Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - Prosecutors Engage in GROSS Misconduct, Judge Threatens Mistrial w-Jack Murphy

00:00:00.000 Today was one of the craziest days in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, and I didn't think

00:00:26.000 It could get any crazier.

00:00:28.000 When the state brought in Gage Grosskreutz, who testified that he was only fired upon when he pointed a weapon at Kyle Rittenhouse, I thought it was just, this is too nuts!

00:00:38.000 Today, the defense filed a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, meaning that the prosecution has committed misconduct or error to such a degree, there can't be a fair trial, and because of this, they should not be allowed to retry Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:00:53.000 The judge actually said, I will take the motion under advisement, yelled at the prosecutor on more than one occasion, legit, literally yelled at him, and said, if one more thing happens, So here's what we might see.

00:01:06.000 We probably won't, but there's people speculating about a directed verdict in which the judge could just say, as a matter of law, Kyle Rittenhouse is not guilty.

00:01:13.000 I'm not convinced that'll happen, but hey, I'm not a lawyer, I have no idea.

00:01:16.000 The other thing that could happen is that the defense could come in in the morning with a full motion filed for a mistrial with prejudice, and this was over specifically the prosecutors bringing up evidence the judge had ruled would not be allowed And the prosecution questioned Kyle Rittenhouse because of his right to remain silent.

00:01:33.000 It was such an egregious violation, the judge called it a grave constitutional violation, and actually yelled at the prosecutor saying it's a matter- I mean, he's yelling.

00:01:42.000 A matter of basic law for 50 years!

00:01:45.000 Crazy.

00:01:45.000 We gotta talk about all this.

00:01:47.000 We also have Anna Kasparian of the Young Turks admitting she was wrong.

00:01:50.000 Much respect to Anna for that because we just need people to watch the trial to understand. 1.00

00:01:55.000 We got the breakdown from the New York Times over all their bullet points.

00:01:58.000 I imagine we'll be arguing with them because the media has been, it's all been malpractice in the media as we can expect.

00:02:04.000 And then we got Jimmy Kimmel saying that Kamala Harris' historically low approval rating is due to racism and sexism. 0.99

00:02:12.000 And we got some information about Alec Baldwin.

00:02:12.000 Go figure.

00:02:14.000 Apparently, on set, one witness says the scene did not call for him to draw a weapon and point it at anybody.

00:02:21.000 So there's a lot of questions about that we'll get into.

00:02:23.000 Of course, we're hanging out with Mr. Jack Murphy.

00:02:25.000 Good to be back, guys.

00:02:26.000 I missed last time, but I'm happy to be here.

00:02:28.000 Happy to see everybody's doing well.

00:02:30.000 Luke, I'm even happy to see you.

00:02:32.000 Wow.

00:02:33.000 Thank you.

00:02:34.000 You can find me at Jack Murphy Live or come to Jack Brunch, jackbrunch.com.

00:02:34.000 I'm Jack.

00:02:38.000 We just had an awesome event in Austin.

00:02:41.000 Anybody I know going to Austin?

00:02:43.000 We're going to Austin.

00:02:44.000 You're going to Austin?

00:02:45.000 We're flying out on Saturday, 5.30am.

00:02:46.000 Fantastic.

00:02:46.000 We gotta get up.

00:02:47.000 Austin, beautiful town.

00:02:48.000 We had almost 90 people out at brunch.

00:02:50.000 It was a great time.

00:02:51.000 We're going to be in San Francisco area.

00:02:53.000 Not in that liberal hellhole vax mandate.

00:02:56.000 Nope, we're going across the river or the bay to Sausalito.

00:02:59.000 Oh, I was just thinking about Sausalito.

00:03:00.000 So come on down, jackbrunch.com.

00:03:02.000 Very nice.

00:03:03.000 Jack, where's your 10-piece suit?

00:03:04.000 10-piece suit?

00:03:05.000 You know, I like to dress up for us, and I'm kind of disappointed.

00:03:08.000 Well, I wanted to match you in your, what should we call this, your casual wear?

00:03:11.000 Well, today I am wearing another We Are Change exclusive t-shirt, pretty much depicting the weapons used in World War I, World War II, and currently our World War III, or as some people are saying, Fourth or Fifth Generational Warfare.

00:03:26.000 And it's a shirt that you can get exclusively on TheBestPoliticalShirts.com, and because you do, I'm here, so thanks for having me.

00:03:32.000 It's a camera loaded with cash.

00:03:34.000 Yeah, that's pretty much the modern day machine gun.

00:03:37.000 Dude, an hour ago, I was taking a shower thinking about Sausalito, thinking if you're ever going to go to San Francisco, just go to Sausalito and get a view of San Francisco across the bay.

00:03:46.000 That's awesome.

00:03:46.000 You guys are having Jack Brunch there.

00:03:47.000 Jackbrunch.com.

00:03:49.000 Come on down. 0.94

00:03:49.000 Yeah, you should come. 0.94

00:03:50.000 You know when you should come?

00:03:50.000 You should come to one in D.C.

00:03:52.000 on February 27th.

00:03:53.000 As long as that works with our schedule, because we'll be traveling a lot the next couple of months, the next six months.

00:03:58.000 But I'm 100 percent if we're in town, I'm going to that.

00:04:00.000 Oh, goodness.

00:04:01.000 Yes, I am excited at the prospect of this brunch.

00:04:04.000 I do like Luke's shirt, that's very thought-provoking, and I wanted to say that I hope that you guys are all keeping the witnesses for this trial in your thoughts, as we know people who are going on the stand, and it is very stressful, so keep them in your thoughts and prayers.

00:04:16.000 All right, I think we're ready to go.

00:04:18.000 No, you guys keep talking, because I'm trying to pull up the email.

00:04:20.000 What are we pulling up over there?

00:04:21.000 I'm talking about snakes and frogs, if you guys want to talk about that.

00:04:25.000 I think it is really remarkable that guys that we know, people we talk to, people we hang out with, our colleagues and friends are in the middle of this amazing trial, which is having such an impact and could have even more of an impact, not only on Kyle's life, but on the nation at large.

00:04:38.000 I was listening to Crowder earlier today and he's 100% right when he talks about how this trial could be any one of us.

00:04:44.000 It could be any conservative, anybody who decided that they needed to try to defend themselves, which is terrifying.

00:04:52.000 I'm genuinely concerned about what happens with this case, so I'm excited to get into it.

00:04:56.000 You know, I do wonder, like, how nationally prevalent is the case?

00:04:59.000 Like I asked my kids about it, and they're like, yeah, we're not even talking about it in school or anything.

00:05:03.000 But you would think it's a guy who felt like he needed to protect and defend his city, or like one of his like hometown cities.

00:05:09.000 Like that's a that's a very American.

00:05:11.000 I found the email, so we'll get into all of this.

00:05:14.000 Oh, there we go.

00:05:14.000 We killed the time.

00:05:15.000 Good.

00:05:16.000 Killed the time.

00:05:16.000 Thanks everybody.

00:05:17.000 I had the wrong email pulled up because we have a sponsor today and it's a sponsor you know and love.

00:05:22.000 It's BioTrust's MCT, C8 MCT Keto Elevate Powder.

00:05:26.000 My friends, go to eatrightandfeelwell.com and you can get this C8 MCT powder.

00:05:34.000 If you're doing keto or you want to cut back on sugar, This is the stuff you want.

00:05:37.000 It's all the good stuff.

00:05:38.000 It's medium chain triglycerides, some of the best stuff in terms of getting your energy levels up.

00:05:42.000 If you go to eatrightandfeelwell.com, you get 51% off, and you will also get a 60-day money-back guarantee.

00:05:49.000 Keto Elevate provides your body only C8, the most ketogenic MCT.

00:05:53.000 That means it provides support for energy levels, healthy appetite management, mental clarity and focus, athletic performance, I will also add that I've now been doing it for, it's like going on two and a half, three months.

00:06:03.000 I've been doing keto and I put the stuff in my coffee.

00:06:05.000 It feels great.

00:06:05.000 I had a period where I had COVID and I didn't eat for several days.

00:06:08.000 And this stuff is fantastic because it gives you the energy.

00:06:11.000 It's probably helping me keep me alive when I wasn't eating because I was struggling with it.

00:06:15.000 But you will get five grams of the highly sought after MCTC8 per scoop.

00:06:20.000 Keto Elevate is my favorite MCT powder on the market today.

00:06:22.000 That's a fact.

00:06:23.000 And you get free shipping on every order.

00:06:25.000 For every order today, BioTrust donates a nutritious meal to a hungry child in your honor through their partnership with NoKidHungry.org.

00:06:32.000 To date, BioTrust has provided over 5 million meals to hungry kids.

00:06:35.000 Please help them reach their goal of 6 million meals this year.

00:06:38.000 You get free VIP live health and fitness coaching from BioTrust's team of expert nutrition and health coaches for life with every order.

00:06:45.000 That alone is worth it.

00:06:46.000 And their free e-report, the top 14 ketogenic foods with every order.

00:06:50.000 Again, eatrightandfeelwell.com.

00:06:52.000 Big fans of Biotrust.

00:06:54.000 Any company that's willing to support our work in these tumultuous times when you got crazy cancel culture stuff is a company y'all should be supporting.

00:07:01.000 Don't forget, go to timcast.com, become a member of a members-only segment coming up around 11 or so p.m.

00:07:06.000 And you can go to the store.

00:07:07.000 I'm actually bummed about this.

00:07:09.000 YouTube hasn't approved yet our shirt, Step on Snack and Find Out, and there's a cute little angry snake.

00:07:15.000 And it's not approved on YouTube.

00:07:16.000 It's up on the store.

00:07:17.000 You can buy it.

00:07:18.000 It's a funny little shirt.

00:07:20.000 Hopefully soon we can put it on YouTube, but until then, smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends.

00:07:28.000 This story has lit me up.

00:07:30.000 Jack was just mentioning that, like, my segment at four, I was going crazy.

00:07:33.000 I'm like, I'm like yelling into the camera.

00:07:35.000 Check this out from TimCast.com.

00:07:37.000 Prosecution reprimanded by judge for, quote, grave constitutional violation during cross-examination of Rittenhouse.

00:07:45.000 Judge Schroeder also dressed down the prosecution for attempting to bring in evidence that he banned from admission.

00:07:51.000 This is where it gets crazy.

00:07:53.000 In the trial, I'll give you the gist real quick.

00:07:55.000 The prosecution said, evidence that occurred, you call it evidence, I don't know, an event that occurred four months after the night in question is not admissible because it has nothing to do with him defending himself.

00:08:08.000 And so they were like, okay.

00:08:10.000 The prosecutors started bringing it up anyway, and the judge got mad angry, he got pissed.

00:08:15.000 But the craziest moment was when the prosecution asked Kyle Rittenhouse, why haven't you told this story before until tonight?

00:08:22.000 And then he says, you waited until everyone testified so you could tailor your testimony, and then it was boom, objection, the judge goes off.

00:08:32.000 He's like, what do you think you're doing?

00:08:34.000 You can't do this.

00:08:35.000 You can't question someone as to their right to remain silent.

00:08:39.000 You know this.

00:08:40.000 He's like, you're an experienced trial prosecutor.

00:08:44.000 When the second violation came up, he snapped.

00:08:47.000 He's like, I can't believe, I was astonished that you would dare bring up something like that.

00:08:51.000 It's a matter of basic law for 40, 50 years.

00:08:54.000 And then the prosecutor's like, you know, when it came to the question of the evidence he was bringing in, the prosecutor's like, you open the door, your honor.

00:09:01.000 And he's like, for me, not for you.

00:09:04.000 Don't you get brazen with me.

00:09:05.000 I was shocked.

00:09:07.000 And here's where it gets really crazy.

00:09:08.000 I didn't think it was going to happen.

00:09:10.000 The defense said that if this persisted, they would file a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, meaning that the prosecutors erred or attempted to break the rules to prejudice the jury against Rittenhouse to such a degree he would never have a fair trial and that the judge would have to dismiss with prejudice, meaning they could never file these same charges again.

00:09:31.000 Surprisingly, When they put Kyle in the stand, he starts crying, he's breaking down.

00:09:38.000 When they come back, the craziest thing, the defense actually files the motion asking a judge for a mistrial with prejudice.

00:09:45.000 This is when the judge starts getting into it with the prosecutor.

00:09:47.000 He says, I will take the motion under advisement, and then essentially says if there's one more violation to the prosecutor.

00:09:55.000 So people are speculating now saying what might happen is that the judge, and the judge has actually said this, something to this effect, he doesn't want there to be a circumstance in which he intervenes and shuts down the court proceedings.

00:10:08.000 He wants the jury to be able to come to their findings.

00:10:11.000 But there's speculation, and I don't know how valuable the speculation is, that there could be a directed verdict, meaning that as a matter of law, the charges against Kyle Rittenhouse Are impossible to get.

00:10:22.000 When you had Kyle Rittenhouse, according to the state's witnesses, himself, and everyone else, he was yelling, friendly, and fleeing the scene.

00:10:30.000 You can't get intentional homicide on that.

00:10:32.000 But the judge didn't rule it, and people are saying maybe he wants to see if the jury will rule correctly.

00:10:37.000 He might intervene after the fact.

00:10:39.000 You can tell I'm really amped about this.

00:10:40.000 Totally.

00:10:41.000 Yeah.

00:10:42.000 I thought I was listening to your segment on 2x on the way up here, man.

00:10:46.000 You were you were hyped.

00:10:47.000 You know, one of the things I keep thinking about and I've seen some other people ask about it is this court case is being televised and it's clear that the judge is at least neutral.

00:10:57.000 If not, I don't know.

00:10:58.000 He seems he's at least neutral, right?

00:11:00.000 He's not biased.

00:11:01.000 He's not clearly got a left-wing bias.

00:11:03.000 How many times across the nation, over and over and over again, are prosecutors doing these things that are unconstitutional and getting away with it?

00:11:12.000 And even just having the judge basically on their side as a way to put people away that they think are political, you know, sort of on the other side of the political spectrum.

00:11:21.000 I'm sure from what I've heard from Julie Kelly and other people covering the January 6th stuff, that if the judge, this judge here, the Rittenhouse judge was there in D.C.

00:11:31.000 or wherever they're trying these January 6th stuff, That it would be going a lot differently.

00:11:35.000 Oh yeah.

00:11:36.000 It brings up, you know, the idea of like maybe every single court case should be televised so that we can see every single thing that's going on so that these people can be watched.

00:11:44.000 It's kind of scary to me to think that people, that guy, an experienced prosecutor who clearly knows about the Constitution.

00:11:49.000 I've read from other lawyers that this is a subject that comes up a couple of times in law school, plus it's on the bar exam.

00:11:55.000 You can't, you can't bring up the fact or use it against them that the guy didn't speak after his arrest.

00:12:00.000 And yet there he did, as the judge said, brazenly violating this guy's constitutional rights in the letter and in the spirit of the whole thing.

00:12:07.000 How often is this happening all across the country?

00:12:10.000 This is a prosecutor who knows he has the mob, the rioters, and the press on his side.

00:12:16.000 And even after all of these grave constitutional violations, that's what the judge said, the media doesn't cover it.

00:12:23.000 The media just says, like, Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:12:26.000 They frame everything to the worst degree for Kyle.

00:12:28.000 Kyle cries on the stand because he probably killed the guys.

00:12:30.000 That's the headline.

00:12:32.000 The Daily Beast said Kyle Rittenhouse makes wild accusations about those claiming they were threatening him.

00:12:38.000 And I'm like, wild accusations? 0.99

00:12:40.000 There's multiple witnesses saying that Rosenbaum said, if I get you alone, I'll effing kill you. 0.63

00:12:47.000 That was the state's own witness saying he drew his gun on Kyle Rittenhouse. 0.96

00:12:51.000 And the Daily Beast Lie.

00:12:53.000 False frame.

00:12:54.000 I'll say they falsely frame look I wasn't there obviously I wasn't there

00:12:57.000 But that was one night that I watched as many streams as I possibly could I watched BG. I watched Richie

00:13:02.000 I watched one guy even aggregate like three or four streams into one

00:13:06.000 So like I was there when that guy became the n-word guy remember like not there

00:13:11.000 But like I was watching at the gas Oh, yeah, Rosenbaum

00:13:13.000 Yeah when Rosenbaum became we were just calling him the n-word

00:13:15.000 guy because we didn't know who he was because he was running around screaming the

00:13:18.000 N-word he was obviously agitated. He was looking for conflict. I'm gonna get you

00:13:21.000 I'm gonna do this blah blah blah blah blah and like the people in the press and popular interpretation

00:13:28.000 Just did not experience that the way that the guys on the ground obviously did, that Rittenhouse obviously did, and then those of us who were watching it intently actually experienced it that night.

00:13:36.000 Yeah, framing is everything because you could take certain facts and you could omit some of them, you could highlight some of them, and you know there's different stories being told, but the fact that this case is being live-streamed I think is absolutely amazing.

00:13:48.000 I think we should live-stream all of criminal court cases just so we could actually get An unbiased point of view to what's actually happening here but it was kind of wild seeing the state prosecutor literally argue more with the judge interrupt the judge more than he did the defense.

00:14:02.000 I was like what's what's going on here there was a number of times the judge snapped on the state prosecutor who looked like he was a deer in headlights for many of the.

00:14:10.000 Proceeding.

00:14:11.000 So again, the mainstream media attacking Kyle is nothing new.

00:14:14.000 They've been attacking him from the very beginning.

00:14:16.000 We didn't even know a lot of the details here.

00:14:18.000 The mainstream media came out with a lot of spin on this story and highlighted specific events that fit their narrative.

00:14:24.000 Now, there's another narrative.

00:14:25.000 There's, you know, talk about some of these people who were shot, their criminal past, their criminal history.

00:14:30.000 People are just selecting and picking whatever fits their narrative, but truly seeing this live raw unedited I think is extremely important and I think we should normalize this as much as we can Yeah, I mean aside from being on the ground.

00:14:43.000 I watched it live for multiple streams.

00:14:44.000 I've interviewed Richie and BG on the scene I was just listening to the podcast that we did with them back in the summertime.

00:14:51.000 I it's one of these things where like I have such almost first-hand experience in New York. I wasn't there,

00:14:58.000 but like to see the discrepancy between what happened that night, talking to eyewitnesses,

00:15:02.000 watching the trial, and then seeing what's happening in the headlines. Like how,

00:15:06.000 where did they even get the white supremacist and this and that? I mean, they didn't even

00:15:10.000 kill anybody who was black. 1.00

00:15:12.000 Yeah. They're all tweeting that Cal Rittenhouse killed three black people. 1.00

00:15:15.000 What? 0.98

00:15:16.000 Okay, hold on, hold on.

00:15:18.000 Not everyone, but there's some elements on Twitter and social media saying that.

00:15:21.000 People on Twitter are pushing this.

00:15:22.000 And they're not getting fact-checked at all.

00:15:23.000 There was a New York lawyer account with like a quarter million followers who tweeted, I have not been following this in my new detail, but I think the fact remains Kyle Rittenhouse crossed state lines with an assault rifle to go to a protest.

00:15:35.000 And I'm like, The prosecutor has charges against Dominic Black for supplying a weapon in Wisconsin to Kyle Rittenhouse.

00:15:42.000 That's a substantial portion of the criminal proceedings out of Kenosha.

00:15:47.000 These people don't even understand what the prosecutor is going for in this.

00:15:51.000 They just made something up, they all tweet about it, they don't fact check, they don't watch the trial, and then they claim they did.

00:15:56.000 I've been sitting here every morning with it on livestream, on TV.

00:16:00.000 And then just like reading all the legal analysis from like Raketa Law and from Andrew Branca, and a plethora of other, you know, legal analyses, watching all these live streams.

00:16:09.000 And I'm not gonna pretend to be a lawyer and know, right?

00:16:11.000 All of the nitty-gritty details in the law, the defense is citing various laws that were violated by the prosecutor.

00:16:16.000 I can just tell you the judge screamed at the prosecutor for a grave constitutional violation.

00:16:22.000 He said, he was like, you're on the borderline, you may be over it.

00:16:26.000 I was actually pissed.

00:16:27.000 He cut himself off too, he's like, and then, I'll just I'll just leave it at that for right now. You

00:16:31.000 want to know why I was pissed?

00:16:32.000 I was listening to Rekheda's stream and it was fantastic Rekheda had 70,000 viewers on his stream. It's really really nice

00:16:39.000 Almost like Tim Kast. Oh yeah, close. I mean, but that's way bigger than we've been in this past year

00:16:43.000 I mean and so their commentary is fantastic and I don't know who it was, but they made the comment that

00:16:47.000 The judge doesn't it doesn't he wants to prove that these trials can happen that the process can work

00:16:55.000 And as soon as I heard that, I realized if the judge does not declare a mistrial with prejudice, he proves that prosecution can violate your constitutional rights, prejudice the jury by admitting evidence that was deemed inadmissible, and the judge will allow it to happen.

00:17:10.000 But if he has this dueling incentive of a wanting the jury to rule on the facts and perhaps come back with a not guilty verdict at the same time as wanting to protect his constitutional rights and the process and such, and maybe then go to this direct verdict, that's a tough one for the judge to actually manage, isn't it?

00:17:30.000 It is.

00:17:31.000 But I think some people have speculated that the judge will wait for the jury to issue their finding and then intervene.

00:17:38.000 Can you imagine?

00:17:40.000 But I mean, can you imagine if they come back and say guilty on all charges and the judge is like, nah.

00:17:40.000 It happens.

00:17:46.000 The reaction is going to be absolutely insane.

00:17:48.000 That would probably be the worst case scenario.

00:17:49.000 And then, I mean, the Chicago Police Department already put out a notice saying for officers that their leave is not Going to be approved because they want all officers on the force because they're expecting civil unrest to happen in major cities.

00:18:04.000 So already there's a lot of threats, there's a lot of hyperbolic language on social media that's not getting fact-checked, that's not getting corrected, that's being escalated, that's being promoted.

00:18:12.000 So this is building up to another recipe of disaster, especially with the mainstream media putting fuel on the fire in this entire situation, blatantly lying about it.

00:18:21.000 I thought about that.

00:18:27.000 I'm like, if he intervenes, people will claim there is no fair trial.

00:18:31.000 But if we watch prosecutorial misconduct, malicious prosecution, what was the guy's name?

00:18:37.000 DeBruin, I think his name was.

00:18:38.000 Do you see this?

00:18:39.000 The witness who testified that ADA Krause and Binger brought him in and told him to change his police statement?

00:18:46.000 Malicious prosecution.

00:18:47.000 That was on Zeminsky.

00:18:48.000 I think his name is Zeminsky, is that his name? 0.96

00:18:50.000 Not on Rittenhouse, but these guys are clearly corrupt.

00:18:50.000 Yes, Zeminsky Joshua.

00:18:54.000 If the judge says, I'm gonna allow this corruption to play through, then unfortunately the system is broken.

00:19:02.000 Maybe this isn't the A-team either.

00:19:04.000 I mean, if you grow up and your biggest goal in life is to become the prosecutor in Kenosha, Wisconsin, does that mean that you're the A-team prosecutor?

00:19:12.000 No offense to Kenosha or small towns around the country or anything, but maybe this is just standard, you know, incompetence that we see.

00:19:20.000 And I mean, I have no idea.

00:19:22.000 I haven't sat in on too many murder trials.

00:19:24.000 In fact, the one that stands out to me is OJ.

00:19:27.000 This is all reminding me a little bit of the OJ trial.

00:19:30.000 Just among politicos.

00:19:30.000 are probably too young for this, but I remember the whole country was watching, man. And in fact,

00:19:34.000 like the, I remember I was in class at university. It just stopped the day of the verdict. And like,

00:19:39.000 it was such a big deal. We were all watching it. I don't think that this has that same level of

00:19:43.000 national prominence, but it is among politicos. Oh yeah, definitely. People like us. Let me,

00:19:48.000 let me bring up this mainstream media stuff because someone actually just chatted this

00:19:51.000 and I had a, so I had the New York times pulled up.

00:19:53.000 I want to go through what the media has been saying, but this CNN article is one of the most egregious violations of the truth.

00:20:00.000 CNN writes, Kyle Rittenhouse testifies he knew Joseph Rosenbaum was unarmed when he fatally shot him.

00:20:07.000 That is completely immaterial.

00:20:11.000 It was a small second of this massive trial, and this is what the media does.

00:20:16.000 They pull snippets.

00:20:18.000 This is also an interesting point, though.

00:20:20.000 Many people thought it was crazy they put Kyle Rittenhouse on the stand.

00:20:24.000 There were a few points he made that could not have been admitted as evidence unless he testified, and that's why people think maybe that's why they put him on the stand.

00:20:31.000 One was that Rosenbaum had threatened his life on two occasions.

00:20:35.000 And that he knew that the Zeminsky guy was armed and he testified he heard the gunshot as he was running and turned.

00:20:43.000 What the prosecutor is trying to do is falsely frame as much as possible.

00:20:48.000 Now I noticed a lot of people asking why the defense wasn't objecting to the insane questions of the prosecutor.

00:20:56.000 Some have suggested the prosecutor's line of questioning were so absurd, it's prejudicing the jury against him.

00:21:03.000 He kept asking the same question over, he asked the same question like five times.

00:21:06.000 And every time Kyle would answer him, he'd say, I'll ask you again. 0.98

00:21:10.000 When you were going, he was doing things like, you wanted to kill those people.

00:21:15.000 And Kyle goes, I didn't want to kill anybody.

00:21:17.000 And he goes, I'll ask you again.

00:21:19.000 You went out there because you wanted to kill those people, right?

00:21:22.000 And he goes, I didn't want to kill anybody.

00:21:23.000 He asks the question again!

00:21:25.000 Over and over again.

00:21:26.000 Yeah, he was bringing up video games.

00:21:28.000 He was trying to insinuate that video games are akin to killing people No, he said don't you play Call of Duty with your friend Dominic black and he's like I mean maybe sometimes and he goes and isn't the point of that game to take these rifles and kill people and then he was like Video games aren't real life And then he started talking about AR-15s being prominent in the video game, and Kyle was like, well, there's a lot of other firearms.

00:21:52.000 There's pistols and shotguns in there as well.

00:21:54.000 But he was like, but AR-15s are the most prominent ones.

00:21:57.000 And they're like, no.

00:21:58.000 Shovels. 0.95

00:21:58.000 And a lot of people were saying that it was almost as if the term and concept of an AR-15 was on trial, since how much it was brought up, how much it was talked about. 0.95

00:22:08.000 Let me show you how CNN frames this.

00:22:10.000 This is not an opinion piece.

00:22:12.000 This is CNN's factual news.

00:22:14.000 They say, Kyle Rittenhouse testified Wednesday that he acted in self-defense when he fatally shot a man who had thrown a plastic bag at him and chased him last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in what is likely to be the pivotal testimony of his homicide trial.

00:22:25.000 Quote, I didn't do anything wrong.

00:22:27.000 I defended myself, he testified.

00:22:29.000 But in cross-examination, Rittenhouse said that he knew the man, Joseph Rosenbaum, was unarmed when he ran at the teenager.

00:22:35.000 Rittenhouse said he pointed his rifle at Rosenbaum in an attempt to deter him, adding that he knew pointing a rifle at someone is dangerous.

00:22:41.000 False.

00:22:42.000 That was leading questions from the prosecution.

00:22:44.000 The prosecution said, did you point your weapon at Rosenbaum?

00:22:48.000 Well, yeah, of course he did.

00:22:49.000 And you did that because you wanted him to know you would kill him and you meant business.

00:22:53.000 And then Kyle, of course, like says, I didn't want to kill him. 0.57

00:22:56.000 I don't want to do it.

00:22:57.000 He keeps getting asked it, asked.

00:22:59.000 What CNN is doing is they're taking statements from the prosecution that Kyle either passively agreed with or said, I guess, and they're acting like he himself said it.

00:23:08.000 Quote, he was chasing me. I was alone. He threatened to kill me earlier that night.

00:23:12.000 I didn't want to have to shoot him. I pointed it at him because he kept running at me and I didn't

00:23:16.000 want him to chase me. You see, they choose, they select all of the worst possible quotes from

00:23:21.000 Rittenhouse.

00:23:22.000 He said that he feared Rosenbaum, who did not touch his body at all that night, would take his gun and kill people, omitting the fact that the, it was, I believe it was the medical forensics, medical examiner who said Rosenbaum's hand was on the gun.

00:23:34.000 And Kyle Rittenhouse said, he grabbed my gun.

00:23:37.000 The prosecution then said, but he didn't touch your body.

00:23:39.000 And Kyle was like, right.

00:23:42.000 And now CNN takes that to falsely frame exactly what happened.

00:23:46.000 Let me pull up this New York Times real quick.

00:23:47.000 They say, key moments from Kyle Rittenhouse's testimony.

00:23:49.000 One of the things they say, Thomas Binger, the lead prosecutor, pressed Mr. Rittenhouse about why he aimed a rifle at Joseph Rosenbaum, who had run toward him but was unarmed. 0.98

00:23:59.000 You wanted him to get the message from you that if you come any closer, I'm going to kill you.

00:24:03.000 That's why you pointed the gun at him. 0.57

00:24:05.000 Mr. Rittenhouse said he did not want to kill Mr. Rosenbaum, though he believed Rosenbaum was trying to disarm him.

00:24:10.000 Quote, if I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me.

00:24:14.000 He would have used it, and killed me with it, and probably killed more people.

00:24:20.000 So respect to the New York Times for putting that quote in right at the top.

00:24:23.000 That was important testimony.

00:24:24.000 But New York Times, Julie Bosman states, a paramedic from West Allis, a Milwaukee suburb, was shot in the arm by Rittenhouse.

00:24:32.000 She says that he was holding a handgun pointed in the air when Rit House shot him from a short distance away.

00:24:38.000 So that was, that was at, uh, she tweeted that at, I copied it at 5 15 PM.

00:24:44.000 Then I tweeted at her, you should probably delete this.

00:24:47.000 And at 5 15 PM, she deleted it.

00:24:49.000 Well, good.

00:24:51.000 But she tried to put it out there until she was fact-checked on it.

00:24:53.000 She wasn't actually doing her job.

00:24:55.000 She was making things up until the tweets started to go viral and people were like, why are you lying?

00:25:00.000 There are two stages to this.

00:25:01.000 We should absolutely criticize people who are incompetent, which is a large portion of the Twitterati, the progressives and the media.

00:25:09.000 When she puts out a false statement like that, that's very serious.

00:25:12.000 So during the trial, The prosecution wanted to bring up video on an iPad, and they wanted to pinch to zoom.

00:25:20.000 And the defense objected, saying that Apple's iPad uses artificial intelligence 3D-enhancing logarithms to change the image. 0.99

00:25:32.000 And I tweeted out that was insane and stupid. 0.92

00:25:34.000 Because, like, image interpolation is a very simple thing. 0.97

00:25:39.000 As you expand it, a program, machine learning, basically tries to fill in gaps that are missing.

00:25:45.000 It's not 3D.

00:25:46.000 It's not artificial intelligence.

00:25:48.000 And then people were like, Tim, you're making fun of boomers trying to explain something.

00:25:52.000 And I was like, OK, I'll delete it.

00:25:53.000 I'll delete it.

00:25:54.000 I have no problem that people make mistakes.

00:25:57.000 And there's a lot of journalists, so you'll see a lot of mistakes.

00:26:00.000 But we should absolutely criticize.

00:26:02.000 If I said something wrong, people did.

00:26:03.000 And I said, OK, I'll accept it.

00:26:05.000 When she puts out fake information, she'll accept it.

00:26:08.000 We should not tolerate it.

00:26:09.000 But we'll be nice about when they do bad jobs.

00:26:12.000 Well, they should not remain in those positions if they're that bad, but the next degree is like CNN.

00:26:17.000 Falsely framing, cherry-picking quotes, and manipulating the narrative, or NPR claiming that Grosskreutz testified his hands were in the air when he was shot, when he testified to the defense that it was only after he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse.

00:26:31.000 That is egregious!

00:26:32.000 When MSNBC put out a video where they say, Grosskreutz testified his hands were up.

00:26:37.000 Then they show a clip of something totally irrelevant.

00:26:40.000 That is intentionally trying to manipulate people.

00:26:42.000 That's the second level of it.

00:26:44.000 Jeffrey Toobin was also on CNN.

00:26:47.000 Jeffrey Toobin, if you don't know who he is, he's the guy who spanked it to his coworkers on Zoom. 0.99

00:26:51.000 And he was on CNN and he literally said, quote, Kyle is an idiot, which I think is just I mean, I mean, that's the type of level of commentary you expect from CNN. 0.93

00:27:02.000 But still, even when it when it when it happens, it's still surprising to see it as that blatantly out there right in front of your face, because Truly what they're doing is a huge disservice and people who are paying attention watching the trial are getting a totally different perspective than people who of course are just editorializing and commenting about it like Tubin was. 0.96

00:27:22.000 I think Kyle had a hard time on the stand.

00:27:24.000 He answered a lot of questions very very well so the prosecution When the defense was doing the direct with Kyle Rittenhouse, Kyle, of course, you know, he's probably working this out with the defense, answered the questions, he did a really good job, he explained, you know, why he was there, what his goals were.

00:27:42.000 When it came to cross-examination with the prosecutor, the prosecutor was just badgering him and badgering him, and caught him up in a few instances, and now the New York Times says, Mr. Rittenhouse struggled to give clear answers to questions about why he brought his gun as he ran towards the car lot with a fire extinguisher.

00:27:58.000 The event that immediately preceded the shooting of Mr. Rosenbaum.

00:28:01.000 I'm watching the testimony, and one of the questions he asked was, after the protesters cleared away from this area, why did you walk directly in this direction instead of going around them?

00:28:12.000 And I'm like, that's a question that can only be asked in hindsight.

00:28:16.000 And Kyle didn't have a good answer because he never thought about it and he's on the spot. 0.97

00:28:20.000 And that's why it was a huge risk to put him on the stand because that question is garbage, nonsensical. 0.94

00:28:25.000 He was like, why did you have your gun? 0.98

00:28:27.000 What were you trying to protect?

00:28:29.000 He asked him, why were you looking for Ryan Belch?

00:28:33.000 And Kyle was like, because you're safer in pairs.

00:28:35.000 Safer from who?

00:28:37.000 And it's just like, Kyle didn't have good answers for this.

00:28:40.000 But I think he's 18, he's not experienced, and this is why it's a risk to put him on the stand.

00:28:46.000 If he was sharper, if he was quicker, you know, he could have said something like, Cause there was rioters and arsonists and people doing violence all over the place?

00:28:53.000 Because criminals exist.

00:28:55.000 Because when you go out on the streets for any reason, you're safer with another person regardless of whether or not there's a riot or a protest.

00:29:01.000 So many of these questions strike me as being in the same vein of why did you wear that miniskirt out at night, young lady?

00:29:09.000 So one of the issues was when he was asking Kyle, like, why did you bring a gun?

00:29:13.000 It's like, because someone might attack me.

00:29:15.000 Who?

00:29:16.000 I don't know.

00:29:17.000 And Kyle actually had a really good answer.

00:29:19.000 He said, you brought the gun.

00:29:21.000 The prosecution said to Kyle, asked him, Why did you bring the gun?

00:29:25.000 And Kyle says, I thought I needed protection.

00:29:27.000 And then he said, protection from whom?

00:29:29.000 And Kyle said something to the effect of, I didn't think I would need to use protection.

00:29:33.000 And then the defense, the prosecutor goes, I'm confused.

00:29:36.000 You said you needed protection.

00:29:37.000 Now you're saying you didn't.

00:29:38.000 And Kyle very quickly and very, very on point, sharp said, I thought I needed to bring protection, but I didn't think I would need to use it.

00:29:46.000 And that was really, really good.

00:29:48.000 But when you have a prosecutor who's asking the same question 50 times,

00:29:52.000 you now give the media the opportunity to say he couldn't answer.

00:29:54.000 Kyle was getting confused and saying, I don't understand your question.

00:29:59.000 One of the things Binger said was that hollow point bullets, when they're fired into somebody,

00:30:03.000 explode. And Kyle's like, what? And the judge was like, what?

00:30:07.000 What are you talking about?

00:30:09.000 It seems like a gish gallop. 1.00

00:30:10.000 Are you familiar with a gish gallop?

00:30:11.000 I have literally never heard that in my life.

00:30:14.000 It's a debate tactic where you throw as much garbage at someone so that they look like they can't answer the question properly.

00:30:20.000 So instead of asking a question in a debate like, is 2 plus 2 4?

00:30:24.000 You go, look, 2 plus 2 equals 5, and 2 plus 2 equals 6, and 3 minus 7 is 22, and you know it's 22, and now we have 7 minus 3 is 4, and your opponent goes, oh, wait, wait, what did you say?

00:30:33.000 What?

00:30:34.000 And the goal is to make you look confused to the audience.

00:30:38.000 I don't know.

00:30:39.000 Are these common tactics, generally speaking, when doing a cross-examination of witness like this?

00:30:46.000 Or is this specific to this case because they don't have a real case and they're trying to use these psychological tactics?

00:30:52.000 Well, I mean, I think they're just fishing.

00:30:53.000 They're trying to throw out as much as they can, see what they could get back.

00:30:57.000 I mean, being cross-examined like that for hours is difficult.

00:31:01.000 It's not easy.

00:31:03.000 So, I mean, just watching the case, it really looked like, let's just keep throwing something at it.

00:31:08.000 Let's see if we get something back.

00:31:10.000 And, you know, if you're a state prosecutor, they're going to do everything in their power.

00:31:13.000 They're going to take as much time as they want to, of course, try to beat up the witness, beat up the person being questioned, and try to literally break him.

00:31:25.000 That's a tactic used by many people in cross-examinations.

00:31:28.000 Keep berating him, keep beating him, keep asking him the questions to see maybe it's an interrogation tactic too to keep asking the same question but in different formats.

00:31:36.000 Sure, and you start off by asking him something that you know is an affirmative.

00:31:40.000 Did you do that?

00:31:41.000 Yes.

00:31:41.000 Did you walk over here?

00:31:42.000 Yes.

00:31:43.000 And you get them in the habit of saying yes.

00:31:44.000 I have given testimony under oath a number of times, depositions in court and whatnot, And with some lawyers, you know, in my mind, I know where they're going and I can answer honestly and still sort of, you know, screw with them and win the game.

00:31:59.000 But I am not 18 years old.

00:32:00.000 I am not on the stand fighting for my life.

00:32:02.000 I am not being accused of murder.

00:32:04.000 That has got to be an extraordinarily stressful circumstance.

00:32:07.000 There's actually, there was an amazing point where they freeze frame a moment when he had, when Gage Grosskreutz was attacking him.

00:32:17.000 They freeze frame it, and in the still, Rittenhouse's gun is pointed forward towards the legs of Gage Grosskreutz, whose hands are up, and then he's like, he's not pointing a weapon at you, but you're pointing a weapon at him.

00:32:30.000 And then Kyle Rittenhouse says, it's a freeze frame, I believe if you play the video you'll see I'm actually lowering the weapon.

00:32:37.000 And I was like, wow.

00:32:39.000 Kyle actually did a pretty good job on the stand.

00:32:41.000 However, it's the James Bond technique.

00:32:44.000 If you ask a woman to hook up 30 times, this is literally the James Bond jokes from Family Guy. 0.97

00:32:50.000 Ask the woman 30 times and she says no. 1.00

00:32:53.000 When she finally says yes, James Bond looks at the camera and goes, 30 no's and one yes means yes.

00:32:59.000 It's the James Bond joke.

00:33:02.000 But the point is, that's what abusers do.

00:33:05.000 They know that they can ask you the question 20 times until you finally get confused and say what they need, and then they can put that on the record and then go to the jury and say, remember when he testified X?

00:33:15.000 It's like, yeah, if you ask the same question 50 times and confused him, that's a tactic.

00:33:20.000 They don't have a case.

00:33:22.000 The crazy thing, I'll say it again, was when the defense actually stated to the judge that the prosecutors either have forgotten the rulings of the judge or are purposefully trying to trigger a mistrial because they know they have no case and they don't want this to go before the jury.

00:33:36.000 The defense actually said that to the judge.

00:33:39.000 Massive.

00:33:40.000 Now what does it mean when they've, can the judge, and we're not lawyers, but can the judge receive a motion and not rule on it?

00:33:47.000 So, one of the things the judge said, uh, they wrapped up, uh, about, I think, like, um, Eastern Time, 5.40 or so.

00:33:54.000 The judge was actually contemplating bringing another witness, but he said, it's a little late, you know, why don't we, uh, you know, come back tomorrow, first thing in the morning, we'll dismiss the jury.

00:34:04.000 And he said to the defense, I'll get you my preliminary.

00:34:07.000 Nope, nope.

00:34:08.000 I won't promise that, but we'll see what happens.

00:34:11.000 So I think the judge is going to issue a ruling on the motion.

00:34:16.000 Yeesh.

00:34:17.000 But I'm not a lawyer.

00:34:19.000 I have no idea.

00:34:20.000 You're better off, you know, listening to lawyer commentary.

00:34:23.000 That's just what the judge said about a preliminary ruling on it.

00:34:26.000 I'm crossing my fingers and I hope we have this much attention on the Ghislaine Maxwell case, which is going to be starting in a little bit.

00:34:32.000 So I'm like, please, please, let's keep up this kind of judicial attention on such important issues.

00:34:39.000 I was thinking that she was actually hooking up with a bunch of those people that would come to the Epstein's place. 0.98

00:34:45.000 Well, there's a lot of very serious allegations around her, but I don't want to deviate too much from this particular case.

00:34:49.000 I gotta give a shout out.

00:34:50.000 I gotta give a shout out.

00:34:51.000 We're sitting here, we're criticizing the media, and there's someone in the media who deserves some respect, and people are not going to want to accept it, but we're people of principle.

00:35:01.000 Anna Kasparian of the Young Turks.

00:35:02.000 Check this out, from the Daily Wire.

00:35:04.000 Quote, I was wrong.

00:35:06.000 Young Turks Kasparian admits she bought into false Rittenhouse narrative.

00:35:10.000 Mad respect.

00:35:11.000 100% respect.

00:35:12.000 I disagree with their politics.

00:35:14.000 I think the Young Turks have been very unfair to me. 1.00

00:35:17.000 I think they've lied about me on more than one occasion.

00:35:19.000 Cenk Uygur screamed at me at Politicon for no reason.

00:35:23.000 I've known the guy for years, and I politely asked him, like, hey, you guys put up a smear piece on Dave Rubin, but, like, my name's, like, in the thumbnail in the middle.

00:35:30.000 And then he starts yelling at me.

00:35:32.000 All of that aside, if you recognize that you're wrong and you correct it, I will give you the respect you deserve.

00:35:38.000 Because if we still, you know, if someone comes out and says, you know, I bought into this false narrative on cow retinas, which is what Ana Kasparian did, and then we refuse to accept their acknowledgment, you only encourage them to keep doing bad. 0.65

00:35:50.000 Mm. We tell them thank you for, for saying the right thing with, with respect. And hopefully

00:35:55.000 they continue to do the right thing. Do the research, looking at these tweets from people,

00:35:59.000 they keep saying crossing state lines with a gun, crossing state lines with a gun. They keep saying

00:36:05.000 assault rifle, assault rifle wrong. These people have not done any, any research into this at all.

00:36:15.000 And if they do, I'll give them the respect they deserve.

00:36:17.000 Well, that's big that she came out and corrected her statement.

00:36:20.000 Because if we remember, I mean, the mainstream media, especially MSNBC, they were calling Kyle a domestic terrorist, a mass murderer.

00:36:26.000 They were using extremely hyperbolic language in order to kind of inflame this situation.

00:36:32.000 There's people trying to make this about race.

00:36:34.000 And again, this has nothing to do with any of that.

00:36:37.000 But when it comes to this kind of salacious action, someone actually saying, hey, I was actually wrong here is very big because the mainstream media doubled down, tripled down, and they're still trying to ignore a lot of important facts in this case.

00:36:50.000 They didn't know what happened, but they still were able to declare definitely domestic terrorists, definitely a mass murderer.

00:36:55.000 Again, we're still finding out all the details of the case here, and the picture portrayed here is totally different.

00:37:00.000 I saw a really funny tweet.

00:37:01.000 You know who I love to shout out is Cameron Kasky.

00:37:04.000 Because, you know, he seemed like somebody who was acting in good faith initially, but he's totally just lost any will, to be honest.

00:37:12.000 He tweeted something really funny.

00:37:14.000 He tweeted, I'm paraphrasing, how come all of these centrists are so much smarter than me?

00:37:19.000 And I thought it was really funny because he's being sarcastic, he's saying they're not.

00:37:24.000 But I realized that's the attitude that many of these establishment Democrat types and leftists have, where they don't actually read the news, they don't know what they're talking about, but they're arrogant enough to get online and say these things, and there are tribalist individuals who are willing to retweet it because it makes them feel good inside. 0.98

00:37:43.000 But when you come out and say, assault rifle, when literally not a single person in Kenosha had an assault rifle, not a single person, I'm not gonna play stupid semantic games. 0.96

00:37:54.000 They meant long gun, not assault rifle.

00:37:58.000 But saying that is factually and legally wrong, and they don't bother to do a Google search.

00:38:06.000 Google search.

00:38:07.000 Five seconds to figure out what an assault rifle is.

00:38:10.000 They don't even do that.

00:38:11.000 They get verified, they get a million followers, and then they tweet, I'm smarter than you.

00:38:15.000 I prefer DuckDuckGo, but that's just a separate topic.

00:38:17.000 Go ahead.

00:38:18.000 Well, you know, I was thinking that a lot of these people's perceptions on this are prejudiced from the actions that Facebook and GoFundMe took very early on, right?

00:38:26.000 So if Facebook, if Facebook, where grandma shares pictures of her cats, Tells me that Rittenhouse is clearly guilty and you get suspended.

00:38:35.000 I don't know.

00:38:36.000 They remember the details, but they did ban and censor some elements about this and GoFundMe definitely took down his fundraiser.

00:38:42.000 Well, then it must be true because Facebook is a benign entity where my pictures of my grandkids are getting likes from all of our cousins.

00:38:50.000 Social media took people down for talking about facts of this case.

00:38:55.000 So that's absolutely huge.

00:38:56.000 People were prevented from having a discussion what was going on here.

00:39:00.000 We only got mainstream media dribble and assertions, and then everyone else left talking about this was scared of being targeted and taken down.

00:39:08.000 There's people demonetized, there's people who lost their channels, there's people who were eviscerated and deleted, unpersoned, because they were discussing the facts here.

00:39:16.000 There was a really good tweet from the Libertarian Party.

00:39:18.000 I think it may have been of New Hampshire.

00:39:19.000 I'm not sure.

00:39:22.000 This account highlighted two tweets.

00:39:24.000 One was from a leftist who said that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist who was hunting down civil rights protesters, which is a lie.

00:39:32.000 And the other tweet said, based on the evidence in this trial, it's clear that Kyle was acting in self-defense.

00:39:38.000 The self-defense tweet got suspended.

00:39:40.000 And the white supremacist tweet, massive retweets.

00:39:42.000 Oh, there's this guy, BrooklynDadDefiant or whatever.

00:39:45.000 He's got something like a million followers.

00:39:47.000 Just constantly railing on this.

00:39:48.000 Constantly telling people to lie, lie, lie.

00:39:51.000 A million followers verified on Twitter.

00:39:54.000 Look at Sean King, dude.

00:39:56.000 Right.

00:39:56.000 These people built careers off intentionally misleading, and this has been the MO of the establishment for the past, I mean, maybe for longer than we realize, but you get Russiagate.

00:40:10.000 They accused Trump of doing what they literally did.

00:40:13.000 The Clintons and the Democrats had more ties to Russia and this manipulation and lies than Trump ever did, and they put up fake news and the media helped them.

00:40:21.000 Now you get Sean King and there was that time he falsely accused that cop of abusing that woman or whatever.

00:40:27.000 There's a video he put out where he claimed Proud Boys had gone out and done something that Proud Boys weren't even involved in.

00:40:33.000 He just lies.

00:40:34.000 He knows it.

00:40:35.000 And many leftists have called him out.

00:40:37.000 He's still got a million plus followers.

00:40:39.000 He gets hired at these companies like The Intercept and The Daily News or whatever.

00:40:41.000 He gets paid lots of money.

00:40:43.000 Then you get Brooklyn Dad to find it turns out he's being paid by political operatives.

00:40:47.000 That was a big expose.

00:40:48.000 I could be wrong about that, but it's my understanding, at the very least, that he was a paid political operative, and even leftists criticized him for it.

00:40:57.000 You have a massive propaganda machine pumping out lies, making money. 0.97

00:41:02.000 They're grifters.

00:41:03.000 What do they do?

00:41:05.000 They know they have to accuse us to deflect.

00:41:08.000 So they'll say, when we pull up video or we pull up news articles and challenge them and show you what's going on in the trial.

00:41:15.000 The other day we played the actual video from MSNBC and in the trial to disprove their lies, they'll claim we're the ones who are manipulating people.

00:41:22.000 When Brian Stelter tells people, don't watch the propaganda, come to us.

00:41:26.000 When I think it was Cuomo when he said, you're not legally allowed to read WikiLeaks, only we can.

00:41:31.000 Anyone who tells you not to seek out information is manipulating you.

00:41:35.000 Because I'll tell you this.

00:41:36.000 Watch CNN.

00:41:37.000 See what they say.

00:41:38.000 Read the New York Times.

00:41:38.000 See what they say.

00:41:40.000 And then watch Crowder.

00:41:41.000 Watch David Pakman.

00:41:42.000 Watch the Young Turks.

00:41:43.000 And watch us.

00:41:44.000 Try and get as much as you can because then you'll see through the lies.

00:41:47.000 What do they tell you?

00:41:48.000 Don't listen to the grifters.

00:41:49.000 They're manipulating you.

00:41:50.000 Man, this is one reason why you gotta be in good shape, guys, because you need stamina to withstand this constant barrage of lies, manipulation, disinformation.

00:42:01.000 If you are weak, if you're physically weak, if you're mentally, emotionally, spiritually weak, You're just going to fall victim.

00:42:08.000 You're just going to be led right off the cliff away from the truth and into ways that are going to end up harming you in the long run if you follow all of the mainstream narratives.

00:42:16.000 Now, I agree with Tim on some points here, especially when it comes to seeing what the larger media landscape actually looks like.

00:42:22.000 But remember, after watching the mainstream media, remember to squeegee clean your third eye and try to decompress.

00:42:31.000 Because seriously, there's a lot of trauma-based mind control and a lot of psychological tricks and dirty tricks used by the mainstream media.

00:42:38.000 It's absolutely just... When you watch it, it's like watching another reality.

00:42:42.000 It's like watching another world.

00:42:45.000 And truly, you have to be very careful with what they say because you have to fact-check everything.

00:42:49.000 And usually when you do, even with basic things that you think are common, you're shocked and surprised by just simply trying to look at the evidence yourself, what they're saying, and what the actual truth of the reality is.

00:43:01.000 The difference is so stark that it's difficult to accept sometimes.

00:43:04.000 And you think to yourself, nah, that can't be possibly right.

00:43:08.000 And you doubt your own perception.

00:43:09.000 They can't be lying that much.

00:43:11.000 And then when you think about what we're just witnessing in real time right now, and then you just think about all of written history, and then it's just like, oh God.

00:43:20.000 When we had, we had Steve Hilton on the other day, and when we were showing the video of that guy on MSNBC, I don't know his name, and he was like, Gage Grosskreutz testified that his hands were up when he was shot, and then I play the video where the defense is like, it wasn't until you pointed the gun at Kyle Rittenhouse that he fired on you, and he goes, correct.

00:43:39.000 He didn't believe it.

00:43:39.000 He was like, no, like, how could they just say that?

00:43:43.000 And I'm like, the videos published after the testimony, the articles, even if, even if the article came out right before that testimony and they rushed it, they haven't corrected it.

00:43:54.000 And he was just like, I can't believe they would outright and overtly lie like that.

00:43:58.000 And I'm like, I can't.

00:43:59.000 I tried to tell somebody.

00:44:01.000 You remember the Portland shooting where the Antifa guys shot that Jay, Jay Danielson?

00:44:07.000 Yeah, Aaron Danielson.

00:44:08.000 Aaron Danielson, and nicknamed Jay, right?

00:44:10.000 And there was a guy who filmed it live, who was just allegedly Strolling along the street and happened to pick up the entire thing on video, right?

00:44:19.000 So I got in touch with the guy and I interviewed him and I went through it frame by frame by frame and asked him all the questions and then I asked him why he was going to the protest and he says, oh, my daughter got me into going to these things.

00:44:28.000 Black Lives Matter.

00:44:29.000 And you know, I just want to support her.

00:44:31.000 I'm like, oh, you're a family man.

00:44:32.000 Yeah, you believe in family, right?

00:44:34.000 You're a good dad?

00:44:35.000 You like leading your family?

00:44:36.000 You like having a whole intact family?

00:44:38.000 Yeah?

00:44:38.000 Well, did you know that Black Lives Matter is opposed to the nuclear family?

00:44:42.000 That wants to, quote, disrupt the norm around the nuclear family? 0.99

00:44:45.000 He's like, nah.

00:44:46.000 I'm like, hold on a second.

00:44:49.000 I pulled it up.

00:44:49.000 I showed it to him.

00:44:50.000 He read it.

00:44:51.000 And his reaction was, oh, that just must be a typo.

00:44:56.000 That just must be a mistake.

00:44:58.000 They did delete it because it was so egregious and outrageous, but it is true.

00:45:03.000 It's part of their platform.

00:45:03.000 It's what they believe.

00:45:04.000 And a guy, I put it right in front of him on the website, everything.

00:45:08.000 And he still could not believe that he was supporting an organization that was against his whole raison d'etre.

00:45:15.000 It always being a dad and leading a family drives me nuts when people say I can't believe it when something happens

00:45:21.000 Especially watch sports announcers. Oh, we caught the catch.

00:45:23.000 I can't believe it like dude believe it it happens Stop telling yourself. You can't believe what's right in

00:45:28.000 front of you I think one of the one of the big problems that we're

00:45:31.000 seeing now Especially with the right is that they keep saying things

00:45:35.000 like why would someone want there to be no justice?

00:45:38.000 You know, they're like the the people who are cheering for Kyle Rittenhouse to go to prison are cheering the

00:45:43.000 destruction of our justice system Why would you want that?

00:45:46.000 And I'm just like, you'd think after this many years, you'd realize that communists who scream, long live the revolution, this guy Gage Grosskreutz testified, he did, hold up his fist.

00:45:56.000 Are you affiliated?

00:45:56.000 No.

00:45:57.000 Did you go to their things?

00:45:58.000 Yes.

00:45:58.000 No, no, no.

00:45:59.000 Did you speak at their events?

00:45:59.000 He said, are you a member?

00:46:00.000 Are you a member?

00:46:01.000 He said, no.

00:46:02.000 No.

00:46:02.000 But you've spoken at their events?

00:46:03.000 Yes.

00:46:03.000 So you're affiliated?

00:46:04.000 Yes.

00:46:04.000 Did you chant the slogans?

00:46:06.000 Did you raise your fist and say, long live the revolution?

00:46:08.000 Yes.

00:46:09.000 What people need to understand, and this is what I was trying to say to Steve the other day, when you assume that your political rival holds the same moral framework and worldview as you, you are wrong.

00:46:18.000 You're making assumptions.

00:46:20.000 When these people say, long live the revolution, and then you wonder why it is they're lying under oath, They do not respect our moral framework.

00:46:29.000 They do not agree with our moral framework.

00:46:31.000 They do not respect the authority of the court.

00:46:33.000 And they believe they have a right, by any means necessary, to subvert and destroy this system.

00:46:38.000 I was surprised when he actually admitted, bicep guy.

00:46:41.000 I don't like using their names.

00:46:42.000 I call him the N-word guy, and the bicep guy, skateboard guy. 0.94

00:46:46.000 I was actually surprised that he just straight up was like, yeah, he didn't point the gun at me until I pointed the gun at him.

00:46:53.000 Well, he tried denying it at first.

00:46:55.000 But he admitted it?

00:46:56.000 He had to though. That was what was so crazy about the testimony. The defense was like,

00:47:00.000 even so I still was surprised. But check it out. The defense said to him first,

00:47:03.000 you pointed your gun at Kyle Rittenhouse and then he fired upon you and gross courts goes,

00:47:08.000 no. And then he was like, he pulls the video up and he hands him a phone and goes, that's a photo.

00:47:14.000 What is it of?

00:47:15.000 And he's like, it's my bicep being vaporized.

00:47:17.000 And he's like, and your gun is pointed at the defendant.

00:47:19.000 He's like, yes.

00:47:20.000 And that's when he shot you.

00:47:21.000 Yes.

00:47:22.000 So it was only after you advanced on the defendant, pointed your gun at him, that he fired on you.

00:47:27.000 And he goes, yes.

00:47:28.000 When you're showing a picture to the jury, what's the dude going to say?

00:47:31.000 No.

00:47:32.000 He tried that.

00:47:33.000 He tried.

00:47:34.000 This guy has no allegiance to the prosecutor.

00:47:36.000 The prosecutor's already put himself in a position where he can't criminally charge him.

00:47:40.000 So he's like, that's on you.

00:47:43.000 I'm not going to make myself look worse and incriminate myself.

00:47:45.000 And there you go.

00:47:46.000 Dang.

00:47:47.000 I don't understand though, that's like, what's called perjury, you just lied to the jury under oath?

00:47:51.000 Yup.

00:47:52.000 But this is a matter, the issue is there's a big difference between like, hard perjury and an interpretation.

00:47:58.000 Of course.

00:47:59.000 So when he's like, you know, it wasn't until you pointed the gun, he's like, no.

00:48:03.000 And then, well here's the video, oh yeah, I guess so.

00:48:05.000 It's very different from them, and this dude lied a lot.

00:48:08.000 It was funny when the prosecutor, playing the video, with Gage Grosskreutz, holding his gun, and he goes, so at this point, you've pulled your gun as you're approaching Kyle Rittenhouse, and he goes, no.

00:48:20.000 And the prosecutor's like, here's the video we just played with a gun in your hand.

00:48:25.000 And he goes, yes.

00:48:27.000 This dude is lying! 0.91

00:48:29.000 The worst. 0.95

00:48:29.000 But perjury almost never, my understanding is almost never gets prosecuted. 0.95

00:48:34.000 And it's typically for like, were you at the bar at 2am?

00:48:38.000 No, I was in Buffalo, New York.

00:48:40.000 And then they find a picture of you there.

00:48:41.000 You overtly lied about what you were doing.

00:48:43.000 And then they might try again.

00:48:45.000 Did you knowingly spy on the American people?

00:48:50.000 That's right, and unfortunately when him and Schiff and all of these cronies went on TV and lied about Russiagate, they weren't under oath.

00:48:59.000 When they were under oath in congressional testimony, they admitted, I have no evidence, it's not true, it's all bunk.

00:49:05.000 That's one of my favorite things, talking to Cash, him pointing all that stuff out.

00:49:08.000 I'm so glad that he was on the show.

00:49:10.000 What a good dude.

00:49:11.000 All right.

00:49:11.000 Now listen, we just gave respect to Anna Kasparian because she corrected the record on a mistake she made.

00:49:17.000 And now I'm going to highlight Cenk Uygur.

00:49:20.000 I'm not someone who, you know, I typically don't like talking about the Young Turks or other commentators, but this is actually a really important cultural moment that we're getting not just from Cenk Uygur, but from one of his followers that I think we absolutely need to address.

00:49:35.000 Cenk Uygur tweeted, So Joe Rogan's show has now become a boring right-wing show.

00:49:41.000 No real diversity of opinion. It's just insane conspiracy theories and right-wing lies,

00:49:46.000 like every other Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson-like show, and it's obvious he doesn't

00:49:50.000 want to be challenged on his ideas anymore. The Democrats just lost miserably in a series

00:49:56.000 of elections. In Virginia, notably due to critical race theory.

00:50:00.000 Suburban housewives, white suburban women voted for the Republican critical race theory plays poorly with, you know, working class individuals and suburbanites. 0.99

00:50:11.000 We saw a state senator who spent only $153 win without campaigning against the incumbent

00:50:19.000 Democrat who refused to concede until today's like, okay, I accept that I lost because people

00:50:23.000 just said, I'll take a ham sandwich.

00:50:25.000 If there's an R next to it, that's how much people are fed up with the Democrats, with

00:50:29.000 wokeness, with all of this stuff we've been complaining about for a long time.

00:50:33.000 If you look at basically every metric.

00:50:35.000 You'll see that independent voters are leaning closer towards Republicans simply because Republicans are closer to them and Democrats are going further and further left.

00:50:45.000 Pew Research put out a political tribes chart.

00:50:48.000 There is a group called the stressed sideline, which is the least politically active group, according to their survey, center-right position.

00:50:58.000 The individuals who consider themselves to be politically neutral are center-right.

00:51:03.000 We would probably fall under what Pew Research refers to as the ambivalent right.

00:51:07.000 It's a group of people who aren't conservative, but have voted Republican, who are actually fairly progressive on certain issues, or economic issues, but are against the Democrats and wokeness and all that stuff.

00:51:17.000 Back to what Cenk Uygur is saying, and here's why I think this is so important to highlight.

00:51:21.000 not just because of his comment, but because of one of his followers' responses, who said,

00:51:25.000 I'm also feeling that way about e-cigar and crystal ball with their breaking points show.

00:51:31.000 I loved it when they impartially went after both sides of MSM, but now it's just one-sided

00:51:35.000 attacks and conspiracy theories, no balance anymore. My response was, as Democrats begin

00:51:41.000 to lose and moderates are shown to be closer politically to the right because the left has

00:51:46.000 has gone so far left, a breakdown among the left ensues.

00:51:50.000 Cenk Uygur's only response is, because he's built up his audience around chasing this fringe, unpopular ideology is, It's not me who's wrong.

00:51:59.000 It's everyone else who just voted against us.

00:52:02.000 And his follower says, that's right.

00:52:04.000 Crystal Ball and Cigar, who are very, like, Crystal Ball's progressive.

00:52:08.000 Yeah.

00:52:08.000 No, no, no.

00:52:08.000 They're far right now.

00:52:10.000 Because they're telling the truth.

00:52:11.000 Yeah.

00:52:12.000 They're breaking down.

00:52:13.000 Yeah, it's amazing.

00:52:14.000 I mean, we've been talking on this show for a long time.

00:52:15.000 I've been talking about it, that the CRT in schools is going to be the biggest red pill delivery service that we've seen, and it clearly played out that way.

00:52:23.000 You know, we've been talking about that.

00:52:24.000 Red pill delivery service.

00:52:26.000 For two years.

00:52:26.000 I mean, when your daughter comes home from school and wonders if she's a racist because what they're talking about in class, You know, that's going to get Mama Bear activated.

00:52:33.000 And I also just want to give some big shout outs to some friends of ours, Corey DeAngelis and Christopher Ruffo.

00:52:40.000 Boy, James Lindsay, James Lindsay, of course.

00:52:42.000 And, you know, all of us here have been hammering all this stuff for a long time.

00:52:46.000 And dude, they had a huge hand in what happened in Virginia, you know, and it really shows.

00:52:51.000 And thank goodness, because I love Virginia and I want it to be read.

00:52:54.000 It really shows that what we need is a big network of people that aren't necessarily on the same campaigns and aren't necessarily getting paid by the same people and aren't necessarily totally aligned.

00:53:04.000 But you need people, you need the academics to define it, you need the media people to set the stage, you need the campaign managers to follow the lead and follow the polls.

00:53:12.000 And what happened in Virginia was amazing. 0.99

00:53:14.000 I was in Orlando at the National Conservatism Conference the night that Youngkin won and Chris Rufo was sitting right next to me and when they announced it, oh man, it was so exciting because that dude has been busting his ass! 0.98

00:53:27.000 But how crazy is it That here we are, you're Democrat to deplorable, being like, I want Virginia to be red, and I'm at the conservatism conference. 0.98

00:53:35.000 I know, I know, and it feels perfectly natural, and those people feel perfectly... I mean, I definitely did not agree with everything that I heard at the National Conservative Concert.

00:53:43.000 However, but they did feel more like, quote, my people.

00:53:47.000 And who would just interpret a random event in a similar fashion than these crazies like Cenk. 1.00

00:53:52.000 And dude, I'd gotten a media game later than you.

00:53:56.000 So I have never seen this Cenk Uygur guy be reasonable or say anything smart or whatever. 0.98

00:54:03.000 He's just been this buffoon. 0.98

00:54:04.000 Just screaming and yelling like some sort of... 1.00

00:54:07.000 Idiot! 1.00

00:54:08.000 2007 he was pretty hard on George Bush in the Iraq war. 1.00

00:54:11.000 He was a shining beacon.

00:54:13.000 Speaking out against it was very nice.

00:54:15.000 He was criticizing a lot of very powerful forces, many multinational corporations.

00:54:18.000 He got a contract on MSNBC.

00:54:20.000 MSNBC tried to stifle him and shut him up and he said no!

00:54:24.000 And he made it a huge issue.

00:54:26.000 He actually stood up and gained a lot of respect from a lot of people.

00:54:29.000 And then ever since then, I think he's just been going downhill and drinking

00:54:33.000 some very strange, oddly smelling Kool-Aid and has gone off the deep end.

00:54:38.000 Money and views start warping your mind too, man.

00:54:40.000 They do.

00:54:41.000 This is what happened to all of these establishment forces.

00:54:46.000 The Young Turks, they were big, they were leftist.

00:54:49.000 You have CNN, who was supposedly the corporate, they're corporate media for sure, but they were never hard left the way they became.

00:54:56.000 What happened was, especially for the Young Turks, is that you go on Twitter, And you look at your mentions, and you get 30 replies, and you're scrolling down, and they're all saying, you were wrong about X. People are easily manipulated by this, assuming that 30 angry people represent their entire base.

00:55:14.000 So what happens is, eventually the Young Turks, and other, you know, digital outlets, start saying, wow, my followers think this is right, or think this is wrong, I don't want to lose followers.

00:55:25.000 So they start adhering to a fringe minority.

00:55:28.000 We've seen the polling data, between 8 and 10% of the country, If you want to abandon 90% of the country for 8% because there's a market share for you, good luck.

00:55:37.000 What's happened now is the Young Turks, CNN, MSNBC, have you seen this?

00:55:41.000 They're losing all their talent.

00:55:42.000 Rachel Maddow's canceling her daily show, she's gonna do a weekly show, and Brian Williams announced he's leaving because their ratings are in the trash.

00:55:49.000 They have almost no key demo.

00:55:50.000 But they're in the trash because of the H.E.R.

00:55:53.000 No, no, no.

00:55:54.000 Here's what happens.

00:55:55.000 If you lie for years, Russiagate, they dedicated themselves to being wrong. 1.00

00:56:02.000 People are not the stupid clowns they treat them out to be. 1.00

00:56:07.000 There are some stupid clowns. 1.00

00:56:08.000 But average people are average and average people can see through lies. 1.00

00:56:13.000 They understand that the square peg goes through the square hole.

00:56:17.000 So when they come out and they say, Trump colluded with Russia, we know it for a fact.

00:56:20.000 Clapper goes on her show and says, we've all seen the evidence.

00:56:23.000 And then three years later, the report comes out.

00:56:25.000 Those people go.

00:56:25.000 Trump didn't.

00:56:27.000 The hell was I just watching?

00:56:29.000 And then what happened?

00:56:30.000 Their ratings collapsed.

00:56:31.000 Rachel Maddow is nearly in tears, but she can't give it up.

00:56:34.000 Why?

00:56:35.000 She lost moderates who are looking for real news.

00:56:38.000 She retained the cult members.

00:56:40.000 The Young Turks have done the same thing.

00:56:42.000 Now Cenk Uygur's only option is to say Joe Rogan, who is moderate left-leaning, and the most popular podcaster, and probably the second most popular comedian, is a right-wing boring show.

00:56:54.000 Cenk, Joe Rogan is like your average dude talking about crazy things all the time.

00:57:01.000 He's not Tucker Carlson.

00:57:03.000 He's not a right-wing pundit.

00:57:05.000 When I look at Joe Rogan, I'm like, that should be your barometer for regular people.

00:57:09.000 The pulse of the nation.

00:57:09.000 Right.

00:57:11.000 And you look at his shows when he goes and performs, People in New York show up for him.

00:57:16.000 These are people in Democrat strongholds showing up.

00:57:19.000 With vaccines accepting the mandates.

00:57:20.000 Absolutely.

00:57:21.000 Yeah.

00:57:22.000 And so when I, you look at Joe Rogan, and he is very likely representing regular Americans, but the Democrats have pulled, you look at this, the Pew data that got released that went viral, when it shows the Democrat shift versus the Republican shift, do you remember this?

00:57:37.000 Yeah.

00:57:37.000 The Democrat center has now become far left, and the Republicans have moved like one point to the right.

00:57:43.000 So Republicans are closer to where they've always been.

00:57:46.000 What happens to a moderate or someone like a Joe Rogan?

00:57:49.000 They look to their left and every day they lie, they cheat, they steal, and they get further left.

00:57:54.000 And they look to their right and there's a Republican saying the same thing they always did.

00:57:56.000 And they're like, the Republican says the 4th of July barbecue and Christmas are great.

00:58:00.000 I like those things too. 1.00

00:58:01.000 They look to their left and they're like, you're white, you're racist, Christmas is racist, shut up. 1.00

00:58:05.000 And they go, okay, that's nuts. 1.00

00:58:06.000 Right, exactly.

00:58:07.000 You know, this is why if you're in journalism, if you're in media, it's really important just to be dedicated to the truth, right?

00:58:15.000 Because then you just ask questions and then you can be wrong because you were never like, this is what I believe.

00:58:21.000 You're just asking questions.

00:58:22.000 I'm just a guy with a microphone.

00:58:23.000 I'm just pulling on a thread.

00:58:25.000 I mean, that's my whole shtick.

00:58:26.000 I don't know really the answers to anything.

00:58:28.000 I'm just asking questions, trying to figure it out and go where the answers take you.

00:58:33.000 But that takes being able to withstand your audience being mad at you.

00:58:40.000 Right? 0.98

00:58:40.000 And because if you just respond to your audience being mad at you, like, you know, I catch a lot of crap for being anti-Trump. 0.98

00:58:46.000 I catch a lot of crap for a lot of things, but it's those moments where you need to have some fortitude because that's when you're staying true to just the pursuit of truth.

00:58:54.000 And that's why guys like Mike Cernovich get so much crap from people because he's just trying, he's just pursuing the truth, his version of the truth, whatever. 0.79

00:59:01.000 He's just asking questions and he's trying to come to his own understanding. 0.89

00:59:05.000 It's when Matt Aldud, I said on November 7th, Donald Trump lost, get over it.

00:59:10.000 You need to move on.

00:59:12.000 And all the hardcore Trump supporters were like, screw Tim Poole, they were mad at me.

00:59:16.000 But still, the left claims I pushed the narrative of election fraud, which I never did.

00:59:21.000 In fact, Steve Bannon came on this show, and I argued with him about it, saying, I think you guys are focused on the wrong thing.

00:59:27.000 You gotta focus on Democrats' ground game, and how they did voting in the park, and how they did universal mail-in voting, because that is the edge that got them the win.

00:59:36.000 Yes.

00:59:36.000 The left will still lie about me.

00:59:37.000 So here's one of the challenges.

00:59:39.000 Here's an example of the Rittenhouse case.

00:59:42.000 One of the challenges with believing in America.

00:59:44.000 The judge, his ringtone was, proud to be an American.

00:59:48.000 Yes.

00:59:48.000 What does that mean?

00:59:50.000 It means he'll be biased for the left.

00:59:51.000 I was going to say, it's not good.

00:59:52.000 It means he's biased for the left.

00:59:54.000 For the left.

00:59:55.000 for the left.

00:59:56.000 Why do you say that?

00:59:57.000 Because he truly believes in the justice system.

00:59:59.000 He's going to allow prosecutorial misconduct because he wants there to be a jury trial

01:00:03.000 because the jury trial is the American thing to do.

01:00:05.000 So as the left, the prosecutor, lies, cheats, and steals, he'll say it is the American value

01:00:11.000 to give an equal opportunity to everyone.

01:00:14.000 You have people who raise their fist and say, long live the revolution.

01:00:18.000 Their explicit goal is to destroy this nation.

01:00:20.000 And you are welcoming them to the fray and giving them an opportunity.

01:00:25.000 I thought about this, and this is what you'll get.

01:00:27.000 A leftist revolutionary sect and democratic establishment authoritarians who will cheat and use your good faith to continue doing it.

01:00:36.000 Definitely.

01:00:37.000 So my thought was kind of, we should only extend the values of our justice system to those who uphold it equally for us as well.

01:00:44.000 If we believe in the Bill of Rights and the Fifth Amendment and the Second Amendment, why would we give people an opportunity to take those rights from us?

01:00:51.000 What I mean to say is, if we believe in the right to remain silent in a fair trial, and someone walks in and says, I will not give you that same benefit, but I demand it of you, we should respond with, no.

01:01:01.000 Either we all agree these are the rules, or we won't apply them to you if you don't want them.

01:01:06.000 To simplify it even further, if you don't believe in free speech, why would I defend your right to free speech?

01:01:11.000 You don't believe in it.

01:01:12.000 I'll give you the respect you've asked for.

01:01:15.000 That's a tough one, man.

01:01:16.000 The issue is... I mean, I hear what you're saying.

01:01:18.000 I hear what you're saying, but like the right to... Yeah, that's tough.

01:01:23.000 But those are the most egregious circumstances that free speech has to be supported.

01:01:27.000 It's even for people that don't believe in it, right?

01:01:29.000 Even for people that are acting insane.

01:01:31.000 For people that are doing the dumbest, craziest things that you could possibly think of, then that's why guys like Mark Randazzo are amazing, because they go out there and defend those kind of people.

01:01:38.000 I agree, but there's a line.

01:01:39.000 Yeah.

01:01:40.000 So there have been a few pundits who have pointed out that one of the problems with conservatives and the more libertarian-minded people on free speech is that they're unwilling to accept any limitations on speech in pursuit of free speech, which is the wrong thing to do.

01:01:54.000 Well, we need to recognize that there are certain limits culturally that we're not willing to accept and then call out the left for violating these same limits and not respecting the free speech that they demand.

01:02:06.000 To put it simply, there's that paradox of intolerance where they say, if you tolerate intolerance, then the intolerant win.

01:02:11.000 And that's not necessarily untrue.

01:02:14.000 We all need to agree on the rules and then operate within those rules.

01:02:18.000 If someone seeks to destroy our rights and attack our way of life, we should not give them equal opportunity.

01:02:27.000 We should not open the door for them, to put it simply.

01:02:30.000 To wrap this all up, my point is, The judge in the Rittenhouse case knows they're breaking the rules, has yelled at the prosecutors, but is still, as someone who believes in America and is proud, will uphold these systems which benefit those who lie, cheat, and steal, and are seeking to destroy the very system that is protecting them.

01:02:48.000 It is a paradox.

01:02:50.000 It just means that we can't be absolute in our defense of egregious actors.

01:02:58.000 We certainly will protect their free speech and act in good faith, but when it becomes apparent that they're trying to destroy the system, we say, okay, we can't tolerate your attempt to destroy free speech.

01:03:07.000 So that logic, do the 9-11 suicide bombers, do they deserve a free, like a fair trial?

01:03:14.000 Absolutely.

01:03:15.000 Okay.

01:03:18.000 I think what I mean to say is, and I think Ian helped my understanding of this.

01:03:23.000 He had some good questions about the ethics of vaccine lockdown, of mandates and lockdowns when you brought up Ebola and what people's rights are.

01:03:30.000 There's a point where if there was an airborne Ebola, everyone in this room would be like, lock it all down, right?

01:03:36.000 Like an 80% mortality of people coughing and their insides are liquefying and you're watching it happen.

01:03:40.000 We'd all be like, lock it.

01:03:42.000 We'd be freaking out.

01:03:43.000 But to varying degrees.

01:03:45.000 So then, you know, I started to think that for the most part, it's really about how much risk you're, how much you're willing to tolerate in terms of sacrificing freedoms, because everybody's willing to give up something if it, if something is, you know, give us some of their freedoms if it's egregious enough.

01:03:56.000 I think for the most part, we just happen to be, people who watch the show and us, substantially more libertarian than they are.

01:04:03.000 So they're more likely to take away people's rights.

01:04:07.000 We won't tolerate that.

01:04:09.000 But a really good point that was made that I think will help people understand this is that someone said to Tucker Carlson, you would not allow someone to come on your show and make racist comments.

01:04:18.000 And Tucker said, you are correct.

01:04:19.000 He's like, right, we agree.

01:04:21.000 There are limits on acceptable speech.

01:04:23.000 It's a good point.

01:04:24.000 The legal limits should not be banning hate speech, but the culturally acceptable limits exist.

01:04:30.000 In which case, we need to enforce culturally our ideals and tell people who would say, revolution nothing less, by any means necessary, that we will not accept that culture. 0.68

01:04:40.000 Since we're opening this can of worms, let's talk about this for just for just one quick second.

01:04:45.000 I knew I know a guy and his he separated from his wife and his kids are in Israel and his daughter's bat mitzvah was coming up.

01:04:54.000 And it looks like that the judge is going to actually order the kids to stay in Israel.

01:04:59.000 And so he and in Israel, you can't enter the country unless you have a vaccine.

01:05:04.000 So what does that guy do?

01:05:06.000 The choice is, and he's just mega opposed to the vaccine.

01:05:11.000 His grandparents were, you know, captured by the Nazis.

01:05:14.000 Like he has a history with this.

01:05:17.000 Forced medical procedures, et cetera.

01:05:19.000 He was faced with get the vaccine and see his kids or don't get the vaccine and maybe never see his kids again.

01:05:28.000 That is a extremely difficult situation to be put in if you believe very, if you're very adamantly opposed to the vaccines and the mandates.

01:05:37.000 And I don't think any of us would argue here that this guy should never see his kids again.

01:05:42.000 So what that clearly lays out for us is that there is, it is a personal decision about this and it's a spectrum.

01:05:42.000 Right?

01:05:50.000 And so I don't fault the guy for getting the vaccine to go see his kids.

01:05:54.000 It broke his heart.

01:05:56.000 Like it tore him up because he didn't want to do it because he was opposed to it and he hated it.

01:06:01.000 But they put him in a situation where it was like, see the kids or get, don't, don't get the vaccine.

01:06:06.000 That's how they win.

01:06:07.000 And that's, this is the big, this is the big challenge.

01:06:09.000 The logic of it is simple.

01:06:11.000 Go for someone's children, and you will have a slave. 1.00

01:06:15.000 They win.

01:06:16.000 But there's no escaping it.

01:06:18.000 There's that guy.

01:06:19.000 There's multiple options.

01:06:21.000 There's multiple ways of trying to go through the system with the system not looking.

01:06:25.000 I'm not advocating for any illegal activities, but if there's a will, there's a way.

01:06:31.000 Compliance isn't the easiest way.

01:06:33.000 It's going to be the easiest way for the moment, but in the long term, it's going to be the most difficult way for everyone else, including that person who, you know, compromised his morals to comply with the

01:06:43.000 state.

01:06:44.000 So there's many different ways around a different issue.

01:06:46.000 Compromise one element of his morals to honor the rest of his morals.

01:06:51.000 I don't, again, I don't agree with that kind of argument.

01:06:56.000 There's many different avenues that people could walk down that doesn't include compliance that could still allow him to see his children in many different ways and many different avenues.

01:07:06.000 And I think you should explore all of those options until there's not an option possible.

01:07:11.000 Flying to, what, like fake vaccine cards and things like this?

01:07:14.000 Again, I'm not here to advocate any of that.

01:07:16.000 I think advocating that is even a felony under the FBI.

01:07:20.000 I mean, there's human rights legal proceedings.

01:07:22.000 He could get a lawyer, he could file lawsuits, he could say, I will not, you know,

01:07:26.000 the government can't mandate a medical procedure and take my kids from me.

01:07:29.000 Meet in another country, have a mediator come in and say, hey, okay, let's go meet in Egypt,

01:07:35.000 or let's go meet in Turkey, let's go meet somewhere nearby and establish

01:07:39.000 that we're gonna be doing this in some sort of way that doesn't infringe on my values and morals.

01:07:43.000 Dad assumes that he has a cooperative ex-wife.

01:07:46.000 Okay, but you know, there's... Well, hold on.

01:07:49.000 You bring up an ex-wife. 0.58

01:07:50.000 Now we're talking about two civil parties and a government entity.

01:07:53.000 So it's much different from an individual versus the government when there's a civil case between two individuals.

01:07:57.000 Sure.

01:07:58.000 My point is, is that there's a spectrum and it's hard.

01:08:01.000 And there's a decision to be made at some point.

01:08:04.000 And the fact that the decision exists is a symptom of the problem, not a contributor to the problem.

01:08:10.000 It's actually, there is something more simple.

01:08:13.000 If everyone said no, there wouldn't be a problem.

01:08:16.000 The problem is that people bend the knee.

01:08:18.000 If you're the 1% left resisting, you've got no one with you. 0.88

01:08:26.000 And that's why I've always been the kind of person that says I would rather live in a van down by the river than compromise.

01:08:34.000 The only way this is ever going to end is if people stop complying.

01:08:37.000 You cannot comply your way out of tyranny.

01:08:39.000 I said this a couple weeks ago.

01:08:41.000 It's impossible.

01:08:42.000 It's impossible because they're going to keep pushing it.

01:08:44.000 They're going to keep asking for more and more.

01:08:46.000 The NBA has mandated boosters.

01:08:48.000 The NBA has told all players, coaches, and referees that you have to have a booster shot if you got the Johnson & Johnson after two months and the Pfizer & Moderna after six months.

01:08:58.000 Obviously, this was coming.

01:08:59.000 We knew this was going to happen.

01:09:01.000 And now, the CDC has already said weeks ago they may change the definition of fully vaccinated.

01:09:06.000 Of course they're going to.

01:09:08.000 So it's only going to get worse.

01:09:09.000 And you look at the inflation, you look at the food shortages, you look at the price of a turkey this year, it's insane.

01:09:15.000 Doubled.

01:09:17.000 They're calling it meat-flation that's happening right now.

01:09:20.000 Bacon's up 20%.

01:09:22.000 So the people who said, I gotta prioritize feeding my kid, congratulations.

01:09:25.000 By complying, you have taken the food out of their mouths.

01:09:28.000 Yeah, short-term gains for long-term sacrifices Sacrificing the future of your children because it's easier

01:09:35.000 now Look you take a look at the at the long hard road and way

01:09:40.000 off in the distance You see paradise and you take a look at the short trip over

01:09:44.000 the bridge and the bridge collapse and you end up getting washed away

01:09:47.000 Sometimes you people got to realize that life is not easy life

01:09:50.000 It's not fair and it takes hard work and you have to you have to face the challenges head-on

01:09:55.000 Because when you take the easy route You make everything worse.

01:09:59.000 Not always, but often.

01:10:00.000 Predominantly, especially.

01:10:01.000 It's never easy, it's never an easy... Whenever you do something cheap, Uh, I think that's the way of describing this.

01:10:08.000 It's going to come back and haunt you.

01:10:09.000 And when more and more people comply, I mean, people complied in Israel.

01:10:13.000 They just said, we'll do anything.

01:10:15.000 We'll go along with the vaccine passports. 0.91

01:10:16.000 We'll get vaccinated.

01:10:17.000 Everything will be fine.

01:10:18.000 The government said, well, well, well, no, now you need a booster shot.

01:10:21.000 Now we need a third shot.

01:10:22.000 Now they're even talking about a fourth shot.

01:10:24.000 So with him complying and saying, yes, I'll, I'll go by your rules.

01:10:27.000 I'll go by the fourth shot.

01:10:29.000 Fourth shot's already official for immunocompromised.

01:10:32.000 So they're not mandated a part of the official passport system, which they will be implementing very soon.

01:10:38.000 And then the fifth shot.

01:10:39.000 And then then we're talking about what hepatitis shots or University of Denver has already mandated flu shots.

01:10:44.000 Yeah.

01:10:44.000 Compliance test.

01:10:46.000 My favorite was the Yahoo News story said NBA recommends boosters for all, you know, referees and everything.

01:10:53.000 And then later on, it said, if you don't do it, you'll be subject to all the same restrictions, blah, blah, blah.

01:10:58.000 So it's a mandate.

01:10:59.000 There was a really cool guy from the NBA at the National Conservativism Conference, as a matter of fact, Isaac Judah, Orlando Magic, sixth pick overall.

01:11:09.000 This is like big time player, right?

01:11:11.000 And he came and sat on stage with Dave Rubin.

01:11:14.000 Yeah, dude.

01:11:14.000 Whoa.

01:11:15.000 NBA, 6'11".

01:11:16.000 Look, look, look, look.

01:11:17.000 Isaac Judah.

01:11:19.000 Seeing people like Kyrie Irving, Aaron Rodgers, people who are willing to speak out and stand up for what they believe in, this is fantastic.

01:11:26.000 Now, Aaron Rodgers apparently lied about his, you know, immunization or whatever.

01:11:29.000 And I, he should have spoken up and just been true and honest from the get-go.

01:11:34.000 But I think when we start seeing celebrities and athletes speak out in defense of individual liberties, individual rights, that's a good thing.

01:11:43.000 That's an amazing thing.

01:11:44.000 And we need to encourage more of it.

01:11:45.000 It was amazing to see him at the conference.

01:11:47.000 And I'll admit, I thought that the crowd was just a little too excited.

01:11:50.000 The fact that there was like an African American guy there.

01:11:53.000 Wait, wait, wait.

01:11:53.000 But that's every conservative conference these days.

01:11:55.000 They're like, there's a black guy and he agrees with us on some things.

01:12:00.000 Yes!

01:12:01.000 We're not racists!

01:12:03.000 I mean, that's, you know, that's the vibe, right?

01:12:05.000 I've not been in a conference like that.

01:12:07.000 That guy was super well-spoken, very intelligent, and made his case very articulately about his natural immunity, etc.

01:12:15.000 Well, the media attacked him viciously because he wasn't going along.

01:12:19.000 And he did a whole press conference where he addressed this entire matter and brought up points very eloquently and was talking about all the scientific issues that actually mattered.

01:12:31.000 Everyone was like, I wish this guy was Dr. Fauci.

01:12:33.000 Because he explained scientific terms in such an easy, simple way that made a lot of people understand his position.

01:12:40.000 And they stopped attacking him because of the way that he approached this situation without getting angry, without attacking, without yelling, without freaking out, and just said, okay, here, let me just explain myself calmly, rationally.

01:12:51.000 And because of that, they stopped attacking him.

01:12:53.000 He's still playing.

01:12:53.000 Something we've brought up a lot.

01:12:58.000 There are a lot of celebrities that watch your show.

01:12:59.000 They message me.

01:13:00.000 Definitely.

01:13:01.000 There's a lot of famous athletes, actors, musicians.

01:13:05.000 And unfortunately, they always say the same thing, I won't speak up.

01:13:09.000 And I'm like, dude, you're who needs to speak up.

01:13:09.000 Right, exactly.

01:13:12.000 You got two million followers.

01:13:14.000 Make a post.

01:13:15.000 Look at look at Demi Lovato.

01:13:16.000 She's she became an ambassador for Gaia.

01:13:19.000 And now they're attacking her saying she's like, it's a conspiracy website.

01:13:22.000 And it's like, it's a yoga and like, holistic health, like forum or something.

01:13:28.000 They're just anyone that tries to deviate from the control of the corporate establishment is smeared.

01:13:34.000 Anybody.

01:13:35.000 Here's a question for you.

01:13:36.000 I don't know the answer.

01:13:37.000 Did George Washington pay the stamp tax?

01:13:40.000 I don't know.

01:13:41.000 If the answer is yes, then all this stuff, we can just throw this whole argument in the trash.

01:13:41.000 No idea.

01:13:45.000 Because he complied?

01:13:46.000 Because he complied.

01:13:47.000 Because he waited until the right moment to make his move.

01:13:51.000 Anybody out there?

01:13:52.000 Did George Washington pay the stamp tax?

01:13:55.000 Did Sam Adams pay the tea tax?

01:13:57.000 Did they pay the tax on the tea before the tea party?

01:14:00.000 Let's get this answer, because that could put this question to bed.

01:14:03.000 Yeah, but Jack, you're not making any moves.

01:14:05.000 What do you mean?

01:14:06.000 Well, the argument is like, you just got to comply, comply, and then, and then go against.

01:14:10.000 1965, dude.

01:14:10.000 Or 1765, right?

01:14:11.000 Give me nine years.

01:14:13.000 Let's see.

01:14:14.000 Nine years.

01:14:15.000 Or 11, actually.

01:14:17.000 You know, the big difference is though, is that communicating took months.

01:14:22.000 So if you were... It took 11 years.

01:14:23.000 Well, if you were a rep in Virginia, communicating with New York about revolutionary ideas, Sure, it took a couple weeks to send a letter, sure.

01:14:30.000 But so the actual conversation could be months unless you came down for a special meeting in Philadelphia or something.

01:14:36.000 I would love to know if any of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, Hamilton, if any of those guys paid the stamp tax at any point in their life.

01:14:45.000 Because if they did, let's talk about it.

01:14:47.000 Why don't we just Google it?

01:14:48.000 I just tried.

01:14:48.000 It didn't come up.

01:14:49.000 Jack, you're just trying to justify compliance.

01:14:51.000 It's not going to work.

01:14:52.000 I haven't taken the vaccine.

01:14:54.000 My kids haven't taken the vaccine.

01:14:55.000 I don't know why everybody's giving me a effing hard time about having a conversation for people in America that are struggling with this issue.

01:15:03.000 I am not vaccinated, everybody.

01:15:05.000 Well, Jack, I appreciate the conversation.

01:15:06.000 I think it's an important one.

01:15:07.000 I'm happy we were able to have one.

01:15:09.000 That's why I wasn't here last week, two weeks ago, when I got the call that Cass Castle was under attack by the coronavirus.

01:15:16.000 I was like, I'm not going because I don't have the vaccine.

01:15:18.000 Well, to be fair, we didn't know for sure at the time.

01:15:20.000 I know, but Lydia was like, everybody's sick, dude. 0.97

01:15:22.000 Sorry.

01:15:23.000 And here's one of the problems with the testing mandate is we had four tests be negative.

01:15:27.000 So we were like, tests cleared us, we're good, it's probably a cold.

01:15:30.000 And then it turns out, you know.

01:15:31.000 Yeah.

01:15:32.000 So, you know, a cursory glance at the Stamp Act just mentions that the colonists viewed it as a violation of their rights.

01:15:40.000 They protested it.

01:15:42.000 But as to whether or not they were paying it... Good question.

01:15:46.000 So you're saying that with the Boston Tea Party, they should have, you know, complied and not done anything?

01:15:52.000 Is that what you're saying?

01:15:53.000 What I'm saying is that there's a matrix to make decisions as to whether this action is going to have the desired outcome.

01:16:00.000 Or if it's only going to be deleterious to yourself or harmful to yourself, there's a lot to consider.

01:16:07.000 And not everybody, even the most venerated people in our history, the people you would call patriots, the people that founded this country, I bet you they didn't resist every single moment of tyranny before they finally had had enough.

01:16:19.000 And actually like the things that they revolted over in some cases.

01:16:23.000 I have an answer for you.

01:16:24.000 Benjamin Franklin actually suggested the appointment of John Hughes as the agent for Pennsylvania to be a stamp distributor, not aware of the turmoil that the tax would create between American-British relations.

01:16:32.000 It's just an interesting historical question.

01:16:34.000 I have an answer for you.

01:16:35.000 What?

01:16:36.000 Benjamin Franklin actually suggested the appointment of John Hughes as the agent for Pennsylvania

01:16:40.000 to implement the stamp, to be a stamp distributor, not aware of the turmoil that the tax would

01:16:46.000 create between American-British relations.

01:16:48.000 To simplify, when the act was implemented, people had to actually engage with it before

01:16:56.000 they understood it was bad and then reject it.

01:16:58.000 So it seems like what happened was the government said, we're implementing this.

01:17:02.000 A bunch of political leaders were like, okay.

01:17:05.000 And then they started talking about it.

01:17:06.000 And then over time, because communication was slower back then, people started protesting in the streets.

01:17:10.000 For like five years, there were protests over this.

01:17:12.000 So once people were impacted by it, understood the ramifications, they started rejecting it.

01:17:17.000 But did they pay the stamp tax in the meantime while they were protesting it?

01:17:21.000 I think the fair... During the protests, probably not.

01:17:24.000 Probably what happened was... And again, this is speculation.

01:17:26.000 I know, totally.

01:17:27.000 We should get a historian on here to talk about this.

01:17:28.000 But what I can say is, initially, they did pay it.

01:17:31.000 And what likely happened is they gradually began not paying it as the protests expanded.

01:17:36.000 So as opposition grew, people said, I won't comply.

01:17:39.000 But that is to say, that means People who want the vaccines and believe in the mandates, of course, will comply.

01:17:45.000 But that also means that people who protest and oppose it would not comply.

01:17:51.000 Interesting historical question.

01:17:53.000 I'd love to dig deeper on that.

01:17:55.000 You know what I want to dig deeper on?

01:17:56.000 I want to talk about Alec Baldwin.

01:17:57.000 There we go.

01:17:57.000 Let's do it.

01:17:58.000 Kapow! 0.99

01:17:59.000 We love subtle transitions.

01:18:02.000 So, I mean, look, we're talking about trials.

01:18:04.000 We're talking about Rittenhouse.

01:18:05.000 We're talking about... There's a bunch of trials, actually.

01:18:07.000 The Ahmaud Arbery case is going on.

01:18:09.000 We have more information on the Alec Baldwin case.

01:18:12.000 A Rust crew member, this is the movie, Rust is the name of the film, where Alec Baldwin shot and killed that woman.

01:18:17.000 He is suing Alec Baldwin and the set armorer for severe emotional distress over shooting.

01:18:22.000 The Independent is reporting, Fatal Scene did not require Baldwin to pull trigger lawsuit claims.

01:18:30.000 It's a claim of a lawsuit of somebody who's trying to make money.

01:18:32.000 So I don't know that it's true.

01:18:35.000 A lot of people are saying, why would an electrician have, you know, key details in that regard?

01:18:39.000 The Independent reports, A Rust crew member who held the dying Helena Hutchins in his arms has sued Alec Baldwin, armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, and assistant director Dave Halls for severe emotional distress over the shooting.

01:18:51.000 Head electrician Sergei Svetnoy alleges in the lawsuit that the scene in which Ms.

01:18:56.000 Hutchins was killed did not call for Mr. Baldwin to fire the weapon, which she had been told was cold.

01:19:01.000 Mr. Baldwin is sued in both his capacity as an actor and a producer of the Western movie, which has been shut down as investigations into the death continues.

01:19:09.000 Mr. Savetnoy claims in the court papers that the bullet that killed Mrs. Hutchins also struck director Joel Soza, almost hit him as well, according to TMZ.

01:19:18.000 He states that he is suing Mr. Baldwin because the star owed a duty to the plaintiff and other crew members and actors on the Rust set to handle the Colt revolver provided to him by defendant Halls with reasonable care and diligence for the safety of the Rust cast and crew.

01:19:32.000 They go on to say, quote, This duty called for defendant Baldwin to double-check the Colt revolver with Halls upon being handled to ensure it did not contain live ammunition, court papers state.

01:19:43.000 The lawsuit also claims the fatal scene did not require Baldwin to pull the gun's trigger, with the script instructing him to draw the weapon and point it in the general direction of the camera.

01:19:51.000 But, quote, the scene did not call for the defendant Baldwin to shoot the Colt revolver.

01:19:56.000 My understanding is that the Colt revolver, especially a piece from this era, would be single action, not double action.

01:20:02.000 Someone commented on this yesterday.

01:20:04.000 Which means, and actually I have a single action, you have to actually pull the hammer back before it can be fired.

01:20:10.000 The question then emerges, If we're assuming this lawsuit is correct, the electrician's claims as a witness and someone involved in the crew is right, maybe he's disgruntled.

01:20:21.000 Maybe he was a disgruntled crew member.

01:20:22.000 Maybe he's lying.

01:20:23.000 I don't know.

01:20:25.000 The first question we have to ask is, why did Alec Baldwin pull the hammer back on the gun, point it at an individual?

01:20:34.000 Why weren't there safety protocols in place?

01:20:35.000 Why did he pull the trigger?

01:20:37.000 I think, as I stated yesterday, we didn't do a full segment on this, which is why this story came out four hours ago and I thought it was important to bring up.

01:20:45.000 We've been giving him the benefit of the doubt the whole time for no reason.

01:20:48.000 I'm not saying I know what happened.

01:20:49.000 I'm saying the media has protected Alec Baldwin and framed this whole story so that from the get-go we assumed it was an accident.

01:20:58.000 They first said it was a blank.

01:20:59.000 They said it was a misfire, which is the wrong terminology.

01:21:01.000 They said Shrapnel hit the producer, uh, the cinematographer, killing her.

01:21:06.000 We know all of that's not true now.

01:21:09.000 And this is witness testimony.

01:21:10.000 Granted, this guy's suing, but it's still someone who was on the crew who's making a statement and saying this is what happened and what was supposed to happen.

01:21:18.000 In which case, the facts we have to start.

01:21:21.000 Alec Baldwin drew a gun.

01:21:23.000 Pulled the hammer back, pointed it at the cinematographer, at the camera with the cinematographer standing there, fired the gun with a live bullet in it.

01:21:30.000 In order to assume that was an accident, we'd have to make a ton of assumptions. 0.92

01:21:38.000 He was mad.

01:21:39.000 He had motive.

01:21:40.000 Sounds like it, right?

01:21:42.000 No.

01:21:42.000 Those are also more assumptions.

01:21:44.000 However, in the absence of evidence, the solution that makes the least amount of assumptions tends to be the correct one.

01:21:52.000 Not that we know definitively.

01:21:53.000 Not that we can say for sure.

01:21:55.000 But I'm just pointing out it is logically absurd to begin the story as if we believe it was a mistake.

01:22:02.000 Well, what's very clear is that Alec Baldwin has a very skilled team of PR people that has been rolling this out bit by bit, manipulating the narrative, seeding things in our mind, much the way an interrogator will get you to say yes and lead you places, plant things out there.

01:22:20.000 Very concerted effort, which, you know, even if it were an accident, they would do the same thing, right?

01:22:25.000 If it was a total accident, he would definitely hire a crisis management team.

01:22:28.000 They would definitely be doing everything that they're doing.

01:22:31.000 But the way that things are coming out bit by bit by bit now, and when you really put it like that, you know, he pulls back, pulls back the action, points it at the guy, pulls, shoots.

01:22:41.000 And doesn't he have a history of going off on people?

01:22:45.000 Remember he just attacked a guy in New York over a parking space?

01:22:49.000 The armor, I think she was claiming that people were afraid of Alec on set, basically.

01:22:55.000 If they were like, hey, it's too dangerous, you can't do that, Alec would flip his lid and fire the person on the spot. 0.79

01:23:00.000 Didn't he leave some nasty voicemail for his own daughter or something, calling her the worst names in the world and being an absolute monster? 1.00

01:23:08.000 He's trash, dude. 1.00

01:23:09.000 Do you remember, uh, did you see the video of him and his wife? 0.99

01:23:11.000 They got out of the car.

01:23:12.000 They were getting chased by, like, paparazzi.

01:23:14.000 They got out of the car to talk, and it was, like, last week.

01:23:16.000 There's a video of it.

01:23:17.000 And he's like, she was my friend!

01:23:19.000 And then he realized, like, I didn't say it with enough emotion.

01:23:21.000 I gotta repeat myself.

01:23:22.000 She was my friend.

01:23:23.000 Like, he's such an actor.

01:23:24.000 Yeah, most actors go crazy.

01:23:26.000 Let me, let me, we got this from your side today.

01:23:28.000 Alec Baldwin sues man who accused actor of punching him over a parking spot in New York.

01:23:35.000 He sues the guy.

01:23:36.000 So everyone thought that Tim was crazy when Tim came up with this idea that it's possible this wasn't an accident, right?

01:23:42.000 But it's not even me coming up with an idea, it's me saying, why are you making assumptions that this was an accident?

01:23:46.000 I know. 1.00

01:23:47.000 We all know that Alec Baldwin is a huge jerk and he always has been. 0.99

01:23:52.000 So there's no reason to assume that this was an accident. 0.99

01:23:55.000 There's no reason to assume that there's no... What grace has he built up?

01:23:59.000 What benefit of the doubt has he built up?

01:24:01.000 He is the equivalent of the N-word guy at the gas station at this point.

01:24:05.000 Dude, from the beginning, everyone was like, we have to be nice to Alec Baldwin.

01:24:09.000 This must be very hard for him.

01:24:11.000 I was like, do you think for one single second that if this were to happen to someone, for example, like James Woods, that he would be compassionate and graceful?

01:24:19.000 He would be on Twitter before the body was cold.

01:24:21.000 Complaining about gun laws.

01:24:24.000 He went trick-or-treating afterwards and was taking, you know, selfies and photos dressed up as a guy in a costume.

01:24:31.000 I pulled up the video of the parking lot incident and it shows Alec, he like shoves the guy in the shoulder.

01:24:37.000 So he says it disproves the claim that, you know, he punched him.

01:24:40.000 This is going back to 2018.

01:24:43.000 I think it's still an important point to make that Alec Baldwin is a hothead.

01:24:46.000 Like Ian was pointing out, people were scared of him on the set.

01:24:49.000 People had complained about what was going on.

01:24:52.000 And I think we could even ignore all of that and just take some basic facts.

01:24:57.000 A woman died.

01:24:58.000 How did she die?

01:25:00.000 She was shot.

01:25:01.000 We're gonna walk backwards.

01:25:02.000 She was shot.

01:25:03.000 How did she get shot?

01:25:04.000 An individual fired a gun at her.

01:25:07.000 The individual was armed with what I believe was a single-action revolver, likely .45 caliber, because it's a Western.

01:25:16.000 He pointed the gun at her, pulled the hammer back, pulled the trigger.

01:25:19.000 Okay, why did he do it?

01:25:22.000 Well, according to one witness, the scene did not call for him to actually pull the hammer back and pull the trigger, but he did anyway.

01:25:29.000 Yeah.

01:25:29.000 So then why would he have pulled the trigger?

01:25:32.000 Well, then we start getting into the crew disputes, the hot-headedness of the character.

01:25:36.000 I don't understand why it's logical in any capacity to say he accidentally pulled a live firearm with a bullet, pulled the hammer back and shot a woman, and be like, but let's figure out how many, how we can justify it as an accident.

01:25:48.000 No, you made a good point about crisis management.

01:25:50.000 This dude's very wealthy.

01:25:52.000 Very likely, his PR firm immediately, as soon as it happened, started saying, we need stories saying this.

01:25:59.000 They probably seeded false information.

01:26:01.000 It was a misfire, it was a blank.

01:26:02.000 Why?

01:26:02.000 To create the narrative of an accident first.

01:26:05.000 And we walked into that.

01:26:06.000 The first thing we said was it was an accident.

01:26:08.000 Then we learned it was a live bulletin.

01:26:10.000 We said, wow, how did that happen?

01:26:12.000 That's a crazy accident.

01:26:13.000 And then I stopped and thought to myself, So I have to assume a woman, an armorer, who's trained with firearms, accidentally loaded a live round, gave it to an assistant director who didn't check it, but claimed it was cold, gave it to Alec Baldwin, who wasn't supposed to pull the trigger, who then pulls the trigger, and all of that is true for me to continue the accident narrative.

01:26:32.000 Okay, I dude, I don't like Alec Baldwin, even though he's just a tremendous actor, which just bothers me.

01:26:38.000 Him and Glenn Cleary, Glenn Ross is like one of the most powerful scenes in film.

01:26:43.000 It's a good movie.

01:26:44.000 So good.

01:26:45.000 But the alternative, and I'm just playing devil's advocate, all you a-holes out there that are going to say that I'm Alec Baldwin.

01:26:52.000 They love you in the comment section, by the way.

01:26:54.000 No, they hate me in the comment section.

01:26:57.000 And there's bots in there running on me.

01:26:59.000 Quit reading the comments.

01:27:00.000 I love the comment section.

01:27:02.000 I love you guys.

01:27:03.000 You guys are incredible.

01:27:05.000 The alternative is, is what?

01:27:07.000 That he came up with a way to murder this woman?

01:27:11.000 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that's too many assumptions.

01:27:14.000 It's simple. 0.94

01:27:15.000 Hot-headed Alec Baldwin shot a woman. 0.97

01:27:16.000 That's it. 0.98

01:27:17.000 So I think someone put the bullet in the gun.

01:27:19.000 Sabotage the set.

01:27:20.000 It's just an assumption, but it's like, if I have to make one, it's gonna be that one.

01:27:25.000 They've made that accusation.

01:27:26.000 And I don't have to make one.

01:27:27.000 Crew members have argued it was intentional sabotage on Alec Baldwin's part.

01:27:31.000 However, if I'm going to make the least amount of assumptions, it's Alec Baldwin shot and killed a woman.

01:27:36.000 Well, for sure, that's the truth.

01:27:37.000 That's not even an assumption.

01:27:38.000 That's a fact.

01:27:39.000 Alec Baldwin pulled back the hammer, pointed the gun, and pulled the trigger at a woman.

01:27:42.000 Motive is, this is a guy who's known to be a hothead, who screamed at his own daughter, who shoved a guy over a parking space. 0.56

01:27:51.000 I'm not trying to argue that he's a rage-filled monster, but that he has a temper.

01:27:57.000 So if we're going to look at how this woman died, Do I assume the armorer who's trained in firearms accidentally loaded a live bullet, then gave it to a second person who claimed to have checked it but didn't, who gave it to Alec Baldwin, who is trained for decades with firearms, who didn't check it, or do I say, there was a producer dispute with the crew over the conditions on the set, and then the guy who's running, one of the producers, shoots a woman!

01:28:23.000 There's a lot of things that are very difficult to believe in each of these scenarios.

01:28:28.000 They're all incredible.

01:28:30.000 Like, wow.

01:28:30.000 How are any of these possible?

01:28:31.000 They're doing live target practice on the set.

01:28:34.000 They're probably getting hammered the night before, coming in all wasted.

01:28:36.000 The girl doesn't even know what she's doing, the armor. 1.00

01:28:40.000 But why would you assume that?

01:28:41.000 She said she's 24.

01:28:43.000 She was like, I'm not comfortable in this job.

01:28:45.000 She was doing two jobs at once on the set.

01:28:47.000 But it's like, you can't say it to Alec because he'll fire you on the spot.

01:28:50.000 I think it's crazy to assume that the one person who was not treating the gun properly was the one person whose job it is to treat the gun properly.

01:28:58.000 You know what I mean?

01:28:59.000 Right.

01:28:59.000 The armorer is the expert on set.

01:29:01.000 Why would I assume she made the mistake and resulted in a person dying instead of Alec Baldwin who pulled the trigger?

01:29:07.000 They all made a mistake.

01:29:08.000 So you think that she handed over a gun that had a blank in it and Alec Baldwin inserted a live round in between receiving the handgun and discharging it?

01:29:17.000 If we're going to start with all of the facts laid in front of us, it is, in my opinion, slightly more probable that Alec Baldwin loaded the gun and shot.

01:29:27.000 No.

01:29:28.000 Than some begruntled crew member that walked off?

01:29:32.000 So the crew member... Is there a chain of possession?

01:29:35.000 The armorer, Hannah Gutierrez... Do they have to sign for it and stuff? 1.00

01:29:38.000 I don't know.

01:29:39.000 Yeah, I wonder.

01:29:39.000 Imagine, right?

01:29:42.000 I'm not saying it's likely.

01:29:44.000 I'm not saying it's true.

01:29:46.000 I'm just saying, why would I assume the armorer made a mistake, the assistant director failed to check it, and then Alec Baldwin, for no reason, pulled the trigger at a woman?

01:29:56.000 And then add to it, very clearly a skilled PR team is seeding stories, manipulating the media, getting out there.

01:30:02.000 We don't know that for sure.

01:30:03.000 It's a big assumption.

01:30:04.000 I think it's likely and fair to say.

01:30:06.000 My point is, I don't know.

01:30:07.000 The intent is so objective, it's annoying sometimes.

01:30:09.000 I don't know what happened. I'm just saying that looking at it like a mathematical equation

01:30:13.000 you have this massive tree of like an Algorithm like a flowchart of all of the things that had to

01:30:20.000 happen for this insane accident to occur and then over here you have

01:30:23.000 angry crew Alec Baldwin hothead shot a woman

01:30:28.000 Like, it's three steps. 0.95

01:30:30.000 It's a guy said, I'm angry with the crew, and then shot a woman.

01:30:33.000 Versus accident, accident, accident, sabotage, conspiracy, angry crew, and I just... Right.

01:30:38.000 And we're falling into the trap of trying to apply rational thinking to irrational people doing irrational things.

01:30:46.000 And hotheaded people who have a temper, who act out sometimes.

01:30:51.000 And we still don't know.

01:30:52.000 I think we have to wait until the police investigation comes out.

01:30:56.000 Uh, if they're going to even investigate it properly, if a lot of the investigation wasn't compromised by a lot of his money.

01:31:03.000 The DA said that they know who put the bullet in the gun.

01:31:07.000 Oh, wow.

01:31:08.000 So maybe, look.

01:31:09.000 Yeah, we'll see.

01:31:10.000 I'm just saying, I feel like a crisis management team likely was involved in seeding stories that were clearly false to create the accident narrative first and then prejudice individuals who read on.

01:31:21.000 But now you have a guy who has, in a sworn statement, a deposition lawsuit, in a lawsuit saying, the scene did not call for him to fire the gun.

01:31:32.000 That is big.

01:31:32.000 That's huge.

01:31:33.000 As soon as I saw that, I was like, this changes a lot.

01:31:35.000 And there's a little bit of motive.

01:31:37.000 Yeah.

01:31:37.000 Right?

01:31:38.000 There was disputes, there was contested and such.

01:31:40.000 People were quitting.

01:31:41.000 They were walking off set.

01:31:43.000 Yeah.

01:31:43.000 So imagine you've got hothead Alec Baldwin trying to run a movie where he's a hothead.

01:31:48.000 People like, you know, Ian mentioned, people were scared they would get fired.

01:31:50.000 Hannah Gutierrez, I guess, had said that.

01:31:52.000 Is that what you were saying?

01:31:53.000 That's what I interpolated from the article I was reading.

01:31:55.000 But remember too, remember we were talking about this before the show, it is known in the actor community that even a blank can kill somebody.

01:32:04.000 Don't let him in, don't let him in!

01:32:09.000 My nose is always itching when I'm in here.

01:32:15.000 It's known in the actor community, and Alec was an actor then, a young actor put a blank to his head and killed himself by accident thinking it was a blank and that it wasn't gonna kill him.

01:32:27.000 So it's known in Hollywood that blanks can be lethal.

01:32:30.000 That's John Eric Hexum.

01:32:32.000 Hexum.

01:32:33.000 And again, Alec Baldwin has decades of action movie experience.

01:32:37.000 There was already a witness who testified that they worked with Alec Baldwin and he knows not only standard gun protocol safety but on-set gun safety and he violated.

01:32:46.000 So Alec Baldwin For this accident to have occurred, slipped his mindstandard gun safety, slipped his mindstandard protocol, pulled the trigger on a gun in a scene that didn't call for it, was handed a gun by a guy who claims to have checked it but didn't, by a woman who accidentally put a live bullet in it and didn't check.

01:33:01.000 That's insane to assume all of those things are true.

01:33:03.000 They were apparently doing live target practice on downtime on set.

01:33:07.000 And then they're like, no, no, people are denying that they were doing it at all.

01:33:09.000 But they're like, dude, there's live ammo all over the set.

01:33:12.000 They were going out and shooting at cans between takes.

01:33:15.000 Yeesh.

01:33:16.000 I don't know.

01:33:16.000 We'll see.

01:33:17.000 I have a feeling nothing bad's gonna happen to all of the chain.

01:33:19.000 Did he say anything beforehand?

01:33:21.000 The shooter's gotta get charged, the production team has gotta get charged, the armorer and the assistant director all need to be charged in this.

01:33:27.000 I was reading legal analysis over basic questions and it seems like, based on the facts we have that have been released, whatever the claims are, involuntary manslaughter is...

01:33:38.000 The fact that it is standard safety protocol not to point a weapon at someone and pull the trigger, the fact that he didn't check when he had the opportunity to do so, means someone died at his hand.

01:33:48.000 It was an accident, but he's responsible. 0.74

01:33:50.000 I'm waiting for all the articles to come out to say Alec Baldwin is a white supremacist who's obviously leaning on his white privilege for having killed this person. 0.91

01:33:50.000 Involuntary manslaughter. 0.91

01:33:58.000 A woman! 0.97

01:33:58.000 Who was probably a person, she was a woman, so she was definitely a person of color. 0.97

01:34:02.000 Well, no, she was Ukrainian.

01:34:03.000 Absolutely.

01:34:03.000 She was.

01:34:04.000 As we know, the Coalition for Communities of Color have said Slavic people are people of color.

01:34:08.000 That's right. 0.90

01:34:09.000 So Alec Baldwin killed a colored person. 0.99

01:34:11.000 Yeah, there you go. 0.99

01:34:12.000 Person of color, that's... Sorry. 0.99

01:34:13.000 Oh, you can't say colored person.

01:34:14.000 No, no, no.

01:34:15.000 My bad.

01:34:16.000 It is person of color.

01:34:17.000 Sorry.

01:34:18.000 All right, all right.

01:34:18.000 Let's do Super Chats.

01:34:19.000 If you haven't already, smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, and go to TimCast.com.

01:34:24.000 Become a member.

01:34:25.000 We're going to have a members-only segment coming up later tonight.

01:34:27.000 But let's read what y'all have to say in the Super Chats.

01:34:30.000 Kevin Robson says, don't get brazen with me!

01:34:34.000 That's right.

01:34:35.000 Yes.

01:34:36.000 Someone took the meme, you know, the 4chan meme where it's like, if only you knew how bad things really are.

01:34:40.000 They took that and changed bad to brazen and put it over the judge.

01:34:43.000 And it said, if only you knew how brazen things really are.

01:34:46.000 I thought that was really good.

01:34:47.000 Yeah.

01:34:48.000 A lot of people are making snarky comments about what happened in Kenosha, which I can't read.

01:34:55.000 Tucker Carlson had a really snarky one that's going viral right now.

01:34:59.000 Oh, so good.

01:35:00.000 You can't read it?

01:35:00.000 What is it?

01:35:01.000 I don't know.

01:35:02.000 It's spicy.

01:35:03.000 Read it after.

01:35:04.000 It hits hard.

01:35:04.000 It's so good.

01:35:05.000 It's amazing.

01:35:06.000 Alright, well, maybe in the bonus, in the after show.

01:35:09.000 Oh my gosh.

01:35:10.000 All right, Mick G says, Hey Tim, can you give more insight on the Fact Checker nonprofit?

01:35:14.000 What's needed for the position?

01:35:16.000 I deal with language and social media.

01:35:18.000 Will you have a meet and greet in Austin?

01:35:19.000 I'm just down the road.

01:35:20.000 Uh, we didn't really plan to do an event in Austin, but our plan is once a month we'll, we're going to have the mobile studio in different cities for different events.

01:35:28.000 And then Friday night we'll do a live venue performance or show.

01:35:32.000 So basically we'll set up a studio on a stage somewhere and then do Timcast IRL Friday night with a live audience.

01:35:39.000 Nice.

01:35:40.000 Yeah, it's going to be fun.

01:35:41.000 So that's the goal.

01:35:41.000 We're not doing it for Austin.

01:35:43.000 But as for the non-profit, one of the big challenges with forming a non-profit is that we did it at the end of the year, which means that we're still awaiting approval from the IRS for tax-exempt status.

01:35:53.000 The entities exist.

01:35:55.000 We have the Truth in Media Foundation, and we have the ON Foundation, which is technology.

01:36:03.000 I've talked to some potential donors who want to help fund the nonprofits and their mission, but they're like, if I donate now, it's not tax deductible until next month.

01:36:12.000 So we basically have to wait about a month and a half.

01:36:14.000 January 1st, we can then take donations, start hiring, and things like that.

01:36:18.000 So that's probably when things will kick off.

01:36:20.000 As for the job, it is required that you know how to do research.

01:36:24.000 And we're probably going to have, I think, three people start at the nonprofit.

01:36:27.000 The goal is to issue ratings on news organizations and also issue general fact checks.

01:36:32.000 So we'll have a consistent, like, here's fact checks.

01:36:35.000 We're going to apply through Pointer for Facebook status and all that stuff like normal.

01:36:39.000 And we're going to fact check anybody.

01:36:40.000 We'll fact check Snopes.

01:36:41.000 Yes.

01:36:41.000 What we're going to do is something unique that people don't do.

01:36:44.000 It's called frame checking.

01:36:45.000 Did this organization omit key context in their fact check or their news assessment?

01:36:50.000 CNN, for instance, in their story about Kyle Rittenhouse, would get a strike saying, falsely framed.

01:36:55.000 In the full testimony, here's what was said.

01:36:58.000 CNN has created a false frame, yadda yadda yadda.

01:37:01.000 What are you going to do when the nonprofit you start to turn on you, like the Intercept did on Glenn?

01:37:06.000 Don't manifest that.

01:37:07.000 It's only going to be like three employees though.

01:37:09.000 And it's simple.

01:37:10.000 I'll fire them.

01:37:13.000 The thing about the Intercept was that Glenn got investment and didn't have full control over the company.

01:37:18.000 So when they went off the rails, he was like, I guess I have no choice but to quit.

01:37:22.000 Gotcha.

01:37:22.000 For this, it's gonna be, like, three people, and if someone starts violating journalistic ethics, we'll just be like, you aren't violating journalistic ethics.

01:37:30.000 You're fired.

01:37:31.000 Gotcha.

01:37:31.000 Yeah.

01:37:32.000 So we'll see.

01:37:32.000 You know, we'll see how things go.

01:37:34.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

01:37:35.000 says, happy Marine Corps birthday to all my fellow brother and sister devildogs out there. 0.97

01:37:39.000 May we all find the clearing at the end of the path.

01:37:42.000 Semper Fi.

01:37:42.000 Right on.

01:37:45.000 Oh, this is good.

01:37:46.000 Bandana Companion says, hey, Tim, did you know that YouTube is taking out the dislike counter on videos?

01:37:50.000 Yes.

01:37:51.000 And it's obviously just for Joe Biden.

01:37:53.000 And Dr. Fauci, whose documentary had, I think, 128,000 dislikes.

01:37:59.000 Here's what's going to happen.

01:38:01.000 All that's going to happen is people are going to be like, this video has a million views and only 10 likes.

01:38:06.000 Which clearly means it's ratioed.

01:38:09.000 They're not doing anything by getting rid of the dislike button. 1.00

01:38:11.000 This is stupid. 0.99

01:38:12.000 And it clearly only impacts Biden and Fauci. 1.00

01:38:16.000 And major corporations that try to shill on major bullcrap by being disingenuous.

01:38:22.000 But are they going to disable its impact on the algorithm, though?

01:38:26.000 That's the question.

01:38:26.000 No, it's still going to be there.

01:38:28.000 I think you can still see it in the back end.

01:38:30.000 So on your videos you can see it.

01:38:31.000 But this is so pointless.

01:38:32.000 Creators could disable that feature if they want to disable it.

01:38:36.000 So this whole ruse that it's for people's protection is nonsense.

01:38:39.000 Can you disable just one of the like, just the down like?

01:38:42.000 I think it's the like and the dislike all together you could totally get rid of.

01:38:46.000 Here's a, we have a really important super chat, but I can't read Cyrillic, so I'm going to pretend that the Cyrillic is English, and it says, E-B-R-E-M, E-B-R-E-N, backwards N, backwards N, A-N-I-C, C-A-H-A, P-O-B.

01:39:02.000 I can't read Cyrillic, whatever.

01:39:03.000 They said, about pinch-to-zoom, even simple linear interpolation can create false details in an image, but Apple doesn't use simple interpolation.

01:39:12.000 They've got machine learning support in hardware in 2017, see Apple Neural Engine, and it can do weird things, just Google Obama depixel.

01:39:21.000 There are people posting images of how zooming in on like iPhones or whatever can make your image warp and look really weird.

01:39:28.000 So the defense in the Rittenhouse case said, The prosecutor tried to bring in evidence by zooming in on an iPad and he says, no, no, no, no, they use, he said, AI 3D logarithms, which I should not have made fun of the boomer guy for not understanding what he was talking about.

01:39:45.000 But he pointed that out.

01:39:47.000 And then the judge, I think, agreed and said, bring in an expert to prove that's not happening and I'll allow it.

01:39:52.000 And they were like, how are we supposed to do that?

01:39:53.000 And the judge was like, you can't admit evidence unless you can prove it's like real evidence.

01:39:59.000 The Raketa Law crew, when they were streaming, said the fact that they would try and zoom in in real time instead of zooming in first, then giving it to a forensic expert, and then admitting it as evidence is absurd.

01:40:13.000 That's what they should do.

01:40:15.000 You shouldn't zoom in during court.

01:40:17.000 You should take it home, zoom in, print it, submit it for evidence to be approved, and then have the zoomed-in image.

01:40:23.000 Right.

01:40:24.000 You keep handing him the phone and it's locked.

01:40:25.000 And he's like, I gotta redo my passcode.

01:40:28.000 A lot of people saying happy birthday to the Marines.

01:40:30.000 So I'll just shut that out.

01:40:33.000 Alex Barturin asks about yesterday's IRL episode.

01:40:36.000 I will simply say if an episode does not appear on YouTube, it will be on Rumble.

01:40:40.000 Yeah.

01:40:41.000 So there's there's, you know, obvious reasons that happens.

01:40:44.000 But sometimes, you know, we've got to put stuff up on Rumble.

01:40:47.000 That's right.

01:40:48.000 Strangely, a lot of our biggest podcast ever was Darren Beattie.

01:40:52.000 And it was one that we put on Rumble.

01:40:53.000 It got millions of views.

01:40:55.000 I think it's also, there's an opportunity there because Rumble is a core audience.

01:41:00.000 It's very active individuals.

01:41:02.000 So if there's a prominent podcast, everyone on Rumble will watch it.

01:41:06.000 So there's benefits to when we put it up on Rumble.

01:41:09.000 Revolver drives big traffic, too.

01:41:11.000 Definitely.

01:41:11.000 Yeah.

01:41:12.000 Right.

01:41:12.000 So when he's posting the video, too, we definitely get traffic.

01:41:17.000 Trey Marx says Drew Hernandez is apparently one of the next people testifying, so there's another eyewitness account of the attacks on Kyle.

01:41:26.000 And I will just say, I won't get into too many details, but Drew Hernandez is a strong-minded individual.

01:41:33.000 He's gonna have a clear memory, he's gonna know the details, and he's gonna be confident in his assessment.

01:41:38.000 It'll take no nonsense.

01:41:40.000 No nonsense.

01:41:40.000 So when the prosecution tries to play manipulative games, I don't think that'll work on someone like Drew Hernandez who's going to be of sound mind and mental fortitude to explain, here's what I saw, here's what happened.

01:41:50.000 And then when they try and say, but don't you think?

01:41:51.000 No, here's what I saw, here's what happened.

01:41:53.000 But isn't it possible?

01:41:54.000 No.

01:41:55.000 Here's what I saw here.

01:41:56.000 Like Richie McGinnis did.

01:41:57.000 That was awesome.

01:41:58.000 Yeah.

01:41:58.000 When he was like, everything you're saying is guesswork.

01:42:01.000 And then Richie goes, well, he said F you and then reach for the gun.

01:42:04.000 That was amazing.

01:42:06.000 Like I, it's not about whether, um, Kyle's right or wrong.

01:42:09.000 It's about, you know, in this instance, I'm referring to journalists who know what they saw, know what they have to say and will not be manipulated by prosecutors or defense.

01:42:18.000 You know, I was just listening to the interview I did with Richie and BG on the scene about all this.

01:42:24.000 I did it with them earlier this summer and or gosh last year.

01:42:28.000 I can't remember now and he he said very clearly that he couldn't he wasn't going to give any opinions as to motive when he was talking to me and that he was going to be a witness in the case and that all he was there to do was to give testimony as to what happened factually.

01:42:43.000 And Richie has held true to that from then all the way through, all the way up until that moment right there on the stand.

01:42:49.000 So kudos to you, Richie McGinnis, man.

01:42:51.000 Awesome.

01:42:52.000 I posted a funny video.

01:42:53.000 People were saying it was a flex, but I thought it was, I was, you know, poking fun at YouTube.

01:42:57.000 So I guess Crowder shot up his gold plaque or whatever.

01:43:01.000 Is that what he did?

01:43:02.000 Did he do that?

01:43:03.000 Yeah, he did.

01:43:03.000 We were just talking about that.

01:43:05.000 So I put up a video.

01:43:08.000 I put up a video where the window over there would not stay open.

01:43:12.000 Right.

01:43:13.000 And I legit was like trying to open the window to get some circulation because we're getting work done in the AC unit.

01:43:18.000 The ventilation was shut off and it wouldn't stay open.

01:43:20.000 And I looked over and I saw I have a golden play button.

01:43:23.000 You know, you get when you get a million subscribers.

01:43:25.000 And so the point is I was disrespecting it.

01:43:28.000 Not that I was flexing, that I'm disrespecting YouTube.

01:43:30.000 So I was like, oh, here we go.

01:43:32.000 And I just prop it in the window to keep the window open.

01:43:34.000 Utility.

01:43:35.000 I thought that was the... Some people were like, look at that, he's flexing, like he's got this goal.

01:43:40.000 No, no, no, no, no.

01:43:40.000 I'm disrespecting it.

01:43:41.000 It's in the window.

01:43:42.000 It's being used as a window prop.

01:43:44.000 It's a great prop.

01:43:45.000 It's perfect.

01:43:47.000 I mean, we have one on the wall or whatever.

01:43:49.000 Well, because there's more than one, Tim.

01:43:51.000 There's four.

01:43:54.000 There are four of them.

01:43:55.000 Actually, we have like eight, I think.

01:43:57.000 I won't put it on the wall till we get to 2 million subscribers.

01:44:00.000 So subscribe.

01:44:01.000 Yeah, Ian is a man of principle.

01:44:02.000 He said it's not fair that he would get this because he joined the show and we had like, what, 300?

01:44:07.000 I don't know.

01:44:07.000 No, I think we had like four.

01:44:09.000 It was later.

01:44:10.000 It was like above 500k.

01:44:12.000 I thought we'd have to check the tape.

01:44:14.000 Whenever we hit a milestone, I get everybody on the show.

01:44:18.000 How many subs do you think you had in February when I came on First Guest? 1.00

01:44:21.000 The First Guest?

01:44:24.000 Oh dude, we had like 180.

01:44:25.000 Like 100,000.

01:44:27.000 Because the channel already had 70 as soon as we started.

01:44:30.000 Because I was tweeting it.

01:44:32.000 I was posting it on YouTube because I had other videos on it.

01:44:35.000 And then within like a month, we had like 100.

01:44:36.000 It was just you and me that day.

01:44:38.000 It's just you and me.

01:44:40.000 So the show has evolved.

01:44:41.000 Now Luke's here.

01:44:42.000 It really picked up steam in August to November of 2020.

01:44:45.000 It got hot in those four months.

01:44:46.000 September was a massive increase.

01:44:48.000 October to November was the biggest.

01:44:49.000 It got hot in those like four months.

01:44:51.000 It was September was a massive increase.

01:44:54.000 October was huge and then November was, October to November was the biggest.

01:44:57.000 I was here even for the millionth subscriber episode as well.

01:45:01.000 We were getting like 150,000 concurrence during the election.

01:45:04.000 I mean, it was crazy.

01:45:05.000 I remember.

01:45:06.000 The party we had.

01:45:07.000 Everybody appreciate you watching, man.

01:45:09.000 Was it the New Year's Eve party or did we have the election party?

01:45:12.000 That was incredible.

01:45:13.000 We should do that again.

01:45:14.000 That was really fun.

01:45:15.000 During the midterms, we should.

01:45:16.000 Yes, we should do that.

01:45:17.000 What we did during the election day was we had so many people here and people would just come in and take a seat.

01:45:23.000 Seamus was running things for a hot minute.

01:45:25.000 That's right.

01:45:26.000 Shim cast. 0.96

01:45:26.000 He took the steering wheel. 0.96

01:45:28.000 Didn't let go either.

01:45:30.000 I gotta read this one.

01:45:30.000 It's good.

01:45:31.000 S. Snork says, Been watching for so long.

01:45:34.000 I miss the old stream starting Jif.

01:45:36.000 I finally got to donate.

01:45:38.000 I also got a Step On Snack shirt, which I can't wait to get.

01:45:41.000 As a gay furry, I feel very isolated in my political views.

01:45:44.000 This is a great place to relax and feel sane. 0.51

01:45:47.000 LOL.

01:45:48.000 I want to read that because I don't care who you are, what you believe, how you want to live, whatever.

01:45:48.000 And you know what?

01:45:53.000 We're trying to just be honest in our assessment and not be...

01:45:58.000 Not judge people who want to live the way they want to live.

01:46:00.000 I mean, that's why I think it's crazy that they say that we're conservative and I think it's a political tactic because we're actually fairly progressive on social issues.

01:46:08.000 We are just not as far left as they are.

01:46:10.000 Not everybody, I know Lydia's conservative. 0.99

01:46:11.000 Yeah, I'm definitely not.

01:46:13.000 But this is like a mixed bag of, I mean like, you know, one of the things you pointed out is that one of the things that allowed you to become, to vote Republican was that Republicans opened up to gay marriage.

01:46:23.000 That's right.

01:46:24.000 So that's, you know, in a traditional sense for this country, that's actually kind of progressive.

01:46:30.000 On social issues.

01:46:30.000 Yeah.

01:46:31.000 So we're not staunch conservatives in that regard.

01:46:33.000 Of course.

01:46:34.000 We're mostly libertarian.

01:46:35.000 Of course that would be the issue that got Jack.

01:46:37.000 I don't, I don't understand your insinuation.

01:46:40.000 I mean, no, it's great.

01:46:41.000 That's awesome.

01:46:42.000 Because Jack believes in liberty and individuals' right to choose and live the lives they want to live.

01:46:47.000 I'm just saying, great job.

01:46:48.000 I can't wait for the special that we do where me and Luke box.

01:46:51.000 I got boxing gloves, I got pads, I've been shadowboxing a little bit.

01:46:54.000 How about for February, we could do a charity match.

01:46:56.000 I got, I got, I got a box of gloves.

01:47:00.000 I got pads.

01:47:01.000 I've been shadowbacked a little bit for February.

01:47:03.000 We can do a charity match.

01:47:06.000 Winner winner's charity gets the whole prize.

01:47:10.000 In January, in January, we're probably going to Nashville.

01:47:13.000 In March, we're probably going to Florida.

01:47:14.000 But in February, we don't got any plans.

01:47:15.000 How about we take the trailer out to, like, Freedomistan and set up a boxing arena?

01:47:22.000 But if you lose, you gotta get a tattoo that says, I love Luke Grodowski on yourself, somewhere on your body.

01:47:27.000 I would take that bet because I don't think you're gonna lose.

01:47:32.000 There should be some odds for sure.

01:47:32.000 Take that bet!

01:47:35.000 We're not in the same weight limit, first of all, but that doesn't stop me.

01:47:39.000 I don't know, it looks pretty close.

01:47:40.000 I'm just big boned.

01:47:41.000 Let's read some more Super Chats. 0.91

01:47:47.000 All right, Kevin Brady says two things.

01:47:49.000 Watched the trial and the coverage of this is gross, and I don't see anything getting better.

01:47:53.000 I sent you an email regarding a cult documentary for up here in Washington State.

01:47:57.000 I'm a filmmaker.

01:47:57.000 Oh, interesting.

01:47:59.000 Well, I will look for it.

01:48:01.000 It's very refreshing to talk about the case here and to know that there's so many thousands of people listening, because actually this is good.

01:48:08.000 We want to give more than MSNBC.

01:48:10.000 Yeah, like legitimate coverage to this court case, I think.

01:48:14.000 It's, it's remarkable to me.

01:48:17.000 You know, I see the news about MSNBC losing Brian Williams, they're bleeding talents.

01:48:21.000 You know, Brian's out there is going like, wow, what's happening?

01:48:23.000 And I'm just like, maybe regular people can only be lied to so many times.

01:48:27.000 That's true.

01:48:28.000 I think what's happening with the moms who are being called racist, they're probably sitting around their dining room table also being like, I'm hoping, uh, man, you know, they're calling me racist.

01:48:39.000 I want, I wonder if all those other people they've been calling racist aren't actually racist, too.

01:48:44.000 Someone tweeted a good point.

01:48:45.000 I don't remember who it was, but maybe it was you.

01:48:47.000 I don't know.

01:48:48.000 They said, it's going to be a major red pill when people who have been following the Rittenhouse trial see how the news covered it.

01:48:54.000 Maybe it was Ian Milestrong.

01:48:55.000 But there's probably a lot of regular people who see the see, you know, there have been a few channels that have

01:49:00.000 been playing it like ABC 7 Chicago is gonna live stream on YouTube. There's probably a lot of people who are

01:49:04.000 interested, and they're watching the trial. I mean, it is it is interesting for a lot of people to understand what's

01:49:10.000 going on. And then they read CNN and go, what? I don't know.

01:49:15.000 I was talking to Steve Hilton last night on the way down here and I was like, you know, most of the people who change their mind about Trump did so because they watched one of his speeches.

01:49:22.000 Not commentary about his speech, just one of his speeches.

01:49:25.000 So watching this trial, I think is going to be like a red pill dispensary as well.

01:49:29.000 Be great.

01:49:30.000 Luke's over there laughing.

01:49:31.000 You reading the comments, dude?

01:49:35.000 I think there was a really great comment by Cassandra Fairbanks.

01:49:39.000 She tweeted that at first she thought it was a really bad idea for them to put Kyle Rittenhouse on the stand.

01:49:44.000 But then she saw him breaking down and she thought to herself, you know, something like, get this baby off the stand as a mother, like, watching him be attacked and he's this young guy.

01:49:54.000 So maybe that's what their goal was, really.

01:49:57.000 The reason, uh, people were criticizing the defense for not objecting to the badgering from the prosecution.

01:50:03.000 But I think maybe the goal was we get him to testify and he does a good job, but he also breaks down and he shows his humility and his fear and remorse and panic.

01:50:12.000 But the guys on the other side, they all took that as him being, uh, you know, just afraid that he's going to jail because he's admitting, you know, being on the stand and it's becoming clear that he committed murder.

01:50:22.000 But I want to just point out one thing.

01:50:24.000 Real quick, my point here is not that they're going to convince the left.

01:50:28.000 It's that the jury, who supposedly has limited information on this, what are they going to see?

01:50:33.000 A guy crying.

01:50:34.000 Not necessarily perfect, because he may be crying because he might go to jail, right?

01:50:38.000 Like you said.

01:50:39.000 However, the prosecution then badgers him.

01:50:41.000 And so the jury sees an annoying prosecution that's wasting their time by asking the same question a million times, and they see a defense compassionately speaking with a defendant who's traumatized.

01:50:52.000 Yeah.

01:50:53.000 Joe Kent, the congressional candidate from Washington state, he had a really nice tweet today where he said that as a guy who's been in combat, him and his wife who was killed in combat, he said that everyone reacts differently to remembering instances in which you were forced to kill somebody or experiencing this kind of trauma.

01:51:14.000 And I was just really pleased to see Joe put out such an empathetic leadership to kind of tweet like that, saying that like emotions and trauma and people react to that in different ways.

01:51:26.000 And we should respect the way that Kyle is reacting to that, because irrespective of his motive, killing somebody is got to be horrible.

01:51:34.000 And we should also give that to Alec Baldwin. 1.00

01:51:37.000 Yeah, but he's an ass. 1.00

01:51:41.000 No, I agree. 1.00

01:51:41.000 I completely, 100% agree. 1.00

01:51:43.000 My thing about Alec Baldwin is just, we should be- Wait, but have we seen him break down and cry in remorse?

01:51:49.000 That was the first image from LA Times, is him crying on the phone.

01:51:51.000 I don't know if he was crying, but he's like distraught, very much so.

01:51:55.000 What I'm trying to say is, I approached the Rittenhouse case by talking to the witnesses.

01:52:00.000 First, I watched the video.

01:52:02.000 We bring the witnesses in, and we try to the best of our ability to know the facts.

01:52:05.000 What I'm saying with Alec Baldwin is we must do the same thing.

01:52:09.000 And if the initial reports of a blank, misfiring, and shrapnel hitting a person are not true, we need to erase from our minds our prejudice, assuming there was an accident, and start with the core facts, and then work our way back from how it happened.

01:52:24.000 I'm not saying he's guilty.

01:52:25.000 I'm not saying there's proof that he did anything wrong.

01:52:27.000 I'm saying just that it's absurd for us to assume it was an accident.

01:52:31.000 We don't have any reason to believe that.

01:52:34.000 We just have a story about a guy who pulled out a gun and shot somebody.

01:52:36.000 We should honor the victim by being open to what the facts and the court says.

01:52:41.000 But the DA says they know who put the bullet in there.

01:52:46.000 That makes me feel like it was not Alec Baldwin.

01:52:49.000 Has Alec been arrested?

01:52:51.000 No, but he was instructed not to talk about it by the police, he said.

01:52:54.000 Well, if they know who put the bullet in there and Alec Baldwin hasn't been arrested, can you make the connection that it's not him?

01:53:00.000 No, because he's high profile and famous and they know it would cause a very big uproar.

01:53:05.000 And in fact, if they knew who put the bullet in there and it was a crew member, the crew member would be arrested instantly.

01:53:11.000 In fact, I would argue that no crew member has been arrested when the DA says they know who did it, suggests it was Alec Baldwin.

01:53:17.000 Interesting.

01:53:18.000 Yeah.

01:53:19.000 That's why I'm saying, like, we shouldn't make assumptions about the case.

01:53:23.000 There are assumptions there as well, which is I try to make the least amount.

01:53:26.000 And we all were influenced by the initial stories.

01:53:29.000 That's why we're even having this conversation.

01:53:31.000 So just be ever vigilant.

01:53:34.000 Yeah, man.

01:53:35.000 All right, Trash Panda says, this trial proves to me that we need a national divorce. 0.90

01:53:39.000 We cannot peacefully exist next to people like Bicep Guy or the prosecutor.

01:53:43.000 National divorce now before it's too late. 1.00

01:53:45.000 It's a scary prospect, but I understand why more and more people keep saying it, and it's not a right-wing thing.

01:53:52.000 John Podesta, Boston Globe, reported this, that he said the West Coast should secede from the Union if Trump wins the election.

01:53:57.000 Podesta's a global hack.

01:54:00.000 He's like the military-industrial complex in a suit.

01:54:02.000 Absolutely.

01:54:03.000 But he works on the Clinton campaign.

01:54:05.000 He worked on the Clinton campaign.

01:54:06.000 He's a high-profile Democratic operative.

01:54:09.000 My point is only to say that there are Democratic establishment actors who are calling for the dissolution of the United States.

01:54:15.000 Yeah.

01:54:15.000 CCP's doing that too.

01:54:17.000 Absolutely.

01:54:17.000 And that's why I think it's a bad idea.

01:54:20.000 I say it's a bad idea on the global scale.

01:54:24.000 I do think there's a problem when you have leftists who don't care about the truth and want suffering.

01:54:31.000 They can say whatever they want all day and night about Q people being dumb, but when they're like, I want someone to go to prison for the sake of me feeling good as a winner, I'm like, yo, that's evil. 1.00

01:54:40.000 It's this balance of like having a free society that gives freedom to people that would do the society harm.

01:54:46.000 And so then they become more authoritarian to protect society from those people and then start protecting it from other people that maybe aren't dangerous.

01:54:54.000 I think dividing it might be the way to cause least amount of harm.

01:54:57.000 If you want harm reduction, you got to have some kind of civil divorce.

01:55:00.000 Mutual defense pact, sure.

01:55:00.000 Yeah.

01:55:02.000 But I mean, I was talking about it for years.

01:55:05.000 It's needed.

01:55:06.000 Right.

01:55:06.000 Let's read some more.

01:55:07.000 We got John Hutto says, I think a big factor is, as we mentioned, The Young Turks, CNN, MSNBC.

01:55:10.000 You know Tucker Carlson used to be on MSNBC?

01:55:13.000 It was a botox.

01:55:13.000 Crossfire, right?

01:55:14.000 No, no, no, no.

01:55:14.000 hour old stories. Their subs left the platform for Reddit and Twitter in 2012. How much money

01:55:19.000 have they blown on staff and studio? I think a big a big factor is, as we mentioned, the

01:55:25.000 Young Turks, CNN, MSNBC, you know, you know, Tucker Carlson used to be on MSNBC. It was

01:55:30.000 a crossfire, right? No, no, no, no. It was his eponymous show. I don't know if it was

01:55:35.000 eponymous, but he was a host on MSNBC.

01:55:38.000 No, but he hosted a Crossfire type show.

01:55:38.000 Yeah.

01:55:40.000 It was great.

01:55:41.000 He was one of the main guys on, I think it was CNN's Crossfire show.

01:55:41.000 He did.

01:55:44.000 Oh, right, right, right.

01:55:45.000 But he was also, he had a show on MSNBC.

01:55:47.000 He got fired.

01:55:48.000 Here's what I think happened to the Young Turks. 0.99

01:55:49.000 Why is it that they have 5 million subs, but they're only getting 40,000 views on their videos?

01:55:54.000 The subs are from a long time ago.

01:55:56.000 People subscribed to the Young Turks, and then over time as the Young Turks drifted further and further left, many of these people said, I don't care to watch that video anymore.

01:56:05.000 Not intentionally.

01:56:06.000 Not like, I hate the Young Turks.

01:56:08.000 But very simply.

01:56:09.000 If Cenk Uygur puts up a video saying, War Bad.

01:56:13.000 You know, Establishment Bad.

01:56:14.000 Someone clicks that.

01:56:15.000 I like this video.

01:56:16.000 Over time, they start putting up more videos saying, Establishment Good.

01:56:19.000 People will say, I'm not gonna click that video.

01:56:21.000 They get less views.

01:56:22.000 But those people already subscribed to the channel.

01:56:25.000 So you look at like a Crowder, for instance, and he's got, I think 5 million, but he gets like a million, which makes sense, right?

01:56:32.000 And then we get, we get like 80 to a hundred K on clips from this show with a million subs.

01:56:36.000 The Young Turks have five times the subs, but you know, a third of the viewership.

01:56:41.000 I think that's simply because they've been around for a long time and they've churned a large portion of their audience.

01:56:46.000 And I'm not saying it to be disrespectful.

01:56:47.000 I just think over time, the rest of it's been disrespectful.

01:56:50.000 Forget that.

01:56:50.000 I think I subscribed to them in 2007.

01:56:52.000 You're probably still subscribed.

01:56:54.000 I'm checking now.

01:56:55.000 It's slow internet.

01:56:56.000 Not only that, but YouTube props them up.

01:56:58.000 Oh yeah, they do.

01:56:59.000 Very much.

01:57:00.000 Alright, let's see what we got.

01:57:03.000 Johnny Knoxville says Ayanna Pressley got 100,000 retweets calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist.

01:57:10.000 Defamation.

01:57:11.000 White supremacist is an opinion and not an actionable statement, unfortunately.

01:57:15.000 If she said that he went to a white supremacist rally, then... Well, maybe.

01:57:21.000 Because she could argue that a rally of right-wingers is white supremacist.

01:57:25.000 That's her opinion.

01:57:26.000 If she said it was like a Klan rally, something proper and specific, then you could be like, I never did that.

01:57:32.000 So that Biden tweet where he shows Kyle, or is that doctored?

01:57:36.000 I don't know about that, but let me clarify.

01:57:38.000 When I was saying if they said he went to a white supremacist rally and he never went to a rally, then it's libelous because he didn't take an action.

01:57:47.000 If you went to a Trump rally and she said white supremacist rally, it's not actionable because it's her opinion.

01:57:52.000 Nazi is in fact an opinion as well.

01:57:55.000 Like if you, I've talked to a bunch of lawyers about this and they're like, everybody knows the word is rather

01:57:59.000 meaningless.

01:58:00.000 Everyone calls everybody a Nazi or a fascist, so it's not actionable.

01:58:04.000 So you could, but today, but like say five, six, eight years ago, it had much different impact.

01:58:10.000 If they say, if someone said like person X is a card carrying member of the Nazi party, then you could be like, that's defamatory and not true.

01:58:18.000 The problem then is you still need damages.

01:58:21.000 So it is not easy.

01:58:23.000 Not, not, not easy.

01:58:25.000 All right.

01:58:25.000 Let's grab some more super chats.

01:58:26.000 What do we got?

01:58:28.000 James Weeks says, I agree with the judge.

01:58:30.000 Better ten guilty men go free than one innocent be punished.

01:58:33.000 ADA, Binger, and the mainstream media are the guilty ones walking free.

01:58:38.000 That's right. 0.99

01:58:39.000 They are bad, bad people. 0.99

01:58:41.000 The prosecutor is a bad dude.

01:58:43.000 You know, I just... Cernovich tweeted out, this guy knew he's gotten away with this in the past, and he wasn't ready for a real judge.

01:58:55.000 You look at what this guy does, and it is just outright disdain and disrespect for our values, for our system.

01:59:01.000 And this is what I was saying before.

01:59:02.000 The problem is, this guy violates the Constitution.

01:59:07.000 Overtly.

01:59:08.000 And the judge says, but I want to preserve this legal system. 0.92

01:59:12.000 And I'm like, then you allow the liars, cheaters, deceivers, the stealers to keep destroying the system.

01:59:18.000 I think a justified mistrial would be something society would be very good for society in modern day.

01:59:27.000 I don't normally read crypto posts, but this one I must.

01:59:31.000 Jackson H says, while the rest of the crypto market is tanking, the FJB token just pumped over 300% today, and the founder donated another 10K to military charities.

01:59:41.000 Wow.

01:59:41.000 Don't miss out on the ride.

01:59:42.000 Tim Jack, I know you want to.

01:59:44.000 Let's go, Brandon.

01:59:46.000 I'm not going to buy FJB token, but I just think it's hilarious.

01:59:49.000 300%?

01:59:49.000 I tried to buy it last night.

01:59:50.000 That's what they're saying.

01:59:51.000 It's tanking.

01:59:52.000 Bitcoin down 3%, Ethereum down 2%.

01:59:55.000 Yeah, no.

01:59:55.000 Crypto's been through the roof.

01:59:56.000 It's insane.

01:59:57.000 Yeah.

01:59:58.000 What's the guy talking about?

01:59:59.000 Tanking.

02:00:00.000 I think he's making a joke.

02:00:01.000 Oh, I see.

02:00:02.000 The FJB token.

02:00:02.000 Because as soon as he said that, I pulled out my phone.

02:00:04.000 I was like, wait, really?

02:00:05.000 What's going on?

02:00:06.000 Time to buy.

02:00:07.000 There's a Let's Go Brandon token and FJB token because making tokens takes five minutes.

02:00:11.000 Gotcha.

02:00:12.000 But I'll tell you this.

02:00:14.000 I don't care for useless tokens where they just try and sell them.

02:00:18.000 But if someone said they were making a token with the express purpose of fundraising for a charity, meaning you buy the tokens and the proceeds from the organization that released them uses that to fund, you know, military charities like they did.

02:00:30.000 Well, that's fantastic.

02:00:33.000 Basically, that just means buying the token as a donation.

02:00:35.000 Some people are trying to speculate, maybe get rich off of it, but it means that the core organization can be helping out.

02:00:40.000 I like the idea.

02:00:41.000 I don't know if that counts as a security.

02:00:42.000 I don't think so.

02:00:44.000 All right, Trinanana Shabba Da Pressure, Bata Calf Care says, please get Rikada on Timcast and teach him how to say my name.

02:00:50.000 Why?

02:00:50.000 Because he can't say Trinanana.

02:00:52.000 I'll go slow.

02:00:53.000 Trinanana Shabba Da Pressure, Bata Calf Care.

02:00:58.000 Very simple.

02:00:58.000 I sat there listening to it on loop and transcribing it.

02:01:02.000 I slowed it down.

02:01:03.000 Pitch shifted it.

02:01:05.000 I don't even speak proper English, so I'm impressed.

02:01:07.000 That's great.

02:01:08.000 And then I wrote it out profound. Yeah. Yeah, because people were saying true and a little bishop her pressure or

02:01:13.000 something like that And I was like you guys didn't even try man reads without

02:01:16.000 comment I don't even speak proper English. I'm impressed. That's

02:01:21.000 great All right. Let's see

02:01:25.000 Rompott Mechanical says Tim, can you look at the Evergrande?

02:01:30.000 The second largest real estate developer in China defaulted on its bonds today in the amount of $148 million.

02:01:35.000 I heard this.

02:01:36.000 I've been tracking it passively.

02:01:38.000 The story about Evergrande, this could precipitate a major collapse in the global markets.

02:01:43.000 China's phony real estate. 0.99

02:01:46.000 Yeah, man.

02:01:47.000 We'll see.

02:01:49.000 Everyone in finance markets have known that the Chinese debt industry and all that has been overblown for decades.

02:01:54.000 I worked at a private equity firm on a hedge fund in 98, 9, 2000, 2001.

02:02:00.000 And even then, every comment about China was all lie, all lie, all fabricated.

02:02:05.000 Nobody's trusted anything that's come out of there forever.

02:02:07.000 Why would you?

02:02:08.000 Which is why, why did we trust any of those videos that were coming out from Wuhan in November and December of people falling over and stories of like billions of cell phones being taken offline?

02:02:22.000 That was weird, right?

02:02:23.000 Yeah.

02:02:23.000 So like that was, you know, people believe that.

02:02:26.000 Yep.

02:02:26.000 And the nation bought that.

02:02:27.000 Bats peeing on people. 0.98

02:02:29.000 I mean, this is all Chinese, man. 0.89

02:02:31.000 Well, South Park really nailed the origin story on that one.

02:02:34.000 Let's get, uh, we'll do two more, two more quick ones.

02:02:36.000 We got Andrew Sutton.

02:02:37.000 He says, Alec Baldwin is a Top Gun actor.

02:02:40.000 So I suppose he was in Top Gun?

02:02:42.000 I don't know.

02:02:43.000 I'm not sure.

02:02:44.000 No.

02:02:44.000 I don't think so.

02:02:44.000 He wasn't?

02:02:44.000 That was wrong.

02:02:45.000 I don't think so.

02:02:45.000 And then Ogdabr says, the armorer was inexperienced and has made mistakes before.

02:02:51.000 She only had the job because her father was the lead prop master.

02:02:55.000 I did hear that.

02:02:55.000 Interesting point.

02:02:57.000 However, this means that the armorer made a mistake, handed it to another person who made a mistake, who handed it to another person who made a mistake, who then shot a woman.

02:03:05.000 I mean, that's just a big, that's many leaps.

02:03:08.000 You know what I mean?

02:03:08.000 So maybe, it's possible, sometimes people win the lottery.

02:03:12.000 You get the numbers, they line up and it's astronomical odds.

02:03:15.000 We went to the casino a couple of weeks ago.

02:03:16.000 You put, you know, 20 bucks on 26 and then, you know, we ended up winning a bunch of money because sometimes 26 comes up.

02:03:22.000 And if there's an ethos of people not taking precautions on the set, if that's the production company's method, then you're going to get five and six people not take precautions all at once.

02:03:32.000 That's possible.

02:03:32.000 Alright everybody, smash that like button if you haven't already done so, subscribe to this channel, take that URL, post it everywhere.

02:03:38.000 If every single person took the URL right now and just posted it on all their social media, we would be bigger than CNN overnight.

02:03:45.000 But I guess some people don't, and you don't have to, we just appreciate it if you did.

02:03:48.000 But go to TimCast.com and become a member.

02:03:50.000 We have a massive library.

02:03:51.000 You can search through all of the different guests we've had for these members-only segments, and we will have a members-only segment coming up, posted around 11 or so p.m.

02:03:59.000 You can follow the show at TimCastIRL.

02:04:01.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast.

02:04:03.000 Check out my Instagram.

02:04:04.000 Follow me there.

02:04:05.000 And Jack, you got anything to shout out?

02:04:06.000 I definitely do.

02:04:07.000 You can follow me on Twitter at Jack Murphy Live.

02:04:10.000 In fact, all over the internet, Instagram, everywhere, Jack Murphy Live.

02:04:14.000 Also check out jackbrunch.com.

02:04:16.000 We're coming to the San Francisco area in two weeks.

02:04:19.000 We were just in Austin, beautiful city.

02:04:21.000 We had about 90 people come out for brunch.

02:04:23.000 It was fantastic.

02:04:24.000 People leave feeling joyful and uplifted.

02:04:27.000 They make new friends, and it's just a really cool experience to be around 100 people that see the world the same way that you do, know the same media people, speak the same language, and are going to view events through a similar filter.

02:04:39.000 It's a lot of fun, and you guys should come down and check it out.

02:04:42.000 Right on.

02:04:43.000 Maybe one day.

02:04:44.000 If you're subscribed to LukeUncensored.com, don't forget to check out today's video.

02:04:49.000 I had a very interesting conversation about the occult, demonic forces, Satanism.

02:04:54.000 All of that is available on LukeUncensored.com.

02:04:57.000 Hope to see some of you guys there.

02:04:59.000 Thanks for having me.

02:05:00.000 Also ecstatic that you guys are back and happy to be here.

02:05:03.000 My name is Ian Crosland.

02:05:04.000 Check me out on social media if you'd like to and I'll see you later.

02:05:08.000 And I am Sour Patch Lids, and I do want to say that I do love my crayon eaters in the Marines, so happy birthday to the Marine Corps.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - November 11, 2021

Timcast IRL - Prosecutors Engage in GROSS Misconduct, Judge Threatens Mistrial w-Jack Murphy

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript