Length
3 minutes
Words per minute
171.8
Word count
587
Sentence count
55
Harmful content
Toxicity
3
sentences flagged
In this episode I talk about hypocrisy on social media and censorship of conservatives. The problem with the system is that there is no objective standard put forth when either fact checking or analyzing things. Only one side gets the fact check and only one side is tried to be made whole by the fact-checkers. And that's the problem with social media, when you're playing on an uneven playing field, it really sort of sucks. If you don't like it, you gotta deal with it. I believe in freedom, but more importantly this is about the censorship of conservative voices and the way that there's not an objective standard to be put forth in either fact-checking, analyzing things, or any other form of media. I think you'll appreciate it. Tweet me and let me know what you think! Timestamps: 4:00 - Censoring conservative voices 6:00- Censorship of conservative views 7:30 - How do you feel about it? 8:15 - What do you think about it 9:20 - What's your thoughts on it? What would you do if someone censored you on social medias standards? ) 11:00 11:40 - Is there a standard for fact checking a tweet or blog post? ? 12:20- What are your thoughts? 13:15- Is it fair to be objective? 14:30- Does it matter who gets the facts? 15:15 16: What is your opinion on something correct or incorrect? 17: What are you going to get the most correct? 18: Is it right or wrong? 19:40- How do I know what I should be allowed to be a fair shot at a quote? 21:30 22:40 Is it possible to be more objective than someone else s opinion on a tweet about something else? or not? 25:10 - Is it a better than another person s opinion? 26:10 27:10- What do I have a better standard of truth or a higher standard of evidence? 29:10 Do you have a problem with a better perspective on a quote or a better idea? 30:00 -- Is it better than a better answer? 31:40 -- How much do you agree or less? 32:30 -- Which side is better?
No flagged segments to show.