True Patriot Love


Why Canada’s Outbreak Response Failed


Episode Stats


Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Dr. Jeffrey Wilson from Novometrics joins us to talk about the outbreak strategy used in dealing with the recent outbreak of avian influenza in Canada. Dr. Wilson explains the importance of outbreak response, and how it relates to dealing with outbreaks like the one that occurred during the culling of the Avian Flu outbreak.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 well it was only a couple of weeks ago now maybe four or five weeks actually that we had this
00:00:09.360 familiar face and growing more familiar all the time with us dr jeff wilson from novometrics is
00:00:14.640 joining us and dr jeff was kind enough to explain to us the last time about what's going on with
00:00:21.440 the avian flu and something that he calls outbreak response which is fascinating and endlessly
00:00:28.240 helpful if we were just to put it into play recently novometrics put up a couple of very
00:00:34.000 interesting white papers about what had occurred during the ostrich culling dr jeff how are you
00:00:40.160 i'm great thanks mike thanks for having me thanks for coming back i appreciate this you know i wanted
00:00:45.440 to follow up because i uh i'm no scientist i think you've gathered that by now um i'm barely a
00:00:52.000 broadcaster at that but one thing i did do was get fascinated with your last two white papers
00:00:57.920 uh that talked about the uh the response to the outbreak strategy that had occurred
00:01:02.800 with the ostrich culling in canada of course uh there was outcries uh from farmers and uh activists
00:01:11.120 uh alike uh saying that this was an overstep and your response to that was well we need outbreak
00:01:17.840 response what were your thoughts if you don't mind you were a little critical of the current
00:01:22.560 outbreak response model and said it was a little fragmented what do you mean explain that to us
00:01:27.520 yeah so um people who are listening may may have heard and talk about uh outbreak response best
00:01:37.520 practices so this is this is based on what's been known published on acted upon in for outbreaks of
00:01:45.520 things like e coli and legionnaires disease and that sort of thing for for a long time several several
00:01:51.920 decades um and uh it was it was devised originally for dealing with those kind of infectious disease
00:02:01.360 outbreaks generally relatively small ones um small in the sense of something like walkerton so obviously
00:02:10.320 a huge deal but small compared to something that we're seeing like with covid obviously or with avian
00:02:19.360 influenza birds so so it turns out there is uh outbreak response is simply the process of of uh if
00:02:29.520 you have an outbreak of something uh what do you do to manage that outbreak that's all it is and there
00:02:36.880 are best practices which are well established and um then there's other stuff which doesn't work very well
00:02:45.360 uh outbreak response is kind of like uh teaching i figure it's like everybody figures they know how to teach
00:02:55.680 and it's kind of like especially with covid people most of us said most people have never
00:03:01.840 even thought about outbreak response was kind of like everybody everybody suddenly had an opinion
00:03:07.600 right which is totally fine but if you have a serious problem you want to have a process that
00:03:14.960 actually works and is valued to work and so i i have a lot of experience and do that i'm not most
00:03:21.040 experienced in that in canada but i have a lot of experience and did as you know some helped in a big
00:03:27.840 way and things like walking and a bunch of outbreaks i think you guys took a lead role in
00:03:32.480 in making sure walkenden came under control yeah exactly we weren't the primary lead it was the
00:03:37.040 medical officer marine quigg but uh we played a big role our team did and um it turns out that uh
00:03:46.640 what happened so i learned this through a through a really quite a rigorous program through the
00:03:51.120 public health agency of canada a two-year internship where i got set out to outbreaks
00:03:56.240 and i learned a lot about how to to do this through first-hand experience and being mentored by people
00:04:02.080 who had done it it's a lot of it's very counterintuitive how we do it and uh so when covid happened
00:04:10.400 i started and asked by people well what should we do and so i ended up doing some speaking some writing
00:04:17.120 and we came up with this model it's not we didn't invent the model all sort of a name and a simplified
00:04:24.240 way to explain how do you do a great response so it's like been entire books you'll probably three
00:04:30.000 four page book written on how you do this so i i created a simplified version that we call the
00:04:34.960 pillars of outbreak response uh there's four pillars and basically it's like a lot of things there's four
00:04:41.600 pillars and then there's kind of sub pillars and sub things sub things right so it's like it's like
00:04:46.320 learning everything it's like baking a cake well it was the basics then there's like a million
00:04:50.160 some things to get to be at a massive kind of level and uh so we we did that and it really started to
00:04:58.560 resonate with people and um uh it works in any outbreak situation and and uh in in the saving
00:05:07.520 influenza stuff we just started talking about it amongst ourselves amongst you and then we started
00:05:13.600 implementing it uh this is kind of a long answer to your question um well no in a sense it's a great
00:05:21.040 setup because what you just told me was okay we have a system we have a response method there are
00:05:27.680 uh a set of procedures underneath each of the pillars we've established the pillars so now you
00:05:33.200 take a look at how things were handled in this most recent outbreak and it makes me say okay so where
00:05:38.720 did it fall apart so so i would say so with the with the ostrich outbreak you mean yeah yeah so yeah
00:05:48.080 so basically there's at universal ostrich farm there was outbreak of something there was there was a
00:05:55.840 year or so earlier there was a bunch of ostriches died of something uh and um uh that kind of set off
00:06:05.040 the the interest in a great response and uh uh but right from the get-go i would say all four pillars
00:06:17.440 which are kind of interrelated when you hear them none of them it got off on the wrong foot and and
00:06:23.440 none of them were done properly and so they all ended up bringing the whole thing down so so to start
00:06:29.760 with what are the four pillars tell me those so the four pillars are number one build build the
00:06:36.240 right leadership team build a proper leadership team number two is collect the right data and
00:06:41.840 information it's unbelievably obvious and you kind of go you have to kind of see how it plays out and
00:06:48.720 why it's so important and why it works why it doesn't work it's not being done the third one is
00:06:53.360 then once you start getting information like what is likely causing this outbreak through things like
00:07:01.440 proper testing then you can start thinking about interventions so interventions are things you do
00:07:08.480 to stop the outbreak so this can range from anything from do nothing which was probably the right thing in
00:07:15.600 this situation to kill everything at the other extreme which is probably not the right thing to do so
00:07:24.720 so you what you do is you you come up with interventions with the right leadership team
00:07:30.960 that has people who actually have experience with actually running outbreak response
00:07:37.440 and and who have information from a wide variety of different sources so people like steve pelic who
00:07:47.760 has an incredible understanding of immunology it's really important to get those kind of people
00:07:53.920 involved in the leadership team people like me who've actually done outbreak response not just
00:08:00.480 stamp right out but actually getting those kind of people involved is extremely important
00:08:07.440 uh and building a transparent leadership team where you're sharing information and talking like
00:08:12.880 we're talking now right with people from outside of the core in this case from cfia because if you
00:08:20.320 just start with the core of cfia you're talking about a bunch of you know generally nice people for the most
00:08:29.760 part as nice as anybody else well-meaning um some of them with some skills but they don't have all the
00:08:36.640 skills and they're not independent and they have tremendous pressure on them to come up with answers
00:08:44.960 that are aligned with stamping out and they don't know how to do stuff other than stamping out so
00:08:50.720 they don't know how to select a proper leadership team or they are impeded in inhibited doing so or they
00:08:58.080 don't know how to collect the right data like actually testing the ostriches so if you don't have the right leadership team 0.98
00:09:04.960 everything goes off kilter you get people saying let's not test the ostriches let's um let's just kill them all right
00:09:14.960 and then the and the and the final one is proper communication so uh with respect to the public
00:09:22.240 telling the public what's actually going on well that was one of the points i had like between
00:09:29.200 between data and uh communication uh building the right team seems to lend itself nicely to
00:09:35.760 transparency transparency lends itself to solutions i think that's it it's really what it is is so anyone
00:09:42.640 who's uh worked you know in a um corporate role or senior government role anybody who's studied leadership
00:09:50.560 this is just straight leadership one-on-one building a leadership unit straight get the right people set
00:09:57.200 the tone set the objective the objective is we're going to actually solve this thing properly with
00:10:02.960 the least amount of unintended consequences we're going to get the right feeling over the doing we're
00:10:08.560 going to build an environment of trust so we can share information we're going to build a team a
00:10:14.640 leadership team that includes people from the outside and when you do that the probability of resolving
00:10:22.960 the thing goes way way up because pretty soon you start collecting the right data like getting
00:10:26.960 the right testing then you do the interventions based on what the data says not based on some
00:10:34.400 other thing which could be uh what you always did before or what you think the minister wants you to
00:10:40.240 do or whatever right so so um hopefully honest with you jeff that's going to take too long and we just 0.96
00:10:47.280 we should probably just kill the ostriches actually well now i think the human response to outbreak 0.75
00:10:52.640 response is we have an outbreak i mean that the i don't know i think part of what makes uh professionals 0.97
00:10:59.520 like yourself uh the obvious leads in these scenarios is you don't get into a panic your first reaction
00:11:07.200 is to put into action a formula that has already been thought through
00:11:12.960 and actually as part of the leadership process and the leader the leadership team dealing with other
00:11:23.760 people who are doing things like handling ostriches or getting samples extremely important that the
00:11:29.920 leadership team have actual practical experience and a personality to remain calm in a crisis not not
00:11:38.960 lackadaisical just calm so that they can actually think and calm everybody else down but it's basically
00:11:48.160 basic basic kind of crisis management there's psychology to it i was going to say the psychology
00:11:53.680 around this should be better communicated we have a viable team we have several processes in place now
00:12:02.960 the the community is going to react better to that than oh my god we had to kill a bunch of
00:12:06.960 ostriches because there's a flu about to kill us all is a very bad place to begin right and we can't
00:12:12.240 tell you and then what happens out is a bunch of talking points which most people look at or many
00:12:19.600 people look at this and go that just sounds like government pr yeah and then the trust level just goes
00:12:26.320 and then it just escalates into or you know escalates down to a worse and worse response
00:12:32.640 one of the things your white paper uh came out with was uh you kind of criticized the lack of
00:12:38.160 testing and biohazard protocols which sounds to me like it these are items that fall outside the
00:12:44.000 pillars because they weren't properly maybe digested or handled or whatever the case is to make sure that
00:12:51.200 there was a process in place biohazards i would imagine and the protocols associated with those would 1.00
00:12:57.040 impact the test results yeah and so the and the the biohazard management is kind of a it's a subset of
00:13:06.640 the leadership of the data and the response and the communication right and so it's an important part of
00:13:13.120 it um uh you want to make sure that that that the possibility of other people animals getting
00:13:24.240 infected is reduced right yeah and so uh so um it it's it's really important what happened with it in in a
00:13:36.160 more rational approach which we've been put forward and we're not alone um bio the biohazard would have
00:13:45.680 been dealt with largely by saying okay it looks based on the data with a proper leadership team is calm and
00:13:53.680 informed and unbiased and knowledgeable they like they would say um that we're um uh this thing is
00:14:04.240 they probably aren't shedding avian influenza let's test them yeah it probably would have come back
00:14:11.920 negative so it would have calmed things down more and then people would have said okay let's put on
00:14:17.440 a few more layers of bio of quarantine and biohazard control without going without panicking or
00:14:25.920 or just you know doing things that are necessary and uh and that's how the biohazard piece would
00:14:34.000 imagine what happened with this one is the whole leaders team never got on to that it that it probably
00:14:43.200 they probably weren't infected or that we should just accept that they're not infected we should not 0.99
00:14:49.920 test because it might show that they're not infected and then and then we should kill all these ostriches 1.00
00:14:58.080 and then and then we have to get rid of them somewhere in secret so we need to transport them
00:15:04.960 somewhere where where we can dispose of them and um no the whole the whole thing the whole thing reads
00:15:14.080 uh like a mishap and that's that's just totally well this is why i think these papers are important and
00:15:20.480 i'll make sure that there's a link to them in here so that you know canadians can read uh your response to
00:15:25.840 this because the response that you put out there was really i think what the average person wants
00:15:31.120 to hear okay we have a pause a policy we have a process uh you know the the human health risk
00:15:37.520 becomes reduced immediately because we're going through these protocols biohazard isn't a problem
00:15:43.280 the other thing is the communication face on this thing was so bad as you point out we're killing
00:15:48.640 ostriches and hiding them is not a good place to begin an outbreak response the public becomes suspicious
00:15:55.120 there's outcries about the the uh the cruelty to animals the farmers have lost uh you know so much
00:16:01.440 money in the process and and uh you know the livelihoods uh put in jeopardy thank goodness
00:16:07.840 in a sense that that became part of the spotlight because it puts a spotlight on what really needs
00:16:13.040 to be done which is in many cases for many things in this country and i think you've heard me say this
00:16:17.840 before jeff we really do have a scenario where outbreak response could be applied hand over fist
00:16:27.120 in many scenarios whether it was uh homelessness totally you know uh serious drug use on the streets
00:16:36.720 mental health issues uh you know so many of these uh major issues that we have could have these four
00:16:44.160 pillars with the right team at the top having a look down how what what is the message we could take
00:16:49.280 to the government that says you really have to build outbreak response into your planning for safety
00:16:55.680 governance and and and moving you know the country forward in all of these categories
00:17:00.720 well i think it would probably be something like um look uh if i was in your shoes and i was like a mayor
00:17:12.960 or uh you know provincial person involved in homelessness or whatever we've got we've got some
00:17:19.920 serious problems right and and never mind that they're hurting people you mr permanent person or
00:17:28.880 mrs government or or politician these are hurting you like like i would i would actually start to appeal
00:17:36.000 to their own self-interest right and going you you this is not working for you the way we're doing it we
00:17:44.000 do this properly you're going to end up being heroes because you're the first people to actually use the
00:17:53.280 proper process to act and you will step by step get successes right there'll be a bit of trial and error
00:18:01.840 and then it's going to work better you'll do things like homelessness and wealth you'll start talking to
00:18:08.880 actual other people who have managed this in other parts of the world and you're going to get ideas from
00:18:13.440 them and you're going to get up in a in an upward spiral and that if you're a politician that's going
00:18:18.960 to improve votes for you right it's it's going to make your mental health a lot better for you as a
00:18:26.320 person in whatever role that's honestly kind of the wow that's a great response if you want your
00:18:33.760 job to be easier if you want to do better things for your constituents start to get your head around
00:18:39.360 this kind of modeling this kind of preparation because it sounds to me also now jeff correct me
00:18:45.040 if i'm wrong an outbreak is not the time to call jeff you should probably have an outbreak response
00:18:52.000 in your in your field in your industry uh in in the medical field and at the government levels
00:18:58.000 totally this should be built now in advance of the problem it's way better and and we call it the
00:19:04.640 pillars of outbreak response partly because that's where we start everybody it's easy to get people's
00:19:10.240 attention about outbreaks because they're so obvious right and so that's where we started but the
00:19:15.680 same process it's really just a coherent group problem solving process so so yeah so if we want
00:19:25.680 say we have a a new thing in our community that we're just wondering hey could this turn into a bad
00:19:32.000 thing right maybe it's brand new um the the thing to then is to get people together and go okay guess
00:19:39.840 what we need leadership team data any interventions required maybe not maybe it's a little tweaking
00:19:48.560 communications same process and what will happen is it'll save money it'll it'll you know it's some
00:19:56.480 series it could save lives and it works across every function within government uh at every level
00:20:06.400 and and the more you work on it the more it integrates people just get on uh they got a virtuous
00:20:12.240 cycle and and start working together it starts to get fun because we're having success and getting
00:20:17.200 along and not having to hide you know what jeff i hope there's an outbreak of common sense and then
00:20:23.200 this gets put into play at every level of government and uh in every industry certainly the ones that
00:20:29.120 service us feeding ourselves uh certainly the ones that watch over our agriculture and our safety uh and
00:20:36.000 our health so uh look i will encourage people to have a look at at these um you know white papers that
00:20:42.960 you've put up uh novometrics where can people find out more and download these i think they're right
00:20:47.760 on your site are they not yeah and i'll tell you things are moving pretty fast um i'm not
00:20:52.960 sure what's the next thing going up on our website you can put that there and then and people are
00:20:57.760 welcome to email me and give them my email address and uh i was gonna say there's there's one other
00:21:04.800 thing i was gonna i was gonna say but it just you wanted you wanted to place me on your advisory team
00:21:11.200 oh hey i had a question for you before we get out of here by the way yeah was there uh was there ever
00:21:17.760 a role for vaccination associated with uh the the bird flu and canadian poultry was that something
00:21:24.400 that was considered at some point yeah and it still is being considered okay and so um so the way i look
00:21:32.240 at this is this and this is a classic outbreak response thing if you're on an outbreak you're on an
00:21:38.960 outbreak team a leadership what you try to avoid is at the outset going hey guys should we vaccinate or
00:21:48.880 not right so it's it's like okay we got an outbreak okay should we vaccinate should we vaccinate it it's
00:21:54.560 not the time and why now it's not that it's not important and then that it might not even work it's
00:22:00.160 that you need a bit of time to normalize the relationship so that some people might be extremely
00:22:06.800 pro-vaccine some not so you have to kind of not you have to get some common ground and then you have
00:22:12.720 to get some actual information that everybody can agree on right like so we're going to do vaccine we're
00:22:20.080 going to want to know do we actually have a problem uh would these vaccines actually work would they be
00:22:28.400 cost effective are there any adverse events are there actual better ways we could do this than the
00:22:35.760 vaccine right or maybe the vaccine could be integrated sorry as as part of a process maybe
00:22:45.440 just for some chickens or some whatever right okay so so it's very important to do that otherwise you
00:22:52.800 just get on a momentum of some people and then it's become becomes who's who can yell the loudest
00:23:01.360 who can manipulate who can lobby the best right not what's the best process so now with with vaccines
00:23:09.600 uh and i'm not an expert in these vaccines but i can tell you definitely um there are there are
00:23:18.080 certainly concerns even even from an adoption perspective amongst the public some of these
00:23:24.960 vaccines are mrna vaccines well that's what we went through with kobe right they they've still never
00:23:32.000 had the proper um on the human side never had proper uh i mean it's hard it's yeah it's hard to
00:23:41.760 understand efficacy of these things because it's so recent and it happens so quickly right so exactly we
00:23:47.200 still don't really know so i i'd kind of go listen i think it's a it's a great thing to consider but
00:23:53.280 let's now get the right people together and not take forever look this through and go there's some
00:23:58.400 near-term things we can do and um the other thing is with poultry vaccines is that typically uh and there
00:24:06.800 may be exceptions i'm not aware but typically it's a problem because once you start vaccinating
00:24:11.360 for a certain disease like that in canada it limits your ability to export poultry products or eggs or
00:24:20.400 what have you overseas because they get tested and a lot of these vaccines will come up as positive so
00:24:26.720 you can't tell is it a vaccinated bird or an infected bird so there's all that stuff has to be kind of
00:24:32.880 figured out right so that's a very interesting that's almost a devastating moment okay we've we've done
00:24:39.280 everything we need to do on our end but they're testing badly as we export them and suddenly
00:24:43.680 are are the market for this product is gone well this and i'm in all honesty i'm not i'm i'm not an
00:24:50.560 expert i have a fair degree of knowledgeable i'm definitely not i'm the guy who has the expertise
00:24:56.320 saying okay these are the different people we have to have around the table on the leadership team or as
00:25:03.440 advisors to the leadership team so we can make an intelligent decision and not go off a
00:25:09.120 cliff and of course that's a lot of what happened with coven i know that may trigger some people
00:25:13.760 because of it's just a very personal thing but that's that's a lot what happened we didn't have
00:25:19.840 we didn't have a broad leadership team there was the data was totally fragmented there was only of
00:25:24.400 the interventions a lot of them actually made they weren't aligned with the day because there was no
00:25:29.600 data and then the communications often that will default to different people pushing their own form of
00:25:39.120 propaganda or their own narrative on all the different sides it doesn't
00:25:44.800 jeff at dinner parties what do you say to people who argue this and they say decentralization is a
00:25:51.840 better way to go because you know once you centralize it then there's control over the masses
00:25:57.120 on this by this uh what's your argument to that now you got to bear in mind we're at the dinner party
00:26:03.200 we've both had a couple of drinks we've shoved each other around a little bit already
00:26:07.200 and i ask you this question what's your response well so one my my first response now is i i will
00:26:15.120 often say nothing just so you know because it's not necessarily the best environment right but if i feel
00:26:22.080 that that um you know there's a possibility of of talking about it without you know triggering me or
00:26:30.240 other people or what have you my general thing would be because i like it's not like i'm immune
00:26:35.600 to this right i have my own perspective right and so um uh generally just a second here now so your
00:26:43.360 thing is if we uh oh yeah centralization or not so here's here's okay it's one of these things where
00:26:52.960 it's not either or it's uh it's not either centralized or distributed it isn't an either or
00:27:02.560 thing when it's looked at in the best way okay so so what could that actually mean what we're proposing
00:27:12.480 is we need to bring together the distributed network of interested people across canada to be
00:27:22.160 part of the solution and be involved in adoption so that means doctors chicken farmers you know
00:27:29.200 homemakers what have you they have to be part of the thing that's a question of a distributed network
00:27:36.720 left to its own it can be utterly chaotic because there's no decision making process so then what you
00:27:42.880 need to do is have a centralized process that everybody can see and can buy into and draws a leadership
00:27:51.760 from amongst the different constituencies from people who are trustworthy and want to make a
00:27:58.480 difference you bring that together and then they can manage the issue with continual communication to
00:28:07.520 the public and experts it's not either or you know dr jeff i don't know if you realized you were a diplomat
00:28:15.280 that was very nicely handled but it makes sense but it's actually it's actually sorry go ahead
00:28:20.800 it makes perfect sense that that's the truth i mean yes i mean these are the experts that you want
00:28:25.200 at the top of the pillar number one you want the right people in the industry with the right knowledge
00:28:30.880 and uh connectivity to other people with knowledge on that same thing by the way i will never challenge
00:28:37.200 i will never challenge you on this at a dinner party i promise and i tried it pretty much now people
00:28:41.760 we're pretty well resigned a lot of us most people in the world are kind of like we certainly we're
00:28:45.840 not top really i'm not going to politic we're not going to talk over we're not talking outbreak
00:28:51.120 response honey i don't want you bringing up outbreak response with the dinner guest tonight
00:28:56.560 but but there is a way to do it right um i would say this thing about your or see i got i wrote a book
00:29:02.400 on belief systems years ago because i was trying to sort out how to deal with all the stuff so i can go
00:29:08.160 crazy so there's lots of things which are not either or so i remember a friend one time and it was
00:29:14.640 it was oh my husband's moving to to um ottawa from guelph and i have to decide either will i will i
00:29:25.040 change my job and give up my job here and move there or will i stay and then not only see my husband
00:29:31.360 on weekends see that thing which is not nicely amenable to either or it'll tie you in knots much
00:29:39.360 better is a is a integrated thing where you go the creative thing well what if you what if you had the
00:29:46.160 same job and you could tell the work and then you were able to have the best of both worlds right
00:29:53.520 it's it's actually just creative problems and that's a huge chunk of what
00:29:58.960 what outbreak response is about are we going to use vaccines or not well maybe we'll get started
00:30:05.600 and maybe there's a place we could use them or maybe there's something better facts maybe they're
00:30:09.760 the best possible thing if you have the that makes you have a if you have a a policy and a procedure of
00:30:16.640 discussion that actually leads to the so look we're all headed to the same solution but we have to do it
00:30:23.760 methodically we have to do it with as much knowledge as we can yeah uh listen this is uh i'll make sure
00:30:30.320 that your email is connected and we'll connect everybody in the description to these white papers
00:30:36.400 dr jeff this is not the last time i'll bug you in this new year happy new year thanks so much for
00:30:41.200 joining us not at all and again just people i know that i i kind of laugh about this stuff obviously
00:30:48.800 it's not so i take it very seriously it's just it's not that i'm nervous about talking about it
00:30:55.840 i just find intuitively it's helpful to kind of not get angry about it and not get one side and and a
00:31:05.920 little bit of silly humor as long as respectful to me helps me if nobody else so i just find people
00:31:13.600 it's not that i don't take it seriously look i gotta tell you if if i took everything we did every day
00:31:19.360 here seriously i would not come in in the morning most of this stuff is discussion and i love having
00:31:25.680 them with you because it it's a calming effect uh you realize pretty quickly that common sense is what
00:31:32.000 needs to reign over in these scenarios and that there's a methodology we can use uh by the way and
00:31:38.320 i say this often to be critical of what's happened before is making it better uh the next time today's
00:31:44.560 wardrobe seeing it in the camera right now is a good example of that i promise you won't see this
00:31:48.960 combination again jeff thank you so much i'm going to encourage people to reach out and get this info
00:31:54.560 from novometrics and uh uh if you don't mind we'll catch up again shortly i would love to thanks appreciate
00:32:00.800 it thank you