Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - SCOTUS DENIES GOP Lawsuit Over Mail in Voting, Is THIS The End?? w- Will Chamberlain

00:00:00.000 .

00:00:42.000 However, there is still a lawsuit coming from Texas.

00:00:47.000 Texas is suing four states, so maybe Maybe that's the one, right?

00:00:51.000 Everybody, Trump can still win somehow, I guess?

00:00:53.000 I don't know, a lot of people are mad because they're convinced, you know, no matter what, Trump is going to win somehow.

00:00:59.000 And admittedly, I will say, there's always some kind of open window, but the way I've described it is, you know, Trump is on track for some kind of victory, but the track's got loop-de-loops, there's like trees falling on it, so yeah, theoretically, if he makes it through all these obstacles, there is a way he becomes president again.

00:01:15.000 But it's looking—look, let's just be real, okay?

00:01:17.000 It's looking worse and worse with every one of these lawsuits.

00:01:19.000 But, far be it from me, I am no legal expert, and I can't tell you.

00:01:22.000 So I brought on a legal expert who recently got ratioed—one of the biggest ratios in Twitter history, I think.

00:01:29.000 Will Chamberlain.

00:01:30.000 What up?

00:01:30.000 Yes.

00:01:31.000 Who are you, Will?

00:01:32.000 I'm Will Chamberlain.

00:01:33.000 I'm the publisher of Human Events.

00:01:34.000 I'm a lawyer, and I serve as senior counsel to the Internet Accountability Project and the Article 3 Project.

00:01:40.000 Yeah, try and keep a little closer.

00:01:41.000 That way people can hear you.

00:01:42.000 Okay.

00:01:42.000 So, Will recently had a Twitter thread about... which case was it?

00:01:48.000 I've done a thread on a number of cases.

00:01:50.000 I did one on the Third Circuit case, which we're not talking about today.

00:01:52.000 The crazy ratio you got of... Oh, the crazy ratio I got was just because I was frustrated with people telling me I dared say Biden was the president-elect.

00:02:00.000 And they were like, you can't say that yet.

00:02:02.000 Trump has... it's not official.

00:02:04.000 Technically true, but please don't tell me what to say on my Twitter, so I was just mad.

00:02:11.000 We have to talk about what this means.

00:02:14.000 You're not a constitutional lawyer, you probably know better than anybody else in this room and many people on Twitter who are opining, so we'll talk about that.

00:02:21.000 Because we do have the Texas lawsuit, and a lot of people are super excited.

00:02:24.000 This is it.

00:02:25.000 Texas!

00:02:26.000 They're suing.

00:02:27.000 That's it, right?

00:02:28.000 It's more hopeful than many other challenges that have been brought, but it's still a big long shot.

00:02:34.000 I mean, we can get into it.

00:02:35.000 We'll get into it.

00:02:36.000 Because we've got a ton of other stories, too.

00:02:38.000 This is crazy.

00:02:39.000 Luke was just telling me that the FBI issued a warning saying that China's going to be targeting people on U.S.

00:02:43.000 soil.

00:02:44.000 It's not just that.

00:02:45.000 We've got This video that was published the other day on Fox News of a Chinese professor bragging, basically, that Joe Biden's compromised and that the old guard is back in power, so China's going to get what they want.

00:02:57.000 It's shocking stuff.

00:02:59.000 And so we'll talk about this stuff.

00:03:00.000 We'll talk about what's going on.

00:03:01.000 Portland police recently retreated.

00:03:02.000 Antifa overran them.

00:03:04.000 So we'll get into it.

00:03:04.000 We're hanging out with Luke Rudkowski.

00:03:06.000 He's chilling here.

00:03:07.000 So we have Luke and Will today.

00:03:08.000 It's a, it's a, it's a... It's a tuper. 0.62

00:03:10.000 Well, Luke's wearing his Santa hat, so it's a Christmas special.

00:03:14.000 Howdy, this was very last minute.

00:03:15.000 I was just doing my grocery shopping until Tim called me here.

00:03:18.000 I am the Sansei behind WeAreChange.org.

00:03:21.000 I appreciate sungazing, and an interesting fact about me was that I was once arrested by then New York City Michael Bloomberg for asking him a question.

00:03:29.000 How are ya?

00:03:30.000 Hope you're doing well.

00:03:32.000 And Ian's chillin' over with the static orb.

00:03:34.000 Oh, there it is.

00:03:36.000 And of course, Lydia is producing.

00:03:38.000 Wait, where's the button?

00:03:38.000 Okay, I'm over here in the corner.

00:03:40.000 I got a lot of people to switch cameras for.

00:03:41.000 Yeah, we have a lot of people.

00:03:42.000 I'm keeping up with it.

00:03:43.000 So, if you haven't already, smash the like button, subscribe, notification bell, all the good stuff.

00:03:47.000 We're live Monday through Friday at 8 p.m.

00:03:49.000 But let's just jump into the first story, and I will read what USA Today has to say.

00:03:53.000 USA Today reports Supreme Court dismisses Trump allies' challenge to Pennsylvania election.

00:04:00.000 The Supreme Court refused today to stop Pennsylvania from finalizing President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the state despite allegations from allies of President Donald Trump that the expansion of mail-in voting was illegal.

00:04:11.000 I like how they say allies of President Donald Trump instead of just saying like Republicans or, you know, it's always got to be about Trump.

00:04:17.000 The action by the nation's highest court, which includes three justices named by Trump, came as states across the country are locking in the results that will lead to next week's Electoral College vote.

00:04:27.000 It represented the latest in a string of stinging judicial opinions that have left the president defeated both politically and legally.

00:04:34.000 By their one-sentence denial, the justices left intact a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Alright, there's a lot to go through here.

00:04:41.000 passed in 2019 came far too late. New Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett

00:04:46.000 appeared to have participated in the case. No dissents or accusals were noted.

00:04:50.000 Led by conservative Rep. Mike Kelly, the challengers claimed the Republican-led

00:04:54.000 state legislature's expansion of absentee voting violated the Pennsylvania

00:04:58.000 Constitution. Rather than going to court after its passage, however, they waited

00:05:02.000 until the state figured prominently in Trump's loss to Biden last month.

00:05:06.000 Alright, there's a lot to go through here. First off, I gotta clarify.

00:05:11.000 The lawsuit didn't have anything to do with Trump directly.

00:05:15.000 It wasn't filed by Trump's people.

00:05:17.000 It wasn't coming from the Trump campaign.

00:05:19.000 Mike Kelly actually won his race, and it was noted by a lower court judge that they would likely win on the merits, and Mike Kelly would be negatively impacted by this in the event they do get some kind of relief.

00:05:31.000 But first of all, all right, Will, just give me your general opinion so we can break this down and so I can better understand this.

00:05:38.000 What does this mean?

00:05:38.000 Are they saying that the case is done permanently?

00:05:41.000 It's over?

00:05:42.000 Nothing's gonna happen?

00:05:43.000 No, but they're saying that they've denied emergency injunctive relief, right?

00:05:47.000 Basically, Parnell and Kelly, the two guys who were, you know, they lost at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

00:05:53.000 And they want to get the Supreme Court of the United States to stop it

00:05:56.000 So they need to actually have an injunction as well before you know, they have hearings and an argument

00:06:01.000 Well, what was it? What would the injunction do the injunction would set things in like somehow stop what's happening,

00:06:07.000 right?

00:06:07.000 So maybe the injunction would stop the electors from being certified. I don't know if that I think they might have

00:06:11.000 already been certified I think they're already certified. It might have stopped

00:06:14.000 them from going to the Voting in the Electoral College or something like that

00:06:19.000 I mean an injunction is just getting the court to order somebody to stop doing something and freeze things as they

00:06:23.000 are So what I read was there's a couple things

00:06:26.000 First, we have the lawsuit coming out of Texas, which we'll get to in a second, because this may be bigger.

00:06:30.000 I think it is absolutely bigger, in your opinion?

00:06:32.000 I mean, at this point, it's certainly bigger, because... Oh, right, right, right, right.

00:06:35.000 We'll get to that, but... So, I heard something that said, basically, they denied emergency rejunctive relief, but part of it has to do with the fact that Texas is asking for basically the same thing anyway.

00:06:45.000 I don't really think that that's a related, that's the reason they denied here.

00:06:49.000 I mean, I read the briefing from the state of Pennsylvania and it was just good briefing and it explained there were like four or five different independent procedural problems with the litigation as far as trying to get SCOTUS to do anything.

00:07:01.000 Yeah.

00:07:02.000 You know, first off, if you're going to, you know, SCOTUS doesn't want to consider issues for the first time.

00:07:07.000 They want to see things resolved in the lower courts and then they can sit as a court of review.

00:07:11.000 The problem is it looks like that Kelly and Parnell and their lawyers didn't raise the sort of federal issue, the idea that not just it would be a violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution, but also that it would be a violation of the federal Constitution.

00:07:24.000 No, they did.

00:07:24.000 They did.

00:07:25.000 I think they did.

00:07:25.000 But not in the lower courts, I don't think.

00:07:27.000 Right, right, right.

00:07:28.000 Right?

00:07:28.000 Like, they did that later, but they needed to raise that specific argument earlier.

00:07:33.000 And because Pennsylvania never ruled on it, or nobody ever ruled on it, and Supreme Court itself would be the first people to consider that issue, they're like, whoa, we don't want to do this.

00:07:41.000 And then there were the additional issues that have popped up elsewhere.

00:07:44.000 Standing, mootness.

00:07:46.000 Latches?

00:07:47.000 Is that what it's called?

00:07:47.000 Latches, right.

00:07:48.000 So that's just undue delay in bringing your case.

00:07:51.000 So for those that aren't familiar, I think that's the biggest one.

00:07:54.000 That's basically what they're ruling on.

00:07:55.000 Yeah.

00:07:56.000 It basically says you have to reasonably bring your lawsuit, reasonably within a certain amount of time.

00:08:01.000 You can't just sit on it forever.

00:08:02.000 Right.

00:08:03.000 And so there are, I mean, this is a common theme in a lot of the election litigation that's been ruled on so far,

00:08:09.000 is that there are these big procedural problems before you even get to the substance of questions

00:08:14.000 about whether or not the scheme is unconstitutional in the first place.

00:08:17.000 And so I really wasn't surprised by this news because I read the brief from Pennsylvania.

00:08:21.000 I'm like, oh wow, you guys, you didn't raise the federal question

00:08:24.000 in district quarter in Pennsylvania at all.

00:08:27.000 They're just gonna not hear your case because they don't wanna deal with it.

00:08:30.000 And that's really interesting because when you look at the mainstream media's

00:08:32.000 coverage of this, it essentially is Trump is done.

00:08:35.000 It's over.

00:08:36.000 Yahoo News has an interesting headline here.

00:08:38.000 They have an article that says, Supreme Court shuts down Trump's campaign's last-ditch Pennsylvania appeal.

00:08:46.000 So they're making it sound like it's done.

00:08:47.000 It's not even coming from the Trump campaign.

00:08:48.000 Well, that's what they're saying on Yahoo News.

00:08:50.000 So that's what I bring up here in this USA Today article.

00:08:52.000 They say that, what was the exact quote?

00:08:55.000 They said basically that It was too late because they waited until the state figured prominently in Trump's loss.

00:09:03.000 Nowhere in this does it say Trump lost, therefore, or anything having to do with Trump.

00:09:07.000 And we had Sean Parnell on, one of the plaintiffs, and he said he didn't know.

00:09:11.000 He didn't know at all that it was unconstitutional.

00:09:14.000 They all thought the law was constitutional, and now they're suing because they found out it wasn't.

00:09:17.000 So, I mean, there's a question about whether or not the Pennsylvania Supreme Court correctly applied their Latches doctrine, right?

00:09:24.000 But the problem is, you know, Latches is an issue of state law.

00:09:28.000 It's not a federal law issue.

00:09:29.000 And then, ultimately, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is the final arbiter of what Pennsylvania law is.

00:09:36.000 And so that's why, you know, they have to figure out how is this possibly a federal question.

00:09:40.000 And they didn't raise it initially.

00:09:42.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:09:43.000 It was sort of like a last minute audible of like, oh, we actually need to go to the U.S.

00:09:46.000 Supreme Court.

00:09:47.000 How do we do that?

00:09:48.000 And it's like, it's way too late.

00:09:50.000 You need to have kind of anticipated this potential problem and its path at the very beginning.

00:09:54.000 Do you remember what their federal argument was?

00:09:56.000 Because it's in there.

00:09:57.000 Yeah, so the federal argument goes something along the lines of because there's the electors clause in the federal constitution delegates the power to, you know, run your elections in a certain way to the legislature.

00:10:11.000 And then that's also sort of incorporates the lawmaking process with, you know, the constitution, etc.

00:10:17.000 But they didn't bring that up early.

00:10:18.000 Pennsylvania courts and the Pennsylvania government is somehow violating their own procedures,

00:10:23.000 then that creates a federal question because it's a violation of somehow that delegation

00:10:27.000 of power.

00:10:28.000 But they didn't bring that up early.

00:10:29.000 They didn't bring it up early enough to get, at least that's probably what I think is the

00:10:32.000 reason here, right?

00:10:33.000 The Supreme Court didn't say why it refused to review, just give a one-sided no.

00:10:37.000 But my guess is that this is the big reason.

00:10:39.000 So what you're saying is that you're a better lawyer that should have hired you because

00:10:42.000 I'm not kidding.

00:10:43.000 I'm not saying any of that.

00:10:45.000 I don't even actively practice right now.

00:10:47.000 I run a conservative magazine.

00:10:48.000 If you're hiring me to do your litigation right now, you're probably making a mistake.

00:10:52.000 Did you see the lower court's opinion on the merits?

00:10:55.000 I mean, I saw the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's opinion.

00:10:58.000 It was narrow.

00:10:59.000 Yeah, it was very narrow.

00:11:00.000 I wasn't impressed by it, but that's the thing about being a Supreme Court.

00:11:03.000 Like, I think there was some famous justice once who said, we're not, we're not final because we're right, or something like, we're right because we're final.

00:11:14.000 In the sense of, you know, like, because we are the Court of Last Resort, that means we're right.

00:11:18.000 So, the claim was that mail-in voting violated the Constitution because it already has an absentee voting provision.

00:11:26.000 Violated the Pennsylvania Constitution.

00:11:27.000 Pennsylvania Constitution, right.

00:11:28.000 And the first judge did issue an injunction, and then when it got appealed to the Supreme Court, she issued then an opinion saying, here's why I did it, and they will likely win if it's ruled on the merits.

00:11:40.000 But then the Supreme Court said, nah, you're too late, bye-bye.

00:11:43.000 Yeah, and they didn't even they didn't even consider the federal question if or any of the questions about the actual substantive constitutionality of the statute.

00:11:50.000 And they just kind of get away with it.

00:11:52.000 I mean, in this case, it's one of the situations where, you know, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is there's elections for, I think, the sitting justices.

00:11:59.000 I think it's a very, very partisan court.

00:12:01.000 And so it's not surprising to me that they end up.

00:12:04.000 What's your opinion?

00:12:04.000 this really bad spot and then and then you know so it's not surprising the

00:12:07.000 Pennsylvania Supreme Court is really partisan and didn't handle this case

00:12:09.000 fairly and then it's not surprising they didn't get to go to SCOTUS with it

00:12:12.000 because they didn't I don't feel like they were prepared for that right or

00:12:15.000 Avenue but does this create a problem that like I mean give me give me what's

00:12:20.000 your opinion do you think it's unconstitutional what they did with mail

00:12:22.000 in voting oh I mean and as according to the text of the Pennsylvania

00:12:26.000 I mean, the Pennsylvania Constitution says, here are how you can regulate, here are the rules for regulating absentee ballots, and these are the only circumstances where you can do it.

00:12:34.000 And Pennsylvania didn't amend its constitution, they just passed legislation So are we now going to, and based on other challenges in other states, potentially have a president gets elected because of unconstitutional elections and the rest of America has to just accept that?

00:12:51.000 I mean, you know, this is one of the things that I think people, you know, remember the tweet I did that got everybody angry, where I was like, Joe Biden won, he didn't win fair and square, but like, we need to get ready for that.

00:13:01.000 You know, I mean, history is full of instances where people who, very famous people, won elections via cheating and took office and there wasn't like some

00:13:09.000 later remedy to it we just knew they cheated in that case why shouldn't trump use any and all means to

00:13:13.000 retain the presidency um i mean i don't think i just don't want to have a military coup man i

00:13:19.000 really don't i think that that the down that road leads all sorts of terrible things so i think you

00:13:25.000 know to me a lot of the problem here starts with the year before the election where the

00:13:30.000 democrats are going around the country right weakening voter integrity measures all over the country.

00:13:35.000 And they should have stopped it.

00:13:36.000 And we needed to do a better job of stopping it.

00:13:38.000 That's where we lost it.

00:13:39.000 Yeah, but regular Americans don't know it's not their job. 0.97

00:13:44.000 I'm not going to ask a plumber to understand how to file a lawsuit in advance.

00:13:47.000 Right.

00:13:47.000 So do you remember when the Trump campaign sued over ballot observers?

00:13:51.000 Yeah.

00:13:52.000 Do you see what the judge said about observation?

00:13:54.000 That as long as they're in the room, then that satisfies election law?

00:13:57.000 I mean, it shouldn't, right?

00:13:59.000 That's crazy, right?

00:14:00.000 But like, I mean, here's a real problem.

00:14:01.000 The Pennsylvania legislature agreed to all these reforms to ballot processing.

00:14:06.000 Well, technically.

00:14:06.000 They agreed to universal mail-in.

00:14:07.000 They agreed to a bunch of stuff.

00:14:09.000 So, but, technically, what they agreed to it, what they've said is that we didn't realize they would do a whole bunch of crazy things like the curing process and the extended deadlines, and that's what they just rolled with after the fact.

00:14:20.000 I think that's part of the Texas lawsuit, which, again, we're gonna get to in just a second.

00:14:24.000 But what's crazy to me about the ruling from the judge on the Trump campaign is that On the Trump campaign lawsuit.

00:14:31.000 So Trump sued, his campaign sued, Rudy Giuliani was arguing I guess saying that 682,000 ballots were counted without observers having meaningful access.

00:14:41.000 Meaning the observers are supposed to look at the ballots to make sure that what the counter is saying is correct.

00:14:46.000 Right.

00:14:47.000 But they kept them like 100 feet away so they couldn't see anything.

00:14:50.000 And then the judge said, How many were in the building?

00:14:53.000 The Trump campaign lawyer I think said very famously a non-zero number of observers were in the building, but they didn't have meaningful access.

00:15:01.000 And then the judge basically said, well, the election code says observers have to be there.

00:15:05.000 The observers were there.

00:15:06.000 It doesn't specify distance.

00:15:08.000 Therefore, the code's requirements were satisfied.

00:15:12.000 I mean, to me that sounds- that's somehow law and justice don't always correlate, right?

00:15:16.000 Like, you know, that's- that sounds like the judge is looking at the law and saying, here's the rules.

00:15:21.000 Well, the rules are these people need to be in the building.

00:15:23.000 Doesn't say any- doesn't anticipate any sort of- But isn't a judge supposed to solve that problem?

00:15:28.000 That's insane.

00:15:29.000 That's- that's actually not what judges are supposed to do, right?

00:15:31.000 Judges are supposed to apply the law.

00:15:32.000 Well, hold on, hold on.

00:15:34.000 I had a conversation with multiple lawyers about the gender issue in New York City, right?

00:15:39.000 So, have you ever looked at the New York City human rights gender issues?

00:15:43.000 I can't say I'm super familiar with New York City in particular.

00:15:45.000 They have codified 31 genders, but New York City recognizes any and all that anyone might assert.

00:15:54.000 Okay.

00:15:54.000 And they say that in all public accommodations, they must adhere to these practices, essentially, if you use a specific name.

00:16:02.000 And so I had a question about the extreme nature by which this law exists.

00:16:09.000 And this is relevant.

00:16:10.000 Everyone just hear me out.

00:16:11.000 This makes sense.

00:16:12.000 So the idea was, if I can say my name as anything, and I can wear any clothes, and use any pronouns, I should be able to go into a Starbucks, or go to a job, I can get hired at a job, and then show up wearing whatever I want, and say, here's my name, say it, or else, right?

00:16:26.000 And they say that a willful refusal to use someone's preferred name or pronoun is a violation, a human rights violation, of $250,000, which will warrant a $250,000 fine.

00:16:39.000 So I talked to multiple lawyers about this, and I said, I'm going to give you an extreme hypothetical.

00:16:43.000 I'm going to take the letter of the law to the extreme degree.

00:16:45.000 What if I dressed up in a very, very offensive way and said that my gender was, you know, insert racial slur gender, and that my official name was a racial slur?

00:16:54.000 They said that the courts would laugh you out and say, no way, we'll never uphold that.

00:16:58.000 I mean, I'd just be less pessimistic than the other lawyers you've talked to, right?

00:17:04.000 and dress any way I want, why couldn't I go to Starbucks dressed like a giant Pac-Man and say

00:17:08.000 I'm Pac-Gender or whatever? And I'm not trying to disparage anybody, I'm saying if the law isn't

00:17:12.000 specific, couldn't it create this exploit? I mean I'd just be less pessimistic than the other

00:17:16.000 lawyers you've talked to, right? I mean obviously I don't think, I wouldn't guarantee that a judge

00:17:19.000 would act on it or cede the law your way, but my view is, I mean if their law is really that vaguely

00:17:25.000 written, oftentimes you get results in court that people think defy common sense. I mean it's a...

00:17:30.000 So it depends.

00:17:31.000 Sometimes the judge is going to do common sense anyway.

00:17:33.000 Some judges are more active.

00:17:35.000 Some judges are more, like, strictly literalist in how they read the law.

00:17:38.000 The reason why I bring that up is Well, people could exploit this to make money, obviously, but the idea is, when it comes to New York City and the human rights law, if a judge can determine that my gender is laughable, like, you know, if you clearly pick something ridiculous meant to garner laughs, and the judge does, then why would any other judge not be allowed to throw out any legitimate claim about, you know, trans human rights violations?

00:18:03.000 Sure, and that's exactly the reason why they might You know, why I probably would end up disagreeing with the lawyers you previously talked to.

00:18:09.000 So you could actually get a job at Starbucks, show up the next day dressed like Pac-Man and say, your name's Pac-Man.

00:18:15.000 And if they tell you, no, get out.

00:18:16.000 You can't wear that.

00:18:17.000 You can, you can challenge them.

00:18:18.000 I mean, based on how you've characterized that law to me.

00:18:21.000 Yes.

00:18:21.000 Right.

00:18:21.000 I mean, it is, it is, it is really that vague.

00:18:23.000 It says, it says gender identity is self-expression.

00:18:26.000 Yeah, there's definitely a lot of laws in New York City.

00:18:29.000 There's also a very specific law against people's hair.

00:18:31.000 So if you discriminate against someone's hair or hairstyle, you also could be fined as a business a quarter million dollars for doing so.

00:18:40.000 Okay, so not to get off track, the reason I bring it up is because now I'm hearing, and again, different lawyers, different opinions, is no, it's the letter of the law.

00:18:48.000 The judge just says, here's a letter of law, we're done.

00:18:50.000 I mean, it depends on the judge.

00:18:51.000 Like, not all judges act the same way, some judges are more... Do you think a judge should say, the law is clearly intended to make sure you can observe the ballot reasonably?

00:19:01.000 I kind of don't, actually. 0.94

00:19:03.000 I mean, I think that's the kind of thing that needs to be dealt with by a legislative fix, because I generally think that the way these things should work procedurally is, you know, judges just apply the law as written in the best reading of it, and then the legislature tweaks the law if the law is stupid.

00:19:19.000 But think about the problem that creates.

00:19:20.000 It's like, we say, okay, we want observers to be able to read the votes so we know there's scrutiny and the votes are legit.

00:19:27.000 And then someone finds a loophole and just exploits and abuses it.

00:19:31.000 So then we have an entire election that is essentially not the will of the people in any capacity because it was exploited.

00:19:38.000 Right.

00:19:38.000 Well, I mean, then that question becomes like, okay, well, is there some other restriction or some other like Law, like, or right that's being compromised here, and maybe that comes into play to say, like, to constrain the way that the specific election code can be interpreted, right?

00:19:52.000 So, but you need to be appealing to, like, something else.

00:19:54.000 You can't just say, well, the law doesn't make any sense, so we should trust the law.

00:19:59.000 Like, that usually is not something lawyers look at.

00:20:01.000 Or the judge just says, I think the, you know, very clearly, the interpretation of the law is such that people can actually observe what is written on the ballot, I mean, not just to say, well, there's no official foot number in the law.

00:20:13.000 So therefore, I mean, he quite literally said you could be sitting in the bathroom in the other room of the building and it counts as having an observer present.

00:20:20.000 I would argue that clearly makes no sense.

00:20:22.000 If they can't see it and they're not observing it, then they're not observers.

00:20:25.000 And therefore, there are no observers.

00:20:27.000 Right.

00:20:27.000 Well, that but then the very likely in the statute is also a definition of who counts as an observer and who doesn't.

00:20:34.000 Right.

00:20:34.000 Like that's very common for most of these election statutes.

00:20:37.000 is to have some sort of definitions portion where like the right words they use so that

00:20:42.000 might constrain that sort of that's a great i mean it's good it's creative lawyering don't

00:20:45.000 get me wrong but it's like that would be probably precluded by a definition so their official job

00:20:50.000 title is observer but they're not actually observing exactly so the judge said well they're

00:20:55.000 called observers and they can be sitting in the back of the room playing on their phone playing

00:20:59.000 candy crush and that counts as having an observer present it's it's bad law like

00:21:02.000 I don't know what else to say.

00:21:03.000 I think that pretty clearly Pennsylvania has really bad election codes that make a mockery of election integrity that need to be changed.

00:21:14.000 But if you're asking me straight up, do I think that Pennsylvania judge was in legal error the way he interpreted the statute, it doesn't sound like it.

00:21:22.000 No, you're right.

00:21:23.000 It sounds like he just interpreted the law and applied it.

00:21:26.000 That's crazy to me.

00:21:27.000 Because how could you anticipate that as a regular person?

00:21:31.000 You could go through every law and make sure, OK, I want to make sure nobody cheats, nobody plays any unethical games.

00:21:37.000 How would you predict a judge is going to be like, well, you know, observers don't mean actually observing the name on the ballot.

00:21:43.000 It just means being there.

00:21:45.000 I mean, I don't know.

00:21:47.000 I feel like in Georgia, they've lessened their restrictions.

00:21:50.000 I mean, COVID probably pushed them further away.

00:21:53.000 I'm sure poll observers have been around for a pretty long time.

00:21:56.000 So you'd feel like it was one of the better developed areas of law, but apparently Pennsylvania's just- There's always something.

00:22:01.000 So let me ask you, is this the end for Donald Trump?

00:22:04.000 It's not the end, but it forecloses one hopeful path.

00:22:09.000 I think there are basically two viable paths.

00:22:12.000 Let's do it!

00:22:13.000 Okay, Texas.

00:22:15.000 From CNBC, Texas sues four battleground states and Supreme Court over unlawful election results in 2020 presidential race.

00:22:22.000 Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in the U.S.

00:22:27.000 Supreme Court to invalidate presidential election results in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

00:22:32.000 The lawsuit asserts that unlawful election results in those four states which President-elect Joe Biden won should be declared unconstitutional.

00:22:40.000 The filing argues that those states used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to unlawfully change their election rules.

00:22:46.000 Experts in election law were quick to dismiss the likelihood of a nine Supreme Court justice taking the case.

00:22:51.000 Now, I'm just gonna, I'm gonna poke your buttons a little bit and say Joe Biden is not the President-elect, but, uh... That's fine.

00:22:57.000 But he's not, he's not, right?

00:22:57.000 Yeah, no, like, technically not.

00:22:59.000 I mean... No, literally not, but technically is.

00:23:03.000 Is this like a bugaboo of yours?

00:23:07.000 No, no, no.

00:23:09.000 Well, no, because you tweeted that Joe Biden was president-elect, right?

00:23:11.000 No, I tweeted that Joe Biden won.

00:23:13.000 Okay, well you said it earlier, so I'm making the point to clarify for everybody what it means.

00:23:17.000 President-elect is January 6th, when all the votes are counted and they say he will now be inaugurated in 14 days or whatever.

00:23:24.000 Okay.

00:23:24.000 Okay, let's talk about Texas.

00:23:25.000 is president-elect officially because we go by the Electoral College.

00:23:28.000 Technically he is because everybody recognizes the projections from all the states and thus

00:23:33.000 it's going to happen anyway.

00:23:34.000 So they consider it an inevitability.

00:23:37.000 Okay, so let's talk about Texas.

00:23:40.000 Okay, let's talk about Texas.

00:23:42.000 Is this Trump, he's guaranteed to win now, it's over?

00:23:45.000 No, no.

00:23:46.000 So I mean this is a very interesting thing.

00:23:48.000 Like, I had to learn, I read about it today because I was like, well, I mean, this is something you remember from your con law class is like a footnote that, by the way, when states sue each other, they go to the, straight to the Supreme Court.

00:23:58.000 But it's not something that comes up very often.

00:24:00.000 I think I looked into it.

00:24:01.000 There's been an average of one case like this every year.

00:24:03.000 Really?

00:24:04.000 For like the last hundred years.

00:24:06.000 And out of all the cases that the Supreme Court takes.

00:24:08.000 So states routinely sue other states?

00:24:11.000 The point is it's not routine.

00:24:12.000 One case like this every year happens out of 75 or 100 or 150 that the Supreme Court takes.

00:24:19.000 It happens and it's usually designed for things like water rights.

00:24:23.000 So like Wisconsin and Illinois or something?

00:24:25.000 Yeah, right.

00:24:26.000 They have the Great Lakes Coalition though, so they're all pretty much in agreement.

00:24:29.000 I remember there was Arizona suing the Great Lakes saying, we deserve access to the water because it's on American soil or whatever.

00:24:36.000 And that was actually the original idea behind the Supreme Court, was you had to have a place where the states could resolve their disputes.

00:24:43.000 So what's this lawsuit about?

00:24:44.000 What are they suing on?

00:24:45.000 So they're suing and they're basically saying Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc.

00:24:49.000 all didn't follow their own election laws, all made a mockery of election integrity.

00:24:54.000 As a result, that injures us, the state of Texas, not just because our electors don't get to vote for president and it's canceled out by these illegitimate unconstitutional votes, but also, even more important, from the state perspective, in terms of its own interests, the vice presidency is now changed.

00:25:10.000 you know we're a state we have a direct interest in our Senate representation

00:25:11.000 Right.

00:25:13.000 and our ability to vote there and the vice president is the president of the

00:25:16.000 Senate who breaks the ice. 0.85

00:25:18.000 So they're basically saying like look we have standing to object here

00:25:22.000 uh... there are all these problems and you know you should take this and

00:25:25.000 actually we think you the Supreme Court don't have the discretion we think you

00:25:27.000 have to take this case uh... and then you know going through the litany of

00:25:31.000 problems that we've been They said that SCOTUS has to take it?

00:25:34.000 They argued that.

00:25:36.000 That's not, doesn't look like it's a majority view on the Supreme Court.

00:25:39.000 It looks like it's just Alito and Thomas, although we don't know how the three latest justices would rule on it.

00:25:45.000 That said, I am doubtful, but not like, you know, I don't think it's a guaranteed or anything, but I'm doubtful that the Supreme Court will take this case.

00:25:51.000 And it kind of gets to the heart of, you know, what does the Supreme Court normally do?

00:25:55.000 It does appeals, right?

00:25:56.000 Right.

00:25:57.000 Again, it sits as a court of review.

00:25:58.000 When the case comes to it in the first instance, the Supreme Court's like, well, I guess we have to have like a trial or something, right?

00:26:03.000 Like we need to have evidence, we need to have witnesses.

00:26:05.000 And how they actually do that is they literally just appoint basically a special master, which is like a private judge.

00:26:11.000 And they're like, oh, I guess we have one of those cases we have to take.

00:26:13.000 Well, here you go, private judge, go resolve it and we'll deal with this later.

00:26:16.000 And then after everything's presented, they can rule on what?

00:26:19.000 Right.

00:26:19.000 But because they're not equipped for it, they've kind of found ways to say, like, OK, how do we, like, not take these cases if we don't have to?

00:26:25.000 Right?

00:26:26.000 Like, we're an appeals court.

00:26:27.000 We don't like to decide things in the first instance.

00:26:29.000 How do we... Let's narrow this down as much as possible.

00:26:32.000 And so the way they do it now is they say, well, can the underlying interests of this case be vindicated in another lawsuit somewhere else?

00:26:41.000 Okay, and if they can't, then fine, we'll take it.

00:26:43.000 But if they can with other litigants in a forum so that things go normally and percolate their way up, then we'll do that.

00:26:50.000 This is one of those cases where there are other forums where the underlying interest being talked about in the lawsuit can be vindicated.

00:26:56.000 There are election contest laws in all these states, which is actually one of the avenues we haven't really talked about where I think there's a real chance of doing something and persuading a judge.

00:27:04.000 So what is that?

00:27:05.000 Uh, well, so, for example, in Georgia, President Trump and David Schaffer, the director of Georgia Republicans, filed a formal election contest in Georgia state court under Georgia's election contest law.

00:27:16.000 When was that?

00:27:16.000 That was, like, two days ago.

00:27:18.000 Is that still going?

00:27:19.000 Yeah, that's still going.

00:27:19.000 They just filed it.

00:27:21.000 Oh, wow.

00:27:21.000 Um, I think on the 5th or 6th.

00:27:22.000 But doesn't that, doesn't that play into safe harbor somehow?

00:27:24.000 Like, they've got to resolve that dispute?

00:27:25.000 I don't know.

00:27:26.000 I don't know how it real...

00:27:27.000 You know, how it interplays with State Harbor.

00:27:29.000 But I just know that, like, it's the first lawsuit I saw where I was like, oh, there isn't an obvious procedural problem with this, right?

00:27:35.000 That's going to prevent this from getting heard.

00:27:36.000 Right.

00:27:37.000 And that's not going to lead to a judge just kicking it out of court.

00:27:39.000 Because that's been the problem with all the lawsuits so far.

00:27:41.000 Like, the other side gets in and says, oh, you have no standing and mootness and, like, going down the list of, like, problems with your lawsuit that mean we don't even get to the substance.

00:27:48.000 Or some of them are just...

00:27:50.000 I don't know, the Kraken lawsuits?

00:27:52.000 I mean, the Kraken lawsuits got dismissed yesterday.

00:27:55.000 I mean, one of them got dismissed from the bench, which you never see.

00:27:58.000 Like, that's how bad it was?

00:27:59.000 Yeah, I mean, because normally, I mean, a district judge is worried about being reversed on appeal.

00:28:03.000 It's humiliating.

00:28:04.000 It's your superiors telling you publicly.

00:28:06.000 Seems to happen all the time, though, right?

00:28:07.000 It does, but they want to avoid it because it's humiliating, right?

00:28:09.000 Like, they don't like being reversed. 0.76

00:28:10.000 It says they got the law wrong and they didn't do their job properly.

00:28:13.000 And it's a public opinion.

00:28:14.000 Like, imagine getting a performance review and having it be in, like, a federal register.

00:28:16.000 And then imagine being the Supreme Court and you're just chilling because no one's going to challenge you.

00:28:20.000 No one can do that.

00:28:20.000 That's why all the judges want to be Supreme Court judges.

00:28:25.000 So as a result, if they don't want to be reversed, they try and put all their decisions in writing and make them pretty rigorous so that they survive appeal.

00:28:31.000 Literally, the guy just looked at the Kraken plaintiffs and their lawyers and was like, you guys lose for, like, four reasons.

00:28:36.000 One, two, three, four.

00:28:38.000 You never could get into court.

00:28:39.000 Even if you could, your claims are meritless.

00:28:40.000 Go away.

00:28:41.000 Like, it was just, I haven't seen that in a serious piece of litigation in a long time.

00:28:46.000 I mean, wasn't the filing missing spacings between words?

00:28:49.000 Oh, there are typos all over the place.

00:28:50.000 Not typos, like, there were whole paragraphs that had no spaces.

00:28:53.000 Oh, it was a mess.

00:28:54.000 It was not proofread.

00:28:56.000 What is this?

00:28:57.000 I mean, it's like, I don't know what's going on.

00:29:01.000 I don't understand it.

00:29:01.000 Because when I was practicing law, if I did that, I would have gotten fired.

00:29:04.000 The reason I ask is, I hear a lot, it's 4-D chess.

00:29:07.000 They're trying to lose on purpose to get to Supreme Court.

00:29:09.000 There's nothing good about losing.

00:29:11.000 You're going to go to the Supreme Court even if you win.

00:29:14.000 Again, say Sidney Powell wins her lawsuit at the district court level.

00:29:17.000 You think the other side's going to be like, well, we're done here.

00:29:21.000 I guess we're just leaving.

00:29:22.000 Yeah, they'd appeal and say no.

00:29:25.000 It's going there no matter what.

00:29:26.000 Right, and you'd like to have an opinion that says you were right from the lower court, at least to give you some presumption.

00:29:32.000 There's a strategy to losing.

00:29:33.000 When they lost, when Trump's campaign lost in I think the third circuit over, I was basically saying, you know, a bunch of people were like, that's exactly what we wanted.

00:29:41.000 Thanks for ruling so quickly so we can get to SCOTUS.

00:29:44.000 And I'm like, there is a good point to be made in that if they're going to win, and they're still going to SCOTUS anyway, then they want to get there as fast as possible, right?

00:29:53.000 So that makes sense, sort of.

00:29:55.000 But still, you'd rather win than lose, even if that was the case.

00:29:57.000 Right.

00:29:57.000 And you don't want to lose the way they lost in the Third Circuit.

00:30:00.000 Which was, again, in all these procedural problems.

00:30:02.000 Things like, even if you won your point, you wouldn't have enough to change the result of the election based on the claims you're making.

00:30:07.000 So you have to get out of court, or, you know.

00:30:10.000 Well, that was they wanted to amend the complaint a second time, or whatever. 0.96

00:30:13.000 Oh yeah, gosh, the way they went about that was so silly. 0.57

00:30:16.000 They wanted to amend the complaint a second time.

00:30:18.000 They weren't actually appealing the underlying substantive ruling.

00:30:21.000 They were appealing the decision by the district court not to let them fix their complaint.

00:30:25.000 And usually that's granted liberally because you want to basically... Everybody should have access to justice, so they shouldn't be kicked out of court on technicality.

00:30:33.000 But the Trump campaign had been there saying, we have to get this done by November 23rd.

00:30:37.000 We need to do it really fast because, you know, the election certification, blah, blah, blah.

00:30:40.000 We have to get it done fast.

00:30:41.000 And then the district court dismisses their case and they're like, oh, well, can we fix the complaint and take another six weeks?

00:30:47.000 And the district court's like, no.

00:30:49.000 Wow.

00:30:50.000 It's too late.

00:30:52.000 So my question then is, and we'll go back to Texas and get to the heart of that lawsuit.

00:30:58.000 Rudy Giuliani.

00:30:59.000 Is he a old crackpot well past his prime who's falling apart or a mad freaky genius playing 4D chess who's going to pull out a tremendous victory?

00:31:08.000 It's only one or the other.

00:31:09.000 There's no middle ground.

00:31:10.000 Well, I mean, I don't want to be mean to Rudy Giuliani, but he's most and he's doing like what many other people are doing.

00:31:15.000 It's PR in the place of law.

00:31:16.000 Like, I was really disappointed to see Giuliani being selected to argue the appeal.

00:31:21.000 Giuliani is not an appellate lawyer.

00:31:23.000 He hasn't practiced appellate law in years.

00:31:24.000 He hasn't argued any appeals.

00:31:26.000 As far as I know.

00:31:27.000 I mean, it's possible I'm wrong about this and you already appealed recently, but that's like a practice.

00:31:31.000 They were doing things like, one of the things that in the third circuit case, people didn't miss this too, they appealed a temporary restraining order.

00:31:40.000 That's actually wrong.

00:31:40.000 You can't do that.

00:31:42.000 You have to apply to the appellate court for an injunction pending appeal.

00:31:46.000 How do you know this?

00:31:47.000 They don't, and you're not even this kind of... I didn't know this beforehand, but I read about it afterwards.

00:31:51.000 Shouldn't they have read it?

00:31:53.000 Exactly.

00:31:54.000 This is why you would hire experienced appellate lawyers because they don't, they don't have to wait for the judge's opinion to find out what they should have done.

00:32:00.000 So, uh, so, but, but you're, you're a big Trump supporter.

00:32:02.000 Yeah.

00:32:03.000 You're, you're, I mean, you mentioned this before the show that we had a conversation a couple of years ago where I was like, it sounds like we agree on all of these, like, you know, culture war kind of issues and stuff.

00:32:12.000 And then I don't know if it was you asked me or I asked you something like you asked me then why wasn't I supporting Trump or something?

00:32:17.000 Yeah.

00:32:17.000 And then, like, I had some answers back in the day.

00:32:19.000 I mean, back then it was like, those are the Bolton stuff and the foreign policy failures and stuff.

00:32:23.000 That's kind of what...

00:32:24.000 But the riots really changed things too.

00:32:26.000 So now I'm like, you know what, man, everything else is kind of out the window.

00:32:28.000 But, um, so what you're saying is the best chance that Trump has right now to legitimately win,

00:32:35.000 as per some kind of constitutional processes, martial law.

00:32:40.000 Send in the troops, go in, just lock everybody up, arrest them all.

00:32:43.000 Is that really winning?

00:32:44.000 I don't know.

00:32:45.000 I don't want any coups.

00:32:46.000 I think there's some possibility of the Texas lawsuit getting taken.

00:32:51.000 And it's one virtue, if you will, is that it only has to get past this one big procedural hurdle, and then they can hear the case.

00:32:57.000 And what's that?

00:32:58.000 That's the Supreme Court deciding to grant permission for them to file the complaint.

00:33:02.000 So they haven't even filed the complaint yet.

00:33:03.000 Yeah, they've asked for permission to file it.

00:33:05.000 And people are getting this wrong.

00:33:07.000 They, like, see it on the docket.

00:33:08.000 They're like, oh, SCOTUS has agreed to hear it.

00:33:10.000 No.

00:33:10.000 SCOTUS has, when they do that, they're saying, oh, you met the proper steps to ask for permission to file this complaint.

00:33:17.000 That's all we're saying.

00:33:18.000 Your filing was procedurally correct so far.

00:33:21.000 And then they decide if they want to hear it or not.

00:33:23.000 Yeah, they decide if they want to hear it or not.

00:33:24.000 Odds are, my answer is, they probably won't.

00:33:26.000 But if they get past that, if the Socotas decides, on this one little decision, they're going to overlook how they've been doing things in the past.

00:33:34.000 And is it majority rule?

00:33:35.000 Yeah, it's a 5-4 decision.

00:33:38.000 5-4?

00:33:38.000 Because you don't count Roberts?

00:33:39.000 No, Roberts is lit.

00:33:41.000 Yes, I know.

00:33:42.000 He's a total lit.

00:33:45.000 But even so, I think, you know, if I'm betting man, I'm not betting on the success of that litigation, because in general, I mean, it's the problem we talked about earlier, that the interests underlying, that they're trying to be vindicated there, right, election irregularities, there's processes in the individual states to deal with it, and the Supreme Court generally hates having these original jurisdiction cases and only will take them if there's no other place it can be vindicated.

00:34:07.000 I don't know.

00:34:07.000 Election betting odds has Trump up 0.7% today.

00:34:12.000 Considering the news, you'd think he'd be going down, but they still have around 10% to win and be the next president.

00:34:18.000 That's free money.

00:34:22.000 That's what that is.

00:34:22.000 I don't know.

00:34:23.000 I still wouldn't bet.

00:34:24.000 I wouldn't take a bet.

00:34:25.000 I'm going to disclose something.

00:34:26.000 Maybe I shouldn't.

00:34:27.000 After I, like all this nonsense with the one stuff I looked on Predict It and they were, Predict It was giving me like, they said Trump was at 13% to win and you can make a bet on based on that.

00:34:37.000 Well, but, uh, so, Predict It has Trump at 14.

00:34:41.000 Oh, wow.

00:34:41.000 That's way too high.

00:34:42.000 Yeah, but you know what it is, though?

00:34:44.000 It's because you can buy them and then sell them when they go up.

00:34:48.000 So when it's at 10 cents, people are like, I'll buy it because some news will come out, it'll go up to 12, and then I'll sell out.

00:34:53.000 You know, and then make 2 cents.

00:34:54.000 Right.

00:34:55.000 I keep telling everybody, man, there's two big plays right here.

00:34:58.000 If you really think Trump's got, you know, 40 chests and the Kraken was actually hiding and wasn't slain at all, you really think Trump's going to win.

00:35:09.000 You got to go and you got to place those bets, right?

00:35:12.000 Yeah, that's free money.

00:35:12.000 I am not advocating for gambling.

00:35:14.000 If you believe that 100% Trump's going to be in office in two months, that's absurd free money.

00:35:18.000 You can make huge amounts of money.

00:35:19.000 Yeah, you'd be rich.

00:35:21.000 I saw one post on social media where someone claimed to have put like 20k into betting on Trump to win.

00:35:25.000 And now they're panicking because it was like their life savings.

00:35:28.000 But at the same time, I'll tell you this right here.

00:35:30.000 You think that's true?

00:35:31.000 It's free money?

00:35:32.000 Yeah, I mean... Then why don't you bet on Biden right now?

00:35:34.000 You can do it.

00:35:35.000 You did.

00:35:35.000 I already did.

00:35:35.000 You bet on Biden.

00:35:36.000 Yeah, I got like four grand riding on Biden.

00:35:39.000 I'm sure there's a ton of people watching right now who are like, oh, I hope he loses that money Well, here's I actually I have a there's sort of an ethical thing Like I think if you make predictions like this you should bet on them.

00:35:49.000 That's a good betting is a tax on BS Yeah, right like that's a good point.

00:35:53.000 Yeah, you know, so, you know make a video like series like You know, when Luke comes out and he says something, I'll be like, okay, put the money down.

00:35:59.000 You know what I mean?

00:36:00.000 Right, like, I mean, it's a real test.

00:36:01.000 Like, all the people who are saying that Trump's 100% going to be in office, why aren't they?

00:36:05.000 I mean, there's huge amounts of money to be made on this bet.

00:36:07.000 I mean, you're going to make, what is that, 86 cents on the dollar?

00:36:10.000 No, I'm not going to make that much because I'm betting on Biden.

00:36:12.000 No, no, no, I'm saying, like, someone were to bet.

00:36:13.000 You put down 14 cents for Trump, you win a buck.

00:36:15.000 Yeah.

00:36:16.000 So put down $14 and win $100.

00:36:19.000 And I mean, the point being like, not that I don't want Trump to win.

00:36:22.000 I still do, because I think it would be good for the country.

00:36:24.000 But it's like, I've made public predictions that Trump will not win.

00:36:27.000 And I feel like there's sort of an ethical obligation to be willing to put money on the public predictions I make.

00:36:32.000 Well, I'll tell you this.

00:36:33.000 In 2018, I was like, I think the Republicans are gonna keep control, and they're gonna keep the House, maybe even gain in the House, because all the culture war stuff was getting crazy.

00:36:41.000 And turns out I was wrong.

00:36:43.000 Actually, I was right.

00:36:44.000 I was right for the first two days.

00:36:46.000 And then about a week later, with all the mail-in ballots they started finding all over the place, then the Democrats ended up winning.

00:36:52.000 So, uh, it's interesting how that happened, right?

00:36:54.000 Yeah.

00:36:54.000 So, uh, so I was wrong.

00:36:56.000 Then I said, I thought Trump was going to win this one.

00:36:58.000 I did say, I'm very tepid most of the time, but I was saying for months leading up to the election, like, I think Trump is going to win.

00:37:03.000 That's my gut feeling, but you know, Biden could win.

00:37:05.000 Don't underestimate your opponent.

00:37:07.000 So when it turns out that, you know, now the election is going Biden's way and I'm saying, yeah, Biden's got this, I'm probably wrong again.

00:37:13.000 And now we're all going like, no, I've been saying over and over again, ever since the seventh, It's 99.99% for Biden.

00:37:21.000 The reason I reserve that, actually earlier on I said it was like 97%.

00:37:25.000 This was before Trump actually filed the lawsuits and I was like, so he has all of these ways to challenge these things.

00:37:30.000 And then as his campaign and other Republicans and pro-Trump individuals have been losing, I'm like, He, of course, still can.

00:37:39.000 Right.

00:37:39.000 But is it at a point where it's like winning the lottery three times in a row?

00:37:41.000 I mean, it's just really unlikely.

00:37:43.000 He has to win all these election contests.

00:37:46.000 We're running into the time constraints where the Electoral College is going to vote. 0.63

00:37:49.000 I mean, even at the beginning, I said that the odds have been prevailing after the election results came in, like 5% at max.

00:37:55.000 Well, on January 6th, the members of Congress can contest, can dispute.

00:37:59.000 Right.

00:38:00.000 And it happens, apparently, relatively often, never works.

00:38:02.000 It never goes anywhere.

00:38:03.000 Yeah.

00:38:03.000 I mean, that's what I would expect to happen here.

00:38:06.000 But isn't it true that, what is it, Article 2, Section 1, or is it Section 2, Article 1 of the Constitution?

00:38:12.000 That sounds, if it's about Congress, it would be Article 1.

00:38:14.000 Constitution.

00:38:15.000 Oh no, you're right, it's about the presidential election, so it's Article 2.

00:38:17.000 That it doesn't matter what the states say, the state legislatures always decide.

00:38:22.000 Yeah, I mean, I think there's the absolute authority is placed in the state legislatures, but I don't think they're gonna do anything to contradict the Electoral College.

00:38:29.000 I mean, the precedent there is crazy.

00:38:30.000 Like, if you think about it, the idea that the state elections don't matter and that... They don't.

00:38:35.000 I mean, in like... This is the craziest thing, because I've been reading more and more about early US history, and the founding fathers didn't want direct democracy.

00:38:43.000 Like, we all know that, and we've actually been sort of eroded Yeah.

00:38:48.000 The Senate, meaning making the Senate elections direct elections.

00:38:51.000 Right.

00:38:51.000 I'm sure you're familiar with the Senate meaning making the Senate elections direct elections.

00:38:54.000 Exactly.

00:38:55.000 It used to be appointments by the state legislatures.

00:38:57.000 Right.

00:38:57.000 And so senators were I think that system made more sense in a lot of ways.

00:39:02.000 You know why.

00:39:03.000 Why.

00:39:03.000 We don't care about local elections anymore.

00:39:06.000 And now our own communities fall apart and become detached and dejected.

00:39:10.000 Yeah, it's like our whole politics has been nationalized.

00:39:12.000 Like, you can't run a local paper doing local politics section.

00:39:14.000 That's a whole, you know... No one cares.

00:39:16.000 And what's really irksome to me is when I see someone running for Congress talking about how if they get elected, they're going to do all the good things for our district.

00:39:25.000 I'm like, you represent the district to the federal government.

00:39:28.000 You don't clean up your district.

00:39:30.000 You go to Congress and vote on national-level policy.

00:39:33.000 Yeah, and here's a real interesting thing.

00:39:35.000 The whole idea of representing your district, that basically went out the window with a band of earmarks.

00:39:40.000 That was the way they represented their district.

00:39:41.000 They got a little money for little pet projects.

00:39:44.000 Now they don't even do that.

00:39:45.000 But the issue is, if you want your town cleaned up, you gotta vote local.

00:39:49.000 Yeah.

00:39:50.000 And so before the 17th Amendment, for those that aren't familiar, the 17th Amendment says senators will be chosen by popular vote.

00:39:55.000 Before that, the state legislatures would essentially vote.

00:39:58.000 The problem was there was bribery or some kind of, you know, just crony BS.

00:40:04.000 Yeah, no, that came out of like Teddy Roosevelt and all the good government stuff that they were doing in the early 1900s.

00:40:09.000 But think about it.

00:40:10.000 If that's how the system still worked, then you'd be like, you gotta vote for, you know, who's the PA state senator guy who's, um, Mastriano, is that his name?

00:40:19.000 Yeah.

00:40:20.000 Yeah, you'd be like, you gotta make sure he gets re-elected because he's gonna make sure to get a good senator for us.

00:40:24.000 Now it's like, I don't even know who that guy is and I live in Pennsylvania, right?

00:40:27.000 Not me personally, I'm just saying figuratively.

00:40:28.000 Like, you've got people who live in PA who can't even name who's in their General Assembly.

00:40:34.000 Yeah.

00:40:35.000 I mean, I just moved to Maryland, but I don't even know who my... Yeah.

00:40:39.000 Yeah.

00:40:39.000 I lived in New York for five years, I can't name a single person.

00:40:41.000 I can name Ocasio-Cortez, I didn't live in her district.

00:40:43.000 And she's federal, I can't speak... 1.00

00:40:45.000 I don't know who the councilmen are, I don't know any of that stuff.

00:40:49.000 It has been... everything's being nationalized and it's extremely dangerous.

00:40:52.000 It's not just about politics, it's about media.

00:40:54.000 Let's say... this was talked about like a decade ago, as local media was dying off because the internet was

00:41:01.000 replacing everything.

00:41:02.000 This like...

00:41:05.000 Maybe this plays into the culture war in a lot of ways.

00:41:07.000 It used to be that your tribe was partially local.

00:41:10.000 What you cared about locally might be your high school football team versus the neighboring town or whatever.

00:41:14.000 But with social media, the tribes became singular, national, top-level, and, like, very specific.

00:41:22.000 Right.

00:41:23.000 They used to write about, with this phenomenon, you could have a local politician be extremely corrupt, and there's no one to write about it, because no one cares.

00:41:31.000 Do I care about, you know, I don't know, the mayor of Gainesville committing some crime or whatever?

00:41:36.000 No, I care about DeSantis.

00:41:37.000 I don't care about the smaller town mayor, or whatever, or the city councilman.

00:41:42.000 It's not gonna make the news.

00:41:42.000 No one's really gonna care.

00:41:43.000 Unless it's really crazy, like, you know, he builds a flying machine and then starts dropping mortars on people or something.

00:41:48.000 I don't know, maybe.

00:41:48.000 I have to think about it, though, because part of this is youth and, you know, living wherever you want.

00:41:52.000 I wonder if, like, we would change our minds if we were, you know, well, I guess you are a homeowner, but...

00:41:57.000 Yeah, like if I was like personally a homeowner in a place and knew I was gonna stay there for 20 years I might start caring a little more about local elections.

00:42:03.000 Yeah, but but no, I mean your general point that was correct about how I mean our politics have been nationalized our media has been nationalized and the concerns people have are are You know ultimate, you know, and also like I have a random thing like people people would say to me like there's you know I think you might have said this there's no way Joe Biden got 80 million some votes.

00:42:19.000 Mm-hmm, like I think there is a way, for sure.

00:42:23.000 Let's play the media game.

00:42:27.000 Normies were radicalized by a psychotic Trump derangement media apparatus that sought to make money off of outrage about Trump, and it created a whirlpool that sucked in regular people who snapped and said, I just can't take it anymore!

00:42:42.000 Biden, boom.

00:42:43.000 Yeah, no, I think that's exactly, that was exactly my thesis, right?

00:42:46.000 Like, our, you know, sports went away, like, what were people even focused on over the last year?

00:42:50.000 But I think Trump's, Trump got oceans elevened, that's the way I put it.

00:42:53.000 Like, the real heist happened months ago, when they were going around knocking on doors and saying, vote, when they're doing ballot harvesting, when they were doing those illegal, uh, democracy in the park things in Wisconsin.

00:43:02.000 There's the, the viral videos of the Native American women saying, like, we're gonna give you money if you vote, like, make sure you tell us you vote.

00:43:08.000 One tribe actually said, send us a picture of you voting, we'll send you 20 bucks.

00:43:12.000 Like, super illegal stuff.

00:43:13.000 Oh yeah, and I've no doubt there were tons of shenanigans too.

00:43:16.000 Like, I remember, you know, I was in Philly on Election Day.

00:43:18.000 You were buzzing those videos.

00:43:19.000 Yeah, the video of the poll watcher.

00:43:21.000 I referenced that when we had Destiny here, he's a leftist, and he said, if these claims of, like, irregularity and fraud and stuff, or the observers being blocked were true, then where were all the videos on election night?

00:43:31.000 And I was like, Will Chamberlain was there and he posted, like, a video in the morning of, like, an observer being kicked out.

00:43:36.000 Yeah.

00:43:36.000 It happened.

00:43:37.000 Yeah, that's weird.

00:43:38.000 Like, there were so many people who... Just a random side note.

00:43:40.000 So many people denied that.

00:43:41.000 Like, I got... I saw fact checks that were, like... Yeah!

00:43:44.000 BuzzFeed?

00:43:45.000 BuzzFeed tried a fact check.

00:43:46.000 I literally corrected her, and she withdrew it to her credit.

00:43:48.000 Yeah.

00:43:48.000 Like, you know... That's so weird.

00:43:50.000 She's like, he wasn't... You know, and then... They tried claiming that, no, he was at the wrong precinct or whatever.

00:43:54.000 Right.

00:43:54.000 It's like, no... And then you posted the photo where it's, like, good in any precinct or something.

00:43:57.000 Right, exactly.

00:43:58.000 So weird.

00:43:58.000 They just... They were so tuned for, like, oh, there's misinformation.

00:44:02.000 People are gonna spread misinformation.

00:44:03.000 I'm like, You guys know, there's actual shenanigans going on in Philly.

00:44:06.000 And I don't know that there was some, like, massive plot to, like, thwart poll watching.

00:44:10.000 It's more like that, you know, what I would attribute this particular thing to was just sort of an arrogance among the poll workers in that area that, like, they were kings of the castle.

00:44:20.000 They dictated what happened.

00:44:21.000 They didn't need to pay attention to stuff.

00:44:22.000 You see the video where the guy yells, all Republican poll watchers leave now or whatever?

00:44:26.000 I didn't see that one, but I mean, that's awesome.

00:44:28.000 Oh yeah.

00:44:28.000 that or they're putting up boards to block the windows.

00:44:31.000 Do you see what Scott Adams said about this?

00:44:34.000 He said if you are having a discussion about the potential irregularities or fraud after

00:44:41.000 they barred observers and blocked windows, you're a victim of misinformation and essentially

00:44:46.000 misdirection.

00:44:47.000 Yeah.

00:44:48.000 Because as soon as they said no witnesses, you can't do anything after that.

00:44:53.000 Right.

00:44:53.000 So when they say, where's the evidence of fraud?

00:44:55.000 I don't know.

00:44:55.000 They kicked out the observers and boarded the windows up.

00:44:57.000 Right, and I'm actually for, like, as a general rule, like, the idea that if you wrongfully kick out poll watchers, then the votes go away, right?

00:45:04.000 Yeah.

00:45:04.000 Like, we assume you've committed fraud.

00:45:07.000 The presumption is you committed fraud, and you need to affirmatively prove you didn't.

00:45:10.000 Yes.

00:45:10.000 Like, I mean, that's, you know, like, that's how it kind of works in the court system generally.

00:45:14.000 Like, if you fail to produce something of litigation, judges will eventually issue an adverse inference instruction saying, jury, you need to assume that this was terrible evidence for them that proved that they did something horrible.

00:45:23.000 Interesting, um, you know, and that's the way I should look at I think we should look at but we need to change the law

00:45:28.000 To do this, right?

00:45:28.000 but I think we should change the law about poll watchers and

00:45:30.000 and get people to a point where When they are instructed about working a poll and letting a

00:45:34.000 poll watcher and they're like we better not Restrict this poll watcher because the consequences of

00:45:38.000 doing so are terrible Well, that's clearly not the case in philly the

00:45:42.000 consequences of what we're talking about go well beyond just

00:45:46.000 The election and which team won, right?

00:45:49.000 Right.

00:45:49.000 What people need to realize, and I've been saying this quite a bit, is that we're a nation of people.

00:45:54.000 A judge could rule something that's ridiculous and dumb, and it would stand because they're the judge. 0.94

00:45:59.000 And if it's a Supreme Court justice who gives a bad ruling, then what do they do, right? 0.98

00:46:03.000 It ends with them.

00:46:05.000 People aren't computers.

00:46:06.000 They're not robots.

00:46:07.000 And so I was mentioning this previously that people keep saying, here's what the safe harbor provision says, therefore we've won.

00:46:14.000 And I'm like, you could get a crazy justice who's like, you know, he just goes nuts and give some crazy ruling.

00:46:20.000 And I'm within reason, obviously, like within the confines of law, I just have a weird interpretation of it.

00:46:24.000 And then you get a weird ruling you didn't expect because people make the decisions, not computers.

00:46:28.000 It's not a code.

00:46:29.000 You know what I mean?

00:46:29.000 Right, and I mean, like, that's why, you know, for example, the Texas lawsuit still has a chance.

00:46:32.000 I wouldn't rule it out, right?

00:46:34.000 Like, there's always some human variability.

00:46:36.000 Yeah.

00:46:36.000 You know, there's cases where you have better odds and worse odds, right?

00:46:39.000 If you're fighting six different procedural arguments that a judge has to decide, oh, well, I'm just going to have to ignore the law in, like, six different core areas of our jurisprudence in order to rule for you.

00:46:49.000 They're just not going to—they don't want to do that.

00:46:50.000 What are the odds you would give Trump of winning?

00:46:53.000 Right now?

00:46:53.000 Yes.

00:46:54.000 Less than 1%.

00:46:54.000 Wow.

00:46:55.000 But more than 0.01%?

00:46:56.000 I mean, those are still not bad odds, to be honest.

00:47:03.000 I mean, you know, he's not ahead in the vote counts in like four different states.

00:47:07.000 And the problem is he has to win.

00:47:09.000 I'll talk about the other reason I like the Texas lawsuit.

00:47:12.000 He has to win in four different states or has to flip four different states.

00:47:15.000 Or win one lawsuit from Texas.

00:47:16.000 Yeah, exactly, right?

00:47:17.000 The lawsuit in Texas at least is elegant in the sense of a chance to just, in one shot, get rid of all the problems.

00:47:22.000 But otherwise, he has to win independent election contests in four different states with time running out.

00:47:27.000 You know what it is?

00:47:28.000 It's like in a movie, and there's like four bad guys, and then like, Texas comes up, and he pulls out his gun and goes, bam, bam, bam, bam, bam!

00:47:35.000 And then just knocks them all out at once, and then on the gun, he puts it away.

00:47:38.000 That's Texas.

00:47:39.000 That's the hope.

00:47:43.000 I'm hoping for that.

00:47:43.000 I really am.

00:47:44.000 I hope to lose the foreground I bet on Biden and be revealed to be a complete charlatan as a result.

00:47:49.000 No, no, no.

00:47:50.000 I think, you know, it's annoying to me that people think you're not allowed to be wrong when you make predictions.

00:47:56.000 It's like, you can be wrong, whatever.

00:47:57.000 Like, at the time, you had made an educated guess based on the evidence laid before you, and there's a lot of variables, and there you go.

00:48:07.000 So I'll tell you this man, long story short, I had a buddy tell me in 2011 not to buy Bitcoin when it was at 70 cents.

00:48:12.000 Because he said, you can't do anything with it, it's hard to get, if you make this purchase now, you'll be putting a bunch of your money into something you can't get out, and then what happens in a month when everyone forgets about it, you'll have nothing.

00:48:22.000 That's actually a really good argument, so I said, better not buy it. 0.70

00:48:25.000 If I had spent the five grand on 70 cent Bitcoin, I would be very, very happy today if I did, but it was, it would have been stupid for me to take.

00:48:33.000 It was basically my life savings and putting it in Bitcoin.

00:48:36.000 I was like, this new technology, this is amazing.

00:48:38.000 You're reading about this stuff.

00:48:39.000 I'm really excited.

00:48:39.000 And he's like, don't do it, man.

00:48:41.000 You need that money now for food and rent.

00:48:43.000 I'm like, yeah, you're right.

00:48:44.000 As I was telling you to do it.

00:48:45.000 A month later, a month later.

00:48:47.000 This is before I met you.

00:48:48.000 No, no, even afterwards when Bitcoin was out there, I was like,

00:48:50.000 you got to get into Bitcoin.

00:48:50.000 You got to do it.

00:48:51.000 I was buying, I have Bitcoin.

00:48:53.000 Yeah, I've been paying attention.

00:48:54.000 But anyway, here's what I'm saying.

00:48:56.000 This election is not just about which team won.

00:49:00.000 Right.

00:49:00.000 It's about, at this point, I think this is maybe the most consequential election we've ever had.

00:49:07.000 So here's the next story that we're gonna get into.

00:49:10.000 Trump tweets video of Chinese professor claiming that Beijing can swing U.S.

00:49:14.000 policy because it has people at the top of America's core inner circle of power in clip that has been deleted from social media in China.

00:49:21.000 Not only does this guy, Di Dongsheng, say that they have old friends, he calls it, In high positions.

00:49:29.000 He says that Joe Biden's son became rich with all this international financing stuff and who do you think helped him do it?

00:49:36.000 Essentially it's saying the Bidens are compromised but he doesn't need to say it because Tony Bobulinski already said it.

00:49:43.000 That Joe Biden is compromised by China and now we have a guy in China, they're all laughing as he says he did it.

00:49:50.000 This is the consequence now of losing this election.

00:49:53.000 Yeah, no, I'm really not happy about that, you know, and I think... But, so, listen, listen.

00:49:59.000 What do you do?

00:50:01.000 What do you do?

00:50:02.000 You try and beat him, or, I mean, or, well, and one of the things I've been talking about has been, let's get a special counsel going, right?

00:50:09.000 Like, this is what Democrats did.

00:50:11.000 Let's have a special counsel for Biden in China.

00:50:14.000 And the election.

00:50:16.000 And the election, yeah.

00:50:16.000 Let's have a second, like, we should have three, right?

00:50:18.000 There's Durham already.

00:50:19.000 But let's have a new one for the China Burisma stuff. 0.62

00:50:23.000 And let's have one for the election irregularities.

00:50:25.000 And let's make the Democrats adhere, you know, if the Democrats want, like, obviously a Democrat Attorney General can figure out a way to fire these people.

00:50:32.000 There are ways.

00:50:33.000 But if they want to set that precedent, fine.

00:50:34.000 Then we're never going to have to deal with another BS investigation from the civil service again.

00:50:39.000 Right.

00:50:39.000 And so, I mean, I think they probably will end up doing that if we took the, you know, if Barr pulled the trigger.

00:50:44.000 Was it LeBron James who came out all pro-China?

00:50:48.000 Yeah, that's right.

00:50:49.000 Yeah.

00:50:50.000 We've been seeing more and more U.S.

00:50:51.000 companies capitulate to China.

00:50:54.000 Authoritarian despots, communists who harvest organs from religious minorities. 0.88

00:51:01.000 And they're bragging now that they've essentially got the incoming president in their back pocket.

00:51:07.000 Yeah, it's kind of funny how, like, the communist government of China ended up proving every critique of capitalism true, right?

00:51:14.000 Like, you end up with, I mean, all the worst sort of rapaciousness and corruption.

00:51:19.000 They were able to go to these Harvard professors?

00:51:23.000 What are the universities where they arrested all these guys?

00:51:25.000 Oh yeah, I mean, it was Harvard, Berkeley, I think had one.

00:51:27.000 They go to Professor and say, hey, we'll give you $50,000 a month.

00:51:30.000 Give us your secrets.

00:51:31.000 Recruit for us.

00:51:32.000 And they say, you bet.

00:51:34.000 Not only to them, but to U.S.

00:51:35.000 soldiers, to military personnel with top secret clearances, just like that NYPD officer that was taken in, and also other governments like Israel that have sold U.S.

00:51:43.000 technology to China.

00:51:45.000 So this is a major issue that's going to have major implications.

00:51:47.000 I want to know, who is this top American corps The inner circle of power and influence.

00:51:53.000 Who are these people?

00:51:54.000 I want to know.

00:51:54.000 There deserves to be an investigation.

00:51:56.000 Deep state.

00:51:59.000 Top level Wall Street.

00:52:00.000 Let's call them the old friends.

00:52:01.000 I'm gonna call them the old friends from now on.

00:52:02.000 He did extensively talk about Wall Street and how Wall Street was able to contain someone like Obama that was very easy to manipulate and then he said when Trump came in The story wasn't so true, and then he thinks that when Biden comes in, things are gonna go back to normal.

00:52:17.000 What's normal?

00:52:18.000 What is this normal according to Beijing and the Chinese Communist government?

00:52:21.000 Kissing the pinky ring of the Chinese Communist Party. 0.51

00:52:24.000 Trump wouldn't do it.

00:52:25.000 This guy was like, how do we fix the Trump administration?

00:52:28.000 We couldn't do it.

00:52:29.000 Well, then Biden won, and everyone laughs.

00:52:32.000 Everyone laughs.

00:52:33.000 So, look, Sam Harris tweeted the other day, the story from the New York Times, why do so many people think the election was rigged?

00:52:41.000 And Jeffrey Miller, he's another professor, responded that when there's so much anti-conservative bias in academia and institutions and the media, people just don't trust the elections, right?

00:52:51.000 But it's crazy to me that we have Joe Biden, the single greatest president in American history, based on his ability.

00:52:58.000 I mean, you have to imagine the amount of votes he got, 80 million, and the amount of campaigning he did, basically none.

00:53:06.000 He must have been the most powerfully charismatic individual.

00:53:09.000 I can only imagine when he got up on TV and he said, come on man, every single one of these voters was blasted back by the pure awe of Joe Biden's charisma.

00:53:21.000 I don't know.

00:53:22.000 Hillary was a really bad candidate in a lot of ways. 1.00

00:53:25.000 People really didn't like Hillary Clinton and they had really good reason not to like her. 0.99

00:53:29.000 You know, the thing about Biden, he's a goofball, he's in cognitive decline, but nobody hated him. 0.94

00:53:36.000 Right. 0.98

00:53:37.000 He's not a threat.

00:53:37.000 Trump wasn't a threat.

00:53:39.000 It's like, who loathes Joe Biden?

00:53:42.000 There might be a few people.

00:53:43.000 Yeah.

00:53:44.000 And maybe he's done some really loathsome things, like with China. 0.98

00:53:46.000 Scott Adams was.

00:53:47.000 Tara Reid.

00:53:48.000 Yeah, Tara Reid.

00:53:50.000 You know, there are certainly scandals that are loathsome, but personality-wise, he's not like Hillary, and he's not like a lot of Democrats who are just, you know... Well, so let me ask you this.

00:54:02.000 Let me load the question up a little bit.

00:54:06.000 Joe Biden beat every non-polling bellwether metric, such as voter enthusiasm, party registration numbers, Google searches, which is a new one.

00:54:16.000 There's primary vote count and support.

00:54:20.000 He also won the other silly ones like cookie sales and mass—I'm sorry, he lost.

00:54:24.000 Oh, you're talking about Trump won all these and Biden— Biden beat them.

00:54:27.000 So basically, all of these things weren't against him.

00:54:30.000 So whoever gets the highest enthusiasm tends to win.

00:54:32.000 Whoever gets the best primary turnout tends to win.

00:54:34.000 Whoever gets the most new registration tends to win.

00:54:38.000 Whoever sells the most Halloween masks and most cookies. 0.99

00:54:40.000 Those are the silly ones. 0.92

00:54:41.000 I bring them up on purpose. 0.96

00:54:42.000 Joe Biden lost all of those things and still won.

00:54:44.000 He lost the three bellwether states and 18 of 19 bellwether townships.

00:54:48.000 So when you say all that, a lot of people say... Look, if you came up to me and said, he beat a few of these things, I'd be like, wow.

00:54:54.000 You come on, you tell me that he beat every single one of them?

00:54:57.000 At once?

00:54:59.000 Isn't that weird?

00:55:00.000 I mean, it's weird, and I think certainly there is fraud.

00:55:03.000 It's not impossible.

00:55:04.000 It's just not impossible, and 2020 was a different election.

00:55:07.000 It's true.

00:55:08.000 It's true.

00:55:08.000 What I often say people got to realize, too, is that COVID moved everybody around.

00:55:11.000 That people were moving and the riots moved everybody around.

00:55:14.000 So that could explain the states and the townships, I suppose.

00:55:17.000 But we also have to understand that who was in Biden's corner.

00:55:20.000 China was in his corner. 0.96

00:55:21.000 The big tech monopolies were in his corner.

00:55:23.000 Hollywood was in his corner, the mainstream media was in his corner, the establishment was in his corner, and they all are working together, helping each other out.

00:55:31.000 So it makes you really wonder what really happened here, especially with the latest revelations from this professor from Beijing.

00:55:37.000 I mean, this is mind-blowing stuff.

00:55:40.000 When he said about Hunter and how the Hunter story was treated in the United States, it was a Essentially stuffed out the American public were denied the truth about the Hunter Biden emails because of the mainstream media and big tech social monopolies collusion destroying it.

00:55:54.000 This is what the professor said.

00:55:56.000 Trump has been saying that Biden's son has some sort of global foundation.

00:56:00.000 Have you noticed that?

00:56:01.000 Who helped Hunter build the foundation?

00:56:05.000 Got it?

00:56:05.000 There are a lot of these deals inside You need to understand the way he said it.

00:56:10.000 Yes.

00:56:11.000 The laughing and smiling.

00:56:12.000 He didn't just say, and who helped him build it?

00:56:14.000 Got it?

00:56:14.000 He went, and who helped him build it?

00:56:17.000 Yeah.

00:56:17.000 And everyone laughs?

00:56:18.000 Got it?

00:56:19.000 Uh-huh.

00:56:19.000 Our old friends, the political establishment, the elites, the old guard, the people who are in government who are helping us out.

00:56:25.000 He says, I talked to our friends.

00:56:27.000 They said they were trying to help, but they couldn't stop Trump.

00:56:30.000 Well, then Biden wins.

00:56:32.000 He smiles and everyone laughs.

00:56:34.000 So look, man, I think dark times are coming.

00:56:40.000 Dark winter is putting it lightly.

00:56:42.000 That's what Biden said.

00:56:43.000 I hope that we win the Georgia Senate races really, really badly.

00:56:47.000 I don't think so.

00:56:48.000 Well, a lot of Republicans are disenfranchised because Trump's being kind of quiet.

00:56:53.000 He's not really being bombastic.

00:56:54.000 He's not really fighting.

00:56:55.000 And then everything just looks like it's not going his way.

00:56:59.000 But Trump's not on the ticket.

00:57:01.000 People don't like the Republicans.

00:57:02.000 I mean, in Georgia, right, like, you know, the Senate candidates outperformed Trump, right?

00:57:07.000 But, like, Loeffler was appointed.

00:57:09.000 Yeah, I mean, there's not huge enthusiasm behind them, but, you know, the sort of... She didn't win a popularity contest, right?

00:57:17.000 Yeah, I mean, she didn't win it outright, but, like, there were overall more Republican votes in both the Senate seats. 0.83

00:57:22.000 I think it's still pretty viable for us to win those Senate seats.

00:57:25.000 I agree.

00:57:25.000 I'm just leaning towards... and maybe I'll be wrong again, because, you know, I'm not good at predicting how people vote, I suppose.

00:57:31.000 Or I am, and I'm not good at predicting how fraud plays out.

00:57:34.000 But that's the case.

00:57:34.000 The Democrats win.

00:57:36.000 I don't know.

00:57:38.000 I speak to some personal experience.

00:57:39.000 My parents are classic suburban Republicans.

00:57:44.000 My mom couldn't stand Trump. 0.99

00:57:46.000 She just couldn't.

00:57:47.000 And voted for Hillary and voted for Biden.

00:57:49.000 But even she called me the other day and said, I'm really still glad Trump went to Georgia to get those Republican Senate candidates elected.

00:57:57.000 There really is that constituency of people Um, in, in certain places like Georgia that just couldn't, couldn't stomach Trump, but would generally want Republicans in power.

00:58:07.000 Well, let's talk about the more severe reality of what comes next.

00:58:11.000 This is from, we got Yahoo News.

00:58:13.000 FBI warns state local police about China targeting people on U.S.

00:58:18.000 soil.

00:58:18.000 They say the FBI is warning local law enforcement agencies to beware of cooperating with a Chinese government campaign to coerce U.S.

00:58:26.000 residents to return to China to face criminal charges, according to a counterintelligence bulletin obtained by Yahoo News.

00:58:32.000 The bulletin comes shortly after eight people Including a former New York Police Department officer were indicted on charges of acting as a legal agents for Beijing Eight people including a new NYPD officer were I mean, how is this not treason?

00:58:48.000 Well, he wasn't just an NYPD officer It's he also held a very important security clearance because he was in the military as well in the US military in the US military as well and he was spying on the Tibetan community and Which was a protest community that he was going back all the way to China giving out key information who was a part of organizing against the Chinese government.

00:59:07.000 Do you see what Mike Pompeo said earlier this year?

00:59:09.000 I'm not, he said a lot of things.

00:59:11.000 He said China's infiltrated every level of government from state, city.

00:59:14.000 That's very true.

00:59:15.000 So I feel like this guy getting up on stage in China and gloating that the Bidens are basically in the pockets of the old friends and seeing the story about Hunter Biden.

00:59:27.000 Let me just make something really really clear.

00:59:29.000 Joe Biden took Hunter Biden and Air Force Two to China for a private equity deal.

00:59:34.000 Why did Joe Biden use U.S.

00:59:36.000 government resources to help his son get a $5 million forgivable interest-free loan from China and launch a billion-dollar equity firm?

00:59:45.000 They're in the pocket.

00:59:47.000 It's Beijing-Biden. 0.60

00:59:47.000 Bob Yelinski, who worked with the family, gave an interview saying they're compromised. 0.60

00:59:51.000 And that's it?

00:59:52.000 We just roll over and say we're all Chinese subjects now?

00:59:55.000 Second-class citizens?

00:59:55.000 Unless- because we can't even go to China.

00:59:56.000 I mean, China poses such a difficult problem.

00:59:59.000 Like, I often- people think like it was just obvious that, you know, we were gonna win.

01:00:04.000 The Cold War, I mean, we had a massive espionage disadvantage of the Soviet Union.

01:00:07.000 Yeah.

01:00:08.000 But ultimately, the Soviet Union was, you know, fighting us, but they had a completely dysfunctional economic system.

01:00:14.000 They couldn't put enough toilet paper on the shelves.

01:00:16.000 You know, they didn't... Guess who can't put enough toilet paper on the shelves now?

01:00:19.000 Yeah, I mean, right.

01:00:21.000 But, like, it took 50 years to beat that economy, and that economy was completely dysfunctional.

01:00:26.000 China's economy is not dysfunctional.

01:00:27.000 No.

01:00:29.000 It's manipulative.

01:00:30.000 It's manipulative.

01:00:31.000 And they also have the same sort of, like, espionage superiority over us that the Soviets had over us. 0.58

01:00:36.000 They have four times the people.

01:00:37.000 Four times the people.

01:00:38.000 I mean, in terms of agents, like, we don't have any meaningful presence there.

01:00:41.000 They have, I mean, there's some great books on this about what the variety of different operations China's running here.

01:00:48.000 Trying to hack lower-level defense contractors, because they can't hack, obviously, the DOD, but they try and get low-level contractors and get plans that way.

01:00:58.000 Basically trying to recruit people.

01:00:59.000 I mean, there are, I think, something that somebody said to me, or I think I might have read it, there are serious technical computer science programs at College Park taught by Chinese professors to Chinese students in Chinese.

01:01:13.000 That's weird.

01:01:14.000 And then those kids go back.

01:01:16.000 Dude, they're manipulating their real estate market in China to create this, like, a regular middle class house is like a million dollars compared to an American, which is, you know, $200,000 to $300,000 or something like that.

01:01:29.000 They're buying up large swaths of land in countries all over the world.

01:01:33.000 In Brazil, in Africa, in the U.S., on the West Coast, they're buying up tons and tons of property.

01:01:39.000 They're just slowly buying their way to take everything over.

01:01:42.000 Yeah.

01:01:42.000 It's clever.

01:01:43.000 It's basically they've convinced the United States to give up all its manufacturing in exchange for cheap labor.

01:01:49.000 These politicians we've had over the past several decades, the old friends, as D. Dong Cheng says, have thought to themselves, look, it's good for the American business to have dollar an hour Chinese laborers I've got to pay benefits to.

01:02:01.000 They save money, and we all get rich.

01:02:03.000 And then a generation goes by.

01:02:04.000 A decade goes by.

01:02:06.000 And now we no longer make our own medicine.

01:02:08.000 You buy a musical instrument, you buy computers, cameras, whatever, it's all made somewhere else. 0.64

01:02:14.000 We don't make it anymore.

01:02:16.000 What would happen if China declared war right now?

01:02:18.000 We'd be caught with our pants down.

01:02:19.000 I mean, it's, I mean, they wouldn't, I mean, there's still the mutual assured destruction worries,

01:02:24.000 but I mean, they were beyond the point of being able to, you know, really meaningfully coerce them.

01:02:29.000 Like that's, and that's, that's actually different from like where we were as a superpower even 20

01:02:33.000 years ago. Like, and that's sort of, you know, we at Human Events, I mean, we ran an article,

01:02:38.000 like Xi Jinping will have his way in Hong Kong, and that was like two years ago.

01:02:41.000 Yeah.

01:02:41.000 We got a lot of flack from that from people who were saying, whoa, whoa, whoa.

01:02:44.000 But like, we, you know, again, a descriptive versus a normative argument.

01:02:48.000 Do I want Xi Jinping to have his way with Hong Kong?

01:02:50.000 No.

01:02:50.000 Wieldy?

01:02:50.000 Yes, exactly. This Beijing professor confirmed everything that we've been hearing about for a very long time. We were

01:02:56.000 talking about this two days ago Before the video came out. Two days ago, we were breaking

01:02:59.000 everything down and we got to understand we're in their trade war

01:03:02.000 We're gonna gonna be in a currency war We're probably according to the tzatziki trap might be even

01:03:08.000 in a hot war and we have to understand China has its hands deep in 0.57

01:03:13.000 American institutions like we can't even imagine When we look at politicians and corporations, they have been enriched more than they could have even imagined because of this opening of China policy that has been instituted by individuals like Henry Kissinger under the Nixon administration.

01:03:28.000 that literally went to China with David Rockefeller and said, Hey, we're going to have a lot of jobs for you.

01:03:33.000 We're going to bring you a lot of factories.

01:03:35.000 We're going to bring you a lot of industry.

01:03:36.000 You just give us the cheap Chinese slave labor, and then we're going to have a great deal and everything's going to go through China. 0.99

01:03:41.000 And that's exactly what's happening right now.

01:03:43.000 Look, it's beyond just the schools where they have the Thousand Towns Project, where they've actually got a bunch of professors taking 50k a month or whatever, recruiting more people and selling our secrets.

01:03:54.000 They've got Hollywood bending the knee. 1.00

01:03:56.000 Doing movies where they remove negative things that could offend China.

01:03:59.000 The NBA is praising them.

01:04:01.000 And they got TikTok.

01:04:02.000 And mainstream media as well.

01:04:03.000 Mainstream news articles refuse many times to even criticize China or the Uyghur Muslims.

01:04:08.000 Look at Tibet as an example.

01:04:10.000 A few years ago, everyone was talking about Tibet and the Tibetans and the things that they're going through with the Chinese government.

01:04:16.000 Now, no one's even talking about Tibet.

01:04:18.000 No one's talking about the Uyghur Muslims.

01:04:19.000 No one's talking about The Hong Kong, where we're getting video footage right now of them sending activists and protesters to mainland China to never be seen again.

01:04:29.000 Or the video footage of the Uyghur Muslims being loaded into trains, heads shaven. 1.00

01:04:34.000 All that's happening, and it sounds like if Trump isn't the president in the next four years, we will just be subjects of China.

01:04:42.000 I mean, I don't think we'll be subjects of China.

01:04:44.000 I think that we're still too strong.

01:04:46.000 Figuratively.

01:04:46.000 But, like, it'll get to the point where whatever soft power we had, I mean, like, it just, it will be gone, right?

01:04:52.000 Like, we'll ask somebody.

01:04:53.000 We're a generation or two out.

01:04:55.000 You see what TikTok is doing?

01:04:57.000 People don't realize this with how TikTok works.

01:05:00.000 You know what?

01:05:01.000 I'm going to stop and talk about a different social media app, okay, that's similar.

01:05:07.000 And what they do is, and I've mentioned this before, you get, in order to get a bunch of young people using your social media app so you can manipulate them and control what they see and what they think, you get some kids to use it.

01:05:18.000 You give them fake followers.

01:05:20.000 All of a sudden, some high school kids, like, I got 2,000 followers on this app.

01:05:23.000 Like, I don't have any followers on Facebook or Twitter.

01:05:26.000 They use the app more.

01:05:26.000 They get more followers.

01:05:27.000 The followers aren't real.

01:05:28.000 They brag to their friends.

01:05:30.000 You got, how many followers do you have, 50?

01:05:31.000 I got 4,000 on TikTok.

01:05:34.000 Or I should say a different app, not TikTok.

01:05:36.000 No, I mean literally a different app.

01:05:38.000 Because I don't know if TikTok did this, but I know there's another company that did this, and it worked out very, very, very, very well for them.

01:05:44.000 You get all these young people to use it, and eventually you've created a cultural wave that everybody wants to be on it, because they want to get recognition, they want the followers, they want the points, they want the score.

01:05:53.000 Then, you use the algorithm to control what they can see and what they can't see.

01:05:56.000 All of a sudden now, anything negative about China is gone.

01:05:59.000 Everything positive about China is coming back. 0.99

01:06:01.000 Donald Trump is the orange man, he's awful, he's evil, he's bad, everybody hates him, right? 0.99

01:06:04.000 You better go vote. 1.00

01:06:05.000 Then you get a big surge of young people who go out and vote.

01:06:08.000 And that's manipulated through this technology coming from these other countries.

01:06:12.000 It's fifth-generational warfare.

01:06:13.000 I mean, there's a reason China doesn't let its citizens use Twitter.

01:06:15.000 Exactly.

01:06:16.000 But they use it for us.

01:06:18.000 Yeah, like, I mean, there needs to be reciprocity there or nothing at all, right?

01:06:23.000 It's ridiculous that it took so long or that people were even pushing back against the problem of China.

01:06:27.000 And they're aggressively going after VPNs so people in China can't even, you know, change their addresses to see what people in the world are saying.

01:06:35.000 So just imagine living in China where your social credit score relies on what you regurgitate, what you read. 0.88

01:06:41.000 If you read something you're not supposed to read, your social credit score goes down.

01:06:45.000 And this is a society that other places like Singapore and other governments are even thinking about adapting themselves, because this is a great way to control people, to subjugate people, and to benefit the special interest class, which are seeing these things.

01:06:59.000 They're saying, wait, this could be probably good here.

01:07:01.000 And then we have a Biden administration where his cabinet is being filled with individuals that are literally arguing, we can't do anything to stifle.

01:07:08.000 We shouldn't stop China, because if we do, that's going to hurt the global economy. 1.00

01:07:12.000 We need to let China rise. 0.63

01:07:14.000 Just give up.

01:07:17.000 Guys, just lay down. 0.88

01:07:19.000 And put your hands up and expose your soft underbelly for China. 1.00

01:07:23.000 They just want to lock up the Uyghur Muslims. 1.00

01:07:25.000 We need satellite internet.

01:07:27.000 We need to bypass ISPs and get this free software mesh network in place.

01:07:31.000 We need it here so we don't get censored, but they need it.

01:07:36.000 Yeah, I mean free and open internet is something critically important.

01:07:40.000 And when you see China controlling it, controlling what their people can and cannot listen to and see, this is a huge, vast power that it just started out with saying, with the government coming out saying, no, we're going to tell you what you should listen to. 0.72

01:07:53.000 We know what's best for you.

01:07:54.000 Just like corporations are making the argument here.

01:07:57.000 We have to fight against fake news and everything that's wrong in our society.

01:08:00.000 We're going to curate everything for you and provide it to you on a silver platter.

01:08:03.000 I think we're on track to Based on everything we're seeing happening right now, when I say that we'll be subjects of China, I don't mean in a year, I mean in 50 or 100. 0.82

01:08:14.000 We will be a weak, old regional power, probably fractured in many ways with a, you know, disparate broken government in some... I imagine at that point, you know, and again a lot of variables from now between the 50 or 100 years, but China's got the power, China's growing, China's controlling us, and we're losing. 0.68

01:08:35.000 I don't know.

01:08:36.000 I would say I'm that as pessimistic as you are, but I definitely think that we're, in general, I mean, the Democrats are, you know, continuing Democrat control will lead to that, sure.

01:08:44.000 Look at the past several decades of what the U.S.

01:08:45.000 has been doing.

01:08:46.000 Sending our manufacturing overseas, Trans-Pacific Partnership.

01:08:49.000 Now, you know, Joe Biden's going to jump in whatever Pacific Partnership agreement there's going to be.

01:08:55.000 And it's not just about China.

01:08:57.000 They're the biggest threat the U.S.

01:08:59.000 has right now, but it's also about the U.S.

01:09:00.000 just giving up.

01:09:02.000 And it's not like the collective spirit of America has said, oh, I failed, I'm done.

01:09:07.000 It's that we've got politicians that never cared about us, and it's partly our fault.

01:09:11.000 When people go in and they say, I'm gonna vote Democrat, I'm voting Republican, they don't know who they're voting for.

01:09:16.000 They end up voting for people who are just like, vote for me, and I'll fight for you, I'll give you whatever you want, and then all they really wanted was the keys to the castle.

01:09:23.000 They wanna get the paycheck, they wanna get the pension, and they wanna get their name etched in stone for history, and then they did nothing.

01:09:29.000 And then when it came to passing bills, they said, How much money can we make in the short term if we send our manufacturing to, you know, to Mexico, to Indonesia, to, you know, to Vietnam or China?

01:09:39.000 We'll make a ton of money in the short term.

01:09:41.000 What about the long term?

01:09:42.000 Oh, we'll lose.

01:09:43.000 Yeah, but we won't care about that.

01:09:44.000 That's our kids, right?

01:09:46.000 Politicians have sold out the next generations.

01:09:49.000 I'm so surprised to me you've got so many young people who are becoming socialists.

01:09:52.000 That seems to me like the downward trajectory is we had a period where a bunch of our leaders were selling on a manufacturing base.

01:10:00.000 For a short-term gain with a long-term loss.

01:10:04.000 And then we created this world where these kids are like, well, just go to college then, right?

01:10:07.000 That's the solution.

01:10:08.000 There's no more good manufacturing jobs.

01:10:10.000 Go to college and you'll get a good paying job.

01:10:12.000 But what happens when everybody has a degree in some field or another and you're competing with people on the same level once again?

01:10:17.000 There are still no jobs.

01:10:19.000 There can be a million good computer jobs, but if, you know, 50 million kids are coming out of college with computer degrees, there's still no jobs.

01:10:25.000 Now they're saying, nothing works, we need communism.

01:10:28.000 But communism doesn't produce anything, it extracts things.

01:10:31.000 So over a long enough period of time, as everyone keeps demanding the government pay my bills, we need a stimulus!

01:10:37.000 Lock everything down, have the government pay for it.

01:10:39.000 The government can print money.

01:10:41.000 Money can facilitate trade, but if there's nothing being produced, there's nothing to trade in the long run.

01:10:45.000 Yeah, I think that's right.

01:10:46.000 All right, I need to quickly use the restroom. 1.00

01:10:48.000 I just did that.

01:10:50.000 I would say all the jobs are definitely in China with the Uyghur Muslims producing a lot of the corporate American goods that lecture us on racism here in the United States, which is something that people need to realize as well.

01:11:01.000 But I don't know if we want to go into the next story, but I mean, they infiltrate not only these kind of intellectual institutions that kind of set Uh, our young children to be where they are right now.

01:11:13.000 China has a huge influence on the universities and colleges, but they also infiltrate politicians in more ways than one as we found out today with the Chinese spy.

01:11:24.000 Oh, that's right.

01:11:25.000 Swalwell has the nerve to say cheat an election when he had a fundraiser organized by a Chinese spy.

01:11:33.000 Yes, and there's accusations by Donald Trump Jr.

01:11:36.000 that allegedly this spy had relations with Mr. Eric Swalwell, which by the way, Eric Swalwell was one of the biggest proponents of Russian collusion.

01:11:45.000 If you remember, he was out there on all the media networks.

01:11:48.000 They loved him.

01:11:49.000 He was ranting and raving.

01:11:50.000 There's a foreign government infiltrating our government.

01:11:53.000 There's a foreign government controlling everything.

01:11:55.000 The Russians are colluding! 1.00

01:11:57.000 He farted on TV while accusing Trump of trying to cheat an election.

01:12:01.000 Exactly.

01:12:02.000 And at the same time he was being infiltrated at very high levels by a Chinese government which he had very close dealings with.

01:12:11.000 Now this person is very interesting because they are describing her as a honeypot.

01:12:15.000 She slept with many prominent government officials and she escaped to China as soon as the FBI came looking for her.

01:12:22.000 They saw that she somehow miraculously escaped.

01:12:25.000 Which is absolutely mind-boggling.

01:12:26.000 So the Biden family's compromised.

01:12:29.000 Dianne Feinstein had a Chinese spy working for her office, and now Swalwell and many other people had a spy working for them.

01:12:35.000 Secretary Pompeo said that Chinese governments infiltrated every level of government.

01:12:40.000 Not just infiltrated.

01:12:41.000 I mean, this spy was deemed an important political figure in California.

01:12:46.000 She was orchestrating a lot of the campaigns, a lot of the fundraisers.

01:12:49.000 Fundraising for Swalwell.

01:12:50.000 Exactly.

01:12:50.000 So there's individuals right now saying Swalwell needs to resign immediately since he's been infiltrated.

01:12:56.000 The mainstream media right now is slowly patting him on the back saying, it's okay, he's a victim here.

01:13:01.000 He was given a briefing by the FBI.

01:13:03.000 They didn't do that for Trump.

01:13:04.000 Yep.

01:13:05.000 When Trump was accused of Russia, they just started spying on him.

01:13:07.000 The FBI called him and notified him that he was infiltrated by the Chinese government And we still don't know exactly what this person has.

01:13:14.000 We don't know what information they were able to gather.

01:13:16.000 This person also did fundraisers for Tulsi Gabbard, of all people.

01:13:20.000 Wow.

01:13:20.000 Yes.

01:13:21.000 So this is a major big story that's going to have a lot of ramifications.

01:13:26.000 Because when you look at the Beijing professor, he also talked about a political figure that helped him out tremendously, that now has Chinese citizens and now was back in China.

01:13:36.000 So we saw this Beijing professor literally talk about this, gloating about this.

01:13:40.000 acting very happy that this happened and now we have this ...

01:13:43.000 story that just came out there and I think this probably ...

01:13:47.000 happened a couple weeks ago maybe even a couple months ago ...

01:13:50.000 and now we're just finding out about it is a correlation with ...

01:13:54.000 it you make me more pessimistic but the whole China ...

01:13:57.000 I mean I rather know the truth and reality that we're facing ...

01:14:00.000 than be blinded to exactly what's going on.

01:14:02.000 Because we have to understand, our institutions are corrupted to the core, and they need to be replaced immediately.

01:14:07.000 Listen, listen.

01:14:08.000 If you just praise the glory that is the Chinese Communist Party, then you'll get to be a wealthy party member.

01:14:14.000 You'll have a nice loft atop the tallest building.

01:14:17.000 I wouldn't feel right imprisoning the Uyghurs. 1.00

01:14:20.000 I wouldn't feel right imprisoning the poor Hong Kong people.

01:14:22.000 What if it's you?

01:14:23.000 Would you rather go to the Gulag yourself?

01:14:25.000 All you have to do is give in.

01:14:27.000 Just give in.

01:14:27.000 No thank you.

01:14:29.000 That's what's happening though.

01:14:31.000 It's the way people feel.

01:14:32.000 It's a path of least resistance.

01:14:34.000 Why bother fighting against this machine that is gaining strength and taking over when you can just give in and be rich, right?

01:14:42.000 That's how they won over the elites.

01:14:45.000 We're talking about the spying program that was revealed today with the Chinese honeypot that infiltrated more ways than one a lot of U.S. 0.96

01:14:53.000 government officials.

01:14:54.000 What do you think about that?

01:14:55.000 Because a lot of people are saying this is room for Swalwell to resign.

01:14:59.000 Do you think that's legitimate?

01:15:03.000 Do you think there's any legal merit in that?

01:15:05.000 I mean, there's not a legal... It's not a legal argument.

01:15:09.000 It's a political argument.

01:15:10.000 I think you should resign.

01:15:11.000 I think this should be looked at like... I think you should have resigned a long time ago.

01:15:14.000 Like, you were compromised by a Russian spy in the middle of the Cold War?

01:15:18.000 Yeah, time for you to resign.

01:15:21.000 But I, in general, think a lot more people in our government should be resigning.

01:15:24.000 I think they should all resign, to be honest.

01:15:25.000 Except for Rand Paul.

01:15:26.000 And retiring from public life.

01:15:28.000 Like, why hasn't Bill Kristol retired from public life?

01:15:30.000 Oh, seriously.

01:15:31.000 Or Henry Kissinger, of all people.

01:15:32.000 Well, he got fired by Trump.

01:15:34.000 his organization did.

01:15:35.000 I mean, he's 90.

01:15:36.000 Doesn't he have grandchildren?

01:15:37.000 He can hang out with them.

01:15:38.000 It's fine.

01:15:39.000 Doesn't it seem like Trump is...

01:15:40.000 I'll say this, in my opinion, Trump is doing...

01:15:43.000 Everything he's doing, he's acting as though he's not going anywhere.

01:15:46.000 I mean, I think that's...

01:15:47.000 I think it's a front.

01:15:48.000 Honestly, I think he'll, you know...

01:15:50.000 Remember, the dude was a billionaire and he gave up the life of a billionaire and he'll

01:15:53.000 be returning to the life of a billionaire for the most part.

01:15:56.000 Yeah, but I don't know.

01:15:56.000 The TDS individuals are going to go after him.

01:15:59.000 Yeah, right.

01:16:01.000 The state prosecutors.

01:16:02.000 There's a bunch of them. 1.00

01:16:03.000 They're nuts. 1.00

01:16:04.000 This is what I'm saying, man. 0.99

01:16:07.000 I can't imagine everything just goes back to normal the way some of these people, like these Democrat voters, think is going to happen.

01:16:13.000 Yeah, like the calls for unity.

01:16:15.000 Like, I'm sorry, you don't get to call us Nazis one day and then suddenly have me turn around and sing Kumbaya with you.

01:16:20.000 But they think it's going to calm down when you've literally got, you know, Lin Wood and Cindy Powell, for instance, saying, don't vote Republican.

01:16:26.000 Oh my gosh.

01:16:27.000 I mean, that said, like, and there's stuff like I'm seeing like calls for martial law and, you know, like, I'm not for any of that.

01:16:35.000 In that respect, I'm just like, count me out.

01:16:37.000 I'm not gonna sit here and be like... Well, we gotta be honest here.

01:16:39.000 If the Republicans were accused of stealing the election, I think half of America would be burned down by now.

01:16:44.000 Oh yeah, sure, right.

01:16:46.000 But it's also the consequence of that.

01:16:49.000 If what you're calling for is martial law and a re-vote, and if you actually prevailed, then half of America would be burned down.

01:16:57.000 If Trump succeeds in his efforts, because president, Yeah, it's going to be Antifa times 10 times 100.

01:17:04.000 And I mean, like, I mean, that's not that's not independently a reason, right?

01:17:09.000 The question is, like, I, the reason I pose that is not like, oh, well, Antifa is bad, and they'll do bad things.

01:17:13.000 It's not, you know, we shouldn't let that control our behavior and decision making.

01:17:17.000 But Uh, that doesn't mean I want to live in a country with coups or, uh, sort of what do you, what do you look if, if Trump on January 21st is a regular guy again, the new New York's going after him like crazy and, and the media smears and lies about him.

01:17:33.000 It's intense.

01:17:34.000 That's intense!

01:17:34.000 I don't know.

01:17:35.000 I mean, it's just, you remember everybody hated Nixon and then they stopped and they forgot after the Ford pardon.

01:17:39.000 I could even see a Biden pardon of Trump, honestly.

01:17:42.000 But that's federal level.

01:17:42.000 What about the state level?

01:17:43.000 The state level is the issue.

01:17:44.000 I mean, they can't pardon the state level, but I think the sort of urgency and onus to keep going after Trump is gone if he's not president anymore.

01:17:51.000 I think.

01:17:51.000 Perhaps.

01:17:52.000 I mean, I might be wrong, but... I don't think so, though, because I think they need their boogeyman.

01:17:56.000 They need their villain.

01:17:57.000 And you know what the articles that are coming out right now from the left say?

01:18:00.000 In order for us to heal, Trump must go to prison.

01:18:03.000 Yeah, no.

01:18:04.000 A lot of hot takes coming from the left on that one. 0.54

01:18:06.000 Well, they've been calling for things like truth and reconciliation commissions.

01:18:09.000 Tribunals.

01:18:10.000 Tribunals.

01:18:11.000 So he's like Hideki Tojo or something.

01:18:13.000 I'll say a couple things.

01:18:16.000 By all means, call out the people saying we need martial law, right?

01:18:19.000 Yeah.

01:18:19.000 The Democrats have already implemented it in many states.

01:18:22.000 Oh, you know, over COVID restrictions.

01:18:23.000 Right.

01:18:24.000 And then you add that to the fact now they're saying tribunals for not just Trump but his

01:18:27.000 enablers and some people have gone so far as they put a list of their supporters.

01:18:32.000 So that would be you, me, or even Luke, even though Luke's not a Trump supporter.

01:18:35.000 It doesn't matter.

01:18:37.000 You've called out China.

01:18:38.000 You've been critical of the left.

01:18:39.000 Therefore, it's good enough for them.

01:18:40.000 Ian, who's actually kind of a hippie dude, they'd say, doesn't matter.

01:18:44.000 He's on the Timcast IRL show.

01:18:45.000 Put him on the list of enablers and supporters.

01:18:47.000 So if we're at the point where we already have martial law locked on many places and states that's violating the Constitution, they're calling for truth and reconciliation commissions, tribunals, and things like that, and then on the other side they're calling for martial law, like, how does this go down?

01:19:05.000 I mean, I don't know how it resolves.

01:19:07.000 I think, you know, my hope is that... Collapse?

01:19:11.000 I'm not saying hope, I'm saying the resolve.

01:19:13.000 Right, like if you're making predictions?

01:19:14.000 I don't know.

01:19:14.000 I mean, I think, and there's a lot of other, you know, the COVID reorientation of wealth to the big companies versus people.

01:19:22.000 People having nothing left are going to snap.

01:19:25.000 Like that viral video of the Pineapple Hill woman, where she's got this outdoor seating area that Newsom's like, you can't use it.

01:19:32.000 And then right next to it is Hollywood food production services.

01:19:35.000 Totally fine.

01:19:36.000 Regular people are looking at that and their brains are going to explode.

01:19:39.000 Yeah, and I wonder if the consequences for that are finally going to be felt in a world where Trump isn't around.

01:19:45.000 He does have this effect of sucking all the air out of the room, and that in terms of media coverage.

01:19:49.000 I mean, the thing about—it is really deeply offensive that these politicians can't adhere to their own guidelines.

01:19:56.000 And they don't want to.

01:19:57.000 It's also important to note that we saw record levels of protest under the Obama administration when he first came in.

01:20:02.000 We saw Occupy Wall Street.

01:20:04.000 So that's also another factor to really consider here.

01:20:06.000 And also that a big swap of the left is not really impressed with Biden at all.

01:20:10.000 But I was going to ask you, how do you see this unfolding in the worst case scenario?

01:20:14.000 And how do you see it unfolding in the best case scenario?

01:20:17.000 I mean, worst case, you get I mean, I guess, like, Democrats are gonna be in control of the federal government, and Republicans generally don't do, like, full-scale rebellion.

01:20:28.000 Right.

01:20:28.000 And they don't do cultural institutions.

01:20:30.000 And they don't do cultural institutions, but they also don't do, like, Antifa-type stuff in general.

01:20:34.000 Like, there isn't—you know, you don't see the sort of burning down of the cities and— Let me know your thoughts on this.

01:20:40.000 I think we might see, you know, Joe Biden, for instance, he wants to ban all online sales of guns and accessories and ammo and things like that.

01:20:46.000 He wants to do what you- Bullet registration and a $200 tax on every- Every gun, NFA.

01:20:51.000 What is it, National Firearms Act, is that what it is?

01:20:54.000 Yes, yes. 0.99

01:20:55.000 That's why we need to make sure we don't lose the damn Senate. 0.99

01:20:58.000 Well, so what happens then if he does this, if the Senate does this, if they pack the courts, I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of jurisdictions, small towns, all of a sudden had right-wing militias putting up checkpoints. 0.99

01:21:09.000 Sure.

01:21:09.000 I mean, I think that would be a point where you'd actually see the sort of rebellions and like, you know, real serious Yeah, but I think, I mean, my guess is that's ultimately going to be just talk.

01:21:17.000 I don't think Biden's going to sign new gun legislation.

01:21:18.000 become like a really big thing.

01:21:19.000 And that's why we had the, uh, what was it?

01:21:21.000 What were the two?

01:21:22.000 You had Waco, you had Ruby Ridge. 0.56

01:21:24.000 Yeah, but I think, I mean, my guess is that's ultimately going to be just talk.

01:21:29.000 I don't think Biden's going to sign new gun legislation.

01:21:31.000 I think that, I mean, Democrats.

01:21:32.000 You don't think they'll pack the Supreme Court?

01:21:34.000 I mean, I think, I think if they had the power, they would do it.

01:21:38.000 And I think the big problem there is what you'll... I don't know if Biden will do this stuff at the federal level, but what I expect will be in a world where the court is packed, DC versus Heller gets overturned.

01:21:49.000 What is that one?

01:21:50.000 That's the court decision that establishes that the right to bear arms is an individual right and not a collective one.

01:21:55.000 Right, so the collective right would be like, if there's a militia, then you're allowed to be in the militia with guns.

01:22:00.000 Exactly.

01:22:01.000 And it's scary that that decision's even close.

01:22:02.000 Like, I mean, it requires real bastardization of the grammar of the Second Amendment.

01:22:06.000 Well, have you read the original Second Amendment?

01:22:09.000 Oh, the one that says that we can do whatever we want with guns?

01:22:12.000 It's like that Parks and Rec, Ron Swanson?

01:22:15.000 When they were initially proposing the Bill of Rights, there were like 17 articles that were proposed.

01:22:20.000 The original Second Amendment said something to the effect of, If someone chooses not to join active duty militia or military, they will still have the right to bear arms.

01:22:30.000 And they took that language out, I guess, because there was a concern about it could potentially mean people could avoid conscription.

01:22:37.000 So initially they were like, you can bear, you know, a well-regulated militia being necessary to, you know, for a free state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.

01:22:45.000 And if an individual chooses not to join or be part of militia, they shall still have the right to bear arms.

01:22:49.000 And they were like, wait, wait, wait, get rid of that part, because it makes it sound like you can avoid conscription.

01:22:53.000 And we need conscription, because at the time, if you were an able-bodied male, it's like, you're going to war, buddy.

01:22:59.000 So they get rid of it, now we have these arguments, which I think are completely in bad faith.

01:23:03.000 If you actually look at the history of the Second Amendment, we had privateers, we had corsairs.

01:23:07.000 Like, a regular dude's like, here's my battleship I can use to blow up a French, you know, trade vessel. 1.00

01:23:13.000 Regular citizens had cannons on their houses and properties and things like that, so they could.

01:23:17.000 Now, now it's like, you can't have any of that, and that's the argument, but anyway.

01:23:22.000 Also defund the police, because the police are bad, and really just like, let yourself be at the mercy of people who would do violence to you.

01:23:29.000 That's why I think what we're talking about is fifth generational warfare.

01:23:33.000 Disarm the people, and disarm their local police.

01:23:37.000 Why would you do that?

01:23:38.000 Let me tell you this.

01:23:39.000 In these West Coast places, where they're very prominently doing this.

01:23:42.000 Portland, Seattle, places in California.

01:23:46.000 It's already hard enough to get a gun in California.

01:23:49.000 Now you've got defund the police.

01:23:51.000 What do you think would happen if you had Northern California, nobody's armed.

01:23:55.000 Well, Northern California is fairly Republican, so people probably have long guns.

01:23:58.000 But let's say you have a city.

01:23:59.000 Very few people have guns.

01:24:01.000 And the police are now defunded and fractured.

01:24:05.000 Anybody can walk right in.

01:24:07.000 Dystopia.

01:24:08.000 You know, I'm from California.

01:24:10.000 I would never move back.

01:24:11.000 And it's sad to see what's happened to the state.

01:24:13.000 I think if, you know, they get the Senate, and I do think they'll get it.

01:24:19.000 I do.

01:24:19.000 Because Trump's not on the ticket.

01:24:20.000 Look at 2018.

01:24:21.000 They didn't have the...

01:24:25.000 Trump supporters are not Republicans, for the most part.

01:24:28.000 Yeah, but Stacey Abrams lost in 16. 1.00

01:24:30.000 She lost to Brian Kemp.

01:24:31.000 In 16?

01:24:32.000 Yeah, sorry, in 18.

01:24:34.000 That's true.

01:24:34.000 I mean, and like, I still, you know, I still am a, Georgia's a red state in general.

01:24:39.000 I think it just had a particular coalition, sort of like Utah, if like Utah were a closer state.

01:24:44.000 Utah was, you know, very Mormon and had a big chunk of, you know, Trump underperformed his normal, the normal Republican performance in that state.

01:24:52.000 So I think Georgia's kind of similar in that respect, where you've got You know, that big suburban Atlanta population.

01:24:58.000 Since you're a betting man, what odds would you give on Georgia going Republican?

01:25:01.000 Going Republican?

01:25:02.000 I'd say, I mean, 70% chance, 75% chance.

01:25:04.000 Wow.

01:25:05.000 I think that's what the, uh, the betting odds are right now.

01:25:07.000 It's like 70, 70 something.

01:25:09.000 Sounds about right to me, right?

01:25:10.000 Like, you know, when I was, I, the funny thing is I didn't bet on the original, the election before the election, cause I thought the odds were about right.

01:25:15.000 You know, I think Trump was about a two to one dog or something like that.

01:25:18.000 And I thought that was right.

01:25:19.000 I have to say, either way, it doesn't look good, because if, you know, the Senate is, by one, a majority of the Republicans, how much dirt do the Chinese have, especially with their honeypots on one politician, to persuade them or to push them into doing whatever they want? 1.00

01:25:32.000 I mean, and they've been doing some crazy stuff.

01:25:34.000 I mean, they decided—I still don't understand this and why they would even consider it.

01:25:37.000 They did the Mike Lee's immigration bill where he wanted to, like, remove country caps.

01:25:42.000 Guys, get a grip, we're trying to win the Senate here, and you're out there, you're pushing liberalized immigration policy when there's a Republican... That's why I don't even think the Republicans are going to do enough to defend the country.

01:25:54.000 I just, I mean, I don't expect much out of them, I just expect them not to do things that are, you know, disastrous and catastrophic, because, I mean, the way I look at it is Democrats want to completely remove the ability for Republicans to win elections.

01:26:05.000 I don't know if you've read the book, It's Time to Fight Dirty, I might have recommended it, I don't know.

01:26:09.000 But basically, I mean, what do they want to do?

01:26:10.000 Why do they want to do it? 0.97

01:26:12.000 Pack the Supreme Court, add more states so that they can control the Senate permanently, you know, national voter registration, you know, automatic voter registration, voting day a holiday.

01:26:21.000 They want to completely... Universal mail-in voting.

01:26:22.000 Universal mail-in voting.

01:26:23.000 And the argument is, we want to make it easier for people to vote, and that's just not true.

01:26:28.000 They're trying to strip away election security.

01:26:31.000 That's what they're doing.

01:26:32.000 Yeah, and I mean, but the end goal here is permanent Democratic control, and they thought they almost had it.

01:26:36.000 They thought they were going to get it.

01:26:38.000 One of the, you know, and that's actually one of the arguments, like, why I don't think the whole thing was rigged, you know, in terms of, like, well, the voting machines are rigged.

01:26:43.000 Well, if the voting machines were rigged, why didn't they just get a result in line with polling?

01:26:48.000 You know, Democrats underperform public polling in the run-up to the election.

01:26:51.000 Joe, well, yeah.

01:26:53.000 The polling was nuts, though.

01:26:55.000 It was insane.

01:26:58.000 Look, if you want to play, it's easily explained in terms of the Trump supporter, more conspiracy mindset.

01:27:04.000 The polls were propaganda to demoralize voters saying Trump's going to win, don't bother.

01:27:09.000 Sure, I agree.

01:27:09.000 Then when it came to actually, as Trump has said, this is their opinion, That he ended up winning so well that they panicked and had to really go crazy on, you know, cranking out the fake votes.

01:27:20.000 Just so story, you know.

01:27:21.000 Right.

01:27:22.000 What I'm saying is there's like, there is an explanation.

01:27:25.000 The left is saying right now, if Biden cheated, then how come he, the Democrats lost down ballot?

01:27:30.000 Well, because there's a bunch of undervotes, votes that were just for Biden.

01:27:35.000 Right.

01:27:35.000 I mean, and like, I think there's plenty of cheating on the fringe, right?

01:27:38.000 Like, I still think that, you know, I watched poll watchers get denied entry.

01:27:41.000 I watched how frivolous, like, the behavior of these Democratic poll workers was.

01:27:46.000 And I'm like, these people could have—there's no moral thing that would have stopped these people from doing some amount of cheating if they could get away with it.

01:27:52.000 Um, the question is just what could they get away with?

01:27:54.000 And I think, you know, you end up getting away with things like coerced absentee votes, duplicate votes, those sort of, and then maybe some bad stuff.

01:28:02.000 Well, in Philly they were putting up those signs saying, here's who you should vote for.

01:28:05.000 Yeah, like that's super it's like it's the weird like it's like the cheating on the margins or fraud on the margins versus like fraud at the core and I think that I haven't seen any good evidence of fraud at the core.

01:28:14.000 I don't think there's like proof of you know, these the Dominion allegations, but there's like that's that's that's so wait, you know, you know what really bothered me about Dominion stuff is that I even said this on the show.

01:28:24.000 I got really mad about it.

01:28:25.000 Because the Dominion stuff and Hammer and Scorecard was a red herring.

01:28:32.000 Here's what happens.

01:28:34.000 There will be some dirty politician, and he'll get caught doing something illegal, and when someone starts sniffing too close, What they'll do is they'll throw out some crazy idea to throw him off the trail, and then instead of saying, I caught this dude doing drugs, it turns into crazy pizza cult at, you know, in D.C.

01:28:50.000 And now the real crime is they're laughing, saying, we tricked those people, how easy.

01:28:55.000 So right now when you've got actual irregularity and impropriety, Trump's suing and trying to be legitimized in his claims.

01:29:01.000 The single worst thing for Donald Trump in all of this was the lawsuit from Sidney Powell And that's why a lot of people, it's funny, they're claiming that Sidney Powell's a Democrat and Lynwood's a Democrat and they're like trying to subvert Trump.

01:29:16.000 I tell you, man, I was reading a post on Reddit and they said when it comes to a coup, the one thing a leader and the person staging the coup need is legitimacy.

01:29:27.000 The current leader needs to tell everyone, I'm in charge, I will always be in charge, listen to what I have to say so that the lower, you know, individuals, the police, the law enforcement, military, listen.

01:29:36.000 What the other guy needs in the coup is legitimacy in the same regard.

01:29:41.000 Here's why I'm actually in charge, listen to me.

01:29:44.000 Trump comes out and says, 682,000 votes.

01:29:47.000 No one was able to observe.

01:29:49.000 What's going on here?

01:29:50.000 Matthew Brainard's Voter Integrity Project.

01:29:52.000 Look at all of these votes from people who live in different states and voted twice.

01:29:56.000 That's legitimate.

01:29:57.000 Then all of a sudden, Sidney Powell comes out with this typo-laden, crackin' lawsuit that sounds crazy, that has, you know, it's almost impossible to back up except for a bunch of YouTube videos and a bunch of weird videos popping up.

01:30:08.000 And it worked.

01:30:09.000 loses that legitimacy. The media jumped on that in two seconds and tried making every claim from

01:30:14.000 the Trump campaign about the fringes and craziest conspiracy to delegitimize his claim that he

01:30:19.000 actually won. And it worked. Yep. Yeah, no, I, those lawsuits are a disaster.

01:30:26.000 And I had people in my mentions constantly, who knows if they're real or not, honestly, but people in my mentions being like, how dare you say that this won't work?

01:30:34.000 And it's just like, because I'm a lawyer, and I can read a brief.

01:30:37.000 These people are real.

01:30:37.000 The people are real.

01:30:38.000 I know people in my life, I've talked to people who are adamantly convinced the Dominion stuff is real.

01:30:43.000 I'll tell you what, maybe.

01:30:44.000 Sure.

01:30:44.000 But listen.

01:30:45.000 It's voter suppression, too, for the Georgia thing.

01:30:48.000 Sorry to interrupt, but you're suppressing your own voters when you tell them that the election is completely rigged.

01:30:53.000 And you see what happened with Ronna McDaniel when the lady was asking her, like, why should we even bother voting?

01:30:57.000 It's rigged.

01:30:58.000 And she's like, no, no, no, you have to vote.

01:30:59.000 Then you see Sidney Powell and Lin Wood.

01:31:02.000 Not only did they delegitimize Trump's claims strongly, not completely, they're also now telling people not to vote for Republicans.

01:31:11.000 I mean, it's just, you know, this is the Suicide Caucus.

01:31:14.000 Like, the sort of, we should just commit electoral suicide because we didn't get exactly what we wanted.

01:31:18.000 Maybe they're accelerationists.

01:31:19.000 Maybe they are.

01:31:20.000 They think, look, the Democrats take everything over.

01:31:24.000 Here's the problem.

01:31:25.000 Frogs boiling in a pot eventually just boil.

01:31:29.000 But you throw boiling water at a frog and the frog's going to jump and run away.

01:31:32.000 That's what the accelerationists think.

01:31:35.000 Yeah, I mean, well, maybe there's some big giant strategy, but really I think it's just a giant PR exercise from people who've gotten high on their own supply of PR.

01:31:43.000 What about Trump?

01:31:44.000 You think Trump's trying to win, though?

01:31:45.000 I mean, I think he's trying to win.

01:31:46.000 I just think I think he's, you know, he's been a businessman for a long time.

01:31:49.000 He's a guy who's litigated a bunch of cases to the end.

01:31:52.000 So he's probably just like he's doing what he does.

01:31:54.000 He's like any other businessman.

01:31:55.000 He'll litigate hard as long as he can until his appeals are exhausted and then he'll comply.

01:31:59.000 That's what I think.

01:32:00.000 All right.

01:32:00.000 Let's do this.

01:32:01.000 We would normally not jump to super chats, but I want to do one more segment because I've been sitting on the story.

01:32:05.000 It's a week old now, but I really want to talk about it.

01:32:07.000 It has very little to do with politics and everything to do with just the absurdity of the modern political world.

01:32:13.000 Ladies and gentlemen, Vanderbilt players were crying during Sarah Fuller's 30-yard kick.

01:32:20.000 This is an actual news story.

01:32:21.000 Let me break it down for you.

01:32:23.000 Sarah Fuller is the first woman to play in, what is it, Power 5, I think it's called?

01:32:28.000 I'm not a big football fan, so I don't know a whole lot about what this means.

01:32:31.000 Changing the game, Sarah Fuller became the first woman to play in a Power 5 college football game.

01:32:36.000 The team she's on, Vanderbilt, lost.

01:32:39.000 41-0.

01:32:42.000 She came out in the second half and did, uh, she kicked. 1.00

01:32:45.000 And kicked, like, between 20 and 30 yards.

01:32:48.000 And then ended up losing.

01:32:49.000 I tweeted about this.

01:32:50.000 And I didn't say anything negative, because I was just like, I was like, history was made.

01:32:55.000 You know, the first woman to play in a Power 5 game. 0.99

01:32:58.000 Loses 41-0, she kicked 30 yards. 0.99

01:33:00.000 And people were trying to convince me, like say to me, it was a squib kick, it was on purpose, right?

01:33:07.000 Then we got more news, this is the craziest thing.

01:33:10.000 Vanderbilt players consider opting out of final game at Georgia, another kicker joining team, after this fiasco.

01:33:18.000 Players actually said that they wouldn't play in another game.

01:33:22.000 They were not going to do it.

01:33:24.000 Seems like, I don't know if this team thought, hey, we'll just put the first female kicker on to get all this good social justice PR, but it resulted in the players actually crying. 1.00

01:33:35.000 So this is the story from the Daily Caller.

01:33:37.000 They say, Vanderbilt players were apparently emotional during Sarah Fuller's kick against Missouri.

01:33:41.000 Okay, maybe they were crying because with tears of joy, right?

01:33:45.000 They were just crying watching this historic moment.

01:33:47.000 Sure.

01:33:48.000 During the 41-0 blowout loss, Fuller became the first woman to play in a major college football game.

01:33:54.000 When she kicked the start of the second half, the ball went a staggering 30 yards.

01:33:57.000 There were some people on the sideline tearing up, QB Mike Wright said during a Saturday morning College Game Day segment on Fuller's kick.

01:34:05.000 As hard as that might be to believe, I can promise that I'm not making this up.

01:34:07.000 You can watch the video below.

01:34:09.000 It used to be an insult, yada yada.

01:34:12.000 When is this nonsense going to end, they say?

01:34:13.000 This was nothing more than a PR stunt, which didn't save Derek Mason's job, and now we're out here talking about players crying.

01:34:20.000 Are you kidding me?

01:34:21.000 This can't possibly be real.

01:34:23.000 From the way people talk about Fuller's kick, you'd think she was the first woman to walk on the moon. 1.00

01:34:26.000 So it sounds like they're actually saying they were crying tears of joy.

01:34:29.000 Right?

01:34:30.000 Yeah. 0.97

01:34:31.000 I mean, it's, it's incredibly silly and patronizing.

01:34:36.000 And I mean, any meaningful... I don't know. 0.81

01:34:39.000 I mean, there's record low testosterone out there and it keeps going down.

01:34:43.000 Remember the tri guys from BuzzFeed? 0.96

01:34:45.000 Yes.

01:34:45.000 Oh my gosh.

01:34:46.000 And it's like, they got tested.

01:34:47.000 They got tested.

01:34:47.000 You know this?

01:34:48.000 I'm sorry.

01:34:48.000 You got tested?

01:34:49.000 Yeah, go ahead.

01:34:49.000 So there were four guys at BuzzFeed, and they got their T levels tested.

01:34:53.000 And they were all like 80-year-old men.

01:34:56.000 I could have told you that just looking at them, though.

01:34:58.000 I mean, super low and it's kind of, it's kind of crazy.

01:35:01.000 I wonder, is there like, what's going on?

01:35:03.000 There's been a progressive decline in testosterone that's been tested throughout the decades.

01:35:08.000 There's many theories out there.

01:35:10.000 There's many different explanations.

01:35:12.000 Some people are talking about microplastics.

01:35:13.000 Some people are talking about poor diet.

01:35:15.000 Some people are talking about birth control in the water, birth control in the water, which is another thing.

01:35:19.000 Some people are talking about the frogs deciding to change their orientation. 1.00

01:35:23.000 Turn the freaking frogs gay! 1.00

01:35:25.000 I didn't want to say that, but yes, that's exactly what's been happening. 1.00

01:35:28.000 Is that going to derank you?

01:35:30.000 I don't know, probably.

01:35:32.000 They're going to think it was actually Alex Jones.

01:35:34.000 They're going to be like, we caught it!

01:35:37.000 No, no, I'm just doing an impersonation.

01:35:38.000 But this is a serious issue because reproductivity of human beings is going down dramatically, so people... So what does that have to do with the kick in the football game?

01:35:46.000 Well, we just made a comment about the testosterone issue, and maybe they were crying for real because they were emotional.

01:35:52.000 When I read that, I thought they were crying because their careers are now destroyed.

01:35:55.000 They're now losers on a losing team because of this PR stunt to put a woman on the team. 1.00

01:35:58.000 They lost 41-0.

01:35:59.000 Maybe you're not familiar with this, but there was some Chicago White Sox owner who had his team send out a six-year-old or something to bat in a baseball game.

01:36:09.000 Really?

01:36:09.000 He walked because of the small strike zone.

01:36:13.000 Is that real?

01:36:14.000 That's real.

01:36:15.000 I think it's Eddie Geidel.

01:36:16.000 G-E-I-D-E-L. 0.99

01:36:17.000 I think that's right.

01:36:19.000 I know the owner is Bill Veck.

01:36:20.000 See if I got the name right.

01:36:22.000 That's amazing.

01:36:24.000 I always find things like that kind of patronizing.

01:36:26.000 Look at that.

01:36:27.000 Man, my memory's good.

01:36:29.000 He was the world's smallest player.

01:36:31.000 He was five foot six inches.

01:36:32.000 No, no, no, that's Rizzuto.

01:36:33.000 Click on the link.

01:36:35.000 This?

01:36:35.000 Eddie Geidel?

01:36:36.000 Yeah, there he is.

01:36:36.000 Oh wow, look at that.

01:36:39.000 That's real.

01:36:39.000 That happened.

01:36:40.000 Oh wow, but he wasn't six years old.

01:36:42.000 I'm not sure how old he was when he played.

01:36:44.000 He's just a little person.

01:36:45.000 No, no, no.

01:36:46.000 He was a child.

01:36:46.000 He was a child?

01:36:47.000 He was a child.

01:36:48.000 He gained recognition in the second game of the St.

01:36:49.000 Louis Browns doubleheader.

01:36:51.000 Weighing 60 pounds and staying at 3'7", he became the shortest player in history of the major leagues.

01:36:56.000 Oh, no, you're right.

01:36:57.000 I guess you're right.

01:36:57.000 He was actually... He looks like a child.

01:37:01.000 Smart play, though.

01:37:01.000 Smart play.

01:37:02.000 Tiny strike zone.

01:37:03.000 Hard to get that.

01:37:04.000 He's going to in your walks.

01:37:06.000 Yeah, he walks so... that's what I didn't remember correctly.

01:37:09.000 So what is the strategic advantage of having a female kicker? 1.00

01:37:12.000 There isn't one, but I guess... BuzzFeed's gonna like you.

01:37:16.000 I was thinking it's like, you know, 50 years ago people recognized this sort of thing as like a ridiculous stunt, and it's like...

01:37:22.000 Well, I'm gonna tell you, I'm gonna tell you.

01:37:24.000 The reason I want to talk about this is because I said, I think like three years ago, when like a lot of video game and movie stuff was happening, I said it's only a matter of time before they just change the rules to mandate women in major league sports.

01:37:35.000 Like, why not?

01:37:36.000 The rules are arbitrary, right?

01:37:38.000 We could raise the basketball nets five feet.

01:37:42.000 We just agree to do it.

01:37:43.000 Then no more dunking or something.

01:37:45.000 People might still be able to dunk, I guess.

01:37:46.000 But we could just say, okay, new rule change.

01:37:48.000 So what if right now everyone just said, okay, new rule change.

01:37:51.000 Players have to be half women, half men.

01:37:53.000 Why not?

01:37:55.000 Well, is the NBA gonna be diverse?

01:37:58.000 Then you just see a bunch of, I mean, there would be a huge market for trans women. 1.00

01:38:02.000 That's what happens.

01:38:03.000 Well, I said back then that it's only a matter of time before there are diversity demands in major league sports.

01:38:10.000 If the rules can be changed by people, then there's no reason they can't have a rule saying, the easiest way to get women in major league sports is just to mandate that they're there. 1.00

01:38:18.000 It's the same as any diversity quota.

01:38:20.000 It's not about your merit, it's about making sure there's representation in the game, right?

01:38:25.000 I mean, I would have said Democrats wouldn't do that, but they've done a lot of crazy things in the past few years.

01:38:29.000 But this already happens in mainstream society.

01:38:31.000 In the corporate world, this already exists.

01:38:34.000 So why wouldn't it exist in the NBA?

01:38:36.000 And I think it's going to.

01:38:38.000 It's absolutely going to. 0.97

01:38:39.000 They'll get their bones broken.

01:38:42.000 Well, perhaps. 0.98

01:38:43.000 Or perhaps you're a bigot, Ian.

01:38:45.000 No, I'm talking about physiology.

01:38:48.000 You gotta be compassionate.

01:38:50.000 Will, can you hear this bigot?

01:38:52.000 Everyone knows there's no difference at all.

01:38:54.000 I'm just struck by the fact that he's not recognizing the impact of discourse on physiology.

01:38:58.000 Yeah.

01:39:00.000 We can talk people to be the same.

01:39:03.000 Well, no, no, no.

01:39:04.000 But think about this.

01:39:04.000 Think about this.

01:39:06.000 There's no rule stopping women from playing in any major league sport. 1.00

01:39:10.000 They just don't win.

01:39:11.000 When they try out, like, you know, she kicked 30 yards.

01:39:14.000 She didn't kick 70. 0.89

01:39:15.000 So I looked at it, I don't know anything about football, and they said a good, you know, kick is 70 yards.

01:39:19.000 She got it.

01:39:20.000 She might have been kicking onside, though, because they were down so far.

01:39:22.000 Was that the case?

01:39:23.000 Well, if they're down 25 points at the beginning of the second half, and she might kick an onside kick. 1.00

01:39:30.000 And some people said it was a squib kick, intentionally.

01:39:32.000 Which is an onside, yeah.

01:39:33.000 She might be a great kicker. 1.00

01:39:34.000 Yeah.

01:39:35.000 For a woman.

01:39:37.000 The point I'm making is, look, we make up the rules of the game.

01:39:41.000 Right now the rules are the best of the best are chosen by the managers and the owners for who's going to be on the team.

01:39:48.000 We could simply just say, yeah, exactly.

01:39:50.000 Diversity over meritocracy.

01:39:51.000 I don't know.

01:39:55.000 Well, I don't know about naturally.

01:39:58.000 Like, men are naturally losing testosterone.

01:40:01.000 Like, the BuzzFeed guys are a good example of that.

01:40:03.000 But I think that might be because they're not exercising.

01:40:06.000 You know, look, guys used to have to go and chop lumber.

01:40:08.000 True.

01:40:09.000 Now they sit at their desks and eat Doritos and drink Mountain Dew.

01:40:12.000 Yeah, COVID was not good for my waistline, that's for sure.

01:40:16.000 But maybe with more women getting in sports and things like that, maybe we'll see an increase over time. 1.00

01:40:22.000 But look, the point I'm saying is, you mentioned in corporations, we already have the diversity quotas.

01:40:27.000 You look at California now, they passed that law where the mandatory board member must be female or minority or whatever.

01:40:35.000 Why not in Major League Sports?

01:40:37.000 I'm not saying why not in the sense of, I'm advocating for it.

01:40:39.000 I'm saying, why wouldn't they do it?

01:40:41.000 They will be doing it, and you're calling it out, and we're gonna see in a few months, maybe even a few years, just these kind of patronizing representation of, here we are, we're all equal, we're all the same, everyone gets an award.

01:40:53.000 I don't know, I mean, you might end up, it might be a bridge too far, right?

01:40:57.000 You get the sense that people were able to do a lot of things.

01:41:00.000 I want you to think about this, like, I wonder how long the mass kneeling would have lasted in a world where the crowds were still at the arenas, right, after George Floyd.

01:41:07.000 There's a sense where they could get away with it because there was no audience to boo.

01:41:10.000 I wonder how long people would do that if there was systematic booing.

01:41:13.000 Well, look what happened to the NBA and their record low ratings with them politicizing this and literally putting Black Lives Matter on the basketball court.

01:41:20.000 And then they polled people.

01:41:21.000 It was a Hill-Harris X and they found that most people said, I can't stand the politics.

01:41:25.000 Yeah.

01:41:26.000 So they're not watching anymore.

01:41:27.000 Well, I watched one game and it was just during the timeouts during the interviews, any kind of patronizing any kind of virtual signal they could put out they put out there as much as they could.

01:41:36.000 So what you're saying I think is going to come true.

01:41:39.000 It's only going to be a matter of time and it's trendy.

01:41:42.000 It's cool.

01:41:42.000 Well, you got to get with the times.

01:41:44.000 Yeah, that's why I'm a conservative.

01:41:48.000 It's gonna come down to Claptor, right?

01:41:51.000 What we're gonna see is people are gonna be watching sports and they're not gonna care about touchdowns or scores.

01:41:56.000 They're gonna care about representation of people.

01:41:58.000 So it's like that episode of South Park where they had Sarcastible.

01:42:02.000 where football was too rough so that it turned into a game of tag and then it was

01:42:05.000 like them chasing balloons around and wearing bras and it was because Randy was like okay fine like it's too

01:42:11.000 rough why don't we just have the kids chase balloons instead I guess

01:42:14.000 and they're like okay that's a good idea okay then why not have them wear bras 1.00

01:42:17.000 while they do it and they're like okay let's do it and they did it and the game became just

01:42:22.000 ridiculous nonsense and then they didn't realize like they were like I don't

01:42:25.000 know if I'm being sarcastic anymore nothing makes sense everything's broken 0.89

01:42:28.000 but I think I think that's where we're gonna we're gonna get to we're gonna start seeing

01:42:32.000 a bunch of these you know political if you did if you had like a force fed men and women on the

01:42:38.000 football field together you'd eventually get like a group of rogue dudes that are huge

01:42:42.000 and beast that would just go start their own league 0.98

01:42:45.000 I think, you know what, I was reading that we should just let everybody take whatever drugs they want.

01:42:50.000 Well, I'm into that.

01:42:51.000 In terms of performance enhancement.

01:42:52.000 No, I'm just kidding.

01:42:53.000 Was it Joe Rogan talking about this?

01:42:54.000 Somebody was talking about it.

01:42:55.000 Probably.

01:42:55.000 Where they were like, just let everybody take whatever drugs they want, and then you'll have gigantic monsters just running on the field.

01:43:00.000 Like steroids.

01:43:01.000 Yeah, just everything.

01:43:03.000 Their heart rate's like 250, resting, and they're like, run!

01:43:07.000 Running, you know, 30 miles an hour, just the craziest all out.

01:43:12.000 Barry Bonds was roided out.

01:43:13.000 We just didn't know about it.

01:43:20.000 So let's roll it.

01:43:20.000 Okay, let's do super chats.

01:43:21.000 Yes.

01:43:22.000 Super chats.

01:43:23.000 All right.

01:43:24.000 If you haven't already, smash the like button, hit the notification bell, subscribe.

01:43:28.000 We do the show Monday, Friday, live at 8pm.

01:43:30.000 But let's read what y'all have to say.

01:43:31.000 Bill Ray says, Louisiana just joined Texas lawsuit with SCOTUS.

01:43:35.000 More states are said to follow.

01:43:36.000 Is that?

01:43:36.000 Can you google it?

01:43:37.000 Yes, I saw that article out there as well.

01:43:39.000 It's true.

01:43:40.000 Don't think it'll matter.

01:43:41.000 Sorry.

01:43:44.000 Stop raining on our parade wheel.

01:43:46.000 I mean, the question from the Supreme Court's perspective is not how many states agree that we should sue here, but do we want I mean, think about, from their perspective, right now there are election contests in states and this litigation is handled elsewhere.

01:44:00.000 Do they really want to be the court of first resort for states that are upset about election results?

01:44:06.000 No, but what if they have secretly their own self-preservation at heart?

01:44:10.000 They know that the court will get packed and they'll lose all their legitimacy and become a legislative body and then eventually they'll say, we vote for the Supreme Court justices.

01:44:16.000 I just don't think they're... I've been around long enough to see when the Supreme Court decides they don't want to hear cases and they don't have to, they end up not.

01:44:26.000 That said, I could be wrong here because there's three justices who might end up agreeing with Alito and Thomas.

01:44:31.000 Um, that we haven't heard from on the issue of whether or not they think it's actually mandatory for them to take these cases.

01:44:36.000 Wait, Alito and Thomas do think it's mandatory?

01:44:37.000 Yeah, Alito and Thomas think it's mandatory, but for a long time, the majority has said it's discretionary.

01:44:42.000 And I mean, that's, that's a practical thing, too.

01:44:43.000 So you would, you would, so you have Alito and Thomas, if potentially Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, then you would need... And Gorsuch, yeah.

01:44:49.000 So, potentially Gorsuch.

01:44:50.000 Possible, I just, just doubtful.

01:44:52.000 The three, you don't know their opinions, and if they do agree...

01:44:56.000 Yeah, but I mean, if they agree, there's a lot of reasons for them to not want to agree, because, you know, they've just invited a whole slew of leaders they don't want.

01:45:02.000 But come on, come on, come on, Will.

01:45:03.000 Don't you think that Clarence Thomas has waited 30 years for his revenge against Joe Biden?

01:45:08.000 That's what the meme said.

01:45:09.000 I bet he is very tempted.

01:45:11.000 I bet he is very tempted.

01:45:12.000 No, you know that meme where, you've seen the meme where Clarence Thomas' eyes are glowing and it says, I've been waiting 30 years for this moment, Mr. Biden, or whatever?

01:45:19.000 I was like, I think Clarence Thomas is of sound mind and integrity and maturity that he would not have that... He doesn't... These are some of the most, you know, people of highest integrity and merit.

01:45:33.000 I don't see them being like, I have a personal grudge to fulfill and I've been waiting 30 years and I'm going to use the court to get it.

01:45:38.000 That doesn't sound like... That's not how it works.

01:45:40.000 That's not how they want to do their jobs.

01:45:42.000 Maybe though, I mean, I saw that look on Kavanaugh's face and remember what he said?

01:45:47.000 Like, what did he say?

01:45:48.000 Something about, you know, them getting what they deserve or something like that?

01:45:51.000 Yeah, I mean, like... And it's Kamala Harris.

01:45:55.000 And she was one of the people.

01:45:56.000 But I mean, there's just an ethos to judging that a lot of these judges have, which is they take pride in applying the law as written.

01:46:03.000 And doing it better than other people and in a more fair way.

01:46:06.000 It's almost like law is a kind of, it's almost like a kind of game or puzzle that you're trying to like, you know, and the legal problems are puzzles you're trying to elegantly solve.

01:46:15.000 And it's hard to escape from that to do something so radical.

01:46:18.000 William Martinez says, according to Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis, it isn't rejected.

01:46:22.000 They only rejected the emergency injunction relief.

01:46:24.000 Right.

01:46:25.000 That's true.

01:46:26.000 We talked about that.

01:46:26.000 Basically, the idea is, if they don't put, if they don't agree with the injunction now, then what relief could they possibly give if the lawsuit can't do anything anymore?

01:46:35.000 There's a reason they filed the emergency injunctive relief.

01:46:38.000 It's important.

01:46:39.000 The fact that you had unanimous denial of that without a dissent is a real, I mean, it's just a really bad sign for the underlying litigation.

01:46:47.000 And I think that in a world where they really did think that the Pennsylvania plaintiffs would prevail, they would be inclined to grant that relief.

01:46:55.000 So these are superchats from a while ago.

01:46:57.000 Ziggy says, Lawsuit was dismissed because of Texas lawsuit.

01:47:00.000 Also, seven more states just joined Texas lawsuit.

01:47:02.000 I haven't seen seven more states?

01:47:04.000 Yeah, I haven't seen seven.

01:47:04.000 I have, okay.

01:47:05.000 I have seen Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana who are supporting Texas.

01:47:09.000 This is from three hours ago.

01:47:11.000 Really?

01:47:12.000 Yeah, I don't know.

01:47:13.000 There might be even more.

01:47:14.000 Are we going to get the second Civil War here? 0.69

01:47:16.000 That's the most recent thing I saw.

01:47:18.000 I think, again, is not to put cold water on it.

01:47:20.000 Bring it on, Bill.

01:47:22.000 We can handle it.

01:47:23.000 But it's like the idea that the Supreme Court would dismiss one case in order because Texas filed a lawsuit that is a type of lawsuit that is very narrowly circumscribed to these like water rights type cases.

01:47:35.000 A lot of people are saying seven other states just joined.

01:47:37.000 Let me see what else I can find.

01:47:38.000 Yeah, I'm not optimistic.

01:47:41.000 That said, again, I do say that I'm more optimistic about this than I have been about other things, just because instead of having like six or seven independent procedural bars to hearing the case, there's just this one thing.

01:47:52.000 And so if the court gets over this one thing, they could hear it.

01:47:57.000 I think you're just a negative Nancy Will, and you just hate Trump.

01:48:01.000 I'm so tired of being called that.

01:48:04.000 Everybody's like... Maybe I should just put my brain in a bowl of warm water and forget for the next, like, weeks.

01:48:10.000 Well, no, it is funny, though, because it's like when I'm reading legal analysis on Twitter, the right-wing opinions are always like, here's why Trump is gonna win, and the left is always like, this is why Trump's gonna lose.

01:48:20.000 And then there's a tendency so far for Trump only had a few lawsuits, and then you had a bunch of other lawsuits from other people.

01:48:26.000 These leftist legal opinions are always like, oh, that's Trump down 40 now, and it's like Trump didn't actually file all those lawsuits.

01:48:33.000 He can't control those people, so they're really trying to ham it up.

01:48:35.000 But then in certain, you know, you get the point, right?

01:48:39.000 Yeah, and I mean, you can't help when somebody files a lawsuit that's terrible, and it gets thrown out on jurisdictional grounds.

01:48:46.000 Mike Hunt, uh, I almost read it, I almost read it, you're gonna get me in trouble.

01:48:50.000 Mr. Hunt, first name, Mike, says, watch Viva Frey's video on the Texas lawsuit, we will win. 0.70

01:48:57.000 Well, I don't know, Viva Frey, he's a famous... I respect Viva Frey.

01:49:01.000 But he's Canadian, isn't he?

01:49:02.000 Yeah, but I think, like, you know, I tried to do my reading on this, and like, when I first read the lawsuit... Will, Will.

01:49:08.000 Just put that negative feeling in the back of your mind and lie so you can get more followers on Twitter.

01:49:15.000 Yes.

01:49:17.000 Does that work?

01:49:18.000 Yes, of course it does.

01:49:19.000 That's what Twitter is.

01:49:20.000 It's their code of conduct.

01:49:22.000 If you came out and said, Hi, I'm a respectable lawyer and I run a publication and my clear legal analysis suggests that Donald Trump is guaranteed victory.

01:49:30.000 You'd gain a bunch of followers.

01:49:31.000 Yeah, I'd probably get like 10,000 retweets.

01:49:33.000 Yeah, man. 0.99

01:49:34.000 Harmeet Dhillon tweeted out from, you know, Lin Wood said that Raffensperger and Kemper are going to prison or whatever and she said, this is bat ass. 0.99

01:49:41.000 It's not gonna happen. 0.98

01:49:42.000 She lost followers.

01:49:43.000 She's like, good.

01:49:44.000 Yeah.

01:49:44.000 I feel that way too.

01:49:45.000 If you want a lawyer to lie to you, go follow them.

01:49:46.000 Don't follow me.

01:49:47.000 And I'm like, exactly, exactly.

01:49:48.000 I mean, it's culling the weak.

01:49:51.000 She's great.

01:49:51.000 Yeah, absolutely.

01:49:52.000 The commander says, a war against China won't be hopeless. 0.85

01:49:55.000 Look up Binkov's Battleground episodes of Taiwan vs. China.

01:49:59.000 The Marines are currently training new missile crews and putting them in ships in reserve to contain them to the China Sea and counter their island building.

01:50:06.000 Interesting.

01:50:07.000 Yeah, they're building islands. 0.96

01:50:09.000 Yeah.

01:50:10.000 Floating islands.

01:50:11.000 Yep.

01:50:12.000 Steven Krashefsky says, if you want an example of what SCOTUS will look like once Dems are done with it, look at the PA Supreme Court.

01:50:19.000 Political, partisan, corrupt.

01:50:21.000 That's correct.

01:50:22.000 That's a good shot.

01:50:23.000 Yeah?

01:50:24.000 And then, and then what?

01:50:25.000 Do we just roll over and give up now?

01:50:27.000 There's no, there's no, this is it, right?

01:50:29.000 I mean, yeah. If they pack the courts and they give statehood to DC, which makes no sense,

01:50:34.000 Puerto Rico, I can understand. And then all of a sudden, Republicans never win elections.

01:50:38.000 And when they do, they never win any of their votes. And it's extreme single party rule.

01:50:43.000 And then we become California. Next thing we know, they're trying to repeal the Civil Rights Act.

01:50:47.000 Yeah. Because, yeah, it'll last for too much equality. 1.00

01:50:50.000 Yeah, they tried.

01:50:52.000 Archimagirius says, in PA if you buy a gun you can select non-binary for gender on the application. 0.59

01:50:59.000 WTF?

01:51:00.000 Identify as a fit 145 pound non-binary with no felonies. 0.99

01:51:04.000 Yeah, you can.

01:51:05.000 See, people... I have a random bit on this.

01:51:08.000 People seem to think that... Everybody said, you know, gender is not, like, in the current thing, is not a new... It's a new word.

01:51:16.000 You know, before 1960s, gender only referred to how it is used in languages.

01:51:20.000 And then the 1960s, people realized, hey, we want a word that is distinct from, like, biological sex to refer to sort of archetypes of behavior among males and females.

01:51:29.000 So let's call it gender and let's make it that thing. 1.00

01:51:32.000 And then 30 years later, that's like, hey, did you know that gender is a social construction?

01:51:36.000 I'm like, yes, that's why it was invented.

01:51:38.000 But now they're saying sex is a social social construct.

01:51:42.000 So I put out a tweet that was meant to be just like general support for Elliot Page.

01:51:47.000 Elliot Page is female. 0.95

01:51:48.000 But you know, and there are people who feel a certain way and ask that you respect them.

01:51:53.000 I have I have no problem giving someone respect when they've earned it.

01:51:55.000 And I think Elliot Page is cool.

01:51:57.000 So I'm totally cool with Sure, I mean, there's also like a basic kindness, like call people what they want to be called.

01:52:02.000 Saying Elliot Page is female is transphobic, and people were like reporting me like crazy, and quote-tweeting saying, why won't Twitter ban him?

01:52:10.000 Why won't Twitter ban him?

01:52:10.000 Because I said a basic fact with respect.

01:52:13.000 The point I was making was that even though Elliot Page is a female, Elliot Page is asking for respect, and I think Elliot is cool, so I'll grant that respect.

01:52:20.000 I have no problem there.

01:52:22.000 I think this is great.

01:52:23.000 It's fine.

01:52:23.000 You know, do your thing.

01:52:24.000 The problem is the left wants you to think that biological sex is now a social construct, which it's not.

01:52:31.000 No, it's not.

01:52:32.000 So there is a basic fact about this, but I'm not trying to be mean.

01:52:36.000 Like, I'm trying to make the point that we can still respect someone if they, you know, you're not guaranteed respect.

01:52:40.000 No one has to give you respect, but people can choose to.

01:52:42.000 Right.

01:52:43.000 There's a difference between kindness and mandatory thought control.

01:52:46.000 Yep.

01:52:46.000 Right?

01:52:46.000 I think that, you know, I'm perfectly happy to be kind and use people's names the way they want them used.

01:52:51.000 But when you start saying, oh, we should mandate pronoun usage, I mean, now you're mandating how I talk about you when you're not here.

01:52:58.000 Right?

01:52:58.000 That's another thing about pronouns.

01:52:59.000 So pronouns, I don't, when I talk to you, I don't use your gender or your sex.

01:53:03.000 So a lot of people are bringing up, JayofLegends has seven more states joined Texas.

01:53:08.000 Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, eight states in total now.

01:53:14.000 But certainly at a certain point, there's a constitutional crisis, right?

01:53:17.000 I mean, it's just, it strikes me as just like a PR exercise.

01:53:20.000 States file amicus briefs all the time supporting litigation.

01:53:23.000 Is that what it is?

01:53:24.000 Yeah, and I mean, it's like, that's why, I mean, and so this isn't like an amicus brief.

01:53:29.000 This is like, oh, well states, apparently under this theory, states can sue other states if they don't enforce their election laws properly.

01:53:36.000 I mean it makes sense. It makes sense but then you also kind of see like shouldn't this be like

01:53:40.000 an amicus brief in a case where that is not like straight to the Supreme Court and instead you know

01:53:46.000 there's like election contest procedures. They waited the very last day for the safe harbor

01:53:50.000 deadline too. Are they gonna get the Supreme Court might just be like. I mean the there was one thing

01:53:55.000 I thought the briefing was generally not bad.

01:53:57.000 There were a couple things I noticed.

01:53:58.000 One thing, and this is more inside baseball, the Texas Solicitor General was not in the brief, and that's not a good sign.

01:54:04.000 Yeah.

01:54:04.000 People were saying that he wouldn't sign off on it because they don't believe in it.

01:54:07.000 Yeah, I mean, that's wrong.

01:54:09.000 So the Solicitor General of any state is the person who handles all their appellate litigation, Supreme Court stuff, and the appellate litigation in their own state.

01:54:16.000 And they're usually a person who is often a former Supreme Court clerk, etc., and they're in charge of that.

01:54:22.000 And if they're not willing to sign on, it's like, That's not a good sign.

01:54:25.000 But I'm saying, after everything we've seen with the conflict, the chaos, the fighting, the street battles, the tensions reaching the Supreme Court, now you have a bunch of states suing other states.

01:54:35.000 Whether or not these states actually mean it, the regular people are seeing this, and Trump supporters are agreeing with it, and we're being pushed towards the most extreme outcome.

01:54:45.000 That's true.

01:54:45.000 States lining up against other states.

01:54:47.000 That didn't work out well the first time it happened.

01:54:49.000 5% of the population died.

01:54:51.000 I don't want that to happen again.

01:54:52.000 I would argue that it didn't work out well in that capacity, but it actually worked out very, very well.

01:54:58.000 Slavery was ended.

01:55:00.000 I agree that it's a good thing that slavery ended.

01:55:02.000 That seems like the most uncontroversial thing I could ever say.

01:55:05.000 I think it was a good thing that slavery was ended.

01:55:08.000 I'm on the side of that was an idea.

01:55:10.000 That was a good idea.

01:55:10.000 We should have done that.

01:55:12.000 No, but think about the potential outcomes of where we're at now.

01:55:16.000 If it is true that we are slowly being eroded by just feckless politicians who are selling us out for over a long time, then regaining control in some capacity, there's a net positive.

01:55:29.000 There's nothing as clearly as moral as slavery in this instance, however.

01:55:33.000 Yeah.

01:55:33.000 I think the threat of a foreign power is serious, but Civil War, you know, brought about the end of slavery.

01:55:38.000 I mean, that's just... At the end of the day, I think, like, the other states realize that it's an obvious PR exercise to, like, sign on to a lawsuit that their constituents want them to sign on to.

01:55:46.000 I understand that, but think about what that means to the regular people of their state.

01:55:49.000 How many people do you think started polishing their guns when they heard eight states are now supporting the suit?

01:55:53.000 Yeah, no, that's something to worry about.

01:55:56.000 And also probably a reason that they would deny cert again, right?

01:56:00.000 Like, that they would deny a motion They'd be like we don't want this we don't want a massive state-on-state battle when you're talking about I think I think that's what they would create if eight states are saying we demand to be heard and the Supreme Court says no Then regular people are gonna say are you kidding me?

01:56:15.000 If eight states can't get Listened to in the federal courts and we've seen the evidence and they won't give us the time of day People are gonna their heads are gonna explode.

01:56:24.000 Yeah.

01:56:24.000 No, that's that's I think the smartest thing would be the Supreme Court actually hearing it and then ruling against it on some, you know, in some capacity.

01:56:32.000 I don't know.

01:56:33.000 Good question.

01:56:34.000 Denying eight states is gonna make people blow up.

01:56:37.000 Yeah, no, I didn't really think about like that angle of it.

01:56:39.000 That makes sense.

01:56:40.000 I mean, I still think ultimately the Supreme Court's gonna pass, but...

01:56:44.000 I wouldn't be surprised.

01:56:45.000 The injunctive relief was 9-0.

01:56:47.000 It was unanimous.

01:56:48.000 They said no to injunctive relief.

01:56:50.000 I mean, that's not the first time, right?

01:56:51.000 The Third Circuit was... People have commented.

01:56:54.000 They're saying the reason they did that is because Texas lawsuits is bigger and it's going to accomplish the same thing.

01:57:00.000 I mean, this is just more 40HS thinking.

01:57:03.000 Like, oh, this loss is actually what we want.

01:57:05.000 Like, no, we don't want to lose.

01:57:07.000 We're losing is bad.

01:57:07.000 Well, no, but does that make sense?

01:57:09.000 That the Supreme Court would say, we're already, you know, we have a bigger case that's going to happen?

01:57:14.000 I mean, they would have just gotten the filing by the time they were, I mean, they would have finalized the decision in the last few days.

01:57:19.000 They wouldn't have known about this filing.

01:57:20.000 They would have just gotten the filing.

01:57:21.000 They barely reviewed the briefing, have not reviewed any opposition briefing or even thought about it.

01:57:26.000 I think the fact that this many states have lined up is signaling to the people of this country that the divisions are as extreme as they could possibly be.

01:57:35.000 Oh, I have no doubt about that.

01:57:36.000 I mean, the divisions are horrible.

01:57:38.000 But I think that leads to some, you know, really bad scenarios in the next few years.

01:57:42.000 I hope not.

01:57:43.000 I hope you're wrong.

01:57:44.000 V City says, related to your story earlier, do you remember in 1996 the DNC and Clintons got busted illegally accepting contributions?

01:57:51.000 The Chinese billionaire doing that got arrested in 2015 for illegally bringing 4.5 million into the US.

01:57:56.000 That was the John Ash case.

01:57:58.000 Interesting.

01:58:01.000 Big Rig says, what is the definition of a reasonable amount of time in the context of the PA lawsuit?

01:58:07.000 I mean, in the PA lawsuit, that would relate to latches.

01:58:14.000 There, it's a question of whether or not there was undue delay, and that will differ under the circumstances.

01:58:20.000 There's a lot of cases in law where there's not an exact technical definition.

01:58:25.000 And then it's like, did it cause prejudice to the opposing party?

01:58:27.000 Rylo704 says, he wins in court or revolution it is.

01:58:31.000 That's what everyone around me in North Carolina is thinking.

01:58:33.000 As seen by massive gun ammo sales.

01:58:35.000 No one will tolerate an agent of China as POTUS. 0.96

01:58:38.000 I have a DD-214 and I will readily die for America.

01:58:41.000 You see what the Arizona GOP said?

01:58:43.000 Are you ready to die for your country or whatever?

01:58:45.000 I mean, I'll be actually a little bit more forceful later.

01:58:48.000 I think all that talk is too much.

01:58:50.000 Oh, I agree.

01:58:52.000 Look, I'm at a point where I'm like, we see what's going on with the Chinese infiltration and this guy bragging about Biden being in the back pocket.

01:58:59.000 We've seen the story.

01:58:59.000 We've seen the laptop.

01:59:00.000 We've seen the emails.

01:59:01.000 We know about the flight on Air Force Two.

01:59:03.000 We know all that's happening.

01:59:04.000 It's not about what I think or what you think or anyone in this room thinks.

01:59:06.000 It's about what regular people have decided a long time ago.

01:59:08.000 Sure.

01:59:09.000 I mean, and hopefully it's, I mean, it's the same sort of talk that was like, I mean, the Democrats were pushing that Trump was a Russian agent for so, you know, a long time.

01:59:17.000 This seems like kind of the analog of that.

01:59:19.000 Like, you know, I don't think, I don't think Democrats, I mean, there were anarchist Democrats, but I don't know the Democrats were talking about a complete revolution in the streets.

01:59:27.000 So they were talking about resistance obnoxiously.

01:59:29.000 I don't know.

01:59:29.000 Deditated says, what does Ian think?

01:59:32.000 About what?

01:59:32.000 About what we're talking about.

01:59:34.000 I think that we need a cultural cohesion and it's not gonna come through politics.

01:59:40.000 That we need to focus on our art, make some sweet songs, and keep doing shows like this.

01:59:44.000 I agree, yeah.

01:59:45.000 That's why we're doing the vlog.

01:59:47.000 We want to have fun with lasers and 3D printers so we can create something positive.

01:59:53.000 You know, a lot of what we talk about is all negative.

01:59:55.000 All these bad things.

01:59:56.000 I don't like talking about how my side is going to lose.

02:00:01.000 It's not fun.

02:00:02.000 It's not my favorite thing to do.

02:00:03.000 Or a civil war.

02:00:05.000 Right, right. 0.96

02:00:06.000 We want to build a laser and shoot a teddy bear with it.

02:00:10.000 I was having so much fun when we were talking about the national emergency declaration.

02:00:14.000 Everybody didn't agree with me, but I was like, no, this will work.

02:00:17.000 Here's the statute.

02:00:18.000 Here's the law.

02:00:18.000 Here's why what Trump's doing is going to work.

02:00:20.000 Super stoked to talk about that.

02:00:21.000 Really not a fan of talking about how Trump's not going to win these election challenges.

02:00:25.000 But you know outside of just politics in general everything's always about some crisis or some problem

02:00:30.000 Yeah, even if you're talking about winning you're talking about a fight, so that's why I'm like we got to do a vlog

02:00:33.000 We got to do so we're gonna be we're buying farmland. We're gonna be doing a lot of stuff here

02:00:37.000 We're also gonna a big farm, and we're gonna do crazy stuff there

02:00:39.000 We're gonna build like dome houses that was Luke's idea and we can make videos about just doing positive things

02:00:44.000 teaching people how to be responsible for themselves and having fun while we do it because

02:00:49.000 There's got to be a balance. Yeah We can't just talk every night about how bad everything is.

02:00:53.000 Are you optimistic about anything?

02:00:55.000 I mean, I'm optimistic about... I think I'm honestly optimistic about, like, how life is going for me personally in general.

02:01:02.000 You know, I'm still reading a lot of books.

02:01:03.000 I got, you know, Human Events is doing well.

02:01:06.000 I mean, things are going well personally.

02:01:07.000 Cool.

02:01:08.000 Like, I read a thousand page book on the Battle of Midway recently.

02:01:12.000 I enjoyed that.

02:01:13.000 Yeah.

02:01:13.000 Right on.

02:01:14.000 Jonathan Trudeau says, I have a question.

02:01:16.000 Can we have the National Guard watch over the poll counters to make sure everyone plays by the rules?

02:01:21.000 And if you don't, then you get arrested.

02:01:22.000 And then there and then there and then there and they stay and watch the ballots till everything is counted.

02:01:31.000 I mean, we should have a ballot system that no one questions.

02:01:35.000 Like, that should be the end goal.

02:01:36.000 I don't know, I don't realize why people, like, don't think of that. 1.00

02:01:38.000 I mean, other countries look at our ballot system and are like, that's stupid. 0.99

02:01:41.000 Yes. 0.99

02:01:42.000 Like, we should have a ballot system that, like, that's beyond question.

02:01:46.000 That should be the goal.

02:01:47.000 Because, you know, especially in a world where we're so polarized.

02:01:49.000 I remember tweeting something along the lines of, isn't it a wonderful time to be experimenting with It's entirely possible that throughout the show we are talking about nonsense because people were getting the news while we weren't, but someone says SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit.

02:02:00.000 Is that true?

02:02:00.000 No, I don't think so.

02:02:02.000 I haven't seen that yet.

02:02:04.000 I haven't seen it.

02:02:05.000 I'm pretty sure that it was just docketed.

02:02:08.000 Yeah, it was like last night or whatever.

02:02:11.000 No, the lawsuit was filed this morning, I think, but it was docketed.

02:02:14.000 It was on the Supreme Court's docket and people were out there saying, oh, they've agreed to hear it.

02:02:17.000 I'm like, no, they just docketed it, which is just an acknowledgment that it was properly filed procedurally.

02:02:24.000 Trevor Klein says, so this is it.

02:02:25.000 The free world has lost.

02:02:27.000 The future is red.

02:02:28.000 If Biden becomes president, you guys won't have a true election.

02:02:30.000 Canada is already effed.

02:02:32.000 I had hoped in you guys.

02:02:33.000 Now it does not.

02:02:34.000 Now it does look long night.

02:02:36.000 I'm not, I'm not that depressed, especially if you hold the Senate.

02:02:40.000 Incoming presidents generally do worse in their first, in their first, uh, congressional midterm.

02:02:46.000 And, uh, Biden is also going to be 81 in, in 2024.

02:02:48.000 And it's not like cognitive decline reverses.

02:02:52.000 So.

02:02:54.000 Lex Murley says, I'm laughing so hard I'm crying.

02:02:55.000 Don't ever fix Ian's mic.

02:02:57.000 It is his mic now.

02:02:58.000 People are saying that your mic is echoing.

02:02:59.000 Yes.

02:03:00.000 And it's probably, it sounds super low.

02:03:02.000 Why is it echoing?

02:03:03.000 Maybe the camera's audio is actually being picked up.

02:03:06.000 I think that might be it.

02:03:07.000 Oh God.

02:03:07.000 Yeah, there's nothing I can do about it.

02:03:08.000 Welcome to my world.

02:03:10.000 Sorry everyone.

02:03:11.000 Somebody said lock the door so we can't come back.

02:03:13.000 That wasn't very nice.

02:03:16.000 I'm not your buddy guy says dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what's easy and what is right.

02:03:23.000 Albus Dumbledore.

02:03:24.000 Has anybody read a book other than Harry Potter?

02:03:26.000 To be fair, that is a good quote.

02:03:27.000 Hold on, hold on, hold on.

02:03:29.000 There are other books?

02:03:30.000 Not yet.

02:03:32.000 Yeah, I love that millennials need to learn how to read books because they only ever read Harry Potter.

02:03:36.000 It's replaced the Bible as a common cultural touchstone.

02:03:39.000 Seriously.

02:03:40.000 Well, it's kind of annoying to me because I've actually read the Harry Potter books and there are some good lines like that one.

02:03:45.000 There are some very hopeful and inspiring lines.

02:03:47.000 No one ever uses those.

02:03:48.000 They only use the dark ones and the really super resisty ones.

02:03:52.000 Kaylin R. says, I put $300 on Trump to win.

02:03:56.000 Howley report of major voter fraud arrests in Texas.

02:03:58.000 Biden Ukraine video on YouTube.

02:04:00.000 Kill Chain video on HBO shows exactly how voter fraud is accomplished.

02:04:03.000 Kemp is in it and for sitting U.S.

02:04:07.000 senators.

02:04:08.000 Well, there's always somebody on the other side of the bet.

02:04:10.000 Yep.

02:04:11.000 Talbot Link says, there's people saying Trump supporters should be shaved like the French ladies that supported the Nazis.

02:04:17.000 With how many protesters did that to themselves, I foresee a dark twist on Benny Hill style stuff going down.

02:04:23.000 Yep.

02:04:25.000 Tyler Danielson says, if China runs the one world government, the Galactic Federation will never let us in.

02:04:30.000 Or they will, because they're like the Borg and they're extreme authoritarians who want just people to be under control, right?

02:04:37.000 There's actually a petition on change.org right now to label the Galactic Federation as a racist organization for the exclusion of Earth.

02:04:44.000 That's happening right now.

02:04:47.000 Getting a lot of signatures.

02:04:48.000 Nice.

02:04:50.000 Wouldn't it be speciesist and not racist?

02:04:52.000 Yeah, I don't know what that would be.

02:04:53.000 Okay, so is this real?

02:04:55.000 EW says SCOTUS just gave Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia until December 10th at 3pm to respond to the Texas lawsuit.

02:05:01.000 I did see that, but that's not exactly new.

02:05:03.000 That could be, I mean, that's obviously something where they would, and again, it's not, I'm not responding to the Texas lawsuit.

02:05:09.000 They're responding to the motion for leave to file.

02:05:12.000 And so, like what we saw with Pennsylvania, they ordered Pennsylvania to respond.

02:05:16.000 Pennsylvania did.

02:05:17.000 And then they said, unanimously, reject.

02:05:20.000 Injective relief.

02:05:20.000 Yeah.

02:05:21.000 Like, that's also happened a lot, where, I mean, everybody's been really excited about, like, the motions they've granted are, like, the motions for expedited review.

02:05:28.000 And they've been like, we won a victory!

02:05:30.000 We won the right to have our case dismissed really soon, as opposed to later on.

02:05:34.000 Is it, is it possible that what's going on is everyone's kind of agreed, we've got to string the Trump supporters along just enough so that they run out of steam?

02:05:42.000 Because on election night, they're all riled up, right?

02:05:43.000 Yeah.

02:05:44.000 And if Biden won outright, people would explode immediately.

02:05:47.000 But drag it out as long as possible, get their hopes up and then bring them down and hopes up, then bring them down and slowly get to the point where they lost.

02:05:54.000 I mean, otherwise they go nuts.

02:05:55.000 I mean, maybe that, maybe that's the way it'll work, right?

02:05:57.000 Maybe you'll just have like, I mean, maybe we'll just keep losing these cases and there you go.

02:06:03.000 Shooter13 says, may your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

02:06:09.000 Good quote.

02:06:10.000 Who's that?

02:06:13.000 I forget.

02:06:14.000 I think it's Sam... Samuel Adams?

02:06:16.000 Hold on, let me look it up for us.

02:06:19.000 Jay says, Will looks like he's going to cry if Trump wins.

02:06:21.000 Can you comment on JRE with Jack Dorsey?

02:06:25.000 Was Jack being deceitful seeing now all the recent censorship?

02:06:28.000 Well, was Jack back on Joe Rogan?

02:06:30.000 I don't know.

02:06:31.000 I didn't see it.

02:06:32.000 Is that what happened?

02:06:33.000 Was that today?

02:06:33.000 Not that I've seen.

02:06:34.000 I can comment on Jack with, uh, Joe with Jack Dorsey when I was on it, but that was like, you know, almost two years ago now.

02:06:41.000 Is that what they're referring to?

02:06:42.000 Yeah.

02:06:42.000 Can I read this quote real fast?

02:06:44.000 Oh, I see.

02:06:44.000 Yeah.

02:06:45.000 It is from Sam Adams.

02:06:46.000 It says, If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.

02:06:54.000 We ask not your counsel or arms. 0.99

02:06:56.000 Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. 1.00

02:06:59.000 May your chains set lightly upon you and may your posterity forget that you are a countryman. 1.00

02:07:02.000 We have two comments.

02:07:04.000 Jerome Morrow says, I used to like Ian, but now that he's demonically possessed, I don't know.

02:07:09.000 And Empowin Chat said, Ian is in his echo chamber in his safe space.

02:07:16.000 We got to fix that.

02:07:17.000 We got to fix that.

02:07:17.000 We'll look at that.

02:07:18.000 Because we don't, we don't hear it because the input is on the camera.

02:07:21.000 It's not going into the mixer.

02:07:22.000 It's actually really simple.

02:07:23.000 We just flick the sound off on the, on the camera.

02:07:25.000 Want me to do that now?

02:07:27.000 Yeah, I mean, we're a couple minutes out from all going to bed, so, you know, we'll get it sorted.

02:07:32.000 I like demons, by the way.

02:07:33.000 I was gonna say, somebody said he sounded like God.

02:07:35.000 We can go into it later.

02:07:36.000 Like God?

02:07:36.000 Yeah, like the voice of God.

02:07:38.000 I was like, I don't think Ian would mind that.

02:07:40.000 Actually, the mics are all correct.

02:07:42.000 We hear Ian.

02:07:43.000 He sounds reverberating.

02:07:45.000 I hear you fine.

02:07:45.000 That's what I've always been like.

02:07:47.000 I hope you make all that money, Eli.

02:07:48.000 everyone's hearing that's actually Ian's voice. It's not technical witch at all.

02:07:51.000 Vibrato. JJ says the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with

02:07:55.000 the blood of patriots and tyrants. Thomas Jefferson. Eli Ben says I bet ten

02:08:00.000 thousand dollars on predict it for Trump to win. Still confident I will make bank.

02:08:05.000 I hope you make all that money Eli I just don't think you will.

02:08:09.000 And would you say that you hope you lose your money and he makes his money?

02:08:13.000 I hope I lose my money.

02:08:14.000 Like, I, you know, I hope I'm wrong.

02:08:17.000 But I'm also like, you know, I'm not, again, I'm not going to make a public prediction without putting a bet on it.

02:08:21.000 Like this one, especially when everybody's disagreeing with me.

02:08:23.000 So.

02:08:24.000 I think that's fair.

02:08:25.000 Donnie Mason says, the left was absolutely talking revolution in the streets.

02:08:29.000 What else would you call no justice, no peace, defunding the police, and nationwide riots?

02:08:33.000 Um, well, I'm not so sure about that, but I remember when they were chanting, revolution, nothing less, I'm pretty sure that implied they wanted revolution.

02:08:40.000 Right, I was trying to distinguish between like the Antifa lefties and the sort of Russia truthers. 0.88

02:08:47.000 In a weird way it was like a more bizarre theory like at least like the sort of Antifa revolution the streets like there's a coherence to it this theory that our billionaire real estate magnate turned president was really a secret Russian nation.

02:08:58.000 It was a fun idea because like living in a movie you know but life is more boring than that.

02:09:03.000 Let's see.

02:09:03.000 Jacob Jones says, Gandalf quote to Frodo lamenting bad times, quote, So do I and so do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide.

02:09:12.000 All we have to decide is what we do with this time that is given us.

02:09:15.000 That's great.

02:09:16.000 Yeah, true.

02:09:17.000 Well, I think, you know, we're a little bit over, but we'll wrap up there.

02:09:21.000 Make sure you guys hit that like button, subscribe, notification bells.

02:09:23.000 We'll be back tomorrow.

02:09:24.000 Will, thanks so much for hanging out.

02:09:26.000 You want to mention your website?

02:09:28.000 Yeah, humanevents.com.

02:09:29.000 uh... you know read our read our news and and follow me on twitter and periscope

02:09:33.000 at will chamberlain right regularly periscope doing a lot of the

02:09:36.000 legal periscopes as legal news happens will chamberlain

02:09:39.000 yes you you realize the first time i was introduced to you some women said your

02:09:42.000 name was will chamberlain i was like was not like a soccer players like what

02:09:46.000 Wilt Chamberlain?

02:09:46.000 Wilt the Stilt, they called him.

02:09:47.000 Super tall basketball player.

02:09:48.000 It's not the first time I've...

02:09:49.000 Right, I imagine.

02:09:50.000 It's like a comparison.

02:09:51.000 I was like, that name sounds familiar.

02:09:53.000 Wilpa Stilt, they called him.

02:09:55.000 Super tall basketball player.

02:09:57.000 Basketball player, there you go.

02:09:58.000 Wilpa Stilt Chamberlain.

02:09:59.000 All right, well make sure you follow me on Twitter, Instagram, Parler, at Tim Castner.

02:10:03.000 Check out my other channels, YouTube.com slash TimCast, and YouTube.com slash TimCastNews.

02:10:07.000 Again, we're live Monday through Friday at 8pm, so make sure you subscribe, hit the notification bell, and don't forget to follow Luke Rutkowski.

02:10:12.000 He's chillin' here.

02:10:13.000 Yep, you can find me on YouTube.com forward slash WeAreChange, and hope to see you there. 0.69

02:10:18.000 And of course we got Ian, who is now the demonic monster.

02:10:23.000 You don't have to do that.

02:10:24.000 I don't have to.

02:10:25.000 You're already performing.

02:10:27.000 Follow me at Ian Crossland.

02:10:28.000 Hit me up.

02:10:29.000 Everywhere.

02:10:30.000 And of course, you got Sour Patch Lids over on the production station.

02:10:32.000 Yes, I've been pushing the buttons all along tonight.

02:10:34.000 You guys sound very similar.

02:10:36.000 You guys are basically brothers from different mothers.

02:10:38.000 I'm sorry about that.

02:10:39.000 Who?

02:10:40.000 Sour Patch Lids.

02:10:41.000 Luke and Will, you sound very similar.

02:10:44.000 Your voices.

02:10:44.000 So yeah, it's been difficult.

02:10:46.000 Interesting.

02:10:47.000 Anyway, here's Tim.

02:10:48.000 Thanks for hanging out, everybody.

02:10:49.000 We'll be back tomorrow at 8 p.m.

02:10:51.000 and we will see you all then.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - December 09, 2020

Timcast IRL - SCOTUS DENIES GOP Lawsuit Over Mail in Voting, Is THIS The End?? w- Will Chamberlain

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript