00:01:10.460I did have to twist your arm, but you were very kind. You came on and now we're very glad to welcome you back.
00:01:14.760You've written what I think is a book about probably the crucial issue of our day at the moment.
00:01:20.260I don't see a bigger issue that's a challenge to our society in real terms right now, the housing crisis.
00:01:26.500And one of the things I didn't know before reading the book was it's so much worse in this country than it is around the West, which I didn't know was the case.
00:01:34.080So before we get into into talking about it, lay out the scale of the problem for us.
00:01:39.420Well, the scale of the problem is that home ownership in the UK has gone from 73 percent of households a decade ago to a little more than 60 percent now.
00:01:47.800But within that, home ownership among 25 to 39 year olds has actually absolutely plummeted from well over 60 percent to well below 40 percent, that crucial family forming age.
00:02:01.460At the same time, today's young adults are spending more on rent and are less likely to own their own property than in any decade since the 1930s, which, of course, was the decade of the Great Depression and massive countrywide, indeed worldwide austerity.
00:02:20.380And it's not just that, you know, nice professional people called Jonathan and Sophie can't buy homes.
00:02:26.300It's that many, many other people can't even get social housing, lower down the income scale.
00:02:31.900And it's not just a shortage of homes to buy because we haven't been building enough.
00:02:35.720It's also a shortage of properly affordable homes and indeed social housing, sometimes called council housing.
00:02:41.680that means we've now got a proper homelessness epidemic, massive overcrowding in this country,
00:02:49.800so-called concealed households, which I write about in my book, Home Truths.
00:02:54.120And this situation is more acute in the UK than practically any other Western country.
00:03:02.140The average house now costs about eight times annual earnings, annual average earnings.
00:03:08.180That's the average across the country.
00:03:10.800It's much, much worse in London than the southeast, of course,
00:03:13.560but multiples are way above historic levels in the Midlands,
00:03:17.340in the northwest, in the west country, even parts of the northeast
00:03:20.780where the economy is a little bit slower, with all respect.
00:03:25.180I thought you were just going to say where no one wants to live.
00:03:36.680And that eight times average earnings, average multiple is up from four times just 20 years ago.
00:03:43.800So if you're a couple and you're both earning, right, you're both full time working, you can't get a mortgage for eight times annual earnings.
00:03:51.340That's before child care. And that is the nub of the crisis.
00:03:54.700We built too few homes, far too few homes. And that's why rents and prices to buy are now way, way beyond earnings.
00:04:04.920And you touched on the homelessness situation. I want to just explore that a little bit. You mentioned a stat in your book that I found utterly heartbreaking. The charity Shelter said that it was one in every 200 people they estimate are homeless in this country.
00:09:49.620And that's why the politics of planning
00:09:51.140at the local level is so fraught. But what I argue in Home Truth, and it's like the centerpiece of
00:09:56.600all the proposals that I've laid out, is that when you give land planning permission,
00:10:02.620the value of that land can go up like 100, 200, 500 fold, just the stroke of a bureaucrat's
00:10:09.620pen. That massive gain, we call it planning uplift. In most other countries in the Western
00:10:15.500world, and particularly in Asia, big parts of the States, a lot of that planning gain goes to the
00:10:20.740state, particularly the local authority, so they can use that huge value uplift to fund new schools,
00:10:27.320new hospitals, new roads. So people are like, yeah, we'll take the houses because where we live
00:10:32.040will get better. And actually our value of our house will go up and we'll take the disruption.
00:10:36.380Of course, some people object, but it's a much more balanced conversation. Here in the UK,
00:10:40.600we've had these very opaque mechanisms called a Section 106 and a community infrastructure levy,
00:10:46.920which are complicated ways of saying the state tries to claw a little bit of money back particularly
00:10:52.700from the big house builders but they're often rebuffed and the big powerful house builders at
00:10:57.160the local level say we're not going to build these houses this year unless you let us off
00:11:01.140these community obligations and this amount of money we say we pay to for local facilities
00:11:07.540and this happens behind closed doors and it means that often new housing does not come
00:11:13.520with the public facilities, if you like, the community assets, the extra infrastructure
00:11:20.060that makes it worthwhile for existing residents. So we have to learn to share this planning game.
00:11:26.840And in Home Truths, I say we should share that planning game straight down the middle,
00:11:32.72050-50 between the local authority and the house builder slash developer, whoever owns the land.
00:11:39.580It's often a sort of offshore trust, by the way, in this country.
00:11:43.380And that would mean that the local politics of planning would be completely revolutionized.
00:11:48.360And the UK would start spending as much on infrastructure, you know, three, three and a half percent of GDP that many continental European countries do and Asian countries do rather than spending what we currently spend one, one and a half percent of GDP because it's all out of, you know, straight taxation rather than planning game.
00:12:05.380So you bring up politics and the local politics issue is complicated.
00:12:10.020I understand the point that you're making.
00:12:11.840But also in the book, you go through and you give quote after quote from politician after politician who keep saying the housing crisis is a crucial issue.
00:12:21.460We must address it. We must tackle it.
00:12:23.560And yet it doesn't it's not happening. Right.
00:12:26.160So why is there this lack of political?
00:12:28.820I mean, one of the things I've always thought is that in an overinflated housing market, if you're a government that allows the housing market to correct, the people who own houses may well never vote for you again.
00:12:42.480Right. So there is that inherent problem, isn't there, where the politicians have a disincentive to actually address this problem.
00:12:50.980That's right. You've put your finger on something very important there. And by the way, I'm going to steal this mug.
00:14:23.960Now, that's starting to change. You're right. Politicians don't want to mess with existing homeowners, because in general, the political geometry has been that they are the majority of voters.
00:14:33.440Absolutely. But as homeownership's gone down, as we said at the beginning, that's starting to change.
00:14:38.880The second side of the Iron Triangle of vested interests are the house builders and the landowners, right? Massive, massive donors, particularly to the Conservative Party.
00:14:48.460Right. Right. They've got a kind of headlock on Conservative governments.
00:14:52.740A million quid they gave, didn't they?
00:15:03.580And then the third leg of that, the third side of that iron triangle of vested interests,
00:15:08.600another massive interest group, the banks.
00:15:12.180The banks are now up to their neck in property loans.
00:15:16.320Now all the building societies have become banks, been amalgamated into the banks.
00:15:21.440Something like 65%, 70% of all loans in this country extended by banks are linked to property, right?
00:15:28.480So the Treasury will tell every housing minister, oh, don't mess with the housing market because if prices level out or go down a little bit,
00:15:37.020then the collateral that the banks hold will become worth less and you'll have another banking crisis.
00:16:08.620So you've got this iron triangle of vested interests, which means that politicians want to talk big about building more, but they don't actually change incentives to make it happen.
00:16:19.300They don't tackle this Iron Triangle of vested interests.
00:16:22.600But in the last few years, something has started to change, not just those social attitudes that France is alluded to.
00:16:32.640What's also changed is that politicians, particularly the Tories, are starting to hear this coming up all the time, even in the shires.
00:16:41.540And when Jeremy Corbyn came within just a few thousand votes, frankly, of power in 2017,
00:16:47.460a lot of that was a surge of support from young people.
00:16:50.740And it wasn't just people in their 20s who you sort of expect to vote Labour, right?
00:16:54.180If you don't vote Labour in your 20s, then you're a bastard.
00:17:10.920But a lot of those first time Corbyn voters in 2017 were first time Labour voters who gave the Tories a hell of a scare.
00:17:17.840Yes, May was crap, a campaign or the rest of it.
00:17:19.560But a lot of them were into their sort of adult life and they still hadn't been able to buy a home generation rent.
00:17:27.160And they were angry and they're still there and they're still angry. Right.
00:17:31.380Now, in the last election, of course, Corbyn took a hammering, but he still did very, very well because he lost a lot of working class votes.
00:17:39.360He still did very, very well among that kind of educated, professional Labour voting class who haven't got houses.
00:17:47.060And those people are still there and they're not going to get any less angry as they get older.
00:17:51.220A lot of, you know, when I wrote Home Truths just before Christmas, it was published.
00:17:56.740I've had a lot of people writing to me saying, you're exactly right.
00:18:01.240My life, my girlfriend's life, my boyfriend's life, we're on hold.
00:18:05.700We're in rented accommodation. We're not having kids.
00:18:08.320we're stalling and there's an astonishing graph in the book that shows that back in the early 90s
00:18:14.400the average age for a woman in the UK to have their first child was 27 right that's since gone
00:18:20.060up to 28 right but back in the 90s at the age of 27 only 15 percent of women in the UK were in
00:18:28.400rented accommodation right now it's 40 percent wow so you see the point you've got a lot of people
00:18:34.940young adults renting often when they don't want to right yeah great this life the one of the
00:18:41.960archetypal um sitcoms if you like well dramas of the 90s yeah they're all kids in london they're
00:18:49.140renting they're having a great time at certain times in your life you want to rent if you're
00:18:53.140more itinerant person you want to rent i'm not saying there shouldn't be a private rented sector
00:18:57.680there should be but our private rented sector has gone from 10 of households to over 20 households
00:19:03.280in little more than a decade and you've got a lot of youngsters locked into rental contracts
00:19:09.140locked into a rented house situation when actually they want to be owning homes they're often from
00:19:14.900families where their first generation at university their parents were manual workers
00:19:19.980non-professional people with respect their parents bought a nice house and they can't
00:19:25.320so you've got some sort of reversal in generational fortunes here which tears at the social fabric
00:19:31.600Broadway's smash hit, The Neil Diamond Musical, A Beautiful Noise, is coming to Toronto.
00:19:37.380The true story of a kid from Brooklyn destined for something more, featuring all the songs you love,
00:19:42.640including America, Forever in Blue Jeans, and Sweet Caroline.
00:19:46.640Like Jersey Boys and Beautiful, the next musical mega hit is here, The Neil Diamond Musical, A Beautiful Noise.
00:19:53.460Now through June 7th, 2026 at the Princess of Wales Theatre.
00:21:05.760So if, unlike me, you don't believe in burning books, head over to the website, find StrongWords online, enter Trigger as your special code, and you can get your first edition for one pound, which is a great deal.
00:21:45.480It is affecting the birth rate. It's also affecting people's view of capitalism. Capitalism for
00:21:53.960a lot of people isn't working if you can't get any capital you don't like capitalism so it does
00:21:59.220lead to more radical politics a society of homeowners tends to be a more stable society
00:22:06.600a society a lot of academic work shows where people are happier there's more civic and community work
00:22:12.720um you you have a stake you know british people don't mind other people getting rich but as long
00:22:19.740as they have a chance. And home ownership since the Second World War has allowed an awful lot of
00:22:25.440working class people to get a stake, to get a little bit of capital behind them, to have some
00:22:30.320life choices, right? They can downsize and buy himself a smaller place, give some money to the
00:22:36.020kids, and everyone's happy. If you have this generation of 30, 40, now into 50-year-olds
00:22:42.900who are renting when they want to buy, what happens when they stop work? And they can't
00:22:48.180afford to rent? Where's the social housing for them? I mean, the housing benefit bill is going
00:22:53.320to go to the moon. That's the thing about if you have a mortgage and buy, you pay lots of money
00:22:58.240for your home. But when it's yours, it's yours. And then you're living in it rent free. And you
00:23:03.400have that asset. You have that security. And now the UK home ownership, this nation of homeowners
00:23:10.120is well below the EU average. And I personally think that's a reversal of our national fortune.
00:23:18.180And the current decline in home ownership is such that we're going to be on course to be having owner-occupiers as a minority of households by the end of the 2020s.
00:23:30.600I think that will completely change our national character and indeed our politics.
00:23:36.200And Liam, I mean, the government have introduced, tried to introduce certain schemes, for instance, to help to buy schemes.
00:23:41.980So, for instance, when I was a teacher, there was a lot of, you know, advertisement saying, you know, we'll help you get onto the housing ladder.
00:23:48.300You can get this new property and wherever it is.
00:23:50.960And it's a way for you to make a step up and to make that difficult first sleep.
00:24:29.740So one of the great things about writing home truths is reaching out to an understanding.
00:24:37.600there is actually believe it or not quite a consensus of opinion across politics about what
00:24:44.000i've written so on the cover of my book you'll see praise quotes from shelter you know the
00:24:49.600quintessential housing charity pretty much on the left but massively respected around the world
00:24:56.880um as a sort of um for their practical help they give homeless people but also their research
00:25:02.780search expertise. And then you've got Andrew Neil, you've got the Centre for Policy Studies on the
00:25:07.380right, you've got, you know, Tory chancellors praising the book, other ministers. Because
00:25:13.120there is a consensus. And one of the consensuses actually, from think tanks on the left and the
00:25:18.640right was that help to buy was a bad idea and is a bad idea. Because when you've got massive pent
00:25:23.520up demand and still constraints, constrained supply, if you give people the ability to buy
00:25:29.200with even more money funded by taxpayers prices are just going to up loads which is what happened
00:25:33.940so the margins that the big help to buy only helps you if you buy a new build so what help to buy did
00:25:40.180and it's cost like 20 to 30 billion so far is it just massively increased the profits of the big
00:25:45.700house builders who were then giving loads of campaign donations um but they weren't didn't
00:25:51.420actually end up building more homes the big house builders are still building far fewer homes than
00:25:56.100they were before the financial crisis and we've had very few small builders now because they were
00:26:01.020all wiped out by the financial crisis and they haven't been able to get a foot in the door they
00:26:04.940can't get hold of land because the big guys have got it all sewn up that's why it is as i say an
00:26:09.760oligopoly some people would say it's a cartel which is actually illegal the big house builders
00:26:14.320would deny that i think there is very compelling evidence now which the big house builders deny
00:26:19.820your honor of a cartel of actual restrictive practices that's why i call in the book for a
00:26:28.900full competition commission inquiry like an uh you know where we actually examine if the market
00:26:34.300is operating properly i don't think it is um the house lords economic affairs select committee the
00:26:41.120chairman michael forsyth read home truths they're now doing an inquiry into house building industry
00:26:48.500I gave evidence to it and I and I repeated that recommendation that we see now competition commission inquiry just to get numbers on the concentration of the house building industry is pretty difficult at the moment.
00:27:02.740They're being very coy about their actual output.
00:27:06.600So we'll see if the House of Lords takes up that recommendation and what happens.
00:27:11.260But help to buy is a great for a short term headline if you're a chancellor and it's good for some of the people that it helps.
00:27:18.500But a lot of the people that it helps, and I've made documentaries for dispatches about this, have ended up in lashed together, substandard new build homes because the big house builders know they're a captive audience because they're using help to buy.
00:27:37.860And so you end up with this situation where all that's happened is that help to buy has pushed up the price of increasingly bad quality new build homes for those who can get access to help to buy.
00:27:49.780And the like 95 percent of home buyers who can't get access to help to buy have to face even more higher prices.
00:27:57.260And then you and then you highlighted the bonuses that these chairmen were getting these companies.
00:28:40.460And yet they're making bonuses of like tens of millions of pounds a year.
00:28:44.920That is a clear signal the market is not working, right?
00:28:49.180I like capitalism, but capitalism needs to work.
00:28:53.240And what we got here with the house building industry isn't capitalism.
00:28:56.740It's a grotesque distortion that's giving capitalism a bad name and is working only for the firms and not for the customers and broader society.
00:29:08.040And you mentioned the term rabbit hutch Britain in your book.
00:29:25.580So on the on the rabbit hutch Britain, what's happened because because all the planning gain, all the uplift goes to share to landowners and developers and these shadowy, opaque land agents.
00:29:37.520Right. It means everyone's got an incentive to just sit on land and do nothing.
00:29:42.100Right. And so land prices have gone exponential in the face of massive demand for new homes.
00:29:51.960And that means that when a big house builder does get hold of some land, it costs shitloads of money.
00:29:59.460So the average house that's sold in Britain now, the average new build, the land accounts for 70% of the price.
00:30:06.360Back in the 50s and 60s, the land would account for like 5% or 10% of the price.
00:30:11.200That's how messed up the market for land now is.
00:30:14.220That's why we need to share this planning game to calm it down, to take the speculation out of it or some of the speculation out of it, as I say.
00:30:21.060But when you're building a house and the land is 70% of the price of the land, you're going to squeeze as many houses on your building plot as you can.
00:30:28.840That's why you go to a lot of these new build estates.
00:30:32.240And, you know, there are good new build house builders in this country.
00:30:35.020I'm not saying new builds are always bad, but a lot of the more ropey end of the market, they'll be very, very small.
00:30:42.180The gardens will be almost non-existent.
00:31:17.940And you talk about heat seeking drones, Constantine. Yes, because I also write in Home Truths. And I go back to where I grew up in Kingsbury, North London. Pretty, you know, fantastic place to grow up massively ethnically diverse now as it was when I was a kid, a huge privilege to grow up there.
00:31:38.480and I went back there and I walked down the street where I grew up
00:31:56.100and people renting there, not paying council tax
00:31:59.460and so what Brent Council did in north-west London
00:32:03.220and this is happening not just in London
00:32:05.220but in Salford, in Bristol, in Manchester, in Oxford, this beds and sheds crisis.
00:32:12.920In Brent, they used heat-seeking drones to see if people were sleeping at night,
00:32:18.740to see if people were sleeping in outbuildings because of the heat of bodies they could see.
00:32:22.880So they could actually say to people, these people are living there.
00:32:25.740You didn't put the rent on your tax return.
00:32:27.380And they're not paying council tax to try and, you know, curtail this illegal activity because it's not just a tax thing, because often these outbuildings, you know, electricity, plumbing, it's it's medieval.
00:32:44.120kids. And so that is, again, is a sure sign that the market is not working when we're crowding
00:32:51.520residential accommodation illegally into gardens in suburban Britain. That is what is now happening.
00:33:00.260And yet there's, you talk to central government about this, they're like, oh, really? I mean,
00:33:04.180they have no idea. They have no, there's no audit of any of this. There's no grip on the scale of
00:33:10.780this issue the beds and sheds issue which is absolutely massive see in russia the way we'd
00:33:15.580solve it is we'd put missiles on the drones but i do like you're the one who raised heat-seeking
00:33:21.700drones it's like it's in your blood we must vomit to the ground but liam let's turn to an issue that
00:33:28.380i know a lot of people watching this will be having at the back of their mind right now and
00:33:32.400you tackle it head-on in the book which is you know people are not stupid they do the maths and
00:33:37.680they go, look, we've had a mass wave of immigration over the last 15, 20 years. Obviously, if you
00:33:43.440don't have enough houses, lots of people come. Immigration caused the housing crisis. You tackle
00:33:47.840that issue quite directly. I do. There's a whole kind of subchapter on that. And you have to tackle
00:33:55.860it head on. The problem isn't immigration. The problem is that we haven't been building enough
00:34:01.580houses. So immigration has exposed and made worse the problem rather than causing the problem.
00:34:07.680And in the book, there's quite a detailed series of paragraphs that are very closely argued comparing the UK and France.
00:34:15.440Right. And over the last 20 or 30 years, France has actually had more immigration per head than the UK.
00:34:23.000France has built twice as many houses as the UK.
00:34:26.360So house prices in France have gone up, but not nearly as wildly in front of earnings as they have in the UK.
00:34:33.860So you just need to build more houses.
00:34:35.960And then people will say, oh, but we're full. Really? If you look at the landmass of England, what percentage of the landmass of England do you think is taken up with residential accommodation? It's 1.1%. And that includes gardens. There is tons of space, right?
00:34:55.460We haven't built a new town in this country like Milton Keynes or Welling Garden City or Harlow in my lifetime.
00:35:04.960And I'm, you know, I'm 50. It's completely crazy.
00:35:08.320We have had our own demography leading to increases in population and immigration, too, particularly since 2013 and accession.
00:35:17.220But the answer isn't, I mean, I voted Brexit. As you know, one reason was partly because I accept that a big part of the population doesn't want to stop immigration. We are a nation of immigrants. They just want to make sure there are controls so there can be some kind of ability to accommodate and provide for schools, hospitals and all the rest of it.
00:35:40.700So the pace of immigration means that lifestyles aren't undermined, particularly for people at the lower end of the income scale.
00:36:01.180It's not the problem isn't immigration.
00:36:03.480The problem is, as the French example shows, we just haven't built enough houses.
00:36:08.280So if you build more houses, you know, we are building fewer houses per head of population in this country than Bulgaria.
00:36:15.200Right. With all respect to my Bulgarian friends.
00:36:19.740I think we were the slowest construction rates of any country in the EU before we left, I think, with the exception of Malta.
00:36:29.280I mean, it's completely mad. This is a country that's like full of people that know about building.
00:36:34.060And people say, oh, where's the label? Well, let me tell you, I'm from an Irish building family.
00:36:37.940There are a lot of people who are plumbers, who are bricklayers, who are driving cabs because in their part of the country, the building works just too slow.
00:36:46.840And the big house builders treat them so badly.
00:36:49.640So if you had some decent house builders with access to land, if you had the sharing of planning gain,
00:36:56.540if planning permissions had to be built out in a certain period of time or companies were fine.
00:37:00.880so it's like a contract to build rather than an ability to build,
00:37:05.400then you could have a much, much higher rate of house building in this country
00:37:09.240to accommodate the wave of immigration that we've had
00:37:12.600and to accommodate the immigrants that we will continue to have,
00:37:16.620albeit in a more controlled environment.
00:37:23.720We've got an exciting new sponsor, haven't we, Constantine?
00:37:26.940Yes, we do. It is, in fact, The Economist.
00:37:29.160And The Economist is a fantastic publication because it just doesn't just deal with economics.
00:37:34.260It also deals with politics, science, technology.
00:37:37.440If you want to read what some of the finest journalistic minds are writing about today, then The Economist is a publication for you.
00:37:45.360Yeah, I was reading an article that very recently, incredibly insightful into the U.S. Democratic primary.
00:37:50.400So if you want that kind of insight into all kinds of things, politics, economics, etc., I really recommend it.
00:37:57.300It's been a trusted source of intelligence for people for over 170 years.
00:38:02.500And when you say a trusted source of intelligence, you make it sound like the Soviets used it.
00:38:07.200Thanks for that little bit of casual racism, which we now have to cut from the ad.
00:38:12.680And there's a very, very divisive issue, which you've sort of touched on, which is the green belt.
00:38:19.340You know, because it gets very emotive.
00:38:21.680People get very upset about it, you know, building on Gingland's green and pleasant land.
00:38:25.760Yeah. Look, we have in this country demarcated national parks, right? No one's saying build on them. No one's saying build on areas of outstanding natural beauty. No one's saying build on, you know, parts of the green belt that have aesthetic merit and provide access to ordinary people to exercise and get thick and live and get some fresh air.
00:38:50.180but the green belt isn't being concreted over and hang on to your hats guys the green belt is now
00:38:56.500over 140 percent bigger by area than it was in the late 70s because councils keep adding to it
00:39:03.480the green belt was meant to be around london five miles wide it's now almost 50 miles wide in places
00:39:09.260you get these massive commutes because people are like jumping over the green belt twice a day
00:39:14.860to go live in some rabbit hutch, you know, an hour and a half from London.
00:39:40.920So let's keep some of the green belt, but let's get this in perspective.
00:39:43.880The green belt is growing and growing all the time as councils keep adding to it because they know it's popular, because it locks in the advantages that people have.
00:39:52.940What I'm saying is if we share planning gain, if we give more access to land to small builders, if we make planning permissions into contracts to build rather than permissions to build, get houses built, use that planning gain to build infrastructure,
00:40:06.360then the politics of planning changes and there'll be a lot less local support for the NIMBYs and to
00:40:13.420continue to lock people out. People know their kids need somewhere to live. Families are breaking
00:40:18.340up because kids have to move miles and miles and miles away from their ageing parents. This is
00:40:24.420having massive, massive negative implications for ordinary British folk. And the Green Belt is one
00:40:32.580of the big issues we have to grab. And I'm glad that in the book, even the likes of Vince Cable
00:40:37.420and the Lib Dems of, you know, past masters at increasing the size of the Green Belts or Yimby
00:40:42.700Central, even Vince Cable says in my book in an interview that you can't be serious about solving
00:40:49.980the housing crisis without examining parts of the Green Belt and giving them over to house building.
00:40:56.480Liam, I just want to come back to the immigration issue, simply because I, having seen, you know,
00:41:02.200youtube comments and people reply oh yeah there's a very simplistic way of thinking and i think the
00:41:06.920angrier people become the more simplistic the thinking becomes so it's very much like well
00:41:11.920we've had a lot of immigration if you put two and two together you get four you know uh but one of
00:41:16.600the points you actually make and before i say this as i'm someone who who very much agrees with
00:41:22.320even though i voted remain with what you said about brexit you know people have a right to feel
00:41:26.400that they want to have the level of immigration into their country that they are comfortable with
00:41:30.800They want people to have the time to integrate.
00:49:12.500Now, right to buy was very popular in the 80s under Thatcher, but Thatcher stitched up Heseltine and students of politics and I'm talking about because Heseltine, who put that legislation through to make council the right to buy for tenants, he said, yes, we'll do the right to buy, but the money must go back to the local authorities so they can replace it with another council house.
00:49:36.240right now in the end what happened was the money four-fifths of it went back to the treasury and
00:49:41.580disappeared into the pot so those council houses were not replaced so what i'm actually calling
00:49:46.620for and this will sound odd to some people given that i'm a telegraph columnist i'm calling for
00:49:51.980the right to buy now which was reintroduced by david cameron to be suspended until we've actually
00:49:57.400built more council houses the scottish parliament the welsh assembly has already suspended the right
00:50:01.620to buy and i think that's the right thing to do at the moment while we have such a shortage of
00:50:05.260council houses. Not in England. I think that should now happen. The problem is that local
00:50:10.920authorities at the moment have no incentive to build social housing because if they build social
00:50:16.560housing and people live in it for a couple of years, they then have to sell it to them at a
00:50:21.360sub-market price, often less than the cost of building the thing, given that land prices are
00:50:26.220so high. And then four-fifths of that money that the local council gets back, that denuded amount,
00:50:32.440because the price is subsidized goes to the treasury so you know local authorities that
00:50:37.660look into going through all the thickets of admin and madness that it takes to build some social
00:50:43.480housing it's very very difficult it's not going to solve their problem because the way the
00:50:49.000structures are incentivized now they could end up losing that social housing from the public realm
00:50:55.880very very quickly. Liam as we head towards the end of the interview you mentioned that the
00:51:01.780political landscape is gradually changing. Are you optimistic that this issue will be
00:51:06.660tackled in the next 10, 15 years? Okay. No, I'm not. And as we're sitting here,
00:51:14.420news is breaking around us, right? So when Estimate Fay was appointed housing minister,
00:51:20.760she was the 18th housing minister in 20 years. We've just heard from the reshuffle,
00:51:27.480she's been moved. So the housing portfolio is seen as like some ridiculous stepping stone to
00:51:35.040the great offices of state. There should be in the cabinet, housing secretary, and it should be
00:51:40.760a very big job with a big political beast with big ambitions behind it. That's what Macmillan
00:51:47.580had in the 50s. That's what you had in the 20s when Lloyd George was doing Homes Fit for Heroes.
00:51:54.280Why did Lord George do Homes for Heroes?
00:51:56.920And I've got some of the cabinet minutes in my book.
00:58:18.080the the phrase i'd used is is anti-trust right what is anti-trust anti-trust uh harks back to
00:58:27.360the likes of uh teddy roosevelt so the republican uh president at the turn of the 19th into the
00:58:34.52020th century who forced by journalists and he was forced by journalists he took on the big
00:58:41.220conglomerates, the big syndicates, as they were then called, famously the oil baron John
00:58:48.440Rockefeller, but other big parts of the economy that had become silted up and controlled by
00:58:54.960producers where capitalism had stopped working for ordinary people. This was all beautifully
00:59:01.780portrayed in Mark Twain's satirical novel, The Gilded Age. And Roosevelt, in the end,
00:59:09.120took on the big vested interests and made capitalism work better, got companies to break
00:59:16.820up, injected competition. Capitalism doesn't happen completely organically. Every now and then
00:59:23.400it needs a kick in the shins in order to shake it up and make sure that competition is actually
00:59:29.780working. Every now and then you need a government with courage and a political class and a media
00:59:34.940class to get hold of these issues. Otherwise, capitalism loses its legitimacy and you get much
00:59:41.040more extreme interventionist, counterproductive policies taking over. I think we are now entering
00:59:47.840a new gilded age. And that gilded age is a very pejorative term. Twain meant it as an insult.
00:59:55.920Income inequality hasn't risen all that much, but wealth inequality has massively increased.
01:00:03.060And as ordinary people are unable to buy homes, as they don't have pensions, that wealth inequality is only going to get worse.
01:00:10.920Look, we still live in a country, the Brexit vote showed eventually of one person, one vote, right?
01:00:17.340And if we have that policy of one person, one vote, in the end, we have to make sure that the system works for a broad range of people.
01:00:25.600At the moment, it's only working well. It's working very well for an ever smaller and ever diminishing sort of gilded elite. And in order to break that, you need antitrust. You need policies that inject competition that make sure we're on the side not of big business, but of small business on the side, not of cronyism, but competition.
01:00:50.840That's a great point, a very important point.
01:00:52.840I think, you know, one of the things we talk about a lot on this show
01:00:55.680is kind of the emergence of woke politics.
01:00:58.280I think quite a bit of it stems from what you're talking about.
01:01:01.460You know, if people can't have capital, they can't buy a house,
01:01:04.380how do you expect them to be capitalists
01:01:06.360and then these extreme ideologies become that much more appealing?
01:01:17.960I'm not saying that we shouldn't be polite to each other, but when ordinary folk who are literally trying to make ends meet hear endless television debates and endless stuff in their newspapers about issues that have no bearing on their lives, they think the political and media class is increasingly remote from them.
01:01:39.420And so they withdraw. And that's the situation we're now in. The political and media class increasingly doesn't represent ordinary people. We've done very well in terms of diversity of colour and gender, but there's no diversity of opinion and class.
01:01:56.560I mean, the equivalent of me now wouldn't get the media opportunities that I managed to get in my 20s and my 30s.
01:02:08.340So we need to make sure that we have a political and particularly a media class that actually represents and is representative of ordinary people.
01:02:18.420And if we did have one, then books like Home Truths will be all over the place.
01:02:23.880Well, they will be after this interview.