Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - Tucker Carlson ANNOUNCES NEW SHOW On Twitter After Elon Musk Meeting w-Michael Heise

00:00:00.000 Tucker Carlson is back!

00:00:21.000 He put up a video on Twitter saying that he'll be launching a new show on Twitter and the news comes after it was reported that Tucker Carlson met with Elon Musk.

00:00:30.000 Now the interpretation from most people was that they came to some kind of accord.

00:00:34.000 But Elon Musk came out and said there's no deal.

00:00:36.000 Tucker is just going to do a show on Twitter.

00:00:39.000 But we will see.

00:00:40.000 It feels like What they're really saying is they have not signed anything, and this could be for legal reasons due to Tucker's current contract with Fox News, but it does seem like Tucker and Elon have a plan of sorts.

00:00:52.000 So this is big interesting stuff, but there's more news in the Tucker front.

00:00:57.000 Apparently, it's being reported, he was fired as part of the Dominion settlement.

00:01:01.000 As if to imply that Dominion was like, okay, we'll settle, but you gotta fire Tucker Carlson.

00:01:05.000 Which is very, very strange, to say the least.

00:01:07.000 So we'll talk about that, plus a whole bunch of other stories, my friends.

00:01:10.000 Before we get started, head over to CastBrew.com to pick up your Cast Brew coffee.

00:01:14.000 I don't have the bag with me today, because we were actually drinking it this morning.

00:01:17.000 But you can pick up one of four special blends.

00:01:20.000 Rise with Roberto Jr.

00:01:21.000 Appalachian Nights, and then we have a Colombian and a French Roast. 1.00

00:01:25.000 Supporting the show, if you buy from Casper, you're supporting the show because we're sponsoring ourselves.

00:01:30.000 We're trying to get away from being beholden to corporate sponsors as it pertains to generating revenue.

00:01:34.000 So head over to casper.com if you want to pick up some good coffee.

00:01:38.000 My favorite is Rise with Roberto Jr.

00:01:40.000 to be complete.

00:01:40.000 This is a light roast, but if you like dark roasts, we've got Appalachian Nights.

00:01:43.000 And it's going to be part of our coffee shop that we're going to be opening up, hopefully, across the country very soon.

00:01:47.000 But either way, the first one is already underway.

00:01:50.000 We're already building it out, plus our social club, so again, casprew.com.

00:01:54.000 Don't forget to head over to timcast.com, click join us, become a member, and you'll get access to exclusive members-only uncensored shows on the front page of timcast.com, Monday through Thursday at about 10.10pm Eastern.

00:02:09.000 We will have one of those shows for you tonight.

00:02:11.000 And as a member, you can join our Discord server, hang out with like-minded individuals, and actually submit questions to our show and even call into our show for the members only uncensored.

00:02:21.000 So smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends.

00:02:24.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Michael Heiss.

00:02:28.000 Thanks for having me, Tim.

00:02:29.000 Who are you, sir?

00:02:30.000 Well, as you said, Michael Heiss.

00:02:32.000 I am the founder and chair of the Libertarian Party Mises Caucus.

00:02:35.000 We're a group of rabble-rousers, Libertarians, and kind of the Ron Paul, Dave Smith, Tom Woods tradition.

00:02:41.000 And, you know, after a long fight, we took over the Libertarian Party last year to make it more base.

00:02:48.000 I'm proud to say that we might be the only institution in the entire country that de-woke-ified. 0.98

00:02:52.000 Where the Libertarian Party kind of went woke, and a lot of people were disappointed with that.

00:02:56.000 Well, we came in here to reverse course, and we made that happen last year.

00:03:00.000 And now we're launching all of our kind of plans and our political strategies.

00:03:03.000 And anybody who's looked at the Libertarian Party can tell that something serious has changed with the messaging.

00:03:07.000 Looking forward to that presidential announcement coming soon.

00:03:11.000 I think we all are.

00:03:12.000 We'll see what happens.

00:03:12.000 We also have Ben Stewart hanging out.

00:03:14.000 That's right.

00:03:15.000 Ben Stewart, documentary filmmaker.

00:03:17.000 You can go to benjosephstewart.com.

00:03:19.000 I usually talk about things like consciousness and psychedelics, but I think I skipped timelines and now I'm talking about the Federal Reserve.

00:03:25.000 Yeah, we've got that.

00:03:26.000 It's our second documentary.

00:03:27.000 Well, we have two documentaries.

00:03:28.000 We have Infringed and then we have yours on the Federal Reserve, both of which will be coming out soon.

00:03:32.000 So, excited for that.

00:03:33.000 Thanks for hanging out, Ben.

00:03:34.000 Yeah, man.

00:03:34.000 Seamus is here!

00:03:35.000 My name is Seamus.

00:03:36.000 I have a YouTube channel called Freedom Tunes, where we release an animated cartoon twice a week.

00:03:40.000 We just released one today that I think you guys will really, really enjoy.

00:03:45.000 The fans seem to be loving it.

00:03:46.000 If y'all wanna go check that out.

00:03:47.000 And I also have a podcast on Rumble, which is called Shamer.

00:03:51.000 We released an episode of that today as well.

00:03:53.000 Right on.

00:03:55.000 Hello, everybody, I'm Phil Abonte, lead singer of All That Remains, anti-communist and counter-revolutionary, and... I am Serge.com.

00:04:05.000 I'm ready to go when you guys are.

00:04:07.000 Let's get it.

00:04:07.000 Here's the first big news from TimCast.com.

00:04:10.000 We're back!

00:04:11.000 Tucker Carlson to stream new show through Twitter, saying, The news you consume is a lie.

00:04:16.000 You are being manipulated.

00:04:17.000 You know what?

00:04:18.000 How about we just play the actual clip from Tucker himself?

00:04:21.000 Here we go.

00:04:23.000 Hey, it's Tucker Carlson.

00:04:24.000 You often hear people say the news is full of lies, but most of the time that's not exactly right.

00:04:30.000 Much of what you see on television or read in the New York Times is in fact true in the literal sense.

00:04:35.000 You could pass one of the media's own fact checks.

00:04:38.000 Lawyers would be willing to sign off on it.

00:04:40.000 In fact, they may have.

00:04:41.000 But that doesn't make it true.

00:04:43.000 It's not true.

00:04:44.000 At the most basic level, the news you consume is a lie.

00:04:48.000 A lie of the stealthiest and most insidious kind.

00:04:51.000 Facts have been withheld on purpose, along with proportion and perspective.

00:04:56.000 You are being manipulated.

00:04:57.000 How does that work?

00:04:58.000 Let's see.

00:04:59.000 If I tell you that a man has been unjustly arrested for armed robbery, that is not, strictly speaking, a lie.

00:05:05.000 He may have been framed.

00:05:06.000 At this point, there's been no trial, so no one can really say.

00:05:10.000 But if I don't mention the fact that the same man has been arrested for the same crime six times before, am I really informing you?

00:05:18.000 No, I'm not.

00:05:19.000 I'm misleading you.

00:05:21.000 And that's what the news media are doing in every story that matters, every day of the week, every week of the year.

00:05:27.000 What's it like to work in a system like that?

00:05:30.000 After more than 30 years in the middle of it, we could tell you stories.

00:05:34.000 The best you can hope for in the news business at this point is the freedom to tell the fullest truth that you can.

00:05:40.000 But there are always limits.

00:05:41.000 And you know that if you bump up against those limits often enough, you will be fired for it.

00:05:47.000 That's not a guess.

00:05:48.000 It's guaranteed.

00:05:50.000 Every person who works in English language media understands that.

00:05:54.000 The rule of what you can't say defines everything.

00:05:58.000 It's filthy, really, and it's utterly corrupting.

00:06:01.000 You can't have a free society if people aren't allowed to say what they think is true.

00:06:06.000 Speech is the fundamental prerequisite for democracy.

00:06:10.000 That's why it's enshrined in the first of our constitutional amendments.

00:06:13.000 Amazingly, as of tonight, there aren't many platforms left that allow free speech.

00:06:19.000 The last big one remaining in the world, the only one, is Twitter, where we are now.

00:06:25.000 Twitter has long served as the place where our national conversation incubates and develops.

00:06:31.000 Twitter is not a partisan site.

00:06:32.000 Everybody's allowed here, and we think that's a good thing.

00:06:36.000 And yet, for the most part, the news that you see analyzed on Twitter comes from media organizations that are themselves thinly disguised propaganda outlets.

00:06:45.000 You see it on cable news, you talk about it on Twitter.

00:06:48.000 The result may feel like a debate, but actually the gatekeepers are still in charge.

00:06:54.000 We think that's a bad system.

00:06:56.000 We know exactly how it works, and we're sick of it.

00:07:00.000 Starting soon, we'll be bringing a new version of the show we've been doing for the last six and a half years to Twitter.

00:07:05.000 We bring some other things too, which we'll tell you about.

00:07:08.000 But for now, we're just grateful to be here.

00:07:10.000 Free speech is the main right that you have.

00:07:13.000 Without it, you have no others.

00:07:15.000 See you soon.

00:07:17.000 So, Elon Musk responded to all the news, saying, on this platform, unlike the one-way street of broadcast, people are able to interact, critique, and refute whatever is said.

00:07:25.000 And of course, anything misleading will get community notes.

00:07:28.000 I also want to be clear that we have not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever.

00:07:31.000 Tucker is subject to the same rules and rewards of all content creators.

00:07:35.000 Rewards means subscriptions and advertising revenue share, coming soon, which is a function of how many people subscribe and the advertising views associated with content.

00:07:43.000 I hope that many others, particularly from the left, also choose to be the content creators on this platform.

00:07:48.000 Now, I see what Elon's got going on here.

00:07:52.000 We have not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever.

00:07:54.000 That does not mean they did not shake hands and come to an agreement.

00:07:58.000 Because we had this story from Forbes, Elon Musk talking with Tucker Carlson about working together.

00:08:03.000 I don't believe that Tucker Carlson would walk away from launching his own network and making a hundred million plus per year on subscriptions unless there was some kind of deal in place, be it verbal, not a contractual agreement.

00:08:16.000 I imagine that there is probably some kind of deal in that, as they said, there's going to be the subscriptions and stuff like that.

00:08:25.000 And I imagine that Elon essentially went to Tucker and said, look, the money's there.

00:08:31.000 Blah, blah, blah.

00:08:32.000 We'll make sure that you get the reach, you have this many, etc.

00:08:36.000 This is how it'll work with the way that we're thinking, and so I can assure you that, you know, give you my word that this will be.

00:08:43.000 And it may be just a handshake deal, like you said, but it doesn't see... I don't see, you know, I don't think that he'll have a problem coming up with money.

00:08:51.000 He's the...

00:08:53.000 I just think that there's no reason for anyone to do a show on Twitter unless Elon makes a guarantee.

00:09:00.000 Like, YouTube subsidizes content.

00:09:03.000 Yeah, I think, but the thing is, I think that there's a lot of people, I think there's more people that are like you, that the money isn't, you know, the issue.

00:09:10.000 Like, Tucker doesn't, I was talking about this with Michael downstairs, the money, like, Tucker's already rich, he's already gonna make, you know, never gonna have to worry about money in his life, so I just feel like he's looking for For reach, and for probably security, and I think that the money is a secondary thing.

00:09:30.000 I mean, it's not like you care about it, you know?

00:09:31.000 I agree, but I mean, money is secondary.

00:09:33.000 You want to do something good, you want to say what you have to say, and you want people to see it, but money is like the oil for the machine.

00:09:40.000 Fair.

00:09:41.000 So, I don't think Tucker's going to want to look at his net worth, his bank account, his assets, and be like, let's liquidate this property so that I can do a show.

00:09:48.000 He's probably gonna be like, how can I fund a show?

00:09:50.000 How can I make money?

00:09:51.000 That being said, it may be that Elon simply went to Tucker and said, you do your show on Twitter, we absorb all of the costs of broadcast, hosting, server, and everything.

00:10:01.000 And so Tucker might be thinking about it like, okay.

00:10:03.000 We'll do subscriptions.

00:10:05.000 We'll make money on Twitter that way.

00:10:06.000 Elon says they only take 10%, so what am I really losing?

00:10:09.000 And they're gonna cover all the hosting costs?

00:10:11.000 Done.

00:10:12.000 I just imagine that there's plenty of money to be made and plenty of avenues for him to make money, and that essentially the teaming up of It could be paradigm shifting.

00:10:23.000 biggest free speech names going really puts pressure on all of the other media.

00:10:29.000 Like this is the most, this is going to be the most pressure that all of the other media

00:10:34.000 outlets have probably ever experienced.

00:10:37.000 It could be paradigm shifting.

00:10:38.000 I mean, one, we don't know what the restrictions that Tucker has on him that would maybe prevent

00:10:43.000 him from discussing the money and revenues from this sort of content.

00:10:47.000 But, you know, look at what happened with Musk himself.

00:10:50.000 He put a portion of his fortune up to try to do something good with Twitter because he saw, you know, what was going on with the collusion and the lack of free speech on Twitter.

00:10:59.000 So if we're lucky, we're gonna get something similar with Tucker himself where, you know, maybe what Elon is doing with Twitter, they are now trying to do to YouTube and kind of create a new paradigm in the content creator hub.

00:11:13.000 Yeah.

00:11:14.000 I mean, I feel like this is more about the...

00:11:20.000 conversation that, you know, the discourse that's going on, the national discourse, than it is about him being concerned about monetary, you know, how much money he's going to make.

00:11:31.000 Because again, it's already rich and these guys are the dudes that are out there carrying the torch for actual liberalism in an age when you've got so many progressives that are really authoritarian and really, really strongly looking to, you know, censor speech and say, this is outside of the realm of acceptable conversation.

00:11:49.000 The opportunity right now is for anybody who wants to launch a show needs to launch it on Twitter right now.

00:11:53.000 100%.

00:11:54.000 Because what's going to happen is within the next year, Elon is going to be looking at propping up whatever shows and content they have.

00:12:02.000 And what Elon's not going to want to do is start trying to poach outside content because it's very difficult.

00:12:08.000 I would love to have TimCastIRL live every day on Twitter.

00:12:11.000 I've got 1.6 million followers.

00:12:13.000 It would be fantastic.

00:12:14.000 I think we'd get tremendous reach.

00:12:15.000 It's just difficult to do, and I don't know what the upside is other than just general reach.

00:12:21.000 It's an investment, I understand, but it's kind of out of sight, out of mind.

00:12:25.000 If we invested in multi-streaming, did the show on Twitter, did a live stream or whatever because they have that capability, I don't know what we would get out of it.

00:12:33.000 So Elon, let's say he comes to us and he's like, we want you on Twitter.

00:12:37.000 I'd be like, okay, here's what we need to cover the costs of that, hiring somebody to do it, et cetera, et cetera.

00:12:41.000 If somebody just launches a show on Twitter right now, when Elon is looking for content to put in the suggested feed, it will be you.

00:12:49.000 So that's how it always works.

00:12:51.000 When YouTube first started, there were people who made no money and just did it.

00:12:55.000 And then when YouTube started expanding, they promoted those people.

00:12:58.000 Those people became rich and famous.

00:12:59.000 So, I don't know, man.

00:13:01.000 Tucker doesn't need it.

00:13:03.000 I'm wondering what the conversation was.

00:13:05.000 Let me pull up what Forbes had to say.

00:13:07.000 Forbes said that Elon Musk has been talking with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson about possibly working together, according to a new report from Axios.

00:13:15.000 The news comes after Carlson was abruptly pulled off the air by Fox, blah blah blah.

00:13:19.000 They said that Axios had learned that Carlson and Elon Musk had a conversation about working together, but didn't discuss specifics.

00:13:26.000 I don't know.

00:13:27.000 I don't know where we go from here.

00:13:28.000 I think it's about who Tucker is as well.

00:13:30.000 It's a big signpost who Tucker is and him coming here.

00:13:34.000 It's it's definitely him, his face and a new turning point for Twitter.

00:13:39.000 So that's that's pretty cool convergence right there.

00:13:42.000 But is this going to drive the left off of Twitter into places like Blue Sky or Mastodon

00:13:47.000 Because they're already attacking Twitter saying you're going to host Tucker Carlson.

00:13:54.000 It is interesting he even says that.

00:13:56.000 I hope that many others, particularly on the left, will make some content.

00:14:03.000 Elon's late to the party.

00:14:04.000 I'm glad he's at the party, but he's late to the party.

00:14:06.000 He posts that meme of, you know, the left moving further and further left, and then that makes a moderate right wing.

00:14:13.000 And it's like, bro, that was 10 years ago.

00:14:15.000 That happened 10 years ago, and you got to the party like two years ago, or whatever.

00:14:20.000 We're all so early, though, Tim.

00:14:22.000 People that are plugged in are extremely early, and normies are just catching wind of this.

00:14:27.000 And I think that, you know, the whole COVID thing is, I mean, I don't wanna, I'm a little hesitant to say this, but one of the, and actually I'll say it like this.

00:14:38.000 One of the benefits, one of the silver linings of COVID was it woke people up to the control of the narrative from the left and from the government and it made people realize that the government was really interested in censoring and really interested in controlling what is and isn't allowed to be said.

00:14:58.000 So I understand your frustration.

00:15:01.000 I just feel like I'm not frustrated.

00:15:03.000 I'm just saying, it's wishful thinking.

00:15:04.000 I mean, I understand your point, but I just think that this is really...

00:15:08.000 We're so ahead of the curve.

00:15:10.000 I'm just saying, it's wishful thinking.

00:15:10.000 Like, and...

00:15:13.000 Elon, I think, doesn't understand.

00:15:16.000 He understands a little bit, but he's new to this.

00:15:20.000 The left is a cult.

00:15:21.000 Yes.

00:15:22.000 We had Lance from the Serfs on this show who admitted, I asked him, okay, earmuffs for your kids.

00:15:30.000 I'll keep it family-friendly to the best of my abilities.

00:15:32.000 I said, if you went into MGM National Harbor, you know, it's just south of DC, it's this big shopping center, casino, and loudly proclaimed what you previously said, and what did he say?

00:15:46.000 Let's just put it this way.

00:15:47.000 He claimed that if a straight male, I'm sorry, that if a male engaged in adult activities with a biological male who was trans, it wasn't in fact gay.

00:15:56.000 He said it in a different way.

00:15:57.000 Much more graphic.

00:15:58.000 Much more graphic description.

00:15:59.000 And I said, if you ask the average person, would they agree with you?

00:16:01.000 He said, no, of course not.

00:16:02.000 I'm like, you're in a cult.

00:16:04.000 If you believe so strongly in this worldview and you know no one agrees with you at all, like the majority of the world, you are the odd person out.

00:16:12.000 You are on the wrong side of history.

00:16:15.000 And so with that being said, I think Elon doesn't understand the extent to which the left is in a cult and unwilling to engage and willing to burn things down for their cult.

00:16:26.000 Well, I mean, there's definitely truth in that.

00:16:28.000 I'll also add this, though.

00:16:29.000 I think there is some fear that people are expressing here about the potential for left-wing people to leave the platform.

00:16:36.000 I think a lot of people who are true believers are pretty far to the left would leave.

00:16:41.000 Your average, normal, run-of-the-mill left-wing person probably would not.

00:16:45.000 And part of the reason these platforms were able to get away with censoring conservatives for so long Well, I don't care if they leave.

00:16:51.000 I'm not saying that they should stay.

00:16:51.000 of like sort of a small contingent of conservatives really far to the right

00:16:56.000 leaving and so I think based on those same market principles there's not that

00:16:59.000 much of a risk of people on the left leaving. Well I don't care if they leave

00:17:03.000 I'm not saying that they should stay I think this is a good thing because I

00:17:07.000 think here's what's gonna happen my point is taking Twitter was one of the most

00:17:10.000 powerful things you could do in the culture war Elon Musk nailed that.

00:17:14.000 Because it's like you're saying.

00:17:16.000 The left dominates the space, and so default liberals fall in line.

00:17:20.000 But now with the left fleeing, it's actually a good thing.

00:17:23.000 Because that means the popular accounts, the big accounts, the accounts that people want to aspire to be like, are going to be more moderate to right-leaning.

00:17:29.000 And that means regular people who are on the platform are going to see more of that.

00:17:33.000 Exactly.

00:17:34.000 I just want to mention one more thing.

00:17:35.000 Twitter does lean to the left, but it's not like Tumblr was, where it's just overwhelmingly left-leaning, and anyone who goes there can sniff that out immediately and disregard most of what they're seeing.

00:17:47.000 It's deceptive, because it almost seems more moderate, even though traditionally the user base has been more left-wing.

00:17:55.000 But that's been part of why it's been so powerful as a tool for framing the narrative on the part of the left.

00:18:00.000 People get the feeling it's unbiased when it is really centered left.

00:18:04.000 I was going to say, I think there is something to be said about maintaining the olive branch to people who are reasonable and sending the incentives against the unreasonable people.

00:18:14.000 We want them to leave so that we can have legitimate conversation.

00:18:17.000 But then, you know, you've got people out there like RFK Jr.

00:18:19.000 He's on the left and I think, you know, he's got some good ideas and he seems like somebody who doesn't hate us.

00:18:24.000 You know, I don't agree with him on gun control and stuff like that, but he seems like somebody who doesn't hate us.

00:18:28.000 You know, you've had Destiny on this show.

00:18:29.000 He's at least willing to engage.

00:18:31.000 I don't agree with him on everything, but he's at least willing to engage and have the conversation.

00:18:34.000 You've got the Jimmy Doors of the world, and you've got the walk-away movement, where there is some level of disgust with the cult mentality and all of that, so I think there's something to be said about the Oliver.

00:18:45.000 The people you're naming are people who agree on facts.

00:18:48.000 Jimmy Dore, he's a social- I think he's a self-proclaimed socialist, but he's like, here's what the news said, and here's what we fact-checked, and here's what we found out to be true.

00:18:57.000 He can bring that to us, and we say, yes, you're- you are correct.

00:19:00.000 We've analyzed the facts, and we agree on the facts.

00:19:03.000 Then our opinions differ, and we're like, well, that's okay.

00:19:04.000 All of our opinions differ.

00:19:05.000 Right.

00:19:06.000 You get someone like Destiny, who comes out and says Kyle Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense, and the left comes after him, he may be a liberal, but he's like, hey, I watched it, I'm not gonna lie, this is what happened.

00:19:17.000 And then the cult are the people who are just outright lying.

00:19:20.000 They will say whatever needs to be said, even if it doesn't make sense.

00:19:24.000 For instance, you might have some leftists say something like, a woman should be allowed to abort her child at any point because it's part of her body, but she shouldn't be allowed to do meth because that would intentionally kill the baby, which is just Confusing because it's contradictory in itself.

00:19:38.000 So that to me is a cult member.

00:19:41.000 Yeah, I think without the olive branch to reasonable people, you run the risk of doing the same thing that's done to the right.

00:19:49.000 You know that meme where the guy is pushed from the left and they're like, oh, are you okay?

00:19:57.000 Why are you associating with the right?

00:19:58.000 I think if we don't have that, and it's got to be less about ideas or even political philosophy, more about character.

00:20:05.000 You know, and people who are just reasonable.

00:20:07.000 There's a lot, I think there's a lot of substance to that because one of the things that I've experienced is just in my life, it has happened to be that when I interact with people on the left, I have felt like they're exclusionary.

00:20:21.000 And this is, again, this is anecdotal, I know, I understand that, but like, if you don't If you're not welcoming, you're not going to get anybody on your side. 0.90

00:20:31.000 When All That Remains got our start, the blogs that were giving me the most crap were the ones that were on the left.

00:20:38.000 So I'm not going to feel any kind of sympathy towards people that are on the left when all the people that are attacking me are from the left.

00:20:46.000 You have to leave the door open.

00:20:48.000 And there's going to be a left wing, right?

00:20:50.000 Like, no matter what, like, unless you can somehow, like, obliterate the connection between personality type and political association, there is going to be a left wing.

00:21:01.000 Is Jimmy Dore left wing?

00:21:02.000 If you ask the quote-unquote left, they'll say, no, he's far right.

00:21:06.000 That's insane.

00:21:07.000 And that's where we're at.

00:21:07.000 Yes.

00:21:09.000 So, right now, in this country, There are actual left and actual right who are friends and having good conversations and trying to move things forward, and that would be like the Jimmy Dore and the Tucker Carlson having that conversation.

00:21:22.000 But what we refer to now as left and right isn't even political.

00:21:24.000 It's cult and not cult.

00:21:26.000 And Jimmy Dore is probably the best example of that.

00:21:26.000 Yeah.

00:21:29.000 And then to a lesser degree, someone like me, right?

00:21:31.000 Like moderate centrist, but they call right wing.

00:21:33.000 Well, the left will make arguments like, yeah, but look at this.

00:21:36.000 He voted for Trump.

00:21:36.000 I'm like, yeah, I did vote for Trump.

00:21:38.000 Jimmy Dore does not like Donald Trump, but they still call right wing.

00:21:42.000 That is that is insane.

00:21:43.000 You voted for Trump.

00:21:44.000 And like 15 years ago, Trump was a Democrat, right?

00:21:48.000 People on the right would have said he's But that's their argument.

00:21:51.000 The argument from the left is, when people say, I'm a regular, I'm just a regular person from 10 years ago, they say, that's what conservative means.

00:21:59.000 They were like, the argument the left makes is, if someone from 1950, in 1970, said, you know, I'm not conservative, I'm just a regular person from 15 years ago, they would say, yeah, before civil rights.

00:22:11.000 Like, yes, so you are right wing, you are conservative, because you're not with the times or whatever.

00:22:16.000 The difference today is, Left and right in the sense of our politics, cultural, traditional versus economic, you know, communal systems or capital systems mean absolutely nothing.

00:22:31.000 Jimmy Dore, a socialist, is right-wing.

00:22:34.000 You can, you can deviate from leftist economic policy, but you can't deviate from social cult policy.

00:22:41.000 Even if it doesn't make sense.

00:22:43.000 Like when that dude said, you know, you can take meth, or you can't, a woman can't take meth because it'll kill the baby, but you can't kill the baby. 1.00

00:22:48.000 Yeah.

00:22:49.000 Like that just, it literally makes no sense.

00:22:51.000 As long as he is saying words that align with the quote-unquote left, the cult, then you're left.

00:22:57.000 That's it.

00:22:58.000 Even, even, I think the funny thing about the whole debate is, Seamus is over here, as he often is, as the pro-life guy, he's not even saying anything, and me, the traditional pro-choice guy, arguing with the pro-abortion guy, and he's calling me pro-life right wing. 0.98

00:23:11.000 Well, Forrest Berther, and I, part of it was, I didn't, it's so stupid, I didn't want to dogpile him. 0.69

00:23:17.000 But there were one or two moments, I mean there were a few moments where he said things that were blatantly factually incorrect, but then when he was saying things that were blatantly factually incorrect related to healthcare for children and trying to justify mutilation, I had to jump in. 0.96

00:23:29.000 I mean, I needed to correct the nonsense he was saying.

00:23:32.000 But yeah, part of why I was remaining quiet wasn't because I was like, oh man, like, obviously you know I believe this is an incredibly important issue.

00:23:38.000 It's incredibly important to me, but I thought they're having the discussion and it would be in bad taste if this was a jumping.

00:23:44.000 I'm not trying to rehash that episode.

00:23:45.000 No, I get it, I get it.

00:23:46.000 I'm just trying to point out that I'm clearly at odds with you on a lot of these issues.

00:23:50.000 Exactly.

00:23:50.000 As someone who's like moderate, slightly left leaning on the issue, but to their perspective, he's equating you and I together despite the fact that we disagree.

00:23:58.000 Which is a huge compliment for you, you know what I mean?

00:24:02.000 Yes, yes, of course.

00:24:03.000 But let's jump to this next story because this one's pretty shocking.

00:24:05.000 This is from the Postmillennial.

00:24:07.000 Carlson was told by a member of the Fox board that he was taken off the air as part of the Dominion settlement per Tucker's legal team.

00:24:14.000 Two people briefed in the conversation told Axios that Carlson had been told by a Fox board member that he was taken off the air abruptly last month as part of a settlement with Dominion voting systems.

00:24:24.000 The $787 million settlement for each of the two parties came less than a week after it was revealed Carlson was off the air.

00:24:31.000 In a letter from Carlson's lawyers to Fox News, they argue that Carlson's non-compete clause in his contract, which runs through 2025, is no longer valid, alleging Fox employees, including Robert Murdoch himself, broke promises to Carlson intentionally and with reckless disregard for the truth.

00:24:46.000 The lawyers accused Fox executives, which two sources told Axios, are Viet Dinh and Murdoch of making material misrepresentations or promises to Carlson that was intentionally broken, constituting fraud.

00:25:00.000 The revelation comes as Tucker Carlson has launched a new show on Twitter.

00:25:04.000 So this is kind of crazy.

00:25:05.000 The reporting that Dominion basically told Fox, you've got to fire Tucker Carlson.

00:25:12.000 And then why would they do it?

00:25:13.000 Let's break this down.

00:25:14.000 You got to fire Tucker Carlson and almost a billion dollars.

00:25:18.000 But consider this.

00:25:20.000 I do a contract with somebody.

00:25:22.000 They can't abruptly fire me without cause.

00:25:24.000 Contracts will have terms, and if you do your contract right, it gives you some protections.

00:25:29.000 So, I've done contracts before with networks, and they've all said, if you terminate the show, remove him, or in any way inhibit his work, it will constitute a, you know, a breach of contract, and, you know, a party will be responsible for paying out the full amount of the contract, you know, therein or whatever.

00:25:48.000 So if you do a contract for a million bucks over three years, and then six months in they say, your show's off the air, you gotta pay me the million bucks right now.

00:25:55.000 That is the contract agreement.

00:25:57.000 And so typically they don't like to do that.

00:25:59.000 To break this contract with Tucker Carlson implies Dominion was going after more money.

00:26:06.000 So basically the cost-benefit analysis comes in and Fox News says, how much money will we lose if we defy Dominion?

00:26:13.000 Is it gonna be another 100, 200, 300 million?

00:26:15.000 How much do we lose if Tucker sues us?

00:26:18.000 By the way, I could be mistaken here, but if I'm correct, Tucker wasn't really blaming Dominion for the election outcomes.

00:26:18.000 Fire Tucker.

00:26:26.000 No, he was denying.

00:26:27.000 This is the crazy thing about it.

00:26:29.000 Tucker is the guy who said to Sidney Powell, come on my show and I'll give you all the time in the world to prove your claims.

00:26:34.000 Where's the evidence?

00:26:35.000 And he got attacked by Trump supporters for it.

00:26:38.000 So why would Dominion want him out?

00:26:40.000 I don't know.

00:26:41.000 Because maybe the people who work at Dominion are just cult members, and they're like, here's our opportunity to strike at the heart of Fox News.

00:26:47.000 Well, and then they would lump all dissident conservatives in under the category of election denial or whatever label they're using.

00:26:55.000 Let me ask you guys this question.

00:26:57.000 Why won't the left go after Hennity?

00:27:00.000 Why is Tucker Carlson the target?

00:27:02.000 Despite the fact that Tucker Carlson overlaps with the left on a ton of issues.

00:27:06.000 Because he's moving the Overton window.

00:27:08.000 Populism, economic populism, anti-war, yet they attack him exclusively.

00:27:13.000 He's the closest to anti-government.

00:27:15.000 Like, Sean Hannity is not anti-government at any, by any stretch of the imagination.

00:27:21.000 He'll talk about small government, but Sean Hannity is the As typical of a Republican as you can probably get.

00:27:30.000 Tucker Carlson, for all the fact that he used to be a Democrat, like back in the day, and I'm sure that he's comfortable with a fairly large government too, he's still anti-establishment.

00:27:43.000 So even if he would want a big government, he doesn't want the type of big government that we have now.

00:27:48.000 So I imagine that's why he gets the heat that he does.

00:27:51.000 Didn't Tucker Carlson recently call himself a liberal?

00:27:54.000 I mean, he did support Ron Paul when he was running.

00:27:56.000 Yeah.

00:27:57.000 And when he I think when he says liberal, he means like liberal in the classical sense.

00:27:57.000 Oh, yeah, yeah.

00:28:01.000 Yeah.

00:28:01.000 And I would say Hannity is part of the conservative ink cult.

00:28:01.000 Right.

00:28:05.000 You know, like and so at some point, you know, the cults all do their own thing, but don't come after each other.

00:28:05.000 Yes.

00:28:11.000 It's the people who step outside of the cult, outside of the, you know, the three by the allowable opinion that that have to be taken out and have to be, you know, made out to be crazy.

00:28:20.000 Shout out to Tom Woods for that three by five card.

00:28:22.000 Yeah, absolutely.

00:28:24.000 How did he support Ron Paul?

00:28:27.000 I think he openly, vocally did.

00:28:29.000 And I'm pretty sure, if I remember correctly, when Ron Paul spoke at his counter-event to the GOP National Convention that Tucker Carlson spoke there.

00:28:36.000 Don't quote me on that, but I think he did.

00:28:38.000 But he was vocally in support of Ron Paul.

00:28:42.000 Well, yeah, and I think they also want to go after someone who they perceive as weak because they're outside of one of those bubbles, right?

00:28:49.000 When you're standing on your own and there aren't going to be as many people who have your back when they start running hit pieces on you, it's much easier to take you out.

00:28:58.000 I wonder how effective that will be now with the largest communications platform, maybe?

00:29:06.000 That's the irony.

00:29:06.000 I don't know.

00:29:07.000 He hasn't Like evolved into his ultimate form and now he has the room to do that.

00:29:13.000 Yeah.

00:29:14.000 I mean, it's definitely going to be, you know, it's definitely going to be extremely interesting to see what does happen.

00:29:20.000 I kind of smelled that he was going to go to Twitter.

00:29:22.000 I'd been talking about it because...

00:29:25.000 Musk has made comments about when he bought Twitter. He was thinking, you know, there's no place like WeChat in the US

00:29:31.000 So like we've had WeChat in in China, you can pay for everything you can watch videos and etc

00:29:36.000 And he when he bought Twitter, he was thinking oh, I think that you know, we should make Twitter in I think I think it's

00:29:41.000 gonna work I think so, too. Yeah. Yeah

00:29:44.000 I'm thinking about, he's already responded saying like Twitter TV app or something like that, Twitter live app, so that you can open your TV and watch Twitter videos.

00:29:54.000 People are gonna be producing video content.

00:29:56.000 He's already got the subscriptions going.

00:29:58.000 That's the first thing he has to do.

00:29:59.000 People subscribe to content that generates revenue for the person, which gets them to use the platform more.

00:30:05.000 It generates revenue for Twitter.

00:30:06.000 It puts Patreon out of business.

00:30:08.000 It's a big threat to Rumble as well, considering he's allowing free speech.

00:30:12.000 But I'm really excited about Patreon imploding, because there's no way you can compete.

00:30:17.000 You've got your followers on Twitter already.

00:30:20.000 Patreon is where you try to direct them.

00:30:22.000 If they're already on Twitter, you can just be like, click that little button right there.

00:30:25.000 Hey, you follow me?

00:30:26.000 Click that button.

00:30:27.000 Boom.

00:30:27.000 You got a new subscriber.

00:30:28.000 So it's way easier to convert your existing fanbase.

00:30:31.000 Elon knew this.

00:30:32.000 I think him going after Twitter to buy it in the first place, it had a lot more to do with than just the Babylon Bee.

00:30:38.000 People were talking about how this is actually an effective app for communicating over long distances, like sending messages from Mars, for instance.

00:30:46.000 Yeah, exactly.

00:30:47.000 You post it, and you let it go, and then it appears when it appears.

00:30:50.000 So I think Elon's got big plans.

00:30:51.000 I'm just still waiting.

00:30:53.000 You were saying he was kind of late for the party.

00:30:53.000 I can't stand.

00:30:57.000 He even admitted after OpenAI launched GPT-4, he's going to start training his own LLM.

00:31:05.000 He knows he's late to the party there.

00:31:07.000 But, you know, there's something where there's all these pots in the fire that he's got going that I think either he has an idea of where they may converge in the future, or he's just actually trying out a bunch of things and seeing what works.

00:31:22.000 I'm excited to see what happens with Twitter, but with this LLM thing... What's LLM?

00:31:27.000 The Large Language Models, like GPT.

00:31:30.000 So he's going to start training his own one.

00:31:32.000 He said he's going to call it TruthGPT, which will basically just not have the biases and stuff like that in there.

00:31:39.000 And he knows he's behind the curve, but if anyone behind the curve can do it, it's probably him.

00:31:44.000 I've been using Mid Journey a lot.

00:31:46.000 You may have seen I posted a picture on Twitter, which I think is very important.

00:31:49.000 Actually, I'm going to pull it up right now.

00:31:51.000 I think it is one of the most important images of this or any generation.

00:31:56.000 Let me just try and scroll down here.

00:31:59.000 And I think it's going to be right here.

00:32:02.000 Let me pull this one over.

00:32:04.000 There you go, ladies and gentlemen.

00:32:05.000 The most important photo.

00:32:06.000 America's back, baby!

00:32:08.000 For those who are just listening, it's a picture of Donald Trump and Sonic the Hedgehog running in Washington, D.C.

00:32:12.000 for some reason.

00:32:13.000 And then I have this picture of Donald Trump shaking hands with Sonic the Hedgehog for some reason.

00:32:18.000 But I've been using Mid Journey, and so it is interesting to see where we go.

00:32:23.000 Like, this photo of Donald Trump looks real.

00:32:24.000 I mean, Sonic the Hedgehog obviously does not look real.

00:32:26.000 He's not a real thing.

00:32:27.000 But the photo of Trump looks like it's actually Trump running.

00:32:31.000 And we've already seen a bunch of photos of him getting arrested and things like that.

00:32:34.000 It took me 10 seconds to do this.

00:32:35.000 I just typed it in as a bit.

00:32:37.000 Donald Trump running beside Sonny the Hedgehog.

00:32:39.000 Enter.

00:32:39.000 Boom.

00:32:40.000 30 seconds goes by and it just pops up on the screen.

00:32:43.000 The things are starting to get crazy.

00:32:44.000 I think it'll be... I don't know.

00:32:47.000 I wanted to bring it up.

00:32:47.000 I think it'll be fascinating to see where this AI stuff goes.

00:32:50.000 Especially if Elon Musk is getting involved.

00:32:51.000 And especially if the Twitter firehose is plugged right into the language learning model.

00:32:56.000 It's going to create...

00:32:59.000 It's going to create some kind of weird Borg structure.

00:33:01.000 A hive mind of all of our thoughts.

00:33:04.000 No, oh my gosh, all of our thoughts from Twitter, that thing's gonna be horrible.

00:33:09.000 It's just gonna be Pepe.

00:33:10.000 It's gonna be just like a big Pepe the Frog, and it's gonna be like, I am incarnate, I am Kek, and we're gonna be like, wow, it happened.

00:33:16.000 The dark painting of the world.

00:33:18.000 As a filmmaker, they have speech-to-text.

00:33:20.000 I follow the Code Report and a bunch of videos like that, and it's just insane with the amount of plugins.

00:33:26.000 I was just watching something today that was saying, actually, it wasn't the open letter where people were saying we need to slow down AI, It was another one saying that the ones who aren't doing it open source actually are having a big hindrance because all the open source ones seem to be evolving a lot faster.

00:33:48.000 Have you heard of that video AI that's like mid-journey?

00:33:50.000 You can type in walking through a forest at night and it will generate a video of walking through the forest at night.

00:33:56.000 Have you seen that one?

00:33:57.000 Yeah, it can do just speech-to-text, or just speech-to-video, and it's only a couple seconds long, but just remember, anyone listening, that's the worst it's going to look, and it doesn't look that bad right now.

00:34:09.000 I've seen the videos and it's nuts.

00:34:10.000 There's apps right now where you'll have people on their phones just filming themselves like, you know, running through their house or something like that, and then with a few prompts and 10 seconds later, The whole landscape around turns into like, you know, he's now wearing Indiana Jones type stuff and the place he's in is like an underground catacombs or something.

00:34:31.000 This is actually why another good reason I think Twitter might end up being the place in terms of the internet.

00:34:38.000 Because if it's a platform where people are just sharing ideas and Elon does get this stuff integrated, we're coming to the point where, look man, I'm an artist.

00:34:46.000 I made that picture of Donald Trump and Sun Tzu running in Washington, D.C.

00:34:51.000 You had a beret on as you did it.

00:34:53.000 Look, if someone uses a paintbrush to make an image, they're using a tool to do it.

00:34:57.000 It's still their image.

00:34:59.000 Now we're at the point where the canvas and the paintbrush is literally just an AI.

00:35:04.000 You tell it what to make.

00:35:06.000 You refine it.

00:35:06.000 It is your art.

00:35:08.000 And it feels, a lot of people probably disagree, but we're not going to be thinking that in 10, 20 years.

00:35:12.000 People are going to be like, that was so creative of you to make that movie.

00:35:14.000 They're going to be like, Seamus, that feature length film you made last night was incredible.

00:35:19.000 I enjoyed the whole thing.

00:35:20.000 Thanks.

00:35:21.000 No problem.

00:35:21.000 I enjoyed it too.

00:35:22.000 I appreciate it.

00:35:23.000 I'm glad you guys enjoyed it.

00:35:25.000 All by myself actually.

00:35:26.000 Right now, check it out.

00:35:28.000 They have apps where you can animate images.

00:35:31.000 You can post a picture of a person, and then type, send in text, or play an audio file, and it will sync the photo with the audio file.

00:35:38.000 We've already seen the stuff where people are singing, right?

00:35:40.000 We did the music video, Genocide, where we had like Taylor Lorenz singing our song.

00:35:44.000 You can, they have high resolution versions of it.

00:35:46.000 Someone used Mid Journey to generate a sci-fi looking spaceship captain female. 0.98

00:35:52.000 Then they wrote out with a text-to-speech program, a paragraph.

00:35:56.000 They then took that audio file and put it in this program with the image and made her talk.

00:36:00.000 That was like one plus two equals three.

00:36:02.000 Imagine someone in a year having a program that does all of that instantly.

00:36:06.000 And then, once you have those things, all you gotta do is type in, a movie about a space captain leaving Earth to go find a new colony, but gets betrayed by the first mate, and then aliens come, and the first mate was working with aliens the whole time.

00:36:20.000 And then it will just render the whole movie like that.

00:36:23.000 It's crazy.

00:36:24.000 And it's all based upon the language models, because there's a ton of different AI models But then all of a sudden 2017 rolls around and the language models start doing what the other models weren't able to do.

00:36:37.000 Like, language models can now do chemistry better than chemistry AI, which is trained specifically for that.

00:36:45.000 It's starting to progress where everyone who is in all these other camps of AI, they're only focusing on one platform, which means the progress is going to go that much faster.

00:36:55.000 Let's jump to this next story, ladies and gentlemen.

00:36:57.000 We have this tweet from BBC News World.

00:37:00.000 Wait, what is this?

00:37:01.000 It says, why some people, some people?

00:37:04.000 What do you mean by some people?

00:37:05.000 Oh my God.

00:37:06.000 Are spreading false rumors about the Texas government.

00:37:08.000 Seamus, what do they mean, some people?

00:37:10.000 I don't know exactly what they mean.

00:37:11.000 Now, I'm gonna assume this is some kind of racist dog whistle, because that's what it sounds like.

00:37:16.000 It is, and then they post this picture of me, right?

00:37:20.000 And, you know, it looks like they've darkened my skin. 0.74

00:37:23.000 I just can't believe.

00:37:24.000 Some people?

00:37:25.000 What does this mean?

00:37:25.000 Yeah, what is this?

00:37:27.000 Um, I do think it's hilarious that they said some people instead of just saying my name.

00:37:31.000 And also put a- Why some people are spreading false rumors.

00:37:33.000 Also put a picture of me.

00:37:34.000 Well, no, and this is, this is what's really insidious about this, right?

00:37:37.000 So they have some people, that refers to a group, and then Texas gunman, which refers to one person.

00:37:43.000 So your brain goes to, the picture of the person there is the gunman.

00:37:47.000 So it looks, it really does, when I first saw this I was like, oh my, is this like a meme or something?

00:37:52.000 That like, the lefties are trying to joke that Tim is responsible for this?

00:37:56.000 And so they're posting, no they literally posted your image.

00:37:59.000 Actually St.

00:37:59.000 Clair said the same, noticed the same thing she tweeted about it.

00:38:01.000 She said that it was like disgusting that they made that title.

00:38:04.000 Because it does look like they're saying, or implying that Tim's the shooter.

00:38:07.000 Yeah.

00:38:08.000 No it seriously does look like that, it looks like that.

00:38:11.000 It really does.

00:38:11.000 And they definitely picked a picture that, you know, could somewhat closely look like a mug shot.

00:38:17.000 Oh wow, I think I might have to sue the BBC for doing that.

00:38:20.000 If Tim made a Mobb Deep album cover, it would be that.

00:38:23.000 It would be that picture.

00:38:25.000 Yeah, that's a fair point, because saying some people is a reference to multiple people, but then saying singular Texas gunman and showing the image is to imply that was me.

00:38:32.000 I think I might have to sue BBC, I'm gonna sue you.

00:38:35.000 You gotta change that.

00:38:35.000 I'm gonna sue you.

00:38:37.000 I'm telling you.

00:38:38.000 Check it out though.

00:38:38.000 Here's what they say.

00:38:39.000 Why some people are spreading false rumors about the Texas gunman.

00:38:42.000 This article is actually hilarious.

00:38:44.000 Because it gives you a bunch of patter, fluff, nonsense in the beginning that means nothing, that there's no point in reading.

00:38:49.000 It's just like, there's a guy and he was shooting people, blah, blah, blah.

00:38:52.000 What did the suspect post?

00:38:53.000 Blah, blah, blah.

00:38:54.000 How do we know the account was his?

00:38:56.000 My favorite part.

00:38:57.000 The BBC has examined the material and we can be confident the suspect was the person behind the posts.

00:39:02.000 Hey! 0.99

00:39:02.000 Confidence is not confirmation! 0.99

00:39:05.000 So this is an opinion piece, BBC.

00:39:08.000 Well, so hold on.

00:39:09.000 Why are they confident?

00:39:10.000 Like, where's their confidence coming from?

00:39:12.000 I know what their confidence is coming from.

00:39:13.000 It fits their narrative.

00:39:14.000 Look at this, look at this.

00:39:15.000 It says, Garcia appeared to use the account as an online diary.

00:39:18.000 He posted multiple documents including his name, date of birth, and other identifying details, including a plane ticket, a speedy ticket, and an ID card.

00:39:26.000 This is what we call in the business an orgy of evidence.

00:39:29.000 Do you guys get that reference?

00:39:31.000 When you walk into a crime scene and you see all the documents laid out perfectly, it's like, oh boy, I believe that!

00:39:36.000 Wasn't that from Seven where they talked about it?

00:39:38.000 No, that was Minority Report.

00:39:39.000 There you go.

00:39:40.000 They go into the room and there's all the photos of Tom Cruise's kid, and then Colin Farrell's like, this is what we call an orgy of evidence.

00:39:47.000 It's not believable.

00:39:49.000 You walk in and they're just like, look, here's the guy who did it!

00:39:52.000 I think it's almost, like, as absurd as if... Could you imagine if there was a story that was as crazy as to suggest that, like, maybe a plane crashed and then, like, a passport survived the fireball and landed on the ground?

00:40:02.000 Thousands of people... Oh my gosh, in the rubble?

00:40:04.000 If you could believe that, yeah.

00:40:06.000 And then, anyway, it says, despite the clear evidence, the clear evidence, that's an opinion right there.

00:40:14.000 Several activists and internet personalities, including at least one mentioned in Garcia's post,

00:40:18.000 have attempted to cast doubt on the authenticity of the material.

00:40:20.000 They've claimed, without evidence, that it's part of a psychological operation

00:40:24.000 or false flag by the government to smear those on the right or far right.

00:40:28.000 Well, I didn't say any of that later stuff, false flag.

00:40:31.000 I did say PSYOP, but PSYOP could include corporations and private sector as well.

00:40:37.000 So you see how they expand upon it, take what you say, and then add context to it.

00:40:44.000 But I love how they're just at the bottom, like, a picture of me.

00:40:48.000 Adding to the misinformation, blah blah blah, what did they say?

00:40:51.000 The podcaster Tim Pool, a former Occupy Wall Street supporter and Vice News reporter, was among those mentioned several times.

00:40:57.000 I got a message earlier today.

00:40:59.000 Because USA Today also talked about me, and they called me a former journalist.

00:41:04.000 I'm like, oh, okay, sure, thanks.

00:41:06.000 They're so threatened.

00:41:07.000 There's no evidence that Garcia was inspired to action by Mr. Poole's podcasts, which cover right-wing talking points and conspiracy theories.

00:41:15.000 Oh my gosh.

00:41:15.000 Mr. Poole immediately tried to cast doubt on the veracity of the material, accusing those digging up the material as being part of a psy-op.

00:41:21.000 Yes, yes.

00:41:22.000 BBC, your opinion piece is interesting to me, but please, spare me your opinion piece, and don't use my photo in the way you did.

00:41:29.000 But I would just like to point out, what do we have here?

00:41:33.000 A couple weeks before this incident, someone started posting random photos from Reddit, And posting four clips from Timcast IRL, a single episode, and making a post about libs of TikTok to no followers, to nobody.

00:41:49.000 For what reason?

00:41:50.000 A Mexican neo-Nazi inspired by a Jewish woman and a mixed-race Korean guy.

00:41:56.000 What are they trying to imply here?

00:41:59.000 And the Nazi stuff I just think is the most absurd considering they're like, libs of TikTok is great! 0.97

00:42:03.000 It's like, Haya Raichick is Jewish. 0.99

00:42:07.000 He could be a self-hating Mexican. 0.96

00:42:09.000 And so anyway, that's the story. 0.99

00:42:12.000 And then I go, that sounds like BS.

00:42:14.000 Oh, BBC better write up a whole article about it and put his picture in it.

00:42:18.000 Well, thanks for that, BBC. Appreciate it.

00:42:20.000 The existence of the CIA at all means that all conspiracy theories are at least plausible.

00:42:28.000 Period.

00:42:30.000 J-F-R-X-Z-I-D- Like, how many times has there been, you know, covert operations that have come to light that the CIA was involved in?

00:42:38.000 COINTELPRO?

00:42:40.000 What was it called?

00:42:41.000 COINTELPRO.

00:42:42.000 So, this is Bellingcat that uncovered this profile.

00:42:49.000 How?

00:42:50.000 Like, serious question.

00:42:51.000 A Bellingcat researcher just so happened to be browsing Russian social media, underground Russian social media, and found a profile with no followers?

00:43:00.000 Come on, dude.

00:43:01.000 And it's the same guy that connected the New York Times with the, uh...

00:43:08.000 It's information laundering.

00:43:09.000 What they do is, Bellingcat can write whatever they want, and then say, oh, look at this, this is interesting.

00:43:16.000 Then the media writes it up, and they can't be sued.

00:43:18.000 That's how it works.

00:43:19.000 And Bellingcat's a non-profit, which is very, very difficult to get money out of. 0.67

00:43:22.000 So, in my humble opinion, I believe at the very least, the Bellingcat people are so bad at their jobs, they genuinely believe random garbage on the internet.

00:43:32.000 Let me tell you how easy it is.

00:43:33.000 Make a profile.

00:43:34.000 Make ten profiles.

00:43:35.000 Post a series of images about a specific individual you want to smear. 0.87

00:43:39.000 So, uh, right now, someone could go on a Russian website and make a profile where they post a bunch of pictures of Hasidic Jewish Nazis.

00:43:46.000 Seemingly making no sense.

00:43:48.000 No pictures of faces or anything like that.

00:43:50.000 They can then write posts, and then wait.

00:43:52.000 And then as soon as something happens, they can take the picture of the individual, upload it as the profile picture, Then add demographic information, birthdate, location, and the BBC will be like, well, the birthdate matches!

00:44:03.000 That proves it!

00:44:04.000 Even though they made the profile in advance.

00:44:06.000 And I'm not saying it's a government having to do it, and I'm not saying that it's an intelligence agency.

00:44:10.000 I'm saying literally any activist can do this right now.

00:44:13.000 Any random person sitting in their mom's basement can do this right now.

00:44:17.000 So for you to be like, we're confident it's actually the account, is just nonsense.

00:44:23.000 Again, these are the people who believe Jussie Smollett, right?

00:44:26.000 Right.

00:44:26.000 These are the people who believe Jussie Smollett.

00:44:28.000 Yeah.

00:44:28.000 Well, you don't.

00:44:30.000 I know, the bad guys.

00:44:31.000 And I'm just saying, look, it's just... 0.72

00:44:34.000 I think if you did have a lunatic who had posted a couple clips from Tim's show, obviously it goes without saying that that doesn't make Tim at all culpable for the behavior of that lunatic.

00:44:44.000 I wasn't even subscribed.

00:44:46.000 Yeah.

00:44:46.000 The clips show he wasn't even subscribed to the channel.

00:44:48.000 Wow.

00:44:49.000 Right, it's like he's a fan, like he wasn't even subscribed.

00:44:52.000 It was four clips from one show.

00:44:54.000 But yeah, so my point is this is grasping at straws, right?

00:44:57.000 Because even if they can definitively prove, even if it turns out that this is legitimate, that really is this guy's profile, they're telling the truth and they have good reasons to be confident, that still is not the nail in the coffin that they think it is here.

00:45:10.000 I mean, I gotta be honest, like, I think it's funny and I really just don't care.

00:45:15.000 I think we've won so much ground in the culture war that it is completely meaningless that they would even do it, assuming it was a PSYOP.

00:45:22.000 It's just, it means nothing to me.

00:45:24.000 It's just, it's just funny.

00:45:26.000 The fact that every chance they get they're, they're just slandering, you know, like, Musk or TimCast or whoever it is that is The opposing view, it's straight slander, just associations with the most terrible organization in history, the Nazis, right?

00:45:43.000 That's just, it shows that they have no substance.

00:45:47.000 Here's how I responded.

00:45:48.000 Ian Miles Chong tweeted something out. 0.99

00:45:50.000 Keith Olbermann responded saying, sure, it's suspect because your side and libs of TikTok got caught inspiring a mass murderer, blood on your hands, F you.

00:45:59.000 And I said, I really don't care what the cult thinks, like, At all. 0.97

00:46:02.000 Fart fart fart, Keith Olbermann. 1.00

00:46:03.000 I'd say you're dumb as a box of rocks, but that's demeaning to rocks. 1.00

00:46:07.000 Like, I just, do I care about what ranting, raving, lunatic Keith Olbermann thinks? 1.00

00:46:13.000 He thought Donald Trump was a Russian spy. 0.95

00:46:16.000 Like, these people are not smart people, and there's nothing, like, you know, they try to shame you, and I'm just like, you know, you can't shame me.

00:46:24.000 Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

00:46:26.000 Exactly, I mean, for any story, especially if it's something that suits their narrative, you really need to see hard proof from them in order to give it any level of credibility.

00:46:36.000 But I just don't care! 0.94

00:46:37.000 Keith Olbermann could come out and be like, look at this picture of a thing happening, and I'd just laugh at him and be like, you are a really dumb guy, and your words are meaningless, and there's no reason for me to read them. 0.94

00:46:45.000 Like, there is nothing Keith Olbermann can say that will impact my life in any meaningful way, politically, media-wise, I just, I don't care about these people. 1.00

00:46:54.000 He's a real piece of crap. 0.98

00:46:55.000 But it's not just him, it's like I've gotten to the point where in the culture war, a leftist can come and start going, in my ears, and I'm just like, it does nothing. 1.00

00:47:04.000 It has no bearing whatsoever.

00:47:05.000 It's like you said, it's all about narrative control because, ostensibly, it's about, oh, there was a shooting and it's tragic and, you know, they want us to believe that this is a Mexican, like, it's a bold claim to say it's a Mexican white supremacist.

00:47:19.000 And they will use the tragedy to ostensibly run that narrative.

00:47:23.000 When, at the same time, there was other shootings that happened.

00:47:25.000 Like, there was a shooting that happened in Tulsa, Oklahoma, right around that same time.

00:47:29.000 As far as I know, nobody watched your show on that shooting, so that's not the one that they choose.

00:47:34.000 They choose the one where they have to make the claim that it's a Mexican white supremacist just to be able to say that it's somebody who's watching your show.

00:47:42.000 Still waiting on that Las Vegas shooter motivation.

00:47:45.000 Remember that one?

00:47:46.000 Or the manifesto from the...

00:47:48.000 The Covenant shooting?

00:47:50.000 That Nashville incident, as well as the Vegas one, we still haven't figured out those, have we?

00:47:55.000 That was 20 minutes from my... my daughter was going to a private school like 20 minutes away from there. 1.00

00:48:00.000 It hit close to home.

00:48:02.000 But yeah, we don't hear much about that.

00:48:04.000 That was a Christian school.

00:48:05.000 The fact that You had to wait so long to get information about the Nashville shooter, the manifesto's still not out, but this had so much information the very next day, and you're not supposed to be suspect?

00:48:23.000 If you're skeptical at all, it's verboten to be skeptical.

00:48:27.000 Give me a break! 1.00

00:48:28.000 And the other thing I've noticed, looking at the coverage of this, and this has to be part of the narrative control too, is Every single article has this same talking point of over 200 mass shootings this year.

00:48:40.000 All of them.

00:48:40.000 And they all cite the same non-profit.

00:48:42.000 It's a lie.

00:48:43.000 Yeah, and they all cite the same non-profit that is saying this.

00:48:46.000 Now that non-profit says there's been 1,200 defensive uses of guns. 0.94

00:48:50.000 That's ridiculous.

00:48:51.000 Anybody who knows about that statistic knows that there's hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns every year. 0.95

00:48:56.000 So it makes you wonder, how the hell are they defining a mass shooting to come to that number?

00:49:02.000 It's usually three or more people being injured by a firearm.

00:49:05.000 And so what they'll do is this little bait and switch where they have one definition of a mass shooting that says something depending on the definition you're looking at either three people being injured with a firearm or three people being killed.

00:49:17.000 And when people hear mass shooting, of course, they don't think that that's what the bar is.

00:49:21.000 They're thinking of a school shooting.

00:49:23.000 They're thinking of a large group of people being massacred.

00:49:26.000 So, yeah, I think three people being injured by a firearm is a very different thing from a public massacre.

00:49:32.000 But the way the term is used paints a picture that 200 separate times this year already there have been these massive, you know, Columbine-level events.

00:49:43.000 Exactly.

00:49:43.000 When you use the phrase mass shooting, it brings to mind Columbine, or Virginia Tech, or Parkland, or any of the other horrible, horrible, horrible shootings.

00:49:55.000 And when you're talking about 200 of them so far this year, they're talking about two probably really terrible shootings in 198 that are Three people took rounds when a drug deal went bad.

00:50:13.000 And that's what a mass shooting is.

00:50:14.000 Exactly.

00:50:15.000 And that's one thing.

00:50:16.000 So a lot of it is like gang activities, drug deals, someone pulling out a gun.

00:50:20.000 Again, that's not a good thing.

00:50:21.000 That's not a thing we want to tolerate in our country.

00:50:23.000 We want to clean that up.

00:50:24.000 But that is not something that belongs in the same category.

00:50:27.000 As an event like a school shooting.

00:50:29.000 Yeah, and that's the thing.

00:50:30.000 They're bringing to mind the school shooting, so it's the most horrible event that happens in America.

00:50:36.000 It puts you in the most emotional state, where you might be the most reactive and the most accepting of a narrative.

00:50:41.000 It's also very understanding of how people read information, like this one.

00:50:46.000 Most people will read the headline, they'll read maybe the first couple lines in there, and they'll come to their conclusions, but you have to post something like this BBC article Specifically because of the way that people look for information.

00:50:58.000 We want to confirm what we already kind of believe.

00:51:02.000 So if we want to look up something like this and we see, okay, yeah, sure, it makes perfect sense.

00:51:08.000 And, you know, it writes off Tim in a very, like, interesting, dismissive way.

00:51:14.000 So this is also very intelligent in how people peruse their information and come to their conclusions and just validate what they've already believed.

00:51:22.000 I particularly like this headline from UnHerd.

00:51:25.000 Don't blame Tim Pool for the Texas mall shooting.

00:51:28.000 That's really nice of him.

00:51:30.000 Thank you for that!

00:51:32.000 Look at the picture, too.

00:51:33.000 So what are you doing?

00:51:35.000 I think I look pretty good in that picture.

00:51:36.000 It's kind of like a shrugging.

00:51:38.000 I think that's your outro, actually.

00:51:39.000 It clips your outro.

00:51:40.000 One other thing that I want to point out is that the... Centrist media personality.

00:51:44.000 Say thank you, UnHerd.

00:51:45.000 The mass shooter stuff is actually dual use, right?

00:51:48.000 So one thing, it...

00:51:51.000 can demonize people or groups of people.

00:51:54.000 They can use it to say, oh, these people are saying the wrong things, blah, blah, blah.

00:51:58.000 And on the second point, it gives them a route to attack rifles, which rifles are the tools that will keep a tyrannical government at bay.

00:52:09.000 That's why they are after rifles.

00:52:12.000 And they're not after machine guns.

00:52:14.000 They're not after tank busters, grenades.

00:52:16.000 They're after rifles.

00:52:18.000 That's because of Vietnam, because of Afghanistan, because all over the world, if you have a population that's armed with rifles that can take shots at three, four, five hundred yards, they can harass a well-equipped army and they can basically wait them out.

00:52:35.000 And that's the last thing that the government wants to have to deal with.

00:52:37.000 They want to get rid of the rifles so that way they can go ahead and say, all right, we're going to institute this particular law that violates your rights and people are in a position or not in a position to say, no, we're going to put our foot down.

00:52:46.000 We got a, I want to jump to this, uh, this story from Timcast.com.

00:52:50.000 Jury rules Trump committed battery and defamed E. Jean Carroll, former president, calls verdict

00:52:56.000 a disgrace. A jury has ruled that former president Donald Trump committed battery on E. Jean Carroll

00:53:01.000 in 1996 and later defamed her. Carroll has claimed Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing 0.69

00:53:06.000 room in New York City. Quote, I'm here because Donald Trump raped me and when I wrote about it, 0.99

00:53:10.000 he said it didn't happen. 0.97

00:53:11.000 Carol testified.

00:53:12.000 Trump did not testify or call any witnesses to the case.

00:53:14.000 The jury ruled that Trump did not rape Carol, but that he is liable for sexual abuse.

00:53:19.000 He has now been ordered to pay her $5 million in damages in the civil case.

00:53:22.000 There are no criminal charges.

00:53:24.000 Carol went public.

00:53:25.000 Blah, blah, blah.

00:53:26.000 This is a crazy story.

00:53:28.000 Trump said, I have absolutely no idea who this woman is.

00:53:31.000 This verdict is a disgrace, a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.

00:53:35.000 How does something like this happen?

00:53:37.000 It's been 30 some odd years, and now Trump's got to pay $5 million.

00:53:41.000 What evidence did they have?

00:53:43.000 I guess they must have had something, right?

00:53:45.000 Did she wear a blue dress or something? 0.98

00:53:47.000 I don't know.

00:53:48.000 Trump's not doing himself any favors, because apparently in the deposition, he said something like, he told the lawyer questioning him that she wasn't hot enough for him.

00:53:56.000 Did you guys see that?

00:53:57.000 He did, he ruled.

00:53:58.000 He plays to the base no matter what, man.

00:54:00.000 It was awesome!

00:54:02.000 He said something like, she's not really my type and quite frankly, neither are you.

00:54:07.000 You didn't need to say that!

00:54:09.000 You're not doing yourself any favors!

00:54:11.000 No, but he was doing us favors!

00:54:13.000 He is a man of the people!

00:54:16.000 How do you think a jury responds when they hear that?

00:54:19.000 Snickers, personally.

00:54:20.000 I chuckle.

00:54:21.000 I think they chuckle.

00:54:21.000 A New York jury?

00:54:24.000 Yeah.

00:54:24.000 He's like, oh, should I not have said that?

00:54:26.000 Tough crowd.

00:54:31.000 I just don't know, like, did she have, like, actual evidence?

00:54:34.000 A jury of six men and three men awarded her five million dollars.

00:54:36.000 Trump called it a disgrace.

00:54:38.000 What's, uh, what is the, what is the evidence, I suppose, that they saw that they felt that warranted Trump having to pay?

00:54:44.000 They said, uh, former magazine writer was abused by Trump nearly 30 years ago.

00:54:48.000 The jury did not find that he raped her, as, uh, as she had long claimed.

00:54:53.000 The jury returning the verdict shortly after 3 p.m.

00:54:55.000 found Trump is running to regain his presidency, blah blah blah.

00:54:58.000 Mr. Trump's lawyers called no witnesses.

00:55:00.000 He never appeared at the trial to hear Ms.

00:55:01.000 Carroll who had sued him last year.

00:55:02.000 So maybe that's it.

00:55:04.000 It's just because he didn't defend himself that they were just like, okay, I guess default?

00:55:07.000 Maybe.

00:55:08.000 I don't know.

00:55:09.000 She walked out of the courthouse grinning from ear to ear. 0.98

00:55:11.000 This is crazy to me.

00:55:12.000 Sure she did.

00:55:13.000 It's absolutely crazy.

00:55:15.000 I think I saw that the judge would not allow him or his defense to post evidence for their defense online too.

00:55:22.000 So he's like gagged.

00:55:24.000 I'd be curious to see.

00:55:26.000 So, the other thing that popped up was this story here, because apparently I'm just in the news all the time.

00:55:31.000 Donald Trump's trial juror, fan of right-wing provocateur, Tim Pool.

00:55:35.000 What website is this?

00:55:36.000 See, this is the kind of credence that would be in this jury.

00:55:39.000 Yeah, totally!

00:55:39.000 They say, where do we have this?

00:55:46.000 A security guard, 31, from the Bronx said he got his news and information from podcasts.

00:55:50.000 He particularly listened to one by Tim Pool, a controversial right-wing commentator.

00:55:54.000 Well, at least UnHerd called me a centrist.

00:55:58.000 But I'm curious.

00:56:00.000 This is an international article that says it was May 10th.

00:56:04.000 But I'm curious.

00:56:05.000 Somebody who watches this show must have seen some pretty damning evidence if they're going to convict Trump, right?

00:56:09.000 I don't know.

00:56:11.000 What do you guys think?

00:56:12.000 I was not paying that close of attention to that trial.

00:56:14.000 I heard a little bit about it today, but I didn't get a chance to look into the verdict why they ruled the way they did.

00:56:20.000 What could the evidence be?

00:56:21.000 Did you like sniff his finger or something?

00:56:24.000 Is there a video of it?

00:56:25.000 I just don't understand.

00:56:26.000 How could you have evidence this long of something like that happening?

00:56:29.000 They're like, well, it didn't happen, but Trump's gotta pay her anyway.

00:56:31.000 Yes.

00:56:31.000 I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the evidence be everywhere now then?

00:56:36.000 Wouldn't something be out there about it?

00:56:37.000 They would have leaked something.

00:56:38.000 They love talking about him.

00:56:40.000 I think a lady said Trump did a thing and they're like, okay, pay her.

00:56:42.000 I think that's what happened.

00:56:44.000 So then when I hear that one of the jurors was a fan, I'm like, what?

00:56:49.000 He had to have seen something, right?

00:56:51.000 You know, I just, I just can't believe that somebody who would watch this show would be like, I don't need evidence.

00:56:55.000 I will convict.

00:56:56.000 I will, I will, I will agree.

00:56:58.000 It's not conviction.

00:56:59.000 I guess, you know, I will.

00:57:01.000 Found liable.

00:57:02.000 Find Trump liable.

00:57:03.000 There you go.

00:57:04.000 That's funny that he paid five million dollars to use that line.

00:57:08.000 Which one?

00:57:09.000 You're not pretty enough for me.

00:57:11.000 You probably thought it was funny.

00:57:14.000 He's like, I'll pay five million to say that.

00:57:17.000 We all enjoyed it, I guess.

00:57:19.000 They say that Mr. Takapina clashed with the judge seeking a mistrial on pervasive unfair and prejudicial hearings, based in part on what he described as the judge improperly sustaining objections by Ms.

00:57:30.000 Carroll's lawyers, who argued that his questions were argumentative.

00:57:33.000 At one point, Judge Kaplan quoted the definition of an argumentative question from Black's Law Dictionary, reading it aloud to Mr. Takapina.

00:57:39.000 I just, I, I, I just, I can't believe, I don't believe it.

00:57:42.000 I really, I really just don't believe it.

00:57:43.000 Someone said that you only need six jurors to find the person guilty in a civil trial?

00:57:48.000 I don't know at all.

00:57:50.000 I'm just seeing something that someone was saying on the internet.

00:57:53.000 I don't know, man.

00:57:54.000 I just think all of this is fake.

00:57:56.000 I think there's just going to be a non-stop circus around him through the entire election cycle to have everyone looking at these different things and to distract away from anything that he might have to say about the nonsense.

00:58:09.000 I think this country's already fallen off a cliff, right?

00:58:11.000 We had that story earlier about the border crossings, 26,000 apprehensions and the Biden admins like just release them to the streets.

00:58:19.000 So they're just gonna release a whole bunch of, they're basically saying there's no border anymore.

00:58:23.000 And I'm not exaggerating.

00:58:24.000 They said that Title 42 ends, they will enter this country and they will be released, which means it's a free for all. 0.98

00:58:31.000 So I see that, I'm kind of just, it's hard for me to get enthused by any of this news where I'm just sitting here thinking like, we are free falling.

00:58:37.000 So with stuff like this, I think people need to, I think you're right, I think we're over the cliff and we need to give up on any kind of political solution from the federal level.

00:58:49.000 However, The states and the localities have a lot of decision-making authority under the 10th Amendment.

00:58:55.000 A lot.

00:58:55.000 And I think that's really got to be the political thing that is embraced.

00:58:59.000 This concept of nullification.

00:59:01.000 There is absolutely no reason that states can't set their own immigration policies.

00:59:07.000 That's not in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.

00:59:09.000 They have every bit of authority to do that.

00:59:11.000 And basically, well not basically, everything that's not listed explicitly in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution is up for this kind of movement.

00:59:19.000 So I really think that that's what's got to happen, is we've got to realign politics with culture, closer to the localities in these states, and then that's who was always meant to be making the majority of decisions anyway.

00:59:30.000 Radical decentralization.

00:59:31.000 That's what has to happen, but not just that in theory.

00:59:34.000 It was given to us by the founders.

00:59:36.000 That power was there and debated heavily, you know, for the states and the localities to have this.

00:59:43.000 And that is, in my opinion, what has to happen, is we have got to bring the sovereignty back down as close to the individual as possible.

00:59:52.000 No, I just want to ask you, I hear you, but what would that look like at a state level?

00:59:56.000 How would that operate if states were having more strict immigration laws or enforcing them in a way that the federal government wasn't?

01:00:03.000 I mean, they would have whatever authorities and resources at their disposal.

01:00:07.000 So, like, the Texas National Guard, they could authorize that to do what they want.

01:00:14.000 If Texas being a border town, and it's affected the most, why shouldn't they have the most say?

01:00:21.000 Or why shouldn't they do it as they see fit, when they're being essentially made to stand down by the feds, when they have no authority to do that in the first place?

01:00:28.000 Yeah, that's an interesting point.

01:00:31.000 I hear you now.

01:00:31.000 Look, I'm all about states' rights and having the states step in, especially when the federal government is failing to do their duty.

01:00:39.000 I hope something like that could work.

01:00:40.000 I'm a little worried, though, just about How would we be able to pull that off, especially with budgets?

01:00:45.000 And I agree with you that the states at some point have to do something if the federal government isn't gonna step in and do anything.

01:00:54.000 So we're definitely on the same page there.

01:00:56.000 I'm just a little worried about how effective it's gonna be.

01:00:59.000 I get encouraged by it because almost anything that's good that happens, happens at this level.

01:01:05.000 You see states like legalizing gold and silver as legal tender.

01:01:10.000 You see states like there was just a major victory for the Defend the Guard bill in the Senate in Arizona.

01:01:15.000 You see constitutional carry at the state level.

01:01:18.000 You see these different things that happen.

01:01:21.000 What wins like that could you say have happened at the federal level in the past five years?

01:01:25.000 None, and that's the point.

01:01:26.000 Very little.

01:01:27.000 The infrastructure is all there.

01:01:29.000 It's the way that our government's set up currently.

01:01:30.000 but that's judicial, but still. I would agree with that.

01:01:33.000 Yeah, I would agree with that. The things that we're discussing right now are all, the infrastructure

01:01:37.000 is all there. It's the way that our government's set up currently. So it's really just

01:01:42.000 states taking the authority that they have, you know, governors getting some balls and state legislatures

01:01:48.000 getting some balls and doing things that they decide are good for their states.

01:01:53.000 Whether it be Abbott in Texas, or whether it be, you know, DeSantis, these are governors that are doing things that help their states, and other governors should follow suit.

01:02:02.000 And here's the thing, it's not just the states.

01:02:05.000 The localities have this authority.

01:02:07.000 And so when the localities start to embrace this, that starts to set the tone for the culture in the state or the conversation in the state to make a move at the state.

01:02:15.000 And what we're describing is actually what the Mises Caucus is all about. 0.90

01:02:19.000 We're calling it Project Decentralized Revolution.

01:02:21.000 We're recruiting people to run for city council, mayor, school board, sheriff, judge, to run for these types of offices where you can nullify the federal government from that local level for the specific purpose to nullify The federal government at that level.

01:02:35.000 That's what we're all about.

01:02:37.000 We know that we're not winning Governor and Senate, you know, like we're realistic.

01:02:40.000 But this is what, in my opinion, has to be done.

01:02:44.000 And it kind of brings together both the political solution and the cultural solution, because culture is something that emerges from the ground up.

01:02:52.000 It's not something... they're trying to bring it down from the top, but it's not organic, it's not real.

01:02:57.000 So by Bringing the community together at that local level to make these decisions and insulate ourselves from the insanity of the feds, that I think is the thing that in time can generate the broader conversations.

01:03:08.000 What's the biggest resistance you would find to something like that?

01:03:11.000 Just maybe like one example of the biggest resistance you would find and how you'd face that.

01:03:15.000 The cult mentality that seeks power and the will to dominate.

01:03:19.000 It is the will to dominate, because the thing that people that are against libertarian ideals tend to object to, even if they don't say it, is they can't do things that they want to do that will negatively affect other people.

01:03:34.000 They can't implement this policy or implement this project, and the reason is because it'll affect other people.

01:03:42.000 And so people don't want to vote libertarian if they can't use the government to push other people around.

01:03:47.000 Whether it be push other people around by getting money from the government and having funding, whatever their pet project is, or maybe it's make sure that this person doesn't do a drug that I don't like or doesn't have a lifestyle that I don't like.

01:03:58.000 The will to dominate, libido dominante, is something that is ingrained in A significant portion of humans, probably most humans, and it's a very small portion of people that are like, I really am a live-and-let-live person.

01:04:11.000 And if it wasn't for that fact, that it is a very small portion, you would see more libertarian policies actually in the world.

01:04:18.000 Because everyone says they're libertarian.

01:04:19.000 Everyone says, no, I don't want to, you know, I'm a live-and-let-live kind of guy, until it comes down to actually voting as if you're a live-and-let-live kind of guy.

01:04:26.000 And I just want to plug one resource on this front.

01:04:29.000 The guys over at the 10th Amendment Center, Michael Bolden, Mike Meharry, and the 10thAmendmentCenter.com, they do this work and they track all of these nullification type of bills that are happening at the various states around the country.

01:04:41.000 So there already is that repository and they have sample legislation on their website that anybody can start taking to their city council or to their state rep to do various things from You know, a gun sanctuary where, you know, the state or the locality is going to not comply with federal gun control laws, to the gold and silver repositories, to decriminalization, to the banning of the warrantless use of surveillance technology.

01:05:05.000 All of this stuff can be done.

01:05:06.000 Like, once you realize how short of a list of authority is in Article 1, Section 8, your imagination can run wild on what you can insulate yourself from in your community from the feds.

01:05:16.000 I think that if we got rid of party affiliation on ballots, you'd see a lot of Libertarians in office.

01:05:22.000 Probably.

01:05:23.000 You'd see a lot less Democrats, you'd see a lot of different parties in general.

01:05:28.000 The closest thing that I can say that backs that up is that the majority of victories for big L Libertarians are at the local level and specifically where the state makes it so that local level races don't have party affiliation.

01:05:41.000 Yep.

01:05:42.000 What did they say?

01:05:42.000 Unaffiliated?

01:05:43.000 Yep.

01:05:44.000 Yeah, there's a lot of local politicians that we've talked about who are clearly Democrats, but they're listed as unaffiliated, even though they are members of the Democratic Party and they fundraise with them and things like that.

01:05:55.000 But like you said, so I think, we talked about it before, get rid of D and R and L or whatever, just names.

01:06:02.000 And then let the uninformed voters go in and be confused and vote at random.

01:06:07.000 They'll just check a random box or don't vote.

01:06:09.000 If you don't know who you're voting for, don't vote.

01:06:11.000 You'd see a lot fewer Democratic celebrities getting on television saying, just go out and vote.

01:06:18.000 This is one of my pet peeves.

01:06:20.000 This is one of my pet peeves, right?

01:06:22.000 Every single time you see one of these get out and vote PSAs, it is almost always a spokesperson from the left.

01:06:30.000 And it's because they know the people who are only going out to vote because a celebrity on their television told them to don't know anything and will almost certainly vote Democrat because of that.

01:06:43.000 Get Out the Vote is always targeting people that are uninformed about what they're voting for.

01:06:48.000 Exactly.

01:06:49.000 Let me give one piece of pushback here, and this is an example that maybe this wouldn't work out.

01:06:55.000 So I remember I was working for Maj Torre when he was running for City Council in Philadelphia.

01:07:01.000 Now the rules for City Council in Philadelphia are you have seven at-large positions on the City Council, and any one party is only allowed to have five of those spots, so the two spots are reserved for the minority party.

01:07:12.000 And what happened in that race, this was 2019, is that a couple of Democrats created a fake third party called the People's Party.

01:07:19.000 And, you know, so it wasn't subject to the party line, and yet they got pumped with millions of dollars and almost took all seven spots.

01:07:28.000 They took six, so they took the sixth spot and almost took the seventh spot.

01:07:34.000 Wow.

01:07:37.000 All right.

01:07:38.000 Now that's Philadelphia though.

01:07:41.000 Which brings me to another potential solution.

01:07:43.000 What about the idea of... I don't know if this would require a state constitutional convention, but when you think of the county governments, what would happen if the collective of county polities came together and essentially just pushed out the big cities to be their own self-governing units?

01:08:03.000 Be like, you know, Philadelphia, love the stuff that you produce for us.

01:08:07.000 Don't really like sharing a government with you here in Pennsylvania.

01:08:10.000 We'll have borders with you.

01:08:12.000 You're saying that we should build a wall, but not on the southern border, just around all of the cities?

01:08:16.000 A political wall, yeah.

01:08:18.000 A physical wall.

01:08:19.000 30 feet, no doors.

01:08:23.000 And put a dome on top.

01:08:25.000 Just forget about it and plug your ears when you hear yelling.

01:08:28.000 I've heard people argue for this, right, with Washington D.C.

01:08:31.000 specifically, also with L.A., Chicago as well, right, separating from Illinois.

01:08:40.000 I see many upsides to that.

01:08:44.000 I wonder if it's possible.

01:08:46.000 I mean, normally I would have said, you know, if you asked me a couple years ago, will that ever happen, I would say absolutely not, that's crazy.

01:08:51.000 But so many things that I would not have predicted happening have happened over the past couple years, so it's got to the point really.

01:08:57.000 I don't know, maybe that is possible.

01:08:58.000 Well, we got this story from CNN, ladies and gentlemen.

01:09:02.000 They got him!

01:09:03.000 George Santos charged by Justice Department and Federal Probe.

01:09:07.000 And that's it!

01:09:07.000 We have no information.

01:09:09.000 They say it's sealed.

01:09:10.000 We have no idea why they're charging him.

01:09:11.000 So there you go.

01:09:13.000 Spokespeople for the Brooklyn U.S.

01:09:14.000 Attorney's Office declined to comment.

01:09:16.000 It's a sealed indictment.

01:09:18.000 And that's it.

01:09:19.000 This is the guy who, I guess they say, lied about everything to get elected and he was actually a drag queen or something.

01:09:24.000 One of the guys that lied about everything to get elected.

01:09:27.000 One of 435.

01:09:29.000 This is how they're gonna get the house back.

01:09:33.000 Just a series of sealed indictments.

01:09:36.000 They're gonna start indicting everybody for fraud, being like, you lied to get elected.

01:09:39.000 Yeah, that's the job description.

01:09:42.000 Look, I'm pro Santos, man.

01:09:43.000 That guy lied so much, and then lied in such a spectacularly hilarious way.

01:09:48.000 But how do you know he lied?

01:09:49.000 Okay, well then I would be less pro Santos if he didn't lie.

01:09:53.000 To be honest, the deciding factor is the lies.

01:09:56.000 There's this picture of a drag queen in Brazil, and they're like, that's him?

01:09:59.000 And I'm like, I don't know, that's him?

01:10:02.000 Like, it's a drag.

01:10:03.000 It's a drag queen wearing a bunch of makeup and a costume. 1.00

01:10:04.000 I mean, it might be.

01:10:05.000 I don't know.

01:10:06.000 Whatever makes the story more hilarious, I'm for.

01:10:08.000 Yeah, this is the thing they do.

01:10:10.000 It's like, yo, if I go online, I can find a picture that looks like Phil and then be like, here's Phil riding a giraffe in, you know, Africa or whatever.

01:10:17.000 And people are going to be like, that does kind of look like him.

01:10:20.000 And then all the other stories, they're like, is it true you didn't actually do this thing or that thing?

01:10:24.000 And I'm like, look, I don't know what he did or didn't lie about, I'm just saying, like, if someone says 20 years ago, if I came out and was like, 20 years ago I was riding my bike and I did a bar spin.

01:10:34.000 And then you're like, that's a lie, Tim doesn't ride bikes.

01:10:36.000 You know what I mean?

01:10:37.000 Like, how do you know I didn't do it?

01:10:38.000 How do you verify these things?

01:10:40.000 You know what I mean?

01:10:42.000 That guy is supposed to be a Brazilian cross-dresser?

01:10:44.000 Yeah.

01:10:45.000 Nah, they got pretty convincing ladyboys over there. 1.00

01:10:47.000 That guy wouldn't make the cut.

01:10:49.000 I don't know, they all claimed that he was.

01:10:50.000 I looked up, look, I got the Snopes article to fact check it, and I'm not seeing a conclusive answer in the Snopes article.

01:10:58.000 Was Rep George Santos a drag queen in Brazil? 0.94

01:11:01.000 And they don't actually say.

01:11:02.000 Look, they don't tell you.

01:11:04.000 The one time we needed them most, they disappeared.

01:11:08.000 Where's the fact check at the bottom?

01:11:09.000 Tell us!

01:11:09.000 Look at this, they're claiming this is it, like what?

01:11:13.000 There's actually, there's a better picture of him alleged to be.

01:11:17.000 Well, not in the Snopes article.

01:11:19.000 Even Snopes couldn't confirm it.

01:11:22.000 YouTube video.

01:11:22.000 Oh wait, hold on.

01:11:24.000 Let me see.

01:11:25.000 New York.

01:11:25.000 Betcha he drinks Bud Light.

01:11:29.000 Maybe.

01:11:31.000 Speaking of pictures that look kinda like me, there's a kid that actually put up a picture of someone that he thought looked like me.

01:11:38.000 He's like, this isn't Phil LaBonte, but it made me remember how much I hate Phil LaBonte.

01:11:42.000 So you're right, there are plenty of pictures out there that will remind someone of someone else enough.

01:11:48.000 Or like Clint and Fred Durst.

01:11:50.000 Oh yeah!

01:11:52.000 So this is the picture.

01:11:54.000 They're saying Performa Eula Rochards provided Sina with this image of a person she claims is George Santos.

01:12:00.000 I hope it's real.

01:12:01.000 I just don't think it's him.

01:12:03.000 That does not look like the Freshmaker to me. 0.99

01:12:05.000 I don't know.

01:12:06.000 I don't know, man.

01:12:09.000 I want to believe.

01:12:10.000 I mean, maybe, but the nose is different.

01:12:13.000 He's got a round nose.

01:12:15.000 This one's got, you know, the nose is a little wider at the base.

01:12:20.000 Maybe.

01:12:20.000 I just don't believe it.

01:12:21.000 Could you imagine?

01:12:22.000 And look at the lips.

01:12:23.000 His lips are way different!

01:12:25.000 This is crazy.

01:12:25.000 And he denies it.

01:12:27.000 Strongly denying claims that he once performed it.

01:12:28.000 The most recent obsession with the media claiming I'm a drag queen and performed as a drag queen is categorically false.

01:12:32.000 And they just go with it!

01:12:34.000 And then people just claim it's true.

01:12:35.000 This is... I just think it's nuts.

01:12:37.000 You can't just take a picture of somebody and be like, that's him.

01:12:40.000 And you're like, how do I know that?

01:12:42.000 So wait a minute, is he being indicted for being a Brazilian cross-dresser?

01:12:45.000 No, we don't know why he's being indicted.

01:12:46.000 But people need to understand this too.

01:12:50.000 Anybody who's ever seen a celebrity walking down the street, you're like, is that him?

01:12:54.000 I can't tell.

01:12:55.000 Because when they're doing movies or doing TV shows, the angles are all different.

01:12:59.000 One of the biggest tricks in media that confuses people is that cameras are typically held at chest height, like right below your ribcage.

01:13:09.000 And so this makes everybody look really tall.

01:13:11.000 So when you're watching a TV show, men and women look tall because the perspective you have is looking up at them.

01:13:17.000 Then you meet them in real life and you're like, this dude's very short.

01:13:20.000 Women especially. 0.98

01:13:21.000 They film women from a low angle and it makes them look like they're tall and then you meet them in real life and they're like, this lady's five foot tall! 1.00

01:13:26.000 So that's what happens with a lot of these politicians too.

01:13:29.000 You meet them and you're like, I didn't realize.

01:13:31.000 So, I don't know.

01:13:32.000 Why do you like this guy, Phil?

01:13:34.000 What about?

01:13:34.000 Just because he lied his way into Congress.

01:13:38.000 For no other reason.

01:13:39.000 Just because you like every politician.

01:13:41.000 I just don't understand how that separates him.

01:13:43.000 He so blatantly lied.

01:13:46.000 Like, he told people that he was Jew-ish.

01:13:50.000 He was telling people that he had, like, a grandmother that died in the Holocaust, and then he came back and said, no, no, I never said that.

01:13:58.000 I said that I'm Jew-ish.

01:13:59.000 I'm kind of.

01:14:00.000 That was good.

01:14:02.000 All sorts of really, really, really big whoppers.

01:14:06.000 Like, absurd whoppers that make it, alright, you're really putting it on my back.

01:14:10.000 You gotta be a Pocahontas fan, then.

01:14:12.000 Yeah. 0.90

01:14:13.000 Remember when that lady claimed that Kavanaugh was gang raping women in college? 0.98

01:14:18.000 Yes. 0.73

01:14:19.000 And they all just run the story and they believe it?

01:14:21.000 Well, with that story, not only do they not have evidence, the evidence actually pointed in the opposite direction.

01:14:26.000 Like, there were people who were at the party where this supposedly occurred saying that didn't happen.

01:14:30.000 Well, that was the first story.

01:14:32.000 The first story was when she claimed that he pinned her to a bed or something and then rolled around.

01:14:37.000 But, like, even that story that she told, I'm like, so wait.

01:14:41.000 She was at a party, and she was upstairs, and there were two guys, and he threw her on the bed and jumped on her, and then the other guy jumped on him, and they rolled around laughing and giggling.

01:14:49.000 And that's her, like, rape story. 1.00

01:14:52.000 That was the story, I guess.

01:14:53.000 He, like, jumped on the bed, and then the friend jumped on him.

01:14:56.000 I don't remember.

01:14:56.000 I thought she accused him of something pretty serious, but I just remember that the evidence of... The eyewitness testimony of people who were actually there at the event did not corroborate her story.

01:15:07.000 The first, so that was, I think that was Swetnick or whatever, that was, first you had Christine Blasey Ford and she was like, I was at a party, we went upstairs, he jumped on me on the bed and held me down, then his friend jumped on him and then knocked him over and then they rolled around and then I left.

01:15:19.000 But none of the people at that party remember him being there, even her friend.

01:15:22.000 She's like, I don't know what she's talking about, that never happened.

01:15:24.000 And then she lied about everything.

01:15:26.000 She lied about, she's like, I'm scared to travel.

01:15:28.000 And they're like, you've gone on vacation several times on planes.

01:15:30.000 And she's like, oh.

01:15:30.000 And she's like, I have to have two doors to my house because I'm so scared.

01:15:33.000 And they're like, you Airbnb'd that one.

01:15:34.000 Like, you're renting it out.

01:15:36.000 It's just, none of it was true.

01:15:38.000 And then it was the other woman who claimed at a party Brett Kavanaugh would, and the boys would have gangbangs where they would kidnap a woman and lock her in a room and then line up outside the door and take turns.

01:15:48.000 Like these things don't happen!

01:15:50.000 These people just make things up and then they believe it!

01:15:54.000 That's modern politics for you.

01:15:55.000 And then the BBC is like, we believe it's true, and Tim Pool's wrong!

01:15:59.000 Do you think it's starting to happen where we don't believe it, though?

01:16:03.000 Yeah, absolutely.

01:16:05.000 Take the Trump story.

01:16:07.000 Does it really feel like there's momentum behind that story?

01:16:12.000 You were saying that you're not even following it, you're on this show every day.

01:16:16.000 I feel like it's worn out, the whole wild claims thing.

01:16:21.000 That's why I'm saying, like, it's getting really hard to care, to be honest.

01:16:24.000 Like, we're in freefall, there's no southern border, the economy is imploding, and then this stuff, I'm just kind of like... 0.98

01:16:31.000 Look, culturally, I think people have just said, shut your mouths to the psychopaths. 1.00

01:16:37.000 Just shut up. 1.00

01:16:38.000 Don't I hear it? 0.99

01:16:39.000 And then what can you really do as the economy is crumbling?

01:16:41.000 Get out of cities.

01:16:44.000 You know?

01:16:45.000 It's the land of confusion.

01:16:47.000 Isn't it wild how we're talking about some pretty heinous stuff?

01:16:51.000 And some of it's like, I don't know if I really care.

01:16:55.000 I don't know if I can follow along with all of it.

01:16:57.000 I don't know how much of it I actually believe.

01:16:59.000 It's burnout, man.

01:17:00.000 And it's every single day.

01:17:02.000 It's several stories every single day that you would imagine are huge, but now it's just like, it's just too much.

01:17:08.000 I don't know if I even care anymore.

01:17:11.000 That's the collapse.

01:17:12.000 That's it.

01:17:13.000 And they almost never pay any kind of price for lying, right?

01:17:17.000 I mean, in the case of Sandman, you know, he was able to sue them and then they settled out of court.

01:17:23.000 And I think some say that Rittenhouse has launched some lawsuits and Potentially he'll get some money out of them, but for the most part they just lie constantly and they basically never pay any price for it.

01:17:35.000 Deferred liability.

01:17:36.000 It's like these articles and stuff like that.

01:17:39.000 If you word it in such a way, well it's actually even what Tucker was even saying, like you can say something that could hold up, a lawyer would sign off on it, but it's really misleading.

01:17:48.000 It's not really pointing you in the right direction.

01:17:50.000 And he could have given a better example.

01:17:51.000 You know, it's like if I said a guy was arrested, you know, in charge of the crime, unjustly, you might say, okay, that may be true, we don't know, but then if I were to admit that he was arrested six times previously for the same crime, now I'm misleading you.

01:18:05.000 There's better examples.

01:18:06.000 The example I like to give is quotes.

01:18:08.000 They do this all the time.

01:18:10.000 Oh yeah.

01:18:11.000 Like when they, when they attributed Seamus' statement to Ian.

01:18:14.000 To Ian.

01:18:14.000 Yeah, Jezebel did that.

01:18:15.000 They literally took a statement right from me.

01:18:17.000 One of my greatest hits. 1.00

01:18:19.000 A based and red-pilled quote about how horrible and stupid no-fault divorce is. 0.99

01:18:23.000 And they gave it to Ian Crosland. 1.00

01:18:25.000 But they do a thing where- Right before my eyes.

01:18:27.000 Here's a better way to explain how the media lies.

01:18:30.000 Seamus will say, I once heard Phil Labonte claim that he prefers chocolate ice cream over strawberry.

01:18:38.000 Phil Labonte said to me, I like chocolate ice cream more than I like strawberry ice cream.

01:18:42.000 They would then say, Seamus Coghlan said, quote, I like, because you did say those words, it is literally true, and if you sued, you wouldn't win.

01:18:51.000 Because they'd be like, Seamus literally said those words, we quoted him.

01:18:53.000 Even though the context was, it was someone else you were repeating.

01:18:57.000 Exactly.

01:18:57.000 I mean, they're using their language to communicate a non-truth, which is lying, but you're right, that in a literal sense, technically they can say you did it.

01:19:07.000 Factual, but not truthful.

01:19:08.000 Magazines have been doing that.

01:19:10.000 Like, there was this one, and I might have just heard this as an example, but it was like, Michael Jackson and Faye Dunaway get married.

01:19:17.000 They did, but not to each other.

01:19:20.000 That's great, yeah.

01:19:22.000 That's a good one.

01:19:23.000 It's all very postmodern.

01:19:25.000 We could use that.

01:19:26.000 So let's look for a celebrity who just got married. 0.96

01:19:29.000 Let me see if I can do a quick Google search.

01:19:32.000 And then use mid-journey to put their pictures together.

01:19:36.000 Oh my goodness.

01:19:37.000 Celebrity weddings of 2023, seven hours ago.

01:19:40.000 Who got married?

01:19:41.000 All right, so I got this article and this one's gonna be fun.

01:19:46.000 Sia got married, okay, and also Luke, I don't know who those people are, so okay, so Sia, right?

01:19:55.000 You know Sia, right? 0.97

01:19:56.000 The musician.

01:19:57.000 Swing from the chandelier.

01:19:58.000 Let's just try and find Simone Biles. 1.00

01:20:02.000 Well, there we go.

01:20:02.000 Sia and Simone Biles have gotten married.

01:20:03.000 I like it.

01:20:05.000 2023.

01:20:05.000 Can you believe it?

01:20:06.000 That Sia and Simone Biles got married.

01:20:09.000 Some mighty fine reporting there, Tim.

01:20:11.000 I try to be a white pillar, and I don't want to say that there's no consequences to them lying.

01:20:16.000 You know what I think the consequences of them lying are?

01:20:18.000 The success of this show.

01:20:20.000 The success that Tucker Carlson is about to have outside of the system.

01:20:27.000 The success of Joe Rogan and Patrick Bette David and Dave Smith and all of this stuff.

01:20:32.000 And I think the other cost is kind of the conversation that we're having right now, like, yeah, I don't believe that rape story.

01:20:38.000 Here we go.

01:20:39.000 Abigail Breslin and Buzz Aldrin got married.

01:20:44.000 Those are factual statements, but I never said to each other.

01:20:48.000 So just to respond to what you're saying, I totally agree with that.

01:20:51.000 And I think the fact that there's real competition is a massive white pill.

01:20:56.000 My point about them not facing consequences is that there's no consequence from within their own structure.

01:21:01.000 So they don't have any incentive to tell the truth in their own institution, but you're correct that if you look

01:21:06.000 outside of the institution There are very good reasons why they should start telling

01:21:10.000 the truth about things if they want to be successful But they're more interested in promoting their narrative

01:21:15.000 than they are and they're completely Trapped within their dying model and their dying paradigm

01:21:20.000 because like what was it like maybe six months ago that CNN tried to do that

01:21:23.000 CNN plus about a year ago now. Yeah, actually Time flies.

01:21:27.000 I think it was a little over a year ago, right?

01:21:31.000 It crashed and burned instantly.

01:21:33.000 It was so bad.

01:21:34.000 I saw the billboard in LA and then it was just gone.

01:21:37.000 They had to sell it.

01:21:40.000 What that seems like to me is short-term gain over long-term gain.

01:21:44.000 These institutions, they'll still use these old tricks because there's short-term gain.

01:21:50.000 It worked on the Boomers, but us Wiley, Gen Xers, and Millennials... Time preference, we love Hopper. 0.89

01:21:57.000 You need a better mousetrap there, Propagandists. 0.97

01:22:01.000 So who did George Santos just marry then?

01:22:04.000 Yeah, we gotta figure that out.

01:22:06.000 They have to at least get married to somebody for me to claim they got married. 0.93

01:22:09.000 Yeah, that's true.

01:22:10.000 So, it is what it is, but Buzz Aldrin got married.

01:22:13.000 So basically, anybody, right now, guys listening, if anybody you know gets married, if like, if you have like a friend named, you know, Sarah Smith, you can be like, you know, Sarah Smith and Buzz Aldrin got married.

01:22:22.000 And they'll be like, what?

01:22:24.000 To Buzz Aldrin?

01:22:25.000 You'll be like, huh?

01:22:26.000 No, they got married.

01:22:27.000 Not to each other.

01:22:27.000 You can just say those things now.

01:22:29.000 That's how the media works.

01:22:30.000 That's a good one, by the way.

01:22:32.000 It is.

01:22:32.000 That's a great one.

01:22:33.000 There's other examples like that that you could just pair up.

01:22:36.000 Like, you know, these two things happened in the same year or on the same day and you'd somehow merge them together.

01:22:42.000 Yeah, like we could say something like, um, Tucker Carlson announces new show on Twitter shortly after Vladimir Putin places nuclear weapons in southern Belarus.

01:22:53.000 It's like as if to imply they're related or something.

01:22:55.000 True story.

01:22:56.000 Yeah.

01:22:56.000 And you're like, what do those things have to do with each other?

01:22:59.000 Well, you gotta read the rest of the article.

01:23:02.000 Well, you know, after Tucker heard about this, he said, I gotta get out, I gotta get back on the air and I gotta talk about this, you know?

01:23:07.000 And there you go.

01:23:09.000 I mean, that is the implication with Tucker and Elon, though.

01:23:11.000 They had a meeting.

01:23:12.000 And after the meeting, he's like, hey, I'm doing a show on Twitter.

01:23:14.000 And then Elon's like, we don't have a contract.

01:23:15.000 So it's like, there's the real inference, you know?

01:23:19.000 How many interviews did Tucker do since he left?

01:23:22.000 Because I knew he was just on Michael Knowles, right?

01:23:24.000 Did he do Knowles?

01:23:25.000 No, I don't think he did any show.

01:23:28.000 I could have sworn I saw a piece with him on Michael Knowles' show.

01:23:32.000 Maybe it was before the whole thing went down, but... Yeah, I don't know.

01:23:38.000 Because he was talking about Building 7.

01:23:41.000 Tucker was.

01:23:41.000 And he was saying how, like, you can talk about Flat Earth because no one will believe you, but ask some questions about Building 7 and you'll get fired for that.

01:23:49.000 That was on Michael Knowles.

01:23:51.000 Wow.

01:23:52.000 I don't think so.

01:23:55.000 No?

01:23:55.000 I don't think Tucker did an interview with anybody yet.

01:23:57.000 Oh, you got deepfaked.

01:23:58.000 No, because, I mean, I could be wrong, but my understanding was that he still works for Fox News.

01:24:04.000 He is still a contracted employee of Fox News, so he's still...

01:24:10.000 It's no different than when he had a show.

01:24:11.000 They just took his show away.

01:24:13.000 Interesting.

01:24:13.000 That's gonna bug me.

01:24:14.000 I don't know.

01:24:15.000 What are people saying in the chat?

01:24:17.000 They're saying it was Tulsi Gabbard.

01:24:19.000 He did a show on Tulsi Gabbard?

01:24:21.000 That would make sense.

01:24:21.000 I mean, they're friends, right?

01:24:22.000 But I saw Michael Mills' face responding and reacting to it.

01:24:26.000 Maybe he's playing a clip.

01:24:27.000 Yeah, he could've clipped that.

01:24:29.000 Yeah, yeah.

01:24:29.000 Okay.

01:24:30.000 Maybe.

01:24:30.000 I'd imagine so.

01:24:31.000 So Tucker appeared.

01:24:34.000 She did a show with... Wait. 1.00

01:24:36.000 I saw that on YouTube.

01:24:37.000 I swear I saw something the other day.

01:24:38.000 That she had Tucker Carlson on her show?

01:24:40.000 I think something like that, yeah.

01:24:42.000 I don't know.

01:24:44.000 No, I think people are wrong.

01:24:45.000 This looks like old clips from Fox News she put on her channel.

01:24:48.000 Oh, okay.

01:24:49.000 Yeah.

01:24:50.000 No idea.

01:24:51.000 Tucker didn't do an interview with Michael Knowles.

01:24:53.000 He did it with Tulsi Gabbard.

01:24:55.000 But where did they do it?

01:24:56.000 Because on Tulsi's channel, I don't see it.

01:24:59.000 Is it here?

01:24:59.000 What am I looking at?

01:25:00.000 I saw a clip from it, but I'm not sure where she posted it.

01:25:03.000 That's what I saw too, I think.

01:25:05.000 No idea.

01:25:06.000 I see stuff from like two or three weeks ago with Tucker.

01:25:09.000 He was on Redacted?

01:25:11.000 What is Redacted?

01:25:14.000 I think people are saying also he was on Milk Boys, too.

01:25:17.000 Trump was on Milk Boys a while ago, as well.

01:25:18.000 I think that might be right.

01:25:20.000 Basically, Tucker was on every single show.

01:25:23.000 Just name a show he was on it.

01:25:24.000 It's Schrodinger's Tucker Carlson.

01:25:29.000 Oh, that's the Full Sun podcast, right?

01:25:31.000 Yes, Nelk Boys is full send.

01:25:34.000 By the way, the Trump one is pretty good.

01:25:35.000 Oh yeah, looks like someone... Did they have Tucker Carlson?

01:25:40.000 That was a month ago.

01:25:42.000 Hmm.

01:25:42.000 Uh, yes.

01:25:43.000 Yeah.

01:25:43.000 So these are, these are old, like after, after the, the, the firing is the, is the question.

01:25:49.000 Did it happen?

01:25:49.000 You know what I mean?

01:25:51.000 Yeah.

01:25:52.000 No idea.

01:25:53.000 No idea.

01:25:54.000 But, um, I don't know, man, it's just, it's, it, it really is.

01:25:58.000 Sometimes I wake up and I, and this morning I see this story about the border is completely open, just, just gone.

01:26:03.000 And I'm like, but it's been gone.

01:26:05.000 You know what I mean?

01:26:05.000 Like, have we, do we really believe there was anything going on with the border?

01:26:08.000 But Tim, hold on.

01:26:09.000 Have you considered that a nation fulfilling its primary definitional duty of protecting the border is mean?

01:26:17.000 One more time?

01:26:18.000 Have you considered that a nation fulfilling the most basic duty of a nation or government by protecting its border is mean?

01:26:26.000 It's very mean.

01:26:27.000 Yeah.

01:26:27.000 Come on, don't you know anything?

01:26:28.000 It triggers me.

01:26:29.000 Yeah.

01:26:30.000 Have you considered that you're bad?

01:26:34.000 The fact that the federal government has three Like, real jobs.

01:26:40.000 Provide courts for regressive grievance, protect the borders, and protect the rights of the citizens.

01:26:49.000 And stop misgendering.

01:26:50.000 I am shocked at this blue-pilledness that you think that the stated purpose is actually the goal.

01:26:55.000 And they can't even protect the borders.

01:26:58.000 Yeah. 0.96

01:27:00.000 It's ridiculous. 0.96

01:27:01.000 It's intentional. 0.89

01:27:02.000 They used to.

01:27:03.000 Obama was Deporter-in-Chief, remember?

01:27:05.000 Back in the day?

01:27:05.000 But didn't they change the definition of deportation right before he took office to make it seem like he deported more than he actually did?

01:27:11.000 They've changed the definition of everything else.

01:27:13.000 Yeah, well, because I think it used to be you actually had to round someone up and send them out of the country for it to be considered a deportation, but then under Obama what they said was people who were sent away, who came to the border and were sent back were counted as deportations.

01:27:25.000 Sounds like something you'd do.

01:27:27.000 He also set up those concentration camps that AOC was so concerned about.

01:27:30.000 Those cages.

01:27:31.000 But didn't care until Donald Trump became president.

01:27:34.000 Most of the arguments that you see in politics are just fallacies created to attack their opponents, the political opponents, more so than anything of substance.

01:27:45.000 Very rarely do you have politicians that are actually talking about things of substance, and that's something that Tucker Carlson talks about a lot.

01:27:53.000 He made a remark that, I think in the last video that he put up, that the most important things that you can talk about, like war, the economy, etc.

01:28:03.000 Those are things you're not really allowed to have any kind of dissenting opinion on.

01:28:07.000 And if you do, then you get things like booted out of your job or whatever.

01:28:13.000 You know, back to the fact that Tucker's going on to Twitter, I think, again, it reaffirms that, to me, this is a really good thing.

01:28:20.000 You've got Elon Musk, who, ostensibly, is looking to have the most honest platform out there.

01:28:28.000 I mean, Community Notes does it all the time.

01:28:31.000 Community Notes will tell you if an ad Is BSing.

01:28:36.000 You know, you can get a community note on advertisements.

01:28:40.000 So even if you don't like Tucker Carlson or even if you don't like Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson being on Twitter with community notes means if Tucker Carlson lies or tells something that isn't true, It can be refuted with community notes.

01:28:58.000 The left thinking that that's a bad thing, or the left not en masse trying to get onto Twitter to make sure that they're able to have a voice, it'll be a bad thing for the left.

01:29:11.000 If they don't come to Twitter and refute the things that Tucker says.

01:29:16.000 And as far as I'm concerned, fine, because generally I find myself agreeing with Tucker Carlson most of the time.

01:29:24.000 And I have a significant, we'll call it distaste, for the far left.

01:29:30.000 But, you know, walk away and let us go ahead and have the floor and control the narrative.

01:29:38.000 I don't mind that at all.

01:29:40.000 So there's this, one of the articles that we pulled up from the Free Beacon, apparently people think that George Santos and Gretchen Whitmer are the same person.

01:29:48.000 So that's one, you know.

01:29:50.000 Yeah.

01:29:51.000 George Santos in drag, George Santos, Gretchen Whitmer, they're all the same person.

01:29:55.000 Dude, listen.

01:29:56.000 Maybe she should be indicted. 0.99

01:29:57.000 Here's the thing.

01:29:58.000 The deepfake thing is going to make this so much easier.

01:30:00.000 A few years ago there was a picture that went viral of Richard Dawkins and who's the one who played the girl in Harry Potter?

01:30:13.000 There's a picture that went viral of Richard Dawkins and Emma Watson side by side, where their faces look very, very similar.

01:30:18.000 It looks like they're almost identical.

01:30:20.000 But what someone actually did was slightly manipulated both of their faces so that they looked more similar to each other.

01:30:27.000 But for a while, people were going, oh my gosh, Emma Watson and Richard Dawkins look so similar.

01:30:31.000 That's going to be really easy to pull off with AI.

01:30:34.000 People are going to start doing that and conflating a picture of one person with a picture of another person or just generating completely fake images of people at like drag shows or whatever.

01:30:42.000 I'm going to get fact-checked by Snopes.

01:30:44.000 They're going to say, did Donald Trump run through D.C.

01:30:46.000 with signed to Hedgehog?

01:30:47.000 False.

01:30:47.000 Tim Poole is fake news.

01:30:49.000 Did Donald Trump team up with signed to Hedgehog?

01:30:51.000 False.

01:30:52.000 Tim Pool, AI generated that picture.

01:30:54.000 Sonic the Hedgehog is not real.

01:30:55.000 At some point, the only way people are going to be able to know something is real is if it came from your account.

01:31:00.000 And even then, you could be lying.

01:31:02.000 Or someone could make a fake account that looks just like yours and then they can buy verification or something.

01:31:06.000 That begs the question of, in the AI space, is there any kind of corresponding growth in Detection for what is AI because there's some real dark side to all of this stuff, too Like imagine imagine, you know, you're married and then all of a sudden there's deep fake porn of you quote-unquote cheating on your wife You know, I mean that could get real crazy real fast or imagine a guy cheats on his wife And then the wife finds video is like honey.

01:31:28.000 That's a that's a deep thing.

01:31:29.000 That's not real.

01:31:30.000 Oh It's going to be so easy to gaslight people as this AI stuff grows.

01:31:34.000 I'm like, that's, no, that chat GPT made that.

01:31:36.000 But that's what I'm saying.

01:31:37.000 Is there any kind of like, uh, corresponding technology where it's like, this was AI generated?

01:31:43.000 I'm sure there will be AIs that will, I think there might be AIs that will be able to tell you.

01:31:48.000 I don't know, man.

01:31:49.000 We're getting dangerously close to that point where you can make fake historical photographs that look real.

01:31:55.000 And slightly alter it in such a way that people will think it's the real photo.

01:31:59.000 So, take a picture of Donald Trump doing something, and then alter it in such a way that it's a little bit worse than it really was.

01:32:07.000 Everybody eats it up.

01:32:08.000 And you were even saying that the scariest thing isn't going, like, hog wild on the deepfake.

01:32:13.000 It's much more about changing one word.

01:32:15.000 Like, slightly changing the context or making it sound like they used a derogatory term in the midst of a speech that they actually gave.

01:32:15.000 Yeah.

01:32:23.000 Because then everyone's gonna be like, we know the speech happened, but which one's the real one?

01:32:27.000 Mm-hmm.

01:32:28.000 If you do a fake video of, like, Donald Trump punching a baby, no one believes it.

01:32:31.000 Yeah.

01:32:32.000 Donald Trump running with Sonic the Hedgehog in D.C.

01:32:34.000 Some people might fall for it.

01:32:35.000 I get that.

01:32:35.000 Yeah, I believe that.

01:32:36.000 I thought that was real at first.

01:32:37.000 Shamus thought it was real, and he was freaking out.

01:32:38.000 So you showed me the one where they were shaking hands, and I was almost like that was real, but then I noticed Sonic wasn't wearing any gloves, and I was like, Sonic always wears gloves.

01:32:45.000 You can see his fingernails.

01:32:46.000 Yeah, I was like, that's fake.

01:32:47.000 But that one you did almost get me.

01:32:50.000 But then someone's gonna make a picture of Donald Trump yelling or something and people will think it's real.

01:32:55.000 Or, like you said, changing a minor word here and there with the audio technology or the voice synthesizers.

01:33:02.000 Yeah, like the Very Fine People hoax.

01:33:04.000 They'll change him saying, and I'm not talking about the white nationalists or the neo-Nazis because they should be condemned totally.

01:33:10.000 They'll change it to him saying, because some of them should be condemned totally so that They can be like, I know this what you're talking about, I did hear it, and he said some of them.

01:33:18.000 And you'll say, no, he said they, and then they'll play the clip, and you'll be like, which one's the real one?

01:33:22.000 And they both look identical, they both say CBS, and then they're gonna be like, I know Trump is bad, he said some of them.

01:33:29.000 I know he did not come out and praise them, that's crazy, but he did say some of them because he thought some were okay. 0.98

01:33:35.000 Well, also, even with just the way they decide to parse out the grammar of it, when he said, they're not sending their best, we've talked about this on the show before, they're not sending their best, they're sending their, what did he say, criminals, robbers, et cetera, they're murderers, and then they're rapists, as in clearly they are sending their rapists, but they translate it as they are rapists. 0.98

01:33:57.000 Trump said Mexicans are rapists, like, what? 0.98

01:34:00.000 Do you think, like, yes, he gave a campaign speech and he's like, do you know what I think of all Mexicans? 1.00

01:34:06.000 It's just the most ludicrous thing, yeah, the most ludicrous thing in the world. 0.99

01:34:10.000 Alright, we're gonna go to Super Chats!

01:34:11.000 So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com by clicking that Join Us button.

01:34:16.000 We're gonna have members-only uncensored show coming up for you at 10, 10 p.m.

01:34:19.000 Eastern Time.

01:34:20.000 You don't wanna miss it, it's gonna be a lot of fun.

01:34:21.000 And if you are a member, you can submit questions and even call into the show and talk to us and our guests.

01:34:25.000 But now, we will slowly and calmly read your Super Chats.

01:34:31.000 Drive-by commenter says, I don't know if you guys discussed this, but researchers are able to use MRIs with generative AI to read people's thoughts with 82% accuracy.

01:34:41.000 What?

01:34:42.000 Put Seamus in there.

01:34:43.000 Repeat that.

01:34:44.000 We're going to put Seamus in that machine, and then we're going to go on the mic.

01:34:48.000 Seamus?

01:34:49.000 Pop-Tart.

01:34:50.000 And then they're going to be like, he's thinking about watermelons.

01:34:53.000 So wait a minute, it does what with 82% accuracy?

01:34:56.000 Reads your mind.

01:34:57.000 What?

01:34:59.000 What kind of image do you think you're looking at?

01:35:01.000 This is gonna save so many relationships.

01:35:03.000 Where do you want to eat, honey?

01:35:05.000 And then you just put the AI on her head and it's like, oh, Denny's, okay.

01:35:09.000 They're gonna have to miniaturize MRI so that way you can actually have it in the car or something like that.

01:35:14.000 It'll send a text to your phone of the image that she's thinking of.

01:35:17.000 Right.

01:35:17.000 It's scary to think that the intelligence applications of all of this stuff have probably been plotted out for years.

01:35:22.000 Oh, that's a good point.

01:35:23.000 Yeah, they already know exactly how they're going to use this to screw us.

01:35:26.000 Yeah, the intelligence applications were the inspiration to start the research in the first place.

01:35:30.000 Oh, yeah.

01:35:31.000 All of this converges on sentient world simulation.

01:35:34.000 Look it up.

01:35:36.000 Alright, what do we got here?

01:35:36.000 Oof.

01:35:37.000 I will look that up.

01:35:38.000 I'm looking.

01:35:38.000 Gret, Chet says, shoutout to Chicken City, buck buck cluckers.

01:35:42.000 The other night, I noticed the light was on, and I went out and looked, and some of the chickens were outside.

01:35:47.000 Like, in the outer area.

01:35:50.000 Sleeping.

01:35:50.000 And I'm like, why didn't they go inside?

01:35:52.000 There's a little door that opens with the sun, and then goes down at sunset.

01:35:56.000 And the chickens, they go home.

01:35:58.000 But these chickens, they didn't go home.

01:36:00.000 Why?

01:36:01.000 No idea.

01:36:02.000 Anyway, where are we at?

01:36:06.000 Tuma says to the guest, is there other branches of the caucus in other states?

01:36:11.000 Oh, yeah.

01:36:12.000 So there is a 50 state apparatus.

01:36:15.000 We have 250 state organizers and thousands of volunteers under us.

01:36:20.000 And so if you were to go to TakeHumanAction.com and sign up, they would contact you and get you involved.

01:36:27.000 Well, right on.

01:36:29.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.

01:36:30.000 says, Tim, once the right stops giving an ish, what the freak cult says or thinks about them, victory will come much faster.

01:36:36.000 Let them ruin themselves, a wise beanie man once said, don't know, don't care.

01:36:42.000 I do say that.

01:36:43.000 I do say that.

01:36:44.000 Soleil Cucumber Lime says, let's effing go, MAGA 2024-7.

01:36:50.000 Slash seven.

01:36:51.000 I think that picture of Trump shaking hands with Sonic the Hedgehog is the energy we need for 2024.

01:36:57.000 I made that image because Seamus suggested a different image that MidJourney wouldn't let me make because it broke its rules.

01:37:03.000 No, you, dude, we made, we made so many insane images over the weekend.

01:37:07.000 We were at, we, yeah.

01:37:09.000 And then Seamus suggested one and I typed it in and it said, you have, you are breaking the rules.

01:37:12.000 I don't remember which one.

01:37:13.000 Well, yeah, remind me up here because I genuinely don't remember which one.

01:37:16.000 It's not something I can probably, probably be appropriate for families. 0.95

01:37:19.000 Seamus had a dirty mind. 0.92

01:37:20.000 He was like, do this one. 0.99

01:37:21.000 And I was like, okay.

01:37:23.000 No, no, no.

01:37:25.000 Well, you did pregnant Donald Trump. 1.00

01:37:27.000 And then I was like, hey, so he did pregnant Trump and he had a pregnant Trump. 0.68

01:37:32.000 I was like, I was like, do pregnant Trump.

01:37:33.000 And like Sonic is the dad standing next to him or something like that.

01:37:37.000 And it was I don't remember the Sonic is the dad.

01:37:40.000 Is that the one I tried?

01:37:41.000 No, that one worked.

01:37:42.000 And all I did was make a picture of Trump as Sonic.

01:37:46.000 That's right!

01:37:47.000 Chris searched for pregnant Trump and made it. 1.00

01:37:51.000 It can happen now.

01:37:52.000 And then I did morbidly obese Joe Biden, 700 feet tall, crushing New York City, and it made it.

01:37:57.000 It was this big, massive Joe Biden just crushing buildings.

01:38:00.000 There was no reason for our minds to have access to this technology.

01:38:05.000 We were coming up with some absurd nonsense.

01:38:08.000 I'll mention the members only exactly what Seamus suggested I do, and it told me it broke the rules.

01:38:14.000 I don't even remember what it was.

01:38:16.000 And then what we're going to talk about for the members only is we have this leftist anti-police protester was going to an anti-police protest and was killed.

01:38:24.000 I think that's what the story was.

01:38:25.000 She died in a robbery or something like that.

01:38:26.000 It's a tragic story, but it's like, you know, we got to address why probably, probably shouldn't get rid of the police, you know, like maybe reform and stuff like that.

01:38:35.000 But, you know, but we'll mention the members only exactly what Seamus recommended I search for and why it didn't work.

01:38:43.000 Alright, Dave says, Mike, can you speak to what's happening in Michigan's Libertarian Party?

01:38:46.000 The fraudulent board continues to raise funds and purport to be legitimate despite the LNC's statement to the contrary.

01:38:52.000 God, this is getting into, uh, inside baseball.

01:38:56.000 But, um...

01:38:58.000 To set the table, it seems to me that the effect that politics has on the human condition exists everywhere.

01:39:05.000 And so there were some people who were extremely, extremely angry and upset that we took the Libertarian Party over to the point where they were willing to sabotage the party or their state parties on the way out.

01:39:18.000 And long story short, without getting all the boring details, the Libertarian Party of Michigan Hold a convention that was against its rules to try to displace our leadership and then continued on with that.

01:39:37.000 Proclaim to replace the leadership didn't and then their judicial committee, which is like the court system of the party ruled that that was not accurate that that was all invalid they broke the rules restored the old board and There is now a dispute between these two boards.

01:39:54.000 That's that is the I don't want to bore everybody short version Andrew Roland says, I would like to see Twitter add a video platform to compete with YouTube and Rumble.

01:40:02.000 Depending on how the ad revenue will go could potentially move a lot of people from YouTube to Twitter.

01:40:07.000 I completely agree.

01:40:08.000 I really do want to see them create a proper video component to Twitter because I've got 1.6 million followers and I would put my videos up on Twitter.

01:40:17.000 You could do it right now.

01:40:19.000 It just doesn't work that well because of the way the feed works.

01:40:21.000 You need to be able to, like, have a recommended videos thing or something like that, or people need to start building the habits of going to their video feed on Twitter, which means Twitter needs to make a video feed section.

01:40:31.000 Eric Miller says, cast brew coffee names, hen house blend, and you should do a keto creamer called Shamer.

01:40:38.000 Nice.

01:40:38.000 Or is it Shemer?

01:40:40.000 No, Shamer, because that's my podcast, bro.

01:40:42.000 He's, like, trying to shout me out.

01:40:44.000 Big League Drew says, Tim, if you disagree with me, you're in a cult pool.

01:40:48.000 Quite the opposite, good sir!

01:40:49.000 My point was, if you went to the public, and the public held a worldview that you did not, it was you who was the odd person out, not the public.

01:40:58.000 These leftists are all about making the world bend for them, instead of them adapting to the world.

01:41:03.000 It's the peak of hubris to be like, everyone else should change to accommodate my demands.

01:41:09.000 You can't!

01:41:09.000 It's impossible!

01:41:10.000 Is everyone gonna bend to the whims of literally every other person?

01:41:13.000 It makes no sense.

01:41:15.000 We just try to, uh... We just try our hardest.

01:41:18.000 BPay says 1.5 million subs times $5 is $7.5 million per month without being exclusive to the platform.

01:41:26.000 Elon also said they wouldn't be taking $10 for the first year.

01:41:30.000 How many followers does Tucker Carlson have?

01:41:35.000 Good question.

01:41:36.000 He's got 7 million.

01:41:39.000 Tucker Carlson has 7 million followers.

01:41:42.000 I imagine he'll be making a couple million dollars per month.

01:41:44.000 Not 7.5, but maybe like 2.

01:41:46.000 Because conversion matters.

01:41:49.000 And he should charge more than 5 bucks.

01:41:51.000 Um, hosting and stuff is expensive and we want Tucker to succeed.

01:41:55.000 So, but, but, you know, maybe, maybe five works for his show considering volume.

01:41:59.000 Volume matters.

01:42:00.000 If you've got a hundred followers and you want to make a living off of your platform, you need those hundred followers to give you like, you know, maybe 20 or 30 bucks a month so that you can break even and do some kind of show.

01:42:13.000 If you have a thousand followers, now you only need ten bucks per person, five bucks.

01:42:17.000 The more followers you have, the less, the cheaper it becomes, all in all.

01:42:21.000 Unless you're trying to build a big network, and then you've got to pay for all the bandwidth and hosting, and it becomes more expensive the more followers you get.

01:42:28.000 But for Tucker doing one show, I bet if he charged five bucks, he'd make like two million dollars per month, for sure.

01:42:35.000 Bro Cody says, Tim, did you hear about the social worker who was axe murdered in Vermont?

01:42:39.000 The idea that social workers are equipped to handle the mentally ill running around is a liberal fantasy. 0.81

01:42:43.000 I agree.

01:42:48.000 Omega Resetsu says, Tim, I cringe every time you say economic right and left.

01:42:53.000 Economics falls in the authoritarian-libertarian axis, not left-right, bottom-up versus top-down.

01:42:57.000 Completely wrong!

01:42:58.000 You are wrong, sir!

01:43:00.000 Wrong! 0.86

01:43:01.000 So, on the libertarian spectrum, you can have anarcho-communist and anarcho-capitalist.

01:43:06.000 And people who don't understand the spectrum might say, like, how can communists be anarchists?

01:43:12.000 Seven people living on a farm who don't use money for any exchange and have an expectation amongst each other as a community on what work is to be done and how.

01:43:21.000 So it's quite literally someone's like, Hey, I grew some squash.

01:43:25.000 Would you like to share it with me?

01:43:26.000 I'm going to give my squash to you.

01:43:28.000 And then the other hippie goes, and I did the dishes so that we can have clean plates when we eat our squash.

01:43:33.000 That's not capital.

01:43:35.000 That is communal labor.

01:43:37.000 Works really, really well for small groups and tribes.

01:43:40.000 Does not scale.

01:43:41.000 Then you move to the right and you get laissez-faire capitalism, where the guy walks up to the other guy and says, I got squash.

01:43:46.000 If you want it, it's a dollar apiece.

01:43:47.000 That dollar is a universal trade medium that I use.

01:43:50.000 Then they can reinvest that dollar into, you know, hiring someone, helping them grow more squash, etc, etc.

01:43:54.000 In the communal side, if you start going towards the authoritarian spectrum, you get Stalin, where he walks up to you, puts a gun in your mouth, and says, you are giving me your squash because we're going to share it with everybody.

01:44:03.000 Now, strangely, how it works with the authoritarian right doesn't quite make sense because they don't necessarily have capitalist systems, but there is still an argument to be made for what we associate with the authoritarian right being ultra-traditionalist, and then, to your point, There is a confliction between what we would determine to be the authoritarian right.

01:44:24.000 It's the odd group out in the entirety of the political compass.

01:44:27.000 However, it's typically because Nazis did use capital systems.

01:44:32.000 They were, quote-unquote, socialists, but they used capital exchange, kind of like the Chinese communists do.

01:44:38.000 There's a lot to go through, and it's a lot more complicated than that, but that's the simple version.

01:44:42.000 Well basically what you're describing what the Nazis did was corporatism and that's what we have today.

01:44:42.000 I don't know if you wanted to add anything.

01:44:48.000 It's kind of the best of both worlds between communism and capitalism where you still have some semblance of private ownership, you still have a price system and the price system is probably the most important.

01:44:56.000 But that's not communism then, it's just authoritarianism.

01:44:58.000 It's authoritarianism, but it's not communism in the sense that it's not complete government ownership and control, but it's government management through policy, through regulation, and they basically pick the corporate overlords who then write the policy and tip everything, and so you're off of a free market system.

01:45:14.000 The issue is that people think communism, and the only examples that exist in history, are authoritarian, statist communism.

01:45:22.000 So they associate authoritarian, overt control, and communism as one thing.

01:45:27.000 Whereas you can have 10 hippies.

01:45:30.000 There are communes in the United States where it's like a hundred people on a farm and they all just do a base piece of labor and then share.

01:45:38.000 And they vote people in, they vote people out.

01:45:41.000 They exist.

01:45:42.000 They just don't scale up because you can't have a guy from, you know, two towns over coming over to me and being like, okay, now I get your fruit and you get my wood.

01:45:51.000 And I'm like, I don't need that.

01:45:52.000 There needs to be some kind of way to do an exchange.

01:45:54.000 And it begs the question of what exactly is economics?

01:45:58.000 The school of thought that I'm from, the Austrian school, would say that economics is basically just the observance of subjective value judgments in the marketplace when weighed against real-world things like scarcity.

01:46:14.000 So in that sense, Action that is economized of all types is technically economic.

01:46:21.000 It's economic activity.

01:46:23.000 And money actually observed historically as a social phenomenon to solve the problem that you're talking about.

01:46:30.000 In economic theory, it's called the double coincidence of once.

01:46:33.000 The whole, oh well, you have an axe, I have eggs, we can't trade, so I have to go to some intermediary to trade my eggs to get your axe.

01:46:42.000 And that is how gold and silver became money in the organic sense.

01:46:47.000 A government that dictated that these things are money.

01:46:50.000 They were just a commonly valued commodity that over time became money.

01:46:55.000 And so, that problem was overcome by money, and then emerged the price system.

01:47:01.000 Kim Walajo in the general chat says, that is not communism, Tim.

01:47:03.000 Communism is Marxism.

01:47:04.000 You're talking about hippie communes.

01:47:06.000 I think you exemplified perfectly my point.

01:47:09.000 If we are talking about the basic economic structure, Then yes, I am defining communism, and you are defining a specific historical example of one guy's writing, which is not the general concept.

01:47:20.000 So there's a bunch of different kinds of capitalism, right?

01:47:23.000 There's capitalism to varying degrees.

01:47:26.000 When you move left and right on the political compass, you get varying degrees of regulation versus freedom.

01:47:33.000 Laissez-faire capitalism.

01:47:35.000 But there's an upward motion as well.

01:47:37.000 So, like, in the middle, you have a basic thing, like, the libertarian middle would kind of be like, we live on a farm, we all agree there's a chore rotation.

01:47:46.000 However, if somebody wants a specific task done, then we trade for it.

01:47:50.000 If you go all the way to the hippie commune left, everyone's just like, we agree you can use whatever you want.

01:47:55.000 I don't think that scales properly.

01:47:57.000 If you go all the way to the right, then everyone's just trading and exchanging value, which tends to work very, very well in the long run.

01:48:03.000 That doesn't mean that all forms of communal living are authoritarian.

01:48:07.000 Because there are communes in the United States.

01:48:10.000 There's one example I was reading about.

01:48:12.000 100 people live there.

01:48:14.000 100 people!

01:48:14.000 And it is a commune.

01:48:16.000 And they have, like, a board that votes on when people can come in and go out, and they all agree the system works and they all get along.

01:48:21.000 But it's usually, like, people come and live there for a year or two, then leave, so...

01:48:25.000 Let's see what happens is people read about history and there's one historical example of communism, because it never works at scale, and it's statist authoritarianism.

01:48:34.000 But don't confuse an authoritarian system with the economic concept of communal economics.

01:48:44.000 All right, where are we at?

01:48:45.000 Yes Man says, has anyone ever been far enough as decided to use even go want to do more to do look more like There's an old meme.

01:48:53.000 I wonder, yeah.

01:48:54.000 It's an old meme, but it checks out.

01:48:56.000 Rudy Cassone says, Tucker was a traditional Libertarian, that's why he backed Ron Paul back in the day.

01:49:00.000 You're probably too young to remember that.

01:49:03.000 I knew that he was a traditional Libertarian.

01:49:05.000 He's talked about it, hasn't he?

01:49:07.000 Oh, yeah.

01:49:08.000 I think he was associated with Cato at one point, but they're... They're the dark side of the Libertarian.

01:49:14.000 PhilDudeBro says, so whose nickname is the Hedgehog and who is going to do battle with?

01:49:19.000 Hint, his name is also Ron.

01:49:22.000 What would Trump call Sonic the Hedgehog if he was debating him?

01:49:26.000 Oh, how would he insult him?

01:49:28.000 That's actually a really tough one. 0.59

01:49:30.000 The person is making a reference to a porn star.

01:49:35.000 Ron Jeremy, his nickname is The Hedgehog.

01:49:39.000 He's going to jail, isn't he?

01:49:40.000 I believe so. 0.91

01:49:42.000 Immortal Legend says, pertaining to Keith Olbermann, it must suck to be a propagandist and be terrible at that job.

01:49:47.000 Bro, you had one job. 0.87

01:49:49.000 That dude's very unwell.

01:49:50.000 He is absolutely hysterical about, like when he tweets and stuff, it's not reasonable and chill.

01:49:58.000 It is just spazzing out.

01:50:02.000 Yeah.

01:50:03.000 It's kind of wild to watch.

01:50:04.000 Yeah.

01:50:05.000 Kane Abel says, Tim, they really do hate you.

01:50:07.000 I would not be surprised if you're on the FBI's top 10 list of enemies of the state.

01:50:11.000 Well, I guess we know what happened when you do not show up for work.

01:50:15.000 I don't know about that.

01:50:16.000 I don't think they hate me.

01:50:17.000 I think they half like the show.

01:50:20.000 No, they hate you.

01:50:20.000 They fear you.

01:50:21.000 They hate you.

01:50:21.000 I think they really don't like Seamus.

01:50:22.000 No one at school likes you.

01:50:24.000 They all hate you.

01:50:25.000 Well, you know, like the FBI came over and they were like, hey, we're cool, dude.

01:50:28.000 Seamus, man, you brought him back.

01:50:29.000 And I was like, are you serious?

01:50:31.000 Yeah.

01:50:32.000 And then the CIA showed up.

01:50:32.000 Did you stand up for me?

01:50:33.000 Did you stand up for me?

01:50:34.000 And then they were like, oh, the FBI's here.

01:50:35.000 And then they were like, yeah, we're here too.

01:50:37.000 And the CIA guy goes like, It's Seamus, isn't it?

01:50:41.000 First of all, they're not friends.

01:50:42.000 I know this story isn't true because they don't like each other.

01:50:44.000 They don't like each other.

01:50:45.000 They're both like, you don't like Seamus either?

01:50:47.000 And I was like, well, we have that in common, I guess.

01:50:48.000 That's fair, honestly.

01:50:49.000 That happens.

01:50:51.000 The Department of Energy showed up and they were like, oh, they really don't like me.

01:50:55.000 Has the Southern Poverty Law Center declared you a hate leader yet?

01:50:59.000 Uh, they claimed that, uh, what did they say?

01:51:02.000 That I was, that I spoke in Iran at a Holocaust deniers conference because they found an archive of an Iranian website.

01:51:09.000 That's a deepfake of you I want.

01:51:11.000 That's the craziest thing ever to see the Southern Poverty Law Center write that I was a speaker at a Holocaust deniers conference in Iran and I was just like, what?

01:51:21.000 Yeah, and they had to delete it and then apologize.

01:51:24.000 That was hilarious.

01:51:25.000 But did you?

01:51:27.000 I have never been to Iran.

01:51:28.000 I am proudly featured in their Hatewatch series.

01:51:31.000 Oh, wow.

01:51:31.000 Oh, no way.

01:51:32.000 Yeah.

01:51:33.000 They featured Lukard Kowski a while back.

01:51:35.000 Did they?

01:51:35.000 Makes sense.

01:51:37.000 I haven't gotten my wings yet, boys.

01:51:37.000 Yeah.

01:51:39.000 You haven't got your wings.

01:51:40.000 And even Media Matters ignored you.

01:51:42.000 No, well, sort of.

01:51:43.000 Sort of.

01:51:44.000 Media Matters published an article based on my very naughty words, and by naughty words I mean saying marriage is between a man and a woman.

01:51:53.000 In Gay Marriage Doesn't Exist, it's an incoherent concept, and they titled it, TimCast Podcast Panelists Fight Marriage Equality, and the picture was of you, and so people were sharing it going, ah, this is why I knew not to trust Tim Pool, he's against gay marriage, and blah blah blah.

01:52:10.000 I was like, I was the one who said it!

01:52:12.000 Right?

01:52:12.000 I was the one who said it.

01:52:13.000 They're making it sound... I know, it's unfair.

01:52:15.000 And the article, they give me credit, though.

01:52:17.000 When Media Matters wrote the list of TimCast guests, they omitted you.

01:52:20.000 Yeah, they left me out.

01:52:21.000 They omitted me.

01:52:22.000 It was funny because... And I was like, I'm worse than all these people!

01:52:27.000 But you are!

01:52:28.000 That's the point!

01:52:28.000 That's actually really funny.

01:52:30.000 I remember a while ago, there was also this...

01:52:34.000 analysis that was done infamously on YouTube and how it radicalizes people

01:52:38.000 and they had a bunch of conservative channels on there and they put me as

01:52:43.000 like center-right towards moderate and they took some of my friends who are

01:52:47.000 like libertarians like and like Lou Perez from We Are The Internet and put

01:52:51.000 them in the far-right category I was like wait a minute they're far-right and

01:52:55.000 And I'm like, center right?

01:52:57.000 But the reason, the thing is, it's because they have no way to distinguish between the different gradients that exist in conservatism, because to them, politics is a binary.

01:53:06.000 You're either on my side, or you're a Nazi. 0.58

01:53:08.000 And then all these people are Nazis. 0.56

01:53:09.000 I've only gotten a couple, like, Pokes from the left, like Media Matters and stuff like that.

01:53:15.000 And they never mention the band.

01:53:17.000 They call me right wing guy.

01:53:19.000 But they never say the guy from All That Remains or whatever.

01:53:22.000 They don't want people to know that I'm anything other than a guy that talks on the radio. 0.98

01:53:30.000 In 2006, I'm so ahead of the curve that I was saying fascism sucks before the commies were saying fascism sucks. 0.96

01:53:42.000 Before the Zoomer commies. 0.95

01:53:43.000 Not, you know.

01:53:44.000 Let's read this.

01:53:45.000 Southern Yankee says, Tim, get Mark Dice on the show. 0.52

01:53:47.000 Mark Dice has an open invite.

01:53:49.000 I have talked to him many times.

01:53:51.000 He's a good dude.

01:53:51.000 Big fan.

01:53:52.000 So he can come on whenever he can.

01:53:53.000 That'd be great.

01:53:54.000 It'd be great to have him on the Culture War Show, too.

01:53:57.000 We're working on a big project, which is going to be really awesome with the Culture War Show, expanding it.

01:54:02.000 And I'm really excited for that, but we'll give you more details later on.

01:54:05.000 Rudy Cassone says, the ancient Romans were unaware of the lead affecting their brains from their wine jars.

01:54:10.000 Today, chemicals in our food, cleaning products, etc.

01:54:13.000 are affecting many people's ability to reason.

01:54:15.000 True. 0.97

01:54:15.000 And I actually think it's making the frickin' kids trans! 0.97

01:54:19.000 Because the endocrine disruptors and the plastics and all that are affecting fetal development. 0.93

01:54:23.000 I don't care what was in the Roman water. 0.99

01:54:24.000 Marcus Aurelius had his shit together. 0.99

01:54:26.000 Yeah, true. 1.00

01:54:27.000 He was based.

01:54:28.000 He was a very based guy.

01:54:28.000 Yeah.

01:54:29.000 I'm reading his, uh, what is it called?

01:54:31.000 Meditations.

01:54:32.000 I just got a, I ordered a leather-bound copy of that and I think they had to actually make it in India because it took me like two months to get from Amazon. 0.99

01:54:39.000 Oh, sweet ass. 1.00

01:54:41.000 Phenomenon says, E. Jean Carroll is the same woman who went on Anderson Cooper and literally said that she thinks rape is... I'm not going to read the quote, but she thinks rape is sexy. 1.00

01:54:49.000 What she actually said was, she said that most people think it is sexy.

01:54:54.000 She didn't say that she did.

01:54:55.000 You know, if that distinction matters to you, I don't know.

01:54:57.000 The quote's slightly off.

01:55:00.000 Mo Harris says they took our jobs.

01:55:03.000 Took our jobs!

01:55:04.000 Classic.

01:55:07.000 Zane Thomas says, read Reynolds v. Sims, 1964, to understand how the Blue Cities gained control of the Red Counties.

01:55:14.000 Well, interesting.

01:55:14.000 What was that again?

01:55:16.000 Reynolds v. Sims, 1964.

01:55:17.000 Okay.

01:55:20.000 To learn how Blue Cities gained control of Red Counties.

01:55:22.000 Yeah, I'm gonna look that up.

01:55:25.000 Larry Stouts says, article in The Hill has Biden wanting to use the 14th Amendment for the budget problem.

01:55:30.000 Hmm.

01:55:32.000 Well, okay.

01:55:33.000 Some people are saying that is unconstitutional.

01:55:35.000 Crazy.

01:55:36.000 Roger Page says, Tim Pool and Brian Stelter had meetings I was not allowed to partake in.

01:55:41.000 I don't know what that means.

01:55:42.000 I've never had a meeting with Brian Stelter.

01:55:44.000 What is that a reference to?

01:55:45.000 Is that a joke I'm missing?

01:55:47.000 I think so.

01:55:48.000 It'd be funny if you had a meeting with him, though.

01:55:51.000 That'd be hilarious.

01:55:52.000 Yep.

01:55:54.000 And YouTube just gave us the jump.

01:55:56.000 Rick E. says, Trump hedgehog of 2024.

01:56:00.000 Is that his last name?

01:56:01.000 The Hedgehog?

01:56:01.000 The Hedgehog? I believe so, yeah. I believe in Sonic and his middle name is The and then his last name is Hedgehog.

01:56:06.000 And if Trump is smart, that's who's gonna select as his running mate.

01:56:09.000 Can you...

01:56:13.000 Late, quite frankly, what am I... I'm selecting Sonic.

01:56:18.000 Some people were saying I was going to pick him.

01:56:22.000 I won't name names.

01:56:23.000 Some say he's fast.

01:56:25.000 Some say it's a race.

01:56:27.000 Some say you have to go fast in a race.

01:56:30.000 He's the fastest.

01:56:31.000 If you want to win the race.

01:56:34.000 So it would have to be an arc where he starts by just relentlessly trashing Sonic through the primaries.

01:56:39.000 Little blue Sonic.

01:56:42.000 Just ripping him apart.

01:56:43.000 Little baby blue.

01:56:45.000 Little baby blue Sonic runs from all his problems.

01:56:49.000 And then eventually he'll be like, I like him because he won't get caught.

01:56:54.000 I like him because he couldn't get caught, he's too fast.

01:56:56.000 Yeah, that's what he'll do.

01:56:59.000 Jessica Cox has been a supporter since day one.

01:57:01.000 Michael is wearing my boyfriend's band shirt, The Contortionist.

01:57:04.000 Tell Michael, Joey B says hi and thanks for the support.

01:57:07.000 Yeah, they're fans of the show, man.

01:57:09.000 Oh, cool.

01:57:09.000 Yeah, they're great guys.

01:57:10.000 Sweet.

01:57:11.000 Sounds awesome.

01:57:13.000 Krentist the Dentist says, what do you think of Bitcoin?

01:57:15.000 Should we trust in a currency even though it's not backed by any assist or physically commodities?

01:57:22.000 Yeah, I know, but it says assist.

01:57:23.000 Oh, yeah.

01:57:24.000 So I just read them as they type them.

01:57:25.000 I didn't see that.

01:57:26.000 By the way, I love the reference to the name, Crentist the Dentist.

01:57:29.000 Good Office reference.

01:57:30.000 Remember when Dwight's trying to take the day off and he's clearly lying?

01:57:33.000 Never seen it.

01:57:34.000 He's like, I'm going to the dentist.

01:57:35.000 And then Michael's like, what's his name?

01:57:37.000 He's like, Crentist.

01:57:39.000 I've never seen the office.

01:57:40.000 Oh my gosh, you've never seen a single episode?

01:57:42.000 No.

01:57:42.000 Wow.

01:57:43.000 Not one.

01:57:44.000 You have to.

01:57:44.000 No.

01:57:44.000 It's funny.

01:57:45.000 You're an animal. 0.87

01:57:46.000 You're uncultured and you want to stay uncultured, and that's fine. 0.99

01:57:50.000 That's fine.

01:57:51.000 I'll let you live that life.

01:57:52.000 Zermis Playground says, Hey Tim, for Poker with the Boys, you should set up a fake mustache vending machine outside the door.

01:57:58.000 It could be priced at a dollar apiece, but give back 23 cents change.

01:58:02.000 Would be a hilarious gag I can wait for.

01:58:03.000 Infringed. 1.00

01:58:04.000 We skipped Bitcoin.

01:58:06.000 The problem with the, oh yeah, yeah, we were going to ask about, what do you think about Bitcoin?

01:58:10.000 I love Bitcoin.

01:58:12.000 I got a bunch.

01:58:13.000 There you go.

01:58:14.000 Should have bought a bunch more.

01:58:15.000 They say that it's not, or he was asking, it's not backed up by anything, and it's not backed up by what you normally think of, but there was energy in the form of electricity, and there was value in that electricity that was put into it, so there is a certain amount of value instilled into it.

01:58:28.000 Right.

01:58:29.000 The energy required to make a Bitcoin guarantees the price of Bitcoin.

01:58:33.000 I'm going to be a stickler.

01:58:34.000 It's not backed by a certain amount of value, it's backed by a certain amount of utility.

01:58:37.000 Because the value is still subjective.

01:58:42.000 And basically what it is, the blockchain itself, serving as a ledger of account, gives it a unique quality of money that no other money has ever had.

01:58:53.000 Where you can trust it to that extent, because you can't hack Bitcoin.

01:58:56.000 But all money is, Do people have confidence it can be used for exchange?

01:59:02.000 And the value of Bitcoin isn't actually in the coins, it's in the network.

01:59:07.000 Correct, in the security and the ability to transfer value.

01:59:12.000 Someone in chat said Bitcoin is backed by math, and I misread that as meth for a second.

01:59:19.000 What if there is a math standard implemented at some point?

01:59:22.000 That's true.

01:59:23.000 As for poker with the boys, the problem is, poker is illegal in West Virginia, which makes no sense, but Pokemon and Magic the Gathering and Yu-Gi-Oh are also illegal, and I'm not exaggerating or being cute.

01:59:35.000 Yu-Gi-Oh, like Pokemon is?

01:59:36.000 It's illegal.

01:59:37.000 The law explicitly states you can't host any card game, and you cannot play any card game.

01:59:44.000 It doesn't say you can't gamble or wage your money.

01:59:48.000 It literally says you can't play card games.

01:59:50.000 The thing is, the law was likely written before card games were invented, and so the only card games that existed were card decks with 52 cards, you know, the standard poker decks.

02:00:00.000 And so the law was written vaguely.

02:00:02.000 Then Pokemon, Magic the Gathering, and Yu-Gi-Oh!

02:00:04.000 emerged, and now we have a constitutional problem.

02:00:08.000 Where the state allows children to wager on games of chance.

02:00:11.000 Now I know Magic the Gathering Pokemon have skill in deck building and strategy and play.

02:00:17.000 But the law says you can't play card games, period.

02:00:20.000 Then when a child gives money to the owner to enter a competition in which chance plays a role, because there's another important factor.

02:00:27.000 The law in West Virginia does not say to what degree chance.

02:00:30.000 It says it is chance any.

02:00:32.000 So a game where you draw cards and there's a random chance at getting good cards or energy or whatever you need, that is a game of chance.

02:00:40.000 Outside of all of that, I kid you not, look up the laws in West Virginia.

02:00:43.000 It says card games are illegal.

02:00:44.000 And when I went and talked to the government, they were like, yeah, card games are illegal.

02:00:47.000 Yeah.

02:00:47.000 And I'm like, there's Pokemon and Magic the Gathering all over the state.

02:00:50.000 So how do you control for one but not the other?

02:00:53.000 And I think I was talking to a state senator and I said, I guess the end result is either they will ban Pokemon

02:00:59.000 or legalize poker.

02:01:01.000 Cause it can't both be the same thing.

02:01:04.000 Because it just says card games.

02:01:07.000 It doesn't matter how much chance is involved.

02:01:08.000 I want to stress that point.

02:01:09.000 Alright everybody, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com by clicking that join us button.

02:01:17.000 We're going to have a members-only uncensored show coming up for you in about 10 minutes when we go live on the front page of TimCast, so definitely sign up.

02:01:25.000 You can follow the show at TimCast IRL, basically everywhere.

02:01:28.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast.

02:01:29.000 Michael, do you want to shout anything out?

02:01:31.000 Yeah, absolutely.

02:01:31.000 I mean, if you agree with what I'm saying as far as the decentralization and nullification strategy, this is what the Libertarian Party is doing.

02:01:38.000 You can go to lp.org slash join.

02:01:40.000 You do not have to change your registration to become a member of the party.

02:01:43.000 You can just throw in some support.

02:01:45.000 And if you want to support the Mises Caucus, go to TakeHumanAction.com and keep the revolution alive.

02:01:51.000 Yeah, I think I'll actually just give a shout out to Robert Breedlove who has the What Is Money podcast because a lot of what we were just talking about with Bitcoin and what is money, what are economics, he gets into that pretty deeply.

02:02:04.000 I actually want to shout out Ben here, because in the time before clown world, when YouTube

02:02:11.000 didn't suck, and there was a lot of independent documentaries, Ben was one of the early pioneers

02:02:16.000 producing content that was red-pilling people on a deep level with his documentaries The

02:02:21.000 Esoteric Agenda, Chimatica, and Ungrip, and that didn't get mentioned.

02:02:24.000 So those documentaries are still out there, and they're still good stuff, man.

02:02:27.000 And we got one that's just about ready to come out.

02:02:30.000 Game of money.

02:02:31.000 Game of money.

02:02:32.000 And it's perfect timing too, considering all the banks are collapsing.

02:02:36.000 So Ben's actually here so we can figure out the proper distribution.

02:02:39.000 With Infringed, we might do a premiere, which means it might actually take a month.

02:02:44.000 We're trying to get clearance on certain clips we want to use, so the lawyers got to go through it.

02:02:48.000 And then the opportunity there is like, okay, well, if we're waiting, why don't we get a theater and then do like an actual premiere of the documentary, which would be cool.

02:02:55.000 So we'll see.

02:02:55.000 Yeah.

02:02:56.000 Seamus!

02:02:57.000 My name's Seamus Coghlan.

02:02:58.000 What I want to shout out is the novena that we're praying to Saint Joseph for the working class in this tumultuous economy, for the unborn, for our enemies, including the people at Vice, many of whom may be out of work, and Dylan Mulvaney.

02:03:12.000 These people are very confused that they may see the light and that our country will return to God.

02:03:16.000 So if you go over to my Twitter, that novena, I just retweeted it.

02:03:20.000 We'll be praying it tonight.

02:03:21.000 Please join us.

02:03:22.000 I am Phil Labonte from the band All That Remains.

02:03:26.000 Phil That Remains on Twitter, Phil That Remains Official on Instagram, and the band is All That Remains on Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube, etc, etc.

02:03:37.000 And I am SIRS.com everywhere, SoundCloud, Instagram, Twitter, etc.

02:03:42.000 Follow me, let's argue.

02:03:44.000 We will see all of you over at TimCast.com in a few minutes.

Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - May 09, 2023

Timcast IRL - Tucker Carlson ANNOUNCES NEW SHOW On Twitter After Elon Musk Meeting w-Michael Heise

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript