How Civilisations Die - Ancient Greece Expert David Butterfield
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 30 minutes
Harmful content
Toxicity
5
sentences flagged
Hate speech
27
sentences flagged
Summary
What can the West learn from the fall of Athens and ancient Greece? What is civilization, and what does it mean to be a civilization? In this episode, we speak with Professor David Butterfield, a classicist and professor of Latin at Ralston College, about this question.
Transcript
00:00:03.400
Horizontal tails built in Winnipeg, engine sensors from Ottawa,
00:00:06.280
and stealth composite panels crafted in Lunenburg to name just a few.
00:00:09.540
Thanks to thousands of skilled Canadian workers,
00:00:11.700
the F-35 aircraft is delivering unmatched capabilities
00:00:16.220
and will generate more than $15.5 billion in industrial value for Canada.
00:00:22.800
Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, and RTX.
00:00:30.000
What can the West learn from the fall of Athens and ancient Greece?
00:00:36.000
We're in a much worse place than late-day Athens.
00:00:40.000
I do think hubris needs to be a recurrent word.
00:00:43.000
I've never known a more selfish, myopic, frankly philistine and uneducated class of politicians than we have now.
00:00:57.000
if a random citizen has one of these positions of power
00:01:00.540
and things go wrong in the year that they have power,
00:01:06.200
Mate, the joke's right themselves, don't they?
0.99
00:01:15.640
we have been waiting to have this conversation for literally months.
00:01:20.780
Thank you so much for having me. It's a thrill to be here, chaps.
0.99
00:01:24.480
we met actually in Greece where you were part of a Ralston College tour there for the students
00:01:29.680
and we were invited along. And you talk, you're a classicist, that's your background. In fact,
00:01:34.220
why don't you tell us your background? Because that will be, you know, helpful to people to
00:01:37.360
understand the conversation we're going to have. Of course. I'm a classicist, a classical scholar,
00:01:41.740
which means I study the ancient Greeks and the Romans. And in particular, I'm interested in
00:01:47.520
how these ancient peoples shaped not just the Western world, but the world as a whole,
00:01:52.500
as we live in it. Now I grew up in northern England. I was fortunate to go to a state school
00:01:59.800
that taught Latin to everyone and I also picked up ancient Greek and those two ancient languages
00:02:05.700
led me into a love of the ancient world. Then it was off to university studying the classics
00:02:12.440
and I realized that the career I wanted in journalism was ultimately going to be a waste
00:02:17.680
of time and be far more interesting to get my head down and explore the classics so long story short
00:02:24.000
I became a lecturer at Cambridge I stayed there for 20 years and although I had a job which
00:02:32.320
employed me until retirement which would have been somewhere in the 2050s I decided for a series of
00:02:39.380
reasons mostly linked to the decline I was seeing in that great university and in higher education
00:02:46.420
more broadly, I decided to resign and to tie myself to a new college that was seeking to
00:02:55.240
teach the humanities, starting with ancient Greek, in a way that went back to first principles and
00:03:01.920
did things properly. That's Ralston College. That's how I met you two in the flesh in Greece
00:03:06.940
last summer. And now I'm professor of Latin and provost of Ralston and very much enjoying my life.
00:03:13.460
Well, it's great. And look, there's a lot to unpack in what you've said. We'll probably come
00:03:17.160
to that later because we want to talk about the history. Actually, when we were in Greece and you
00:03:22.740
were basically showing us around, showing us the history, but also explaining the history of
00:03:28.460
ancient Greece, I think I remember by day three, you said, you know what, I had a bit of a nightmare
00:03:32.680
that you were still asking me questions during the night. Because Francis and I were both so
00:03:37.400
curious and interested in what you had to say. So let's get into it. A lot of people talk about
00:03:42.560
the history of our civilization being rooted in Athens and in Rome. And if we talk about the
00:03:48.720
Athens portion of that, before we even get to that, David, I've always wanted to ask someone
00:03:54.180
with your knowledge and expertise this question. What is civilization? It's a big question. It's
00:04:00.920
not a simple matter. And indeed, it's a controversial question, but I think unduly
00:04:06.180
controversial. Civilization is a useful word and it's one we should use. But what is and what
00:04:12.520
is not a civilisation, the best we can do is to point to certain things which seem to be
00:04:18.100
necessary to a civilisation and see how far that takes us. So to be a civilisation,
00:04:24.040
a group of people need to have stability. That means geographical stability. They are sedentary
00:04:30.720
in one place. And that typically means having an agricultural and economic base, which allows them
00:04:37.180
to be rooted in that place. But more than that, they need stability politically and socially.
00:04:43.940
Often that means a fixed law code. Often it means some kind of social hierarchy that gives a sense
00:04:49.840
of place within the society. And often, but not necessarily, it means a standing military
00:04:54.900
to defend that civilization from external encroachments. But there's more than that
00:05:01.440
that's required. And I would point to a self-awareness, a self-conscious realization
00:05:09.000
of the shared civilization of that group of people. And what that means in practice is the
00:05:14.320
desire somehow to memorialize and to monumentalize what that civilization stands for.
00:05:21.900
And what that means in practice is a desire to somehow communicate across time and space.
00:05:27.960
The civilization may want to make monuments for the gods transcendent beyond our human world,
00:05:33.480
or more likely, they may want to leave monuments for their future selves.
00:05:38.640
So I personally would say that writing or something akin to writing is a necessary
00:05:44.240
technology that a civilization must have. Why? Because if you're not able to express your thoughts,
00:05:51.320
ideas, and achievements in language through writing, all you can do is preserve an oral
00:05:57.660
tradition. So although it's not often seen as a technology, it should be seen as one. Writing
00:06:03.780
is a necessary part. That sort of mixture and having the stability to last for, let's say,
00:06:11.240
centuries at a minimum, seems to me to lead us towards a rough definition of a civilization.
00:06:18.340
As for Western civilization, that's even more contested a claim. It is a phrase that I use,
00:06:26.760
but it's not the most apt way of describing what I think we mean. I much prefer the term
00:06:32.900
Western tradition. The reason is twofold. Civilization as a word, like any word that
00:06:40.900
ends in shun, T-I-O-N, all such words are processes in origin. They come from Latin words which are
00:06:48.020
about a process. So even a word like nation, which sounds like a static thing, actually in origin
00:06:53.800
means birth, coming into being. So civilisation, when it was used, was conceived of as a progression,
00:07:02.040
a civilising movement from not having the characteristics I mentioned,
00:07:08.120
following some sort of linear progress, and then reaching the goal. What was the goal?
00:07:13.260
When the term was used, it was mostly something looking like Western democratic society.
00:07:18.020
But I, perhaps you too, I'm extremely pessimistic about the notion of linear progress, about the
00:07:25.860
fact that there's a clear telos or end point in our society. So I think that's the wrong way of
00:07:32.100
conceiving of what a civilization is. We're not necessarily heading somewhere better tomorrow.
00:07:38.900
Tradition's better because, as another word ending in shun, it's about the act of handing on.
00:07:44.220
Latin tradere, traditio, is the handing over. And the reason why that's such a good metaphor
0.57
00:07:50.760
to think of the history of the West is that it involves two kinds of people and you need both.
00:07:56.880
One is someone in a position actually to pass on, actively to stretch the arm out and give to
00:08:04.320
another the thing deemed worth preserving. But crucially, that baton is going to be dropped
00:08:09.540
if there isn't also the second person who is willing to receive it and sees the value in
00:08:14.680
picking it up. And that is really the metaphor we should use when we think of the West.
00:08:21.480
If you read modern books, modern op-eds, criticising the term Western civilisation,
00:08:29.120
generally the arguments seduced are a series of childish and really not very logically powerful
00:08:36.000
counterclaims. So someone will say, well, how can it be the West because some of the countries that
00:08:42.920
are part of the Western civilization movement are in the East? Or how can it be truly Western
00:08:48.880
if some parts of the West don't have these features? Or how can it be a meaningful civilization
00:08:53.980
if I can point to you periods in the last 3,000 years where these ideals have not obtained in a
00:09:00.520
given place or time in the West. All of that's just noise. It's just not meaningful to understand
00:09:06.620
the world we're in as we are. Fundamentally, the West would look nothing like it does. And there
00:09:14.160
is no way we would be having this conversation without the intertwined threads of the Greco-Roman
00:09:20.580
intellectual, philosophical, artistic tradition and the core thread of Christianity, which itself
00:09:27.960
emerges from Judaism, but it's Christianity intertwined with the Greco-Roman legacy that
00:09:35.480
leads us to where we are now. And that's just indisputable fact. So that being indisputable
00:09:41.000
fact, let's talk about the Greco-Roman intellectual and philosophical tradition.
00:09:46.000
What is it? How is it different from what people in other places believed around the same time
00:09:51.480
to this day? That's a very big topic. We'll ask all the big questions.
00:09:57.680
You do. And then there are a few bigger questions than that. So if I can set out some sort of
00:10:02.880
core elements in my answer before we get to particulars. So Rome is extremely important
00:10:10.900
and also not important in this tale. It's extremely important because most of the Greek
1.00
00:10:18.120
ideas that matter to the tradition of the West end up surviving and being catalyzed and being
00:10:26.000
refined through Roman conquest of Greece. Without the Romans, it's a really open question what the
00:10:33.500
fate of the Greek world and what the fate of the West would have been. So the Romans preserve and
0.69
00:10:37.740
propagate a lot of the Greek ideas. But it's also unimportant because, you know, if we had a weighing
0.57
00:10:44.740
scale of the intellectual contribution of the Greeks versus the intellectual contribution of
00:10:50.200
the Romans, the scale would break in the Greeks' favour. There is comparatively very, very little
00:10:59.200
innovative intellectual thought among the Romans compared to the Greeks. And that is not because
00:11:04.700
the Romans weren't innovative or original. No, they were really sharp, curious, clever people,
00:11:11.940
broadly speaking um it's it's that the greeks were operating at a level of originality ingenuity
00:11:20.440
energy and joy in discovery that to my knowledge is utterly unparalleled uh in in the world
00:11:26.820
so that's one important part of the story another is that a lot of the things that in the modern
00:11:33.420
West really matter to us in our values have retrospectively been picked up again. So we talk
00:11:41.840
about democracy being a natural good, even though it's a very complex thing. For most of the history
00:11:47.600
of the West, democracy was not obviously a good thing. In fact, through the Roman period, through
00:11:54.240
the early, late medieval period, even after the Renaissance in the early modern period, no one is
00:12:00.900
celebrating democracy. It's not a continuous virtue in that Western tradition I'm talking
00:12:07.880
about. However, come the 18th century, come the Enlightenment, come the growth of the nation-state
00:12:14.680
and various revolutions which try to put the people ahead of the vested interests of monarchs
00:12:20.020
and despots, then suddenly democracy is the thing to investigate. And at that point,
00:12:26.020
thanks to the preservation of these ideals in both Greek and Latin literature,
00:12:31.220
there's a conscious look back to the very specific period of 5th century Athens.
00:12:37.440
And it's beyond doubt the innovations made in this very experimental mode of government
00:12:44.320
in classical Athens were not only unlike anything the world had ever seen,
00:12:50.840
but they've never been tried again at anything like the degree they were.
00:12:56.020
the ultra direct democracy that the Athenians pioneered and thrived with before ultimately
00:13:03.700
having a tragic downfall, much like the tragedians would depict on stage, is a unique phenomenon.
00:13:12.680
So democracy is a major part of the answer to your question, but also philosophy. We assume
00:13:19.140
that philosophy is asking the big questions and humans the world over presumably have always been
00:13:25.580
asking the big questions. But it's not so. There are genuinely turns, intellectual turns that
00:13:32.360
happen in the sixth and fifth centuries BC in Greece, not just in Athens, but in various Greek
00:13:38.260
city-states, which as far as we can tell, and we have a lot of cross-cultural evidence,
00:13:43.440
are entirely new. So the word philosopher is invented actually by Pythagoras on the island
00:13:50.780
we met in Samos, but a few generations before him in a place called Miletus, which is just across
00:13:57.540
the water now in Western Turkey, someone called Thales starts to ask questions which break from
00:14:03.940
the tradition of seeing the world around us as divinely controlled and ultimately intertwined
00:14:10.540
with myth. He starts to ask what we would now call scientific questions, cosmological questions,
00:14:17.660
questions about physics and biology. And he is able to use inherited mathematics and
00:14:25.160
astronomical knowledge to predict a solar eclipse in 585. And that day is regarded by some as the
00:14:32.180
day science began. Not because a calculation could be made of that kind, but because the very fact
00:14:39.420
an eclipse could be predicted show that there were rational principles underpinning these amazing
00:14:46.620
cosmic events, which hitherto had been seen as divine. And within 100 years of Thales,
00:14:55.340
half a dozen, 10 very individual philosophers emerged around the Greek-speaking world,
00:15:02.820
each tackling problems, not just of cosmology, but of how we know things, epistemology,
00:15:09.580
of what existence is, ontology. And when it comes to 5th century Athens, questions about how we
00:15:17.400
should live, ethics. And that's when we get to Socrates and his legacy. So another major part
00:15:24.460
is that the sense of self and our place in the world is suddenly rationalized in the 6th and
00:15:31.940
5th centuries by this series of philosophical developments. One more thing worth mentioning,
00:15:39.580
before we take up any of these particular threads, is on the artistic and literary side.
00:15:46.780
There is almost no kind, no genre of artistic production that we could think of now in 2026,
00:15:56.700
which was not live and thriving in classical Greece. And again, they didn't inherit that from
00:16:03.900
other parts of the world, be it tragedy, comedy, historiography. Instead, they innovated these
00:16:12.060
ways of enacting with the world around them in poetry, in drama, in written texts, now that they
00:16:22.060
had the technology of writing. And it's unparalleled both in its innovation and in its enduring legacy.
00:16:29.940
Everything of that kind goes back to the Greeks.
00:16:41.700
I've seen enough people pushing miracle solutions
00:16:47.400
and I'm not someone who sticks with those things
00:16:56.700
designed to support your energy, mood and digestion.
00:16:59.500
For someone juggling the podcast, writing, travel, and trying to stay sharp enough to hold my own
00:17:04.700
in the conversations we have on this show, that foundation matters to me. I'm not dragging myself
00:17:10.540
through the afternoons the way I used to. With AG1, I feel like I'm actually running on a full tank,
00:17:15.860
and this isn't just marketing copy. AG1 is clinically backed. Every study on their website
00:17:21.600
is openly available for you to read. If you're a trigonometry listener, you don't take things on
00:17:27.160
faith so go and look at the evidence yourself that transparency is part of why i trust it
00:17:32.200
so if you care about thinking clearly and staying on top of your game try ag1 for yourself at
00:17:38.320
drink ag1.com slash trig and for 59 pounds instead of 79 pound for the first month plus vitamin d3
00:17:45.900
and k2 a free five count travel pack and a free welcome kit give it a go it's a really profound
00:17:53.940
point, because I don't think people are aware of the legacy that the ancient Greeks give us.
00:17:59.860
How much of that is ancient Greece and how much of that is ancient Athens?
00:18:07.220
Ancient Athens is doubly important. One, because its democratic experiments
00:18:14.500
happens to combine with an unparalleled flowering, blossoming surge of cultural activity in Athens.
00:18:23.180
However, that meant that Athens was a great draw of people in the Greek-speaking world.
00:18:29.000
So a lot of the philosophers I mentioned were not Athenians, but they came to Athens.
00:18:38.680
These figures were drawn there because it was the place to be.
00:18:41.040
It was the genuine, literally, marketplace in the agora of ideas.
00:18:49.580
but fundamentally Athens comes later than a lot of these revolutionary moments. Athens is not
00:18:57.320
really important until the late 6th century BC and a lot of these major turns in how the Greeks
00:19:05.160
view themselves and their place in the world are happening in a century before that. Because I
00:19:11.440
think we should talk about Athens a little bit because the story of Athens is fascinating because
00:19:17.500
it started off like relatively every city civilization, and then it transformed into
00:19:23.380
something quite different, didn't it? It did. So the geography of Greece is something
00:19:28.120
always worth thinking about because I think it's a genuine causal factor in what we might call
00:19:34.460
the Greek miracle, this period of unparalleled innovation. In that part of the Mediterranean,
00:19:40.460
everything is post-volcanic, it's craggy, it's rocky, it's broken up, it's fragmented.
00:19:48.140
And what that means is the Greeks living around all of these hundreds of islands,
00:19:53.740
these various inlets, are divided from one another. They are small city-states, what we call
00:19:59.660
poleis. And by virtue of that, although they're united by a shared language,
00:20:04.640
they are each operating almost like a control experiment separate from the rest in terms of
00:20:11.240
how they structure their society and what ideas seem to work and what don't. And because they're
00:20:18.400
so interconnected by trade and by travel by sea, what works spreads and what doesn't doesn't. So
00:20:26.720
it's a really sort of organic community of different things being tried. And it so happens
00:20:32.540
that this Athenian experiment, kicked off by Cleisthenes, really,
00:20:41.420
but proves to be utterly revolutionary for the people of Athens
00:20:50.140
let's talk about what actually precipitated Cleisthenes and those changes.
00:20:54.660
Because Athens was pretty much, from what I read,
00:21:03.340
Yep, Draco is there about a century before the major democratic reforms.
00:21:09.500
Our English word draconian is all about over-the-top and harsh laws.
00:21:14.300
Draco set up a legal code where punishments were extreme for minor peccadillos.
00:21:21.020
And as such, it was very, very rigid and oppressive, but deemed suitable to the time.
00:21:33.800
A guy called Solon comes in and starts to set in train some of these evolutions which lead to democracy.
00:21:43.380
But we should be clear about a particular word that comes up a lot, which is the word tyrant, the Greek tyrannos.
00:21:50.460
A lot of rulers in a lot of these city-states were tyrants, but that doesn't mean they were
00:21:55.540
tyrannical in the modern sense of the word. There were good tyrants and there were bad tyrants.
00:22:00.720
What it fundamentally meant was that it was a single ruler who had taken up power
00:22:05.800
outside a bloodline of a monarchy handing on to natural descendant. And yes, Athens had its
00:22:15.420
tyrants, most famously Paesistratus and his family. But it wouldn't be true to say that that
00:22:22.260
was a despotic, tyrannical time where the Athenians were completely oppressed. It was simply power
00:22:29.900
ultimately lay with one man rather than with a larger group. Democracy emerges from that kind
00:22:37.220
of picture. And as far as we can tell, Cleisthenes was thinking on his feet and inventing something
00:22:44.300
as he progressed. Presumably had no confidence it would work, but he did some extremely
00:22:51.860
ingenious things to reset the power balance. And since we're talking about democracy,
00:22:57.840
one of the things I found really interesting was the words the same, but the way they practiced
00:23:03.520
democracy was not exactly the same as we do today. Can you talk about what the roots of democracy,
00:23:08.560
what it looked like on the ground, etc.? Of course. So as we know, democracy,
00:23:14.060
demokratia, is giving the power, the strength, the kratos, to the demos, the people. The people
00:23:21.140
have the power. And by the people, we don't just mean people in general. We mean the people beneath
00:23:28.240
the typical ranks of the aristocracy. So it's not an oligarchy. It's not a meritocracy. It's
00:23:34.940
actually allowing all people to have power. Big caveat here, which is a big one, but actually
00:23:43.680
it's not an interesting one, and I can explain why. The big caveat is when we say the people
00:23:49.000
have power, we mean citizens in Athens. That means males over the age of 20 who've done their
00:23:57.120
two years military service and people who have Athenian parents, initially just fathers, but then
00:24:05.820
father and mother's citizenship was restricted. And therefore it doesn't mean children, doesn't
00:24:10.940
mean slaves. It doesn't mean visiting foreigners. So when we talk about the people in classical
00:24:17.020
Athens, we mean all of the males over 20 who are full Athenian citizens. However, not allowing
00:24:25.540
slaves, not allowing women, not allowing children to have political power, is the norm cross-culturally
00:24:31.300
in almost all of the world, in all of world history. It is 6th century BC. They weren't as
0.75
00:24:37.480
woke as we might want them to. Exactly. The Greek for woke is not known as yet.
00:24:44.280
So, within that scale, which is maybe 20, 30, 40,000 Athenian citizens, power was not only
00:24:54.400
made available to citizens, but they were compelled to be part of it. So just to go back to
00:25:00.540
Cleisthenes, who, if you're interested, is 508-507. That's when this suddenly happens.
00:25:06.220
He realizes that although Athens is a city, it's surrounded by lots of villages which are part of
00:25:12.420
broader Athens. And these people have very different interests in the world. Some live on
00:25:17.460
the coast and they're interested in maritime affairs. Some are landholders who live in the
00:25:22.600
countryside, and some are urban traders. And he treats those three categories as separate blocks.
00:25:30.240
Before that period, there had been four different tribes which Athenians belonged to,
00:25:35.900
but those tribes had their own political, sort of ethnographic links. They were voting blocks,
00:25:42.480
really. They were ghettoized. So out of nowhere, Cleisthenes decides he's going to make up
00:25:48.580
10 new tribes. The four are gone. It's going to make up 10 new tribes. They're going to be named
00:25:52.900
just after Athenian heroes. And each of those tribes is going to have a mixture of coastal,
00:26:01.120
urban, and rural people within it. Random mixture, which means no emerging tribe
00:26:07.820
is tied to any historic power block. It's like you're randomly put in a new team.
00:26:13.620
a new set of football teams are invented, and you're told that you're now a lifelong supporter
00:26:19.120
of this one. So people had to rub shoulders with people who historically might have been their
00:26:24.300
enemies, and people whose interests did not exactly align with their own. So there was a
00:26:29.600
fundamental reset of how Athenians viewed one another and how they voted. But it gets more
00:26:35.220
extreme than that. Any citizen was liable to be part of the workings of government.
00:26:47.280
So the assembly ultimately decided what should be laws, whether people should go to war,
00:26:53.800
and the assembly needed 6,000 people to gather together. If you were in Athens doing your thing
00:27:01.020
as a male citizen, wandering around, talking to Socrates, whatever it may have been.
00:27:06.620
On the day of the assembly, a group starts to approach you with a long rope. And that rope is
00:27:13.140
covered in wet red paint. And the rope comes closer and closer towards you and it starts to surround
00:27:19.700
you. And you're being corralled to head towards the PNICs to engage in the assembly and do your
00:27:27.000
duty of democratic voting. If the rope touches you and you have red paint on you, you were trying
00:27:33.440
to flee your democratic duty and you will be punished. So male citizens were corralled,
0.69
00:27:39.300
literally, into the act of pursuing democracy. The really ingenious thing Cleisthenes did was
0.96
00:27:48.300
not just to force citizens to be engaged in democracy. It was slowly and by gradation to
0.59
00:27:55.740
remove the obstacles for normal citizens to have power. They were twofold. One was wealth.
00:28:04.540
It's all well and good saying we've got to spend our day voting on the future of Athens.
00:28:09.340
But if that means you can't do your actual job where you're earning money to feed your family,
00:28:14.820
well, it's not very attractive. And in fact, you need some leisure to be democratically active.
00:28:20.020
Well, over the course of the 5th century, various reformers introduced pay, first to those who attend the Council of 500, then to those who do jury duty, and then finally to people who attend the assembly.
00:28:33.220
You get a good day's pay by the end of the 5th century for doing your democratic duty.
00:28:39.320
So that breaks the aristocratic stronghold over democracy. Anyone, regardless of their means, could spend their days as a democratic citizen.
00:28:47.840
The second, and this is really shocking, was to remove elections. You would think that asking
00:28:57.060
the people their democratic will as to who would be best placed to decide what we should do
00:29:03.160
is a good system. You could look at the merit of what people have done. You could judge on that
00:29:09.000
basis. You could choose people who are known to you for their skill set and elect them. The problem
00:29:15.240
was, the problem that Cleisthenes wanted to combat was that money would corrupt elections. People
00:29:22.720
would campaign, they would bribe, and people who really wanted the office and had the pockets to
00:29:27.600
pay for it would get it. So what do you do if you want to get rid of elections? You go for random
00:29:34.460
lot. Your name will be picked out of the hat and that may mean you end up on the council. You may
00:29:42.440
say, okay, there's 500 people on the council. I can probably keep my head down. No. The 500 people
00:29:49.720
on the council over the 10 months of the Athenian year, each group of 50 from each of the 10 tribes
00:29:58.000
for one month have to live together in a special building and they're in charge. Worse than that,
00:30:05.340
each day, a random name of those 50 is chosen and whoever's name is chosen is the Epistateres.
00:30:12.440
and that guy is running the whole show. If war is declared, that guy has the responsibility.
00:30:21.500
If suddenly some ambassador comes, this guy, who ultimately is a random citizen,
00:30:26.980
has to play host and to handle scenarios, has to handle what happens in the assembly.
00:30:32.720
So there is no keeping of your head down in a world of random sortition, that is, selection
00:30:39.460
by lots. So democracy is not just inclusive of all-male citizens. It actively requires
00:30:47.660
engagement, but delegates power to anyone who's prepared to step forward. The only caveat to this,
00:30:55.320
which makes it only a slightly mad system, is that there were two areas where elections were kept.
00:31:01.520
for military generals 10 were elected and they could be re-elected and for those accounting
00:31:10.080
roles that involve dealing with big budgets they were also elected generally they wanted wealthy
00:31:15.220
people to have those positions so that they didn't embezzle money or if they did embezzle money they
00:31:20.360
had the wealth to pay it back final thing to say if a random citizen has one of these positions of
00:31:27.000
power, and things go wrong in the year that they have power, you could be executed. The
00:31:34.760
Assembly could decide that you so egregiously failed in your political duty that death is
0.94
00:31:43.780
Mate, the jokes write themselves here, don't they? You can see what... These boys knew
00:31:52.700
what they were doing. You know what I'm saying. They did. They did. So, yeah, talk about
00:31:59.580
accountability. One other thing. You'll be aware of the word ostracism, which we generally mean
00:32:07.820
these days of someone who's just banished from society. They become a pariah. Actually,
00:32:12.740
this process of ostracism was really elegant and in some way quite merciful in the Greek system,
00:32:20.200
Athenian system in particular. What was it? Well, clearly in this sort of hothouse of democracy
00:32:26.340
we're describing, things do go wrong. Different parties emerge. Different people are able to
00:32:33.840
rouse up the assembly as demagogues and fall out with other groups. It's not as though party
00:32:38.820
politics disappears. And at times, the assembly will be extremely angry with an individual.
00:32:45.180
But rather than deciding that the death penalty is the best way of handling that person, they could collectively vote as to whether they wanted to ostracize a given person.
00:32:56.820
And what that meant was banishing someone from Athens for 10 years, but not confiscating his property, not giving him any legal stigma once he returned,
00:33:12.520
and giving him an enforced decade-long cool-down period.
00:33:16.220
And there are plenty of cases of people being ostracised
00:33:18.600
and coming back and sort of getting their head down,
00:33:25.840
What's particularly nice about it is the Assembly couldn't just get angry one day
00:33:34.740
The Assembly had to decide whether it wanted to do an ostracism
00:34:13.940
And then you can get someone you want ostracized
00:34:19.820
We found in Athens places where whole hordes of one name
00:34:24.560
written again and again and again have been found,
00:34:26.620
which were abandoned before being used in the vote.
00:34:31.740
but like most things politically, open to hacking and abuse.
00:34:36.980
You know how at the beginning of every year, people say, this is a year things change.
00:34:44.920
If you've been sitting on a business idea for months or even years,
00:34:51.600
The most common thing that separates people who talk about building something
00:34:55.020
from the people who actually do it is taking the first step.
00:34:58.340
And if you want this to be the year you finally launch,
00:35:01.520
the smartest move you can make is starting your business with Shopify.
00:35:09.720
the year you transform into an entrepreneur, founder, or boss.
00:35:13.260
One powerful move puts your future firmly in your hands,
00:35:18.580
Maybe you've got a product you can't stop thinking about,
00:35:23.580
or a store you've already imagined in your head.
00:35:29.180
Shopify provides everything you need to sell online and in person.
00:35:33.340
Millions of entrepreneurs have already made this leap.
00:35:36.440
From household names to people launching their first ever business.
00:35:40.240
Shopify gives you all the tools to build your dream store easily.
00:35:44.320
You can choose from hundreds of beautiful templates and customize everything to match your brand.
00:35:50.120
Set up is fast thanks to Shopify's built-in AI tools.
00:35:53.440
They write product descriptions and headlines for you and even help you edit your product photos.
00:35:59.180
Marketing is built in too. You can create email and social campaigns that reach customers wherever they scroll.
00:36:05.840
As you grow, Shopify grows with you. Handle more orders, expand into new markets, and manage everything from one simple dashboard.
00:36:13.140
In 2026, stop waiting and start selling with Shopify.
00:36:17.160
Sign up for your £1 a month trial and start selling today at shopify.co.uk slash trigger.
00:36:33.760
But isn't the problem with ostracization, David, that, look, what we talk about on the
00:36:40.640
show a lot are unpleasant truths, because sometimes the truth is unpleasant.
00:36:44.740
And if you have somebody who's brave enough and has integrity and goes, look, we're not
00:36:50.160
addressing the real issue here, in many ways, that's not in everyone's best interest.
00:36:54.620
And if you want this person gone because it's an unpleasant truth, then that is a way of dealing with and silencing free speech.
00:37:05.160
I agree entirely with what you say there, Francis, but it wouldn't be true to say that ostracism was used to get rid of someone who was saying awkward things.
00:37:14.500
In fact, quite the contrary. One of the things that really allowed classical Athens to flourish
00:37:18.980
was its unbelievable commitment to free speech and the free exchange of ideas.
00:37:27.000
So there are two concepts which are at the heart of Athenian society and indeed Athenian politics.
00:37:32.720
One's Isegoria and one's Paresia. The first is the equality of everyone to speak.
00:37:39.340
anyone could stand up in that assembly. If they had something to say, they would be heard out
00:37:44.960
and people could act on it or reject it as they saw. Everyone had the right to speak
00:37:50.360
among the male citizens. Then there was paresia, which is the freedom to say whatever you want.
0.81
00:37:56.640
And this wasn't, you know, standing on awkward eggshells about this or that particular issue.
00:38:04.140
It was the freedom to be as offensive and as extreme in your criticism of your fellow people
00:38:12.460
as you wished. And on the stage, especially in comedy, we see full-blown heresia. So the kind
00:38:19.220
of people being ostracized were not those saying awkward things or things that were offensive.
00:38:24.380
Instead, they were people whom the Athenian demos felt were on the trajectory that was going to
00:38:31.900
cause Athens problems. So maybe they were gathering power to such a degree that they might attempt a
00:38:38.040
tyrannical coup and overthrow democracy. Or maybe they were showing an allegiance to Persia or to
00:38:45.580
Sparta, which was not in Athens' interest, and they just needed to be out of the system.
00:38:51.080
So please don't get me wrong. Ostracism was not used to shut down free speech or cancel people
00:39:07.220
Socrates spends his whole life doing nothing more
00:39:11.380
than asking awkward questions of people who should know better.
00:39:24.860
David, let me try and have a go at the ancient Greeks
00:40:07.560
which sort of frames things for the Assembly to vote on,
00:40:14.100
You could only serve on that twice in your life.
00:40:17.520
And in all of these randomly chosen by lot positions,
00:40:24.860
So you had your one year's term and then you were out. So the continuity was almost nil.
00:40:30.800
There was almost a full change of government with each year. The strength of that was it meant no
00:40:36.220
one could arrogate power or push a particular agenda against the will of the people more
00:40:41.320
broadly. The downside is that people were literally learning on the job every year and a lot of people
00:40:48.160
simply didn't have the merit, the skill to do the job well. What the consequence of that emerges to
00:40:55.760
be was tragic, which is that those who really did want to make something happen had to do it either
00:41:03.280
behind the scenes in a way which undermined democracy, or they had to do it through their
00:41:09.420
military prowess as a general. You could keep getting re-elected as a general, and that was
00:41:14.380
a place to wield power. So Pericles, probably the most famous statesman of fifth century Athens,
00:41:20.320
he's able to remain dominant because he keeps being re-elected as general. So the tragedy is
00:41:27.020
because there couldn't be a clear handing over of power in a way that built to something,
00:41:34.520
it meant the democracy was always fragile. And when that big war happened at the end of the
00:41:40.240
5th century between Athens and Sparta, a big Peloponnesian war which lasted 27 years, twice
00:41:49.320
Athenian democracy completely pivots, both times to an oligarchy or a tyranny, depending on what
00:41:57.940
term you want. So although it seemed as though it was baked in to the very system and in the
00:42:03.280
bloodstream of Athens to be democratic, its fragility was very real. If the frustrations
00:42:08.420
were high enough, the people would pivot and look for a strong man, a strong group who seemed to
00:42:14.140
have better ideas, and the whole dream could die. Because what is so interesting about the Greek
00:42:21.900
states is that sometimes they're at war with one another, Athens and Sparta, and then sometimes
00:42:28.660
when you have the Persian Empire looking to invade, they became allies. It's really quite
00:42:35.080
bizarre in many ways, because that's not how you saw states within a country behave.
00:42:40.820
No, but it is quite a human response. I mean, where I'm from in Cumbria, you know,
00:42:47.400
two villages are rivals and they might play a derby, but they would very much band together
00:42:51.900
if Lancashire, the county next door, were fighting them and Cumbria and Lancashire against each other.
00:42:56.820
But Cumbria and Lancashire would band together if it was North versus South.
00:43:00.280
And North and South would be against each other, but band together if it's England against France.
00:43:03.740
So the sort of scaling up of where the enemy is and where allegiances make sense and don't
00:43:10.120
make sense is a dynamic one. So city-states were against one another for the most part,
00:43:16.460
but in the 5th century, after this incredible and unexpected victory over the Persian invasion,
00:43:24.060
Athens starts to form a bigger band of allies, which ends up running as an empire. But it's
00:43:30.520
prepared to work with its Greek enemies when the external threat becomes real.
00:43:36.540
So can we actually just talk about the Persian War briefly?
00:43:39.100
Yes, let's get into it, because the Greeks and the Athenians, they were the underdogs.
00:43:45.400
Persia had a huge army, they had what many people believe was a superior navy, and there
00:43:53.560
And one, which if you don't know anything about ancient Greek history, is a word that
00:43:58.500
we use all the time now, which is marathon. Exactly. So although the Greeks are doing
00:44:04.720
their things around the Greek-speaking world, there is no Greek nation. There's no Greek empire
00:44:10.320
in the late 6th century BC. The Persians are growing and growing and growing. Darius is
00:44:17.940
in charge by the early 5th century BC of not just the largest empire in the world,
00:44:23.920
but the largest empire the world had ever known, perhaps having towards half of the world's
00:44:29.440
population within it, within two million square miles. And because various Greek states, including
00:44:36.520
Athens, had come across the Aegean and defended their Greek colonies when Persia tried to take
00:44:43.020
them, Persia decided that mainland Greece, and Athens in particular, needed punishing.
00:44:48.860
So Darius drew up an army and a navy of immense size.
00:44:54.520
Persia at the time had northern Greece, had western Turkey, Asia Minor, had North Africa, and almost had surrounded mainland Greece.
00:45:04.540
And both the navy and the army headed down towards Athens.
00:45:07.560
and on paper, on papyrus, it was beyond doubt that this was going to be not just the temporary
00:45:15.760
but the permanent crushing of Greece. Sparta, down in the Peloponnese, got wind of this and
00:45:22.440
wanted to help, but factually, they arrived too late. And so in 490, at the Battle of Marathon,
00:45:28.900
it's just the Athenians in their full armour as hoplites with a band from the town of Plataea.
00:45:36.040
And incredibly, that force was able to defend and defeat a huge part of the Greek army.
00:45:59.300
And it was so shocking to the Persian force that they effectively left to lick their wounds.
00:46:09.420
Meanwhile, Egypt revolts against Persia. Darius dies and it falls to his son Xerxes to approach
00:46:17.580
unfinished business. And that's where exactly right, Francis, we get to 480 and the attack is
00:46:25.060
is renewed. In 480, it's primarily a sea battle at Salamis, but the context of that is again
00:46:33.520
stunning. J.S. Mill, by the way, the great 19th century philosopher and statesman, he says the
00:46:41.560
Battle of Marathon and the Persian Wars in general are, even in British history, a more important
00:46:47.800
moment than the Battle of Hastings. The reason being, it is not hard to see at all that if the
00:46:54.600
Persians do have victory in 490 or 480, Greece is over. And as I said earlier, if Greece is over,
00:47:03.240
Rome looks nothing like the Rome we know, which means the Western world looks nothing like we
00:47:07.940
could identify as Western, be a different world entirely. So there we are. King Xerxes is sitting
00:47:16.760
on a mountain, overlooking the strait next to the island of Salamis. Athens has been ruined.
00:47:24.600
The Parthenon has been destroyed. The temple of Athena pulled to the ground. It's occupied
00:47:28.700
by the men of Mardonius, the general of Xerxes. Women, children, the old, the young, have fled
00:47:37.120
to Salamis. And it all comes down to this naval battle. Between 490 and 480, a miracle happened
00:47:45.240
for the Athenians. And that was the discovery, quite by chance, east of Athens, of an extremely
00:47:52.660
rich seam of silver. It's a bit like Norway discovering oil. There's this sudden windfall
00:48:00.480
of massive amounts of money. And there's a debate among the Athenians in the 480s.
00:48:05.520
What do we do with this sudden windfall of immense wealth? The majority of people said,
00:48:12.960
let's just all take a dividend. We'll all have a piece of the pie and jobs are good.
00:48:20.100
But Themistocles, a general, had a longer perspective, and he knew that the Persians
0.77
00:48:25.760
were not going to stay away for good. And he said, no, let's actually do something we've never
00:48:31.060
really tried to do, which is to build a good navy. Let's build hundreds upon hundreds of triremes
00:48:37.060
with 170 rowers and a crew of 30, and let's make those war machines. And he does that in the 480s,
00:48:44.720
which means come the Battle of Salamis, the Athenians are not only well-equipped, but they're
00:48:49.860
well-trained in attack. And they're able to outmaneuver and defeat the Persian navy, despite
00:48:57.080
the skill of the Phoenicians within that battle. And they route the naval force entirely.
0.99
00:49:04.240
It then flees back to the east, where it's destroyed off Samos, next to Mycolae. And in
00:49:10.640
the following year, the land troops, the infantry, are destroyed at the Battle of Plataea, again with
00:49:17.860
a huge force of Greek strength. The Spartans are involved in this time round, and their heroic
00:49:26.260
defence of Thermopylae, the 300, who held back the force for a while, is an important moment.
00:49:33.800
But fundamentally, this is one of those crux points, one of those forks in the road of history,
00:49:39.660
and by the skin of their teeth the Greeks defended against the Persians for good. The Persians never
0.95
00:49:46.280
came back for a full-scale attack on Greece. And how does Athens and Greece more broadly
0.81
00:49:53.600
end up declining and being replaced and taken over by Rome eventually?
00:49:58.920
Look, we spend a lot of time on trigonometry talking about things that matter and I'd argue
00:50:03.660
this matters more than most of them because you are wearing underwear right now and there is a
00:50:08.300
reasonable chance, sorry, and there's a reasonable chance it's not doing its job. I'm talking about
00:50:14.420
sheath. S-H-E-A-T-H. Sheath.com. It's underwear built around a dual pouch system. What that means
00:50:22.120
in plain English, everything stays where it should be. No sticking, no chafing, no shifting around
00:50:27.020
mid-sentence while trying to maintain an air of gravitas. The fabric breathes, the design separates.
00:50:32.340
there is apparently a technical term for what this creates and that term is zen-like separation
00:50:38.660
which sounds ridiculous and is also completely accurate. It was developed by a veteran on his
00:50:44.060
second tour which means it was designed under conditions where comfort was not a luxury. Over
00:50:49.280
10,000 five-star reviews from people who are not messing about and I'll be honest the difference
00:50:53.660
to my day-to-day comfort is bigger than I'm comfortable telling you about on a politics
00:50:58.100
podcast if you know you know go to sheath.com that's s-h-e-a-t-h.com use code trigonometry
00:51:07.140
at checkout for 20% off first pair comes with a full money back guarantee so there's no reason
00:51:12.760
not to try them sheath.com once you sheath you won't go back sheath.com like the greek
00:51:22.940
tragic heroes on stage, they become victims of their own hubris, their own overweening pride,
00:51:31.220
their arrogance that they will endure. And that manifests itself quite particularly in an episode
00:51:37.680
in the Peloponnesian War against the Spartans. That war spiraled out all across the Greek-speaking
00:51:44.460
world because Athens and Sparta got into a bit of a standoff where they didn't fight.
00:51:52.260
Sparta was landlocked, so it couldn't really be attacked.
00:51:54.380
And Sparta was a superpower on land, and the Athenians just retreated behind their walls.
00:52:07.580
Sparta instigated this war, and it did so because Athenian supremacy was becoming too great.
00:52:14.060
like a lot of European wars, the wars are not over a matter of principle. They're over a way of
00:52:21.700
reining in and clipping the wings of a particular state or empire or person that is growing beyond
00:52:29.740
the bounds that are going to be sustainable. So they're preventative. And it's true. The Athenians
00:52:34.820
by this point were breaking a lot of their own rules. They'd set up this alleged league, this
00:52:40.700
an amalgam of allies. But most of the money coming in from that was being siphoned off to Athens.
00:52:48.740
They were spending it on huge sculptural, architectural, artistic undertakings.
00:52:56.680
And they actually moved the treasury from the island of Delos to the Parthenon and basically
00:53:03.220
were embezzling the money of others. The reason why that's an important detail, by the way, is
00:53:07.940
it's hard to see the Athenian miracle of the 5th century working without there being so much
00:53:15.660
external income. It doesn't look as though there could have been that amount of philosophical,
00:53:22.680
artistic, literary leisure without actually relying upon not a slave populace, which was
0.60
00:53:29.060
there in Athens, but subservient other Greeks whose money was ultimately bankrolling the
0.54
00:53:34.760
the experiment. So Sparta and Athens are at war over broader supremacy in the Greek world.
00:53:43.420
And in 415, the Athenians decide that they're going to attack the second largest Greek city
00:53:48.600
of them all, Syracuse, over in Sicily, on the east coast of Sicily. As you'll know,
00:53:54.620
Sicily, southern Italy in modern terms, were Greek lands in this period. And unfortunately,
00:54:02.500
everything goes wrong for the Athenians. Alcibiades, this charismatic playboy figure
00:54:09.060
who bounces around the world in his allegiances, is recalled. His tactical brilliance isn't in play.
00:54:18.180
The Syracusans are a very serious force and they utterly annihilate the Athenians over in Sicily.
0.99
00:54:25.340
And as such, the money, the confidence, the momentum of the Athenians is entirely broken.
0.86
00:54:32.500
As a result of that, the democracy is overthrown in 411. A group come in of oligarchs and say,
00:54:38.760
no, let's just row it back a bit. Let's go back to the good old days when the people with a bit
00:54:43.440
of money, with a bit of class to them, could run the system. And the Athenian people are saying,
00:54:48.580
okay, that doesn't last long. Back to democracy. But then at the end of the war,
00:54:54.400
the Spartans win. The Spartans win partly because the Persians are helping them behind the scenes.
0.93
00:54:59.320
And one of the terms of the treatise at the end is that Athens has to have a tyranny.
0.94
00:55:07.340
So 30 tyrants are installed, just like as happens in the Spartan government, where there's 30 old
00:55:14.040
men running the show alongside the two ceremonial kings. And an attempt is made to make Athens
0.69
00:55:19.420
Sparta. Again, it doesn't last, but thousands of people are killed. It's a bit like the latter
00:55:25.020
the days of the French Revolution, when the expectation is it will be so easy just to have
00:55:30.460
a new system, but the new system rapidly collapses and ends in bloodshed. As to your question,
00:55:36.080
how does Athens decline? It has another 60 or 70 years of independence after 404, but ultimately
00:55:43.900
the sense of self has gone, the confidence in the project is over, the innovation declines
00:55:53.100
outside the philosophical schools, and with the rise of Philip and then Alexander in Macedon,
00:55:59.880
ultimately Athens is conquered and never raised its head again politically in the history of the
00:56:05.200
world. And what you're talking about actually has resonance with nowadays, because to me,
00:56:12.660
it seems that Athens was a victim of its own success. It became lost in its sense of decadence
00:56:18.640
and arrogance. And you look at the Spartans, they were anything but. Now, they may not be as
00:56:24.920
technologically advanced or as philosophically sophisticated, but when it comes to the messy
00:56:30.600
business of war, they were streets ahead, weren't they? They were. The Spartans are a very
00:56:37.420
interesting case study, and they're almost unique, not just in the Greek world, but cross-culturally.
00:56:42.700
they are a populace that decided early on that their thing was going to be military excellence
00:56:50.740
and it doesn't seem as though they ever really stepped back to interrogate why that's the goal
00:56:56.640
they just remain wedded to it and they operated in a different way from the Athenians even from
00:57:02.540
the get-go because whereas all of these Greek city-states had slaves generally slaves were
00:57:09.200
non-Greeks. They were captured or purchased somehow from outside the Greek world. And for
00:57:14.880
Greeks of this period, if you don't speak Greek, you just speak ba-ba-ba, you are barbaros, a
0.96
00:57:20.460
barbarian, and therefore liable to enslavement. But the Spartans conquered other Greeks on the
0.90
00:57:28.780
Peloponnese and made them effectively their serfs. These are called the helots, the captives.
0.64
00:57:34.680
And as such, Sparta decided at an early stage that other Greeks were going to be subservient
00:57:39.180
to them. That had problems because these helots shared Greek and could work together and overthrow
0.95
00:57:47.220
the government in a way that the typical slave in the typical Greek city-state couldn't and wouldn't.
0.99
00:57:54.320
So almost to defend against its own choices, Sparta had to become heavily militarized,
00:58:00.120
and it put everything into that. So literally from birth, males would be tested,
00:58:07.040
they would be put through an extreme form of military testing, then sent out in their
00:58:14.640
latter teenage years for two years, not to find themselves, but actually to prove that they're a
00:58:19.720
real man in the world. And the rest of their life would be surrounded by military activity.
00:58:26.500
But here's the thing. Sparta didn't really want an empire. It wasn't acquisitive in the hope of
00:58:32.860
gaining overseas colonies and the Spartan culture spreading. It simply wanted to be
0.97
00:58:39.700
left to its own thing, but its own thing, paradoxically, was warfare.
00:58:46.320
So Thucydides was very puzzled by Sparta. He couldn't understand why a culture that was so
00:58:51.680
self-confident did so little of those things I said at the start about civilization. It wasn't
00:58:57.520
really memorializing itself. It wasn't thinking of its long-term future. It wasn't spending time
00:59:02.980
on culture. It wasn't concerned with that. It was concerned with being a number one military
00:59:08.040
machine. So he said, although Sparta and Athens are these two great dominant entities in the
00:59:14.860
Greek world, when a future generation looks at the ruins of these two cities, they will imagine
00:59:21.780
Athenian prowess to have been double what it actually was, such as the splendor of what they've
00:59:27.060
left to us. But the ruins of Sparta will be so meagre that no one could imagine how big a role
00:59:33.240
Sparta played in world history. So they are an enigma, and they wrote very little, which adds
00:59:40.200
to their mystique. But by the time of the Roman conquest, rather sadly, Sparta had become a sort
00:59:46.660
of Disneyland. It was a theme park where people would go visit and sort of marvel at this absurdly
00:59:55.320
militarised form of life and the Spartans were sort of putting on a show because they had no
01:00:00.680
power. They were conquered by the Romans at this point. They were simply living out the only thing
01:00:06.440
they knew how to do, which was to live with a view to war. And what can the West learn from the fall
01:00:12.560
of Athens and ancient Greece in particular? What lessons can we take from it? It's hard to take a
01:00:19.840
lesson from the fall of ancient Greece, because that is more complicated and it's really down to
01:00:25.840
Rome's growth rather than Greece's failure. But Athens in particular is a very important
01:00:32.980
episode to study. I do think hubris needs to be a recurrent word. The Athenians did become
01:00:42.200
too confident in their own principles and in their own futurity. And by virtue of that,
01:00:49.460
they didn't allow themselves to innovate and to rethink. Socrates' whole goal when wandering
01:00:56.680
around the Agora and buttonholing people and interrogating them about their supposed expertise
01:01:02.400
is that people don't really know how much they don't know. They're ignorant of their ignorance.
1.00
01:01:09.960
He, of course, famously said, the one thing that I know is that I know nothing. You know,
0.99
01:01:14.800
this was allegedly the root of his wisdom. But what the Athenians, despite having Socrates
01:01:21.580
really badgering them with these questions, never did is to interrogate whether the democratic
01:01:28.020
process in its ultra-extreme form really was working. And because they didn't do that,
01:01:34.360
and the political system didn't really allow them to do that, they left themselves vulnerable to
01:01:39.200
completely ridiculous decisions, such as attempting to take down Syracuse mid-war,
01:01:45.740
and vulnerable to complete political 180s, such as a tyranny stepping in and initially being
0.68
01:01:52.540
welcomed by the people. So the lesson is, if you want stable government, you need to have
01:01:59.740
broad extension of power, but also genuinely self-reflective modes of interrogating how the
01:02:10.220
power works. You need education. You need to take the process of your own governance seriously.
01:02:19.000
Merit matters. Merit is not equally apportioned between everyone. And you need to be able to have
01:02:25.900
grown-up conversations about who can do what better and who is not doing things well. So
01:02:32.300
obviously, all of those are rather banal things to say. But one of the striking things about
01:02:39.080
Athenian democracy is how little, at the time, it interrogated its principles.
01:02:46.780
And you're talking about having grown-up conversations about apportioning merit.
01:02:50.660
Are we doing that in the West? Because a lot of what you're saying about the downfall of
01:02:55.620
Athens. I mean, I'm going to be honest with you, David, there's a few alarm bells ringing in my
01:02:59.620
head. Yeah, we're in a much worse place than late-day Athens. Late-day Athens had still a
01:03:07.680
system of delegated trust in your fellow Athenians that they knew enough to be involved in the shared
01:03:13.920
conversation. And ultimately, there was a shared goal, which for Athens was the survival of the
01:03:19.260
the city-state. That ended up getting hacked and pulled apart in various ways. But fundamentally,
01:03:26.440
education was tied in with citizens having a clear sense of what's happening.
01:03:31.980
There was a high level of transparency and trust, and the system, in principle, was able to work.
01:03:41.600
as to where we are now, so many things are eroding the very bedrock of the kind of democracy we
01:03:50.580
celebrate. Even democracy is something we don't interrogate. We assume that democracy is not just
01:03:57.300
a good thing, but the good thing. We don't step back and think, well, hang on, if there's some
01:04:03.540
genocidal dictatorship sitting around a table and they have a vote on what the next genocide should
01:04:09.640
be, and the majority wins in that democratic vote, we don't wonder about whether that's good or bad
01:04:15.460
democracy. Democracy only means something if it's tied into the broader aims and goals of the people
01:04:22.360
using it. It's a process, not an unalloyed good in itself. And it depends where we're talking
01:04:29.340
about in the world. But if we talk about our shared country of Britain, the democratic deficit
01:04:36.040
is the widest I've ever known it, that's to say, in my lifetime. On paper, everything should work.
01:04:46.420
We have not a direct, but a representative democracy. Anyone over a certain age can vote.
01:04:55.440
If 10% of people in a constituency don't like what their representative is doing,
01:05:01.140
that person can be recalled and you can have a by-election and you can change them.
01:05:05.260
And inside the House of Commons, if a majority decide they don't like the direction of travel,
01:05:11.060
literally on the day, you can pull the government down and there'll be an election as soon as
01:05:16.080
That all sounds great, but it only works if your MPs, your representatives, are of a
01:05:25.000
calibre and of a character that means they spend their time carrying out ultimately the
01:05:34.680
And I've never known a more selfish, myopic, frankly, philistine and uneducated class of politicians than we have now.
01:05:49.460
The saddest thing about that is less the lack of quality in Parliament.
01:05:56.520
it's how high the hurdles are for the ordinary good British citizen which I really do believe
01:06:03.900
the great majority of people are how high the hurdle is for people to get over if they if they
01:06:09.340
want to be involved in that you know party politics is much more an obstacle to good government than
01:06:15.200
it is a help so I really worry about our own democratic process and the fact that the House
01:06:25.760
of Lords is slowly losing all of its powers as a genuinely scrutinising body that can block
01:06:33.560
poorly made laws. But in education more broadly, we're simply not leading our young people who
01:06:42.080
will become voters to a level of understanding of our history and our values that makes them
01:06:48.920
sufficiently well-informed voters. I mean, right now we have this perverse scenario where
01:06:54.760
a Labour government has lowered the voting age to 16, but at the self-same time is making changes
01:07:00.900
to education and indeed to the freedoms of 16-year-olds that don't give them the information
01:07:06.440
on which to make a considered vote as a notional adult in the nation. So there's very little
01:07:12.780
joined-up thinking going on as to how we can improve in Britain our own democratic process.
01:07:18.440
and we've become scared of merit, of excellence and of exclusion where it's necessary.
01:07:27.880
And that takes me back to where I began with one of the problems in higher education.
01:07:32.560
Well, that was one of the things I actually found most shocking because I guess at the
01:07:37.640
level of the normal person, which is what we are, who is not involved in education,
01:07:42.560
You go, look, the University of whatever on whatever.
01:07:47.540
Yeah, of course, it's a woke madrasa, blah, blah, blah.
01:07:53.060
And suddenly, when you talk to people who are actually involved in all these great institutions
01:08:01.500
I mean, these are the pillars of British history, of British society.
01:08:05.200
He's given us prime ministers on days on end, et cetera.
01:08:08.600
For someone of your caliber, of your intellect, of your sharpness, of your brilliance, to
01:08:15.720
give up, and people need to understand this, you had tenure at Cambridge, which means you
01:08:20.380
You can be there, you can say whatever you want, you can do whatever you want, like some
01:08:23.700
of your colleagues might look at you as cons, but you can stay there, nobody can do anything.
01:08:27.940
For you to give up that job and to go to what's effectively a startup at Ralston College,
01:08:31.980
which is brilliant, but a startup, that's got to be, there's got to be something seriously
01:08:39.560
Right, I'll be honest. I know a fair few blokes who've gone through the whole hair loss thing,
01:08:44.920
and almost all of them said the same thing. They wish they'd acted sooner rather than
01:08:49.800
waiting until it was too late. This is where HIMSS comes in. HIMSS offers convenient access
01:08:54.840
to a range of prescription hair loss treatments with ingredients at work, including chews, oral
01:08:59.800
medication, serums, and sprays. Doctor-trusted ingredients like finasteride and minoxidil can
01:09:05.560
stop further hair loss and regrow hair in as little as three to six months. It's all 100%
01:09:11.100
online with personalized treatment plans and no hidden fees, no awkward appointments, no surprise
01:09:16.560
costs, just real care on your schedule. For simple online access to personalized and affordable
01:09:22.600
hair care for hair loss, ED, weight loss, and more, visit hims.com slash trigger. That's hims.com
01:09:29.960
slash trigger for your free online visit. Hims.com slash trigger. Featured products include
01:09:36.760
compounded drug products which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness or
01:09:42.560
quality. Prescription required. See website for full details, restrictions and important safety
01:09:48.120
information. Individual results may vary based on studies of topical and oral minoxidil and
01:09:54.140
an asteroid? When I made the decision a couple of years ago, most people, friends, family,
01:10:00.700
colleagues, thought I was mad. But actually, it was one of the most rational decisions I've ever
01:10:07.980
made, and certainly don't regret it at all as things stand. And the calculus was really down to
01:10:13.480
the direction of travel of the university. What I'm about to say is all true, but it's tied in
01:10:20.400
particular to the humanities and the social sciences. Broadly speaking, the STEM subjects,
01:10:26.440
those that are based in tangible, measurable reality and in proofs, they're upstream from
01:10:34.380
this decline and they may hold on. So I'm really talking about the humanities in particular.
01:10:42.180
Fundamentally, at Cambridge and indeed at all the other universities I'm aware of in the Western
01:10:50.000
Anglophone world. A rupture has been building and has almost fully manifested itself between
01:10:59.240
the fundamental commitments of what it is to study the humanities, to ask the questions about
01:11:05.560
the human condition, and to range over as widely as possible the products of human civilizations.
01:11:14.300
there's been a rupture between that and the actual exercise of what it is to be an academic
01:11:20.640
in the humanities that's manifested itself in all sorts of ways in some cases the hyper politicization
01:11:28.340
of what it is to study a different culture certain academics feeling that their role in the world
01:11:34.860
is more that of enacting social justice outside the campus rather than pursuing truth within it
01:11:43.500
There's been a radical rejection, indeed, of the very concept of truth. Many of my colleagues,
01:11:50.940
indeed, probably most people in the humanities, don't believe in an objective truth. They don't
01:11:56.600
believe in a genuine external reality which hard work and scholarship can uncover. And once that
01:12:05.020
rupture has happened, both from why we think the humanities matter and whether we think there's a
01:12:11.140
concrete outcome we can get through that study, decline is not only inevitable, it is rapid.
01:12:19.180
So consider, if we're in a system where how one responds to a particular Greek philosopher
01:12:26.720
does not itself lead to a true and a false response, it therefore follows that there
01:12:35.580
aren't really better and worse answers in that intellectual inquiry. That then follows that the
01:12:43.700
examination system, which literally is meant to grade by degree, that's why we use these terms,
01:12:50.840
doesn't have a sufficient ground to stand on. Which means the very act of going to a university
01:12:57.260
to learn things which can then be tested and you can tell your future employer
01:13:01.360
the degree to which you did well in that exercise, actually no longer is fit for purpose.
01:13:09.280
And this is the main reason that grade inflation has become rampant. The main reason that it's
01:13:14.500
almost impossible to get lower than a 2-1. In the British system, of course, there's a first,
01:13:19.600
then a 2-1. But historically, there was a 2-2, a lower second, then a third,
01:13:24.820
then a pass, and then a fail. All of that category beneath 2-1 has almost entirely been eroded.
01:13:31.360
So long as you've done something, you really will get a 2-1. Why is that happening so quickly?
01:13:38.320
Because there is a complete lack of faith in merit and excellence when it comes to examination.
01:13:46.520
So I looked around at what was happening within the subject, how every change to the syllabus,
01:13:54.480
to admissions criteria to examination methods was in the direction of travel away from
01:14:03.220
identifying excellence and rewarding it. Even appointments at the academic level were starting
01:14:09.640
to be made much less on the ground of academic excellence than either about the socio-political
01:14:17.180
advantage of having such a person there or even about the external optics of being able to have
01:14:22.640
such a person. And I could see that just as one of a few people who were really sticking our heads
01:14:29.560
above the parapet and complaining, the internal governance of the university was not going to
01:14:35.320
change course in the near or indeed middle-term future. And so I decided, as you say, although I
01:14:43.320
could just bury my head in the sand, get in a corner of a library, enjoy my own academic work
01:15:00.760
And what I wanted to do was to go back to first principles,
01:15:05.000
to search for what truth we can find in the world
01:15:08.340
and to teach alongside and with academics and students
01:15:16.080
about the intellectual journey and the curiosity that motivates it. And so Ralston College,
01:15:23.180
where I am now, is genuinely unique in the world. Not only do we start in Greece, which is where we
01:15:29.920
were, but we teach ancient Greek in ancient Greek from scratch on day one, which means not only are
01:15:39.480
the students immersed in the place where the Western tradition emerged, but they are forced
01:15:45.440
to learn it through hearing, through speaking, through private conversations and through classes
01:15:50.160
to make the language their own and therefore to internalize the very thought processes
01:15:55.920
that made this Greek rational term happen. After that, we pursue the rest of the Western tradition
01:16:03.880
back in Savannah, Georgia, but we operate with a rigor and a commitment to objective truth and
01:16:11.600
indeed to transcendent qualities such as the good, the beautiful, that was not something I could get
01:16:20.240
at Cambridge. And I feel liberated as an academic intellectually to be able to have a smile on my
01:16:28.160
face when I teach and research now. I was going to say, because what you're really talking about
01:16:32.760
here, David, and what we saw in the comedy industry and a lot of other industries have
01:16:38.000
seen, and it's a tragedy, is the death of meritocracy. And what people don't realize
01:16:42.860
is that once you get rid of meritocracy, everything else is doomed. It will eventually
01:16:47.620
crumble. That's why so many people love sport. You go and watch a Premier League or the NBA or
01:16:52.560
UFC or a heavyweight boxing championship. When you buy your ticket, what you're buying is access
01:17:01.360
to the elite level athlete doing things that you couldn't possibly dream of at the highest
01:17:07.880
level. But if diversity comes into, for instance, football or basketball, then it's over. And this
01:17:15.480
is what people don't seem to understand. Cambridge is only Cambridge because it's meant to be the
01:17:21.080
best of the very best. Correct. But people have worked themselves into a corner that they
01:17:27.560
intellectually cannot escape. They know on the one hand that Cambridge has existed for its academic
01:17:33.520
excellence and that there's merit behind that. But equally, it has to follow from that that
01:17:40.280
means it is exclusionary to certain types. Now, in part, that is worth interrogating because our
01:17:47.960
school system really is not what it's meant to be. And certain schools will educate to a much
01:17:52.700
better level than others. That holistically needs looking at because we're all fair-minded and we
01:17:58.640
all believe that potential should get as far as it's able to. However, the very idea of Cambridge
01:18:05.380
being elite and selective, these are the same words, elite and selective are the same words,
01:18:11.440
is deemed problematic because it's therefore not for everyone. And some sort of political,
01:18:18.700
almost virus in their worldview has forced them into a conclusion which is actually destructive
01:18:25.720
of the job they hold. They cannot allow themselves to believe that some people are not allowed to
01:18:32.480
come to Cambridge because of their lack of intellectual merit. As such, they're faced with
01:18:38.480
an irresoluble paradox, and the only way they aim to respond to it is to turn down the meritocratic
01:18:45.060
dial, to celebrate excellence less, and to include those who in some cases really should not be
01:18:52.320
included in terms of the principles of what Cambridge stands for. So I'm fully with you.
01:18:58.480
And what really encourages me, Francis, is that as a people, as a nation, perhaps as a species,
01:19:04.700
we are inherently meritocratic and we naturally celebrate excellence. We love athletic prowess.
01:19:11.820
We love art that is beyond our own individual powers. We love music and song that we could
01:19:18.720
never make ourselves. We celebrate excellence, but in certain political climates, excellence
01:19:25.620
gets in the way of the necessary change that some people want to bring in.
01:19:30.460
And which is one of the reasons that they have to erode the concept of truth. And I found what
01:19:34.680
you were saying about truth so powerful because it's permeated everything now. I did this
01:19:41.320
interview with The Telegraph and the journalist was great and he did a great profile, you know,
01:19:44.940
no qualms, but even in that sort of conversation where I think people have a similar page,
01:19:51.860
et cetera, he said, well, Constantine talks about something he calls the truth.
01:19:58.540
And I went, it's not, I call it the truth. There is a truth. And that's not to say that I have
01:20:04.680
access to, or David has access to, or Francis has access to, but I thought the point was
01:20:09.040
of inquiry or debate or discussion is we all sit down, we all go, well, I think this is what
01:20:14.780
the truth. You think that, okay. And we get closer to that objective reality. But the moment you say
01:20:21.020
there is no truth and it's my truth and your truth, then like you said, the entire foundation
01:20:27.180
of this building is not there and the building collapses. Exactly. And it's interesting that you
01:20:32.580
put it that way because that really does bring us back to one of the challenges that fifth century
01:20:38.040
Athens faced. So at this time, when everything rests upon what the assembly decide, clearly
01:20:44.500
rhetoric. Words, oratory, have immense power. And a new kind of intellectual or guru literally
01:20:51.620
turns up in Athens called the Sophist. And the Sophist is built entirely around rhetorical
01:20:58.940
tricks which will make the worse argument sound the better. And one of the leading Sophists was
01:21:05.720
a guy called Protagoras. And the reason he's important is he is the guy who opened the door
01:21:11.440
to relativism. Protagoras, as a sophist, said, man is the measure of all things. But what he
01:21:17.900
meant specifically by that is you, as an individual man, Francis, you can decide how the world around
01:21:24.660
you is. You make your own truth. Everything is unstable and subjective. Words can mean one thing
01:21:31.340
and another. There's no better or worse course. We'll just frame it in a certain way. And the
01:21:36.760
sophists were regarded as a toxic presence in Athenian society because they, as you say,
01:21:44.300
took the foundations away from the democratic principles of wanting to do the actually best
01:21:49.240
thing. So I'm with you entirely. As soon as one believes not only that there isn't an objective
01:21:57.020
truth, but with that we each have our own meaningful truths, the whole academic game is
01:22:01.720
over. We may as well all pack up and go home. It's basically then a sort of vanity project,
01:22:08.000
you know, an art installation, us saying what we like about the world around us.
01:22:13.360
What's really shocking, and maybe the viewers don't know how widespread this is, is that in
01:22:19.060
the humanities and the social sciences, it is a majority view that there is no objective truth.
01:22:24.940
Yeah. I don't know why you're... Look, let's not be fake about it. Why are you pulling that face?
01:22:32.600
We know this. You can see it. The world around you is governed by that principle. You can see it.
01:22:38.320
Look, I think it's... The fact is that... Because there was still part of me holding on to the fact
01:22:44.080
that it was a vocal minority and that the rest of them were cowed into silence and that it was
01:22:52.420
But the fact that the majority of them believe that,
01:23:06.260
Yeah, but the only reason I'm interjecting here
01:23:19.580
That is, one is a direct consequence of the other, because...
01:23:28.300
But frankly, Francis, the wheels have just kept turning.
01:23:32.960
So what initially sounded like a conspiracy actually was a conspiracy.
01:23:38.780
But what's surprising is that it was completely successful.
01:23:42.700
So this goes back to Rudi Dutschke, the long march through the institutions, the cultural turn of the Frankfurt School, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, fundamentally realizing that in order to set the conditions for a wholesale revolution of society to a particular set of political principles,
01:24:09.820
the culture is what needs the erosion and since the late 60s a certain particular kind of
01:24:19.280
left-wing academic has not only found access but actually been much the most successful
01:24:26.400
in terms of propagating their own school and bringing in colleagues and so what really would
01:24:32.220
have been a minority view when I entered Cambridge early 2000s has simply replicated
01:24:39.080
in such a way and become standard among those educated there who are now academics,
01:24:44.760
that it really is the majority view. And things that I would say to a normal Brit and would be
01:24:51.180
completely acceptable as basic views of how we understand the world around us would either
01:24:58.800
raise eyebrows or cause genuine objections in academic discussions. It's that divorced
01:25:17.360
it just needs a fundamental reset back to day one.
01:25:27.600
Plato founded the academy back in the 5th century BC,
01:25:37.040
so poorly by the public. That trust has been eroded. Why? Because they have seen academics
01:25:44.260
pursue goals and agendas, which are not ultimately part of the project of the pursuance of truth and
01:25:51.980
the celebration of excellence. And we're not learning the lessons from ancient Greece and
01:25:57.620
ancient Athens, which is, you mentioned that word, hubris, an excess of pride. And you're looking at
01:26:02.840
But the universities, I mean, if that's not an excess of pride to go on TV and go, you know what, you can turn from a man into a woman, I don't know what is.
01:26:11.640
Yeah, no, it's a collective act of self-harm for universities to have allowed themselves to be political agents, especially for those which are known to be not true.
01:26:25.140
David it's great to have you on it's a great honor for us to be able to share your thoughts
01:26:31.620
and your expertise with so many people who watch us and listen to this really appreciate coming
01:26:36.180
i'm sure we'll be delighted to have you back before we head over to substack where our audience
01:26:41.060
get to ask you their questions what's the one thing we're not talking about that we really should be
01:26:47.860
reading it sounds simple it sounds basic and maybe even sounds boring
01:26:55.140
but I genuinely believe the only way we as a society, as the Western tradition, as the world,
01:27:02.020
whatever we want to call it, the only way we're going to keep ourselves sane and safe
01:27:10.040
in the coming decades is to bring back reading. Not just because reading by definition
01:27:19.200
brings you into a fixed corpus of things that have been deemed worth publishing or printing.
01:27:25.480
It keeps you within the actual canon of what has been judged worth its place in written form.
01:27:32.800
But also because the very act of reading, where you as an individual are communing with a page
01:27:39.780
and allowing the long-form argument or narrative of the page to bounce off your brain,
01:27:45.920
There's no external intermediary or interference. That is the safest way that we can ensure that
01:27:54.700
not just the young, but the middle-aged and the old can continue an intellectual process
01:28:02.880
when the rest of the world is trying to destroy it. There's no question in my mind that in the
01:28:09.400
21st century, the biggest threat to the human condition is not warfare. It's not climate change.
01:28:18.480
It's not disease. It's not some bizarre innovation that we can't think of. It's the
01:28:26.460
knock-on effects of AI. Not what AI can do, but the degree to which it erodes the act of being
01:28:35.080
human for AI to take such a dominant role in our lives. And I think we radically and rapidly
01:28:42.320
need to bring people's attention back to this completely open treasury of shared wisdom
01:28:49.880
in a fixed written form. It can't be changed. And the easiest way to do that is something
01:28:55.860
literally as simple as to find time in your day, pick up a book that interests you,
01:29:00.140
and spend alone time with it. So it's an obvious thing, but we're really not talking about it in a
01:29:06.220
way that takes it seriously. And it's one of the few genuine protections I think we have
01:29:12.020
against the storm that is about to hit. And it's exactly this problem with the academics failing
01:29:20.400
to speak to the public and inspire the public on the things that matter to them that led me
01:29:26.240
and a few other academics to found a website called Antigone, which is all about trying to
01:29:32.760
bring the Greeks and the Romans before the public in a way that doesn't patronize the public,
01:29:38.220
doesn't treat the Greeks and the Romans as problematic and racist and not worthy of our
01:29:42.940
attention, but actually treats the reader as an adult and welcomes them in to a world which,
01:29:49.560
of course, has its challenges, has its absurdities, but is also deeply inspiring if we as individuals
01:29:55.880
care about our place in the world and understanding where we've come from.
01:29:59.680
So the Antigone team is a free website all about that.
01:30:07.180
Make sure to head over to our subset where we carry on the conversation.
01:30:12.260
Is the West actually a Roman misunderstanding of Greece?
01:30:17.120
Did Rome preserve Greek thought, distort it or weaponise it?