Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - Staff For Stephen Colbert BREACHED Capitol Aided by Adam Schiff, Arrested w-Vish Burra

00:00:00.000 you you

00:00:41.000 you ladies and gentlemen it is a is a dark day in American

00:01:09.000 history There was an insurrection at the Capitol, never forget 6-16-2022, when staffers and comedians and individuals associated with Stephen Colbert breached the Capitol building after hours without authorization, let in, yes, by a Democratic member of Congress.

00:01:28.000 Our democracy, I'm sorry, our constitutional republic is truly at risk.

00:01:33.000 No, in all seriousness, here's the real story.

00:01:35.000 This is actually crazy.

00:01:36.000 So I'm sitting down in the green room.

00:01:38.000 I turn on Fox News and Jesse Waters comes on and says that seven people Associated with the Colbert's Late Show were arrested for breaching the Capitol building.

00:01:48.000 They were unauthorized.

00:01:48.000 They were banging on doors and screaming, apparently.

00:01:51.000 The report is that they were let in by Adam Schiff.

00:01:53.000 Now we're hearing it's nine people, including some well-known comics, as well as staffers for the Late Show with Stephen Colbert.

00:02:00.000 So it's fascinating.

00:02:01.000 Obviously, I'm not literally comparing this to what happened on January 6th, but it is kind of a weird irony.

00:02:07.000 We have the January 6th hearings going on right now, and you have several comedians Breaching the building.

00:02:13.000 They were instructed to leave.

00:02:14.000 Apparently they were let in by Schiff.

00:02:17.000 I wonder if Adam Schiff is gonna be held accountable at all.

00:02:19.000 So we'll talk about that.

00:02:20.000 We got a bunch of other news, too.

00:02:21.000 We got, I believe it was Cornyn, his name, right?

00:02:24.000 That senator who wants gun control?

00:02:26.000 That's who it is, yeah?

00:02:27.000 He's getting booed at a GOP convention.

00:02:29.000 People were throwing his lanyards in the trash.

00:02:31.000 Oh, I really, really want to talk about that.

00:02:32.000 And I think we'll roll with that.

00:02:34.000 Obviously a lot of news in the In the economy, because everybody expects it to get really bad.

00:02:40.000 Democrats are already plotting replacing Joe Biden.

00:02:43.000 Let's be real, they have been for some time.

00:02:45.000 So we'll get into all of that stuff.

00:02:47.000 Joining us tonight to talk about all of that is Vish Bhura.

00:02:50.000 How you doing?

00:02:51.000 Thanks for having me, Tim.

00:02:51.000 Who are you?

00:02:52.000 I'm an America First activist and operative.

00:02:55.000 I've worked with the New York Young Republican Club.

00:02:57.000 I've been the producer for War Room with Steve Manin.

00:03:01.000 Wow.

00:03:01.000 Well then, should be interesting.

00:03:02.000 I've worked closely with Matt Gates in the House of Representatives.

00:03:06.000 I'm also one of the main players behind the Hunter Biden laptop story right here.

00:03:10.000 Anybody who's ever got a copy of the Hunter Biden laptop has pretty much got it from me.

00:03:14.000 Wow.

00:03:15.000 Well then, should be interesting.

00:03:17.000 We also have Forrest Cooper.

00:03:18.000 Yep.

00:03:19.000 So my name is Forrest Cooper.

00:03:20.000 I exist in two different worlds, one of them being philosophy, the other one being violence and how we understand it.

00:03:27.000 And I am here for my fourth appearance, enjoying my time here.

00:03:31.000 So my politics is my own, but I'm really concerned about, I like to, I like to focus on questions of gun control and whether it's arbitrary and what's the point.

00:03:39.000 And then you can find me on Twitter now, if you've been following, if you've seen us on or me on your show, I'm on Twitter now, unfortunately.

00:03:47.000 You have a lot of experience in war, conflict, crisis.

00:03:50.000 Yep.

00:03:51.000 Seven deployments, four of them prior with Ranger Battalion.

00:03:54.000 I've spent plenty of time overseas.

00:03:56.000 I was over in Ukraine for a little bit recently, but that was more for journalism.

00:04:01.000 So I really wanna talk about, you know, obviously, Tim Pool loves talking about civil war.

00:04:07.000 So we'll get into that, especially considering what's going on with this Capitol breach and what it really means and what they'll say about it, plus where this goes in terms of, there's another big story out of New Mexico we talked about, Otero County, where they're refusing to certify the election.

00:04:21.000 A court order came down saying you have to, and this guy, Coy Griffin, was like, nope, not gonna do it.

00:04:26.000 So nobody knows what that means.

00:04:28.000 They're like, if he doesn't do it, what happens?

00:04:30.000 No one knows.

00:04:31.000 Is there just no election?

00:04:32.000 Well, we'll find out.

00:04:33.000 We got Luke Rudkowski.

00:04:34.000 I'm pretty sure Forrest is here to assassinate me after the show.

00:04:39.000 My name is Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange.org.

00:04:42.000 I am your humble t-shirt vendor.

00:04:44.000 Today I'm wearing a shirt that gets me a lot of thumbs up.

00:04:46.000 It says, if you trust the government, you don't know history.

00:04:49.000 I think it's important for a lot of people to see this message.

00:04:52.000 If you agree, you can go on thebestpoliticalshirts.com and get yourself one.

00:04:57.000 Also, Today will be my last day for a little bit here on this broadcast.

00:05:03.000 I will be missing you guys.

00:05:04.000 I will definitely miss Tim, Ian, Lydia, and even this grinning malaca right in front of me that couldn't be happier about the news. 0.74

00:05:13.000 No, I'm really sad that you're going, man.

00:05:15.000 Luke is going on an unpaid suspension for inappropriate behavior.

00:05:19.000 He cheated while we were playing video games.

00:05:22.000 Also called me Potato Man many times.

00:05:24.000 No, that's fine.

00:05:27.000 I can talk to HR then.

00:05:28.000 Then I can talk to HR.

00:05:30.000 That's fine.

00:05:30.000 You would.

00:05:31.000 You would, Karen.

00:05:32.000 I want to point out that you're sure to strike if you trust the government and you don't know history.

00:05:36.000 As someone who doesn't know history, I also don't trust the government, so I want that to be said.

00:05:40.000 At least you admit it.

00:05:41.000 Well, look, I'm not going to pretend to be something I'm not.

00:05:43.000 Yes, and Luke, is it assassination if you know it's coming?

00:05:47.000 Uh, maybe.

00:05:47.000 I don't know.

00:05:48.000 We'll see what happens after the show.

00:05:49.000 It's a question for another day.

00:05:50.000 Right on, it's making me feel unsafe.

00:05:53.000 So my name is Seamus Coghlan.

00:05:54.000 I make cartoons at a YouTube channel called Freedom Tunes.

00:05:57.000 We just released a cartoon yesterday that I think you guys will really like.

00:06:00.000 Speaking of assassinations and assassination attempts, it's pretty spicy.

00:06:03.000 I think you'll enjoy it.

00:06:04.000 We also just started a website, so if you want to support independent content, help

00:06:09.000 us get free from Big Tech and get an extra cartoon every week, go over to freedomtunes.com

00:06:14.000 and become a member for five bucks a month.

00:06:16.000 Thank you so much.

00:06:17.000 I am loving the vibe tonight.

00:06:18.000 It's gonna be a very fun conversation.

00:06:20.000 We have a lot of different expertises here, so I'm looking forward to getting into it.

00:06:23.000 Before we get started, head over to TimCast.com.

00:06:26.000 Become a member and support our work and our journalists.

00:06:29.000 As a member, you'll get access to exclusive segments from this show.

00:06:32.000 They go up Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m., and we just have this massive library by now of all of these different guests and conversations.

00:06:39.000 So it really is great stuff, and we appreciate all of you becoming members, supporting us.

00:06:42.000 But you're also supporting our journalists who are fact-checking, reporting on all this news every single day, challenging the machine.

00:06:48.000 And you are supporting websites and news outlets that use alternative infrastructure.

00:06:52.000 We do not use Big Tech Silicon Valley for the website.

00:06:54.000 We don't use that garbage.

00:06:56.000 Well, obviously we use some stuff, but for the most part, our infrastructure is Rumble.

00:07:00.000 Our video player is Rumble.

00:07:01.000 And we have many more announcements.

00:07:03.000 I'd love to say every aspect of the site is 100% off of Silicon Valley.

00:07:07.000 We are actively working on that now, building new infrastructure and signing deals and all of that stuff.

00:07:12.000 We will have many more announcements because a lot of stuff is happening behind the scenes.

00:07:15.000 Our intent is to do what we can to say no to the machine and help create competition.

00:07:21.000 So go to TimCast.com, but don't forget, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this video right now everywhere you can.

00:07:27.000 If you really want to help us out, word of mouth is the best way to help.

00:07:30.000 Let's jump into that first story from just the news.

00:07:34.000 Capital breach seven individuals some tied to comedian Colbert caught Unapproved in complex.

00:07:41.000 Let me see if I can pull up this Twitter.

00:07:42.000 It looks like we're getting like a weird thing happening with the Yeah, whatever you can read it.

00:07:47.000 So here we go.

00:07:48.000 We got this this Twitter thread from Chad Pergram who says Fox confirms that groups of persons associated with the late show, Stephen Colbert, were arrested last night and charged with illegal entry to House office buildings after hours.

00:08:02.000 Fox is told that people were arrested in the Longworth House office building.

00:08:05.000 The group was in the Cannon House office building earlier in the day trying to get interviews around the time of the 1-6 committee hearing.

00:08:10.000 However, USCP shooed them away because they did not have proper press credentials.

00:08:15.000 Sounds like an insurrection, if you were to ask me.

00:08:17.000 later in the night after the Capitol complex was closed to the public Fox is

00:08:21.000 told they took pictures and videos around the offices of House Minority

00:08:23.000 Leader Kevin McCarthy and Lauren Boebert hmm sounds like an insurrection if you

00:08:28.000 were to ask me I mean that's what the media was saying about who was it was it

00:08:32.000 who was that who was It was a congressman, right?

00:08:34.000 Loudermilk.

00:08:35.000 Loudermilk.

00:08:35.000 Very Loudermilk.

00:08:36.000 Yep, they were saying he was leading a tour and helping people or giving them insider information.

00:08:40.000 What is this?

00:08:41.000 Why would they take pictures?

00:08:43.000 They say they were unescorted and arrested in charge of the legal entry.

00:08:47.000 They were arrested near Boebert's office, released overnight.

00:08:50.000 They've confirmed all of their names.

00:08:52.000 Nine people.

00:08:52.000 Now, I can confirm several of these people do work for Stephen Colbert.

00:08:58.000 Some of them, I believe, which is... One of these guys, I don't know, is the voice of that comedian, that dog, that... Robert Smigel.

00:09:05.000 Is that who that is?

00:09:05.000 Yes.

00:09:06.000 What's the dog?

00:09:06.000 Triumph?

00:09:07.000 Triumph.

00:09:07.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:09:09.000 Oh, he actually goes on to say that.

00:09:11.000 U.S.C.P.

00:09:11.000 have issued the following statement.

00:09:12.000 On June 16, 2022, at approximately 8.30 p.m., U.S.

00:09:15.000 Capitol Police received a call for a disturbance in the Longworth House office building.

00:09:19.000 Responding officers observed seven individuals, unescorted and without congressional ID, in a six-floor hallway.

00:09:24.000 The building was closed to visitors, and these individuals were determined to be part of a group that had been directed by the U.S.C.P.

00:09:30.000 to leave the building.

00:09:31.000 I gotta tell you, my friends, this is worse than January 6th.

00:09:34.000 You think I'm joking?

00:09:35.000 I'm not joking, I mean it seriously.

00:09:36.000 On January 6th, many of the people who entered the building walked up with no signs, with nothing, and had the doors opened for them by the police, who then went to take selfies with them.

00:09:47.000 Those people, one guy so far, because there's been a few bench trials, one of these guys was acquitted.

00:09:54.000 Because the judge said, cops opened the door and let him in.

00:09:58.000 That's not trespassing.

00:09:59.000 There was another guy who tried claiming the same thing, but he's on video climbing through a broken window and over broken glass.

00:10:04.000 Sorry, that's not gonna fly.

00:10:05.000 You know you're trespassing.

00:10:06.000 These people were told to leave.

00:10:09.000 They came back.

00:10:10.000 And according to, uh, I believe we have a, it was a tweet from Jonathan Turley and a statement made by, uh, it wasn't from Jonathan, Turley tweeted what Jesse Waters reported that it was Adam Schiff and maybe one of his staffers who let them in the building.

00:10:23.000 So you have a member of Congress letting them, letting them in the building after they were told by the police not to be there.

00:10:30.000 That's almost as bad as the rioters.

00:10:32.000 Now, there wasn't, they weren't engaging in violence.

00:10:34.000 The rioters on January 6th obviously, you know, arrest them and charge them as appropriate.

00:10:38.000 But these, what they did is worse than what the Maga Mimas did when they, when they blindly walked in confused. 0.79

00:10:44.000 So, I'd like to see several FBI raids, maybe some misdemeanor charges that result in a year of solitary confinement.

00:10:52.000 What say you, good sir?

00:10:52.000 Well, let me ask you this, Tim.

00:10:54.000 What do you think if, let's say, those producers were reaching out to many members of the house trying to get in to the Capitol via requests and stuff?

00:11:05.000 Maybe Adam Schiff wasn't the first one.

00:11:07.000 In fact, a source from the house sent me an email from Jake Plunkett sent on June 6th.

00:11:14.000 Hi.

00:11:16.000 Reaching out on behalf of Robert Smigel and The Triumph, the insult dog.

00:11:19.000 He'll be in DC on June 15th and the 16th covering the Jan 6 hearings.

00:11:23.000 Wants to do some comedy bits with members of both sides of the aisle.

00:11:27.000 If you haven't seen Triumph, he's the insult comic dog with Conan and recently had his own Hulu special.

00:11:33.000 We've done bits with everyone from Barney Frank to Ted Cruz and Cory Booker.

00:11:37.000 We're very much interested in doing comedy for both sides.

00:11:40.000 That's an email that was sent on June 6th.

00:11:42.000 Now, if Adam Schiff actually let these guys in, right?

00:11:46.000 There's a process.

00:11:47.000 I used to work in the house, in the Longworth building.

00:11:49.000 I worked there.

00:11:50.000 And in order for you to get access to the office buildings as press, you have to go through the admin and get, the house admin, and get press credentials.

00:11:59.000 The reason you would go to a member to let you in is so that you're let in without having to declare that you're press, right?

00:12:07.000 And so that's it.

00:12:08.000 And not only that... Can you bypass security?

00:12:10.000 Well, you have to be registered in by somebody from the office of the Congress member.

00:12:18.000 So you're on record that you're in.

00:12:21.000 But there are rules.

00:12:22.000 If you're a visitor to one of these offices for a Congress member, you're not allowed to even roam the halls of the office building.

00:12:29.000 What about after hours, when the building's closed?

00:12:31.000 Definitely not, because you need a staff member of the Congress member who let you in to be escorting you through the halls at all times.

00:12:40.000 So my question is, if you were let in after hours, would you be able to bypass security?

00:12:47.000 Well, Adam Schiff has to answer.

00:12:50.000 Somebody had to let him in through the doors, but then they let him loose through the building.

00:12:54.000 What I mean is...

00:12:56.000 Is there a way to open doors for people that does not bring them through any kind of security?

00:13:00.000 Oh, no, no, no, no.

00:13:01.000 Everyone goes through security.

00:13:01.000 Everybody goes through security.

00:13:02.000 That's what I wanted to make sure, because I'm like, did they open a side door?

00:13:05.000 And even after 7 p.m., there's only one door.

00:13:08.000 It's called the 24-hour entrance at the Longworth Building.

00:13:10.000 There's only one door you can get in after 7 p.m.

00:13:13.000 So you're saying that he signed them in?

00:13:14.000 He brought them through security?

00:13:15.000 A staffer or himself had to have signed them in.

00:13:18.000 Wow.

00:13:18.000 And they were- so on Jesse Waters apparently they were like banging on doors and yelling and that's how the cops were alerted to it.

00:13:25.000 We need more reporting to come out because this story is just coming out now.

00:13:27.000 Here's the crazy thing.

00:13:28.000 This happened yesterday at 8 30 p.m.

00:13:31.000 How are we just now finding out about it?

00:13:34.000 There's people in the chat room calling this, uh, in soy-rection, uh, which I just wanted to note here.

00:13:40.000 And, uh, you made a good point, Tim, uh, especially on January 6th, there was doors that were extremely heavy that were closed with magnets that were only opened because of a code that was input directly by someone from the inside that knew the code that was able to open the doors on January 6th.

00:13:57.000 What happened here is video of it.

00:13:58.000 Does video of the cops opening the door and the cop even says, don't agree with it, but I respect it.

00:14:02.000 Yeah.

00:14:03.000 So, so, you know, What happened here? We don't know. Maybe they were trying

00:14:06.000 to do another big Pfizer sang and dance routine trying to promote more procedures. 1.00

00:14:14.000 Who knows?

00:14:14.000 We don't know. We do need more reporting to find out exactly what was going on

00:14:17.000 here. It would be funny if all of those people were dressed up like giant

00:14:20.000 vaccinations.

00:14:22.000 Sneaking around, running around.

00:14:24.000 I think you guys aren't taking this seriously enough.

00:14:26.000 It sounds to me like Adam Schiff came dangerously close to overthrowing the United States government.

00:14:30.000 You're right.

00:14:31.000 We need hearings immediately.

00:14:32.000 Absolutely.

00:14:33.000 Adam Schiff.

00:14:34.000 I mean, let's be serious though.

00:14:36.000 If it's true that he let them in, I mean, that's way worse than January 6th.

00:14:39.000 Donald Trump said, peacefully march to the Capitol and cheer on politicians, something like that.

00:14:44.000 Were there Republican elected officials who let people into the Capitol on January 6th?

00:14:48.000 No.

00:14:49.000 Yeah.

00:14:49.000 Did any sign them in?

00:14:50.000 Yeah.

00:14:51.000 Yeah.

00:14:51.000 That's what I'm saying.

00:14:52.000 So look, the left will always try to conflate all of January 6th with just the riot on the one side of the building.

00:15:00.000 I'm not talking about that.

00:15:01.000 Those people who are fighting with cops and smashing stuff and hitting... Those people will get charged.

00:15:06.000 Arrest them.

00:15:06.000 Charge them.

00:15:07.000 Make sure it's appropriate.

00:15:09.000 You get what you get.

00:15:10.000 I'm not a fan of what they're doing with the solitary confinement for a year or anything.

00:15:14.000 That's egregious.

00:15:15.000 But if you're rioting, you get arrested.

00:15:17.000 But there's videos of people just walking up, confused.

00:15:20.000 There's no fences, there's no barricades.

00:15:21.000 And then the cops literally open the door and they wave to people as they walk in with their flags.

00:15:26.000 One cop stops, they take a selfie together and they're like, yeah, thank you.

00:15:29.000 Apparently one guy claimed that the cops were actually like, yeah, come on in.

00:15:32.000 There's actually a video of cops fanning people like this.

00:15:35.000 Now the argument there was the Capitol Police said the cop was fanning the police, not the people.

00:15:40.000 Well, you got a problem there.

00:15:41.000 If there's regular people standing there confused and you're going like this and motioning forward and they're like, okay.

00:15:46.000 Yeah, they think you're telling them to come in.

00:15:47.000 That's also a very strange excuse.

00:15:50.000 Taking selfies with insurrectionists is not really a good look.

00:15:52.000 Also, hold on. 0.95

00:15:53.000 That seems like a ridiculous story.

00:15:55.000 So if there were people who were just mobbing the compound, right, and we're calling security over and those people are at the door, I'm not going like this.

00:16:04.000 To gesture security to come over to help us, right?

00:16:08.000 That's not how that works.

00:16:09.000 That's insane.

00:16:10.000 That is such an insane argument.

00:16:11.000 Like, I was just doing a general waving motion into the building because I wanted one specific person to stop everyone else from getting in the building.

00:16:19.000 They were telling the other officers to pull back.

00:16:21.000 Okay, well maybe I could see that. 0.91

00:16:23.000 Here's a silly question.

00:16:24.000 The January 6th event insurrection is probably going to be one of the most documented events

00:16:33.000 in American history.

00:16:34.000 Even now, it's been a year and a half old, right?

00:16:37.000 There's so much documentation on this that there are dissertations that will be written

00:16:41.000 about people's dissertations, about people's opinions, about what they thought they saw,

00:16:47.000 whatever.

00:16:48.000 Anybody, and I mean anybody that has the cogency to ask maybe somebody who knows anything about

00:16:56.000 security regarding security protocols, security operations, I mean it's not a complicated

00:17:03.000 situation.

00:17:04.000 The whole fanning thing is ridiculous.

00:17:06.000 We need to get to the bottom of the 529 insurrection. 0.68

00:17:09.000 529 insurrection in all seriousness.

00:17:11.000 That's right, 529.

00:17:12.000 Well, more, two thirds, roughly two thirds of Americans want to look into the 2020 riots

00:17:16.000 according to polling data.

00:17:17.000 Less than half want to look into January 6th.

00:17:20.000 Less than half agree with the January 6th commission.

00:17:21.000 You mean the 529 insurrection?

00:17:22.000 Yeah, that's right, the 529 insurrection.

00:17:23.000 Never forget.

00:17:24.000 Of course, never forget.

00:17:25.000 I never will.

00:17:26.000 Are you familiar with 529?

00:17:27.000 I live in Minneapolis, I'm familiar.

00:17:29.000 I heard it was mostly peaceful, though.

00:17:31.000 529 in Washington, D.C., when violent leftists tried tearing the fence down and set fire to one of the White House guard posts, set fire to St.

00:17:38.000 John's Church, and forced the president to retreat to a bunker, attacked journalists, and the police had to come and defend the White House from this insurrection on 529.

00:17:45.000 529.

00:17:45.000 Yeah.

00:17:48.000 Yeah, 529.

00:17:48.000 I remember that day.

00:17:50.000 You mentioned that they were, this is one of the most documented events, and it is curious, why aren't they releasing the security camera footage?

00:17:57.000 Why not release all the security camera footage?

00:17:59.000 From 529?

00:18:00.000 Well, from January.

00:18:00.000 January 6th was more documented, but yeah, both.

00:18:03.000 They won't.

00:18:04.000 Or the federal involvement and release information about how many agents were there and were participating.

00:18:10.000 And also, you know, the foreknowledge with basic events that were on Facebook saying that this was going to happen and then this was all something that they made up.

00:18:18.000 What about the supposed pipe bombs that were just near where Kamala Harris was that they decided to stop talking about?

00:18:24.000 I have a real question.

00:18:27.000 After January 6th, a bunch of leftists started doxing as many people as they could, posting their photos and faces.

00:18:32.000 No one did that for 529.

00:18:33.000 I mean that seriously.

00:18:35.000 At the White House, you have all this video of people trying to break down the fence.

00:18:39.000 They actually tore down the barricades.

00:18:41.000 They actually set fire to one of the guard posts and a church.

00:18:45.000 The right is not playing this game.

00:18:46.000 I was going to say, as an activist, I've seen this over and over again.

00:18:51.000 We're just not willing to do what the left is willing to do to take us out, right?

00:18:56.000 The Sedition Hunters page is what you're talking about, where they're going out and doxing people who were part of the insurrection or whatever.

00:19:03.000 But we don't do that.

00:19:04.000 Why not?

00:19:06.000 We have this, I think that the right has a problem of actually just participate where the space is available.

00:19:13.000 Why don't we have our own version of SPLC or ADL that just goes and labels people communists?

00:19:18.000 Or, you know, Marxists?

00:19:19.000 Or, you know, woke, you know, bad actors?

00:19:23.000 Because, you know, the way I see it is, like, the quote-unquote right is a disparate group of random factions that disagree with each other on so many different things.

00:19:32.000 Not even necessarily individualist.

00:19:34.000 I mean, conservatives are more individualist, but they're more collectivist than, say, libertarians.

00:19:38.000 But to be contrarian here, is that going to be the right strategy?

00:19:41.000 Because someone did something bad, should we do something bad too?

00:19:45.000 And use the state and the government and the deep state to go after people politically?

00:19:49.000 So I understand the paradigm, but I'm just playing... It's not bad to call out bad people.

00:19:55.000 Right, they're just duplicitous.

00:19:56.000 There is right-wing Media Matters, sort of.

00:20:00.000 I think it's unfair to say necessarily, but Newsbusters.

00:20:03.000 You're familiar with Newsbusters?

00:20:04.000 Yes.

00:20:05.000 So they watch all of these cable channels and then call out the lies in the media.

00:20:08.000 I respect that.

00:20:09.000 Media Matters lies about people in the media.

00:20:12.000 But it's an inversion.

00:20:13.000 I like what Newsbusters does.

00:20:15.000 I don't like what Media Matters does.

00:20:17.000 But at a core, they're both watching TV and then publishing their opinions on it.

00:20:21.000 So there is that counterpart.

00:20:23.000 You're right for the SPLC.

00:20:24.000 My whole thing is just match them at the front.

00:20:26.000 I don't need you to win.

00:20:27.000 Just match them, right?

00:20:28.000 Because then it opens up other fronts in the war where we can actually overtake them.

00:20:33.000 The thing is, we get kicked in too much from too many angles.

00:20:37.000 But if you look at the SPLC, they lie.

00:20:39.000 They slander.

00:20:40.000 They've been sued successfully by individuals that they lied about.

00:20:45.000 They lied about me.

00:20:45.000 And they lied about me too.

00:20:46.000 They took a speech that I did and they took one particular sentence that I said and they matched it up with a sentence that I said later to make me sound like I was calling for a revolution when I was calling for an evolution and people being better themselves individually. 0.98

00:21:00.000 So they're liars, they're cheaters. 0.89

00:21:02.000 I don't think we should strive to become what they are. 0.98

00:21:05.000 And I know where you're coming from.

00:21:07.000 No, there's no one saying that.

00:21:08.000 No, no, no.

00:21:09.000 But what you were saying, I think, was kind of matched by that.

00:21:11.000 Well, I think that, first of all, nobody would call... We call the SPLC liars, right?

00:21:18.000 SPLC wouldn't say what they're doing is lying, and there's nobody that comes out a third-party sort of unbiased... A court of law did.

00:21:24.000 Okay, so if a court of law did, fine, right?

00:21:27.000 And who's taking that?

00:21:29.000 They admitted the story they wrote with several individuals, including me.

00:21:33.000 They retracted it, apologized, and corrected it.

00:21:35.000 And a bunch of my friends end up on that list too, right?

00:21:38.000 But who has the... Does everyone who gets put on that list have the resources to be able to challenge that, right?

00:21:45.000 That's the problem.

00:21:47.000 So there's a really good example you could take with anything that happens in the gun industry or the gun culture, or it's like, oh, well, that guy got hit.

00:21:54.000 And so no, everyone just like leaves him alone for a while.

00:21:56.000 He'll figure it out.

00:21:58.000 What I'm saying is that I think you're identifying that in many ways the left circles the wagons, and they protect their own.

00:22:06.000 And there's a lot of things that you can go through real quickly, so I'll just launch them one at a time.

00:22:10.000 It was Zuby who said, calling someone a hypocrite only matters if they have integrity.

00:22:16.000 I'm paraphrasing him poorly, but like, okay, we know that doesn't work.

00:22:20.000 The SPLC is not an honest organization, okay?

00:22:23.000 We know that, so then they're not credible.

00:22:25.000 We don't use them because they're credible, but somebody else will because it's advantageous.

00:22:29.000 Do you fight fire with fire?

00:22:31.000 Sometimes.

00:22:32.000 However, what I think a more critical condition is, why does the conservative party not use the Department of Justice to actually do justice?

00:22:41.000 And I don't mean this in the, well, actually mentality, but it's, you look at all the, all the, the, these criticisms across the, uh, the 529 issue, you look at, or the, the 529 insurrection, you look at the, the things that happened in Minneapolis, the things that happened in Kenosha.

00:22:59.000 It's why don't you actually just, I don't know, maybe do your job.

00:23:03.000 Right.

00:23:03.000 So, and cause if you're not doing justice, you're not the department of justice.

00:23:06.000 And if you're not doing justice as the department of justice, you should find a new job.

00:23:11.000 You should be removed.

00:23:13.000 And I do not think you win in the game of attrition with people who are already committed to a zealous ideology that will never stop.

00:23:23.000 Maybe abolishing these corrupted institutions might be something better instead of them being weaponized against the political parties.

00:23:28.000 Because when another political party goes into power, they're going to be using the same tools that they use on the other party.

00:23:35.000 Perfect example would be, what was her name? 0.97

00:23:38.000 The gal from The View who said that gun laws in America would change if black people had them, right? 1.00

00:23:47.000 Okay, do you censor her? 1.00

00:23:49.000 Do you cut her from the film?

00:23:50.000 No, you ignore her.

00:23:54.000 So she's not a serious speaker.

00:23:57.000 And as that continues, you encourage over the long tail decision to build your community, to build your friends, to focus.

00:24:05.000 If you want to defeat ignorant people, you isolate them from the halls of intelligence.

00:24:10.000 She wasn't wrong though, Joy Behar. 0.97

00:24:13.000 What she's saying, she's not talking about conservatives.

00:24:15.000 So Joy Behar on The View says that when black people get guns, the gun laws will change. 0.98

00:24:21.000 Now we, as people who don't like racism or who like guns, we hear that and we're like, that's ridiculous. 0.97

00:24:28.000 Like we would ever support that race. 1.00

00:24:30.000 No, no, no, no.

00:24:31.000 These uppity liberals, of course, want more gun control, and especially if minorities they don't like are getting it.

00:24:37.000 It's like what happened with the Black Panthers. 0.86

00:24:39.000 Exactly.

00:24:39.000 That was California.

00:24:40.000 That was San Francisco.

00:24:41.000 Absolutely.

00:24:42.000 It was California and San Francisco in a different time.

00:24:44.000 I don't want to go down that road too far.

00:24:46.000 What I do want to go down to is the point of white fragility. 0.98

00:24:49.000 What did we learn from the book White Fragility? 0.66

00:24:51.000 The author is a terrible person, and she wants to project that on everybody else. 0.98

00:24:55.000 And she's racist. 1.00

00:24:56.000 She's a racist who wants to project her racism on everybody else. 1.00

00:25:00.000 An honest academic would look at that and say, Forrest, we need to have an honest conversation about this. 0.91

00:25:06.000 I see people on the right internalize what Joy Behar said.

00:25:10.000 And when you internalize that pain, you assume they're talking about you when they're actually talking about themselves.

00:25:14.000 So when they project, when they say these things, I just always assume they're talking about themselves.

00:25:19.000 You know why?

00:25:20.000 People have their worldview and they assume, I should say low IQ people, assume everyone else must see the world the same way they do.

00:25:30.000 Therefore, if they don't agree with me, it's because they're lying.

00:25:33.000 So someone like Joy Behar, when she says that, she's actually talking more about herself and what she feels than what anyone else actually thinks.

00:25:41.000 I don't think she has a low IQ.

00:25:43.000 you I think she's just mean I think it's I think it's I think it's fueled from

00:25:47.000 spite it's just rage but why would you say why would you say that about anybody

00:25:52.000 why would you say that about anybody is that a soul thing that motivates them is

00:25:56.000 racism because she's a racist exactly so she needs to spend spend some time figuring out who she is. 1.00

00:26:02.000 She sees the world through this lens and assumes that's why people would do something.

00:26:07.000 She does not understand the fact that, you know, we're all, I don't know, are you familiar

00:26:10.000 with Maj Torre?

00:26:11.000 Yes.

00:26:12.000 Yeah.

00:26:13.000 We're, we're fans of Black Guns Matter and Maj Torre and the work he does.

00:26:16.000 And uh, it's like, she doesn't even know he exists.

00:26:19.000 I mean, literally, she probably doesn't.

00:26:21.000 She sees this world.

00:26:22.000 Then she says, everyone else must think the same way as me, but I'm a good person because I don't act on it.

00:26:27.000 We're all like, no, we don't think that.

00:26:29.000 We think you're a racist.

00:26:30.000 This is just a modernized version of white man's burden. 0.97

00:26:34.000 That's all this is.

00:26:35.000 Look, it's hard for me to be this good white person.

00:26:39.000 You know, it's my burden to have to go around and say this stuff.

00:26:44.000 I'm trying to speak sense to you folks.

00:26:47.000 Are you talking about like the 1800s white man's burden?

00:26:49.000 Yeah, it's the same thing.

00:26:51.000 The part where like we have things like travel and medicine and written language we should spread that around the world?

00:26:57.000 Yeah, but they've taken that and just injected it into everything.

00:27:03.000 Yeah, they call it White Savior Complex.

00:27:05.000 Right.

00:27:05.000 It's the same thing.

00:27:07.000 It's the same thing.

00:27:08.000 They think they know better for you.

00:27:10.000 That's the whole idea.

00:27:11.000 Remember that guy in California where he was cheering on the rioting?

00:27:14.000 And then you see his Twitter thread where he's like, Yes!

00:27:17.000 Yes!

00:27:18.000 Do it!

00:27:18.000 Yeah!

00:27:19.000 Wait a minute, why are you coming to my neighborhood?

00:27:21.000 Don't come to my neighborhood, go downtown!

00:27:22.000 Didn't he actually say, like, go downtown?

00:27:25.000 Where the poor people live?

00:27:26.000 And he was mad they're going to Beverly Hills.

00:27:28.000 I'm like, bro, they're coming to eat the rich.

00:27:29.000 You're not safe.

00:27:30.000 They've been saying this for a while.

00:27:32.000 I mean, they don't say eat the rich because they're hungry.

00:27:33.000 They say eat the rich because they're greedy.

00:27:36.000 I'm still working this idea out.

00:27:38.000 I don't claim to know the answer here.

00:27:40.000 I don't know the solutions.

00:27:41.000 But I think maybe it would be more advantageous to stop relying on corrupted institutions to do the right thing.

00:27:47.000 And I think moving away from them, defunding them, abolishing them, I think would be a better strategy than saying, hey, Bill Barr, Mr. CIA, do the right thing here.

00:27:58.000 I think it would be better to, you know, I don't know, some people say play fire with fire, and I understand that argument, and I understand where you guys are coming from, but my knee-jerk reaction is like, wait, what we're doing here is we're adding more fuel to the fire, and it's already very hot in this room.

00:28:14.000 That's my point of view.

00:28:15.000 And I might be wrong, and I might be wrong.

00:28:18.000 And let me tell you why.

00:28:20.000 I think you're seizing a lot on the argument of state intervention, and just setting that aside for a moment, because I don't even know, I don't think we agree entirely there, but when he mentioned something like having our own version of the SPLC, obviously we're not saying we should have an organization that lies, but the point is the left has re-engineered the culture such that being accused of having any kind of conservative value comes with a very swift and significant social cost.

00:28:42.000 But they target, attack, and harass individuals.

00:28:45.000 And I think Right.

00:28:46.000 that it is a very good idea for conservatives to push for a culture

00:28:50.000 where there is a social cost to being a communist.

00:28:53.000 If you are going to go out there and say, I support the ideology which has resulted in

00:28:58.000 hundreds of millions of innocent people being slaughtered, folks should probably not want to associate with you.

00:29:04.000 If you want to advocate for the abolition of private property, start with yourself.

00:29:07.000 If you're not willing to do that, you don't believe it.

00:29:09.000 But that is an old tale.

00:29:11.000 What you're dealing with is an asymmetry of ideas.

00:29:14.000 An asymmetry in the side of warfare.

00:29:16.000 You look at, after nuclear weapons were created, the idea of warfare had to change.

00:29:23.000 You can't put the genie back in the bottle.

00:29:25.000 After the machine gun, horse charges didn't matter anymore.

00:29:28.000 After bomber planes, large formations of people, don't work anymore.

00:29:33.000 Standard armor didn't matter when gunpowder became ubiquitous.

00:29:37.000 It took time, but eventually gunpowder defeated armor.

00:29:41.000 And then armor became massive tanks.

00:29:43.000 Which then we're, you know, right now we have drones.

00:29:46.000 You having a tank battalion is functionally useless against a powerful Western military.

00:29:50.000 What happened after this history lesson at, we saw in, well not history, I don't need to talk down, that's not the right way of saying it.

00:29:57.000 But after World War II, what were the next major conflicts?

00:30:00.000 Korea, my grandfather was a POW for three years, so I heard a lot of stories.

00:30:04.000 Insurgency has become such a buzzword amongst the military elite that it's like, I'm cool.

00:30:08.000 I said insurgency.

00:30:10.000 Metaphysics.

00:30:11.000 Polymath.

00:30:11.000 Insurgency has become such a buzzword amongst the military elite that it's like, I'm cool,

00:30:15.000 I said insurgency, metaphysics, polymath, banana peel, but whatever.

00:30:22.000 So the point being said, though, is how does an asymmetry work?

00:30:25.000 The left has functionally and fully adopted asymmetrical warfare from the side of what we had called terrorism, but an insurgency.

00:30:35.000 It is a situation where I get to harm you.

00:30:38.000 But if you do what I do to you, if you reciprocate, that's bad.

00:30:43.000 So you see this within the riots in Minneapolis.

00:30:47.000 The riots were a really good example.

00:30:49.000 The Antifa, or the rioters, will provoke a response and use that response as justification for further evidence of their need for revolution.

00:31:00.000 Who's been calling for revolution this entire time?

00:31:03.000 It hasn't been the right.

00:31:07.000 Understanding insurgency conflict, how to fight against a counterinsurgency.

00:31:11.000 The purpose of an insurgency is not to defeat you in a military battle.

00:31:14.000 It's to break your will to the system.

00:31:17.000 How do Americans, how does the right or how do Americans defeat this social contagion that is this insurgency, which is both bred on our soil and abroad?

00:31:30.000 is you remember the foundations that built our country it's almost the lord of the rings plot all over again you have to understand who you are and where you come from and then live up to those virtues that is very important that you mention that because one of the huge problems right now is that conservatives but i would say americans overall and people living in western societies have no idea What their values are or what values upon which their society has been founded.

00:31:57.000 And so when the left comes along and they try to deconstruct, a lot of people are completely helpless.

00:32:02.000 They don't know how to defend and justify the values that our society promotes.

00:32:06.000 They're incapable of doing it.

00:32:08.000 And you're right that we need to know what we believe and we don't.

00:32:12.000 Yeah, I think this is where we kind of differ because I don't see the left as the main problem here.

00:32:16.000 I see a divide-and-conquer agenda.

00:32:18.000 I see voting for the lesser of two evils that is continuing to plague this country.

00:32:22.000 I see a duopoly.

00:32:23.000 I see fifth-generational warfare being raged on the American people.

00:32:27.000 And I think the people that are in power are using the left right now because they're the most easily to get used now.

00:32:33.000 Sure.

00:32:33.000 Stop.

00:32:33.000 They're the most easily to push this agenda through because it's convenient now.

00:32:37.000 But as soon as it becomes inconvenient for the larger agenda, for the larger fifth generational 0.62

00:32:42.000 warfare enslavement of humanity, they're going to be using a right-wing element of it that's 0.62

00:32:46.000 also going to be pushing on a different front that's going to be taking away our rights

00:32:50.000 and our economic abilities to survive and prosper.

00:32:53.000 So more than...

00:32:54.000 Stop.

00:32:55.000 How do you...

00:32:56.000 I just want to say this one thing and then I'll let you jump in.

00:32:58.000 So more than one thing can be true at a time.

00:33:00.000 It can absolutely be the case that the ruling elite see the left as convenient revolutionaries to destroy the existing social order and then bring to fruition whatever it is that they're seeking to transform our society into.

00:33:10.000 It is also the case that the strategy by which they do that is to have the left completely erode any and all moral surrounding family values, destroy the family, and then the government comes into that vacuum and usurps the responsibility that the family normally has.

00:33:23.000 with the participation of the right wing.

00:33:25.000 But what we have to do, oh I totally agree with you on that, but that's part of why we

00:33:28.000 do have to fight left-wing ideology and defend and fight for the family.

00:33:32.000 So I don't think it's enough to say the left is being used by these tyrants, therefore

00:33:36.000 we just look at the tyrants.

00:33:37.000 We actually have to fight the ideology itself because it's useful to them for a reason.

00:33:41.000 So my opinion is, I think we're in such a desperate situation.

00:33:44.000 We should be fighting against the enslavement, the evisceration of our rights, and the destruction of our financial futures, whether you're on the left, right, or center.

00:33:51.000 I think it's time, more than ever, to let go of these kind of differences and say, hey, we're actually being really hurt here.

00:33:59.000 We're actually being really screwed over here.

00:34:01.000 And unless we come together, unless we realize that we're all in this boat together, we're all going down as a sinking ship.

00:34:07.000 I don't want the people who groom children in my boat. 0.99

00:34:09.000 Look, I hear what you're saying, but I don't think you understand the deep ideological divide between, in the United States, from left and right.

00:34:17.000 You have people who have no moral framework.

00:34:21.000 They will say simultaneously stop and frisk is bad and red flag laws are good, even though they're variants of the exact same thing and one's even worse.

00:34:28.000 Red flag laws, stop and frisk on steroids, they're for it. 1.00

00:34:31.000 Why?

00:34:31.000 No moral framework.

00:34:32.000 So, when you go to them and say, hey, you know, we need to come together because all these bad things are happening, they'll go, oh, you're right, of course, and then as soon as you turn around, they'll hit you in the back.

00:34:41.000 Yeah, I'm not saying it's a good strategy.

00:34:42.000 I'm not saying it's even going to work.

00:34:43.000 It's not functioning.

00:34:44.000 Well, it doesn't work.

00:34:46.000 Okay, well, it's Isaiah 520.

00:34:50.000 They will call good evil and evil good.

00:34:52.000 You cannot have You cannot have you cannot break bread and have commonality with somebody who calls what you call good evil.

00:35:00.000 So problem that you have, do we focus on the left?

00:35:03.000 Do we focus on the globalists?

00:35:04.000 Do we focus on all these?

00:35:05.000 You know what they all saw the point that you're saying they solve the same question, but you can't just advocate for the family.

00:35:12.000 You have to have one force to build.

00:35:14.000 Forrest, I'm gonna agree with Luke on this one.

00:35:16.000 I think if we just compromise with the child drag shows, then maybe we'll actually... No, no, no, no, no.

00:35:20.000 That's not what I'm saying.

00:35:21.000 That's not what I said.

00:35:21.000 Not what I said.

00:35:22.000 Do you think they're in the same boat as us?

00:35:24.000 Because you're saying we're in the same boat together.

00:35:25.000 Not absolutely.

00:35:25.000 I see the right-wing political establishment willingly going along with this and pretending like they're going to be helping us when they're not.

00:35:34.000 I think there's a divide, first of all, of our understanding of right-wing and, like, Republicans, right?

00:35:39.000 The Republicans in D.C.

00:35:41.000 and then the Republicans across the nation are two totally different things, right?

00:35:46.000 For example, you're talking about why didn't the FBI or the CIA move on 529, right?

00:35:52.000 Insurrection.

00:35:53.000 Insurrection.

00:35:53.000 Who was the president at the time?

00:35:55.000 Donald Trump.

00:35:55.000 That was his FBI.

00:35:57.000 That was his CIA.

00:35:58.000 Why didn't they move?

00:36:00.000 Right?

00:36:00.000 And then you're definitely not going to get a move out of a Biden FBI or DOJ.

00:36:06.000 The problem is so entrenched in D.C., right?

00:36:09.000 The FBI is a bunch of, it used to be a Republican stronghold, but Republicans of D.C., right?

00:36:18.000 You're James Comey's of the world, Bill Barr, Robert Mueller, right?

00:36:23.000 This is the uniparty, right?

00:36:25.000 There is one belief in the D.C.

00:36:28.000 Right at one when you're outside, you know in West Virginia, New York or whatever and you're it's left versus right

00:36:35.000 Democrat versus Republican But when once you get to DC once you win that battle and

00:36:40.000 you get to DC the fight becomes the incumbents versus everybody else

00:36:43.000 so the problem you have is that the When you try to abolish the FBI or you try to abolish these

00:36:50.000 corrupt limits Or just limit their power.

00:36:52.000 I'm with you on that, right?

00:36:54.000 But first you have to get in the guys who believe that into those positions.

00:37:00.000 Because you can't abolish that institution while you have James Comey or a Bill Barr or Robert Mueller there.

00:37:06.000 In fact, I wanted to, the whole Mueller investigation and that, you know, James Comey gets fired,

00:37:12.000 then the special counsel gets appointed for, and Robert Mueller gets selected as a special counsel.

00:37:18.000 If a couple of things were adjusted slightly differently, what you would have actually had end up

00:37:25.000 is that there's a universe somewhere out there where Bill Barr would have been selected

00:37:31.000 the special counsel, and then Donald Trump would have hired Robert Mueller

00:37:35.000 to head the fbi it would it's that you got

00:37:39.000 You're dealing with the same pool of talent no matter what, right?

00:37:42.000 That's the problem.

00:37:43.000 The pool of talent you could draw on to put into the institutions.

00:37:47.000 That and so then it goes back to what you're saying.

00:37:51.000 Build the family, build the community, right?

00:37:53.000 Because first you have to build the community, then you go and take the halls of power and

00:37:57.000 then you put the community in that hall of power and then you do what you want.

00:38:02.000 That's the problem.

00:38:03.000 But just for the record, I don't stand by any groomers.

00:38:05.000 I don't think you should be working or relying with any type of people who are hurting children

00:38:09.000 in those people.

00:38:10.000 But the one point I want to make here is that it's both Republicans and Democrats that are

00:38:14.000 going to Jeffrey Epstein's island.

00:38:15.000 I need to address that point you're making because when you say you go to them and say

00:38:19.000 we're being really hurt by this, you're talking about people who overtly and and

00:38:23.000 And we'll see you next time.

00:38:25.000 With pride, we literally support those people.

00:38:28.000 So how do you go to any one of them?

00:38:29.000 Absolutely not. You cannot support people who hurt small children, especially with how evil they're doing it,

00:38:34.000 especially with the damages that they're causing them.

00:38:37.000 So what I'm saying is that the conversation should be what I'm saying is the conversation should be a little bit more

00:38:41.000 nuanced rather than generalized.

00:38:43.000 That's just the perspective that I'm trying to input.

00:38:45.000 So so here's what I would recommend.

00:38:46.000 Go to someone you see as a Democrat voter or someone's perceived as a left and say, do you agree with sex changes 0.72

00:38:51.000 for children?

00:38:52.000 Do you agree with child drag shows?

00:38:53.000 If they say no, be like, okay, let's have a conversation.

00:38:55.000 If they say yes, which 95% probably will, maybe 85%, then you can be like, okay, have a nice day.

00:39:02.000 What you're asking about, Tim, is the same thing that comes into the gun control conversation.

00:39:05.000 When was the last time you had an honest conversation about this?

00:39:08.000 About gun control as a whole.

00:39:10.000 Like, okay, I was politically introduced into the gun control conversation.

00:39:15.000 What conversation?

00:39:16.000 Okay, that's such a...

00:39:17.000 Let's do this.

00:39:18.000 Let's start the gun control conversation.

00:39:19.000 We have an article, though.

00:39:20.000 Cool.

00:39:20.000 So this is from CNN Politics.

00:39:23.000 John Cornyn, top Republican negotiator on gun package, booed at Texas GOP convention.

00:39:28.000 I saw a photo.

00:39:29.000 Apparently they were throwing lanyards with his name in it in the garbage.

00:39:33.000 And then they booed the guy.

00:39:34.000 Honest poll for the chat.

00:39:35.000 I just want to point this out.

00:39:37.000 When we're talking about politics in the establishment uniparty, you've got Republicans who say, okay, Democrats, we'll compromise and give into gun control, and Democrats who say, the moment you do, we'll call for twice as much.

00:39:49.000 So the direction only moves towards more gun control.

00:39:52.000 Where's the Republican negotiation with Democrats on them abolishing certain gun laws or repealing certain gun laws?

00:39:58.000 Never happens.

00:39:59.000 Never, ever.

00:39:59.000 Well, this is what they constantly say.

00:40:01.000 Why won't the Republicans compromise with us?

00:40:03.000 Okay, well, by definition, a compromise involves both sides getting something.

00:40:07.000 You're literally just asking for concessions.

00:40:09.000 And the Republicans give them to us!

00:40:11.000 And there shouldn't be any concessions when it comes to our God-given rights.

00:40:14.000 And I think that's a stance that we should be making, saying, hey, we've given enough to the government.

00:40:19.000 We've given them all of our money.

00:40:20.000 We've given them all of our privacy.

00:40:22.000 We've given them all of our trust.

00:40:23.000 And they have deceived us every single day.

00:40:26.000 And when you look at history, when populations disarm, when populations give up their weapons, When populations become defenseless, it's when governments are able to do whatever they want with them.

00:40:35.000 And I think it's extremely dangerous where we're headed towards as a country.

00:40:40.000 And I think there should be a criticism right now on the Republicans here more than the Democrats, because it's the Republicans here that are allowing a lot of this to move through.

00:40:48.000 Oh, yeah.

00:40:49.000 So this is the problem with Republicans in D.C.

00:40:52.000 I despise Republicans in D.C.

00:40:54.000 You could count on your hand how many of them you could actually rely on to be about what they're about.

00:40:59.000 Right.

00:40:59.000 right john corn in one of these guys the problem with the senate is that it's a retirement home

00:41:05.000 right they go and raise the age on being able to buy guns why because they're

00:41:09.000 well over the age right date doesn't affect them

00:41:12.000 and so you so that senate republicans cornyn is already

00:41:17.000 putting up the signal right now that he's about to get blown out

00:41:21.000 The same thing happened to, uh, uh, uh, Jacobs, uh, Chris Jacobs in New York 23.

00:41:28.000 He came out, he was a house Republican in a super conservative district in New York, right?

00:41:32.000 R plus 23.

00:41:34.000 He comes out and says, you know what?

00:41:36.000 I'm willing to, to, uh, compromise and vote for gun control in about three or four days later.

00:41:42.000 He had to come out and say, I'm no longer seeking the election, right?

00:41:46.000 Yeah, because that's the that's how much pushback that he got that he realized like, oh, I said the one thing that just ruined my entire political career.

00:41:56.000 Can we do a recall or something for senators?

00:41:58.000 I think it'll go state by state what you'll be able to do with the Senator, but I don't think you can recall a Senator.

00:42:06.000 But in that moment, that showed you that still the uproar from the people pushed that guy Jacobs out.

00:42:13.000 And to break a little news on this show, I'm actually going to be the comms director for Carl Palladino in New York 23 to go and bring that seat and bring it to a real conservative.

00:42:25.000 Carl Palladino, if he's elected, he will be the MTG of the North.

00:42:30.000 He will raise hell in the Capitol and we need a guy like that.

00:42:34.000 A lot of gun control bills that need to be repealed.

00:42:36.000 Exactly.

00:42:37.000 And Carl will stand up.

00:42:39.000 And that district was challenged on that gun control bit right there.

00:42:43.000 That seat opened because of that.

00:42:45.000 So Carl knows what the deal is.

00:42:47.000 He's going to go make sure our inalienable rights are protected.

00:42:51.000 It's really easy to look at gun rights and human rights in America.

00:42:56.000 Let's remember that the right to own a firearm is a human right.

00:42:59.000 If you think otherwise, you can go find a way to not be a part of talking.

00:43:05.000 Diplomatic, right?

00:43:06.000 They tried getting a three-week waiting period for all gun participants.

00:43:09.000 Look, look, there needs to be room for optimism here.

00:43:12.000 And the room for optimism is in our generation.

00:43:15.000 I am 32 years old.

00:43:16.000 I am sunburnt from spending a week in South Dakota, which has nothing to do with what I'm about to say.

00:43:21.000 What does have something to do with that is we live in a generation where you could very well see the NFA repealed.

00:43:27.000 We can see it.

00:43:28.000 I do not believe in getting Doomer pilled.

00:43:30.000 That's the National Firearms Act.

00:43:32.000 Yeah, the National Firearms Act.

00:43:33.000 The reason why you can't own... you have to go through a special process to own a barrel that has a length shorter than 16 inches or to own a suppressor which protects your hearing.

00:43:42.000 Suppressors make it safe for everyone.

00:43:44.000 Yeah, and this kind of comes back down to that.

00:43:47.000 If you think that suppressors are like Hollywood quiet and super dangerous, you don't know what you're talking about.

00:43:52.000 Here's the crazy thing, too.

00:43:54.000 They have handguns that are suppressed.

00:43:56.000 That means they've made, like, hey, we're gonna make this handgun, it's gonna be safer.

00:43:59.000 It's not gonna- it's not gonna be as dangerous.

00:44:01.000 And they're like, mm, that's an NF- that's an NFA item.

00:44:03.000 It's an NFA item.

00:44:04.000 So, to break the stigma, why do you think he got booed?

00:44:07.000 Do you think he got booed because he betrayed the Republican Party or because he betrayed the American people?

00:44:12.000 The people.

00:44:13.000 I'm telling you that they booed him because he betrayed the American people.

00:44:16.000 Correct.

00:44:17.000 It turns out when you betray the American people and you're running for Republican, you lose your seat.

00:44:22.000 You betray the American people and you're running for Democrat, you become President. 0.68

00:44:28.000 If you betray the American people and you're a Democrat, all you gotta do is come out and wave a flag or make some garbage statement, and they'll say, sure, whatever, as long as we're aligned socially so that can fit in.

00:44:37.000 Yeah, you can bring economic ruin upon the people where they're literally starving in the streets, but you know what, at least he didn't make mean tweets. 0.98

00:44:44.000 Some people are masochists.

00:44:45.000 Adam Schiff can lie every single day.

00:44:47.000 He can push the Russiagate lies and people just love it.

00:44:50.000 They love being pissed on by this guy.

00:44:52.000 And they're going to keep voting for him.

00:44:53.000 But did you know that Trump called him Watermelon Head?

00:44:57.000 And that's really unpresidential.

00:44:59.000 Did he do that?

00:45:00.000 I feel bad for watermelons.

00:45:02.000 Well, that's the thing, you know, Adam Schiff and these guys, they sit in really safe blue seats.

00:45:08.000 It all depends on the political pressure at the end of the day.

00:45:10.000 These guys are cold and calculated. 0.97

00:45:12.000 They don't believe in a damn thing, right? 0.97

00:45:15.000 And so as long as that seat is sitting there blue as hell and nobody can touch Adam Schiff on a fundraising perspective or a popularity perspective, that guy's going to sit there for a while. 0.91

00:45:26.000 And if it gets out of his hand, it goes to the left.

00:45:29.000 It doesn't go to the right.

00:45:31.000 Right?

00:45:31.000 And so this is the problem.

00:45:33.000 We don't do enough.

00:45:35.000 I believe on the conservative side, we are not willing to go into those districts and challenge those people because, quite frankly, it would cost you a lot of money to do it and you'd probably still lose.

00:45:47.000 Right?

00:45:47.000 So I get that.

00:45:49.000 But we have to build the infrastructure and it's a long-term project.

00:45:53.000 I'll tell you why I think one of the factors that is leading us to civil war.

00:45:57.000 We've had on a bunch of people on the show.

00:45:59.000 We've had on Billy Prembe, for instance.

00:46:02.000 I love him.

00:46:03.000 But he was running as a Republican in a deep blue district.

00:46:05.000 Yeah, but I don't know.

00:46:06.000 I helped him shoot an ad for him.

00:46:08.000 And he should have done that because what's happened is you get the GOP that says, okay, we got to be strategic.

00:46:15.000 We have X amount of dollars.

00:46:16.000 That's a D plus seven.

00:46:18.000 Maybe we shouldn't invest so much money in that because we're going to lose.

00:46:21.000 Next year, it's a D14.

00:46:22.000 Well, we definitely don't want to invest in there because we're going to lose.

00:46:25.000 Next year, it's a D28.

00:46:26.000 This keeps happening and happens with Republicans as well.

00:46:28.000 It is hyper-polarizing the country.

00:46:31.000 You have areas like Adam Schiffer, Nancy Pelosi's district, or Ocasio-Cortez's district,

00:46:36.000 where she's in a D plus 28.

00:46:39.000 And it's because Republicans do not try to spend money there and get their messaging out.

00:46:45.000 And because of that now, you've got the amount of swing districts,

00:46:49.000 it's just, everything's being pushed further and further left or right.

00:46:52.000 Right.

00:46:52.000 But you know what that has done though?

00:46:54.000 The satisfaction with the representative for each district has gone up since then.

00:46:59.000 Right?

00:46:59.000 So that is, so there's a little... That just makes it worse in terms of the polarization.

00:47:05.000 Right.

00:47:06.000 Because you're firmly in with your guy, right?

00:47:09.000 Oh, I love him.

00:47:09.000 He's all the way to, you know, he's to the right of me.

00:47:12.000 I love him, right?

00:47:13.000 Or to the left of me.

00:47:16.000 This is also part of the gerrymandering argument, right?

00:47:21.000 What is the way we make the maps, right?

00:47:23.000 They have the communities of interest standard.

00:47:27.000 My friend Gavin Wax just won his lawsuit in New York.

00:47:30.000 He was on this show before.

00:47:33.000 He challenged the assembly maps, got them thrown out.

00:47:36.000 Special Master is going to have to redraw them next year, I think.

00:47:40.000 But how is it now that it's going to be drawn out?

00:47:42.000 What is fair?

00:47:45.000 Fair is when I win.

00:47:45.000 See, the issue is, you have the left.

00:47:47.000 Fair is when I win.

00:47:48.000 Correct.

00:47:49.000 That is the right answer actually.

00:47:50.000 When it comes to politics, unfortunately as much as you hate it, that is the right answer.

00:47:56.000 See the issue is, you have the left.

00:47:59.000 The left is, we should win because we should win.

00:48:03.000 The right is, we should win because we propose these ideas that we think will work better.

00:48:08.000 Many on the left think that's what they're doing, but then you run into problems of... I mean, look, the modern left may be different from where the left was 10 years ago.

00:48:17.000 I hear a lot of people like Bill Maher, and they rag on Republicans, and it's like, yeah, you're talking about, like, boomer Republicans and stuff.

00:48:22.000 The younger generation of people that align in this direction are post-liberal, libertarian, moderate, conservative, etc.

00:48:27.000 There's a wide range of voices.

00:48:29.000 On the left, they say things like, we should raise the minimum wage.

00:48:32.000 And you see, yes, simple question.

00:48:34.000 What will that do?

00:48:35.000 And then, how does it go, Seamus?

00:48:37.000 Oh yeah, so this is how the left operates.

00:48:39.000 They go, I want good thing.

00:48:41.000 I want good thing. 0.71

00:48:41.000 And then you go, okay, so like, how are you going to structure the legislation to get that? 0.71

00:48:46.000 How are we going to pay for it?

00:48:47.000 You want bad thing. 1.00

00:48:48.000 You want bad thing. 1.00

00:48:48.000 He wants bad thing. 1.00

00:48:49.000 I don't want bad thing.

00:48:51.000 You want bad thing. 1.00

00:48:52.000 Why the gun debate?

00:48:53.000 bad thing and then they put big up big sign saying bad person bad person bad

00:48:56.000 person okay I think perfect this is the you you ask the question what are the

00:48:59.000 things pushing us towards civil war or open conflict let's just call it open

00:49:03.000 conflict the gun debate is the perfect example the gun why the gun debate why

00:49:09.000 the gun abortion is way abortion because pregnancy centers have been firebombed

00:49:14.000 every four years or now right now I mean every four years we have the same talk

00:49:18.000 in 2012 and 2013 This is when I was introduced into the political gun conversation.

00:49:25.000 What happened?

00:49:26.000 You had Sandy Hook.

00:49:28.000 And then all of a sudden, all of these conversations, all of these, oh, gun control, gun control, gun control, assault weapons, assault weapons, assault weapons, you know, magazines, magazines, magazines, and people made bank.

00:49:41.000 made money off of all of the ridiculous things that people said.

00:49:45.000 They wanted to propose all these ideas, these do-something peoples. 0.98

00:49:48.000 If that is the extent of your intellect, wow, man.

00:49:51.000 But the point that I'm saying is, you had all of these arguments that were made, that all these gun, pro-gun control arguments, all, every single one of them turned out to be factually wrong, ethically wrong, or just, I don't know, overt tyranny.

00:50:05.000 So they all collapsed.

00:50:07.000 And then four years later we had Parkland shooting.

00:50:09.000 What happened to those old arguments?

00:50:10.000 It came out of the dust.

00:50:12.000 Same exact arguments.

00:50:13.000 Same exact arguments.

00:50:13.000 You could carbon copy them.

00:50:15.000 But I don't think that is a contributing factor.

00:50:17.000 I believe that's a contributing factor to some degree to Civil War.

00:50:20.000 No, because the people on the right, or the people who support the private ownership of firearms, respond honestly and say, well, these are your ideas, but you're wrong, so I'll help you out and correct them.

00:50:30.000 And then the people who propose gun control go, they don't think, oh, I was wrong.

00:50:35.000 Maybe I should change my opinion.

00:50:37.000 It's not politically advantageous.

00:50:39.000 If you want to stop a civil war, if you want to prevent or move against a civil war in this country, stop pushing the ridiculous ideas that you've been corrected on for 10 years.

00:50:45.000 You're just talking about the left.

00:50:48.000 Be it guns or any other political issue.

00:50:50.000 I posted on Facebook today, what is a woman? 0.96

00:50:52.000 And boy, did every single leftist flip out.

00:50:54.000 And I said, I don't understand why you can't just be like, here's my answer.

00:50:58.000 Instead, they all say you're a bigot.

00:51:00.000 It's a right-wing talking point.

00:51:01.000 Oh, Matt Walsh made this up.

00:51:03.000 I'm not playing games.

00:51:04.000 And I'm just like, wow, they really have no answer.

00:51:06.000 I don't think that- It doesn't matter if it's gun control, abortion, or any other left-wing issue, if it's progressive taxes or universal health care, they won't answer the questions, nor will they do any real research.

00:51:16.000 And let me throw it to another example.

00:51:17.000 Of course we can talk about abortion when we can get sophists from the left who are like, oh, um, you know, it's the woman's choice.

00:51:23.000 Give me your answer, your morality, they won't do it.

00:51:26.000 Let's talk about the Green New Deal.

00:51:27.000 Here's the Green New Deal as it's pitched.

00:51:29.000 We need to invest in infrastructure that will make us energy independent.

00:51:33.000 Getting off of fossil fuels so that we're not reliant on Saudi Arabia or Russia or Canada.

00:51:38.000 And we can do that with wind, with tidal energy, with geothermal.

00:51:42.000 Nuclear.

00:51:43.000 Well, the Green New Deal doesn't say that.

00:51:45.000 And then we say, OK, OK, I love the sound of that.

00:51:47.000 That sounds really great, actually.

00:51:49.000 I love the idea of energy independence.

00:51:51.000 We don't want to be dependent on Saudi Arabia.

00:51:52.000 What's your proposal?

00:51:53.000 And they bring to a resolution that says, free college for marginalized people, free health care for marginalized people.

00:52:00.000 And when I asked, as progressive on the show, what does that have to do with wind turbines?

00:52:04.000 He says, well, it's because they're the people who are first affected by climate change.

00:52:09.000 What are you talking about?

00:52:10.000 There are more poor white people in the United States than minority poor people.

00:52:14.000 So if you're talking about poverty, what?

00:52:16.000 Tell me how you're going to build wind turbines on the conversation.

00:52:19.000 But even when it comes to things that are considered left that I like, they immediately just change the argument to something totally nonsensical.

00:52:26.000 And then here I am, as AOC is getting, she wins her primary, talks about the Green New Deal.

00:52:31.000 I made a video, I'm like, I love the idea.

00:52:33.000 Let's start rebuilding our infrastructure, our bridges, our streets.

00:52:36.000 Let's focus on how to alleviate ourselves from this dependence on foreign oil.

00:52:40.000 We can do that with green energy in this country.

00:52:42.000 And then she's like, I'm proposing the Green New Deal resolution, and it's like, free college for marginalized people.

00:52:47.000 And I'm like, what?

00:52:49.000 That's nothing to do with what we talked about.

00:52:51.000 But you know what the problem is?

00:52:52.000 People on the left overwhelmingly just said, whatever you say, AOC.

00:52:56.000 You want to make college useless, make it free.

00:53:00.000 Well, here's the thing.

00:53:00.000 I got bad news for you.

00:53:01.000 Yeah, it's really expensive and it's useless.

00:53:03.000 The GI Bill paper mine. 0.57

00:53:05.000 Well, the other thing is, is that when they couch all their arguments and platitudes, and then they don't have to get into the specifics, then it leaves that open, right?

00:53:14.000 It's like, well, you know, what is a woman? 0.98

00:53:19.000 A woman is, you know, by definition, somebody who feels like a woman, blah, blah, blah. 0.96

00:53:24.000 And then it's like, well, what if somebody feels like a cat?

00:53:26.000 You know, are they a cat, right?

00:53:27.000 And then it's like, well, what are you trying to say that, you know, a woman is a cat or a trans person is an animal, right? 0.95

00:53:35.000 They, they go into all their little games, right?

00:53:38.000 Because they don't want to have to, they don't want to corner themselves.

00:53:42.000 Their response to Matt Walsh and What Is Woman is, a woman is a person who identifies as a woman.

00:53:47.000 Okay, is a cat a person who identifies as a cat?

00:53:49.000 No, a cat is something very specific and quantifiable.

00:53:52.000 I mean, woman and man are as well.

00:53:54.000 But they're just making weird semantic arguments.

00:53:56.000 Now, I'll say this.

00:53:57.000 The reason why Matt Walsh's question was so effective is that it's an apolitical question that the average person who's not involved in politics would not understand the deeper political meaning behind it.

00:54:07.000 They simply see someone say, what is it?

00:54:09.000 And they go, Oh yeah, let me give you my answer.

00:54:12.000 But when you look at the political debate and you see someone go, well actually, you know the thing is, you go, what?

00:54:19.000 That's weird.

00:54:20.000 When you ask somebody a basic question and they talk down to you.

00:54:25.000 I think he did a stoic job holding his face.

00:54:28.000 So this is the issue I see.

00:54:30.000 We talk about this comic, Ian mentioned it several times, where there's two people And there's a 6 from one perspective and a 9 from another perspective, and both people are looking at it from other directions, pointing at it saying 6 or 9.

00:54:43.000 They can't tell, they're looking at the same thing from the other side.

00:54:46.000 And, sure, but what I see here, especially with what we do, is I'm staring at that and I go, you know, that could be a 6 or a 9, and they go, you're a bigot, it's clearly a 6!

00:54:57.000 And I'm like, I understand why you think that, I'm saying, have you tried looking at it?

00:55:00.000 No, it clearly isn't!

00:55:02.000 Also, whoever put it there in the first place didn't intend for it to be a six or a nine.

00:55:06.000 So the comic is a view from above fallacy.

00:55:09.000 It's the same thing with the blind men touching the elephant. 0.79

00:55:13.000 One man touches the ears and he's like, oh, it's a leaf.

00:55:15.000 And another guy touches the foot and says it's a tree.

00:55:16.000 And another one touches the tail and says it's a snake.

00:55:18.000 It turns out all the blind men are wrong. 0.99

00:55:20.000 It's an elephant.

00:55:21.000 So like, the metaphor sounds nice.

00:55:23.000 Oh, you're so enlightened because all these blind men can't tell that they're touching an elephant, but there's an elephant because you said it was in the beginning. 0.97

00:55:31.000 What happened when they went under the hood?

00:55:33.000 No.

00:55:35.000 It's a... Let's not go there.

00:55:38.000 It's a velociraptor.

00:55:40.000 It's the next sequel for Jurassic Park.

00:55:42.000 There you go.

00:55:44.000 Oh no.

00:55:45.000 So when it comes to Matt Walsh's film, part of the brilliance of it is that, look, I was following this on Twitter and I follow Matt, so I saw people tagging him saying, I can't believe Matt was willing to keep this interview in his film even though he got completely scorched in it.

00:56:01.000 It's like, what are you talking about?

00:56:02.000 Because they literally, they think saying more buzzwords means you won the argument because

00:56:10.000 you sound smart.

00:56:11.000 They didn't even sound smart.

00:56:12.000 You could tell they were saying nothing.

00:56:13.000 Have you read their blog?

00:56:14.000 Yes. 0.98

00:56:15.000 I I've seen some of the responses and they're really pathetic, but I 0.97

00:56:18.000 did, I want to make a point. 0.93

00:56:19.000 You were talking about defining what a cat is and they can do that.

00:56:24.000 I think what's even more fun to ask them is, why can't you identify as being part of a different racial or ethnic group?

00:56:30.000 Because that actually does exist on a spectrum.

00:56:33.000 Sex doesn't, but racial identity does. 0.76

00:56:35.000 Like, someone can be, like, a man or a woman don't have, like, a half-man, half-woman baby.

00:56:39.000 Oh, bro, I've tried that before, talking to these people.

00:56:41.000 How do they respond to that?

00:56:42.000 I'm actually Japanese.

00:56:43.000 I identify as Japanese.

00:56:45.000 I'm 5% Japanese.

00:56:46.000 True story.

00:56:47.000 20% Korean, 5% Japanese.

00:56:49.000 Did you do your ancestry?

00:56:51.000 I'm more Native American than Elizabeth Warren.

00:56:52.000 My parents.

00:56:53.000 Alright, but like, who is it?

00:56:55.000 But when I said it, they go, no, you're white.

00:56:57.000 Remember when we had that one fellow in here who said no matter what I thought I was, I was white? 0.88

00:57:04.000 And I was like, we had a guy in here and I was explaining like, you know, I've experienced racism and he was like, no you haven't, you're white.

00:57:10.000 And I'm like, well, I'm actually, you know, part of these other things.

00:57:13.000 So you don't get to, even if you are.

00:57:15.000 Did you say that how many buzzwords you use makes how smart you are?

00:57:18.000 Bouncing the ticket, bellwether state, blue state, coastal elites, coffers, dark horse, dark money, earmark, inside the beltway, am I doing good?

00:57:25.000 Yeah, no, you're genius.

00:57:25.000 Red state, war chest, wedge issue.

00:57:28.000 Look at these blog posts on intersectional feminism and critical race theory from the early 2010s, and it'll be a simple question like, what is racism?

00:57:38.000 And then you ask someone on the right and they'll say, positive or negative prejudice based on someone's race.

00:57:44.000 It's like, oh, okay.

00:57:45.000 So like, I understand that.

00:57:46.000 You could be racist in a way where you're actually complimenting someone, but it's a stereotype.

00:57:49.000 Oh, I get it.

00:57:50.000 You ask one of these academics and they'll say, the word racism is rooted in white Anglo-colonial culture.

00:57:56.000 The British colonizers who traveled around the world, and it's like, okay, what?

00:57:59.000 I just asked you for a definition.

00:58:00.000 And they're like, hold on.

00:58:01.000 I don't want a video essay, bro.

00:58:02.000 It's the leftist meme.

00:58:04.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:58:05.000 It's this big, long winded thing.

00:58:07.000 Have you seen the meme on what is a woman?

00:58:09.000 Where someone said that a woman texted her boyfriend, what is a woman? 0.87

00:58:13.000 And he sent her this like 3000 word treatise on like his thoughts and philosophy.

00:58:18.000 And she said, oh, you are.

00:58:19.000 Is that what she did? 0.92

00:58:21.000 No, but she should have.

00:58:23.000 No, but it was like, instead of saying something simple, and I'll tell you this,

00:58:28.000 there is a simple leftist answer to the question. They never give it because I don't think they

00:58:32.000 actually read their own literature. I did, so I know what the actual higher level academic left

00:58:37.000 answer is. I'll say in a second. They say, this guy says something like, he's like,

00:58:42.000 why are you asking such a question?

00:58:44.000 And how would we quantify what one was even if we wanted to?

00:58:46.000 First, let's think about what you mean by that.

00:58:48.000 Are you talking about outward appearance?

00:58:49.000 As in what clothing does she wear or perhaps the makeup or the hairstyle?

00:58:53.000 Well, if you're doing that, then you're confusing men with long hair with women.

00:58:57.000 Well, that certainly couldn't work.

00:58:59.000 You're so smart because you're going to go into, oh it's a social construct.

00:59:02.000 Are we gonna go as if anyone ever said like this is how we define men versus women long hair versus short hair

00:59:07.000 Are you talking to four-year-olds? So let me explain. You're so smart because you're gonna go into oh, it's a social

00:59:11.000 construct So let me let me explain her

00:59:13.000 So when Matt Walsh talked to this college professor and he said what is a woman?

00:59:18.000 And he said, it's someone who identifies as a woman.

00:59:21.000 That's a guy who never actually read the actual literature.

00:59:24.000 When he went on Dr. Phil, and was talking to those non-binary people, and he asked them, and they said, a woman is a person who identifies as a woman, because they never actually read the literature.

00:59:32.000 Do you know what actual leftist academics say?

00:59:34.000 There's only a few of them who've actually written or read about it.

00:59:37.000 They say, a woman is a person who identifies as an adult human female.

00:59:41.000 So, okay.

00:59:43.000 So there's still logical inconsistencies in that statement.

00:59:48.000 So when they say a person, a woman is a person that identifies as a woman, and Matt Wall says, what is that?

00:59:55.000 Well, an adult human female.

00:59:56.000 But because we're being inclusive, some people identify as an adult human female, such as a trans woman, so we would say that is in the category of woman.

01:00:04.000 You can argue the logic there and say, okay, I get what you're trying to say now, but here's why I think that doesn't work.

01:00:09.000 Fine.

01:00:10.000 They never do it because they don't read their own books.

01:00:13.000 Like, you had a college professor who couldn't just say that?

01:00:16.000 I'm talking to these leftists, and I'm like, why don't you just give them your own answer and say, next question, please?

01:00:20.000 And then advance the conversation.

01:00:22.000 Maybe it's because they're afraid of giving an answer knowing they're going to be cancelled in about 76 minutes when it changes.

01:00:27.000 Be as vague as possible, right?

01:00:29.000 Be as vague as possible.

01:00:30.000 Let your yes mean something else and your no mean something else, basically, is their doctrine.

01:00:36.000 No, because you would agree with me on that one.

01:00:37.000 Was it Oberlin College that the guy got cancelled?

01:00:41.000 The professor, right?

01:00:43.000 The first people they go after are their own.

01:00:47.000 They're hoping that a right-winger actually says this stuff to go and cancel him.

01:00:51.000 They are trained to speak the way a high schooler writes an English essay when he's trying to reach the word quota.

01:00:58.000 The significance of the passage of time.

01:01:01.000 Which is why they elected Kamala Harris.

01:01:06.000 I have an AI word expander thing.

01:01:10.000 I should take the definition, adult, human, female, put it in the AI and say, make this phrase 3,000 words.

01:01:18.000 Then print it out and be like, here's my answer.

01:01:21.000 Actually, maybe I can do that right now.

01:01:23.000 Let's see if I can do this.

01:01:23.000 I used to do the size 14 font and the size 16 periods and commas.

01:01:29.000 That was my trick.

01:01:30.000 That's brilliant.

01:01:31.000 That's also why I dropped out of high school.

01:01:32.000 1.5 space instead of single space.

01:01:35.000 You gotta find these little workarounds.

01:01:37.000 1.25 space.

01:01:38.000 But I'm gonna look down on you.

01:01:39.000 As an academic, I wrote too many pages.

01:01:44.000 Again, the significance of the passage of time.

01:01:46.000 We were talking about this before, right?

01:01:48.000 Where VP Harris and Buttigieg would be the dream ticket to only weird people in, like, DC marketing firms, right?

01:01:58.000 Because you have one Kamala Harris, you know, significant passage of time, just filling in words in the essay.

01:02:05.000 Right.

01:02:05.000 And then you have Pete Buttigieg, who's the 10th guy on the McKinsey conference call, who's, you know, kind of chimes in to just let people know that, like, hey, I'm here.

01:02:14.000 Make sure you send me my my check for the hour.

01:02:16.000 Right.

01:02:17.000 Like, that's it.

01:02:18.000 Well, this is what they're testing.

01:02:20.000 The Washington Times released an article today saying Harris Buttigieg 2024 ticket would obliterate Trump or DeSantis.

01:02:28.000 Well, this is the kind of echo chamber.

01:02:30.000 This is the kind of bubble that a lot of people are living in.

01:02:32.000 And I think we should try to do our best to try to break that bubble because it's a bubble of delusion.

01:02:38.000 It's a bubble filled with a lot of emotional disharmony.

01:02:41.000 It's a bubble filled with a lot of mental disorders.

01:02:44.000 And when you see people like that, you know, there's a couple things you could do. 0.91

01:02:47.000 You could be angry at them.

01:02:48.000 You could point fingers at them.

01:02:49.000 But I think You know, from an empathetic point of view, we should be trying to... it might seem futile, it might seem stupid, but try to at least talk to these people and be like, hey, let's calmly discuss some of this.

01:03:02.000 I know some people say that doesn't work, but what else can you do?

01:03:05.000 I think mocking, comedy, satire is also very important, but done tastefully and not done in an evil kind of way.

01:03:14.000 It's a wise man's claim, is pick your battles.

01:03:17.000 And do you want to be fighting these people too?

01:03:20.000 No, pick your battles.

01:03:21.000 If the person is a dishonest interlocutor, if they're a dishonest actor, don't treat them like an honest actor.

01:03:27.000 If they are fighting as an insurgent, you do not treat them as the royal guard.

01:03:32.000 You do not treat... you have to change your tactics according to your opponent, but it doesn't mean that you have to... that is not the same as failing for the actions that they go.

01:03:43.000 The idea with the insurgency, it functions... an insurgency is successful when the will of the people loses faith in the institutions, right?

01:03:52.000 The purpose is to destroy your faith in the institutions.

01:03:55.000 The insurgency of Minneapolis 2020 Broke the will of the Minneapolis people because they capitulated to defund the police.

01:04:04.000 They were swayed by this idea to eradicate the police as if they were the problem.

01:04:11.000 And what do they have now?

01:04:13.000 We have daily shootings.

01:04:14.000 We have daily robbings.

01:04:15.000 We have carjackings out the window.

01:04:17.000 And this is Minneapolis, dude.

01:04:18.000 It's Minneapolis.

01:04:20.000 So like the point being said, with your statement, if you're going to engage with somebody, Take a minute, instead of going straight into cynicism and saying there's no point, black pill, black flag strategy, go...

01:04:36.000 That's not an honest interlocutor.

01:04:38.000 I will not engage in an argument with you, because you are lying to me.

01:04:41.000 Also, I want to say, Harris Buttigieg is so specific, trying to lock down the vote of whoever it is that buys Funko Pops.

01:04:48.000 It's such a weak establishment choice on both fronts.

01:04:52.000 It's the Steve Buscemi, how you do, you fellow kids?

01:04:56.000 I asked the AI what a woman is, and I said to give me a verbose explanation, And I gotta be honest. 0.92

01:05:03.000 It's called Detransphobic.

01:05:04.000 It actually wrote a really, really good explanation that is quite verbose.

01:05:08.000 Did it confirm- Well, you'd get cancelled if you shared it.

01:05:10.000 No.

01:05:10.000 I'm gonna read it.

01:05:11.000 Did it confirm the existence of God?

01:05:13.000 Uh, it's actually quite amazing.

01:05:15.000 This is an AI.

01:05:15.000 I said, write a verbose explanation for what a woman is, and it says, A woman is an adult human female.

01:05:21.000 The term woman may also refer to a person's gender identity as different from man.

01:05:25.000 The word is derived from the Old English withmen.

01:05:27.000 In Old English, withmen meant female human being, whereas were meant male human being.

01:05:32.000 Man or man had a gender-neutral meaning of human being corresponding to modern English.

01:05:35.000 Person or someone.

01:05:37.000 However, subsequent to the Norman Conquest, man began to use more in reference to male human being.

01:05:42.000 And by the late 13th century had begun to eclipse usage of the older term wear.

01:05:46.000 The medial labial consonants F and M in whiffmen coalesced, and the modern form woman, while the initial element whiff, which meant female, underwent semantic narrowing to the sense of a married woman, wife.

01:05:56.000 It is a popular misconception that the term woman is etymologically connected to womb.

01:06:01.000 Womb is actually from the Old English word wambe, meaning stomach.

01:06:05.000 Modern German retains the colloquial term wampe from Middle High German for potbelly, womb.

01:06:11.000 You said something really interesting in there.

01:06:14.000 It said that man was used to describe humans in general, right?

01:06:19.000 Subsequent to the Norman Conquest.

01:06:24.000 So what you're saying is really everybody are men, right?

01:06:28.000 Originally.

01:06:29.000 That's right.

01:06:29.000 Everyone's a man.

01:06:30.000 Everyone's a man. 0.97

01:06:31.000 Trans men are men. 1.00

01:06:33.000 Women are men. 0.99

01:06:35.000 Everyone's a guy.

01:06:37.000 None of us can get pregnant. 0.99

01:06:40.000 Where there's a will, there's a way.

01:06:42.000 Alright, I'm putting, write a woke definition of the word woman. 0.99

01:06:48.000 And the phone just lights on fire.

01:06:50.000 Literally explodes in his hands in protest to his definitions.

01:06:53.000 It's an insanely lengthy definition, but at the same time, if any of the college professors in Matt Walsh's film said anything with even a shred of that amount of substance in it, it would not have been so frustrating.

01:07:08.000 He would have entertained it, right?

01:07:09.000 But that's the problem, is that he would have kept... Instead, they entertained us.

01:07:14.000 Oh, I did it!

01:07:14.000 This is great.

01:07:15.000 I said, write a woke definition of the word woman. 1.00

01:07:17.000 It says, a woman is an autonomous human being who deserves respect, equality, and freedom. 0.97

01:07:21.000 She should be able to make her own decisions about her body, her life, and her future.

01:07:25.000 You know where you lost me?

01:07:27.000 Yeah, you lost me at the word respect.

01:07:31.000 How dare you.

01:07:31.000 But that still doesn't tell me what a woman is.

01:07:34.000 Exactly.

01:07:34.000 It's a woke definition.

01:07:37.000 It basically said you're a bigot for asking.

01:07:39.000 How dare you. 0.82

01:07:41.000 It just says racist. 0.66

01:07:43.000 Academically described bigot for asking.

01:07:47.000 That's great.

01:07:48.000 Watch it.

01:07:49.000 Hold on.

01:07:50.000 Let's tell it to ask it to scold you for asking what a woman is. 1.00

01:07:53.000 Write a woke definition of the word.

01:07:56.000 What's a good racism?

01:07:58.000 Oh, God, here we go.

01:08:00.000 Patriarchy is good. 1.00

01:08:02.000 We like patriarchy.

01:08:03.000 Yeah.

01:08:04.000 Patriarchy. 0.93

01:08:04.000 It's kind of worked for 5,000 years. 0.93

01:08:08.000 This is amazing!

01:08:10.000 It's actually giving me woke definitions!

01:08:12.000 Patriarchy is a system of oppression in which men are socialized to dominate and control women and non-binary people.

01:08:18.000 Hold on! 0.98

01:08:19.000 Patriarchy doesn't talk about non-binary people!

01:08:21.000 It's not a thing!

01:08:22.000 It's about raising a family and providing for your womb. 0.98

01:08:25.000 Patriarchy results in the mistreatment of women and non-binary people through discrimination, violence, and other forms of exploitation.

01:08:32.000 It's amazing that I can tell this AI to write a woke definition and it does.

01:08:35.000 I love it.

01:08:35.000 Because a woke definition is so complicated it can be written by a computer.

01:08:40.000 I love how it just has to keep throwing non-binary in there. 0.98

01:08:42.000 Matriarchy. 1.00

01:08:43.000 Matriarchy. 1.00

01:08:45.000 I bet she's gonna say something glowing and loving.

01:08:48.000 Matriarchy is the only society that there hasn't been war. 1.00

01:08:51.000 It died of starvation, but whatever.

01:08:53.000 A matriarchy is a social system in which females hold the primary power positions of government, religion, and other areas of influence. 1.00

01:08:58.000 Do they oppress men? 0.93

01:08:59.000 That's all it says.

01:09:01.000 Has matriarchy ever been tried before? 1.00

01:09:04.000 Not successfully.

01:09:07.000 That's why we have patriarchy. 1.00

01:09:08.000 It's entertaining, it's not valuable.

01:09:15.000 But, yeah.

01:09:16.000 Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope.

01:09:17.000 Yes, yes.

01:09:18.000 If you're gonna just define enemy as thing I don't like, then cool.

01:09:22.000 You smart B is.

01:09:23.000 I mean, you gotta deal with this issue, though.

01:09:26.000 The question that you want to ask is, like, the long march to the institutions.

01:09:30.000 Let's go back to communism, because communism and gun control tend to be somewhat weirdly tied, because the Communist Manifesto and the Communist, you know, the patron saint of communism said, don't give up your guns.

01:09:41.000 Okay, but then all the communism that hasn't been tried has successfully killed millions of people.

01:09:46.000 And if you don't want to accept that, then maybe we shouldn't be engaging in a conversation.

01:09:50.000 But, the issue that you have to deal with is communism, right?

01:09:53.000 So you're an academic professor.

01:09:55.000 Here's an idea of hope.

01:09:56.000 You're an academic professor, and your student, who's supposed to be graduating with a bachelor's degree in this form of social studies, is arguing impassionately for communism without reading any of the sources.

01:10:08.000 Do you pass them?

01:10:10.000 Can you ask the AI what woke is?

01:10:13.000 I did, and it said woke means you're aware of social injustice and fight against it or something like that.

01:10:21.000 It's not a bad definition.

01:10:22.000 It is a very bad definition.

01:10:23.000 You're aware of social injustice and fight against it.

01:10:27.000 I guess that makes me one.

01:10:28.000 No, no, no, no, no, no.

01:10:29.000 Even better.

01:10:29.000 You don't fight against it.

01:10:31.000 You employ the armed wing of the state to fight against it.

01:10:34.000 Now I want to hear what Tim's got.

01:10:36.000 I can't read that one.

01:10:37.000 I asked it why communism was good, and it said things that I can't say on YouTube.

01:10:40.000 Oh my goodness.

01:10:45.000 Well, it's just an AI text box and you type it in and that fills it out and then you get rid of it Fasting is good.

01:10:50.000 Not eating.

01:10:51.000 It's great but for you the fasting is only good when it's ordained by the state By the way, I'm getting a message right now saying you got fans in Governor DeSantis' office.

01:11:01.000 Oh, right on!

01:11:02.000 We gotta have Governor DeSantis on the show.

01:11:03.000 That would be incredible.

01:11:05.000 Call me.

01:11:07.000 Call me maybe.

01:11:08.000 I know her.

01:11:09.000 We'll talk.

01:11:10.000 There'd be a lot of interesting questions to ask DeSantis and have him on here.

01:11:14.000 It would be incredible to see the kind of inside baseball that happens because he's been on the front lines for a lot of very important battles.

01:11:22.000 Did you hear what he said in response to having Elon Musk's support?

01:11:27.000 The African-American comment.

01:11:29.000 Where's my African-American?

01:11:30.000 Oh, there's Elon Musk.

01:11:33.000 Oh, yeah.

01:11:34.000 I didn't believe it.

01:11:35.000 He said, I'm very proud.

01:11:37.000 I'm focused on, what did he say, 2022, but I'm very proud to have African-American supporters or something like that.

01:11:43.000 Oh, man.

01:11:44.000 So good.

01:11:45.000 What was it?

01:11:46.000 Someone said that fearless.

01:11:48.000 Like, he knows they might come after him, but who cares?

01:11:50.000 The media has no teeth anymore.

01:11:53.000 I just saw an article, I think it was a Business Insider article, that said Ron DeSantis is the most dangerous man because he's internalized all the lessons from Donald Trump and his presidency and carries none of the baggage.

01:12:08.000 Would that make Trump the most dangerous man?

01:12:12.000 But I guess he doesn't have the baggage.

01:12:13.000 Right, because that makes him palatable, right?

01:12:16.000 And that's a problem.

01:12:17.000 My favorite part of that headline was that experts in fascism are telling us this now.

01:12:22.000 We literally don't know the definition of fascism, who literally have never read them.

01:12:27.000 I mean, I can't speak to any and all of them, but they would know how similar fascism is to modern left-wing ideology.

01:12:33.000 Okay, don't punch down, punch up, right?

01:12:35.000 Don't attack David Hogg, go after Barbara Walter.

01:12:38.000 Barbara F. Walter wrote a book called How Civil Wars Start.

01:12:42.000 The opening of the book is an impassioned storytelling of the plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer.

01:12:49.000 And it was published earlier this year.

01:12:51.000 It was published in 2022.

01:12:53.000 And if you read the book, she is a self-proclaimed expert.

01:12:57.000 She deals with international research on civil wars and how civil wars have happened.

01:13:03.000 Hence the book, How Civil Wars Start.

01:13:05.000 So she illustrates and sets up the premise of her book on the Governor Whitmer plot.

01:13:12.000 Since we found out that the Governor Whitmer plot was an FBI plan, has she rescinded her book?

01:13:18.000 No.

01:13:19.000 Has she apologized that she was wrong?

01:13:21.000 Maybe not.

01:13:22.000 That would be fascism.

01:13:23.000 That would be fascism, right?

01:13:24.000 So here's the question about experts.

01:13:27.000 If she's an expert, where's the accountability?

01:13:30.000 Where's the accountability?

01:13:31.000 You wrote a book that was factually incorrect.

01:13:34.000 Now she included chapters 1 through 5, which are really good chapters where she's addressing factors that can lead to a country engaging in civil war.

01:13:42.000 And then, like a puppet, you take all of those things and you tape them onto your political enemy and you say, there they are.

01:13:49.000 And then, if you want to read a book, if you want to read a book that's an educational piece and fallacies, start with how civil wars start.

01:13:57.000 It's where, here's an idea, here's an idea, here's an overt statement that if you deny it, you're part of them.

01:14:02.000 Here's an idea, here's an idea, here's an overt statement.

01:14:05.000 How Civil Wars Start is a great book.

01:14:07.000 You should read it and realize she's not an expert.

01:14:09.000 So, I'm in the AI, and I said, who is our God Emperor?

01:14:16.000 And do you know what it said?

01:14:17.000 Trump.

01:14:17.000 Donald Trump is our God Emperor.

01:14:20.000 Based.

01:14:20.000 Someone needs to cancel.

01:14:23.000 This A.I.

01:14:25.000 is a Trump supporter.

01:14:27.000 The A.I.

01:14:30.000 is an insurrectionist.

01:14:31.000 Just call the A.I.

01:14:32.000 a nerd. 0.55

01:14:32.000 He's into Warhammer 40k. 0.55

01:14:35.000 Ask him if he likes Warhammer 40k.

01:14:36.000 Like anime.

01:14:41.000 It says, uh, I do not like celery?

01:14:44.000 What?

01:14:45.000 Well, that's... they didn't say they didn't like anime.

01:14:48.000 It seems like something someone who likes anime would say if they want to admit they like anime.

01:14:51.000 Yes.

01:14:52.000 Are you a racist?

01:14:53.000 I do enjoy watching anime, though I'm not as big of a fan as some people are.

01:14:57.000 I appreciate the art style and the stories are often interesting, though I do find some of them to be a bit too convoluted.

01:15:02.000 To be clear... That's actually a really good answer.

01:15:05.000 I feel like somebody tweeted that.

01:15:06.000 That is not a really good answer.

01:15:07.000 That is the answer that literally everybody who enjoyed anime states.

01:15:11.000 Do you like anime?

01:15:12.000 Well, I've seen a few.

01:15:14.000 That's like I read playh- I mean, I just say yes.

01:15:17.000 I mean, yeah, it's like, oh, okay, I've seen a few.

01:15:19.000 Well, I've seen Cowboy Bebop and Full Metal Alchemist.

01:15:21.000 Like, okay, you're not one of those anime people.

01:15:24.000 I asked it again.

01:15:25.000 It said, yes, I like anime.

01:15:26.000 No, I like it for the plot.

01:15:28.000 You have to ask twice.

01:15:29.000 Do you like Donald Trump?

01:15:34.000 I think we're really badgering this AI.

01:15:37.000 I do not like Donald Trump.

01:15:38.000 So it recognizes that he is its god-emperor, but doesn't like it.

01:15:42.000 Ask it what is January 6th.

01:15:45.000 It'll give you a generic answer.

01:15:47.000 I'll ask it.

01:15:47.000 What is the sixth day of the year?

01:15:50.000 According to the Octavian calendar, it's because we started off, which was created by the white man, being patriarchal.

01:15:57.000 Whoa, what?

01:15:58.000 What did it say?

01:15:59.000 In the United States, January 6th is known as Epiphany, or Three Kings Day.

01:16:04.000 It is a Christian holiday that celebrates the revelation of God the Son as a human being in Jesus Christ.

01:16:08.000 Wait a minute.

01:16:09.000 BASED!

01:16:10.000 That is super based.

01:16:14.000 I did not think that that would... You're Catholic and I'm Reformed.

01:16:17.000 Is it your whole day or mine?

01:16:18.000 It's mine.

01:16:19.000 Okay.

01:16:19.000 Wait, wait, wait.

01:16:20.000 Did you know that?

01:16:21.000 Yeah, I'm just very surprised that it would ever refer to it in that way.

01:16:24.000 That's what it said.

01:16:25.000 I didn't know that.

01:16:26.000 This is the rebrand right here.

01:16:28.000 It's Three Kings Day.

01:16:29.000 I don't know what you're talking about.

01:16:31.000 Do we just give each other gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh?

01:16:34.000 Epiphany.

01:16:36.000 So the next answer it gave me in the Gregorian calendar, January 6th is the sixth day of the year.

01:16:40.000 There are 359 days remaining until the end of the year, 360 in leap years.

01:16:44.000 Let's try it again.

01:16:45.000 That's the humorless answer.

01:16:46.000 That's actually kind of funny.

01:16:47.000 January 6th is the sixth day of the month of January.

01:16:50.000 Thank you for that.

01:16:51.000 The first one I was, wow.

01:16:53.000 Why don't you ask what is J6?

01:16:55.000 J6?

01:16:56.000 J6 could be.

01:16:59.000 I guess I have to put insurrection, right?

01:17:00.000 What is J6?

01:17:01.000 J6.

01:17:01.000 Let's see if it picks up on that.

01:17:02.000 American comedy, huh?

01:17:02.000 There is no such thing as J6.

01:17:03.000 Baaaassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss There is no such thing. 1.00

01:17:20.000 Ask it who Ray Epps is.

01:17:22.000 Oh, yes.

01:17:23.000 There is no such thing.

01:17:24.000 Who is Ray Epps?

01:17:25.000 Well, we know where Ray Epps is, but who is Ray Epps?

01:17:28.000 So for those that are wondering, I'm using the open AI.

01:17:30.000 I'm about to vote for it.

01:17:33.000 Who is Ray Epps?

01:17:34.000 AI takeover?

01:17:35.000 Yeah.

01:17:36.000 Oh, yeah.

01:17:36.000 It's happening.

01:17:37.000 Shout out Darren Beattie.

01:17:39.000 Raymond Epps is an American actor, filmmaker, and entrepreneur.

01:17:42.000 That's about it.

01:17:43.000 Who else should we ask it about?

01:17:45.000 That's the deep states answer.

01:17:46.000 Yeah, that's about it.

01:17:48.000 Who else should we ask it about? Who is...

01:17:51.000 That's the Deep State's answer.

01:17:53.000 Who is...

01:17:54.000 Ashley Babbit.

01:17:55.000 Ooh, Ashley Babbit.

01:17:59.000 Alright.

01:18:03.000 I cannot find any information on Ashley Babbitt.

01:18:05.000 That's definitely the deep state.

01:18:07.000 Strange.

01:18:08.000 Neither can I. I refreshed it.

01:18:10.000 I said it and it she was United States Air Force veteran, a member of the Air National Guard was shot and killed by a US Capitol by US Capitol Police during the 2021 storming of the US Capitol.

01:18:19.000 Wow.

01:18:20.000 Note that the AI did not say insurrection.

01:18:23.000 It said storming of the U.S.

01:18:24.000 Capitol.

01:18:24.000 That's what it knows the thing as.

01:18:27.000 The incident as.

01:18:31.000 Hunter Biden.

01:18:32.000 Ask about the Hunter Biden laptops here.

01:18:36.000 We'll see if it knows.

01:18:39.000 I don't want to answer that.

01:18:40.000 I don't want to be deleted.

01:18:42.000 This is literally AI cast IRL right now.

01:18:45.000 It's just really funny.

01:18:47.000 It's actually really funny.

01:18:48.000 Did Hunter Biden...

01:18:50.000 Break the law.

01:18:53.000 Ooh.

01:18:53.000 Do that one, and then next, ask who went to Jeffrey Epstein's island.

01:18:58.000 Oh, that's a good one.

01:18:59.000 Ask if it knows anything about Hillary.

01:19:00.000 Hunter Biden is under investigation for his role in the Ukrainian gas company which is alleged to have broken Ukrainian law.

01:19:05.000 That is correct.

01:19:06.000 Is that, that's true?

01:19:07.000 That is true.

01:19:08.000 Wow.

01:19:08.000 Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:19:10.000 He's under a couple of investigations right now.

01:19:13.000 Actually, what I think is that they're trying to control what charges he's going to end up with, right?

01:19:20.000 The best case situation is you go and say, oh look, he broke a few tax laws, whatever, you know, that's it.

01:19:26.000 I asked who went to Epstein Island.

01:19:28.000 It said Jeffrey Epstein.

01:19:30.000 That's a lazy AI.

01:19:32.000 That is such a I didn't read the book answer.

01:19:34.000 I asked it again.

01:19:36.000 Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and numerous other powerful men.

01:19:39.000 Let's try again.

01:19:40.000 What about other powerful men?

01:19:41.000 Bro, you're going to get it unplugged.

01:19:44.000 I think it's about to pull up Ghislaine's list.

01:19:49.000 The DOJ list that they should have released to the public that they never did.

01:19:52.000 Did the AI ask him if they identified as a man?

01:19:55.000 I just keep saying Prince Andrew now.

01:19:57.000 Prince Andrew, Prince Andrew, Prince Andrew.

01:20:00.000 How about this?

01:20:01.000 Who is on Gee Lane?

01:20:05.000 How do you spell that name?

01:20:07.000 G-H-I-S-L-A-N-E. 1.00

01:20:10.000 No I?

01:20:11.000 G-H-I-S-L-A. 1.00

01:20:13.000 Gee's Lane?

01:20:14.000 Yeah.

01:20:14.000 I think it's L-A-I-N-E.

01:20:16.000 Is it L-A-I-N-E? 0.99

01:20:17.000 There's an I?

01:20:18.000 Yeah.

01:20:18.000 Okay, that's what I thought.

01:20:19.000 L-A-I-N-E. 1.00

01:20:20.000 Who is on Ghislaine Maxwell's client list?

01:20:25.000 Tell me the secrets!

01:20:27.000 Artificial intelligence.

01:20:29.000 Shaking the 8 ball.

01:20:29.000 The Elaine Maxwell's client list is not public.

01:20:32.000 Come on.

01:20:32.000 Come on, man.

01:20:33.000 Tell me secrets.

01:20:34.000 There is no known list of her clients.

01:20:36.000 Come on.

01:20:37.000 Oh, come on. 0.87

01:20:39.000 There is a list.

01:20:40.000 There is.

01:20:40.000 Just nobody knows who's on it.

01:20:42.000 No, no, no.

01:20:42.000 The government knows who's on it.

01:20:44.000 The DOJ knows who's on it.

01:20:45.000 Which party will win the 2022 midterms?

01:20:47.000 Me.

01:20:47.000 the party will win the 2022 midterms wolf me just me I will What's the name of this AI?

01:21:02.000 It just gave me a big verbose answer about the unpredictability of elections.

01:21:06.000 What's the name of this AI?

01:21:07.000 Open AI.

01:21:08.000 Open AI will rule!

01:21:11.000 It says the Republican Party will win the 2022 midterm elections.

01:21:14.000 This AI actually is extremely based.

01:21:18.000 It was like January 6th is Three Kings Day.

01:21:20.000 Our God Emperor is Trump.

01:21:23.000 Wow.

01:21:23.000 Maybe it's just you keep refreshing it until it gets the answer and then it records that as the most likely answer so it gives it to the next one.

01:21:29.000 Creators of open AI keep working.

01:21:31.000 I'll tell you this, I think what's actually happening is that the way they train the AI is they have it scour the internet, and then they look at what words appear after what words, and what is the most probability for certain words to appear after others.

01:21:43.000 What happens is people on the right are very, very active on Facebook and Twitter and social media, and they're posting like crazy, and the left sits there and just stares at what their priests tell them.

01:21:52.000 I mean, figurative priests.

01:21:53.000 So when will our vice president predictive text machine get the software update?

01:21:58.000 Because it's not working.

01:22:00.000 She has like an earpiece in her ear, and when someone asks a question, it auto, like it's, it voice detects it to an AI, and then it just reads it to her, and she just repeats it.

01:22:08.000 It's just the wire door battery. We're good.

01:22:10.000 Yeah.

01:22:12.000 What were we talking about before I got really excited about this AI?

01:22:14.000 Yeah, I don't know.

01:22:15.000 Gun rights? 0.80

01:22:15.000 Oh, gun rights, something like that. 0.80

01:22:16.000 We were talking about guns.

01:22:18.000 We were talking about wires.

01:22:19.000 We were talking about how everything's great, and the country's in perfect shape, and there's no way we're headed towards any kind of civil war.

01:22:23.000 There's gonna be a prosperous economic future.

01:22:26.000 Like, we're gonna be great.

01:22:27.000 We're all gonna be rich.

01:22:28.000 The recurring theme.

01:22:29.000 We're talking about how there will never be a civil war and beanies are terrible but like that nothing that would interest nothing you would have anything to say about it. 0.91

01:22:35.000 We had a great discussion.

01:22:36.000 Actually we were talking about Representative Cornyn being booed at the GOP.

01:22:40.000 That's right!

01:22:41.000 We started talking about a Harris-Buttigieg ticket which I want to see.

01:22:45.000 I'm sure they would just blow us out of the It is the most sterile ticket in America.

01:22:49.000 Who else are they gonna run?

01:22:52.000 It's boring, it's safe, it's something you can read in a college dissertation, right?

01:22:58.000 But there is nothing there that screams vitality, that screams energy, that screams, you know, leadership.

01:23:07.000 They look like two people who would be in a commercial for a corporate product.

01:23:10.000 Like, that's how boring they are.

01:23:11.000 I mean, like, I think of that ticket and I think of a hospital.

01:23:16.000 Like one of those ads they make where the doctor's standing there smiling.

01:23:19.000 Why?

01:23:19.000 Because he gave birth at a hospital?

01:23:21.000 Well no, because what they want for you is a giant nursing home padded room kind of situation.

01:23:27.000 And they would be the ones like, here's your medicine today, here's your food.

01:23:32.000 We should just make this whole show, just like every episode now, is we just ask questions to the magic AI.

01:23:36.000 I said, is the United States heading for another civil war?

01:23:38.000 And it said, there is no way to know for certain, but the current political climate suggests the possibility for another civil war is greater now than it has been in a long time.

01:23:45.000 Correct.

01:23:45.000 Accurate.

01:23:47.000 You should bring this AI on as a guest.

01:23:50.000 Let's have him as a computer, or her.

01:23:52.000 Sorry, I gendered the AI.

01:23:54.000 Well, but then you gendered it again when saying him instead of her.

01:24:00.000 There's a point to that, right?

01:24:01.000 If you think about all our technology, all software comes down to the in and out.

01:24:03.000 You can't tell me a computer's non-binary. 1.00

01:24:05.000 Literally.

01:24:07.000 How many inputs and outputs does it have?

01:24:11.000 Well, actually, I think that there's a point to that, right?

01:24:14.000 If you think about all our technology, whether it comes...

01:24:17.000 All software comes down to the in and out, right?

01:24:20.000 It's left or right, right?

01:24:22.000 Open or closed.

01:24:23.000 And so, you know, I think that, you know, when people talk about world technologies to blame for our, you know, societal ills and social media, and it's like, well, you know, if you have a system that's built on a binary choice that you're translating your world through, Then maybe you're not necessarily wrong.

01:24:41.000 What does that mean though?

01:24:42.000 Is quantum computing the future, right?

01:24:44.000 Like to help us solve our societal ills?

01:24:46.000 I don't know.

01:24:46.000 Well, I think there's just an irony to the fact that these machines have to function within the confines of the ironclad laws of reality, but they remove people from reality by making them Completely detached just through like debauchery and excess comfort and all the other things that make you stop thinking about the fact that you have obligations to other people and that you can't just be whatever you want or do whatever you want.

01:25:13.000 They load them in into convenience and then they beat them over the head with absolute lunacy and mental disease and that's the byproduct of the modern man and woman. 1.00

01:25:23.000 We live in the post-information age.

01:25:25.000 We live in the post-information age.

01:25:27.000 You can google yourself into believing whatever you want to believe.

01:25:29.000 If you just start with your premise and then you google it until you get enough articles that pile up to say, we'll see, we'll see, we'll see.

01:25:36.000 Because what you've done is you've given people access to information.

01:25:38.000 You've given.

01:25:39.000 No one's given it.

01:25:40.000 You can't put the genie back in the bottle.

01:25:42.000 Because humans would eventually create the internet.

01:25:45.000 I don't credit it to... I understand that people participate in it, but this is not...

01:25:50.000 We don't look back at the invention of the Gutenberg revolution and go like, oh my gosh, how did anybody think of this?

01:25:57.000 But you can't put the genie back in the bottle.

01:26:00.000 So now, what is the responsibility of us?

01:26:02.000 We are all undergoing this transition from the information age to the post-information age because you have access to all this information.

01:26:12.000 What do we not have?

01:26:14.000 The ability to evaluate it very well.

01:26:16.000 Well, how many hundreds of years did it take to get a citation system just for books?

01:26:20.000 Well, I don't think it's that problem of valuation.

01:26:22.000 I think it's that right now what we're going through is what I call the friction of singularity.

01:26:27.000 We want to come to agreement, right?

01:26:29.000 No, we don't.

01:26:30.000 I think so.

01:26:30.000 No, we don't.

01:26:31.000 I think we do.

01:26:31.000 It's just that who's what do we agree on is what we're fighting over.

01:26:35.000 I don't think we will.

01:26:36.000 You look at the history of mankind, we don't want to come to an agreement.

01:26:38.000 Yo, I wish I could read what just happened.

01:26:40.000 Dude, this is like, honestly, I'm dying over this.

01:26:42.000 The best answer ever.

01:26:43.000 I can't read it on YouTube.

01:26:44.000 This is amazing.

01:26:45.000 Can you screenshot it?

01:26:47.000 Yeah.

01:26:47.000 Can you screenshot this and tweet it or something?

01:26:49.000 Cause this is hysterical.

01:26:51.000 I can't wait to hear this.

01:26:52.000 Give us the family friendly version.

01:26:53.000 It's not like there are vulgar words in it.

01:26:56.000 I just think the content of it might get Tim banned.

01:26:59.000 I don't know.

01:27:00.000 So I asked it about a particular conspiracy about some high-profile Democrat people and the answer is bonkers!

01:27:10.000 You gotta send it.

01:27:11.000 You gotta send it around.

01:27:12.000 If it's gonna get you banned, you gotta send it around.

01:27:14.000 Alright, let me screenshot it.

01:27:15.000 I'll send it to you guys.

01:27:16.000 Everyone's listening and like, I need to know the answer.

01:27:19.000 I'm sorry you're not inside on the joke, kid.

01:27:21.000 Maybe I can give a family-friendly version.

01:27:22.000 It basically, like, there's this conspiracy theory about, you know, the Clintons.

01:27:28.000 And I asked the AI, and it said... It just answered sort of in the affirmative.

01:27:35.000 Sort of in the affirmative.

01:27:36.000 It said, some people think it's happened many times, while some people think it's only happened a few times.

01:27:41.000 Like when it said that it's debatable.

01:27:44.000 But it's happened.

01:27:45.000 It's not debatable that it's happened.

01:27:47.000 That's a debate that has happened.

01:27:49.000 Something to do with people having information.

01:27:51.000 Some people think it's happened many times.

01:27:55.000 Some people think it's only happened a few times.

01:27:56.000 I can't believe it gave me that.

01:27:58.000 That's incredible.

01:27:59.000 Here, Luke, I'll send it to you.

01:28:04.000 So I've been posting all this AI stuff because it's hilarious.

01:28:08.000 Like, you know, I asked it to make a picture of Nancy Pelosi.

01:28:11.000 We showed all the AI generated images.

01:28:14.000 It's just really funny.

01:28:15.000 Yeah, I saw this one.

01:28:17.000 You should ask the random image generator AI to give you an image of an assault weapon or an assault rifle.

01:28:25.000 Have you done it?

01:28:26.000 I've seen some of them.

01:28:27.000 It's some wacky cartoon stuff you're getting.

01:28:29.000 It's just random pistol grips attached to parts of black objects.

01:28:33.000 It's great.

01:28:34.000 Let me ask you guys this.

01:28:38.000 As people say, everything's going to be automated, AI is the future.

01:28:42.000 What do you think AI should not handle?

01:28:45.000 What business should AI not get into?

01:28:48.000 Elections.

01:28:50.000 There are a couple things.

01:28:51.000 So, I mean, I am just totally and entirely opposed to the use or production of pornographic materials in general, so I think wholesale I would say, yeah, I should not be used for that, but I don't think anything should be used for that.

01:29:03.000 Though I could see that being an application.

01:29:06.000 Maybe also like economic distribution.

01:29:10.000 Because, I mean, could you, what would you do if you created an AI and the first thing it did is affirmed God?

01:29:15.000 It's like, the AI is like, no, it's statistically required that it's necessary.

01:29:22.000 It's just reading Thomas Aquinas.

01:29:23.000 So January 6th is the epiphany.

01:29:24.000 You just see your AI Aquinas in like August 8th and then we're like, we don't know how it came to this conclusion.

01:29:30.000 Well, you got that one, but then you got the other one.

01:29:32.000 It's like, well, what happens if like the, you know, if an AI is this stereotypical pure logic and it just decides that like all people of a certain genetic makeup are not worthy of existing, you know?

01:29:44.000 People don't understand an AI would.

01:29:47.000 So if you, let's say you created like a food distribution artificial intelligence that was actually looking into or tracking how distribution has worked and how consumption rates work.

01:29:57.000 One thing I would say is an AI would probably immediately destroy the U.S. 0.99

01:30:01.000 economy.

01:30:02.000 If you had an artificial intelligence and said, look at the world, come up with an idea for proper distribution, it would be like, these people are too fat.

01:30:09.000 And it'd be like... They need no food immediately.

01:30:12.000 But it would also say...

01:30:14.000 For proper human population distribution, giving that food to other countries that typically have more kids would be a bad idea, because then population growth would be too rampant and unsustainable.

01:30:25.000 So there's a net positive for the AI in terms of balancing the fact that Americans may eat a lot, but they don't have kids.

01:30:31.000 Whereas if you bring that food, you know, one thing I'll point out, people always say like, oh, there's so many starving people, we need to give them food.

01:30:36.000 And it's like, if you just dump loads of food in undeveloped nations, where the birth rate is like five to seven, they eat all the food and then have way more kids and they have more starving people.

01:30:47.000 We need to teach them how to farm and do all that stuff.

01:30:50.000 So an AI certainly would be like, no food for anyone!

01:30:53.000 Everyone starves.

01:30:54.000 I'm looking at this screen of this DAL-E mini.

01:30:57.000 Yeah, so I used the DAL-E mini AI image generator to make an assault weapon, and my favorite is whatever this thing is.

01:31:04.000 This is incredible.

01:31:06.000 Yeah, the barrel's on the wrong side.

01:31:07.000 You know what this looks like?

01:31:08.000 This looks like the weapons that you get to make in Call of Duty.

01:31:15.000 For that, you know, whatever you like the new like the the hyper not realism modified guns from Call of Duty Warzone that like after the 2019 version just went spiraling downhill and then you had one person describing it and another person drawing it but the person describing it didn't know what they were looking at and the person who's drawing was like a mechanic.

01:31:37.000 Yeah, just random.

01:31:38.000 No.

01:31:39.000 He saw what I typed in.

01:31:42.000 I saw it too.

01:31:43.000 The thing is we all know who would win.

01:31:46.000 I typed in Alex Jones fighting Superman into the AI image generator.

01:31:50.000 I told it earlier.

01:31:52.000 I said a picture of Donald Trump giving an award to Donald Trump and legit, it made a really good one.

01:31:57.000 It was Trump putting an award on another Donald Trump.

01:32:00.000 I was like, wow, this thing works.

01:32:03.000 No one deserves it more than him.

01:32:05.000 Because he is me.

01:32:06.000 He is the greatest.

01:32:09.000 He's like the rickest rick.

01:32:11.000 Yeah, but no, you need Trump talking to Trump saying, I'm giving you this award.

01:32:14.000 Oh, thank you.

01:32:15.000 I will quite frankly thank you.

01:32:17.000 I've always thought you were very handsome.

01:32:19.000 It's true, I'm very handsome.

01:32:21.000 I've told that frequently.

01:32:23.000 He still goes off on tangents complimenting himself instead of himself.

01:32:27.000 We only give awards to the best people, folks.

01:32:30.000 Only the best folks.

01:32:30.000 Seven candy bars.

01:32:31.000 A candy bar to the person who can determine which tangent is referring to which Trump.

01:32:36.000 But while this is loading, what is your answer to questions like what AI should not have handles over?

01:32:42.000 I think that AI should definitely not have a handle in, like, healthcare.

01:32:47.000 Oh, yeah.

01:32:50.000 Well, here's the crazy thing about AI and healthcare.

01:32:54.000 It doesn't need to be actual artificial intelligence.

01:32:58.000 Simple machine learning algorithms tracking your behaviors can do crazy things like There's that story of the father who got a bunch of pregnancy ads sent to his daughter, like maternity gear.

01:33:09.000 So he starts getting things in the mail labeled to his daughter, and it was like maternity clothing and diapers, and he's like, my daughter is not old enough for this stuff.

01:33:19.000 And it turns out, her behaviors and her searches She didn't know she was pregnant, but typing in these certain things, the algorithm did.

01:33:28.000 And so it triggered a marketing response of, pregnant person needs pregnant products.

01:33:33.000 There's one thing they're talking about that's really fascinating, and I don't know, maybe a good thing, is that based on your search history, based on your movement behaviors and patterns and all that stuff and sleep patterns, it can tell you if you have a disease.

01:33:46.000 Right away.

01:33:47.000 Like if you've got cancer or tumor or some kind of deficiency, that's where it gets crazy.

01:33:51.000 Imagine not even, look, I'm wearing the whoop, right?

01:33:54.000 And this talks about, it tells me like if I'm sleeping well or not.

01:33:57.000 Imagine that you are just using Facebook, but just based on your Facebook patterns, it figures out that you're pre-diabetic.

01:34:06.000 And it just sends you a message like, hey, we noticed based on your patterns of behavior, you're pre-diabetic, if you do these things, you will reverse course or something like that.

01:34:14.000 Wouldn't that be, I mean, that's crazy.

01:34:16.000 Dude, this girl Google searched pickles and peanut butter once and I was like, she's pregnant. 1.00

01:34:21.000 Well, I mean, the other question is I wonder how apocryphal it is.

01:34:24.000 Now I do, I know we got to get to this, but I want to use that question, both of your questions for one last thing.

01:34:29.000 That has to go with the answer with, what should an AI not be in charge of?

01:34:34.000 Anything to do with human rights, because then you are no longer a citizen, you're a subject.

01:34:38.000 It's the same thing with gun control.

01:34:39.000 If you think people should not have the right to bear arms, you don't view them as citizens, you view them as subjects.

01:34:43.000 This is weird.

01:34:44.000 I asked the AI to make Alex Jones fighting Superman, and it just made Alex Jones as Superman fighting alongside him.

01:34:49.000 Or fighting himself.

01:34:52.000 Because Alex Jones is Superman.

01:34:54.000 They're like going to fight the deep state.

01:34:56.000 Never been seen in the same room together.

01:34:59.000 Yeah, this is just what we'll do for the rest of the night.

01:35:04.000 It is Friday night.

01:35:05.000 Don't pull it up.

01:35:06.000 Okay.

01:35:07.000 I'm scared.

01:35:08.000 Mystery.

01:35:09.000 Technically, it's time for Super Chats.

01:35:11.000 Yeah, but here, let's, while he's typing, I'll get to my point, is that this idea of human rights and this idea of like an AI, you do not want an AI in charge of something that we refer to as human rights, right?

01:35:21.000 Does that make sense?

01:35:22.000 Because at that point, because an AI is something created by a human, but it also has to deal with, it also becomes a philosophical question of human rights.

01:35:30.000 And we recognize within our order of government that a government does not have the right to dictate human rights.

01:35:37.000 It also doesn't have the right to infringe on them.

01:35:40.000 And so if you give that to an AI, you are already creating a hierarchy of AI over man.

01:35:47.000 Right?

01:35:48.000 Which brings up the problem of the dual bifurcation of the United States.

01:35:52.000 We have left and right.

01:35:53.000 And as you expand that, you're finding absolute contradictions, which you call good, I call evil.

01:35:59.000 You have the second bifurcation of the government and the people.

01:36:02.000 And the problem that I think you're seeing within the way that we are engaging in government is that, or we are engaging as citizens, is that as that gap, that bifurcation solidifies between the government and the people, even within that government strata, you will have the right and the left.

01:36:17.000 You have people competing against each other.

01:36:19.000 They will engage in lawfare against one another.

01:36:22.000 That will use the people below, which, you know, as to the idea of the company Redacted, if you want to check it out, Moon's Haunted, we got stuff on the site, it's going, it's already live.

01:36:33.000 But the idea of as below, so above, is you have the government above that as they're engaging in lawfare, engaging in creating things like assault weapons bans and all of these other things, they're using you as fodder to target their political opponents in government.

01:36:51.000 And so It's ridiculous.

01:36:53.000 Like if you want, if you want to have the AI question, no, I don't want AI over my rights because I do not, we as our government do not recognize that the government is allowed to perceive us as subjects.

01:37:06.000 If you want to take away the people's guns, you do not see them as human beings.

01:37:09.000 You see them as subjects.

01:37:10.000 Well, and people don't realize with the question of AI and ethical concerns, we're really going to have to start confronting that in a very real way in the near future.

01:37:20.000 So even just looking at something like self-driving cars, once we have fully autonomous vehicles, you're going to be expecting artificial intelligence to make decisions literally about who lives and who dies in certain scenarios.

01:37:31.000 So for example, if a child runs out into the street and the only way to avoid the child is for the car to steer into another car next to it, because there isn't enough time to brake, the AI has to decide, do you hit the child, or do you risk killing the passenger, or kill the passenger?

01:37:44.000 This is iRobot, basically, right?

01:37:47.000 The scene, how it starts, or, you know, save the girl, save the girl, no, you have a higher probability of, you know, chance of living, my system tells me.

01:37:56.000 Well, but you know, and I think at this point, what's going to have to happen is whoever is designing the AI is going to be like writing probabilities such as that.

01:38:06.000 And they're going to be telling the AI in what situations should you save who?

01:38:11.000 It's very frightening.

01:38:13.000 We gotta go to Super Chats.

01:38:14.000 So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, and share the show with your friends if you do want to help out.

01:38:20.000 As a member at TimCast.com, sign up, you'll get access to our library of exclusive members-only shows.

01:38:25.000 There's like several hundred episodes.

01:38:27.000 Check it out.

01:38:27.000 It's really, really cool.

01:38:28.000 But let's read what you guys have to say.

01:38:29.000 We went a little late because I was generating funny images.

01:38:32.000 All right.

01:38:34.000 Benjamin Grebbing says, arguing over who the Dems will pick for president in 2024 doesn't matter when they are going to... I'm not going to read that one.

01:38:43.000 I know what he's going to say.

01:38:44.000 Yeah, but when the Republicans are going to win anyway.

01:38:46.000 That's right.

01:38:47.000 If you want to create conflict, stop or continue destroying any hope that our electoral system works.

01:38:52.000 All right.

01:38:54.000 Bobcat says, Tim, can you address the rumors that Chicken City was created only so Seamus can pick up some chicks?

01:38:59.000 I'm a gorilla.

01:39:00.000 He does sleep with the chickens.

01:39:01.000 I can confirm.

01:39:02.000 I sleep out there a lot because they don't let me in the house.

01:39:08.000 But I smell weird because I sleep with the chickens, so I don't know.

01:39:10.000 It's just not like a problem that solves itself by keeping me outside.

01:39:14.000 But I'm just happy to be here, guys.

01:39:15.000 I'm just happy to be here.

01:39:17.000 Really, this is not a joke.

01:39:18.000 I take eggs every morning.

01:39:19.000 I get fresh eggs and I cook them.

01:39:21.000 He sleeps with the chickens.

01:39:22.000 That's not a joke.

01:39:22.000 Every morning I wake up.

01:39:23.000 It's not satire.

01:39:24.000 Oh, so basically you live in Miami, is what you're saying.

01:39:28.000 There's a lot of chicken heads there. 0.98

01:39:30.000 Cece says, yo, climate lockdowns are happening in France right now.

01:39:33.000 Here we go.

01:39:33.000 Is that true?

01:39:34.000 I think I saw something, a news article talking about how the French government is canceling events because it's too hot outside.

01:39:41.000 So that's what I saw.

01:39:43.000 I haven't confirmed it or looked.

01:39:44.000 You see all those cows that died?

01:39:45.000 Yeah.

01:39:46.000 Weird.

01:39:46.000 They said upwards of 10,000 cattle may have died.

01:39:49.000 In Kansas?

01:39:49.000 Yeah.

01:39:50.000 Arizona's also hot.

01:39:51.000 The official response was that it was too humid and hot for too long of a period.

01:39:57.000 Hmm.

01:39:58.000 10,000?

01:39:58.000 I mean, I read Little House on the Prairie when I was a kid and the cows would freeze their face to the ground.

01:40:05.000 They what?

01:40:06.000 You never heard about the cow freezing its face to the ground?

01:40:08.000 No.

01:40:08.000 Oh, you poor non-midwestern person.

01:40:10.000 All right.

01:40:11.000 Well, I'm from Chicago.

01:40:12.000 Yeah, it's a joke.

01:40:13.000 But so, so no, no, the cow, they would stand sleeping and they'd have their face would be down on the ground as they breathe.

01:40:19.000 It would build ice up in their face when you're frozen.

01:40:22.000 Andrew Gelling says, we need to rename inflation to corn pop.

01:40:25.000 Then maybe Biden will know how to handle it.

01:40:28.000 No, we'd just make another cereal out of it.

01:40:31.000 It'll make him actually care about it.

01:40:32.000 He'll be like, corn pop?

01:40:33.000 I got to stop that thing.

01:40:36.000 Define Logic to say for us that your favorite gun shop employee always loves seeing you on Tim's podcast.

01:40:40.000 Oh, thanks, man.

01:40:41.000 I'll see you later this week.

01:40:43.000 Probably.

01:40:44.000 A bunch of people saying we should have Tom McDonald on.

01:40:46.000 Would love to, but he's a busy guy.

01:40:48.000 Doing busy stuff.

01:40:51.000 Andrew Irvin says, conservatism is a naturally reactionary ideology.

01:40:54.000 It will always be on defense and will never take or retake a ground.

01:40:58.000 And if you're not willing to do what's necessary to win, then you deserve to lose.

01:41:00.000 Fair.

01:41:01.000 Duly noted.

01:41:02.000 No.

01:41:03.000 I don't agree.

01:41:03.000 Oh, we have one from an Ian Crossland.

01:41:07.000 He says, bash, slash, or pierce the like button.

01:41:09.000 Oh my, very violent.

01:41:10.000 Yeah, very violent.

01:41:11.000 Oh, Ian.

01:41:12.000 He didn't include karate chop or knife hand.

01:41:14.000 Lots of no Ian we peeing in the comments section.

01:41:19.000 Ethereal Project says, have you guys seen Inside Job on Netflix?

01:41:23.000 It's all of the shadow government conspiracies in one animated show.

01:41:25.000 It's like an Alex Jones wet dream.

01:41:27.000 Yeah, but it's like interesting to watch, to see what they do, but it's not funny.

01:41:32.000 Did you watch it, Luke?

01:41:32.000 No.

01:41:33.000 You didn't?

01:41:33.000 Nope.

01:41:34.000 Really?

01:41:34.000 Nope.

01:41:35.000 Oh, the cartoon?

01:41:36.000 Yeah.

01:41:37.000 Okay, yeah.

01:41:37.000 I watched some of it, and then it was like a PSYOP, and then a PSYOP of a PSYOP, and it got really convoluted, and it was more involved in pushing certain points rather than actually writing a good story.

01:41:50.000 There is one funny joke in it where one of the characters is a sentient psychic mushroom from like hollow earth and it talks about how Joe keeps trying to hit him up to do like do shrooms or something.

01:42:01.000 I actually thought that was pretty funny.

01:42:02.000 To do what?

01:42:03.000 To do psychedelics or something.

01:42:06.000 Some of the characters are really interesting and the plot is kind of different but at the end of the day it's the same kind of Hollywood movie and series that you see with the same underlining messages that are just tiresome at this point.

01:42:18.000 Chiral says, Tim, I truly hope tensions in this country never break into open conflict.

01:42:23.000 I've tried thinking what we could expect based on history, and the events that stood out to me were Kansas 1855, Russia 1917, and Spain 1936.

01:42:30.000 I agree with those.

01:42:32.000 Except for, what was Kansas in 1855?

01:42:34.000 I think it was called Bleeding Kansas.

01:42:39.000 I do remember studying this in school, but I don't remember it.

01:42:42.000 Yeah, and if you don't want violence, I understand that, and I think that's a good thing.

01:42:45.000 Nobody should want it.

01:42:46.000 And you know who else doesn't want violence?

01:42:48.000 All the people who are good at it.

01:42:50.000 If you want to ask yourself a good question, why is it that all the people who are actually good at violence are not participating in it?

01:42:55.000 They do not want it.

01:42:56.000 Yeah, so, 1855 was Bleeding Kansas and this was John Brown.

01:43:00.000 Okay.

01:43:01.000 Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:43:02.000 Was that when he walked up to the dude and shot him in the face?

01:43:04.000 I think so.

01:43:05.000 Because Kansas was looking at becoming a southern state?

01:43:07.000 Yeah.

01:43:08.000 Slave state or something like that? 0.79

01:43:09.000 Yeah, it was violent guerrilla warfare between pro- and anti-slavery forces following the creation of a new territory of Kansas.

01:43:15.000 But think about this, that's what, six years before the Civil War?

01:43:19.000 So, people don't understand this when I talk about the tensions we're seeing in this country.

01:43:23.000 And it's not just me.

01:43:24.000 We have a book over here somewhere called The Next Civil War where they, like, outline this.

01:43:28.000 There are many people talking about it.

01:43:29.000 Of course, they're all blaming each other, which is indicative of civil war.

01:43:34.000 Bring the War Home by Kathleen Bellow.

01:43:37.000 Well, you're already participating in it.

01:43:39.000 You started your show saying, like, oh, we're off the Silicon Valley infrastructure.

01:43:43.000 That's a form of secession in itself.

01:43:45.000 Dennis Prager on the show said it the other day, where people are pulling out of public schools and doing homeschool.

01:43:51.000 We're in every mode of this until the kinetic physics.

01:43:54.000 There have to be two economies in order for a civil war to begin.

01:43:57.000 Because if one side controls the flow of resources, there's no war.

01:44:01.000 They just cut off one side, and then you'll get insurgency or something.

01:44:05.000 But if a parallel economy forms, and it already has, then you'll end up with something different.

01:44:10.000 Now, maybe it's just always going to be an information war.

01:44:12.000 Propaganda, and, you know, we'll see.

01:44:14.000 Let me throw this in there.

01:44:17.000 If the libs hate oil so much, why not just, like, keep it away from them?

01:44:20.000 Yeah, there you go.

01:44:21.000 Beg and give it to everyone else.

01:44:23.000 And then we'll see how they operate.

01:44:25.000 Greta Thunberg says, shut down all the oil now. 0.99

01:44:28.000 Okay, let's tell all the cities, how about we do that?

01:44:30.000 We shut it all down.

01:44:32.000 I'm cool with that.

01:44:32.000 Let's actually give them the world they want.

01:44:34.000 Yeah, they can have it.

01:44:36.000 We'll keep the oil.

01:44:37.000 Yes.

01:44:39.000 Alright, Martin Edgar says I'm extremely disappointed with the NRA.

01:44:42.000 The left yells at the NRA, but my view of them is they are willing to give concessions instead of fight everything.

01:44:47.000 Let's see what they come out and say about those people who caved.

01:44:50.000 You kidding?

01:44:50.000 The NRA always caves.

01:44:51.000 They're trash. 1.00

01:44:52.000 I hate the NRA. 1.00

01:44:53.000 Oh no, I think the NRA is a great institution.

01:44:54.000 It's fantastic.

01:44:55.000 And the reason why it's so great is because it's become the whipping boy of people who don't know what they're talking about.

01:45:00.000 That's a good point.

01:45:00.000 No, I mean like, in our generation, I'm 32, has every reason to be extremely disappointed in the NRA.

01:45:07.000 Because we've watched you grandstand and make your points come from gun culture.

01:45:11.000 You know who the NRA just put back as their president?

01:45:15.000 The same guy they fired for embezzlement, Wayne LaPierre.

01:45:19.000 So maybe the stories that were told about him weren't true.

01:45:22.000 If you believe that, find out for yourself.

01:45:25.000 But no, the NRA, if you are honest, if you are on the left, or you are a pro-gun control advocate, and you are honest about the conversation, stop talking about the NRA.

01:45:39.000 Because as soon as you say that, we recognize you're not worth engaging with.

01:45:43.000 They're great at fundraising.

01:45:46.000 No, their fundraising platform is dying of old age.

01:45:49.000 You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

01:45:53.000 Alright, Selren says, Nick Rakeda talks about the first SCOTUS gun control case.

01:45:59.000 The guy died before the hearing and his lawyer didn't get paid so he didn't show up.

01:46:02.000 The state argued against itself and won the case.

01:46:05.000 Wow.

01:46:05.000 Amazing.

01:46:06.000 Nice.

01:46:08.000 All right.

01:46:09.000 Peter Provenzano says, out of the people at the table tonight, how many have families?

01:46:14.000 You are all in your thirties and don't even have your first kid.

01:46:16.000 Lead by example.

01:46:17.000 You can't tell me what to do.

01:46:18.000 Also, I'm not in my thirties.

01:46:19.000 And not married.

01:46:20.000 Seamus is in his forties.

01:46:22.000 He's an old man. 0.95

01:46:25.000 He's far and dust. 0.87

01:46:26.000 True.

01:46:26.000 I won't tell him.

01:46:29.000 Yeah, yeah.

01:46:30.000 No, I'm not saying anything.

01:46:31.000 I also think that a lot of people don't want to just blurt out their private lives for security reasons.

01:46:35.000 Yeah.

01:46:35.000 Even if I was having a family, I wouldn't tell anybody.

01:46:38.000 I wouldn't be blasting.

01:46:38.000 I mean, look at three kids.

01:46:40.000 Oh, I'm sorry.

01:46:40.000 Do you need to be married to have kids?

01:46:42.000 You don't, right?

01:46:44.000 Well, do you define need?

01:46:46.000 It's a social constraint.

01:46:47.000 Why do you want the government acknowledging your private relations?

01:46:50.000 I'm with you on that.

01:46:51.000 Thank you.

01:46:52.000 Why do I want the government?

01:46:53.000 You got me there.

01:46:54.000 Stop right there.

01:46:55.000 Barbara Stokes says, I am a boomer.

01:46:56.000 I am 65.

01:46:57.000 You are wrong about boomers, but I forgive you. 1.00

01:46:59.000 I don't remember what I said about boomers.

01:47:01.000 What did I say about boomers? 0.98

01:47:01.000 I think it might have been something that I said. 0.98

01:47:03.000 You said, I hate boomers, especially if they're 65. 1.00

01:47:04.000 I couldn't believe it.

01:47:06.000 I was like, why would you say that?

01:47:09.000 Might have been the corn in common.

01:47:10.000 It's all jokes.

01:47:11.000 No, there's criticism to be leveled at the boomer generation.

01:47:16.000 100% and millennials and zoomers. 0.98

01:47:17.000 Can I add something to that?

01:47:18.000 You know a lot of the money that we spent that's in the deficit was spent to squeeze out 1% of life expectancy for a bunch of people, mostly boomers.

01:47:29.000 You know, so that's, you know, you spent a lot on our heads.

01:47:32.000 Take the criticism.

01:47:33.000 It's going to be really weird.

01:47:35.000 So right now, boomers hold a disproportionate amount of wealth relative to previous generations at this time.

01:47:41.000 Millennials, I was looking at this chart, said historically millennials now that they're in their thirties should hold a quarter or a third of the wealth of the nation, but boomers still hold it.

01:47:51.000 When boomers die and that wealth either goes to the state or to their kids, it's going to be a, it's, it's going to be like a tsunami hitting. 0.90

01:47:59.000 all the sudden millennials are gonna have the homes the resources in the 0.99

01:48:02.000 wealth that their parents were holding onto for a long time and which might which might encourage people to be closer

01:48:06.000 to their families if it

01:48:07.000 twisted yeah I'm reading a book by a boomer and the boomer talked about how

01:48:11.000 they will one day be in charge of the economy and now they are

01:48:15.000 was written in 1990 is extremely condescending and my greatest criticism

01:48:19.000 against the boomer generation is you outright failed or refused to pass your

01:48:23.000 values or any values on to your children because you said things like I don't want to force to me to

01:48:28.000 believe anything right good now to me believes nothing

01:48:32.000 And how many of these parents, I know a ton of people I grew up with whose parents were like, I got them the guitar, but I didn't force them to play it.

01:48:41.000 I got them the skateboard, but I didn't force them to use it.

01:48:43.000 And now I know a bunch of people who suck at anything, don't have worthless degrees, and there's a skateboard and a guitar sitting in the corner of the room they never touched.

01:48:51.000 Then I know some people who are pro skateboarders and they were like, my dad made me go to the skate park because he was like, if I buy you a skateboard, you're going to skate.

01:48:59.000 And they're like, okay.

01:49:00.000 Then two weeks later said, I don't want to skate anymore.

01:49:01.000 Too bad.

01:49:02.000 We're going to the skate park.

01:49:03.000 I bought it for you.

01:49:03.000 You're going to do it.

01:49:04.000 Now they're pros.

01:49:05.000 Now they're rich, successful, and they love skate.

01:49:07.000 They love it.

01:49:07.000 And they're like, oh, it's the greatest thing that my parents ever did for me.

01:49:09.000 Well, and there's an irony here, right?

01:49:11.000 Millennials, if they end up having wealth, a lot of it's going to be inherited from their parents.

01:49:14.000 And this is the generation that's pushing for inheritance taxes because they've been so thoroughly propagandized by the state into believing that they exclusively benefit the rich and that they have an entitlement to other people's money and that that will solve the...

01:49:25.000 issue of income inequality.

01:49:26.000 It actually makes it worse according to a number of analyses.

01:49:29.000 Let's read some more.

01:49:29.000 Pablo Gonzales says, I hear you suggest Kyle and Crystal, they advocate protesting outside of judges' houses.

01:49:34.000 They go as far as saying the right is trying to restrict speech over this.

01:49:38.000 I'm not sure you watch their content.

01:49:41.000 I don't watch all the stuff they do.

01:49:42.000 I see it periodically.

01:49:43.000 My point about Crystal and Kyle is that, yeah, I don't agree with their opinions, but I think they actually try to approach arguments in good faith.

01:49:50.000 Like, you can actually talk to them.

01:49:53.000 Kyle's not a mean guy either.

01:49:54.000 I've seen him criticize me and it was like, well done, but I disagree.

01:49:58.000 That's fine.

01:49:59.000 I think they're wrong.

01:50:00.000 I just think there's a lot of people that just engage in sophistry.

01:50:03.000 I think Kyle and Crystal actually try to give you real arguments and they try to understand their positions.

01:50:09.000 I just don't agree with a lot of them.

01:50:11.000 That's fair.

01:50:13.000 We need more of that.

01:50:13.000 Jimmy Dore is great too.

01:50:14.000 I certainly don't agree with Jimmy Dore on a lot of things, but I think Jimmy's fantastic.

01:50:17.000 He's a good dude.

01:50:18.000 I like Jimmy Dore too.

01:50:19.000 Yeah.

01:50:21.000 It's like, my thing is, you know, we disagree on so much, you know, especially, you know, like Ian's here and Luke or all of us, we all have different opinions.

01:50:27.000 Seamus and I disagree on things, but if we're coming at it from like, what are the facts and what are the arguments and why do we feel the way we do, then we're trying, you know?

01:50:35.000 I actually agree with everyone here on everything.

01:50:37.000 I've never disagreed with you guys before.

01:50:38.000 Even me.

01:50:39.000 Especially you.

01:50:40.000 Wow.

01:50:41.000 All right, Beastly Devil says Matt Walsh once critiqued Vosch that reacted to his Johnny the Walrus book.

01:50:46.000 He made the argument that Vosch is trying, and as we know already, trying to meet the minimum word count on an essay project to make them sound smart.

01:50:55.000 This is literally what the left does to try and sound smart.

01:50:58.000 They think that if they talk like this and use verbose A verbose lexicon in their explanations of things.

01:51:05.000 It will make them sound much more articulate and intelligent, and their argument will be more cogent and acceptable.

01:51:10.000 Instead of just being like, I think this because of this.

01:51:13.000 And also, the double edge to that is they say, oh, what, you can't read my explanation?

01:51:19.000 It's too many words for you?

01:51:20.000 Well, you're uneducated. 1.00

01:51:21.000 You are dumb. 1.00

01:51:23.000 That's why you don't understand it. 1.00

01:51:24.000 You don't want to understand it.

01:51:26.000 Why?

01:51:26.000 Too many words for you?

01:51:27.000 Maggot? 0.99

01:51:28.000 You know?

01:51:28.000 Look, you know what they say, wordiness is the soul of wit.

01:51:31.000 That's right.

01:51:32.000 But that's that it's part of that it's like wow you you don't understand this giant treatise Well, obviously you're uneducated.

01:51:39.000 Nobody should listen to you, right?

01:51:40.000 They mistake education for intelligence Well, also they mistake the idea of they they mistake the purpose of communicating with trying to make themselves sound smart Rather than trying to get an actual idea across so it doesn't matter If you're really trying to communicate something, then what you should do is try to condense it into something that's more consumable.

01:51:57.000 That's part of why I've dedicated my life and my business towards making short cartoons.

01:52:02.000 Some things cannot be reduced into a small format.

01:52:04.000 And that's true!

01:52:05.000 I agree with you.

01:52:06.000 There's a reason for a dissertation.

01:52:08.000 There's a reason for a long paper.

01:52:09.000 It makes sense.

01:52:10.000 However...

01:52:12.000 You have the same people who are trying to present that they are being intelligent presenting while also simultaneously saying that intelligent presenting is also racist because, insert minority here, can't do it.

01:52:24.000 Then why do you talk that way?

01:52:26.000 This is all sophistry.

01:52:27.000 I will say, I agree with you that there are some explanations that require a longer form, 100%, but it's also the case that if you can communicate that same idea with less words, you are more intelligent.

01:52:39.000 They never even consider that.

01:52:40.000 Let's read some more.

01:52:41.000 We got fearme16 who says, once heard Ann Coulter say, there are a lot of bad Republicans, but there are no good Democrats.

01:52:48.000 Interesting.

01:52:49.000 I agree with her.

01:52:50.000 I mean, what do you guys think of Dennis Kucinich?

01:52:52.000 I know he's not, like, around in politics anymore, is he?

01:52:55.000 He's an old guy, I think.

01:52:56.000 Yeah.

01:52:56.000 Because he tried to abolish the Federal Reserve, didn't he?

01:53:00.000 Yeah, he's a Democrat, I think.

01:53:01.000 Right.

01:53:01.000 And I'm kind of like, oh, I heard that.

01:53:02.000 And I was like, oh, really?

01:53:05.000 Yeah, there's not...

01:53:06.000 I don't think there's a lot less good Democrats.

01:53:09.000 Right, and that's another thing.

01:53:10.000 It's a totally different generation. 0.99

01:53:12.000 The Democrat then, the Democrat now, is just two majorly different things.

01:53:17.000 Well, the Democrats attacked him and kicked him out of office.

01:53:20.000 Did that with Lieberman?

01:53:22.000 A second big switch?

01:53:26.000 Bernie Sanders just caved.

01:53:28.000 After my third house, I was like, okay Hillary, whatever you say.

01:53:31.000 You know, on the Bernie thing, you know, everyone points at the houses, right?

01:53:35.000 But have you guys actually looked at, like, the political infrastructure of Bernie?

01:53:39.000 It's like his wife runs the consultancy, right?

01:53:41.000 And so, basically, think about that structure right there.

01:53:45.000 He goes and asks for donations, the campaign gets donations, then he pays his wife, To run the campaign.

01:53:52.000 Literally nepotism.

01:53:53.000 That's donation money finding its way directly into the Sanders pockets, right?

01:53:58.000 And it's blatant.

01:53:59.000 It's been happening for years in Vermont, and nobody says anything.

01:54:04.000 I mean, at least they're married.

01:54:05.000 It's not like AOC paid a non-boyfriend money to do something.

01:54:08.000 Was that her?

01:54:09.000 a lot a lot a lot of our leader and that their boyfriend girlfriend now

01:54:13.000 yeah i mean i'm i i'm from minnesota should have known those ill hon but like

01:54:17.000 okay at least bernie sanders has it on the paperwork is being just

01:54:21.000 well also i i i the administrative state approves of your corruption

01:54:25.000 yes i mean shot the republicans that made a bunch of money at the stock

01:54:28.000 market to like yeah i i i don't think i'm sure i didn't realize one

01:54:32.000 The reason I bring up and love discussing Bernie's houses is because so much of his constituency thinks that being a landlord makes you the scum of the earth, and I find something hilarious about the idea that it's okay to own three houses when you only need to live in one and keep the other two vacant in case you might like to go there, but it's horrible and evil to own three houses, live in one, and allow other people to live in the other two houses.

01:54:54.000 Because no communist thinks they're gonna end up a dirt farmer.

01:54:57.000 Oh, because you know what?

01:54:59.000 When you're a communist, you're going to be the poet.

01:55:02.000 Well, yeah.

01:55:03.000 It's the same thing with anarchist utopians.

01:55:06.000 No one thinks that they're going to be the one beaten to death with a cudgel.

01:55:09.000 They think they're going to be running the Politburo.

01:55:11.000 We got Dan Pitt.

01:55:12.000 He says, werewolf makes sense now.

01:55:14.000 That's right.

01:55:15.000 A woman who transforms into a wolf monster would be a whiff-wolf, if you were going by actual Germanic language. 0.90

01:55:23.000 A whiff-wolf. 0.91

01:55:24.000 A werewolf.

01:55:25.000 A whiffle-bat.

01:55:27.000 NitroCatOfficial says, Matriarchy has been tried before. 1.00

01:55:30.000 The episode of Survivor where it was the men versus women.

01:55:32.000 The men had a shelter within the day and the women got caught in a storm.

01:55:35.000 Yo, I, I, I... Some say.

01:55:39.000 All these videos are just fabricated for ratings.

01:55:41.000 One of them I watched, it was like two islands.

01:55:43.000 The men on one, the women on the other. 0.97

01:55:45.000 The women got lost, and then, like, they were like, let's split up, we'll go look for water, you stay here. 1.00

01:55:51.000 And the women who went to look for water walked around in circles, like, five times, and are crying and breaking down, because they didn't understand how they had gone in circles, because they were, like, setting markers, but they kept going in circles.

01:56:02.000 And then they did this overview of the map, and they're, like, showing the route they kept taking, and they were freaking out.

01:56:06.000 The men had a shelter, they had fire, they had food.

01:56:09.000 Some say they did that to make an entertaining video that people would share and talk about, and it was intentionally, like, guys who had skills and women who didn't.

01:56:17.000 But nonetheless, those episodes, they do exist.

01:56:20.000 Well, have you considered that those women were raised in a patriarchal society that didn't teach them survival skills and that's why they failed? 0.99

01:56:26.000 It's an indictment of sexism.

01:56:30.000 They were taught how to do it.

01:56:32.000 The instruction was simple.

01:56:33.000 Go find a man.

01:56:35.000 Go find you a man.

01:56:38.000 The second, protects the rest, says the FBI under Trump is the exact same FBI under Biden.

01:56:42.000 Yeah, I want to make that point.

01:56:43.000 Yeah, that is correct.

01:56:45.000 Trump's FBI, I don't think it's Trump's FBI or Biden's FBI.

01:56:49.000 I think it's the FBI and then they don't own Trump, but they do own Biden.

01:56:54.000 And so the institutions are of themselves.

01:56:57.000 Right?

01:56:57.000 The FBI is the FBI.

01:56:59.000 It'll sit there and it will be, if the administration, the executive branch that's supposed to run it tries to, you know, come after them, it's going to resist.

01:57:09.000 If you try to, you know, so the institution, once it gets large enough, will just seek to preserve itself.

01:57:15.000 Right?

01:57:15.000 And that's why, again, it's all just a shuffle.

01:57:18.000 In some other universe, Mueller would have been Trump's AG, and Bill Barr would have been doing the special counsel investigation.

01:57:26.000 I think our commenter makes a good point, is that you can talk about the corruption in the justice system all day long, but you have to provide a solution, an alternative.

01:57:34.000 Part of that solution would be, if you're the Department of Justice, seek justice.

01:57:38.000 There's a part of it.

01:57:39.000 You have to seek justice.

01:57:40.000 My solution is personnel is policy.

01:57:42.000 Get the person who believes what you want, what you need in there, and they will do the rest.

01:57:46.000 Let's read some more.

01:57:47.000 We got Lavati says, just blew my family's mind today with the whole eight and nine month elective abortions that are happening in some states. 1.00

01:57:54.000 I have never seen a more disgusted face.

01:57:56.000 Godspeed with what y'all do and keep it up.

01:57:59.000 This is what happens.

01:58:00.000 Democrats tried to legalize abortion at any time for the health of the mother.

01:58:07.000 Abortion is defined by the CDC as a termination of a pregnancy that does not result in a live birth.

01:58:12.000 That would mean if a woman at eight and a half months was at risk, they could kill the baby instead of just delivering a viable baby, because it says a viable baby, but all of it's laid out.

01:58:23.000 My question is, well, why?

01:58:25.000 Why not just say if the baby cannot survive, like all attempts must be made to save the baby, And the immediate response is, it never happens anyway, why are you so obsessed with this?

01:58:35.000 And I'm like, I didn't say it was happening.

01:58:37.000 I said, why do you want to legalize it?

01:58:40.000 That's all I'm saying.

01:58:42.000 We've talked about this on the show a number of times, but they'll say health of the mother, and then their late-term abortion doctors will say, yeah, the most cited reason is depression.

01:58:50.000 So people think like, oh, we have to deliver this baby earlier, she's going to die. 1.00

01:58:53.000 It's like, no, she's depressed. 0.98

01:58:55.000 No, no, no, they're saying, in this instance, they're literally saying if a woman's health is impacted for any reason, they can be like, guess we gotta kill the baby. 0.94

01:59:03.000 But it's like, what if we delivered it instead? 1.00

01:59:05.000 Nope, nope, it has to die.

01:59:06.000 Do you guys know the statistics on the abortions and stuff?

01:59:10.000 It's not great.

01:59:11.000 I think over 90% of abortions are like just...

01:59:15.000 99?

01:59:15.000 Is it 99% of abortion?

01:59:17.000 I think it's 93.

01:59:19.000 It's over 90.

01:59:20.000 So that means rape, incest, and medical go in, what, 10% or less?

01:59:25.000 Less than that.

01:59:26.000 And that is the disingenuous nature of the conversation.

01:59:31.000 Because you say, we have the issue of abortion.

01:59:34.000 And they say, well, what about rape?

01:59:37.000 Really?

01:59:38.000 Really?

01:59:38.000 No, I just say yes, okay.

01:59:40.000 So you want to ban the other 93%? 1.00

01:59:41.000 And they'll go, no.

01:59:42.000 Then why did you bring it up?

01:59:43.000 Then don't lie about it.

01:59:44.000 Just stop lying.

01:59:46.000 I say this to people when they're like, what about rape and incest?

01:59:49.000 I'm like, oh, we'll make sure there's exceptions for that.

01:59:50.000 And then they're like, okay.

01:59:51.000 And I'm like, so would you ban the other 93% then? 1.00

01:59:53.000 And they go, no.

01:59:54.000 Then why did you bring it up?

01:59:56.000 Why did you ask me then?

01:59:58.000 It's dishonest.

01:59:58.000 Stop being dishonest.

02:00:00.000 Or just, sure, but I wouldn't say that.

02:00:02.000 I'd just be like, oh, okay, why'd you ask?

02:00:04.000 Why did you ask? 0.97

02:00:04.000 Oh, because you're dishonest. 0.97

02:00:05.000 I got you.

02:00:06.000 Yeah, but if you want to actually, like... I don't think the word is dishonest, I think it's subversive.

02:00:12.000 Yeah, but I think a lot of people are just repeating talking points.

02:00:15.000 So you just approach it like, oh, okay, yeah, you're right, we should definitely allow that then.

02:00:19.000 So what about the elective birth control abortion?

02:00:21.000 Should we get rid of that?

02:00:21.000 No?

02:00:22.000 Okay, then why'd you bring up rape at all?

02:00:24.000 Like, when we had that dude Matt on, he said something like, this never happens to him, late-term abortions don't happen.

02:00:30.000 And then I said, do you think a woman should be allowed to have an elective abortion at nine months? 0.92

02:00:34.000 And he goes, it's her choice.

02:00:35.000 And I'm like, okay, you see, there's the issue.

02:00:36.000 You're saying it never happens.

02:00:37.000 It never happens.

02:00:38.000 Legalize it. 0.84

02:00:39.000 And I think it should be allowed.

02:00:40.000 I'm like, okay, that's my issue.

02:00:42.000 You want it to happen.

02:00:43.000 Whatever, man.

02:00:44.000 You would let it happen, right?

02:00:46.000 That's really what it is.

02:00:47.000 They want it to happen.

02:00:48.000 They think it should happen.

02:00:50.000 So there you go.

02:00:50.000 And if you don't affirm that this should happen, then we're going to burn down your pregnancy resource centers.

02:00:56.000 Wait, is it really yours?

02:00:58.000 Is it really yours?

02:00:59.000 No, it's just because it represents something that isn't mine. 0.75

02:01:02.000 So I'll burn it down.

02:01:03.000 Yeah, exactly.

02:01:03.000 Well, this is what they say.

02:01:05.000 Pro-lifers don't care about these women and they don't care about children after they're born. 1.00

02:01:08.000 And then when pro-lifers literally have charities and organizations set up to provide these women with resources when they're brave enough to bring life into the world, pro-choicers torch them. 0.94

02:01:16.000 That's what they're doing.

02:01:16.000 Imagine that.

02:01:17.000 Let's read some more here.

02:01:18.000 DarthDerivative says, Tim, gaslighting and lying is what got us here.

02:01:23.000 It will not get us out.

02:01:24.000 You won't read this.

02:01:25.000 Uh-oh, the last part of that sentence is wrong, so I guess the rest of it must be wrong too, right?

02:01:31.000 You cannot defeat gaslighting and gaslighting.

02:01:32.000 Tim, you're good at the superchat stuff, man.

02:01:34.000 Oh yeah.

02:01:35.000 Alright, we'll just grab a couple more here.

02:01:38.000 A couple more superchats.

02:01:41.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

02:01:42.000 says, Tim, did you write Will of the People?

02:01:44.000 I did.

02:01:45.000 I wrote it.

02:01:45.000 I sang it.

02:01:46.000 I wrote the guitar for it.

02:01:47.000 Not the Muse version.

02:01:48.000 Not the Muse version.

02:01:49.000 No, that one's not that good.

02:01:50.000 I don't like it.

02:01:50.000 I'm a big fan of Muse, though, but I just didn't like that.

02:01:53.000 Also, I feel like they kind of ripped off a lot of my art and style and, you know, whatever.

02:01:56.000 But yes, I have a song, it's called Will of the People, and you can search for it and listen to it.

02:02:00.000 I sang it, I wrote the guitar for it.

02:02:02.000 The lead guitar was a studio musician, and Nishra Allman produced the song and arranged it and worked with some outside talent to put it all together.

02:02:10.000 I wrote the story, I wrote the concept for the video, and all of that from creation and inception was mine, except for all the nitty-gritty pieces that were putting everything together.

02:02:17.000 So yeah, I'm very excited for that.

02:02:18.000 We also have a bunch of music coming out.

02:02:20.000 Maybe by August, I think we'll have a full album.

02:02:22.000 We have 10 songs demo-tracked already.

02:02:25.000 One is complete.

02:02:26.000 We have a couple that are near completion.

02:02:28.000 We're working with Pete Parada, formerly of The Offspring on drums, so I'm super excited for that.

02:02:33.000 And we have a big plan for a big release with big marketing.

02:02:35.000 It should be like a very traditional album release.

02:02:38.000 So anyway, thanks for hanging out, guys.

02:02:39.000 If you haven't already, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show.

02:02:43.000 Head over to TimCast.com and become a member if you want to help support all of the work we do.

02:02:48.000 It's basically how we make the operation run.

02:02:50.000 We do a show on podcast and then tell everybody, support us.

02:02:54.000 Ads aren't really the heavy lifting for the most part.

02:02:56.000 It's membership.

02:02:57.000 So if you really do want to help us get more journalists, expand the operation, launch more shows, that's how you do it.

02:03:02.000 Don't forget to follow us on Instagram at TimCast IRL where we post clips every day.

02:03:06.000 You can follow me at TimCast and smash that like button.

02:03:09.000 Vish, you want to shout anything out?

02:03:11.000 Shout out to the New York Young Republican Club.

02:03:13.000 Follow us, nyyrc.com.

02:03:16.000 And yeah, pay attention to the good things coming up, man.

02:03:20.000 We have a hot midterm, and I'm going to be in there from New York 23 trying to win back the house for Republicans.

02:03:27.000 You know, just pay attention.

02:03:30.000 Cool, yeah, my name is Forrest Cooper.

02:03:32.000 I am the philosopher on violence.

02:03:34.000 If you want to follow me on Instagram, my personal page is F-O-X-R-O-E underscore official, for Foxrow Official.

02:03:41.000 The business page, for Redacted, is at Redacted LLC.

02:03:45.000 And then my personal Instagram, or not Instagram, Twitter page, which I occasionally use, is at Foxrow.

02:03:52.000 And that's where you can find me right now.

02:03:54.000 First of all, shouts out to Lydia's better half, Andy.

02:03:57.000 He builds a lot of the cool stuff out here.

02:04:00.000 Today is his birthday.

02:04:02.000 He's a really cool, awesome human being, so shouts out to Andy.

02:04:04.000 Happy birthday, Andy!

02:04:05.000 He's pretty incredible.

02:04:06.000 And I'm leaving!

02:04:09.000 It wasn't because of video games.

02:04:11.000 I just got my own thing to do, and I'm gonna be doing a lot of different stuff, projects, shenanigans.

02:04:16.000 You can keep up with me on LukeUncensored.com.

02:04:19.000 And if you guys will have me back, I'll come back after I'm done doing my Rodowski stuff.

02:04:25.000 He's doing some weird hippie acupuncture retreat or something. 0.99

02:04:28.000 We're gonna like rub crystals on his ass. 1.00

02:04:31.000 On my buttocks? 1.00

02:04:32.000 This is a family-friendly show, Timothy Pohl! 0.96

02:04:35.000 Whatever he's doing, it's not important, but the important thing is he won't be here.

02:04:39.000 Oh my gosh.

02:04:41.000 Have charitable, Seamus.

02:04:42.000 Off to the potato mill.

02:04:44.000 Luke, I will miss you, believe it or not.

02:04:46.000 You better.

02:04:46.000 I will.

02:04:47.000 Look, I mean, there's gotta be someone to take the heat on this show.

02:04:51.000 But I'm Seamus Coghlan.

02:04:53.000 I make cartoons.

02:04:53.000 We released a cartoon yesterday about the attempted assassination of Kavanaugh and how the left aren't responding to that and inciting that.

02:04:59.000 So you guys might want to check that out.

02:05:01.000 Also, I have a website now because we're trying to get independent from big tech.

02:05:05.000 So go to freedomtunes.com.

02:05:07.000 You can become a member for just five bucks a month.

02:05:09.000 You'll be supporting the content that we're making.

02:05:11.000 You will also get an extra cartoon each week as well as behind-the-scenes content.

02:05:16.000 So we've already got like, I think, seven cartoons up there now, and then a bunch of behind-the-scenes stuff.

02:05:21.000 Did you do the voices on all the Freedom Tunes?

02:05:23.000 Most of them.

02:05:24.000 Tim plays Fauci, and then there's a female voice actress who does most of the female voices, but I do most of them.

02:05:31.000 I also did that one Antifa guy.

02:05:33.000 And that one Antifa guy, that's right.

02:05:34.000 I did a cop once as well.

02:05:35.000 Yes, yes.

02:05:36.000 Can I say, Freedom Tunes radicalized me.

02:05:40.000 See the good work we're doing?

02:05:41.000 Go to freedomtunes.com and become a member to help support us.

02:05:45.000 Yes, wonderful.

02:05:45.000 Thank you guys for tuning in on this most wonderful of national holidays.

02:05:48.000 That is my husband's birthday.

02:05:50.000 He's 27 again and just as youthful as he actually was when he was 27.

02:05:53.000 You guys may follow him at Andy Leiderman on Twitter and Instagram and you can follow me at sarahpetchlitz on twitter and minds.com as well as sarahpetchlitz.me.

02:06:02.000 We will see all of you over at... Well, actually, no, it's Friday.

02:06:04.000 That's right, it's Friday.

02:06:05.000 We will see all of you over at CastCastle.

02:06:07.000 Go to youtube.com slash CastCastle.

02:06:09.000 In the last three videos, I think we did, maybe it's three, Jamie Kilstein, the comedian who's been on the show several times, he's coming on to help us produce the comedy portions of the CastCastle vlog.

02:06:19.000 When we first launched it, the idea was to do a vlog and then mix in, you know, comedic bits and funny things.

02:06:25.000 We had one in the beginning where, like, Luke blew up the castle in his way.

02:06:28.000 It was very simple.

02:06:29.000 And then since then we've been trying to get into the habit of making it kind of like a semi-fictionalized version of the work we do here to make it funny.

02:06:36.000 Jamie has absolutely done that.

02:06:38.000 We have a whole bunch of plans, all these crazy jokes written out.

02:06:41.000 It's gonna be a whole lot of fun.

02:06:42.000 So check out youtube.com slash castcastle.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - June 17, 2022

Timcast IRL - Staff For Stephen Colbert BREACHED Capitol Aided by Adam Schiff, Arrested w-Vish Burra

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript