00:02:31.000It is being reported that more Marines and ships are being deployed to the Middle East as the Trump administration is preparing for a ground incursion in Iran.
00:02:40.000Now, initial reports is that this would just be limited to Karg Island, which is not the main body of Iran, to secure their oil distribution and force them to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
00:02:50.000However, Donald Trump himself has put out a statement saying we are getting ready to wind things down.
00:02:56.000So, at the same time, he's saying that the United States is deploying more Marines and ships to the region, so you have to figure out what you think is really going to happen.
00:03:06.000And I'm of the opinion I think things are probably going to escalate, and hopefully they don't.
00:03:10.000But some are speculating for the 800 millionth time that this, this, could be World War III.
00:03:18.000Venezuela could have been World War III.
00:03:19.000Ukraine could have been World War III.
00:03:21.000Actually, to be honest, I think there's a compelling argument that we are looking at potentially World War III, and that is, in World War II, the argument is it was a series of battles that started, and before anyone, no one really knew that it was a world war at the time when it kicked off.
00:04:38.000You can trade it with whoever you want, and they can never ban you.
00:04:40.000The reason why it's important, guys, if we do enter a censorship era and debanking comes back with vengeance, it's never gone away, mind you, but it has been somewhat suppressed.
00:04:51.000You're going to need a means by which you can transact with people where you know you're not going to get banned.
00:04:54.000That's why the Rumble Wallet is a great way to do that.
00:04:56.000You can also use the Rumble Wallet to tip your favorite creators on Rumble, like yours truly.
00:05:01.000So again, check out wallet.rumble.com.
00:06:13.000Trump administration making heavy preparations for potential use of ground troops in Iran.
00:06:19.000We then have this in the New York Times.
00:06:20.000U.S. dispatches Marines and warships to the Middle East.
00:06:23.000Officials said 2,500 Marines from 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit in California and the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group will go in April to relieve Marines already deployed in the Persian Gulf.
00:06:35.000Now, at the same time, as they are saying Trump is gearing up for a ground incursion of Carg Island, Trump himself boasts we are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the terrorist regime of Iran.
00:06:50.000One, completely degrading Iranian missile capability, two, destroying the defense industrial base, three, eliminating their Navy and Air Force, four, et cetera, et cetera.
00:07:43.000And based on what we have seen in terms of deployment or announced deployments, as well as the request for $200 billion and the fact that there's now discussions of invading Karg Island, I don't think this is going well.
00:07:55.000Trump is under a political meat grinder.
00:07:57.000He has a midterm coming up, and this is the Iranian strategy.
00:08:01.000They want to grind it out until Trump is curtailed after the midterms, and then they win effectively.
00:08:17.000I mean, militarily, the U.S. is achieving the goals that they're looking for, but there's also the political goal of this, which is actually the removal of the regime, it seems.
00:08:28.000And I'm not so sure that that's going to happen in any kind of timeframe that the administration wants.
00:08:33.000Well, I'm really confused because Trump has said that we've won this war eight different times, but now he's coming to Congress asking for $200 billion.
00:08:43.000The $200 billion is to replenish the munitions we have here because they sent them all over there.
00:08:49.000Well, not only replenished, it's replenished by some new, there's like some beefing up as well.
00:08:53.000My point is like, whether or not we want a war, like if we won the war, they'd still need to ask for this money, or I should say, want to ask for this.
00:10:22.000He negotiates with Putin, who's Iran's biggest ally, and then he simultaneously ends the war in Ukraine while ending this war, and then it can look like he did a two-for-one deal.
00:11:24.000He wants to cut them back in and say, we're going to make you money, and you should be working with us because you're Western.
00:11:29.000Well, I think the petrodollar is what's in limbo right now, because if all of these Gulf states don't actually feel like we're providing them any safety, then they don't even have to use the petrodollar.
00:11:38.000And then we'd be totally screwed because we have nothing that backs our currency.
00:11:40.000So it's like, I feel like this is a very slippery slope if this thing goes even more sideways.
00:11:46.000Yeah, I mean, look, this is, like I said earlier, this is still a military success for the United States.
00:11:52.000Like, the U.S., I think that when Iran is saying that they've achieved something because they managed to hit one F-35, like, that's a big deal to them, considering all the sorties that have gone over.
00:12:04.000You've got B-52s, which are not stealth aircraft.
00:12:06.000They're flying over there basically at their whim.
00:12:10.000They've got total air domination, if I understand correctly.
00:12:14.000You can't say that Iran is winning the war.
00:12:17.000The fact of the matter is the U.S. doesn't have the, there isn't a likelihood that the U.S. is going to achieve its political goals.
00:12:23.000And that's consistently what the U.S. has been doing.
00:12:26.000They'll achieve the military goals, but actually getting the political goals is something that has eluded the U.S. for a while.
00:12:35.000If the win condition for the regime is the regime stays in power, then if America backs off before the regime has crumpled and regime change has happened, the regime is going to say we won.
00:12:45.000It is going to likely further solidify their very antagonistic position towards Israel and America.
00:12:51.000And we're going to be left with this state that's extremely hostile towards America with potentially concerns, again, about are they going to begin just rebuilding their nuclear power?
00:13:01.000So do we need to crush them right now?
00:13:07.000I think the issue is without having a proper, I think you guys said Starlink got opened for Iran today or they're thinking about it, right?
00:13:14.000Like I think without regime change, I don't see how this ends because the current regime won't negotiate with us.
00:13:20.000They are going to continue to pursue nuclear warheads since they seem explicitly interested in that.
00:13:26.000I think they're going to plan regime change.
00:14:35.000So this is where the boots on ground comes of, like, if we hadn't started striking Iran, is there this question of before any of this happened, could we have gotten weapons into some actual legitimate, more friendly to democracy group that could have had a successful regime change?
00:14:53.000Well, you bring up Afghanistan, but there is a huge difference when you compare Iran's military, which had 900,000 people in their three different branches.
00:15:01.000And you look at the Taliban, they had 40,000 people.
00:15:04.000So it's just going to be, and then what, it took 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban?
00:15:08.000But the populace is very different, right?
00:15:09.000Iran has a very highly educated, high, large middle-class populace that has a large interest in regime change that does not like the regime that is asking for support in Shift.
00:16:34.000And there's really, really good research actually that came out of the Pentagon as to like why we failed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
00:16:40.000And like these things I'm listening, like middle class, high levels of education, psychological interests of the people growing towards specifically the regime change that America's trying tends to lead to more successful regime change.
00:16:50.000Whereas in Afghanistan, there's a number of areas where we like didn't work nearly closely enough with locals.
00:16:54.000We supported oftentimes other counter-terrorist groups rather than looking for an alternative in the middle.
00:17:00.000There was a lot of major mission mistakes that didn't happen in other successful regime change, which poses the question, is it possible?
00:17:06.000I want to say this about regime change, though.
00:17:08.000If Donald Trump thinks that he can influence regime change in Iran, but he can't even influence the regime of New York City, I think he's going to have an echo battle.
00:17:17.000Yeah, distance is a really, really important thing.
00:17:26.000Because there's no reason you go in here, you spend the money, you spend the time and the resources to go there, and that's not the end of the object.
00:17:33.000I kind of think, you know, looking at everything that's going on, looking at the sentiment, looking at the media landscape, I wonder if the American, America as a hegemony is done.
00:17:46.000There's a lot of money to be made for what we've seen over the past decade or so with global content, meaning making content that plays to a multicultural audience.
00:17:56.000The simplest form of this is these just for laugh gags videos that have been viral for a decade plus, where it's comedy bits, but there's no English in it.
00:18:04.000That way it can be played for anybody.
00:18:06.000So if you're in the age of the internet and you're a business and you want to make money, especially with media content, targeting as many people around the world as possible is going to make you the most money.
00:18:18.000You're going to be like, imagine if some dude lived in Malaysia and just all day posting Ian Miles.
00:18:29.000Imagine somebody lived in Malaysia but posted nothing about American politics so they could run content in the United States, sell ads against it.
00:18:35.000The same thing is true for everywhere else.
00:18:37.000So if you can find a lowest common denominator cultural icon or item to produce content around, then, I mean, so we're seeing that with AI slop content.
00:20:00.000The line used to be that an individual needed even just a tiny bit of talent to make a video that might get some views.
00:20:07.000Even to just make the video, to turn the camera on, press record, press stop.
00:20:11.000Now you've got, there's one video where a dude was explaining how he does something like $100,000 per month or $80,000 per month, working two hours a day by just clicking a button on an AI website and generating a video and then uploading it.
00:20:23.000And he's like, yeah, I do like 10 of these per day.
00:20:26.000And he's like, and I make 80 grand a month.
00:20:28.000It's like, okay, that kid is a millionaire.
00:20:34.000And as much as people are going to say, like, I don't want it, it doesn't matter because it's what becomes available.
00:20:39.000There's going to be 700 videos that's AI trash.
00:20:43.000And there's going to be two or three legitimate conversations about war in Iran.
00:20:46.000And what's going to happen is that shows like this will not be able to survive this era.
00:20:50.000I do think there's a big shift happening.
00:20:52.000I believe the narrative machine is coming back.
00:20:54.000It's going to be impossible for independent personalities to actually express opinions on these matters.
00:20:59.000And we talked about it before, but my prediction is you had the era of free music, then you get the streaming music services where you subscribe.
00:21:08.000You had the era of free movies, and now it's just Amazon where people just click the button and buy the movie or watch it on Paramount or CBS or whatever.
00:21:14.000The same thing is going to happen to all podcasts.
00:21:29.000People are going to get mad at me for saying this, and maybe this is going to be bad for my career, but I'm going to tell you what the perceived plan is based on the powers that be and the rumors that are circulating in D.C. is that Joe Kent is friends with Donald Trump.
00:21:41.000Joe Kent did not resign in opposition.
00:21:43.000He did not resign because he hates Israel or he's concerned about Israel.
00:21:46.000He did not resign because he's concerned about this war.
00:21:48.000He resigned intentionally to create a bifurcation in the right to shift the political parties in the next couple of years.
00:21:53.000And he's going to run for office, likely with Tulsi Gabbard in 2028.
00:21:56.000These conversations have been happening behind the scene for some time among many people in these circles.
00:22:01.000If you follow Laura Loomer, she's talked about something going on with Tulsi Gabbard.
00:22:04.000And potentially, she's working with Trump very well.
00:22:08.000What I can tell you is, I have heard a handful of things in the D.C. area.
00:22:13.000And that is, Joe Kent didn't just all of a sudden do a 180 on Trump.
00:22:20.000They want to restructure the political parties around a moderate Democrat Party and a neocon Republican Party that reflects more like the Obama-McCain years.
00:22:29.000That way you have a Democrat candidate who says, we might have to go to war, but we should bring some of our troops home.
00:22:36.000So you're going to have maybe war and yes, war, and there's not going to be a strong anti-war element, despite what people are claiming right now.
00:22:45.000And that's one of the reasons we're seeing this play.
00:22:50.000I'm saying if Tucker runs, he's anti-war.
00:22:52.000he's not what what we're hearing in dc i was gonna tell you what what what what the you haven't heard tucker say that he's against this war i'm gonna tell you Yesterday you said that the right was shifting.
00:23:02.000You said the left would be pro-war and the right would be anti-war.
00:23:04.000No, have you heard something different?
00:23:05.000No, The Tulsi Gabbard is going to be the anti-intervention Democrat.
00:23:12.000Yeah, when Tim explained this to me, I was surprised it told you.
00:23:13.000Okay, so you think Tulsi and Kent will flip to being Dems?
00:23:18.000Tulsi will flip to Dems and the Lexington.
00:23:20.000So again, I don't, all I can tell you is I've heard a handful of things from people in DC who work in the space that have like, so there's a lot of rumors.
00:23:30.000And it sounds to me based off a few things.
00:23:35.000What I can tell you, I know for sure, the mandate of the corporate media right now is to buy podcasts, to absorb them into their infrastructure and put them on the front page of their streaming services.
00:23:44.000Duh, look at what's happening with CBS.
00:23:47.000The play is the machine state wants the narrative control back, so they're flooding YouTube with AI content to suppress independent commentary and channels.
00:23:57.000They'll still exist, but they won't have a big impact on the general perception of what's going on in the media.
00:24:02.000Then you're going to need to reshift the political parties so you can have, I would describe it as a Kyla Democrat party, still kind of on the left, but more reasonable when they have a conversation, trying to make sound arguments.
00:24:13.000But the weirder elements of woke and all of the weird gender stuff is going to slowly be pushed aside, and you're going to get a Tulsi Gabbard that is like moderate Dem with some social policies.
00:24:24.000But the strategy is when she comes out, she will not say Trump is bad.
00:24:29.000She will say, I believe Trump did his best with the information that he was given.
00:24:55.000The rumors that I'm hearing, and this could be all just nonsense, but from staffers and lobbyists and people in D.C., is the play that's happening right now.
00:25:05.000Like, why is Tucker Carlson all of a sudden saying, oh, this is a bad thing, I oppose this, when only several years ago, he was like, Iran is a serious threat.
00:25:19.000And if you want to win this, you need controlled opposition.
00:25:24.000There should be an acceptable Democrat and Republican party.
00:25:28.000And with the Democratic Party and woke being largely unfavorable, they are going to try and create a moderate space that will attract the likes of Joe Rogan because you know he loves Tulsi Gabbard.
00:25:39.000And then you're going to have Joe Rogan in a couple of years being like, you know, I thought the Democrats were nuts.
00:25:44.000However, Tulsi Gabbard comes back in, and now we have real leadership for the Democrats.
00:25:51.000But this prevents culture war, civil war expansion, and allows for the military-industrial complex and the pro-Israel element to maintain their wars and the liberal economic world.
00:26:02.000Because this is a lot of really, really, really big pieces moving.
00:26:05.000And there's also an assumption that the Democrat base would ever consider.
00:26:10.000Like, I understand you're saying the moderate, the moderate rights right now shift back to being the moderate left and vote for Tulsi, but you won't win anything without the Democrat base.
00:26:19.000And the Democrat base is never going to go for Tulsi.
00:26:22.000Anyone who touches Trump, I don't know if that's the right thing.
00:27:29.000Why is Ellis interested in working, would be interested in Tulsi Gabbard?
00:27:33.000Why would Tulsi be able to make a better bid for the moderate Democrat vote than somebody like Gavin Newsom, who's making a pretty hard movement towards trying to connect with you?
00:27:52.000I think Rubio is the actual player for 2022.
00:27:58.000Well, Trump's going to get impeached, probably.
00:27:59.000Trump's going to get impeached, and there's even speculation that Trump might actually step down early so that Vance gets in as president for a little bit before Rubio takes the opportunity for 2028.
00:28:10.000What I can tell you is this: there have been rumors around D.C. for a while that Tulsi Gabbard was preparing to resign and she was going to start doing PR moves where she views Trump respectively so that she can maintain moderates.
00:28:24.000She's not going to play the Trump derangement syndrome game.
00:28:26.000She's going to say that she respects him.
00:28:42.000Even if it wasn't her, their strategy actually makes sense to me because at least you get rid of the progressive side of politics, which I think is the most radical thing on the planet.
00:28:52.000And so if this is what they're thinking, if this is what they're planning, it sounds like a nice little strategy because even if Tulsi loses, if she is the person, that still means it doesn't go to the progressive side like Gavin Newsom.
00:29:16.000Right, which is why Edison's a lot of people.
00:29:17.000Which is why I'm going to be like, why would Ellison fall in line under Gabbard?
00:29:21.000So if a Tulsi Gabbard candidate is in, if your choice, like if Larry Ellison's looking at who his choice is going to be, and it's got to be a Republican like Trump or some whack-a-loon lefty, he's going to be like, can we get a Democrat in there that's not a threat to us?
00:31:08.000Again, the way I look at it is it is being viewed largely by these donors and these elites that we must have a narrative machine the way we did back in the 90s or the 2000s, where when we say we're going to war for the petrodollar, we do not get media opposition.
00:31:26.000Hence why they should be buying up all of these podcasts.
00:31:29.000And that's what they're already doing.
00:31:31.000Or drowning them out with AI slop content or buying TikTok and banning certain voices.
00:31:37.000So again, I point this out in perhaps there are grand conspiracies I don't know about, or maybe there's not really.
00:31:44.000And there's just a handful of powerful elite billionaires that are making moves to make this happen.
00:32:24.000Then when Axios put out this report showing that the majority of the content after October 7th flipped to pro-Palestine, all of a sudden all the Democrats were on board.
00:32:33.000And they said, yes, we should ban TikTok.
00:32:36.000Trump's strategy was not to stop the ban of TikTok, although that's what it looked like.
00:32:41.000And all these young people were cheering for him.
00:32:42.000Trump's strategy was, there's a better way to do this.
00:32:52.000Just off of TikTok alone, I think it is fair to see the play for every Democrat, every Republican, and the investors is take control of the media and pro-Israel and the narrative will be pro-Israel.
00:33:20.000I just, yeah, I'm trying to see the through line of like what the China Warner feels.
00:33:24.000Well, somebody's not under the bus necessarily.
00:33:27.000You do know that they purchased TikTok because of this.
00:33:29.000Yeah, no, no, I agree that the Ellis Brothers have been buying up all sorts of their own.
00:33:32.000CBS, they're going to get CNN with the Warner Brothers merger as well.
00:33:35.000Yeah, yeah, I'm familiar with all of that.
00:33:37.000I'm just trying to go, if he's so pro-Trump, why wouldn't he just pivot?
00:33:40.000If he's got this good thing with the right, it feels like there's a lot of still like motivated energy behind it.
00:33:45.000I understand Iran's not popular, but just why don't you just have Marco Rubio come out and be like, man, like they're going to have Marco Rubio.
00:33:50.000But why wouldn't they get him behind him?
00:34:50.000All of a sudden, then you have several high-profile, prominent conservatives who were friends with Trump flip and now all adopt similar positions around the exact same time.
00:35:01.000Now, I will say it's entirely possible that there is a global or cultural zeitgeist where this is the content that makes money.
00:35:08.000This is what people are going to chase.
00:35:09.000So you can call Tucker, Megan, Candace, and whoever else grifters who are just trying to make money.
00:35:14.000And maybe that's really just what it is.
00:35:16.000But I do think it's interesting that they all shift their positions at the exact same time, despite being friends with the Trump family and the administration.
00:35:22.000Yeah, but it feels like the way you're talking about it, I feel slightly negatively, I guess, about this.
00:35:26.000Like I'm curious from a conservative side, like when you guys hear like that the conservatives are maybe, let's just say all this, this is true.
00:35:34.000How do you guys as conservatives feel about that happening within your movement?
00:35:38.000Well, it sounds like we're living on borrowed time then.
00:36:47.000Well, it depends on the change in media, right?
00:36:50.000So we had, there's a couple of theories on it.
00:36:54.000So I'm actually friends with the individual who started Obama's Facebook campaigning, which many contribute to his victory.
00:37:02.000He's mobilizing young people on social media.
00:37:04.000And the perception is, or at least what this individual has told me, when the campaign was told to use social media, this is, again, this is like 2007, 2008.
00:37:13.000Like no one really knows what's going on with it, but young people are on it.
00:37:17.000The older crowd, the boomers, and the Gen X were like, why does this matter?
00:37:21.000And it's kind of like the blockbuster phenomenon.
00:37:23.000They take a look at, actually, let me phrase it like this.
00:37:28.000You can't move until it's too late, right?
00:37:30.000So Blockbuster, for instance, is the biggest game in town in video rentals.
00:37:34.000Netflix, I believe Netflix was founded before Google was.
00:38:49.000Now you have the political commentary and social media space where people are affecting the political worldview and they're going to wrap that back up, put in a subscription service and get their power back.
00:38:58.000But so I guess I'm still, I feel like I'm not going to get an answer to this.
00:39:02.000If I heard this, like my own side, people that I supported to some degree, are moving in such a way to further crush free speech and control the narrative, my answer goes, that's not good.
00:39:25.000How do you guys feel about the fact that in many ways it sounds like you're hearing that your own side that in many ways you support my own side?
00:39:32.000I would argue that the establishment powers and the millionaires and the billionaires have never been anyone's side other than the elites in the power.
00:40:35.000What you said is Marco Rubio will be the one that Ellis is in support.
00:40:38.000Tulsi Gabber will be the moderate, slightly pro-war, but not totally pro-war.
00:40:42.000She's the controlled opposition that they're putting forward.
00:40:45.000But all this is being organized in many ways, it sounds like, by people who are supporting Republicans in behind Republicans and believed in the Republican vision.
00:40:52.000So what you're saying is a lot of people that in many ways were part of your coalition, whether you like them or not, are in many ways now moving against your own selves to crush free speech.
00:41:02.000And my question is, what do you do about that?
00:42:23.000The Democrats hate the right, the Republicans hate the left, and the middle-of-the-road people are flickering left and right on various issues.
00:42:30.000Sometimes they lean left on a lot of issues.
00:42:33.000They've been leaning around a lot of issues.
00:42:34.000And so the play is: how can we make the left and the right, the moderates are the left, and the Republicans are the right.
00:42:40.000And then the Democrats and the progressives just are not strong enough as a coalition to actually win anything.
00:42:46.000The Democratic Party will then have no choice but depend on moderates.
00:42:49.000The Trump administration will then be safe.
00:42:51.000Or I should say Trump officials after 2029 will not have to worry about whatever this thing is that Democrats are planning to do.
00:43:19.000Well, crushing free speech isn't good either.
00:43:22.000Well, this could be a weaponization of the DOJ.
00:43:25.000This could be legitimate prosecutions.
00:43:26.000The idea that this will not turn into a witch hunt is kind of immediately literally said, if we can't get them criminally, then we'll get them civilly.
00:43:34.000DeSantis, if it is the case that they've done something wrong, right?
00:44:00.000So it really depends on what it actually comes to be forming.
00:44:03.000But in general, I'm not a big fan of large group pre-presidential plans like Project 2025 that get built up by a bunch of self-interested think tanks.
00:44:14.000Right, right, well, I don't like any of these things.
00:44:35.000That's the exact thing that comes to mind.
00:44:37.000There's nothing that we go, what is the way?
00:44:39.000How do we look for, for example, in the upcoming elections, regardless of party, the candidates who we think that's somebody that we can get him behind?
00:44:49.000And how do we leave behind these party ties to get good officials?
00:45:58.000If there are certain Democrats that want to break liberalism, that want to break more of the Constitution to get retribution to the conservatives that they are mad at, I am opposed to that fundamentally.
00:46:31.000I don't know if the next thing is we go, well, if they're moving towards a Marco Rubio who also wants to crush free speech and they're already actively right now weaponizing the DOJ, I don't know the answer shouldn't be, well, I just don't know.
00:46:42.000Well, no, let me ask you a purely hypothetical.
00:47:19.000What we do, for example, is like recognize that a democracy needs a strong left and a strong right.
00:47:24.000This is why when I'm in a lot of liberal spaces, when, for example, like Ben Shapiro is standing up saying there do have to be lines of who's in the tent, we go, that's good, right?
00:47:34.000I don't have to like any of Ben Shapiro's policies.
00:47:37.000You guys, I don't know how you feel about Dun Trio.
00:47:38.000I'm not saying you have to, but we have to look at people who are saying, we must play by the rules of the Constitution if you believe in democracy.
00:47:46.000And if you think that this nation's beautiful experiment of America is something worth fighting for, and you have to find the politicians and the speakers and the pundits who do this.
00:48:16.000Yeah, blasphemy was illegal when the First Amendment was ratified.
00:48:20.000Is this just the argument you can amend a will?
00:48:23.000The left's idea of what is protected under the Constitution is fundamentally different from the right.
00:48:28.000And how each culture interprets the Constitution determines whether or not they believe it's being adhered to.
00:48:34.000So when you say we must adhere to the Constitution, which one?
00:48:39.000I would say this is where the Rawls Veils of Ignorance is so useful: you go, imagine you're in a society and you can't know where you're going to fall.
00:48:47.000What are the rules that you want in place?
00:50:03.000The best example is the current process due to an illegal immigrant who has an order for deportation is to be taken into custody and immediately deported.
00:50:13.000The left argues the process that should be due is a judicial hearing where he can argue his case.
00:50:25.000The executive Congress has deleted all powers on immigration to the INA to the executive branch, and that's why the executive branch has executed.
00:50:50.000Regardless, what I'm saying to you is, are you saying that we don't have due process as a principle at least that we're not going to be able to do that?
00:50:57.000I am saying that what the left considers due process is incongruous with what the law actually says.
00:51:03.000What conclusion can we possibly take from that claim, Clinton?
00:51:06.000When a leftist says, I want due process, we must ask them, what do you mean by that?
00:51:12.000And then you come to discover the left and the right have completely different worldviews on what that word actually means.
00:51:17.000Answer is, we can't, we actually can't do democracy anymore.
00:51:59.000And so the question that I still have to pose as people who want to at least agree with these principles of free speech, of due process, though the way that I think of free speech and the limits that we have around it might be different than you, we still both value free speech.
00:53:31.000And the left and the right are so divergent in this, it's extreme.
00:53:34.000Sure, but that doesn't mean that these things can't be unified.
00:53:37.000I guess my question to you is, what's the conclusion from what you're saying?
00:53:40.000The right Constitution I would define as the traditional American Constitutional Republic, and the left constitution is a multicultural democracy.
00:53:49.000So I don't care what words are used by each other, but they are entirely advocating for two different worlds.
00:53:54.000It has come to the point where they are threatening force against each other and exercising that.
00:53:59.000I believe we should, whatever means necessarily to stop this escalation needs to occur.
00:54:05.000Unfortunately, neither side will back off.
00:54:08.000That means if Donald Trump pulls a move with powerful investors and billionaires to create a new Democrat-Republican spectrum, the progressives are not simply going to say, guess we lose.
00:54:19.000They're going to get guns and they're going to go shoot people.
00:54:22.000I don't know what the off-ramp is for all of this, but I can tell you, when Pritzker is saying we will arrest, and if we can't, we'll destroy you civilly.
00:54:30.000Did you know that right now, there's a hilarious story from SFK, hundreds of millionaires, and this meant like hundreds, this is a large number, there are services that exist to facilitate the exodus from this country right now because of things like that.
00:54:46.000It is not a question of if you are a political player.
00:54:49.000There is a fear among high net worth individuals that the Democrats are going to Bolshevik your ass.
00:54:56.000On the left, when Project 2025 came out, it was the exact same type of terror and fear because both of them were.
00:55:04.000Project 2025 had a lot of things that a lot of the left viewed shrinking of rights.
00:55:09.000Many political, wealthy individuals are fleeing, not Republicans, because they fear that the Democrats are going to swing the hammer against anyone.
00:55:17.000They fear both sides are going to be killed.
00:55:20.000No, they fear it because the ballot measure in California, because of what's going on in Washington state, and because there's Ro Khanna and Bernie Sanders talking about that same kind of policy nationwide.
00:55:33.000So this is the thing that I'm trying to, I'm getting confused by.
00:55:36.000You keep on saying this situation at hand and that both parties are going to ramp up and ramp up and round up and we're basically engaging in like brinksmanship.
00:55:45.000And I'm saying to you, what's the conclusion that we take from that?
00:55:49.000Well, my conclusion is I don't want a civil war because I don't want a bunch of mostly young men dying for this.
00:55:55.000I think that that's the worst outcome.
00:55:57.000I look at this and I go, this is the issue.
00:56:01.000That's not the answer because both sides insist.
00:56:04.000Well, one of the things that can't be the answer is insisting that it's just the left or insisting that it's just the right.
00:58:05.000We already saw, I think it might have been Arkansas, they tried to have a woman hunted down because she fled the state with a friend to get an abortion.
00:58:14.000And they said, it might not have been Ark, I can't remember which date it was.
00:58:16.000They said that it was a conspiracy to break the law and therefore they needed to stop her.
00:58:21.000At what point, I mean, maybe the argument is that a kid gets taken by a stranger and brought to Washington to get a sex change and the parents go, well, that's life, I guess.
00:58:39.000The issue is that the idea that our country, like, it sounds like what you're saying is the conclusion that you're saying is our country isn't going to continue to exist as a democracy as we've known it.
00:58:51.000Whatever version of America that we have now.
00:58:52.000No, I'm not making a semantic debate over constitutional republicanism.
00:58:55.000I'm saying since Trump's election, we have not functioned in any real democracy.
00:58:59.000And one could argue that we haven't since the liberal economic order.
00:59:02.000My point is, Donald Trump wins, and they claimed for years he was propped up by Russia, even arguing the votes were flipped by Russia, and then launched an investigation and ultimately impeached him.
00:59:13.000Then when Trump loses in 2020, the right says Joe Biden, the Democrats, stole the election.
00:59:18.000There is no belief on either side that there is a functioning democracy right now.
00:59:23.000Sure, but part of that comes down to we are under threat.
00:59:28.000When you look at Russia Gate, for example, there weren't connections that could be made to Trump, but there were, I believe, 12 Russian individuals that were arrested, that had been found to hack multiple sites, and that were actually engaging.
00:59:38.000And how many Ukrainians did we arrest for manipulating the election in favor of Clinton?
00:59:55.000Again, it's going to fall back to when the Democrats took power, knowing that they'd been propped up by the Ukrainians, they arrested a Trump ally and then told us he was guilty.
01:00:02.000And if you're a Trump supporter, you're going to say, that's full of, that's BS.
01:00:27.000just think this has to play itself out ultimately.
01:00:30.000And again, going back to what Tim said, if If a president of the United States, along with his CIA director and other ICs, are making up manufactured intelligence to try to prosecute someone who's trying to get elected as president, yeah, I don't think we have a...
01:00:57.000Went through his presidential, his daily logs, found a series of things they determined to be classified, and then put fake classification papers on top of it, took a picture of it.
01:01:40.000Donald Trump was the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials from a former Soviet bloc country.
01:01:45.000Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton to undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office.
01:01:51.000They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aid in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter only to back away after the election.
01:01:59.000And they helped Clinton's allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisors.
01:04:29.000I mean, they've even come out and said that there's side effects of the vaccine, even though they save ineffective YouTube.
01:04:33.000So my point is, nobody has gone to jail for that.
01:04:36.000And then on top of that, I know people within the Department of Justice that actually tried to go after the people that put together the January 6th committee, and they don't even want to, the DOJ's not going to prosecute the DOJ.
01:04:46.000Maybe it was just your big happy family tree, son.
01:05:03.000I agree that there are problems and that we need to correct the system, but the answer to this isn't just accept more erasure for liberal rights.
01:05:50.000Well, you can get some big booty Latina love potion at the same low price it's always been Casper.com no I think I think Alex I'll give you a little pushback the reason why they're dropping the mass deportation thing is because they're losing Hispanic voters this is what the internal this is what they're saying bro it's because of the when this first started he literally said we're not going to uh we're not going to do workers in Hospital and hotel workers.
01:06:15.000And he's got allies and businessmen who are like, hey, we don't want to do this.
01:06:19.000You also have the political class saying the Hispanic vote for Republicans has dropped dramatically because they don't like the ICE raids and DHS.
01:06:28.000That's why they pulled out of Minnesota.
01:07:08.000This is why progressives would say we need to do things that rally against like the progressive argument, right, is to say this isn't left versus right.
01:07:16.000The progressives reject the Democrat Party.
01:07:18.000They say we need a complete revival where the power actually shifts back to the government.
01:07:24.000They just also want to translate kids.
01:07:25.000So a guy in a black hoodie with a black mask on comes up and says the government is full of corrupt politicians and I go, here, here, brother.
01:07:31.000And then he starts waving a red and black flag.
01:07:33.000And he says, the military-industrial complex has been waging war, killing civilians without cause for generations.
01:07:43.000He goes, we got to put in a candidate who's going to put a stop to this corruption, who's going to fix our voting systems, make sure that people's voice is heard.
01:08:16.000How about like just instead of take it away from the trans topic, like how about people that are like, we don't respect property rights and we're going to expropriate your property?
01:08:23.000Yeah, we shouldn't work with communists.
01:08:35.000AOC is hated by the communists because she moderated and does a lot of bipartisan bills and is increasingly popular.
01:08:41.000Just because the communists have a problem with her doesn't mean that she wouldn't institute policies that the communists want, first of all, second of all, that would also destroy the economy.
01:08:49.000I don't believe that AOC would ever have any political will behind her to actually get away from the city.
01:09:45.000Yes, I understand, but I'm moving back more towards these broader conversations of how we try to unify these two bodies, right?
01:09:52.000And the answer is if you always will have something you prioritize just preferentially over corruption, I guess, yeah, then we're doomed.
01:10:02.000But I guess I would say if we care about like one of the fundamental things that made this country great that has shifted over time, but is built on like certain liberal, not left, liberal values, like strong institutions, balance of power, ensuring that like the votes have integrity, that we have some level of like regulation and whatnot.
01:10:23.000If you value some of these things, if you value free speech, right?
01:10:27.000The miracle that is Western liberal democracies, then you have to prioritize probably some other things over other things.
01:10:35.000Definitely vote within your state against John's kids.
01:10:37.000But the problem is there's a difference of opinion on what those definitions are to those terms that you're using.
01:10:48.000I agree that we don't see it the same way.
01:10:49.000But here's one of the benefits of this latest kind of FCC pressuring of all these things is all of a sudden all the progressives that I was yelling at three years ago being like, actually, free speech matters even for people we disagree with, like conservatives.
01:11:05.000Now we're at this perfect type of position where a lot of the progressives, not just liberals, but progressives, are actually sensitive to certain, there's progressives that are 2A, right?
01:11:18.000They're wearing 2A the same way that there are fundamental rights getting removed and we're understanding why these rights mattered in the first place.
01:11:26.000And what we shouldn't do is go, well, the billionaires are winning.
01:11:35.000Because what's wrong if like, honest question, like, let's say the billionaires take back control and they seize media and then everybody has a homogenized worldview and everybody agrees almost on everything.
01:11:56.000Well, the homogenized society that we're talking about in this unipolar system is less free speech, for example, because it's a very important thing.
01:12:02.000Okay, let's just pause again and I'll ask the question again.
01:12:05.000The billionaires fund their politicians who win.
01:12:13.000The country homogenizes around a similar set of worldviews with minor differences where anyone can speak their mind and say whatever they want whenever they want.
01:13:09.000So when they buy up all the news networks, if your billionaires lead to a world where we just respect liberal constitutional values and amendments and these liberal things that I've outlined, these four things, sure, that's fine.
01:13:21.000I'm fine with that, but it sounds like you're saying that they won't.
01:13:23.000My point is, when there are five streaming services and every person who's hired to have shows where they get a lot of views are going to be either somewhat moderate on war or pro-war, what's like if you are an anti-war individual, they're not going to invite you on the show.
01:16:18.000Like, if you want to get an apartment in New York City, the co-op board can just basically ban you for nothing, like if they just don't like anything about you.
01:16:24.000And so I think that that will be, whatever happens in New York, it kind of can be extrapolated to the future of our society.
01:16:29.000So it's like we kind of already do, like Tim says, has a have a hidden social credit score.
01:16:34.000But I think it would probably be better if we had a forward-facing one, because then at least you get some free government assistance or something, right?
01:16:40.000Because that's why people will sign up for it because they won't have to pay as many taxes.
01:16:43.000They'll get a free car, free gas, whatever incentive they need to make us agree to it.
01:16:48.000But if the Trump, Rubio, Gabbard coalition that we outlined at the beginning is moving for that direction, again, my question goes, what do we do about that?
01:16:57.000Well, so honest question, like, if the Democratic Party organically just moderated, right?
01:17:02.000Let's say that they were just like, you know, Tulsi Gabbard is socially liberal on a bunch of things.
01:17:07.000She's worked with Republicans, so she's got moderates on her side.
01:17:10.000And if she genuinely won the primary, is that a bad thing?
01:17:14.000Not my fundamental question always with any politician is what's their policy?
01:17:33.000Well, it would depend on, so she's flipped now Democrat, Republican, then back to Democrat.
01:17:37.000I would need, it's kind of like this like Kamala thing of being like on County Valley of being like, remember when Kamala was like a progressive for her.
01:18:25.000But that's the point of democracy is that people give up their authority to elected officials to enact their will so it's going to call it.
01:18:31.000If you're a politician that I voted for doesn't do my will.
01:19:08.000And I don't know how I feel about it because I'm going to be happy if a politician that I like his policies has win, and I'm going to be less happy if a politician that I don't like wins it.
01:19:16.000I think you're being naive because a lot of people are voting.
01:19:19.000A lot of politicians give you power and don't forget to do a function of democracy for a reason, and you have no answer.
01:22:13.000If you look at it through the lens of political machinations, you're going to hate every politician ever.
01:22:18.000I'm not inherently opposed to Gabbard.
01:22:20.000What my actual position that I was outlining here that you were initially pushing back on was I was saying, well, aren't we concerned that if Gabbard is just a controlled opposition and it's not a legitimate person and she's just going to not do the policies that she runs on, I would look at that and go, that isn't as illegitimate as of democracy because then we essentially have a charlatan, right?
01:22:40.000We have somebody who's saying, I'll do this, but she's actually just controlled by the other party and won't necessarily do that thing.
01:22:46.000Okay, I don't want a puppet democracy all the time.
01:22:49.000Well, to some extent, like there's actually this really interesting political theory that says all civilians to some degree assume that politicians are lying.
01:22:58.000But we also still want politicians to enact like 60% of their policy.
01:23:34.000There has to be a special interest behind them.
01:23:36.000And when they do get elected to Congress, they have to cut a deal with like the NRCC or the Driple C. There is no such thing in this country as a duly elected representative, in my opinion.
01:24:15.000It literally was just like I was on the phone with a high-ranking member of the government in West Virginia, and the subject of Maha banning artificial dyes came up.
01:24:23.000And I said, oh, man, I hope this happens.
01:24:27.000And I said, I think we got to get rid of all that stuff.
01:24:29.000And I was like, I think it would be great because if you're in PA, Ohio, Kentucky, or Maryland, or Virginia, and you know that you can drive like three miles to go to a supermarket in West Virginia and you'll have no garbage in your food, I think tons of moms are going to do it.
01:24:43.000I think suburban moms are going to drive that fetcha three miles.
01:24:46.000And that could be great for the economy.
01:25:17.000A guy will go and meet with a member of Congress and they'll sit down for a steak dinner and they'll be discussing policy and it's not all that crazy.
01:25:24.000And then the lobbyists will say something like, if you don't back this bill to fund Israel, I'll release videos of you raping children.
01:25:30.000And then they go, oh, okay, I'll vote for that bill.
01:26:36.000The most square footage, the most tables.
01:26:38.000It might not be the most square footage, but the most tables.
01:26:40.000They get raided for illegal gambling and money laundering.
01:26:44.000Because in Texas, you cannot run a gambling operation as a house.
01:26:48.000The way it works in Texas, however, is card clubs emerged because they allow private games where you pay a membership fee, and that's actually within the law.
01:27:40.000Where today the regional championships took place in Houston where children wager $80 for a $71,000 prize with a $10,000 cash prize for first place on a card game of chance, which is illegal in the state of Texas, but they don't care.
01:29:01.000I talked to the lottery commission, and they said, well, collectible card games are exempt.
01:29:04.000So we made a collectible card game called Debate Me, which is functionally poker.
01:29:07.000And I said, okay, we're exempt now, right?
01:29:09.000But what pissed me off is when the Lodge got shut down, I read that the Pokemon tournaments were coming here that operate under the exact same structure.
01:29:16.000You pay 80 bucks, you play a card game, tournament bracket style, and the winner gets cash prizes.
01:29:22.000The law in Texas says you cannot put money up front to use cards or any other dice or gambling device for a chance to win cash prizes with any amount of chance involved.
01:30:45.000I think West Virginia is, and I'll tell you why we're talking about this.
01:30:50.000The casinos, you've got two big casino players in West Virginia, and one of them is Penn Entertainment, which is the second biggest casino chain in the country.
01:30:57.000They operate, I think, about 42 locations.
01:30:59.000And it has been conveyed to me that the lobby there is extremely powerful, not because, back to the lobbying question, not because they will sit down with politicians and buy them dinner, but because they threaten them.
01:31:10.000They say, we will pull funding from your PACs, and we will guarantee your opponent wins if you oppose us.
01:31:56.000Colbert went on a show and said, Trump's FCC, I was told in no uncertain terms by CBS that the FCC was threatening us unless, if we were going to air an interview with Tallerico, because Trump doesn't want you to see this.
01:32:07.000The only problem is the FCC Equal Time didn't apply to the Republicans or Trump.
01:32:10.000It applied to Jasmine Crockett specifically.
01:32:12.000And so Tellerico went on Twitter and said, this is the interview Trump doesn't want you to see.
01:32:17.000But in fact, it had nothing to do with Trump.
01:32:20.000They were trying to make it appear as though the only player was Tallarico and whoever the Republican candidate was going to be.
01:32:27.000They didn't want to give Jasmine Crockett equal time on TV.
01:32:30.000But this is the issue is late night TV shows almost never give equal time because late nights have been basically exempt from this.
01:33:41.000He could obviously disappoint me in the future.
01:33:43.000But what I'm saying here to you guys is that when it comes to politics, I have one really big priority right now, which is corruption in the government and trying to get the common man a voice back in politics.
01:33:56.000Do you give any room to the fact that they're all corrupt?
01:34:00.000They're all corrupt to varying degrees, and I always want to try to vet for the least corrupt person who will pass policy that reduces corruption.
01:34:07.000Just based on special interests, based on money and politics, they're all inherently corrupted at a certain level.
01:34:44.000You think Jesus would be Exodus 21, 22?
01:34:48.000It seems like Jesus made a very specific law that, yes, if you kill a baby in the womb, you can get just a financial fine instead of capital punishment.
01:34:57.000It is a, in my opinion, misleading to say someone doesn't take PAC money because PACs don't spend money on candidates.
01:35:19.000The party who claims to love democracy, they sure have a funny way of showing how they do that because what they did with Jasmine Crockett is the opposite.
01:36:07.000You made this point the other day that you said, I believe it was a Rudyard, if you keep making points, I'm going to have to rant for 20 minutes, or I can address them point by point.
01:36:38.000So what I am saying, in the case of Jasmine Crockett, the FCC policy that got utilized against him, which wasn't actually pushed, the network was worried about it because there are increasing FCC pressures from CAR against late night shows specifically, which is equal time.
01:37:04.000I'm going to say foundation real quick.
01:37:06.000What we are discussing is not equal time rules and how they apply.
01:37:09.000Yes, it is because you said that he stabbed her in the back by not allowing her on the show.
01:37:12.000So let's just pause real quick and say the campaign from Colbert and Tallerico was to claim that Donald Trump shut down their interview so that it appeared James Tellerico was the only candidate in play and the only other candidate was a Republican.
01:37:29.000So when people went to vote, he had a very high profile moment that got millions of views and across the board the media said this stunt put him over the edge.
01:37:38.000Jasmine Crockett then went after she lost, she said they cheated, this was stolen.
01:37:44.000I believe she also made a massive, I don't know if that's what she said.
01:37:47.000How about the fact I'm sure she was like, literally the same day that he won, she made a large social media post celebrating James Tallerico on her own.
01:39:02.000So every time Trump has done massive, I'm just wanting to make sure you're consistent.
01:39:07.000You're so mad at James Tallarico and you can't trust him at all.
01:39:11.000Well, don't moralize at me about how bad and awful James Tallarico is if you won't engage with me very seriously about whether or not you have an issue with him lying about Ruby Friedman to support his argument that his it's it's not just bad oh, it's evil.
01:39:28.000It's of course it's evil great, of course Tellerico is evil too.
01:39:32.000Okay, but the issue is that, who have you said you would never vote for again?
01:39:35.000Democrats yes because, let me clarify what I said was, unless the party is purged and they bring in moderates who have not supported transient kids, how do you vote for someone who, five years ago, wanted to lop off a girl's book?
01:39:49.000Did Carr and Curry pressure through the FCC to not have Tallerico and other people on?
01:40:04.000Their lawyers didn't say that they could not do it, but they said that it could not be aired on their mainstream, that it had to be on YouTube.
01:40:18.000What they did say to him though instead, is that no, that if he was on, they couldn't air it on the mainstream, that it could only be on YouTube.
01:40:50.000Somebody insisting, for example, that the 2020 election results are not true and pressuring his staff to change and try to delay the certification of the vote, that is not the same thing as being like the FCC told us that he couldn't be here.
01:41:04.000And it's like, oh, it turns out the FCC didn't say that exactly.
01:41:06.000They just said, if he's there, you have to give equal time to Jasmine Crockett.
01:41:39.000You have primaries to vote for politicians that have different leaning ins of different things, right?
01:41:44.000You have grassroots movements to go and canvas behind people who won't take PAC money because if you don't take PAC money, it's really hard to get your home on this.
01:42:10.000CBS denies forcing Stephen Colbert to not air interview with Democratic candidates as it provided legal guidance about FCC equal time rule.
01:42:23.000The broadcast could trigger the FCC equal time rule for two other candidates, including rep Jasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled.
01:42:31.000The late show decided to present the interview through its YouTube channel with on-air promotion on the broadcast rather than potentially providing the equal time options.
01:42:46.000Well, the issue is it's not nearly you did a Mott and Bailey.
01:42:49.000You made it seem like it was this really big hoax and he was doing all sorts of shifty stuff.
01:42:53.000He did one thing, which is yeah, he lied and said that the FCC said he couldn't.
01:42:58.000And I wouldn't be surprised, for example, if he wasn't told this, that Colbert said this to him.
01:43:03.000So probably the main person who did the hoax was Colbert and possibly even because Colbert slightly misunderstood what the lawyers meant when they said you'd have to explore other options.
01:47:12.000But more importantly, the reason they chose Taylor Rico is that he's a Democrat who wears a Christian suit.
01:47:17.000So they're hoping that the less informed, like the default Christians, who are non-practicing Christians, will find him an acceptable person to vote for because he says, I'm a Christian, vote for me.
01:47:27.000They're going to earn a lot more votes that way.
01:47:29.000And he is politically savvy because he was able to get on a bunch of politics in the establishment.
01:47:34.000No, there's a lot of policies he's aligned with with the establishment.
01:52:07.000All right, we're going to go to your Rumble Rants and Super Chats, my friends.
01:52:10.000Smash the like button, share the show with every person you've ever met, including your grandma or that Indian neighbor whose dog you kicked.
01:52:15.000All right, we got this from Joey Giggles.
01:52:40.000Whether she's right or whoever you think is right, sitting in an echo chamber where we all shake each other's hands and be like, you are correct, sir.
01:54:37.000He says, for Chuck Norris, a true American and man that inspired tens of millions of young men to not give up on their dreams, may his legacy grow even in death, allegedly.
01:54:48.000After several decades of intense meditation, he has figured out how to break through the astral plane to the afterlife because he is hunting death himself.
01:55:08.000I really do love that for the past several decades, we've had this weather somewhat joking, but this image of being the ultimate man and being masculine.
01:55:19.000And the joke was that he was strong, he was powerful, but he was a hero and he was good.
01:55:23.000And with many jokes that we would make, still, it's good for young people to envision this like, you know, it's like one thing to have a Superman, which we know is just silly, but Chuck Norris is a real guy that they pretend is Superman.
01:55:35.000They killed him to distract us from the Iran War.
01:56:03.000There's actually a girl who looks like me that Hookstein thought was me, who is a communist, who probably would love to be called the Kami Mami.
01:56:57.000Under no circumstance did Marx believe that the people should have guns to defend their lives or property.
01:57:04.000That is a totally different way of understanding what arms are for.
01:57:10.000He did not in any way believe that the people should be able to overthrow the government or defend their property because he didn't even believe you should have property.
01:57:17.000So don't listen to leftists that say, oh, no, we believe in guns.
01:57:20.000They only believe in gun rights insofar as it's useful for.
01:57:23.000Thomas Jefferson did, in the way that Thomas Jefferson did.
01:57:25.000It's only useful insofar as it's useful for the revolution.
01:57:29.000Well, for protecting or protecting your country, right?
01:57:31.000Like that, that's what 2A the principle most importantly is, is sometimes from time to time, the blood of liberty must be.
01:57:39.000It's defending your life and property.
01:57:42.000TJ, who wrote the Constitution, definitely seemed to think that it was a good idea.
01:57:51.000He wrote the Declaration of Independence, right?
01:57:52.000But TJ was a big fan of rising up against tyrants.
01:57:57.000And I'm not saying that that's not a reason for owning arms, but the fundamental reason for owning arms is to defend your life and property.
01:58:08.000Property rights was one of the things that Thomas Jefferson was going to put into the Declaration of Independence.
01:58:30.000And they'll work with you guys, but they don't agree about the gun culture private property.
01:58:33.000And you're right, they do want to use it for the revolution, but they are fundamentally also against tyrants.
01:58:37.000Considering the situation that we're in now, which is basically 29 states are constitutional carry, if they were looking to expand that kind of stuff, I would, yes, because of the fact that it advances individual gun rights.
01:59:41.000My problem with it is the leftist perspective on profit is that it's something undo when the general understanding of profit is just it's the excess F cost.
01:59:50.000So for the working class, when these leftists were saying things like abolish profit, it's like, listen, the dude who makes birdhouses and sells them, it costs him $20 to make the birdhouse.
02:00:30.000The larger the group is, like, take a look at the AI, for instance.
02:00:36.000AI is so incredibly smart, but it's like an autistic, like autistic on.
02:00:40.000You can ask it to do a crazy math calculation, say, program something, it will.
02:00:43.000And then you ask it basic questions and it just dumps all over the floor like, like it just doesn't understand humans, right?
02:00:50.000Yeah, if you asked it like the 10 best white players, like the 10 best white NBA players, it gives you, it doesn't put Dirk Nowitzki in the future.
02:01:00.000It's because as a Korean person, I have tried asking it a question about Koreans and it kept telling me it refused to answer on the basis it could be offensive to Koreans.
02:01:08.000And I was like, I'm Korean and I'm asking you this question.
02:03:17.000Well, I mean, I don't think, I wouldn't use the word nihilist because of the way it's interpreted by most people, but I certainly recognize subjective views on reality and the limited understanding the average person has.
02:03:31.000So I'd make the argument that while I do believe there's a God and things like that, the general function of the regular person serves towards something nihilistic.
02:03:41.000But anyway, my point is, I don't know if this is true or not, but I do think that the powers that be the deep state are just like, they go to YouTube and they go, we want these shows.
02:04:14.000Well, my theory is that the machine, like we know that Twitter and Facebook, when it was Twitter, had backdoors for the FBI and the government.
02:04:27.000So I do think that most of what we see in terms of who is the bigger show, including ourselves, is a function of the government being like, this is acceptable.
02:05:29.000Get some big booty Latina love potion at cashbrew.com and watch my show After Hours with Alex Stein on Real America's Voice Monday through Friday, 11 p.m. Eastern.
02:05:39.000You can check out my Patreon where I have been writing op-ed stuff.
02:05:43.000I just posted one today about a CIA memo that came out in 2021 talking about how white women are the new vector of infecting the youth with extremist values.
02:05:56.000Go read it at patreon.com/slash Phil that remains.
02:06:00.000You can check out the band All That Remains at Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, Spotify, and Deezer.
02:06:05.000We're going on tour this spring with Born of Osiris and Dead Eyes.
02:06:09.000We start April 29th in Albany, New York, and we go through all of May.
02:06:14.000You can get tickets at allthatremainsonline.com.
02:06:17.000And don't forget the left lane is for crime.