Triggered - Donald Trump Jr - Well, It's Another Twitter Censorship Double Standard!

The rules on social media are not only arbitrary, but also seem quite arbitrary. Is Kyle Rittenhouse s case any different than Hunter Biden's laptop being doxxed by the mainstream media? And what are the real differences between the two? And why is it okay to doxx someone for donating to a legal defense fund and doxxing someone for not doing so? What are the rules and why do they seem to be arbitrary? This episode is dedicated to anyone who has been offended by the way people have been treated by the media and the way they have been handled by social media. I hope you enjoy this episode and find some common ground with those who have been offended or offended by what has been done to them and how they have dealt with the situation. I know I did and I will do my best to explain the difference between them and explain why they are in fact not so different from the ones we have been dealing with in the case of Hunter Biden s laptop and the Kenosha shooters case and why they should not have been doxed. I hope this helps clarify the difference and clarify what is and is not being dealt with by the rules, and why it is not okay to be offended by them and what they should dox someone who has contributed to the defense fund to help defend someone who is not only a suspect in a case, but a victim in a criminal case. The rules are not arbitrary, they are not so arbitrary, and that they are actually serve a purpose and are not just to serve a political agenda. Thank you for listening to this podcast! -Jon Sorrentino , Jon and Jon's words Jon's thoughts on the rules. - Jon's opinions and thoughts on this episode John's thoughts and opinions on the situation and the rules on this topic - John's words, and his thoughts on it - - and more - Jonathan's words on the matter - is he right or wrong, Jon's point of view on it? - or not? -- and his point of views on it ? -- or not yours? , and his opinion on it, and what should we do with it? - and what do you think about them? ? - would you agree or disagree with them? -- and what would you like to see them, Jon s thoughts on them, and your thoughts on those words? .

00:00:00.000 Okay guys, today we're going to talk about the rules on social media and how you must ultimately conduct yourselves because it seems as though there are rules, but they also seem quite arbitrary.

00:00:12.000 We're going to talk a little bit today about the Kyle Rittenhouse stuff as it relates to people who've contributed to them and have been doxxed and ultimately lost their jobs, right?

00:00:21.000 There was that Virginia police officer that donated to his defense fund just to help get him get a fair trial.

00:00:28.000 I know they don't want that for someone who's not part of the desired narrative.

00:00:35.000 So there was a Virginia police officer who was fired for donating to Kyle Rittenhouse's defense fund.

00:00:42.000 And that information was made available because It was essentially doxxed.

00:00:49.000 Twitter, and I quote,"...defends not censoring hacked content about donors who gave Kenosha shooters legal defense." So Twitter allowed the information of those who have donated to Kyle Rittenhouse's defense fund to be made public.

00:01:07.000 They were put out there, and Twitter defended that.

00:01:10.000 And they said, you know, I guess it's okay.

00:01:12.000 There was an article in the Daily Caller about it.

00:01:14.000 But what Twitter didn't seem to be okay with was it banned the New York Post from publishing Excerpts about Hunter Biden and the laptop and the shady deals and the big guy and all of those things, things that people today, since the election, I've said, had they known about, because the media did literally, it feels to me, whatever they possibly could have to cover that up.

00:01:40.000 But Twitter banned the New York Post.

00:01:45.000 From talking about that. They shut down their account for violating its policies against doxing and sharing hacked materials.

00:01:54.000 So how is the Hunter Biden laptop any different than Twitter defending, censoring hacked content about donors who gave to the Kenosha shooters legal defense fund?

00:02:07.000 How is it different, folks?

00:02:09.000 It's not. It's not different.

00:02:11.000 It's not even a little bit different.

00:02:12.000 It's just one narrative worked for social media's desired outcome, just like mainstream media.

00:02:19.000 And one didn't.

00:02:20.000 They don't want Kyle Rittenhouse to be able to have people donate to his defense fund.

00:02:26.000 They don't want that because it's bad for the narrative if he gets off.

00:02:31.000 They don't want information about Hunter Biden and things that could have hurt Joe Biden in the election out there because that would hurt their job essentially as being the marketing arm of the Democrat Party.

00:02:45.000 So some hacked material And doxing material is okay.

00:02:50.000 They won't violate the rules because we're getting to where we want.

00:02:54.000 Others, when they hurt our desire to get to where we want, are a problem.

00:02:59.000 So a Virginia police officer loses his job.

00:03:03.000 Not for doing anything illegal or anything wrong, but because he simply gave to a legal defense fund.

00:03:10.000 The New York Post, the second oldest, I believe, newspaper in America, got shut down for weeks if not months for doing the exact same thing.

00:03:20.000 Not illegal. No one denied that the stuff was real.

00:03:24.000 No one even pretended it wasn't real other than the mainstream media trying to run with it or just not talk about it at all so as not to be able to hurt Joe Biden.

00:03:31.000 That's the difference. So those are the rules.

00:03:34.000 Remember, if you're on one side, you're fine. 0.58

Triggered - Donald Trump Jr - April 23, 2021

Well, It's Another Twitter Censorship Double Standard!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript