ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
True Patriot Love
- January 18, 2026
Canada’s Dangerous Bet on China
Episode Stats
Length
23 minutes
Words per Minute
175.12604
Word Count
4,076
Sentence Count
4
Hate Speech Sentences
11
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
it was just a few months ago prime minister mark carney told canadians the biggest threat to our
00:00:09.360
country was china and here we are in january 2026 and prime minister carney and a bunch of very
00:00:15.680
important politicians in this country are in china begging for their money in their business well
00:00:21.280
should we be concerned as canadians to talk more about a thrill to be joined by a former national
00:00:25.920
security analyst and the author of an impactful an incredible new book called under assault that's
00:00:31.360
available on amazon.ca and chapters indigo dennis molinaro dennis how are you i'm good thank you
00:00:37.600
for having me uh thank you very much for being on with us i guess before we get to the nuts and
00:00:43.200
bolts of the book i think there was an anecdote today before you joined us where reporters were
00:00:49.440
questioning melanie jolie that they were forced to bring burner phones to beijing for the meeting
00:00:55.280
for the fear of security and spying on by the people's liberation government of china this is
00:01:01.760
the kind of thing that goes on routinely how concerned should we be as canadians that prime
00:01:06.960
minister carney and the canadian government are trying to get so in bed with their government for
00:01:11.760
the sole purpose of business and money i think canadians have a right to be concerned and i mean
00:01:18.240
just by virtue of the fact that those like you said those politicians needed burner phones that tells
00:01:25.040
you a lot right there of the kind of country that you're dealing with in other words that this is
00:01:30.160
not a country that is or should be regarded the same as any other western nation when it comes to
00:01:36.160
trade or as a viable replacement for trade with our closest trading partner the united states the fact
00:01:42.720
that politicians have to be so careful about their security use burner phones when they're over there
00:01:49.200
it begs the question of is this really the kind of partnership you know that you're seeking here
00:01:54.080
with this guy with a country like this we're seeing it in so many uh different businesses that
00:02:00.720
were turn a blind eye to china and their practices because of the money the nba is deep deep ties to
00:02:08.080
china we're seeing it with movies john cena actually voiced i believe was a mandarin apology for a comment
00:02:15.600
he made about the chinese theater so they didn't lose the chinese movie industry what what is it about
00:02:22.960
the china and their economy that people are blind to all the bad things that they do
00:02:28.880
i think part of it part of it has to do with a little bit of nostalgia going going back to the
00:02:34.720
90s right there's that period of time where china's economy opened up and i think that's where a lot of
00:02:39.680
these types of impressions about the potentials of china that's really when it started to really take off
00:02:46.560
um and the united states was very similar to canada in that respect in terms of this fear of missing out
00:02:53.040
and getting into china as quickly as possible uh to do business there and so both countries
00:02:57.840
were you know guilty of that but i think that's where it kind of really took off and it's lingered
00:03:03.680
ever since and it's been really difficult to change the narrative on that in spite of all the activities
00:03:12.000
that china's been doing i think that's going to start changing especially as the temperature wraps
00:03:16.960
up or ramps up sorry with with taiwan um i think we're going to be forced to a moment of realization
00:03:24.960
of what china actually is i've heard this from different sources and you feel free to correct me
00:03:30.560
if i'm wrong but china plays the long game that they're willing to spend 10 20 30 years of getting
00:03:37.040
their hooks into a business or a country or a culture for their benefit but i was shocked with
00:03:42.560
your book and your research which is incredible that the ties from china to canada date back to the 70s
00:03:50.160
oh yeah um it it dates right back to the very i would say beginning of when when the prc is recognized
00:03:56.480
uh by the west now other countries recognized china before canada i mean the uk did france did but
00:04:02.480
what's important to note is that recognition wasn't so i guess you could say uh focused or heavily
00:04:09.760
dealing on on the taiwan issue the uk really skirted it france skirted it as well whereas canada made this
00:04:17.120
point to note uh the prc's position when it comes to taiwan and that's important because that type that
00:04:24.640
recognition language was really what the united states ended up adopting uh years later and it's also
00:04:31.280
important because my research dug into the very real possibility and likelihood that that recognition
00:04:39.120
was actually a foreign interference operation a foreign influence operation by china against canada
00:04:44.000
and its leadership well that raises a very good point that it was even acknowledged in the last
00:04:50.080
election that china's influence on our federal elections in the last decade are very very strong
00:04:56.400
and then we saw an individual uh potential mp who had to step down because of ties to china for for
00:05:02.240
the uninitiated checking this out listening to your interview dennis how deep are the chinese
00:05:07.440
government's ties to our country when it comes to election time i i think we have a uh i think canadian
00:05:14.800
should be rightly concerned i mean this this came out in the hogan query where we heard that there was
00:05:20.400
interference in at least two elections that we know of um federal elections we know that they're going
00:05:28.000
back to the 1970s like i said in the book there was an attempt to uh influence the governments at the
00:05:33.760
time uh even from my interviews from politicians who were on the ground in the 80s in the 90s they had
00:05:40.800
talked about the fact that influence attempts were known uh at the time that that they were trying to
00:05:46.000
be influenced that there was attempts to influence so this has been going on a long time and that's
00:05:51.120
a real problem and so the question then becomes what are we doing about it and what what is the
00:05:58.400
what what is being done about it it's one thing where you can say well maybe we didn't have we
00:06:04.640
didn't know we didn't have the research we didn't dig into it but we've dug into it the research has
00:06:08.640
been done it's very public um and that begs the question again of what's happening i mean we heard
00:06:14.480
during the whole inquiry about all these different networks and proxies and what have you of and so
00:06:20.000
what's what's happened with them to go into china now talking about partnership and strategic partnerships
00:06:28.320
and ignoring essentially all the security elements and risks that have taken place here and not doing
00:06:34.880
anything to protect canadians from them begs the question of how seriously does the government take
00:06:40.880
the threat of china and what does that mean for our position with the united states and i guess
00:06:46.880
that was my next question too dennis is i get the hesitancy to keep doing business with the united
00:06:52.160
states considering the current administration what donald trump has done the way he's treated canada
00:06:57.920
privately and publicly but are there not other countries and other economies that we can
00:07:03.520
form a relationship with other than china to benefit canada absolutely there are i mean and this is
00:07:09.600
this is a bit of the the problem i have with with what's happening here is that and the way really
00:07:15.120
that the argument and the positions are being framed um this is one administration this is one american
00:07:23.760
administration that our current government has a problem with it's not americans right it is not the
00:07:31.600
american people it is not businesses it is not it's you have a district you have disagreements with other
00:07:37.360
governments all the time um and i think those can be hammered out and hashed out but to seek
00:07:45.680
partnerships with countries that are adversaries of the west is not the solution because if we want
00:07:50.880
to talk about diversifying trade from the united states sure we should have been doing that a long
00:07:55.360
time ago just as an independent nation but the realities are that previous prime ministers have tried
00:08:01.040
to do that repeatedly and failed and i think largely because how difficult it is uh because of geography
00:08:07.920
because of the realities of where we are the culture the integration what have you um so they never
00:08:13.760
really sought to do this and this is something that would take decades to do anyways it's not going to
00:08:18.480
happen in carney's four-year term or it's just not possible so really i would say part of the other
00:08:25.200
problem is we talk about diversify a trade with the united states but what about from china why are we not
00:08:30.160
looking for other uh purchasers of canola besides china which has weaponized canola against us
00:08:37.440
before it did it in 2019 when we were had the dispute with the michaels uh and mong wenzhou's arrest
00:08:43.200
so why go back to the same market that we know will weaponize it again it's in and be forced into this
00:08:53.520
false choice of east versus west canada or canada or china versus uh the united states
00:08:58.480
speaking of denis molinaro the former national security analyst and noted author and academic
00:09:04.720
and the author of an incredible new book called under assault and and i think the term assault
00:09:09.680
dennis but there's also different ways to do it because you see the proliferation of fentanyl labs in
00:09:15.360
north america and canada money laundering in canada those all add up to hurt us as a country
00:09:21.920
oh absolutely i mean the thread is multifaceted and it's a multi-pronged thread
00:09:26.240
i mean you the laundry list is is enormous whether it's precursors of fentanyl whether it's things like
00:09:32.720
money laundering whether it's um you know just giving up secrets and uh biotechnology secrets from
00:09:39.520
the winnipeg lab um cyber attacks against this country uh foreign interference and influence against
00:09:46.080
elections uh that's just that's a handful right there and those things have gone on for years
00:09:52.800
and you talk about the book and i almost forgot about this that nortel was plundered of intellectual
00:10:00.080
property by digital spies and that's the one thing i've heard from different experts as well as yourself
00:10:05.920
all your peers that china and the chinese government think nothing of robbing someone's intellectual
00:10:12.000
property and using it for their benefit of basically creating their version of whatever product they
00:10:16.960
plunder yeah and that's really the the kind of myth exposed you could say when it comes to china
00:10:23.280
because there is that tendency for businesses and as it was put to me with one interview subject
00:10:30.320
in the book where they said you you go to china thinking that you're going to get rich you're going
00:10:36.480
to do business things are going to take off you you build your factory and across the street in very
00:10:43.120
short order the competing factory is built that has the same technology and ip you were using workers
00:10:49.360
are cheaper to pay them and you go out of business and you have to leave and this happens repeatedly so
00:10:56.160
again it relies on to go into china thinking you're going to get rich and this is going to pay off
00:11:01.600
relies on a level of ignoring the realities and the past and i feel that that's what the canadian
00:11:08.800
government has done a lot of which is believing what it wants to believe with china hearkening
00:11:14.320
back to nostalgia rather than facing the reality that it should be facing you know and i was just
00:11:21.200
thinking while you're saying that that it's one of the great jokes from ricky gervais and the golden
00:11:25.040
globes a few years ago looking at tim cook talking about slave labor to make iphones and you know he
00:11:31.200
looked uncomfortable there was the nervous laughs but there was so much truth to that but people are still
00:11:35.840
buying their iphones built in china yeah absolutely i mean there was a whole book about apple in china
00:11:41.120
um so it's it's it's again it's it's that that allure right that there's that there's that there's
00:11:48.160
profit there's money to be made when in reality you have to understand that the prc is interested in its
00:11:54.400
own interests and it will do whatever it can to benefit those interests and it does have the benefit to
00:12:01.920
where you know in that sense to accomplish it its leadership is you know it's part it's a one party
00:12:08.480
system that party does not change the leaders change and that's why you know you could see it as
00:12:14.000
something in to the effect of playing the long game versus western nations that have an election every four
00:12:18.880
years because their mission their desire is longer right if they're going to replace western hegemony
00:12:26.000
uh in the globe and to try to retake taiwan or conquer taiwan not retake conquer it um that's
00:12:32.960
going to take a long time and that's something that passes over from one leader to the next
00:12:38.160
10 years ago the thought of china being able to conquer taiwan and absorb it into the one china policy
00:12:45.920
i kind of shook my head and said i don't think they could do it they have built so many tanks and
00:12:51.280
planes and ships and so much military hardware in the past last decade that they now have the
00:12:57.440
capabilities so much so to do it if that happens and that's their you know their goal they've made
00:13:02.880
no bones about it what does canada do with their business ties does that mean they they stopped doing
00:13:08.080
business with china because they invaded taiwan well this is the situation right this is a situation
00:13:14.240
that we would be putting ourselves in if we seek some kind of enlarged partnership uh with the prc
00:13:22.080
now we don't know when they want to attempt to do this they've made it clear though that you know
00:13:29.360
xi jinping has has made it clear that he wants reunification to happen under his watch um and you're
00:13:36.080
right about the buildup the buildup from china is the largest military buildup that a country's ever
00:13:41.760
engaged in since germany in the second world war you don't build a military like this and be engaged in
00:13:48.320
a massive buildup unless you intend to use it um and alongside that they have expanded that dual use
00:13:56.960
kind of uh philosophy yes when it comes to building um civilian ships so you have coast guards for
00:14:03.840
instance ships that are built a ton of them that are being built that are going to be in service and
00:14:09.520
are in service of the plan so that's important to note as well they're utilizing that those that
00:14:16.720
those those ships and those boats for their military purposes as well because i i read somewhere that
00:14:23.360
they're building ferries like we would use to go from new brunswick to pei that that could be converted
00:14:28.480
to troop ships that day yes absolutely they are doing that and they have done that um so they have greatly
00:14:36.000
expanded the size of of of their navy um and landing craft as well amphibious landing craft to be able
00:14:41.840
to land to do an island invasion um one of their most recent essentially blockade drills of the island
00:14:49.040
was was condemned internationally that just happened right over the uh the holiday break um so this is a
00:14:55.200
very real threat that they are actively pursuing that they have a real policy that they are actively
00:15:00.640
pursuing and it's a threat to us it's also a threat to places like japan um when there is that attempt
00:15:06.640
to try to take taiwan that puts that puts direct security pressures and threats uh to the japanese which
00:15:12.720
is why they've been so vocal about actually protecting taiwan you know dennis so much has been made
00:15:18.400
since carney arrived in china about net zero in the climate in the environment and doing uh work with china
00:15:26.320
for the environment and climate and net zero and even the most pro-liberal supporter out there would
00:15:32.560
have to wait say wait a second china's the worst polluter in the world so how can they spin that
00:15:38.560
that they're hoping to get net zero in a business relationship with china which china pollutes more
00:15:43.680
than any country in the world well they've already thrown that out the window the ability to use that
00:15:49.680
net zero argument is gone and the reason it's gone is because just today they announced uh mou with
00:15:54.560
expanding oil and natural gas sales to china so you you can't be talking out of both sides of your mouth
00:16:01.680
at the same time i mean if you're saying net zero and yet you're going to expand gas and and and oil
00:16:08.000
sales to china those two things don't line up um now again it's it's not unheard of i mean united
00:16:14.640
states sells to china as well um they've just promised also the to expand uranium uh sales from what i
00:16:21.040
understand as well it's not that we haven't sold uranium to china before the problem is the
00:16:27.280
language and these types of agreements that's coming around it and the idea that china is a great
00:16:34.240
alternative to the united states that's really how it's being pitched i mean you see these kind of
00:16:38.720
posts on x that that mark carney is doing right now trying to and and melanina jolie and anita and
00:16:44.400
saying that well this is you know things like this is a new era what does that mean because all the
00:16:49.280
existing threats are still there they haven't been dealt with so what kind of a new era is this and
00:16:54.720
that's the problem that that's the real problem i have with what's been happening there's also talk
00:17:00.880
about reducing tariffs on chinese electric vehicles and electric vehicle plants and doug ford i mean i
00:17:07.920
don't agree with everything he says but when he says that could be a gut blow to the ontario automobile
00:17:13.600
industry i kind of agree with him oh he's right about that he's 100 right about that he's wrong
00:17:20.080
though when he talks about inviting investment from china uh as an alternative to that so that's where i
00:17:26.800
think his lines are crossed and he's he's not he's either not getting the full story about how the prc
00:17:32.240
operates or he doesn't understand how they operate and again it goes back to this failure to understand
00:17:37.840
the way china operates so if china were to invest in in ontario in a plant or what have you one ev the
00:17:47.920
ev industry is a strategic one for china so 100 there's going to be some government involvement
00:17:53.280
in whatever company uh is operating so you're probably going to have a company that has at least
00:17:58.320
you know the ccp has what's called a golden share of that company to exert some type of control over them
00:18:03.360
or leverage they offer so you're going to be inviting the communist party to invest in ontario
00:18:09.440
alongside that they are more than likely as they've done elsewhere in the world
00:18:13.680
would bring in their own labor to construct that factory and use their own technology which would
00:18:19.280
completely shut out sorry in ontario in ontario 100 they've been doing that around the world
00:18:24.400
they did it in brazil uh where they would bring in their own workers uh to basically construct the place
00:18:31.120
and so canadian labor would be totally cut out of that and then i would not be surprised either
00:18:37.920
if they brought in their own workers to run in there to work in it so where's the benefit to canada
00:18:44.400
and alongside that you would be bringing in a ally of russia an ally of iran and north korea into the
00:18:53.600
ontario market and supply chain integrated with the united states and how does anybody think the
00:19:00.000
u.s is going to react to prc technology and cars and equipment being integrated into a north american
00:19:09.120
market well i mean even if gavin newsom and the democrats were the current administration they'd
00:19:15.520
have a problem with it not just trump and this is the failure of of canadian policy makers today to
00:19:21.920
really understand this and people who are parroting uh a success in traveling and doing more business with
00:19:28.880
china what they seem to fail to grasp is that national security in the united states is much much more
00:19:37.040
non-partisan than it has been in canada and you see the consistency across administrations when trump
00:19:44.640
put in place tariffs against the prc biden continued a number of them and even increased them
00:19:51.360
the arrangement with tariffs on evs was not done under the trump administration it was done between
00:19:58.400
the canadian administration and the biden administration so if canada backpedals on an
00:20:03.840
agreement with an ally for the protection of supply chains and industry and national security with the
00:20:10.160
united states they would in my opinion they would be handing a justification to the u.s to keep tariffs
00:20:17.360
under national security grounds if they thought the the argument was flimsy under fentanyl they would
00:20:23.280
strengthen it by doing this and i am quite confident that democrats would be put in a position where
00:20:29.680
they'd say well we can't really help you because you you made your bed dennis i mean obviously your depth
00:20:38.240
of knowledge your experience and everything is the reason you are what you are there are other people like
00:20:43.600
you in canada and i i don't think mark carney is in a circle or dumb people so why don't they listen
00:20:50.720
to national security experts like you and others before getting into bed with the chinese government
00:20:56.000
so much it's a good question that i wish i had an answer to but it's it's something that you know um
00:21:04.960
politicians and governments have their own agendas and their own view of the world i guess you could say
00:21:11.520
and try as you might sometimes to dislodge that or inform it um if they're determined to do what
00:21:17.200
they're going to do for whatever reason they have to do it you're kind of stuck on the outside looking in
00:21:24.400
because i look at this deal now and say for sake of argument we have an election later this calendar
00:21:30.880
year it almost is carny and china against whomever and another country i mean it would not not be a
00:21:38.560
massive election issue for a lot of canadians this arrangement today it's it should be a massive
00:21:45.120
election issue my concern is that what's being ramped up to justify it is anti-americanism that's
00:21:52.880
being whipped up to to justify this turn and direction towards the prc when really it should be about
00:22:01.840
you know there's there's an opportunity in general here where canada could take a position of diversifying
00:22:09.120
itself from everyone um to become more self-reliant to become a more you know a stronger country in
00:22:16.880
terms of its relations with the world uh vis-a-vis the united states china everyone um but instead there's
00:22:23.600
this false dichotomy that's being presented as if we need to latch on to one superpower or another
00:22:31.600
um and i don't feel that that's the choice that should be put before canadians it should be actually
00:22:36.080
one that supports a strong independent canada from everyone um instead i i couldn't agree more the book
00:22:43.040
is called under assault by dennis molinaro available on chapters indigo amazon wherever you get your books i
00:22:48.480
i cannot recommend it enough and your eyes will be open to uh this country's relationship with china
00:22:55.360
and what it means to us going forward dennis thank you so much for taking the time and educating me
00:22:59.360
and everybody else it was i greatly appreciate it and it was something that will be a big story in
00:23:03.360
the weeks to come thank you very much i really appreciate being on the show it was great
Link copied!