In this episode, we talk to Rob Lyman, an expert on the Pacific War and the Far East, about the impact of the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the impact it had on the American response to it.
00:07:26.760It became very militaristic, and the dominant political voices in Japan became military voices.
00:07:32.760And the two great parties in Japan that were exercising influence, political influence, not military influence, but political influence, were actually military parties.
00:07:41.760The army and the navy being two great examples of this.
00:07:45.760So then you had a great drive to modernization.
00:07:48.760You have a fundamentally a feudal culture in Japan.
00:07:51.760That's really important to understand.
00:08:34.760It's a self-built culture of exceptionalism.
00:08:36.760And a lot of this was built around, certainly when it comes to the military view of things, around the idea of the samurai.
00:08:43.760Now the samurai were the ancient knights, of course, in Japan.
00:08:46.760They were almost mythical, spiritual, a little bit like the Knights of the Round Table, very Arthurian.
00:08:52.760And this whole idea that you could become a samurai, that your Japanese exceptionalism could be expressed through martial valour,
00:09:02.760became a very, very important part of the Japanese idea of themselves.
00:09:06.760So if the highest point of cultural value in society is your ability to fight a war, you need war in order to be able to exercise or express that.
00:09:42.760It was a very homogenous culture in Japan.
00:09:46.760And they started trying to express that by war and conquest.
00:09:51.760And it started really in 1904 with the war against Tsarist Russia.
00:09:56.760And then, of course, many of your listeners may know that the Japanese basically conquered Korea in 1905
00:10:06.760and then occupied in the years following Chinese Manchuria, which they are then called Manchuco and incorporated as part of the Empire in 1931 and 1932.
00:10:17.760Robert, I'm just going to stop you there because we've used good names like Malay and Chinese Manchuria.
00:10:22.760And there's going to be a lot of people.
00:15:58.760What about the idea, I hear a lot of people talking about that they invaded because Americans were preventing them from getting the oil they need.
00:16:28.760I mean, Japan wasn't able to produce much oil itself.
00:16:32.760It needed to be able to have access to foreign markets for almost everything.
00:16:37.760It produced a lot of rice, produced a lot of coal, a lot of tin and steel.
00:16:41.760But like all countries, particularly countries that are as rocky and mountainous as Japan, you needed to be able to exercise effective markets.
00:16:50.760The Japanese, though, had produced in their mind this idea that markets are created by power, not influence or money.
00:16:59.760And there's a fundamental difference, of course, between the capitalist approach to empire, which is basically how I describe the rise of the British Empire,
00:17:07.760and an empire that's created by force or violence or conflict, which is effectively the way that Stalin decided he was going to create his empire.
00:17:16.760It was how definitely Hitler decided he was going to create his empire, which he called Grosser Deutschland, this idea that wherever there is German blood, that is my empire,
00:17:25.760regardless of any states that might exist and regardless of any sovereignty that might previously exist, because that's all irrelevant.
00:17:31.760The most important thing is Grace of Deutschland, German blood in a greater Germany.
00:17:38.760They had this idea that they were primus inter pares in Asia.
00:17:43.760They were the country, the single country that could provide leadership in Asia, because they looked at empire and they said,
00:17:50.760the reason why all the states in Asia have fallen prey to colonialism is because they're not strong enough intellectually, mentally, culturally.
00:18:01.760We can take the place of these foreign empires.
00:18:04.760We can get rid of the Europeans and we can have an Asia for the Asiatics, which is what they argued.
00:18:09.760The real interesting thing about Japan for me is that there wasn't much intellectual planning or idea in Tokyo around what the economic co-prosperity sphere might look like.
00:18:21.760And if you go to Japan and look at the archives and look at the evidence for this great creation of an economic co-prosperity sphere, look at the arguments for it,
00:18:31.760look at the suggestions that actually what we might be able to do is ship lots of rice from Burma, that doesn't really exist.
00:18:37.760That's all actually arguments that were developed in the 1950s and 60s by rational American historians who said,
00:18:44.760well, the Japanese must have attacked for a reason.
00:18:47.760Well, we know they wanted oil, so they invaded Borneo to get oil.
00:18:52.760We know they wanted rice, so they invaded Burma to get rice.
00:32:03.760So we were caught with our pants down.
00:32:05.760We weren't preparing at all to defend our imperial possessions.
00:32:10.760The funny story is a film called Objective Burma, which was a – I love telling the story because it says a lot about who we think we were as Brits.
00:32:23.760Because it was shown for the first time, I think, in January 1945, a Hollywood blockbuster with Errol Flynn, who was a Brit living in America, but he's still a Brit, dressed as an American.
00:32:33.760And this film was released in Leicester Square in January 1945.
00:32:39.760And the crowd in the cinema, who were there for the first showing, were very excited about this film.
00:33:01.760Because the Brits who were watching this film were horrified to think that the Americans were taking the glory of the war in Burma to themselves.
00:33:09.760And this was classic American exceptionalism itself.
00:33:23.760It just touches on the reality of perceptions of the time.
00:33:25.760Because, actually, America was deeply involved in the CBI theatre, the Far Eastern theatre, the theatre that we as Brits think was ours.
00:33:33.760I'll just start by explaining that in 1945, the Southeast Asian Command, which is basically running the war in the Far East, so China, Burma, and India, and all parts in between, comprised 1.3 million men.
00:33:47.760This was essentially a British campaign, we think.
00:33:51.760And it was headed by Lord Louis Mountbatten, Supreme Commander of Southeast Asia.
00:33:55.760He had an American deputy by the end of 1944.
00:33:59.760But prior to that, it was General Vinegarjoe, Stilwell, and then it was General Weidemeyer.
00:34:09.760Well, actually, if I tell people that there were nearly three times as many Americans fighting in Southeast Asia Command as there were Brits, there were 277,000 Americans fighting in Southeast Asia Command, and only 100,000 Brits.
00:34:23.760So actually, the film was completely correct.
00:34:25.760The film, incidentally, was of a part of the Burma campaign, the northeastern part of Burma called the Hawken Valley, fighting down from the new road that was being built to replace the road that had been lost to the Japanese in 1942, the Burma Road, known as the Stillwell Road or the Lido Road, coming down through the mountains.
00:34:48.760Quite an extraordinary engineering achievement to a place called Michener.
00:34:51.760And that was being run initially by the Americans under General Vinegarjoe, Jay Stillwell, and about 30,000 Chinese troops.
00:34:58.760And the film was about those guys only.
00:35:00.760And the great thing about the film is that it was always fantastically accurate, great story.
00:35:05.760It just didn't mention the fact that on the left-hand side of Burma, the Brits were trying to fight to throw the Japanese out.
00:35:10.760But that wasn't the purpose of the film.
00:35:11.760This is an American film made in Hollywood for American audience, telling a true story.
00:35:15.760And the great thing about the film is there's a lot of really good combat cinematography in it from American cinematographers embedded in the troops taking film of real fighting.
00:35:27.760But, of course, our perception back home in London was that Burma was a British campaign and there were the same number of African troops, East and West African colonial troops, fighting in Burma against the Japanese as there were white Brits.
00:35:42.760The entire size of the fighting forces, without confusing it with the numbers, think about the 1.3 million men and a few women fighting against the Japanese by 1945.
00:35:52.760Of that, 606,000 were fighting troops, people with bayonets and rifles and grenades and so on.
00:35:59.760Of that number, 87% were, do you know what nationality they were?
00:36:32.760They weren't forced by poverty or any other form of force to join up.
00:36:38.760They joined up in the main to fight the Japanese because Japan was an existential threat to India.
00:36:45.760They didn't join up to fight for the Raj.
00:36:48.760They didn't fight for the British Empire.
00:36:50.760They didn't fight because Britain asked them to.
00:36:52.760They joined in the main to fight against Japan.
00:36:55.760The first Indian veteran I ever interviewed way back in 1997 said to me, after about an hour of me trying to get questions, trying to ask him questions.
00:37:04.760And I had a very, I had a typical Western framework of understanding as I was approaching him.
00:37:10.760And that framework was the product of my education, which basically said that colonial enterprise was an oppressive one where people did as they were told.
00:37:19.760If Britain told them to go to war, they went to war because they were unthinking.
00:47:02.760We know that in July 1945, the Japanese basically mobilized their population to create a local defense volunteer.
00:47:08.760So basically the dad's army in order to stop the American and the allied invasion that they knew was coming in early 1946, which would have cost perhaps a million lives.
00:48:02.760I need to quickly talk about Curtis LeMay and the area bombing of Japanese cities, because this comes into it as well.
00:48:08.760Because we need to see the dropping of the bombs as part of this concept, which began in March 1945, of bringing Japan to its knees by area bombing.
00:48:19.760Until March 1945, high level precision bombing by B-29 bombers over Japan had failed.
00:48:27.760The evidence demonstrated that only about 4% of targets were destroyed by large, large swathes.
00:48:33.760We're talking about hundreds of B-29s dropping bombs over Japan from August of the previous year when the first bombing bombardment groups were formed.
00:48:40.760So the idea that it started with Duet in the 1920s that high level precision, high altitude precision bombing of enemy targets would bring a country to its knees had been disproven.
00:48:51.760And America was the great proponent of this idea, which is why they went for daylight precision bombing in Northwest Europe, which also failed.
00:49:01.760So they then transited very, very quickly.
00:49:03.760Curtis LeMay almost did it by a slight of hand in March 1945 to area bomb Japanese cities.
00:49:09.760And this wasn't because Curtis LeMay was a bad man.
00:49:12.760He wanted to bring Japan to its knees.
00:49:15.760He wanted to destroy its military potential.
00:49:17.760He wanted to persuade the Japanese to stop fighting.
00:49:22.760It's a series of military mechanisms that, whilst disastrous for the lives that are lost, was salvation for the lives that were preserved.
00:49:31.760It's really important to realize that when you're fighting a total war, you have to make a judgment about what you do in battle to achieve victory and prevent further loss.
00:49:43.760And that was a very, very important series of conversations that took place in 1945.
00:49:47.760And as soon as we separate out the military decisions over Japan and their moral decisions, we try and treat them as two separate things, it loses its efficaciousness.
00:49:58.760I mean, you can't consider the moral question on its own without understanding the military decisions that were being made.
00:50:05.760And too many people who take the moralistic line then apply bad faith judgments to the military actors.
00:50:13.760Oh, Curtis de May was a murderer, and he was as bad as Hitler, and all this sort of nonsense, which you do here on the left of the spectrum on a regular basis.
00:50:21.760In terms of Israel and Gaza, the same principles apply.
00:50:25.760Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, has a sovereign right to defend itself, and it must defend itself.
00:50:32.760In fact, its primary duty is to defend its citizens.
00:50:35.760Now, in order to defend its citizens, it needs to take all measures in war on a proportional basis.
00:50:43.760And it's really, really important that the purpose of war for a democracy is to right a wrong.
00:50:51.760You need to right a wrong, but you need to do it proportionally.
00:50:54.760And Nigel Bigger, Professor Nigel Bigger, does explain this brilliantly in a number of his books.
00:50:59.760So if you keep those two things in mind, yes, war is justified if it rights a wrong.
00:51:06.760And Israel is fighting to reverse the wrong or to right the wrong that was initiated in October last year, October 2023.
00:51:15.760But it needs to do so on a proportional basis.
00:51:18.760And that's an entirely separate subject as to whether Israel has been doing that.
00:51:21.760My personal view is that they've done it remarkably well on a remarkably proportional basis.
00:51:26.760If Israel was not acting proportionally, there would be aerial bombing the whole of Gaza now.
00:51:33.760And Gaza would be a very different place to what it is.
00:51:40.760The military operation in Gaza, in my view, has been an exemplar of military proportionality.
00:51:46.760And that's what we need to understand. We need to keep this in mind.
00:51:49.760Of course, the people who hate the idea of a sovereign Jewish nation, what do they attack most?
00:51:58.760They attack this point about proportionality.
00:52:01.760And they link proportionality with morality.
00:52:04.760And they infer that Israel is not a legitimate state and therefore does not have a legitimate right to defend itself.
00:52:13.760If you just follow the logic in all these things through, you'll see where it's all going.
00:52:17.760If Israel is a Zionist colonial state, it's not legitimate, therefore has no legitimate need to defend itself.
00:52:23.760So all the arguments around Gaza need to be stripped back to look at what the intentions and the purposes of the people who are criticizing Israel are.
00:52:34.760And if you're able to reveal them, then you can get a sense of proportionality about the fighting as well.
00:52:39.760Well, come back to Japan with me, because you mentioned earlier that you thought the Hirohito, the emperor of Japan, could have stopped the war from breaking out later.
00:52:49.760But wouldn't that be disproven by the fact that even after the first bomb was dropped, when he tried to say,
00:52:57.760guys, guys, maybe we should start thinking about it, there was a military coup against it.
00:53:01.760Yeah, he was very nearly assassinated.
00:53:03.760So I think my point is that he should have done what he could to prevent the war in the first place, but I don't think he had the balls, frankly, and I don't think he had the means.
00:53:13.760The real power didn't reside with Hirohito.
00:53:16.760He wasn't a titular head of state, he was the head of state, but actually power resided elsewhere, and power resided with Tojo in particular and the military factions.
00:53:24.760And is that why the Americans dropped the second bomb, because they wouldn't surrender after the first one?
00:54:18.760When you look at the numbers to see actually Nagasaki, a largely Christian city, large numbers of Christians in Nagasaki, are being destroyed and their empire collapsing at the same time as a consequence of what they had started.
00:54:31.760Was part of the reason that they didn't surrender, is it because the idea of surrender was deeply dishonorable to them?
00:54:44.760The military code is basically, there's no such thing as surrender.
00:54:48.760So Bushido, if I describe it this way, when a soldier was, when a recruit joined the army and was trained, they would send home in a little matchbox a piece of hair and a piece of fingernail, denoting that actually their lives were now the emperors, not their families.
00:55:05.760Their family was saying to their family, this is my body.
00:55:12.760And in a deeply militaristic society, a deeply militaristic value-based system known as Bushido, the ultimate expression of your loyalty to your country, your family and your emperor is what?
00:55:39.760And that's why so many, so many, the majority of Japanese casualties in battle, when a battle had gone against them, would actually kill themselves.
00:55:51.760And the entirety of the Burma campaign, out of the 105,000, in 1944, 105,000 Japanese soldiers who attacked into India, only 600 were taken prisoner.
00:56:01.760And they were too injured and ill and starving to commit suicide.
00:56:09.760Officers had to commit seppuku, which is basically your ritual disemboweling.
00:56:13.760You had to stab yourself with a sword and start cutting yourself.
00:56:17.760If you were smart enough, you'd get your batman to shoot you in the head after you had done the first act to demonstrate your valour and courage and all this sort of nonsense.
00:56:27.760Individual soldiers would commit suicide with hand grenades more often than not.
00:56:33.760But it's very important that this Bushido code was such that it was dishonourable for a Japanese officer to go into battle with anything other than a sword with his katana.
00:56:44.760And if he had a katana or just a fighting sword otherwise, because no Japanese soldier would ever commit to firing a bullet from a rifle or pistol.
00:56:56.760In order to be able to demonstrate their martial valour, they needed blood on their katanas.
00:57:02.760That speaks to the point that you made earlier, which I thought was an incredibly powerful one, which is that we rational, secular Westerners, we imagine that everybody thinks in the way that we think we do.
00:57:15.760I don't even know that we think the way we think we do, but let's set that aside for a second.
00:57:19.760And so we can't comprehend that maybe a country would invade another country, not because of rational reasons, but for reasons that we might consider irrational.
00:57:32.760And war is often undertaken for irrational reasons.
00:57:35.760The idea that everything can be deduced or reduced to rational rationality is nonsense.
00:57:41.760I mean, human existence demonstrates that.
00:57:45.760And when you get tribes together that start beating war drums, as I said right at the start, the problem with a militaristic society is it only goes one way.
00:57:54.760Militaristic societies end up with war.
00:57:57.760And actually, that's one of my arguments about Putin.
00:58:00.760Well, let's talk about that right now, because I think, I don't know whether Putin is the best example of it, but I think there is a lot of blindness now in the West, very generally speaking about, we just, I heard of another historian, I think Sarah Payne, an American, she teaches, talk about how we play half court tennis.
00:58:23.760We only know what happens on our half of the court.
00:58:58.760We tried to deal with Hitler, of course, the 1930s in a rational way without realizing that a lot of his motivations were intensely racial and therefore irrational.
00:59:09.760The problem is that you've made the point that we don't treat our potential enemies with the respect they deserve in terms of understanding their motivations.
00:59:21.760And I think one of the extraordinary things, I've got a good friend, Samantha Maitre, who talks about this all the time.
00:59:26.760You know, we have cast, we are trying to understand Russia.
01:00:32.760Russia had promised to protect the sovereignty of Ukraine.
01:00:36.760Then at a point where that became no use to Vladimir, he invaded.
01:00:42.760And he had persuaded himself that there's a real danger here that in trying to create this new myth about yourself and about your identity, you fall into hubris.
01:00:52.760You fall into this delusion that part of this myth is true.
01:00:56.760And he had built up this idea that Ukraine was the beating heart of the Soviet identity and needs to be brought back in the fold.
01:01:05.760The resonance with Russia and Ukraine with Hitler and Grace Deutschland is unbelievable.
01:01:11.760People now forget about Grace Deutschland.
01:01:13.760Grace Deutschland was the driving force of the Nazi Party.
01:01:16.760The idea that the real Germany existed where German blood flowed through people's veins.
01:01:21.760That was the natural borders of Germany.
01:02:03.760We're not talking about actually what's really happening.
01:02:06.760We're not talking about how we can draw the conflict and Ukraine to a close because there is a pretty easy way in my view to drawing it to a close.
01:02:21.760But it does mean Ukraine defeating Russia.
01:02:23.760It doesn't mean the West defeating Russia.
01:02:25.760It means drawing the fighting to a close and coming to a negotiated deal.
01:02:29.760The day after, I'm not an Ostradamus, but the day after the invasion took place, I wrote a long article for the Murrow in which I said, this will be a bloody fight, but it will end in a negotiated settlement.
01:02:41.760And there are going to be some trade offs required.
01:02:45.760Korea was divided arbitrarily in 1945 in order to disarm the Japanese.
01:02:51.760Joe Stalin created a puppet state in the North where he wanted to create a buffer series of states around Soviet Union, and North Korea was part of it.
01:03:01.760And North Korea has never been united since.
01:03:04.760There is a demarcation line between the two.
01:03:06.760We are looking at the same in Ukraine.
01:03:08.760The big question is how much of Donbass and Le Hance goes back to Ukraine, where the Crimea stays.
01:03:14.760And interestingly enough, I use this example all the time.
01:03:23.760Syngman Rhee, the head of the Republic of Korea, president of the Republic of Korea, so South Korea, was desperate not to hand over any of his territory to the North, and desperate to unite the whole country under democratic, well, he wasn't really a Democrat, capitalist, democratic South.
01:03:42.760And we have this challenge in Ukraine.
01:03:44.760So I have utmost respect for President Zelensky.
01:03:47.760But he needs to recognize, and Ukraine needs to recognize, that the war will end with a negotiated settlement that will not meet all their national imperatives.
01:03:57.760But the first thing that needs to happen is, Russia needs to be persuaded to draw stumps.
01:04:04.760And he's not going to be persuaded to draw stumps if we, in the West, don't actually enable Ukraine to defend itself as it ought to.
01:04:12.760I don't think anyone in the West should be deluded in the sense that the West can defeat the Russians in battle.
01:04:21.760Russia is too big and too strong for that ever to happen, despite the embarrassment that they've suffered recently over the last few years.
01:04:30.760Actually, the Russians have behaved extraordinarily militarily.
01:04:34.760Their operations in Ukraine have been a complete choke, with the exception of the defensive buildup, the strategy that they've built up over the last few months, where they've prevented the Ukrainians from actually penetrating Donbass and Luhansk.
01:04:51.760But actually, they're being whittled away.
01:04:53.760But in the long term, Russia will survive the long war.
01:04:57.760So that needs to be brought to a close.
01:04:59.760But there needs to be a decisive military breakthrough that forces Russia to the negotiating table.
01:05:05.760Ukraine will almost certainly have to give up Crimea, and that's going to be a real challenge for Zelensky, because that's the big political problem for him.
01:05:14.760And even leaving any of the territory along the Dnieper in Russian hands is going to be a political problem for him, but I suggest it's a necessity.
01:05:53.760We need to get to a point where both sides stop fighting and a negotiated settlement of some kind does lock peace into our political framework, because without that, we're going to have endless war.
01:06:08.760Robert, thank you so very much for coming on.
01:06:23.760I think that's the story of this great clash between America, China, Japan, Britain, and India in the Second World War, 1942 to 1945, is my big book.
01:06:32.760It's a book I've been working on for 35 years.
01:06:35.760And it brings all these ideas together, really reminding people that war is a consequence of political determination.
01:06:41.760And that political determination was Japan's desire to create an empire.
01:06:45.760And it came up against empires that were differently constructed and were able to respond in better ways than the Japanese.
01:06:51.760And it demonstrated that one empire is different to the other.
01:06:54.760One might even say one empire is better than another, but you have to be very careful with that.
01:06:59.760The other really big book I wrote with General Lord Dennett last year was called Victory to Defeat, which is really trying to understand the state of the world now in terms of the demilitarization of the West between the 1920s and 30s.
01:07:10.760And the 1920s and 30s, the West disarmed itself completely and became very weak in the face of the dictator, the rise of the dictators in the 1930s.
01:07:18.760So our question was, we actually argue in the book that the British Army in particular, and the Commonwealth armies, the Empire armies, were dramatically successful in 1918.
01:07:29.760And they defeated the armies of Lutendorf.
01:07:31.760And instead of the German armies being stabbed in the back, they were stabbed in the chest and defeated.
01:07:37.760And that acts against the Nazi myth that the German armies were stabbed in the back and helped the rise of Nazism in the 1930s.
01:07:46.760And yet by 1940, we had completely lost the idea of how to fight.
01:07:51.760We lost the ability to imagine what modern war could look like and had disarmed ourselves to the state that actually we weren't really ready to fight against the enemy in the way that we should have done until about 1944.
01:08:16.760After their invasion of the Far East in 1942, they basically sat in their laurels, started getting eaten up by the Americans in the Pacific, sat in their laurels in Burma, and were smashed by a reinvigorated Indian army in 1944.
01:08:27.760So those two books would be really helpful.
01:08:29.760There are lots also out there as well that you could fill your boots with.