00:00:00.080So at what point did he, before being a whistleblower, and typically as a whistleblower, to do that at a young age, that could be a career, it could hurt you with your career if you're going to come in and talk about it, right?
00:00:11.440So you have to be careful because all the other engineering firms to hire you, they may be like, whoa, do we want to hire a whistleblower?
00:00:17.960It's a little bit of a risk for him, right?
00:00:19.720What got him to get to the point of saying, I have to blow the whistle here with what's going on?
00:00:24.760Yeah, he had his own startup plans before he quit OpenAI.
00:00:30.360In July, he had a plan to start a startup with respect to neuroscience and machine learning.
00:00:38.820He did check with his friend from UC Berkeley who studied together, will you join me?
00:00:44.820He already knew he was not going to be depending on anyone's job.
00:00:49.360He's going to create his own job and his company.
00:00:51.760And telling the ethics would demonstrate his integrity that would only help him secure funds, he said.
00:03:49.620Can you go back to the New York Times one?
00:03:51.520So in the New York Times one, he's saying that over the past two years, a number of individuals' business have sued various AI companies, including OpenAI, arguing.
00:03:59.140That's the New York Times saying that they illegally use copyright material to train their technologies.
00:04:05.040Those who have filed suits include computer programmers, artists, record labels, book authors, and news organizations.
00:04:10.940So New York Times also sued OpenAI in December.
00:04:14.400And if I'm not mistaken, in your interview with Tucker, you were saying, you were talking about the fact that a part of the New York Times document was sealed, not open to the public, but you were waiting until the end of January for your husband to become the estate administrator for you to have access to it.
00:05:06.200And then also, the New York Times, at the time, if I'm not mistaken, when I'm looking at the date, November 18th, New York Times court files, filing, identified that New York Times attorneys, copyright cases on OpenAI, that certain people that would testify, and one of the names, November 18th, was Suchir that would testify, Balaji that would testify against OpenAI.
00:05:57.000New York Times argued that Balaji would have unique and relevant documents supporting to new plaintiffs allegations of willful infringement, among other issues.
00:06:05.180The Times attorney had previously asked the court to designate eight other current or former OpenAI employees as custodians in the case, including Ilya, Suitskever, co-founder and former chief scientist, and that's the friend that you're talking about.
00:06:19.660And Bright Light Cap, the chief operating officer.
00:06:23.200Nowadays, more than ever, the brand you wear reflects and represents who you are.
00:06:28.380So, for us, if you wear a Future Looks Bright hat or a Valuetainment gear, you're telling the world, I'm optimistic, I'm excited about what's going to be happening, but you're a free thinker, you question things, you like debate.
00:06:40.500And, by the way, last year, 120,000 people got a piece of Future Looks Bright gear with Valuetainment.
00:07:16.800But if you believe the future looks bright, if you follow our content and what we represent with Valuetainment, with PBD podcast, go to vtmerch.com.
00:07:27.460And, by the way, if you order right now, there's going to be a special VT gift insight just for you.