don't have food or water?

00:43:43.000 They're going to leave or they're going to die.

00:43:45.000 I mean, it's going to get bad, but... They're not just going to leave.

00:43:48.000 So if you look at like New York City, liberal city, most of the state's relatively red. 0.64

00:43:53.000 So what is the city gonna do when the city is struggling and doesn't have food or water?

00:43:57.000 The same thing the left always does.

00:43:59.000 Steal it from somebody else.

00:44:00.000 The easiest thing to do is to go up north and go to the rural farms and just seize their food.

00:44:05.000 Hey, it's what communists do.

00:44:06.000 They're gonna say the people need this more than you.

00:44:08.000 They already do it in California with the water.

00:44:10.000 They tell the farmers, who are the lifeblood of the whole state and a good portion of this country, that they don't have surface water rights.

00:44:16.000 Because the surface water has to go to the liberal cities where people have voting power.

00:44:20.000 Then the poor people who live in these farming districts lose access to well water when the farmers drill into the earth to get groundwater to grow crops.

00:44:29.000 You can already see how that starts to break down.

00:44:31.000 My experience in California during the drought made me understand the importance of the Electoral College.

00:44:36.000 Why it is absolutely necessary.

00:44:40.000 And the Senate and Congress.

00:44:41.000 How the Founding Fathers did this.

00:44:42.000 It's brilliant.

00:44:43.000 In California, you have poor migrant workers and their wells for water run 30 feet deep. 1.00

00:44:51.000 There's canal water running through Tulare County, and I asked the farmers, why don't you use that water there?

00:44:58.000 And they said, we're not allowed to, it's illegal.

00:44:59.000 Because the cities voted to take the water, and the politicians say, well, the people need water first.

00:45:05.000 So what the farms do then, is they drill tens of thousands of feet, thousands of feet into the earth for groundwater, which drains the groundwater, and now all the poor people have no water anymore.

00:45:15.000 They're 30 foot wells, can't reach water, and the water stops.

00:45:18.000 The Electoral College changes the way the voting system would work.

00:45:22.000 Now, you can't just go to this small, I should say, a Republican system, and I mean that in the philosophical sense, not in the colloquial sense.

00:45:32.000 You have to go to them and say, we need you all to vote.

00:45:35.000 We can't just vote to take from you.

00:45:38.000 So that's the point.

00:45:39.000 When you look at why we break things down by states, why they have senators, so that you can't just say, we outvote you, therefore we get your water.

00:45:48.000 Right.

00:45:48.000 And my statement is it's not broken down enough.

00:45:51.000 Have you heard of the Free State of Jefferson initiative?

00:45:53.000 Yes.

00:45:54.000 And California trying to break into three different states?

00:45:57.000 Greater Idaho.

00:45:57.000 Right.

00:45:58.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:45:59.000 Those are the type of things that need to happen because you're right, San Francisco and L.A.

00:46:03.000 Control an entire state now, and that's the problem, is all that centralized control.

00:46:07.000 So if that can be removed and dispersed, I think that's the only peaceful solution.

00:46:12.000 It's not a peaceful solution.

00:46:13.000 I don't disagree.

00:46:14.000 I think it is a better move to make now.

00:46:17.000 But when you have 10 million people in the New York metro, and it's falling apart and collapsing, a decent amount of them leave, and a decent amount of them will band together and say, we deserve it.

00:46:27.000 And then you get conflict.

00:46:28.000 You're gonna have people in cities, like the Colorado River is a really interesting problem.

00:46:33.000 The Great Lakes are a really interesting problem.

00:46:35.000 You've got states, I think it was Arizona trying to sue, to claim the rights over Great Lakes water, arguing the Great Lakes are part of the United States, and the water should be dispersed, and then you have the Great Lakes Coalition, fortunately, because I believe Ontario is a part of it, it's now international, and other states can't just drain the Great Lakes.

00:46:52.000 But the Great Lakes need to be replenished.

00:46:54.000 They go down if there's too much consumption.

00:46:57.000 I see what I see happening with places like San Francisco and why I'm concerned about them is that as they fall into chaos, those people who live there, they need food and they need water.

00:47:09.000 They need shelter and they want security.

00:47:11.000 And if that falls apart, even by their own fault, they will come and take it from you.

00:47:15.000 And that means maybe they just move to where you live, and then start voting for things that destroy your systems, or maybe they stay there, it continues to decay, and then eventually, they just start going and stealing from farms, passing laws where they lock farms down, and claim property, and you get communism.

00:47:30.000 I mean, how is that not happening under our federalist system we have now, though?

00:47:34.000 The same thing's happening.

00:47:35.000 They're doing that to every single state.

00:47:37.000 So if we had property rights, if we had a federal system that actually enforced equality under the law, you have a lot less of this.

00:47:44.000 Now someone shows up and says, I get your farm.

00:47:46.000 They say, I sue you.

00:47:48.000 Now it goes to the federal government and they supersede the state and say, you can't do that.

00:47:50.000 You can't take someone's farm.

00:47:51.000 But that's breaking down.

00:47:52.000 And that's the issue.

00:47:54.000 We don't have a shared... Like, it's a combination of things.

00:47:56.000 It's not just government.

00:47:57.000 It's culture.

00:47:58.000 We don't have a shared moral framework anymore.

00:48:00.000 You have the rise of leftists.

00:48:02.000 And the funny thing is, the success of this nation gave rise to weak-minded, entitled individuals who seek to steal from others without doing any of the work.

00:48:10.000 And that leads to collapse.

00:48:12.000 I mean, these people vote.

00:48:13.000 So they vote, they vote to take, and they keep doing it.

00:48:15.000 And then what ends up happening is one of two things.

00:48:18.000 As the system starts to break down, you either get revolution, or, well, there's a few ways.

00:48:22.000 Reform is really possible, but it's really hard.

00:48:24.000 You're either going to get revolution or civil war if it really does escalate to that point.

00:48:29.000 And I kind of feel like when we learned the DOJ is going after Trump's lawyers, That, that, like, look man, it was already unprecedented the DOJ went after Joe Biden's political rival, Donald Trump.

00:48:42.000 Unprecedented.

00:48:43.000 Now they're saying they're going to go after Trump's lawyers, the people giving him legal counsel.

00:48:47.000 The government basically saying, if you provide constitutionally protected services, legal representation to someone who we oppose, we're going to lock you up.

00:48:57.000 There's an obvious next step to this.

00:48:59.000 Advocacy.

00:49:00.000 They were already saying they were political consultants.

00:49:02.000 One of the co-conspirators was a consultant, not even a lawyer.

00:49:04.000 Someone who advocated that Trump file these lawsuits and seek alternate electors.

00:49:10.000 The next step is fairly obvious.

00:49:11.000 Those who incite criminal actions.

00:49:15.000 They've already made the claim that it's not free speech to incite criminal activity, right?

00:49:19.000 So now when they say that Donald Trump's actions in 2020 were criminal, the next step beyond his lawyers is anyone who publicly spoke advocacy for Donald Trump's illegal actions was inciting people to commit crimes, and they're next.

00:49:34.000 So, I think the South should have been allowed to secede during the Civil War, and the rewritten history about it is that it was all about slavery that had nothing to do with anything else, and that has built an American dream that it's wrong to let people leave this country, and wrong to let people do their own thing, and that it's morally correct to bind us all together as one country.

00:49:58.000 If the South had actually left, I don't think, you know, the North was kind of doing what you're describing that leftists do, is always trying to reach out and get more power.

00:50:07.000 They were taxing the South a lot more than they should have been.

00:50:11.000 And so that type of thing is happening now, you know, the reconstruction mindset.

00:50:18.000 Has really just like kept going and given us the progressive era and destroyed this country and unless we finally just break off and say, you know what?

00:50:27.000 We don't know what we don't all belong under the same system.

00:50:29.000 We need to have you know, different governments that you know, respect people the way they want to live and you know, I just I just think it's the only way we can go forward and then what what happens after that?

00:50:40.000 I think that The leftists are always going to want more control, like you said, but the only way to not give it to them is starve them of it.

00:50:50.000 What likely happens after a separation, if the United States were to break into two, and the left called it like, Jesus Land and the United States of Canada, that's the meme they put out, The next likely thing to happen is a unipolar Chinese communist planet, where trade is going to be regulated under their currency and their rules and their whims, and you're going to end up with not NATO control, but BRICS control. 0.54

00:50:50.000 Right? 0.54

00:51:12.000 That could go on for several decades, maybe a hundred years, who knows?

00:51:15.000 What that means for Americans is, well, for one, it could mean less war, it could mean that we can live peacefully and farm in our own states and mind our own business, but it means your standard of living drops by some odd 90%.

00:51:27.000 And that's, you know, I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing.

00:51:30.000 I mean, the issue is the petrodollar.

00:51:32.000 It props up our economy and makes Americans wealthy based on nothing.

00:51:35.000 When this country splits in two, the petrodollar ceases to exist.

00:51:39.000 BRICS nations basically take over the global economy and oil trade, and that means Americans have to once again start producing, and we don't. 0.98

00:51:46.000 So, for those that advocate for this, the end result is going to be you will work more than you've ever worked in your life, and your standard of living will be 90% lower.

00:51:54.000 Me, personally, I don't mind tending to chickens and animals and working on a farm and reading books and just working every day.

00:52:01.000 These liberals, these leftists, they're going to cry.

00:52:04.000 They're going to cry more than they've ever cried in their lives, and they're going to beg to bring back the petrodollar.

00:52:08.000 Don't you think that's kind of an inevitability at this point, though?

00:52:11.000 That's why I say it's unavoidable.

00:52:13.000 Yeah, I mean... Well, I mean, look, in the event that... I really do mean it.

00:52:18.000 If you get a Donald Trump, a Vivek, or even a Ron DeSantis, if they win and they actually do follow through on the things they've said, it's not inevitable.

00:52:26.000 There is a possibility that we come out on top of this successfully.

00:52:31.000 And that's still sort of bad news for anti-war individuals because the US machine just keeps on keeping on.

00:52:36.000 But to fire corrupt prosecutors, to criminally charge corrupt politicians, and to reform and restore the actual Like, I don't want to say moral framework of the past in its entirety, but the core moral frameworks of classical liberalism the Founding Fathers believed in, then things start to repair and strengthen.

00:52:59.000 But you've got to get rid of the rot.

00:53:01.000 You've got to carve out the rot first and then rebuild.

00:53:03.000 There's part of me that does think that if you can wake up the average shitlib, right, the average liberal that Gets conned into illiberal things because some authoritarian convinces them that they'll be safer or they'll be looked at, you know, as the nice guy or it's, you know, it's racist to not do this or whatever the...

00:53:28.000 The con from the progressives is if you can convince your average bad liberal that they're being a bad liberal and they need to come back to things like the rule of law, the freedom of speech, that things like the rule of law has a big effect on You know, the criminal element in your cities and that has a big effect on the economy.

00:53:51.000 And if you can remind liberals that these things actually do matter and that the way they've been voting and the behaviors of the politicians they're electing are actually illiberal, then I think that you could have A positive result without some kind of massive revolution, but without the people realizing that the things that they're asking the government to do are bad, illiberal, and producing the results that they actually don't like.

00:54:22.000 As long as people don't realize that, as long as they think that voting for what sounds nice is the Proper course of action.

00:54:30.000 There's not going to be any significant change I just wanted to also add that you know Not just on a warfare front but on an economic front ever since we've been on the petrodollar the dollar has lost You know all its value if you look 1971 we came off the gold standard and then I think in 1974 we went on the petrodollar and ever since then the dollar has just tanked so I don't think it was a I don't think it was a reliable system even with you know competent leadership I don't think it was sustainable

00:55:01.000 I want to show you this picture.

00:55:02.000 This is the only path forward.

00:55:03.000 Right here.

00:55:04.000 Everyone take a look.

00:55:04.000 That's it.

00:55:05.000 I'm just kidding.

00:55:05.000 Who does?

00:55:07.000 So I pulled up some AI images that I made because I think they're funny.

00:55:10.000 But look at this guy's hat.

00:55:12.000 Like this one guy over here is wearing a very, very tiny hat for some reason.

00:55:15.000 This is Midjourney made this.

00:55:16.000 It's Generalissimo Trump.

00:55:18.000 But I want to show you another image.

00:55:21.000 This is what the establishment fears.

00:55:22.000 Donald Trump shaking hands with Sonic the Hedgehog.

00:55:25.000 But this one is actually the one I want you to see.

00:55:28.000 Because if you were to actually remove Sonic the Hedgehog from this image, it actually looks like a real photo of Donald Trump running down the street.

00:55:36.000 The average person is not going to be able to understand that this was generated by AI.

00:55:41.000 Granted, we put Sonic the Hedgehog in it, so we know this is not real.

00:55:44.000 But this is what I'm talking about with the political battle that's coming up.

00:55:49.000 This next year, the deep fakes that we are going to see of audio of video.

00:55:54.000 It's it's no one's going to know it's real.

00:55:57.000 There is not.

00:55:58.000 I mean, look, if Joe Biden is willing to steal the private communications of Trump and try and lock him up, you think Democrats aren't going to make fake audio of him, fake videos of him?

00:56:06.000 You can do all that and more.

00:56:09.000 Can you, I mean, that's the stuff that is going to be really, really difficult for people to sort through.

00:56:18.000 Because it's not going to be, it doesn't have to be like the official DNC to produce something that looks really good.

00:56:24.000 I mean, we saw that with the DeSantis... They're going to outsource it.

00:56:28.000 Video that had the sonor out at the end.

00:56:29.000 Well, that was his campaign who made that.

00:56:32.000 Or the CCP.

00:56:33.000 Yeah, but what I'm saying is it wasn't difficult for them to make that.

00:56:36.000 It's not difficult for a person like the Carpe Donctum or whatever his name, like he was doing that stuff in his own time.

00:56:44.000 It's not like you need some big infrastructure with highly skilled people.

00:56:49.000 You just need Photoshop or Lightroom or whatever your, you know, DAW.

00:56:55.000 No, it's not a DAW.

00:56:56.000 What's the, I don't know, your program of choice.

00:57:00.000 So yes, your point is well taken and it's something that is going to be difficult to navigate.

00:57:09.000 I want to bring up this story for everyone who said that Trump can't win.

00:57:13.000 Trump mocks Chris Christie's weight. 0.99

00:57:15.000 Don't call him a fat pig. 0.96

00:57:17.000 The former president made fun of, yes, of the former New Jersey governor and 2024 Republican nomination rival in a speech in New Hampshire. 0.97

00:57:24.000 It's really funny because he said, Christie, he's eating right now.

00:57:28.000 He can't be bothered.

00:57:29.000 When he said that, there was like 30 people in the media that were just like, yes, he's back.

00:57:34.000 That's when a man in the crowd shouted out to prod Trump. 0.99

00:57:37.000 Sir, please do not call him a fat pig. 0.99

00:57:39.000 I'm trying to be nice. 0.99

00:57:41.000 Don't call him a fat pig. 0.99

00:57:42.000 You can't do that. 1.00

00:57:43.000 That is the masterful anti-insult insult of Trump.

00:57:49.000 When he goes on stage and he says, you know, you've got Chris Christie. 1.00

00:57:53.000 Some people call him a fat pig. 0.99

00:57:55.000 We don't do that. 0.99

00:57:55.000 It's a mead. 0.99

00:57:57.000 That's his that's his game.

00:57:58.000 And it's brilliant because he's insulting him. 0.99

00:58:00.000 I said, don't call him a fat pig. 0.99

00:58:00.000 What do you mean? 0.99

00:58:02.000 You know, Trump's back.

00:58:04.000 I saw that. 0.98

00:58:05.000 As soon as I saw the story, don't call him a fat pig, I busted out laughing and I'm like, this is what Trump excels at. 0.97

00:58:11.000 He is an entertainer. 0.97

00:58:13.000 He builds confidence by being in control of the stage.

00:58:17.000 And he's got it now.

00:58:18.000 Not to mention Chris Christie is very pro-war.

00:58:20.000 So I don't know who's going to vote for that guy anyway. 1.00

00:58:23.000 But I do think this is a sign, as silly and stupid as it may be, that Donald Trump has the energy to win again. 0.99

00:58:30.000 I'd prefer a lot of other people, to be completely honest. 1.00

00:58:32.000 Only thing I'm really saying is, I hope Trump fires everybody.

00:58:37.000 Trump is good at firing people, I'll give him that.

00:58:39.000 It's just he's never been good at hiring them.

00:58:41.000 That's true.

00:58:42.000 And he wasn't his first time around, but I'm really hoping that this time around he's just seeing red the whole time.

00:58:48.000 If it's Trump, great, that's fine.

00:58:50.000 But for me, it's like, look, I want a president that's going to significantly cut the government.

00:58:57.000 Yeah, he's not your best bet.

00:58:59.000 No, but he, him?

00:59:00.000 Yeah, he probably isn't.

00:59:01.000 I mean, compared to who else?

00:59:02.000 Again, Vivek, maybe?

00:59:04.000 I'm just saying, because, just given, like, I expect him to piss a lot of people off, but I expect him to sign tons of spending bills, and, I mean, just, just looking at how he, I mean, I know I'm a libertarian, but even if you're a conservative, judging how Trump governed, like, gun control, spending, expansion of government, like, he was just, He's the only one that looks at the security establishment, or the intelligence establishment, or whatever, as the enemy.

00:59:32.000 I agree with you there.

00:59:33.000 I think that he would make significant cuts in the FBI.

00:59:37.000 I think he would make changes, like a personnel change.

00:59:41.000 I don't see him actually taking a hatchet to it.

00:59:43.000 Do you know the extent of what he did with the drone program?

00:59:46.000 I know he made it secretive and gave control to the generals, his subordinates.

00:59:50.000 Yeah, I mean, they stopped recording how many drone strikes were happening under his presidency, so they don't actually know what the number is.

00:59:58.000 It was very high, though.

00:59:59.000 You know, people rightly point out how many bombs Obama dropped because it was abysmal, but Trump...

01:00:06.000 Uh, I think he, he didn't drop more than Obama, but he dropped, uh, more in his first four years than Obama did in either four year period.

01:00:16.000 So it was, I mean, he dropped a lot of bombs.

01:00:18.000 And then he, then there was a bunch off the record.

01:00:20.000 We just don't know how many were dropped or where they were dropped or anything like that.

01:00:23.000 Do you think that, what's your view of how we handle, say like Afghanistan or Syria, just complete instant removal of all assets and personnel?

01:00:32.000 So I think, I mean, it's a mess no matter how you leave.

01:00:35.000 The problem with Afghanistan, I think I talked about this last time I was on here, was the order of operations, you know, like Phil said, that you get the people out first and the military out last, but also Donald Trump had made deals with the Taliban about like, hey, we're out of here in May.

01:00:51.000 And then Joe Biden came in and was dragging his feet and was like, nope, I'm going to make my own Taliban deal and we're going to leave in September.

01:00:58.000 And then the Taliban was like, well, what the heck?

01:00:59.000 Why are you still here?

01:01:01.000 So, you know, there are ways we could actually start pulling troops out.

01:01:04.000 But Trump was actually stifled by a lot of his generals.

01:01:06.000 He wanted people out of Afghanistan. 0.99

01:01:09.000 He wanted to start withdrawing and they screwed him up.

01:01:12.000 Um, that was one of the best things about his presidency was the deal with the Taliban and trying to pull him out. 1.00

01:01:17.000 So the issue with the drone strikes is if you immediately remove all the troops, you get what Joe Biden did.

01:01:24.000 Granted, I think Joe Biden sabotaged Afghanistan intentionally.

01:01:29.000 The abandoning of Bagram Air Force Base was a psychotic move.

01:01:32.000 What I see with Trump, and this is not to defend drone strikes, the US should never have been engaged in these wars, I think Trump's strategy was increase drone strikes and pull our troops out.

01:01:44.000 Man, once our troops are out, decrease drone strikes, we're gone.

01:01:48.000 Well, Trump increased troops in Afghanistan in the beginning of his presidency.

01:01:52.000 He did start trying to pull them out eventually, but at the beginning of his presidency, on war, he was awful.

01:01:58.000 Yeah, he fired 59 Tomahawks into Syria. 0.97

01:02:00.000 Yeah, he was just ramping everything up.

01:02:01.000 John Bolton.

01:02:02.000 And then toward the end, he was kind of like, alright, alright, alright, you know, maybe I actually should pull some troops out.

01:02:07.000 So I think one of the only ways you effectively withdraw from Afghanistan in the way that What would be to you basically use drone strikes as a placeholder as you remove personnel and then you rescind the drone strikes.

01:02:21.000 You need you need a wall to stop what happened.

01:02:23.000 And I think I think Joe Biden as awful as what he did gave us a window into into into how not to respond in terms of the mistakes.

01:02:32.000 He did use a drone strike though after.

01:02:36.000 What was it?

01:02:36.000 After that ISIS-K bombing?

01:02:39.000 He did use a drone strike and killed like 11 civilians with it or something.

01:02:39.000 Right.

01:02:43.000 Right, right, right.

01:02:44.000 And my point is this.

01:02:46.000 If you are trying to actively withdraw all your troops from, say, Afghanistan, you can't just recall them all instantly.

01:02:52.000 There's got to be a tapered pullback of certain areas.

01:02:54.000 You obviously don't abandon Bagram Air Force Base.

01:02:57.000 My point is that I think Trump's strategy, probably not even his, but probably some advisor was, Increase the drone strikes to create pressure.

01:03:05.000 Get our troops out.

01:03:06.000 Decrease drone strikes, release pressure.

01:03:08.000 We're gone.

01:03:09.000 I think the problem with Afghanistan was extending the leave date by like six months.

01:03:15.000 Well, that's Joe Biden.

01:03:16.000 That is Joe Biden.

01:03:16.000 Right, right, right.

01:03:17.000 And then Joe Biden says, we're going to pull our troops out abruptly in the middle of the night without informing any of our partners in the region, without informing the Afghan security forces.

01:03:17.000 100%.

01:03:24.000 And then they're left with no logistics.

01:03:26.000 So you've got guys flying helicopters being like, where am I going for fuel?

01:03:29.000 Is anyone there?

01:03:30.000 What's happening?

01:03:31.000 Just gone in an instant.

01:03:33.000 And I think it was all for political optics.

01:03:35.000 It was all because he didn't want Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal plan.

01:03:39.000 Yep. 1.00

01:03:41.000 I mean, what an evil piece of garbage. 1.00

01:03:43.000 Was it 19 people died because of it? 1.00

01:03:45.000 Yeah.

01:03:46.000 I mean, I think more than that, we're talking about 19 Americans, right?

01:03:49.000 Yeah, from the ISIS-K bombing.

01:03:51.000 How many civilians, bystanders are caught up in this and now living under the Taliban?

01:03:57.000 So, I mean, Joe Biden is plenty fair game, but also George W. Bush is who everyone really should hate.

01:04:05.000 We didn't need to be in Afghanistan for 20 years.

01:04:07.000 We could have had Osama bin Laden in 2001. 0.97

01:04:10.000 I do not believe the U.S.

01:04:11.000 went to Afghanistan for Osama bin Laden.

01:04:12.000 No, they didn't.

01:04:13.000 They went there for poppy, for heroin and oil.

01:04:16.000 And lithium.

01:04:17.000 Lithium as well.

01:04:18.000 They didn't go there for heroin.

01:04:19.000 They went there for lithium.

01:04:20.000 There's actually photos of U.S.

01:04:22.000 soldiers guarding poppy fields as they were harvesting it.

01:04:24.000 And that may be a component, but I think it was probably strategic access, a pincer move on Iran, access to lithium, seizing the region before China or Russia could take it, and nation building.

01:04:37.000 And they use Osama bin Laden as an excuse to launch that invasion, and they use WMD as an excuse to invade Iraq. 0.74

01:04:44.000 Why?

01:04:46.000 Anybody know geography?

01:04:48.000 Iraq's over here, Afghanistan's over here, Iran be right in the middle. 1.00

01:04:52.000 John Bolton said, I think it was in 2018, by this time next year we'll be celebrating in Tehran.

01:04:57.000 That's what their goal was.

01:04:59.000 I'm glad you brought up George Bush because we talk a lot about how Biden is the worst president ever in people's lifetimes.

01:05:04.000 A lot of people will say that.

01:05:06.000 It was George Bush, yeah.

01:05:06.000 It was George Bush.

01:05:07.000 That guy started this.

01:05:08.000 The worst? 0.98

01:05:10.000 9-11, War on Terror crap, the Patriot Act, all the war that we've seen in the Middle East was started by those people. 0.82

01:05:15.000 All the power that the Democrats are using against conservatives now with the Department of Homeland Security and everything, you can thank George W. Bush.

01:05:23.000 I think to be fair though, we can say that Cheney was the worst president because I don't think George... I almost said that!

01:05:29.000 Dick Cheney, I believe, maybe you can confirm this, Reid, that George Bush had actually given authority of the Air Force to Dick Cheney?

01:05:35.000 Is that what it was?

01:05:37.000 On 9-11 it was Cheney's call whether or not to fly the planes to defend the towers.

01:05:41.000 Yeah, it was Cheney's call to not shoot down the plane that hit the Pentagon.

01:05:45.000 And that should have been the president's call.

01:05:47.000 Yeah, but he was reading to children or something and then was on Air Force One. 0.97

01:05:52.000 What a pathetic, nepotistic, daddy's boy getting into power mess of a presidency, and then they put his dad's buddy in as the VP to let him run the show. 0.75

01:06:01.000 If you don't mind me going on a short side trail here, just because Vivek Ramaswamy put out a great tweet about 9-11. 0.98

01:06:09.000 And it was about Flight 77.

01:06:11.000 It was about the hijackers who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, Khalid al-Midar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, and how they had Saudi royalty indirectly wiring them money.

01:06:22.000 Prince Bandar, who was the Saudi ambassador to the United States, wired money to Maher al-Bayoumi in the United States, and then he gave it to uh Khalid Almodar and Nawaf Al-Hazmi who later flew the plane into the pentagon and this is something that a lot of 9-11 conspiracy theorists completely miss because it's flashy and sexy and everything to deny a plane hitting the pentagon or deny a plane going down at shanksville but if you just deny these things instead of looking into it you actually find out that the true anomalies

01:06:55.000 of people doing shady things are mostly involved with Flight 93 and Flight 77.

01:07:01.000 And I'm not the expert on this.

01:07:02.000 I just know people who are.

01:07:04.000 Ryan Dawson, Adam Fitzgerald, they've done extensive research on all this stuff.

01:07:07.000 Go check them out.

01:07:09.000 But Flight 77, Khalid Al-Madar, Nawaf Al-Hazmi, the 28 pages of the 9-11 report.

01:07:14.000 Just go check that out.

01:07:15.000 It's very eye-opening.

01:07:16.000 I thought that for 20 years they had one story, which was it was just they were just there working together.

01:07:22.000 For fun.

01:07:22.000 Like, there was no connection, and then all of a sudden in the last two years, more documents came out that show the connection to the Saudi Prince.

01:07:28.000 Let me read this from Vivek.

01:07:30.000 So, he says, Mike Pence says today that he was deeply offended that I don't trust that the government told us the truth in the 9-11 commission report.

01:07:37.000 He says, well, I find it offensive that our government repeatedly lies to us.

01:07:40.000 Here's the truth.

01:07:41.000 The FBI quietly declassified documents in 2021 that definitively reveal the government lied to the public about basic facts of Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9-11, until documents were declassified and they changed their story 20 years later.

01:07:53.000 Omar al-Bayoumi, a 42-year-old graduate student, welcomed, housed, set up bank accounts, and gave rent money to the first two al-Qaeda hijackers.

01:08:02.000 After they landed in Los Angeles in January of 2000, Al Baioumi claimed to have met the two terrorists entirely by chance.

01:08:08.000 The 9-11 Commission report verified that Baioumi's altruism was in the name of hospitality, as he claimed.

01:08:14.000 The FBI 20 years later changed its story.

01:08:16.000 In documents declassified last year, the Bureau affirmed that Biaomi was in fact an agent of the Saudi intelligence service who worked with Saudi religious officials and reported to the kingdom's powerful ambassador in Washington.

01:08:26.000 U.S.

01:08:27.000 government officials continue to lie about other matters of public importance, the origin of COVID, knowledge about UAPs, Hunter Biden's laptop, and how our money is actually being spent in Ukraine.

01:08:38.000 The Nashville Shooter's Manifesto, with a complicit media that just accepts the prevailing narrative without question.

01:08:44.000 This fuels rampant public distrust.

01:08:46.000 There is no credible evidence that 9-11 was an inside job, but ironically, when the government systematically lies about Saudi involvement, and the media runs interference, that lends plausibility to an otherwise unlikely claim.

01:08:57.000 There's no such thing as a noble lie.

01:08:59.000 With all due respect to the former VP, the reason that people don't trust the government is because the government doesn't trust the people.

01:09:05.000 Very well said.

01:09:05.000 Man, mic drop!

01:09:06.000 Wow!

01:09:07.000 He's great.

01:09:08.000 I want to vote for this guy.

01:09:09.000 Yeah, do it.

01:09:10.000 Yeah, I do hope he wins.

01:09:12.000 Me too.

01:09:12.000 I think, to be honest, I don't think he's going to win.

01:09:14.000 He'd need to be selected somehow, like Obama was.

01:09:18.000 Well, Deep State needs to get involved.

01:09:20.000 I'm surprised he's not polling higher already, considering he's broken into second place a couple times, and in the prediction markets he has.

01:09:27.000 I'm surprised.

01:09:28.000 He's just, every time I see him do an event, he's hitting a home run.

01:09:31.000 He's hitting a grand slam.

01:09:32.000 Well he basically, he echoed or just talked about exactly what we were just talking about, that 20 years after the 9-11 Commission report had lied to the American people about the terrorists' involvement with the Saudi Prince, they didn't even bring up the Saudi Prince maybe at the time, I don't know, 20 years later they admit we were lying, that the Saudi Prince was involved in funding these guys.

01:09:49.000 When Donald Trump said that Chris Christie was probably eating, he said Vivek is catching up on DeSantis and he's good.

01:09:57.000 Yeah.

01:09:58.000 Trump was like, he's good.

01:09:59.000 Vivek knows how to play the game.

01:10:00.000 It's all respect between Trump and Vivek.

01:10:02.000 I like it.

01:10:03.000 Yeah, remember who was like that in 2016 though?

01:10:05.000 It was Trump and Cruz until right up till the end.

01:10:09.000 They were like buddy buddy, you know, like he wouldn't tread on Trump's shoes and then...

01:10:13.000 I bet the gloves come off eventually.

01:10:15.000 The vape has handled his reason for running and his criticisms of Trump masterfully.

01:10:21.000 He's defended Trump on all the most important things, praised Trump on all the good things

01:10:25.000 that he's done, and I think his core issue is that he's mostly just a younger, more active

01:10:30.000 and involved individual who thinks that he could do a better job.

01:10:34.000 What's Trump going to say to that?

01:10:36.000 This is one area where Trump really messed up was with the Saudis.

01:10:36.000 Good luck!

01:10:39.000 You know, he talked about finding out what really happened on 9-11 when he ran in 2016, and then when he's president, he's over there with the Saruman ball with them, you know, and, you know, dancing with the sword and, you know, just forgetting about Khashoggi and all that.

01:10:53.000 So, I don't know.

01:10:54.000 So, the Saudi Arabian prince was sending money to the terrorist hijackers.

01:11:00.000 Before they hijacked the planes.

01:11:01.000 To Mayer al-Bayoumi, who was a Saudi student in the United States.

01:11:06.000 A middleman.

01:11:07.000 Yeah, middleman, who then was housing and giving aid to Khalid al-Madar and Nawaf al-Hazmi.

01:11:12.000 Now, someone funding terrorists before they attack doesn't necessarily mean that they were funding the terrorist attack.

01:11:18.000 They might have just been funding these guys for fun.

01:11:21.000 There's no way to know.

01:11:22.000 But this is damning.

01:11:24.000 This shows direct correlation between the Saudi government and the terrorist attacks on 9-11.

01:11:30.000 And he's on target.

01:11:31.000 Like, what he's talking about here is the real deal. 0.62

01:11:33.000 I mean, so many people get distracted by, I'm gonna just call them dumb conspiracies, like no planes or, you know, like stuff that doesn't matter.

01:11:41.000 And he's on target, so good for him. 0.82

01:11:45.000 Let's jump to the story about Trump.

01:11:46.000 Trump, we got this from CNN.

01:11:48.000 Security increases for judge assigned to Donald Trump's January 6th criminal case.

01:11:53.000 It all appears to be some kind of escalation.

01:11:56.000 CNN has observed more security detail to Judge Tanya Chutkin, and Deputy U.S. Marshals discussed

01:12:01.000 security plans for the judge on Monday.

01:12:03.000 The U.S. Marshals Service handles security at the D.C.

01:12:05.000 District Court and the spokesman for the service said it takes that responsibility very

01:12:09.000 seriously.

01:12:10.000 Ensuring that judges can rule independently and free from harm or intimidation is paramount

01:12:15.000 to the rule of law.

01:12:17.000 You know, you see this, and we had the story that we kicked off with about that guy in Provo who the FBI killed, and it seems like, I mean, look, it seems like violence is on the horizon.

01:12:28.000 And then you think about the fact that, or the story about Andy's, Andy Ngo's situation yesterday, how the entire court seemed to be against him.

01:12:41.000 But Andy did win.

01:12:43.000 So, in this particular case, he loses against these two individuals, but the court found the other defendants in default.

01:12:50.000 And I think what happens is fairly obvious.

01:12:54.000 Andy sues a handful of these far-left extremists.

01:12:57.000 Then, they all meet together.

01:12:59.000 And my opinion and assumption on what they probably did was, hey, you guys actually did it, so don't show up.

01:13:07.000 They'll hold you in default, you'll lose, but we don't want it on the record that you actually did it.

01:13:14.000 Then those who weren't involved will go, say I wasn't involved, I didn't attack them, and then you'll get a trial where it's Andy no loses.

01:13:22.000 So he won against a couple of defendants already.

01:13:24.000 They're in default.

01:13:25.000 What does that mean, that they're in default?

01:13:26.000 It means, like, no contest.

01:13:28.000 They didn't show up, so they lose.

01:13:29.000 So they're found guilty?

01:13:30.000 It's not guilty, it's a civil trial.

01:13:32.000 They're in default, so they made no argument.

01:13:36.000 Yeah, to what extent, I'm not entirely sure.

01:13:38.000 Against the guys who likely attacked him, they probably... And apparently one of the guys showed up after the fact, if he was already found in default.

01:13:44.000 He tried showing up in the stands or whatever.

01:13:46.000 But the story about Trump and the judge, and the judge getting more security, apparently people are saying that the judge is... that basically what's happening is they're insinuating there are very serious threats from the right against the judge because of things Trump's been saying, and they're trying to make it look like Trump is a persistent and consistent threat.

01:14:05.000 I support them getting security for any judge at this point, but I do agree that I think this maybe is a play to make it look like the guy that's got a preside over them.

01:14:16.000 No, it's not maybe.

01:14:17.000 Look at the way that they behave about the right all the time.

01:14:22.000 It is constantly that the right is dangerous.

01:14:25.000 We need security from the right.

01:14:26.000 The right's going to do this.

01:14:27.000 The right's going to do that.

01:14:28.000 And if you look at the past couple of years, you know, you've got Justice Steve Scalise was shot by a Bernie Sanders supporter.

01:14:37.000 You got people showing up at Supreme Court justices' houses saying that they're, oh, we're going to, you know, I came here because I was going to kill the guy.

01:14:45.000 Yeah, but Phil, a guy dressed up in a buffalo costume and went into the Capitol once.

01:14:49.000 He was on Michael Malice's show, by the way.

01:14:51.000 He was today, yeah.

01:14:53.000 Jacob Chansley.

01:14:55.000 You've got people actually throwing Molotov cocktails at police in Portland.

01:15:02.000 And all that stuff is is mostly ignored.

01:15:04.000 There's an attack on the White House that makes Trump go into the bunker and all that's ignored.

01:15:09.000 But then, you know, the right does anything and then and it's it's. 0.93

01:15:12.000 That's the most amazing hypocritical moment right there.

01:15:15.000 But it's not hypocrisy. 0.82

01:15:16.000 I've said this a bunch.

01:15:17.000 There's this dude, Herbert Marcuse, who wrote papers.

01:15:20.000 Giving the logic, giving the justification.

01:15:23.000 It's called Repressive Tolerance.

01:15:26.000 It came out in 1964.

01:15:28.000 An essay on tolerance, I think is what it's called, came out in 1964.

01:15:32.000 Herbert Marcuse is a rock star of philosophy on the left.

01:15:36.000 He wrote a bunch of books.

01:15:39.000 Coincidentally, he's also influential when it comes to queer theory.

01:15:43.000 He wrote this book called Eros and Civilization.

01:15:45.000 He wrote a book called One Dimensional Man.

01:15:47.000 But all these things that we're seeing in reality here in society now, these things are all At least outlined in leftist theory books decades and decades ago.

01:16:01.000 They're just manifesting in reality now.

01:16:02.000 All this stuff is completely predictable and you can see, you can just go and find the arguments and read the arguments for this behavior if you want to.

01:16:12.000 It's not like the right is making it up.

01:16:14.000 Is it fair to say that Marcus was writing like a playbook of how to win a cultural revolution in the United States?

01:16:21.000 I don't know that he was writing a playbook.

01:16:23.000 I think that he was more A philosopher overall than an actual tactician, but possibly.

01:16:31.000 I don't know.

01:16:32.000 I think I would defer to someone that's more familiar with Marcuse's stuff.

01:16:37.000 I haven't studied his stuff.

01:16:39.000 I see.

01:16:40.000 I guess there's a difference in strategy and tactics.

01:16:42.000 So is he more of a strategist?

01:16:43.000 I thought that was like Salilinsky's stuff.

01:16:46.000 That guy rules radicals and he was really like a tactics dude.

01:16:54.000 Maybe someone like Mark Hughes was a strategy guy, and then Olinsky was more of a tactics guy.

01:16:59.000 You know, like an on-the-street, or on the ground, how you actually affect these ideas, or make these ideas manifest in reality.

01:17:07.000 I want to pull up this tweet from Julie Kelly.

01:17:10.000 She tweets, Jack Smith errantly claimed that Trump was a flight risk to convince Judge Beryl Howell to prevent Trump from knowing about the Twitter search warrant.

01:17:20.000 Beryl Howell agreed that Trump would flee from prosecution, writing, the district court also found reason to believe the former president would flee from prosecution.

01:17:28.000 The government later acknowledged, however, that it errantly included flight from prosecution as a predicate in its application.

01:17:35.000 They have already laid the groundwork to remand Trump to custody under the idea that he will flee if they try to convict him.

01:17:44.000 And so this is what I was saying before.

01:17:47.000 If the charges against Donald Trump are legitimate, if they genuinely believe it, Trump would be locked up right now.

01:17:52.000 They would not let him leave.

01:17:53.000 The man owns several jets, helicopters.

01:17:55.000 He's a billionaire.

01:17:56.000 He has buildings with his name on it.

01:17:58.000 He owns buildings all over the world.

01:18:00.000 He could go to any one of these countries.

01:18:03.000 He has the absolute capabilities to flee.

01:18:05.000 The only reason he wouldn't is because he's running for president, but they have made the argument already.

01:18:09.000 We're getting this information out of the Twitter revelation that they're trying to seek information from his Twitter account.

01:18:16.000 They're actually arguing now that Trump's going to try and flee.

01:18:19.000 So how long until they remand him to custody?

01:18:21.000 How long until they make the argument that Trump should not be free, and then they stop him from campaigning?

01:18:27.000 I don't know.

01:18:28.000 I thought that they were not going to do that.

01:18:30.000 This just came out today that they errantly included flight from prosecution as a predicate.

01:18:36.000 What does that mean?

01:18:37.000 They accidentally had his flight risk in there and then they took it out?

01:18:44.000 I think what they're saying is they did not mean to include that they feel that Trump is a flight risk when facing prosecution.

01:18:51.000 That's got to be false.

01:18:53.000 Like, you don't make accidents at that level.

01:18:55.000 Maybe.

01:18:56.000 Maybe they do.

01:18:56.000 Maybe they do, actually.

01:18:57.000 I don't know.

01:18:58.000 But it seems like a convenient accident to have that piece of data on and off the record at the same time.

01:19:03.000 I think they're going to lock him up.

01:19:05.000 They're trying to silence him.

01:19:06.000 Trump's fighting back.

01:19:07.000 Can he still run if they lock him up?

01:19:09.000 Yes, but he's not going to be able to go to rallies.

01:19:11.000 I mean, it sounds kind of fun, though.

01:19:13.000 I'm kind of interested in that idea.

01:19:15.000 I think if they lock him up, he still wins.

01:19:17.000 That'd be the best.

01:19:18.000 In fact, I think it helps him.

01:19:19.000 And I think they know, they know, exactly.

01:19:22.000 I think they know putting him in jail is gonna give him a major victory.

01:19:25.000 Look, if Elon Musk is right, that is the funniest outcome.

01:19:29.000 It is.

01:19:30.000 He gets arrested and then goes to jail and then wins and pardons himself.

01:19:34.000 And pardons all the guards.

01:19:36.000 And then goes to D.C.

01:19:38.000 That would be hilarious.

01:19:40.000 Yes.

01:19:40.000 But there are many people Throughout history, who have been jailed by their government or political rivals, and then later get out and then win.

01:19:49.000 Hitler is the first one that comes to mind. 0.97

01:19:50.000 Yeah, I was going to say Hitler. 0.88

01:19:51.000 I was going to say Mandela.

01:19:52.000 Mandela's the other one.

01:19:53.000 Napoleon was banished, and then he came back and went right back to the revolution and started attacking again.

01:19:58.000 Yep.

01:20:00.000 I don't know, man.

01:20:01.000 I think there's a strong possibility they lock up Trump.

01:20:04.000 They're throwing everything and the kitchen sink.

01:20:07.000 I think it'd be hilarious.

01:20:08.000 They would piss off a hundred million people if they did that, like beyond mega.

01:20:14.000 That would be the worst tactic.

01:20:15.000 Maybe that's the real conspiracy theory.

01:20:17.000 That Trump really is the, the, you know, the trigger.

01:20:22.000 No, that's a war.

01:20:23.000 No, that Trump is deep state.

01:20:25.000 And in order to get him to win with the support of the people, you need to make him into the martyr into the victim that people are willing to get behind.

01:20:32.000 Interesting.

01:20:32.000 It's not that hard to imagine though, if you think about like, so just do a thought experiment with me for a second.

01:20:38.000 Imagine if Joe Biden had been president in 2020, do you think all those red governors would have locked their states down? 0.92

01:20:46.000 Yeah.

01:20:47.000 Mmm, they would they would have been on the opposite side.

01:20:49.000 They would have said oh, no, you know Yeah, they would have been like resisting the tyranny of Joe Biden where with Donald Trump saying hey guys We got to do this, you know all the red states kind of like, okay, whatever.

01:20:59.000 So some day, that's a word Yeah, but the the argument would be How do you get a libertarian to vote for a Republican president?

01:21:09.000 Make him funny.

01:21:10.000 Make him unpopular.

01:21:11.000 No, you make him the martyr.

01:21:13.000 You make him the persecuted.

01:21:14.000 You make him the anti-establishment.

01:21:15.000 You make him the anti-government.

01:21:17.000 I was talking about this with Bitcoin.

01:21:19.000 I was like, you know, if I was a World Economic Forum globalist billionaire, And I wanted a one-world currency.

01:21:29.000 How would I do it?

01:21:30.000 Because we've heard that conspiracy over and over again.

01:21:32.000 They're gonna make a one-world government currency.

01:21:34.000 You know, Alex Jones has been talking about it for decades.

01:21:36.000 I'm like, well, you gotta get the crackpot conspiracy theorists to be the ones pushing and advocating for it.

01:21:42.000 Because you come out against them, then you get that whole network of people paying attention to politics, they're against you and they don't want to do it.

01:21:48.000 So then I see Bitcoin, and all of a sudden I see the likes of these anarchists, anti-establishment, conspiracy theorist types, all saying it's the future and you have to use it.

01:21:57.000 And I'm like, so this, this, you're calling it, I don't know if they call it a currency these days or whatever, but this like global financial transaction system that can be tracked by anyone at any point.

01:22:06.000 Right.

01:22:06.000 And they can know everything you're doing.

01:22:09.000 And y'all are advocating for, I'm like, that's a, this is like a one world unified currency.

01:22:13.000 Well, I mean, you know, I'm like, I'm not saying that that's true.

01:22:16.000 I'm just saying, if you want a one world currency, Bitcoin's, or I should just say crypto in general is a fast path.

01:22:23.000 Especially considering they can track everything you're buying.

01:22:25.000 Yeah.

01:22:26.000 I'm a gold bug, so Phil's got to defend Bitcoin.

01:22:30.000 I mean, I'm a fan of Bitcoin as well as gold and silver, and I've got a little bit of all that stuff.

01:22:37.000 I'm not a one-way kind of dude.

01:22:41.000 That sounds a little... The guys in Tower Gang are going to punish me for that comment.

01:22:48.000 I like that you can create your own crypto and use it locally for things, even though the government would want to take taxes from you, you can still do it.

01:22:55.000 And things like, someone just texted Monero.

01:22:57.000 Gustav said that in the chat.

01:22:59.000 Yeah, Monero apparently is untrackable or more challenging to track.

01:23:03.000 Zcash.

01:23:04.000 What happens when they tell Trump, they say, where are you currently residing?

01:23:08.000 It says Bedminster, New Jersey.

01:23:09.000 They say, OK, don't leave the state.

01:23:11.000 What about that?

01:23:12.000 That's a half scenario.

01:23:13.000 It's like they're not jailing him because they don't want to give him any hard political martyr benefits.

01:23:16.000 He probably would not leave the state. 0.79

01:23:18.000 Go nuts on social media.

01:23:19.000 They're not letting me leave the state. 0.95

01:23:22.000 This is unconscionable.

01:23:23.000 I'm stuck here in this beautiful palace in Bedminster.

01:23:26.000 You know, but I think he would stay there and just do a lot more media.

01:23:30.000 I have social media.

01:23:31.000 I don't know.

01:23:33.000 If he went and he said that he was in Florida, I imagine he wouldn't get remanded to... It's gonna be a federal judge who says, like, we're gonna release you, but you have to stay in a certain area because we want to make sure that you don't flee, blah blah blah.

01:23:47.000 Maybe.

01:23:49.000 I do want to see this though.

01:23:50.000 You want to see Trump arrested?

01:23:52.000 I want Trump remanded to custody.

01:23:54.000 I think the fact that they arrested him and let him go proves they're lying about everything.

01:24:00.000 They're accusing the guy of trying to overthrow the government, and they're like, yeah, you can go.

01:24:04.000 Go do whatever you want.

01:24:05.000 Yeah.

01:24:06.000 So what I find interesting is they can't, you know, prosecute him for war crimes because they'd be complicit in the same things they tried to go after, you know.

01:24:15.000 Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton.

01:24:17.000 Oh boy, we can go all the way back.

01:24:19.000 And the let them go thing is like, we think you did a crime, but you can go.

01:24:22.000 It's kind of like, here, take this package.

01:24:24.000 Whatever you do, don't take it across the street to that 7-Eleven.

01:24:27.000 Don't do it.

01:24:27.000 And then they just watch and they're waiting for him to take the package across the street.

01:24:31.000 They're like, we just want you to flee, man.

01:24:32.000 We just want you to do something to give us an excuse to crack down a hundred times harder.

01:24:38.000 Trump's got a big jet.

01:24:39.000 He can fly wherever he wants.

01:24:41.000 So do you think Trump will put his foot down on Ukraine?

01:24:44.000 Because he... Yes.

01:24:46.000 Again, I judge a man by what he does, not what he says.

01:24:49.000 And, you know, to his credit, he did talk to Putin and he kept an open line of communication for the most part.

01:24:55.000 But he also was the guy who initiated lethal aid to Ukraine.

01:25:00.000 Obama, like he even bragged, Obama was only sending pillows and helmets or something like that.

01:25:05.000 I'm sending them missiles.

01:25:07.000 And I mean, he was responsible for a lot of the escalation.

01:25:10.000 He tore up the INF Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, you know.

01:25:14.000 So, I don't know.

01:25:15.000 Like, I just don't believe what people say.

01:25:17.000 I believe what they do.

01:25:18.000 I do.

01:25:18.000 I think the war ends the moment he gets elected.

01:25:20.000 Yeah?

01:25:21.000 Mm-hmm.

01:25:22.000 I think Putin is going to cease fire, and then he's going to say, we're waiting, and Trump's going to go.

01:25:28.000 And I think a likely scenario, if Trump did get elected, is The Donbass goes to Russia.

01:25:34.000 Crimea and the Donbass go to Russia.

01:25:36.000 Ukraine retains everything else.

01:25:37.000 Fighting stops.

01:25:39.000 I mean, I would like to think that could happen, because it's a very low bar.

01:25:42.000 Like, all we gotta do is stop sending billions of dollars and the war ends.

01:25:46.000 Which, the media's even starting to admit that now, that Ukraine can't win the war.

01:25:49.000 Boris Johnson went there and disrupted peace agreements.

01:25:52.000 So, yeah, NATO countries want, they want war.

01:25:55.000 I mean, look, I think many in the West, United States particularly, are saying, this is our chance to, it's a casus belli for war with Russia.

01:26:03.000 We needed a way to justify war with Russia, and now we have it, but Russia needs to push harder, Russia needs to attack a NATO country so that NATO can invade Russia. 0.74

01:26:13.000 That's what they want to happen.

01:26:15.000 And they'll keep doing it until Russia has no choice. 0.77

01:26:17.000 I wouldn't be surprised if you get NATO military forces firing from inside NATO territory at Russians.

01:26:23.000 You've already got a story about a Russian strike that it was 600 feet from Romania or something like that, so we're getting dangerously close.

01:26:29.000 Donald Trump is going to go in and be like, nope, no more fighting.

01:26:32.000 He's going to go to Ukraine and be like, you're not getting any more money from us.

01:26:35.000 And they're going to go, okay, we want peace.

01:26:37.000 No more funding, no more military.

01:26:39.000 They're not going to be able to support any effort against Russia.

01:26:43.000 How entangled do you think the deep state is with this war right now?

01:26:46.000 How much vested interest do they have in seeing it through?

01:26:48.000 100%. 0.93

01:26:49.000 Then they'll assassinate him if he tries to stop it.

01:26:51.000 I see one- I think you mean to say they'll try. 0.53

01:26:54.000 They'll try.

01:26:54.000 They'll try over and over and over and over and over.

01:26:56.000 One big problem with your theory I have is Lindsey Graham, how close that guy still is with Trump.

01:27:03.000 I mean, he is like the epitome of everything we're talking about.

01:27:07.000 I think Donald Trump wants revenge too much.

01:27:13.000 When he goes in, he is going to be just screaming at the top of his lungs.

01:27:18.000 I'm not saying it's absolute, I'm just saying what they've done to him now, assuming it's all on the level, raiding his house, going after his family, whatever, he's gonna go and he's gonna scream at these people.

01:27:29.000 He's gonna be like, you're weak, you stabbed me in the back, Lindsey Graham?

01:27:32.000 Sure, maybe, but Lindsey Graham, what's he doing to help Trump right now?

01:27:36.000 Nothing.

01:27:37.000 They campaigned with him a little bit.

01:27:37.000 These guys abandoned him.

01:27:38.000 Yeah, but they abandoned him across the board.

01:27:41.000 So Donald Trump, maybe not perfect.

01:27:43.000 There's a strong possibility you get a bunch of BS.

01:27:45.000 But I'll, you know, I'll flip the coin.

01:27:48.000 I think there's a good, the best candidate right now for firing people in government.

01:27:51.000 Hey, maybe it's one guy, I'll take it.

01:27:53.000 It's gonna be Trump.

01:27:54.000 I think it's Vivek because he talks about you can't literally fire people.

01:27:54.000 No, I don't think so.

01:27:58.000 You can shut down Like sectors of the government where people work and then their jobs are dissipated and they no longer work there.

01:28:05.000 You can't do individual firings.

01:28:07.000 Trump didn't know that apparently when he was in office.

01:28:09.000 He's like, I can't fire them.

01:28:10.000 But he could have shut them down and he didn't.

01:28:13.000 I think he's not in a good state.

01:28:14.000 I don't know.

01:28:15.000 I don't want to assume too much, but it seems like Trump's not in a very good state of mind relative to 2016 when he was like, we're going to make America great.

01:28:20.000 He was talking about making things great.

01:28:22.000 Now he's talking about like, I'm going to go get them.

01:28:24.000 You let me back in there.

01:28:25.000 I'm going to get them. 0.56

01:28:26.000 Revenge.

01:28:27.000 I mean, in 2016, he talked about the Federal Reserve and the bubble economy we've created and how lowering interest rates artificially is going to cause problems.

01:28:27.000 I don't want that.

01:28:36.000 And then as soon as he became president, without addressing any of it, it was instantly the greatest economy in the world.

01:28:41.000 Everything's fine.

01:28:42.000 You know, so he has a way of talking about the problems when he's not in there.

01:28:47.000 And then as soon as he gets in, he has awful people, you know, talking him up and, you know, schmoozing him and everything.

01:28:54.000 And then He just kind of, I don't know, he listens to bad advice a lot.

01:28:57.000 I feel like his instincts are better than the governing he's done.

01:29:02.000 But, you know, he likes flattery, he likes being worshipped.

01:29:06.000 That's so dangerous for a leader.

01:29:08.000 Ian, you said that you don't want someone that's going to go in there and get him.

01:29:13.000 That's exactly what I want.

01:29:15.000 I want someone that's going to go in there and disassemble portions of the government. 0.93

01:29:21.000 I want someone that's going to go in there and get them.

01:29:25.000 I want someone that looks at them as a problem that needs to be remedied.

01:29:30.000 The bureaucracy in Washington needs to be disassembled.

01:29:36.000 That's the biggest problem the United States has right now is the massive amounts of bureaucracy.

01:29:42.000 Probably the security apparatus that was built after 9-11 has to be totally disassembled.

01:29:48.000 It has to be because it's been turned on the American people now.

01:29:51.000 So whoever's going to do the most disassembling, and I mean it, whoever's going to do the most damage to the bureaucracy, and by damage I mean disassembling, like taking it apart, firing people, Like getting rid of people that are working for the government.

01:30:10.000 Ending contracts.

01:30:11.000 I'm talking about serious, serious cuts to the government.

01:30:15.000 We get a lot of people coming in here and talking about like, oh I want to do this and I want to do that and stuff.

01:30:21.000 I want the guys that are like, I'm going to take the government apart because it's too big.

01:30:26.000 It's the biggest government in human history and it's It has so much redundancy, so much unnecessary power, and it violates the rights of people in the United States in every imaginable way.

01:30:43.000 Every single bill, every single amendment in the Bill of Rights is violated in some way nowadays by the federal government, and we should take the government apart and stop them.

01:30:53.000 I agree about disassembly.

01:30:55.000 I'm concerned about the methodology, because the two guys that I've been talking about are Trump and Ramaswamy.

01:31:00.000 And Vivek's pretty articulate and architectural about the way he wants to end certain programs, replace them with some, or in some instances not replace them with anything.

01:31:10.000 As opposed to what I'm hearing from Trump, and I haven't really talked to him about it, is, I want to go get them.

01:31:16.000 I'm going back in there to get them.

01:31:17.000 And it's like, I want to hear about your structural reform.

01:31:20.000 I don't really care about the people that much.

01:31:22.000 Yeah, I was going to say, that's Trump.

01:31:25.000 I mean, he's not descriptive. 1.00

01:31:26.000 Like, literally, like that's like, whether or not Trump has, Trump never has a plan for that shit. 0.99

01:31:31.000 I don't think that he has any kind of plan. 0.99

01:31:34.000 He's gonna go in there and be like, how do I take things apart, take that apart, take this

01:31:36.000 apart.

01:31:37.000 He's not, he's not.

01:31:38.000 He's gonna be on his computer, Google, how to disassemble federal government.

01:31:41.000 And then he'll have to rely on advice and the people that play shell games with him will be like, yeah, actually you can't disassemble that one.

01:31:46.000 And he'll be like, really?

01:31:47.000 And then like six weeks will go by and he'll be like, why can't we do it guys?

01:31:50.000 Whereas Vivek's like stomping his foot, like sign this piece of legislation.

01:31:53.000 I've read the constitution 30 times.

01:31:55.000 Like he knows exactly where to move and to put the pieces to, to take this thing apart in a way that won't destroy it.

01:32:02.000 I want the destruction!

01:32:03.000 Well, disassembly and destruction are two different... No, they're not!

01:32:06.000 ...methodologies to take something apart.

01:32:08.000 No, they're not!

01:32:09.000 I mean, you could argue... No, they are, they are.

01:32:12.000 If you disassemble... If you destroy it... I mean, you could argue that disassembly is a form of destruction.

01:32:16.000 I want it... I want it disassembled in a manner in which it does not function anymore.

01:32:22.000 So whether you call it disassembly, I'm saying disassembly so that way I sound nice and reasonable.

01:32:28.000 You can call it murder the government.

01:32:31.000 You can call it destroy.

01:32:32.000 You can say, you can use whatever, you know, articulate it however you want.

01:32:36.000 However you want, not like the guy in Utah, you know.

01:32:40.000 That was a very specific individual.

01:32:43.000 I'm talking about the government broadly, the bureaucracy.

01:32:46.000 So I don't care if you talk about how you describe it.

01:32:50.000 I want the function of the bureaucracy currently to end and the people that work in the bureaucracy to work in other fields that are no longer in the government.

01:33:01.000 And then I want the buildings that house the bureaucracy to be razed to the ground or sold.

01:33:10.000 Actual elimination of government bureaucracy not restructure not give it or move it around Not a shell game.

01:33:18.000 I'm talking about get rid of jobs in the government because I want the government Smaller than it is and there's and I think there's too many people that that will say that especially even or even Libertarians or small government people they'll say oh we want to limit this and limit that but then they would never ever say I want to Get rid of jobs.

01:33:38.000 They'll never actually say they want to make real cuts.

01:33:41.000 I want real cuts.

01:33:43.000 Real, real cuts.

01:33:45.000 Real painful cuts to the government.

01:33:48.000 I guess technically they'd be layoffs, not firings, but layoffs.

01:33:51.000 No, no, no.

01:33:52.000 I don't care.

01:33:53.000 I just want them not doing their job anymore.

01:33:53.000 Call them what you want.

01:33:56.000 I want those jobs gone.

01:33:57.000 I want those jobs totally destroyed.

01:34:00.000 This is what they did in Iraq, though you've got to be careful with the Ba'ath Party. 0.87

01:34:03.000 No, that was getting rid of people that had a political, that was getting rid of a political ideology in the Ba'ath Party.

01:34:09.000 We're saying, you know, shut down the Department of Education.

01:34:11.000 The Ba'ath Party was getting rid of the party ideology.

01:34:14.000 I'm saying, get rid of the function.

01:34:17.000 So like, when you talk about getting rid of the Ba'ath Party, what they did is they got rid of people that had an ideological perspective.

01:34:23.000 Saddam Hussein's political party.

01:34:25.000 It's like getting rid of Republicans.

01:34:26.000 What I'm saying is get rid of whatever the function that this agency does, whatever their job is, make the government no longer have that job.

01:34:38.000 So it's not getting rid of ideology, it's removing a function of the government.

01:34:42.000 All right, we're gonna go to Super Chat.

01:34:44.000 So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, take that URL on YouTube, post it wherever you can, it really does help.

01:34:51.000 And head over to TimCast.com, become a member.

01:34:53.000 We're gonna have a members-only uncensored show coming up in about a half an hour.

01:34:57.000 And right now, I put up a poll on YouTube.

01:35:00.000 Should we keep Rise with Roberto Jr., or create a memorial blend for Roberto Jr.?

01:35:06.000 As of right now, 73% think we should immortalize Rise with Roberto Jr.

01:35:12.000 So, If by the end of tonight's show.

01:35:14.000 That is the dominant preference among all of you.

01:35:17.000 What I'm going to do is, we will alter the art on the existing Rise with Roberto Junior coffee blend to add his date of birth and his date of death and in memoriam on the back, but we will keep it in every other way the same.

01:35:33.000 Which means, the existing bags that we have, we actually have a few thousand that are still available, We'll be the last time those are printed, but we will keep it overwhelmingly the same.

01:35:43.000 I just feel like I don't want to do nothing.

01:35:45.000 I don't want to just have the same thing like we did nothing, you know, Roberto Jr.

01:35:48.000 Our favorite rooster, he dies, and we're just like, yeah, we'll just keep him.

01:35:51.000 We'll make a new bag art, so that means that the existing art will be unique, and then there will be a very, very, very similar, but we'll say, in memoriam, with his, you know, life on the back.

01:35:51.000 No, no, no.

01:36:02.000 I think that's the appropriate thing, if you all agree that we should immortalize the rise with Roberto Junior blend.

01:36:07.000 I love that the term rise with Roberto now takes on new meaning.

01:36:11.000 It's like the spirit.

01:36:12.000 It's like an elevation of spirit, man.

01:36:14.000 Well, the return of the king.

01:36:15.000 We'll have to make a new blend for Roberto, who's returned.

01:36:17.000 Oh, the beast.

01:36:18.000 He's come back because his son passed and he's got to take care of his grandkids.

01:36:22.000 Is he in there now?

01:36:23.000 Oh, okay.

01:36:23.000 Yeah.

01:36:24.000 He's out there.

01:36:25.000 But we'll read some more Super Chats. 0.97

01:36:27.000 Let's get on with it.

01:36:28.000 I'm not your buddy guy.

01:36:29.000 Always the first!

01:36:30.000 He says, they aren't protecting Biden, they're protecting Obama.

01:36:33.000 Biden just so happens to be the key connection to unraveling the intel influence.

01:36:37.000 Perhaps.

01:36:38.000 Mick Zenmancer says, did I beat I'm Not Your Buddy Guy for first?

01:36:41.000 Oh, so close.

01:36:42.000 No, you didn't.

01:36:43.000 You were six minutes late.

01:36:45.000 Sorry.

01:36:48.000 Kenneth Hart says, your show is not kid-safe, bro.

01:36:48.000 Where are we at?

01:36:51.000 We visited my library mom, who, of course, rescued a pit bull.

01:36:55.000 I catch my oldest son wiggling his jowls, copying Tim's imitation of Obama, saying, too many kids, gotta blow them up.

01:37:01.000 He put too many pits.

01:37:03.000 That was just Seamus.

01:37:04.000 Too many kids. 0.99

01:37:05.000 Gotta blow them up. 0.99

01:37:06.000 Yeah, so I made the joke where it's like, Barack Obama's like, if you vote for me, I'm gonna blow up kids. 0.99

01:37:11.000 And then Seamus was like, gotta blow up kids. 0.96

01:37:13.000 Too many of them. 0.72

01:37:15.000 Gotta change the population.

01:37:17.000 Tom Mannion says, defend the guard.

01:37:19.000 Thanks for representing the bill, Reed.

01:37:21.000 Got it.

01:37:23.000 Let's grab some more superchats.

01:37:26.000 SR71Industries says, Tim and gang, thank you.

01:37:28.000 My channel wouldn't be where it is today without you.

01:37:30.000 I do car enthusiast gaming, soon health and fitness for truck drivers, guns and gear.

01:37:35.000 This veteran appreciates it.

01:37:36.000 Rip Roberto. 0.51

01:37:37.000 Much love, Roberto Jr.

01:37:39.000 But I appreciate the sentiment.

01:37:40.000 Roberto is his father, who has returned.

01:37:44.000 His name is Roberto Beaks, and it was Roberto Beaks Jr.

01:37:47.000 And Roberto Beaks, Mr. Beaks, he's back.

01:37:52.000 William Tresh says, Tim, what are you talking about?

01:37:54.000 That nothing happened when the left threatened Trump.

01:37:56.000 Republicans sent so many strongly worded letters.

01:37:59.000 They did.

01:38:00.000 I remember those.

01:38:01.000 How dare you?

01:38:01.000 They were shaking their fist at clouds.

01:38:04.000 Matthew Maddox says people tried to burn down the White House with Trump inside.

01:38:08.000 They did.

01:38:09.000 And, uh, January 6th is more important, I suppose.

01:38:13.000 There you go.

01:38:16.000 Let's go.

01:38:18.000 Wardantic says, They definitely came after people who threatened Trump.

01:38:22.000 I got a visit at work from the SS because of an Epstein meme. 0.92

01:38:26.000 I had him and Kennedy in the same sentence and they cornered me at work.

01:38:29.000 And I'm a random nobody.

01:38:30.000 But that's what I was saying, we've heard all these stories about them knocking on doors.

01:38:34.000 The question is, what happened with this guy in Provo?

01:38:36.000 I think he probably shoved it to his door with a gun.

01:38:38.000 And then they were like, nope.

01:38:39.000 And he was like, nope.

01:38:40.000 And then this is what happens.

01:38:41.000 Yeah.

01:38:42.000 I think he, he probably got lippy.

01:38:46.000 Judging off his social media.

01:38:47.000 Yeah. 1.00

01:38:48.000 Dummy. 0.99

01:38:50.000 Mike E says, head to send to my dog of 15 years over the rainbow bridge today. 0.96

01:38:54.000 Can y'all please shout out my dog, Abby, one of the greatest dogs ever.

01:38:58.000 Abby, may your spirit rest in peace.

01:39:00.000 Sorry to hear it, Mike.

01:39:01.000 Rest in peace, Abby.

01:39:02.000 Abby.

01:39:04.000 OMG Puppies says, the Democratic Party controls the media, and that's all that matters. 0.89

01:39:09.000 Aristotle said this 2,400 years ago.

01:39:12.000 Democracy is ruled by whoever masters rhetoric.

01:39:16.000 Agreed!

01:39:16.000 Yep.

01:39:18.000 They have a strong influence over it.

01:39:19.000 I don't know, not full control, but definitely strong influence.

01:39:23.000 Ryan Spaulding says, the cover art of Megadeth's The System Has Failed album really resonates with current events, and that album was released in the early 2000s.

01:39:31.000 Do you know that one?

01:39:32.000 The cover of The System Has Failed?

01:39:38.000 Brian Barwinski says, Ian is grounded and crystal-pilled tonight.

01:39:42.000 20.

01:39:42.000 Oh, thank you.

01:39:43.000 Oh, very nice, very nice.

01:39:44.000 I've been holding this ruby as we talk.

01:39:46.000 A ruby, huh?

01:39:47.000 We gotta give you that charged crystal.

01:39:48.000 It's just sitting on our counter.

01:39:49.000 Oh, let's bring it.

01:39:50.000 Yeah, gotta bring it over. 0.99

01:39:53.000 Colton Hyres says, I think it's incredibly stupid to vote for whoever will make your opponents the angriest. 0.97

01:39:58.000 Vote for whoever can bring the most change. 0.99

01:39:59.000 I see that in Vivek and not in Trump anymore.

01:40:02.000 Don't troll vote.

01:40:04.000 I like Vivek.

01:40:05.000 I want to vote for him in the primary.

01:40:07.000 We'll see, though.

01:40:08.000 I think it's going to go Trump.

01:40:10.000 But it would be pretty amazing if Trump picks Vivek for VP.

01:40:14.000 I'm not entirely sure that would happen, though.

01:40:16.000 What do you guys think?

01:40:16.000 You think?

01:40:17.000 He'll probably offer it to him.

01:40:18.000 I feel like Tim Scott Lindsey Graham?

01:40:22.000 Yeah, not Lindsey Graham, that 80-year-old in the White House. 0.97

01:40:25.000 If he chose Lindsey Graham, he loses.

01:40:27.000 Hands down.

01:40:28.000 Because there are people who vote for Trump but don't like Trump, right?

01:40:31.000 You put Lindsey Graham on the ticket and they're just like, I'm out.

01:40:33.000 There's this thing about RFK and Trump uniting and running.

01:40:38.000 Have you ever heard of that?

01:40:39.000 Yeah, I'd vote for it.

01:40:40.000 Absolutely. 0.95

01:40:40.000 Do you think that could happen, or is it ridiculous? 0.95

01:40:42.000 I don't think it's... I mean, it is a little ridiculous, but I think it could happen. 0.91

01:40:46.000 You know, Trump is a New York Democrat. 0.86

01:40:50.000 I mean, yeah, I want to say, like, he's conservative by New York standards today.

01:40:54.000 You know what I mean?

01:40:55.000 But he's like an old school Democrat.

01:40:57.000 Right.

01:40:58.000 And so RFK has got a lot of bad positions and a lot of past positions that are questionable.

01:41:02.000 But I kind of just want to see insurgent candidates storm the gates.

01:41:06.000 You know what I mean?

01:41:07.000 They go in, they walk in and it's like, we're in charge now.

01:41:09.000 You're fired.

01:41:11.000 Sign this bill.

01:41:12.000 You know?

01:41:13.000 Yeah.

01:41:14.000 Man, we gotta have something going on.

01:41:17.000 14all says Elon did hand over Trump's account to the government in the end though.

01:41:21.000 This is only being half-reported.

01:41:23.000 Yes, that is true.

01:41:25.000 So the question is, was it Elon trying to obstruct?

01:41:27.000 Was he strong-armed?

01:41:31.000 Let's see, defect says, what do you think about the Department of Education?

01:41:34.000 I just found out their annual budget is $270 billion, more than 10 times that of NASA.

01:41:39.000 It doesn't seem we are getting the value for the money.

01:41:42.000 Doesn't seem?

01:41:42.000 We're literally not.

01:41:43.000 And also, their budget goes up every year and test scores go down, have gone down every year.

01:41:51.000 Every single year they have been lower than the previous year since the inception of the Department of Education.

01:41:59.000 That would be, if you split up, what is it, 270 billion among 50 states, you'd have, what is the math?

01:42:06.000 I don't know what the math is there.

01:42:08.000 Six billion, five billion per state, something like that?

01:42:11.000 That's a lot of money that you could give out to the states directly.

01:42:14.000 It's the most important department that we could abolish on a, what's the word I'm looking for?

01:42:22.000 Not foreign policy, on a domestic level.

01:42:25.000 Yeah, I agree with that probably.

01:42:29.000 Nathan Rossman-Bagow says, Vivek, love him and all, cannot win.

01:42:29.000 All right.

01:42:33.000 None of your guests can even say his name right, and they are politically clued in.

01:42:37.000 I think that I don't necessarily disagree with that.

01:42:41.000 The fact that no one can say his name actually matters, because the dude has been speaking a lot.

01:42:46.000 Now, granted, people are going to read things phonetically.

01:42:49.000 They're going to say Vivek when his name is Vivek.

01:42:51.000 But it seems like no matter how many times we've brought it up, no matter how many times it comes up, we've even corrected people on the show and they still won't say his name.

01:42:58.000 Also, Morrowind, Elder Scrolls III, Vivec's one of the gods, V-I-V-E-C.

01:43:04.000 It's spelled a little different, so Vivec is in the consciousness already, but it's Vivec.

01:43:07.000 But we've had guests where we'll be like, it's Vivec, like cake.

01:43:10.000 And they'll go, oh, okay.

01:43:11.000 And then 20 minutes later, they're like, well, Vivec is saying... Vivec.

01:43:13.000 Some people will be like, I don't know, he's relatively new into the social consciousness.

01:43:19.000 And he may not win this time.

01:43:20.000 I'm not, I don't know.

01:43:22.000 I want to manifest his victory, but at the same time, he might just win in 2028.

01:43:26.000 There's a reason all his yard signs say truth, not his name on them.

01:43:30.000 Oh, wild.

01:43:31.000 At least in New Hampshire, that's what they all say.

01:43:31.000 Yeah.

01:43:33.000 Really?

01:43:34.000 Mm-hmm.

01:43:35.000 Dom G says, the Fourth Amendment is not limited to your home.

01:43:37.000 It includes your person, houses, papers, and effects.

01:43:40.000 Looking through my messages is like looking through my mail.

01:43:42.000 Ian Rowland, Zeroes.

01:43:43.000 Looking into my eyeballs is like looking into my mind, man.

01:43:46.000 Get out of it.

01:43:46.000 No, come on, dude.

01:43:47.000 But that's true.

01:43:48.000 The Fourth Amendment does... He's right. 0.92

01:43:51.000 If you have a stack of papers in your office laying on a desk, the Fourth Amendment protects them from the government walking up and just grabbing them and reading them.

01:43:58.000 It's extensive.

01:44:00.000 Historically, the courts have found that it's an extensive protection.

01:44:04.000 Imagine you rent an office.

01:44:07.000 In a big building.

01:44:08.000 And you've got paper sitting on your desk.

01:44:10.000 So the government goes to the building's owner and says, we're gonna go in and take all these private messages because they're actually yours because they're in your building.

01:44:17.000 And he goes, deal.

01:44:18.000 Sounds like Patriot Act.

01:44:18.000 Yeah.

01:44:19.000 Sounds like complete nonsense.

01:44:23.000 We'll grab some more.

01:44:24.000 James Dineen says, Ian, what's your favorite flavor of boot?

01:44:29.000 Oh, straight up leather, dude.

01:44:31.000 You can actually eat leather.

01:44:32.000 Yeah, I read somewhere that if you're starving, you gotta eat your leather off your shoes.

01:44:36.000 Chew it up.

01:44:37.000 It's animal hide.

01:44:39.000 How does it just last forever?

01:44:41.000 Like, what, bacteria can't eat it, but you can or what?

01:44:43.000 I don't know.

01:44:46.000 We will get some more Super Chats.

01:44:47.000 What do we have here?

01:44:48.000 Mr. Howie Howie says, Tim, you mentioned a memorial statue for Roberto Jr.

01:44:52.000 I'm a professional sculptor.

01:44:54.000 I'm up for it, in fact.

01:44:55.000 I just emailed a 3D render of a fun version of RJ I've been working on recently.

01:44:59.000 Have a look.

01:45:01.000 Where did you email it?

01:45:02.000 I will write down your name.

01:45:03.000 Yeah, we should do this, Mr. Howie Howie.

01:45:08.000 But I'm just writing Howie squared, so I don't have to write Howie twice.

01:45:10.000 Yeah, it would be great.

01:45:13.000 We'll get a little statue of Roberto Jr.

01:45:14.000 We'll put it by Chicken City.

01:45:16.000 Like a weather vane?

01:45:17.000 We should get a weather vane of him.

01:45:19.000 Just constantly spinning around.

01:45:20.000 That's actually a good idea.

01:45:21.000 We have to put it way up high, though, if you want to actually, you know, so a little statue is probably, you know.

01:45:27.000 Redbox says, Phil, why would you judge RFK Jr.

01:45:29.000 based on his past positions rather than his most recent modified positions that lean more center-right?

01:45:35.000 Because he held the past positions for longer.

01:45:38.000 Judge a man by what he does. 0.83

01:45:40.000 Because he's got history and behavior that shows that he endorses those things.

01:45:47.000 The most recent stuff could possibly be changing for what is politically expedient, whereas the things that he has said consistently in the past probably reflect his real opinions.

01:46:04.000 So that's that's why. Silence do-betters has only three percent of the American population

01:46:10.000 participated in the revolution. It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,

01:46:15.000 tireless minority keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men. Samuel Adams.

01:46:20.000 Wow. I feel like it's easier to fight a war back then than it is now,

01:46:26.000 like with the spread of information and with the amount of porn on the Internet.

01:46:30.000 Yeah.

01:46:32.000 I disagree.

01:46:33.000 I think it's easier now than it's ever been.

01:46:35.000 Offense has become increasingly... One thing we see is that throughout history, offense has increased faster than defense.

01:46:44.000 Defense is incredibly difficult and always has been.

01:46:47.000 You get to the point where, you know, when you have clubs and stuff, someone makes a shield.

01:46:51.000 And you're fairly equal in your defense and offense.

01:46:53.000 You swing the club, you block it and deflect it with the shield.

01:46:55.000 You swing with your club, he blocks it.

01:46:57.000 And then we get bows and arrows.

01:46:58.000 And now you have high-speed projectile weapons that can penetrate through a shield, hit your arm, hit you in the leg, break through your armor, even rip through plate.

01:47:05.000 So once they advance between, you know, from chainmail to plate, now you've still got offensive capabilities.

01:47:10.000 Then you get gunpowder.

01:47:11.000 Now all of a sudden, armor made no sense.

01:47:13.000 It's like, the musket ball's gonna rip through whatever you're wearing anyway.

01:47:16.000 So, you're better off having a light soldier who can carry more and move faster, because we're using muskets.

01:47:22.000 We do have bulletproof vests, we do have all these things, but the reality of warfare is, today, you have cyber capabilities.

01:47:28.000 The ability to manipulate hundreds of millions of people overnight, instantly.

01:47:32.000 Viruses to destroy their economy, and take out their electrical plants, their grid.

01:47:39.000 In the snap of a finger, the entire grid in the world could be shut down.

01:47:42.000 I'm sure that every government has a button they could press because they've already hacked and installed viruses on everyone else's machines.

01:47:48.000 So we don't even need the minute, you know, time frame for the ICBM to launch into the air to shut a city down.

01:47:53.000 Now they can just click a button and the grid's gone.

01:47:56.000 Right, I think, like, war in general is easier to fight, but the likelihood of someone in this country grabbing a rifle and heading to go fight a war, I think that is less, just because of the amount of ease people live with now, the amount of technology that makes their life enjoyable.

01:48:13.000 I mean, back in the day... But that's acting like, you know, people can afford their rent and people can afford food.

01:48:21.000 There's an entire... Right, but I think those things have to go before... Like any revolution.

01:48:25.000 Yeah.

01:48:25.000 Like any civil conflict.

01:48:26.000 I think it has to get that miserable before there's any sort of actual big conflict.

01:48:30.000 But then you're not saying anything different, right?

01:48:32.000 So when people in France were fed, they didn't want a revolution.

01:48:35.000 And then when the famine came, they wanted a revolution.

01:48:37.000 The same thing is true for Tunisia and Egypt.

01:48:37.000 Yeah.

01:48:40.000 The cost of bread was going up.

01:48:41.000 That's not...

01:48:46.000 Every revolution has, to a certain degree, that in common.

01:48:50.000 Some kind of lack of direct access.

01:48:52.000 I think it's, what's his name?

01:48:54.000 The Hierarchy of Needs?

01:48:55.000 Maslow?

01:48:55.000 What's that guy's name?

01:48:56.000 Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.

01:48:57.000 When you disrupt these things, people get mad and they'll fight for them.

01:49:01.000 Food is a critical component.

01:49:03.000 So for a lot of people who are, you know...

01:49:05.000 We're very, very fat.

01:49:06.000 So long as the communists keep people fed, there ain't gonna be a revolution.

01:49:09.000 Just theirs. 0.94

01:49:10.000 Or there won't be a civil war, just a revolution.

01:49:12.000 So they gotta make sure everyone's fat and happy, and they'll be like, well, I got food, I ain't gonna fight.

01:49:15.000 Yeah.

01:49:16.000 But, but, uh, I will also add, saying that it's harder for people today to pick up, like, a rifle or something, uh, it, there's always organization to these conflicts. 0.96

01:49:24.000 I think anybody who's, like, thinking they're gonna run out and grab a gun is stupid, and they shouldn't do anything like that. 0.96

01:49:28.000 We want to win where the conflict actually occurs. 1.00

01:49:31.000 And today it's a culture war.

01:49:32.000 We need to win the culture.

01:49:33.000 We want to win in the legal front.

01:49:35.000 And I would say it's like saying people are much less likely to pick up a sword today.

01:49:40.000 It's like, well, that's not the effective means of conflict.

01:49:41.000 The effective means of conflict today are manipulation of the mind, social media.

01:49:45.000 I think people just still think of a generic civil war.

01:49:49.000 When they hear that term, they think of like North and South or Republicans and Democrats like grabbing their guns and fighting each other.

01:49:55.000 And I don't think that's accurate.

01:49:56.000 And that's like saying, when you say war, it's like, what, people running around with swords and shields fighting in the streets?

01:50:01.000 Like, no, no, dude, that was thousands of years ago.

01:50:03.000 What, you mean like people with guns?

01:50:04.000 No, dude, that was 100, 200 years ago.

01:50:06.000 People going online right now, we are being faced with a cultural revolution and it is being actively resisted.

01:50:13.000 And there are two principal factions at odds over who is, I'm glad to say that it's substantially less violent.

01:50:18.000 I hope we don't get any violence, but like, this is it.

01:50:22.000 Are we going to win the cultural battle or end up in prisons?

01:50:26.000 Let's read some more!

01:50:28.000 Wait, what is this?

01:50:29.000 I'm not going to read that because I can't verify it right now.

01:50:35.000 All right, Tetris says, hey Tim and crew, can I get a shout out?

01:50:38.000 My wife and I just found out we're expecting our first child.

01:50:40.000 Ooh, congratulations.

01:50:41.000 Congrats.

01:50:42.000 Something happened to the Ecuadorian president?

01:50:44.000 Yeah.

01:50:44.000 Well, no, not the president.

01:50:46.000 Someone that was running for president was assassinated.

01:50:48.000 Whoa! 0.71

01:50:49.000 So there's video going around of it.

01:50:52.000 It happened at like a political rally, I think.

01:50:55.000 So it's definitely verifiable, I could say.

01:50:57.000 Wow.

01:51:00.000 Josh says, REX, it'll end up being enabled on the app only, not the browser, for security reasons.

01:51:07.000 The only solution I know that addresses this is CIF, which has quantum-resistant in-browser code signing.

01:51:14.000 And they always got some way to bypass encryption, man.

01:51:16.000 They're two steps ahead for a reason.

01:51:21.000 And they force people to install backdoors because they have guns.

01:51:25.000 All right, what's this?

01:51:28.000 Tim Brackett says, RIP Roberto Jr.

01:51:30.000 Really do appreciate it.

01:51:32.000 Ryan Chrisman says, one of the presidential candidates in Ecuador was assassinated today at a campaign rally. 0.81

01:51:37.000 WTF.

01:51:38.000 The guy's name is Fernando Villavicencio. 0.96

01:51:38.000 Wow. 0.96

01:51:43.000 Dreadnought Trucking LLC says, if somehow either Trump's beat the charges on his own or the Supreme Court gets involved, I am predicting now with 200% confidence that Vivek will be Trump's VP and in 28 it will be Vivek as Prez and Rand Paul as VP.

01:51:58.000 Those are bold predictions!

01:52:00.000 I think you can take those odds up in Vegas, and if you get it right, you'll be a millionaire.

01:52:05.000 Sean Kennelly says... Kennelly?

01:52:07.000 Kennelly?

01:52:08.000 Long live Roberto Jr.

01:52:10.000 He and your constant talk about roosters was the inspiration for my business name, Roosters Property Maintenance.

01:52:14.000 My tagline, reliable as the rooster.

01:52:16.000 Tim, just keep being Tim.

01:52:18.000 All of the cast castle rocks.

01:52:19.000 Vivek 2024.

01:52:21.000 I like Vivek, man.

01:52:22.000 He's a good dude.

01:52:25.000 Yeah, Roberto's returned.

01:52:26.000 He's got, Roberto Jr.' 's got brothers, you know?

01:52:29.000 But none of them are Roberto, you know, are Roberto-esque.

01:52:32.000 So we gotta figure out who's gonna take the mantle of Roberto III.

01:52:34.000 I need to figure out how many sons he's had.

01:52:36.000 We think he has a couple.

01:52:38.000 And so one of them's gonna have to be Roberto III.

01:52:41.000 Yeah, they would do that in the Middle Ages, too, if someone would just take a new name as, like, the seventh or something, you know, the Scottish king would be coming.

01:52:47.000 Yeah, people still do that.

01:52:48.000 Isn't James O'Keeffe the third?

01:52:49.000 He is.

01:52:50.000 I think so, yeah.

01:52:51.000 Jimmy.

01:52:52.000 There's three of them.

01:52:53.000 That's a good amount.

01:52:54.000 Third one was the best one, apparently.

01:52:55.000 I'm sure the other ones were good, too, but this current one is a good James O'Keeffe.

01:52:59.000 Yeah, James II looks legit.

01:53:01.000 James II was probably good.

01:53:02.000 He made James III.

01:53:03.000 James III is pretty based.

01:53:03.000 Yeah.

01:53:05.000 Paul Tascalo says, Tim, I'm a 38-year-old lawyer.

01:53:08.000 I feel a call to use my skills for good.

01:53:10.000 I'd love to contribute to the show, plus share my stories, experience with classified docs, FISA warrants, national security, presidential pardons, Obama, and nuclear weapons.

01:53:18.000 Well, all right.

01:53:20.000 Sure, I guess.

01:53:22.000 I don't know how.

01:53:24.000 You can reach out through our emails or whatever.

01:53:27.000 I always just tell people to message Ian.

01:53:30.000 He's on Twitter.

01:53:32.000 What do you need to do?

01:53:32.000 Good luck.

01:53:33.000 You want to get in touch with Tim Cantrell?

01:53:36.000 Is there a jobs email or anything where people submit for jobs?

01:53:40.000 On the Discord, I think we have that?

01:53:42.000 On the members Discord, we have that stuff.

01:53:42.000 Yeah.

01:53:45.000 Diego Rivera says, Reed, can you explain how Defend the Guard uses radical decentralization to rein in the war party?

01:53:51.000 Yeah, so Defend the Guard is a state-by-state legislation that makes it impossible for the president to send troops overseas unless there has been a declaration of war.

01:54:03.000 We have not declared war since World War II, but of course we've been to Vietnam, you know, Afghanistan, Iraq.

01:54:11.000 Everywhere.

01:54:11.000 Korea.

01:54:12.000 Korea.

01:54:12.000 Panama.

01:54:14.000 So, actually during Hurricane Katrina, I think 60% of Louisiana's National Guard was in Iraq.

01:54:21.000 Um, just to show you, like, how many National Guardsmen end up over there.

01:54:26.000 So, this would be passed state by state, and every state that passes it would disallow the government from sending National Guard troops unless Congress passes a declaration of war, which is a 60% majority, which is pretty hard to do.

01:54:40.000 And also, if a congressman is actually signing his name behind a war, you know, that takes a little bit of selling to the public and a little bit of responsibility, so it's a lot harder to happen than The president just deciding to send people somewhere for some military operation.

01:54:55.000 It hasn't passed in any state yet, but it passed, I think, the Senate in Arizona.

01:55:00.000 And, uh, I forget what other state it passed.

01:55:02.000 One of the legislative branches.

01:55:04.000 Um, and it's picking up steam.

01:55:05.000 So check it out.

01:55:07.000 Uh, you can support it in your own state.

01:55:08.000 It's the most important anti-war legislation on the books right now. 0.78

01:55:12.000 Is there a website for it?

01:55:13.000 Yeah, I think it's bringourtroopshome.com, Defend the Guard.

01:55:20.000 You probably just Google Defend the Guard.

01:55:21.000 I think it's on here.

01:55:24.000 Yeah, just Google Defend the Guard, you'll find it.

01:55:26.000 Jadrick Penifer says, I've got the solution.

01:55:29.000 What does the crew think? 0.99

01:55:30.000 Trump is president, being our monster. 0.79

01:55:32.000 RFK Jr.' 's attorney general. 1.00

01:55:33.000 Trump hates them all.

01:55:34.000 RFK has proven he's willing to go after them.

01:55:36.000 Plus, Vivek, as Secretary of State, has countered WEF fighting the fight abroad.

01:55:41.000 Is RFK even a lawyer?

01:55:44.000 Isn't that what he was?

01:55:45.000 I have no idea.

01:55:47.000 Yeah, wasn't he like fighting for people who were having coal sludge dumped in their rivers or something like that back in the day?

01:55:55.000 Yeah, he's a lawyer.

01:55:57.000 He's an environmental lawyer.

01:56:00.000 You go to his Wikipedia, it says, he's an American environmental lawyer, politician, and writer known for advocating anti-vaccine misinformation.

01:56:00.000 I love this.

01:56:07.000 Oh my gosh.

01:56:09.000 Of course.

01:56:11.000 It was so, Wikipedia was so, like, potentially awesome.

01:56:15.000 I mean, it's still, I guess, is if you could get a hold of the code.

01:56:17.000 It depends.

01:56:18.000 No, it depends on the topic.

01:56:20.000 Like, if you're going to something that doesn't really get touched by politics, or that's somewhat insulated from politics, it's pretty good.

01:56:28.000 If you go to things that can be touched by politics, it's getting really bad.

01:56:33.000 Science.

01:56:34.000 And it's continuing to get bad.

01:56:36.000 Are you talking about, like, biology?

01:56:36.000 Science?

01:56:39.000 Nobody even knows what a man or a woman is on Wikipedia anymore.

01:56:42.000 I just realized something.

01:56:44.000 I know what the first thing Roberto's gonna do once we let him out his little house in Chicken City. 0.97

01:56:50.000 What's that?

01:56:50.000 You know what he's gonna do.

01:56:52.000 Going right for her.

01:56:53.000 He's going right for her. 0.66

01:56:55.000 Roberto's been at Cocktown for the past, like, something like a year.

01:56:55.000 Probably.

01:56:59.000 Wow.

01:57:00.000 Roberto Jr., he took over, you know?

01:57:02.000 He was in charge of all the ladies.

01:57:03.000 Roberto hasn't seen a woman in some time.

01:57:05.000 Wow.

01:57:07.000 Yeah, so, you know, we had to send him off because we don't want him, you know, mixing it with his kids. 0.99

01:57:12.000 Because roosters don't think twice about that. 1.00

01:57:14.000 You know, so.

01:57:14.000 Yeah.

01:57:15.000 But he's gonna come out.

01:57:16.000 He hasn't seen the lady in a long time.

01:57:17.000 Wow.

01:57:18.000 Get it on camera.

01:57:19.000 It's gonna be on camera at Chicken City.

01:57:21.000 The wonders of the birds and the bees for everyone to watch live.

01:57:26.000 Let's grab some more Super Chats.

01:57:27.000 Well, looks like we've got defendtheguard.us for Bill and bringourtroopshome.us for the org.

01:57:32.000 There you go.

01:57:33.000 I think that's where it is.

01:57:34.000 Diego Rivera said that.

01:57:35.000 Thank you.

01:57:37.000 Jason Dobson says, why would you trust somebody as president who previously headed a pharmaceutical company?

01:57:42.000 More power to big pharma is a scary thing.

01:57:44.000 Well, I don't trust him because of it, but I like his experience within the organization itself.

01:57:49.000 He knows how to disassemble the thing.

01:57:51.000 But I don't immediately think all pharmaceutical companies are bad.

01:57:54.000 Right?

01:57:54.000 You know, like, I don't like the big ones, but there are smaller ones, too.

01:57:57.000 The question is, what did his company do, and did they do bad things?

01:58:01.000 If they did bad things, then he should be criticized and challenged on his bad things.

01:58:04.000 But, uh, I don't know.

01:58:06.000 Maybe we should dig into that.

01:58:07.000 He knows a lot about loopholes that the pharmaceutical companies use, and was talking about them on the Patrick Bet-David Town Hall.

01:58:13.000 It was really, really a great town hall from last week.

01:58:16.000 Check it out.

01:58:17.000 And like they said themselves previously headed a pharmaceutical company.

01:58:20.000 It's not necessarily giving more power to big pharma.

01:58:22.000 And it's not it's not considered a biotech.

01:58:24.000 It's not considered pharmaceutical.

01:58:25.000 It's a biotech company.

01:58:26.000 Yeah, it's biotech.

01:58:27.000 So they do technology and drug development.

01:58:29.000 He said they brought five drugs to patent, I think.

01:58:31.000 Yeah.

01:58:32.000 So I guess is that pharmaceutical company?

01:58:35.000 I wouldn't call it that.

01:58:37.000 They, what does it say?

01:58:39.000 Technology portfolio includes, blah blah blah, clinical trial data for pharmaceutical development, blah blah blah.

01:58:44.000 I mean, I think if you have a concern, a legitimate concern, Jason Dobson, I respect and agree with it, you should start looking into the company and see what you find, and then we should talk about it.

01:58:55.000 You know, he ran a company, what did his company do?

01:58:57.000 There's criticisms over how Trump ran his company, sure, and then, I think for the most part, I'm not super concerned with the real estate, you know, company and what he was doing, and the left certainly is.

01:59:05.000 But, uh, you know, what's inherently wrong with making drugs to cure diseases or whatever? 0.85

01:59:11.000 If he was treating symptoms and perpetuating a lot of awful garbage, I think we ask him about it.

01:59:15.000 Right. 0.96

01:59:18.000 Ward Spose says, put the Royal Chicken Family tree on it.

01:59:22.000 On what?

01:59:24.000 On the coffee bag?

01:59:25.000 Oh, yeah.

01:59:27.000 Well, I guess, yeah, I guess people mostly agree we should keep Rise with Alberto Jr., but I think we'll just write on the back, you know, of all future bags.

01:59:35.000 A special lineage brand?

01:59:37.000 Where it shows all their... So the way it works is we pre-order bags.

01:59:37.000 Yeah.

01:59:41.000 The bags are printed.

01:59:42.000 It takes a long time to make.

01:59:43.000 It takes like a month and a half to make the bags.

01:59:45.000 So we order a ton of bags.

01:59:46.000 The coffee is then brewed in short, in small batches and made fresh.

01:59:53.000 And then packaged and sent off, so it's relatively small batches.

01:59:57.000 So I think we have like 5,000 bags, empty, ready to be loaded when we start selling more product.

02:00:04.000 So after this run, which is, there's 5,000 so, you know, you'll probably have some time if you want to buy one, there will no longer be the original bag.

02:00:13.000 So these bags are first edition bags.

02:00:16.000 That was unexpectedly, uh, they became very sought after very quickly.

02:00:20.000 Well, maybe not.

02:00:21.000 I don't know.

02:00:21.000 Maybe nobody really cares.

02:00:22.000 Collector's items, you'll call them.

02:00:23.000 That if you want to have an original bag, get them now because we're going to add the Rest in Peace Roberto Jr.

02:00:28.000 in memoriam on the back of the new ones.

02:00:31.000 So effectively creating a unique, a unique bag you will never be able to get again.

02:00:36.000 And I'm really excited for Return of the King.

02:00:38.000 Roberto's... It's gonna be wild, dude.

02:00:39.000 Return of the King.

02:00:40.000 We should make a really strong, like, espresso.

02:00:43.000 Yeah, that'd be dope.

02:00:44.000 Yeah.

02:00:45.000 Because he was only removed because of circumstance.

02:00:47.000 He wasn't ever violent.

02:00:48.000 He was never angry.

02:00:49.000 Did he rough him hard?

02:00:50.000 Well, he got... Not like his son.

02:00:52.000 We had to put him in jail because he was roughing up the girls. 1.00

02:00:55.000 Big Daddy.

02:00:55.000 Do they ever come back from that?

02:00:56.000 When they become aggressive, they tone down?

02:00:59.000 Well, the issue is that, you know, their spurs get really big when they get older, and it starts hurting the girls.

02:01:04.000 Oh, okay.

02:01:05.000 Yeah.

02:01:06.000 Okay.

02:01:06.000 And trimming the spurs is like abuse to the- Lil Luke's figuring it out.

02:01:10.000 We're really proud of him.

02:01:11.000 Yeah, alright everybody, we're gonna go to the members only section of the show, portion of the show, so head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, and we're gonna talk about naughty things.

02:01:20.000 So, not for the kids, it's a bit more wild portion of the show.

02:01:24.000 But you can submit questions and every night we choose four or five callers to talk to us and our guests.

02:01:30.000 It's a whole lot of fun.

02:01:31.000 Best part of the show in my opinion.

02:01:32.000 So join us at TimCast.com.

02:01:34.000 Should be up in a few minutes.

02:01:35.000 You can follow the show at TimCast IRL.

02:01:37.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast.

02:01:39.000 Reid, do you want to shout anything out?

02:01:41.000 Yeah.

02:01:42.000 Check out Defend the Guard. 0.54

02:01:44.000 Check out the Free State Project.

02:01:47.000 And then, I haven't done a show in a while, but you can check out my stuff at Reed Coverdale on Twitter.

02:01:52.000 I'm with Tower Gang, too.

02:01:54.000 Is Clint joining the team soon?

02:01:56.000 Is that a thing that's happening?

02:01:57.000 I don't know.

02:01:57.000 I hope so.

02:01:58.000 We've been talking to him about it, but I don't know if anything's on the books yet.

02:02:02.000 I love having Clint.

02:02:03.000 Yeah, no, Clint's a good friend of mine.

02:02:05.000 We have Tower Gang.

02:02:06.000 I haven't done that in a while either.

02:02:07.000 I've just been busy working, but check out my show, The Naturalist Capitalist.

02:02:13.000 I am Phil Labonte.

02:02:15.000 The band is All That Remains.

02:02:18.000 You can check us out on Apple Music, Spotify, what is it, YouTube, Pandora.

02:02:24.000 We're on there.

02:02:25.000 Yeah.

02:02:26.000 Cheers.

02:02:26.000 Have an excellent rest of your day, guys.

02:02:28.000 I'm Ian Crosland.

02:02:29.000 Great to be here, Reid.

02:02:30.000 Always good to see you, man.

02:02:31.000 Thanks for the data.

02:02:32.000 Coming in hot and strong, baby.

02:02:34.000 Catch you later, man.

02:02:36.000 And I am Serge.com.

02:02:37.000 Looking forward to this after show.

02:02:40.000 Let's get to it, Tim.

02:02:41.000 Alright everybody, thanks for hanging out.

02:02:43.000 Come hang out with us at TimCast.com.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - August 09, 2023

Timcast IRL - FBI TAKES OUT Man Who Threatened Action Against Biden In Raid w-Reed Coverdale

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript