TRIGGERnometry - December 18, 2024


The Rise of the Right is the Left's Fault - Stephen Fry


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

154.83882

Word Count

9,427

Sentence Count

505

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Francis and Rowan are joined by the great Stephen Fry to discuss the importance of free speech and the role of the state in limiting freedom of speech in a society that is increasingly police-run and more and more totalitarian.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.800 There is something deeply, deeply rotten in the state of Denmark.
00:00:04.920 What you stand for here on trigonometry is correct.
00:00:08.140 Almost everything that I dislike about the rise of the right in America and here and in Europe,
00:00:14.600 I can say is probably the fault of the left.
00:00:18.240 The left's greatest sin, it seems to be, and I speak as a sort of leftist,
00:00:22.080 is that it would rather be right than effective.
00:00:24.360 There's not even a Wizard of Oz operating the levers in the background.
00:00:27.980 There's just nobody.
00:00:28.740 You must be very uncomfortable with police enforcing speech.
00:00:32.440 Oh, absolutely. It's absurd.
00:00:34.580 To start to get afraid of a word is a very bad thing psychologically.
00:00:39.740 Why?
00:00:40.100 Because you're not facing the truth behind the word.
00:00:44.020 Stephen Fry, it's a dream come true for us.
00:00:47.020 Shush.
00:00:48.760 It's so great to have you on the show.
00:00:51.300 You were one of our absolute favorite guests to get on seven years ago now when we started the show.
00:00:57.220 So it's a real honor for us. Thank you so much for being here.
00:00:59.620 I want to read you a quote. I don't normally do this from a man Francis and I both greatly respect.
00:01:04.840 It's this.
00:01:05.640 It's now very common to hear people say, I'm rather offended by that, as if that gives them certain rights.
00:01:10.960 It's actually nothing more than a wine.
00:01:13.140 I find that offensive. It has no meaning.
00:01:15.060 It has no purpose. It has no reason to be respected as a phrase.
00:01:17.680 I'm offended by that. Well, so fucking what?
00:01:21.140 That was me, wasn't it?
00:01:22.180 That was Stephen Fry.
00:01:23.220 Yes, I remember writing that.
00:01:24.120 So that was a good, close to 20 years ago now.
00:01:27.140 It's become one of those internet postcards.
00:01:28.960 It has.
00:01:29.140 Usually, you know, there's a sunrise or a dew on the end of a blade of grass and the wet nose of a fallow deer.
00:01:38.720 But, yes, I mean, I kind of mean it.
00:01:45.300 And I mean it as one always should for these things, directed inwards.
00:01:50.360 I mean, that's to say I have to accept that if I'm offended, it doesn't really mean anything.
00:01:56.060 It's sad to be offended if I'm offended on the basis of my looks, my race, my sexuality, my manner, my work, almost anything.
00:02:07.380 I can be slightly offended if someone is rude about it.
00:02:11.060 But that's because it's rude.
00:02:12.960 But rudeness is not a crime.
00:02:15.000 It's just a solacism, if you like.
00:02:17.740 And I think one of the – I was thinking as I walked here, what are we going to talk about?
00:02:23.520 Do I believe in free speech?
00:02:25.040 Well, how can one say one doesn't believe in free speech?
00:02:27.500 But is free speech the acme of everything that we have to aim for in life?
00:02:33.140 Why is free speech important?
00:02:35.880 Why do we value it?
00:02:37.380 We value it because it's just, it's fair, it's reasonable, and it's fair, and it makes for a fairer world.
00:02:46.400 And that tells us that justice and fairness are actually the end point.
00:02:51.340 Freedom of speech is not an end point.
00:02:53.820 You don't say, I want a society where everyone can speak freely.
00:02:57.100 You say, I want a society where everyone can speak freely because it leads to a society where people are happier and there is more equity and justice in the world.
00:03:04.680 I don't mean necessarily I'm going to say that free speech is the aim of every social justice warrior, as they used to be called, you know, back in the dark days of Twitter.
00:03:13.980 SJWs, SJWs, libtards, and all the insults that used to be directed at people like me, and probably rightly.
00:03:22.800 But, and I think that's best shown in the difference between Europe and America.
00:03:28.780 In America, it really is the most important thing, free speech.
00:03:32.260 Or at least it's put forward as the most important thing.
00:03:35.760 Free speech is the shining summit to which a nation must, you know, bend its efforts and to which we must all climb.
00:03:47.300 And finally, we've got there, our speech is entirely free.
00:03:51.820 Is that really the golden, is that the golden point?
00:03:55.340 I don't think it is.
00:03:56.900 The golden point is something else.
00:03:59.080 Comity, amity, happiness, joy, friendship, all the things that are really very difficult to achieve.
00:04:06.100 And free speech is one of the, one of the roots that you get to, isn't it?
00:04:11.680 I mean, I'm suggesting this.
00:04:13.080 No, I think you're making really good points in some ways, and some I disagree.
00:04:18.560 And here's why.
00:04:19.940 I think that what you're talking about is that free speech in and of itself does not produce a good society.
00:04:26.920 I think that's true.
00:04:28.260 The question, though, is you said offense is not a crime.
00:04:33.100 But in a society that tries to regulate through the law, as ours increasingly does, I would put it to you,
00:04:39.620 what people say to produce friendliness and amity and all these other things.
00:04:45.040 You end up with the sort of situation that we have in this country with the police routinely knocking on people's doors for a tweet.
00:04:51.180 And I think the reason free speech has become such a calling card for a lot of people, especially in America, is that contrast.
00:04:58.540 And they're going, well, if this is the choice, if I get to live either in a society where the police will knock on my door or in a society where everyone says what they want and it's pretty ugly,
00:05:08.900 I'd rather the ugly but free world than the artificial, cozy conformity enforced by the state.
00:05:15.560 I agree.
00:05:15.980 I wonder if that's a false choice, though.
00:05:17.540 I mean, it's a bit like saying either you don't allow arms or you allow arms, you know, the gun laws in America.
00:05:25.040 Well, yes, but you don't allow individual citizens to own belt-fed mortars and nuclear weapons.
00:05:31.360 So there is a limit you put on the arms they can own.
00:05:34.280 There is a, you know, that's what lawmaking is about.
00:05:36.940 It's about saying thus far and no farther.
00:05:40.140 And unfortunately, people tend to come out with slippery slope arguments, which are fallacies, or at least always were fallacies.
00:05:48.000 It's one of the primary Aristotelian logical fallacies, the slippery slope.
00:05:52.000 Yet people use it all, oh, once you go down that path.
00:05:55.320 Well, we're human beings and we have will.
00:05:58.260 Once we go down that path, we stop.
00:06:00.780 Or the path bifurcates.
00:06:02.520 Or we make another choice.
00:06:04.200 We rethink.
00:06:05.640 It's very easy for the rhetoric to run away with itself when it comes to these extremes.
00:06:13.360 But what I'm saying is I don't think in the UK now we are in the realm of rhetoric anymore.
00:06:18.220 No, I agree.
00:06:18.880 You must be very uncomfortable with police enforcing speech.
00:06:22.000 Oh, absolutely.
00:06:22.760 It's absurd.
00:06:23.860 Absolutely absurd.
00:06:24.800 And I spent, I'm not wishing to paint myself as a hero, but there was a case.
00:06:29.620 I won't say what it was because I, you know, I insisted on it being private.
00:06:33.780 But I intervened and paid for somebody's legal fees all the way to a judge in a high court because they were threatened with prison for a tweet.
00:06:45.560 An innocent joke was ridiculous.
00:06:48.480 And I said, look, I got in touch with his lawyer and said, I'll fund his case because I really thought it was absurd.
00:06:57.800 But then at the same time, I didn't want to do it publicly because it looked like a gesture and a boasting and so on.
00:07:04.680 But yes, it does matter to me that things have become absurd.
00:07:09.000 But what it's the equivalent of, it seems to me, is the Victorians arresting someone for saying arse in the theatre.
00:07:22.320 Things they did.
00:07:23.680 Because the Victorians had their own political correctness, which wasn't called that, their own wokeness, whatever.
00:07:33.820 They called it decency.
00:07:36.100 And it was at its most extreme, we know, we laugh at the fact they covered up piano legs.
00:07:42.240 People weren't allowed to say certain things.
00:07:44.500 They just weren't.
00:07:45.500 They couldn't say them in the theatre.
00:07:46.860 They couldn't say them in public.
00:07:48.000 They couldn't say them in print.
00:07:49.320 They'd be arrested for either sexual, usually, references that the Victorians found utterly distasteful and wrong, morally wrong to them.
00:08:02.980 Or occasionally political ones, you know, political sedition and pamphleting and so on was punished very, very severely.
00:08:11.420 Indeed, there was no free speech in this particular area.
00:08:15.520 And it loosened.
00:08:19.080 It loosened after the First World War in particular.
00:08:22.180 But nonetheless, it carried over to my youth.
00:08:26.600 If I was in the company of a great aunt, there's certain things I wouldn't say.
00:08:32.460 I wouldn't say, fuck and cunt.
00:08:34.680 I just wouldn't.
00:08:35.820 She'd be absolutely horrified.
00:08:38.620 It would be so rude and so unpleasant.
00:08:41.380 And I sometimes think the same when I'm in a taxi and the driver says, God, Stephen, you can't say anything these days, can you?
00:08:49.260 And I want to say to him, here you're in a safe space, as people like to say.
00:08:54.580 You're in a cab with me.
00:08:56.160 You can say anything.
00:08:57.180 What is there that you wanted to say in the past, in the last month, in the last year, that you haven't been able to say?
00:09:05.680 No, but you know what I mean.
00:09:06.840 No, tell me.
00:09:07.880 Say it.
00:09:08.440 Because it's absolutely safe.
00:09:09.800 It will go no further.
00:09:11.220 Well, and they won't say.
00:09:13.620 Because they know what they want to say is actually disgusting, probably, to most people.
00:09:18.600 It's a joke of some sexual nature or racial nature that is actually the equivalent of saying, come to your great aunt.
00:09:26.440 It's just bad manners.
00:09:28.320 It really is that simple.
00:09:30.420 It's terrible manners.
00:09:32.360 It's inconsiderate to speak like that to people who are going to be.
00:09:36.000 And yes, I say this.
00:09:37.120 So what if you're offended?
00:09:38.520 But at the same time, you recognize it.
00:09:43.380 And a decent person doesn't want to offend people.
00:09:45.900 Why would you need to do that?
00:09:49.580 Can I just push back there?
00:09:51.720 You don't want to offend people.
00:09:54.060 But sometimes, Stephen, the truth is offensive.
00:09:56.480 Yes, it can be.
00:09:57.840 And the offense is just a byproduct of you being honest.
00:10:03.360 Yes, I agree.
00:10:06.760 I agree.
00:10:07.800 But most of the time, you're able to temper your speech according to the person you're speaking to, in the same way that you dress according to, you know, the situation.
00:10:25.260 Well, we've both failed on that front.
00:10:27.020 You have to have done.
00:10:28.340 Exactly.
00:10:28.780 But, you know, you go for a job interview or you go to a club where they insist on wearing you a tie, which I've got a lunch in later.
00:10:38.280 And you accept.
00:10:43.360 Those are the rules of the game.
00:10:49.680 And without it, then the game won't work.
00:10:54.420 But that is the everyday experience of most people.
00:11:00.740 They just, they're not going to be rude for any, you know, just for the sake of it.
00:11:06.260 Because I can be and I've got the right to be.
00:11:08.480 So I'm going to say this about Jews or this about Islamic people or this about gay people.
00:11:14.720 I'm going to say this.
00:11:15.960 All right, if you must.
00:11:18.760 Fine.
00:11:19.280 But it's, I'm going to think, very poorly, obvious.
00:11:24.620 I'm going to think you're an utter arsehole behaving like that.
00:11:27.420 But if you've got important things to say, much as I don't follow, agree with almost everything he stands for,
00:11:37.040 if Nigel Farage wants to talk about immigration in certain ways,
00:11:41.540 he's got every right to as a politician.
00:11:44.400 And he probably has a point for millions of people.
00:11:48.080 And the left is miserable at countering that.
00:11:55.820 They just go on about, you know, they call it racism.
00:12:00.400 Well, I don't know.
00:12:03.600 I don't know.
00:12:05.660 I don't know how helpful that is.
00:12:07.480 Because most of the time, the left, the left's greatest sin seems to me, and I speak as a sort of leftist,
00:12:15.340 is they would rather be right than effective.
00:12:18.160 And that to me is, I'm very English in that regard.
00:12:22.440 I come from the empirical tradition.
00:12:24.340 And things should work.
00:12:26.840 Things should have an effect.
00:12:28.400 And if it's simply just the usual screams of racism and so on, then that's not going to help.
00:12:42.080 It's not going to help stop the rise and rise of reform.
00:12:45.940 It's not going to stop the terrible deaths of immigrant families coming in on rickety boats across the channel.
00:12:56.660 It's not going to help anything.
00:12:59.840 And almost everything that I dislike about the rise of the right in America and here and in Europe,
00:13:08.540 I can say is probably the fault of the left.
00:13:12.960 There was a period not that long ago, which you were both old enough to remember,
00:13:18.980 when at the top of the wheel of fortune were Clinton and Blair and the third way
00:13:24.560 and the kind of social democratic politics that looked set fair.
00:13:32.260 And they're now at the bottom of the wheel.
00:13:34.780 And they screwed up.
00:13:35.820 They screwed up in all kinds of ways.
00:13:39.200 They had the wind of economic fortune at their backs.
00:13:44.000 They had everything really to make the 90s and early 2000s a very prosperous time for the West.
00:13:51.120 And the fall of Russia and the Soviet bloc and the melting of the ice of that extraordinary hegemony
00:14:00.060 seemed to lead to the famous, you know, remarks,
00:14:05.600 Fukuyama and the end of history and all that.
00:14:09.980 But, you know, as we know, it failed.
00:14:12.300 And part of the reason it failed is that it only spoke to itself.
00:14:16.540 And its language became more and more alien to most people, I think.
00:14:25.640 And I think that's a very profound point because you see a lot of what is happening on the left,
00:14:29.680 and I say as someone who comes from the left,
00:14:31.560 and you see these kind of speech codes.
00:14:34.980 And now in Parliament, you see a Labour MP, Tahir Ali, talking openly about blasphemy laws.
00:14:42.280 Yeah.
00:14:42.860 And you go, and I find that, as somebody who has experienced a communist country,
00:14:48.500 I find that utterly terrifying.
00:14:50.080 You look at Scotland, a left-wing government, criminalising public performance.
00:14:55.740 This is terrifying, Stephen.
00:14:57.320 It is.
00:14:57.780 It is.
00:14:58.340 It's monstrous.
00:14:59.240 And it must be opposed.
00:15:00.300 And it must be opposed loudly.
00:15:03.540 And, you know, it is, in a strange way, up to people like you and me,
00:15:09.940 who are supposedly from the left.
00:15:11.160 I'm not saying your voice isn't powerful too, Constantine, because it is, obviously.
00:15:14.700 But, yeah, it's extraordinary to think we've come so quickly from a time when the blasphemy laws were being lifted
00:15:25.060 to a time when they're about to be, you know, pushed down our throats again.
00:15:31.480 I got involved with the blasphemy laws being lifted in Ireland, funnily enough,
00:15:35.920 because I did an interview with, do you remember Gabe Byrne?
00:15:39.360 Yes, I remember Gabe, yeah.
00:15:40.760 Very famous talk show.
00:15:42.180 Yeah.
00:15:42.320 And when he stepped down from the Late Late Show in Dublin and started to do this very personal interview show
00:15:49.580 about what people believed, and I did one rather pleasingly in number one Merrion Square,
00:15:57.080 which is where Oscar Wilde grew up as a boy.
00:16:01.160 And he talked about my atheism and so on, because it was a Sunday programme for Ireland,
00:16:08.640 and so it was basically a spiritual religious slot that he was occupying for the television.
00:16:15.340 And he said, now suppose, Stephen, suppose, suppose you die and you open your eyes and there's God.
00:16:25.440 What do you say to him?
00:16:27.540 If you're wrong, there he is.
00:16:29.320 And so I came out with a very standard theodicy, as it's called, the argument from evil.
00:16:38.580 I said, I'd say to him, how fucking dare you?
00:16:42.780 Bone cancer in children?
00:16:44.800 What were you thinking of?
00:16:46.280 You made this cosmos and this world, and you were allowed for this absolutely undeserved pain and so on.
00:16:52.380 And I went on and on like that.
00:16:55.200 Anyway, it went viral, this thing I said on his programme, and somebody went to the police
00:17:03.800 and said, he is breaking Ireland's blasphemy laws, which hadn't changed since the days
00:17:10.520 when the church basically ran the country, and he should be taken to court.
00:17:15.900 And it was all very Irish, because I said, yes, I suddenly pictured myself, pale but resolute,
00:17:24.500 gripping the dock and speaking up for my right to offend the religious.
00:17:32.980 And it turned out, of course, that the man who had gone to the police was actually an Irish barrister
00:17:39.020 who did it in order to test the blasphemy laws and to prove that they were ridiculous
00:17:43.640 and to force them to be changed, which they then were.
00:17:47.140 So Ireland got rid of them.
00:17:49.020 So that's how, and that was only, I don't know, eight years ago.
00:17:51.540 Well, I remember this.
00:17:52.560 Yes, you remember that, do you?
00:17:53.780 I remember that video that you did, the interview that you did, and I remember that clip,
00:17:57.280 which is, I think, exactly what we've been talking about on the show the entire time since we started it,
00:18:05.900 which is, when I was growing up, the people that I looked up to were the people who were challenging the orthodoxy
00:18:12.980 and saying the restrictions around humour, the restrictions around speech,
00:18:18.100 whether it was the life of Brian or any of this other stuff,
00:18:22.460 and, you know, Bill Hicks and George Carlin, people like that in America,
00:18:25.820 challenging the people who were saying, no, you can't say that, you can't do this,
00:18:29.240 you can't joke about that.
00:18:31.200 And then, without me changing my position or Francis changing his,
00:18:34.780 or I assume you changing yours,
00:18:36.800 suddenly the restrictions around speech were coming from an entirely different place.
00:18:41.300 This is what's happened, and this is why a lot of people, you know, you say,
00:18:45.420 well, I'm a kind of...
00:18:46.540 And that's why people don't really know where they are anymore.
00:18:49.700 No, they don't. You're right.
00:18:50.900 These cosy little partitions no longer apply, do they?
00:18:54.680 But it's interesting you mentioned someone like Bill Hicks,
00:18:56.640 who, you know, I hope people remember or look for on YouTube or wherever else his work is available,
00:19:02.420 because, unlike Dave Chappelle say,
00:19:05.820 not that Dave Chappelle has no right to say whatever he wants to say as a comedian,
00:19:09.380 I'm not going to argue with that,
00:19:11.340 but it's a pity that in order to show that they are supremely free in their speech,
00:19:17.300 a lot of comedians today will punch low.
00:19:21.280 They'll go for...
00:19:22.320 I mean, does no one have sympathy for some poor child
00:19:25.540 who believes that they're born into the wrong body as far as gender is concerned
00:19:29.560 and is trying very hard to live a life that they believe that somehow they're...
00:19:33.780 You know, this has happened in history for thousands of years.
00:19:37.000 There have been a certain proportion of people born like that, transgender.
00:19:40.940 Now, you know, to go into the whole transgender argument,
00:19:43.520 it will take us down some very dark and smelly alleys, I know,
00:19:47.000 but essentially, whatever one's view about real biological sex and gender,
00:19:53.020 not to have sympathy or indeed some admiration for the bravery of children
00:19:58.120 who turn up at school in different clothing and argue their, you know, their feelings.
00:20:04.160 You know, we can say that there are all kinds of reasons
00:20:07.780 why they should wait before puberty blockers come
00:20:10.600 or whatever it is that, you know, we disagree with
00:20:13.440 in terms of the transgender wokeness, if we want to call it that,
00:20:17.000 but nonetheless, not to have any sympathy for it
00:20:19.040 and to use them as the butt of your humour.
00:20:23.820 Bill Hicks used himself as the butt and you as the butt,
00:20:28.220 not some poor minority group that is already mocked enough in life.
00:20:34.680 And that seems to me the shame is that free speech champions
00:20:38.520 should be championing free speech,
00:20:41.040 which makes people feel deeply uncomfortable about who they are
00:20:44.440 because that's what satire is.
00:20:46.040 No, he's not the problem, she's not the problem, they're not the problem,
00:20:49.700 you are the fucking problem and I am the fucking problem.
00:20:53.020 Don't you get that?
00:20:54.540 It's our fault.
00:20:56.100 If the world is going to shit, it's because of me and it's because of you.
00:21:00.120 It's not because of them.
00:21:01.300 And that seems to me to be so important.
00:21:04.920 And that's what Jonathan Swift and all the great satirists understood
00:21:08.020 is the revolting nature of the individual human being
00:21:11.520 and their hypocrisy and their inability to face the blame for, you know,
00:21:19.400 and necessity cause and blame,
00:21:22.220 the Aristotelian qualities that we have to think about,
00:21:25.640 where, you know, where the problems in the world come from.
00:21:30.540 And I do think, you know, Chesterton, who was a great hero of mine
00:21:35.620 and a great hero of the right, you know, Chesterton's hedge,
00:21:38.280 I'm sure is something you've talked about in this world of disruption and so on.
00:21:42.260 And he's like a sort of Burkean figure in old conservatism, if you like.
00:21:47.220 And he wrote a letter to the newspapers when they said,
00:21:52.120 he said, I noticed you have been publishing a lot of correspondence
00:21:57.280 about the nature of the world and it's having gone to the dogs.
00:22:02.060 Everything being wrong with it.
00:22:03.280 And a lot of things have been blamed,
00:22:04.700 but I'm in a happy position to explain to you
00:22:08.600 why the world has gone to the dogs.
00:22:12.260 And it's my fault.
00:22:13.580 It's because of me.
00:22:14.600 I'm very surprised that other readers
00:22:17.080 haven't written a similar letter yet.
00:22:20.620 Stephen, but just to dig into that a little bit.
00:22:23.980 Yeah.
00:22:24.440 I don't, I, look, what you've just said is 100% true
00:22:28.520 and not enough of us look inwards enough
00:22:31.740 and improve ourselves first before trying to affect the world.
00:22:35.640 I completely agree with this.
00:22:37.180 But I also think that there is a little bit of nuance
00:22:39.600 to add to your analysis of Chappelle and Hicks and so on.
00:22:42.680 Because, look, Bill Hicks was very openly mocking of Christians, for example.
00:22:46.560 He wasn't saying, I'm the problem.
00:22:48.000 He was saying, you guys are stupid.
00:22:50.000 You're the problem, right?
00:22:51.140 Absolutely.
00:22:51.700 He was doing that.
00:22:52.660 And when it comes to Chappelle,
00:22:55.480 he's perfectly capable of defending himself.
00:22:57.320 But just the ideas level analysis, I would argue,
00:23:00.920 is it's perfectly possible to have both things in your head at once.
00:23:06.060 On the one hand, you can have compassion with anyone
00:23:08.460 who feels that they are in the wrong body,
00:23:11.080 or frankly, their sexuality is different to the majority of people
00:23:15.620 for which they are attacked and mocked and bullied in school
00:23:18.120 and all those things.
00:23:19.420 And at the same time, also recognize that some of the people
00:23:23.160 who are now or have been, maybe not now anymore,
00:23:25.900 but have been, in charge or at the forefront of telling comedians
00:23:30.500 you can't joke about this, telling people you can't say about this,
00:23:33.680 saying to people you can't have the opinion about biology that you do
00:23:38.760 because that's transphobic, when it's simply an opinion about biology.
00:23:42.280 You can't have this opinion about a child's ability to make decisions
00:23:46.000 about long-term medical interventions, right?
00:23:48.500 To mock that while holding the compassion and empathy for the child,
00:23:54.440 we can do both of those, can't we?
00:23:56.340 Yeah, we can.
00:23:57.180 You're absolutely right.
00:23:58.480 You're absolutely right.
00:23:59.580 And on the other hand, the only times I remember being told
00:24:04.700 what I can say on television were in the past
00:24:08.600 when you would sit with a journalist, and not journalist, sorry.
00:24:13.220 I don't know if that's Freudian or what it is.
00:24:14.880 You would sit with a lawyer.
00:24:15.740 Maybe journalists are, as Shelley called poets,
00:24:22.240 the unacknowledged legislators of the world.
00:24:24.220 Maybe that's journalists.
00:24:25.260 But anyway, you'd sit with a lawyer, BBC lawyer, ITV lawyer,
00:24:28.340 and he'd say, you can say two wanks or one fuck.
00:24:33.580 You can't say, I'm sorry, absolutely not.
00:24:37.820 Yeah, shit, you can, I'll allow you three shits in the half hour,
00:24:42.160 but no more, and please space them out.
00:24:43.920 Literally, that's being told what to say.
00:24:49.360 I've never been told what to say in, you know,
00:24:52.900 I'm aware of cancellation in the things that happen
00:24:56.840 as a result of people apparently saying things,
00:24:59.620 but I've never been aware of someone saying,
00:25:01.940 you can't say that.
00:25:03.120 But do you think that's because of the views that you have,
00:25:05.740 which align not entirely, but largely,
00:25:08.860 with the orthodoxy that exists in that world now?
00:25:11.120 To some extent, I suppose, and yes, I've never wanted to say,
00:25:15.340 you know, you fucking X, Y, or Z about some racial minority
00:25:20.740 or anything else.
00:25:21.700 But I'll give you a different example.
00:25:22.700 Sorry to interrupt.
00:25:23.720 For example, during the pandemic, there were people who were saying
00:25:27.020 COVID probably came from a lab in China.
00:25:29.000 And this was banned on YouTube.
00:25:31.300 If we had said it on our channel, our channel would have been taken down.
00:25:34.280 The US Congress just did a report saying, lo and behold,
00:25:38.040 it came from a lab in China.
00:25:39.080 It came from a lab in China.
00:25:39.800 Big surprise.
00:25:40.420 Yeah, I know.
00:25:41.060 That was just extraordinary and so destructive to everything that,
00:25:49.520 whether YouTube should be like that.
00:25:51.400 But yes, YouTube as a platform or whatever it likes to call itself,
00:25:54.560 it is extraordinary that you couldn't say that.
00:25:58.020 I don't know what they were reacting against or why.
00:26:00.400 I suppose it was, yeah, it was Fauci and his gang,
00:26:07.540 or it was the politicians who were trying to be, I don't know,
00:26:12.320 trying to keep China on side.
00:26:14.480 I don't know what their excuse would be for laying down such a bizarre,
00:26:20.740 absurd diktat.
00:26:23.120 I mean, it's very, very odd.
00:26:25.280 Yeah, those things are, you know.
00:26:26.880 What I'm getting at, Stephen, is this idea that a lot of people
00:26:31.300 position the conversation about freedom of expression as,
00:26:35.500 in a way that you sort of did there,
00:26:37.560 which is I've never wanted to say these people are immigrants.
00:26:39.120 No, I agree.
00:26:39.860 That's not good enough.
00:26:40.580 But that's not really what we're talking about.
00:26:42.700 We're talking about the ability of people to express very legitimate concerns
00:26:46.860 that you may disagree with, but nonetheless, as you said,
00:26:50.000 with Nigel Farage about immigration or about where COVID came from
00:26:53.820 or about medicalisation of transgender kids,
00:26:57.220 all sorts of things like that where it's a substantive debate.
00:27:01.040 Yes, it is.
00:27:01.480 It's just a debate about what's true,
00:27:04.160 and surely we've got to be able to have that debate
00:27:06.480 without people jumping in and saying,
00:27:08.120 you can't say this, because I'd much rather they were telling us not to say cunt
00:27:12.340 and you fuck only twice per interview,
00:27:15.520 but we could actually have the debate.
00:27:17.540 Yes.
00:27:17.900 Do you see what I'm saying?
00:27:18.400 I do understand.
00:27:19.720 I do understand what you're saying, and it is very important.
00:27:22.720 And it is also, there's something deeply patronising about the fact
00:27:27.800 that it's really saying,
00:27:29.100 it's OK for intelligent, educated people to have the debate
00:27:34.100 in a debate-y sort of way,
00:27:35.820 but the problem is it leads to all kinds of ordinary people out there.
00:27:40.260 The can-eye will bark all kinds of ugly things,
00:27:45.220 and that's what we're stopping.
00:27:47.360 Because that is no way to legislate for anything,
00:27:51.840 or it's no way to run a Welk stall, as the old phrase goes.
00:27:55.680 Yeah, I mean, you are right.
00:27:57.100 You know, what you stand for here on Trigonometry is correct.
00:28:01.960 There is something deeply, deeply rotten in the state of Denmark,
00:28:06.240 as Hamlet puts it.
00:28:08.120 There is something amiss in our polity that we have to face,
00:28:14.560 and that people, I was going to say people who have influence,
00:28:21.700 but then that means influencers.
00:28:24.560 I'm not sure it does.
00:28:25.860 No, it probably doesn't.
00:28:27.320 That's a separate thing.
00:28:29.640 But, you know, people like you and people in politics
00:28:33.420 and people who...
00:28:36.860 I mean, isn't the problem also that there is no locus of authority anymore
00:28:43.380 whom we can admire and respect?
00:28:47.900 You know, I used to say, as a sort of joke,
00:28:49.880 when the Queen and David Attenborough died,
00:28:51.480 then there's nothing left for us to look up to in the world,
00:28:54.800 if you're British, in terms of just sort of,
00:28:57.280 oh, bless, you know, someone...
00:28:58.880 Because there's certainly no one...
00:29:00.280 There's no...
00:29:01.400 I don't know how you'd put it.
00:29:03.560 There's not even a Wizard of Oz operating the levers in the background.
00:29:07.360 There's just nobody.
00:29:09.280 And...
00:29:09.800 But isn't that their fault, Steve?
00:29:12.220 Oh, yes.
00:29:12.760 It is their fault.
00:29:13.620 Yeah.
00:29:14.100 Because they've betrayed our trust.
00:29:15.740 Absolutely.
00:29:16.400 I'm saying that it is the failure of the left.
00:29:18.080 It's the failure of authority.
00:29:19.420 It's the failure of the establishment, or whatever one wants to call it.
00:29:23.520 It is...
00:29:24.540 And, of course, media, we still...
00:29:28.560 You and I probably still look at newspapers.
00:29:30.600 But nobody else does that.
00:29:32.960 They are completely irrelevant, really.
00:29:37.040 And so you have this peculiar situation
00:29:40.760 that newspapers are, to some extent,
00:29:44.320 constrained by their responsibilities as publishers,
00:29:49.160 whereas the enormous platforms like Facebook and Instagram,
00:29:53.980 TikTok and the YouTube and the X,
00:30:00.860 have no responsibility in that regard at all.
00:30:03.600 They are platforms and they take no responsibility.
00:30:08.280 And they are beacons of free speech,
00:30:10.360 which, apparently, if you're Elon Musk
00:30:12.620 and have a loud hailer the size of whales
00:30:16.000 and you stand in a public square
00:30:17.900 where everybody else is this big,
00:30:20.560 that's free speech, apparently.
00:30:24.320 But let's call...
00:30:27.180 Let's call the channels of communication that we have rivers.
00:30:34.700 And they flow...
00:30:37.000 And they used to be mighty rivers
00:30:38.640 with grand bridges and structures
00:30:40.480 and they were the Times newspaper and the BBC.
00:30:43.780 And the river was something you could swim in
00:30:46.740 and you could occasionally find it...
00:30:50.680 You know, a little turd would float along.
00:30:52.740 And you'd think, oh, that's unpleasant.
00:30:55.120 But generally speaking,
00:30:56.780 the rivers of discourse were...
00:31:00.280 You could live with them.
00:31:02.180 You could swim and splash about
00:31:03.660 and see other people and wave at them.
00:31:06.040 And some would be at the other bank
00:31:07.340 and you thought they were a bit odd
00:31:09.220 and they thought you were a bit odd.
00:31:10.920 But now all those rivers are contaminated
00:31:14.380 just as British rivers are.
00:31:16.040 They're absolutely full of nothing but raw sewage.
00:31:18.920 And everybody else who's swimming in the river
00:31:21.880 is the enemy and you hate them
00:31:23.540 and they hate you.
00:31:24.800 And there is no clean water anymore, anywhere.
00:31:29.400 Everything is polluted.
00:31:31.080 And this is true where it upsets me more
00:31:35.460 in a strange kind of way
00:31:36.740 is in art, if you like,
00:31:41.200 or at least the creative industries
00:31:43.060 or whatever we like to call it.
00:31:44.640 that if you tried to write a play or a novel
00:31:50.760 that was set here today
00:31:53.500 in Britain or in the West now,
00:31:58.340 it would be impossible
00:31:59.980 not to address the discourse.
00:32:03.920 In other words, every character in the book
00:32:06.060 represents a point of view in the discourse,
00:32:09.720 the cultural discourse
00:32:10.860 that we all sort of understand
00:32:13.220 but can't quite name this world
00:32:15.040 of wokeness but also anti-wokeness
00:32:18.320 and all the terrors and embarrassments
00:32:22.960 that it invokes.
00:32:25.240 And that's why the last four books I've written
00:32:29.460 have been set in the world of Greek mythology.
00:32:33.180 Because as Wagner pointed out,
00:32:35.920 if you set a drama in the present day,
00:32:39.020 it is about the bourgeois and the aristocracy
00:32:43.560 and the working class.
00:32:44.660 He was writing in the 1880s.
00:32:46.040 It's about the death of kings.
00:32:49.000 It's about now, where we are.
00:32:51.380 And so you look at it and it dates instantly.
00:32:53.760 But if you set it in the world of myth,
00:32:56.080 it's pure humanity.
00:32:57.800 It's father-daughter.
00:32:59.200 It's revenge.
00:33:00.720 It's loyalty.
00:33:01.800 It's honour.
00:33:02.440 It's betrayal.
00:33:03.540 It's faithfulness.
00:33:04.540 It's all the pure elements
00:33:06.600 of what it is to be human
00:33:07.840 can be discussed
00:33:09.000 without the fucking discourse,
00:33:11.800 without the horror of having to say,
00:33:13.980 is he gay?
00:33:14.520 Is he straight?
00:33:15.200 Is she this?
00:33:15.940 Is she that?
00:33:16.760 What do they stand for?
00:33:18.020 Where do they, you know,
00:33:18.900 what do they believe in terms of now?
00:33:21.900 Because now is, you know,
00:33:23.420 again, to have the river,
00:33:25.380 now is just one little moment
00:33:27.840 of a moving river.
00:33:28.740 And morality is not a permanent thing.
00:33:34.020 It's manners.
00:33:34.880 It's mores.
00:33:35.520 It is custom.
00:33:37.180 And it was the custom for it to be perfectly okay
00:33:40.280 to stir sugar into tea.
00:33:44.840 Our ancestors would do that,
00:33:46.680 knowing that they'd both been plucked by slaves.
00:33:50.120 And it was fine.
00:33:51.500 Sorry, that's all I'm saying.
00:33:52.160 But now it isn't.
00:33:53.300 It's now immoral.
00:33:54.560 But because the river moves, yeah.
00:33:56.740 Do you think, Stephen,
00:33:58.180 part of the problem is,
00:33:59.600 is the way that language has changed.
00:34:02.340 Now, of course, language always changes.
00:34:04.420 Yeah.
00:34:04.680 But if you look at words like safety, for instance,
00:34:07.660 safety on a university campus,
00:34:10.060 a safe space,
00:34:11.340 effectively means that
00:34:13.380 I don't want to hear certain viewpoints
00:34:15.340 because they make me feel uncomfortable.
00:34:17.040 You talk to the older generation,
00:34:19.140 safety means prevention of physical harm.
00:34:21.300 Yes.
00:34:22.180 Do you think part of the problem
00:34:23.500 is that we're now having conversations
00:34:25.560 where we're using words,
00:34:27.320 but for different people
00:34:28.880 on different ends of the political spectrum,
00:34:31.080 these words have totally different meanings.
00:34:33.560 So it's a fundamental problem
00:34:36.400 because if we can't agree on the meaning of language,
00:34:38.900 how can we possibly have
00:34:40.460 any type of productive conversation?
00:34:42.040 This has always been the case.
00:34:43.660 I mean, I remember Margaret Thatcher saying,
00:34:45.700 quite astonishingly,
00:34:46.960 when she banned a program by Thames TV,
00:34:50.760 a documentary about the IRA figures
00:34:56.780 being assassinated in Gibraltar
00:34:58.660 called Death on the Rock.
00:35:00.100 I don't know if I remember.
00:35:00.740 Anyway, it was a Thames TV.
00:35:02.600 And she had sort of said
00:35:04.860 that the program prejudged something.
00:35:07.540 She said,
00:35:08.100 and that it broke the national security.
00:35:13.280 And she said,
00:35:14.140 if something like that happens,
00:35:15.560 then freedom dies, she said.
00:35:18.600 I remember thinking,
00:35:20.660 your interpretation of the word freedom
00:35:23.120 is very different from mine, Prime Minister.
00:35:26.200 And this is the problem.
00:35:27.620 I mean, you know,
00:35:28.100 you go back to philosophers like T.E. Hume,
00:35:30.380 the philosopher, poet,
00:35:31.840 who talked about capital letter moralists,
00:35:34.740 you know,
00:35:34.980 who use words like justice, mercy, freedom
00:35:37.660 with capital letters.
00:35:38.760 But he said that that's like presenting someone
00:35:42.180 with a currency note that says three and a half pounds.
00:35:46.880 We don't recognize it.
00:35:48.580 It's not legal tender
00:35:50.800 to just to use words in that manner
00:35:54.700 that aren't an agreed exchange.
00:35:56.760 And you can't agree the exchange of word freedom.
00:35:59.760 It's obviously freedom from or freedom to.
00:36:02.140 And it's similar,
00:36:07.040 justice, mercy, decency.
00:36:10.940 So I remember precisely the same thing.
00:36:13.280 What safety meant to Mrs. Whitehouse
00:36:17.980 was not saying these disgusting things on television
00:36:23.040 that children would be exposed to.
00:36:25.040 And it was unsafe for children
00:36:26.800 to hear and see sexual references on television.
00:36:30.300 I mean, this was a massive thing.
00:36:32.360 And it was, you know,
00:36:33.280 and things were censored as a result all the time.
00:36:37.040 And as you say,
00:36:38.080 that's to us now,
00:36:39.140 that's easy.
00:36:40.080 Well, who cares?
00:36:41.220 I would rather live in a world
00:36:43.060 in which you, as you say,
00:36:44.160 you can't say fucking cunt on television
00:36:45.920 than one in which you can't debate
00:36:47.520 an issue openly and so on.
00:36:51.800 And I generally agree with you,
00:36:54.640 but it'd be nice to live inside.
00:36:56.340 We'd be free to do both, obviously.
00:36:59.520 It's, yeah,
00:37:00.840 it's always been the case
00:37:01.860 that words have had different meanings
00:37:03.380 to different people.
00:37:04.320 And I think the safety is a good example,
00:37:07.620 but it's not new.
00:37:09.620 And you want to protect children
00:37:12.040 was always the thing
00:37:13.900 about sexual references on television.
00:37:15.840 And it still is.
00:37:16.700 For most people,
00:37:17.560 a lot of people are still very prudish
00:37:19.820 about all kinds of things appearing on television.
00:37:22.220 And there are warnings,
00:37:23.540 trigger warnings,
00:37:24.280 as we call them now.
00:37:26.080 And of course,
00:37:27.200 that is kind of makes the,
00:37:29.640 you know,
00:37:30.720 the hackles rise
00:37:31.580 when you hear that.
00:37:33.180 But in fact,
00:37:33.880 there always were trigger warnings,
00:37:36.060 but they were just of a different nature
00:37:38.060 and they didn't use the word trigger.
00:37:40.200 So that being the case,
00:37:42.140 so let's take another word,
00:37:43.500 kindness.
00:37:44.480 Because a lot of time
00:37:45.660 when people talk about kindness,
00:37:47.060 it actually means
00:37:48.600 don't challenge me.
00:37:49.960 Don't make me feel uncomfortable.
00:37:52.160 It's not kind for you
00:37:53.580 to say these things
00:37:54.740 or to challenge me
00:37:55.560 or to disagree with me.
00:37:57.280 And to me,
00:37:57.800 that's not the meaning of the word.
00:37:59.700 No.
00:38:00.660 No, I agree.
00:38:01.740 And the word empathy
00:38:02.700 has been sort of raped.
00:38:06.160 Well, we're all now cancelled.
00:38:08.420 The word rape has also had an evolution.
00:38:12.080 Yeah, it's a good word.
00:38:13.200 It means disease.
00:38:14.020 By the way,
00:38:14.400 this video has been demonetised
00:38:16.040 about 73 times by now.
00:38:19.180 Stephen Fry is our dream guest
00:38:20.800 and we will make zero money
00:38:22.520 from this episode.
00:38:23.760 Thank you.
00:38:24.180 Yeah, no, I'm sorry about that.
00:38:25.860 No, yeah.
00:38:26.340 I mean, you have to...
00:38:30.340 I'm always very keen
00:38:34.180 when I'm in America
00:38:34.900 to say died
00:38:35.980 when someone says
00:38:37.380 I hear so-and-so passed.
00:38:41.220 Oh, you mean died?
00:38:43.080 Very important to get that across,
00:38:44.900 you know,
00:38:45.120 because there is the euphemistic element
00:38:47.340 and rape is an important word
00:38:49.020 but it means to seize
00:38:49.920 and obviously we use words like raptor
00:38:51.700 to describe birds that seize,
00:38:54.620 you know,
00:38:54.940 raptors
00:38:55.460 and velociraptors
00:38:56.940 and so on
00:38:58.520 and rapine
00:38:59.300 and so on.
00:39:03.180 And
00:39:03.660 to start to get afraid of a word
00:39:06.540 is a very bad,
00:39:08.360 I think,
00:39:08.880 very bad thing psychologically.
00:39:10.320 Why?
00:39:10.900 Why, Stephen?
00:39:11.420 Because
00:39:12.880 I don't think...
00:39:14.640 Because you're not facing the truth
00:39:15.640 behind the word.
00:39:16.520 Thank God.
00:39:17.320 And it's really essential,
00:39:19.200 you know,
00:39:19.560 when one does.
00:39:20.840 It's, you know,
00:39:24.520 things like
00:39:26.360 death and difficulty
00:39:28.360 and poverty
00:39:30.960 and distress
00:39:32.020 and distress
00:39:32.040 and the real truth
00:39:34.440 of the agonies
00:39:35.560 and the things
00:39:36.840 that can happen
00:39:37.440 to human beings
00:39:38.180 can't be covered up
00:39:39.580 and brushed over
00:39:40.380 and they're difficult
00:39:43.040 for people to hear
00:39:44.520 and to handle
00:39:45.160 and so,
00:39:46.740 as you say,
00:39:47.360 they'd rather just
00:39:48.280 everything get smothered
00:39:49.360 in empathy
00:39:50.240 and kindness
00:39:50.940 and I agree.
00:39:52.780 I mean,
00:39:53.200 it's...
00:39:54.280 The awful pedantic
00:39:57.060 figure in me
00:39:58.500 loves the word kind
00:39:59.520 because it is
00:40:00.320 a really interesting word.
00:40:02.540 In Chaucer's day
00:40:03.300 it meant nature.
00:40:04.700 Nature.
00:40:05.360 And it still does
00:40:06.060 to some extent.
00:40:07.540 Their own kind.
00:40:10.080 Their kind
00:40:11.100 is related to kin.
00:40:12.740 Your kin.
00:40:14.860 Your kind.
00:40:16.780 Mankind.
00:40:18.840 You know,
00:40:19.280 humankind.
00:40:20.600 Fishkind,
00:40:21.340 if you wanted
00:40:21.740 to put it that way.
00:40:23.400 And so,
00:40:24.720 when you're talking
00:40:25.600 about being kind,
00:40:27.700 it is sort of
00:40:28.680 being connected
00:40:30.140 to the nature
00:40:32.760 of things.
00:40:34.300 To who we all are.
00:40:37.420 It's not just
00:40:38.200 patting people
00:40:38.780 on the head
00:40:39.320 and saying,
00:40:39.880 it's all right.
00:40:40.420 There, there.
00:40:41.400 It's okay.
00:40:43.720 Obviously,
00:40:44.720 a lot of it
00:40:46.700 is personal
00:40:48.520 and selfish.
00:40:49.380 We talk about
00:40:50.060 abstract things
00:40:50.820 all the time.
00:40:52.300 Ideas.
00:40:53.440 But our human lives
00:40:55.040 are about meeting
00:40:55.920 the eyes of other people
00:40:56.940 you see in the street,
00:40:58.760 in the, you know,
00:40:59.560 in the pub,
00:41:00.980 down the road,
00:41:01.720 or people you work with,
00:41:02.860 people in the office
00:41:03.940 and so on,
00:41:04.520 and how you deal with them
00:41:05.520 and how you relate to them.
00:41:07.140 And most of us
00:41:08.360 want to see
00:41:09.020 in the eyes of others
00:41:10.060 something
00:41:11.160 that reflects
00:41:12.260 well on us.
00:41:13.340 We are
00:41:14.080 basically narcissistic.
00:41:16.340 We look at,
00:41:16.760 we look at for our reflection
00:41:18.120 in someone else's
00:41:19.540 pupils
00:41:20.240 and we want to see back
00:41:22.000 that we're liked
00:41:23.060 and we're valued
00:41:23.820 and we're understood
00:41:24.820 and we're appreciated
00:41:26.020 and we're not,
00:41:28.140 you know,
00:41:28.580 subject to the contempt
00:41:29.820 and dislike
00:41:30.700 of other people.
00:41:32.300 You know,
00:41:32.880 popularity.
00:41:33.620 We're like when you're children.
00:41:34.580 Oh my God,
00:41:35.080 I'm unpopular.
00:41:35.880 It's the worst feeling
00:41:36.840 in the world.
00:41:38.220 We want,
00:41:38.840 I mean,
00:41:39.280 some people are very good
00:41:40.260 at saying,
00:41:40.620 I don't give a fuck
00:41:41.240 what people think of me
00:41:42.120 and I'm very impressed
00:41:44.300 if they really believe that.
00:41:45.780 But most of us
00:41:46.540 want that feeling
00:41:48.800 of reciprocal appreciation
00:41:52.620 and being liked
00:41:54.060 and liking
00:41:54.940 and so on
00:41:56.180 in a very simple way.
00:41:57.720 And so I suppose
00:42:00.980 the trouble is
00:42:02.900 you have to get into
00:42:05.340 some sort of psychological,
00:42:06.760 which can often be
00:42:07.500 very impertinent,
00:42:09.160 suggestion
00:42:10.940 that when people
00:42:13.140 ask others to be kind,
00:42:15.740 what they really need
00:42:17.020 is to be kind to themselves
00:42:18.200 and forgive themselves
00:42:19.200 for whatever it is
00:42:20.860 that they feel bad about.
00:42:22.060 Because mostly
00:42:23.360 we do feel bad
00:42:25.200 about things.
00:42:26.100 I mean,
00:42:26.340 I don't know about you,
00:42:27.300 it's,
00:42:28.860 when I try and get to sleep
00:42:30.300 at night,
00:42:31.480 I spend a fair amount
00:42:33.300 of time thinking,
00:42:33.960 oh God,
00:42:34.460 why did I say that?
00:42:36.260 Well,
00:42:36.540 I made such a fool
00:42:38.240 of myself.
00:42:38.900 Why did I do that?
00:42:39.940 Why didn't I
00:42:41.080 try a bit harder?
00:42:42.720 Why was I lazy here?
00:42:44.100 Why was I,
00:42:44.560 you know,
00:42:45.000 I mean,
00:42:46.820 I don't want to overstate it
00:42:48.780 as if I'm some kind
00:42:49.540 of trying to be a saint
00:42:50.420 all the time,
00:42:51.120 but there is
00:42:52.340 this impulse,
00:42:55.620 there is Jiminy Cricket
00:42:56.680 on our shoulder
00:42:57.400 whispering,
00:42:58.240 saying,
00:42:58.540 you're fucked up,
00:42:59.280 you know,
00:42:59.520 you're bad,
00:43:00.660 you're a bad person,
00:43:01.680 why are you like this?
00:43:02.920 Come on,
00:43:03.840 you can be better.
00:43:05.160 This deontic,
00:43:06.620 if you like,
00:43:07.500 sense of,
00:43:08.360 of an obligation
00:43:09.480 to be better than one is,
00:43:10.980 of a duty,
00:43:12.120 of a kind of moral need
00:43:14.940 to be good,
00:43:19.500 to be virtuous
00:43:20.220 in some way.
00:43:22.500 And I think
00:43:25.940 to get dragged
00:43:30.120 into abstract ideas
00:43:31.580 of what is right
00:43:32.360 and wrong
00:43:32.780 in politics
00:43:33.520 or in culture
00:43:34.340 or in society,
00:43:35.700 I mean,
00:43:37.540 I think these are all
00:43:38.240 important,
00:43:39.720 but I tend to,
00:43:42.580 I suppose it's because
00:43:43.640 English literature
00:43:44.720 and novels
00:43:46.020 and plays
00:43:46.840 and art
00:43:47.520 to me
00:43:48.360 are mankind's
00:43:49.800 supreme way
00:43:50.600 of expressing
00:43:51.160 all these things,
00:43:52.100 not political writing,
00:43:53.580 not history,
00:43:54.480 although those are interesting.
00:43:55.820 I mean,
00:43:55.980 we know more
00:43:56.820 about the First World War
00:43:58.200 because of the few poems
00:43:59.740 of Wilfred Owen
00:44:00.480 than of every single
00:44:01.980 history book
00:44:02.580 written about
00:44:03.140 the First World War
00:44:03.920 because we know
00:44:04.840 what it's like
00:44:05.400 to be there.
00:44:06.320 We can feel
00:44:07.200 and smell
00:44:07.940 and hear
00:44:08.600 the entire experience.
00:44:11.500 And again,
00:44:13.000 to Chesterton,
00:44:13.820 the thing that I always
00:44:14.740 return to
00:44:15.780 is his refusal
00:44:17.600 to respect
00:44:19.200 abstract statements
00:44:20.800 and he makes it funny.
00:44:22.600 So here's
00:44:23.500 a very good example.
00:44:24.520 He begins an essay.
00:44:26.460 I read the other day
00:44:27.700 the following statement.
00:44:30.380 At the trumpet call
00:44:31.760 of Ibsen and Shaw,
00:44:33.660 modern woman
00:44:34.520 rises to take
00:44:35.680 her place
00:44:36.180 in society.
00:44:38.000 And I thought to myself,
00:44:38.880 well,
00:44:38.980 that's very good news.
00:44:41.200 Who do I know
00:44:42.360 who's a modern woman?
00:44:43.840 Mrs. Button.
00:44:44.760 She comes in
00:44:45.360 from Clapham
00:44:45.980 every day
00:44:46.520 to scrub the floors
00:44:47.720 and clean the house
00:44:49.500 and beat the carpets.
00:44:51.940 And she's 38.
00:44:54.420 She has five children
00:44:55.720 and she's as modern
00:44:57.600 a woman
00:44:57.900 as I can think of.
00:44:58.780 She takes the bus
00:44:59.580 or the train
00:45:00.220 and she comes here.
00:45:01.640 So I say to myself,
00:45:02.660 at the trumpet call
00:45:03.920 of Ibsen and Shaw,
00:45:05.420 Mrs. Button
00:45:06.100 rises to take
00:45:07.260 her place
00:45:07.720 in society.
00:45:08.720 And I realize
00:45:09.480 the statement
00:45:09.920 is not only nonsense
00:45:10.880 but it's pernicious nonsense
00:45:12.360 because of course
00:45:13.520 what he was responding to
00:45:14.620 was some airy article
00:45:16.060 by some
00:45:16.580 Bloomsbury idiot
00:45:17.920 saying that
00:45:19.600 Ibsen and Shaw
00:45:20.480 had changed the world.
00:45:21.380 But as a model
00:45:23.900 of thinking
00:45:24.640 I think it's superb.
00:45:26.440 Just don't trust
00:45:27.460 these abstract statements
00:45:28.740 about people feel
00:45:29.940 that well okay
00:45:30.820 I think of a person
00:45:32.100 Mrs. Button
00:45:33.060 or Mr. Button
00:45:34.020 and is that really true
00:45:35.580 what you're saying?
00:45:36.640 I don't think it is.
00:45:37.940 You're talking about
00:45:38.700 this very small
00:45:39.620 narrow band
00:45:40.260 of what used to be called
00:45:41.720 in the 90s
00:45:42.840 the chattering classes
00:45:43.880 and then became
00:45:44.720 the wokarati
00:45:45.660 or some other
00:45:46.880 hideous name
00:45:47.640 for us.
00:45:48.320 The elite of course
00:45:51.020 is the one
00:45:51.420 that people like
00:45:51.960 to use now
00:45:52.620 mostly billionaires
00:45:54.040 call people the elite
00:45:55.200 and I think
00:45:59.320 we should really
00:46:00.020 remember
00:46:00.700 that we don't
00:46:01.480 speak for humanity
00:46:02.520 we don't
00:46:03.540 you know
00:46:03.920 the abstract statements
00:46:05.760 we make about
00:46:06.580 truth and freedom
00:46:07.460 and so on
00:46:08.160 are very interesting
00:46:09.780 and they make
00:46:10.320 a good essay
00:46:11.040 whether it's
00:46:11.700 an oral essay
00:46:12.760 like a podcast
00:46:13.820 or a conversation
00:46:15.080 but the experience
00:46:17.300 of the individual
00:46:18.240 I come back
00:46:19.120 to this
00:46:19.400 empirical way
00:46:20.220 of thinking
00:46:21.040 you know
00:46:21.520 and that's
00:46:23.000 what comedians
00:46:23.640 do
00:46:23.920 you know
00:46:24.680 Woody Allen
00:46:28.580 sort of thing
00:46:29.180 not only
00:46:30.040 am I not sure
00:46:31.180 that there's a god
00:46:32.080 I'm pretty sure
00:46:32.980 that you can't
00:46:35.000 get a dentist
00:46:35.560 on Saturdays
00:46:36.520 it's the real world
00:46:38.580 where things
00:46:39.220 are messy
00:46:40.100 and confusing
00:46:41.440 is
00:46:43.360 it doesn't
00:46:44.940 follow the
00:46:45.700 lines of argument
00:46:47.060 that journalists
00:46:49.120 and podcasters
00:46:50.500 with all respect
00:46:51.120 necessarily
00:46:51.860 feel are the
00:46:53.400 vital
00:46:53.960 kind of
00:46:54.860 currents
00:46:55.340 of human
00:46:57.280 discourse
00:46:57.740 because I think
00:46:58.420 for most people
00:47:00.100 these things are
00:47:00.780 you know
00:47:01.180 in the same way
00:47:02.080 that most people
00:47:02.640 are not monstrous
00:47:03.640 in Hungary
00:47:05.940 or in
00:47:06.740 some other country
00:47:08.680 whose leader
00:47:10.500 we may distrust
00:47:11.440 and
00:47:13.180 it's
00:47:15.820 only
00:47:16.700 it's only
00:47:18.220 in
00:47:18.500 when you're
00:47:19.440 reading
00:47:19.880 and
00:47:20.300 it's the
00:47:23.240 problem
00:47:24.260 of
00:47:24.660 you know
00:47:27.220 the
00:47:27.480 Facebook
00:47:28.460 thing
00:47:29.780 a two word
00:47:31.900 algorithm
00:47:32.400 that
00:47:33.620 when
00:47:35.600 you know
00:47:36.660 it started
00:47:37.060 to get
00:47:37.340 100 million
00:47:37.920 300 million
00:47:38.540 500 million
00:47:39.340 a billion
00:47:39.940 users
00:47:40.680 from
00:47:41.240 2006
00:47:42.400 7
00:47:42.840 8
00:47:43.120 9
00:47:43.420 as it
00:47:43.720 was
00:47:43.880 growing
00:47:44.300 out of
00:47:45.380 only
00:47:45.720 Ivy League
00:47:46.200 universities
00:47:46.780 then into
00:47:47.260 all universities
00:47:47.980 then into
00:47:48.780 world universities
00:47:49.720 then into
00:47:50.200 ordinary people
00:47:51.000 suddenly all
00:47:52.000 this server
00:47:52.600 expense
00:47:53.200 in those
00:47:53.680 days
00:47:53.980 you know
00:47:54.280 Moore's Law
00:47:54.680 hadn't made
00:47:55.260 servers quite as
00:47:56.480 reliable
00:47:56.980 and cheap
00:47:58.080 as they are
00:47:58.640 now
00:47:58.980 they had to
00:48:00.200 pay for
00:48:00.480 itself
00:48:00.720 so they had
00:48:01.120 to have
00:48:01.320 advertising
00:48:01.840 and that's
00:48:02.360 all reasonable
00:48:02.900 and in order
00:48:04.540 to get
00:48:04.860 advertising
00:48:05.360 this was a
00:48:05.880 whole new
00:48:06.260 model for
00:48:06.820 advertising
00:48:07.400 Facebook
00:48:07.940 they asked
00:48:10.260 a very
00:48:10.520 simple
00:48:10.840 question
00:48:11.880 of their
00:48:13.520 electronic
00:48:15.120 circuits
00:48:15.800 by putting
00:48:16.480 in an
00:48:16.780 algorithm
00:48:17.160 that said
00:48:18.360 quite reasonably
00:48:19.200 maximize
00:48:20.120 engagement
00:48:20.940 that as
00:48:22.620 long as
00:48:23.140 Facebook
00:48:23.940 maximized
00:48:24.940 engagement
00:48:25.480 it would
00:48:26.080 get eyeballs
00:48:26.840 and clicks
00:48:27.640 for the
00:48:28.420 advertisers
00:48:28.920 which is
00:48:29.500 what the
00:48:29.740 advertisers
00:48:30.140 wanted
00:48:30.580 and to
00:48:32.200 give
00:48:32.560 you know
00:48:33.140 all
00:48:34.320 possible
00:48:35.420 allowances
00:48:37.360 to
00:48:37.860 Zuckerberg
00:48:38.480 whatever
00:48:38.700 one may
00:48:39.240 think
00:48:39.440 of him
00:48:39.660 he probably
00:48:40.220 didn't
00:48:40.680 realize
00:48:41.100 as nobody
00:48:41.820 else did
00:48:42.400 at the
00:48:42.740 time
00:48:43.140 that if
00:48:44.000 you say
00:48:44.320 maximize
00:48:44.800 engagement
00:48:45.500 to a
00:48:46.020 little
00:48:46.300 robotic
00:48:47.460 algorithm
00:48:48.680 it will
00:48:50.160 discover
00:48:50.600 almost
00:48:51.700 instantly
00:48:52.300 that means
00:48:53.140 maximize
00:48:53.740 hatred
00:48:54.520 outrage
00:48:55.740 fury
00:48:56.740 you know
00:48:58.160 misery
00:48:58.960 envy
00:48:59.920 resentment
00:49:00.700 basically
00:49:01.360 entire
00:49:02.460 Pandora's
00:49:03.840 box
00:49:04.180 and that's
00:49:06.180 what leapt
00:49:06.560 out
00:49:06.880 in you
00:49:07.420 know
00:49:07.540 you can
00:49:08.320 say
00:49:08.560 when it
00:49:08.840 was
00:49:09.120 almost
00:49:09.480 2012
00:49:10.060 13
00:49:10.980 14
00:49:11.420 it
00:49:11.700 started
00:49:12.020 to
00:49:12.240 happen
00:49:12.520 which
00:49:13.540 was
00:49:13.680 also
00:49:13.900 the
00:49:14.100 time
00:49:14.340 most
00:49:14.540 children
00:49:14.880 got
00:49:15.460 phones
00:49:16.440 smartphones
00:49:17.000 suddenly
00:49:18.200 the majority
00:49:18.720 of children
00:49:19.220 had them
00:49:19.620 by then
00:49:20.020 so
00:49:21.920 we are
00:49:24.440 living in
00:49:24.940 a world
00:49:25.300 in which
00:49:26.200 engagement
00:49:26.960 has been
00:49:27.360 maximized
00:49:27.880 in other
00:49:28.240 words
00:49:28.440 fury
00:49:28.820 has been
00:49:29.220 maximized
00:49:29.820 and people
00:49:30.240 have been
00:49:30.640 so in
00:49:31.560 the same
00:49:31.880 way that
00:49:32.200 people say
00:49:32.660 kindness
00:49:33.040 is just
00:49:33.460 protect me
00:49:34.140 and be
00:49:34.600 nice to
00:49:35.020 me please
00:49:35.660 and make
00:49:37.140 me feel
00:49:37.460 warm and
00:49:37.960 cozy
00:49:38.340 in a way
00:49:41.460 people also
00:49:42.040 saying
00:49:42.480 privilege my
00:49:43.440 outrage
00:49:44.020 allow me to
00:49:44.740 be disgusted
00:49:45.500 and outraged
00:49:46.160 by everybody
00:49:46.720 else
00:49:47.120 allow me to
00:49:48.000 be furious
00:49:48.620 allow me to
00:49:49.280 express my
00:49:50.040 absolute
00:49:50.440 hatred of
00:49:51.100 everything
00:49:51.480 and yes
00:49:52.240 you're
00:49:52.780 allowed to
00:49:53.460 but do
00:49:54.040 really
00:49:54.560 that's like
00:49:55.760 saying let
00:49:56.260 me you know
00:49:57.240 forget
00:49:57.620 laboratories
00:49:58.060 let me
00:49:58.460 shit in
00:49:58.760 the corner
00:49:59.200 the results
00:50:01.060 will not
00:50:01.540 be pleasant
00:50:02.060 it's a very
00:50:03.180 good point
00:50:03.860 and particularly
00:50:04.460 the point
00:50:06.640 you made
00:50:07.040 about getting
00:50:08.060 carried away
00:50:08.820 with ideas
00:50:09.800 that sound
00:50:10.940 good but
00:50:11.400 actually
00:50:11.660 increasingly
00:50:12.060 don't apply
00:50:12.660 to real
00:50:13.020 people
00:50:13.300 I gratefully
00:50:14.680 accept the
00:50:15.300 rebuke
00:50:15.780 it wasn't a
00:50:16.560 rebuke
00:50:16.800 I'm as guilty
00:50:18.160 as anybody
00:50:18.820 else
00:50:19.200 we all are
00:50:19.420 absolutely
00:50:20.900 Stephen
00:50:21.520 we've got to
00:50:22.360 wrap up
00:50:22.660 because we
00:50:22.960 want to
00:50:23.240 respect your
00:50:23.740 time
00:50:24.060 but before
00:50:24.760 we ask you
00:50:25.300 our last
00:50:25.620 question
00:50:25.920 and go to
00:50:26.400 Substack
00:50:26.780 and ask you
00:50:27.260 questions from
00:50:27.780 our supporters
00:50:28.380 the one thing
00:50:29.420 that strikes me
00:50:30.000 most about you
00:50:30.860 as we sit
00:50:31.420 across from
00:50:32.000 each other
00:50:32.360 is I think
00:50:33.440 you're
00:50:34.120 incredibly
00:50:35.400 and given
00:50:36.160 your family
00:50:36.960 background
00:50:37.340 this might
00:50:38.080 sound strange
00:50:38.520 but you're
00:50:38.780 incredibly
00:50:39.200 British
00:50:39.600 in the most
00:50:40.780 amazing way
00:50:41.460 and I think
00:50:41.800 you'd be
00:50:42.140 recognized
00:50:42.700 around the
00:50:43.160 world as
00:50:43.640 actually being
00:50:44.160 incredibly
00:50:44.720 British
00:50:45.120 so the
00:50:46.080 question I
00:50:46.500 want to
00:50:46.700 ask you
00:50:47.240 is
00:50:48.440 what does
00:50:49.320 it mean
00:50:49.720 to be
00:50:50.020 British
00:50:50.300 it's an
00:50:51.880 excellent
00:50:52.220 question
00:50:52.800 and you
00:50:54.120 know
00:50:54.320 one's mind
00:50:55.060 travels
00:50:55.920 backwards
00:50:56.260 and forwards
00:50:56.760 over
00:50:57.100 various
00:50:58.020 you know
00:50:58.620 the famous
00:50:59.060 George Orwell
00:50:59.840 you know
00:51:00.500 vicar on the
00:51:01.520 bicycle
00:51:01.900 and the warm
00:51:02.520 beer and the
00:51:03.140 cricket
00:51:03.400 and there's
00:51:05.060 an element
00:51:05.440 of that
00:51:05.940 and I think
00:51:07.100 I'll start
00:51:08.420 off with
00:51:08.780 as you say
00:51:09.240 given my
00:51:09.700 family background
00:51:10.380 I think
00:51:11.120 growing up
00:51:12.340 in a very
00:51:12.740 traditional
00:51:13.320 English way
00:51:14.040 in a country
00:51:15.020 house sent
00:51:15.880 away to
00:51:16.260 school with
00:51:17.120 other English
00:51:17.820 boys but
00:51:19.280 being coming
00:51:20.980 from a Jewish
00:51:21.820 family at least
00:51:22.320 half Jewish
00:51:22.900 and realizing
00:51:24.880 quite early on
00:51:25.500 that I was
00:51:25.780 gay in a
00:51:26.400 world in
00:51:27.120 which you
00:51:27.560 know I
00:51:27.920 was interested
00:51:29.120 enough in
00:51:29.680 literature and
00:51:30.260 reading around
00:51:30.840 to know that
00:51:31.760 meant prison
00:51:32.560 and exile and
00:51:33.480 disgrace and
00:51:34.200 stigma and
00:51:34.760 shame so
00:51:36.620 it's almost as
00:51:37.820 if I adopted
00:51:38.480 overdid it I
00:51:39.940 mean I look at
00:51:40.440 myself psychologically
00:51:41.360 I'm a member
00:51:43.480 of the Garrick
00:51:44.160 Club I'm
00:51:44.580 actually wearing
00:51:45.000 his tie at
00:51:45.520 the moment
00:51:45.740 the MCC
00:51:46.580 the Beefsteak
00:51:47.440 the Athenaeum
00:51:48.560 the Saville
00:51:49.120 Club
00:51:49.460 I mean it's
00:51:50.720 unbelievable
00:51:51.280 the Oxford and
00:51:52.080 Cambridge Club
00:51:52.680 the Arts Club
00:51:53.800 the Chelsea
00:51:55.560 Arts Club
00:51:56.540 as well
00:51:56.920 it's just
00:51:57.260 showing off
00:51:57.700 you are the
00:52:01.040 liberal elite
00:52:01.520 it's more than
00:52:04.000 showing off
00:52:04.460 it's actually
00:52:05.060 revealing something
00:52:06.080 deeply tragic
00:52:07.120 this absolute
00:52:08.840 desperate need
00:52:10.580 to be accepted
00:52:11.900 and to feel
00:52:12.760 that the doors
00:52:13.880 of society
00:52:14.560 are open to
00:52:15.300 me
00:52:15.520 of course
00:52:16.320 they're open
00:52:16.720 to me
00:52:17.020 I mean I
00:52:17.440 don't know
00:52:17.780 why I keep
00:52:18.420 needing
00:52:18.780 but for some
00:52:20.440 reason I have
00:52:21.260 this sense
00:52:24.420 I mean I wrote
00:52:25.640 about it in
00:52:26.100 an autobiography
00:52:26.700 and the way I
00:52:27.200 put it was
00:52:28.040 that like a lot
00:52:30.020 of adolescence
00:52:30.940 but unfortunately
00:52:31.620 as an adult
00:52:32.620 I've still
00:52:34.040 taken it
00:52:34.600 I was pulled
00:52:35.860 apart by
00:52:37.380 this
00:52:37.980 this
00:52:39.280 this tension
00:52:40.260 this
00:52:40.720 these
00:52:41.440 contradictory
00:52:42.060 impulses
00:52:43.260 one
00:52:44.380 was to
00:52:45.860 stand alone
00:52:46.600 to be
00:52:47.400 you know
00:52:47.820 the Ibsen
00:52:48.880 hero
00:52:49.240 the stands
00:52:49.900 strongest
00:52:50.280 who stands
00:52:50.840 most alone
00:52:51.500 you know
00:52:51.920 that
00:52:52.140 that thing
00:52:53.620 of being
00:52:54.040 the individual
00:52:54.800 different
00:52:55.680 apart
00:52:56.540 but at the
00:52:58.140 same time
00:52:59.020 yearning
00:52:59.680 to belong
00:53:01.100 so to be
00:53:02.420 apart from
00:53:03.100 and to be
00:53:03.540 a part of
00:53:04.280 were my
00:53:05.340 two things
00:53:06.480 that pulled
00:53:06.960 pulled me
00:53:07.580 so I wanted
00:53:08.640 to look down
00:53:09.360 on people
00:53:09.920 who were there
00:53:10.320 they're playing
00:53:10.760 their rugby
00:53:11.240 and doing
00:53:12.500 their thinking
00:53:13.460 ordinary thoughts
00:53:14.440 being conventional
00:53:15.520 imagining a life
00:53:18.220 with mortgages
00:53:19.360 and owning
00:53:20.080 owning garden
00:53:21.440 hoses
00:53:21.840 and lawn
00:53:22.700 nose
00:53:23.020 and I wanted
00:53:24.640 to be apart
00:53:25.260 from that
00:53:25.760 but another
00:53:27.260 element of
00:53:28.240 being just so
00:53:28.940 wanted to be
00:53:29.660 embraced by the
00:53:30.400 world
00:53:30.660 and to be
00:53:31.900 to belong
00:53:32.620 and I
00:53:34.000 think that
00:53:34.600 is a
00:53:35.220 strangely
00:53:35.520 English
00:53:35.920 thing
00:53:36.320 or at least
00:53:36.820 a certain
00:53:37.180 kind of
00:53:37.620 Britain
00:53:37.840 has that
00:53:38.620 this need
00:53:39.180 to stand
00:53:40.240 apart
00:53:40.720 and I'm
00:53:41.740 not
00:53:41.980 I don't
00:53:42.580 belong to
00:53:42.980 any of that
00:53:43.400 nonsense
00:53:43.740 I don't
00:53:44.300 believe in
00:53:44.720 this
00:53:45.000 and I'm
00:53:45.520 different
00:53:45.940 and to
00:53:47.080 say
00:53:47.320 but also
00:53:48.180 to
00:53:48.460 join
00:53:50.400 but what
00:53:51.560 it is
00:53:51.880 to be
00:53:52.140 British
00:53:52.500 I mean
00:53:53.980 we used
00:53:55.260 to
00:53:55.520 I grew up
00:53:56.600 believing
00:53:56.920 that it
00:53:57.200 was fair
00:53:57.820 play
00:53:58.180 and I
00:54:00.340 think that
00:54:00.680 is still
00:54:01.100 a part
00:54:01.500 of
00:54:01.640 you know
00:54:02.020 British
00:54:03.340 and the
00:54:03.780 Anglo-Saxon
00:54:04.460 tradition
00:54:04.880 because the
00:54:05.260 Australians
00:54:05.700 call it
00:54:06.400 a fair
00:54:06.740 shake
00:54:07.220 you've got
00:54:07.800 to have
00:54:07.960 a fair
00:54:08.300 shake
00:54:08.740 you know
00:54:09.060 decent
00:54:09.560 you know
00:54:10.260 equity
00:54:10.640 in that
00:54:11.080 sense
00:54:11.340 not social
00:54:11.920 justice
00:54:12.300 warrior
00:54:12.600 equity
00:54:13.000 but just
00:54:14.440 you know
00:54:14.800 it's not
00:54:15.200 something's
00:54:15.800 not fair
00:54:16.360 and that's
00:54:16.820 as a
00:54:17.080 child
00:54:17.460 we all
00:54:18.120 know
00:54:18.320 children
00:54:18.720 scream
00:54:19.580 when things
00:54:20.320 aren't
00:54:20.560 fair
00:54:20.840 and we
00:54:21.560 are enraged
00:54:22.920 by injustice
00:54:23.560 and we
00:54:24.240 should be
00:54:24.620 we shouldn't
00:54:25.100 ever lose
00:54:25.580 that I'm
00:54:25.980 sure
00:54:26.240 and I
00:54:28.860 think
00:54:29.300 a certain
00:54:33.640 this is
00:54:36.240 impossible
00:54:36.580 to say
00:54:37.120 because it
00:54:38.420 sounds the
00:54:38.900 opposite
00:54:39.240 but a
00:54:39.760 certain
00:54:39.940 modesty
00:54:40.460 is important
00:54:41.180 a certain
00:54:42.320 sense that
00:54:43.100 one isn't
00:54:43.460 quite good
00:54:43.900 enough
00:54:44.260 and that
00:54:44.760 one should
00:54:45.180 be better
00:54:45.660 is an
00:54:47.180 important part
00:54:47.840 of being
00:54:48.120 British
00:54:48.440 and
00:54:48.940 disliking
00:54:50.000 showing off
00:54:50.620 and braggatism
00:54:51.400 and general
00:54:52.000 sort of
00:54:52.320 braggadocio
00:54:52.900 if you like
00:54:53.420 and that's
00:54:54.100 why we
00:54:54.360 find Trump
00:54:55.000 so incomprehensible
00:54:55.900 I mean
00:54:56.240 a lot
00:54:57.320 of what
00:54:57.520 he says
00:54:57.880 and what
00:54:58.100 he stands
00:54:58.520 for
00:54:58.700 we can
00:54:59.020 completely
00:54:59.440 understand
00:54:59.980 why people
00:55:00.540 vote for
00:55:01.420 him
00:55:01.600 but just
00:55:02.300 at a
00:55:02.600 simple
00:55:02.900 personal
00:55:03.360 human
00:55:03.680 level
00:55:03.980 the idea
00:55:04.540 that a
00:55:04.840 British
00:55:05.060 person
00:55:05.500 could ever
00:55:06.340 vote for
00:55:06.820 someone
00:55:07.120 who was
00:55:07.520 so full
00:55:08.000 of
00:55:08.140 themselves
00:55:08.540 it's
00:55:09.400 just
00:55:09.640 so
00:55:10.000 oh my
00:55:10.500 god
00:55:10.780 you
00:55:10.940 cannot
00:55:11.320 talk
00:55:11.700 like
00:55:11.920 you heard
00:55:12.700 him saying
00:55:13.100 he's so
00:55:13.500 good
00:55:13.720 at this
00:55:14.140 and he's
00:55:14.520 the best
00:55:14.940 at that
00:55:15.460 no one
00:55:16.280 would be
00:55:16.600 acceptable
00:55:17.080 in British
00:55:17.660 society
00:55:18.140 in a pub
00:55:18.860 if someone
00:55:19.180 said
00:55:19.340 I'm the
00:55:19.900 best
00:55:20.200 that ever
00:55:20.580 excuse me
00:55:23.960 in the same
00:55:24.840 way that we
00:55:25.300 couldn't have
00:55:25.720 a prime
00:55:26.000 minister
00:55:26.260 who said
00:55:26.760 let us
00:55:27.080 pray
00:55:27.400 or god
00:55:28.380 will
00:55:28.620 you know
00:55:29.020 you know
00:55:29.560 Tony Blair
00:55:30.080 is probably
00:55:30.400 the most
00:55:30.680 religious
00:55:30.980 prime minister
00:55:31.440 we've had
00:55:31.760 for a while
00:55:32.220 but we
00:55:34.260 just would
00:55:34.760 not accept
00:55:35.340 that
00:55:35.740 and there's
00:55:36.620 a fantastic
00:55:37.260 moment
00:55:37.540 here's what
00:55:38.560 it is
00:55:38.840 to be
00:55:39.080 British
00:55:39.460 Kipling
00:55:41.320 great
00:55:42.880 great writer
00:55:43.820 no accident
00:55:45.100 Nobel Prize
00:55:46.040 winner
00:55:46.280 obviously
00:55:46.960 unfortunately
00:55:47.560 associated
00:55:48.240 with Empire
00:55:49.280 and the Raj
00:55:49.900 in ways
00:55:50.580 that have
00:55:50.960 made him
00:55:51.660 a little bit
00:55:52.080 unacceptable
00:55:52.540 to some
00:55:53.060 people
00:55:53.380 but if
00:55:54.560 you read
00:55:54.940 him
00:55:55.120 you think
00:55:55.620 this is
00:55:56.100 a truly
00:55:56.780 great
00:55:57.140 writer
00:55:57.480 and
00:55:58.140 T.S.
00:55:59.020 Eliot
00:55:59.180 and many
00:55:59.620 others
00:56:00.000 were you
00:56:00.500 know
00:56:00.620 built up
00:56:01.700 his reputation
00:56:02.320 when it
00:56:02.680 had fallen
00:56:03.560 down a bit
00:56:04.420 there's a scene
00:56:04.980 in one of
00:56:05.360 his novels
00:56:06.240 a kind of
00:56:06.740 almost comic
00:56:07.360 novel of
00:56:07.800 school days
00:56:08.260 called Storky
00:56:08.960 and Co
00:56:09.400 hugely popular
00:56:10.860 and it was
00:56:12.040 kind of based
00:56:12.620 on his own
00:56:13.180 childhood
00:56:13.780 he represents
00:56:14.960 himself as a
00:56:15.760 character called
00:56:16.220 Beatle
00:56:16.660 he's very
00:56:17.120 short-sighted
00:56:18.220 because Kipling
00:56:18.980 was almost
00:56:19.400 blind
00:56:19.760 there's a
00:56:22.280 moment when
00:56:22.740 a politician
00:56:23.560 comes
00:56:24.060 to the
00:56:25.500 school
00:56:25.780 and we
00:56:26.720 know that
00:56:27.160 what happens
00:56:27.640 to Storky
00:56:28.260 and his
00:56:28.760 friends
00:56:29.220 they're
00:56:29.680 wonderfully
00:56:30.180 naughty
00:56:33.180 children
00:56:33.700 I mean
00:56:34.220 they're very
00:56:34.540 disrespectful
00:56:35.180 they're absolute
00:56:36.780 renegades
00:56:37.420 as children
00:56:38.700 Storky
00:56:39.180 and Co
00:56:39.480 at their
00:56:39.800 school
00:56:40.080 but we
00:56:40.680 know that
00:56:41.060 they then
00:56:41.420 joined the
00:56:41.780 army
00:56:41.960 and that
00:56:42.320 two of
00:56:43.800 them are
00:56:44.020 killed
00:56:44.340 and that
00:56:44.880 they're
00:56:45.740 kind of
00:56:46.900 soldiers
00:56:47.640 and that
00:56:49.980 they probably
00:56:51.240 are
00:56:51.960 patriotic
00:56:53.060 they believe
00:56:54.220 in their
00:56:55.120 country
00:56:55.500 and therefore
00:56:56.180 I suppose
00:56:56.740 empire
00:56:57.260 anyway
00:56:58.820 a politician
00:56:59.480 comes
00:57:00.080 and speaks
00:57:01.420 to them
00:57:01.840 at speech
00:57:02.520 day as they
00:57:03.100 do at these
00:57:03.600 schools
00:57:03.900 and he
00:57:05.360 points to
00:57:05.880 the flag
00:57:06.440 and says
00:57:06.860 the flag
00:57:07.400 my boys
00:57:08.040 and Storky
00:57:09.840 and his
00:57:10.180 friends
00:57:10.600 start to
00:57:11.820 hiss
00:57:12.300 they hiss
00:57:14.220 him down
00:57:14.780 they cannot
00:57:15.620 bear
00:57:16.380 that someone
00:57:17.460 should
00:57:17.700 talk
00:57:18.420 in that
00:57:19.540 way
00:57:19.860 sentimental
00:57:20.520 way
00:57:21.040 about
00:57:21.340 country
00:57:21.860 it's a
00:57:22.520 private
00:57:22.880 thing
00:57:23.260 you may
00:57:24.580 have
00:57:24.840 feelings
00:57:25.260 about
00:57:25.600 your
00:57:25.800 country
00:57:26.220 you may
00:57:27.040 have
00:57:27.320 pride
00:57:28.000 and
00:57:28.320 something
00:57:29.360 but for
00:57:30.060 someone
00:57:31.500 to talk
00:57:32.260 about it
00:57:32.800 is just
00:57:34.040 bad taste
00:57:35.140 and that
00:57:36.920 sense of
00:57:37.400 English
00:57:37.640 bad taste
00:57:38.240 that you
00:57:38.580 don't
00:57:39.180 parade
00:57:39.920 such
00:57:41.240 feelings
00:57:41.800 like
00:57:42.940 patriotism
00:57:43.640 and to
00:57:44.300 this day
00:57:44.780 I think
00:57:45.100 if a
00:57:45.340 politician
00:57:45.680 went on
00:57:46.100 about the
00:57:46.440 glory
00:57:46.680 of the
00:57:46.940 country
00:57:47.280 like
00:57:47.980 when
00:57:48.240 Michael
00:57:48.660 Patillo
00:57:48.960 in a
00:57:49.180 very
00:57:49.320 short
00:57:49.580 period
00:57:49.840 when he
00:57:50.120 was
00:57:50.240 defence
00:57:50.580 secretary
00:57:50.900 did that
00:57:51.780 wrapped himself
00:57:52.500 in the
00:57:52.860 flag
00:57:53.960 and to
00:57:54.840 people
00:57:55.140 of right
00:57:55.600 and left
00:57:56.000 it was
00:57:56.300 just
00:57:56.660 distasteful
00:57:57.720 and I
00:57:58.660 think
00:57:58.980 that is
00:58:00.000 a problem
00:58:00.600 for the
00:58:00.940 British
00:58:01.160 because
00:58:01.620 whatever
00:58:02.400 the British
00:58:02.780 values
00:58:03.520 may be
00:58:04.500 they are
00:58:05.340 under threat
00:58:06.060 as they
00:58:07.340 are
00:58:07.540 western values
00:58:08.300 generally
00:58:08.760 are under
00:58:09.240 threat
00:58:09.620 deeply
00:58:10.240 under threat
00:58:10.960 and
00:58:12.020 to defend
00:58:13.640 them
00:58:13.960 means
00:58:14.560 to speak
00:58:15.820 in a
00:58:16.100 very
00:58:16.300 un-British
00:58:16.820 way
00:58:17.140 and
00:58:18.220 that
00:58:18.940 makes
00:58:19.180 us
00:58:19.340 uncomfortable
00:58:19.880 in America
00:58:21.720 they don't
00:58:22.100 have that
00:58:22.400 problem
00:58:22.680 they talk
00:58:23.380 about
00:58:23.600 freedom
00:58:23.960 and
00:58:24.200 America
00:58:24.640 and the
00:58:25.480 flag
00:58:25.920 and they're
00:58:26.480 very happy
00:58:27.440 to do it
00:58:28.060 but we
00:58:29.300 find that
00:58:29.700 fairly
00:58:29.940 preposterous
00:58:30.620 but maybe
00:58:32.340 it's time
00:58:33.380 for me to
00:58:34.060 change
00:58:34.440 and to
00:58:34.700 be less
00:58:35.040 British
00:58:35.380 and to
00:58:36.300 wave
00:58:36.620 the flag
00:58:37.440 in
00:58:38.680 not in
00:58:39.660 terms of
00:58:40.240 empire
00:58:40.800 and past
00:58:41.720 greatness
00:58:42.200 and silly
00:58:43.760 things
00:58:43.960 but in
00:58:44.300 terms of
00:58:44.700 values
00:58:45.360 which include
00:58:47.200 free speech
00:58:47.780 which include
00:58:48.700 respect and
00:58:51.140 affection
00:58:51.960 for the
00:58:52.420 underdog
00:58:53.000 self-mockery
00:58:54.900 and an
00:58:56.420 ability
00:58:56.840 to
00:58:58.020 consider
00:59:00.820 other people
00:59:01.440 from inside
00:59:02.180 if you can
00:59:02.940 I suppose
00:59:03.700 Stephen
00:59:04.900 it's been
00:59:06.360 I don't know
00:59:06.880 if that helps
00:59:07.420 no it don't
00:59:08.160 it's a wonderful
00:59:09.460 way to finish
00:59:10.280 the interview
00:59:10.700 the final
00:59:11.320 question is
00:59:11.800 always the
00:59:12.140 same
00:59:12.340 what's the
00:59:13.100 one thing
00:59:13.560 we're not
00:59:13.860 talking about
00:59:14.480 that we
00:59:14.840 really should
00:59:15.300 be
00:59:15.540 ah
00:59:16.040 well
00:59:17.080 I mean
00:59:18.820 that's really
00:59:19.760 it's almost
00:59:20.200 like being in
00:59:20.780 the cab
00:59:21.220 saying go on
00:59:21.800 you're free
00:59:22.080 to say
00:59:22.360 absolutely
00:59:22.780 what haven't
00:59:23.780 you spoken
00:59:24.260 about
00:59:24.680 I suppose
00:59:28.340 I would
00:59:28.800 say
00:59:29.320 and it's
00:59:32.020 special
00:59:32.640 pleading
00:59:33.060 to some
00:59:33.700 extent
00:59:34.100 art
00:59:36.640 literature
00:59:37.580 creativity
00:59:38.500 what
00:59:39.440 people
00:59:40.140 say
00:59:40.820 create
00:59:43.500 in
00:59:44.140 music
00:59:45.140 it can be
00:59:45.740 lyrics of
00:59:46.340 songs
00:59:46.660 it can be
00:59:47.080 anything
00:59:47.420 that the
00:59:48.120 way we
00:59:48.560 speak to
00:59:49.040 each other
00:59:49.420 the way
00:59:49.840 we uncover
00:59:50.540 the truth
00:59:51.080 about who
00:59:51.540 we are
00:59:51.960 about the
00:59:52.640 fact that
00:59:52.980 we die
00:59:53.540 we live
00:59:54.220 that there's
00:59:54.980 pain and
00:59:55.600 there's
00:59:55.820 betrayal
00:59:56.260 and there's
00:59:56.800 dishonor
00:59:57.340 and there's
00:59:57.780 honor
00:59:58.080 all these
00:59:59.020 difficult things
01:00:00.000 are very hard
01:00:01.620 to talk about
01:00:02.380 in an abstract
01:00:05.300 way
01:00:05.720 but art
01:00:07.440 reifies and
01:00:08.600 embodies these
01:00:09.500 things through
01:00:10.100 people and
01:00:10.760 through ideas
01:00:11.900 or images
01:00:12.440 and remind us
01:00:14.760 that we die
01:00:16.360 which is very
01:00:17.520 important
01:00:17.980 so I
01:00:18.640 so I
01:00:18.660 suppose
01:00:19.020 art
01:00:20.160 probably
01:00:21.760 should come
01:00:22.600 into your
01:00:23.040 conversation
01:00:23.600 more
01:00:23.940 and it's
01:00:25.660 difficult
01:00:26.140 because it
01:00:26.520 sounds
01:00:26.840 elitist
01:00:27.660 but it's
01:00:29.400 important
01:00:29.860 art and
01:00:30.420 literature
01:00:30.740 and popular
01:00:31.420 culture
01:00:31.800 if you like
01:00:32.260 just
01:00:32.480 the
01:00:33.000 you know
01:00:33.600 the
01:00:33.800 discourse
01:00:34.140 the fact
01:00:34.560 that the
01:00:34.860 discourse
01:00:35.160 is so
01:00:35.660 constipated
01:00:36.640 by self
01:00:37.520 consciousness
01:00:37.980 and inability
01:00:38.980 to express
01:00:39.860 perhaps
01:00:40.820 head on over
01:00:42.320 to Substack
01:00:42.980 where we'll
01:00:43.440 carry on the
01:00:43.980 conversation
01:00:44.480 with Stephen
01:00:45.060 I'd be
01:00:47.480 fascinated to
01:00:48.180 have Stephen's
01:00:48.740 take on
01:00:49.140 Jordan Peterson
01:00:49.960 with him who
01:00:50.800 took part in
01:00:51.540 the 2018
01:00:52.200 Monk debate