TRIGGERnometry - Are We Being Told the Truth About Climate Change？ Patrick Moore

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome to Trigonometry. I'm Francis Foster. I'm Constantin Kisson. And this is a

00:00:10.320 show for you if you want honest conversations with fascinating people. Our brilliant guest

00:00:16.060 today is the co-founder of Greenpeace and the director of the CO2 Coalition in Arlington,

00:00:21.380 Virginia. Patrick Moore, welcome to Trigonometry. Great to be with you, Constantin. And Francis,

00:00:26.480 we're both here. It's good to have you on the show. Oh, and Francis. That's right. Don't worry

00:00:33.200 about him. You don't really need to talk to him. Patrick, but welcome. It's great to have you on

00:00:38.400 the show. We had Roger Hallam, who is the co-founder of Extinction Rebellion, on our show some time ago.

00:00:45.880 And we had a chat with him about environmentalism and all of those things. So we wanted to bring in

00:00:51.380 a different perspective, which is why we're delighted to welcome you to the show.

00:00:55.320 So before we get into the conversation itself, tell everybody a little bit about who are you?

00:01:01.300 How are you where you are? What has been the journey that you've had through life? Because

00:01:05.280 it's an interesting one. You know, I introduced you as a co-founder of Greenpeace. You did,

00:01:09.780 you were involved with that movement, then you moved away from it. And just tell us a little bit

00:01:14.220 about how all of that has happened. Well, I grew up on the very northwest tip of Vancouver Island

00:01:21.260 in a completely remote wilderness area with no road to it. So I grew up with boats. I went to school

00:01:29.360 by boat. I had a boat when I was six. I had a motor for it when I was 12. So I had a completely unique

00:01:36.460 childhood in the wilderness of northern Vancouver Island in the rainforest by the Pacific.

00:01:42.500 And I learned to love nature at an early age as a result. So when I was sent away to boarding school

00:01:49.120 after the one room schoolhouse here only went to grade eight, I had to go to Vancouver where I learned

00:01:56.760 city ways and went into life science in a big way, biology, biochemistry and genetics. And by the time

00:02:05.480 I got to university, I already was well versed in those subjects and did a BSc honors in biology and

00:02:14.140 forestry, the industry that I grew up in up here on the north end of Vancouver Island, where there are

00:02:19.920 far more trees than people and anything else you can name. And so I then found out about the science

00:02:29.080 of ecology during a lunchtime lecture by an expat Czechoslovakian who had come here to get away from

00:02:38.600 the communists as he'd been in the underground against them after the Second World War. And he taught

00:02:44.000 me about ecology and forest ecology. And that was it for me. That's what I decided I wanted to spend my

00:02:51.640 life studying. That word had not yet been printed in the public press. The environment was being talked

00:02:58.400 about a lot by the early 1970s. When I joined this small group in a church basement in Vancouver,

00:03:04.840 that's where Greenpeace began, to take a voyage across the North Pacific with 12 other people in a

00:03:13.100 small fishing boat against the US hydrogen bomb testing in Alaska. We had the temerity at that time,

00:03:20.640 looked like a bunch of hippies, but actually we were all professionals of one sort or another by that

00:03:25.420 time, to take on the world's largest and most powerful organization, the US Atomic Energy

00:03:32.180 Commission at the time at the height of the Cold War. And we won. President Nixon, partly as a result

00:03:40.140 of providing a focal point for media attention to the nuclear tests, we had tens of thousands of people

00:03:47.340 marching in the streets as a result of our voyage being shown on television around the world. And

00:03:55.060 when that bomb went off, we didn't stop that one. But when it went off, people came from both sides of

00:04:02.640 the US-Canada border, the largest undefended border in the world, to join hands against nuclear testing

00:04:09.520 and the threat of nuclear war. And so this became kind of the cusp of the Cold War. We were right

00:04:19.300 there at that time. We didn't do it, but we sure put an exclamation mark on it. And when President

00:04:26.120 Nixon canceled those remaining tests, it began the de-escalation of nuclear weapons buildup and the

00:04:33.480 talks to reduce nuclear weapons between the Soviet Union, as Russia was called then, and the United

00:04:40.600 States of America. And we were just a bunch of Canadians trying to do something useful at that

00:04:47.940 time in history. So I spent the next 15 years full-time with Greenpeace in the top committee. I was a

00:04:55.120 director all the way through. I was the ostensible leader for a couple of years in between there. And then

00:05:01.500 when we created Greenpeace International in 1979 to bring together all the different groups that had sprung up

00:05:09.700 in Australia, New Zealand, France, Britain, Netherlands, Canada, and all over the United States, we became a quite

00:05:18.760 powerful force, going on eventually to stop French atmospheric nuclear testing in the South Pacific, the

00:05:26.960 slaughter of 30,000 whales every year in the world's oceans, and then on to toxic waste. At that time

00:05:35.880 in the late 1970s, pretty well all the rivers in Europe and Britain were dead because of factories putting

00:05:43.080 poison in through pipes coming in underwater. And we created the riverboat named the Beluga, a smaller boat

00:05:52.360 than we'd been using on the high seas. And we took it up the rivers and frogmen went down and plugged the

00:05:58.620 pipes of these factories and backed the effluent up into the factory itself. And just the image of that

00:06:07.320 made really good media. And today, the Rhine, the Rhône, the Elbe, the Thames have fish in them.

00:06:15.560 And that's very much because of what we did back then. Well, as time went on, we evolved from a group

00:06:23.940 of volunteers into a famous environmental organization with people throwing money at us.

00:06:30.680 And pretty soon, we had a fairly big payroll with lots of people working at doing good things. And

00:06:37.860 then when you have a payroll, you have to do fundraising. And fundraising suddenly, over time,

00:06:44.260 became maybe more important than it should have been. And pretty soon, you're a business, basically,

00:06:52.820 and with a payroll to meet. And gradually, that sort of took over the importance of what campaign you

00:07:01.560 were doing. And in the late 70s into the early 80s, my fellow directors, there were six of us in

00:07:11.140 Greenpeace International as directors, decided, none of whom had any formal science education as

00:07:17.820 I did, decided Greenpeace should take on a campaign to ban chlorine worldwide. And I'm going like,

00:07:26.480 hey, you guys, that's one of the elements in the periodic table, you know, like one of the building

00:07:31.100 blocks of the universe, and probably shouldn't be trying to ban that just now, maybe a little more

00:07:38.080 subtle approach would be in order. But in, you know, that a bit of a joke there. But in fact,

00:07:45.800 chlorine is the most important element for public health and medicine. Adding it to drinking water was

00:07:52.100 the most important move in public health in history. And 85% of our medicines are based on chlorine

00:08:00.680 chemistry. 25% of them actually have chlorine in them. We ingest it in order to cure ourselves.

00:08:08.840 So banning it worldwide was not a good idea. I tried to impress them of that. And they went on

00:08:15.280 anyways to do it. So that was sort of the micro reason why I had to leave Greenpeace as I couldn't

00:08:21.440 be part of an organization that wanted to ban the most important element for public health and medicine.

00:08:26.120 But that kind of reflected on the larger philosophical issue. By this time, many members

00:08:31.920 of the Green Movement were beginning to call people the enemies of the earth. Humans are the enemies of

00:08:40.700 nature. And as if we were the only bad species on the planet, that was just a bit too much like

00:08:48.420 original sin for me. I'm not a fire and brimstone guy, not even particularly of a particular

00:08:55.620 religious bent, more of a scientist. And I had to leave. And I was sorry that it had ended up like

00:09:05.040 that. But I'm really glad I did now because over the years, it's basically turned into a racket

00:09:10.600 peddling junk science and doing basically nothing other than trying to scare people into thinking the

00:09:16.940 world is coming to an end. And the whole ocean is full of plastic and it's killing everything.

00:09:21.520 And just a lot of lies.

00:09:24.540 It's interesting because we wanted to talk to you about the plastic and the global warming and all

00:09:28.600 of that stuff. And I know you will have a lot to say on it. But one of the questions you just brought

00:09:32.620 up yourself is this idea that humans are a sort of plague on the planet. Isn't that, I mean, isn't that

00:09:40.420 true, Patrick? Like we're consuming all the resources, we're polluting everything.

00:09:44.940 People would say the world is overpopulated. We're having to modify crops just to be able to feed the

00:09:52.140 population. We're messing around with all sorts of things. You know, we're probably going to end up having

00:09:57.920 to go to Mars to try and, you know, you get the picture I'm trying to paint here, right? Isn't all of that

00:10:03.640 true?

00:10:05.820 No, that would be a simple answer. No, it's not true. We are perfectly good species. And most of us

00:10:14.180 actually try to be good people and good species. There's always a few bad ones in, I guess, whatever

00:10:22.740 species. There's probably bad mice and bad birds and, you know, that don't like the other birds or

00:10:30.000 whatever. But we are a perfectly fine species. We do a lot, especially since the era of mechanization

00:10:41.060 ended up causing pollution because we were burning fuels without any control. We have done a lot to

00:10:50.180 mitigate that. And I mean, if you were where I am today on the north end of Vancouver Island, you

00:10:56.500 would not think there's too many people. And one of the reasons people think there's too many people

00:11:01.860 is because most of them are crowded into dense urban centers, which occupy about two percent of

00:11:09.300 the land on this earth. And the land is only 25 percent of the surface of the earth. So it's way

00:11:15.980 less than one percent of the planet that is covered in concrete full of people. And those people in that

00:11:24.360 concrete don't have a very good balanced understanding of what the whole earth actually

00:11:31.780 looks like. If they would go, they should fly more over top of the countryside where they live. Even

00:11:39.160 Europe, which is one of the densest populations, if you fly over it, you see nothing but trees. You know,

00:11:46.420 you see the odd city here and there when you land and when you take off. But Europe is 43 percent

00:11:53.780 forested. The EU, the entire EU has 43 percent forest cover. 250 years ago, it was less than 10 percent

00:12:04.000 because wood was being used as the energy source for everything and for building, of course, as it still

00:12:12.840 is today. But in those days, the forests were disappearing in Europe and that caused humans

00:12:19.980 to invent the science of silviculture, often referred to as forestry. They like to call it

00:12:26.760 deforestation. But if you plant trees after you cut the ones that are growing there in the first place,

00:12:32.920 it is called reforestation, not deforestation. And Europe has become very good at reforestation. In fact,

00:12:41.200 getting right into it, the meat and potatoes of it, China and India are doing more to help green the

00:12:49.560 earth than any other countries because they are so populated, because there are so many people and

00:12:56.600 they are emitting so much CO2, about as much between the two of them as the whole rest of the world

00:13:02.700 combined. They are fertilizing the earth with carbon dioxide, which is causing the trees and food

00:13:10.600 crops to grow 30 to 40 percent faster than they were just 50 years ago. And because they have so many

00:13:18.920 people, they need a lot of food and they need a lot of wood. So they are planting vast areas of forest

00:13:24.940 in once denuded areas before they started thinking about what they should really be doing, which is

00:13:31.000 planting more trees. And China and India, between the two of them, are responsible more for the

00:13:38.320 greening of the earth than any other countries and are producing more biomass, more living material

00:13:44.900 in the form of photosynthetic plants like trees and food and all the wild plants too, and are actually

00:13:53.960 doing a great service to the planet. And that is the irony and why I am a member of the CO2 coalition,

00:14:03.440 because they've got it completely backwards. Carbon dioxide is not some kind of toxic poison brought

00:14:10.440 by Martians to kill everybody. Carbon dioxide is the food of life. It is what plants eat. And we have

00:14:18.880 to start thinking like a plant, because we're not a plant, we're an animal that eats plants. And if it

00:14:26.900 wasn't for the plants, we wouldn't be here. Animals could never have existed if it weren't for the fact that

00:14:33.040 plants came first. They came first and made the oxygen, because they consumed carbon dioxide,

00:14:41.040 kept the carbon for themselves to build wood and fibers and fruits and vegetables. And then they gave

00:14:49.920 off the oxygen into the atmosphere, which made it possible for animals to evolve in the first place.

00:14:57.020 So we owe our entire existence to plants and should therefore worship them regularly and make sure we

00:15:04.800 understand just exactly what the formula is on this planet, instead of thinking that by burning fossil

00:15:12.000 fuels, which are in fact made from plants, do people understand this? Come on, people, plants made the

00:15:19.780 fossil fuels. Fossil fuels. Fossil fuels were made by solar energy in the forests and in the grasslands of

00:15:27.740 this earth. And they got buried. Those forests got buried and turned into hydrocarbons. They started out

00:15:35.280 as carbohydrates. All they did was lose their oxygen and became hydrocarbons like coal and oil and gas.

00:15:43.620 And we are now releasing that solar energy that they captured. So hydrocarbons, fossil fuels are the

00:15:53.880 greatest storage battery of solar energy on this earth. And we should use them judiciously, which is

00:16:02.940 why I favor nuclear energy, because it could actually supplant a great deal of fossil fuels in an effective

00:16:10.280 way. Unlike wind and solar, which don't work three quarters of the time, they could actually work all

00:16:17.120 the time, as they do. There's 440 nuclear plants operating in around the world today. Nearly 100 of

00:16:24.000 them are in the United States. And no citizen of the US has ever been harmed by a nuclear plant. And I don't

00:16:31.120 believe any citizen of the UK or of the EU has ever been. Well, Chernobyl did affect the EU, of course.

00:16:38.540 And it was the only nuclear accident in the history of nuclear energy that killed people. And it was about 86

00:16:45.600 people, according to the World Health Organization. Greenpeace says it was 300,000 who died in Chernobyl, but they

00:16:53.240 don't have gravestones or names. So I suspect something is amiss there in their calculation.

00:16:59.680 Sir Patrick, before we touch on nuclear power, there is a narrative that is being spread at the

00:17:08.280 moment by people at Extinction Rebellion, you know, Greta Thunberg, and so on and so forth, that

00:17:13.480 our planet is in grave danger. We have something like 50, you know, harvests left. If we don't do

00:17:19.160 something now, we're facing a climate catastrophe, are the words that they use. Is this accurate?

00:17:26.260 And if it's not, what is the reality of the situation that we face? Because global warming

00:17:32.140 is a thing, isn't it? Yes, and we're in a climate emergency right now. Can't you see outside the

00:17:38.860 climate emergency which is unfolding about you? It's complete hogwash. There is no climate emergency,

00:17:45.300 obviously. This is a prediction that they are making for the future, very near in the future,

00:17:50.860 apparently. But it isn't here yet, because even the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate

00:17:57.860 Change of the United Nations, which is controlled by China, apparently, even the IPCC cannot hide the

00:18:06.420 fact that there is no increase in any extreme weather event occurring since weather events began to be

00:18:15.040 recorded, which is quite a while ago. Nothing is unusual about what is happening in the weather

00:18:21.760 today in this world. Nothing. So this cannot possibly be called a climate emergency if everything is

00:18:30.320 more or less normal. Patrick, can I just stop you there? You know, we're talking about rising sea

00:18:36.200 levels, you know, the ice is melting in the Arctic, all of these... Don't forget the polar bears.

00:18:42.440 Yeah, and let's talk about the polar bears as well, you know. Surely, isn't that...

00:18:47.080 Let's talk about the polar bears. That's a good idea. The polar bear owes its very existence to

00:18:56.540 climate change. There would not be any polar bears if it wasn't for climate change. The climate change

00:19:04.320 I'm referring to is not the weather. It is the reduction in global temperature that has occurred

00:19:12.800 over the last 50 million years. We are at the tail end of a 50 million year cooling period on this

00:19:21.460 earth. The graphs are there to see. The data is there to see. It's from marine sediment analysis

00:19:27.340 showing that the eocene thermal maximum, it's even got a name, peaked 50 million years ago. And since

00:19:36.480 then, the earth has cooled to where we are today. How many people actually know that we are in the

00:19:45.820 Pleistocene ice age today? This is the Pleistocene ice age. We are in an interglacial period,

00:19:53.960 one of about 40 to 45. We don't know exactly because it goes back 2.6 million years, which is

00:20:02.560 when the people who are in charge of figuring out when to name an age and then the next age and the

00:20:08.940 next one after that. They say we are in the Pleistocene ice age today and that this is the

00:20:15.640 Holocene interglacial period, which is a slight warming from when ice covers a very large part of

00:20:23.920 the entire northern hemisphere, like all of Canada, for example, right down into the northern United

00:20:30.300 States. 20,000 years ago, that's the picture of the earth. An ice sheet miles thick covering the

00:20:39.660 whole of Canada and down into the U.S. That ice sheet melted over the last 20, well, for 10,000 years

00:20:48.520 after that. And for the last 10,000 years, we have been in what's called an interglacial period,

00:20:54.900 which is still colder. Note there are large sheets of ice on both poles. For the 250 million years

00:21:03.640 before that, there was no ice on the North Pole. None. Because it was warmer for 250 million years

00:21:14.300 before that. So those are the kind of time periods that people have to consider when talking about the

00:21:21.060 climate of the earth and its conducive to life or not. It was very conducive to life when the whole earth

00:21:27.760 was warmer than it is today because life then existed where there is ice today. But let's get back to the

00:21:34.540 polar bears depending on climate change. Patrick, I'm sorry to interrupt again, but before we get back to the

00:21:39.620 polar bears, which I'm really keen to do. I really appreciate you setting this in the historical

00:21:45.360 context, which I think is essential if you're going to discuss this. But there is a flaw in what

00:21:50.440 you're saying, isn't there? Which is the argument about the changing climate is that, yes, the earth

00:21:56.400 had its cooling and warming periods for millions and millions of years before. But what has happened in

00:22:02.520 the last 200 years with the Industrial Revolution is human beings have started to affect the climate in

00:22:08.920 ways that are not natural for our planet. And if we mess with it, there's a runaway phenomenon where

00:22:15.400 you simply don't ever get to go back to the normal way of the planet being. Isn't that true?

00:22:22.540 No. You simply can never go back. A runaway effect. Why hasn't that happened before? And people say,

00:22:31.540 well, humans weren't here when it was warmer. Yes, but our ancestors were. Every single living

00:22:38.920 thing on this planet today, every insect, every bird, every human represents a continuous,

00:22:47.320 successful reproduction since the beginning of life. We are the toughest, baddest ass species that ever

00:22:56.460 existed because we have lasted longer than any other species. All the species that are on earth today

00:23:02.900 have come through the gamut of cold and heat and whatever nature threw at us. We are still here.

00:23:12.100 And it isn't as if we just popped up out of the ground. We came from reproduction over millennia.

00:23:20.740 Any time two people get together and don't have children, that line ends. That's the pruning of

00:23:31.100 the evolutionary bush. And it's been going on since the beginning of life. So no, what we have done is

00:23:39.820 caused slightly more than one degree Celsius increase in global temperature. If you believe the people who

00:23:47.500 are trying to tell us we're all going to die if we don't stop putting CO2 into the atmosphere,

00:23:52.520 they are manipulating these numbers all the time. The sea level rise 2000 years ago, the sea level in

00:24:02.000 Britain was much higher than it is today. There's remains of Roman docks in the south of England that are

00:24:10.500 way inland. This is true. I've been to some. I've been to some, Patrick. It's interesting. I've been

00:24:16.700 to, I think it's Pevensey Castle here in the south of England, which used to be a fortress that would

00:24:24.220 guard the sea. It's now about five or 10 miles inland. Yes. Many of the southern towns in Britain

00:24:32.240 were ports at that time, 2000 years ago. So it's gone up and down and up and down for the last 7,000

00:24:40.080 years. The sea did rise 400 feet, 120 meters as the ice sheet melted from 20,000 to 10,000 years ago.

00:24:52.140 That was sea level rise, 400 feet. But what I say today, when the sea is rising less than an inch per

00:25:00.180 year, way less than an inch per year on average, is you have two choices if the sea rises to where you

00:25:08.760 don't want it to be. Either move to higher ground, that would be a fairly logical choice to make,

00:25:17.080 so that you were not inundated by the sea, or hire the Dutch. They have been very successfully

00:25:24.840 protecting 25% of Holland is below sea level.

00:25:30.460 And you could do that with Manhattan, for example, because there's a lot of people and infrastructure

00:25:37.340 there. It'd be worth building dikes around Manhattan. We can build things so fast these

00:25:42.940 days. We can make whole new cities. Look what the Chinese have done in just the last 30 or 40 years.

00:25:49.220 I mean, if you set your mind to it these days with the technology we have, it's no problem.

00:25:55.740 So let's forget about that one for a bit. Can I go back to polar bears?

00:26:01.060 Yeah. Yes, you can. I like them as well.

00:26:06.000 They actually highlight a lot of important principles. As I said, if it weren't for climate

00:26:12.640 change, there'd be no polar bears. I'm going to try to get that through Extinction Rebellion's

00:26:19.000 thick head. So before there were polar bears, when the earth was warmer, there were only brown bears,

00:26:27.620 the Eurasian brown bear, as it is called. I'm sure you know what I mean. Over here, we call them

00:26:32.840 grizzly bears, but they are the same species because the grizzly bear came to the new world at the same

00:26:39.020 time people did, 15,000 years ago or so. When the sea was 400 feet lower, Bering's land bridge

00:26:47.580 occurred between Russia and Alaska. So along came the humans, the brown bear, which we call grizzly

00:26:56.060 bear, the moose, which in Swedish is elke. So they sort of call it an elk, but we have another kind

00:27:03.780 of elk over here that was here already. And the caribou, which you call reindeer, they came then

00:27:09.600 to, and so did the timber wolf. So those five species of mammals weren't even in the new world

00:27:16.180 until 15,000 years ago. So then the world started to cool. And the Eurasian brown bear

00:27:24.480 hived off as the Arctic began to freeze and ice sheets form, and seals under the ice could be hunted

00:27:34.260 by a bear. The Eurasian brown bear split into two populations. One population went to the Arctic

00:27:44.920 to hunt seals under the ice. At that time, they were still brown, and they were still Eurasian brown

00:27:50.620 bears. But they gradually evolved into a white bear for camouflage and developed a diet that was much

00:27:57.840 more carnivorous because there aren't many plants in the Arctic like there are where the brown bear lives.

00:28:04.260 So the polar bear is actually the offshoot genetically of the Eurasian brown bear. And today,

00:28:13.740 because they're not separated by much time, only a few hundred thousand years, because of that,

00:28:21.220 they can still breed successfully between the two. They seldom find each other because one's in the

00:28:27.420 Arctic and ones on the land down south. But if they are put together, they can produce viable offspring,

00:28:36.280 which is actually the definition of a species. But we see the polar bear as being so distinct

00:28:41.840 from the brown bear that we give it a separate species name. There you go. If it wasn't for the descent

00:28:50.140 into the Pleistocene ice age that began three or four million years ago and was finally said to be

00:28:58.040 this is now an ice age 2.6 million years ago, that caused the Eurasian brown bear to evolve into a polar

00:29:06.020 bear. And that's why they wouldn't exist if it weren't for climate change. Now, as to their population

00:29:12.160 and the threat of extinction and all of that, here's the true story. In the early 70s, wildlife

00:29:20.820 biologists went to the leaders of the polar countries, which is Russia, Canada, the United

00:29:27.640 States, Norway and Denmark, of all places, because it owns Greenland, which actually has quite a lot of

00:29:34.340 polar bears on it. And told them that the hunting of polar bears had increased to such a level that

00:29:42.320 is a threat to the population. They had been reduced to somewhere between six and 10,000 individuals

00:29:48.640 at that time. So all the polar countries came together and signed an international treaty in 1973

00:29:57.900 to end the unrestricted hunting of polar bears. How many members of the public are aware of that?

00:30:06.240 None of them are told this. The media never talks about the international treaty to end the unrestricted

00:30:13.860 hunting of polar bears because by the early 70s, it'd become real easy to take a plane to the Arctic,

00:30:20.880 hire an Inuit guide, and get yourself two or three polar bear rugs for in front of your fireplace.

00:30:25.540 And lots of people had enough money to do that. And it was a thing to do. So the polar bears were

00:30:32.040 diminishing. Since that treaty was signed, the polar bear population has grown to somewhere between 30

00:30:38.540 and 50,000. It's not easy to count them all because they're distributed all around the North Pole on the

00:30:45.180 ice pack. And that's one of the reasons they can make up this fake story. That's why my book is called

00:30:50.920 Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom because the polar bears might as well be invisible

00:30:56.660 to nearly everybody on Earth. Same with coral reefs. So they're not invisible in the sense that if you

00:31:04.240 could get there and see them and count them and look at them all, you could verify them. You could see

00:31:10.080 them. But most people can't see the Great Barrier Reef or the polar bears. And those have become the two

00:31:16.360 iconic symbols of the death of the planet, when in fact, they are both healthier than ever.

00:31:24.100 Sir Patrick, you know, that is something as well that I've been told that, you know, that the Great

00:31:28.360 Barrier Reef is dead, where once it was, you know, pink coral, now it's bleached white, etc, etc.

00:31:34.300 Is that true? No, it's completely recovered from the bleaching of 2016, which itself was completely

00:31:44.300 exaggerated. And when coral bleaches, it is not dead. They don't tell you that. You look at the

00:31:52.340 headlines from that time. It said 93% of the Great Barrier Reef is dying. They didn't say it was dead.

00:32:02.100 They said it was dying. And the newspapers translated that as dead. They said that it was about to die.

00:32:09.540 They said it was terminal. Forbes even said that it was in its final terminal stage, as if there are

00:32:16.580 previous terminal stages to the final one. It was just a bunch of hype. And the fact of the matter is,

00:32:24.140 Peter Ridd, Dr. Peter Ridd, who was fired from James Cook University for daring to counter the

00:32:30.560 propaganda from his own fellow scientists in Australia, who are exaggerating the threat to

00:32:37.000 the reef in order to get hundreds of millions of dollars in research money. Now, how on earth can

00:32:46.000 hundreds of millions of dollars save the coral reef? What are they going to do? They're going to go out

00:32:51.980 there and look at it and take photographs of it and dive on it. How does that fix the reef, if indeed

00:33:01.360 it was in trouble? They are not coral reef doctors. They are charlatans sucking money out of the

00:33:09.940 taxpayers on the pretense that the coral reef is dying. The main threat to coral reefs is cyclones,

00:33:17.240 which we call hurricanes. That is what causes real damage to coral reefs, because they're right out

00:33:24.240 there in the middle of the ocean with no protection whatsoever, except for their own selves. And very

00:33:30.600 often there's large damage caused. Now, bleaching is a really, I mean, it's a complicated phenomenon.

00:33:37.980 The coral is a symbiotic union of an animal and a plant. And do you want me to go on from there and

00:33:49.120 describe the whole life history of corals? Probably not. But when they bleach, when they bleach, they are

00:33:55.800 ejecting the plant. The coral animal, which is a relative of jellyfish, is transparent. As you know,

00:34:04.340 a lot of jellyfish are basically transparent. You can see through them. That's the true of the coral

00:34:11.040 reef polyp, as it's called. And when they bleach, they are ejecting the plankton, which are the plants

00:34:19.460 in the coral. And again, read two pages of my book and you will understand this. But that's what happens

00:34:29.400 is it's just a stage in the life cycle of the coral to eject these plankton and then eventually take up

00:34:38.160 new ones. They do it when the ocean gets hot quickly and they do it when the ocean gets cold

00:34:43.500 quickly. So it's not just the heating. But the truth is the Great Barrier Reef is not in the hottest

00:34:50.540 waters in the world for coral reefs. The most biodiverse coral reefs are in the Coral Triangle in

00:34:56.780 Indonesia, which my wife and I have dived on two occasions on 10 to 14 day trips. So we know the

00:35:04.940 coral reef very well. The Coral Triangle reefs very well. They are the most biodiverse in the world and

00:35:10.880 they are in the warmest oceans in the world. When the world cooled into the Pleistocene Ice Age,

00:35:17.940 the range of corals was drastically restricted from what it had been during a warmer earth and is now

00:35:26.760 kind of a sanctuary in the Indonesian ocean, which is an archipelago with a shallow sea

00:35:32.780 and no cold water ever comes there. So corals do better there than they do anywhere else in the

00:35:39.500 world. There are 600 species of corals there, two thirds of all coral species and more reef fish

00:35:45.200 species there than anywhere else in the world. This is also thoroughly documented in my book,

00:35:49.920 which, by the way, is titled Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom, available on

00:35:54.540 Amazon.

00:35:57.940 Patrick, let me take a step back here. And look, you've got to understand we're asking you these

00:36:03.400 questions because that is what a lot of people think and that's what a lot of people are being

00:36:08.280 told. So the ignorance that we show probably from your perspective is because we have faith that other

00:36:14.360 people out there are equally as ignorant as us. So in that, very much in that spirit, let me ask you a

00:36:20.200 broader question, which is based on what you've said so far and your book, the change in global

00:36:27.820 temperature is not significant. Polar bell is thriving. You know, all of the other stuff I listed before

00:36:34.900 not true. You also mentioned plastic. I don't want to go to 10 rounds with you on it. I mean,

00:36:39.760 people say the Great Pacific Vortex is the biggest man-made object ever, which is just a bunch of

00:36:45.640 plastic rubbish floating in the Pacific, etc. No, it's not. There actually is no such thing as the

00:36:52.420 Great Pacific Garbage Patch. It is a fake thing. And again, it's because no one can see it. You can't

00:36:58.460 stand on the beach in California and see the Great Pacific Garbage Patch because they say it's in the

00:37:06.420 middle of the Pacific Ocean, far from land, right? Look at my book. There's a photograph in it, which

00:37:12.840 proves that there is no Great Pacific Garbage Patch. It is totally fake. They show a picture on the

00:37:20.280 internet with underneath it, it says part of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. And it's this huge patch

00:37:25.680 of debris with a diver coming up, holding some stuff. But in the background, there are mountains.

00:37:32.040 And I looked at that and I thought, now just a minute, there are no mountains in the middle of

00:37:37.580 the Pacific Ocean. So where was this picture taken? Ah, the tsunami in Japan caused by the earthquake

00:37:45.500 that caused the Fukushima nuclear crisis. That's where that picture was taken. It is not the Pacific

00:37:52.580 Garbage Patch. It is whole towns that were washed into the sea when 20,000 people died from that tsunami.

00:38:00.380 So they show that. That's the only real picture they show. Otherwise, if you go to the internet,

00:38:07.600 after Googling Great Pacific Garbage Patch, you find photoshopped mock-ups where people have painted

00:38:14.860 a blob on the Pacific Ocean and put an arrow to it saying Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

00:38:20.680 It's totally fake. There is no such thing.

00:38:23.940 Okay. Well, you're making my point for me, which is all of these things that I've given to you,

00:38:28.740 you've dismissed, which is fair enough. So this is really perfect.

00:38:33.360 No, I didn't dismiss them. I proved they didn't exist.

00:38:36.140 Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm not disagreeing with you, just to be clear. I'm trying to set up the real

00:38:40.660 question, which is, if all of what you're saying is true, why are we being told, or everything we're

00:38:48.160 being told, why does every major European government and American government and every other government

00:38:55.140 seemingly in the world, why are they all considering a Green New Deal? Why are we being told that we need

00:39:01.420 to desperately, urgently invest in renewable energy before we all die? Why is this all going on,

00:39:07.700 in your opinion, if none of what I've put to you is correct?

00:39:10.620 Because the key to controlling the populace is fear and guilt, the combination of which

00:39:18.040 is very effective. Like, you're driving down the street in your SUV and you think you're killing

00:39:24.400 your grandchildren. That's what you've been told. And that makes you feel guilty. So you send a big

00:39:30.840 check to Greenpeace, thinking they might do something to stop this from happening, which is

00:39:36.080 garbage to start with, because they're just hobnobbing with the rest of the

00:39:40.620 crowd at Davos in the World Economic Forum and supporting global government, which I think

00:39:46.680 amounts to bureaucrats in Beijing, unelected bureaucrats in Beijing. And so the whole thing

00:39:54.900 is based on fear. Now, let's go back in history, not so far as I did previously, not millions of years,

00:40:01.040 but just thousands of years. Since people have been standing on street corners with signs saying,

00:40:07.560 the end is near, the end is near, and predicting apocalypse, end times, cataclysm, and all the rest.

00:40:19.680 How many of those predictions have come true that the earth is coming to an end? I'd say they're

00:40:25.800 batting zero on that one, seeing as though if the earth had come to an end, we wouldn't be talking

00:40:31.100 with each other right now. So the earth has never come to an end, despite hundreds of predictions

00:40:37.780 through the ages that it was very soon coming to an end. And anyways, what does the end of the world

00:40:45.580 look like? Does it implode, explode? Do the seas catch fire and then burn the whole land off and

00:40:51.880 everything is dead? I'm not sure what the end of the world might look like. But I'm quite sure it has

00:40:59.680 never happened and therefore is unlikely to happen anytime soon, especially due to carbon dioxide

00:41:07.840 emissions from burning fossil fuels that were made by solar energy millions of years ago that we are

00:41:14.900 now taking advantage of because we're smart. Imagine rabbits finding coal. What would they do with it?

00:41:25.120 They would not have a clue what to do with it. And we actually are a pretty special species,

00:41:33.280 actually. Look at what we've done. You have art on the wall behind you there. How many other species

00:41:39.700 produce art so prolifically as the human species does? Or all the other things we do? And the idea that

00:41:49.400 we are evil is at the root of all this, that the enterprise of the human species predicts the end of

00:42:00.720 the world, that it's just going to happen automatically because of how awful we are, is a

00:42:07.420 complete and utter lie. There is no possibility that the world will come to an end anytime soon

00:42:15.880 from anything we are doing. As a matter of fact, what we are doing, the main effect of our use of

00:42:22.180 fossil fuels, other than providing 82 or 3 or 4, whatever it is, percent of all the energy we use to

00:42:31.440 stay alive each day and to get from one place to another each day, to, in other words, carry out our

00:42:38.160 existence every day. The other most important thing that CO2 is doing, that fossil fuels are doing,

00:42:47.160 is greening the earth. All you have to do is go to NASA greening the earth on the internet and you

00:42:53.260 will see the satellite photos. This was actually pioneered by the Commonwealth Science and Industry

00:43:00.500 Research Organization, CSIRO in Australia, which is their peak science body. And they figured this out

00:43:09.740 in the mid-2000s, or I think it was 2014, actually, when they published their map, showing up to 30%

00:43:18.480 increase in vegetation growth, especially in the driest parts of the world. Because CO2, increased CO2,

00:43:27.720 not only results in faster plant growth, because that's the food for plants, CO2 also makes plants

00:43:36.700 more water efficient. In other words, more drought resistant. Because when there's more CO2, it's easier

00:43:45.220 for the plants to take it in, so they don't make as many holes under their leaves, which is where they

00:43:50.800 take it in. And that means less water escapes from them, so they can survive on a smaller amount of

00:43:57.560 water than they could when CO2 was lower. So, CO2 is performing miracles with the life on earth.

00:44:08.540 And making our, you know, why are there record food crops every year? The main reason is increased CO2.

00:44:16.140 That is the primary reason. And people are not being told that. They're being told a pack of lies

00:44:22.300 about CO2, like as if it's bad. When in fact, like, nobody can question that it is the main food for

00:44:29.960 life. It is the main food for plants, and it is the main food for animals, because animals eat plants.

00:44:37.120 That is their food. And plants are made from carbon, from CO2. So therefore, so are we.

00:44:44.140 Patrick, I take your point. So then, why is it that over the last couple of years, you know,

00:44:50.980 we've, you know, we've been fed this narrative, we've had Greta Thunberg on the TV, all over the

00:44:57.640 news and media, saying, you know, that the planet is ending. Is it really to instill people with fear?

00:45:04.800 Because what you're saying is very Orwellian, if I'm being honest.

00:45:08.200 If there is evil in this world, it's this movement to try to convince people that they

00:45:17.040 should commit mass suicide by ending the use of fossil fuels. There's people living

00:45:22.880 on the 30th floor of a condominium in 500 cities of over a million people.

00:45:33.160 They sleep at night while the trucks bring the food in from the countryside. Big trucks

00:45:41.680 that are not going to be running on batteries anytime soon.

00:45:47.320 The food that those trucks are carrying was produced with the help of very large tractors

00:45:54.740 and combines and other mechanization that make it possible for less than 5% of the population

00:46:02.320 to grow all the food for the rest of the people who are living in the cities, where there isn't

00:46:08.540 any room to grow the food. Not on a balcony on the 30th floor of a condominium, if you're

00:46:15.460 lucky enough to have a balcony. So they don't see the trucks coming in to resupply the stores

00:46:24.280 every night with food. They don't even have a clue where their food is coming from.

00:46:29.300 They don't understand a thing about it. This is the downside of mechanization. Mechanization has

00:46:37.380 been a wonderful thing to take the burden of labor, manual labor, off a huge percentage of the

00:46:45.880 population. At one time, it took 80% of the people to grow the food and the other 20% lived with the

00:46:54.000 other lords and ladies in the castle with the king. But the 80% of them were out slaving every day,

00:47:00.680 living in hovels, so that kids by six and eight had to become labor and didn't get educated because

00:47:08.280 they were necessary to do part of the food production. By hand. Everything by hand.

00:47:16.120 Today, 80% of the people plus live in cities, and it takes only a much smaller proportion of the people

00:47:26.240 to provide everything the people in the cities need to survive. The energy, the food, and the materials,

00:47:36.940 like concrete and steel, for example, and wood to build their homes. People in the cities think the

00:47:46.020 people in the country who are digging and plowing and cutting and drilling and all the excavating

00:47:54.620 and building huge mines. They are the enemies of the earth. They are the ones who are destroying the

00:48:00.640 planet. They forget that the only reason those people are doing that is so that they can remain

00:48:07.040 alive in their hives in the city. That's the only reason those people are doing that. Well,

00:48:14.200 they take a little bit for themselves along the way, but not as much as most of the wealth is in

00:48:20.780 the cities. Most of the people in the cities have more fancy cars and travel more and all the rest.

00:48:27.260 They got more money. So, Patrick, someone who's not familiar with your work, who hasn't heard you say

00:48:32.160 these things before, might be going, what kind of environmentalist is this guy? He doesn't sound

00:48:37.080 green at all to me. What are the things that people who do care about the environment, ecology,

00:48:47.100 biodiversity, et cetera, if those things are important, what should we actually be doing?

00:48:52.140 Should we be recycling plastic and tins and whatever? Should we be avoiding taking unnecessary

00:48:59.000 trips? Should we be cutting down our energy consumption? What else should we be doing? First of

00:49:04.480 we'll get to the nuclear power and other stuff in a second, but as individuals, what should people be

00:49:09.760 doing from your point of view? You mentioned unnecessary trips. No trip is necessary with

00:49:19.420 the technology we have today. So what you're basically saying is people can't go on holidays

00:49:25.540 because they are really unnecessary. But I would argue that's not the case, that holidays are a break

00:49:35.120 from whatever you're doing in your normal life. And the definition of necessary comes into question

00:49:43.140 there. It's not a hard and fast word. What we should be doing is making sure the water and the air

00:49:51.240 and the earth are clean and not polluted, but they've, they have twisted the meaning of so many words

00:49:59.520 that they call a carbon dioxide pollution. You know, I used to laugh at people who said their plants liked

00:50:05.560 it when they talked to them as if like plants have ears or something and could listen to music or

00:50:13.900 whatever. But I don't laugh anymore because I hadn't realized at the time that when you talk to your

00:50:21.960 plants, especially if you're standing close to them or sitting close to them, which you normally would

00:50:26.400 be if you were talking to them, you are breathing out 40,000 parts per million carbon dioxide, which is

00:50:34.220 100 times the level it is in the natural air. Therefore, you are basically breathing super saturated

00:50:41.420 fertilizer on the plant. And that's why it grows better when you talk to it. It's a perfectly simple

00:50:48.080 matter. And so they have now in the United States, for example, the Environmental Protection Agency

00:50:54.460 ruled under Obama that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, an air pollutant, when in fact it is the main food for

00:51:03.960 all life and has no toxic properties whatsoever. So it's not toxic. It is the main food for life and it is

00:51:14.180 being called pollution. The same thing is true with plastic. They tell me that plastic is leaching toxins

00:51:23.260 into the sea, that when fish ingest plastic and when birds ingest plastic, it's leaching toxins into their

00:51:33.060 body. Is that why we wrap most of our food in plastic? Because it's toxic? The disconnect here is

00:51:42.360 unfathomably insane. The reason we use plastic to contain our food is because it's non-toxic, because it is

00:51:54.280 sterile. And the reason adult albatross feed bits of plastic to their chicks, they're not actually

00:52:04.760 feeding it to them. They are causing them to ingest it because they're not eating the plastic. They can't

00:52:12.100 digest the plastic. The bits of plastic that the adult albatross give to their chicks and indeed continue,

00:52:21.180 the adults continue to ingest plastic all their lives along with other hard bits that they can find

00:52:29.220 in the ocean. There's no pebbles in the sea. They don't float very well. So whereas land birds use

00:52:36.380 pebbles as a digestive aid in their gizzard, which is a second stomach that all birds have, birds don't have

00:52:45.660 teeth. Therefore, they can't chew their food and have to swallow it whole. Sometimes they swallow a whole

00:52:51.300 squid, for example. In order to digest that whole squid, they send it to their gizzard, where it's a

00:53:01.760 muscular organ, where they also put hard objects of a suitable size and shape so that the birds can use

00:53:11.920 them to help grind the food. It's used in industry all the time for grinding things by putting hard

00:53:18.660 objects in the grinder to help grind it. Birds figured that out millions of years ago. Sir David

00:53:25.700 Attenborough, your lovely Sir David Attenborough, lies and says the birds are mistaking plastic for food

00:53:36.100 and feeding it to their chicks. No, they're not. They are not mistaking it for anything.

00:53:44.840 They are using it as a substitute for bits of pumice, hard nuts, pieces of wood, and the squid beaks

00:53:54.040 remain in the gizzard when the bird digests the flesh of the squid, because the squid beaks are a hard

00:54:02.040 object. So they keep them there. And those objects all wear out over time and have to be replaced.

00:54:08.000 That's why they have to continue eating, ingesting these digestive aids all their life. One would think

00:54:15.680 that Sir David Attenborough, having written The Secret Life of Birds, a large book, and having done a

00:54:23.640 10-part BBC series on birds that he might know they have a gizzard. He never mentions the gizzard.

00:54:34.520 He never tells the truth about the hard plastic bits that are being used as digestive aids in the

00:54:43.340 chick's gizzard and in their own gizzard. He pretends that they are mistaking it for food and holds up a

00:54:49.860 clear plastic bag on television saying that they're ingesting this thinking it's food. They never show a

00:54:58.960 clear plastic bag being fed to an albatross chick because that's not going to happen. Then you go on

00:55:05.100 the internet and if you google plastic in baby albatross chicks, you will find baby albatross chicks that are

00:55:14.820 mostly desiccated and half rotten. They've had their side cut open and they've been stuffed with plastic

00:55:23.780 objects. They are staged artifacts. They do this in order to make people think that birds are stupid

00:55:33.800 when in fact birds are not stupid. They are very intelligent and they don't feed their chicks things

00:55:41.260 that they mistake for food. They know what food is just like we do. And we don't eat plastic bags or

00:55:50.280 bits of hard plastic because we don't have a gizzard like birds do. And there's also the great

00:55:56.520 walrus suicide pact

00:55:59.260 where the walruses are filmed by Sir David Attenborough

00:56:05.260 leaping from a cliff to their death. He says it's because there isn't enough ice in the Arctic.

00:56:13.960 That's why they commit suicide because they're too crowded on the land. And actually they don't belong on

00:56:20.280 the land. They belong on the ice. Well, there must be some reason that this area of land on the northern

00:56:26.760 Russian coast is called a walrus sanctuary, like it's designated as a walrus sanctuary. So walrus must

00:56:34.800 go on it occasionally. As a matter of fact, that's where they go when the ice recedes in the summer north

00:56:41.300 from the northern Russian coast. It happens every year. So there is no ice to get on during the summer.

00:56:49.400 Turns out the reason the walruses leapt to their death was because a pack of 20 to 30 polar bears

00:56:57.680 was coming up from behind them. And they were at the top of a cliff. They just happened to have gone up,

00:57:03.420 walked up, waddled up to where they were at the top of a cliff. And they were trapped because this group

00:57:09.340 of polar bears came. But Sir David Attenborough didn't show that. He said that the walrus's home

00:57:16.540 is on the ice. No, the walrus's home is in the ocean and on the land and on the ice when they want

00:57:25.120 to get out and rest. But unlike the polar bear, whose home is on the ice in the winter, hunting seals,

00:57:32.940 walruses do not hunt seals through the ice. They are bottom feeders, sort of like Sir David Attenborough

00:57:41.120 and his film crew of our planet. Walruses use their tusks to harvest clams from the seabed and other

00:57:51.280 creatures that live there. They cannot dive more than 300 feet deep. So they have to stay near the

00:57:58.480 shore. They are actually a shore animal. They're a seaside animal. They don't go out into the deep sea

00:58:06.900 ever because there's nothing there for them. Even seals and sea lions can go into deep water to fish.

00:58:14.500 But walruses don't fish. They dig clams. And they have to stay near the beach. They are a beach

00:58:22.020 beachside species. And he just completely ignores that.

00:58:26.820 Gotcha. Let me drag you back to, so we got to keep the rivers and the air clean.

00:58:31.240 What else should individual people be doing to be environmentally friendly?

00:58:38.000 Protect endangered species. Protect endangered species. That's a very important thing to do.

00:58:43.840 You know, it wasn't until about 100 years ago that the average person even cared about endangered

00:58:49.400 species. Only a few naturalists and biologists even knew about what it was. And when the passenger

00:58:57.260 pigeon went extinct, which is one of only two species that have gone extinct in North America

00:59:04.320 since European colonization, people woke up to this because the media made a deal about it.

00:59:10.940 Like passenger pigeons were a mainstay in markets all across the eastern United States. In New York,

00:59:17.920 they were hanging in groups of 20 outside the shops. And then there weren't any anymore. And there had

00:59:24.600 been millions of them. So this dramatic extinction that occurred over a period of not that many years

00:59:32.320 with, and they were easy to kill. They flew at low elevation in large flocks. And that's what really

00:59:39.320 triggered the concern for endangered species in this world. And so it's only been a short time since

00:59:45.720 anybody even cared about that. I mean, before that, everybody just thought, well, if a species goes

00:59:51.480 extinct, it goes extinct. Species have been going extinct forever. Way more species have gone extinct

00:59:57.800 than exist in the world today, like thousands of times more species. Some of the great extinction

01:00:04.500 events, which were the last one we are quite certain was caused by an asteroid piercing the Earth's crust

01:00:10.000 and throwing billions of tons of debris into the stratosphere where it blocked out the sun for many

01:00:14.860 years, and basically ended the food chain that it killed all the plants. And therefore, there was

01:00:21.000 nothing for the animals to eat. Interestingly, one of the reasons birds survived through that

01:00:28.380 extinction event, and none of the dinosaurs that walked on the Earth survived, but the ones that flew

01:00:37.400 did, because they could fly hundreds of miles to eat the carrion from the ones that died. So they survived

01:00:45.420 through that because of flight. And of course, today we realize how important flight is to animals when you've got so

01:00:52.800 many different bird species that have survived through all these ages. That's just a little aside. But there's been five

01:01:03.800 great extinctions of life. One thing that I will ask you about, and I think it's a final thing, is the Amazon

01:01:15.100 and deforestation. Surely that is a huge problem.

01:01:20.480 No, it's not. 90% of the Amazon is intact. Again, it's a situation where not even many Brazilians ever go to the

01:01:28.400 Amazon. There's no reason to go there. It is basically a very hot steaming jungle. It's been described as a

01:01:36.380 human desert because there's so few people there. 10% of the Amazon has been developed into cattle

01:01:44.300 ranching and other forms of farming. It is not a sea of factories spewing smoke. It is a huge wilderness

01:01:55.080 area. I have flown across it. It takes five hours to do so. I have been at the mouth of the Amazon. I've

01:02:02.380 been at Jari partway up the Amazon. I've been at Manaus where the Rio Negro comes into the Amazon.

01:02:08.520 So I've seen a huge part of it. It is still there. It is not deforested. And the fires they show you that

01:02:18.720 take up the entire frame, of course, nothing but flames, right? It doesn't take a very big fire

01:02:24.860 to take up the whole lens of a TV camera. Most of those fires are re-clearing land that is being used

01:02:33.960 for cattle because the vegetation grows so fast there that when they built a road to Manaus,

01:02:41.340 it quickly disappeared as plants came up through the pavement and destroyed the road. It is an amazing

01:02:51.500 living ecosystem. And they've rekindled the Amazon is dying meme as a result of the election of a

01:03:03.920 president who is not a communist. And therefore, they're just going after him saying that he's

01:03:12.540 destroying the Amazon like they did 20 years ago. And as I say, I've been there. I've been all over

01:03:18.980 Brazil, right from the south to the northeast to the west. Brazil is an amazing country. It is nearly as

01:03:25.780 large as the lower 48 United States. And the Amazon is a huge piece of it, which is largely intact.

01:03:36.400 Look at a map that shows the reservations that have been made for the indigenous people of the Amazon

01:03:43.760 and the national parks in the Amazon. And if you own a piece of land in the Amazon, you are only allowed

01:03:51.060 to develop 20 percent of it. And actually, Brazil, even in the south, where the main agriculture is,

01:03:59.560 has some of the best land use practices in the world. They require that 20 percent of all agricultural

01:04:07.360 land, private land, be kept in nature and that all streamside areas be protected and left in natural

01:04:16.240 vegetation. Take a look in England. They farm right up to the bank of the river. Maybe a willow tree

01:04:23.120 finds a footing there that they can't, you know, that they leave alone. But Brazil actually has really

01:04:30.140 good land use planning. You've been very critical of the United Kingdom in this. You've slated David

01:04:36.500 Attenborough, our farming practices and all the rest of it. As well you deserve. But I'm sure you'll be

01:04:43.060 happy to find out birds have a second stomach because you'd love one. Yeah. I'm just speaking

01:04:48.440 to the home audience, you know. Yeah. But it's great. Listen, let me ask you. We've got a final

01:04:53.960 question to come, but very, very quickly because we're running over in a couple of minutes. Talk to

01:04:59.760 us about nuclear energy, because just for context, you're talking to somebody. I'm from Russia.

01:05:05.100 Originally, my wife actually was evacuated from Kiev in Ukraine during the Chernobyl episode,

01:05:12.780 the disaster that happened there. I've never understood why that one incident, which is,

01:05:19.080 by the way, caused by human deliberate incompetence and stupidity and the sort of planned economy of the

01:05:28.640 Soviet Union and which then generated human error. Why that one incident has been used to essentially,

01:05:35.120 you know, cause such resistance to the idea of nuclear power. But tell us very quickly your view

01:05:43.280 of it and whether we should be using nuclear energy more or less than we are in the moment.

01:05:47.440 Well, we are using nuclear energy a lot at the moment. There are 440 nuclear plants operating in the

01:05:54.920 world. Europe actually has most of the countries that have more than a third of their electricity

01:06:03.720 being produced by nuclear energy. But the big movement in nuclear today is in China, India and

01:06:12.240 Russia, where they are actively building new plants right now as we speak and plan many, many more

01:06:19.100 because they are actually thinking of the future. Nuclear is the energy of the future because fossil fuels

01:06:26.800 are limited. And one of the most important reasons to support nuclear energy is to reduce the rate at

01:06:34.200 which we are burning the precious fossil fuels. And nuclear can do that more than any other technology

01:06:40.620 we have today. Hydroelectric is wonderful where it is applicable, but it requires rainfall and

01:06:48.700 topography to be correct in order for, you know, you're not going to have hydroelectricity in Saudi

01:06:55.300 Arabia anytime soon. So nuclear is applicable anywhere in the world. You can, you can build it anywhere

01:07:03.240 you want to have energy. Now Chernobyl was an exceptional situation. The Chernobyl class of reactors built by

01:07:13.440 the Soviets behind the Iron Curtain without any input from Western science and Western nuclear

01:07:19.500 understanding. Those reactors, there were more than 20 of them spread out over the former Soviet Union in

01:07:26.880 all the satellite countries as well, including Slovakia, for example. Those reactors were basically the

01:07:35.700 same design as they were using to make plutonium for nuclear weapons. And they were a flawed design

01:07:44.680 in that they had a positive void coefficient, which would take too long to explain, as opposed to a

01:07:52.640 negative void coefficient. What that meant was they were actually capable of a runaway nuclear reaction

01:07:58.940 operation if things weren't done properly. And most people don't realize that the Chernobyl accident did not come

01:08:06.960 during normal operating procedures, like making electricity. It came when a group of, when a group of scientists came

01:08:15.240 from nuclear headquarters, probably in Moscow, to do an experiment. And there was a lack of proper communication

01:08:22.920 between the operators and these high-level guys who came in to do this experiment. Also, they told the

01:08:32.140 operator to shut down the safety system so that the safety systems would not interfere with their experiment.

01:08:38.400 And it blew up. Three Mile Island and Fukushima were not nuclear explosions. They were meltdown of the core

01:08:47.120 due to lack of cooling water after the reactor was shut down. So Chernobyl was an exceptional situation.

01:08:55.880 It killed people, especially the people fighting the fire, which went on for 10 days. They had a 2,000 ton

01:09:03.120 graphite moderator, which is pure carbon, which was very, very difficult to put out. And indeed, it did kill

01:09:13.020 over 80 people, including the children who died of thyroid cancer, which was a small number, but they

01:09:20.280 were diagnosed too late to save them. A lot of people did get thyroid problems, but they were diagnosed

01:09:28.720 early enough that it could be cured. The death rate was not a nice thing, but those are the only people

01:09:36.400 that have ever died from civilian nuclear reactors in the world.

01:09:40.880 That being the case, and this is the last question, yeah, that being the case, why do we seem to

01:09:46.320 be so worried about nuclear energy? Why do we seem to recoil in horror when it's suggested

01:09:51.700 as an alternative?

01:09:53.720 Because it's as fake as the fear of carbon dioxide. It's that fake.

01:09:58.740 There is no reason to be afraid of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy, if you look at casualties versus

01:10:06.820 energy produced, nuclear is the safest of all the electricity producing technologies. And it also

01:10:13.940 takes up less room. Like, look how much room wind and solar takes up. It takes up vast swaths. And if

01:10:20.940 they make it 10 times as much as it is now, it'll take up a lot of agricultural land where we grow our

01:10:27.520 food. They need flat land for these things. So that is what should be stopped.

01:10:35.260 Patrick, I agree with you. That's the one issue on which I will say that this is one thing I do know

01:10:40.620 a little bit about having grown up in the Soviet Union. My father was someone who was familiar with

01:10:46.100 these things. So that's the one thing I can definitely say that I know about that we can agree on.

01:10:52.160 But listen, we're running out of time. It's been such a pleasure speaking with you and having

01:10:56.380 a completely different perspective to the one that we are being given elsewhere. We've got one more

01:11:03.400 question for you. Which is always, what's the one thing we're not talking about, but we really should

01:11:07.680 be?

01:11:10.980 Oh, yes. The one thing we're not talking about that we really should be.

01:11:14.660 Um, I think the fact that aquaculture, which is the growing of fresh and marine water fish

01:11:25.980 in a farming context, as opposed to catching wild fish, that aquaculture is the way we will save the

01:11:34.980 wild fish from being overexploited. And aquaculture is being attacked on every front by the greens,

01:11:42.140 as if it's poisoning the sea or something, when in fact, it takes the pressure off the wild fish.

01:11:49.100 Wild fish have been overfished now for at least 30 years. They should let the wild fish recover.

01:11:56.780 In many cases, they should reduce the rate of catch of wild fish in the ocean.

01:12:02.360 And they should increase the amount of fish being produced by aquaculture. It produces beautiful

01:12:09.400 product. Almost all the shrimp you buy these days is produced in farms. Much of the salmon now,

01:12:16.280 of course, Norway having led that effort, and now British Columbia and Chile and New Zealand have

01:12:23.140 followed in their footsteps and are producing beautiful product with aquaculture. And tilapia is

01:12:30.360 another one that is becoming very successful because it's easy to grow and it's inexpensive.

01:12:37.000 So fish has the best proteins and oils of any protein food, any meat that we can eat. So we should

01:12:45.620 be eating more fish, but we can't eat more fish based on the wild fish because they have already

01:12:50.760 been thoroughly overexploited. And I see Britain and France arguing over who's going to get the fish.

01:12:58.040 fish. And it should be more like, let's not catch quite so many of them next year and let's share them

01:13:06.140 equitably somehow. But however you do it, let's make sure we don't catch too many fish because there's the sea

01:13:13.500 is only capable of producing so much. And these are wild animals. We stopped basing our food on land, our meat on

01:13:21.660 land on wild animals 10,000 years ago practically, because we farm animals on the land. And yet the

01:13:28.440 green movement seems to be adamantly opposed to farming fish in the sea, in the lakes and in rivers.

01:13:35.940 And that is a completely bass-ackwards position. They should be supporting aquaculture to take the

01:13:44.220 pressure off the wild fish stocks. Gotcha. Patrick, thank you so much for coming on. Remind everybody

01:13:50.420 where they can find your work online if they want to follow up this interview and read more and find

01:13:55.240 out more before we let you go. Please just Google me, Patrick Moore, and you'll find all kinds of

01:14:03.640 videos, etc. But what I'd really like you to do is to read my new book, Fake Invisible Catastrophes

01:14:09.920 and Threats of Doom. It's the result of more than 50 years of learning on my part. I've been a

01:14:16.260 lifelong learner all my life, of course. And please do read my book. It will change the way you see the

01:14:24.300 world and in a positive way. We should not be believing in the doomsday narrative. We should

01:14:32.360 be believing in the promise of this earth and of life upon it. Thank you. And we didn't get a lot of

01:14:38.720 jokes out of you. I thought you guys were comedians. Well, now we're getting scolded as well. I tried

01:14:44.720 to do a joke at the end there by saying, how dare you? But the internet got in the way. Yeah, how dare

01:14:50.200 you? Yeah. Patrick, listen, it's been a pleasure. We're going to do a couple of quick questions for

01:14:54.820 our supporters as a separate thing very quickly, and then we'll let you go. Thank you so much for

01:14:59.940 watching. Thank you guys for watching at home. We will see you very soon with another brilliant

01:15:04.620 interview like this one or a Raw show. All of them go out at 7pm UK time. Take care. See

01:15:10.620 you soon, guys.

TRIGGERnometry - July 12, 2021

Are We Being Told the Truth About Climate Change？ Patrick Moore

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript