00:03:15.200And it's only really in the May of 2021
00:03:19.700that there was a sea change because of various things that came together suddenly the media
00:03:25.320started saying actually we can't rule out the possibility that came out of a laboratory
00:03:29.120we need to investigate it properly even the united nation sorry the the world health organization
00:03:34.160and uh the u.s government particularly the biden administration said very firmly yeah that
00:03:39.700explanation does have to be on the table and we've got to explain it so to some extent we're we're
00:03:44.920there still but there's been quite a lot of pushback recently saying oh please can we just
00:03:48.840drop this subject we better not you know of course it was natural most pandemics are natural so this
00:03:53.980one must have been we I started out telling people no don't go down that rabbit hole it's not out of
00:04:02.540a lab it's natural I've read these papers that say so I then began to think about the arguments they
00:04:08.260were using in those papers began to look at the evidence a bit more and I said well I think it's
00:04:13.320an open question. It does need to be investigated. Alina Chan and I started writing a book. We both
00:04:19.540thought that within a few months, it would probably become clear that it was something to do with that
00:04:24.020market. But the more we looked into it, the more extraordinary it was. They couldn't find any
00:04:29.500evidence for a connection with the food chain or the market or anything. And the more the
00:04:36.140experiments and work that was going on in that one laboratory began to look odd.
00:04:42.000Before we get into that, let me ask you a broader question first, which I think, sadly, a lot of people will be asking themselves and people like you and people like us who want to cover this issue.
00:04:54.560Everyone wants to move on from COVID, I think, except the people who benefit from it massively, which is a significant portion now of people online particularly.
00:05:03.140Why does it matter where this virus came from is what some people might say.
00:05:07.400yeah i'm staggered by how many people ask that question i know you're asking it because it has
00:05:14.320to be asked but uh you know for me it's obvious why it matters and you're right that apathy is
00:05:20.400probably our biggest challenge on this topic in particular it matters i think for three reasons
00:05:26.700first because if we don't understand how this pandemic started we're less likely to be able
00:05:30.860to stop the next one second because bad actors are watching this and saying we could do a lot
00:05:37.080of damage with a highly transmissible virus it doesn't even need to be very virulent
00:05:40.440and actually the who is going to come in and say well it probably happened naturally so we
00:05:47.120wouldn't even get blamed you know so unless we pin down what happened we're encouraging these
00:05:53.900bad actors and the third reason which i think is important is that we've got between five and
00:05:59.80015 million people dead now. We do owe it to them in some sense, I think, morally, if not
00:06:06.700otherwise, to find out what happened and how this happened. It's a great point. And when you told me
00:06:14.200about this, that people were saying it's not important, I found it baffling. But let's actually
00:06:18.980now look into the virus. What makes you think that there is a good chance the virus was created in a
00:06:25.060lab? Well, there's two main strands to answering that question. The first is the lack of evidence
00:06:30.560for the alternative natural hypothesis. In the case of SARS, within a couple of months, it was
00:06:36.480clear that food handlers had antibodies or had the virus, that the animals in the markets,
00:06:42.780particularly the palm civets, had the virus, etc, etc. A very clear pattern emerged. Today,
00:06:49.740with much superior technology you know much better genetic testing equipment we haven't been able to
00:06:57.480find a single infected animal not one I mean sure cats are catching it now but they're catching it
00:07:03.200from people you know nobody prior to the first human infection no animal had it and no food
00:07:10.700handlers no chefs none of the stuff we had with SARS so the normal pattern you'd expect and this
00:07:16.660happened with you know with nipper too which is a virus that was found in malaysia some time ago
00:07:22.220you know the pigs were getting it from fruit bats you know it was very clear how it was happening
00:07:26.480so none of that has happened in this case and they've tested 80 000 animals in china or claimed
00:07:31.380to have done and they've not found a single one with it on the other hand on the positive side
00:07:36.800you have to take into account the fact that the laboratory that was doing the most research on
00:07:43.360SARS-like viruses caught in bats in the world, by a mile, was in Wuhan. The laboratory that
00:07:52.780published most papers on this topic is the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The laboratory that
00:07:58.520deposited most SARS-like virus genomes into databases is in Wuhan. That's not because this
00:08:08.540virus is found in bats around Wuhan. They've tested over 10,000 bats around Wuhan, and they've
00:08:13.800never found a virus like this in the bats there. So it's not a local issue. It's thousands of miles
00:08:19.280away. But, you know, here's an analogy. 2007, there was an outbreak of foot and mouth on a farm
00:08:27.540in Surrey. It was less than 13 miles from the world's leading reference laboratory for studying