Mark Gagliotti is a security consultant and historian who has written extensively about the rise of Vladimir Putin and his role as a leader in Russia. In this episode, Mark and I discuss Putin's rise to power, how he got there, and why he may not be as strong as we think he is.
00:00:00.160I mean, I think what we might be missing is there is a tendency to think of him as this kind of Bond villain.
00:00:05.240I think what we have to realise is the degree to which he's also a scared and rather limited old man.
00:00:11.500When even the boss doesn't want to know what's really happening, that's when you are on a path to potential disaster.
00:00:18.360And this invasion of Ukraine was a classic example.
00:00:20.580He doesn't think that it's Ukrainians wanting to join the EU and NATO.
00:00:24.320He thinks it's the EU and NATO wanting to steal Ukraine.
00:00:27.200It's just the minor point being, it's all nonsense.
00:00:32.780Compliance moves fast and Moody's can help organisations move even faster.
00:00:36.880Leveraging AI to help you gain quicker insights and reduce bottlenecks.
00:00:40.400Let Moody's help your organisation navigate change with confidence.
00:00:43.500Visit moody's.com slash kyc slash ai dash study to discover how.
00:00:47.940Mark Gagliotti, welcome to Trigonometry.
00:00:50.000You've talked and written extensively about Russia, Russian history, the security issues to do with that.
00:00:55.960You're a security consultant in addition to historian.
00:00:58.920We're going to have a fascinating conversation about one man in particular, which is, of course, Vladimir Putin.
00:01:04.460I feel like the public interest in the war in Ukraine has died down.
00:01:09.520And it's something we've covered extensively on the show already.
00:01:12.080But the one thing I think, even now, even after all the talking that's been done about that, that most people in the West are still not fully across, not still fully informed about is Vladimir Putin, his rise to power, how he fits into the historical context of Russia, the future, of course.
00:01:30.260But talk to us a little bit about what you think that, you know, I think what we might be missing in relation to Vladimir Putin.
00:01:37.900I mean, I think what we might be missing is there is a tendency to think of him as this kind of Bond villain who's plotting disaster on all his enemies from a sort of mountain fastness or an extinct volcano or something.
00:01:50.220I think what we have to realise is the degree to which he's also a scared and rather limited old man who I think has lost a lot of his capacity to really sort of shape the world around him.
00:02:03.740Again, I think, you know, if one thinks of even the invasion of Ukraine, he did it because he was responding to an essentially paranoid fantasy of what he thought was facing Russia and facing his regime.
00:02:17.300But nonetheless, again, I think we need to get away from this idea that he is this grand geopolitical chess master and that he's controlling the board and that we are just sort of hapless pawns in this game.
00:02:31.300You know, yes, I'm not saying that we're that great either, but I think that we do ourselves a disservice.
00:02:38.860That's why you stretch the credibility of your argument, if you were to say that.
00:02:42.920No, I mean, I think, you know, we should assume that he's every bit as rubbish as we are and not invest him with his power because that's part of his shtick.
00:02:51.280That's part of his strength is precisely this image that has been built up about him.
00:02:56.520Do you think that's that's it's interesting because I'm obviously a critic of his, but the one thing I would never criticize is his competence, actually, because I think would it be fair to say that actually it's not that he's necessarily rubbish, but the system that he operates in, the authoritarian top down hierarchy, lots of corruption, lots of things being done without his say so, etc.
00:03:18.780So maybe that that he himself or would you say that he himself is now at a point where he's not not a very strong and capable leader?
00:03:26.660I think two things look like like most authoritarian leaders over time, he becomes something of a caricature of himself.
00:03:31.900Those things which were once strengths when he was sort of a young and vigorous figure of a mere 50 something instead of a 70 something year old, you know, actually now have ossified.
00:03:42.060And one of the key things is you talk about this system, he's absolutely now kind of encased within it.
00:03:48.940People tell him lies and he believes them and creates policy based on those lies.
00:04:20.900And for a long time, in a way, it didn't really matter too much because the fights Putin was picking were with much weaker enemies.
00:04:29.160Or there were enough technocrats who did know their job, who instead, in many ways, I think kind of running, running the system regardless of Putin.
00:04:39.160There's a lot of really able Russians.
00:04:40.820You know, if one looks, for example, the economy, Elvira Nabyulina, chairwoman of the central bank, absolutely brilliant, has done an amazing job in essentially bypassing a lot of the impact of sanctions.
00:04:52.680So there are a lot of people like that who, in some ways, were keeping everything working.
00:04:57.120But the point is when even the boss doesn't want to know what's really happening, that's when you are on a path to potential disaster.
00:05:05.500And this invasion of Ukraine was a classic example.
00:05:07.520This idea that they could just roll in, that Ukrainians would think, oh, that's a shame, but we'll accept having a puppet government imposed upon us.
00:05:16.760There must be any number of people within the top ranks of the Russian state who could have said, Vladimir Vladimirovich, it's not going to be like this.
00:05:27.700Either they couldn't or they just didn't dare.
00:05:29.980So I think we have to realize that on one hand, Putin is a prisoner of his system, but it's a system that he basically has built.
00:05:38.140And Mark, can we dig into a little bit before Francis, I know he's got lots of questions for you as well.
00:05:43.080One of the things that I think has been the biggest talking point, particularly in certain sections of the political spectrum, especially the people who describe themselves as anti-war.
00:05:53.220I mean, there's a lot of quibbles with that label, in my opinion, but nonetheless, who allude to the things that you alluded to right at the beginning, which is the fact that Putin is reacting.
00:06:03.980Some of them have argued to provocation, most prominently someone like a John Meyersheimer, who would say Vladimir Putin warned consistently that NATO expansion was unacceptable.
00:06:13.960And he only invaded Ukraine because he feels really threatened.
00:06:19.180Russia has been invaded time and time again from the West by Napoleon, by Hitler, etc.
00:06:25.660Russia is very sensitive to the encroachment of NATO on its borders, which it sees as a hostile force.
00:13:28.020So we're going to go for a different leadership.
00:13:29.540So I think that there is this coexisting of almost a sense of they believe that Putin deserves to have statues, but statues while he's in retirement.
00:13:39.780But that's a very real challenge because Russia is this huge landmass, which has all of these different countries.
00:13:49.560So we just put it like that or territories, many of them who want to become independent.
00:13:55.700And you need somebody like Putin to hold that all together, don't you?
00:13:59.480You can't really have a Keir Starmer figure in charge of Russia.
00:14:50.520They might have their various disputes, except for the North Caucasus.
00:14:54.220This particular part of southern Russia, which is where the Chechens of great infamy were from and such like, where there really is genuine independence.
00:15:04.040And quite frankly, this is a region which most Russians will probably quite happily wave goodbye to and offer them independence,
00:15:10.020because at the moment they end up getting huge amounts of central subsidy and just cause nothing but grief, I think is the general consensus.
00:15:16.880But apart from that, you know, actually, this is a country which I think can hold together.
00:15:34.360The psyche, I would put it to you, hasn't quite caught up with it in Russia, certainly in my experience growing up there and speaking with people there now.
00:15:41.220But coming back to Putin, one of the interesting things you said is he's trashed his war machine in Ukraine,
00:15:50.100which is an interesting take because, I mean, certainly the Russian military has taken losses.
00:15:56.600But actually, I think many people would look at what's happened and they certainly wouldn't conclude that either Ukraine or the West have had a win there.
00:16:05.900Maybe you would argue Putin hasn't either.
00:16:08.000It's been a bad outcome for all sides, really.
00:16:12.120I mean, look, this is a military machine that he spent, I said, 20 years dumping a huge amount of money in and which actually had gone through quite a process of reform.
00:16:20.880The irony is that it went through much the same process of reform that most Western armies did.
00:16:26.120You know, we once upon a time had NATO, which was designed to fight the Soviets.
00:16:29.580Then Cold War was over, lots of peace dividend, but also increasingly people thought, well, no, what's the threat going to be?
00:16:36.940It's going to be from people in caves in distant countries.
00:16:39.740So what we need are smaller, nimble expeditionary forces who can go out there and fight terrorists and such like.
00:16:45.880We ran down, you know, who needs tanks in that era and so forth?
00:16:50.220The interesting thing, and one of these great historic ironies, is that's a similar process to what the Russian military was going through.
00:16:58.160It wanted the sort of forces who can sort of neatly take Crimea, as they did in 2014, or go and deploy into Syria, as they did in 2015, rather than just simply being a retread of the old Red Army.
00:17:08.060And that's one of the reasons why, when they went into Ukraine, a country which perversely hadn't reformed its military so much, so it was still more Soviet and still able to actually get a lot of sort of metal on the front line, it hasn't done very well.
00:17:21.620So sure, I agree with you that we can hardly call what's happening a Ukrainian and Western win at this scale.
00:17:28.080But nonetheless, in the process, the Russian military has evolved surprisingly well.
00:17:47.440But on the process, look, we are seeing tanks that were built in the 1960s being reconditioned and sent into the battle line because they haven't got enough new ones.
00:17:55.300We're seeing increasingly an army that is being fought by 40-something-year-old reservists and taking a hell of a lot of casualties.
00:18:00.640You know, yes, they can cope up to a point and for a certain length of time.
00:18:06.600But all the fancy high-end kit, the sort of kit you would need if you wanted to, say, roll into NATO, that basically has been burnt through at a horrific rate.
00:18:16.360And what does all of this mean for Putin?
00:18:20.020Because there are people who would argue Russia and Putin's position has been strengthened.
00:18:25.480I would actually argue that post-Prigozhin's mutiny, post him jailing his critics like Strelkov and Kirk and whatever, he's actually got a stronger handle on Russia now than perhaps he did before the war.
00:18:46.580I'm saying, but what we're seeing is, you might say, whereas once upon a time, you know, certainly the elite went along with Putin because he was good for business, essentially.
00:18:54.340You could steal at home, spend and bank abroad.
00:19:15.940Now, that might seem like no big deal, given that sort of Putin basically breaks international law before breakfast.
00:19:21.360But this is the first time, as far as I'm concerned, that he broke a deal with an insider, with one of the people in his camp.
00:19:27.560And so on the one hand, that actually weakens Putin because people don't necessarily feel they can trust him.
00:19:32.500But on the other hand, given what happened to Prigozhin, there's that sense of, yeah, but I'm not going to be the one to actually challenge.
00:19:38.740So in some ways, it's more like you're now very antsy around this violent man who's got a gun.
00:19:46.600But I think the thing is, it is brittle in the sense of, I think there's fewer people who now feel that they have an active reason to remove, to support Putin.
00:19:55.880And if you look at what happened in the mutiny, what was really interesting was Prigozhin didn't have that many troops.
00:20:00.420The point is, he was able to roll them towards Moscow because not many people in security forces joined him, but most of them weren't in that rush to stop him either.
00:20:10.140They just thought, well, let's just see what happens.
00:20:15.320No one's daring to be the first to go after Putin.
00:20:18.040But if and when something does happen, I think there's a lot of people who, whereas once upon a time they might have felt, look, I'm going to back him, not because I like him, but because it's good for me, who might just think, well, maybe I didn't happen to get a call.
00:20:31.180And, you know, maybe I'll just wait and see what happens.
00:20:35.420I mean, I think one of the things that people in the West have been absolutely obsessed about since this latest conflict broke out is trying to get some insight into the psychology of Vladimir Putin.
00:20:46.880Do you have any access to anything in that area?
00:20:57.800You know, obviously, your argument, which is one that matches very much what I've heard and read and spoke to people about, is he was essentially misled into starting the conflict because he kept being told, oh, we'll just roll in there with a few thousand troops.
00:21:11.420It'll be easy, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:21:14.000So I imagine he was quite annoyed at that point.
00:21:17.580Then the war wasn't going very well initially, but then they had a lot of rollbacks, losses, etc.
00:21:34.040I mean, even the intelligence services don't really know what Putin is thinking and what he talks about to the very small, narrow circle of people that he genuinely trusts and talks to.
00:21:44.300So what we're having to do, it's a little bit like, I mean, I'm sure it's not the same this way.
00:21:47.840I remember back when I was at school in science experiment, you can't see air molecules, but you can see smoke particles.
00:21:53.880So you kind of put smoke particles into a little sort of Petri dish and watch them over the microscope.
00:25:38.940But the point is, you know, these are the things which clearly he wasn't really interested in, you know, and he is getting older.
00:25:47.420And so my suspicion is that part of the thinking about the Ukraine invasion was, again, he thought it was going to be easy.
00:25:54.260And then Belarus, the other, the third of the great Slavic nations is already kind of a sort of a vassal state.
00:26:01.680He would have gathered the Russian lands together, one of the great things that sort of Ivan III, known as Ivan the Great, was sort of famous for.
00:26:09.920It would have elevated him into the pantheon of Russian state-building heroes and allowed him to step down.
00:26:16.140In an authoritarian regime in which law doesn't matter, to step down is to hand all control of yourself, your future, your family, your fortunes to your successor.
00:26:26.260So I think maybe he felt this would have made him that successful, that kind of much of a historic figure, that he was pretty much untouchable.
00:26:35.420Of course, didn't quite work out that way.
00:26:38.720So I'm not sure if he's really ever going to feel that he can safely step down, because he must know that the temptation for his successors to use him as the scapegoat would be great.
00:26:49.180And even if they seem loyal today, in Kazakhstan, Central Asian country, another post-Soviet state, right at the beginning of 2022, we had an example of just how you can't trust your successor.
00:27:00.780You know, again, there they had a very Putin-like figure, Nazarbayev, who stepped down from the presidency.
00:27:06.160He gave himself a key position as chairman for life of the Defense Council, and he handpicked his successor.
00:27:12.200Everything seemed fine until the successor decided, clearly, I don't necessarily want to be under Nazarbayev's shadow anymore.
00:27:20.040So there's a kind of a confused moment, but it's a bit of a coup and a bit of a revolution.
00:27:25.180And then Nazarbayev steps down from his position of his own accord.
00:27:29.560You know, you're only president for life or chair for life for a while.
00:27:33.720So I think from Putin's point of view, this would have probably been quite a cautionary tale that, you know, this is basically the same problem that any mob boss has.
00:27:44.220That, you know, if you rule by virtue purely of your position, can you ever really safely give up your position?
00:27:51.440So I'm not sure if Putin will ever feel now that he feels he can safely step down.
00:27:56.080And, to be fair as well, he's got a lot of enemies, and he's garnered a hell of a lot more since the beginning of the war in Ukraine.
00:28:04.580Yeah, and he's also increased his value as a bargaining chip.
00:28:09.180I mean, imagine he steps down, he hands power to a successor, and either the successor is toppled in two years' time,
00:28:14.840or just the successor after a point decides, well, that was nice, but, you know, gratitude only goes so far in politics.
00:28:28.680Send him to The Hague, and you can basically write your own meal ticket for that.
00:28:33.400So, I mean, even if actually that wouldn't happen, you could imagine Putin thinking it would happen, and that's quite a reason not to ever say that.
00:28:40.700Especially given how paranoid he likely is to be at this point.
00:28:43.900And you mentioned that, I mean, one of the things that's clearly animating Vladimir Putin, if you listen to his speeches, I've translated a number of them for the public to read.
00:28:51.740You can see, reading between the lines, that he sees himself as the successor to the great czars of Russia.
00:29:00.260And by the way, you smirk when I say this, but I have to say, even as someone who really is against many of the things that he's done,
00:29:06.620you have to acknowledge this is a man who transformed Russia with a lot of luck and good fortune and all of that.
00:29:13.760But nonetheless, he took over in 1999, he's been in power for 24 years.
00:29:19.740Russia is a changed country, has become certainly a lot stronger, economically more prosperous during that time.
00:29:25.660I think he could credibly claim to have made a significant contribution to the history of the country.
00:29:31.020But he sees himself as one of the true greats, the Peter the Greats, the Catherine the Greats, the Ivans.
00:29:39.520What, as a historian, would you say his kind of position would be and how he will show up 100 years from now in the history of Russia?
00:29:48.380I mean, look, I can't help but think he's going to be, firstly, a transitional figure.
00:29:53.560He's one of these guys who has his mindset, not just from his schooling and so forth, but also his kind of formative early career days in, incidentally, the KGB set.
00:30:03.480And I don't think he ever really came to terms with the end of the Soviet Union and the end of superpower status.
00:30:17.680But in terms of who I was going to draw the comparison to, and yes, look, one cannot take away the achievements, particularly of the early Putin years.
00:30:26.160You know, if he had stepped down after his first two presidencies, something which he appears to have been contemplating when he sort of briefly put in his prime minister, Medvedev, as a sort of placeholder president.
00:30:37.540I suspect that history will be very, very kind to him.
00:30:41.540As a man who did a necessary job, he took a country which was facing anarchy, and let's face it, a huge country which is a nuclear power, falling into anarchy is not something any of us want.
00:30:53.000But he took that and he pushed it into a very sort of much more sort of different way.
00:31:17.620If you call him Ivan the Awesome, he sounds like a surfer.
00:31:21.560Why don't you – most people have heard the name but don't know the details.
00:31:25.940All Russians are taught about Ivan the Terrible, so we kind of get it.
00:31:28.780But why don't you just give people a flavor, first of all, of Ivan the Terrible and then why you think he's in the same.
00:31:33.440I mean, the thing is, Ivan the Terrible, he comes to power at a point when basically Moscow has already just risen as the dominant power over all the sort of principalities of the Rus.
00:31:44.260So this is just – again, I'm sorry to interrupt.
00:31:46.160I just want to give people the context.
00:32:09.200And in that regency, frankly, you've got all these different noble families, so-called boyars, competing for power.
00:32:14.240And Ivan himself actually has a really miserable childhood.
00:32:18.740But he learns the cutthroat lessons of Muscovite politics well.
00:32:22.840I think when he's 13, he has his first prince arrested and beaten to death, you know, a little formative moment.
00:32:29.620But when he actually comes to power, and he's the first czar, in the sense that he's the first person who's actually crowned a czar emperor,
00:32:38.040it's a point when, in a way, Russia is, as you say, just beginning to happen.
00:32:41.820And the fascinating thing about Ivan the Terrible is his reign really can divide it into two halves.
00:32:47.600The first half, he was a state builder.
00:32:49.920He created all the foundations of a modern Russian state.
00:32:53.940If you look at the Russian foreign ministry, it dates its own history back to the creation of the ambassador's office under Ivan.
00:33:01.660Interior ministry routes back to the brigandage office, as it was called.
00:33:05.960He creates the first Russian standing army, the Streltsi, and so forth.
00:33:09.680In all of these things, he codifies the laws, etc.
00:33:40.900On the whole, people focus on the sort of mad, bad Ivan of the later half without considering the degree to which actually he was extraordinarily...
00:33:49.880extraordinarily, in, again, a certain foggish way, a real creator in his first half.
00:33:56.380That, for me, is a very compelling parallel with Putin.
00:33:59.620One has to acknowledge all the very positive things that happened on his watch.
00:34:04.860Not necessarily because he did them himself, but he allowed them to happen.
00:34:08.700If you're also going to blame him for all the bad things that have happened in the latter part of his reign.
00:34:15.860And following from that, the period...
00:34:18.720So, when Ivan the Terrible died, having killed his only capable son and heir,
00:34:24.120he essentially sparked a period of, I think, several decades, times of trouble,
00:34:30.300during which Russia experienced, I mean, some of the greatest horrors in its history.
00:34:34.840Starvation, invasion, you know, endless claims to the throne, fake and true and all of that.
00:34:42.300And it's one of the fears that actually sits at the very core of the Russian psyche and the Russian mindset,
00:34:48.620which is the idea we referenced earlier with Francis,
00:34:51.500which is when you don't have strong leadership, bad things happen.
00:34:55.160Do you therefore prophesy that at the end of Putin's reign,
00:34:59.540Russia is going to be thrust into some kind of turmoil of that kind?