When did Democrats become so pro-pedophile? And why is it so hard to question them? Judge Kathleen Brown Jackson is up for confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States, and she's got a record of handing out some of the most lenient sentences for child sex offenders in American history. Is it because she grew up in a family of pedophiles? Or because she was raised in a religious cult? Or is it because her father was a pedophile? And why does she get away with it? And what does it have to do with pedophiles across the country? And how can we, as a country, even begin to question her appointment to the highest court in the land of . Well, we can start by asking the question, when did the Democratic Party become this way, and how did it get to this point? And when did they become so soft on sex offenders, and why are they so eager to have someone like her on their side on the court? And is it a good thing that they re not going to vote for her? And if they do, what s going to do about it? And what s the best thing they can do to stop her? and why should she get a shot at the job? Join the conversation by using the hashtag on social media to let us know what you think about it! in the comments section below. and if you think it s a good or bad thing, and if it s working for you, and what would you like to see her get a chance to run for Supreme Court confirmation on the next time it s up for a spot on the Court of or if you would like to run in the next election? If you re a Supreme Court nomination, tweet us what you d like to have her on the 2020 race? or what s your thoughts on it tweet us ? and we ll have a shoutout! in a future episode of the podcast ! :) Timestamps: 4: 5:00 - How do you feel about this episode? 6:30 - How did you think Judge Brown Jackson s case? 7:15 - What do you think of her record? 8:00 9:40 - Is she a good judge? 11:30 12:00 | How does she deserve a chance? 13:40 15:30 | How do we know she s a bad guy? 16:10 17:20
00:00:12.000Were they always into that, but, like, technology didn't make it that easy?
00:00:16.000Or is it that technology now makes it easier to catch them?
00:00:19.000At any other time in American history, the mere defense of this sickness would be disqualifying.
00:00:25.000Now it's not even, like, shameful to them.
00:00:27.000I mean, you have someone Who's up for the Supreme Court of the United States, who gave industrial-level child porn traffickers, like, light sentences.
00:00:38.000When Ted Cruz asks her why she did this, Dick Durbin, the leading Democrat on the commission, just cuts off the questioning.
00:00:45.000Like, I mean, why would you even ask for that?
00:00:48.000I mean, she's gonna rule on the most important cases in American history from the point she joins that bench, but, like, come on.
00:00:55.000I mean, that's not even really a question, right?
00:00:57.000I mean, Pedophiles across the country must be rejoicing at the prospect of having Judge Jackson as a continued advocate for them sitting on the Supreme Court.
00:01:05.000I literally can't believe Democrats and the usual rhinos who don't want to get involved because it's beneath them, apparently, to question these sorts of things like, you know, Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse.
00:01:17.000Parents, like, you think it's time to speak up?
00:01:19.000You think maybe it's time to get involved?
00:01:21.000Ted Cruz actually pulled out a whiteboard to illustrate that Katenji Brown Jackson gave defendants an average of 47.2% less of a sentence than what prosecutors recommended.
00:01:33.000And don't forget, I believe she's from a pretty liberal area, so that's already probably lenient prosecutors on this sort of stuff, given, again, what seems to be a trend Of being like, well, you know, this is just, it's not really that big a deal, right?
00:01:47.000Do Democrats in Washington, D.C. not understand that to the American public, like 99% of them, child pornographers are the lowest of the low, the absolute scum?
00:01:58.000You know, Josh Hawley talks about, literally, her sentencing guidelines, where she actually seems to apologize.
00:02:08.000I'm trying to read here. He read from a sentencing Where she said she, quote, feels so sorry for the perp's family and, quote, for you, for the anguish that this has caused you.
00:02:31.000We'll let it go. A guy that has a huge collection of prepubescent pornography, hours of it, you know, you say to him, you're not really a pedophile.
00:02:44.000So she gives lenient sentence to a child predator because he presented all of his diplomas and certificates, meaning he was a little bit more of an academic pedophile.
00:02:53.000He had degrees and a pedigree, so he can't be like a regular pedophile.
00:02:58.000He's special and should be treated accordingly.
00:03:02.000How do you have this person on the Supreme Court?
00:03:04.000How can this person even be nominated?
00:03:06.000And how can Republicans not go all in?
00:03:09.000I would understand if you said, hey, if you're a child predator, death penalty.
00:03:13.000I think that's a much more reasonable solution than lenient sentencing.
00:03:19.000Like other insane policies, whether it's energy, whether it's the environment, whether it's the economy, you've seen where that's gotten you.
00:03:26.000This is the one that's, to me, by far the most extreme.
00:03:30.000How does this person have a position on any court?
00:03:33.000I mean, if Dems think that, like, the Jackson child sentencing point is like a phony nothing burger, why won't they give the documents to the Republicans on the committee?
00:03:42.000They'll give it to the other Democrats on the committee.
00:03:45.000They have it. They won't give it to the Republicans.
00:03:48.000What a stupid move. It looks like they're hiding something about their record, which, of course, they are.