00:21:33.800A guy called Solon comes in and starts to set in train some of these evolutions which lead to democracy.
00:21:43.380But we should be clear about a particular word that comes up a lot, which is the word tyrant, the Greek tyrannos.
00:21:50.460A lot of rulers in a lot of these city-states were tyrants, but that doesn't mean they were
00:21:55.540tyrannical in the modern sense of the word. There were good tyrants and there were bad tyrants.
00:22:00.720What it fundamentally meant was that it was a single ruler who had taken up power
00:22:05.800outside a bloodline of a monarchy handing on to natural descendant. And yes, Athens had its
00:22:15.420tyrants, most famously Paesistratus and his family. But it wouldn't be true to say that that
00:22:22.260was a despotic, tyrannical time where the Athenians were completely oppressed. It was simply power
00:22:29.900ultimately lay with one man rather than with a larger group. Democracy emerges from that kind
00:22:37.220of picture. And as far as we can tell, Cleisthenes was thinking on his feet and inventing something
00:22:44.300as he progressed. Presumably had no confidence it would work, but he did some extremely
00:22:51.860ingenious things to reset the power balance. And since we're talking about democracy,
00:22:57.840one of the things I found really interesting was the words the same, but the way they practiced
00:23:03.520democracy was not exactly the same as we do today. Can you talk about what the roots of democracy,
00:23:08.560what it looked like on the ground, etc.? Of course. So as we know, democracy,
00:23:14.060demokratia, is giving the power, the strength, the kratos, to the demos, the people. The people
00:23:21.140have the power. And by the people, we don't just mean people in general. We mean the people beneath
00:23:28.240the typical ranks of the aristocracy. So it's not an oligarchy. It's not a meritocracy. It's
00:23:34.940actually allowing all people to have power. Big caveat here, which is a big one, but actually
00:23:43.680it's not an interesting one, and I can explain why. The big caveat is when we say the people
00:23:49.000have power, we mean citizens in Athens. That means males over the age of 20 who've done their
00:23:57.120two years military service and people who have Athenian parents, initially just fathers, but then
00:24:05.820father and mother's citizenship was restricted. And therefore it doesn't mean children, doesn't
00:24:10.940mean slaves. It doesn't mean visiting foreigners. So when we talk about the people in classical
00:24:17.020Athens, we mean all of the males over 20 who are full Athenian citizens. However, not allowing
00:24:25.540slaves, not allowing women, not allowing children to have political power, is the norm cross-culturally
00:24:31.300in almost all of the world, in all of world history. It is 6th century BC. They weren't as0.75
00:24:37.480woke as we might want them to. Exactly. The Greek for woke is not known as yet.
00:24:44.280So, within that scale, which is maybe 20, 30, 40,000 Athenian citizens, power was not only
00:24:54.400made available to citizens, but they were compelled to be part of it. So just to go back to
00:25:00.540Cleisthenes, who, if you're interested, is 508-507. That's when this suddenly happens.
00:25:06.220He realizes that although Athens is a city, it's surrounded by lots of villages which are part of
00:25:12.420broader Athens. And these people have very different interests in the world. Some live on
00:25:17.460the coast and they're interested in maritime affairs. Some are landholders who live in the
00:25:22.600countryside, and some are urban traders. And he treats those three categories as separate blocks.
00:25:30.240Before that period, there had been four different tribes which Athenians belonged to,
00:25:35.900but those tribes had their own political, sort of ethnographic links. They were voting blocks,
00:25:42.480really. They were ghettoized. So out of nowhere, Cleisthenes decides he's going to make up
00:25:48.58010 new tribes. The four are gone. It's going to make up 10 new tribes. They're going to be named
00:25:52.900just after Athenian heroes. And each of those tribes is going to have a mixture of coastal,
00:26:01.120urban, and rural people within it. Random mixture, which means no emerging tribe
00:26:07.820is tied to any historic power block. It's like you're randomly put in a new team.
00:26:13.620a new set of football teams are invented, and you're told that you're now a lifelong supporter
00:26:19.120of this one. So people had to rub shoulders with people who historically might have been their
00:26:24.300enemies, and people whose interests did not exactly align with their own. So there was a
00:26:29.600fundamental reset of how Athenians viewed one another and how they voted. But it gets more
00:26:35.220extreme than that. Any citizen was liable to be part of the workings of government.
00:26:47.280So the assembly ultimately decided what should be laws, whether people should go to war,
00:26:53.800and the assembly needed 6,000 people to gather together. If you were in Athens doing your thing
00:27:01.020as a male citizen, wandering around, talking to Socrates, whatever it may have been.
00:27:06.620On the day of the assembly, a group starts to approach you with a long rope. And that rope is
00:27:13.140covered in wet red paint. And the rope comes closer and closer towards you and it starts to surround
00:27:19.700you. And you're being corralled to head towards the PNICs to engage in the assembly and do your
00:27:27.000duty of democratic voting. If the rope touches you and you have red paint on you, you were trying
00:27:33.440to flee your democratic duty and you will be punished. So male citizens were corralled,0.69
00:27:39.300literally, into the act of pursuing democracy. The really ingenious thing Cleisthenes did was0.96
00:27:48.300not just to force citizens to be engaged in democracy. It was slowly and by gradation to0.59
00:27:55.740remove the obstacles for normal citizens to have power. They were twofold. One was wealth.
00:28:04.540It's all well and good saying we've got to spend our day voting on the future of Athens.
00:28:09.340But if that means you can't do your actual job where you're earning money to feed your family,
00:28:14.820well, it's not very attractive. And in fact, you need some leisure to be democratically active.
00:28:20.020Well, over the course of the 5th century, various reformers introduced pay, first to those who attend the Council of 500, then to those who do jury duty, and then finally to people who attend the assembly.
00:28:33.220You get a good day's pay by the end of the 5th century for doing your democratic duty.
00:28:39.320So that breaks the aristocratic stronghold over democracy. Anyone, regardless of their means, could spend their days as a democratic citizen.
00:28:47.840The second, and this is really shocking, was to remove elections. You would think that asking
00:28:57.060the people their democratic will as to who would be best placed to decide what we should do
00:29:03.160is a good system. You could look at the merit of what people have done. You could judge on that
00:29:09.000basis. You could choose people who are known to you for their skill set and elect them. The problem
00:29:15.240was, the problem that Cleisthenes wanted to combat was that money would corrupt elections. People
00:29:22.720would campaign, they would bribe, and people who really wanted the office and had the pockets to
00:29:27.600pay for it would get it. So what do you do if you want to get rid of elections? You go for random
00:29:34.460lot. Your name will be picked out of the hat and that may mean you end up on the council. You may
00:29:42.440say, okay, there's 500 people on the council. I can probably keep my head down. No. The 500 people
00:29:49.720on the council over the 10 months of the Athenian year, each group of 50 from each of the 10 tribes
00:29:58.000for one month have to live together in a special building and they're in charge. Worse than that,
00:30:05.340each day, a random name of those 50 is chosen and whoever's name is chosen is the Epistateres.
00:30:12.440and that guy is running the whole show. If war is declared, that guy has the responsibility.
00:30:21.500If suddenly some ambassador comes, this guy, who ultimately is a random citizen,
00:30:26.980has to play host and to handle scenarios, has to handle what happens in the assembly.
00:30:32.720So there is no keeping of your head down in a world of random sortition, that is, selection
00:30:39.460by lots. So democracy is not just inclusive of all-male citizens. It actively requires
00:30:47.660engagement, but delegates power to anyone who's prepared to step forward. The only caveat to this,
00:30:55.320which makes it only a slightly mad system, is that there were two areas where elections were kept.
00:31:01.520for military generals 10 were elected and they could be re-elected and for those accounting
00:31:10.080roles that involve dealing with big budgets they were also elected generally they wanted wealthy
00:31:15.220people to have those positions so that they didn't embezzle money or if they did embezzle money they
00:31:20.360had the wealth to pay it back final thing to say if a random citizen has one of these positions of
00:31:27.000power, and things go wrong in the year that they have power, you could be executed. The
00:31:34.760Assembly could decide that you so egregiously failed in your political duty that death is0.94
00:31:43.780Mate, the jokes write themselves here, don't they? You can see what... These boys knew
00:31:52.700what they were doing. You know what I'm saying. They did. They did. So, yeah, talk about
00:31:59.580accountability. One other thing. You'll be aware of the word ostracism, which we generally mean
00:32:07.820these days of someone who's just banished from society. They become a pariah. Actually,
00:32:12.740this process of ostracism was really elegant and in some way quite merciful in the Greek system,
00:32:20.200Athenian system in particular. What was it? Well, clearly in this sort of hothouse of democracy
00:32:26.340we're describing, things do go wrong. Different parties emerge. Different people are able to
00:32:33.840rouse up the assembly as demagogues and fall out with other groups. It's not as though party
00:32:38.820politics disappears. And at times, the assembly will be extremely angry with an individual.
00:32:45.180But rather than deciding that the death penalty is the best way of handling that person, they could collectively vote as to whether they wanted to ostracize a given person.
00:32:56.820And what that meant was banishing someone from Athens for 10 years, but not confiscating his property, not giving him any legal stigma once he returned,
00:33:09.080but effectively removing him from the hothouse
00:33:12.520and giving him an enforced decade-long cool-down period.
00:33:16.220And there are plenty of cases of people being ostracised
00:33:18.600and coming back and sort of getting their head down,
00:33:22.200learning from their lessons and continuing.
00:33:25.840What's particularly nice about it is the Assembly couldn't just get angry one day
00:36:33.760But isn't the problem with ostracization, David, that, look, what we talk about on the
00:36:40.640show a lot are unpleasant truths, because sometimes the truth is unpleasant.
00:36:44.740And if you have somebody who's brave enough and has integrity and goes, look, we're not
00:36:50.160addressing the real issue here, in many ways, that's not in everyone's best interest.
00:36:54.620And if you want this person gone because it's an unpleasant truth, then that is a way of dealing with and silencing free speech.
00:37:05.160I agree entirely with what you say there, Francis, but it wouldn't be true to say that ostracism was used to get rid of someone who was saying awkward things.
00:37:14.500In fact, quite the contrary. One of the things that really allowed classical Athens to flourish
00:37:18.980was its unbelievable commitment to free speech and the free exchange of ideas.
00:37:27.000So there are two concepts which are at the heart of Athenian society and indeed Athenian politics.
00:37:32.720One's Isegoria and one's Paresia. The first is the equality of everyone to speak.
00:37:39.340anyone could stand up in that assembly. If they had something to say, they would be heard out
00:37:44.960and people could act on it or reject it as they saw. Everyone had the right to speak
00:37:50.360among the male citizens. Then there was paresia, which is the freedom to say whatever you want.0.81
00:37:56.640And this wasn't, you know, standing on awkward eggshells about this or that particular issue.
00:38:04.140It was the freedom to be as offensive and as extreme in your criticism of your fellow people
00:38:12.460as you wished. And on the stage, especially in comedy, we see full-blown heresia. So the kind
00:38:19.220of people being ostracized were not those saying awkward things or things that were offensive.
00:38:24.380Instead, they were people whom the Athenian demos felt were on the trajectory that was going to
00:38:31.900cause Athens problems. So maybe they were gathering power to such a degree that they might attempt a
00:38:38.040tyrannical coup and overthrow democracy. Or maybe they were showing an allegiance to Persia or to
00:38:45.580Sparta, which was not in Athens' interest, and they just needed to be out of the system.
00:38:51.080So please don't get me wrong. Ostracism was not used to shut down free speech or cancel people
01:23:28.300But frankly, Francis, the wheels have just kept turning.
01:23:32.960So what initially sounded like a conspiracy actually was a conspiracy.
01:23:38.780But what's surprising is that it was completely successful.
01:23:42.700So this goes back to Rudi Dutschke, the long march through the institutions, the cultural turn of the Frankfurt School, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, fundamentally realizing that in order to set the conditions for a wholesale revolution of society to a particular set of political principles,
01:24:09.820the culture is what needs the erosion and since the late 60s a certain particular kind of
01:24:19.280left-wing academic has not only found access but actually been much the most successful
01:24:26.400in terms of propagating their own school and bringing in colleagues and so what really would
01:24:32.220have been a minority view when I entered Cambridge early 2000s has simply replicated
01:24:39.080in such a way and become standard among those educated there who are now academics,
01:24:44.760that it really is the majority view. And things that I would say to a normal Brit and would be
01:24:51.180completely acceptable as basic views of how we understand the world around us would either
01:24:58.800raise eyebrows or cause genuine objections in academic discussions. It's that divorced
01:25:07.560from civic reality in both Britain and America
01:25:12.600that you can understand why some people say
01:25:17.360it just needs a fundamental reset back to day one.
01:25:22.800And that's why academics have the lowest trust
01:25:37.040so poorly by the public. That trust has been eroded. Why? Because they have seen academics
01:25:44.260pursue goals and agendas, which are not ultimately part of the project of the pursuance of truth and
01:25:51.980the celebration of excellence. And we're not learning the lessons from ancient Greece and
01:25:57.620ancient Athens, which is, you mentioned that word, hubris, an excess of pride. And you're looking at
01:26:02.840But the universities, I mean, if that's not an excess of pride to go on TV and go, you know what, you can turn from a man into a woman, I don't know what is.
01:26:11.640Yeah, no, it's a collective act of self-harm for universities to have allowed themselves to be political agents, especially for those which are known to be not true.
01:26:25.140David it's great to have you on it's a great honor for us to be able to share your thoughts
01:26:31.620and your expertise with so many people who watch us and listen to this really appreciate coming
01:26:36.180i'm sure we'll be delighted to have you back before we head over to substack where our audience
01:26:41.060get to ask you their questions what's the one thing we're not talking about that we really should be
01:26:47.860reading it sounds simple it sounds basic and maybe even sounds boring
01:26:55.140but I genuinely believe the only way we as a society, as the Western tradition, as the world,
01:27:02.020whatever we want to call it, the only way we're going to keep ourselves sane and safe
01:27:10.040in the coming decades is to bring back reading. Not just because reading by definition
01:27:19.200brings you into a fixed corpus of things that have been deemed worth publishing or printing.
01:27:25.480It keeps you within the actual canon of what has been judged worth its place in written form.
01:27:32.800But also because the very act of reading, where you as an individual are communing with a page
01:27:39.780and allowing the long-form argument or narrative of the page to bounce off your brain,
01:27:45.920There's no external intermediary or interference. That is the safest way that we can ensure that
01:27:54.700not just the young, but the middle-aged and the old can continue an intellectual process
01:28:02.880when the rest of the world is trying to destroy it. There's no question in my mind that in the
01:28:09.40021st century, the biggest threat to the human condition is not warfare. It's not climate change.
01:28:18.480It's not disease. It's not some bizarre innovation that we can't think of. It's the
01:28:26.460knock-on effects of AI. Not what AI can do, but the degree to which it erodes the act of being
01:28:35.080human for AI to take such a dominant role in our lives. And I think we radically and rapidly
01:28:42.320need to bring people's attention back to this completely open treasury of shared wisdom
01:28:49.880in a fixed written form. It can't be changed. And the easiest way to do that is something
01:28:55.860literally as simple as to find time in your day, pick up a book that interests you,
01:29:00.140and spend alone time with it. So it's an obvious thing, but we're really not talking about it in a
01:29:06.220way that takes it seriously. And it's one of the few genuine protections I think we have
01:29:12.020against the storm that is about to hit. And it's exactly this problem with the academics failing
01:29:20.400to speak to the public and inspire the public on the things that matter to them that led me
01:29:26.240and a few other academics to found a website called Antigone, which is all about trying to
01:29:32.760bring the Greeks and the Romans before the public in a way that doesn't patronize the public,
01:29:38.220doesn't treat the Greeks and the Romans as problematic and racist and not worthy of our
01:29:42.940attention, but actually treats the reader as an adult and welcomes them in to a world which,
01:29:49.560of course, has its challenges, has its absurdities, but is also deeply inspiring if we as individuals
01:29:55.880care about our place in the world and understanding where we've come from.
01:29:59.680So the Antigone team is a free website all about that.