Valuetainment - January 07, 2026


"Prices Will NEVER Go Down" - Trump’s Affordability Promise COLLIDES With Cost-of-Living NIGHTMARE


Episode Stats

Length

19 minutes

Words per Minute

205.8522

Word Count

4,017

Sentence Count

346

Misogynist Sentences

1


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Trump administration laser-focused on affordability as Trump softens tariff strategy. White House announces Wednesday that tariffs slated to kick in Thursday on furniture, kitchen cabinets and vanities would be postponed for another year. This indicates that on some level, the White House understands that President Trump s tariffs are driving up consumer prices and that Trump and the Republican Party are incurring substantial political damage from higher prices.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:00.000 White House laser-focused on affordability as Trump softens tariff strategy.
00:00:06.440 Okay, so there's two stories like, well, you know, affordability is just a Democrat hoax.
00:00:11.760 It's not a real thing. No one's really dealing with that. It's just a bunch of BS.
00:00:15.340 But behind closed doors, apparently, guys, we got to get this affordability thing scored away
00:00:20.260 as we're going through this next phase.
00:00:22.220 So the Trump administration is ramping down tariffs for even more goods
00:00:25.980 as the White House zeroes in on its messaging around affordability.
00:00:29.940 The White House announces Wednesday that tariffs slated to kick in Thursday
00:00:33.260 as furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities would be postponed for another year.
00:00:39.560 This indicates that on some level, the White House understands that President Trump's tariffs
00:00:43.180 are driving up consumer prices and that Trump and the Republican Party
00:00:46.780 are incurring substantial political damage from higher prices.
00:00:49.920 As Michael Strain said, the White House slapped a 25% tariff on furniture, kitchen cabinets,
00:00:55.400 and vanities in October. Tariffs on furniture were slated to increase to 30% in January,
00:01:00.000 and tariffs on the cabinets and vanities were set to increase to 50%.
00:01:03.700 But they're trying to figure out something going on here with affordability.
00:01:06.920 Tom, your thoughts on the story?
00:01:08.120 Well, first of all, we were correct.
00:01:10.420 We talked about this, and we said that the tariffs, and we said at the beginning of the year,
00:01:15.660 they would be tactics, not taxes. And guess what? All the economists come out and so surprised.
00:01:23.260 Oh, wow. Well, you know, it really hasn't gone up. It hasn't been as inflationary as we thought.
00:01:27.300 Even the Fed, Jerome Powell, you know, the short timer who's about to lose his job, has said that.
00:01:33.380 And what's happening this week is the president is talking more about affordability to kind of take
00:01:38.700 the messaging back from the Democrats who keep saying, oh, it's inflationary, inflationary.
00:01:43.260 If you look at one of the things that was happening this week, it was a bunch of pre-made
00:01:46.980 construction stuff. These are things that, you know, average Americans buy every week, not.
00:01:52.940 Vanities, kitchen cabinets, you know, higher-end furniture, come on. Those aren't the things that
00:01:59.120 people are buying every week, and that's not what tariffs are going to cause inflationary.
00:02:02.600 As a matter of fact, he moved on some agricultural tariffs that were in Italy, and it took the
00:02:11.720 tariffs down to 1.2 percent on certain Italian pastas. So the pastas that are coming in, it was
00:02:17.580 less than one-seventh of our sales tax. So what's happening right now, point one, the president
00:02:23.700 hears these messages Democrats are trying to push on affordability. So now he's fighting back saying,
00:02:29.820 hey, it wasn't inflationary in the first place, and I'll tell you what, let me suspend this tariff
00:02:34.420 over here, this tariff here that was on kitchen vanities, cabinets, and things that you would
00:02:38.940 use for remodels. And Americans aren't really doing that right now, right? There's not a lot of
00:02:42.720 remodeling going on. You see the quarterly reports from Home Depot and Lowe's. But energy is down,
00:02:49.340 heating oil is down for the winter. And also, he just did like what he did on the imported Italian
00:02:55.160 pasta. Make it like a one percent tariff coming over there. So he's getting the joke that he can't
00:03:00.720 just say to the microphone, oh, affordability is a headline issue that's being spun by the Democrats.
00:03:06.020 No, there's some reality to it because the prices haven't come back down from Biden inflation. And so
00:03:11.880 now the White House and the president are out there speaking to it to counter the message of the
00:03:16.700 Democrats. And yes, certain things like Italian pastas came down a little bit.
00:03:20.360 Jeff, your thoughts on this? Yeah, this is not a messaging thing. And the fact that they try to
00:03:26.100 treat it as a messaging problem shows that they're still kind of out to lunch. You're saying it's a
00:03:30.220 real thing. It is absolutely a real thing. And, you know, the original problem here that Republicans
00:03:37.040 had specifically is they came in, you know, last year or the year before. Sorry, it's 2025 or 2026.
00:03:42.380 Now they came in the year before and said, we're going to bring prices down. Well, in economics,
00:03:46.260 prices don't go down. That was a mistake to begin with. When prices went up back in 21 and 22,
00:03:51.580 that was a permanent change. You can't go backwards. Every supply shock in history,
00:03:56.880 prices go up in a step fashion and then they level off where they are at a new step fashion or the new
00:04:01.240 equilibrium and they stay there. So Republicans should have said is, you want to blame Biden for
00:04:07.000 that? Fine. Biden made you poorer. Now we're going to try to fix it. Not by getting prices to go down
00:04:11.780 because they will not go down. They should have been clear on that. Prices will never go down again.
00:04:15.560 We are never going to see 2019 prices again. So what we're going to try to do is our absolute best
00:04:22.080 to make sure the jobs market is as strong and as resilient as matching the rhetoric coming from all
00:04:27.140 these different economists in the Federal Reserve. So that what happens is what should have happened
00:04:31.520 if we had a strong economy, that you have prices that went up in 21 and 22 or 21 back then, five years
00:04:38.140 ago, and then incomes rise to, first of all, meet prices and then exceed them. What happens first?
00:04:45.000 What happens first? Cost of goods goes up first, then income rises? What is the typical pattern?
00:04:53.300 Well, in this case, because prices were forced higher by government action, it was a non-economic...
00:04:58.120 Income has to be forced to increase.
00:04:59.640 Income should naturally go... If there was an actual recovery from the pandemic and the lockdowns,
00:05:04.520 incomes would naturally rise over enough time that it would equalize with the prices from 21 and 22
00:05:10.140 and then exceed them. So even though the cost of a car is now 50,000 instead of 30,000, you have more
00:05:16.440 than enough income to pay for it. And so we all get used to the new higher prices and it doesn't
00:05:20.820 become a major problem.
00:05:21.940 But is that happening?
00:05:22.800 No, that's the problem. What really happened was prices went up massively in 21 and 22 and incomes never
00:05:29.660 caught up. This is what people are talking about when they talk about inflation and affordability.
00:05:33.420 It's not about the price of a dryer or something that's gone up in the last year. It's the price
00:05:38.560 of everything that went up five years ago and incomes never went up enough for people to
00:05:44.640 claw back to...
00:05:44.940 So one, whose fault is that, too? How do you address it?
00:05:47.500 First, whose fault is that? It's the government's fault. They created the pandemic and the lockdowns
00:05:51.640 and then because of the pandemic...
00:05:53.400 Under Biden, when they did the pandemic and the lockdown...
00:05:55.160 You can't forget, it was also Trump.
00:05:56.740 It was... The spending was on both sides.
00:05:58.740 Spending was on both sides.
00:05:59.500 But the lockdown was on both sides.
00:06:00.640 Yeah, it was both sides. I mean, you got to blame both sides for this part.
00:06:03.520 On lockdown?
00:06:04.120 Sure.
00:06:04.720 And spending and in the printing.
00:06:06.480 Who locked down on Trump's side?
00:06:07.400 2020? Two weeks to flatten the curve? That was in Trump's watch.
00:06:12.420 Right. The lockdown. But it wasn't a... You're not talking about the lockdown that happened
00:06:16.520 under Biden?
00:06:17.440 No, the repeated emergency pandemic measures, that was absolutely devastating. That's where
00:06:24.140 really the price changes came from.
00:06:25.520 Right.
00:06:26.000 Because what happened is you had the economy starting to come back from the lockdowns,
00:06:29.300 so there's more demand that was rising. But at the same time, supply, the supply side
00:06:33.840 of the economy was hindered by all those emergency measures and logistics.
00:06:37.020 So the government printed more money?
00:06:37.860 Not money printing. Not money printing. What happened was it's called a supply shock,
00:06:42.480 which is an imbalance between demand and supply. So you have demand and supply that completely
00:06:46.860 plummeted during the lockdowns. When they came back, demand started to come back, but supply
00:06:51.720 couldn't. It was restrained. People were home. They couldn't work. We couldn't get stuff shipped
00:06:55.600 from overseas. So demand came back faster than supply, and this is basic economics.
00:07:00.140 What happens when demand is growing faster than supply is? The only way to reconcile those
00:07:04.820 is prices have to rise. Think about it as an auction process. If you have an auction where
00:07:09.040 a ton of people show up and there's only a couple of sellers, the sellers are going to
00:07:11.800 get huge prices for it.
00:07:12.920 So because supply was restricted, that's why it's called supply shock, prices had to rise
00:07:18.140 to meet for the rising demand. Now, what should have happened, what the government said was
00:07:23.500 going to happen, was that we are going to do all these stimulus plans. We're going to
00:07:28.380 give money to people. And what that's going to do is that's going to temporarily stimulate
00:07:33.200 the economy so that the process I talked about, where incomes would start to rise and then
00:07:37.280 slowly over time, they would offset and exceed price changes. But that never happened.
00:07:42.920 Because stimulus never really actually stimulated.
00:07:45.540 How do you address it now?
00:07:46.480 How do you address it now is we got to get the labor market back working again, which
00:07:50.280 means the economy needs to hit some kind of equilibrium coming off of that three years
00:07:54.760 ago, four years ago, where it was artificially stimulated in all the worst ways. Now it has
00:08:00.140 to clear out all the bad stuff, including the stuff we're going to talk about here with
00:08:03.440 fraud. I mean, fraud and government waste was a huge part of stimulating the economy, which
00:08:08.700 is the worst way to try to create a sustainable economic growth pattern. You don't
00:08:12.640 you don't create growth from waste and fraud and inefficiency and unproductivity. So we
00:08:17.140 got to clean all that stuff out and let the economy start growing. It's like the same reason
00:08:20.700 why you cut back all your weeds in your garden, you know, all the bad growth. You got to get
00:08:24.380 rid of that.
00:08:24.800 That's what recession is for.
00:08:25.660 Tom, what do you think we're going to be saying?
00:08:26.340 So there's a couple of things here. First of all, I agree that there is this cataclysmic
00:08:30.440 jump in prices that happened under Biden. And you can argue whether it started as Trump,
00:08:36.720 but you can certainly look at the charts and it went nuts under Biden. And there's a lot
00:08:42.040 of core products that probably aren't going to be able to come down. Energy is one where
00:08:47.200 the president can help it get down. I mean, look what Biden did. Biden depleted the SPR,
00:08:53.480 Strategic Petroleum Reserve, to artificially drop gasoline prices in the face.
00:08:57.420 That's never happened. They used the SPR and it didn't actually get oil prices to go down.
00:09:02.640 Correct. But that's what he said he was doing. Instead, it just depleted it.
00:09:06.500 But again, that's all just messaging. We need to do something to appear to be doing something.
00:09:10.900 Correct. Well, he didn't do anything. What Trump is doing something, and you can look at the price
00:09:15.080 of gas outside of the blue states where it have the artificial cap taxes. California's got $1.90
00:09:20.740 cap tax on the true price of gas. So you take a look at what you'd pay, say, in Texas,
00:09:25.720 Alabama, even New Jersey, and then put $1.90 on it, the California cap tax. And that's why it's
00:09:31.200 $5 in California and $2.99 in other states. So the president can push down on energy. But this
00:09:37.840 president needs to talk about affordability to blunt what's happening with the Democrats.
00:09:45.160 That's the messaging thing. What you're saying, solution. I agree the solution isn't messaging.
00:09:49.660 But one year, you're not going to have a 30% increase in American income. That is, by the way,
00:09:55.240 we do see that around the world. It's hyperinflation, right? If everybody's income goes up,
00:09:59.800 then all the companies that pay those people... That's why it happens over time. What I'm
00:10:02.640 arguing for is that from the president and political perspective is that what they should
00:10:05.860 do is be honest. They should just be honest and say, look, we're not going to get prices to go
00:10:09.820 back. That's not how economics works. So that's... We're not even going to try. That's not our goal
00:10:15.540 here. What do you think any president would say, you know, the other guy did it, and I can't fix it.
00:10:21.500 I'm not even going to try. No, that's what I'm saying. No, I'm saying is... He's not saying that.
00:10:24.320 What he's saying is... We need to go in another direction. What's not saying is we're officially
00:10:28.280 in a new reality. The new reality is... And this new reality is... $50,000 a year cars instead of
00:10:34.940 $30,000. So then, but what do you do with that? How do you address that, Brandon? You're not going to
00:10:38.820 get the cars to go... I understand that. That's what I'm saying to you. So when you're saying...
00:10:42.840 So is the solution to... The messaging, if you want to go to the messaging, the messaging needs to be... Not messaging.
00:10:47.320 And I'm not talking messaging. I could care less about messaging. What I care about is
00:10:51.100 results. I want to find out what do you do. So... Strongest job market that we can possibly
00:10:55.920 have. How do you do that? That's the only way to get out of this is to make sure that incomes
00:10:59.520 grow in a fashion that pays for all of those price changes from five years ago. Yeah.
00:11:04.340 How do we get jobs growing again? We need a lot of things to take place, but among them
00:11:08.440 is we need the banking sector to be more efficient and actually start making loans again instead
00:11:12.640 of just lending to BlackRock and the most liquid borrowers out there. We need a more efficient
00:11:19.500 banking sector. We need a more efficient monetary system. We also need... Like I said, we got to get the
00:11:25.100 government out of the economy. The government is the biggest impediment because the government is all
00:11:29.220 fraud, waste, and inefficiency. I agree with that, but you've just... Can you hear me? Yeah.
00:11:35.060 Yeah. I agree with that, but you can't fix every layer of the lasagna all at once.
00:11:40.680 I'm not arguing that we should. What I'm saying is the government should come clean and say,
00:11:45.440 look, we're not going to focus on prices because that's a lost cause. They should be honest about
00:11:50.080 that. That's a lost... Prices are never going to go backward. Prices of what? Prices of...
00:11:53.340 Everything. Just general prices. General prices. Houses, yeah. Because gas, you saw the article that
00:11:57.560 came out saying with gas prices being where it's at right now, saving Americans a half a billion
00:12:01.400 dollars. I don't know if you saw that number or not. Yeah. I mean, the wholesale price of gasoline
00:12:04.560 at the CME is $1.70 a gallon. That's where it is right now, which is the lowest it's been in five
00:12:08.660 years. That's actually not a good thing. What about the deflationary innovation though?
00:12:11.940 Like the way that a flat screen TV started off at $10,000 and now I'd say it's $200. So there's
00:12:16.500 examples of things going down in price. Yeah. There's always individual items that go down
00:12:19.900 in price and tradable commodities can go up and down in price. Sure. But we're talking about
00:12:24.400 goods that usually... The economists use the term sticky. This is what sticky really applies
00:12:28.100 to, which means that when prices go up, they tend to stay there.
00:12:31.280 But the things that are killer though is like electricity, food, housing. I think those are the core
00:12:36.300 things that people really get upset about if those are unaffordable. And I mean, I think the
00:12:40.320 problem too is like, I think deficit spending in general is a bigger example of what happened
00:12:44.920 during COVID. Like that M2 money supply chart I sent you, Rob. So this is the amount of money
00:12:49.960 in the economy and like obviously went up a ton in 2020. But just the fact that we're spending
00:12:55.600 like an extra trillion dollars per year than what we actually have, like that's the creation
00:12:59.420 of new money. I know it's not money printing. It's like the treasury issuing new debt, but that's
00:13:04.560 adding new money into the economy. That's artificially increasing demand. So, you know,
00:13:09.100 of course things are going to be more expensive and we're like putting more money in the economy
00:13:12.740 every year. And that's such a waste of capital too, by the way. Like the Fed created like an
00:13:16.960 extra $9 trillion of money on its balance sheet. So that went to banks. So why aren't banks using
00:13:21.980 those loans efficiently? Like where are they just sitting on that money?
00:13:25.540 Yeah. What they've been doing is buying U.S. treasuries because they're risk averse.
00:13:29.340 Yeah.
00:13:29.600 So we need risk taking in the economy, which can't happen because of all this other stuff.
00:13:32.780 I think the one part that you talked about, which I agree with, Rob, can you pull up the
00:13:35.900 number of banks in the history of America over the years? How many we had and how many
00:13:41.040 we are now?
00:13:41.760 Small banks.
00:13:42.340 That's exactly that. Small banks, just banks, total banks in America. If you go to, yeah,
00:13:47.140 while you're doing that, I'll look up the reports. But the question becomes of prices,
00:13:52.820 like you said, you know, flat screen TVs went from $10,000. You can buy a TV right now for
00:13:56.420 four or five hundred bucks. I can't believe how cheap it is right now to buy a, yeah.
00:14:00.240 So what does it say? It says 4,000 commercial banks in the U.S. 2023. Okay. So let's just
00:14:07.100 say around 3917, according to FDIC, the number of banks peaked in the 20th century would
00:14:13.360 estimate is typically around 29,400, 30,400. That's before the Great Depression. But even
00:14:20.620 at 1980s, we had 14,000 banks. To go from 14,000 banks to 3917, no longer lending money
00:14:30.580 to small business owners to start because the underwriting becomes tighter. They want the
00:14:34.640 bigger deals. They want the bigger business. I can see this happening. I can see this happening.
00:14:38.760 But, you know, the other part is as well where the incentive comes about, let's develop cheaper
00:14:44.620 cars. Okay. More cost-effective cars. Let's develop housing that's going to be more cost-effective.
00:14:50.980 How do you do that? Innovation. This is a time where innovation can really lead. But go to that
00:14:58.080 chart right there, Rob. Go to that chart right there. Look at that. I mean, that tells a whole
00:15:01.440 story right there. Consolidation. Look at that. That's not good. Yeah, it wasn't a contraction. It
00:15:06.300 was a roll-up. Yeah, it was a roll-up. That's exactly what it was. That's all mergers.
00:15:09.460 Mergers. It's all mergers. And the consumer wins there. Look how sudden it is from 1980. So
00:15:15.460 why, by the way, Jeff. That's the Eurodollar system. Why is that sudden from 1980, though? If
00:15:20.600 you look at the number, it's increasing 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and then it drops. Yeah, the
00:15:25.600 reason why is because of international consolidation. You have international competition. So we
00:15:31.080 internationalized the monetary system starting in the 50s, 60s, and 70s. And by the 1980s, it
00:15:35.660 became hyper-international, which meant that you don't have a small regional
00:15:39.300 bank in a local U.S. location competing with other small regional banks in that same
00:15:44.080 location. Now you have large-scale banks in Switzerland and Japan and Asia competing with
00:15:52.160 the large banks on Wall Street. And those are the only banks that suck up all the money
00:15:56.080 and oxygen. And as a big bank, what do you do? You buy all the smaller ones. It's the
00:16:01.120 cheapest way to continue to grow in scale. The average person watching this, what can
00:16:04.840 they do? What can they do? What can the average person do? As far as, you're talking
00:16:10.060 about prices, the economy? To fight against this. Last time I was here, you talked about
00:16:14.960 is invest in yourself. Make sure that you are individually doing everything you can to
00:16:20.240 maximize your own talent. So whatever prices are due and whatever the, you know. You're
00:16:23.400 not affected by it. You are affected by it, but you can better, you're better able to
00:16:27.540 handle it. If you're investing in yourself and raising your own income potential, then you
00:16:30.740 can handle higher prices. I agree. I agree. I mean, this is terrible. This is horrible
00:16:35.260 stuff. But I mean, it's the reality. The reality is we can't change it. We can't go
00:16:39.080 backwards. So let's be honest about it and deal with it moving forward.
00:16:42.900 To your point about wages, you've got a couple of things that are going to happen this year
00:16:49.220 and that you're going to hear headlines that are more and more talking about like job
00:16:52.940 retraining and displacement. And you're going to hear going to the election. No, the labor
00:16:57.980 market's actually better than people think. But we have some people in the wrong places
00:17:01.660 and robots are taking over the warehouse jobs. So those people need different training
00:17:05.780 and need to be other places. You're going to hear about displacement, geographic labor
00:17:10.240 shortage and job retraining, which is all messages that's true. But they're going to
00:17:17.320 be trying to say, hey, better paying jobs are available here, here and here. Because
00:17:20.560 remember, it's election year. Having said that, folks, since September 9th or 10th, even
00:17:26.580 when we went to Aspen, I keep telling you this, I have been wearing the same exact shoes.
00:17:31.360 I'm not kidding with you. This sounds crazy, doesn't it? It has to be. It's the only thing
00:17:35.760 that I wear every single day and I show you every single time. This is on, right? Future
00:17:39.500 Looks Bright Shoes. We are now seeing this in 20, I think we just hit 25 or 26 countries
00:17:45.800 that it's been ordered in. If you're somewhere in the world watching this, you haven't placed
00:17:49.380 an order yet, go ahead. But here's a Future Looks Bright Shoes. Rob, go ahead and play
00:17:52.580 the clip. When we set out to create a shoe that blends comfort, function and luxury, we
00:17:59.960 had the choice to make it fast. We had the choice to make it cheap. We chose neither.
00:18:05.580 Instead, we chose Tuscaneiro. We chose true Italian craftsmanship, each pair touched by 50 skilled
00:18:12.580 hands. We chose patience, spending two years perfecting every detail, and we chose the finest quality
00:18:18.580 at every step. Introducing the Future Looks Bright collection. Not rushed, not disposable,
00:18:27.300 not ordinary. Rather intentional, luxurious, timeless.
00:18:32.960 All right, so guys, it's officially on the fourth order. This is how quickly this thing's going
00:18:41.540 right now. We were not expecting for a shoe, but it has become such a big hit. And the biggest
00:18:46.940 thing is people come to this page and they compare it to the Berluti, the Ferragamo, the
00:18:50.060 Zenia, the Gucci. And you look at the FLB and what it offers with the super foam technology
00:18:53.980 at the bottom of it and the craftsmanship made in Tuscan, Italy at five factories. If you
00:18:58.840 haven't placed an order for yourself or your husband or your son or somebody, go place an
00:19:04.380 order. They will fall in love with the shoes. Go read the reviews on the website for yourself
00:19:08.840 only from people who purchased the shoes and enjoy it. They'll come back to you saying,
00:19:13.400 this is the most comfortable thing I've ever worn. Go to vtmerch.com, place your order.
00:19:18.260 And having said that, let's get right into it.
00:19:20.900 If you enjoyed this video, you want to watch more videos like this, click here. And if you
00:19:23.760 want to watch the entire podcast, click here.
00:19:28.840 See you next time.