True Patriot Love

00:00:00.000 well paul here we are in calgary yeah same jackets my man and uh feeling uh very proud to do that uh

00:00:12.000 yeah we had a very interesting launch uh here in calgary as part of the uh conservative convention

00:00:18.480 and we're out here also taking a look at what's happening on the front with uh separation which

00:00:24.560 has become a very boily topic in the last uh 12 hours yeah very sticky yes uh and so uh you know

00:00:32.080 while we're out here we thought it's time to meet some of the people that we admire in this town and

00:00:36.400 get some opinion and discussion going on other topics and this is a really good example of another

00:00:42.000 topic that on a regular basis we talk about and on a regular basis we're being faced with it doing

00:00:48.720 what we're doing with true patriot love uh by the way don't forget to subscribe tell a friend go ahead

00:00:53.920 to hit the note the notification button uh and uh you'll help us uh keep trucking along here today

00:01:00.240 we're going to speak with uh john carpe and we're going to do this on the terms of uh maybe the loss

00:01:06.960 of our freedoms and to quote him just a few moments ago i don't want to sound alarmist that uh proceeded

00:01:13.040 to alarm me uh nonetheless and john thank you so much for joining us so glad to be with you guys

00:01:19.760 so you know as we sat here talking just getting ready for the the show uh it occurred to us that

00:01:25.600 you know there's a bunch of bills being passed and have been passed that are potentially going

00:01:31.520 to limit our freedom and we've seen a trend over the last decade of this i hate to say wokeness but

00:01:38.720 this kind of dialogue treatment that could become a matter of legality and a criminal affair for some

00:01:45.760 people kind of position yourself and give us an idea of where we're at if you don't mind so in

00:01:52.560 terms of bills before parliament right now i'll mention six bills and i'll i'll try and do a one

00:01:59.120 or two sentence description of each one and then you can you know decide which ones to dive into more

00:02:05.520 two years ago two and a half years ago we had bill c11 which was the online news act

00:02:11.360 and sorry the online streaming act was c11 and what that did is it took the powers of the canadian

00:02:19.280 radio television and telecommunications commission the crtc had previously been had jurisdiction

00:02:25.840 authority over radio and television bill c11 the online streaming act extended crs crtc power over the

00:02:35.680 internet now we didn't see changes overnight right the bill passed nothing changed life is very much

00:02:42.720 the same but uh that online streaming act giving the crtc authority over the internet effectively that

00:02:51.120 means that they can slowly say well you have to register your podcast that's all you know oh you just

00:02:59.360 have to provide a brief annual report each year don't worry about it just take you two minutes you know

00:03:05.200 fill it out how many podcasts did you do and then it's like well you have to report on um what what

00:03:11.040 are the topics that you addressed and then it's like we have to report you know do you have enough

00:03:15.600 canadian content aboriginal content lgbtq content right and you know this is how it goes right it starts out

00:03:24.080 slow and innocent um but this can happen the the power is there now for the crtc and they are already 0.80

00:03:31.280 with the algorithms uh the u.s has commented on how this is a problem that the algorithms are pushing

00:03:38.800 what the crtc wants as canadian content to the forefront and american stuff is less and that's

00:03:46.640 not a free internet you know people should just well out of the gate we we get our news through

00:03:51.920 facebook and you know all of these youtube places that are now stopped up so it's really done nothing for

00:03:58.400 canadians getting the information that they want i don't know that it's anything i provided anything

00:04:03.200 to the pocketbook of canadians in production of media or news but it certainly has done that

00:04:10.000 well that was followed up with the online news act which was bill c18 that was also 2023

00:04:18.320 and the goal there the idea was that that google and facebook are

00:04:24.480 uh you know spreading news with the links right but they're not paying for it that's unfair and

00:04:31.200 that's unjust so they passed c18 the online news act so meta including facebook said no we're not

00:04:40.240 doing that at all so now you can't forward a news story via facebook that's wild and then google did

00:04:47.680 kind of cooperate they've got i think it's 100 million a year i'm not sure the number but there's

00:04:53.360 a special slush fund created but that only benefits government approved with the journalist outlets that

00:05:00.240 government likes right um which are the ones getting government funding which is you know the global and

00:05:06.080 the ctv and and most most of these so-called legacy media or establishment media right yeah and that has uh you

00:05:15.520 know it's so interesting because i think that that's done us some good paul because it puts

00:05:19.600 us through in places where there's gaps which is fine but it's not doing anything for the pocketbook

00:05:24.880 and frankly we're discussing topics that are prevalent to the news that should be arriving

00:05:30.640 through those platforms anyway just by the nature of us getting the information that we need not just

00:05:35.840 from the outlets that get approved because it's not easy to get approved as an outlet as we have found

00:05:41.280 no many times so now there's more so that's not where it stops yeah those two are law already

00:05:49.760 in my view they should both be repealed which would not be if a government a government any government

00:05:55.200 wanted to repeal it that would be pretty not that hard to do you use your majority in parliament

00:06:01.040 repeal it i think they should go further and abolish the crtc i don't know what purpose it serves in in

00:06:06.800 a an internet age where you can get thousands if not millions of different podcasts and websites and

00:06:14.880 like what you know why do we need some regulatory body that's going to we're in an environment where

00:06:20.880 broadcasters are handing back licenses because they can't make work of them so yeah the crtc aside from

00:06:27.520 dealing with uh you know what cell phone monopolies can take our money it's kind of tough to see what they

00:06:33.760 actually do yeah at this moment it's it's just it's a power trip for bureaucrats and politicians to

00:06:42.080 i guess make themselves feel useful or important or i think it comes with decent paychecks to be

00:06:47.440 honest with you john that too and so now we're headed down the tubes toward uh two or three other pieces

00:06:54.560 of legislation that could even be a bit more damaging well there yeah the the ones before parliament

00:07:00.960 currently so you have c2 c8 c9 c2 is the strong borders act which in my opinion should be called

00:07:08.000 the strong surveillance act it this is what the government they add in a whole bunch of stuff

00:07:15.600 right so you have the strong borders act c2 parts of it parts of it do pertain to the borders and

00:07:21.200 immigration policy and refugee policy then you have other stuff like the a creation of a new

00:07:27.440 authorized access to information act which will give new powers to federal government officials

00:07:32.560 to conduct warrantless searches on computers and cell phones and to uh demand subscriber data from

00:07:40.080 larger companies like rogers or bell or tell us whatever uh so there's a whole bunch of you know

00:07:46.480 criminalizing cash uh in amounts over 10 000 um authorizing canada post to open letter mail

00:07:55.040 all this stuff has nothing to do with borders but very violating of civil liberties now fortunately c2

00:08:01.760 the government the federal government seems to put it on the back burner okay but really bad uh what do

00:08:09.360 you think the general purpose of that is i mean if it's not border security why why are we why are we

00:08:17.520 chasing laws like this i think it's a battle that's been raging on for hundreds of years and will

00:08:24.640 continue to rage on it's a battle between freedom and tyranny and there are people with and let's just

00:08:30.560 assume they have good intentions but there are people who they don't like the free society they

00:08:34.960 don't like it when you know you and i and everybody else we lead our own lives we make our own decisions

00:08:41.840 it's like no they've got a project uh that everybody has to get on board with and so whether it's a

00:08:49.120 theocracy uh like in iran and saudi arabia you got to get on board with islam you can't publicly

00:08:56.480 criticize islam you'll be in jail or worse uh it could be a fascist thing like mussolini's italy it

00:09:05.120 could be national socialist like in germany uh the the look of the comparisons that are being made

00:09:11.280 yeah yeah well you know it's interesting because you know you bring that up john and i was before

00:09:16.000 the show i was kind of looking at the uh justice center for constitutional freedom so that's not for

00:09:21.680 profit uh you guys started around 2010. registered charity since 2010. yeah yeah so you know the genesis

00:09:29.200 of that i thought to myself that's terrific and i lived in the states for 12 years so you know some

00:09:34.320 of the things that you're talking about you know uh taking a bill and adding pieces onto a bill and

00:09:39.760 doing things very american like these concepts are things that americans do all the time like

00:09:44.960 when i was there quite frankly you'd be reading an agricultural bill and all of a sudden you'd see a

00:09:48.640 gaming section and next thing you know there were 10 casinos in the state right you'd be like

00:09:53.440 how did the agricultural bill get tied to the gaming bill and but it was just things that they were

00:09:59.440 moving and they were cutting deals with each other to pass things and they were being added to bills to

00:10:03.760 pass them through what was the genesis so take me back for a minute so you know when the group started

00:10:09.920 and i assume you all had the same kind of feelings as you just said you know about tyranny and and and

00:10:15.840 the way this was going what in 2010 kind of was the the the turning point where you guys got together

00:10:21.840 and said we're going to put this together we got to stop this and we got to challenge this because

00:10:26.960 you know that's a tough thing to do and i i really commend you guys because in canada

00:10:32.480 you don't see as much of that i think we have a group uh in ontario that does a similar thing

00:10:37.040 constitutional freedom group it's a different group um and but but how did it start well in in the early

00:10:44.000 days of the justice center most of our work was defending campus free speech and at that time so

00:10:50.320 around 2010 the the only group the the only group that was kind of a target of censorship was the

00:10:58.000 campus pro-life groups and you know they're coming out with a message that a lot of people

00:11:04.080 find offensive and and don't want to hear it don't want to see it whatever and um so you know we sued the

00:11:12.160 university of calgary they they threatened to expel these pro-life students simply for peacefully you know

00:11:17.920 there's no violence and they didn't set up an overnight tent city and there wasn't physical

00:11:22.720 obstruction and it just but peaceful expression on campus um they were threatened with expulsion

00:11:29.760 they were found guilty of non-academic misconduct they were not expelled but they were still found

00:11:35.120 guilty so we sued the university of calgary and ultimately we got a court ruling against them

00:11:40.080 and the court said that's not reasonable to have these disciplinary proceedings against these students

00:11:45.920 for peacefully expressing their opinion on campus uh we had another court case against the university

00:11:51.280 of alberta which got really clever by saying we allow all speech on campus except uh the pro-life

00:11:59.760 group if you want to put up a display you have to pay seventeen thousand five hundred dollars for

00:12:05.120 security fee which of course means it's effectively censorship because what how how could a student group

00:12:11.200 come up with seventeen thousand five hundred dollars and the threat to safety and security

00:12:15.840 was coming from people with the opposing viewpoint that were going to be disruptive and obstruction and

00:12:23.120 you know get within six inches of your face and so it's like well so actually punishing the pro-life

00:12:30.800 group with the security fee when the wrongdoing was or potential wrongdoing is coming from people that

00:12:38.480 don't want to debate and they don't want to set up their own display but they want to like physically

00:12:42.800 obstruct blockade shut down you know the types of people that pull a fire alarm shout down a speaker

00:12:49.840 and the university panders to those people and they get what they want because they threaten to

00:12:54.720 create a fuss and then the university gets scared and they punish rather than upholding free speech

00:13:01.120 they punish the people that want to express their views by saying well there's a threat to safety and

00:13:05.600 security so you have to come up with seventeen thousand five hundred dollars if you want to

00:13:10.240 peacefully express your views on campus so it sounds like different iterations of this are the same

00:13:16.880 methodology you're going to fight at every level municipally at the university level or even at the

00:13:21.680 federal level it sounds like the same process you would have to go through by saying look it's just

00:13:28.240 frankly unfair well the council culture has grown things have gotten worse uh you know the uh it's

00:13:37.280 just so commonplace now where the um you know a venue the moment that there's somebody that's upset or

00:13:44.240 offended it's you know a lot of venues will back down some won't so it's uh it's a deterioration and it

00:13:52.960 is analogous unfortunately to what we saw 90 years ago in germany we had the gradual decline and

00:13:59.040 breakdown of democracy and the free society and that was preceded by um thugs disrupting other people's

00:14:07.120 meetings so the communists had their red shirts same thing same thing you know bust up bang up other

00:14:13.040 political parties would just show up there and you know they wouldn't show up with guns and kill people

00:14:17.680 but they kind of disrupt yeah rough people up you know throw a few punches toss a few chairs around

00:14:24.240 and disrupt the the meetings of other parties and then the national socialists they said well we got

00:14:30.480 to we got to protect ourselves against these terrible communists so we're going to create our brown shirts

00:14:36.000 and they were doing the same thing then and going around disrupting shutting down other people's

00:14:40.000 meetings so you had this council culture uh ours in canada 90 years later is a little bit

00:14:47.440 less thuggish but it's the same idea same idea same method same method yeah i'm gonna i'm gonna

00:14:54.400 prevent you from having your event because i'm gonna show up scream shout yell make noise pull a fire

00:15:02.320 alarm well it's interesting and you talk you know constitutional freedoms you know it's in your name

00:15:08.480 and you know again i mentioned to you i lived i lived in the u.s for 12 years so it's very interesting

00:15:13.280 to watch some differences and born here uh came back and it's it's interesting canadians don't

00:15:20.160 really even think of their constitutional freedom and what they are so can we talk a little bit about

00:15:26.400 that and kind of the differences you see around the world because it's interesting i'm watching what's

00:15:30.560 happening right now in the uk and then the us and i'm looking i'm thinking okay why canadians are having

00:15:38.240 the same challenges but we don't focus on it for some reason and is that just because we're too busy

00:15:44.560 too small i think it's a gradual transformation of the country in the past uh 50 60 years starting with

00:15:52.720 pierre elliott trudeau i'm told by people uh people like ted byfield who's passed away a few years ago but

00:16:00.000 uh older canadians said that that throughout the 40s 50s 60s uh right into the end of the 60s we were

00:16:09.840 very proudly british north america and we were very british and we had the royal navy and the royal air

00:16:15.760 force and and uh um and pierre elliott trudeau disliked that and got us off on the you know well

00:16:23.760 we're not british but we're also but we're not american and we're kind of anti-american and yeah

00:16:30.720 it it's uh here we are 50 years later and and there is still some canadian identity uh but it's not

00:16:39.600 um i think you put 10 canadians in a room and ask them what canadian identity was all about you

00:16:44.960 probably get 10 different answers oh yeah and what's their constitutional freedoms would they know

00:16:49.680 well it used to be uh 50 or 60 years ago people just kind of understood as part of our british heritage

00:16:57.920 that we had freedom of speech religion association freedom of conscience you know before before uh pierre

00:17:05.760 trudeau added the charter to our constitution everybody understood that a man is innocent until 0.64

00:17:11.680 proven guilty you have a right to a fair trial uh you have a right to remain silent so that we don't have

00:17:17.760 a situation where police are uh torturing or extracting a confession out of you through

00:17:24.160 torture so you have a legal right to not speak when you're criminally charged and the not speaking will

00:17:29.520 not be used against you um and we this was all part of the fabric of our culture and i think but hey john

00:17:38.080 can i ask you something was that and you know it's interesting because you're a historian obviously you

00:17:43.920 understand the the background to it was that a uh let's call it was that because it's part of uk

00:17:50.640 parliamentary legal process so that's why and we followed from that or was it was it specifically

00:17:57.360 written it was just part of our culture just part of our that's what i thought right it was like this

00:18:03.280 whole idea that that like before that so the chart right now the canadian charter of rights and

00:18:07.040 freedoms or the charter for short sets out in writing that an accused person has the right to

00:18:13.360 be presumed innocent until proven guilty you have the right to counsel you have the right to a fair

00:18:17.280 trial before an independent and impartial tribunal blah blah blah these are spelled out before 1982

00:18:23.440 they were not spelled out and yet they were honored the police understood the crown prosecutors

00:18:28.080 understood the lawyers understood the judges understood that you've got a right to a fair trial and

00:18:33.440 you have a right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt etc so it's just part

00:18:39.120 of the culture so what's changed is that like the culture that people today in in 2026 uh there are

00:18:48.880 many many canadians i would say especially the younger ones but but canadians of all ages they don't

00:18:53.920 understand that freedom of expression is vital to democracy yeah you would find people who will tell

00:19:01.040 you i i'm in favor of free uh i'm in favor of free speech as long as it's not offensive that's just

00:19:07.840 like all right that's crazy right like freedom of speech is worthless and it means nothing if i can't

00:19:15.040 go stand on a sidewalk and and say something that you don't want to hear you don't have to stand there

00:19:21.840 and listen you can ignore me and walk past me but if i can't go onto a street corner and say something that

00:19:27.040 99 of the people disagree with then there's no free speech free speech it's about that it's about

00:19:33.120 uh uh unpopular viewpoint that people consider to be wrong and false that you can go and peacefully say

00:19:42.480 what other people think is wrong or false right thank goodness for podcasting i think we're getting

00:19:47.280 more of that done having said that uh your your organization will actually get out there and represent

00:19:54.560 these events these moments where freedoms are being uh i guess impeded if not stomped on how do you guys

00:20:03.440 go about that like who does it is it a a group of experts lawyers tell me about the group so we've got

00:20:11.920 10 lawyers um we have cases court cases from bc to newfoundland we've got a lawyer in quebec we've

00:20:20.720 got a several in ontario uh lawyers in alberta and then for provinces where we don't have a

00:20:28.720 full-time staff lawyer um we still run the cases there right like currently we don't have uh staff

00:20:34.880 lawyers in uh british columbia or saskatchewan but we take on cases in bc and saskatchewan that are done

00:20:40.880 by the alberta or ontario or whatever you know somebody so for example um we're representing a lady in bc

00:20:48.880 who was told by her school board uh or by her school that she was not allowed to host an international

00:20:55.920 student in a student exchange program which she had done previously and everything had been fine

00:21:01.840 because she had publicly criticized the uh soji sexual orientation gender identity curriculum and

00:21:08.880 it said that she disagreed with the curriculum it just stated her opinions and the school said oh well

00:21:15.280 you're not eligible to um you're not eligible to host an international student what was her what

00:21:22.320 was their justification of that well she's a bad person because she's publicly they didn't say that

00:21:27.360 we're i'm paraphrasing okay but but it's like if you criticize soji the sexual orientation gender identity

00:21:33.600 if you which is in all the bc schools and there's variations of it probably all across canada if you

00:21:40.400 criticize soji you're a bad person because a good person will support soji and if you disagree with

00:21:46.000 soji you're a bad person you're not worthy of hosting an international student i was like the supreme

00:21:53.440 court of canada said trinity western university is not worthy of being allowed to have a law school 0.99

00:21:58.320 because they have uh an evangelical christian community covenant that says no sex outside of

00:22:03.440 marriage and it's it's this is the woke tyranny that is growing still i mean it's a lot i see

00:22:13.600 growing pushback as well it's uh it's wild well in the states you know we did a show member at the

00:22:19.280 beginning when we started the podcasting network basically uh about what the us is doing right now

00:22:25.440 on this front and it has to do with a lot about you know wokeness is is going away but you know again

00:22:32.560 having spent time living in the us and spent time and growing up in canada americans really you know

00:22:38.800 that debate around freedom of speech and and their rights and you know uh their charter per se you

00:22:46.240 know they spend a lot of time on it and and they protect it we don't talk about it a lot which is which

00:22:52.800 is a shame and i think it's coming to the forefront now which you know what you guys are doing is is

00:22:57.520 amazing because that debate has to happen and i think it you know i was just saying i'm glad we

00:23:02.960 met because i don't think that debate happens enough i think we're just we're all kind of saying

00:23:08.240 oh well you know it'll work itself out yeah nobody's ever going to really let that happen yeah it's a

00:23:12.800 perverse it's a twisting of a good thing so we have politeness which is a good thing right yeah so

00:23:18.160 you know i try to uh we all uh all of us strive to not offend people unnecessarily right i'm not

00:23:30.800 going to say something bad about your wife or your mother or your kids or whatever right because so

00:23:37.760 like and it's good it's good to be polite well to be part of society we have to have interdiplomacy

00:23:43.520 yeah so so so this this niceness and diplomacy and you know our mother said if you can't say

00:23:49.040 something nice don't say anything at all which is a good maximum to to live by but like not in

00:23:53.520 an absolute black and white every circumstance but as as a starting point you know if you can't say

00:23:58.240 something nice don't say so these are all good things and it's good to be polite and it's good to

00:24:02.400 be nice however if you take that to an extreme then it gets into well you can't say you're not

00:24:10.160 allowed to say something that that i that i disagree with because if i disagree with it

00:24:15.600 i'm offended and you're offending me and when you say something that i disagree with you're

00:24:21.840 offensive and you shouldn't be so offensive offensive and then like this is how it it breaks

00:24:28.480 down which is unfortunate but it's the twisting of a good thing right so politeness and respect

00:24:34.080 uh diplomacy are good things but then they get twisted into we can't have an honest debate anymore

00:24:42.080 about you know lockdowns or mandatory vaccination policies or abortion or euthanasia or you know men

00:24:49.760 getting transferred into women's prisons which is one of our court cases or on and on and on like 1.00

00:24:54.880 you know we can't debate this anymore because somebody says that they feel offended but that

00:24:59.360 politeness was what got us to solutions often that regular politeness that general politeness of okay

00:25:07.280 i heard your side of it john hear me out and you actually listening listened yeah okay so

00:25:15.520 that is authentic politeness where you listen to another viewpoint yeah you don't just uh you know

00:25:21.280 you got to shut up right now because you're saying something i disagree with at that moment you might 0.67

00:25:25.040 even say to me well all right i can see how you would see that that perspective hmm that's when the 0.84

00:25:31.840 solution begins between us understanding the other person's perspective even if it's wrong even if you've

00:25:37.920 hated it up to that point now i say this as an obvious thing but there you are across the country

00:25:44.240 these guys are fighting battles on this wokeness issue which paul points out is this is real the

00:25:51.680 entertainment business has lost over a trillion dollars in the u.s market over wokeness and audiences

00:25:58.240 rejecting the content they're putting out there because it makes no sense to their humanity or to

00:26:04.000 their sensibilities but it was pushed down the throats of the system of broadcasts and networks and

00:26:09.760 the movie systems and even music and now they find themselves in a lost position because they followed

00:26:17.200 that route well they if it's private companies they will you know the the market will uh cause them to

00:26:25.280 change their ways here in can we're forced to spend taxpayers pay four million dollars every day

00:26:32.080 365 days a year to the cbc so 1.55 billion dollars and i i just had a column in the western standard uh

00:26:44.160 earlier today about how um the federal court of appeal ruled uh upheld a lower court ruling that trudeau

00:26:54.400 violated the conditions in terms of the emergencies act the emergencies act required

00:26:58.720 a serious threat to sovereignty health and safety ordinary law enforcement yeah can't work uh the

00:27:06.720 justice center was involved in that case we provided lawyers for uh for canadians at the trial level

00:27:13.040 and so we won that trial we got that declaration uh that that uh the trudeau and federal cabinet acted

00:27:22.400 illegally and then two years later we got this federal court of appeal ruling so the cbc comes out with

00:27:27.920 a story and says um neo-nazi group linked to freedom convoy i said what is this and so it was a french

00:27:38.640 language um and they they said there was a trial of this guy in ontario who was accused of being involved

00:27:47.440 with a terrorist group wasn't accused of terrorist acts that that harm people but but it's a crime to

00:27:54.320 be involved in a terrorist group okay and and then there's a witness who said that the there was a

00:27:59.920 camera that was used with this group in 2018 to film some of their crazy activities in the woods and the

00:28:06.800 same camera was in ottawa in february 2022 taking shots of freedom convoy okay so it has a camera that was

00:28:15.760 in two different locations at two different points in time and yet they come out and say this proves that

00:28:22.320 the the the headline says freedom convoy linked to neo-nazis that's the headline right so they're

00:28:30.000 smearing freedom convoy with with our money with our tax dollars and and the inaccuracy of which they

00:28:39.040 reported is um is not noted actually by anybody because everybody's on that same everybody in that

00:28:47.680 world in the cbc world we'll just back that up we'll back that up and they will most people or sorry

00:28:53.920 many people often read only the headlines i know i know i do that right like we're busy and there's a

00:28:58.480 gazillion stories right so so the headline says uh neo-nazi group atomwaffen division linked to uh freedom

00:29:11.280 convoy that's the headline right and most people will see the headline they won't read the story and this

00:29:16.880 is the cbc smearing freedom convoy um and the cbc will also they'll they'll i promise that we'll

00:29:24.960 title this one freedom fighting lawyer looks out for your rights okay does that sound fair well

00:29:31.120 but it's interesting because you know the emergency act which um that ruling to me was amazing you know

00:29:37.360 it could still it's still going to go to the prime minister's desk to maybe go to the supreme court i think

00:29:42.640 that's where it sits now let's see where he he's not likely to do that persuade them to hear supreme

00:29:48.640 court's got a two-step sorry to interrupt yeah they got a two-step process first you have to ask the

00:29:52.720 court would you please hear this appeal and you have to persuade the supreme court that there is a very

00:29:58.800 important legal doctrine uh that is in need of clarification because the the waters are muddied

00:30:05.840 and diluted and it's not clear and you know because the let's say the bc and saskatchewan

00:30:12.240 courts of appeal ruled one way on an issue and the alberta and quebec courts ruled the opposite way

00:30:18.480 and then you go to the supreme court and say look we've got this really important legal doctrine we

00:30:21.760 need clarity right that's how you get into the supreme court so i think the federal government would

00:30:26.480 have an uphill fight going to the supreme court and saying oh there's an important national doctrine that

00:30:33.200 is lacking in clarity right it's pretty clear yeah because yeah and on top of just the emergency act

00:30:40.400 part of it there's a bunch of search and seizure issues that actually come into play with that also

00:30:44.800 right the fact that uh they were freezing bank accounts you know freezing funds and they were

00:30:50.080 monitoring the crowd yeah exactly there was there's a whole host of other issues that kind of it's it's

00:30:55.600 multi-tiered again but you know these conversations i find it interesting again drawing sort of from around

00:31:02.640 the world my experience lived in a number of places again in canada when i came back we don't talk about

00:31:08.720 them we don't debate them and we don't um you probably know them from a legal perspective but

00:31:15.120 because the media is not talking about and putting them in and both sides of the media aren't putting

00:31:19.120 them in we don't have fulsome debate which is a shame and we should be and those are people who fight

00:31:23.920 against it you know like shame on them because if if a case for example the emergency act is one

00:31:30.160 we should look at it we should say how do we not do that again therefore we take that off the table

00:31:36.240 so your your point about polite and and uh being a polite society it has to be based on a set of uh

00:31:43.680 premise uh legal background that we all follow and then then we can now if that changes down the road

00:31:50.400 it should be put up for debate there should be a legal challenge and then it should be decided and then we

00:31:54.480 should move forward i think that's probably what we're missing right now so i read that again when

00:31:59.360 it was funny because we were having this debate on the constitution and freedoms for a while and we

00:32:05.280 said we'd like to find someone and it's interesting we found each other through this trip but it was

00:32:12.080 amazing we were having a hard time finding someone who was really open to talk about it and and um that's

00:32:18.080 the truth we tried to find a class action specialist people that would actually understand that you know

00:32:24.720 and to be connected actually is very fortuitous because a lot of the things that we're talking

00:32:29.680 about on a daily basis when it comes to politics freedom falls into it in a big way yeah freedom of

00:32:36.800 speech freedom of movement freedom of you know expression uh this is what our soldiers fought to defend

00:32:45.600 you know particularly in world war ii when we were fighting the national socialist germany fascist italy imperial

00:32:53.440 japan these were dictatorial uh regimes that were oppressive and tyrannical and expansionist

00:33:01.760 and so we were fighting to defend ourselves you know as a country but it was also the ideals of

00:33:10.400 parliamentary democracy freedom of speech freedom of religion freedom from tyranny and oppression that

00:33:16.880 that we have a free society that was what uh united uh britain canada the united states and other

00:33:23.760 countries to to fight and thankfully win against the national socialists and and the fascists that

00:33:32.240 were uh in charge in in germany and italy so the freedom is is really important but what's happened

00:33:39.200 uh more recently is that it's not really threatened by an external enemy i mean you got communist china 0.55

00:33:46.720 is a pretty bad regime but you know i don't think people are scared that that they're going to send

00:33:52.160 in the army and and attack us militarily right so now yeah it it maybe it's it's easier to fight for

00:34:02.400 freedom when the people against it are so obviously the enemies like adolf hitler and mussolini or the

00:34:10.160 enemies of freedom right it it kind of crystallizes it for the mind like now we don't really have an

00:34:15.520 external enemy that's threatening our freedom it's just from within like this woke ideology that you're

00:34:20.800 not allowed to say you know uh you can't speak honestly about the whole transgender stuff you know

00:34:27.280 because now in ontario and manitoba you could actually get in trouble for misgendering is a

00:34:33.920 violation of the human rights code which applies to speech uh you could even even in alberta you could

00:34:39.680 get a complaint filed against you i'm not aware of that having happened but if you uh miss misgender 1.00

00:34:46.240 somebody right right uh that you could have a human rights complaint filed against you yeah you know i

00:34:53.360 think that that's okay so i'll get to the obvious question in a minute we left one of the impending

00:34:58.240 laws off the discussion i think what's the last one that's before our government right now i think

00:35:04.000 there's two is there two more i think there's two more yeah so yeah so for a week so can you imagine

00:35:10.560 well there's six bills so so the the the c11 online streaming act gave the crtc uh legal authority over

00:35:19.200 the internet and and canadian podcasts and websites the c18 online news act uh has taken away from us 0.65

00:35:27.760 the ability to forward it to use facebook to forward news to each other c2 is the strong borders act

00:35:35.360 which has a bunch of bad provisions but the government's put it on the back burner c8 is the

00:35:40.480 cyber security act which would give federal cabinet ministers the power to kick individual canadians off

00:35:47.200 the internet if the cabinet minister decided that somebody was a threat to the national cyber

00:35:55.200 infrastructure which is very broadly worded they need to amend it to clarify that it can't be used

00:36:00.320 uh in respect of boy oh boy i hope that one gets thrown out for obvious reasons okay and then we got c9

00:36:07.200 which is the combating hate act which would remove a current requirement uh for a hate speech prosecution

00:36:15.440 to move ahead it needs the permission of the attorney general or the justice minister uh it would get

00:36:23.200 rid of that so it would take us towards becoming more like the united kingdom where you got 30 people

00:36:27.600 charged uh with you know over social media commentary they say we got too much immigration or the wrong kind

00:36:34.000 of immigration and you get a knock on your door and the police officers there so uh c9 is called the

00:36:40.400 combating hate act very clever that's the one where you can't be a comedian forget about it there can't

00:36:46.480 be any comedians in the uk anymore no it's it's i i spent some time in the uk this summer and uh it's

00:36:52.880 palpable the fear among the comedy community uh to really say anything of any magnitude is you know

00:37:02.240 to be sardonic or sarcastic or to hold a mirror up to ourselves you have to say some things

00:37:08.000 and there's this guy got in trouble for saying i was i was assigned mammal at birth but now i identify

00:37:14.960 as fish i'm in trouble for that that's okay i identify as fish i was assigned mammal at birth

00:37:24.400 assigned yeah yeah but now i really identify as fish no you can't make a joke i mean uh there is very

00:37:31.200 serious um and even online i mean that's the thing is that uh now we're being threatened with our

00:37:37.520 history uh over time so if i said something to you uh eight months ago and my opinion has changed and

00:37:45.040 you and i have made up and we've even shared a dialogue that's more positive i they can still

00:37:51.600 charge me based on the comments that were made previously yeah yeah so though so that's c9 um i've

00:37:58.880 heard some rumblings that the government's backing down on that now the the last one the sixth one is

00:38:04.960 i think the scare the scariest of all unless the online harms act it was brought in two years ago

00:38:11.120 as bill c63 it was brought in early 2024 it died thankfully with the april 2025 election right

00:38:21.200 the federal government keeps saying they're going to bring it back so c63 a huge long bill but a few

00:38:28.480 items i'll try to summarize federal cabinet gets powers to pass internet censorship regulations

00:38:37.520 digital safety commission created to enforce regulations massive multi-million dollar fines

00:38:45.280 for companies that violate these regulations these regulations are not subject to parliamentary scrutiny

00:38:53.600 the federal cabinet makes them right so so that if if the online harms act passes into law that law says

00:38:59.680 that the cabinet without further scrutiny or input from cabinet can pass censorship regulations to censor

00:39:05.360 the internet then another provision um a judge can place you under house arrest order you to obey a curfew

00:39:16.320 put you into an ankle bracelet based on a fear of your neighbor that you might commit a speech crime in

00:39:22.640 future so we're talking about minority report the movie we're talking about canadians who have not been

00:39:28.240 charged with any criminal offense they have not been found guilty of any offense and yet the judge would have

00:39:34.160 the power to place them under house arrest and order them to refrain from communicating

00:39:39.760 and so on based on somebody fearing that they might commit a speech crime in future and then to be able

00:39:47.120 and then to be able to represent themselves from their home in an ankle bracelet with no ability to reach

00:39:52.720 the world they're basically imprisoned you know yeah this is it's just it's shocking like it sounds too

00:40:01.600 evil to be true but it it's it's actually in so this is what they want to bring back right so the

00:40:07.200 federal cabinet can regulate uh the internet digital safety commission with hundreds of new

00:40:14.960 bureaucrats hired can enforce it uh judges can impose conditions on on canadians freedom who have not been

00:40:24.640 charged with or convicted of any criminal quote offense canadian human rights commission gets new

00:40:29.520 powers to prosecute canadians over non-criminal discriminatory speech

00:40:36.240 with fines up to fifty thousand dollars payable to government twenty thousand dollars payable to

00:40:42.240 complainants who could be anonymous i don't know what they do with so if i complain on you

00:40:47.280 i get 20k pretend that's the upper limit i have a nice drive home thinking about that yeah well you

00:40:53.680 know maybe hey maybe maybe i'll only be ordered to pay you you know one thousand dollars because my

00:40:58.960 my you know speech was a little bit discriminatory and not overly discriminatory well i'm going to

00:41:05.280 get what i can yeah uh and you know that's the problem in the end is it turns everybody into these

00:41:10.240 weird kind of speech snitches minority report is a really good example of of this so okay now so 1.00

00:41:17.360 that's the sixth and final bill that's the online harms act has not been reintroduced the federal

00:41:22.560 government keeps on saying that they're going to re reintroduce the same legislation so the justice

00:41:30.080 center on on our website we've got a letter writing campaign where people can click click click click

00:41:35.440 and send a letter to their own mp to say don't bring back the online harms act okay we're going to make

00:41:41.120 sure that that link is available in the description and that was really that was my final question really

00:41:46.240 paul was okay here we are there has to be a route to get us out of this there has to be a road map that

00:41:52.320 that gets us out what is that and it sounds to me like it's taking action letting the government know

00:41:59.280 and actually putting your putting your name on something that says i as a canadian don't want

00:42:05.600 this i don't want these restrictions i don't understand this law i refuse to just let it happen

00:42:10.800 absolutely the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing

00:42:16.480 and so when citizens are engaged uh in the democratic process and we've seen this with bill c2 the

00:42:22.880 strong borders act there are so many things in there violations of privacy the surveillance state uh you

00:42:29.280 know civil liberties groups were against it there was a massive outcry and the government said you know

00:42:36.240 okay that hasn't been withdrawn but it's it's been put on the back burner in fact what the federal

00:42:41.360 government did was they took they took out the parts of the strong borders act they were actually

00:42:46.400 about immigration and refugees created a new bill and got that bill passed i don't know if it's passed

00:42:53.600 yet or not but you know and and all this other stuff about criminalizing the use of cash and the

00:42:59.760 surveillance states and the authorized access to information act and canada post can open your letter

00:43:04.800 mail all that stuff has been put on the back burner why because canadians contacted their mps and said

00:43:11.040 i don't want this anymore so there's your inspiration right there john i'm blown away first of all i'm

00:43:16.000 glad that we met you second of all thank you you seem to be the the check that in the balance needs to be

00:43:22.160 there uh that you know sadly that it has to be but that you're doing this for canadians and that

00:43:28.000 your organization is so widespread uh blows my mind actually yeah no it doesn't i i again i really

00:43:34.480 appreciate all the work you do and uh you know the uh the more we talk about it i feel the more people

00:43:42.640 can get educated and have the debate and that's what's missing in our unfortunately in canada right

00:43:48.000 well credit credit goes to the generous donors right we're next month in february we are going to mail out

00:43:54.240 uh about 9 500 official tax receipts to the 9 500 canadians who donated to us in 2025 right so we

00:44:04.400 issued the tax receipts yeah and then it all those donations from those nine and a half thousand people

00:44:10.640 they uh pay for the staff lawyers the paralegals uh the communication staff the you know the researchers

00:44:18.640 uh you know we're we're going to be working hard in 2026 as well wow fantastic i mean we definitely are

00:44:27.520 blown away uh if people wanted to reach out to you where's the best way for them to do that so website

00:44:33.760 is www.jccf.ca so jccf is justice center constitutional freedoms jccf.ca and you can sign up for a newsletter

00:44:45.920 that we send out only once or twice a month not daily or weekly but if you sign up for a newsletter

00:44:51.760 you'll hear from us once or twice a month uh updating on our cases and papers and projects

00:44:57.600 and whatnot and uh yeah all of the other all of our court cases and everything's on on the website

00:45:03.520 you know what i would love to do paul is to the one of these cases comes up in the future and we just

00:45:07.840 follow it from the beginning yeah through the process and watch it uh watch it unfold through the uh

00:45:13.840 in the hands of john and his group uh thanks so much for joining us we really appreciate it thanks

00:45:19.440 thanks for having me on your show it's an honor let's get you back what do you say yes okay thank

00:45:23.600 you so much uh and thank you so much for joining us don't forget subscribe tell a friend and uh for

00:45:28.800 goodness sake visit tpl.ca and don't forget you are the gas in the tank that keeps us moving thanks so much

Canada’s Free Speech Crackdown？ John Carpay's Warning

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript