00:00:00.000Today on the True Patriot Love Media Network and our Economy Pillar, we're going to break down the revenues and expenses in the 2025 federal budget, just like you would in your own daily personal life or in a small business.
00:00:13.460With federal revenues hitting an all-time high of $507.5 billion through personal and business taxes, plus other revenues, the federal government keeps projecting them to grow every year.
00:00:26.680Where is the breaking point for our tax increases? But hold on, federal expenses are keeping pace, growing at an unprecedented $586 billion in 2026.
00:00:38.940It's your taxes and your dollars being spent, and as a shareholder of Canada, you deserve to know where they're going.
00:00:46.580Stay tuned, learn, get informed, as you have every right to understand how the deficit hit a record high this year of $78.3 billion.
00:00:56.000And why our debt ceiling is being increased to $2.54 trillion.
00:01:02.640But hold on, don't forget the second bucket of expenditures that no one's talking about, capital expenditures of $45.4 billion.
00:01:14.700The majority of the population and your government representatives probably do not understand the accounting of the budget numbers has changed this year, and quite frankly, they can't follow it.
00:01:26.400We will break it down for you, so stay tuned and let us know your thoughts.
00:01:30.960After a long read, we are here today to go through the 2025 budget.
00:01:50.620And in October, we did a couple of shows, and we broke down the 2024 budget so we could get the basis of what we're going to talk about today.
00:02:07.960I mean, I should point out to people that a binder has been produced.
00:02:11.840That will take two binders that will—so I do really appreciate you taking the time because your background in finance, economy, you know, being an accountant to start with—
00:02:24.780—makes a difference to how you see this.
00:02:27.860And just the few minutes that you and I took discussing it in advance shocked me.
00:02:33.720This is a completely new way to look at a budget for Canadians, and I think we need to understand what that means.
00:02:38.580Yeah, and I don't think many Canadians focused on that.
00:02:40.860You know, in October, Prime Minister Carney came out, and he said, listen, I'm going to change this budget to an accrual-based budget.
00:02:47.440And so people's eyes glaze over right away because it's accounting, and I get it.
00:02:51.580So today I'm going to try to—I'm going to split it into bucket one and bucket two so I can kind of, you know, go through.
00:02:58.780And what I tried to do is, like I did in the last show for 2024, I tried to actually create a profit and loss statement for the federal government.
00:03:30.900And, you know, and people were making guesses, you know, on the news, mainstream media was, I think it's going to be this, I think it's going to be that.
00:03:39.160Well, it came out to $78.5 billion for 2026.
00:10:28.980There was a major shift in increase in corporate tax around that time, too.
00:10:32.980Corporations, you know, for all the, for all the people, you know, who knock corporations for not paying tax.
00:10:38.220And, you know, there's, you know, roughly 130,000 corporations.
00:10:42.660And we, you know, we see corporations come and go every year in Canada.
00:10:47.500So that, that's a pretty steep increase.
00:10:49.620You know, average company, if you look at the stats, and this is give and take a few bucks, is about a quarter million dollars in income tax a year.
00:12:56.920And I think a lot of these numbers are, quite frankly, just indexed going forward.
00:13:01.620So I think, you know, they always, I call these revenues and the expenses we're going to talk about that tie into the $78.5 billion deficit for this year, which is 2026, kind of standing revenues and expenses.
00:13:25.320You know, when, it's interesting when you, a lot like, this is where we are a little bit similar to the US.
00:13:30.700Our politicians don't spend a lot of time on the givens, the standing expenses or the standing revenues.
00:13:37.800So whether, you know, they're, you know, when there's something they need to talk about, it comes to the table.
00:13:43.720But for the most part, every year, whether it be personal tax, corporate tax, it just indexes up, you know, expenses for seniors and for health care.
00:13:59.760And quite frankly, we don't really seem to adjust them, which when we get to the end of this, you're going to see.
00:14:05.520We didn't really make, as far as, other than a few government expense changes, we didn't really do a lot to our standing expenses and revenue for this year.
00:14:21.320We had it going up to $56.5 billion for 2027 from 51.4 and 24.
00:14:30.920So if this goes up 10%, is that based on an increase in the GST potentially?
00:14:35.860We're going to hear an announcement that that's going to go up or that we're expecting that there's going to be that much more in-country business.
00:14:44.520They haven't announced, so they're not announcing an increase in GST.
00:14:48.740But, you know, I think they're thinking, given where we are with the U.S. right now, there's going to be a lot more trade in-country.
00:14:57.140Now, it's interesting because, you know, and I'm not going to jump too far ahead, but, you know, we're projecting quite a high unemployment rate, almost 9% to 10% coming up in 2027.
00:15:07.680So I find this one a little interesting that they think people's spend patterns are going to increase in-country.
00:16:01.640You know, the one thing we talked about going into this budget or the government talked about is how aggressive they were going to be with respect to their projections and also their investments, which we're going to get to in a few minutes.
00:16:13.600So unemployment insurance, as I talked about earlier, also going up 13% to $33.3 billion, another hit for corporations, half of that paid by corporations.
00:16:26.580So then there's another 6% on top of the 17 that you're already paying.
00:16:41.240And that's, you know, that's a substantial increase for a person right now who's just trying to eke out a living, you know, pay for groceries, car.
00:16:52.040But they're going to get hit with a tax hit and then they're going to get some EI hits.
00:16:58.240Total revenue off of this after other revenue, which always amuses me, there's only just $37 billion in other revenue.
00:17:06.100That's going to be, so other revenue is up 48%.
00:17:21.760And then like foreign exchange return on their investments.
00:17:25.340So this is, this is turning out to be where they're allocating the benefits of all their investments.
00:17:32.560So they're saying by making all these investments in infrastructure and everything else, they think that they're going to see a substantial increase in other revenue flowing into the country.
00:17:43.280So not only are they amortizing the expenses over a long period of time, they're assuming profitability on that over a period of time as well.
00:18:04.660You know, you'd be buying, uh, you know, and I was, you know, laughing about it with you earlier.
00:18:10.080It's kind of like the story where, you know, your, your business is losing money, but you and your wife decide to actually go out and buy a home and put a pool in it.
00:18:37.840Now, if we jump over to page three and we go to the expense line, um, uh, there's some really interesting, uh, things to talk about here.
00:18:46.720So elderly benefits, which I talked about on the last show, um, you know, we're, we're about, you know, 7, uh, million, you know, seniors in Canada right now.
00:19:11.600And so, you know, that, uh, uh, the indexing on seniors payments is very aggressive.
00:19:18.260It always has been there a large voting block.
00:19:20.980The government has always treated them really well.
00:19:23.140And quite frankly, uh, they're going up to 89, which, uh, billion dollars in 2027, um, for benefits.
00:19:31.500It's interesting if you follow this out to the 2030, if you go out to 2030 and you look at what they budgeted, it actually hits the a hundred billion dollar mark.
00:19:40.780I don't think anyone would have thought that elderly benefits would have ever been a hundred billion dollars.
00:19:58.320And quite frankly, it's a 3% growth rate.
00:20:01.280It really is a very, uh, easy to track.
00:20:03.980We talked about earlier, you know, this is the unemployment insurance, um, amount.
00:20:09.780Now this is growing, you know, they're, they're basically saying, you know, right now, if you do the math, we have roughly, uh, 1.5 and, uh, unemployed people in 2024.
00:21:15.900So, but, you know, recession level, if, you know, CPI, if you believe the CPI numbers, they're usually crap anyways, quite frankly.
00:21:24.940And our inflation rates are usually understated.
00:21:27.920So it seems like we are, for the most part, probably have been in a recession for the last two years.
00:21:33.440If you look at it, uh, with respect to our low growth rates, really what this says is we're either going to pay more employment insurance per person,
00:21:41.220or we have a lot more people unemployed.
00:21:56.880Well, then that's the, you know, again, you know, we talked about, it's kind of the conundrum they're in because after the last decade, they have to spend their way out of it.
00:22:07.520The challenge will be, and we're going to get to that in the show, you know, later in the, uh, uh, shows coming up, they have to spend, uh, spend on projects that are going to have a great return on investment.
00:22:19.800They're going to have to have an increase in GDP.
00:22:22.560Children's benefits was one that got me as well.
00:23:17.540So the, the, the expenditures, this program and the child benefit programs that we have in place have just not met the objectives that people need.
00:23:26.360Need, need, and quite frankly, it's a combination, Mike, of a bunch of things.
00:23:30.540So it's not just, you know, I, I wouldn't, I wouldn't say we want to take anything away from people, you know, $10 a day, get daycare.
00:23:37.200They're all great things, um, quite frankly, but if you can't buy an affordable home and if you can't buy groceries and you can't, you're not thinking about having kids.
00:23:45.340So if you've already had a kid and you're struggling, it helps you a little, but quite frankly, the problem is we can't get people to enter the, the family zone.
00:23:54.160Let's call it because they can't get their head around how they're doing everything else.
00:23:58.900So yeah, there, there is a, there's no financial security for people by and large to keep that growth potential for family growth.
00:24:08.920Uh, you know, I had three kids, uh, you've had many kids as well.
00:24:13.720I think 16 or 17, the, no, not that many, the, uh, the reality is that's, if you take a look at the, many of the people just working for us.
00:24:24.060In that age group that might be having children soon or having one child, that's their thought process.
00:24:34.640I don't think that we've actually put this money toward incentivizing people to, to have families.
00:24:39.000Yeah, it's everything else is too difficult.
00:24:40.680It's gotta be a full package and we didn't do a good job, but what we're doing is we're sustaining.
00:24:44.580And because these are, as I mentioned, these are standing expenses, we, we just take programs and we clip them along, even if they're not working.
00:24:52.080And then we index them and we increase them, but they don't have the, the results we need.
00:24:56.820So Paul, can you explain this line to me?
00:24:58.620The COVID-19 income support for workers line?
00:25:51.340So it's our transfer payments to other levels of government.
00:25:54.340Uh, this is, we just started to see other provinces, you know, unveiling budgets.
00:26:00.340And quite frankly, they're hitting deficits, but this is the money we pay to the provinces for healthcare equalization payments and other fiscal arrangements.
00:26:30.340So, you know, on previous, on previous shows, we've talked about this a lot.
00:26:34.340We continue to aggressively increase our healthcare expenditures, something that people don't know, you know, they, they think we're underfunded, um, in the healthcare world.
00:27:33.340Uh, it really doesn't seem like, um, it, I mean, whether our healthcare is underfunded or overfunded 14% to change a healthcare system that is so obviously broken, I think would shock Canadians in itself.
00:27:46.340I think Canadians would say, no, we need a 20 or 25% increase to do something that'll make a difference.
00:27:52.340Well, that, yeah, their service levels are down.
00:28:19.340And by the way, if anything you see in this presentation, you know, please, if you have another idea, if you think, uh, you'd like to correct us on anything, just send us a note.
00:28:27.340We're, we're really interested in your opinion.
00:28:33.340We, but, but poor Paul, because he is our economist, he gets, uh, and also I think, I think you found it very interesting because this time we have a different kind of budget.
00:37:38.340So that's, that's if you want to buy a new home, a car, put a pool in, that's that type of stuff, you know, and the layman's term for a person.
00:38:19.340Well, he's not really saying he, he, he is, and he isn't right.
00:38:22.340So he's, he's kind of telling the, and this is the, the media spin on it.
00:38:27.340Um, there's been, you know, in the budget, they, there's a lot of graphs talking about the full spend over five years and everything else, but you really have to break it down by year to figure out where it's going and how.
00:38:38.340So in 2026, so the year that's going to end and the new, you know, we've the accounting on it, we're going to basically spend $123.7 billion on the money we lost as a deficit.
00:38:56.340So the money with it, we were over, so there are revenues were not enough to cover our expenses.
00:39:01.340So, you know, we, we were running a business, but we didn't make enough money to cover the expenses.
00:40:17.340Now, the interesting thing, if we would have done it the, you know, and this is very complicated, but I won't spend a lot of time on it.
00:40:23.340If we would have stayed under the old accounting methodology, that would have shot up by another 30 million.
00:40:31.340We would have been about 30 million higher because under a cash basis, our cash capital expenditures would have been significantly higher.
00:40:41.340Right. Okay. Right. So, so for the, for the time being.
00:40:45.340But because it's, this has been amortized over such a long period of time, we see it as a lower number.
00:40:52.340Yes. We see it as a little, but we still, we still, you know, in the budget, they're still saying we need to go out and we need to borrow $137 billion.
00:41:01.340And then for 2027, it goes up to $149 billion.
00:41:06.340So we're going to have a slightly lower.
00:41:10.340So we're going to go and borrow another, what is that?
00:41:13.340Another $11 billion the following year.
00:42:05.340And that's where, you know, but, you know, I said on previous shows and Mike, I just, you know, wrapping this up, I just wanted to go through with you.
00:42:12.340I don't know if you have any other choice.
00:42:15.340So I, you know, I, I'm, I'm of the opinion and I've said it on previous shows.
00:42:19.340The challenge is whatever capital expenditures you pick right now, here's the challenge for the country.
00:42:26.340And I think this is critical for everyone to pay attention to.
00:42:29.340They have to be good, productive revenue generating projects.
00:42:35.340So you can put so much into infrastructure, you can put so much into defense, but you also need to be actually doing projects that you can.
00:42:49.340Sold for a profitable amount, not sold at a loss.
00:42:51.340So, and that's how you get your GDP productivity and your PPD productivity to increase.
00:42:58.340And those are things you got to pay attention to right now.
00:43:00.340And I think a lot of economists and bankers right now are kind of echoing that concern is that you really got to put in those guardrails and those reporting mechanisms and accountability to do that.
00:43:12.340And what, what's kind of, uh, I'm not, I don't want to be critical of, of anyone on this cause this is a difficult time.
00:43:20.340Um, but I think, you know, the opposition is spending a lot of time, you know, uh, we had two non-confidence votes and the, you know, they basically, they threw up kind of silly.
00:43:31.340I thought they were, uh, you know, usually when a budget goes up, you usually have, there's three readings, the final readings, the important one, uh, both the other parties get a chance.
00:43:41.340To amend, um, their amendments weren't very good.
00:43:54.340And I think quite frankly, uh, I think there were better ways to actually put in amendments to actually put in, um, guardrails and accountability and reporting so we could.
00:44:08.340Maybe Carney expected the opposition to come to the floor with guardrails rather than actual opposing of the budget, because like you've said, and many people have said, this is not a horrible budget.
00:44:22.340I mean, it's not the greatest news in the world always, uh, when you get, when you get to the economy of a country and we're in that scenario, but is it not better to, this is just my opinion or question on that basis.
00:44:35.340Is it not better for us to be working together on the amendments to this thing that makes sense and just get it passed so that we can begin or should we be voting this thing down?
00:44:47.340I, I, if you can't, if you can agree on the amendments, quite frankly, you're going to get there.
00:44:51.340And I think you, but you have to, you know, unfortunately we, we took those two votes and we didn't take the opportunity to have constructive dialogue.
00:45:00.340And I think if both parties would have sat down or all, all parties would have sat down and come up with some really reasonable requests in order to put those in place, I think it would have been a better use of time.
00:45:12.340I think maybe the prime minister should invite them to the table.
00:45:18.340And rather than worrying about who's walking across the floor, let's worry about how to make this work.
00:45:23.340They might've actually, uh, things might've stayed the course actually with, uh, with, uh, people crossing the floor or taking a powder, abstaining votes because they had a, an opinion and it made a difference.
00:45:37.340So, uh, hope you enjoyed this and we're going to continue.
00:45:40.340So we're going to do a couple of part two and three, uh, talking about the actual, uh, pillars that were in this budget specifically with respect to operating and capital, um, uh, expenses.
00:45:53.340So please subscribe, uh, watch, and we hope to see you soon.