TRIGGERnometry - ＂Politics is an Addiction＂ - Jordan Hall

00:00:00.700 Broadway's smash hit, the Neil Diamond Musical, A Beautiful Noise, is coming to Toronto.

00:00:06.520 The true story of a kid from Brooklyn destined for something more, featuring all the songs you love,

00:00:11.780 including America, Forever in Blue Jeans, and Sweet Caroline.

00:00:15.780 Like Jersey Boys and Beautiful, the next musical mega hit is here, the Neil Diamond Musical, A Beautiful Noise.

00:00:22.600 Now through June 7th, 2026 at the Princess of Wales Theatre.

00:00:26.800 Get tickets at murbish.com.

00:00:30.000 Hello and welcome to Trigonometry. I'm Francis Foster.

00:00:38.400 I'm Constantine Kissin.

00:00:39.440 And this is a show for you if you want honest conversations with fascinating people.

00:00:44.700 Now, as you know, we spend a lot of time talking about the culture war,

00:00:48.200 and today we have someone who can actually take us a level above that

00:00:50.940 and look at some of the bigger processes that are happening under all of that.

00:00:54.500 Jordan Hall, welcome to Trigonometry.

00:00:55.760 Yeah, thanks. I'm interested to find out what the conversation unfolds.

00:00:58.760 Well, we will find out.

00:01:01.100 But listen, I was saying to you before we started, we recently interviewed David Fuller from Rebel Wisdom,

00:01:06.340 and that's how we came across your stuff.

00:01:08.080 And I just thought you have such a much broader conceptual frame to discuss many of the things that are happening in society,

00:01:16.320 things that we've talked about on the show, whether that's the culture war,

00:01:19.320 whether that's the changes that are happening in the media landscape,

00:01:23.060 the politics of the last four years, which are all things that you've talked about.

00:01:28.500 As I say, from a much broader perspective, you've talked about how the changes that have occurred in the last,

00:01:34.520 you know, century, let's say, in terms of technological progress,

00:01:38.680 in terms of the explosion in the population, in terms of the breakdown of what you call the blue church,

00:01:45.100 in particular, the sort of down from authority communication to a group of people,

00:01:49.860 in terms of mass communication, all that sort of stuff.

00:01:52.800 So the question I want to start by asking you is,

00:01:57.320 what the hell is going on in the world, and why is it happening?

00:02:02.180 Oh, okay.

00:02:03.120 Well, there's, let me see, maybe do this in multiple different levels.

00:02:06.660 So the first point, lots of things.

00:02:09.200 That's, I guess, maybe the first insight is that if you try to reduce it down to any small number of things,

00:02:13.620 you're definitely doing it a disservice, likely confusing yourself or potentially lying to other people.

00:02:19.000 So lots of things are going on in the world.

00:02:20.820 And they're happening in different levels.

00:02:22.480 Like some things are happening at, I don't know how we say it,

00:02:26.640 at a scale, a spatial scale and a temporal scale that we might call now, like in the year, right?

00:02:35.980 There are things that are happening that were happening in terms of how people make choices,

00:02:39.740 how institutions execute cycles like that.

00:02:41.900 Just think about some sort of phenomenon like, you know that really cool new musical device where you can record in loop?

00:02:49.140 Yeah.

00:02:50.300 And then you can loop, you know, play music with yourself.

00:02:53.680 I've got one loop that's going on, I don't know, maybe a year loop.

00:02:57.580 And so it has this time sequence in terms of how it does what it does.

00:03:00.980 And then I've got other loops that are moving at different temporal loops, different spatial loops,

00:03:04.480 and they have different propagations through the environment that we're in.

00:03:07.760 So, for example, one thing that's going on is Homo sapiens sapiens is not yet ever really fully dealt with the fact that we're a technological species.

00:03:15.820 That's been going on a long time, right?

00:03:18.180 And that has profound implications that continue to ramify and cascade to the entire sociocultural field.

00:03:24.000 And we're kind of dealing with these giant ripple effects that have been bouncing off the edges of our world for a long time.

00:03:32.600 And that's coming home to roost in big ways.

00:03:34.520 And it has continuously done so over a long period of time.

00:03:37.560 At a lower level of sort of scale has to do with the fact that we happen to be right at the cutting edge of one of the major waves in that bigger story.

00:03:47.200 And there's many different names of it.

00:03:49.480 And by the way, that wave isn't one wave.

00:03:52.320 It's like a dozen or 50 waves that all happen to be linking up together.

00:03:56.680 So, you know, it becomes a much bigger phenomenon.

00:04:00.220 Another piece of it is that the implications of that kind of a change we tend,

00:04:05.660 and particularly we modern post-enlightenment scientific physicalist rationalists,

00:04:11.880 tend to focus on change happening outside as a technical, economic, physical material.

00:04:19.480 Like climate change is salient.

00:04:21.520 We get it.

00:04:22.080 Those are changes that happen out there.

00:04:23.600 But of course, the same quantity, magnitude, and quality kind of changes are also going on in our interior.

00:04:32.920 We are produced by the environment as much as we produce the environment.

00:04:36.020 And so, but because we're not simultaneously not particularly prepared to be aware of and respond to those changes,

00:04:42.800 and because those changes are actually of the same level of magnitude as the ones that are going on in the exterior,

00:04:47.680 that's another big upwelling that's causing all kinds of confusion and disruption.

00:04:51.940 So we've got multiple different stories, multiple different waves, moving in different paces and complexly interacting with each other.

00:05:00.060 And so it creates a highly chaotic environment.

00:05:03.480 And in that context, I guess maybe the last piece, because it refers to some of the stuff we were talking about earlier,

00:05:11.880 for the most part, to the degree to which we are endeavoring, even consciously,

00:05:17.620 like actually intentionally endeavoring to respond to the problem,

00:05:21.880 the methods by which we go about making sense of what's happening and making choices about how to respond

00:05:29.080 are themselves part of the problem.

00:05:31.680 And the mental image I have is like, if you've got a, you're driving a car,

00:05:37.080 and something goes wrong with the steering column, so there's a lag.

00:05:40.260 So when you turn left, it actually takes longer than you're used to.

00:05:43.400 And this car starts waggling out of control.

00:05:45.620 But in order to get the car to go straight, you keep turning even more abruptly.

00:05:49.500 You're actually adding to the problem.

00:05:51.900 That's another piece of the story.

00:05:53.760 So obviously, I just threw a big chunk out there.

00:05:57.260 But there you go.

00:05:57.720 That sounds familiar.

00:06:00.240 By the way, just a reminder, we're two comedians, so don't get too clever on us.

00:06:04.980 But in terms of the responses to what's happening, we'll get to that perhaps.

00:06:11.400 Can we just get to what's happening?

00:06:13.780 What is this lag in the turning that's happening?

00:06:17.220 In particular, the issue that I found very interesting is your description of how the media landscape has changed

00:06:24.600 as a result of the emergence of the internet and other types of technology.

00:06:28.660 Can you just break that down for us and our viewers and listeners?

00:06:32.740 Sure.

00:06:33.160 And then let me maybe propose to also talk about the institutional framework.

00:06:38.140 Let's do both of those.

00:06:39.260 Yeah, please.

00:06:40.260 And do them at the same time.

00:06:41.180 Okay, so we have a way of putting it.

00:06:51.120 We have a way of doing things individually, but in this case, in particular, at a level of how our social technologies come together.

00:07:01.300 Actually, I'm going to put it this way.

00:07:02.460 I'm going to walk us up.

00:07:03.600 I'm going to create a framework and then use that framework.

00:07:05.560 So when television first came into the – showed up, television happens, the people who are creating television programming don't really know what it is they're dealing with, obviously, right?

00:07:20.540 It's new.

00:07:21.760 And so they do their best to do TV, which for the most part means they point a camera at what effectively is a form of Broadway play.

00:07:29.940 They take something they know and understand, and they add this new ingredient to it.

00:07:36.180 Thus begins, though, an actual experiment, an actual learning of the nature of the underlying new thing that has a bunch of different characteristics.

00:07:44.140 For example, unlike a Broadway play, in television you can have two cameras, and you can cut back and forth and force the viewer to actually shift that perspective.

00:07:53.120 You actually can control the territory the viewer's attention is focused on in a way in a play you cannot.

00:07:57.620 And, of course, you can do that not just in terms of visual perspective.

00:08:02.020 You can do it in terms of time.

00:08:03.180 I can do – I can cut back and forth in time very easily, et cetera, et cetera.

00:08:08.560 There's all kinds of things that happen as we begin to explore the actual characteristics of the novel milieu of television.

00:08:15.780 By the way, the same thing is actually happening on the part of the audience.

00:08:18.880 The audience is watching early, early TV, hasn't yet understood what it is they're watching.

00:08:23.700 So they're experiencing something, but as the audience becomes more and more sophisticated, they begin to build a storehouse of, say, for example, what TV tropes are.

00:08:32.440 And it becomes a new vocabulary, a new vernacular.

00:08:35.240 So in a certain sense, context begins to show up.

00:08:37.900 Like you hear the chords of music that is playing in the background in your body.

00:08:41.700 It's like, oh, now I'm supposed to feel that it's dramatic, for example.

00:08:45.780 And so it's actually a really interesting co-developmental process of understanding what the potentials of the medium are and the relationship between creative expression and perception in that context that builds more and more capacity to actually move into this new place.

00:09:00.540 Okay?

00:09:00.980 So that's a framework.

00:09:01.880 So we enter into a new media landscape, naively, and usually by treating it as if it's the old one.

00:09:08.300 Then we learn how to build competencies and capacities as both perceiver and receiver in that new media landscape.

00:09:15.800 And then we're sort of operating in that fashion.

00:09:18.360 Then a new one comes along.

00:09:19.900 Okay?

00:09:21.140 So this is true also in a broader context.

00:09:23.680 If I'm looking at, for example, how governance works, one of the challenges of governance in the 20th century, actually for a very long period of time, but in the 20th century in particular, is that you're dealing with very large populations, more or less, generally over large geographic regions, oftentimes with meaningful diversity and heterogeneity of cultural assumptions.

00:09:51.340 And yet, we need to find some way to get them all to more or less agree on a relatively narrow set of choices.

00:09:59.740 And so we have two things going on simultaneously that tend, by the way, to reinforce each other.

00:10:05.960 As television, for example, emerged in the mid-century, governance began to learn how it can use television to do the thing that it needs to do, which is ultimately to create what's called a cybernetic control structure.

00:10:19.800 I don't mean that necessarily as a negative.

00:10:21.740 You know, I have the previous example of a steering wheel as a form of cybernetic control structure.

00:10:25.980 It's how I can use my intelligence and agency to control, to steer some kind of underlying system.

00:10:36.600 And so even the concepts of, by the way, cybernetics happen to emerge in that timeframe.

00:10:40.780 So it's a little bit of self-referentiality there.

00:10:44.840 And so by the time you get to the 90s, at least in the United States, I don't actually know what,

00:10:49.800 the specifics are in your place.

00:10:52.580 We get to a place where governance had become quite TV native, meaning both the tools and techniques, the approaches, the understandings, the habits, the unconscious instincts,

00:11:06.140 and also the possibilities and capacities of what actually could be effectively managed and steered through this particular modality.

00:11:12.700 And an audience that had been prepared, for example, I remember very clearly as a eight or 10-year-old, my dad would turn on the nightly news every night.

00:11:24.440 Local news.

00:11:25.560 Why?

00:11:25.980 It was his civic duty.

00:11:26.920 He had been trained to watch the local news every night as part of a civic duty, which is to say he plugged into the cybernetic control structure, mediated through television, and it was important and useful.

00:11:39.160 He was connected to that system.

00:11:41.380 And then the system had learned how to do things like, how do you create the right kind of messages?

00:11:46.480 How do you shape the, you know what the Overton window is?

00:11:48.740 How do you shape the Overton window so that it's broad enough that people feel like they're getting a real consideration of what's happening, but also narrow enough that actually causing choices to happen within the bandwidth that we have as choice makers is also feasible, like that kind of stuff.

00:12:05.740 But of course, as we enter into the 90s, we also enter into the emergence of an entirely new media landscape.

00:12:10.120 This new digital media, this interactive, digital, highly decentralized or distributed landscape comes online, which has completely different characteristics than broadcast television.

00:12:22.600 You know, instead of being, for example, in America, three channels, it is, in fact, an infinite number of channels.

00:12:29.640 And instead of having the characteristic of temporal flow with no memory, like, you know, right, right, when I'm watching the nightly news, up until the invention of like TiVo, it was just gone, right?

00:12:43.060 The second it, the moment had passed, that moment was in the past.

00:12:46.460 And so memory was very much not part of the story.

00:12:49.320 What was a part of the story was what gets my attention now and what leaves a felt sense of making good choices.

00:12:55.760 Okay, it feels like we're doing okay.

00:12:57.040 That's it.

00:12:57.440 That's the only memory I've got.

00:12:58.460 We can kind of vaguely refer to things that happened to the past, but hard to know exactly.

00:13:04.740 Obviously, in the digital environment, the internet never forgets.

00:13:07.560 You know, to the degree to which you guys choose to broadcast this video, it will then be a durable trace that 10,000 years from now, assuming somebody has the capacity to sort of do digital technology, it'll still be there.

00:13:20.340 It can be rewound and looked at second by second.

00:13:22.460 And, of course, highly decentralized, meaning that you guys didn't have to ask anybody's meaningful permission to begin the process of actually creating a new form of communications channel.

00:13:32.020 And neither did I, you know, I can go on YouTube now, of course, the evolution of the control structures in the context of the new media channel is already happening apace.

00:13:43.100 So the development and discovery of different techniques of trying to control how do you engage in the kinds of shaping of conversation that are valid and meaningful and effective in this new milieu is happening, right?

00:13:57.160 It's accelerating, but from the period of 2000 and so, and particularly 2008, 2009, 2010, and this just has to do with relative rates of penetration of the amount of tension that was applied to the different media and the ages of different generations whose psychologies and underlying habits have been developed in different environments, began to create a mixture of underlying forces.

00:14:21.500 It's kind of like when a river flows into the ocean, you've got kind of cool, fresh water mixing with whatever the temperature of the ocean happens to be, let's go with warm salt water, it creates a very turbulent environment in the middle.

00:14:33.140 And that's large, that's been a big piece of what's actually happening is that, which is a deeper thing.

00:14:37.600 Now, we see lots of stuff happening at a more superficial level, which doesn't mean, by the way, that it's not relevant.

00:14:43.840 It just means that it's happening at a different level of causation and scale.

00:14:48.380 But in many cases, a deeper cause is what I was just describing.

00:14:54.740 We can, by the way, there's an arbitrary, we could go weeks on just that and pulling pieces of that out if we'd like.

00:15:00.340 And what is the effect of this on our society, this new media, this new way of communicating?

00:15:08.400 The fact that anybody can have access to an audience, anybody can have access to disseminate the information that they believe is valuable and frame it in their own way.

00:15:18.840 Well, okay, there's two different categories of response to that.

00:15:24.740 One has to do with an exploration of the underlying characteristics of the medium, which I'd actually like to get to later, in a moment.

00:15:33.720 And the other has to do with the specifics of what I was just describing, which is to have to do with the change.

00:15:39.520 So the change has one impact on our society, the change in and of itself.

00:15:42.860 The second has to do with the shift, the journey to this new location.

00:15:49.760 So the change shows up as things like surprise, confusion, anxiety, conflict in ways that don't necessarily make sense.

00:16:02.280 Because part of what's happening is pre-existing categories are finding themselves no longer applicable to the new environment.

00:16:10.960 You can imagine that I've got a company, like the New York Times.

00:16:14.000 The New York Times has a sense of being the New York Times, but it has almost a verticality to it.

00:16:20.600 It's like a box.

00:16:21.600 There's a New York Times and there's a culture of people who are part of it.

00:16:24.520 But the emergent wholeness of the New York Times has latent cross cuts of various kinds of memetic tribes that are in it.

00:16:38.460 And because this new environment has a different pull, almost like a shearing strength, there's tension and pulling on the wholeness of the interior of the New York Times, which is in many ways confusing, particularly to older people.

00:16:53.120 Like the old, there's a big generation gap that the more TV your mind is, for example, again, there's lots and lots of things going on.

00:17:01.180 But the more TV your mind is, the more odd and weird and strange it is that these kinds of things that are coming up from this new digital decentralized capacity show up in the way they show up.

00:17:13.800 Things like pace and style that are very not of the same sort.

00:17:18.520 So disruption, surprising disruption, generalized anxiety because of the presence of simple novelty and the breakdown of old forms and habits that seem to make sense, but no obvious way of understanding or being able to feel comfortable with what's happening.

00:17:36.240 Probably a little bit like the way that animals feel before an earthquake.

00:17:40.360 Like something big and momentous is happening, but I don't know what the hell it is.

00:17:44.760 And so it's like almost in the body, a basic felt sense of flea or undifferentiated energy that in some sense almost randomly shows itself up.

00:17:54.540 People are scrambling to find out what's a safe and or a good place to be in a context where they really don't know what's happening.

00:18:02.840 Okay.

00:18:03.420 Now the other side of the equation, the other piece, which has to do with the underlying nature of the new milieu.

00:18:09.500 Well, maybe two points.

00:18:14.940 One point is we don't know.

00:18:16.620 So as part of what's happening is we actually are entering into a new period of deep uncertainty and a new period of exploration and journeying and learning how to become capable of that.

00:18:26.500 Like unlearning the habits of being cogs in a well-functioning machine and relearning the capacity of being explorers or journeyers or humans in a new niche.

00:18:41.500 And that's actually, depending on the magnitude of the change, there's almost like a verticality.

00:18:45.400 How far down that unlearning and relearning do we have to go?

00:18:47.900 But if we look at the characteristics of this new environment, there are a few, like, almost like, you know, islands that pop out of the ocean, high points that you can kind of point at right now from where we are.

00:19:02.380 And frankly, they look a lot like what's going on in China.

00:19:04.940 The social credit score, the, the, and by the way, a French philosopher named Jude Deloise pointed this out in the mid-90s.

00:19:12.960 He called it the societies of control.

00:19:15.660 And this has to do with the fact that in a, in a, uh, uh, a digital environment, the ability to perceive and signal and then modulate signal at a very, very fine grain and at a very, very rapid and bespoke pace.

00:19:33.740 So for example, in the context of broadcast television, the message had to be a message that was sort of generically targeted to a large demographic.

00:19:42.460 Even the contact concept of demographics was invented by marketers to make sense of how to use TV effectively.

00:19:50.760 In the context of digital, uh, what we're discovering is that in fact, the appropriate, the technology enables and the appropriate mode is actually micro targeting on the interior of your own, your individual human psychology.

00:20:05.580 Right?

00:20:06.100 So I don't want to create a message targeting, say the three of us.

00:20:09.440 I don't want to, I don't even want to create a message targeting you.

00:20:12.880 I want to create these tiny, tiny nudges, clusters of them that are all qualitatively different that actually impact your psychological interior inside your own mechanism of maintaining the integrity of your own psychology.

00:20:26.240 So as to nudge you in a fashion that you don't even perceive as happening, but as you, like as this, as a distinct human being, as a distinct agent in the environment.

00:20:36.380 Um, so micro control and fluid modulation, like instead of having it happen as a, uh, like a Apple is an example of like actually a pretty strong TV style or broadcast style.

00:20:49.920 Um, where this, this, this buildup that's the spend a lot of time planning and have one big, significant focused, really high quality event that hits hard, that kind of a move in the digital environment.

00:21:03.960 As you move further and further and further down, you actually get a, something that's much more like, um, short fluid iterations that change rapidly.

00:21:11.820 And it's more like fluid dynamics.

00:21:13.400 If you've ever seen that, what that looks like, um, like if you, if you watch the water flow into a, uh, uh, a title title tide pool where there's lots of rocks and you can see the complexity of the tide as it flows in and out.

00:21:27.080 So it's like that it's much more like that.

00:21:29.600 Um, so fluid modulation, and then think about what happens at the level of the physical environment.

00:21:34.980 And this is, again, think China, um, where, uh, let me just do the virtual first and I can do the concrete a second.

00:21:43.500 You know, when, when I show up to amazon.com, I guess you show up to amazon.co.uk.

00:21:50.020 Um, what I see is not what you see.

00:21:52.280 And we may see something that has a lot of aesthetic similarity because Amazon wants to maintain the continuity of its brand, but by definition it's bespoke, right? 0.95

00:22:01.120 I see something that is perfectly optimized to the degree to which Amazon has information and competence to cause me to buy shit. 0.98

00:22:08.760 And it's different than the kind of stuff that will cause you to buy shit. 0.99

00:22:11.320 Yeah. 0.94

00:22:12.180 Now just imagine what happens in our physical environment has that same set of characteristics where the pub, you literally just can't even go into the pub.

00:22:21.420 Because that pub is not part of your modulated flow stream.

00:22:25.440 You know, you, you get into the self-driving electric replacement for the cab and there's only a certain number of places that you can go.

00:22:34.740 And there's other places that if you go there, they are vastly cheaper for you to get into.

00:22:37.860 For example, let's just use economics.

00:22:39.260 There's so many different variations on the theme because in this new environment, the number of different control mechanisms like control currencies goes way up.

00:22:46.960 So let me just come and give you an example.

00:22:48.940 So you go to a pub number one and one thing that happens is it's three times as expensive per drink.

00:22:56.260 And the second thing that happens is your, uh, your, your ability to show up as a, uh, a good possible date in, you know, the new version of Tinder goes down.

00:23:08.440 All right.

00:23:09.040 So if you go to this pub, then it costs you more to drink beer and you're going to have less sexual success.

00:23:15.120 All right.

00:23:16.320 If you go to pub.

00:23:16.800 Sounds like London, Jordan.

00:23:18.520 Well, with pub number two, you go into that pub and it's cheaper and your Tinder score goes up.

00:23:24.660 Right.

00:23:25.480 Well, you're almost everybody is just going to flow to pub number two.

00:23:30.380 Um, well, guess what?

00:23:31.380 We now have very bespoke and that's just two currencies, by the way, two powerful ones, money and sex.

00:23:35.960 But there's many, many more, right?

00:23:37.460 And the idea is that in this novel digital environment, the capacity for that exists, how exactly it shows up, who knows?

00:23:44.620 And by the way, it'll probably show up differentially depending on exactly how the design, what ends up designing or controlling the design of that control structure.

00:23:53.640 You know, the Chinese version will look very different than say, for example, the EU version, although not as far as I can tell, radically different.

00:23:58.700 Um, so that's an example, right?

00:24:02.380 Just to kind of get a gesture in the direction of the kinds of things to be looking out for in terms of principles, fluidity, micro, um, very bespoke and maybe some concrete examples of how it shows up in Amazon and how it might show up in the, uh, self-driving pub of the future. 0.77

00:24:21.640 Hey, KK, do you like feeling silky and smooth like a sexual dolphin? 0.84

00:24:27.520 Never talk to me again. 0.97

00:24:28.840 What if I told you that Manscaped have brought out a new and improved Lawnmower 3.0 that allows you to be fresh and trim for the ladies down below? 0.99

00:24:39.500 Mate, I've been married 20 years.

00:24:41.020 The last time I was fresh and trimmed down below, Jimmy Savile was a respected children's entertainer.

00:24:46.740 I'm going to ignore that.

00:24:47.540 The Lawnmower has a cutting edge ceramic blade, which reduces the risk of having an accident where you least want an accident.

00:24:55.080 My bank account. 1.00

00:24:55.980 No, you idiot. 1.00

00:24:56.720 You know, los huevos. 1.00

00:24:59.240 Oh, right.

00:25:00.240 Plus, it's waterproof, which means you can groom in the shower and it has an LED light so you can get a really accurate and precise trim.

00:25:09.780 Excellent.

00:25:10.120 To take advantage of this incredible offer, go to manscaped.com and you'll get 20% off with free shipping.

00:25:17.220 Just use our code, which is, of course, Trigger.

00:25:19.780 Yeah, that's 20% off with free shipping at manscaped.com and use our code, Trigger.

00:25:26.700 Your huevos will thank you.

00:25:28.880 Excellent.

00:25:29.260 Jordan, so basically, at the moment, we all have our own virtual reality and I'm fully aware of this.

00:25:38.580 Like, I know that when I am writing a joke, let's say, as a comedian or making a tweet that I want to make a certain point, if I'm referencing something, there's quite a large portion of other people who have no idea what the hell I'm talking about because they've got their own Twitter.

00:25:54.380 Right. And what you're talking about is on a physical level, that will start to take shape to the point where eventually we're all going to have our own reality in every way.

00:26:05.220 Well, meaning.

00:26:06.520 Yeah. Now, I mean, this may be my inherent pessimism coming out here and I'm the optimistic one of the two of us.

00:26:14.360 We both chose to be comedians. This implies we're both pessimistic.

00:26:17.620 Yeah. So that doesn't sound like a recipe for anything good to me.

00:26:22.720 Well, I was going to say, if you wear shit colored glasses, the things look like shit. 0.99

00:26:27.900 So, yes. What I would say is that it has three consequences. 1.00

00:26:32.820 One consequence is that it will, oftentimes in a very surprising way, cut existing Gordian knots surprisingly easily.

00:26:43.460 So problems that are wicked problems now are actually wicked because our underlying capacity to solve problems can't address them.

00:26:51.980 But this new mode will have different ways of addressing problems and quite often will actually end up just evaporating.

00:26:58.560 Problems that right now feel very intractable.

00:27:00.480 So, for example, maybe climate change turns out to be trivially solved in this new environment.

00:27:05.760 How so?

00:27:08.380 Well, if I can imagine something like if I have a currency structure.

00:27:16.860 Do you want me to go down there? I can do it if you'd like.

00:27:19.380 If you can do it in a brief and understandable way, that would be great.

00:27:23.160 Well, I can't. I'll just say for understandable.

00:27:24.700 Particularly when endeavoring to do it briefly.

00:27:28.860 It's something like, imagine if we had the capacity.

00:27:32.460 And in fact, we kind of do.

00:27:33.900 Imagine we had the capacity to identify every single externality that our current supply chains threw into the environment.

00:27:42.820 That makes sense.

00:27:43.580 Imagine if we tracked it down to the granular level at every single transformation across the supply chain.

00:27:49.320 And then imagine if we use that information to drive the control structure that was nudging people's behavior at a very fine-grained level.

00:27:59.660 For example, I'll just use a slightly different one than climate change.

00:28:02.720 Let's just go with litter. 1.00

00:28:04.720 I don't know if you guys, do people smoke in England?

00:28:09.160 Yeah, some people do.

00:28:10.840 Some people do. It's very retro, Jordan.

00:28:12.660 Well, back when I was younger, people smoked a lot.

00:28:15.060 And one of the things I noticed as a kid is you'd go to the park and sit at a park bench and there were cigarette butts everywhere.

00:28:21.940 Well, imagine if every single cigarette comes with an RFID tag attached to it.

00:28:26.320 And every single purchase of cigarettes actually immediately identifies the individual human being who last owned it.

00:28:33.340 So that when you threw the cigarette butt away, it shows up on a database as your cigarette butt that's on the ground

00:28:37.900 and negatively impacts your social currency score to the point where nobody litters anymore.

00:28:42.080 For example, now just generalize that across all possible externalities.

00:28:46.680 We could sort of extinguish pollution to the degree to which we have the competence to actually track it effectively.

00:28:52.560 So that would be an example.

00:28:56.140 That makes sense.

00:28:56.980 So that's the first type of – so it will be good for that.

00:28:59.820 And also, by the way, you know, when I said it would all be negative,

00:29:01.980 obviously, the ability to fulfill human desires, wishes, needs, et cetera, will be multiplied manyfold

00:29:08.840 because you're getting a super tailored service.

00:29:11.160 It's not all bad.

00:29:12.320 Agreed.

00:29:12.640 Well, this is the point.

00:29:13.700 It opens up new opportunities and creates new problems.

00:29:15.820 That's it.

00:29:16.700 Right.

00:29:17.000 But the reason that I was saying there's nothing good, I didn't mean that there's nothing good.

00:29:22.300 What I meant was if you are in an environment where everybody lives increasingly in their own reality,

00:29:29.620 the lack of understanding of other people and the potential for tribalism that comes out of that, to me, is quite scary.

00:29:37.920 Yeah.

00:29:38.280 If you sort of – I don't mean by any means to poo-poo the challenges.

00:29:43.560 Quite the opposite.

00:29:44.420 Maybe even a better way of putting it is every time we enter into a new – enter a new technology into our environment,

00:29:52.760 we unlock both opportunities and risks.

00:29:57.180 The more powerful the technology, the more powerful the opportunities, and the more powerful the risks.

00:30:03.620 This particular set of technologies is several orders of magnitude more powerful than anything we've ever unlocked before,

00:30:10.400 and therefore the risks are several orders of magnitude larger.

00:30:15.420 And in this case, there are several orders of magnitude larger because actually of the micro nature.

00:30:21.900 The nuclear bomb back in the mid-century was big, dangerous, powerful, but very macro.

00:30:30.080 And it was only – for most of the time, only two countries meaningfully had the ability to use it at all.

00:30:37.640 And still, I think it's something like six or seven.

00:30:40.260 And highly high constraint.

00:30:42.100 One event, nuclear bomb.

00:30:43.520 And that's a concentrated, very salient risk.

00:30:47.280 It's kind of easy to focus your attention on it.

00:30:49.740 This new environment has to do with the fact that we're doing hundreds of quadrillions of things,

00:30:54.540 all happening in very, very narrow basis.

00:30:56.820 And small deviations in our design characteristics of, say, the underlying machine learning that drives most of this

00:31:02.960 may lead to huge shifts in human psychology and behavior.

00:31:08.300 And we don't even vaguely have the capacity to predict any of that right now.

00:31:13.100 So, for example, that's actually a deeper version of what you just said.

00:31:15.880 But broadly speaking, something like – actually, it's funny.

00:31:20.640 So, a radical divergence or radical heterogeneity of worlds is simultaneously the best possible

00:31:31.480 and the worst possible scenario that I can currently imagine.

00:31:35.100 On the one hand, creative potential exists as the connection between heterogeneous worlds.

00:31:42.360 You and I can actually have meaningful, useful, delightful, creative experiences in relationship

00:31:47.900 precisely because we inhabit different worlds.

00:31:50.640 And to the degree to which we are inhabiting different worlds, our ability to communicate,

00:31:55.640 our ability to actually connect and be in a relationship at all,

00:31:59.480 the numbers of mistakes and errors and misunderstandings that we will have also goes way, way up.

00:32:05.160 So, it becomes harder and harder to maintain quality relationships.

00:32:10.060 And a large part of what's happening right now is precisely that.

00:32:12.860 We're using a toolkit of relationality, like I say on Twitter,

00:32:17.540 that has an underlying assumption of shared context.

00:32:21.500 When in fact, that's not even vaguely true.

00:32:24.720 So, we're running this, you know, something that assumes shared context and projects it on the other.

00:32:30.000 And then what's really happening is the other's actually got a completely different context.

00:32:33.000 By the way, not just deep context, but even moment-to-moment context, as you say.

00:32:36.180 Like, I'm reading five Twitter feeds and have a certain context.

00:32:40.540 You're reading five Twitter feeds.

00:32:42.360 It's the only one that's vaguely the same as the one that we happen to be on right now.

00:32:46.020 And even that is a different context.

00:32:47.840 And of course, you put 128 characters into your tweet,

00:32:50.580 which is a minuscule amount of context to provide to me.

00:32:53.500 And I respond with 128 characters, which is a minuscule amount of context to respond to you.

00:32:58.300 The application, of course, being either we both have to be quite wise,

00:33:03.000 like quite, quite mature and skillful at understanding the nuance and subtlety

00:33:08.280 of what happens when two beings from very different worlds with very little context

00:33:13.080 are in communication, or we're going to make lots of mistakes.

00:33:17.760 And Jordan, to me, this is, it's a very worrying conversation because

00:33:22.820 how are you able to mitigate the worst effects of a type of technology

00:33:28.800 if you don't know what the downsides and the dangers of this technology are?

00:33:33.360 Aren't you just simply stumbling blind into, you know, a situation

00:33:38.660 which you have no control over?

00:33:40.960 I would actually go more along the lines of, I don't know,

00:33:43.840 snow skiing at a breakneck speed blind through that environment

00:33:50.160 with a complete and completely inebriated, something like that.

00:33:54.960 That's true.

00:33:55.380 The magnitude of the lift is quite high.

00:33:58.220 But part of that is say, okay, well, if that's the metaphor, 0.84

00:34:00.700 stop drinking, sober the fuck up, take off the skis, 0.99

00:34:04.520 and walk down the goddamn mountain, right? 0.99

00:34:06.580 So what does that look like? 1.00

00:34:08.040 What does that look like in this context?

00:34:11.500 Ah, well, this is interesting.

00:34:13.380 A big part of it actually starts with three things.

00:34:19.220 You know, it's almost like, you can go to AA.

00:34:21.320 You know, first admit you've got a problem.

00:34:23.900 You first actually recognize that this is the case.

00:34:26.880 You know, you have to slow down enough to actually, 0.99

00:34:28.640 whoa, whoa, shit, I am speeding down a mountain 0.99

00:34:32.160 at breakneck speed, totally inebriated. 0.99

00:34:33.860 Maybe that's not the best place, to become conscious,

00:34:36.480 to restore yourself to being a conscious agent in the world.

00:34:41.120 That'd be the first step.

00:34:44.440 And of course, most people find themselves

00:34:46.500 careening about an unconscious reaction

00:34:48.520 and an increasing addiction to careening

00:34:50.820 about an unconscious reaction.

00:34:52.820 So that's not a small step.

00:34:53.960 The next step is to begin the process

00:34:58.880 of carefully disconnecting yourself

00:35:01.040 from the things in your context

00:35:03.360 to which you are most addicted

00:35:04.680 and beginning to give yourself permission

00:35:10.600 to go as slowly as you need to

00:35:13.500 to be able to actually make effective choices

00:35:16.240 on a moment-to-moment basis.

00:35:18.140 Now, this is very challenging

00:35:20.400 if you have anything vague

00:35:22.560 like an ethical commitment

00:35:23.780 to the well-being of other people or the world

00:35:25.600 because you will be slowing down

00:35:29.280 and disconnecting

00:35:30.460 while you're watching everything around you

00:35:32.700 get worse and worse

00:35:33.760 and potentially catastrophically so.

00:35:36.720 And this is a tricky business

00:35:38.560 to be able to choose to say,

00:35:41.560 okay, well, shoot.

00:35:43.140 I can say with some degree

00:35:45.040 of confidence and clarity

00:35:46.260 that the path that we're on

00:35:48.100 is not going to work

00:35:49.080 and that I can't solve the path.

00:35:51.120 I can't get the car out of its skid

00:35:53.300 by increasingly jerking back and forth

00:35:55.860 on the steering wheel.

00:35:56.620 The best thing to do is, in fact,

00:35:57.840 to take my foot off the brake,

00:35:59.520 take my hand, stop steering,

00:36:01.500 and slow down

00:36:02.980 until I notice some new groove,

00:36:05.600 something that shows up

00:36:06.700 where, ah, effective choice just happened.

00:36:09.580 This is that going down.

00:36:11.240 I don't know if you guys are all familiar

00:36:12.480 with something called Theory U.

00:36:14.480 No.

00:36:14.940 No.

00:36:15.940 I'm not particularly familiar with it,

00:36:17.720 but it's somewhat known.

00:36:20.280 It has to do with exactly this process

00:36:22.100 in the interior of the psychology.

00:36:24.080 So you could say like meditation,

00:36:25.700 like meditation practice

00:36:27.220 is a practice of going down

00:36:28.520 to the bottom of the U,

00:36:30.960 disentangling your awareness

00:36:32.980 from habituated emotional

00:36:36.380 and cognitive responses

00:36:37.580 until you get to a place

00:36:38.560 where you actually are,

00:36:39.400 at long last, free.

00:36:41.240 Like actually disentangled,

00:36:42.800 no longer beholden

00:36:44.260 to habits of mind

00:36:45.220 and habits of emotion

00:36:46.180 from which you can then go back

00:36:48.520 up the other side of the U

00:36:49.620 and begin to,

00:36:51.160 from a place of conscious choice

00:36:53.060 and with some degree of effectiveness,

00:36:56.100 move back into the world.

00:36:58.160 One metaphor

00:36:58.840 that I think is actually quite silent

00:37:00.300 is a little bit like

00:37:01.300 from The Matrix, the movie,

00:37:03.600 where first Neo had to choose to take,

00:37:07.920 I think it's the red pill, right?

00:37:08.980 Yeah, unfortunately.

00:37:10.180 An awfully over-coded metaphor now,

00:37:11.740 but you get it.

00:37:13.380 Which is to say,

00:37:14.060 to acknowledge you've got a problem.

00:37:16.240 Then what he discovers 0.99

00:37:16.940 is that his ass was actually 1.00

00:37:18.280 a body that doesn't even know 1.00

00:37:21.240 how to walk

00:37:21.800 or basically even move,

00:37:24.280 you know,

00:37:24.480 entirely running a virtual simulator.

00:37:26.040 His own agency

00:37:26.820 is actually effectively nil.

00:37:29.260 And he gets unplugged

00:37:30.260 from that entire structure.

00:37:31.440 He goes to the bottom of the U

00:37:32.460 somewhat abruptly.

00:37:34.480 And in his case,

00:37:35.140 he has some help, right?

00:37:35.920 Thank God.

00:37:37.700 And he gets put on the table

00:37:38.900 and he gets plugged back up

00:37:40.040 and he begins the process

00:37:41.060 of relearning

00:37:41.720 how to do basic things

00:37:42.720 like move his fingers

00:37:43.600 and blink and walk and breathe.

00:37:45.480 Then, of course,

00:37:45.920 eventually he gets to the point

00:37:47.020 where he can walk around and eat

00:37:48.100 and then he gets plugged back

00:37:48.960 in and learns Kung Fu.

00:37:50.560 And so the hope

00:37:51.380 might be something like,

00:37:53.460 that's actually a very powerful metaphor

00:37:54.700 for where we are right now

00:37:55.700 because the level of

00:37:57.020 lack of agency,

00:37:59.600 the level of helplessness

00:38:00.620 that a person will feel

00:38:02.220 if they choose

00:38:03.660 to unplug themselves

00:38:04.660 from the matrix,

00:38:05.900 which is to say

00:38:06.220 unplug themselves

00:38:06.940 from the habits

00:38:08.060 and cognitive structures

00:38:10.160 and institutional frameworks

00:38:11.960 of power and influence

00:38:13.040 that they may or may not

00:38:13.920 actually be in right now

00:38:14.940 in order to be able

00:38:16.900 to achieve a level

00:38:18.000 of clarity and slowness

00:38:19.620 where they can actually begin

00:38:20.700 to be full agents.

00:38:22.700 Live players,

00:38:23.420 as my friend

00:38:23.820 Simon Berger puts it,

00:38:24.800 is a lot.

00:38:27.960 It feels very scary.

00:38:31.160 You feel very vulnerable

00:38:31.840 when you make that move.

00:38:33.540 You do feel very vulnerable

00:38:34.800 when you make that move, Jordan,

00:38:36.060 but isn't another part

00:38:37.660 of the problem

00:38:38.180 is that these negative behaviors

00:38:40.560 that a lot of people exhibit

00:38:42.420 on these technologies,

00:38:44.320 social media,

00:38:45.640 they're actually incentivized.

00:38:48.080 You're incentivized

00:38:49.280 to be outrageous.

00:38:50.040 You're incentivized

00:38:51.460 to present, you know,

00:38:53.360 opinions without nuance

00:38:54.920 because that will get

00:38:56.040 maximum engagement.

00:38:57.840 Therefore, realistically,

00:38:59.000 how can you expect people

00:39:00.900 to behave in the manner

00:39:02.460 that you're saying

00:39:03.300 when the reality is

00:39:04.960 if you behave in a manner

00:39:06.040 which is less socially responsible,

00:39:08.440 should we say,

00:39:09.020 you're going to get

00:39:09.720 far more reward from it?

00:39:11.000 Well,

00:39:13.700 I've heard a story,

00:39:16.380 at least,

00:39:17.160 that somewhere

00:39:18.340 in the order of 2,000 years ago,

00:39:20.760 a whole crew

00:39:21.620 of

00:39:22.300 Iron Age

00:39:24.600 pagans

00:39:28.020 reached a point

00:39:29.720 where they're capable

00:39:31.020 of

00:39:32.380 having a disposition

00:39:35.060 of commitment

00:39:36.200 to a particular ethos

00:39:37.640 in spite of the fact

00:39:39.260 that the incentive structure

00:39:40.140 was rather pointed.

00:39:41.780 To say that

00:39:42.440 you choose to be a Christian

00:39:43.700 in the early Christian communities

00:39:44.880 would end up with you 0.92

00:39:46.020 being tortured to death 0.99

00:39:47.060 in public,

00:39:48.180 which is substantially more

00:39:49.420 than getting a downvote

00:39:50.600 in Twitter

00:39:51.040 or whatever the

00:39:51.580 dopamine equivalent might be.

00:39:55.000 Getting ratioed.

00:39:56.140 Getting ratioed.

00:39:56.840 Getting ratioed,

00:39:57.620 or more specifically

00:39:58.280 getting canceled.

00:40:00.220 If the contemporary equivalent

00:40:01.820 of being fed to the lions

00:40:03.340 is to be canceled,

00:40:04.660 what I would say

00:40:05.300 is that you're 1.00

00:40:05.800 a rather pitiful human 0.82

00:40:06.840 if you can't actually 0.62

00:40:07.600 stomach that.

00:40:09.440 And I would point out

00:40:10.360 that up until

00:40:10.900 the relatively recent era,

00:40:12.740 humans have endeavored,

00:40:13.780 have suffered vastly

00:40:14.900 greater magnitudes

00:40:16.480 of pain and duress

00:40:17.540 for vastly lower stakes.

00:40:20.240 So that's more,

00:40:21.100 I'll put the burden

00:40:21.600 back on people

00:40:22.380 to say,

00:40:22.860 hey,

00:40:23.900 you know,

00:40:24.720 take more responsibility

00:40:25.540 because I know you can't.

00:40:26.740 You can take a lot,

00:40:27.700 lot more.

00:40:28.100 Like the depth

00:40:29.180 of responsibility

00:40:30.020 you're actually capable of

00:40:31.580 is so vastly beyond

00:40:33.300 that which you currently

00:40:34.120 are taking

00:40:34.560 for effectively everybody,

00:40:35.900 myself very much included.

00:40:38.600 The to assume

00:40:39.480 that you know

00:40:40.200 what's possible

00:40:40.900 even in just yourself

00:40:42.440 is already a form

00:40:44.280 of,

00:40:45.280 what do you call it?

00:40:48.600 Hmm.

00:40:49.080 Self-betrayal,

00:40:50.200 actually.

00:40:52.640 All right.

00:40:53.380 So step one

00:40:54.120 is you recognize

00:40:55.080 you've got a problem.

00:40:56.400 Step two

00:40:56.860 is you disconnect

00:40:57.680 and slow down.

00:40:59.820 Step three?

00:41:00.980 Step three

00:41:01.480 is you learn

00:41:01.920 how to have Kung Fu.

00:41:03.840 Step three

00:41:04.320 is you actually

00:41:04.760 begin the process

00:41:05.640 of,

00:41:06.060 and this,

00:41:06.640 and the step three

00:41:07.160 is very interesting

00:41:07.960 because it has

00:41:08.500 two really powerful

00:41:10.220 characteristics

00:41:10.820 that I think

00:41:11.200 are quite attractive.

00:41:12.740 One is

00:41:13.600 you begin

00:41:16.520 to actually

00:41:17.280 adapt

00:41:18.240 to the reality

00:41:19.160 that you're

00:41:19.600 actually living in.

00:41:20.840 So what happens

00:41:21.420 is you go down

00:41:22.160 to that bottom

00:41:22.640 of the U

00:41:23.540 as you're dropping

00:41:24.800 habits

00:41:25.500 and you're dropping

00:41:26.360 unconscious reactive

00:41:27.640 responses,

00:41:28.720 what you're actually doing

00:41:29.680 is you're beginning

00:41:30.240 to build adaptive

00:41:31.420 responses.

00:41:32.580 You're actually

00:41:32.860 becoming capable

00:41:33.860 of being

00:41:34.520 a well-fitted

00:41:36.600 organism

00:41:37.080 for this

00:41:37.600 emergent ecosystem.

00:41:39.460 So you're actually

00:41:40.280 learning how to thrive

00:41:41.240 in this new environment.

00:41:42.240 You're making

00:41:43.060 the journey

00:41:43.600 from the old

00:41:44.200 environment

00:41:44.520 to the new

00:41:44.920 environment,

00:41:45.340 but you're making

00:41:45.840 it from the

00:41:46.720 point of view

00:41:47.380 of what a human

00:41:48.900 is.

00:41:49.240 A human is a

00:41:49.900 niche,

00:41:51.120 a valley-crossing

00:41:52.800 being.

00:41:53.500 We do niche

00:41:54.120 transition

00:41:54.660 as our primary

00:41:55.540 competence.

00:41:56.580 We can move

00:41:57.100 from being a

00:41:57.640 desert people

00:41:58.260 to being Eskimos

00:41:59.320 in a couple

00:42:00.180 of generations

00:42:00.760 and in a

00:42:01.260 contemporary environment

00:42:01.880 maybe even

00:42:02.240 faster than that.

00:42:02.880 So you actually

00:42:03.820 become,

00:42:05.060 in principle,

00:42:06.000 you are moving

00:42:06.800 to the strongest

00:42:08.640 position in the

00:42:10.060 new environment.

00:42:11.060 So it's actually

00:42:11.420 better for you to do

00:42:12.160 it even though it

00:42:12.800 has pain in the

00:42:13.640 immediate term.

00:42:14.220 Does the idea

00:42:14.860 of valley crossing

00:42:15.480 make sense?

00:42:16.020 I'm assuming

00:42:16.560 because we talked

00:42:17.220 about this a few

00:42:17.700 times.

00:42:18.680 So one is you're

00:42:19.360 crossing the

00:42:19.880 adaptive valley

00:42:20.520 and net-net,

00:42:21.900 when valley crossing

00:42:23.260 is what's up,

00:42:23.940 that's the best

00:42:24.540 possible choice.

00:42:25.640 That's the first

00:42:26.500 piece.

00:42:26.740 The second

00:42:29.040 piece of this

00:42:29.960 movement is

00:42:31.180 that this is

00:42:33.780 a little bit

00:42:34.100 of a shift

00:42:34.540 but we're

00:42:35.620 bringing in

00:42:36.000 other stuff,

00:42:36.760 bringing in

00:42:37.140 stuff like my

00:42:37.560 friend John

00:42:37.960 Verveke's

00:42:38.600 The Meaning

00:42:39.340 Crisis.

00:42:41.680 One of the

00:42:42.380 implications of

00:42:43.820 the environment

00:42:45.460 that we have

00:42:45.980 been in is

00:42:48.040 that it has

00:42:49.300 traded authentic

00:42:51.060 meaning for

00:42:52.260 simulacra of

00:42:53.200 meaning at a

00:42:54.840 very high rate

00:42:55.640 and also as

00:42:58.120 that environment

00:42:58.800 that we've been

00:42:59.200 in is breaking

00:42:59.640 down, we're

00:43:01.000 left simultaneously

00:43:02.140 with neither the

00:43:03.740 authentic meaning

00:43:04.520 nor the

00:43:05.440 simulacra of

00:43:06.120 meaning and

00:43:06.960 now we feel

00:43:07.700 the pain of

00:43:08.340 how deeply

00:43:09.260 foregone we

00:43:10.180 are with

00:43:11.280 less ability

00:43:13.320 to avoid it.

00:43:14.700 Again, back to

00:43:15.380 the addict

00:43:15.680 model. 1.00

00:43:16.640 You're an 1.00

00:43:17.200 addict. 0.99

00:43:18.140 As long as

00:43:18.840 you are on 0.99

00:43:19.400 the junk, 1.00

00:43:20.320 your real 0.99

00:43:20.940 meaningful life

00:43:21.820 can break

00:43:22.260 down but you

00:43:22.740 don't quite

00:43:23.260 have to own

00:43:23.820 up to it

00:43:24.200 because the 0.91

00:43:24.500 junk can 0.95

00:43:24.900 simulate the

00:43:25.800 feeling of

00:43:26.260 winning but

00:43:27.140 when you get

00:43:27.500 off the 0.83

00:43:27.800 junk, you 0.95

00:43:28.220 feel simultaneously 0.86

00:43:29.480 the loss of

00:43:30.480 the junk and 0.83

00:43:31.280 the acute pain 0.82

00:43:32.300 of the destruction

00:43:33.020 of the life

00:43:33.580 that you actually

00:43:34.140 left behind.

00:43:35.380 But as you

00:43:36.800 come up the

00:43:37.720 other side of

00:43:38.320 the you, you

00:43:39.300 are now in

00:43:39.860 recovery.

00:43:40.660 You are now in

00:43:41.080 a process where

00:43:41.680 you can actually

00:43:42.180 begin to

00:43:42.640 reconnect with

00:43:43.600 actual

00:43:44.120 meaningfulness in

00:43:45.900 life as a

00:43:46.820 human.

00:43:47.820 And so as you

00:43:48.480 begin to walk

00:43:49.100 your way up on

00:43:49.880 the other side

00:43:50.260 of the valley,

00:43:51.080 not only do you

00:43:52.180 achieve a higher

00:43:52.920 level of actual

00:43:53.660 competence in

00:43:54.460 thriving in

00:43:55.020 this new

00:43:55.320 environment,

00:43:56.380 you also can

00:43:57.540 achieve higher

00:43:58.240 levels of

00:43:58.640 actual lived

00:43:59.420 felt meaning

00:44:00.100 in a fashion

00:44:00.740 that is durable

00:44:02.860 and strong.

00:44:04.040 So this is all

00:44:04.820 very much good

00:44:05.940 news on the

00:44:06.680 other side of

00:44:07.120 the journey.

00:44:08.200 So that's what

00:44:08.840 it looks like in

00:44:09.360 step three.

00:44:10.200 But it's slow

00:44:10.720 and frustrating

00:44:11.520 and you'll fall

00:44:12.080 down quite a few

00:44:12.600 times.

00:44:13.720 I completely

00:44:14.480 agree.

00:44:15.020 The question I

00:44:16.300 really want to

00:44:16.800 ask is,

00:44:18.020 do you think

00:44:18.800 that this lack

00:44:19.620 of meaning that

00:44:20.900 we have in

00:44:21.420 our society?

00:44:22.620 Do you think

00:44:23.180 that's part of

00:44:24.060 the reason why

00:44:25.000 we had a

00:44:25.540 collective meltdown

00:44:26.720 over COVID?

00:44:28.040 Because overnight

00:44:29.040 everything shut

00:44:29.940 down.

00:44:31.000 All our industries,

00:44:32.700 everything that we

00:44:33.540 judge ourselves

00:44:34.340 by, everything

00:44:35.240 that in the

00:44:35.720 Western world

00:44:36.260 gives us

00:44:36.700 meanings, we

00:44:37.520 were all sent

00:44:38.260 back to our

00:44:38.860 rooms metaphorically

00:44:39.820 to think about

00:44:40.420 what we've done

00:44:41.020 to quote a

00:44:41.600 comedian.

00:44:42.620 And all of a

00:44:43.200 sudden we realise

00:44:44.420 that our lives

00:44:45.480 don't have as

00:44:46.340 much meaning as

00:44:47.420 we once prescribed

00:44:48.280 to them, hence

00:44:49.740 this huge crisis

00:44:51.020 that we now

00:44:51.560 face.

00:44:52.140 Yeah, that's

00:44:52.540 definitely a big

00:44:53.000 part of it.

00:44:53.340 Can I actually

00:44:53.700 hit two

00:44:54.260 different,

00:44:55.800 go for it,

00:44:56.900 pluck two 0.55

00:44:57.240 strings right

00:44:57.700 there?

00:44:57.880 Because the

00:44:58.200 word meaning

00:44:58.620 has a really

00:44:59.120 interesting double

00:44:59.880 meaning, right?

00:45:01.740 In the sense

00:45:02.340 of means to

00:45:03.100 an end, how 0.99

00:45:03.740 to get shit 0.95

00:45:04.140 done, and 0.99

00:45:05.200 in the sense

00:45:05.580 of this felt

00:45:06.340 sense that I

00:45:07.040 have the

00:45:07.900 capacity to

00:45:08.680 live my life

00:45:09.340 in a thriving

00:45:09.840 way, both of

00:45:11.120 those.

00:45:12.300 And I would

00:45:13.100 say on the

00:45:13.500 one hand,

00:45:14.880 the extraordinary

00:45:17.660 uniform and

00:45:21.260 catastrophic

00:45:21.780 bungling of 0.99

00:45:22.860 the management

00:45:23.340 of the

00:45:23.640 COVID crisis

00:45:24.400 reveals the

00:45:25.720 degree to

00:45:26.220 which we

00:45:26.680 lack meaning

00:45:27.380 in the sense

00:45:27.980 of competence

00:45:28.560 to respond to

00:45:29.360 our environment.

00:45:30.860 So one is

00:45:32.000 a, oh 0.99

00:45:33.400 shit, turns 0.99

00:45:33.980 out we 1.00

00:45:34.320 actually are

00:45:35.440 terrible.

00:45:36.220 Our

00:45:36.340 socio-political

00:45:37.880 choice-making

00:45:38.780 infrastructure is

00:45:39.820 quite terrible.

00:45:40.560 We didn't

00:45:40.800 know it, we

00:45:42.660 felt it, we

00:45:43.400 knew it, but

00:45:44.140 we didn't have

00:45:44.580 to face up to

00:45:45.260 it until it

00:45:45.980 really hit us

00:45:46.440 in the face.

00:45:47.040 That's one

00:45:47.440 side of it,

00:45:47.940 which has a

00:45:48.520 demoralizing

00:45:49.080 effect.

00:45:49.740 Like, oh 0.99

00:45:49.940 shit, we 1.00

00:45:50.740 actually are 0.99

00:45:51.020 not in

00:45:51.320 control of

00:45:51.660 our own

00:45:51.940 destiny.

00:45:52.380 We got

00:45:52.600 nothing that

00:45:53.080 can possibly

00:45:53.500 save us.

00:45:54.020 And in

00:45:54.160 fact, every

00:45:54.520 time we

00:45:54.940 externalize our

00:45:56.120 agency to

00:45:56.640 one of these

00:45:56.940 institutions, we

00:45:58.180 realize with

00:45:58.800 regret that it

00:45:59.380 was a bad

00:45:59.700 choice.

00:46:00.320 So that's

00:46:00.540 one side of

00:46:01.240 it.

00:46:01.860 And the

00:46:02.120 other side

00:46:02.440 of it is

00:46:02.660 exactly as

00:46:03.300 you say.

00:46:04.060 And we

00:46:04.360 in fact have

00:46:04.920 been profoundly

00:46:05.660 addicted to a

00:46:06.580 whole structure

00:46:07.400 of little

00:46:08.420 tiny simulacra

00:46:09.520 that have been

00:46:09.980 trading in for

00:46:11.540 real

00:46:12.320 meaningfulness.

00:46:13.360 And then many

00:46:13.880 of those all

00:46:14.780 at once, not

00:46:15.240 all of them, 0.96

00:46:15.880 got sucked 0.95

00:46:16.820 out. 0.63

00:46:17.800 And of

00:46:18.020 course, what's

00:46:18.780 interesting is

00:46:19.220 that for the

00:46:19.880 most part, there

00:46:21.240 was a bifurcation

00:46:22.000 event.

00:46:22.660 Almost everybody

00:46:23.540 sought as rapidly

00:46:24.640 as possible to

00:46:25.360 plug into a

00:46:26.000 new set of

00:46:26.340 addictions.

00:46:27.460 And Netflix

00:46:28.080 is a good

00:46:28.500 example.

00:46:29.640 If you found

00:46:30.140 yourself binge

00:46:30.780 watching Netflix,

00:46:31.720 what that meant

00:46:32.140 was you needed

00:46:33.740 another addiction,

00:46:34.480 right?

00:46:34.600 You just shifted

00:46:35.180 from heroin to

00:46:35.900 cocaine.

00:46:38.180 Or maybe the

00:46:38.920 other way around.

00:46:40.200 And that's

00:46:41.180 another sign.

00:46:41.940 So broadly

00:46:42.560 speaking, yes.

00:46:43.880 Hmm.

00:46:45.080 Jordan, it's

00:46:45.740 interesting.

00:46:46.080 For me, I

00:46:46.560 plugged into my

00:46:47.600 family, my

00:46:48.760 relationship, and

00:46:49.640 also the work we

00:46:50.660 do here.

00:46:51.200 But I was going to

00:46:52.520 ask you about the

00:46:53.280 work we do here

00:46:53.860 because you're sort

00:46:54.340 of making me

00:46:54.880 question quite a

00:46:55.660 bit of everything

00:46:56.980 in the sense

00:46:57.640 that, you know,

00:46:58.620 our show is a

00:46:59.140 political and

00:47:00.120 cultural discussion

00:47:00.940 show.

00:47:01.260 We talk about the

00:47:02.220 political events,

00:47:03.020 we interview people

00:47:03.700 about, as I said,

00:47:04.480 the culture war,

00:47:05.660 cultural things

00:47:06.660 like that.

00:47:07.900 And at the same

00:47:09.480 time, I've had the

00:47:11.020 sense for a long

00:47:11.760 time that politics

00:47:12.600 ruins everything.

00:47:13.880 Right?

00:47:14.860 Yeah.

00:47:15.980 And one of the

00:47:17.900 subjects that we've

00:47:19.080 talked about somewhat,

00:47:20.240 neither of us is

00:47:20.900 religious, but

00:47:21.600 neither of us can

00:47:22.480 help but notice the

00:47:24.360 fact that as we've

00:47:26.420 killed God as a

00:47:27.420 society, that's 0.88

00:47:28.640 opened up a vacuum.

00:47:30.340 And when you talk

00:47:31.300 about meaning, I'd

00:47:32.560 argue religion gave 0.96

00:47:33.460 people that meaning

00:47:34.260 for a period of time.

00:47:35.820 Now it seems to be

00:47:36.820 politics, and now

00:47:37.980 not only is it

00:47:38.820 politics that fills

00:47:39.700 that void for many

00:47:40.520 people, but also

00:47:41.920 because of that,

00:47:42.840 politics is now

00:47:43.500 becoming a religion.

00:47:44.820 It's becoming

00:47:45.440 religious.

00:47:46.280 People act about

00:47:47.660 their political views

00:47:48.740 as if they're

00:47:49.220 articles of faith.

00:47:50.880 And now, does that

00:47:52.040 resonate with you?

00:47:52.920 And what do you

00:47:54.020 make of that?

00:47:54.780 Yeah.

00:47:55.120 So what comes up

00:47:56.220 for me is that what

00:47:56.800 I would say is

00:47:57.260 something like God,

00:47:59.420 nature, family,

00:48:00.340 community, and

00:48:01.180 authentic self,

00:48:02.460 something like that,

00:48:03.600 are like the five 0.93

00:48:05.820 fingers of meaning.

00:48:07.260 And we have, in

00:48:08.260 fact, alienated

00:48:09.040 ourselves from all

00:48:09.860 of those, and

00:48:11.240 rather substantially.

00:48:13.100 And the one at the

00:48:14.300 very end, authentic

00:48:15.020 self, is the base

00:48:15.980 root from which all

00:48:16.720 the rest has to

00:48:17.440 happen.

00:48:18.320 And so that's where

00:48:19.680 the bottom of the

00:48:20.360 you comes.

00:48:20.860 It's like, okay, 1.00

00:48:21.560 shit, I am not my 0.99

00:48:22.320 identity, for example. 0.99

00:48:23.900 I am not my

00:48:24.560 narratives and my

00:48:25.260 stories.

00:48:26.040 I'm also not my

00:48:26.780 trauma.

00:48:27.280 There's something that

00:48:27.960 is more fundamental

00:48:28.720 that is still there

00:48:29.760 always.

00:48:30.700 Some might call it

00:48:31.300 soul, if you choose

00:48:32.060 to use that language.

00:48:33.120 And when you get

00:48:33.800 back to that place,

00:48:34.780 from that place, you

00:48:35.820 can begin the

00:48:36.300 process of now

00:48:36.900 entering into

00:48:37.600 renewed relationship

00:48:38.980 of meaningfulness

00:48:39.820 across the other

00:48:40.880 four fingers.

00:48:45.300 Then you said,

00:48:46.140 okay, so then

00:48:46.540 what happens is,

00:48:47.640 ah, this is

00:48:48.380 actually this notion

00:48:49.740 of bad

00:48:51.360 satisfiers.

00:48:52.380 This is actually

00:48:52.820 from the

00:48:53.620 anthropological

00:48:54.340 literature, Max

00:48:55.720 Neif.

00:48:57.040 I'm thirsty.

00:48:58.280 I drink a can

00:48:59.060 of Coke.

00:49:01.100 Terrible idea.

00:49:02.380 But I don't have

00:49:03.040 the right tools.

00:49:04.100 Something in my

00:49:04.780 life has given

00:49:05.560 me the wrong

00:49:06.060 tools.

00:49:06.900 So I keep

00:49:07.280 actually getting

00:49:07.840 in my own

00:49:08.360 way.

00:49:08.660 I actually

00:49:09.000 solve the

00:49:09.600 problem with

00:49:10.120 something that

00:49:10.580 actually makes

00:49:11.100 the problem

00:49:11.460 worse.

00:49:12.740 So politics

00:49:13.480 is actually

00:49:14.680 solving the

00:49:15.240 problem of

00:49:15.620 religion with

00:49:16.400 something that

00:49:17.300 actually makes

00:49:17.700 the problem

00:49:18.040 worse.

00:49:19.100 At least

00:49:19.460 politics when

00:49:20.000 adopted in

00:49:20.440 this fashion.

00:49:21.300 It's not

00:49:21.600 necessarily

00:49:22.280 intrinsically

00:49:23.700 a religion

00:49:26.320 replacement.

00:49:28.580 It's more of a

00:49:29.420 community

00:49:29.760 replacement.

00:49:30.280 but in

00:49:32.060 any event

00:49:32.500 it definitely

00:49:33.160 makes the

00:49:33.460 problem

00:49:33.680 worse.

00:49:36.060 Do you

00:49:36.760 have a

00:49:37.060 website or

00:49:37.840 do you

00:49:38.140 plan to

00:49:38.640 have a

00:49:38.920 website?

00:49:39.700 Well if

00:49:40.080 you do

00:49:40.600 then Easy

00:49:41.640 DNS are

00:49:42.620 the company

00:49:43.120 for you.

00:49:43.920 Easy

00:49:44.200 DNS is

00:49:45.140 the perfect

00:49:46.000 domain name

00:49:46.960 registrar

00:49:47.560 provider and

00:49:48.340 web host for

00:49:49.000 you.

00:49:49.340 They have a

00:49:49.800 track record

00:49:50.540 of standing

00:49:51.380 up for their

00:49:51.860 clients.

00:49:52.700 Whether it

00:49:53.040 be cancel

00:49:53.560 culture,

00:49:54.520 de-platform

00:49:55.120 attacks or

00:49:56.200 overzealous

00:49:56.960 government

00:49:57.380 agencies.

00:49:58.420 He knows a

00:49:58.880 bit about

00:49:59.240 that.

00:49:59.700 So will

00:50:00.020 you in a

00:50:00.400 second.

00:50:01.200 Easy DNS

00:50:01.840 have rock

00:50:02.640 solid network

00:50:03.580 infrastructure and

00:50:04.840 incredible customer

00:50:05.920 support.

00:50:06.760 They're in your

00:50:07.460 corner no matter

00:50:08.500 what the world

00:50:09.240 throws at you.

00:50:10.100 Unless it's your

00:50:10.680 ex-girlfriend in

00:50:11.400 which case you're

00:50:11.940 on your own.

00:50:12.560 You'd know

00:50:12.880 about that.

00:50:15.020 Move your

00:50:15.740 domains and

00:50:16.740 websites over to

00:50:17.920 Easy DNS right

00:50:19.080 now.

00:50:19.480 All you've got to

00:50:20.060 do is head over

00:50:20.700 to easydns.com

00:50:22.160 forward slash

00:50:23.020 triggered and use

00:50:24.140 our promo code

00:50:25.180 which is of

00:50:25.980 course triggered

00:50:26.580 as well and

00:50:27.660 you will get

00:50:28.140 50% off the

00:50:29.620 initial purchase.

00:50:30.780 Sign up for

00:50:31.120 their newsletter

00:50:31.920 Access of

00:50:33.060 Easy that tells

00:50:34.160 you everything

00:50:34.820 you need to

00:50:35.460 know about

00:50:36.200 technology,

00:50:37.480 privacy and

00:50:38.520 censorship.

00:50:41.240 Jordan you

00:50:41.980 were also saying

00:50:42.740 as well and

00:50:43.100 you were

00:50:43.300 identified I

00:50:44.020 can't remember

00:50:44.580 so you said

00:50:45.120 family what

00:50:46.260 were the four

00:50:46.760 things you

00:50:47.120 identified?

00:50:48.200 God, nature,

00:50:49.300 family, community

00:50:49.960 and self.

00:50:51.000 Isn't the

00:50:51.440 problem that we

00:50:52.700 live in a

00:50:53.020 capitalist society

00:50:53.920 and we can't

00:50:54.900 monetize any of

00:50:55.780 these?

00:50:56.420 Therefore we

00:50:56.980 don't deem them

00:50:57.620 to be important

00:50:58.420 therefore we

00:50:59.620 don't focus on

00:51:00.440 them.

00:51:00.600 I would actually

00:51:01.180 say quite the

00:51:01.620 opposite.

00:51:02.140 I would say the

00:51:02.500 problem is that

00:51:02.920 we live in a

00:51:03.300 capitalist society

00:51:04.020 and we ruthlessly

00:51:04.880 monetize all of

00:51:05.720 these as much as

00:51:06.360 we possibly can.

00:51:07.580 I call it the

00:51:08.120 strip mining of

00:51:08.740 the soul.

00:51:10.340 And so for

00:51:10.820 example,

00:51:11.960 monetization of

00:51:13.800 religion comes in

00:51:16.100 the form of

00:51:16.480 something like

00:51:17.200 Avengers Endgame,

00:51:19.300 the mythopoetic

00:51:20.500 layer which is

00:51:21.740 deeply important for

00:51:22.740 us to actually

00:51:23.300 have the kind of

00:51:24.720 archetypal

00:51:25.420 connections that

00:51:26.260 allow us to

00:51:26.880 govern our

00:51:27.420 behavior over

00:51:28.420 long timescales

00:51:29.600 and deep

00:51:29.940 events has

00:51:31.180 become a

00:51:31.800 resource to

00:51:32.540 be strip

00:51:33.020 mined by

00:51:33.600 increasingly

00:51:34.340 sort of

00:51:35.520 super salient

00:51:36.460 simulations.

00:51:37.840 For example,

00:51:39.220 the bar,

00:51:41.180 the pub,

00:51:42.340 the salient

00:51:43.940 environment of

00:51:44.800 conviviality is

00:51:46.000 a simulacrum of

00:51:47.020 real community

00:51:47.760 unless it

00:51:48.520 actually happens

00:51:49.000 to be connected

00:51:49.500 to real community.

00:51:50.740 In many places

00:51:52.480 in the UK it

00:51:53.040 actually is and

00:51:53.800 has been for

00:51:54.320 a thousand years.

00:51:55.420 I'm talking

00:51:55.920 about one in

00:51:56.500 a place that

00:51:56.880 doesn't have

00:51:57.280 that characteristic.

00:51:58.260 We replace 0.99

00:51:59.300 community with

00:52:00.620 the simulation

00:52:01.140 of community.

00:52:02.400 School,

00:52:03.340 same thing.

00:52:04.220 School in

00:52:05.260 many cases is

00:52:05.940 a replacement

00:52:06.400 for family

00:52:07.400 and community.

00:52:08.840 So in each

00:52:09.740 of these cases

00:52:10.240 by necessity

00:52:11.100 by the way,

00:52:11.520 I wouldn't say

00:52:11.840 that capitalism

00:52:12.300 is the core.

00:52:14.000 Capitalism is a

00:52:14.640 piece of the

00:52:15.260 entire environment.

00:52:16.540 The bigger

00:52:16.820 challenge is

00:52:17.500 actually what I

00:52:18.220 call the

00:52:18.780 technologies of

00:52:20.240 empire which

00:52:21.500 has to do

00:52:22.100 with the

00:52:23.360 do you want to

00:52:24.360 know what the

00:52:24.560 technologies of

00:52:25.060 empire are

00:52:25.560 and then we

00:52:26.040 can work

00:52:26.280 backwards from

00:52:26.680 there.

00:52:27.380 Yeah.

00:52:28.600 So in

00:52:29.720 relationship with

00:52:30.820 literally the

00:52:31.940 indigenous form

00:52:32.940 of humanness,

00:52:33.940 I have to go

00:52:34.800 all the way

00:52:35.520 back to

00:52:36.000 indigenous

00:52:36.480 humaning.

00:52:38.760 And that's a

00:52:39.560 whole capacity.

00:52:40.640 So things like

00:52:41.080 self and family

00:52:41.920 and community

00:52:42.360 and religion

00:52:42.740 are at their

00:52:44.560 most natural

00:52:45.520 all the way

00:52:46.100 back there.

00:52:47.720 Now as I

00:52:48.400 start moving

00:52:49.040 through history

00:52:49.720 specifically into

00:52:50.560 the zone of

00:52:51.080 history,

00:52:51.400 I enter into

00:52:52.060 the era

00:52:53.320 where the

00:52:53.920 technologies of

00:52:54.540 empire begin

00:52:55.100 the process

00:52:55.600 of building

00:52:55.960 a different

00:52:56.480 way of

00:52:56.860 people being

00:52:57.400 together.

00:52:58.840 One of the

00:52:59.440 technologies of

00:53:00.020 empire is

00:53:00.900 narrative.

00:53:02.500 And I'm

00:53:02.660 distinguished

00:53:03.200 narrative from

00:53:04.240 storytelling.

00:53:05.420 Narrative has

00:53:06.060 a characteristic

00:53:06.700 of formality,

00:53:08.200 particularly when

00:53:08.600 it's a written

00:53:09.100 narrative,

00:53:10.100 when it's

00:53:10.400 written down,

00:53:11.520 where there's

00:53:11.880 something about

00:53:12.460 the characteristic

00:53:13.100 of the narrative

00:53:13.860 where the

00:53:14.220 narrative has

00:53:14.840 a reality,

00:53:15.720 it has an

00:53:17.360 authority that is

00:53:19.020 strictly greater

00:53:20.120 than the

00:53:20.440 people who

00:53:20.840 are telling

00:53:21.180 the stories.

00:53:22.820 That's what

00:53:23.520 narrative is.

00:53:24.040 And control

00:53:24.520 over the

00:53:24.820 narrative,

00:53:25.140 things like

00:53:25.420 ideology is

00:53:26.180 a derivative

00:53:26.600 of narrative.

00:53:27.900 And to the

00:53:28.360 degree to

00:53:28.660 which your

00:53:28.980 religion has 0.75

00:53:29.760 become an

00:53:30.220 ideology,

00:53:31.160 it is an

00:53:31.580 elision from

00:53:32.460 its more

00:53:33.480 natural and

00:53:34.100 healthy form

00:53:34.660 into an

00:53:36.000 imperial form.

00:53:37.100 And of

00:53:37.300 course,

00:53:37.520 it's typically

00:53:38.240 used for the

00:53:38.700 purposes of

00:53:39.160 maintaining

00:53:39.520 structures of

00:53:40.120 empire.

00:53:42.380 By the way,

00:53:42.940 I would say

00:53:43.220 democracy is a

00:53:44.280 variation on

00:53:44.800 empire.

00:53:45.320 So it's

00:53:45.780 important to,

00:53:46.640 I'm not being

00:53:47.180 narrowly focusing

00:53:48.400 on, say,

00:53:48.820 like the Roman 0.96

00:53:49.320 empire, I'm

00:53:49.700 talking about

00:53:50.260 a wide variety

00:53:51.420 of structures,

00:53:51.900 almost everything

00:53:52.400 humans have

00:53:52.840 done outside

00:53:53.820 of the context

00:53:54.460 of the

00:53:54.720 indigenous mode.

00:53:56.440 Money,

00:53:57.420 accounting,

00:53:58.200 the enumeration

00:53:59.620 and the

00:54:00.280 tokenification,

00:54:01.280 like the

00:54:01.560 abstraction of

00:54:02.400 relationality in

00:54:03.960 this new

00:54:04.540 construct,

00:54:05.520 instead of

00:54:05.940 actually being

00:54:06.420 in a

00:54:06.580 relationship of

00:54:07.300 actually knowing

00:54:07.980 each other with

00:54:08.460 high degrees of

00:54:09.100 context and

00:54:10.100 providing each

00:54:10.640 other what we

00:54:11.120 need through

00:54:11.760 that medium,

00:54:12.660 what money

00:54:13.300 does is it

00:54:13.920 enables us to

00:54:14.560 radically scale

00:54:15.720 by virtue of

00:54:16.800 indifference,

00:54:17.800 which means that I

00:54:18.480 can engage in

00:54:18.960 transactions with

00:54:19.580 strangers who I

00:54:20.140 don't know at

00:54:20.520 all, and I

00:54:21.000 can use the

00:54:21.400 price function to

00:54:22.180 mediate that.

00:54:23.300 I'm not, by

00:54:23.760 the way, saying

00:54:24.200 that either money

00:54:24.940 or ideology are

00:54:25.700 intrinsically

00:54:26.160 terrible, although

00:54:26.780 they may be, I

00:54:27.440 haven't come to

00:54:27.960 that conclusion,

00:54:29.100 but they have

00:54:29.640 particular

00:54:29.980 characteristics, they

00:54:31.020 have implications.

00:54:33.020 The third is

00:54:33.560 law.

00:54:34.840 The third, again,

00:54:35.660 is this notion of

00:54:36.300 taking the lived

00:54:37.580 relationships of

00:54:38.460 real people within

00:54:39.240 the context of

00:54:40.640 their actual who

00:54:41.440 they are, their

00:54:41.980 developmental

00:54:42.340 environment, and

00:54:43.560 what's actually

00:54:44.000 going on, and

00:54:45.100 endeavoring to

00:54:45.740 reify that into

00:54:46.960 an abstraction,

00:54:47.700 which can be

00:54:48.760 characterized with

00:54:49.540 a set of, a

00:54:50.200 finite set of

00:54:50.860 statements, a

00:54:51.720 legal code.

00:54:53.000 Napoleon, of

00:54:53.560 course, famously

00:54:53.980 tried to enumerate

00:54:54.700 it all the way

00:54:55.180 down to the

00:54:55.580 detail, a very

00:54:56.300 detailed code.

00:54:57.760 The UK, on the

00:54:58.640 other hand, actually

00:54:59.320 stuck with more of

00:54:59.900 a common law

00:55:00.420 system for the

00:55:01.580 most part, which

00:55:02.540 actually harkens

00:55:03.120 back to an

00:55:03.600 older, deeper

00:55:04.120 form, a more

00:55:04.840 indigenous form.

00:55:09.120 Bureaucracy.

00:55:09.600 The notion of

00:55:12.080 formal institutional

00:55:13.080 structures, the

00:55:14.900 idea that, for

00:55:15.520 example, King

00:55:16.740 Joffrey has the

00:55:18.180 power and

00:55:18.860 deference of a

00:55:19.460 king, even

00:55:20.020 though literally

00:55:20.680 everybody knows

00:55:21.620 that he is the 1.00

00:55:22.500 most disgusting 1.00

00:55:24.300 human, because 0.97

00:55:25.540 we've actually

00:55:25.960 decided to put

00:55:26.740 our responsibility

00:55:27.520 and agency into

00:55:28.560 an abstract

00:55:29.160 formal structure,

00:55:30.240 as opposed to

00:55:31.240 into the real

00:55:31.720 human relationships.

00:55:32.640 No indigenous 1.00

00:55:33.220 culture would ever

00:55:34.280 do that.

00:55:34.760 That's absurd

00:55:35.240 beyond comprehension.

00:55:36.540 It's only when we

00:55:37.300 move into this

00:55:37.800 new mode, into

00:55:38.720 this mode of

00:55:39.240 empire, where

00:55:40.060 that becomes

00:55:40.420 possible, because

00:55:41.460 we're in fact

00:55:42.060 dependent upon

00:55:43.260 it.

00:55:43.920 Once you become

00:55:44.600 addicted to

00:55:45.700 empire, oh 1.00

00:55:46.680 shit, I can't 1.00

00:55:47.740 not give Joffrey 1.00

00:55:48.540 the kingdom,

00:55:49.100 because the

00:55:50.040 implication of

00:55:50.760 that is the

00:55:51.640 formal implication

00:55:52.400 of the destruction

00:55:53.020 of the entire

00:55:53.700 social operating

00:55:54.600 system that

00:55:55.140 enables this

00:55:55.740 widespread set

00:55:57.600 of kingdoms to

00:55:58.180 operate at all.

00:55:59.480 Pulling even a

00:56:00.200 little bit on

00:56:00.600 that thread could 0.98

00:56:01.580 pull away the

00:56:01.960 whole sweater, and

00:56:02.880 that, my friends,

00:56:03.520 is chaos.

00:56:04.880 So as you move

00:56:06.000 a little bit down

00:56:06.700 the historical arc

00:56:07.520 into the

00:56:08.340 constructs that

00:56:09.020 happen under

00:56:09.560 the technologies

00:56:10.160 of empire, you

00:56:11.120 find yourself in

00:56:11.660 a circumstance

00:56:12.120 where, one, you're

00:56:12.740 highly dependent

00:56:13.340 upon them, there

00:56:13.960 is no alternative,

00:56:15.620 and psychologically

00:56:16.900 even begin to

00:56:17.620 become physically

00:56:19.080 dependent upon

00:56:19.780 them.

00:56:19.980 You just lose the

00:56:21.260 capacity to

00:56:22.320 navigate reality

00:56:23.160 through any other

00:56:23.840 modality.

00:56:24.440 You learn how to

00:56:25.040 do things like

00:56:26.300 school, largely,

00:56:29.240 as a training

00:56:29.720 ground to

00:56:30.440 navigate society

00:56:32.180 as defined by

00:56:33.480 the particular

00:56:34.060 instantiation of

00:56:35.020 the technologies

00:56:35.480 of empire that

00:56:36.160 happen to be the

00:56:36.720 ones that you're

00:56:37.240 developing in, for

00:56:38.020 example, and

00:56:38.980 that's why it

00:56:39.300 exists.

00:56:39.880 That's what it's

00:56:40.280 for, is to

00:56:40.900 train you to be

00:56:41.500 able to pull

00:56:42.060 those levers and

00:56:43.200 be pushed by

00:56:43.720 those buttons in

00:56:44.340 the appropriate

00:56:44.720 fashion, and

00:56:45.500 it could have

00:56:45.820 become the

00:56:46.260 right kind of

00:56:47.140 automaton in

00:56:47.820 that construct.

00:56:50.140 Do you guys

00:56:50.680 recall why I

00:56:51.580 ended up going

00:56:51.940 there?

00:56:52.340 I lost the

00:56:52.900 fork.

00:56:53.500 You were

00:56:53.720 talking about

00:56:54.200 the tools of

00:56:54.940 empire initially.

00:56:56.380 And prior to

00:56:57.180 that, it had to

00:56:58.160 do with what was

00:56:58.720 the...

00:56:59.800 I don't recall

00:57:00.860 exactly, but

00:57:01.460 actually I was

00:57:01.880 going to ask you

00:57:02.300 a question about

00:57:02.920 this, which I

00:57:03.680 find really

00:57:04.240 interesting anyway.

00:57:04.960 You're tying in

00:57:07.280 with some of

00:57:07.820 Yuval Noah Harari

00:57:09.120 stuff there in

00:57:09.880 terms of the...

00:57:10.980 Are you familiar

00:57:11.500 with his work?

00:57:12.460 No.

00:57:13.240 I know that he

00:57:13.920 exists, and I

00:57:14.600 know that people

00:57:15.100 seem to think it's

00:57:15.860 good.

00:57:16.080 I've never actually

00:57:16.580 read it.

00:57:17.960 Well, one of the

00:57:18.720 things he talks

00:57:19.260 about is the way

00:57:20.020 that human beings

00:57:20.800 broke out from

00:57:21.760 the indigenous

00:57:22.420 state in which

00:57:24.020 you could only

00:57:24.820 live with about

00:57:25.500 150 other people

00:57:26.720 in a small tribe,

00:57:27.620 and one of the

00:57:28.560 reasons homo 1.00

00:57:29.240 sapiens defeated

00:57:30.160 all forms of

00:57:31.300 other humanoids

00:57:32.180 or humanids,

00:57:33.880 whatever way you

00:57:34.960 pronounce it.

00:57:35.540 Hominids.

00:57:36.380 Hominids, yeah.

00:57:37.160 In the battle of

00:57:38.280 evolutionary success

00:57:39.600 was not that they

00:57:40.640 were bigger, stronger,

00:57:42.120 or even necessarily

00:57:43.200 more intelligent,

00:57:44.300 necessarily, but

00:57:45.260 rather that they

00:57:45.960 were able to

00:57:46.740 create shared

00:57:47.860 myths that allowed

00:57:48.700 them to band

00:57:49.300 together in bands

00:57:50.260 that were bigger

00:57:51.040 than 150 people.

00:57:52.740 And what you're

00:57:53.800 talking about is

00:57:54.580 essentially all the

00:57:55.980 stuff we've had to

00:57:56.980 do to be able to

00:57:57.880 live in a society

00:57:58.720 beyond our small

00:57:59.680 tribe has

00:58:00.880 consequences that

00:58:01.860 we are now paying

00:58:02.660 for, right?

00:58:03.400 Yes.

00:58:03.560 That's what you're

00:58:04.300 really saying.

00:58:05.260 Yeah. 0.67

00:58:05.700 So what the hell

00:58:06.820 did we do,

00:58:07.360 Jordan?

00:58:08.480 Well, now we're

00:58:10.100 sort of in the

00:58:10.780 point where, oh,

00:58:11.880 I think this was

00:58:12.500 actually branched

00:58:13.280 from the point of

00:58:13.660 view of something

00:58:13.960 like politics.

00:58:15.140 Yes, exactly.

00:58:16.340 The replacement of

00:58:17.240 religion with

00:58:17.880 politics.

00:58:18.440 Right.

00:58:18.740 And the point being

00:58:19.660 something like,

00:58:20.760 it's not really

00:58:21.460 capitalism.

00:58:22.360 Capitalism happens

00:58:23.120 to be a subset

00:58:23.820 of a contemporary

00:58:26.000 piece of the

00:58:27.580 story of empire.

00:58:28.800 And the story of

00:58:29.300 empire is of the

00:58:30.580 big story.

00:58:31.920 And, you know,

00:58:33.300 we've endeavored to

00:58:34.520 escape from or to

00:58:35.680 reinvent or quite

00:58:36.580 often just, you

00:58:37.640 know, the whole 0.99

00:58:37.920 fucking thing 1.00

00:58:38.300 collapses and we 1.00

00:58:39.000 just reboot it.

00:58:40.620 But the point is

00:58:41.500 something like

00:58:42.120 consciously, so now

00:58:44.180 being aware of this

00:58:45.380 proposition,

00:58:46.700 endeavoring to

00:58:47.280 consciously design a

00:58:49.000 new basis that is

00:58:50.000 not premised on the

00:58:51.380 axiomatics of

00:58:52.220 empire.

00:58:53.140 That would be what

00:58:53.800 we have to do.

00:58:56.740 And again, this

00:58:57.540 is a retelling of

00:58:59.780 that story that I

00:59:00.420 said, which is

00:59:00.920 that many of the

00:59:02.140 most wicked

00:59:02.600 problems, the

00:59:03.260 problems that are

00:59:04.080 even mythopoetic in

00:59:05.640 nature, like Cain

00:59:06.560 and Abel, like

00:59:07.100 deep, deep

00:59:07.660 problems that we've

00:59:09.800 never historically

00:59:10.580 been able to

00:59:11.080 truly resolve by

00:59:13.200 hypothesis, will in

00:59:14.600 fact find themselves

00:59:15.740 in somewhat

00:59:16.560 surprisingly effortlessly

00:59:18.140 resolved to the

00:59:19.740 degree to which we

00:59:20.380 are successful in

00:59:21.980 this kind of a

00:59:22.560 migration, a

00:59:23.360 transition to a

00:59:24.260 post-imperial

00:59:25.140 modality of

00:59:26.580 humaning.

00:59:28.740 And whole new

00:59:29.640 opportunities and

00:59:30.300 whole new problems

00:59:30.940 will show up as

00:59:31.520 well.

00:59:32.340 But just to kind of

00:59:33.540 put the hypothetical,

00:59:35.980 we know, or at least

00:59:36.920 we have a high degree

00:59:37.460 of confidence, that we

00:59:38.340 made that first move.

00:59:39.760 And we moved from the

00:59:40.660 indigenous mode to the

00:59:41.640 imperial mode, which

00:59:43.200 means that magnitude is

00:59:44.260 possible.

00:59:44.700 We can do that kind of

00:59:45.600 thing.

00:59:46.440 So we now sit at a

00:59:47.600 threshold where the

00:59:49.060 proposition is, well, we

00:59:49.980 need to do something

00:59:50.460 like that as well.

00:59:51.380 We know we can.

00:59:51.760 Well, we know we can

00:59:52.480 move in one direction.

00:59:53.540 Can we move in the

00:59:54.240 other?

00:59:54.480 That's really the

00:59:55.080 question.

00:59:55.480 Well, moving into the

00:59:57.060 other, I don't think is

00:59:58.140 actually valid.

00:59:59.760 And I may be wrong.

01:00:01.340 And it's actually one of

01:00:02.400 my, the people I'm

01:00:03.260 beginning to collaborate

01:00:03.800 with is Tyson Yonka

01:00:04.920 Porta down in

01:00:05.880 Australia, who speaks 0.95

01:00:07.360 quite eloquently from a,

01:00:08.620 an indigenous

01:00:09.160 Australian perspective,

01:00:10.860 cross product with a

01:00:12.260 very sophisticated,

01:00:13.760 complex system science

01:00:14.780 perspective.

01:00:15.580 So it's a very

01:00:16.120 powerful voice.

01:00:18.060 And if I think about

01:00:19.240 the implications of the

01:00:20.240 transition we're going

01:00:21.040 under in the more

01:00:21.900 dystopic version, if I

01:00:23.580 take a more pessimistic

01:00:24.440 view, the only guys left

01:00:26.220 standing are his guys in

01:00:27.720 the aborigines in

01:00:28.960 Australia.

01:00:29.720 Everybody else is dead.

01:00:31.080 If I think about what

01:00:31.820 happens if we actually go

01:00:33.460 down the path of

01:00:34.880 technologies of this

01:00:37.120 order of power, right?

01:00:38.820 The power that we're

01:00:39.480 talking about, orders of

01:00:40.620 magnitude more powerful

01:00:41.440 than anything we've

01:00:41.960 developed before, without

01:00:43.800 an adequate level of

01:00:45.220 wisdom to actually govern

01:00:46.620 our choices, you know,

01:00:47.680 not skiing willy-nilly

01:00:49.000 drunk down the mountain,

01:00:50.220 but actually if we don't

01:00:51.720 figure out how to solve

01:00:52.520 that problem, the end

01:00:53.800 result is not like we

01:00:55.480 die an unhappy life,

01:00:57.160 right?

01:00:57.300 The end result is not

01:00:58.240 that we have a slightly

01:00:59.660 less pleasant, we have

01:01:01.340 weeds in the yard,

01:01:02.360 right?

01:01:02.480 The end result is we end

01:01:03.320 up killing almost 0.69

01:01:04.180 everybody through a wide

01:01:05.980 variety of terrible

01:01:06.940 means, many of which we

01:01:08.240 haven't even invented yet.

01:01:09.400 Remember in 1939, just

01:01:12.220 look at the technology

01:01:13.040 as a death, destruction

01:01:14.340 and power in 1939, compare

01:01:15.760 that to 1946, how far

01:01:17.920 humans could actually go

01:01:19.060 in weapons of destruction 0.99

01:01:20.480 when shit got very, very 0.99

01:01:21.760 real. 1.00

01:01:23.080 Imagine if shit got very, 0.99

01:01:24.340 very real on a truly 0.99

01:01:25.220 global basis with 8

01:01:27.340 billion people, right?

01:01:29.160 All struggling to be the

01:01:30.340 ones who make it through

01:01:31.420 this tiny little possibility

01:01:33.420 of success, survival, or

01:01:35.380 even just domination.

01:01:36.460 Who doesn't want to be on

01:01:37.480 the wrong side of

01:01:38.760 technologies of tyranny and

01:01:39.920 domination at this level

01:01:40.900 of control, right?

01:01:41.740 That's a struggle that

01:01:42.420 might cause people to up

01:01:43.860 the ante and as soon as

01:01:44.740 you get into an arms

01:01:46.360 risk of that magnitude,

01:01:47.160 we have no idea what's

01:01:48.240 on the other side of

01:01:48.720 that.

01:01:49.860 So likely in that

01:01:50.840 context, the only people

01:01:51.960 that are left standing

01:01:52.580 are in fact the

01:01:53.140 Australian aborigines.

01:01:54.900 So perhaps he has the

01:01:56.040 least amount of concern.

01:01:57.220 He might be like, yeah, 1.00

01:01:57.960 fuck you guys. 1.00

01:01:59.440 We didn't want you to 1.00

01:02:00.500 mess with us anyway and

01:02:01.600 we're going to be fine.

01:02:03.620 So the other side of it

01:02:05.260 is actually something like

01:02:06.300 we actually have, from

01:02:07.400 my point of view, we

01:02:08.440 have to actually innovate

01:02:09.200 something that is novel.

01:02:10.900 It's not a going back.

01:02:11.800 It's maybe recovering, a

01:02:13.420 lot of remembering, and

01:02:15.060 in many ways a going back

01:02:16.200 for the purposes of going

01:02:17.380 to the next place, that

01:02:18.320 the going back is the

01:02:19.140 right foundation from

01:02:20.320 which to go to the next

01:02:21.100 place.

01:02:21.780 But the opportunity and

01:02:22.860 the possibility, at least

01:02:24.940 for those who want to not

01:02:26.380 end up just leaving the

01:02:28.000 world to the Australian

01:02:28.700 aborigines and maybe some

01:02:30.060 cool kinds of cybernetic

01:02:32.420 mutants, is to figure out

01:02:35.480 how to get to the next

01:02:36.140 thing.

01:02:37.460 Now there's a group in

01:02:38.180 England actually, I

01:02:39.380 think they called

01:02:40.000 Rethink X, who speak 1.00

01:02:44.360 about this in a very

01:02:44.920 different way than I do

01:02:45.660 and I only discovered

01:02:46.300 their stuff about a year

01:02:47.200 ago, which is neat,

01:02:48.240 because it's quite

01:02:48.700 convergent.

01:02:50.020 Now, I suspect that we

01:02:51.700 actually converge on what

01:02:52.580 I just said.

01:02:53.660 We may not, but we

01:02:55.400 converge on a lot of

01:02:56.100 stuff.

01:02:56.460 And one of their points

01:02:57.080 is that even something as

01:02:58.200 simple and prosaic as the

01:02:59.220 notion of the fourth

01:02:59.880 industrial revolution, if

01:03:02.680 you think about the last

01:03:06.540 three, and particularly the

01:03:08.460 first two, and their

01:03:09.740 implications for how

01:03:11.440 society operated, what

01:03:13.100 identity looked like, how

01:03:14.340 human beings moved, things

01:03:15.820 like the massive migration of

01:03:17.680 the economy from like a 90%

01:03:19.280 agricultural rural to a, in

01:03:22.580 many modern worlds, 90%

01:03:24.200 urban and technical, for

01:03:26.180 example, over a relatively

01:03:27.820 brief period of time.

01:03:28.720 If you think about the fourth

01:03:29.820 industrial revolution and you

01:03:31.200 propose that it actually has

01:03:32.360 an order or two magnitude more

01:03:34.760 implication, more power, and

01:03:36.860 that's just another way of

01:03:37.580 saying what I just said.

01:03:38.860 We're just going through a

01:03:40.080 shift.

01:03:40.620 We're going through a move.

01:03:41.920 We can't, in some sense,

01:03:42.800 can't help it.

01:03:43.700 We've already lit the engine.

01:03:45.920 Like, it's going.

01:03:46.920 We're riding it.

01:03:47.960 The question is, how do we

01:03:49.040 choose to find a way to

01:03:50.160 steer it, or do we find

01:03:51.560 ourselves flung willy-nilly

01:03:53.040 by where it happens to take

01:03:54.200 us?

01:03:56.840 And, you know, we can

01:03:57.660 double, deep dive on that. 0.84

01:03:58.780 I would recommend, if

01:03:59.560 anybody's interested, just

01:04:00.460 find their, I think it's

01:04:01.940 called Rethink Humanity.

01:04:03.900 And they talk about it in

01:04:04.900 terms of Humanity 1, Humanity 2,

01:04:06.440 and Humanity 3.

01:04:07.660 So my indigenous mode maps

01:04:09.360 to Humanity 1, and my

01:04:10.840 imperial mode maps to

01:04:12.020 Humanity 2.

01:04:13.280 And the hypothetical

01:04:13.920 hypothesis is this thing

01:04:15.340 they call Humanity 3.

01:04:17.020 Right?

01:04:17.140 So they're speaking about

01:04:18.060 that same, you know, okay,

01:04:19.220 we've got three big, you

01:04:20.180 know, two big moves,

01:04:21.700 apocle and nature, and we're

01:04:23.360 now entering into what is

01:04:24.400 actually a new epoch.

01:04:25.940 So the way you navigate that

01:04:27.300 first is you acknowledge

01:04:28.340 that's what's up. 0.99

01:04:29.340 You stop fucking around with 0.99

01:04:30.460 things that couldn't 0.99

01:04:30.980 possibly matter.

01:04:31.680 where it's a little bit

01:04:33.560 like you're sitting there

01:04:35.320 on the dock, and I think

01:04:37.060 it's Dover?

01:04:38.360 I don't really know.

01:04:39.000 Sorry.

01:04:39.340 What's that kind of, where

01:04:40.260 did the Titanic take off

01:04:41.240 from?

01:04:41.840 It went from Belfast

01:04:43.080 originally.

01:04:43.860 Oh, okay.

01:04:44.900 Yeah, it was built in

01:04:45.580 Belfast.

01:04:46.080 The Irish like to keep it 1.00

01:04:47.020 quiet.

01:04:48.200 Right, so you're sitting in

01:04:50.460 Belfast, getting ready to get

01:04:51.420 in the Titanic, and for

01:04:53.600 whatever reason, you happen

01:04:54.440 to actually know with a high

01:04:55.580 degree of confidence that

01:04:56.460 it's going to be exactly that

01:04:58.420 trip.

01:04:58.700 But you're choosing to 0.99

01:05:00.200 actually dick around with 0.98

01:05:01.220 the cocktail napkins on 0.99

01:05:03.180 your table.

01:05:05.240 That's, from my point of

01:05:06.420 view, when I look at the

01:05:07.160 notion of what's going on

01:05:07.940 in terms of politics right

01:05:08.900 now, that's the frame that

01:05:10.200 I see.

01:05:11.040 Hey, guys, guess what?

01:05:12.740 This ship is going to crash,

01:05:14.840 and almost everybody's going

01:05:15.880 to die quite horribly.

01:05:17.320 All we have to really do is

01:05:18.800 not do that, like just not

01:05:21.160 run into the iceberg.

01:05:22.100 Can we maybe steer a little

01:05:22.980 bit different, or maybe not

01:05:24.400 leave?

01:05:24.800 There's all kinds of

01:05:25.340 possibilities.

01:05:25.700 I'm not quite sure what it

01:05:26.340 is, but what really has to

01:05:27.840 happen is, you know,

01:05:28.700 enough people on the ship

01:05:29.980 have to stop being

01:05:31.040 focusing on the trivialities

01:05:33.200 that they've been trained to

01:05:34.180 focus on by 19th century

01:05:36.740 society, and by the way,

01:05:39.640 humans developing in the

01:05:40.920 context of 19th century

01:05:41.840 society, and just maybe look

01:05:44.560 collectively at the

01:05:45.340 possibility that there's an

01:05:46.200 iceberg out there, something

01:05:47.620 like that.

01:05:49.460 That's the hardest part.

01:05:50.680 Well, the hardest part, yeah,

01:05:51.800 I see that.

01:05:52.540 I guess the reason people,

01:05:54.740 well, I agree with you.

01:05:55.980 First of all, people are

01:05:56.940 addicted to politics.

01:05:57.740 Second, it's entertainment.

01:05:59.580 Third, it's whatever.

01:06:01.280 But equally, since to a large

01:06:04.120 degree, what we do with the

01:06:05.500 ship depends on the decisions

01:06:06.700 made by politicians, at least

01:06:09.020 that that's the argument, then

01:06:11.780 I've got myself, haven't I?

01:06:15.460 I've got myself, haven't I?

01:06:16.760 I could see that the flaw in my

01:06:18.020 own argument as I was making it.

01:06:19.960 Okay, so what should we focus

01:06:23.260 on?

01:06:23.780 Yeah, this is another simple

01:06:25.380 example.

01:06:26.300 There's great memes that have

01:06:27.600 these images, but simultaneously

01:06:30.340 imagining that you are dependent

01:06:32.120 upon the choices of a bunch of 0.98

01:06:33.380 buffoons, and or that you can rely 0.99

01:06:36.160 on a bunch of buffoons to steer your 1.00

01:06:37.660 life effectively, is a rather foolish 1.00

01:06:40.940 place to be. 0.97

01:06:42.420 Now, acknowledge, for reasons of 0.86

01:06:44.980 history, these particular buffoons have 0.96

01:06:46.540 been handed the crown of Joffrey. 0.96

01:06:47.800 All right, well, that's a real

01:06:49.800 problem.

01:06:50.840 I'm not saying that that's not the

01:06:52.100 case. 0.84

01:06:52.380 We can't naively or stupidly, I 0.93

01:06:54.800 don't know, what are these, Antifa 0.95

01:06:55.720 now climbing on walls and painting

01:06:57.100 on bricks? 1.00

01:06:57.780 That is a naive and stupid 1.00

01:06:59.100 recognition of the actual 1.00

01:07:00.260 underlying reality.

01:07:01.240 They are correct in their

01:07:02.180 assessment that endeavoring to

01:07:04.000 either be governed by or, well, to 0.96

01:07:07.120 be governed by buffoons is not 1.00

01:07:08.560 going to work. 0.99

01:07:09.720 Unfortunately, they are still

01:07:10.680 reactively engaging in poor

01:07:12.320 strategies and tactics.

01:07:13.840 The right response is to actually

01:07:15.200 slow down.

01:07:16.220 Like, it's the same story all the

01:07:17.760 time.

01:07:18.600 Acknowledge, recognize, okay, 0.99

01:07:19.980 shit, Biden's not going to save 0.99

01:07:22.440 us or whoever happens to be in 0.99

01:07:24.180 charge of the UK right now.

01:07:26.560 Well, he's definitely not going to

01:07:28.100 save us.

01:07:29.180 Yeah.

01:07:29.820 He's definitely not going to save

01:07:30.700 you.

01:07:31.320 No.

01:07:31.580 No.

01:07:31.920 Boris is anything.

01:07:33.080 Yeah.

01:07:33.440 No, let's not go there.

01:07:34.740 Yeah.

01:07:34.880 Boris is not going to save you.

01:07:35.960 Right.

01:07:36.160 Boris is not going to save us.

01:07:37.240 No.

01:07:37.360 I think that's fair to say.

01:07:39.040 And, you know, again, there are

01:07:42.820 things that have happened in

01:07:44.020 history that we know, right?

01:07:45.980 Their possibilities are real.

01:07:47.440 They're real possibilities to do

01:07:48.920 things.

01:07:49.740 It is not the case that we must

01:07:51.180 only vote between Trump and

01:07:53.500 Biden.

01:07:53.800 That's not the reality of the

01:07:55.340 circumstance that we find

01:07:56.180 ourselves in.

01:07:57.000 It's a form of addiction.

01:07:58.900 It's a form of learned

01:08:00.220 helplessness motivated by a

01:08:02.380 deeper anxiety around taking

01:08:04.320 that level of responsibility and

01:08:05.580 being overwhelmed with it

01:08:06.760 preemptively.

01:08:08.200 Right.

01:08:08.420 Does that make sense what I just

01:08:09.280 said?

01:08:09.860 Yeah.

01:08:10.120 Yep.

01:08:10.440 Right.

01:08:10.620 If you, if you really can't

01:08:12.320 deal with something out that's

01:08:13.520 10 steps down the road, but you

01:08:15.180 try all at once to imagine

01:08:16.900 dealing with it, you'll have a

01:08:19.160 stack overflow and you will

01:08:20.420 become demoralized preemptively

01:08:21.980 and then you won't take the

01:08:22.940 first step.

01:08:24.640 You've got to identify what is

01:08:25.760 a first step that is a right

01:08:27.360 step.

01:08:27.740 It's a step that is actually a

01:08:28.980 healthy, effective step in the

01:08:30.300 right direction that you can

01:08:31.640 take.

01:08:32.340 And then you have to take it.

01:08:35.220 That's in some sense, simply

01:08:36.600 put, not trivial.

01:08:38.820 And just being able to orient and

01:08:40.040 discern the distinction between

01:08:41.520 what is a random move and what

01:08:43.880 is at least a vaguely move, a

01:08:45.500 vaguely positive move in the

01:08:46.520 right direction.

01:08:47.380 But also the courage to take

01:08:48.700 that step is usually not small.

01:08:50.280 It's going to be a pretty big

01:08:51.140 one.

01:08:51.700 And then you've got to figure

01:08:52.580 out from that new place, which

01:08:54.760 is going to be a very different

01:08:55.520 perspective because now you've

01:08:56.480 changed.

01:08:57.000 Something about you has changed

01:08:58.680 in the movement of this step.

01:08:59.820 It's mostly an individual

01:09:01.320 transformation is a big piece 0.91

01:09:02.640 of it.

01:09:03.240 Then what's the next step?

01:09:04.340 And then the next step.

01:09:05.180 And then the next step.

01:09:05.880 And then the hope.

01:09:06.740 And by the way, pure hope.

01:09:08.620 Right.

01:09:08.740 It's not that we are dependent

01:09:10.360 upon the captain of the ship.

01:09:12.060 At the end of the day, we're

01:09:12.900 dependent upon everybody on the

01:09:14.500 ship.

01:09:15.320 If enough people on the ship

01:09:16.880 say, hey, guys, we need to start

01:09:19.180 dealing with the ship differently

01:09:20.580 than the captain and whatever,

01:09:23.020 the crew will ultimately say,

01:09:25.080 OK, I get it.

01:09:26.340 Even if it turns out we have to

01:09:27.540 grab them and like, you know,

01:09:29.360 convince them that they are no

01:09:30.360 longer actually in charge of the

01:09:31.320 ship.

01:09:31.780 This is the weird thing.

01:09:32.880 This goes back to that notion of

01:09:34.040 learned helplessness, learned

01:09:35.760 formality.

01:09:36.440 At the end of the day, it isn't

01:09:38.780 the way that it is.

01:09:39.300 Now, OK, next, you know, we can

01:09:40.640 make lots of cool little tactical

01:09:42.280 moves.

01:09:43.340 Yeah, but they have the guns.

01:09:44.620 All right.

01:09:44.860 Fair enough.

01:09:45.260 But they aren't even real.

01:09:47.120 Like Boris doesn't have any guns.

01:09:48.300 If he does, he's not very

01:09:49.000 dangerous.

01:09:50.240 He ostensibly can command people

01:09:52.440 who have guns.

01:09:53.060 But those people are people.

01:09:54.380 And they're also, by the way, many,

01:09:55.720 many people.

01:09:56.340 It's not like that.

01:09:57.140 It's like the army is a is a

01:09:58.900 thing.

01:09:59.340 The army is a bunch of people.

01:10:00.540 So it's like this.

01:10:02.500 It's a very malleable

01:10:05.240 consciousness raising, but I'm

01:10:07.080 conscious just raising

01:10:07.660 consciousness, presencing, you

01:10:09.400 know, moving from being an

01:10:10.380 unconscious automaton, merely

01:10:12.420 habitually reacting in some

01:10:13.980 trained and amygdala hijacked

01:10:16.660 way to having a conscious

01:10:18.380 responsibility for the choices

01:10:20.280 that you're making.

01:10:21.420 And then the process of

01:10:23.260 progressively becoming more

01:10:24.620 capable in yourself and more

01:10:26.160 and more with other people to

01:10:28.400 have broader strategic

01:10:29.880 competence.

01:10:30.880 I actually call this

01:10:31.660 sovereignty three or

01:10:33.380 sovereignty.

01:10:34.280 You know, sovereignty two was

01:10:35.340 this notion of it's not the

01:10:36.780 God king.

01:10:37.520 It's these nation states.

01:10:39.340 Sovereignty three is not

01:10:40.200 something that is invoked upon

01:10:41.500 you by virtue of being.

01:10:42.880 It's actually something you

01:10:43.820 build.

01:10:44.400 It's a it's a it's actual

01:10:45.860 competence.

01:10:46.520 The ability to actually take

01:10:47.440 responsibility for more and

01:10:48.660 more effective choices in more

01:10:50.260 and more contexts.

01:10:51.960 And that's it.

01:10:53.580 Like we're on a journey of

01:10:55.500 that shift.

01:10:56.880 But let's go back.

01:10:57.480 Let's be very like let's be

01:10:58.540 hopeful.

01:10:59.880 There's a breakdown at the old

01:11:03.000 modes of power are very

01:11:04.620 obsolete.

01:11:05.560 They're big.

01:11:06.480 They control everything right

01:11:07.540 now, but they're also

01:11:08.320 degrading rapidly. 1.00

01:11:09.680 They're rather stupid and 1.00

01:11:11.700 they don't have any real clue 1.00

01:11:13.100 to how to use the new modes

01:11:14.300 of power.

01:11:14.820 Well, and to a large extent,

01:11:16.760 they inhibit themselves from

01:11:17.620 doing so because they know

01:11:18.880 that the intrinsics of these

01:11:20.060 new modes of power are

01:11:21.860 antithetical to their own

01:11:23.320 nature.

01:11:23.620 And so they kind of don't push

01:11:26.400 the ball as far as they

01:11:27.160 could.

01:11:28.260 So to the degree to which one

01:11:29.780 chooses to become competent,

01:11:31.880 I remember that that journey

01:11:33.120 involved two things,

01:11:34.340 reconnecting with

01:11:35.280 meaningfulness, but also

01:11:36.240 becoming that kind of

01:11:37.640 organism that was most able

01:11:38.900 to explore this new

01:11:40.640 landscape and become

01:11:41.900 adaptive to the real

01:11:42.820 environment.

01:11:43.960 To the degree to which you

01:11:45.000 adopt that, you will in fact

01:11:46.180 discover new forms of

01:11:47.400 potency and power that lay

01:11:49.080 ambient in the potential of

01:11:51.100 the new environment that

01:11:52.280 have not yet even vaguely

01:11:53.900 been discovered.

01:11:55.880 And you can begin to

01:11:56.780 leverage that.

01:11:57.580 And we're sitting on the

01:11:58.360 threshold of a major

01:11:59.180 transition.

01:12:00.360 Well, by definition, that

01:12:02.480 transition involves access

01:12:04.160 to power that dwarfs the

01:12:05.560 power before it.

01:12:06.820 So all the power that you

01:12:08.340 may find yourself facing

01:12:09.660 and be a little bit

01:12:10.220 inhibited by isn't actually

01:12:12.180 the meaningful part.

01:12:13.320 The meaningful part is

01:12:14.080 what's the power that lives

01:12:14.920 beyond the far horizon?

01:12:16.640 And can you become capable

01:12:17.960 of actually forming the kind

01:12:19.720 of collective, the kind of

01:12:20.820 group, a group of people

01:12:22.480 who can, who can trade

01:12:23.660 with each other and

01:12:24.920 connect with each other

01:12:25.920 and communicate with each

01:12:27.160 other, avoiding a lot of

01:12:28.580 the problems that we were

01:12:29.280 talking about earlier.

01:12:29.900 So we can make it very

01:12:30.400 practical.

01:12:31.540 You just learn how to have

01:12:32.960 real conversations on

01:12:34.060 Twitter.

01:12:34.680 It's possible.

01:12:35.820 It can happen.

01:12:36.660 Try that as just a basic

01:12:37.720 rule.

01:12:38.500 And the hypothesis is this.

01:12:40.980 One is three points here.

01:12:42.240 One is you're no longer

01:12:43.660 adding to the noise.

01:12:44.820 That's like an ethical

01:12:45.900 first do no harm.

01:12:47.040 If you can just inhibit

01:12:48.420 yourself from contributing

01:12:50.220 evil to the world, that's a

01:12:51.800 good thing.

01:12:53.640 It's going to take some

01:12:54.640 work for me.

01:12:55.680 For everybody.

01:12:56.800 It may involve the break,

01:12:57.980 right?

01:12:58.120 Just stop.

01:12:59.400 Or habits.

01:13:00.300 Don't do it while you're

01:13:00.820 drunk.

01:13:02.560 Two, you're also in the act

01:13:06.820 of doing that, avoiding harm

01:13:07.900 to yourself.

01:13:09.140 As you know, it's actually bad

01:13:11.200 for you to engage in that.

01:13:12.660 But three, much more

01:13:13.760 importantly, literally

01:13:15.540 everybody who you find is

01:13:17.360 also participating in that.

01:13:18.900 Every relationship that you

01:13:20.020 can have, every communication

01:13:20.940 that you can have that

01:13:21.860 actually is generative in the

01:13:23.220 context of Twitter, that is

01:13:24.280 building increasing

01:13:25.560 competence of how to do it,

01:13:27.660 whether it's happening just in

01:13:28.860 you or in the relationship, in

01:13:30.660 the people you're interacting

01:13:31.520 with, or in the context of the

01:13:33.500 larger story of people being

01:13:34.560 able to perceive it, is

01:13:35.740 building a new kind of

01:13:37.940 collaboration.

01:13:39.360 That is the discovery, the

01:13:40.700 autocatalytic discovery of what a

01:13:42.220 decentralized collective

01:13:43.320 intelligence that is driven by a

01:13:45.160 wisdom commons, that's a whole

01:13:46.140 bunch of terms, actually looks

01:13:48.220 like, the new form of

01:13:49.600 governance that is

01:13:50.240 simultaneously most adaptive to

01:13:53.960 the new environment, but also

01:13:55.480 generates the most positive use

01:13:57.640 of that power without killing

01:13:58.860 everybody.

01:13:59.780 And there's a very specific eye

01:14:00.940 of the needle that you can

01:14:01.580 thread, but the path that I'm

01:14:03.000 describing, the methodology that

01:14:05.400 I'm proposing, I believe, is in

01:14:07.700 fact the one that gets us there,

01:14:10.080 individually and collectively.

01:14:11.140 But that was absolutely

01:14:14.700 outstanding, and hopefully,

01:14:16.960 hopefully, Jordan, we're going

01:14:18.360 to be able to get there.

01:14:19.280 Thank you so much for coming on

01:14:20.860 the show.

01:14:21.480 If people want to be able to

01:14:22.940 find you, where is the best

01:14:24.140 place to do that online,

01:14:25.580 ironically enough?

01:14:27.520 Well, YouTube is where I've done

01:14:30.380 most of my stuff recently because

01:14:31.700 I found that I've gotten a little

01:14:33.300 bit demoralized and lazy around

01:14:34.900 writing.

01:14:36.220 For a period of about three years,

01:14:37.640 I wrote a number of pieces on

01:14:38.840 Medium that are still there, except 1.00

01:14:40.300 for the one on QAnon that they

01:14:41.480 censored.

01:14:43.000 And I feel like I'm probably

01:14:44.960 going to begin writing again on

01:14:46.420 Substack just to see how that

01:14:47.740 feels.

01:14:48.440 I promise I will never create a

01:14:49.920 paywall.

01:14:50.300 That's not the point.

01:14:53.220 But that's pretty much it.

01:14:54.420 I don't really have, other than

01:14:55.280 that, I don't really have much of

01:14:56.220 an online presence.

01:14:57.780 Jordan, before we ask your last

01:14:58.860 question, I'm just curious, if you

01:15:00.160 don't mind me asking, and if you're

01:15:01.420 not happy to answer it, we'll just

01:15:02.880 cut it out.

01:15:03.720 What do you do day to day?

01:15:08.260 Well, I'm a parent.

01:15:08.980 I have a two-year-old, so I engage

01:15:12.200 in parenting.

01:15:15.440 I spend time with my wife.

01:15:19.000 I have a new practice that I really

01:15:21.300 enjoyed quite a bit as I have a...

01:15:23.540 There she is!

01:15:26.980 There she is.

01:15:28.220 There she goes.

01:15:29.420 I have a hot tub in my backyard, and

01:15:34.680 I make myself an espresso, or a

01:15:37.420 particular kind of beverage that's

01:15:38.520 espresso-based, and then I actually

01:15:40.520 sit in the hot tub with my coffee and

01:15:41.940 meditate.

01:15:43.180 That sounds incredible.

01:15:44.460 You're nailing it.

01:15:45.360 It's really good.

01:15:46.300 It's amazing.

01:15:47.760 And then, it depends.

01:15:49.460 Oftentimes, I'll have one or two

01:15:51.120 conversations with people, some of

01:15:52.740 whom I know, some of whom are new

01:15:54.100 people.

01:15:54.360 Oftentimes, I actually think about

01:15:57.120 things like this.

01:15:58.240 I'd say probably about three hours a

01:16:00.460 day contemplating some variation on

01:16:02.060 this thing, which is quite

01:16:02.720 complicated.

01:16:03.240 It's a lot of stuff.

01:16:04.780 Recently, I've actually been focusing

01:16:06.220 on cryptocurrency and the blockchain

01:16:08.720 because it's relevant now.

01:16:12.540 Sometimes it's not, and sometimes it

01:16:13.760 is.

01:16:14.580 And it's in a process right now of

01:16:16.400 gathering more potential energy.

01:16:18.460 And so, it will be, how do I say

01:16:21.420 this right?

01:16:23.260 It's like a, it's like a, it's a

01:16:24.540 part of the journey.

01:16:26.260 It's definitely not the end, but it's

01:16:28.280 part of it.

01:16:29.400 And particularly the part where we

01:16:30.600 shift power from old structures to

01:16:32.140 new structures.

01:16:33.080 Yeah.

01:16:33.480 It is already, it's going to be part

01:16:34.860 of the new structures that have a

01:16:35.780 lot of power.

01:16:36.660 I expect that it will also go away in

01:16:38.320 a surprisingly rapid time, but in

01:16:40.540 the order of like 10 to 20 years, not

01:16:41.900 like two or three.

01:16:43.980 And so, sensing that and being able to

01:16:46.200 navigate, like, okay, where are the

01:16:48.080 trim tabs that can have the most

01:16:49.420 positive influence at the highest

01:16:51.200 level and also at different levels

01:16:52.860 would be an example of something

01:16:53.960 that I'll spend time on when that

01:16:55.820 kind of a, what I call a Kairos or

01:16:57.960 an event that has lots of moment

01:17:00.600 now emerges.

01:17:03.620 Well, very interesting.

01:17:05.240 Listen, thanks so much for coming on.

01:17:06.600 And as always, we have one final

01:17:08.300 question for you.

01:17:09.140 Which is always, what's the one

01:17:10.440 thing we're not talking about, but

01:17:11.780 we really should be?

01:17:14.320 I knew you'd react like that.

01:17:17.320 Yeah, that's a tricky one, particularly

01:17:19.000 given how much we've just talked

01:17:20.200 about.

01:17:20.860 Yeah.

01:17:23.660 Well, I'm wondering and I don't

01:17:25.320 really know, but the thing that I

01:17:28.960 would imagine or I suspect would be

01:17:32.440 something like,

01:17:33.360 a phrase that popped into my head a

01:17:39.520 while ago was pay more attention to

01:17:41.040 the ones you love.

01:17:43.340 So the question that you may not be

01:17:44.780 talking about that you should be is

01:17:46.600 who do I love that I'm not paying

01:17:49.380 enough attention to?

01:17:52.540 Maybe that.

01:17:53.780 At the very least, if you, if you ask

01:17:55.260 that question, it's probably a very

01:17:56.440 good one to ask.

01:17:57.180 It is.

01:17:59.460 Jordan Hall, thank you so much for

01:18:00.620 coming on.

01:18:01.280 All the links to Jordan's YouTube

01:18:03.480 channel and all that good stuff will

01:18:05.360 be in the description.

01:18:06.740 Thank you for watching.

01:18:08.520 Yeah, maybe don't be so addicted to

01:18:10.020 politics.

01:18:10.460 I don't know.

01:18:11.300 We'll see you very soon with another

01:18:12.980 brilliant interview about politics.

01:18:14.440 7 p.m.

01:18:15.020 UK time.

01:18:15.640 They all go out.

01:18:16.700 Take care and see you soon.

01:18:18.200 Take care, guys, and get off Twitter.

01:18:19.680 Bye.

01:18:21.420 Bye, man.

01:18:22.060 Bye.

01:18:22.860 Bye, man.

01:18:23.360 Bye.

01:18:23.520 Bye.

01:18:24.240 Bye.

01:18:24.620 Bye.

01:18:25.300 Bye.

01:18:26.400 Bye.

01:18:27.080 Bye.

01:18:27.260 Bye.

01:18:36.340 Bye.

01:18:37.000 Bye.

01:18:37.460 Bye.

01:18:37.560 Bye.

01:18:37.820 Bye.

01:18:38.380 Bye.

01:18:38.480 Bye.

01:18:38.760 Bye.

01:18:38.840 Bye.

01:18:39.480 Bye.

01:18:39.520 Bye.

01:18:40.620 Bye.

01:18:41.680 Bye.

01:18:42.360 Bye.

01:18:46.460 Bye.

01:18:47.020 Bye.

01:18:47.540 Bye.

01:18:47.680 Bye.

01:18:48.020 Bye.

01:18:48.400 Bye.

01:18:48.680 Bye.

01:18:49.100 Bye.

01:18:49.300 Bye.

01:18:49.620 Bye.

TRIGGERnometry - April 21, 2021

＂Politics is an Addiction＂ - Jordan Hall

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript