00:01:23.520I don't want to experience a world where the Ayatollah has a warhead and his only problem is, how do I get this to America to death?
00:01:32.280There is this growing concern about the relationship between Israel and America and that many people feel that it is not to the benefit of the United States now.
00:01:41.740You mentioned Tucker Carlson. I believe Tucker is the most dangerous demagogue in America.
00:01:45.120Tucker interviewed Fuentes and nodded when Fuentes said his mission was to defeat global
00:01:50.820Jewry. By the way, not Israel, Jews. Do you think Cuba is next?
00:01:58.340Trigonometry is proudly independent and sponsors like Hillsdale College make that possible.
00:02:03.580Access their free library of world-class educational courses at hillsdale.edu slash trigger.
00:02:10.300senator welcome to trigonometry before we start the interview proper it's always good to ask
00:02:17.300particularly politicians about their journey how they came to be where they are and also how your
00:02:22.840journey influenced and shaped your views sure uh my journey i'm a texan uh like like the both of
00:02:30.840you i'm the product of my family story uh for me my hero my whole life has been my dad
00:02:36.700my father was born in Cuba and grew up in Cuba. And as a kid, when he was 14, he began fighting
00:02:45.360the Cuban revolution and fighting actually alongside Fidel Castro. And he did not know
00:02:51.800that Castro was a communist. In fact, when I want to irritate my father, I will call him a
00:02:56.900communist guerrilla. And he gets angry. He goes, I was not a communist. I was never a communist.
00:03:02.520but as my dad describes it he said the revolution were a bunch of kids like him they were 14 and
00:03:08.60015 year old boys who didn't know any better and batista was was a dictator he was corrupt he was
00:03:15.120in bed with the mafia and so my father fought for several years in the revolution and then when he
00:03:21.240was 17 they caught him and they threw him in jail and they tortured him and beat him badly and and
00:03:28.920they let him go. And at that point, my grandfather, my abuelo said, look, they know who you are.
00:03:35.960They're just going to kill you. And so my dad was a freshman at University of Havana at the time.
00:03:41.600And so he applied to three U.S. universities. He applied to University of Miami, LSU,
00:03:47.020and University of Texas, and UT let him in. So 1957, my father takes a ferry boat
00:03:54.160from Havana to Key West, and then takes a Greyhound bus from Key West all the way to Austin, Texas.
00:04:01.560Shows up in Austin, can't speak English, has $100 in his underwear,
00:04:07.200and gets a job washing dishes, making 50 cents an hour. And he worked full-time, he went to school
00:04:13.920full-time, and ended up earning a degree, going on to getting a job, starting a small business.
00:04:21.380today, my dad's a pastor. Now, interestingly, my dad's younger sister, my Tia Sonia,
00:04:28.540who just passed away a few weeks ago, and she was incredible. I called her my Tia Loca,
00:04:33.960my crazy aunt. She was still there after the revolution succeeded. And so she saw that,
00:04:42.700and sadly, this is a pattern a lot of Latin America has seen, that they went as bad as
00:04:46.780Batista was, Fidel Castro was worse. And so she saw him declare that he was a communist,
00:04:52.060begin seizing people's lands, begin executing dissidents. And so my Tia Sonia fought in the
00:04:58.760counter-revolution against Castro. And she ended up being imprisoned and tortured by Castro's goons.
00:05:07.840And that pattern, so she and my dad fought on opposite sides.
00:05:12.360When I was a little kid, I used to sit at the feet of my dad and my Tia Sonia,
00:05:16.840and I would hear stories about freedom fighters.
00:05:47.940And so now in the Senate, I have the incredible privilege of actually getting to do that.
00:05:53.340And, you know, I think of the Senate as almost like the modern day Coliseum, where you strap on your armor and you go fight the barbarians.
00:06:27.560I hate communists and I don't hide it.
00:06:30.740They are everywhere that darkness has touched. It has oppressed and it is empowered. By the way, for the communists, look, Fidel Castro lived like a billionaire. Putin lives like he's a billionaire. I mean, it's very good to be an uncontrollable despot. It just sucks for everybody else.
00:06:52.500And so I think defeating communism is incredibly important.
00:07:01.360And it is communism is the antithesis of human liberty, of free enterprise, of individual freedom.
00:07:08.880So, Senator, moving forward now to talk about the conflict in Iran, you were literally with President Trump the day before the strikes happened.
00:07:16.780Can you explain to us what the reasoning and the rationale are for this war?
00:07:20.360Sure. Look, I urged the president to launch this attack. As you noted, I was with him
00:07:26.440pretty much the entire day on Friday before the attack launched on Saturday.
00:07:31.460And so we were on Air Force One. We were flying down to Texas to Corpus Christi at a big event
00:07:35.380planned in Corpus Christi. So I was on the plane with him. And then he asked me to hop in the
00:07:40.760Beast, the presidential limo, and it was just the two of us one-on-one. And pretty much the whole
00:07:45.860time, he was asking me what I thought we should do on Iran. And I said, look, I think we should
00:07:52.420we should not miss this moment. I think the regime is weaker than it ever has been.
00:07:58.960And we have an opportunity if we can collapse this regime, America will be much, much safer.
00:08:06.320There are very few things on planet Earth that would do more to make improve American national
00:08:12.780security as much as seeing this regime collapse. And he asked me in The Beast, he said, well,
00:08:20.720look, do you think we should negotiate further? And I said, no. I said, I don't believe they're
00:08:25.900negotiating in good faith. They are liars. I think the Ayatollah just wants to delay and delay and
00:08:31.660delay while they rebuild. And I said, as far as I'm concerned, the only deal you should be willing
00:08:36.900to take is the same deal you offered Maduro. And Trump offered Maduro if he wanted to leave the
00:08:43.220country, he could go into exile and he would be allowed to live out the rest of his days if he
00:08:48.240left and exited. And Maduro said no. And I suspect Maduro regrets saying no now.
00:08:55.640And I said, I could live with that deal for the Ayatollah to give him and the mullahs the same
00:08:59.880choice. You can leave and allow a new regime to come to power in Iran. Or if you don't leave,
00:09:05.660the alternative is going to be a less than pleasant one. And so in terms of what are the
00:09:10.700objectives, I'll break it into two categories. Number one, what are the objectives the administration
00:09:15.360has stated? And number two, what I think the objective should be. So the administration has
00:09:20.840stated that the objective is to degrade the military so that they cannot strike out.
00:09:26.220And so we've seen in the two and a half weeks that this military conflict has been ongoing.
00:09:33.040We've seen, number one, their air defenses essentially completely eliminated.
00:09:37.820We've seen their short and medium-term, medium-range missiles all but completely eliminated as well.
00:16:36.300Quo's AI automatically logs calls, generates summaries and highlights next steps so nothing gets lost.
00:16:42.500It can even respond after hours, keeping your business responsive when you're offline.
00:16:47.700Make this the year when no opportunity and no customer slips away.
00:16:51.100Try Quo for free. Plus, get 20% off your first six months when you go to Quo.com slash Trig.
00:16:57.520That's Q-U-O dot com slash T-R-I-G. Quo. No missed calls, no missed customers.
00:17:05.340Some are. And look, we don't have a precise measure on how many people the regime murdered
00:17:09.560anywhere. The estimates range from 10,000 to 40,000. It's certainly clear that they've killed
00:17:15.380many, but you've got a nation of 92 million people. And look, I remember that ad about
00:17:21.260Tiananmen Square because I sat there and thought, you know what? A million people rising up who are
00:17:26.080armed, that's not a protest anymore. That's a revolution. And the same would be true. Look,
00:17:31.620part of why the regime was able to murder 10 to 40,000 people is you had soldiers with machine
00:17:37.640guns and you had people on the other side with rocks. That doesn't work when you have that kind
00:17:42.240imbalance. When both sides can defend themselves, you get a very different dynamic. Let's go for a
00:17:49.020moment to why this is different from Iraq, because I want to be very clear. I think Iraq was a serious
00:17:57.840mistake. And if you rewind, go back to the 2016 presidential election in the United States.
00:18:03.740So in that election, with 17 Republicans run, if you set aside Rand Paul, whose foreign policy
00:18:13.080views are kind of on one fringe, if you set Rand aside, of the 16 remaining candidates,
00:18:19.340there were two and only two who opposed the Iraq war, me and Donald Trump. Everyone else thought
00:18:26.260the Iraq war was a good idea and defended it. Now, why did I oppose the Iraq war? Because I
00:18:31.860think it made America less safe. What I have argued for is the central touchstone for every
00:18:37.880foreign policy decision, every military decision should be protecting the vital national security
00:18:46.040of the United States of America. Saddam Hussein was a bad man. He was a monster. He was a tyrant.
00:18:51.600He was murdering his own people, but he was also killing terrorists. We came in and we toppled
00:18:57.580Saddam Hussein, and the terrorists took over and began killing Americans. That didn't make us
00:19:02.340safer. It made us less safe. By the way, we did the exact same thing in Libya. Gaddafi, again,
00:19:06.900a terrible man. America came in and toppled him. He was killing terrorists. Instead,
00:19:11.920the terrorists took over. They began killing Americans. That was a material harm to our
00:19:17.460national security. Why is Iran different? Iran is different because the Iranians are murdering
00:19:22.400Americans. They are waging war with us, whether the Democrats want to acknowledge it or not.
00:19:27.580And so removing from power Islamists who are actively trying to kill Americans makes us safer.
00:19:36.700Now, Iraq was compounded because the mission became nation building, because the mission
00:19:44.880became put hundreds of thousands of boots on the ground for years at a time. And a lot of folks in
00:19:53.200the Republican Party thought, you know, our mission is to promote democracy. Democracy is
00:19:57.160wonderful. And we are the global police who will promote democracy across the globe. I think that's
00:20:02.540completely misguided. I think democracy is great. I think we should advocate democracy. The bully
00:20:07.340pulpit, I am all for advocating democracy. But I'm not willing to send our sons and daughters to die
00:20:13.880to try to turn countries in the Middle East into Switzerland. I think that was a big mistake.
00:20:21.900So what is the administration trying to turn around into? This is the question that I think
00:20:26.120that I haven't heard a persuasive answer from anybody, not just you.
00:20:29.360Well, look, I think they haven't articulated it because they are wary of using the words
00:20:34.160regime change. So that's why they have said regime change. What they haven't said is what
00:20:39.220the next bit is. Look, if you listen to Pete Hegseth, if you listen to Marco Rubio,
00:20:43.240they're not embracing regime change. They're saying we want to degrade the drones and the
00:20:48.520missiles, they're talking about the specific and discrete military objectives, which are
00:20:53.720meaningful. What I'm saying unapologetically is I want a government that is not an Islamist
00:21:00.640government that is trying to kill us. I want it too, Senator, but how is that going to happen?
00:21:06.120Okay. Because if you keep killing them, they seem to get less moderate, not more,
00:21:10.580from what I'm observing. Look, at some point, this regime stays in power through brute force.
00:21:16.340they stay in power through military might. As you remove their ability to repress the people,
00:21:21.900at some point it's up to the people of Iran to govern themselves. But taking out the people who
00:21:28.480are the Islamist dictators removes them from the equation. And then, look, I am largely agnostic as
00:21:36.120to who the people of Iran choose. There are different people that are competing. And as far
00:21:40.660as I'm concerned, as long as it's not someone trying to kill us, my focus is protect Americans.
00:21:46.340And so if they want, look, there are different discussions. If they have a democratically elected leader, there's discussions about the Shah's son as an interim leader. I'm ambivalent on that. That's their choice.
00:22:00.660What I'm not ambivalent on is having a leader in place and a government in place that is not waging war against us.
00:22:11.480And I think the president's job is to be commander in chief focused on keeping Americans safe, protecting American lives.
00:26:54.180That sounds very on brand for Europe at the moment, we say as Europeans, unfortunately.
00:27:00.860Look, the Strait of Hormuz is no doubt a critical choke point.
00:27:05.420And Iran, I think part of the reason that we're seeing them go after the Strait is because I think they're in desperate straits, that they are so weakened they don't have very many options left.
00:27:18.620And look, we've seen, for example, we've seen a short-term energy price spike.
00:27:24.180Now, listen, if energy keeps soaring and if you end up with gas prices much, much higher, you know, you asked politically about the election.
00:27:32.860High gas prices historically have not been good for elections.
00:27:37.400Now, I don't believe that'll happen in the long term.
00:27:40.600I think we're seeing a short term spike.
00:27:42.240Anytime you have military conflict in the Middle East, you predictably have a spike in the price of oil and the price of gasoline.
00:27:48.280I mean, if we can bring if we can see a stable regime in Iran that is not waging war with us and if the Iranian energy can come to the global market free of sanctions and free of conflict, I think long term that has a significant downward pressure on the price of oil and the price of gasoline.
00:28:07.220And I also would point out that even with the spike we've seen, the price of gasoline is still significantly lower today than it was under Joe Biden.
00:28:16.020And so we saw under the Trump administration and Republican Congress, the price of gasoline basically cut in half.
00:28:23.440And then we've seen about half of that go back up again during this conflict.
00:28:28.320I think the conflict will be short lived and I think you'll see prices fall when that happens.
00:28:31.880Going into this year, I told myself I was finally going to stop guessing about my health.
00:28:37.220Like most people, I want more energy, better focus, and to be still strong and sharp years
00:28:42.120from now. But every time I've gone to the doctor, I walk out with basically nothing. Everything's
00:28:47.160fine. Drink more water, sleep a bit more. No real insight, no plan, just vibes. That's why
00:28:53.500superpower stood out to me. Superpower makes it simple to actually understand what's going on
00:28:58.460inside your body. You do one blood draw, either at home or in a nearby lab, and they analyze over
00:29:03.980100 biomarkers. That's heart health, hormones, metabolism, vitamins, minerals, and even
00:29:09.000environmental toxins. What I love is that you don't just get numbers, you get a personalized
00:29:13.480action plan, supplements, nutrition guidance, lifestyle changes, and even your true biological
00:29:18.880age that you can track over time. Price-wise, this is a no-brainer compared to the alternatives.
00:30:10.320People within Qatar are saying it's going to take three to five years for it to be up and running and to be fully functional.
00:30:15.040And that is responsible for 15% of the world's natural gas.
00:30:18.900And you're going, this is unsustainable, surely?
00:30:21.280Well, look, that was bombed by the Iranians, and it is an amazing statement that Iran, when this military conflict started, began firing missiles at practically every one of its neighbors.
00:30:34.720And ironically, the Arab world is more united behind this military conflict than Europe is, and I think it's because they understand the threat of their neighbor.
00:30:45.080And listen, when the Ayatollah says death to America, I believe him.
00:30:56.220One of the reasons why I have been leading the fight to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is I believe the Ayatollah, if he had had a nuclear weapon, the odds are unacceptably high that he would use it.
00:31:13.580because he was a theocratic zealot who embraced a death cult that celebrates suicide.
00:31:22.240So let's compare and contrast Iran to North Korea.
00:31:27.200You know, if you go back, let's go back to the Bill Clinton administration.
00:31:30.500Bill Clinton administration was negotiating with Kim Jong-il, Kim Jong-un's dad,
00:31:35.440and cut a deal. And they said, okay, if you don't develop nuclear weapons,
00:31:44.420we will give you billions of dollars. And Kim Jong-il said, great deal, happy to do it.
00:31:49.200Well, what happened? They took the billions of dollars, they turned around and developed
00:31:52.940nuclear weapons. And now North Korea has nuclear weapons. And they regularly threatened to use
00:32:01.440them. They threaten to use them on their neighbors in Asia. They threaten to use them on the United
00:32:05.740States. North Korea claims they have missiles that can go. In fact, Austin, Texas has been
00:32:09.840one of the targets they have identified as a nuclear target. Now, look, Kim Jong-un is
00:32:16.840narcissistic and unstable and a megalomaniac. But perhaps some modicum of deterrence is possible
00:32:27.460because the one thing Kim Jong-un understands is if he were, God forbid, to use a nuclear weapon,
00:32:33.440his regime would end that day. The response would be devastating, and he wants to stay in power.
00:32:38.720It would have been a much better world if he didn't have nuclear weapons, but there's at least
00:32:42.260some modicum one can hope of deterrence. What is qualitatively different when religion comes
00:32:48.120into it, when a theocratic zealot comes into it, is that ordinary cost-benefit analysis doesn't work
00:32:54.520nearly as well. So look, if the Ayatollah had a nuclear weapon, I think there is some real chance,
00:33:02.400and I don't know what the possibility is, but it's real that he would detonate that weapon
00:33:07.940in Tel Aviv or New York or Los Angeles. Now, if he did that, the result would be an
00:33:16.280overwhelming military response and a response that predictably would take the lives of many
00:33:21.620Iranians if he detonated a nuclear weapon. Here's the problem. I think the Ayatollah might have been
00:33:26.040just fine with that. If he got to kill lots of Jews or he got to kill lots of Americans,
00:33:30.900I think with religious zealotry, that might be an acceptable tradeoff to him. And so my view was
00:33:39.660as a matter of national security, we should do everything necessary to prevent Iran from
00:33:46.960from acquiring a nuclear weapon. And I will say, one of the additional justifications the
00:33:51.360administration has used for this military conflict is that Iran was rapidly building up
00:33:57.540its short and medium term missile stockpile, building over 100 missiles a month, and they
00:34:03.160were building them up and building them up. And the administration was concerned that they would
00:34:07.440get such an overwhelming stockpile of missiles that it would be extremely expensive in terms of
00:34:15.380loss of lives, to engage in military conflict with Iran. And they would do that essentially
00:34:20.360as a shield to then be able to develop nuclear weapons, that they were developing these short
00:34:25.940and medium term missiles to be able to inflict massive pain and loss of life on all of their
00:34:31.000neighbors. And so the administration said, we don't want to be sitting here a year from now
00:34:35.520where their stockpile and their drones are so massive that to go in and try to take out their
00:34:41.000nuclear facilities risks a massive loss of life. I think that is a reasonable justification as well.
00:34:50.420But all of this is keyed on, are you protecting America? Are you keeping Americans safe?
00:34:55.980I am completely with you on the fact that Iran should not be allowed to get nuclear weapons.
00:35:01.040I don't think there's any evidence to suggest that they were ever likely to be able to hit
00:35:04.900Los Angeles or New York. Tel Aviv, maybe. Tel Aviv, maybe. Although, look,
00:35:09.800there's more than one way to hit a target. Do they have an ICBM that could cross the ocean? No.
00:35:16.160Although they had an ICBM program, they were trying to develop an ICBM. And I would point
00:35:19.900out to people all the time, the I in ICBM stands for intercontinental. You do not need an ICBM
00:35:26.340to hit Israel. They wanted an ICBM for one purpose, which was to carry a nuclear warhead
00:35:32.800to the United States. So they were trying to develop it. But I will point out beyond that,
00:35:37.420look, if you have a nuclear weapon, there's more than one way to deliver a warhead. And if they
00:35:41.760could find a way to get it on a ship or another cargo carrier to put it in a container and put
00:35:46.380it in Manhattan, you don't have to have to deliver the warhead using a missile. And so I don't want
00:35:52.320to experience a world where the Ayatollah has a warhead and his only problem is how do I get this
00:35:58.680to America to detonate? And look, I appreciate that this question, you know.
00:36:03.200And I'll point out, London could be another target. I think he would have rather murdered Americans than the British, but London is certainly another target you could envision him striking.
00:36:15.960No, I think that's Israel. But nonetheless, I mean, I appreciate the president can't think in the terms that I'm about to describe, but nonetheless, it's not a much more likely explanation of why Iran was seeking nuclear weapons.
00:36:27.960is actually the reason that North Korea was seeking nuclear weapons, i.e. to deter aggression
00:36:32.520from Israel, from the United States, and to prevent the very things happening now. And the
00:36:37.440worry for some people is actually this conflict has created an incentive structure that will only
00:36:42.520accelerate the attempts to get nukes. So I don't think that's right. And I will say, look,
00:36:48.840there's a reason the Ayatollah referred to Israel as the little Satan and America as the great
00:36:55.160Satan. As I said, when he would lead mobs chanting death to America, I believed him. I don't think it
00:37:00.960was empty rhetoric. I think he believed it with all of his heart. And his whole life, he had been
00:37:05.260carrying it out. He had been murdering Americans. So we knew it wasn't empty rhetoric. He murdered
00:37:09.600every American he could and every chance he could. And listen, there are some, if you look at the
00:37:16.100Biden administration, their approach, they dealt with every foreign conflict with weakness and
00:37:22.560appeasement. And those on the left think, well, that's how you avoid war. Well, it's amazing.
00:37:27.360When Joe Biden came into office, there was peace and prosperity across the globe.
00:37:32.500And we had two military conflicts break out simultaneously. Russia invaded Ukraine,
00:37:37.140and we had October 7th and the Gaza war that unfolded. And I think both of those
00:37:41.780were in a very direct way caused by Joe Biden's weakness, that our enemies,
00:37:46.060when Biden withdrew from Afghanistan in an absolute debacle of incompetence that,
00:37:54.020among other things, cost the lives of 13 American servicemen and women.
00:37:59.220I said at the time, I said, this has made the world much more dangerous. I said,
00:38:04.760the odds of Russia invading Ukraine have just increased tenfold, and the odds of China invading
00:38:09.220Taiwan have increased tenfold. And our enemies have looked to the Oval Office. They've taken
00:38:14.780the measure of the commander in chief. And they've concluded that he's weak and feckless.
00:38:19.400In contrast, Donald Trump, our enemies are terrified of him. And I think America is safer
00:38:25.840when our enemies are afraid of the commander in chief. Appeasement increases the chances
00:38:32.200of military conflict. I've joked, there's a reason nobody goes and studies and gets a degree from
00:38:37.880the Neville Chamberlain School of Foreign Affairs. It doesn't work. Appeasement encourages bullies
00:38:44.000and tyrants. And so you see, look, when Trump went into Venezuela and arrested Maduro and his
00:38:52.000wife, that had a profound impact and it resulted in our enemies. I think it reduced the chance
00:39:00.720of conflict. Now, you said, well, couldn't Iran want nukes to avoid people attacking them? Look,
00:39:06.340if they weren't killing everyone, nobody would be attacking them. This is not a military. The
00:39:11.720United States is not an aggressor seeking conquest. We're not trying to conquer the land and make it
00:39:17.780an American territory. We're not an expansive regime. We're acting to stop people from killing
00:39:24.400Americans. That's a very different thing. And so the justification of the Ayatollah you suggested,
00:39:30.160well, I want to get the tools to kill a lot more Americans so I can keep killing the Americans I
00:39:35.580can now, that doesn't pass the smell test. One of the other things that's become, you know,
00:39:42.580we've traveled around the United States many, many times before, but we've been here for a
00:39:45.760couple of weeks now talking to all sorts of people on camera and off. As you'll be aware,
00:39:50.060as we're recording this yesterday, a counterterrorism official resigned, Joe Kent.
00:39:55.980And he's saying, I mean, I thought there were a lot of baseless things about Israel that he said
00:40:01.900in the statement. But broadly speaking, he's actually saying something that many people are
00:40:07.700now openly saying, which is that Israel and the United States have different objectives in this
00:40:13.660conflict. And in fact, it is Israel's objectives that are being satisfied while Americans are not.
00:40:18.380Look, I think that is silliness. And I actually think Israel had very little to do with why the
00:40:22.780United States is engaged in this military conflict. President Trump is acting to keep America safer.
00:40:28.160I can tell you when I talked with him about it, Israel didn't even come up.
00:40:32.280We talked about the Iranians killing Americans.
00:40:35.060Like in my conversations with him, Israel was not even part of the conversation.
00:40:39.380It was simply this regime has been tried to murder Trump twice, hired hit men to murder
00:43:24.100Mass Zymes is a straightforward place to start.
00:43:26.860Click the link in the description of this episode
00:43:29.240or go to biooptimizers.com slash trigger
00:43:33.180and use our code TRIGGER at checkout to get 15% off your order.
00:43:38.040Go through 2026 with better digestion and more energy with mass signs by bio-optimizers.
00:43:46.480My reasoning was very straightforward, which is this Ayatollah and this regime is a serious threat to the United States.
00:43:56.020It's not a theoretical threat. It's a threat that's reality.
00:43:58.780Let me make a broader point on you asked about Joe Kent.
00:44:03.380I don't know him personally. I know of him.
00:44:06.180But I will say, I think he embodies, let's talk philosophically for a second.
00:44:12.240For a long time, people have thought about foreign policy, particularly foreign policy
00:44:17.160among Republicans in the United States, as essentially a bipolar world.
00:44:22.160That you're either an interventionist and you want to go invade other countries and
00:44:26.880engage in military conflict, or you're an isolationist.
00:44:30.740You want to withdraw from the world and never engage in military conflict.
00:44:34.620And, you know, sort of the paradigmatic interventionist would have been a John McCain.
00:44:38.780And the paradigmatic isolationist would be a Ron Paul or Rand Paul.
00:44:42.700And those are treated as the only two options.
00:44:45.880I can tell you, I've always thought both were wrong.
00:44:49.340I don't agree with either one of them.
00:44:51.280And I think most Americans don't agree with either one of them.
00:44:54.420I've always described myself as a third point on the triangle.
00:44:57.700And so I call myself a non-interventionist hawk.
00:45:03.840Now, what does that mean? It means, as I said before, that every decision is keyed on protecting the vital national security interests of the United States.
00:45:11.960So you don't engage in military conflict, to engage in nation building, to promote democracy, to defend norms.
00:45:19.340That was a popular phrase in the Obama administration. I don't know what the hell it means to defend norms, but I'm not willing to have U.S. soldiers die to defend norms.
00:45:26.460I am willing to put the U.S. military in harm's way to protect Americans and save America's
00:45:32.620lives, American lives. That's why we have a strong military. And so it means, let's take,
00:45:39.800for example, when Obama was president and he talked about bombing Syria and he drew a red
00:45:48.520line of chemical weapons and Bashar Assad crossed that red line. And when he talked about engaging
00:45:56.080in military conflict. I did not immediately reject it. I said, OK, let me listen to the
00:46:02.020commander in chief. Let me hear your argument for why this protects U.S. national security.
00:46:09.040And I could have envisioned. So at the time, Bashar Assad had chemical weapons. He was using
00:46:14.600chemical weapons against his own people. I could have envisioned conceivably a military operation
00:46:21.160that I would think makes sense and would support. So I wanted to listen to him.
00:46:25.600And I will tell you, I asked in both classified settings and in public settings. At the time,
00:46:29.800there were seven major rebel groups in Syria, many of which were affiliated with radical Islamic
00:46:38.380terrorists, al-Qaeda, al-Nusra. And I said, OK, let's say you go in and topple Assad.
00:46:45.720How do you stop the radical Islamic terrorists from taking over? And if al-Qaeda has chemical
00:46:50.980weapons. We've made the world much worse. As bad as Bashar Assad is, he's not using those weapons
00:46:55.800on Americans. Al Qaeda would love to use those weapons on Americans. I'm not interested in having
00:47:01.080terrorists who hate us get weapons they can use to kill us. When you asked them those questions,
00:47:07.200the answers of the Obama administration were incoherent. They were all over the place. They
00:47:10.680said at one point, John Kerry said, we're going to launch an unbelievably small attack.
00:47:16.660It was like, OK, well, what the hell is the purpose? And look, I could have envisioned,
00:47:19.840let's say there was a mission to go in. We knew where the chemical weapons were. They were in one
00:47:25.320warehouse. We're going to send in a squad to get the chemical weapons and remove them.
00:47:29.160And I could envision that being targeted in a way that might make America safe.
00:47:36.880Obama administration never articulated anything like it. And so I vocally opposed that military
00:47:42.040action because it didn't make America safe. Contrast this with Iran. Iran has been actively
00:47:49.300killing Americans and has plans to continue killing Americans. What is interesting, when I
00:47:54.560say non-interventionist hawk, I think there are two presidents in modern times that reflect that
00:48:01.160same philosophy. One is Donald Trump. Now, Donald Trump doesn't articulate it using the same language
00:48:07.300I do. But if you look at Trump's foreign policy and national security policy, virtually every
00:48:13.820foreign policy and national security decision Trump has made, I agree with. And that's not
00:48:19.780accidental because for many of those decisions, I've been advocating those choices. And so he's
00:48:24.940agreed with me as we've talked about them. The other president who had a very similar philosophy
00:48:29.640was Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan called it peace through strength. You look at it in eight years
00:48:36.240as president, the biggest country Reagan ever invaded was Grenada. He was not one of the
00:48:43.120interventionist whose solution to everything was send the Marines. We see a country, let's invade
00:48:47.080it. We see a country, let's invade it. I'm not interested in that. But he simultaneously
00:48:52.760rebuilt the military, bankrupted the Soviet Union, and won the Cold War without firing a shot.
00:48:59.720That is peace through strength. That's another way of saying being a non-interventionist hawk.
00:49:05.160Don't invade everybody, but be strong enough that you defeat your enemy.
00:49:08.800Well, you've made your point, but forgive me, I must drag you back to Israel. And it's not because it's a personal obsession of mine, actually, at all. But this is an issue that comes up in a lot of conversations now. And of course, it is being driven by people like Tucker Carlson, increasingly others as well.
00:49:25.160do you not accept that there is a growing concern about the relationship between Israel and America
00:49:35.900and that many people feel that it is not to the benefit of the United States now?
00:49:40.280So look, there is a growing anti-Israel sentiment, certainly on the left,
00:49:45.320and there is a sliver on the right. And so let's break. And by the way, it's not just an anti-Israel
00:49:51.660sentiment. There is growing anti-Semitism that is getting materially worse. And in the United
00:49:57.880States, it was about a decade ago that anti-Semitism and vicious anti-Israel animus
00:50:06.360began rising on the left. And I think the Democrats' leadership by and large just looked
00:50:11.820the other way. They just hoped it would go away. And I think it's all but completely consumed their
00:50:17.220Party. I mean, today there is a very real pro-Hamas contingent of the Democrat Party.
00:50:23.400And the remaining Democrats, even if they don't agree with that extreme, they're terrified of
00:50:28.880them because that's where the energy, the money, the power in the party is. Look at all of the
00:50:33.240Democrats who made the trek up to Manhattan to support Comrade Mandami. That's where the
00:50:39.860Democrat party is today. On the right, in the last 18 months, I've seen more antisemitism on
00:50:48.560the right than I have at any point in my life. And I think it is growing. You mentioned Tucker
00:50:53.060Carlson. I believe Tucker's the most dangerous demagogue in America. And he is obsessed. He
00:50:58.520hates Israel. He is attacking Israel on a daily basis. He's attacking Jews on a daily basis.
00:51:04.420And I will say, and there are others, there are a handful of podcasters and voices that are
00:51:08.860amplifying these views. Look, anti-Semitism is a gateway to anti-capitalism and anti-Americanism.
00:51:17.880Mondami is a great example of the green-red alliance that Marxists and Islamists come
00:51:24.060together because they hate the same people. And so, look, you've seen it with Tucker that he starts
00:51:29.480by, he has one crackpot historian on his show who says Winston Churchill was the villain of World
00:51:35.740War II. Yeah, we weren't fans of that one. He then has another crackpot professor who says
00:51:42.320there's a good argument America should have supported the Nazis and intervened on behalf
00:51:46.500of the Nazis in World War II. And Tucker gazes adoringly as he's saying this. He has said he
00:51:55.280thinks America should apologize to Osama bin Laden's family. He has said he doesn't know that
00:52:00.480Hamas is a terrorist organization. He thinks they may just be a political group. He's also said
00:52:04.980there's no one on planet Earth he hates more than Christian Zionists, and he's identified by name,
00:52:10.060me and Mike Huckabee, as the two people he hates the most. Not only has he gone down the road where
00:52:16.180he is defending Islamists, defending Iran, he had the president of Iran on and did this fawning
00:52:20.860interview, asked no difficult questions whatsoever. He had Nick Fuentes, who is a
00:52:25.940open Nazi. And by the way, I don't use the term Nazi lightly. But when you say, as Fuentes has
00:52:33.500has said, I like Hitler, I agree with Hitler, and Hitler was very, very cool. I view that as
00:52:39.840somewhat tautological. If you say you agree with Hitler, then you're a Nazi. You're saying it.
00:52:44.140That's not an adjective I apply unless someone's views make that clear. Tucker interviewed Fuentes
00:52:53.280and nodded when Fuentes said his mission was to defeat global Jewry. By the way, not Israel, Jews.
00:53:01.660Fuentes told him every year he celebrates Stalin's birthday now let me ask you what kind of freak
00:53:11.140even knows Stalin's birthday I don't and I don't care he was one of the most evil men to have ever
00:53:16.120lived as you know very well but and by the way Tucker has also defended Mondami and defended
00:53:25.340Maduro like you go down the road where you're defending Islamists you're defending enemies of
00:53:30.420America that, that as you start, start down this road, it is a very problematic road. And, and at
00:53:37.200least on the right, it is still a minority on the right. So if you look at, for example,
00:53:42.800supportive, and by the way, Tucker hates president Trump. He opposes everything about his foreign
00:53:47.900policy and he's attacking president Trump on a daily basis. Now he's too chicken to actually
00:53:52.540say that. So instead of saying that he's attacking Trump, he just has every clown who hates Trump on
00:53:58.640his show to attack his policies, but he won't actually say the name. Look, I've resolved I'm
00:54:06.020not going to sit quietly and watch my party destroyed by the same forces that have destroyed
00:54:11.720the Democrat Party, because I don't want to wake up in five years and find both national parties
00:54:18.800in the United States unequivocally anti-Israel and viciously anti-Semitic. And I think that is
00:54:25.100a possibility. And I'm going to do everything humanly possible to stop that from happening.
00:54:31.020Tucker's views are still fringe, but they're being heard by young people. And if young people don't
00:54:36.840hear a response to it, that's how both parties are lost to this poison. Senator, but it must
00:54:43.120concern you that the longer that this war goes on, the more casualties on either side, but
00:54:48.080particularly on the American side, ratchet up, the more we're going to see this anti-Semitic virus,
00:54:53.560mine borrows, which is how I like to call it, being spread.
00:54:56.880Look, I don't want to see more American casualties. As I said, I don't think this will be a longstanding
00:55:03.160military conflict. I expect it to be a matter of weeks and not extended. And to be clear,
00:55:11.600if the proposal from the Trump administration had been let's invade Iran and put hundreds of
00:55:16.240thousands of troops on the ground and let's stay there for years, I'd say hell no. Like,
00:55:20.840my mission is not to turn Iran into Switzerland. If they want to turn themselves into Switzerland,
00:55:25.540knock yourself out. I think the mission should be to protect America. And that is a much more
00:55:32.160focused mission that I believe the president is directly focusing.
00:55:40.140And is the problem as well that you've got the two main people, your greatest allies are Israel
00:55:45.600involved in this war. Are your objectives different? Do Israel want a complete regime change?
00:55:53.260Sure. I assume so. I actually don't. I haven't seen them articulate that objective, but I assume
00:55:58.720so because for the same reason, it would be unequivocally in America's interest to see a
00:56:05.240regime in power that doesn't want to murder Americans. The same is true for Israel. They'd
00:56:09.900like a regime in power that doesn't want to murder Israelis. That's a natural, when you have
00:56:15.200a leader who with religious fervor chants death to America and death to Israel, you would expect
00:56:20.440both America and Israel to be like, wait, that that's not good. I'm reminded of during the Obama
00:56:25.320administration, John Kerry was secretary of state. And there was an editorial cartoon of the Ayatollah
00:56:31.580going death to America. And John Kerry says, well, can we meet you halfway? But like, there's not a
00:56:38.820middle ground compromise. And let me be clear. America supports Israel because it is unequivocally
00:56:45.900in America's national security interest to support Israel. Why is that? Because we get massive
00:56:51.000benefits. Number one, the Mossad is an incredibly effective intelligence agency, and they share that
00:56:56.740intelligence with us. We're seeing this right now in this war with Iran. How is it? You look at the
00:57:01.90012 day war, the 12 day war last year, which Israel weighs almost the entirety of. We did virtually
00:57:08.540nothing. The only thing we did in the 12-day war was the one thing Israel couldn't do,
00:57:12.520which is they did not have bunker buster bombs that were big enough to penetrate into the base
00:57:17.760of a mountain where Fordow, the Iranians, had built their nuclear weapon research facilities
00:57:23.000in the base of a mountain precisely because Israeli munitions couldn't take it out.
00:57:27.600The only country that had bombs big enough to do that was the United States. And so we sent our B2s
00:57:32.440over, delivered those bunker busters, took out the nuclear weapons facilities and left.
00:57:37.200hugely successful. You look at how the 12-day war proceeded. Israel took out the air defenses
00:57:43.900almost immediately. They systematically took out the leadership, one after the other after the
00:57:48.960other. If you remember the IRGC, you asked about the IRGC. In the 12-day war, you'd have one head
00:57:53.700of the IRGC. Israel would take them out. The next day they'd appoint someone else. Israel would take
00:57:59.640them out. By the third or fourth day, I can't imagine what it was like for them. I told them
00:58:03.860to say, hey, you want to be head of the IRGC? No, no, no, get Bob to do it. It was literally
00:58:09.540the precision of the intelligence penetration that Israel had of Iran was spectacularly
00:58:17.280effective. That benefits America. Israel shares our values. It is a free market democracy that
00:58:26.460is allied with America. Their intelligence benefits America. Their military, the enemies
00:58:32.960of Israel, the people who want to kill Israel also want to kill America. So every time Israel
00:58:39.840takes out a Hamas terrorist or a Hezbollah terrorist or an IRGC terrorist, they're doing
00:58:45.300it in their own national interest, but it also is making America safer because those terrorists
00:58:49.460are eager to kill Americans. And so we are friends with Israel because they are fighting
00:58:58.540people who want to kill us. And so it is making Americans safer. That's why. And look, conspiracy
00:59:04.940theories, you look online and it's amazing. Everyone blames the Jews for everything.
00:59:11.380I think that's unhinged. And so, and I don't want to see, as you described it, that mind virus
00:59:17.900spread. And so, and I find it amazing that the Tucker Carlson's of the world
00:59:25.000can look at what happened on October 7th, where Hamas terrorists cross over into southern Israel.
00:59:33.840They target civilians. They go house to house. They murder the elderly. They murder children.
00:59:39.880They rape women and little girls. They kill 1,200 people, including dozens of Americans.
00:59:45.900It was one of the largest terrorist attack on Americans in U.S. history.
00:59:49.540they take even more people hostage where they violently assault and rape them
00:59:56.060and I don't understand the Tucker Carlson's of the world that can look at that and say you know
01:00:01.480I'm with those Hamas terrorists who are raping and killing people and not the people who are
01:00:06.300the innocent victims and then are fighting back to defend themselves against monsters you know I
01:00:12.220I don't know you know when I see these left-wing activists who who go on and on I you know I ask
01:00:19.140them, I say, look, in World War II, were you rooting for the Nazis? Like at the end of the
01:00:23.060day, there is a difference between targeting civilians and murdering civilians deliberately,
01:00:29.480which is what Hamas does. It's what Hezbollah does. It's what Iran does. And defending yourself
01:00:35.300and taking out terrorists or trying to murder your citizens, which is what Israel does. And
01:00:39.720it's what the United States does. I actually, the left-wing anti-Semitism makes perfect sense to me
01:00:44.280because it is the logical conclusion of the work worldview where you have oppressed groups which
01:00:49.320tend to be dark-skinned etc and they're weak militarily and you have white straight whatever
01:00:55.320which they think israel is because they've never been i assume um and they are the oppressors and
01:01:01.020so they must be uh increasingly uh it is exactly the marxist ideology of oppressor and victor that's
01:01:08.440right i want to talk about something that men collectively pretend isn't an issue
01:01:13.380and collectively know absolutely it is.