Unify Action - Governments EXPLOIT Climate Panic - The TRUTH You’re Not Supposed to Know

00:00:00.000 I have something to confess. I actually do believe in climate change. I do think our climate is

00:00:05.200 changing, but, big but, I am not terrified by it. I don't think there's a lot we can do and I think

00:00:13.040 they're drumming up a lot of the fear around climate action and climate change. So today we're

00:00:18.080 talking about all of the reactions that we got from our climate change video that we did at the

00:00:22.560 St. Jacob's Market. We're breaking down some of the things that people said and I think it's going

00:00:27.280 going to be a lot of fun. Okay one of the things that we noticed while we were at the market is

00:00:32.380 that there were a lot of people who really had bought into the climate fear but there was one

00:00:36.640 lady who agreed to talk and her her synopsis of the whole situation was really good. I absolutely

00:00:43.520 agree with what she said so we're going to watch a bit of that. I don't think that we as humans

00:00:48.380 can do anything about the weather change. It's going to happen. The weather has never been

00:00:54.020 stationary as far as we know as far back as science can track it but what we can do to be

00:01:00.660 prepared for it is make sure that we are building in safe places we are maintaining our forests

00:01:08.980 which have not been done the undergrowth is part of the problem they need to cut back all of the

00:01:15.520 undergrowth near railroad tracks because that is part of the problem that trains are setting the

00:01:20.920 grass on fire. So all we can do as humans is be aware that it's going to happen and make sure we

00:01:27.640 have the resources that when it does happen, we can help save people, their homes, their businesses,

00:01:34.600 etc. She is absolutely right. I think climate change is a lot of it is out of our hands.

00:01:41.760 There's not much we can do about the climate. If you look at what would happen if the entire world

00:01:47.660 were to throw as much money as they can into transitioning themselves to a net zero regime,

00:01:55.080 that would take $38 trillion of money every year. So that's $4,000 of money for every human being

00:02:03.740 on the planet now every year. There's a lot of people in a lot of places that can't afford that.

00:02:10.440 There are so many governments that can't afford that. And even if we did put all that money

00:02:15.120 towards climate action and a net zero agenda, by 2100, the only net benefit that we're going to see

00:02:25.020 is a reduction in global temperature of 0.02 degrees Celsius. That's 1 50th of a degree.

00:02:35.360 So what would happen is we would bankrupt so many countries and we bankrupt Canada 0.60

00:02:40.920 and destroy many people's lives. And then the only benefit we're going to see by 2100 in 75 years

00:02:48.360 would be a reduction in 1 50th of a degree Celsius. In these developing countries in Africa, 0.74

00:02:55.400 in India, in Asian countries, they can't pay that money forward. They can't. Their chief concerns,

00:03:02.280 if you look at what they're concerned about, their concerns are developing their electrical grid,

00:03:07.800 feeding their populations, like, their top priority is not climate change. So the crazy

00:03:16.800 thing is that bill would have to be forked over to OECD countries. So the Organization for Economic

00:03:25.300 Cooperation and Development, the countries that are part of that group would have to fork over

00:03:30.480 that bill. And if we did, that would be $30,000 per year for each of us in the OECD countries.

00:03:39.440 And that is also very insane. So we can't, we can't do much about this. There is very little

00:03:46.960 that we can do. It's going to happen. And she's absolutely right. We just simply have to adapt.

00:03:52.480 That's what we've done since humanity has been around. We've been adapting. That's the best

00:03:57.520 thing now i did mention the fact that this would be is crazy how much money we'd have to put forward

00:04:03.280 and very little benefit and i mentioned that to one person at the market who was very for

00:04:07.600 climate change and this was her response so that the earth doesn't heat up so we can still live

00:04:13.760 here so um that sounds like a lot of money but um i mean there has to be a solution where

00:04:22.080 we are not as wasteful as humans. So I think it's really important that whatever we can do,

00:04:32.400 but it has to be sustainable so people can afford to live. Obviously, she does get that it's going

00:04:38.980 to be an insane bill and that people need to be able to afford to live. Obviously, she gets that.

00:04:44.620 but the climate idea is so ingrained in her mind that it's going to be so insane that the world is

00:04:52.620 going to be uninhabitable if we don't do something. That is also not true. There is nowhere that has

00:05:01.340 been getting uninhabitable on this planet due to climate change. The only spots that are

00:05:06.860 uninhabitable are like the Sahara Desert and deserts, which have been uninhabitable for years.

00:05:11.840 so the climate scare is it's it's been drummed up by the media absolutely it is it is totally about

00:05:19.880 fear and people don't realize that they've just bought into the fear another thing that people

00:05:25.940 toss around is that oh all of all of our forests are going to burn up if we don't do something

00:05:31.420 about climate change immediately and like i said our temperature reductions are going to be minimal

00:05:38.780 like almost non-existent if we cut emissions as fast as we can right now. So a dramatic emissions

00:05:46.140 cut is not going to help our forest fire problem. Another thing, and this is really interesting,

00:05:52.540 the percentage of area, global forest area, that has been burnt up by fire over the last century

00:06:00.380 has decreased by 50%, so we are getting better at fighting forest fires and also the amount

00:06:09.020 that is being burned has decreased by half. Now, you won't hear that in the media. They will tell

00:06:15.340 you that in Canada today, that this year, they will tell you that this year is the worst year

00:06:22.940 in Canada for forest fires and they would probably try and make you think that it's the worst year

00:06:27.660 in the world for forest fires. If that is the case, then we would have to, the amount of area

00:06:37.200 of forest that would have to be burned this year to make this year the worst year for forest fires

00:06:42.620 would have to increase by 50% what it was last year. Last year was the second lowest year for

00:06:53.260 forest fire and the area being burned ever. The second lowest year. 2022 was the lowest year that

00:07:00.820 we've ever recorded for the amount of area and forest fire that's ever been burned. That, you're

00:07:06.620 not going to hear that. No one's going to tell you that. They're going to tell you that the world is

00:07:10.640 on fire and that we're losing forests at an unprecedented rate and that we've got to cut

00:07:16.780 emissions and spend as much money as we can. And that is simply not the case. They will also tell

00:07:23.000 you that climate change is the driver of world hunger, which again is not the case. Our food

00:07:30.140 production has been increasing so much and maybe it will be slowed down by climate change,

00:07:37.360 but it is still increasing. So the rate that it will increase might be slowed down by climate

00:07:43.040 change, but very, very little. And world hunger is slated to half even more over the next few

00:07:50.560 centuries. So that is a good thing. But climate change is not the main driver for world hunger.

00:07:57.840 The main driver for world hunger is world conflicts, wars, and corrupt governments that

00:08:05.280 are just simply not distributing the food or the aid that other countries give them.

00:08:11.680 And if we really wanted to solve world hunger, we would be wanting to produce as much food as

00:08:17.360 possible. But what we've been seeing the liberal government do is they're actually, they have

00:08:23.600 penalized farmers for using fertilizers and using diesel and gas-powered machinery and making it

00:08:31.280 more expensive for them to dry their grain and to ship it to market and to even cut it and harvest

00:08:37.060 it off the field. They're making that more expensive and they're making food in general

00:08:41.500 more expensive. If we really wanted to solve world hunger, we would need to make food as inexpensive

00:08:48.140 as possible to produce, and we want to produce as much of it as possible. You cannot penalize

00:08:53.660 the production of food and then expect world hunger to be solved. It's just not going to happen.

00:08:59.440 So a lot of these people, the same people that are saying that climate change needs to be stopped

00:09:04.300 no matter what, are also the ones that are saying that we need to make as much wealth redistribution

00:09:10.000 to lower-income people as possible and basically redistribute the wealth that has been accumulated

00:09:16.160 in the world. That's, it's very hypocritical because they're going to punish lower-income

00:09:23.760 families by making food more expensive, making vehicles, making heating, making cooling more

00:09:28.720 expensive, and then they're going to say that we need to give as much money to these people from

00:09:34.980 the wealthy that are creating the wealth and creating the jobs and producing food and things

00:09:41.000 that people need. They're going to penalize them and then they're going to penalize lower income

00:09:45.500 people. It's very hypocritical. Who do they really care about? I mean, I'll leave that up to you guys 0.98

00:09:51.960 to think about who they really care about because it's certainly not either group. And the rise in

00:09:58.460 food prices that happened due to the carbon tax and the rise in heating and cooling costs and

00:10:04.060 things like that. That is part of the reason that made the Trudeau government so unpopular. And

00:10:10.500 that's the reason that they actually removed the commercial side of the carbon tax. But that carbon

00:10:15.880 tax is still on industry. There was one gentleman who actually brought up the carbon tax even before

00:10:20.760 I mentioned it to anyone. Yes, and it was in the context of putting it on industry. And here's what

00:10:27.080 he had to say. It's a long clip, but I'll just play the whole thing. The tax, the carbon tax,

00:10:32.900 I think what they need to do is to increase that on the bigger companies, the industrial companies that are putting these very large outputs of greenhouse gases and that into the environment.

00:10:44.580 Do you think, though, overtaxing our industry will make us less competitive to the states, which doesn't have a tax like that?

00:10:54.320 Good question.

00:10:55.220 there has to be a balance to be able to you know to be globally competitive but yet to be able to

00:11:05.100 decrease the amount of greenhouse gases that are going up in the atmosphere no matter how the

00:11:11.600 government decide that they're going to implement whether it be a tax or a surcharge or whatever

00:11:18.280 to these companies ultimately it will always trickle down to the consumer because you know

00:11:24.100 they have to take on those costs and they have to be able to recoup those costs somehow so

00:11:31.380 eventually it's going to make its way down to us he is suggesting that we increase the industrial

00:11:38.500 carbon tax even more which is really a very interesting statement to think because when

00:11:44.180 i ask him if it's going to reduce our competitiveness he's like he thought about it he didn't want to

00:11:51.220 admit it, but yes, it is going to reduce our competitiveness on the global market because

00:11:56.180 we have to compete with countries that don't have a carbon tax and don't care about their emissions.

00:12:01.220 And it would be much better for industry to stay in Canada and to produce jobs

00:12:06.500 and basically make life better in Canada and produce greener things. They will be much greener

00:12:12.740 than in countries where they really just don't care about their emissions and they will just

00:12:16.980 produce whatever. It'd be much better for that industry to remain in Canada,

00:12:21.460 but instead we're taxing our industry. And I love to think of it this way, that Donald Trump is

00:12:29.220 tariffing our industry and Mark Carney is taxing our industry. Both of those things combined,

00:12:36.740 like where do you think industry is going to go? And I mentioned it to a couple of these girls, 0.60

00:12:40.900 And they admitted it, that it's probably going to leave. The industry is probably going to leave 0.86

00:12:47.940 and go to the States. And since Mark Carney's been in office, we've lost $60 billion worth of

00:12:52.820 investment. And the green agenda and the green initiatives have been a horrible thing for

00:12:59.060 Alberta, which relies a lot on oil. And they've lost something like 30% of their investment

00:13:05.620 just because it's been so unprofitable to be in Alberta and to work there. So that's just a few

00:13:12.900 things of what we've lost. We've lost pipelines, revenue from that. Our shipments from the west

00:13:19.540 coast have been cut. There's a tanker ban now. So yeah, oh, they say, oh, one of the funny things,

00:13:25.540 Stephen Gobilla once said that, oh, why don't we use our pipelines to the fullest? The mountain

00:13:34.100 pipeline going to BC. Oh, that's not even at full capacity. Well, newsflash, there's

00:13:40.100 a tanker ban on the BC Ghost. They can't ship as much as that pipeline can flow because

00:13:47.160 there's a ban. So these things have totally hampered our industry and we've lost LNG deals

00:13:54.160 too with Japan and Germany because of our green initiative. So this is really hampering

00:14:00.860 our economy. They're not thinking about the consequences. The world is driven by energy,

00:14:07.180 and right now that energy is oil and gas. I would love to see greener options,

00:14:12.940 but right now that's just not profitable. I mean, solar and wind are not consistent in how they

00:14:21.740 produce. And I can speak from personal experience as far as solar because we have solar panels on

00:14:26.140 our house. And they are not, they don't produce consistently. Of course they don't produce at

00:14:30.700 night. So you need a battery backup for that to even have power at night. But then they also don't

00:14:36.460 produce consistently in the winter because the sun is just not as strong in the winter as it is in

00:14:41.580 the summer. So you have peak production in the summer where you get most of your energy, but

00:14:45.420 then in the winter you don't get as much energy. So you can't rely that much on solar. You need

00:14:50.700 something else. And wind is also inconsistent. It produces and then it doesn't. So there's a huge

00:14:57.900 cost to pushing all over to solar and wind. And in Ontario, we've actually seen that cost. The

00:15:04.760 Ontario government actually subsidizes our electricity costs like $6 billion per year

00:15:10.340 because they've pushed so much into solar and wind. And those things are inconsistent and driving up

00:15:15.420 our costs. It's like, it's doubled the price of our electricity in Ontario. It's really hurting

00:15:21.400 Ontario citizens because of what they've done in pushing that sort of green agenda. All right,

00:15:28.600 so now that we've covered that, let's hit a different subject. So CO2 is actually plant food,

00:15:35.860 and you would probably have heard that when you took biology in school, but they don't bring that

00:15:41.380 up in context of emissions because they don't want us to think about what would happen if the

00:15:45.680 CO2 were increased in our atmosphere. What if it made things lusher? And in fact, we have data now

00:15:51.780 to show that yes, the CO2 increase is actually making the world lusher. And the increase in

00:15:58.840 green area on our planet has been larger than the United States, something like the continent of

00:16:04.040 Australia. Like that's how much green area has been added to the world. So the CO2, the increase

00:16:12.200 in CO2 is actually being helpful to plant life on this planet. And here's a crazy thing. All that

00:16:20.200 CO2 that's in the ground right now was at one point in the air and going through our ecosystem.

00:16:28.520 And we can know just by looking at a massive amount of carbon in these coal seams, we can't

00:16:34.280 produce that sort of plant life now. It was extremely lush. Like just adding more carbon

00:16:40.440 to the atmosphere will make the world a much lusher and much greener place and plants will

00:16:45.960 grow better. It's just a fact that this increase in CO2 could actually not only make our farming

00:16:52.440 more productive but it could also be a really good thing for our planet as well now that is

00:16:59.160 not something that you'll hear very often that is not a very popular opinion but i actually brought

00:17:04.440 this up with one young lady at the market and uh her reaction was quite interesting does that make

00:17:11.560 sense yeah it does um to that i'm i would say yes years ago it was amazing for our environment

00:17:24.920 but now that we manufactured it in a way when it comes back down on us it might not

00:17:32.280 like lushness us more in a way if that made sense like because it's so man-made now

00:17:39.880 the carbon kind of going to the sky on our ozone and everything I think when it

00:17:48.340 comes back down to what to us it'll have an effect I don't know so that it

00:17:57.880 doesn't make sense a plant does not distinguish what carbon what what co2

00:18:05.080 molecule. It is ingesting when it ingests it. It doesn't say, oh, was this produced by a cool

00:18:10.640 plant? Because if it was, I'm not going to ingest it, right? Like, green agenda. Plants don't,

00:18:16.960 plants don't distinguish like that. So, it doesn't make sense to say that it's a man-made thing and

00:18:23.920 therefore it's not going to be good. Like, plants simply don't distinguish like that.

00:18:28.500 and they're just going to absorb more carbon and which I think is actually one of the benefits of

00:18:36.660 climate change. Now that is not to suggest that we should go and burn as much fossil fuels as

00:18:42.240 possible. I think there's got to be a balance here because one of the benefits to going towards more

00:18:49.600 of an electric vehicle idea, especially in our cities, is that we're going to reduce smog and

00:18:54.360 that, that's a good thing that we reduce smog because people are getting lung cancer and dying

00:18:59.700 simply because of smog. It is really bad in places like Kathmandu and Mexico City.

00:19:05.380 Those places are actually forcing, pushing electric initiatives simply because the smog is so bad.

00:19:12.260 And I hear stories of people that have been in Kathmandu and at the end of the day,

00:19:18.280 their nose is full of black soot because the smog is so bad. Now imagine that, like we say smoking

00:19:24.960 is so bad, but the smog is probably just as bad and the pollution from that. So I think it's a

00:19:31.560 good idea to reduce our emissions, especially in big cities. But to be crazy about it is also wrong

00:19:38.000 and could really hurt our economy. Now, a lot of the focus and a lot of the green initiatives

00:19:44.780 and the money that's being put towards net zero is actually going towards the developed world and

00:19:51.660 Western countries like the US and Canada and Europe. A lot of that money is going to those

00:19:56.920 countries, actually a significant portion of it. But we don't produce the majority of world

00:20:04.480 emissions. In fact, Europe, the US, and Canada, we only produce about one-fifth of the world

00:20:12.000 emissions. Four-fifths of it is actually in the greater part of, like, China, India, Asia, and

00:20:17.500 then the continent of Africa. Those are the places that dramatically would need to reduce their

00:20:22.720 emissions if we were to truly go net zero. But those aren't the countries that are going to do

00:20:28.440 it because they can't afford it. And they're developing. And one of the things you need to

00:20:33.480 develop your country is energy. Energy drives everything. And if you drive up the cost of

00:20:38.780 energy, you drive up the cost of everything. These countries need their energy and they're

00:20:43.460 not going to switch to net zero just because we say that that's good. They're going to go to the

00:20:49.160 cheapest option and that's where the majority of corporations are going to go to. They're going to

00:20:53.820 flood to the cheapest option. That's why industry is actually fleeing Canada and fleeing Europe and

00:20:58.680 going to the States and to places that have less taxes because they care so much about their bottom

00:21:05.820 line and their profit margin. So we can't make things more expensive. Just it's not going to

00:21:11.980 work. And also Canada only accounts for 1.5% of global emissions. If Canada were to go net zero

00:21:20.980 and the rest of the world wasn't, it's not going to affect climate change that much.

00:21:28.340 Another question that I asked people on the street was if it is actually the government's

00:21:33.180 job to be forcing us to comply with the green agenda. Now, if you think that the world is on

00:21:38.560 fire, then you're going to say, yes, it's definitely their job to force us to comply.

00:21:43.160 But if you think more critically and certainly more right-leaning, you'll say, absolutely not.

00:21:48.400 The government is supposed to, yes, keep us safe, but more importantly than keeping us safe,

00:21:53.920 they have to keep us free. That is actually their primary function, to keep us free. And that's not

00:22:00.360 what they're doing when they're forcing us to comply with a green agenda. So I asked that to

00:22:05.360 some people on the street and this is their response. Do you think it's the government's

00:22:09.980 job to force us to comply with a green agenda? Half and half. I think the government isn't doing

00:22:19.740 half what they should be doing and they're doing too much of what they shouldn't be doing.

00:22:23.640 well i mean the government is elected you know by the people in that here

00:22:30.240 um i think whatever they do it should be um you know approved by the people in that before they

00:22:37.940 decide you know that they're going to go ahead and implement a project than that so um sort of

00:22:44.360 you know i don't know if it you know when they do their voting in that um if there's something that

00:22:49.840 could actually be put out to the vote to the people to see whether or not that's something

00:22:53.800 that we want, as opposed to just an organization within the government or the government themselves

00:23:00.040 representing us without any input from the people.

00:23:04.480 Yeah, that's actually a really interesting idea, because he's basically saying we should

00:23:08.660 have a referendum on climate action.

00:23:11.020 And it's a good idea, but the way that the media is pushing everything and pushing the

00:23:17.320 fear that most people will actually vote for climate action. That's the way I'm thinking.

00:23:22.280 But yes, that is the way it should be, that the government should have a referendum on climate

00:23:27.600 action and they should actually ask the people, do you want to spend trillions and trillions of

00:23:36.260 dollars on the transition to net zero? But they will never do that because that is not part of

00:23:43.100 their plan that's it's the government itself not asking the people necessarily it's thinking that

00:23:49.040 they have the power to force the people that even didn't vote for them to comply with this agenda

00:23:54.280 but most of the people don't think that way

00:23:57.320 yes it's their responsibility to set guidelines and institute what people should be doing but do

00:24:09.820 think that totally it conflicts with people's like free will. You, as I said, they said guidelines

00:24:18.120 are not enforceable by law. The way that they're doing it, they're penalizing anyone who doesn't

00:24:25.060 comply with the green agenda. So things like the carbon tax and the EV mandates, they're forcing

00:24:31.980 people to comply with this green agenda and that is very wrong. This is an agenda that our

00:24:38.140 government has, and however good they might think it is, it's actually quite harmful to the world,

00:24:43.820 but they're going to force us to comply with it anyway to our hurt. That is, in my opinion,

00:24:50.120 very wrong because they're making things more expensive for us and then penalizing us when we

00:24:57.200 don't take that more expensive option. It's actually quite wrong for them to say that you

00:25:02.100 can't buy an internal combustion engine car, even though it is, right now at least, the cheaper

00:25:08.480 option, it's very wrong for them to penalize us for wanting to purchase those and then telling

00:25:14.280 us to purchase the more expensive option. You can't make life so expensive for people

00:25:19.900 and then expect them to gravitate towards more expensive options, even more expensive options.

00:25:27.540 you're going to make life unlivable for people. And this really comes back down to what people

00:25:35.640 think the role of government is. And if you've been through the public school system and the

00:25:40.740 government basically educating you, which is still quite funny, the government educating you

00:25:45.800 on what the government thinks it should do. But most people, when they've gone through that whole

00:25:51.360 the public school system, they will think that it's the government's role to keep us safe, which

00:25:56.420 i mean it is to some extent but then also it's the government's rule to tell us exactly what to do

00:26:01.380 and the government always knows best like this is a very common idea that the government always

00:26:06.900 knows best and they're never wrong but the truth is the government is wrong they're imperfect human

00:26:12.580 beings so we can't trust them to always know what's best but unfortunately the larger portion

00:26:19.140 of the canadian population thinks that the government knows what's best they believe

00:26:24.340 As one lady said, they believe in the white coat. They believe in elitists. They think that they

00:26:28.940 know what's best. And it is shocking, actually, that they will never think that maybe there's

00:26:35.260 a group of people that actually wants to control us. Because people who want to be controlling,

00:26:42.260 the controlling sort of personality will gravitate towards government and especially

00:26:47.060 to highly centralized governments like we have in Canada. They will gravitate towards that because

00:26:51.700 power loves nothing more than to see the weaker submit to its authority and rule. It's unfortunately

00:26:59.020 human nature that we want to see other people submit to us. And I guess it never comes into

00:27:05.520 people's minds that there is this sort of people in the government that want to control us and want

00:27:11.500 to use us, and even people that want to reduce the world's population. And those people exist,

00:27:16.740 but they're just trying to hide their agenda. So the climate action agenda is really just another

00:27:22.200 way for them to attempt to reduce the world's population because they're scaring people

00:27:26.800 into not having kids because they say, oh, the world is overcrowded. We're heating up the world.

00:27:32.920 The world is going to end. If you want to have a good world in the future, then you won't have kids,

00:27:39.720 which doesn't make sense to me because there won't be anyone around in the future if we don't have

00:27:45.580 kids. Just saying. My solution would be to reduce the price of greener options, and that might be

00:27:54.660 even more research and development and better technology brought up, because I don't think we

00:28:01.100 have the right technology to produce cheap green energy yet. I just don't think we have it, no

00:28:07.300 matter what the media might say. We need more research and development in those areas that we

00:28:11.140 should actually develop our resources right now. If we want the world to transition to battery

00:28:16.620 electric vehicles, then we can't just say, oh, we can't mine out the ores that are necessary to

00:28:22.300 build the batteries, but then force people to buy these cars anyway, and even though they're

00:28:27.820 insanely expensive. We need to actually get those ores out of the ground. Once they're out of the

00:28:34.220 ground, we can recycle them, and eventually, with enough recycling, we should never need to mine

00:28:39.000 the battery components ever again. But until then, we have to mine. Like, that's just a hard fact.

00:28:46.860 We need to build our industry. We need to use oil and gas until there's a better option,

00:28:52.880 and strangling our economy is just not the way to do it. So yes, the solution, at least in my mind,

00:29:01.200 is to make things less expensive and boost our economy while we can. There's one more thing that

00:29:07.720 I need to mention. There is one thing that Mark Carney will never do. Mark Carney will never

00:29:14.640 subscribe to this channel. So don't be like Mark Carney. Subscribe. All right. Bye.

Unify Action - August 30, 2025

Governments EXPLOIT Climate Panic - The TRUTH You’re Not Supposed to Know

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript